|
Tournoi du 20-06-11
1 55,56 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
2 52,78 5 GEUDVERT Albert -CHANTRAINE René
3 52,55 7 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard
4 51,62 6 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COOLEN Josef
5 51,16 2 DACHET Gérard -ROEGIERS Marga
6 49,77 1 COURTOIS Chantal -LEFEBVRE Michel
7 49,54 9 WARNIER François -LILIEN Raymond
8 44,21 3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
9 42,82 4 SALFI Huguette -MASSAUX Jacques
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 62,04 13 STEED Adrian -CASSART Guy
2 55,79 17 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
3 54,86 11 HENRI Jacques -THIELENS Georges
4 50,93 15 FRAITURE Louis -VERBOIS Léon
5 49,77 18 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
6 47,22 14 PIETQUIN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
7 46,53 12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
8 41,90 10 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger
9 40,97 16 STIENON Annie -LAENENS René
PAIRE Nr : 1 COURTOIS Chantal -LEFEBVRE Michel
10 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 41,90 % 1 NS 3S E = -400 6 37.50
2 NS 4C N = 620 10 62.50
3 NS 1S S = 90 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
18 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,77 % 4 NS 2C W+2 -170 2 12.50
5 NS 4C E = -420 11 68.75
6 NS 5P E-1 100 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
17 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 55,79 % 7 NS 4K W-2 200 13 81.25
8 NS 3K E = -110 4 25.00
9 NS 2P W = -110 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
16 STIENON Annie -LAENENS René : 40,97 %10 NS 1S W-1 100 6 37.50
11 NS 4P S+1 450 7 43.75
12 NS 4P S+1 650 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
15 FRAITURE Louis -VERBOIS Léon : 50,93 %13 NS 6C N-1 -100 0 0.00
14 NS 3P N = 140 6 37.50
15 NS 1C S = 80 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
14 PIETQUIN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,22 %16 NS 3S W = -600 8 50.00
17 NS 4PcE-2 300 6 37.50
18 NS 3CcE-1 100 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
13 STEED Adrian -CASSART Guy : 62,04 %19 NS 6S W = -1440 0 0.00
20 NS 3S W+1 -630 16 100.00
21 NS 2C S+1 140 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 46,53 %22 NS 3K S-4 -200 0 0.00
23 NS 4C W+2 -680 12 75.00
24 NS 6KcW-1 100 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
11 HENRI Jacques -THIELENS Georges : 54,86 %25 NS 6C S+1 1010 11 68.75
26 NS 1S E+1 -120 0 0.00
27 NS 4C N-1 -50 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
Total : 215,0 / 432 = 49,77 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 DACHET Gérard -ROEGIERS Marga
12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 46,53 % 1 NS 3S E = -400 6 37.50
2 NS 4C N = 620 10 62.50
3 NS 4T S = 130 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
11 HENRI Jacques -THIELENS Georges : 54,86 % 4 NS 1S W-1 100 15 93.75
5 NS 4C E = -420 11 68.75
6 NS 4P E-1 100 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
10 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 41,90 % 7 NS 2C W = -110 5 31.25
8 NS 4P W-4 200 12 75.00
9 NS 2T N-1 -50 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
18 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,77 %10 NS 1S W-1 100 6 37.50
11 NS 4P S+1 450 7 43.75
12 NS 4P S = 620 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
17 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 55,79 %13 NS 4C N+2 680 7 43.75
14 NS 2C S = 110 4 25.00
15 NS 4P W-2 100 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
16 STIENON Annie -LAENENS René : 40,97 %16 NS 4C W = -620 4 25.00
17 NS 5K N = 400 9 56.25
18 NS 2P S = 110 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
15 FRAITURE Louis -VERBOIS Léon : 50,93 %19 NS 6P E = -1430 4 25.00
20 NS 5C E = -650 7 43.75
21 NS 2C S+1 140 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
14 PIETQUIN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,22 %22 NS 2P E+1 -140 4 25.00
23 NS 6C W = -1430 4 25.00
24 NS 6PcS-2 -300 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
13 STEED Adrian -CASSART Guy : 62,04 %25 NS 4C S+3 510 3 18.75
26 NS 3S W-1 100 7 43.75
27 NS 4CcN-1 -100 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
Total : 221,0 / 432 = 51,16 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
14 PIETQUIN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,22 % 1 NS 3S E-1 50 12 75.00
2 NS 4C N = 620 10 62.50
3 NS 2C N+1 140 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
13 STEED Adrian -CASSART Guy : 62,04 % 4 NS 4C W = -620 0 0.00
5 NS 3S E+1 -430 5 31.25
6 NS 4P E = -620 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 46,53 % 7 NS 3K W+1 -130 2 12.50
8 NS 5T S-3 -150 2 12.50
9 NS 3T N-2 -100 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
11 HENRI Jacques -THIELENS Georges : 54,86 %10 NS 2P N = 110 10 62.50
11 NS 5P S = 450 7 43.75
12 NS 2P S+2 170 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
10 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 41,90 %13 NS 4P N+2 680 7 43.75
14 NS 3S N+1 430 15 93.75
15 NS 1C S-1 -100 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
18 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,77 %16 NS 4C E = -620 4 25.00
17 NS 5TcW+1 -650 0 0.00
18 NS 2P S-2 -200 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
17 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 55,79 %19 NS 4P E+1 -650 8 50.00
20 NS 5C E = -650 7 43.75
21 NS 2C S = 110 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
16 STIENON Annie -LAENENS René : 40,97 %22 NS 2P E = -110 9 56.25
23 NS 3C E+4 -260 16 100.00
24 NS 6PcN-1 -100 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
15 FRAITURE Louis -VERBOIS Léon : 50,93 %25 NS 6C S+1 1010 11 68.75
26 NS 3S W-1 100 7 43.75
27 NS 6CcN-2 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
Total : 191,0 / 432 = 44,21 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 SALFI Huguette -MASSAUX Jacques
16 STIENON Annie -LAENENS René : 40,97 % 1 NS 3S E = -400 6 37.50
2 NS 4C N = 620 10 62.50
3 NS 1S S+1 120 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
15 FRAITURE Louis -VERBOIS Léon : 50,93 % 4 NS 1S W = -90 10 62.50
5 NS 4C E+1 -450 1 6.25
6 NS 4P E = -620 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
14 PIETQUIN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,22 % 7 NS 2P S+1 140 10 62.50
8 NS 4T S-1 -50 6 37.50
9 NS 3T N-3 -150 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
13 STEED Adrian -CASSART Guy : 62,04 %10 NS 2P N-1 -100 1 6.25
11 NS 4P S+1 450 7 43.75
12 NS 4P S = 620 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 46,53 %13 NS 6C N = 1430 14 87.50
14 NS 3S N+1 430 15 93.75
15 NS 1C S-3 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
11 HENRI Jacques -THIELENS Georges : 54,86 %16 NS 3S W-1 100 12 75.00
17 NS 6K N-1 -50 2 12.50
18 NS 3CcE+1 -630 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
10 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 41,90 %19 NS 6P E = -1430 4 25.00
20 NS 4P E+1 -650 7 43.75
21 NS 2C S = 110 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
18 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,77 %22 NS 3P W-1 100 14 87.50
23 NS 6C W = -1430 4 25.00
24 NS 6PcN-1 -100 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
17 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 55,79 %25 NS 4C S+3 510 3 18.75
26 NS 3S W-1 100 7 43.75
27 NS 4C N = 420 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
Total : 185,0 / 432 = 42,82 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 GEUDVERT Albert -CHANTRAINE René
18 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,77 % 1 NS 3S E-2 100 15 93.75
2 NS 3S N = 600 2 12.50
3 NS 4T S-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
17 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 55,79 % 4 NS 3C E = -140 4 25.00
5 NS 4C E = -420 11 68.75
6 NS 4P E = -620 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
16 STIENON Annie -LAENENS René : 40,97 % 7 NS 3C W-1 100 8 50.00
8 NS 3P W-3 150 10 62.50
9 NS 3T N-3 -150 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
15 FRAITURE Louis -VERBOIS Léon : 50,93 %10 NS 2P N+1 140 12 75.00
11 NS 6C N = 980 16 100.00
12 NS 3P S+1 170 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
14 PIETQUIN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,22 %13 NS 4C N+2 680 7 43.75
14 NS 3S N = 400 12 75.00
15 NS 1C S-1 -100 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
13 STEED Adrian -CASSART Guy : 62,04 %16 NS 4C W = -620 4 25.00
17 NS 6PcE-1 100 4 25.00
18 NS 2P S = 110 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 46,53 %19 NS 6P E-1 100 11 68.75
20 NS 4C E+1 -650 7 43.75
21 NS 2C S+2 170 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
11 HENRI Jacques -THIELENS Georges : 54,86 %22 NS 2P W+1 -140 4 25.00
23 NS 4C W+2 -680 12 75.00
24 NS 5P N-1 -50 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
10 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 41,90 %25 NS 7C S = 1510 16 100.00
26 NS 3S W-1 100 7 43.75
27 NS 4C N-1 -50 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
Total : 228,0 / 432 = 52,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COOLEN Josef
11 HENRI Jacques -THIELENS Georges : 54,86 % 1 NS 3S E = -400 6 37.50
2 NS 4C N = 620 10 62.50
3 NS 3T N = 110 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
10 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 41,90 % 4 NS 1S W = -90 10 62.50
5 NS 3S E+1 -430 5 31.25
6 NS 2P E+2 -170 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
18 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,77 % 7 NS 2C W = -110 5 31.25
8 NS 4P W-5 250 15 93.75
9 NS 3K E+1 -130 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
17 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 55,79 %10 NS 3C W-2 200 16 100.00
11 NS 4P S = 420 0 0.00
12 NS 4P S-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
16 STIENON Annie -LAENENS René : 40,97 %13 NS 6C N+1 1460 16 100.00
14 NS 1S N+2 150 8 50.00
15 NS 3P W = -140 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
15 FRAITURE Louis -VERBOIS Léon : 50,93 %16 NS 6C W-2 200 16 100.00
17 NS 5KcN = 550 15 93.75
18 NS 3S N-4 -400 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
14 PIETQUIN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,22 %19 NS 6P E-2 200 15 93.75
20 NS 4C E+1 -650 7 43.75
21 NS 2C S = 110 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
13 STEED Adrian -CASSART Guy : 62,04 %22 NS 3T N-1 -50 12 75.00
23 NS 6C W = -1430 4 25.00
24 NS 5PcN-2 -300 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 46,53 %25 NS 4C S+3 510 3 18.75
26 NS 3S W-2 200 15 93.75
27 NS 4C N-1 -50 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
Total : 223,0 / 432 = 51,62 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard
13 STEED Adrian -CASSART Guy : 62,04 % 1 NS 3S E = -400 6 37.50
2 NS 4C N = 620 10 62.50
3 NS 2P E-1 100 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 46,53 % 4 NS 1S W-1 100 15 93.75
5 NS 4C E+1 -450 1 6.25
6 NS 4P E = -620 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
11 HENRI Jacques -THIELENS Georges : 54,86 % 7 NS 4K W-2 200 13 81.25
8 NS 4K E-1 50 8 50.00
9 NS 1KcS-5 -1100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
10 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 41,90 %10 NS 2P N+2 170 14 87.50
11 NS 5PcS = 650 14 87.50
12 NS 4P S = 620 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
18 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,77 %13 NS 6K S = 1370 12 75.00
14 NS 2S N-1 -50 1 6.25
15 NS 1S E-1 50 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
17 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 55,79 %16 NS 4K E-1 100 12 75.00
17 NS 3S S+2 460 12 75.00
18 NS 2P S-2 -200 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
16 STIENON Annie -LAENENS René : 40,97 %19 NS 6P E = -1430 4 25.00
20 NS 4C E+1 -650 7 43.75
21 NS 2C S+1 140 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
15 FRAITURE Louis -VERBOIS Léon : 50,93 %22 NS 2P W = -110 9 56.25
23 NS 4C W+2 -680 12 75.00
24 NS 6PcN-1 -100 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
14 PIETQUIN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,22 %25 NS 4C S+3 510 3 18.75
26 NS 3S W-1 100 7 43.75
27 NS 4C N+1 450 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
Total : 227,0 / 432 = 52,55 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
15 FRAITURE Louis -VERBOIS Léon : 50,93 % 1 NS 3S E-2 100 15 93.75
2 NS 4C N = 620 10 62.50
3 NS 2P E-1 100 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
14 PIETQUIN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,22 % 4 NS 1S W = -90 10 62.50
5 NS 4C E = -420 11 68.75
6 NS 4P E-1 100 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
13 STEED Adrian -CASSART Guy : 62,04 % 7 NS 3PcS = 730 16 100.00
8 NS 4KcE = -510 0 0.00
9 NS 2P W+1 -140 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 46,53 %10 NS 1S W-1 100 6 37.50
11 NS 4P S+1 450 7 43.75
12 NS 4P S = 620 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
11 HENRI Jacques -THIELENS Georges : 54,86 %13 NS 5K S+1 620 2 12.50
14 NS 2P S+2 170 10 62.50
15 NS 1C S-2 -200 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
10 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 41,90 %16 NS 3S W+2 -660 0 0.00
17 NS 5KcN = 550 15 93.75
18 NS 2P S = 110 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
18 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,77 %19 NS 7S W-2 200 15 93.75
20 NS 5C W = -650 7 43.75
21 NS 3C S = 140 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
17 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 55,79 %22 NS 3P W = -140 4 25.00
23 NS 6C W = -1430 4 25.00
24 NS 6KcE-1 100 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
16 STIENON Annie -LAENENS René : 40,97 %25 NS 6C S+1 1010 11 68.75
26 NS 3S W-2 200 15 93.75
27 NS 4C N-1 -50 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
Total : 240,0 / 432 = 55,56 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 WARNIER François -LILIEN Raymond
17 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 55,79 % 1 NS 3S E+1 -430 0 0.00
2 NS 6C N-2 -200 0 0.00
3 NS 3T S = 110 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
16 STIENON Annie -LAENENS René : 40,97 % 4 NS 2K N-1 -100 6 37.50
5 NS 4C E-1 50 16 100.00
6 NS 4P E-1 100 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
15 FRAITURE Louis -VERBOIS Léon : 50,93 % 7 NS 3PcS-1 -200 0 0.00
8 NS 3S W-5 250 15 93.75
9 NS 2P W+2 -170 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
14 PIETQUIN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,22 %10 NS 2P N-1 -100 1 6.25
11 NS 4P S+1 450 7 43.75
12 NS 4P S+1 650 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
13 STEED Adrian -CASSART Guy : 62,04 %13 NS 5C N+1 680 7 43.75
14 NS 3S N-1 -50 1 6.25
15 NS 1C S-1 -100 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 46,53 %16 NS 4C W-1 100 12 75.00
17 NS 5K N = 400 9 56.25
18 NS 2S N-1 -100 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
11 HENRI Jacques -THIELENS Georges : 54,86 %19 NS 6P E-1 100 11 68.75
20 NS 4C W+1 -650 7 43.75
21 NS 2K S-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
10 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 41,90 %22 NS 3T N = 110 16 100.00
23 NS 6C W = -1430 4 25.00
24 NS 5PcN = 650 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
18 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,77 %25 NS 6C S+1 1010 11 68.75
26 NS 3S W-1 100 7 43.75
27 NS 4C N = 420 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
Total : 214,0 / 432 = 49,54 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger
1 COURTOIS Chantal -LEFEBVRE Michel : 49,77 % 1 EO 3S E = -400 10 62.50
2 EO 4C N = 620 6 37.50
3 EO 1S S = 90 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
6 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COOLEN Josef : 51,62 % 4 EO 1S W = -90 6 37.50
5 EO 3S E+1 -430 11 68.75
6 EO 2P E+2 -170 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
2 DACHET Gérard -ROEGIERS Marga : 51,16 % 7 EO 2C W = -110 11 68.75
8 EO 4P W-4 200 4 25.00
9 EO 2T N-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
7 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,55 %10 EO 2P N+2 170 2 12.50
11 EO 5PcS = 650 2 12.50
12 EO 4P S = 620 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,21 %13 EO 4P N+2 680 9 56.25
14 EO 3S N+1 430 1 6.25
15 EO 1C S-1 -100 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 55,56 %16 EO 3S W+2 -660 16 100.00
17 EO 5KcN = 550 1 6.25
18 EO 2P S = 110 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
4 SALFI Huguette -MASSAUX Jacques : 42,82 %19 EO 6P E = -1430 12 75.00
20 EO 4P E+1 -650 9 56.25
21 EO 2C S = 110 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
9 WARNIER François -LILIEN Raymond : 49,54 %22 EO 3T N = 110 0 0.00
23 EO 6C W = -1430 12 75.00
24 EO 5PcN = 650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
5 GEUDVERT Albert -CHANTRAINE René : 52,78 %25 EO 7C S = 1510 0 0.00
26 EO 3S W-1 100 9 56.25
27 EO 4C N-1 -50 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
Total : 181,0 / 432 = 41,90 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 HENRI Jacques -THIELENS Georges
6 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COOLEN Josef : 51,62 % 1 EO 3S E = -400 10 62.50
2 EO 4C N = 620 6 37.50
3 EO 3T N = 110 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
2 DACHET Gérard -ROEGIERS Marga : 51,16 % 4 EO 1S W-1 100 1 6.25
5 EO 4C E = -420 5 31.25
6 EO 4P E-1 100 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
7 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,55 % 7 EO 4K W-2 200 3 18.75
8 EO 4K E-1 50 8 50.00
9 EO 1KcS-5 -1100 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,21 %10 EO 2P N = 110 6 37.50
11 EO 5P S = 450 9 56.25
12 EO 2P S+2 170 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 55,56 %13 EO 5K S+1 620 14 87.50
14 EO 2P S+2 170 6 37.50
15 EO 1C S-2 -200 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
4 SALFI Huguette -MASSAUX Jacques : 42,82 %16 EO 3S W-1 100 4 25.00
17 EO 6K N-1 -50 14 87.50
18 EO 3CcE+1 -630 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
9 WARNIER François -LILIEN Raymond : 49,54 %19 EO 6P E-1 100 5 31.25
20 EO 4C W+1 -650 9 56.25
21 EO 2K S-1 -100 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
5 GEUDVERT Albert -CHANTRAINE René : 52,78 %22 EO 2P W+1 -140 12 75.00
23 EO 4C W+2 -680 4 25.00
24 EO 5P N-1 -50 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
1 COURTOIS Chantal -LEFEBVRE Michel : 49,77 %25 EO 6C S+1 1010 5 31.25
26 EO 1S E+1 -120 16 100.00
27 EO 4C N-1 -50 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
Total : 237,0 / 432 = 54,86 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
2 DACHET Gérard -ROEGIERS Marga : 51,16 % 1 EO 3S E = -400 10 62.50
2 EO 4C N = 620 6 37.50
3 EO 4T S = 130 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
7 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,55 % 4 EO 1S W-1 100 1 6.25
5 EO 4C E+1 -450 15 93.75
6 EO 4P E = -620 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,21 % 7 EO 3K W+1 -130 14 87.50
8 EO 5T S-3 -150 14 87.50
9 EO 3T N-2 -100 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 55,56 %10 EO 1S W-1 100 10 62.50
11 EO 4P S+1 450 9 56.25
12 EO 4P S = 620 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
4 SALFI Huguette -MASSAUX Jacques : 42,82 %13 EO 6C N = 1430 2 12.50
14 EO 3S N+1 430 1 6.25
15 EO 1C S-3 -300 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
9 WARNIER François -LILIEN Raymond : 49,54 %16 EO 4C W-1 100 4 25.00
17 EO 5K N = 400 7 43.75
18 EO 2S N-1 -100 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
5 GEUDVERT Albert -CHANTRAINE René : 52,78 %19 EO 6P E-1 100 5 31.25
20 EO 4C E+1 -650 9 56.25
21 EO 2C S+2 170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
1 COURTOIS Chantal -LEFEBVRE Michel : 49,77 %22 EO 3K S-4 -200 16 100.00
23 EO 4C W+2 -680 4 25.00
24 EO 6KcW-1 100 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
6 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COOLEN Josef : 51,62 %25 EO 4C S+3 510 13 81.25
26 EO 3S W-2 200 1 6.25
27 EO 4C N-1 -50 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
Total : 201,0 / 432 = 46,53 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 STEED Adrian -CASSART Guy
7 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,55 % 1 EO 3S E = -400 10 62.50
2 EO 4C N = 620 6 37.50
3 EO 2P E-1 100 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,21 % 4 EO 4C W = -620 16 100.00
5 EO 3S E+1 -430 11 68.75
6 EO 4P E = -620 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 55,56 % 7 EO 3PcS = 730 0 0.00
8 EO 4KcE = -510 16 100.00
9 EO 2P W+1 -140 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
4 SALFI Huguette -MASSAUX Jacques : 42,82 %10 EO 2P N-1 -100 15 93.75
11 EO 4P S+1 450 9 56.25
12 EO 4P S = 620 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
9 WARNIER François -LILIEN Raymond : 49,54 %13 EO 5C N+1 680 9 56.25
14 EO 3S N-1 -50 15 93.75
15 EO 1C S-1 -100 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
5 GEUDVERT Albert -CHANTRAINE René : 52,78 %16 EO 4C W = -620 12 75.00
17 EO 6PcE-1 100 12 75.00
18 EO 2P S = 110 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
1 COURTOIS Chantal -LEFEBVRE Michel : 49,77 %19 EO 6S W = -1440 16 100.00
20 EO 3S W+1 -630 0 0.00
21 EO 2C S+1 140 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
6 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COOLEN Josef : 51,62 %22 EO 3T N-1 -50 4 25.00
23 EO 6C W = -1430 12 75.00
24 EO 5PcN-2 -300 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
2 DACHET Gérard -ROEGIERS Marga : 51,16 %25 EO 4C S+3 510 13 81.25
26 EO 3S W-1 100 9 56.25
27 EO 4CcN-1 -100 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
Total : 268,0 / 432 = 62,04 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 PIETQUIN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,21 % 1 EO 3S E-1 50 4 25.00
2 EO 4C N = 620 6 37.50
3 EO 2C N+1 140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 55,56 % 4 EO 1S W = -90 6 37.50
5 EO 4C E = -420 5 31.25
6 EO 4P E-1 100 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
4 SALFI Huguette -MASSAUX Jacques : 42,82 % 7 EO 2P S+1 140 6 37.50
8 EO 4T S-1 -50 10 62.50
9 EO 3T N-3 -150 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
9 WARNIER François -LILIEN Raymond : 49,54 %10 EO 2P N-1 -100 15 93.75
11 EO 4P S+1 450 9 56.25
12 EO 4P S+1 650 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
5 GEUDVERT Albert -CHANTRAINE René : 52,78 %13 EO 4C N+2 680 9 56.25
14 EO 3S N = 400 4 25.00
15 EO 1C S-1 -100 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
1 COURTOIS Chantal -LEFEBVRE Michel : 49,77 %16 EO 3S W = -600 8 50.00
17 EO 4PcE-2 300 10 62.50
18 EO 3CcE-1 100 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
6 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COOLEN Josef : 51,62 %19 EO 6P E-2 200 1 6.25
20 EO 4C E+1 -650 9 56.25
21 EO 2C S = 110 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
2 DACHET Gérard -ROEGIERS Marga : 51,16 %22 EO 2P E+1 -140 12 75.00
23 EO 6C W = -1430 12 75.00
24 EO 6PcS-2 -300 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
7 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,55 %25 EO 4C S+3 510 13 81.25
26 EO 3S W-1 100 9 56.25
27 EO 4C N+1 450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
Total : 204,0 / 432 = 47,22 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 FRAITURE Louis -VERBOIS Léon
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 55,56 % 1 EO 3S E-2 100 1 6.25
2 EO 4C N = 620 6 37.50
3 EO 2P E-1 100 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
4 SALFI Huguette -MASSAUX Jacques : 42,82 % 4 EO 1S W = -90 6 37.50
5 EO 4C E+1 -450 15 93.75
6 EO 4P E = -620 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
9 WARNIER François -LILIEN Raymond : 49,54 % 7 EO 3PcS-1 -200 16 100.00
8 EO 3S W-5 250 1 6.25
9 EO 2P W+2 -170 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
5 GEUDVERT Albert -CHANTRAINE René : 52,78 %10 EO 2P N+1 140 4 25.00
11 EO 6C N = 980 0 0.00
12 EO 3P S+1 170 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
1 COURTOIS Chantal -LEFEBVRE Michel : 49,77 %13 EO 6C N-1 -100 16 100.00
14 EO 3P N = 140 10 62.50
15 EO 1C S = 80 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
6 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COOLEN Josef : 51,62 %16 EO 6C W-2 200 0 0.00
17 EO 5KcN = 550 1 6.25
18 EO 3S N-4 -400 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
2 DACHET Gérard -ROEGIERS Marga : 51,16 %19 EO 6P E = -1430 12 75.00
20 EO 5C E = -650 9 56.25
21 EO 2C S+1 140 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
7 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,55 %22 EO 2P W = -110 7 43.75
23 EO 4C W+2 -680 4 25.00
24 EO 6PcN-1 -100 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,21 %25 EO 6C S+1 1010 5 31.25
26 EO 3S W-1 100 9 56.25
27 EO 6CcN-2 -300 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
Total : 220,0 / 432 = 50,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 STIENON Annie -LAENENS René
4 SALFI Huguette -MASSAUX Jacques : 42,82 % 1 EO 3S E = -400 10 62.50
2 EO 4C N = 620 6 37.50
3 EO 1S S+1 120 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
9 WARNIER François -LILIEN Raymond : 49,54 % 4 EO 2K N-1 -100 10 62.50
5 EO 4C E-1 50 0 0.00
6 EO 4P E-1 100 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
5 GEUDVERT Albert -CHANTRAINE René : 52,78 % 7 EO 3C W-1 100 8 50.00
8 EO 3P W-3 150 6 37.50
9 EO 3T N-3 -150 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
1 COURTOIS Chantal -LEFEBVRE Michel : 49,77 %10 EO 1S W-1 100 10 62.50
11 EO 4P S+1 450 9 56.25
12 EO 4P S+1 650 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
6 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COOLEN Josef : 51,62 %13 EO 6C N+1 1460 0 0.00
14 EO 1S N+2 150 8 50.00
15 EO 3P W = -140 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
2 DACHET Gérard -ROEGIERS Marga : 51,16 %16 EO 4C W = -620 12 75.00
17 EO 5K N = 400 7 43.75
18 EO 2P S = 110 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
7 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,55 %19 EO 6P E = -1430 12 75.00
20 EO 4C E+1 -650 9 56.25
21 EO 2C S+1 140 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,21 %22 EO 2P E = -110 7 43.75
23 EO 3C E+4 -260 0 0.00
24 EO 6PcN-1 -100 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 55,56 %25 EO 6C S+1 1010 5 31.25
26 EO 3S W-2 200 1 6.25
27 EO 4C N-1 -50 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
Total : 177,0 / 432 = 40,97 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
9 WARNIER François -LILIEN Raymond : 49,54 % 1 EO 3S E+1 -430 16 100.00
2 EO 6C N-2 -200 16 100.00
3 EO 3T S = 110 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
5 GEUDVERT Albert -CHANTRAINE René : 52,78 % 4 EO 3C E = -140 12 75.00
5 EO 4C E = -420 5 31.25
6 EO 4P E = -620 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
1 COURTOIS Chantal -LEFEBVRE Michel : 49,77 % 7 EO 4K W-2 200 3 18.75
8 EO 3K E = -110 12 75.00
9 EO 2P W = -110 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
6 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COOLEN Josef : 51,62 %10 EO 3C W-2 200 0 0.00
11 EO 4P S = 420 16 100.00
12 EO 4P S-1 -100 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
2 DACHET Gérard -ROEGIERS Marga : 51,16 %13 EO 4C N+2 680 9 56.25
14 EO 2C S = 110 12 75.00
15 EO 4P W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
7 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,55 %16 EO 4K E-1 100 4 25.00
17 EO 3S S+2 460 4 25.00
18 EO 2P S-2 -200 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,21 %19 EO 4P E+1 -650 8 50.00
20 EO 5C E = -650 9 56.25
21 EO 2C S = 110 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 55,56 %22 EO 3P W = -140 12 75.00
23 EO 6C W = -1430 12 75.00
24 EO 6KcE-1 100 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
4 SALFI Huguette -MASSAUX Jacques : 42,82 %25 EO 4C S+3 510 13 81.25
26 EO 3S W-1 100 9 56.25
27 EO 4C N = 420 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
Total : 241,0 / 432 = 55,79 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
5 GEUDVERT Albert -CHANTRAINE René : 52,78 % 1 EO 3S E-2 100 1 6.25
2 EO 3S N = 600 14 87.50
3 EO 4T S-1 -50 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
1 COURTOIS Chantal -LEFEBVRE Michel : 49,77 % 4 EO 2C W+2 -170 14 87.50
5 EO 4C E = -420 5 31.25
6 EO 5P E-1 100 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
6 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COOLEN Josef : 51,62 % 7 EO 2C W = -110 11 68.75
8 EO 4P W-5 250 1 6.25
9 EO 3K E+1 -130 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
2 DACHET Gérard -ROEGIERS Marga : 51,16 %10 EO 1S W-1 100 10 62.50
11 EO 4P S+1 450 9 56.25
12 EO 4P S = 620 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
7 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,55 %13 EO 6K S = 1370 4 25.00
14 EO 2S N-1 -50 15 93.75
15 EO 1S E-1 50 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,21 %16 EO 4C E = -620 12 75.00
17 EO 5TcW+1 -650 16 100.00
18 EO 2P S-2 -200 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 55,56 %19 EO 7S W-2 200 1 6.25
20 EO 5C W = -650 9 56.25
21 EO 3C S = 140 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
4 SALFI Huguette -MASSAUX Jacques : 42,82 %22 EO 3P W-1 100 2 12.50
23 EO 6C W = -1430 12 75.00
24 EO 6PcN-1 -100 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 WARNIER François -LILIEN Raymond : 49,54 %25 EO 6C S+1 1010 5 31.25
26 EO 3S W-1 100 9 56.25
27 EO 4C N = 420 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
Total : 215,0 / 432 = 49,77 %
|
|