|
Tournoi du 20-08-12
1 56,25 5 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
2 55,42 9 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François
3 54,38 6 LAENENS René -DOUETTE Albert
4 51,04 3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
5 50,21 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
~ 50,21 4 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine
7 46,46 7 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
8 45,83 2 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David
9 40,21 1 FRAITURE Louis -SPELLANZON Benoit
10 0,00 10 -
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 56,71 11 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
2 53,94 17 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse
3 53,70 15 LIBERT Laurent -de WASSEIGE Ariane
~ 53,70 12 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger
5 51,62 14 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
6 49,54 16 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard
~ 49,54 20 HAEDENS Jacqueline -SALFI Huguette
8 44,44 18 ROSOUX Louis -MOSSERAY Bernadette
9 43,52 13 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert
10 43,29 19 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile
PAIRE Nr : 1 FRAITURE Louis -SPELLANZON Benoit
11 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 56,71 % 1 NS 2C S = 110 2 12.50
2 NS 4P N-2 -200 1 6.25
3 NS 4P W = -620 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 6,25 %
13 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 43,52 % 4 NS 1S N+1 120 8 50.00
5 NS 4K W-1 50 14 87.50
6 NS 4C N = 420 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 53,70 % 7 NS 4CcW-1 200 13 81.25
8 NS 3S W+4 -520 10 62.50
9 NS 3S N+1 430 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
16 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,54 %10 NS 4P W = -620 4 25.00
11 NS 2C N = 110 8 50.00
12 NS 1S S-1 -100 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
17 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 53,94 %13 NS 3S W-4 400 16 100.00
14 NS 2C S-3 -150 3 18.75
15 NS 3S W+3 -490 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
18 ROSOUX Louis -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 44,44 %16 NS 3P E-1 100 10 62.50
17 NS 2T N+1 110 13 81.25
18 NS 5KcN-2 -500 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
19 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 43,29 %19 NS 2S W = -120 9 56.25
20 NS 5P E+1 -680 1 6.25
21 NS 3C S-1 -100 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
20 HAEDENS Jacqueline -SALFI Huguette : 49,54 %22 NS 2CcN-1 -100 6 37.50
23 NS 4C N-1 -100 2 12.50
24 NS 4C W-3 150 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
14 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 51,62 %25 NS 2P S-2 -100 7 43.75
26 NS 3TcW = -670 0 0.00
27 NS 2S E-1 50 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
15 LIBERT Laurent -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,70 %28 NS 5T E+1 -420 6 37.50
29 NS 2K E+1 -110 2 12.50
30 NS 3S E+2 -460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
Total : 193,0 / 480 = 40,21 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David
13 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 43,52 % 1 NS 3K S+2 150 5 31.25
2 NS 1S S = 90 10 62.50
3 NS 4P W-2 200 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 53,70 % 4 NS 2P S = 110 6 37.50
5 NS 3K W+1 -130 4 25.00
6 NS 4C N-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
11 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 56,71 % 7 NS 4C W-2 200 13 81.25
8 NS 6C E+1 -1010 1 6.25
9 NS 2S N+1 150 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
20 HAEDENS Jacqueline -SALFI Huguette : 49,54 %10 NS 4P W = -620 4 25.00
11 NS 1ScS+1 280 16 100.00
12 NS 3S S-1 -100 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
14 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 51,62 %13 NS 1S W+1 -120 4 25.00
14 NS 2C S-1 -50 12 75.00
15 NS 6S W = -990 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
15 LIBERT Laurent -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,70 %16 NS 5CcN-2 -300 0 0.00
17 NS 1S E = -90 2 12.50
18 NS 6C E-1 50 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
16 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,54 %19 NS 1S W+2 -150 4 25.00
20 NS 4P E+1 -650 9 56.25
21 NS 3S S-1 -100 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
17 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 53,94 %22 NS 3T S-1 -50 11 68.75
23 NS 3S N+1 630 15 93.75
24 NS 4K N = 130 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
18 ROSOUX Louis -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 44,44 %25 NS 1S W+2 -150 2 12.50
26 NS 5T W-3 300 12 75.00
27 NS 3K S-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
19 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 43,29 %28 NS 3S W-2 100 16 100.00
29 NS 2P S = 110 12 75.00
30 NS 3S E+1 -430 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
Total : 220,0 / 480 = 45,83 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 53,70 % 1 NS 3S N+2 460 16 100.00
2 NS 1S S = 90 10 62.50
3 NS 2S E-2 200 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
11 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 56,71 % 4 NS 2P S-1 -100 2 12.50
5 NS 3T W = -110 10 62.50
6 NS 4C N+1 450 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
13 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 43,52 % 7 NS 4C W-2 200 13 81.25
8 NS 6C E = -980 7 43.75
9 NS 1S N = 90 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
18 ROSOUX Louis -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 44,44 %10 NS 4P W = -620 4 25.00
11 NS 1S N+1 120 11 68.75
12 NS 1S N+1 120 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
19 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 43,29 %13 NS 2T S = 90 8 50.00
14 NS 2CcS-2 -300 0 0.00
15 NS 5K W+1 -420 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
20 HAEDENS Jacqueline -SALFI Huguette : 49,54 %16 NS 3P E = -140 4 25.00
17 NS 2T N = 90 7 43.75
18 NS 4C E+1 -450 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
14 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 51,62 %19 NS 2S W = -120 9 56.25
20 NS 4P E+2 -680 1 6.25
21 NS 3TcW-1 100 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
15 LIBERT Laurent -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,70 %22 NS 1S S-4 -200 0 0.00
23 NS 4C N = 620 11 68.75
24 NS 3C W-1 50 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
16 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,54 %25 NS 2P S-1 -50 13 81.25
26 NS 3T W-1 100 3 18.75
27 NS 2P N = 110 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
17 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 53,94 %28 NS 3K S-1 -100 14 87.50
29 NS 3K E = -110 2 12.50
30 NS 3S E+1 -430 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
Total : 245,0 / 480 = 51,04 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine
17 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 53,94 % 1 NS 3C S-1 -50 0 0.00
2 NS 1S S-1 -100 4 25.00
3 NS 2P W = -110 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 14,58 %
16 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,54 % 4 NS 4C N-1 -100 2 12.50
5 NS 3K W+1 -130 4 25.00
6 NS 4C S+1 450 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
15 LIBERT Laurent -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,70 % 7 NS 2P S+1 140 8 50.00
8 NS 3S E+3 -490 12 75.00
9 NS 2P S+2 170 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
14 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 51,62 %10 NS 3P W+1 -170 10 62.50
11 NS 1S S+2 150 14 87.50
12 NS 2P W-2 100 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
20 HAEDENS Jacqueline -SALFI Huguette : 49,54 %13 NS 2P E-1 100 12 75.00
14 NS 2C S-2 -100 6 37.50
15 NS 6K E = -920 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
19 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 43,29 %16 NS 4P W-1 100 10 62.50
17 NS 3TcN-1 -100 0 0.00
18 NS 4C E+1 -450 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
18 ROSOUX Louis -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 44,44 %19 NS 3K E-2 200 16 100.00
20 NS 4P E+1 -650 9 56.25
21 NS 3C S = 140 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
13 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 43,52 %22 NS 2C N-1 -50 11 68.75
23 NS 3S S-1 -100 2 12.50
24 NS 5K N-1 -50 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 53,70 %25 NS 2P S-1 -50 13 81.25
26 NS 3C N+1 170 6 37.50
27 NS 2S E-1 50 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
11 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 56,71 %28 NS 5T W+1 -420 6 37.50
29 NS 3K E-1 100 8 50.00
30 NS 3S E = -400 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
Total : 241,0 / 480 = 50,21 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
18 ROSOUX Louis -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 44,44 % 1 NS 3S N = 400 11 68.75
2 NS 1S S = 90 10 62.50
3 NS 4P W-1 100 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
17 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 53,94 % 4 NS 4C N-1 -100 2 12.50
5 NS 3K W = -110 10 62.50
6 NS 4C N = 420 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
16 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,54 % 7 NS 4C W-2 200 13 81.25
8 NS 6C E+1 -1010 1 6.25
9 NS 2P S+2 170 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
11 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 56,71 %10 NS 4P W-1 100 14 87.50
11 NS 2P W-2 100 6 37.50
12 NS 3S S-1 -100 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
15 LIBERT Laurent -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,70 %13 NS 2P W+1 -140 2 12.50
14 NS 2C S-1 -50 12 75.00
15 NS 3S E+3 -490 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
14 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 51,62 %16 NS 3P E-1 100 10 62.50
17 NS 2T N+1 110 13 81.25
18 NS 4C E+2 -480 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
20 HAEDENS Jacqueline -SALFI Huguette : 49,54 %19 NS 1S W+2 -150 4 25.00
20 NS 4P E+1 -650 9 56.25
21 NS 2PcW-3 500 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
19 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 43,29 %22 NS 3P W-2 200 16 100.00
23 NS 4C N-1 -100 2 12.50
24 NS 4CcW-2 300 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
13 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 43,52 %25 NS 2P S-1 -50 13 81.25
26 NS 5KcE-4 1100 16 100.00
27 NS 3S E-2 100 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 53,70 %28 NS 5T E+1 -420 6 37.50
29 NS 3K E = -110 2 12.50
30 NS 3S E = -400 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
Total : 270,0 / 480 = 56,25 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 LAENENS René -DOUETTE Albert
19 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 43,29 % 1 NS 2S N+2 180 8 50.00
2 NS 1S N+1 120 16 100.00
3 NS 4P W-1 100 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
18 ROSOUX Louis -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 44,44 % 4 NS 2C N+1 140 11 68.75
5 NS 3K W = -110 10 62.50
6 NS 4C N+1 450 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
17 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 53,94 % 7 NS 2C W+1 -140 0 0.00
8 NS 3S W+2 -460 14 87.50
9 NS 2P S+2 170 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 53,70 %10 NS 4P W-1 100 14 87.50
11 NS 1S S = 90 4 25.00
12 NS 3S S-1 -100 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
11 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 56,71 %13 NS 2T S-2 -200 0 0.00
14 NS 2C S-1 -50 12 75.00
15 NS 3S E+2 -460 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
16 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,54 %16 NS 4P E-2 200 15 93.75
17 NS 2T N-1 -50 4 25.00
18 NS 5K N-2 -200 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
15 LIBERT Laurent -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,70 %19 NS 3C W-1 100 14 87.50
20 NS 4P E+1 -650 9 56.25
21 NS 1K S+3 130 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
14 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 51,62 %22 NS 2P W = -110 4 25.00
23 NS 3S S+1 630 15 93.75
24 NS 2C E = -110 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
20 HAEDENS Jacqueline -SALFI Huguette : 49,54 %25 NS 1S E+2 -150 2 12.50
26 NS 3C N+2 200 9 56.25
27 NS 2S E-1 50 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
13 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 43,52 %28 NS 4P W+2 -480 0 0.00
29 NS 3P S = 140 16 100.00
30 NS 3S E+1 -430 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
Total : 261,0 / 480 = 54,38 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
20 HAEDENS Jacqueline -SALFI Huguette : 49,54 % 1 NS 2S N+1 150 5 31.25
2 NS 1S S = 90 10 62.50
3 NS 2P W = -110 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
19 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 43,29 % 4 NS 2P S+1 140 11 68.75
5 NS 3S W-2 100 16 100.00
6 NS 4C N = 420 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
18 ROSOUX Louis -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 44,44 % 7 NS 3C W-1 100 5 31.25
8 NS 6C E = -980 7 43.75
9 NS 2P S+1 140 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
13 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 43,52 %10 NS 4P W = -620 4 25.00
11 NS 1S S+1 120 11 68.75
12 NS 3S N-1 -100 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 53,70 %13 NS 1S W = -90 6 37.50
14 NS 4C S-3 -150 3 18.75
15 NS 6S W = -990 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
11 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 56,71 %16 NS 3P E = -140 4 25.00
17 NS 2T N+1 110 13 81.25
18 NS 4CcE+1 -690 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
17 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 53,94 %19 NS 1S W = -90 12 75.00
20 NS 4P E = -620 16 100.00
21 NS 3C S = 140 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 85,42 %
16 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,54 %22 NS 3C N-3 -150 2 12.50
23 NS 3S S = 600 8 50.00
24 NS 3P N+1 170 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
15 LIBERT Laurent -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,70 %25 NS 2P S-2 -100 7 43.75
26 NS 3C N+2 200 9 56.25
27 NS 2S E-2 100 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
14 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 51,62 %28 NS 5T E+1 -420 6 37.50
29 NS 3P S-1 -100 6 37.50
30 NS 3S E+1 -430 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
Total : 223,0 / 480 = 46,46 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
14 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 51,62 % 1 NS 3S N+1 430 14 87.50
2 NS 1S S = 90 10 62.50
3 NS 4P W-1 100 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
20 HAEDENS Jacqueline -SALFI Huguette : 49,54 % 4 NS 3P S+1 170 15 93.75
5 NS 3K W+1 -130 4 25.00
6 NS 4C N+1 450 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
19 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 43,29 % 7 NS 2P N-1 -100 2 12.50
8 NS 6S W = -990 4 25.00
9 NS 2P S+2 170 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
15 LIBERT Laurent -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,70 %10 NS 4P W-1 100 14 87.50
11 NS 1S S-1 -50 1 6.25
12 NS 3S S-1 -100 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
13 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 43,52 %13 NS 2P W-1 100 12 75.00
14 NS 2C S-1 -50 12 75.00
15 NS 3S E+2 -460 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 53,70 %16 NS 3P E = -140 4 25.00
17 NS 2T N+1 110 13 81.25
18 NS 4CcE+2 -790 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
11 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 56,71 %19 NS 1S W+3 -180 0 0.00
20 NS 4P E+1 -650 9 56.25
21 NS 1K S+3 130 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
18 ROSOUX Louis -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 44,44 %22 NS 2S S-1 -50 11 68.75
23 NS 4C N = 620 11 68.75
24 NS 2C W = -110 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
17 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 53,94 %25 NS 1S E+2 -150 2 12.50
26 NS 3T W-1 100 3 18.75
27 NS 1ScE-2 300 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
16 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,54 %28 NS 5T E+1 -420 6 37.50
29 NS 2P S = 110 12 75.00
30 NS 3S E+1 -430 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
Total : 241,0 / 480 = 50,21 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François
15 LIBERT Laurent -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,70 % 1 NS 3S N = 400 11 68.75
2 NS 3S S-2 -200 1 6.25
3 NS 3S E-2 200 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
14 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 51,62 % 4 NS 2P S+2 170 15 93.75
5 NS 3S W+1 -430 0 0.00
6 NS 4C N+1 450 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
20 HAEDENS Jacqueline -SALFI Huguette : 49,54 % 7 NS 3C W-1 100 5 31.25
8 NS 6S W-1 50 16 100.00
9 NS 4P S = 420 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
17 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 53,94 %10 NS 4P W = -620 4 25.00
11 NS 1S S-1 -50 1 6.25
12 NS 3S S-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 10,42 %
16 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,54 %13 NS 3P W-1 100 12 75.00
14 NS 2C S-1 -50 12 75.00
15 NS 3S W+3 -490 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
13 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 43,52 %16 NS 4P E-2 200 15 93.75
17 NS 2T N = 90 7 43.75
18 NS 4C E+1 -450 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 53,70 %19 NS 2P S-3 -150 4 25.00
20 NS 4P E+1 -650 9 56.25
21 NS 5KcS-1 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
11 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 56,71 %22 NS 2C N-1 -50 11 68.75
23 NS 3K S+1 130 6 37.50
24 NS 3C W-1 50 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
19 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 43,29 %25 NS 2P S-1 -50 13 81.25
26 NS 4K E-5 500 14 87.50
27 NS 3S E-4 200 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 85,42 %
18 ROSOUX Louis -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 44,44 %28 NS 3T E+2 -150 12 75.00
29 NS 2P S = 110 12 75.00
30 NS 3S E+1 -430 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
Total : 266,0 / 480 = 55,42 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 -
16 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,54 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
15 LIBERT Laurent -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,70 % 4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
14 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 51,62 % 7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
19 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 43,29 %10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
18 ROSOUX Louis -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 44,44 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
17 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 53,94 %16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
13 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 43,52 %19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 53,70 %22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
11 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 56,71 %25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00
27 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
20 HAEDENS Jacqueline -SALFI Huguette : 49,54 %28 NS BYE 0 0.00
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 480 = 0,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
1 FRAITURE Louis -SPELLANZON Benoit : 40,21 % 1 EO 2C S = 110 14 87.50
2 EO 4P N-2 -200 15 93.75
3 EO 4P W = -620 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 93,75 %
3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,04 % 4 EO 2P S-1 -100 14 87.50
5 EO 3T W = -110 6 37.50
6 EO 4C N+1 450 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
2 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David : 45,83 % 7 EO 4C W-2 200 3 18.75
8 EO 6C E+1 -1010 15 93.75
9 EO 2S N+1 150 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
5 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 56,25 %10 EO 4P W-1 100 2 12.50
11 EO 2P W-2 100 10 62.50
12 EO 3S S-1 -100 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
6 LAENENS René -DOUETTE Albert : 54,38 %13 EO 2T S-2 -200 16 100.00
14 EO 2C S-1 -50 4 25.00
15 EO 3S E+2 -460 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
7 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 46,46 %16 EO 3P E = -140 12 75.00
17 EO 2T N+1 110 3 18.75
18 EO 4CcE+1 -690 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 50,21 %19 EO 1S W+3 -180 16 100.00
20 EO 4P E+1 -650 7 43.75
21 EO 1K S+3 130 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
9 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 55,42 %22 EO 2C N-1 -50 5 31.25
23 EO 3K S+1 130 10 62.50
24 EO 3C W-1 50 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
10 - : 0,00 %25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00
27 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
4 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 50,21 %28 EO 5T W+1 -420 10 62.50
29 EO 3K E-1 100 8 50.00
30 EO 3S E = -400 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
Total : 245,0 / 432 = 56,71 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger
3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,04 % 1 EO 3S N+2 460 0 0.00
2 EO 1S S = 90 6 37.50
3 EO 2S E-2 200 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
2 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David : 45,83 % 4 EO 2P S = 110 10 62.50
5 EO 3K W+1 -130 12 75.00
6 EO 4C N-1 -50 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -SPELLANZON Benoit : 40,21 % 7 EO 4CcW-1 200 3 18.75
8 EO 3S W+4 -520 6 37.50
9 EO 3S N+1 430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
6 LAENENS René -DOUETTE Albert : 54,38 %10 EO 4P W-1 100 2 12.50
11 EO 1S S = 90 12 75.00
12 EO 3S S-1 -100 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
7 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 46,46 %13 EO 1S W = -90 10 62.50
14 EO 4C S-3 -150 13 81.25
15 EO 6S W = -990 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 50,21 %16 EO 3P E = -140 12 75.00
17 EO 2T N+1 110 3 18.75
18 EO 4CcE+2 -790 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
9 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 55,42 %19 EO 2P S-3 -150 12 75.00
20 EO 4P E+1 -650 7 43.75
21 EO 5KcS-1 -200 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
10 - : 0,00 %22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
4 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 50,21 %25 EO 2P S-1 -50 3 18.75
26 EO 3C N+1 170 10 62.50
27 EO 2S E-1 50 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
5 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 56,25 %28 EO 5T E+1 -420 10 62.50
29 EO 3K E = -110 14 87.50
30 EO 3S E = -400 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
Total : 232,0 / 432 = 53,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert
2 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David : 45,83 % 1 EO 3K S+2 150 11 68.75
2 EO 1S S = 90 6 37.50
3 EO 4P W-2 200 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -SPELLANZON Benoit : 40,21 % 4 EO 1S N+1 120 8 50.00
5 EO 4K W-1 50 2 12.50
6 EO 4C N = 420 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,04 % 7 EO 4C W-2 200 3 18.75
8 EO 6C E = -980 9 56.25
9 EO 1S N = 90 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
7 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 46,46 %10 EO 4P W = -620 12 75.00
11 EO 1S S+1 120 5 31.25
12 EO 3S N-1 -100 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 50,21 %13 EO 2P W-1 100 4 25.00
14 EO 2C S-1 -50 4 25.00
15 EO 3S E+2 -460 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
9 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 55,42 %16 EO 4P E-2 200 1 6.25
17 EO 2T N = 90 9 56.25
18 EO 4C E+1 -450 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
10 - : 0,00 %19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
4 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 50,21 %22 EO 2C N-1 -50 5 31.25
23 EO 3S S-1 -100 14 87.50
24 EO 5K N-1 -50 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
5 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 56,25 %25 EO 2P S-1 -50 3 18.75
26 EO 5KcE-4 1100 0 0.00
27 EO 3S E-2 100 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
6 LAENENS René -DOUETTE Albert : 54,38 %28 EO 4P W+2 -480 16 100.00
29 EO 3P S = 140 0 0.00
30 EO 3S E+1 -430 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
Total : 188,0 / 432 = 43,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 50,21 % 1 EO 3S N+1 430 2 12.50
2 EO 1S S = 90 6 37.50
3 EO 4P W-1 100 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
9 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 55,42 % 4 EO 2P S+2 170 1 6.25
5 EO 3S W+1 -430 16 100.00
6 EO 4C N+1 450 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
10 - : 0,00 % 7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
4 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 50,21 %10 EO 3P W+1 -170 6 37.50
11 EO 1S S+2 150 2 12.50
12 EO 2P W-2 100 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
2 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David : 45,83 %13 EO 1S W+1 -120 12 75.00
14 EO 2C S-1 -50 4 25.00
15 EO 6S W = -990 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
5 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 56,25 %16 EO 3P E-1 100 6 37.50
17 EO 2T N+1 110 3 18.75
18 EO 4C E+2 -480 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,04 %19 EO 2S W = -120 7 43.75
20 EO 4P E+2 -680 15 93.75
21 EO 3TcW-1 100 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
6 LAENENS René -DOUETTE Albert : 54,38 %22 EO 2P W = -110 12 75.00
23 EO 3S S+1 630 1 6.25
24 EO 2C E = -110 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -SPELLANZON Benoit : 40,21 %25 EO 2P S-2 -100 9 56.25
26 EO 3TcW = -670 16 100.00
27 EO 2S E-1 50 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
7 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 46,46 %28 EO 5T E+1 -420 10 62.50
29 EO 3P S-1 -100 10 62.50
30 EO 3S E+1 -430 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
Total : 223,0 / 432 = 51,62 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 LIBERT Laurent -de WASSEIGE Ariane
9 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 55,42 % 1 EO 3S N = 400 5 31.25
2 EO 3S S-2 -200 15 93.75
3 EO 3S E-2 200 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
10 - : 0,00 % 4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
4 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 50,21 % 7 EO 2P S+1 140 8 50.00
8 EO 3S E+3 -490 4 25.00
9 EO 2P S+2 170 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 50,21 %10 EO 4P W-1 100 2 12.50
11 EO 1S S-1 -50 15 93.75
12 EO 3S S-1 -100 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
5 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 56,25 %13 EO 2P W+1 -140 14 87.50
14 EO 2C S-1 -50 4 25.00
15 EO 3S E+3 -490 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
2 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David : 45,83 %16 EO 5CcN-2 -300 16 100.00
17 EO 1S E = -90 14 87.50
18 EO 6C E-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
6 LAENENS René -DOUETTE Albert : 54,38 %19 EO 3C W-1 100 2 12.50
20 EO 4P E+1 -650 7 43.75
21 EO 1K S+3 130 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,04 %22 EO 1S S-4 -200 16 100.00
23 EO 4C N = 620 5 31.25
24 EO 3C W-1 50 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
7 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 46,46 %25 EO 2P S-2 -100 9 56.25
26 EO 3C N+2 200 7 43.75
27 EO 2S E-2 100 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -SPELLANZON Benoit : 40,21 %28 EO 5T E+1 -420 10 62.50
29 EO 2K E+1 -110 14 87.50
30 EO 3S E+2 -460 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
Total : 232,0 / 432 = 53,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard
10 - : 0,00 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
4 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 50,21 % 4 EO 4C N-1 -100 14 87.50
5 EO 3K W+1 -130 12 75.00
6 EO 4C S+1 450 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
5 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 56,25 % 7 EO 4C W-2 200 3 18.75
8 EO 6C E+1 -1010 15 93.75
9 EO 2P S+2 170 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -SPELLANZON Benoit : 40,21 %10 EO 4P W = -620 12 75.00
11 EO 2C N = 110 8 50.00
12 EO 1S S-1 -100 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
9 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 55,42 %13 EO 3P W-1 100 4 25.00
14 EO 2C S-1 -50 4 25.00
15 EO 3S W+3 -490 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
6 LAENENS René -DOUETTE Albert : 54,38 %16 EO 4P E-2 200 1 6.25
17 EO 2T N-1 -50 12 75.00
18 EO 5K N-2 -200 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
2 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David : 45,83 %19 EO 1S W+2 -150 12 75.00
20 EO 4P E+1 -650 7 43.75
21 EO 3S S-1 -100 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
7 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 46,46 %22 EO 3C N-3 -150 14 87.50
23 EO 3S S = 600 8 50.00
24 EO 3P N+1 170 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,04 %25 EO 2P S-1 -50 3 18.75
26 EO 3T W-1 100 13 81.25
27 EO 2P N = 110 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 50,21 %28 EO 5T E+1 -420 10 62.50
29 EO 2P S = 110 4 25.00
30 EO 3S E+1 -430 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
Total : 214,0 / 432 = 49,54 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse
4 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 50,21 % 1 EO 3C S-1 -50 16 100.00
2 EO 1S S-1 -100 12 75.00
3 EO 2P W = -110 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 85,42 %
5 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 56,25 % 4 EO 4C N-1 -100 14 87.50
5 EO 3K W = -110 6 37.50
6 EO 4C N = 420 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
6 LAENENS René -DOUETTE Albert : 54,38 % 7 EO 2C W+1 -140 16 100.00
8 EO 3S W+2 -460 2 12.50
9 EO 2P S+2 170 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
9 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 55,42 %10 EO 4P W = -620 12 75.00
11 EO 1S S-1 -50 15 93.75
12 EO 3S S-2 -200 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 89,58 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -SPELLANZON Benoit : 40,21 %13 EO 3S W-4 400 0 0.00
14 EO 2C S-3 -150 13 81.25
15 EO 3S W+3 -490 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
10 - : 0,00 %16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
7 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 46,46 %19 EO 1S W = -90 4 25.00
20 EO 4P E = -620 0 0.00
21 EO 3C S = 140 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 14,58 %
2 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David : 45,83 %22 EO 3T S-1 -50 5 31.25
23 EO 3S N+1 630 1 6.25
24 EO 4K N = 130 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 50,21 %25 EO 1S E+2 -150 14 87.50
26 EO 3T W-1 100 13 81.25
27 EO 1ScE-2 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,04 %28 EO 3K S-1 -100 2 12.50
29 EO 3K E = -110 14 87.50
30 EO 3S E+1 -430 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
Total : 233,0 / 432 = 53,94 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 ROSOUX Louis -MOSSERAY Bernadette
5 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 56,25 % 1 EO 3S N = 400 5 31.25
2 EO 1S S = 90 6 37.50
3 EO 4P W-1 100 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
6 LAENENS René -DOUETTE Albert : 54,38 % 4 EO 2C N+1 140 5 31.25
5 EO 3K W = -110 6 37.50
6 EO 4C N+1 450 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
7 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 46,46 % 7 EO 3C W-1 100 11 68.75
8 EO 6C E = -980 9 56.25
9 EO 2P S+1 140 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,04 %10 EO 4P W = -620 12 75.00
11 EO 1S N+1 120 5 31.25
12 EO 1S N+1 120 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
10 - : 0,00 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -SPELLANZON Benoit : 40,21 %16 EO 3P E-1 100 6 37.50
17 EO 2T N+1 110 3 18.75
18 EO 5KcN-2 -500 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
4 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 50,21 %19 EO 3K E-2 200 0 0.00
20 EO 4P E+1 -650 7 43.75
21 EO 3C S = 140 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 50,21 %22 EO 2S S-1 -50 5 31.25
23 EO 4C N = 620 5 31.25
24 EO 2C W = -110 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
2 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David : 45,83 %25 EO 1S W+2 -150 14 87.50
26 EO 5T W-3 300 4 25.00
27 EO 3K S-1 -50 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
9 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 55,42 %28 EO 3T E+2 -150 4 25.00
29 EO 2P S = 110 4 25.00
30 EO 3S E+1 -430 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
Total : 192,0 / 432 = 44,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile
6 LAENENS René -DOUETTE Albert : 54,38 % 1 EO 2S N+2 180 8 50.00
2 EO 1S N+1 120 0 0.00
3 EO 4P W-1 100 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
7 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 46,46 % 4 EO 2P S+1 140 5 31.25
5 EO 3S W-2 100 0 0.00
6 EO 4C N = 420 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 50,21 % 7 EO 2P N-1 -100 14 87.50
8 EO 6S W = -990 12 75.00
9 EO 2P S+2 170 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
10 - : 0,00 %10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,04 %13 EO 2T S = 90 8 50.00
14 EO 2CcS-2 -300 16 100.00
15 EO 5K W+1 -420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
4 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 50,21 %16 EO 4P W-1 100 6 37.50
17 EO 3TcN-1 -100 16 100.00
18 EO 4C E+1 -450 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -SPELLANZON Benoit : 40,21 %19 EO 2S W = -120 7 43.75
20 EO 5P E+1 -680 15 93.75
21 EO 3C S-1 -100 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
5 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 56,25 %22 EO 3P W-2 200 0 0.00
23 EO 4C N-1 -100 14 87.50
24 EO 4CcW-2 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
9 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 55,42 %25 EO 2P S-1 -50 3 18.75
26 EO 4K E-5 500 2 12.50
27 EO 3S E-4 200 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 14,58 %
2 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David : 45,83 %28 EO 3S W-2 100 0 0.00
29 EO 2P S = 110 4 25.00
30 EO 3S E+1 -430 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
Total : 187,0 / 432 = 43,29 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 HAEDENS Jacqueline -SALFI Huguette
7 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 46,46 % 1 EO 2S N+1 150 11 68.75
2 EO 1S S = 90 6 37.50
3 EO 2P W = -110 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 50,21 % 4 EO 3P S+1 170 1 6.25
5 EO 3K W+1 -130 12 75.00
6 EO 4C N+1 450 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
9 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 55,42 % 7 EO 3C W-1 100 11 68.75
8 EO 6S W-1 50 0 0.00
9 EO 4P S = 420 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
2 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David : 45,83 %10 EO 4P W = -620 12 75.00
11 EO 1ScS+1 280 0 0.00
12 EO 3S S-1 -100 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
4 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 50,21 %13 EO 2P E-1 100 4 25.00
14 EO 2C S-2 -100 10 62.50
15 EO 6K E = -920 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,04 %16 EO 3P E = -140 12 75.00
17 EO 2T N = 90 9 56.25
18 EO 4C E+1 -450 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
5 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 56,25 %19 EO 1S W+2 -150 12 75.00
20 EO 4P E+1 -650 7 43.75
21 EO 2PcW-3 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -SPELLANZON Benoit : 40,21 %22 EO 2CcN-1 -100 10 62.50
23 EO 4C N-1 -100 14 87.50
24 EO 4C W-3 150 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
6 LAENENS René -DOUETTE Albert : 54,38 %25 EO 1S E+2 -150 14 87.50
26 EO 3C N+2 200 7 43.75
27 EO 2S E-1 50 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
10 - : 0,00 %28 EO BYE 0 0.00
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 214,0 / 432 = 49,54 %
|
|