|
Tournoi du 21-06-10
1 55,37 A.7 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François
2 54,63 A.4 CHANTRAINE René -CASSART Guy
3 54,07 A.3 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
~ 54,07 A.9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
5 52,78 A.8 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal
6 50,93 A.6 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette
7 50,37 A.2 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle
8 49,81 A10 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph
9 43,89 A11 FRAITURE Louis -PETIT Jean
10 43,15 A.1 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CLERIN François-Xavier
11 40,93 A.5 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 63,52 a.5 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
2 59,81 a.7 COLLIN Jean-Marie -EVRARD Armand
3 56,30 a.1 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian
4 54,26 a10 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
5 49,81 a.4 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques
6 47,78 a.9 GOFFINET Marcel -WARNIER François
7 45,74 a11 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire
8 44,26 a.3 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
~ 44,26 a.6 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne
10 42,22 a.8 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline
11 42,04 a.2 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
PAIRE Nr : A.1 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CLERIN François-Xavier
a.1 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 56,30 % 1 NS 3S S-1 -50 5 27.78
2 NS 3S N+2 660 14 77.78
3 NS 3K N-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a11 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 45,74 % 4 NS 2C N-3 -300 2 11.11
5 NS 4C W-1 50 14 77.78
6 NS 3P E-1 100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a10 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 54,26 % 7 NS 5T S = 600 10 55.56
8 NS 4P W = -420 6 33.33
9 NS 3S E = -600 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
a.9 GOFFINET Marcel -WARNIER François : 47,78 %10 NS 6P S = 1430 15 83.33
11 NS 1S W-1 50 13 72.22
12 NS 3S E+1 -430 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.8 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 42,22 %13 NS 3S W = -600 9 50.00
14 NS 2C S+1 140 18 100.00
15 NS 3C W+1 -170 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.7 COLLIN Jean-Marie -EVRARD Armand : 59,81 %16 NS 4C S = 420 10 55.56
17 NS 2P W = -110 4 22.22
18 NS 2P E = -110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.6 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 44,26 %19 NS 3S N = 400 4 22.22
20 NS 1S S-1 -100 6 33.33
21 NS 1S N-1 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
a.5 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 63,52 %22 NS 3S W+1 -630 5 27.78
23 NS 5T E-4 400 13 72.22
24 NS 4P E = -420 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.4 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 49,81 %25 NS 4C S+1 450 12 66.67
26 NS 4P N = 620 5 27.78
27 NS 3S E = -400 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.3 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 44,26 %28 NS 4P S = 620 4 22.22
29 NS 1P S+2 140 18 100.00
30 NS 2T W+1 -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 233,0 / 540 = 43,15 %
PAIRE Nr : A.2 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle
a.2 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 42,04 % 4 NS 1S E+3 -180 4 22.22
5 NS 3T W-3 150 18 100.00
6 NS 4P E-2 200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
a.1 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 56,30 % 7 NS 4P N-3 -300 0 0.00
8 NS 4C N-1 -50 17 94.44
9 NS 3S E-1 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a11 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 45,74 %10 NS 6P S = 1430 15 83.33
11 NS 3C N-1 -50 4 22.22
12 NS 4C W = -420 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a10 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 54,26 %13 NS 3S W = -600 9 50.00
14 NS 2S S-2 -100 3 16.67
15 NS 2C W+2 -170 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
a.9 GOFFINET Marcel -WARNIER François : 47,78 %16 NS 3C S+1 170 2 11.11
17 NS 2P W = -110 4 22.22
18 NS 1S N-1 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.8 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 42,22 %19 NS 3S N+2 460 17 94.44
20 NS 2S N = 120 16 88.89
21 NS 1S W = -90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
a.7 COLLIN Jean-Marie -EVRARD Armand : 59,81 %22 NS 3S W+1 -630 5 27.78
23 NS 2S E = -120 2 11.11
24 NS 3S E-3 150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.6 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 44,26 %25 NS 4C S = 420 3 16.67
26 NS 4P N+1 650 15 83.33
27 NS 3S E = -400 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.5 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 63,52 %28 NS 4P S+2 680 12 66.67
29 NS 1S W-1 100 10 55.56
30 NS 2T N-5 -250 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.4 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 49,81 %31 NS 4C S-1 -100 7 38.89
32 NS 2S W+2 -180 5 27.78
33 NS 2P N = 110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 272,0 / 540 = 50,37 %
PAIRE Nr : A.3 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
a.5 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 63,52 % 1 NS 3S S-1 -50 5 27.78
2 NS 6S N-2 -200 1 5.56
3 NS 3S N-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
a.3 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 44,26 % 7 NS 4T N+1 150 8 44.44
8 NS 4C N-3 -150 10 55.56
9 NS 3S E-1 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.2 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 42,04 %10 NS 6P S = 1430 15 83.33
11 NS 4K E = -130 0 0.00
12 NS 4C W = -420 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.1 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 56,30 %13 NS 3S E = -600 9 50.00
14 NS 3C N-1 -50 9 50.00
15 NS 3T N+2 150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a11 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 45,74 %16 NS 3C S+2 200 6 33.33
17 NS 2P W-1 50 11 61.11
18 NS 2P W = -110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a10 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 54,26 %19 NS 3S N+2 460 17 94.44
20 NS 2T N-1 -100 6 33.33
21 NS 2K W-3 150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
a.9 GOFFINET Marcel -WARNIER François : 47,78 %22 NS 3S W = -600 11 61.11
23 NS 2C W-2 200 9 50.00
24 NS 3S E-2 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.8 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 42,22 %25 NS 4C S+1 450 12 66.67
26 NS 4P N = 620 5 27.78
27 NS 3S E = -400 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.7 COLLIN Jean-Marie -EVRARD Armand : 59,81 %28 NS 3S N+4 720 18 100.00
29 NS 2P S-1 -100 3 16.67
30 NS 2S E = -120 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.6 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 44,26 %31 NS 2P N+2 170 16 88.89
32 NS 2S W = -120 16 88.89
33 NS 2C W-2 100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
Total : 292,0 / 540 = 54,07 %
PAIRE Nr : A.4 CHANTRAINE René -CASSART Guy
a.7 COLLIN Jean-Marie -EVRARD Armand : 59,81 % 1 NS 3S N-1 -50 5 27.78
2 NS 6S N-2 -200 1 5.56
3 NS 3C N = 140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.6 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 44,26 % 4 NS 2P E = -110 12 66.67
5 NS 3S E-1 50 14 77.78
6 NS 3PcE-1 200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
a.4 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 49,81 %10 NS 4P S+2 680 5 27.78
11 NS 4K E-1 50 13 72.22
12 NS 4C W = -420 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.3 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 44,26 %13 NS 3S E = -600 9 50.00
14 NS 3C N-1 -50 9 50.00
15 NS 3C E-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.2 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 42,04 %16 NS 4C S+1 450 16 88.89
17 NS 4P W-2 100 16 88.89
18 NS 2P W+1 -140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.1 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 56,30 %19 NS 3S N+1 430 12 66.67
20 NS 2C W-2 200 18 100.00
21 NS 2K N-4 -400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a11 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 45,74 %22 NS 3S W-1 100 16 88.89
23 NS 2P S = 110 6 33.33
24 NS 4C E-2 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
a10 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 54,26 %25 NS 4C S = 420 3 16.67
26 NS 4P N = 620 5 27.78
27 NS 6T E-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.9 GOFFINET Marcel -WARNIER François : 47,78 %28 NS 7P S-1 -100 0 0.00
29 NS 1P S = 80 8 44.44
30 NS 4PcW-1 100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.8 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 42,22 %31 NS 4C S-1 -100 7 38.89
32 NS 3S W = -600 2 11.11
33 NS 3CcW-2 300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 295,0 / 540 = 54,63 %
PAIRE Nr : A.5 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques
a.9 GOFFINET Marcel -WARNIER François : 47,78 % 1 NS 3S S-1 -50 5 27.78
2 NS 3S N+2 660 14 77.78
3 NS Pass Passe 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.8 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 42,22 % 4 NS 2C E-1 100 17 94.44
5 NS 3S W-1 50 14 77.78
6 NS 3P E-1 100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
a.7 COLLIN Jean-Marie -EVRARD Armand : 59,81 % 7 NS 5T S-1 -100 3 16.67
8 NS 4PcW+1 -690 1 5.56
9 NS 1S E+3 -180 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
a.5 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 63,52 %13 NS 3S E = -600 9 50.00
14 NS 4CcS-2 -300 0 0.00
15 NS 2C +2 -170 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
a.4 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 49,81 %16 NS 2C S+2 170 2 11.11
17 NS 2P W-1 50 11 61.11
18 NS 1C S = 80 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.3 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 44,26 %19 NS 3S N = 400 4 22.22
20 NS 3S S-4 -400 1 5.56
21 NS Pass Passe 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
a.2 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 42,04 %22 NS 5K E = -600 11 61.11
23 NS 2C W-2 200 9 50.00
24 NS 3S E-2 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.1 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 56,30 %25 NS 4C S+1 450 12 66.67
26 NS 4P N = 620 5 27.78
27 NS 3S W+2 -460 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a11 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 45,74 %28 NS 2S N+2 180 2 11.11
29 NS 1S W = -90 6 33.33
30 NS 2P W = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a10 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 54,26 %31 NS 2T N = 90 12 66.67
32 NS 2S W+2 -180 5 27.78
33 NS 3C E-2 100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 221,0 / 540 = 40,93 %
PAIRE Nr : A.6 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette
a11 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 45,74 % 1 NS 2S S-1 -50 5 27.78
2 NS 3S N+2 660 14 77.78
3 NS 3S S = 400 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
a10 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 54,26 % 4 NS 1S E+2 -150 6 33.33
5 NS 2K W = -90 10 55.56
6 NS 2S S-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
a.9 GOFFINET Marcel -WARNIER François : 47,78 % 7 NS 3S S+1 630 13 72.22
8 NS 4C N-2 -100 13 72.22
9 NS 3S E-1 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.8 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 42,22 %10 NS 4P S+2 680 5 27.78
11 NS 4K E-1 50 13 72.22
12 NS 3S E+1 -430 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.6 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 44,26 %16 NS 4C S+1 450 16 88.89
17 NS 2C N-1 -50 8 44.44
18 NS 2P E-1 50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
a.5 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 63,52 %19 NS 4P S = 420 8 44.44
20 NS 2C W-1 100 14 77.78
21 NS 1S W-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.4 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 49,81 %22 NS 3S W+2 -660 0 0.00
23 NS 2T E+1 -110 4 22.22
24 NS 4P E-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
a.3 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 44,26 %25 NS 4C S+1 450 12 66.67
26 NS 4P N+1 650 15 83.33
27 NS 4C E-3 150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
a.2 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 42,04 %28 NS 4P S+2 680 12 66.67
29 NS 2P S-1 -100 3 16.67
30 NS 2S E = -120 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.1 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 56,30 %31 NS 4C S-2 -200 1 5.56
32 NS 2S W+1 -150 11 61.11
33 NS 2C W+1 -140 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
Total : 275,0 / 540 = 50,93 %
PAIRE Nr : A.7 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François
a.2 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 42,04 % 1 NS 3S N+1 430 18 100.00
2 NS 6C S-1 -100 6 33.33
3 NS 3P N-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.1 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 56,30 % 4 NS 2P S-1 -100 14 77.78
5 NS 3S E+1 -430 1 5.56
6 NS 2S S-1 -50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
a11 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 45,74 % 7 NS 6T S-1 -100 3 16.67
8 NS 5CcN-1 -100 13 72.22
9 NS 3S E-1 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a10 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 54,26 %10 NS 4P S+2 680 5 27.78
11 NS 4K E-1 50 13 72.22
12 NS 3S E+4 -520 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.9 GOFFINET Marcel -WARNIER François : 47,78 %13 NS 3S W = -600 9 50.00
14 NS Pass Passe 14 77.78
15 NS 3T N+1 130 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a.7 COLLIN Jean-Marie -EVRARD Armand : 59,81 %19 NS 3S N = 400 4 22.22
20 NS 3T N-4 -400 1 5.56
21 NS 1S E-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
a.6 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 44,26 %22 NS 3S W-1 100 16 88.89
23 NS 3KcE-4 1100 18 100.00
24 NS 3S E-2 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
a.5 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 63,52 %25 NS 4C S+1 450 12 66.67
26 NS 4C N+1 650 15 83.33
27 NS 3S E+2 -460 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.4 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 49,81 %28 NS 3S N+2 660 6 33.33
29 NS 1P S+1 110 14 77.78
30 NS 2P W = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.3 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 44,26 %31 NS 3S N = 600 18 100.00
32 NS 3S W-3 300 18 100.00
33 NS 2P N = 110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
Total : 299,0 / 540 = 55,37 %
PAIRE Nr : A.8 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal
a.4 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 49,81 % 1 NS 2S S+1 150 14 77.78
2 NS 6S N-1 -100 6 33.33
3 NS 2K N-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.3 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 44,26 % 4 NS 3S W-1 100 17 94.44
5 NS 2C W+3 -200 6 33.33
6 NS 3P E-1 100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.2 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 42,04 % 7 NS 3S S+1 630 13 72.22
8 NS 5CcN-2 -300 8 44.44
9 NS 3S E-2 200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
a.1 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 56,30 %10 NS 4P S+2 680 5 27.78
11 NS 3C N-1 -50 4 22.22
12 NS 3S E = -400 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a11 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 45,74 %13 NS 3S E-1 100 18 100.00
14 NS 3P S-1 -50 9 50.00
15 NS 3T S = 110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a10 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 54,26 %16 NS 4C S+1 450 16 88.89
17 NS 3PcW-1 100 16 88.89
18 NS 2P E = -110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
a.8 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 42,22 %22 NS 3S W-1 100 16 88.89
23 NS 3P N-2 -200 0 0.00
24 NS 4P E = -420 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
a.7 COLLIN Jean-Marie -EVRARD Armand : 59,81 %25 NS 5C S-1 -50 0 0.00
26 NS 4P N+1 650 15 83.33
27 NS 4C E-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.6 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 44,26 %28 NS 4P S+2 680 12 66.67
29 NS 2P S-2 -200 0 0.00
30 NS 2P E-2 100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.5 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 63,52 %31 NS 2S S-2 -200 1 5.56
32 NS 1S W+2 -150 11 61.11
33 NS 2C W+1 -140 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
Total : 285,0 / 540 = 52,78 %
PAIRE Nr : A.9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
a.6 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 44,26 % 1 NS 3S N-1 -50 5 27.78
2 NS 6S N = 1440 18 100.00
3 NS 2C N+1 140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.5 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 63,52 % 4 NS 1S W+1 -120 9 50.00
5 NS 3S E+1 -430 1 5.56
6 NS 3P E-1 100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
a.4 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 49,81 % 7 NS 4S S+1 660 17 94.44
8 NS 4PcW+1 -690 1 5.56
9 NS 3S E-1 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.3 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 44,26 %10 NS 6P S = 1430 15 83.33
11 NS 3K E-1 50 13 72.22
12 NS 3S E+1 -430 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.2 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 42,04 %13 NS 3S W = -600 9 50.00
14 NS 3C S-1 -50 9 50.00
15 NS 4TcS = 710 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.1 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 56,30 %16 NS 4C S = 420 10 55.56
17 NS 3P W-2 100 16 88.89
18 NS 1S N-2 -200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a11 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 45,74 %19 NS 3S S+1 430 12 66.67
20 NS 1S N = 90 11 61.11
21 NS 2K W = -90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.9 GOFFINET Marcel -WARNIER François : 47,78 %25 NS 4C S+1 450 12 66.67
26 NS 4P N = 620 5 27.78
27 NS 4C E-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.8 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 42,22 %28 NS 4P S+2 680 12 66.67
29 NS 1P S+1 110 14 77.78
30 NS 3KcS-3 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.7 COLLIN Jean-Marie -EVRARD Armand : 59,81 %31 NS 2T N+1 110 14 77.78
32 NS 1S W+2 -150 11 61.11
33 NS 3P N-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 292,0 / 540 = 54,07 %
PAIRE Nr : A10 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph
a.8 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 42,22 % 1 NS 2P N+2 170 16 88.89
2 NS 5C S = 650 10 55.56
3 NS 3S S+2 460 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
a.7 COLLIN Jean-Marie -EVRARD Armand : 59,81 % 4 NS 1S W+1 -120 9 50.00
5 NS 3S E = -400 4 22.22
6 NS 2S S = 120 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.6 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 44,26 % 7 NS 4C E-1 100 6 33.33
8 NS 3PcE+1 -630 4 22.22
9 NS 3S W-1 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.5 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 63,52 %10 NS 5P S+1 680 5 27.78
11 NS 4K E-1 50 13 72.22
12 NS 3S W+1 -430 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.4 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 49,81 %13 NS 3S E = -600 9 50.00
14 NS 2C N = 110 16 88.89
15 NS 2S S = 120 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a.3 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 44,26 %16 NS 3C S+1 170 2 11.11
17 NS 2PcS-3 -500 0 0.00
18 NS 1S N-1 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
a.2 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 42,04 %19 NS 3S N+1 430 12 66.67
20 NS 1S N-1 -100 6 33.33
21 NS 1S W-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.1 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 56,30 %22 NS 3S W+1 -630 5 27.78
23 NS 4C W-4 400 13 72.22
24 NS 4P W-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a10 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 54,26 %28 NS 4P S+2 680 12 66.67
29 NS 1P S+1 110 14 77.78
30 NS 4P W = -420 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.9 GOFFINET Marcel -WARNIER François : 47,78 %31 NS 4C S-1 -100 7 38.89
32 NS 3S E+1 -630 0 0.00
33 NS 2P N = 110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 269,0 / 540 = 49,81 %
PAIRE Nr : A11 FRAITURE Louis -PETIT Jean
a10 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 54,26 % 1 NS 2P N+1 140 12 66.67
2 NS 6S N-1 -100 6 33.33
3 NS 2K N = 90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.9 GOFFINET Marcel -WARNIER François : 47,78 % 4 NS 3S W = -600 0 0.00
5 NS 3K W = -110 8 44.44
6 NS 3T N = 110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.8 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 42,22 % 7 NS 3S S+2 660 17 94.44
8 NS 5K S-1 -50 17 94.44
9 NS 3S E-1 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
a.7 COLLIN Jean-Marie -EVRARD Armand : 59,81 %10 NS 4P S+2 680 5 27.78
11 NS 3C N-1 -50 4 22.22
12 NS 3S E+1 -430 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
a.6 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 44,26 %13 NS 3S W+2 -660 0 0.00
14 NS 3C N-2 -100 3 16.67
15 NS 3C W = -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
a.5 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 63,52 %16 NS 4C S = 420 10 55.56
17 NS 2P W = -110 4 22.22
18 NS 3T N-2 -200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
a.4 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 49,81 %19 NS 6T S-2 -100 0 0.00
20 NS 2T N = 90 11 61.11
21 NS 2K W-2 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.3 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 44,26 %22 NS 3S W+1 -630 5 27.78
23 NS 3CcW-3 800 16 88.89
24 NS 4P E-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.2 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 42,04 %25 NS 4C S+1 450 12 66.67
26 NS 4P N = 620 5 27.78
27 NS 4C E = -420 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a11 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 45,74 %31 NS 4C S-1 -100 7 38.89
32 NS 2S W+1 -150 11 61.11
33 NS 2P N = 110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
Total : 237,0 / 540 = 43,89 %
PAIRE Nr : a.1 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian
A.1 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CLERIN François-Xavier : 43,15 % 1 EO 3S S-1 -50 13 72.22
2 EO 3S N+2 660 4 22.22
3 EO 3K N-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.7 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 55,37 % 4 EO 2P S-1 -100 4 22.22
5 EO 3S E+1 -430 17 94.44
6 EO 2S S-1 -50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
A.2 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 50,37 % 7 EO 4P N-3 -300 18 100.00
8 EO 4C N-1 -50 1 5.56
9 EO 3S E-1 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.8 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal : 52,78 %10 EO 4P S+2 680 13 72.22
11 EO 3C N-1 -50 14 77.78
12 EO 3S E = -400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 54,07 %13 EO 3S E = -600 9 50.00
14 EO 3C N-1 -50 9 50.00
15 EO 3T N+2 150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,07 %16 EO 4C S = 420 8 44.44
17 EO 3P W-2 100 2 11.11
18 EO 1S N-2 -200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.4 CHANTRAINE René -CASSART Guy : 54,63 %19 EO 3S N+1 430 6 33.33
20 EO 2C W-2 200 0 0.00
21 EO 2K N-4 -400 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A10 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 49,81 %22 EO 3S W+1 -630 13 72.22
23 EO 4C W-4 400 5 27.78
24 EO 4P W-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.5 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,93 %25 EO 4C S+1 450 6 33.33
26 EO 4P N = 620 13 72.22
27 EO 3S W+2 -460 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.6 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 50,93 %31 EO 4C S-2 -200 17 94.44
32 EO 2S W+1 -150 7 38.89
33 EO 2C W+1 -140 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
Total : 304,0 / 540 = 56,30 %
PAIRE Nr : a.2 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
A.7 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 55,37 % 1 EO 3S N+1 430 0 0.00
2 EO 6C S-1 -100 12 66.67
3 EO 3P N-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.2 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 50,37 % 4 EO 1S E+3 -180 14 77.78
5 EO 3T W-3 150 0 0.00
6 EO 4P E-2 200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
A.8 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal : 52,78 % 7 EO 3S S+1 630 5 27.78
8 EO 5CcN-2 -300 10 55.56
9 EO 3S E-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
A.3 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 54,07 %10 EO 6P S = 1430 3 16.67
11 EO 4K E = -130 18 100.00
12 EO 4C W = -420 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,07 %13 EO 3S W = -600 9 50.00
14 EO 3C S-1 -50 9 50.00
15 EO 4TcS = 710 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.4 CHANTRAINE René -CASSART Guy : 54,63 %16 EO 4C S+1 450 2 11.11
17 EO 4P W-2 100 2 11.11
18 EO 2P W+1 -140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A10 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 49,81 %19 EO 3S N+1 430 6 33.33
20 EO 1S N-1 -100 12 66.67
21 EO 1S W-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.5 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,93 %22 EO 5K E = -600 7 38.89
23 EO 2C W-2 200 9 50.00
24 EO 3S E-2 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A11 FRAITURE Louis -PETIT Jean : 43,89 %25 EO 4C S+1 450 6 33.33
26 EO 4P N = 620 13 72.22
27 EO 4C E = -420 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.6 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 50,93 %28 EO 4P S+2 680 6 33.33
29 EO 2P S-1 -100 15 83.33
30 EO 2S E = -120 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 227,0 / 540 = 42,04 %
PAIRE Nr : a.3 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
A.8 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal : 52,78 % 4 EO 3S W-1 100 1 5.56
5 EO 2C W+3 -200 12 66.67
6 EO 3P E-1 100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.3 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 54,07 % 7 EO 4T N+1 150 10 55.56
8 EO 4C N-3 -150 8 44.44
9 EO 3S E-1 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,07 %10 EO 6P S = 1430 3 16.67
11 EO 3K E-1 50 5 27.78
12 EO 3S E+1 -430 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.4 CHANTRAINE René -CASSART Guy : 54,63 %13 EO 3S E = -600 9 50.00
14 EO 3C N-1 -50 9 50.00
15 EO 3C E-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A10 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 49,81 %16 EO 3C S+1 170 16 88.89
17 EO 2PcS-3 -500 18 100.00
18 EO 1S N-1 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
A.5 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,93 %19 EO 3S N = 400 14 77.78
20 EO 3S S-4 -400 17 94.44
21 EO Pass Passe 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
A11 FRAITURE Louis -PETIT Jean : 43,89 %22 EO 3S W+1 -630 13 72.22
23 EO 3CcW-3 800 2 11.11
24 EO 4P E-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.6 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 50,93 %25 EO 4C S+1 450 6 33.33
26 EO 4P N+1 650 3 16.67
27 EO 4C E-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
A.1 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CLERIN François-Xavier : 43,15 %28 EO 4P S = 620 14 77.78
29 EO 1P S+2 140 0 0.00
30 EO 2T W+1 -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.7 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 55,37 %31 EO 3S N = 600 0 0.00
32 EO 3S W-3 300 0 0.00
33 EO 2P N = 110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
Total : 239,0 / 540 = 44,26 %
PAIRE Nr : a.4 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques
A.8 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal : 52,78 % 1 EO 2S S+1 150 4 22.22
2 EO 6S N-1 -100 12 66.67
3 EO 2K N-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,07 % 7 EO 4S S+1 660 1 5.56
8 EO 4PcW+1 -690 17 94.44
9 EO 3S E-1 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.4 CHANTRAINE René -CASSART Guy : 54,63 %10 EO 4P S+2 680 13 72.22
11 EO 4K E-1 50 5 27.78
12 EO 4C W = -420 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A10 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 49,81 %13 EO 3S E = -600 9 50.00
14 EO 2C N = 110 2 11.11
15 EO 2S S = 120 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A.5 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,93 %16 EO 2C S+2 170 16 88.89
17 EO 2P W-1 50 7 38.89
18 EO 1C S = 80 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A11 FRAITURE Louis -PETIT Jean : 43,89 %19 EO 6T S-2 -100 18 100.00
20 EO 2T N = 90 7 38.89
21 EO 2K W-2 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.6 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 50,93 %22 EO 3S W+2 -660 18 100.00
23 EO 2T E+1 -110 14 77.78
24 EO 4P E-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
A.1 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CLERIN François-Xavier : 43,15 %25 EO 4C S+1 450 6 33.33
26 EO 4P N = 620 13 72.22
27 EO 3S E = -400 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.7 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 55,37 %28 EO 3S N+2 660 12 66.67
29 EO 1P S+1 110 4 22.22
30 EO 2P W = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.2 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 50,37 %31 EO 4C S-1 -100 11 61.11
32 EO 2S W+2 -180 13 72.22
33 EO 2P N = 110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 269,0 / 540 = 49,81 %
PAIRE Nr : a.5 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
A.3 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 54,07 % 1 EO 3S S-1 -50 13 72.22
2 EO 6S N-2 -200 17 94.44
3 EO 3S N-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
A.9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,07 % 4 EO 1S W+1 -120 9 50.00
5 EO 3S E+1 -430 17 94.44
6 EO 3P E-1 100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
A10 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 49,81 %10 EO 5P S+1 680 13 72.22
11 EO 4K E-1 50 5 27.78
12 EO 3S W+1 -430 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.5 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,93 %13 EO 3S E = -600 9 50.00
14 EO 4CcS-2 -300 18 100.00
15 EO 2C +2 -170 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
A11 FRAITURE Louis -PETIT Jean : 43,89 %16 EO 4C S = 420 8 44.44
17 EO 2P W = -110 14 77.78
18 EO 3T N-2 -200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
A.6 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 50,93 %19 EO 4P S = 420 10 55.56
20 EO 2C W-1 100 4 22.22
21 EO 1S W-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.1 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CLERIN François-Xavier : 43,15 %22 EO 3S W+1 -630 13 72.22
23 EO 5T E-4 400 5 27.78
24 EO 4P E = -420 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.7 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 55,37 %25 EO 4C S+1 450 6 33.33
26 EO 4C N+1 650 3 16.67
27 EO 3S E+2 -460 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.2 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 50,37 %28 EO 4P S+2 680 6 33.33
29 EO 1S W-1 100 8 44.44
30 EO 2T N-5 -250 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.8 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal : 52,78 %31 EO 2S S-2 -200 17 94.44
32 EO 1S W+2 -150 7 38.89
33 EO 2C W+1 -140 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
Total : 343,0 / 540 = 63,52 %
PAIRE Nr : a.6 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne
A.9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,07 % 1 EO 3S N-1 -50 13 72.22
2 EO 6S N = 1440 0 0.00
3 EO 2C N+1 140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.4 CHANTRAINE René -CASSART Guy : 54,63 % 4 EO 2P E = -110 6 33.33
5 EO 3S E-1 50 4 22.22
6 EO 3PcE-1 200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
A10 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 49,81 % 7 EO 4C E-1 100 12 66.67
8 EO 3PcE+1 -630 14 77.78
9 EO 3S W-1 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A11 FRAITURE Louis -PETIT Jean : 43,89 %13 EO 3S W+2 -660 18 100.00
14 EO 3C N-2 -100 15 83.33
15 EO 3C W = -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
A.6 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 50,93 %16 EO 4C S+1 450 2 11.11
17 EO 2C N-1 -50 10 55.56
18 EO 2P E-1 50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
A.1 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CLERIN François-Xavier : 43,15 %19 EO 3S N = 400 14 77.78
20 EO 1S S-1 -100 12 66.67
21 EO 1S N-1 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
A.7 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 55,37 %22 EO 3S W-1 100 2 11.11
23 EO 3KcE-4 1100 0 0.00
24 EO 3S E-2 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
A.2 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 50,37 %25 EO 4C S = 420 15 83.33
26 EO 4P N+1 650 3 16.67
27 EO 3S E = -400 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.8 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal : 52,78 %28 EO 4P S+2 680 6 33.33
29 EO 2P S-2 -200 18 100.00
30 EO 2P E-2 100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.3 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 54,07 %31 EO 2P N+2 170 2 11.11
32 EO 2S W = -120 2 11.11
33 EO 2C W-2 100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
Total : 239,0 / 540 = 44,26 %
PAIRE Nr : a.7 COLLIN Jean-Marie -EVRARD Armand
A.4 CHANTRAINE René -CASSART Guy : 54,63 % 1 EO 3S N-1 -50 13 72.22
2 EO 6S N-2 -200 17 94.44
3 EO 3C N = 140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A10 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 49,81 % 4 EO 1S W+1 -120 9 50.00
5 EO 3S E = -400 14 77.78
6 EO 2S S = 120 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.5 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,93 % 7 EO 5T S-1 -100 15 83.33
8 EO 4PcW+1 -690 17 94.44
9 EO 1S E+3 -180 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
A11 FRAITURE Louis -PETIT Jean : 43,89 %10 EO 4P S+2 680 13 72.22
11 EO 3C N-1 -50 14 77.78
12 EO 3S E+1 -430 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
A.1 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CLERIN François-Xavier : 43,15 %16 EO 4C S = 420 8 44.44
17 EO 2P W = -110 14 77.78
18 EO 2P E = -110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.7 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 55,37 %19 EO 3S N = 400 14 77.78
20 EO 3T N-4 -400 17 94.44
21 EO 1S E-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
A.2 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 50,37 %22 EO 3S W+1 -630 13 72.22
23 EO 2S E = -120 16 88.89
24 EO 3S E-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.8 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal : 52,78 %25 EO 5C S-1 -50 18 100.00
26 EO 4P N+1 650 3 16.67
27 EO 4C E-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.3 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 54,07 %28 EO 3S N+4 720 0 0.00
29 EO 2P S-1 -100 15 83.33
30 EO 2S E = -120 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,07 %31 EO 2T N+1 110 4 22.22
32 EO 1S W+2 -150 7 38.89
33 EO 3P N-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 323,0 / 540 = 59,81 %
PAIRE Nr : a.8 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline
A10 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 49,81 % 1 EO 2P N+2 170 2 11.11
2 EO 5C S = 650 8 44.44
3 EO 3S S+2 460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
A.5 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,93 % 4 EO 2C E-1 100 1 5.56
5 EO 3S W-1 50 4 22.22
6 EO 3P E-1 100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
A11 FRAITURE Louis -PETIT Jean : 43,89 % 7 EO 3S S+2 660 1 5.56
8 EO 5K S-1 -50 1 5.56
9 EO 3S E-1 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
A.6 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 50,93 %10 EO 4P S+2 680 13 72.22
11 EO 4K E-1 50 5 27.78
12 EO 3S E+1 -430 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.1 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CLERIN François-Xavier : 43,15 %13 EO 3S W = -600 9 50.00
14 EO 2C S+1 140 0 0.00
15 EO 3C W+1 -170 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.2 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 50,37 %19 EO 3S N+2 460 1 5.56
20 EO 2S N = 120 2 11.11
21 EO 1S W = -90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
A.8 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal : 52,78 %22 EO 3S W-1 100 2 11.11
23 EO 3P N-2 -200 18 100.00
24 EO 4P E = -420 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
A.3 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 54,07 %25 EO 4C S+1 450 6 33.33
26 EO 4P N = 620 13 72.22
27 EO 3S E = -400 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,07 %28 EO 4P S+2 680 6 33.33
29 EO 1P S+1 110 4 22.22
30 EO 3KcS-3 -500 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.4 CHANTRAINE René -CASSART Guy : 54,63 %31 EO 4C S-1 -100 11 61.11
32 EO 3S W = -600 16 88.89
33 EO 3CcW-2 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 228,0 / 540 = 42,22 %
PAIRE Nr : a.9 GOFFINET Marcel -WARNIER François
A.5 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,93 % 1 EO 3S S-1 -50 13 72.22
2 EO 3S N+2 660 4 22.22
3 EO Pass Passe 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A11 FRAITURE Louis -PETIT Jean : 43,89 % 4 EO 3S W = -600 18 100.00
5 EO 3K W = -110 10 55.56
6 EO 3T N = 110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A.6 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 50,93 % 7 EO 3S S+1 630 5 27.78
8 EO 4C N-2 -100 5 27.78
9 EO 3S E-1 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.1 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CLERIN François-Xavier : 43,15 %10 EO 6P S = 1430 3 16.67
11 EO 1S W-1 50 5 27.78
12 EO 3S E+1 -430 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.7 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 55,37 %13 EO 3S W = -600 9 50.00
14 EO Pass Passe 4 22.22
15 EO 3T N+1 130 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A.2 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 50,37 %16 EO 3C S+1 170 16 88.89
17 EO 2P W = -110 14 77.78
18 EO 1S N-1 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.3 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 54,07 %22 EO 3S W = -600 7 38.89
23 EO 2C W-2 200 9 50.00
24 EO 3S E-2 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,07 %25 EO 4C S+1 450 6 33.33
26 EO 4P N = 620 13 72.22
27 EO 4C E-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A.4 CHANTRAINE René -CASSART Guy : 54,63 %28 EO 7P S-1 -100 18 100.00
29 EO 1P S = 80 10 55.56
30 EO 4PcW-1 100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A10 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 49,81 %31 EO 4C S-1 -100 11 61.11
32 EO 3S E+1 -630 18 100.00
33 EO 2P N = 110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 258,0 / 540 = 47,78 %
PAIRE Nr : a10 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
A11 FRAITURE Louis -PETIT Jean : 43,89 % 1 EO 2P N+1 140 6 33.33
2 EO 6S N-1 -100 12 66.67
3 EO 2K N = 90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.6 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 50,93 % 4 EO 1S E+2 -150 12 66.67
5 EO 2K W = -90 8 44.44
6 EO 2S S-3 -150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
A.1 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CLERIN François-Xavier : 43,15 % 7 EO 5T S = 600 8 44.44
8 EO 4P W = -420 12 66.67
9 EO 3S E = -600 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
A.7 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 55,37 %10 EO 4P S+2 680 13 72.22
11 EO 4K E-1 50 5 27.78
12 EO 3S E+4 -520 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.2 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 50,37 %13 EO 3S W = -600 9 50.00
14 EO 2S S-2 -100 15 83.33
15 EO 2C W+2 -170 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
A.8 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal : 52,78 %16 EO 4C S+1 450 2 11.11
17 EO 3PcW-1 100 2 11.11
18 EO 2P E = -110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
A.3 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 54,07 %19 EO 3S N+2 460 1 5.56
20 EO 2T N-1 -100 12 66.67
21 EO 2K W-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
A.4 CHANTRAINE René -CASSART Guy : 54,63 %25 EO 4C S = 420 15 83.33
26 EO 4P N = 620 13 72.22
27 EO 6T E-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A10 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 49,81 %28 EO 4P S+2 680 6 33.33
29 EO 1P S+1 110 4 22.22
30 EO 4P W = -420 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.5 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,93 %31 EO 2T N = 90 6 33.33
32 EO 2S W+2 -180 13 72.22
33 EO 3C E-2 100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 293,0 / 540 = 54,26 %
PAIRE Nr : a11 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire
A.6 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 50,93 % 1 EO 2S S-1 -50 13 72.22
2 EO 3S N+2 660 4 22.22
3 EO 3S S = 400 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
A.1 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CLERIN François-Xavier : 43,15 % 4 EO 2C N-3 -300 16 88.89
5 EO 4C W-1 50 4 22.22
6 EO 3P E-1 100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.7 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 55,37 % 7 EO 6T S-1 -100 15 83.33
8 EO 5CcN-1 -100 5 27.78
9 EO 3S E-1 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.2 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 50,37 %10 EO 6P S = 1430 3 16.67
11 EO 3C N-1 -50 14 77.78
12 EO 4C W = -420 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.8 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal : 52,78 %13 EO 3S E-1 100 0 0.00
14 EO 3P S-1 -50 9 50.00
15 EO 3T S = 110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A.3 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 54,07 %16 EO 3C S+2 200 12 66.67
17 EO 2P W-1 50 7 38.89
18 EO 2P W = -110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,07 %19 EO 3S S+1 430 6 33.33
20 EO 1S N = 90 7 38.89
21 EO 2K W = -90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.4 CHANTRAINE René -CASSART Guy : 54,63 %22 EO 3S W-1 100 2 11.11
23 EO 2P S = 110 12 66.67
24 EO 4C E-2 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
A.5 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,93 %28 EO 2S N+2 180 16 88.89
29 EO 1S W = -90 12 66.67
30 EO 2P W = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A11 FRAITURE Louis -PETIT Jean : 43,89 %31 EO 4C S-1 -100 11 61.11
32 EO 2S W+1 -150 7 38.89
33 EO 2P N = 110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
Total : 247,0 / 540 = 45,74 %
|
|