|
Tournoi du 22-03-10
1 64,88 12 MATELART Marc -de TERWANGNE Philippe
2 62,81 3 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile
3 53,03 2 FRAITURE Louis -de WASSEIGE Claude
4 52,48 7 GELISSEN Edouard -VERBOIS Léon
5 52,07 10 VANDAM Jean -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie
6 49,72 6 WARNIER François -MASSAUX Jacques
7 49,59 5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
8 47,11 9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
9 46,97 4 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire
10 44,77 11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COURTOIS Patrick
11 43,94 1 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert
12 32,64 8 DOUMONT Hervé -TELLIN Jean-Pierre
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 63,36 24 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian
2 59,37 13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
3 58,68 18 SERRANE Francis -de LAMINE de BEX Nathalie
4 54,96 22 WILLEMS Jacques -PIETQUIN Joseph
5 53,31 16 SALFI Huguette -BRIOT Fernand
6 47,93 23 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne
7 46,42 21 EVRARD Armand -de WASSEIGE Ariane
~ 46,42 17 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
9 44,35 19 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard
10 43,94 14 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse
11 42,29 15 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean
12 38,98 20 NIGOT Pierre -MACAUX Lucienne
PAIRE Nr : 1 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 59,37 % 1 NS 4C W-4 200 10 45.45
2 NS 3T N = 110 0 0.00
3 NS 3S N+1 430 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
23 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 47,93 % 4 NS 3S W = -600 3 13.64
5 NS 4C W-1 50 17 77.27
6 NS 1S E+1 -120 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
22 WILLEMS Jacques -PIETQUIN Joseph : 54,96 % 7 NS 4P W+3 -710 5 22.73
8 NS 2S W+1 -150 3 13.64
9 NS 2C N-1 -50 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
21 EVRARD Armand -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 46,42 %10 NS 2P E = -110 17 77.27
11 NS 3S S+3 490 22 100.00
12 NS 2S W-1 50 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
20 NIGOT Pierre -MACAUX Lucienne : 38,98 %13 NS 4C N-1 -100 7 31.82
14 NS 4C W-1 50 19 86.36
15 NS 4C S = 620 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
19 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 44,35 %16 NS 3S E = -600 10 45.45
17 NS 4C E-1 50 20 90.91
18 NS 4C S-2 -200 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
18 SERRANE Francis -de LAMINE de BEX Nathalie : 58,68 %19 NS 2S S = 120 16 72.73
20 NS 4C N-2 -200 3 13.64
21 NS 4C W-1 50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
17 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 46,42 %22 NS 1S E+1 -120 10 45.45
23 NS 4C W = -620 0 0.00
24 NS 3S E-2 100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
16 SALFI Huguette -BRIOT Fernand : 53,31 %25 NS 3S S-1 -50 3 13.64
26 NS 4C W+1 -650 2 9.09
27 NS 3S W+1 -430 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
15 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 42,29 %28 NS 3P S = 140 14 63.64
29 NS 3S S+1 630 15 68.18
30 NS 2C E = -110 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 43,94 %31 NS 3S N = 600 8 36.36
32 NS 4C N = 420 11 50.00
33 NS 3S S+3 490 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
Total : 319,0 / 726 = 43,94 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 FRAITURE Louis -de WASSEIGE Claude
15 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 42,29 % 1 NS 4K N+1 150 8 36.36
2 NS 3S S+2 660 21 95.45
3 NS 3S S+2 460 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 43,94 % 4 NS 6C W-3 300 21 95.45
5 NS 2C E = -110 10 45.45
6 NS 2S E = -120 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 59,37 % 7 NS 4P W+2 -680 16 72.73
8 NS 4P N-2 -100 14 63.64
9 NS 3T S+2 150 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
23 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 47,93 %10 NS 2P E+1 -140 8 36.36
11 NS 3S N+2 460 17 77.27
12 NS 2P E = -110 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
22 WILLEMS Jacques -PIETQUIN Joseph : 54,96 %13 NS 4C N-1 -100 7 31.82
14 NS 3P S = 140 22 100.00
15 NS 6C S-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
21 EVRARD Armand -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 46,42 %16 NS 2K E+2 -130 12 54.55
17 NS 4C E = -420 7 31.82
18 NS 4C S-1 -100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
20 NIGOT Pierre -MACAUX Lucienne : 38,98 %19 NS 1S S-1 -50 3 13.64
20 NS 4C S-1 -100 12 54.55
21 NS 2C E-1 50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
24 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 63,36 %22 NS 1S E+3 -180 3 13.64
23 NS 2P S+1 140 13 59.09
24 NS 2S E = -120 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
18 SERRANE Francis -de LAMINE de BEX Nathalie : 58,68 %25 NS 3S S = 400 10 45.45
26 NS 2C W+3 -200 12 54.55
27 NS 3S W = -400 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
17 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 46,42 %28 NS 2C N+2 170 20 90.91
29 NS 3S S = 600 9 40.91
30 NS 2S W-2 100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 75,76 %
16 SALFI Huguette -BRIOT Fernand : 53,31 %31 NS 3S N+1 630 18 81.82
32 NS 2K S+3 150 2 9.09
33 NS 3S S = 400 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
Total : 385,0 / 726 = 53,03 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile
17 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 46,42 % 1 NS 3CcE-4 800 21 95.45
2 NS 3S S+2 660 21 95.45
3 NS 3S S+3 490 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 95,45 %
16 SALFI Huguette -BRIOT Fernand : 53,31 % 4 NS 6C W-3 300 21 95.45
5 NS 2P N-1 -100 12 54.55
6 NS 2S E-2 200 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 78,79 %
15 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 42,29 % 7 NS 4P W+2 -680 16 72.73
8 NS 3S W-3 150 22 100.00
9 NS 2S N+1 150 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
24 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 63,36 %10 NS 3P E = -140 8 36.36
11 NS 6S N-1 -50 4 18.18
12 NS 2P W = -110 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 59,37 %13 NS 4C N-2 -200 1 4.55
14 NS 4C W = -420 4 18.18
15 NS 4C S = 620 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
23 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 47,93 %16 NS 3S E-1 100 18 81.82
17 NS 4C W-1 50 20 90.91
18 NS 4C S = 620 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
22 WILLEMS Jacques -PIETQUIN Joseph : 54,96 %19 NS 4C S = 420 22 100.00
20 NS 4C S-1 -100 12 54.55
21 NS 3C W = -140 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
21 EVRARD Armand -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 46,42 %22 NS 1S E+1 -120 10 45.45
23 NS 3C E = -140 7 31.82
24 NS 1P E+2 -140 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
20 NIGOT Pierre -MACAUX Lucienne : 38,98 %25 NS 3S S+1 430 19 86.36
26 NS 2C W+1 -140 17 77.27
27 NS 3S W = -400 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
19 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 44,35 %28 NS 3P S-1 -100 3 13.64
29 NS 2TcW-4 1100 22 100.00
30 NS 2C E = -110 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
18 SERRANE Francis -de LAMINE de BEX Nathalie : 58,68 %31 NS 3S S+3 600 8 36.36
32 NS 4C S+1 450 17 77.27
33 NS 3S S+3 490 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 456,0 / 726 = 62,81 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire
19 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 44,35 % 1 NS 3S S+2 460 16 72.73
2 NS 3S S+1 630 13 59.09
3 NS 3S S+1 430 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
18 SERRANE Francis -de LAMINE de BEX Nathalie : 58,68 % 4 NS 3S W = -600 3 13.64
5 NS 3S W+1 -430 1 4.55
6 NS 1S E = -90 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
17 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 46,42 % 7 NS 4P W+3 -710 5 22.73
8 NS 2S W+1 -150 3 13.64
9 NS 2T S+3 150 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
16 SALFI Huguette -BRIOT Fernand : 53,31 %10 NS 3P E+1 -170 0 0.00
11 NS 4P S = 420 10 45.45
12 NS 3S W-2 100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
15 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 42,29 %13 NS 4C N = 620 21 95.45
14 NS 4C W = -420 4 18.18
15 NS 4C N = 620 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 43,94 %16 NS 5K E-1 100 18 81.82
17 NS 2C E+1 -140 14 63.64
18 NS 4C S-1 -100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 59,37 %19 NS 1S S = 90 10 45.45
20 NS 4C S-1 -100 12 54.55
21 NS 2C W+1 -140 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
23 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 47,93 %22 NS 1S E = -90 19 86.36
23 NS 2C W+4 -230 2 9.09
24 NS 3S E+1 -430 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
22 WILLEMS Jacques -PIETQUIN Joseph : 54,96 %25 NS 3S S = 400 10 45.45
26 NS 4C W+1 -650 2 9.09
27 NS 3S E-1 50 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
21 EVRARD Armand -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 46,42 %28 NS 2C N+1 140 14 63.64
29 NS 3S S+1 630 15 68.18
30 NS 2P S-1 -50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
24 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 63,36 %31 NS 3S N+1 630 18 81.82
32 NS 3K N+2 150 2 9.09
33 NS 3S N+1 430 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
Total : 341,0 / 726 = 46,97 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
21 EVRARD Armand -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 46,42 % 1 NS 3S S+2 460 16 72.73
2 NS 3S S+1 630 13 59.09
3 NS 3S S+1 430 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
20 NIGOT Pierre -MACAUX Lucienne : 38,98 % 4 NS 4C W-1 100 10 45.45
5 NS 4C E-3 150 22 100.00
6 NS 1S W-1 100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
19 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 44,35 % 7 NS 4P W+2 -680 16 72.73
8 NS 3S W-2 100 18 81.82
9 NS 2S S = 120 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
18 SERRANE Francis -de LAMINE de BEX Nathalie : 58,68 %10 NS 4P E-2 200 22 100.00
11 NS 3S N+2 460 17 77.27
12 NS 2P W+1 -140 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
17 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 46,42 %13 NS 4C N-1 -100 7 31.82
14 NS 4C W = -420 4 18.18
15 NS 4C S = 620 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
16 SALFI Huguette -BRIOT Fernand : 53,31 %16 NS 3S E+1 -630 4 18.18
17 NS 3S W+1 -430 1 4.55
18 NS 4PcW-3 500 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
24 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 63,36 %19 NS 1S S = 90 10 45.45
20 NS 4C S-2 -200 3 13.64
21 NS 2C W = -110 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 43,94 %22 NS 1S E+3 -180 3 13.64
23 NS 3P S+1 170 17 77.27
24 NS 3S W = -400 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 59,37 %25 NS 3S S-2 -100 0 0.00
26 NS 4C W+1 -650 2 9.09
27 NS 2S E-2 100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
23 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 47,93 %28 NS 3C N = 140 14 63.64
29 NS 3S S+2 660 19 86.36
30 NS 2P S-1 -50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
22 WILLEMS Jacques -PIETQUIN Joseph : 54,96 %31 NS 3S N = 600 8 36.36
32 NS 3S S+3 490 20 90.91
33 NS 3S S-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
Total : 360,0 / 726 = 49,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 WARNIER François -MASSAUX Jacques
23 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 47,93 % 1 NS 6KcN-1 -100 0 0.00
2 NS 3S S+1 630 13 59.09
3 NS 3S S+1 430 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
22 WILLEMS Jacques -PIETQUIN Joseph : 54,96 % 4 NS 6C W-2 200 17 77.27
5 NS 4C E-1 50 17 77.27
6 NS 2PcS-2 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
24 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 63,36 % 7 NS 4P W+3 -710 5 22.73
8 NS 3K E = -110 10 45.45
9 NS 3S S-1 -50 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 24,24 %
20 NIGOT Pierre -MACAUX Lucienne : 38,98 %10 NS 2P E+1 -140 8 36.36
11 NS 6S N-1 -50 4 18.18
12 NS 2P E-1 50 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
19 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 44,35 %13 NS 3C N = 140 12 54.55
14 NS 4P S-2 -100 12 54.55
15 NS 4C N = 620 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
18 SERRANE Francis -de LAMINE de BEX Nathalie : 58,68 %16 NS 3S E+1 -630 4 18.18
17 NS 2K E+2 -130 16 72.73
18 NS 3S S-1 -100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
17 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 46,42 %19 NS 2C S+1 140 19 86.36
20 NS 4PcW-2 500 20 90.91
21 NS 4CcW-3 500 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 92,42 %
16 SALFI Huguette -BRIOT Fernand : 53,31 %22 NS 1S E = -90 19 86.36
23 NS 3C W = -140 7 31.82
24 NS 3S W = -400 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
15 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 42,29 %25 NS 3T S-1 -50 3 13.64
26 NS 3S W-2 200 22 100.00
27 NS 1S W+2 -150 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 43,94 %28 NS 3C N = 140 14 63.64
29 NS 4C S = 620 12 54.55
30 NS 2P S-1 -50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 59,37 %31 NS 3S N = 600 8 36.36
32 NS 3K S+3 170 6 27.27
33 NS 3S S = 400 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
Total : 361,0 / 726 = 49,72 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 GELISSEN Edouard -VERBOIS Léon
14 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 43,94 % 1 NS 3S N = 400 12 54.55
2 NS 3S S = 600 5 22.73
3 NS 3S S+1 430 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 59,37 % 4 NS 5C W-2 200 17 77.27
5 NS 4C E-1 50 17 77.27
6 NS 2S E-1 100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
23 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 47,93 % 7 NS 4P W+3 -710 5 22.73
8 NS 4K W-1 50 16 72.73
9 NS 3T S+1 130 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
22 WILLEMS Jacques -PIETQUIN Joseph : 54,96 %10 NS 2P E = -110 17 77.27
11 NS 3S N+2 460 17 77.27
12 NS 2P E+1 -140 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
21 EVRARD Armand -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 46,42 %13 NS 3S N = 600 18 81.82
14 NS 4P S-1 -50 16 72.73
15 NS 4C S-1 -100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
20 NIGOT Pierre -MACAUX Lucienne : 38,98 %16 NS 5K E-1 100 18 81.82
17 NS 4C E-1 50 20 90.91
18 NS 4C S-1 -100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 75,76 %
19 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 44,35 %19 NS 1S S = 90 10 45.45
20 NS 4C S = 620 22 100.00
21 NS 4C W-3 150 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 75,76 %
18 SERRANE Francis -de LAMINE de BEX Nathalie : 58,68 %22 NS 1S E+1 -120 10 45.45
23 NS 4P S-1 -100 10 45.45
24 NS 3S E+1 -430 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
17 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 46,42 %25 NS 3S S = 400 10 45.45
26 NS 4C W = -620 7 31.82
27 NS 1S W+1 -120 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
24 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 63,36 %28 NS 3P S-1 -100 3 13.64
29 NS 3S N = 600 9 40.91
30 NS 2C E+1 -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
15 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 42,29 %31 NS 3S N+3 690 22 100.00
32 NS 2S S+3 210 8 36.36
33 NS 3S S+2 460 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 381,0 / 726 = 52,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 DOUMONT Hervé -TELLIN Jean-Pierre
16 SALFI Huguette -BRIOT Fernand : 53,31 % 1 NS 3S S+2 460 16 72.73
2 NS 3S S+1 630 13 59.09
3 NS 3S S+1 430 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
15 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 42,29 % 4 NS 4C W-1 100 10 45.45
5 NS 3S W = -400 8 36.36
6 NS 1S E-1 100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 43,94 % 7 NS 4P W+2 -680 16 72.73
8 NS 3K E+1 -130 6 27.27
9 NS 1S S+1 120 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 59,37 %10 NS 1P E+2 -140 8 36.36
11 NS 6S S-1 -50 4 18.18
12 NS 2P E+1 -140 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 21,21 %
23 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 47,93 %13 NS 3S N-1 -100 7 31.82
14 NS 4P S-2 -100 12 54.55
15 NS 4P N-1 -100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
24 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 63,36 %16 NS 3S E+1 -630 4 18.18
17 NS 4C E = -420 7 31.82
18 NS 4C S-2 -200 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 19,70 %
21 EVRARD Armand -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 46,42 %19 NS 3S S-3 -150 0 0.00
20 NS 6S N-4 -400 0 0.00
21 NS 4PcS-2 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
20 NIGOT Pierre -MACAUX Lucienne : 38,98 %22 NS 1S E = -90 19 86.36
23 NS 3P S = 140 13 59.09
24 NS 3S E+1 -430 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
19 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 44,35 %25 NS 3S S = 400 10 45.45
26 NS 4C W-1 100 20 90.91
27 NS 3S W+1 -430 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
18 SERRANE Francis -de LAMINE de BEX Nathalie : 58,68 %28 NS 3C N-1 -100 3 13.64
29 NS 3C S-1 -100 3 13.64
30 NS 2C E = -110 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
17 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 46,42 %31 NS 3S N = 600 8 36.36
32 NS 3K S+2 150 2 9.09
33 NS 3S S = 400 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 24,24 %
Total : 237,0 / 726 = 32,64 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
18 SERRANE Francis -de LAMINE de BEX Nathalie : 58,68 % 1 NS 3K N+1 130 4 18.18
2 NS 3P N = 140 2 9.09
3 NS 3S N+1 430 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 19,70 %
24 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 63,36 % 4 NS 4C W-1 100 10 45.45
5 NS 4C E = -420 5 22.73
6 NS 2PcS-1 -100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
16 SALFI Huguette -BRIOT Fernand : 53,31 % 7 NS 4P W+3 -710 5 22.73
8 NS 2S W+2 -180 0 0.00
9 NS Pass Passe 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
15 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 42,29 %10 NS 2P E+1 -140 8 36.36
11 NS 3S N+2 460 17 77.27
12 NS 2K W = -90 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 43,94 %13 NS 3C N+1 170 15 68.18
14 NS 4C W-1 50 19 86.36
15 NS 4C S = 620 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 59,37 %16 NS 3S E+1 -630 4 18.18
17 NS 4C E = -420 7 31.82
18 NS 4C S-1 -100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
23 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 47,93 %19 NS 1S S = 90 10 45.45
20 NS 4C S-1 -100 12 54.55
21 NS 3C E-2 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
22 WILLEMS Jacques -PIETQUIN Joseph : 54,96 %22 NS 1S E+1 -120 10 45.45
23 NS 3PcS = 730 22 100.00
24 NS 3S E = -400 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
21 EVRARD Armand -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 46,42 %25 NS 3S S = 400 10 45.45
26 NS 2C W+3 -200 12 54.55
27 NS 1S W+1 -120 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
20 NIGOT Pierre -MACAUX Lucienne : 38,98 %28 NS 3C N+3 230 22 100.00
29 NS 3S S-1 -100 3 13.64
30 NS 2C E = -110 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
19 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 44,35 %31 NS 3S N+1 630 18 81.82
32 NS 3S S+1 430 14 63.64
33 NS 4P N+2 480 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
Total : 342,0 / 726 = 47,11 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 VANDAM Jean -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie
20 NIGOT Pierre -MACAUX Lucienne : 38,98 % 1 NS 3CcE-4 800 21 95.45
2 NS 3S N = 600 5 22.73
3 NS 3S N+3 490 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
19 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 44,35 % 4 NS 4C E-1 100 10 45.45
5 NS 4C E = -420 5 22.73
6 NS 2S E-2 200 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
18 SERRANE Francis -de LAMINE de BEX Nathalie : 58,68 % 7 NS 4P E+3 -710 5 22.73
8 NS 3K E = -110 10 45.45
9 NS 3T N+2 150 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
17 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 46,42 %10 NS 2P E+1 -140 8 36.36
11 NS 5C S = 450 12 54.55
12 NS 1S E-1 50 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
16 SALFI Huguette -BRIOT Fernand : 53,31 %13 NS 2C N+2 170 15 68.18
14 NS 4P N-2 -100 12 54.55
15 NS 4C N = 620 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
15 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 42,29 %16 NS 3S E+1 -630 4 18.18
17 NS 4C E = -420 7 31.82
18 NS 4C N-1 -100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 43,94 %19 NS 3C N = 140 19 86.36
20 NS 4C N-1 -100 12 54.55
21 NS 2C E = -110 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 59,37 %22 NS 1S E+1 -120 10 45.45
23 NS 4C E-4 400 20 90.91
24 NS 3S E = -400 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
24 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 63,36 %25 NS 3S N+1 430 19 86.36
26 NS 4C E = -620 7 31.82
27 NS 1S E = -90 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
22 WILLEMS Jacques -PIETQUIN Joseph : 54,96 %28 NS 3C N-1 -100 3 13.64
29 NS 3S N-1 -100 3 13.64
30 NS 3P N-2 -100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
21 EVRARD Armand -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 46,42 %31 NS 3S N-1 -100 0 0.00
32 NS 4C N+1 450 17 77.27
33 NS 3S N+1 430 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
Total : 378,0 / 726 = 52,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COURTOIS Patrick
22 WILLEMS Jacques -PIETQUIN Joseph : 54,96 % 1 NS 4K N = 130 4 18.18
2 NS 3S S+1 630 13 59.09
3 NS 3S S+1 430 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
21 EVRARD Armand -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 46,42 % 4 NS 4C W = -620 0 0.00
5 NS 4C E-1 50 17 77.27
6 NS 2S E-2 200 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
20 NIGOT Pierre -MACAUX Lucienne : 38,98 % 7 NS 4P W+2 -680 16 72.73
8 NS 3K E = -110 10 45.45
9 NS 3S N = 400 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
19 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 44,35 %10 NS 2P E+1 -140 8 36.36
11 NS 6S N-1 -50 4 18.18
12 NS 2P E = -110 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
24 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 63,36 %13 NS 4C N-2 -200 1 4.55
14 NS 4PcS-2 -300 8 36.36
15 NS 4C S = 620 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
17 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 46,42 %16 NS 3S W-1 100 18 81.82
17 NS 3S W+1 -430 1 4.55
18 NS 3S S-2 -200 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
16 SALFI Huguette -BRIOT Fernand : 53,31 %19 NS 1S S-1 -50 3 13.64
20 NS 2P W = -110 6 27.27
21 NS 4C W-4 200 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
15 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 42,29 %22 NS 3S E = -600 0 0.00
23 NS 3P S+1 170 17 77.27
24 NS 2S E+3 -210 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 43,94 %25 NS 3S S+1 430 19 86.36
26 NS 3C W+2 -200 12 54.55
27 NS 3K E-1 50 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 59,37 %28 NS 2C N+1 140 14 63.64
29 NS 3S S-1 -100 3 13.64
30 NS 2C E = -110 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
23 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 47,93 %31 NS 3S N = 600 8 36.36
32 NS 4C N = 420 11 50.00
33 NS 2K S+2 130 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
Total : 325,0 / 726 = 44,77 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 MATELART Marc -de TERWANGNE Philippe
24 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 63,36 % 1 NS 4K N = 130 4 18.18
2 NS 3S S+1 630 13 59.09
3 NS 3S S+2 460 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
17 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 46,42 % 4 NS 4C W-1 100 10 45.45
5 NS 3S W+1 -430 1 4.55
6 NS 3C W-2 200 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
21 EVRARD Armand -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 46,42 % 7 NS 4P W+1 -650 22 100.00
8 NS 2P N = 110 20 90.91
9 NS 3T S+1 130 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 80,30 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 43,94 %10 NS 1S N = 90 20 90.91
11 NS 6C N-1 -50 4 18.18
12 NS 2P E = -110 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
18 SERRANE Francis -de LAMINE de BEX Nathalie : 58,68 %13 NS 4C N = 620 21 95.45
14 NS 4C W+1 -450 0 0.00
15 NS 4C S = 620 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
22 WILLEMS Jacques -PIETQUIN Joseph : 54,96 %16 NS 3S W-1 100 18 81.82
17 NS 2C E+2 -170 12 54.55
18 NS 4C S-1 -100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
15 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 42,29 %19 NS 1S S = 90 10 45.45
20 NS 1S S+1 120 18 81.82
21 NS 2P S = 110 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
19 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 44,35 %22 NS 1S E = -90 19 86.36
23 NS 2C W+3 -200 4 18.18
24 NS 2S E = -120 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
23 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 47,93 %25 NS 3S S+1 430 19 86.36
26 NS 3C W = -140 17 77.27
27 NS 4P E-3 150 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 87,88 %
16 SALFI Huguette -BRIOT Fernand : 53,31 %28 NS 3K W-1 50 8 36.36
29 NS 3S S+2 660 19 86.36
30 NS 3K W-2 100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
20 NIGOT Pierre -MACAUX Lucienne : 38,98 %31 NS 3S N = 600 8 36.36
32 NS 2TcE-2 500 22 100.00
33 NS 2CcE-4 800 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 78,79 %
Total : 471,0 / 726 = 64,88 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
1 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 43,94 % 1 EO 4C W-4 200 12 54.55
2 EO 3T N = 110 22 100.00
3 EO 3S N+1 430 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
7 GELISSEN Edouard -VERBOIS Léon : 52,48 % 4 EO 5C W-2 200 5 22.73
5 EO 4C E-1 50 5 22.73
6 EO 2S E-1 100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -de WASSEIGE Claude : 53,03 % 7 EO 4P W+2 -680 6 27.27
8 EO 4P N-2 -100 8 36.36
9 EO 3T S+2 150 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
8 DOUMONT Hervé -TELLIN Jean-Pierre : 32,64 %10 EO 1P E+2 -140 14 63.64
11 EO 6S S-1 -50 18 81.82
12 EO 2P E+1 -140 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 78,79 %
3 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 62,81 %13 EO 4C N-2 -200 21 95.45
14 EO 4C W = -420 18 81.82
15 EO 4C S = 620 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,11 %16 EO 3S E+1 -630 18 81.82
17 EO 4C E = -420 15 68.18
18 EO 4C S-1 -100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
4 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 46,97 %19 EO 1S S = 90 12 54.55
20 EO 4C S-1 -100 10 45.45
21 EO 2C W+1 -140 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
10 VANDAM Jean -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 52,07 %22 EO 1S E+1 -120 12 54.55
23 EO 4C E-4 400 2 9.09
24 EO 3S E = -400 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,59 %25 EO 3S S-2 -100 22 100.00
26 EO 4C W+1 -650 20 90.91
27 EO 2S E-2 100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COURTOIS Patrick : 44,77 %28 EO 2C N+1 140 8 36.36
29 EO 3S S-1 -100 19 86.36
30 EO 2C E = -110 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
6 WARNIER François -MASSAUX Jacques : 49,72 %31 EO 3S N = 600 14 63.64
32 EO 3K S+3 170 16 72.73
33 EO 3S S = 400 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
Total : 431,0 / 726 = 59,37 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse
7 GELISSEN Edouard -VERBOIS Léon : 52,48 % 1 EO 3S N = 400 10 45.45
2 EO 3S S = 600 17 77.27
3 EO 3S S+1 430 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -de WASSEIGE Claude : 53,03 % 4 EO 6C W-3 300 1 4.55
5 EO 2C E = -110 12 54.55
6 EO 2S E = -120 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
8 DOUMONT Hervé -TELLIN Jean-Pierre : 32,64 % 7 EO 4P W+2 -680 6 27.27
8 EO 3K E+1 -130 16 72.73
9 EO 1S S+1 120 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
12 MATELART Marc -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 64,88 %10 EO 1S N = 90 2 9.09
11 EO 6C N-1 -50 18 81.82
12 EO 2P E = -110 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,11 %13 EO 3C N+1 170 7 31.82
14 EO 4C W-1 50 3 13.64
15 EO 4C S = 620 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
4 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 46,97 %16 EO 5K E-1 100 4 18.18
17 EO 2C E+1 -140 8 36.36
18 EO 4C S-1 -100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
10 VANDAM Jean -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 52,07 %19 EO 3C N = 140 3 13.64
20 EO 4C N-1 -100 10 45.45
21 EO 2C E = -110 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,59 %22 EO 1S E+3 -180 19 86.36
23 EO 3P S+1 170 5 22.73
24 EO 3S W = -400 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COURTOIS Patrick : 44,77 %25 EO 3S S+1 430 3 13.64
26 EO 3C W+2 -200 10 45.45
27 EO 3K E-1 50 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
6 WARNIER François -MASSAUX Jacques : 49,72 %28 EO 3C N = 140 8 36.36
29 EO 4C S = 620 10 45.45
30 EO 2P S-1 -50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
1 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 43,94 %31 EO 3S N = 600 14 63.64
32 EO 4C N = 420 11 50.00
33 EO 3S S+3 490 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
Total : 319,0 / 726 = 43,94 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean
2 FRAITURE Louis -de WASSEIGE Claude : 53,03 % 1 EO 4K N+1 150 14 63.64
2 EO 3S S+2 660 1 4.55
3 EO 3S S+2 460 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
8 DOUMONT Hervé -TELLIN Jean-Pierre : 32,64 % 4 EO 4C W-1 100 12 54.55
5 EO 3S W = -400 14 63.64
6 EO 1S E-1 100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
3 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 62,81 % 7 EO 4P W+2 -680 6 27.27
8 EO 3S W-3 150 0 0.00
9 EO 2S N+1 150 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,11 %10 EO 2P E+1 -140 14 63.64
11 EO 3S N+2 460 5 22.73
12 EO 2K W = -90 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
4 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 46,97 %13 EO 4C N = 620 1 4.55
14 EO 4C W = -420 18 81.82
15 EO 4C N = 620 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
10 VANDAM Jean -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 52,07 %16 EO 3S E+1 -630 18 81.82
17 EO 4C E = -420 15 68.18
18 EO 4C N-1 -100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
12 MATELART Marc -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 64,88 %19 EO 1S S = 90 12 54.55
20 EO 1S S+1 120 4 18.18
21 EO 2P S = 110 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COURTOIS Patrick : 44,77 %22 EO 3S E = -600 22 100.00
23 EO 3P S+1 170 5 22.73
24 EO 2S E+3 -210 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
6 WARNIER François -MASSAUX Jacques : 49,72 %25 EO 3T S-1 -50 19 86.36
26 EO 3S W-2 200 0 0.00
27 EO 1S W+2 -150 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
1 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 43,94 %28 EO 3P S = 140 8 36.36
29 EO 3S S+1 630 7 31.82
30 EO 2C E = -110 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
7 GELISSEN Edouard -VERBOIS Léon : 52,48 %31 EO 3S N+3 690 0 0.00
32 EO 2S S+3 210 14 63.64
33 EO 3S S+2 460 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 307,0 / 726 = 42,29 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 SALFI Huguette -BRIOT Fernand
8 DOUMONT Hervé -TELLIN Jean-Pierre : 32,64 % 1 EO 3S S+2 460 6 27.27
2 EO 3S S+1 630 9 40.91
3 EO 3S S+1 430 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
3 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 62,81 % 4 EO 6C W-3 300 1 4.55
5 EO 2P N-1 -100 10 45.45
6 EO 2S E-2 200 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 21,21 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,11 % 7 EO 4P W+3 -710 17 77.27
8 EO 2S W+2 -180 22 100.00
9 EO Pass Passe 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
4 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 46,97 %10 EO 3P E+1 -170 22 100.00
11 EO 4P S = 420 12 54.55
12 EO 3S W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
10 VANDAM Jean -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 52,07 %13 EO 2C N+2 170 7 31.82
14 EO 4P N-2 -100 10 45.45
15 EO 4C N = 620 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,59 %16 EO 3S E+1 -630 18 81.82
17 EO 3S W+1 -430 21 95.45
18 EO 4PcW-3 500 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COURTOIS Patrick : 44,77 %19 EO 1S S-1 -50 19 86.36
20 EO 2P W = -110 16 72.73
21 EO 4C W-4 200 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
6 WARNIER François -MASSAUX Jacques : 49,72 %22 EO 1S E = -90 3 13.64
23 EO 3C W = -140 15 68.18
24 EO 3S W = -400 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
1 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 43,94 %25 EO 3S S-1 -50 19 86.36
26 EO 4C W+1 -650 20 90.91
27 EO 3S W+1 -430 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
12 MATELART Marc -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 64,88 %28 EO 3K W-1 50 14 63.64
29 EO 3S S+2 660 3 13.64
30 EO 3K W-2 100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -de WASSEIGE Claude : 53,03 %31 EO 3S N+1 630 4 18.18
32 EO 2K S+3 150 20 90.91
33 EO 3S S = 400 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
Total : 387,0 / 726 = 53,31 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
3 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 62,81 % 1 EO 3CcE-4 800 1 4.55
2 EO 3S S+2 660 1 4.55
3 EO 3S S+3 490 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 4,55 %
12 MATELART Marc -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 64,88 % 4 EO 4C W-1 100 12 54.55
5 EO 3S W+1 -430 21 95.45
6 EO 3C W-2 200 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
4 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 46,97 % 7 EO 4P W+3 -710 17 77.27
8 EO 2S W+1 -150 19 86.36
9 EO 2T S+3 150 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
10 VANDAM Jean -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 52,07 %10 EO 2P E+1 -140 14 63.64
11 EO 5C S = 450 10 45.45
12 EO 1S E-1 50 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,59 %13 EO 4C N-1 -100 15 68.18
14 EO 4C W = -420 18 81.82
15 EO 4C S = 620 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COURTOIS Patrick : 44,77 %16 EO 3S W-1 100 4 18.18
17 EO 3S W+1 -430 21 95.45
18 EO 3S S-2 -200 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
6 WARNIER François -MASSAUX Jacques : 49,72 %19 EO 2C S+1 140 3 13.64
20 EO 4PcW-2 500 2 9.09
21 EO 4CcW-3 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 7,58 %
1 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 43,94 %22 EO 1S E+1 -120 12 54.55
23 EO 4C W = -620 22 100.00
24 EO 3S E-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
7 GELISSEN Edouard -VERBOIS Léon : 52,48 %25 EO 3S S = 400 12 54.55
26 EO 4C W = -620 15 68.18
27 EO 1S W+1 -120 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -de WASSEIGE Claude : 53,03 %28 EO 2C N+2 170 2 9.09
29 EO 3S S = 600 13 59.09
30 EO 2S W-2 100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 24,24 %
8 DOUMONT Hervé -TELLIN Jean-Pierre : 32,64 %31 EO 3S N = 600 14 63.64
32 EO 3K S+2 150 20 90.91
33 EO 3S S = 400 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 75,76 %
Total : 337,0 / 726 = 46,42 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 SERRANE Francis -de LAMINE de BEX Nathalie
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,11 % 1 EO 3K N+1 130 18 81.82
2 EO 3P N = 140 20 90.91
3 EO 3S N+1 430 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 80,30 %
4 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 46,97 % 4 EO 3S W = -600 19 86.36
5 EO 3S W+1 -430 21 95.45
6 EO 1S E = -90 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
10 VANDAM Jean -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 52,07 % 7 EO 4P E+3 -710 17 77.27
8 EO 3K E = -110 12 54.55
9 EO 3T N+2 150 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,59 %10 EO 4P E-2 200 0 0.00
11 EO 3S N+2 460 5 22.73
12 EO 2P W+1 -140 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
12 MATELART Marc -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 64,88 %13 EO 4C N = 620 1 4.55
14 EO 4C W+1 -450 22 100.00
15 EO 4C S = 620 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
6 WARNIER François -MASSAUX Jacques : 49,72 %16 EO 3S E+1 -630 18 81.82
17 EO 2K E+2 -130 6 27.27
18 EO 3S S-1 -100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
1 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 43,94 %19 EO 2S S = 120 6 27.27
20 EO 4C N-2 -200 19 86.36
21 EO 4C W-1 50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
7 GELISSEN Edouard -VERBOIS Léon : 52,48 %22 EO 1S E+1 -120 12 54.55
23 EO 4P S-1 -100 12 54.55
24 EO 3S E+1 -430 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -de WASSEIGE Claude : 53,03 %25 EO 3S S = 400 12 54.55
26 EO 2C W+3 -200 10 45.45
27 EO 3S W = -400 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
8 DOUMONT Hervé -TELLIN Jean-Pierre : 32,64 %28 EO 3C N-1 -100 19 86.36
29 EO 3C S-1 -100 19 86.36
30 EO 2C E = -110 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
3 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 62,81 %31 EO 3S S+3 600 14 63.64
32 EO 4C S+1 450 5 22.73
33 EO 3S S+3 490 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 426,0 / 726 = 58,68 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard
4 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 46,97 % 1 EO 3S S+2 460 6 27.27
2 EO 3S S+1 630 9 40.91
3 EO 3S S+1 430 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
10 VANDAM Jean -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 52,07 % 4 EO 4C E-1 100 12 54.55
5 EO 4C E = -420 17 77.27
6 EO 2S E-2 200 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,59 % 7 EO 4P W+2 -680 6 27.27
8 EO 3S W-2 100 4 18.18
9 EO 2S S = 120 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COURTOIS Patrick : 44,77 %10 EO 2P E+1 -140 14 63.64
11 EO 6S N-1 -50 18 81.82
12 EO 2P E = -110 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
6 WARNIER François -MASSAUX Jacques : 49,72 %13 EO 3C N = 140 10 45.45
14 EO 4P S-2 -100 10 45.45
15 EO 4C N = 620 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
1 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 43,94 %16 EO 3S E = -600 12 54.55
17 EO 4C E-1 50 2 9.09
18 EO 4C S-2 -200 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
7 GELISSEN Edouard -VERBOIS Léon : 52,48 %19 EO 1S S = 90 12 54.55
20 EO 4C S = 620 0 0.00
21 EO 4C W-3 150 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 24,24 %
12 MATELART Marc -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 64,88 %22 EO 1S E = -90 3 13.64
23 EO 2C W+3 -200 18 81.82
24 EO 2S E = -120 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
8 DOUMONT Hervé -TELLIN Jean-Pierre : 32,64 %25 EO 3S S = 400 12 54.55
26 EO 4C W-1 100 2 9.09
27 EO 3S W+1 -430 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
3 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 62,81 %28 EO 3P S-1 -100 19 86.36
29 EO 2TcW-4 1100 0 0.00
30 EO 2C E = -110 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,11 %31 EO 3S N+1 630 4 18.18
32 EO 3S S+1 430 8 36.36
33 EO 4P N+2 480 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
Total : 322,0 / 726 = 44,35 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 NIGOT Pierre -MACAUX Lucienne
10 VANDAM Jean -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 52,07 % 1 EO 3CcE-4 800 1 4.55
2 EO 3S N = 600 17 77.27
3 EO 3S N+3 490 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,59 % 4 EO 4C W-1 100 12 54.55
5 EO 4C E-3 150 0 0.00
6 EO 1S W-1 100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COURTOIS Patrick : 44,77 % 7 EO 4P W+2 -680 6 27.27
8 EO 3K E = -110 12 54.55
9 EO 3S N = 400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
6 WARNIER François -MASSAUX Jacques : 49,72 %10 EO 2P E+1 -140 14 63.64
11 EO 6S N-1 -50 18 81.82
12 EO 2P E-1 50 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
1 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 43,94 %13 EO 4C N-1 -100 15 68.18
14 EO 4C W-1 50 3 13.64
15 EO 4C S = 620 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
7 GELISSEN Edouard -VERBOIS Léon : 52,48 %16 EO 5K E-1 100 4 18.18
17 EO 4C E-1 50 2 9.09
18 EO 4C S-1 -100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 24,24 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -de WASSEIGE Claude : 53,03 %19 EO 1S S-1 -50 19 86.36
20 EO 4C S-1 -100 10 45.45
21 EO 2C E-1 50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
8 DOUMONT Hervé -TELLIN Jean-Pierre : 32,64 %22 EO 1S E = -90 3 13.64
23 EO 3P S = 140 9 40.91
24 EO 3S E+1 -430 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
3 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 62,81 %25 EO 3S S+1 430 3 13.64
26 EO 2C W+1 -140 5 22.73
27 EO 3S W = -400 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,11 %28 EO 3C N+3 230 0 0.00
29 EO 3S S-1 -100 19 86.36
30 EO 2C E = -110 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
12 MATELART Marc -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 64,88 %31 EO 3S N = 600 14 63.64
32 EO 2TcE-2 500 0 0.00
33 EO 2CcE-4 800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 21,21 %
Total : 283,0 / 726 = 38,98 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 EVRARD Armand -de WASSEIGE Ariane
5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,59 % 1 EO 3S S+2 460 6 27.27
2 EO 3S S+1 630 9 40.91
3 EO 3S S+1 430 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COURTOIS Patrick : 44,77 % 4 EO 4C W = -620 22 100.00
5 EO 4C E-1 50 5 22.73
6 EO 2S E-2 200 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
12 MATELART Marc -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 64,88 % 7 EO 4P W+1 -650 0 0.00
8 EO 2P N = 110 2 9.09
9 EO 3T S+1 130 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 19,70 %
1 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 43,94 %10 EO 2P E = -110 5 22.73
11 EO 3S S+3 490 0 0.00
12 EO 2S W-1 50 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
7 GELISSEN Edouard -VERBOIS Léon : 52,48 %13 EO 3S N = 600 4 18.18
14 EO 4P S-1 -50 6 27.27
15 EO 4C S-1 -100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -de WASSEIGE Claude : 53,03 %16 EO 2K E+2 -130 10 45.45
17 EO 4C E = -420 15 68.18
18 EO 4C S-1 -100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
8 DOUMONT Hervé -TELLIN Jean-Pierre : 32,64 %19 EO 3S S-3 -150 22 100.00
20 EO 6S N-4 -400 22 100.00
21 EO 4PcS-2 -500 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 100,00 %
3 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 62,81 %22 EO 1S E+1 -120 12 54.55
23 EO 3C E = -140 15 68.18
24 EO 1P E+2 -140 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,11 %25 EO 3S S = 400 12 54.55
26 EO 2C W+3 -200 10 45.45
27 EO 1S W+1 -120 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
4 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 46,97 %28 EO 2C N+1 140 8 36.36
29 EO 3S S+1 630 7 31.82
30 EO 2P S-1 -50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
10 VANDAM Jean -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 52,07 %31 EO 3S N-1 -100 22 100.00
32 EO 4C N+1 450 5 22.73
33 EO 3S N+1 430 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
Total : 337,0 / 726 = 46,42 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 WILLEMS Jacques -PIETQUIN Joseph
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COURTOIS Patrick : 44,77 % 1 EO 4K N = 130 18 81.82
2 EO 3S S+1 630 9 40.91
3 EO 3S S+1 430 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
6 WARNIER François -MASSAUX Jacques : 49,72 % 4 EO 6C W-2 200 5 22.73
5 EO 4C E-1 50 5 22.73
6 EO 2PcS-2 -300 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
1 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 43,94 % 7 EO 4P W+3 -710 17 77.27
8 EO 2S W+1 -150 19 86.36
9 EO 2C N-1 -50 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
7 GELISSEN Edouard -VERBOIS Léon : 52,48 %10 EO 2P E = -110 5 22.73
11 EO 3S N+2 460 5 22.73
12 EO 2P E+1 -140 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -de WASSEIGE Claude : 53,03 %13 EO 4C N-1 -100 15 68.18
14 EO 3P S = 140 0 0.00
15 EO 6C S-2 -200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
12 MATELART Marc -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 64,88 %16 EO 3S W-1 100 4 18.18
17 EO 2C E+2 -170 10 45.45
18 EO 4C S-1 -100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
3 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 62,81 %19 EO 4C S = 420 0 0.00
20 EO 4C S-1 -100 10 45.45
21 EO 3C W = -140 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,11 %22 EO 1S E+1 -120 12 54.55
23 EO 3PcS = 730 0 0.00
24 EO 3S E = -400 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
4 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 46,97 %25 EO 3S S = 400 12 54.55
26 EO 4C W+1 -650 20 90.91
27 EO 3S E-1 50 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
10 VANDAM Jean -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 52,07 %28 EO 3C N-1 -100 19 86.36
29 EO 3S N-1 -100 19 86.36
30 EO 3P N-2 -100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,59 %31 EO 3S N = 600 14 63.64
32 EO 3S S+3 490 2 9.09
33 EO 3S S-1 -50 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
Total : 399,0 / 726 = 54,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 23 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne
6 WARNIER François -MASSAUX Jacques : 49,72 % 1 EO 6KcN-1 -100 22 100.00
2 EO 3S S+1 630 9 40.91
3 EO 3S S+1 430 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
1 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 43,94 % 4 EO 3S W = -600 19 86.36
5 EO 4C W-1 50 5 22.73
6 EO 1S E+1 -120 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
7 GELISSEN Edouard -VERBOIS Léon : 52,48 % 7 EO 4P W+3 -710 17 77.27
8 EO 4K W-1 50 6 27.27
9 EO 3T S+1 130 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -de WASSEIGE Claude : 53,03 %10 EO 2P E+1 -140 14 63.64
11 EO 3S N+2 460 5 22.73
12 EO 2P E = -110 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
8 DOUMONT Hervé -TELLIN Jean-Pierre : 32,64 %13 EO 3S N-1 -100 15 68.18
14 EO 4P S-2 -100 10 45.45
15 EO 4P N-1 -100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
3 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 62,81 %16 EO 3S E-1 100 4 18.18
17 EO 4C W-1 50 2 9.09
18 EO 4C S = 620 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,11 %19 EO 1S S = 90 12 54.55
20 EO 4C S-1 -100 10 45.45
21 EO 3C E-2 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
4 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 46,97 %22 EO 1S E = -90 3 13.64
23 EO 2C W+4 -230 20 90.91
24 EO 3S E+1 -430 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
12 MATELART Marc -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 64,88 %25 EO 3S S+1 430 3 13.64
26 EO 3C W = -140 5 22.73
27 EO 4P E-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 12,12 %
5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,59 %28 EO 3C N = 140 8 36.36
29 EO 3S S+2 660 3 13.64
30 EO 2P S-1 -50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COURTOIS Patrick : 44,77 %31 EO 3S N = 600 14 63.64
32 EO 4C N = 420 11 50.00
33 EO 2K S+2 130 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
Total : 348,0 / 726 = 47,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 24 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian
12 MATELART Marc -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 64,88 % 1 EO 4K N = 130 18 81.82
2 EO 3S S+1 630 9 40.91
3 EO 3S S+2 460 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,11 % 4 EO 4C W-1 100 12 54.55
5 EO 4C E = -420 17 77.27
6 EO 2PcS-1 -100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
6 WARNIER François -MASSAUX Jacques : 49,72 % 7 EO 4P W+3 -710 17 77.27
8 EO 3K E = -110 12 54.55
9 EO 3S S-1 -50 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 75,76 %
3 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 62,81 %10 EO 3P E = -140 14 63.64
11 EO 6S N-1 -50 18 81.82
12 EO 2P W = -110 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COURTOIS Patrick : 44,77 %13 EO 4C N-2 -200 21 95.45
14 EO 4PcS-2 -300 14 63.64
15 EO 4C S = 620 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
8 DOUMONT Hervé -TELLIN Jean-Pierre : 32,64 %16 EO 3S E+1 -630 18 81.82
17 EO 4C E = -420 15 68.18
18 EO 4C S-2 -200 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 80,30 %
5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,59 %19 EO 1S S = 90 12 54.55
20 EO 4C S-2 -200 19 86.36
21 EO 2C W = -110 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -de WASSEIGE Claude : 53,03 %22 EO 1S E+3 -180 19 86.36
23 EO 2P S+1 140 9 40.91
24 EO 2S E = -120 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
10 VANDAM Jean -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 52,07 %25 EO 3S N+1 430 3 13.64
26 EO 4C E = -620 15 68.18
27 EO 1S E = -90 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
7 GELISSEN Edouard -VERBOIS Léon : 52,48 %28 EO 3P S-1 -100 19 86.36
29 EO 3S N = 600 13 59.09
30 EO 2C E+1 -140 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
4 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 46,97 %31 EO 3S N+1 630 4 18.18
32 EO 3K N+2 150 20 90.91
33 EO 3S N+1 430 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
Total : 460,0 / 726 = 63,36 %
|
|