|
Tournoi du 19-12-11
1 61,85 A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
2 59,81 A.5 COLLET Edgard -BEYNE Anne
3 56,85 A11 NELIS Claude -ROSOUX Louis
4 54,07 A.7 STEED Adrian -DELTOUR Emile
5 52,41 A.4 COURTOIS Chantal -CASSART Guy
6 49,44 A.9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph
7 48,52 A.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
8 44,26 A.3 VAGMAN David -POULAERT Gilbert
9 42,78 A.6 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
10 42,59 A.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard
11 37,41 A10 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 58,52 a.3 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie
2 57,04 a.1 de TERWANGNE Philippe -de WASSEIGE Ariane
3 56,11 a.5 HUBLET Carlo -COLLIN Jean-Marie
~ 56,11 a10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
5 54,07 a.6 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
6 52,78 a.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
7 49,63 a.4 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
8 44,63 a.9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon
9 41,67 a.7 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse
10 40,19 a11 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne
11 39,26 a.8 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette
PAIRE Nr : A.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard
a.1 de TERWANGNE Philippe -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 57,04 % 1 NS 2P W-1 50 13 72.22
2 NS 1S S-2 -200 0 0.00
3 NS 3S E = -600 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
a11 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 40,19 % 4 NS 2S E-2 200 7 38.89
5 NS 2P E = -110 9 50.00
6 NS 3P N+1 170 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 56,11 % 7 NS 2K N = 90 2 11.11
8 NS 2P E = -110 3 16.67
9 NS 4P E-3 300 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 44,63 %10 NS 6C E = -1430 6 33.33
11 NS 4C S+1 450 7 38.89
12 NS 5C W-3 150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.8 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 39,26 %13 NS 3K E-1 100 13 72.22
14 NS 2P E-2 100 14 77.78
15 NS 3C S = 140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.7 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,67 %16 NS 4P S+1 450 8 44.44
17 NS 3C E-2 100 17 94.44
18 NS 4C S+2 680 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a.6 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 54,07 %19 NS 4PcN-1 -100 0 0.00
20 NS 4P N+3 710 7 38.89
21 NS 3S S+1 630 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.5 HUBLET Carlo -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 56,11 %22 NS 4P E+2 -680 6 33.33
23 NS 3S N = 600 6 33.33
24 NS 6P N = 980 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.4 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 49,63 %25 NS 5PcN-2 -300 0 0.00
26 NS 3S S-2 -200 5 27.78
27 NS 2T W-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
a.3 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 58,52 %28 NS 6C E+1 -1010 1 5.56
29 NS 3S E = -600 5 27.78
30 NS 1S W+2 -150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
Total : 230,0 / 540 = 42,59 %
PAIRE Nr : A.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
a.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 52,78 % 4 NS 2S E-2 200 7 38.89
5 NS 2P E+1 -140 3 16.67
6 NS 4P N-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
a.1 de TERWANGNE Philippe -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 57,04 % 7 NS 2S N+1 150 13 72.22
8 NS 3P E = -140 0 0.00
9 NS 2TcS = 180 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a11 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 40,19 %10 NS 6C E-1 100 17 94.44
11 NS 6C S = 980 16 88.89
12 NS 4C W-2 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
a10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 56,11 %13 NS 3T N-1 -100 3 16.67
14 NS 3C N-2 -100 7 38.89
15 NS 4PcE-3 500 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
a.9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 44,63 %16 NS 4C S+1 450 8 44.44
17 NS 2S W = -120 5 27.78
18 NS 4C S+2 680 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.8 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 39,26 %19 NS 4P N+1 450 16 88.89
20 NS 6P S+1 1460 17 94.44
21 NS 3S S = 600 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
a.7 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,67 %22 NS 3S E-1 100 17 94.44
23 NS 3S N+2 660 16 88.89
24 NS 5P N+1 480 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
a.6 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 54,07 %25 NS 4P N-1 -50 10 55.56
26 NS 2S S = 120 15 83.33
27 NS 2C N = 110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.5 HUBLET Carlo -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 56,11 %28 NS 6C E+1 -1010 1 5.56
29 NS 3S E+1 -630 1 5.56
30 NS 3S W+1 -430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 3,70 %
a.4 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 49,63 %31 NS 3S S+3 690 0 0.00
32 NS 1S E+2 -150 6 33.33
33 NS 4C S = 420 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 262,0 / 540 = 48,52 %
PAIRE Nr : A.3 VAGMAN David -POULAERT Gilbert
a.5 HUBLET Carlo -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 56,11 % 1 NS 1P W = -80 4 22.22
2 NS 1S S-1 -100 5 27.78
3 NS 4C W-1 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.3 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 58,52 % 7 NS 2S N = 120 8 44.44
8 NS 2P E = -110 3 16.67
9 NS 2P E-2 200 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 52,78 %10 NS 6C E = -1430 6 33.33
11 NS 4C S+1 450 7 38.89
12 NS 4C W = -420 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
a.1 de TERWANGNE Philippe -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 57,04 %13 NS 2K E = -90 6 33.33
14 NS 3C N-2 -100 7 38.89
15 NS 4C S = 620 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a11 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 40,19 %16 NS 4P S+1 450 8 44.44
17 NS 1C E = -80 14 77.78
18 NS 4C S = 620 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 56,11 %19 NS 2C E-2 200 4 22.22
20 NS 4P N+3 710 7 38.89
21 NS 3S S = 600 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 44,63 %22 NS 4C E = -620 14 77.78
23 NS 3S N+1 630 11 61.11
24 NS 4P N+2 480 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.8 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 39,26 %25 NS 3P N = 140 17 94.44
26 NS 3S N-2 -200 5 27.78
27 NS 2T W-2 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.7 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,67 %28 NS 6C E = -980 6 33.33
29 NS 3S E = -600 5 27.78
30 NS 4P E-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.6 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 54,07 %31 NS 6S S = 1440 12 66.67
32 NS 1S W+2 -150 6 33.33
33 NS 2C S+2 170 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 239,0 / 540 = 44,26 %
PAIRE Nr : A.4 COURTOIS Chantal -CASSART Guy
a.7 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,67 % 1 NS 1P W = -80 4 22.22
2 NS 1S S = 90 12 66.67
3 NS 4C W-2 200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.6 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 54,07 % 4 NS 2S E-3 300 16 88.89
5 NS 2P E+1 -140 3 16.67
6 NS 3P N = 140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.4 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 49,63 %10 NS 7C E-1 100 17 94.44
11 NS 3P S+3 230 2 11.11
12 NS 4C W = -420 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.3 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 58,52 %13 NS 3S N-2 -200 0 0.00
14 NS 2P E-1 50 12 66.67
15 NS 4C S = 620 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 52,78 %16 NS 4P S+1 450 8 44.44
17 NS 2K W+1 -110 9 50.00
18 NS 4C N+2 680 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.1 de TERWANGNE Philippe -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 57,04 %19 NS 4P N+1 450 16 88.89
20 NS 4P N+3 710 7 38.89
21 NS 3S S-3 -300 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a11 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 40,19 %22 NS 4C E-1 100 17 94.44
23 NS 3S N+2 660 16 88.89
24 NS 4P N+2 480 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
a10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 56,11 %25 NS 4K E+1 -150 2 11.11
26 NS 1S S+1 120 15 83.33
27 NS 1S N = 90 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 44,63 %28 NS 6C E = -980 6 33.33
29 NS 3S E-1 100 13 72.22
30 NS 3P E = -140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.8 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 39,26 %31 NS 6S S = 1440 12 66.67
32 NS 2K N = 90 14 77.78
33 NS 2C S+2 170 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
Total : 283,0 / 540 = 52,41 %
PAIRE Nr : A.5 COLLET Edgard -BEYNE Anne
a.9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 44,63 % 1 NS 3P W-1 50 13 72.22
2 NS 1S S = 90 12 66.67
3 NS 4C W-1 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.8 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 39,26 % 4 NS 2S E-2 200 7 38.89
5 NS 2P E+1 -140 3 16.67
6 NS 3P N = 140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.7 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,67 % 7 NS 2S N+1 150 13 72.22
8 NS 2P E-2 100 13 72.22
9 NS 2P E-2 200 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a.5 HUBLET Carlo -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 56,11 %13 NS 3K E-1 100 13 72.22
14 NS 3C N-2 -100 7 38.89
15 NS 4C S+1 650 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a.4 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 49,63 %16 NS 5P S = 450 8 44.44
17 NS 1S W+1 -120 5 27.78
18 NS 4C N+2 680 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.3 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 58,52 %19 NS 3P N+2 200 4 22.22
20 NS 6P N+1 1460 17 94.44
21 NS 3S S-1 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 52,78 %22 NS 4C E+2 -680 6 33.33
23 NS 3S N+1 630 11 61.11
24 NS 6P N = 980 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.1 de TERWANGNE Philippe -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 57,04 %25 NS 4P N-2 -100 5 27.78
26 NS 3S S = 600 18 100.00
27 NS 3S S = 400 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
a11 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 40,19 %28 NS 4C E+3 -510 13 72.22
29 NS 3S E-2 200 16 88.89
30 NS 3P E-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
a10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 56,11 %31 NS 6S S = 1440 12 66.67
32 NS 1S W+2 -150 6 33.33
33 NS 2C N+1 140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
Total : 323,0 / 540 = 59,81 %
PAIRE Nr : A.6 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
a11 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 40,19 % 1 NS 1P W+1 -110 0 0.00
2 NS 3T N-1 -100 5 27.78
3 NS 4C W-1 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
a10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 56,11 % 4 NS 2S E-2 200 7 38.89
5 NS 1S E = -90 14 77.78
6 NS 3P N = 140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 44,63 % 7 NS 3S S-1 -100 0 0.00
8 NS 2P E-1 50 8 44.44
9 NS 3P E-2 200 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.8 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 39,26 %10 NS 6C E = -1430 6 33.33
11 NS 6P S = 980 16 88.89
12 NS 4P E-2 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.6 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 54,07 %16 NS 5P S = 450 8 44.44
17 NS 2K W = -90 12 66.67
18 NS 4C S+1 650 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.5 HUBLET Carlo -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 56,11 %19 NS 4P N = 420 11 61.11
20 NS 4P N+3 710 7 38.89
21 NS 3S S = 600 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.4 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 49,63 %22 NS 4C E+2 -680 6 33.33
23 NS 3S N-2 -200 0 0.00
24 NS 5P S+1 480 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
a.3 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 58,52 %25 NS 3P N-1 -50 10 55.56
26 NS 3S S-2 -200 5 27.78
27 NS 2K N = 90 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 52,78 %28 NS 6CcE-1 100 18 100.00
29 NS 3K E = -110 10 55.56
30 NS 3P E+1 -170 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.1 de TERWANGNE Philippe -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 57,04 %31 NS 6P N = 1430 3 16.67
32 NS 4KcS-3 -500 0 0.00
33 NS 3C N+1 170 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
Total : 231,0 / 540 = 42,78 %
PAIRE Nr : A.7 STEED Adrian -DELTOUR Emile
a.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 52,78 % 1 NS 2P W-1 50 13 72.22
2 NS 1S S+1 120 16 88.89
3 NS 4C W-1 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
a.1 de TERWANGNE Philippe -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 57,04 % 4 NS 2S E-2 200 7 38.89
5 NS 2P E+1 -140 3 16.67
6 NS 3P N = 140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a11 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 40,19 % 7 NS 2P W-1 100 4 22.22
8 NS 2P E-2 100 13 72.22
9 NS 3TcS = 470 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
a10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 56,11 %10 NS 6C E = -1430 6 33.33
11 NS 6P S = 980 16 88.89
12 NS 4C W = -420 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 44,63 %13 NS 3T N = 110 16 88.89
14 NS 3S S = 400 16 88.89
15 NS 4C S+1 650 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
a.7 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,67 %19 NS 4P N = 420 11 61.11
20 NS 4P N+3 710 7 38.89
21 NS 2S N = 120 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.6 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 54,07 %22 NS 4C E+2 -680 6 33.33
23 NS 3S N = 600 6 33.33
24 NS 5P N+1 480 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.5 HUBLET Carlo -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 56,11 %25 NS 2P N = 110 14 77.78
26 NS 3S N-3 -300 0 0.00
27 NS 2S S = 120 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.4 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 49,63 %28 NS 4C E+3 -510 13 72.22
29 NS 1S E+3 -180 8 44.44
30 NS 4P E-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
a.3 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 58,52 %31 NS 6S S = 1440 12 66.67
32 NS 1S E+2 -150 6 33.33
33 NS 4C S-1 -50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 292,0 / 540 = 54,07 %
PAIRE Nr : A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
a.4 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 49,63 % 1 NS 3P W-2 100 18 100.00
2 NS 2K W-4 200 18 100.00
3 NS 3S E-4 400 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 100,00 %
a.3 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 58,52 % 4 NS 2S E-4 400 18 100.00
5 NS 2P E = -110 9 50.00
6 NS 4P N-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 52,78 % 7 NS 2S S+1 150 13 72.22
8 NS 2P E-1 50 8 44.44
9 NS 2P E-1 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.1 de TERWANGNE Philippe -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 57,04 %10 NS 4C W+3 -710 13 72.22
11 NS 6S N-5 -250 0 0.00
12 NS 4K S-2 -200 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a11 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 40,19 %13 NS 2T N+2 130 18 100.00
14 NS 3PcE-3 500 18 100.00
15 NS 4C N = 620 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
a10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 56,11 %16 NS 4P S+1 450 8 44.44
17 NS 3S W = -400 0 0.00
18 NS 4C N+2 680 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.8 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 39,26 %22 NS 4C E+2 -680 6 33.33
23 NS 3S N+2 660 16 88.89
24 NS 6P N = 980 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a.7 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,67 %25 NS 3P N-1 -50 10 55.56
26 NS 3S S-1 -100 10 55.56
27 NS 1S S+2 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
a.6 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 54,07 %28 NS 6C E = -980 6 33.33
29 NS 4S E-3 300 18 100.00
30 NS 3P E-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
a.5 HUBLET Carlo -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 56,11 %31 NS 6S S = 1440 12 66.67
32 NS 3K S = 110 16 88.89
33 NS 4C S-1 -50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 334,0 / 540 = 61,85 %
PAIRE Nr : A.9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph
a.6 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 54,07 % 1 NS 1P W-1 50 13 72.22
2 NS 1S S-1 -100 5 27.78
3 NS 2P E+1 -140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.5 HUBLET Carlo -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 56,11 % 4 NS 2S E-2 200 7 38.89
5 NS 1S E-1 50 16 88.89
6 NS 4P N-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.4 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 49,63 % 7 NS 3S N+1 630 18 100.00
8 NS 4P E-3 150 17 94.44
9 NS 2P E = -110 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.3 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 58,52 %10 NS 6C E = -1430 6 33.33
11 NS 4P S+2 480 12 66.67
12 NS 3C W+1 -170 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 52,78 %13 NS 1S S = 90 9 50.00
14 NS 3C S-2 -100 7 38.89
15 NS 4C N-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
a.1 de TERWANGNE Philippe -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 57,04 %16 NS 4P S+2 480 18 100.00
17 NS 4S W-2 100 17 94.44
18 NS 4C N+2 680 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
a11 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 40,19 %19 NS 3C N+2 200 4 22.22
20 NS 4P N+3 710 7 38.89
21 NS 3S S-3 -300 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
a.9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 44,63 %25 NS 4PcN-1 -100 5 27.78
26 NS 3S S-2 -200 5 27.78
27 NS 2S S+1 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.8 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 39,26 %28 NS 4C E+3 -510 13 72.22
29 NS 3S E-1 100 13 72.22
30 NS 1P W+2 -140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.7 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,67 %31 NS 6S S = 1440 12 66.67
32 NS 2T W+3 -150 6 33.33
33 NS 3C S = 140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
Total : 267,0 / 540 = 49,44 %
PAIRE Nr : A10 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques
a.8 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 39,26 % 1 NS 1P W = -80 4 22.22
2 NS 2S S-1 -100 5 27.78
3 NS 5C W-1 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.7 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,67 % 4 NS 2S E-2 200 7 38.89
5 NS 4P E-3 150 18 100.00
6 NS 4P N-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.6 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 54,07 % 7 NS 3T N = 110 6 33.33
8 NS 2P E-1 50 8 44.44
9 NS 2P E = -110 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
a.5 HUBLET Carlo -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 56,11 %10 NS 6S E = -1440 0 0.00
11 NS 4P S+1 450 7 38.89
12 NS 4C W-2 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.4 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 49,63 %13 NS 2T N = 90 9 50.00
14 NS 3K W+1 -130 1 5.56
15 NS 4C S = 620 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.3 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 58,52 %16 NS 4P S+1 450 8 44.44
17 NS 1S W+3 -180 2 11.11
18 NS 4C S+2 680 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 52,78 %19 NS 3K E-3 300 8 44.44
20 NS 4P N+3 710 7 38.89
21 NS 3S S-2 -200 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.1 de TERWANGNE Philippe -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 57,04 %22 NS 4C E+2 -680 6 33.33
23 NS 1K S+3 130 2 11.11
24 NS 5P N = 450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
a10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 56,11 %28 NS 4C E+3 -510 13 72.22
29 NS 3S E+1 -630 1 5.56
30 NS 4P E-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 44,63 %31 NS 6P N = 1430 3 16.67
32 NS 3S W-2 200 18 100.00
33 NS 4C S-1 -50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
Total : 202,0 / 540 = 37,41 %
PAIRE Nr : A11 NELIS Claude -ROSOUX Louis
a10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 56,11 % 1 NS 4T N-1 -50 8 44.44
2 NS 1S S = 90 12 66.67
3 NS 4C W-1 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 44,63 % 4 NS 2S E-2 200 7 38.89
5 NS 1S N-1 -100 12 66.67
6 NS 3P N+1 170 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.8 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 39,26 % 7 NS 2S N+1 150 13 72.22
8 NS 3P E-3 150 17 94.44
9 NS 3P E-2 200 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
a.7 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,67 %10 NS 4C W+3 -710 13 72.22
11 NS 4C S+1 450 7 38.89
12 NS 3P E-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.6 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 54,07 %13 NS 4T N-1 -100 3 16.67
14 NS 4K E = -130 1 5.56
15 NS 4C S = 620 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
a.5 HUBLET Carlo -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 56,11 %16 NS 4P S+1 450 8 44.44
17 NS 2P E = -110 9 50.00
18 NS 4C S+1 650 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.4 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 49,63 %19 NS 4P N+1 450 16 88.89
20 NS 4P N+3 710 7 38.89
21 NS 3S N+1 630 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
a.3 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 58,52 %22 NS 4C E+2 -680 6 33.33
23 NS 3S N = 600 6 33.33
24 NS 6P N = 980 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 52,78 %25 NS 3P N = 140 17 94.44
26 NS 1S S = 90 12 66.67
27 NS 2C N = 110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
a11 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 40,19 %31 NS 6S N = 1440 12 66.67
32 NS 3K N-1 -50 12 66.67
33 NS 2P S+1 140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 307,0 / 540 = 56,85 %
PAIRE Nr : a.1 de TERWANGNE Philippe -de WASSEIGE Ariane
A.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,59 % 1 EO 2P W-1 50 5 27.78
2 EO 1S S-2 -200 18 100.00
3 EO 3S E = -600 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
A.7 STEED Adrian -DELTOUR Emile : 54,07 % 4 EO 2S E-2 200 11 61.11
5 EO 2P E+1 -140 15 83.33
6 EO 3P N = 140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,52 % 7 EO 2S N+1 150 5 27.78
8 EO 3P E = -140 18 100.00
9 EO 2TcS = 180 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 61,85 %10 EO 4C W+3 -710 5 27.78
11 EO 6S N-5 -250 18 100.00
12 EO 4K S-2 -200 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.3 VAGMAN David -POULAERT Gilbert : 44,26 %13 EO 2K E = -90 12 66.67
14 EO 3C N-2 -100 11 61.11
15 EO 4C S = 620 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 49,44 %16 EO 4P S+2 480 0 0.00
17 EO 4S W-2 100 1 5.56
18 EO 4C N+2 680 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
A.4 COURTOIS Chantal -CASSART Guy : 52,41 %19 EO 4P N+1 450 2 11.11
20 EO 4P N+3 710 11 61.11
21 EO 3S S-3 -300 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A10 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 37,41 %22 EO 4C E+2 -680 12 66.67
23 EO 1K S+3 130 16 88.89
24 EO 5P N = 450 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
A.5 COLLET Edgard -BEYNE Anne : 59,81 %25 EO 4P N-2 -100 13 72.22
26 EO 3S S = 600 0 0.00
27 EO 3S S = 400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
A.6 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 42,78 %31 EO 6P N = 1430 15 83.33
32 EO 4KcS-3 -500 18 100.00
33 EO 3C N+1 170 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
Total : 308,0 / 540 = 57,04 %
PAIRE Nr : a.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
A.7 STEED Adrian -DELTOUR Emile : 54,07 % 1 EO 2P W-1 50 5 27.78
2 EO 1S S+1 120 2 11.11
3 EO 4C W-1 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
A.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,52 % 4 EO 2S E-2 200 11 61.11
5 EO 2P E+1 -140 15 83.33
6 EO 4P N-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 61,85 % 7 EO 2S S+1 150 5 27.78
8 EO 2P E-1 50 10 55.56
9 EO 2P E-1 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.3 VAGMAN David -POULAERT Gilbert : 44,26 %10 EO 6C E = -1430 12 66.67
11 EO 4C S+1 450 11 61.11
12 EO 4C W = -420 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
A.9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 49,44 %13 EO 1S S = 90 9 50.00
14 EO 3C S-2 -100 11 61.11
15 EO 4C N-1 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
A.4 COURTOIS Chantal -CASSART Guy : 52,41 %16 EO 4P S+1 450 10 55.56
17 EO 2K W+1 -110 9 50.00
18 EO 4C N+2 680 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A10 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 37,41 %19 EO 3K E-3 300 10 55.56
20 EO 4P N+3 710 11 61.11
21 EO 3S S-2 -200 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.5 COLLET Edgard -BEYNE Anne : 59,81 %22 EO 4C E+2 -680 12 66.67
23 EO 3S N+1 630 7 38.89
24 EO 6P N = 980 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A11 NELIS Claude -ROSOUX Louis : 56,85 %25 EO 3P N = 140 1 5.56
26 EO 1S S = 90 6 33.33
27 EO 2C N = 110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
A.6 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 42,78 %28 EO 6CcE-1 100 0 0.00
29 EO 3K E = -110 8 44.44
30 EO 3P E+1 -170 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 285,0 / 540 = 52,78 %
PAIRE Nr : a.3 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 61,85 % 4 EO 2S E-4 400 0 0.00
5 EO 2P E = -110 9 50.00
6 EO 4P N-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.3 VAGMAN David -POULAERT Gilbert : 44,26 % 7 EO 2S N = 120 10 55.56
8 EO 2P E = -110 15 83.33
9 EO 2P E-2 200 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 49,44 %10 EO 6C E = -1430 12 66.67
11 EO 4P S+2 480 6 33.33
12 EO 3C W+1 -170 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.4 COURTOIS Chantal -CASSART Guy : 52,41 %13 EO 3S N-2 -200 18 100.00
14 EO 2P E-1 50 6 33.33
15 EO 4C S = 620 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A10 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 37,41 %16 EO 4P S+1 450 10 55.56
17 EO 1S W+3 -180 16 88.89
18 EO 4C S+2 680 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.5 COLLET Edgard -BEYNE Anne : 59,81 %19 EO 3P N+2 200 14 77.78
20 EO 6P N+1 1460 1 5.56
21 EO 3S S-1 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A11 NELIS Claude -ROSOUX Louis : 56,85 %22 EO 4C E+2 -680 12 66.67
23 EO 3S N = 600 12 66.67
24 EO 6P N = 980 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.6 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 42,78 %25 EO 3P N-1 -50 8 44.44
26 EO 3S S-2 -200 13 72.22
27 EO 2K N = 90 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,59 %28 EO 6C E+1 -1010 17 94.44
29 EO 3S E = -600 13 72.22
30 EO 1S W+2 -150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
A.7 STEED Adrian -DELTOUR Emile : 54,07 %31 EO 6S S = 1440 6 33.33
32 EO 1S E+2 -150 12 66.67
33 EO 4C S-1 -50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 316,0 / 540 = 58,52 %
PAIRE Nr : a.4 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 61,85 % 1 EO 3P W-2 100 0 0.00
2 EO 2K W-4 200 0 0.00
3 EO 3S E-4 400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 49,44 % 7 EO 3S N+1 630 0 0.00
8 EO 4P E-3 150 1 5.56
9 EO 2P E = -110 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.4 COURTOIS Chantal -CASSART Guy : 52,41 %10 EO 7C E-1 100 1 5.56
11 EO 3P S+3 230 16 88.89
12 EO 4C W = -420 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A10 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 37,41 %13 EO 2T N = 90 9 50.00
14 EO 3K W+1 -130 17 94.44
15 EO 4C S = 620 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A.5 COLLET Edgard -BEYNE Anne : 59,81 %16 EO 5P S = 450 10 55.56
17 EO 1S W+1 -120 13 72.22
18 EO 4C N+2 680 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A11 NELIS Claude -ROSOUX Louis : 56,85 %19 EO 4P N+1 450 2 11.11
20 EO 4P N+3 710 11 61.11
21 EO 3S N+1 630 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
A.6 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 42,78 %22 EO 4C E+2 -680 12 66.67
23 EO 3S N-2 -200 18 100.00
24 EO 5P S+1 480 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
A.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,59 %25 EO 5PcN-2 -300 18 100.00
26 EO 3S S-2 -200 13 72.22
27 EO 2T W-1 50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
A.7 STEED Adrian -DELTOUR Emile : 54,07 %28 EO 4C E+3 -510 5 27.78
29 EO 1S E+3 -180 10 55.56
30 EO 4P E-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
A.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,52 %31 EO 3S S+3 690 18 100.00
32 EO 1S E+2 -150 12 66.67
33 EO 4C S = 420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 268,0 / 540 = 49,63 %
PAIRE Nr : a.5 HUBLET Carlo -COLLIN Jean-Marie
A.3 VAGMAN David -POULAERT Gilbert : 44,26 % 1 EO 1P W = -80 14 77.78
2 EO 1S S-1 -100 13 72.22
3 EO 4C W-1 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 49,44 % 4 EO 2S E-2 200 11 61.11
5 EO 1S E-1 50 2 11.11
6 EO 4P N-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A10 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 37,41 %10 EO 6S E = -1440 18 100.00
11 EO 4P S+1 450 11 61.11
12 EO 4C W-2 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.5 COLLET Edgard -BEYNE Anne : 59,81 %13 EO 3K E-1 100 5 27.78
14 EO 3C N-2 -100 11 61.11
15 EO 4C S+1 650 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A11 NELIS Claude -ROSOUX Louis : 56,85 %16 EO 4P S+1 450 10 55.56
17 EO 2P E = -110 9 50.00
18 EO 4C S+1 650 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A.6 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 42,78 %19 EO 4P N = 420 7 38.89
20 EO 4P N+3 710 11 61.11
21 EO 3S S = 600 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,59 %22 EO 4P E+2 -680 12 66.67
23 EO 3S N = 600 12 66.67
24 EO 6P N = 980 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.7 STEED Adrian -DELTOUR Emile : 54,07 %25 EO 2P N = 110 4 22.22
26 EO 3S N-3 -300 18 100.00
27 EO 2S S = 120 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,52 %28 EO 6C E+1 -1010 17 94.44
29 EO 3S E+1 -630 17 94.44
30 EO 3S W+1 -430 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 96,30 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 61,85 %31 EO 6S S = 1440 6 33.33
32 EO 3K S = 110 2 11.11
33 EO 4C S-1 -50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 303,0 / 540 = 56,11 %
PAIRE Nr : a.6 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
A.9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 49,44 % 1 EO 1P W-1 50 5 27.78
2 EO 1S S-1 -100 13 72.22
3 EO 2P E+1 -140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A.4 COURTOIS Chantal -CASSART Guy : 52,41 % 4 EO 2S E-3 300 2 11.11
5 EO 2P E+1 -140 15 83.33
6 EO 3P N = 140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A10 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 37,41 % 7 EO 3T N = 110 12 66.67
8 EO 2P E-1 50 10 55.56
9 EO 2P E = -110 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
A11 NELIS Claude -ROSOUX Louis : 56,85 %13 EO 4T N-1 -100 15 83.33
14 EO 4K E = -130 17 94.44
15 EO 4C S = 620 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
A.6 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 42,78 %16 EO 5P S = 450 10 55.56
17 EO 2K W = -90 6 33.33
18 EO 4C S+1 650 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,59 %19 EO 4PcN-1 -100 18 100.00
20 EO 4P N+3 710 11 61.11
21 EO 3S S+1 630 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.7 STEED Adrian -DELTOUR Emile : 54,07 %22 EO 4C E+2 -680 12 66.67
23 EO 3S N = 600 12 66.67
24 EO 5P N+1 480 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,52 %25 EO 4P N-1 -50 8 44.44
26 EO 2S S = 120 3 16.67
27 EO 2C N = 110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 61,85 %28 EO 6C E = -980 12 66.67
29 EO 4S E-3 300 0 0.00
30 EO 3P E-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
A.3 VAGMAN David -POULAERT Gilbert : 44,26 %31 EO 6S S = 1440 6 33.33
32 EO 1S W+2 -150 12 66.67
33 EO 2C S+2 170 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 292,0 / 540 = 54,07 %
PAIRE Nr : a.7 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse
A.4 COURTOIS Chantal -CASSART Guy : 52,41 % 1 EO 1P W = -80 14 77.78
2 EO 1S S = 90 6 33.33
3 EO 4C W-2 200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A10 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 37,41 % 4 EO 2S E-2 200 11 61.11
5 EO 4P E-3 150 0 0.00
6 EO 4P N-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.5 COLLET Edgard -BEYNE Anne : 59,81 % 7 EO 2S N+1 150 5 27.78
8 EO 2P E-2 100 5 27.78
9 EO 2P E-2 200 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A11 NELIS Claude -ROSOUX Louis : 56,85 %10 EO 4C W+3 -710 5 27.78
11 EO 4C S+1 450 11 61.11
12 EO 3P E-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,59 %16 EO 4P S+1 450 10 55.56
17 EO 3C E-2 100 1 5.56
18 EO 4C S+2 680 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A.7 STEED Adrian -DELTOUR Emile : 54,07 %19 EO 4P N = 420 7 38.89
20 EO 4P N+3 710 11 61.11
21 EO 2S N = 120 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,52 %22 EO 3S E-1 100 1 5.56
23 EO 3S N+2 660 2 11.11
24 EO 5P N+1 480 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 61,85 %25 EO 3P N-1 -50 8 44.44
26 EO 3S S-1 -100 8 44.44
27 EO 1S S+2 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
A.3 VAGMAN David -POULAERT Gilbert : 44,26 %28 EO 6C E = -980 12 66.67
29 EO 3S E = -600 13 72.22
30 EO 4P E-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 49,44 %31 EO 6S S = 1440 6 33.33
32 EO 2T W+3 -150 12 66.67
33 EO 3C S = 140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
Total : 225,0 / 540 = 41,67 %
PAIRE Nr : a.8 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette
A10 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 37,41 % 1 EO 1P W = -80 14 77.78
2 EO 2S S-1 -100 13 72.22
3 EO 5C W-1 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.5 COLLET Edgard -BEYNE Anne : 59,81 % 4 EO 2S E-2 200 11 61.11
5 EO 2P E+1 -140 15 83.33
6 EO 3P N = 140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A11 NELIS Claude -ROSOUX Louis : 56,85 % 7 EO 2S N+1 150 5 27.78
8 EO 3P E-3 150 1 5.56
9 EO 3P E-2 200 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
A.6 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 42,78 %10 EO 6C E = -1430 12 66.67
11 EO 6P S = 980 2 11.11
12 EO 4P E-2 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,59 %13 EO 3K E-1 100 5 27.78
14 EO 2P E-2 100 4 22.22
15 EO 3C S = 140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,52 %19 EO 4P N+1 450 2 11.11
20 EO 6P S+1 1460 1 5.56
21 EO 3S S = 600 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 61,85 %22 EO 4C E+2 -680 12 66.67
23 EO 3S N+2 660 2 11.11
24 EO 6P N = 980 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A.3 VAGMAN David -POULAERT Gilbert : 44,26 %25 EO 3P N = 140 1 5.56
26 EO 3S N-2 -200 13 72.22
27 EO 2T W-2 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 49,44 %28 EO 4C E+3 -510 5 27.78
29 EO 3S E-1 100 5 27.78
30 EO 1P W+2 -140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.4 COURTOIS Chantal -CASSART Guy : 52,41 %31 EO 6S S = 1440 6 33.33
32 EO 2K N = 90 4 22.22
33 EO 2C S+2 170 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
Total : 212,0 / 540 = 39,26 %
PAIRE Nr : a.9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon
A.5 COLLET Edgard -BEYNE Anne : 59,81 % 1 EO 3P W-1 50 5 27.78
2 EO 1S S = 90 6 33.33
3 EO 4C W-1 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A11 NELIS Claude -ROSOUX Louis : 56,85 % 4 EO 2S E-2 200 11 61.11
5 EO 1S N-1 -100 6 33.33
6 EO 3P N+1 170 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.6 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 42,78 % 7 EO 3S S-1 -100 18 100.00
8 EO 2P E-1 50 10 55.56
9 EO 3P E-2 200 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,59 %10 EO 6C E = -1430 12 66.67
11 EO 4C S+1 450 11 61.11
12 EO 5C W-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A.7 STEED Adrian -DELTOUR Emile : 54,07 %13 EO 3T N = 110 2 11.11
14 EO 3S S = 400 2 11.11
15 EO 4C S+1 650 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
A.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,52 %16 EO 4C S+1 450 10 55.56
17 EO 2S W = -120 13 72.22
18 EO 4C S+2 680 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.3 VAGMAN David -POULAERT Gilbert : 44,26 %22 EO 4C E = -620 4 22.22
23 EO 3S N+1 630 7 38.89
24 EO 4P N+2 480 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A.9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 49,44 %25 EO 4PcN-1 -100 13 72.22
26 EO 3S S-2 -200 13 72.22
27 EO 2S S+1 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.4 COURTOIS Chantal -CASSART Guy : 52,41 %28 EO 6C E = -980 12 66.67
29 EO 3S E-1 100 5 27.78
30 EO 3P E = -140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A10 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 37,41 %31 EO 6P N = 1430 15 83.33
32 EO 3S W-2 200 0 0.00
33 EO 4C S-1 -50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
Total : 241,0 / 540 = 44,63 %
PAIRE Nr : a10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
A11 NELIS Claude -ROSOUX Louis : 56,85 % 1 EO 4T N-1 -50 10 55.56
2 EO 1S S = 90 6 33.33
3 EO 4C W-1 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.6 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 42,78 % 4 EO 2S E-2 200 11 61.11
5 EO 1S E = -90 4 22.22
6 EO 3P N = 140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,59 % 7 EO 2K N = 90 16 88.89
8 EO 2P E = -110 15 83.33
9 EO 4P E-3 300 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.7 STEED Adrian -DELTOUR Emile : 54,07 %10 EO 6C E = -1430 12 66.67
11 EO 6P S = 980 2 11.11
12 EO 4C W = -420 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,52 %13 EO 3T N-1 -100 15 83.33
14 EO 3C N-2 -100 11 61.11
15 EO 4PcE-3 500 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 61,85 %16 EO 4P S+1 450 10 55.56
17 EO 3S W = -400 18 100.00
18 EO 4C N+2 680 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A.3 VAGMAN David -POULAERT Gilbert : 44,26 %19 EO 2C E-2 200 14 77.78
20 EO 4P N+3 710 11 61.11
21 EO 3S S = 600 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.4 COURTOIS Chantal -CASSART Guy : 52,41 %25 EO 4K E+1 -150 16 88.89
26 EO 1S S+1 120 3 16.67
27 EO 1S N = 90 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A10 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 37,41 %28 EO 4C E+3 -510 5 27.78
29 EO 3S E+1 -630 17 94.44
30 EO 4P E-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.5 COLLET Edgard -BEYNE Anne : 59,81 %31 EO 6S S = 1440 6 33.33
32 EO 1S W+2 -150 12 66.67
33 EO 2C N+1 140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
Total : 303,0 / 540 = 56,11 %
PAIRE Nr : a11 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne
A.6 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 42,78 % 1 EO 1P W+1 -110 18 100.00
2 EO 3T N-1 -100 13 72.22
3 EO 4C W-1 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
A.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,59 % 4 EO 2S E-2 200 11 61.11
5 EO 2P E = -110 9 50.00
6 EO 3P N+1 170 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.7 STEED Adrian -DELTOUR Emile : 54,07 % 7 EO 2P W-1 100 14 77.78
8 EO 2P E-2 100 5 27.78
9 EO 3TcS = 470 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
A.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,52 %10 EO 6C E-1 100 1 5.56
11 EO 6C S = 980 2 11.11
12 EO 4C W-2 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 61,85 %13 EO 2T N+2 130 0 0.00
14 EO 3PcE-3 500 0 0.00
15 EO 4C N = 620 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
A.3 VAGMAN David -POULAERT Gilbert : 44,26 %16 EO 4P S+1 450 10 55.56
17 EO 1C E = -80 4 22.22
18 EO 4C S = 620 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 49,44 %19 EO 3C N+2 200 14 77.78
20 EO 4P N+3 710 11 61.11
21 EO 3S S-3 -300 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
A.4 COURTOIS Chantal -CASSART Guy : 52,41 %22 EO 4C E-1 100 1 5.56
23 EO 3S N+2 660 2 11.11
24 EO 4P N+2 480 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
A.5 COLLET Edgard -BEYNE Anne : 59,81 %28 EO 4C E+3 -510 5 27.78
29 EO 3S E-2 200 2 11.11
30 EO 3P E-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
A11 NELIS Claude -ROSOUX Louis : 56,85 %31 EO 6S N = 1440 6 33.33
32 EO 3K N-1 -50 6 33.33
33 EO 2P S+1 140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 217,0 / 540 = 40,19 %
|
|