|
Tournoi du 22-10-12
1 64,63 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
2 59,07 3 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile
3 54,26 6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
4 51,30 4 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLLIN Jean-Marie
5 50,93 2 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
6 47,04 5 de TERWANGNE Philippe -WALSCHAERTS Carine
7 46,30 10 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse
8 44,07 7 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine
9 43,15 9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
10 39,26 1 VERBOIS Léon -ARICKX Roger
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 60,00 17 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude
2 59,81 14 GOBBE Amélie -STEED Adrian
3 56,67 16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
4 52,96 19 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
5 52,59 11 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
6 48,15 13 STEED Mercédès -DELEVAL Mouche
7 45,56 12 BEYNE Anne -RAVET Brigitte
8 45,00 18 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane
9 40,19 20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
10 39,07 15 DELHEZ Jacques -COOLEN Josef
PAIRE Nr : 1 VERBOIS Léon -ARICKX Roger
11 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 52,59 % 1 NS 5C N-1 -50 5 27.78
2 NS 3T E+1 -130 8 44.44
3 NS 1S N+2 150 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
13 STEED Mercédès -DELEVAL Mouche : 48,15 % 4 NS 1P N+4 200 13 72.22
5 NS 2K N = 90 17 94.44
6 NS 3S N-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
12 BEYNE Anne -RAVET Brigitte : 45,56 % 7 NS 4C N = 620 6 33.33
8 NS 2P E-1 50 3 16.67
9 NS 2C W+1 -140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 56,67 %10 NS 3S W-1 100 18 100.00
11 NS 3K S+2 150 9 50.00
12 NS 3S W+3 -490 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
17 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 60,00 %13 NS 3S W+4 -720 3 16.67
14 NS 4C S-3 -150 0 0.00
15 NS 1P S-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 5,56 %
18 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 45,00 %16 NS 4PcN-2 -300 1 5.56
17 NS 3S W = -400 3 16.67
18 NS 2P N+1 140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
19 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 52,96 %19 NS 2C E+3 -200 0 0.00
20 NS 3S W+1 -630 12 66.67
21 NS 4P S-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 40,19 %22 NS 3S W+2 -660 0 0.00
23 NS 3S W+2 -660 1 5.56
24 NS 1C W-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
14 GOBBE Amélie -STEED Adrian : 59,81 %25 NS 3S N+2 460 16 88.89
26 NS 3C S-2 -200 5 27.78
27 NS 3S S+1 430 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
15 DELHEZ Jacques -COOLEN Josef : 39,07 %28 NS 4C W-2 100 12 66.67
29 NS 2K N+3 150 8 44.44
30 NS 3S W-2 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 212,0 / 540 = 39,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
13 STEED Mercédès -DELEVAL Mouche : 48,15 % 1 NS 5KcW-1 100 8 44.44
2 NS 5KcS-1 -200 2 11.11
3 NS 1S N+2 150 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
12 BEYNE Anne -RAVET Brigitte : 45,56 % 4 NS 3P N+1 170 7 38.89
5 NS 3C W-1 50 13 72.22
6 NS 4P S+1 450 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
11 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 52,59 % 7 NS 4C S = 620 6 33.33
8 NS 5TcW-1 100 7 38.89
9 NS 2P S-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 40,19 %10 NS 4T E+3 -190 14 77.78
11 NS 5K S = 400 18 100.00
12 NS 2T E+4 -170 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
14 GOBBE Amélie -STEED Adrian : 59,81 %13 NS 3S W+4 -720 3 16.67
14 NS 4P S-2 -100 3 16.67
15 NS Pass Passe 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
15 DELHEZ Jacques -COOLEN Josef : 39,07 %16 NS 4P N-2 -100 8 44.44
17 NS 4KcS-1 -100 12 66.67
18 NS 2P N = 110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 56,67 %19 NS 3P S-3 -150 16 88.89
20 NS 3S W+3 -690 4 22.22
21 NS 4P S = 620 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
17 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 60,00 %22 NS 3S W+1 -630 3 16.67
23 NS 4PcW-1 200 17 94.44
24 NS 3S S-2 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
18 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 45,00 %25 NS 3S N = 400 5 27.78
26 NS 2K W-1 100 8 44.44
27 NS 6P S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
19 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 52,96 %28 NS 4C W-2 100 12 66.67
29 NS 4P S = 620 16 88.89
30 NS 3S E-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
Total : 275,0 / 540 = 50,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile
12 BEYNE Anne -RAVET Brigitte : 45,56 % 1 NS 5C N = 450 16 88.89
2 NS 5T E-1 50 16 88.89
3 NS 3S N+1 430 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 92,59 %
11 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 52,59 % 4 NS 1P N+3 170 7 38.89
5 NS 2K N = 90 17 94.44
6 NS 4P S+1 450 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
13 STEED Mercédès -DELEVAL Mouche : 48,15 % 7 NS 4C N = 620 6 33.33
8 NS 5KcE-3 500 16 88.89
9 NS 2C E = -110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
18 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 45,00 %10 NS 5T E+1 -620 7 38.89
11 NS 4K N+1 150 9 50.00
12 NS 3S E+2 -460 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
19 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 52,96 %13 NS 3S E+2 -660 13 72.22
14 NS 4C S+1 450 13 72.22
15 NS 2K N+2 130 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 40,19 %16 NS 4T S-2 -100 8 44.44
17 NS 3ScE-2 300 18 100.00
18 NS 3P N = 140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
14 GOBBE Amélie -STEED Adrian : 59,81 %19 NS 2C E+2 -170 8 44.44
20 NS 3S W+3 -690 4 22.22
21 NS 4P S = 620 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
15 DELHEZ Jacques -COOLEN Josef : 39,07 %22 NS 3S W-1 100 15 83.33
23 NS 3S E-1 100 14 77.78
24 NS 1S N+2 150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 56,67 %25 NS 3S S = 400 5 27.78
26 NS 3P N-2 -200 5 27.78
27 NS 4P S = 420 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
17 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 60,00 %28 NS 4C E = -420 3 16.67
29 NS 4P N-1 -100 1 5.56
30 NS 3S E = -400 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
Total : 319,0 / 540 = 59,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLLIN Jean-Marie
17 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 60,00 % 1 NS 4C N = 420 13 72.22
2 NS 3T E+1 -130 8 44.44
3 NS 1S N+3 180 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 56,67 % 4 NS 3P N+1 170 7 38.89
5 NS 2K N-2 -200 5 27.78
6 NS 3P N+1 170 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
15 DELHEZ Jacques -COOLEN Josef : 39,07 % 7 NS 4C N+1 650 15 83.33
8 NS 3C S+2 200 12 66.67
9 NS 1PcW-1 200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
14 GOBBE Amélie -STEED Adrian : 59,81 %10 NS 5T E+1 -620 7 38.89
11 NS 3K S+1 130 3 16.67
12 NS 3S W+2 -460 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 40,19 %13 NS 3S S+1 630 18 100.00
14 NS 4P S+2 480 17 94.44
15 NS 2K N+1 110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
19 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 52,96 %16 NS 4P N-1 -50 15 83.33
17 NS 4KcS-2 -300 8 44.44
18 NS 3P N-1 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
18 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 45,00 %19 NS 2C E+2 -170 8 44.44
20 NS 3S W = -600 16 88.89
21 NS 4P S+1 650 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
13 STEED Mercédès -DELEVAL Mouche : 48,15 %22 NS 3S W = -600 8 44.44
23 NS 3S E+1 -630 8 44.44
24 NS 2P W = -110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
12 BEYNE Anne -RAVET Brigitte : 45,56 %25 NS 3S N = 400 5 27.78
26 NS 2C S = 110 11 61.11
27 NS 4P S = 420 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 52,59 %28 NS 4C W-1 50 7 38.89
29 NS 3S N-1 -100 1 5.56
30 NS 3S E = -400 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
Total : 277,0 / 540 = 51,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 de TERWANGNE Philippe -WALSCHAERTS Carine
18 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 45,00 % 1 NS 3P E-4 200 10 55.56
2 NS 3K S = 110 18 100.00
3 NS 1S N+2 150 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
17 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 60,00 % 4 NS 1P N+3 170 7 38.89
5 NS 3C W-1 50 13 72.22
6 NS 4P S+1 450 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 56,67 % 7 NS 3S N = 600 0 0.00
8 NS 4K W-1 50 3 16.67
9 NS 2C W+1 -140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
11 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 52,59 %10 NS 5T E+2 -640 0 0.00
11 NS 4TcW-2 300 16 88.89
12 NS 3S W+2 -460 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
15 DELHEZ Jacques -COOLEN Josef : 39,07 %13 NS 3S E+2 -660 13 72.22
14 NS 4P S+1 450 13 72.22
15 NS 5K N-1 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
14 GOBBE Amélie -STEED Adrian : 59,81 %16 NS 3PcN-2 -300 1 5.56
17 NS 3S W = -400 3 16.67
18 NS 3K W = -110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 7,41 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 40,19 %19 NS 2C E+2 -170 8 44.44
20 NS 4P E+1 -650 9 50.00
21 NS 2P S+2 170 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
19 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 52,96 %22 NS 3S W = -600 8 44.44
23 NS 4P W = -620 10 55.56
24 NS 1S N-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
13 STEED Mercédès -DELEVAL Mouche : 48,15 %25 NS 3S S+2 460 16 88.89
26 NS 2KcW-2 500 18 100.00
27 NS 4P N = 420 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
12 BEYNE Anne -RAVET Brigitte : 45,56 %28 NS 4C W-3 150 17 94.44
29 NS 3K N+1 130 6 33.33
30 NS 3S E-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 254,0 / 540 = 47,04 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
19 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 52,96 % 1 NS 6P S-4 -200 0 0.00
2 NS 3C N-3 -300 0 0.00
3 NS 1S N+2 150 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
18 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 45,00 % 4 NS 4P N = 620 16 88.89
5 NS 4P S-2 -200 5 27.78
6 NS 4P N+1 450 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
17 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 60,00 % 7 NS 4C S+1 650 15 83.33
8 NS 5K W-3 150 10 55.56
9 NS 2P W = -110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
12 BEYNE Anne -RAVET Brigitte : 45,56 %10 NS 5T E+1 -620 7 38.89
11 NS 3K S+3 170 14 77.78
12 NS 3S W+2 -460 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
11 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 52,59 %13 NS 3S W+1 -630 16 88.89
14 NS 4C S = 420 9 50.00
15 NS 1S N-1 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 56,67 %16 NS 3PcN+1 630 18 100.00
17 NS 3S W+1 -430 0 0.00
18 NS 3P N = 140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
15 DELHEZ Jacques -COOLEN Josef : 39,07 %19 NS 2C E = -110 18 100.00
20 NS 3S W+3 -690 4 22.22
21 NS 4P S+1 650 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
14 GOBBE Amélie -STEED Adrian : 59,81 %22 NS 3S W-1 100 15 83.33
23 NS 4P W+1 -650 5 27.78
24 NS 2P W-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 40,19 %25 NS 3S S+1 430 11 61.11
26 NS 3P N-3 -300 2 11.11
27 NS 4P S = 420 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
13 STEED Mercédès -DELEVAL Mouche : 48,15 %28 NS 4C W-3 150 17 94.44
29 NS 3P S+1 170 11 61.11
30 NS 2S E+1 -150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 293,0 / 540 = 54,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 40,19 % 1 NS 4P S-3 -150 2 11.11
2 NS 3T E = -110 12 66.67
3 NS 2C W = -110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
19 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 52,96 % 4 NS 1P N+2 140 2 11.11
5 NS 3T N-1 -100 9 50.00
6 NS 4P N+1 450 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
18 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 45,00 % 7 NS 4C N+1 650 15 83.33
8 NS 4PcE-3 500 16 88.89
9 NS 2C W-1 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
13 STEED Mercédès -DELEVAL Mouche : 48,15 %10 NS 5T E+1 -620 7 38.89
11 NS 5KcS-2 -300 0 0.00
12 NS 3S W+2 -460 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
12 BEYNE Anne -RAVET Brigitte : 45,56 %13 NS 3S W+3 -690 9 50.00
14 NS 2P S = 110 6 33.33
15 NS 2K N+1 110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
11 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 52,59 %16 NS 4P N-1 -50 15 83.33
17 NS 3S W-1 50 15 83.33
18 NS 3P N-1 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
17 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 60,00 %19 NS 3C E+1 -170 8 44.44
20 NS 6S W+1 -1470 0 0.00
21 NS 2P S+2 170 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 56,67 %22 NS 3S W-1 100 15 83.33
23 NS 3S E+2 -660 1 5.56
24 NS 2P E-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
15 DELHEZ Jacques -COOLEN Josef : 39,07 %25 NS 3S S+2 460 16 88.89
26 NS 4P N-4 -400 0 0.00
27 NS 4P S-1 -50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
14 GOBBE Amélie -STEED Adrian : 59,81 %28 NS 3C W-1 50 7 38.89
29 NS 3K N = 110 4 22.22
30 NS 3S E-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 238,0 / 540 = 44,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
14 GOBBE Amélie -STEED Adrian : 59,81 % 1 NS 4C N+2 480 18 100.00
2 NS 4K S-1 -100 14 77.78
3 NS 1S N+3 180 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 40,19 % 4 NS 4PcN+1 990 18 100.00
5 NS 3T N-1 -100 9 50.00
6 NS 4P S+1 450 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
19 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 52,96 % 7 NS 4C S = 620 6 33.33
8 NS 3K W = -110 0 0.00
9 NS 4C W-2 200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
15 DELHEZ Jacques -COOLEN Josef : 39,07 %10 NS 3C E+1 -170 16 88.89
11 NS 3K S+2 150 9 50.00
12 NS 2T E+4 -170 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
13 STEED Mercédès -DELEVAL Mouche : 48,15 %13 NS 3S W+4 -720 3 16.67
14 NS 4C N+2 480 17 94.44
15 NS 3CcE-2 300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
12 BEYNE Anne -RAVET Brigitte : 45,56 %16 NS 4P N-2 -100 8 44.44
17 NS 3S E-1 50 15 83.33
18 NS 3K W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
11 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 52,59 %19 NS 2C E+2 -170 8 44.44
20 NS 4P W = -620 14 77.78
21 NS 3P S+1 170 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
18 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 45,00 %22 NS 3S W-1 100 15 83.33
23 NS 4P W+1 -650 5 27.78
24 NS 1S N = 90 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
17 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 60,00 %25 NS 3S S = 400 5 27.78
26 NS 3K W-2 200 14 77.78
27 NS 4P S = 420 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 56,67 %28 NS 4C W = -420 3 16.67
29 NS 2P S+3 200 14 77.78
30 NS 3S E-3 150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
Total : 349,0 / 540 = 64,63 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
15 DELHEZ Jacques -COOLEN Josef : 39,07 % 1 NS 4C N = 420 13 72.22
2 NS 4T E = -130 8 44.44
3 NS 2CcE = -670 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
14 GOBBE Amélie -STEED Adrian : 59,81 % 4 NS 4P N-2 -200 0 0.00
5 NS 5T N-3 -300 1 5.56
6 NS 3P N+2 200 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 40,19 % 7 NS 4C N+1 650 15 83.33
8 NS 4PcE-3 500 16 88.89
9 NS 3T E = -110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
17 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 60,00 %10 NS 5T E+1 -620 7 38.89
11 NS 3K S+1 130 3 16.67
12 NS 3S W+2 -460 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 56,67 %13 NS 3S E+3 -690 9 50.00
14 NS 4P S = 420 9 50.00
15 NS 1S S-1 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
13 STEED Mercédès -DELEVAL Mouche : 48,15 %16 NS 4PcN-1 -100 8 44.44
17 NS 4KcS-2 -300 8 44.44
18 NS 3P N-1 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
12 BEYNE Anne -RAVET Brigitte : 45,56 %19 NS 2C E+2 -170 8 44.44
20 NS 4P E+1 -650 9 50.00
21 NS 4P S = 620 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
11 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 52,59 %22 NS 3S W = -600 8 44.44
23 NS 3S E = -600 12 66.67
24 NS 1S N-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
19 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 52,96 %25 NS 3S S-1 -50 0 0.00
26 NS 3K W-3 300 16 88.89
27 NS 4P S = 420 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
18 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 45,00 %28 NS 3S E+1 -430 0 0.00
29 NS 4P S+1 650 18 100.00
30 NS 3S E-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
Total : 233,0 / 540 = 43,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 56,67 % 1 NS 5C N-1 -50 5 27.78
2 NS 2S W+1 -150 4 22.22
3 NS 1S N+2 150 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
15 DELHEZ Jacques -COOLEN Josef : 39,07 % 4 NS 3P N+2 200 13 72.22
5 NS 4P S-3 -300 1 5.56
6 NS 4P N = 420 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
14 GOBBE Amélie -STEED Adrian : 59,81 % 7 NS 4C N = 620 6 33.33
8 NS 4KcW-1 100 7 38.89
9 NS 2C W+1 -140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
19 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 52,96 %10 NS 5T E+1 -620 7 38.89
11 NS 3K S+2 150 9 50.00
12 NS 1S W+5 -240 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
18 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 45,00 %13 NS 3S E+4 -720 3 16.67
14 NS 4C N-2 -100 3 16.67
15 NS 2K N+2 130 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
17 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 60,00 %16 NS 4PcN-1 -100 8 44.44
17 NS 4KcS-2 -300 8 44.44
18 NS 4K W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
13 STEED Mercédès -DELEVAL Mouche : 48,15 %19 NS 2C E+2 -170 8 44.44
20 NS 6P W-2 200 18 100.00
21 NS 4P S = 620 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
12 BEYNE Anne -RAVET Brigitte : 45,56 %22 NS 3S W+1 -630 3 16.67
23 NS 4P W-2 200 17 94.44
24 NS 3C S-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
11 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 52,59 %25 NS 3S S+1 430 11 61.11
26 NS 2C S = 110 11 61.11
27 NS 3S S = 400 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 40,19 %28 NS 3C W-2 100 12 66.67
29 NS 2P S+2 170 11 61.11
30 NS 3S E-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 250,0 / 540 = 46,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
1 VERBOIS Léon -ARICKX Roger : 39,26 % 1 EO 5C N-1 -50 13 72.22
2 EO 3T E+1 -130 10 55.56
3 EO 1S N+2 150 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
3 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 59,07 % 4 EO 1P N+3 170 11 61.11
5 EO 2K N = 90 1 5.56
6 EO 4P S+1 450 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
2 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,93 % 7 EO 4C S = 620 12 66.67
8 EO 5TcW-1 100 11 61.11
9 EO 2P S-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
5 de TERWANGNE Philippe -WALSCHAERTS Carine : 47,04 %10 EO 5T E+2 -640 18 100.00
11 EO 4TcW-2 300 2 11.11
12 EO 3S W+2 -460 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 54,26 %13 EO 3S W+1 -630 2 11.11
14 EO 4C S = 420 9 50.00
15 EO 1S N-1 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
7 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 44,07 %16 EO 4P N-1 -50 3 16.67
17 EO 3S W-1 50 3 16.67
18 EO 3P N-1 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 64,63 %19 EO 2C E+2 -170 10 55.56
20 EO 4P W = -620 4 22.22
21 EO 3P S+1 170 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 43,15 %22 EO 3S W = -600 10 55.56
23 EO 3S E = -600 6 33.33
24 EO 1S N-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
10 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,30 %25 EO 3S S+1 430 7 38.89
26 EO 2C S = 110 7 38.89
27 EO 3S S = 400 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
4 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 51,30 %28 EO 4C W-1 50 11 61.11
29 EO 3S N-1 -100 17 94.44
30 EO 3S E = -400 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
Total : 284,0 / 540 = 52,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 BEYNE Anne -RAVET Brigitte
3 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 59,07 % 1 EO 5C N = 450 2 11.11
2 EO 5T E-1 50 2 11.11
3 EO 3S N+1 430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 7,41 %
2 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,93 % 4 EO 3P N+1 170 11 61.11
5 EO 3C W-1 50 5 27.78
6 EO 4P S+1 450 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
1 VERBOIS Léon -ARICKX Roger : 39,26 % 7 EO 4C N = 620 12 66.67
8 EO 2P E-1 50 15 83.33
9 EO 2C W+1 -140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 54,26 %10 EO 5T E+1 -620 11 61.11
11 EO 3K S+3 170 4 22.22
12 EO 3S W+2 -460 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
7 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 44,07 %13 EO 3S W+3 -690 9 50.00
14 EO 2P S = 110 12 66.67
15 EO 2K N+1 110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 64,63 %16 EO 4P N-2 -100 10 55.56
17 EO 3S E-1 50 3 16.67
18 EO 3K W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 43,15 %19 EO 2C E+2 -170 10 55.56
20 EO 4P E+1 -650 9 50.00
21 EO 4P S = 620 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
10 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,30 %22 EO 3S W+1 -630 15 83.33
23 EO 4P W-2 200 1 5.56
24 EO 3C S-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
4 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 51,30 %25 EO 3S N = 400 13 72.22
26 EO 2C S = 110 7 38.89
27 EO 4P S = 420 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
5 de TERWANGNE Philippe -WALSCHAERTS Carine : 47,04 %28 EO 4C W-3 150 1 5.56
29 EO 3K N+1 130 12 66.67
30 EO 3S E-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 246,0 / 540 = 45,56 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 STEED Mercédès -DELEVAL Mouche
2 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,93 % 1 EO 5KcW-1 100 10 55.56
2 EO 5KcS-1 -200 16 88.89
3 EO 1S N+2 150 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
1 VERBOIS Léon -ARICKX Roger : 39,26 % 4 EO 1P N+4 200 5 27.78
5 EO 2K N = 90 1 5.56
6 EO 3S N-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
3 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 59,07 % 7 EO 4C N = 620 12 66.67
8 EO 5KcE-3 500 2 11.11
9 EO 2C E = -110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
7 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 44,07 %10 EO 5T E+1 -620 11 61.11
11 EO 5KcS-2 -300 18 100.00
12 EO 3S W+2 -460 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 64,63 %13 EO 3S W+4 -720 15 83.33
14 EO 4C N+2 480 1 5.56
15 EO 3CcE-2 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 43,15 %16 EO 4PcN-1 -100 10 55.56
17 EO 4KcS-2 -300 10 55.56
18 EO 3P N-1 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
10 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,30 %19 EO 2C E+2 -170 10 55.56
20 EO 6P W-2 200 0 0.00
21 EO 4P S = 620 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
4 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 51,30 %22 EO 3S W = -600 10 55.56
23 EO 3S E+1 -630 10 55.56
24 EO 2P W = -110 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
5 de TERWANGNE Philippe -WALSCHAERTS Carine : 47,04 %25 EO 3S S+2 460 2 11.11
26 EO 2KcW-2 500 0 0.00
27 EO 4P N = 420 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 54,26 %28 EO 4C W-3 150 1 5.56
29 EO 3P S+1 170 7 38.89
30 EO 2S E+1 -150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 260,0 / 540 = 48,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 GOBBE Amélie -STEED Adrian
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 64,63 % 1 EO 4C N+2 480 0 0.00
2 EO 4K S-1 -100 4 22.22
3 EO 1S N+3 180 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 43,15 % 4 EO 4P N-2 -200 18 100.00
5 EO 5T N-3 -300 17 94.44
6 EO 3P N+2 200 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
10 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,30 % 7 EO 4C N = 620 12 66.67
8 EO 4KcW-1 100 11 61.11
9 EO 2C W+1 -140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
4 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 51,30 %10 EO 5T E+1 -620 11 61.11
11 EO 3K S+1 130 15 83.33
12 EO 3S W+2 -460 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
2 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,93 %13 EO 3S W+4 -720 15 83.33
14 EO 4P S-2 -100 15 83.33
15 EO Pass Passe 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
5 de TERWANGNE Philippe -WALSCHAERTS Carine : 47,04 %16 EO 3PcN-2 -300 17 94.44
17 EO 3S W = -400 15 83.33
18 EO 3K W = -110 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 92,59 %
3 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 59,07 %19 EO 2C E+2 -170 10 55.56
20 EO 3S W+3 -690 14 77.78
21 EO 4P S = 620 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 54,26 %22 EO 3S W-1 100 3 16.67
23 EO 4P W+1 -650 13 72.22
24 EO 2P W-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
1 VERBOIS Léon -ARICKX Roger : 39,26 %25 EO 3S N+2 460 2 11.11
26 EO 3C S-2 -200 13 72.22
27 EO 3S S+1 430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
7 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 44,07 %28 EO 3C W-1 50 11 61.11
29 EO 3K N = 110 14 77.78
30 EO 3S E-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 323,0 / 540 = 59,81 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 DELHEZ Jacques -COOLEN Josef
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 43,15 % 1 EO 4C N = 420 5 27.78
2 EO 4T E = -130 10 55.56
3 EO 2CcE = -670 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
10 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,30 % 4 EO 3P N+2 200 5 27.78
5 EO 4P S-3 -300 17 94.44
6 EO 4P N = 420 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
4 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 51,30 % 7 EO 4C N+1 650 3 16.67
8 EO 3C S+2 200 6 33.33
9 EO 1PcW-1 200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 64,63 %10 EO 3C E+1 -170 2 11.11
11 EO 3K S+2 150 9 50.00
12 EO 2T E+4 -170 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
5 de TERWANGNE Philippe -WALSCHAERTS Carine : 47,04 %13 EO 3S E+2 -660 5 27.78
14 EO 4P S+1 450 5 27.78
15 EO 5K N-1 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
2 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,93 %16 EO 4P N-2 -100 10 55.56
17 EO 4KcS-1 -100 6 33.33
18 EO 2P N = 110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 54,26 %19 EO 2C E = -110 0 0.00
20 EO 3S W+3 -690 14 77.78
21 EO 4P S+1 650 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
3 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 59,07 %22 EO 3S W-1 100 3 16.67
23 EO 3S E-1 100 4 22.22
24 EO 1S N+2 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
7 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 44,07 %25 EO 3S S+2 460 2 11.11
26 EO 4P N-4 -400 18 100.00
27 EO 4P S-1 -50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
1 VERBOIS Léon -ARICKX Roger : 39,26 %28 EO 4C W-2 100 6 33.33
29 EO 2K N+3 150 10 55.56
30 EO 3S W-2 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 211,0 / 540 = 39,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
10 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,30 % 1 EO 5C N-1 -50 13 72.22
2 EO 2S W+1 -150 14 77.78
3 EO 1S N+2 150 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
4 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 51,30 % 4 EO 3P N+1 170 11 61.11
5 EO 2K N-2 -200 13 72.22
6 EO 3P N+1 170 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
5 de TERWANGNE Philippe -WALSCHAERTS Carine : 47,04 % 7 EO 3S N = 600 18 100.00
8 EO 4K W-1 50 15 83.33
9 EO 2C W+1 -140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
1 VERBOIS Léon -ARICKX Roger : 39,26 %10 EO 3S W-1 100 0 0.00
11 EO 3K S+2 150 9 50.00
12 EO 3S W+3 -490 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 43,15 %13 EO 3S E+3 -690 9 50.00
14 EO 4P S = 420 9 50.00
15 EO 1S S-1 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 54,26 %16 EO 3PcN+1 630 0 0.00
17 EO 3S W+1 -430 18 100.00
18 EO 3P N = 140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
2 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,93 %19 EO 3P S-3 -150 2 11.11
20 EO 3S W+3 -690 14 77.78
21 EO 4P S = 620 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
7 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 44,07 %22 EO 3S W-1 100 3 16.67
23 EO 3S E+2 -660 17 94.44
24 EO 2P E-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
3 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 59,07 %25 EO 3S S = 400 13 72.22
26 EO 3P N-2 -200 13 72.22
27 EO 4P S = 420 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 64,63 %28 EO 4C W = -420 15 83.33
29 EO 2P S+3 200 4 22.22
30 EO 3S E-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
Total : 306,0 / 540 = 56,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude
4 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 51,30 % 1 EO 4C N = 420 5 27.78
2 EO 3T E+1 -130 10 55.56
3 EO 1S N+3 180 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
5 de TERWANGNE Philippe -WALSCHAERTS Carine : 47,04 % 4 EO 1P N+3 170 11 61.11
5 EO 3C W-1 50 5 27.78
6 EO 4P S+1 450 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 54,26 % 7 EO 4C S+1 650 3 16.67
8 EO 5K W-3 150 8 44.44
9 EO 2P W = -110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 43,15 %10 EO 5T E+1 -620 11 61.11
11 EO 3K S+1 130 15 83.33
12 EO 3S W+2 -460 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
1 VERBOIS Léon -ARICKX Roger : 39,26 %13 EO 3S W+4 -720 15 83.33
14 EO 4C S-3 -150 18 100.00
15 EO 1P S-2 -200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 94,44 %
10 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,30 %16 EO 4PcN-1 -100 10 55.56
17 EO 4KcS-2 -300 10 55.56
18 EO 4K W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
7 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 44,07 %19 EO 3C E+1 -170 10 55.56
20 EO 6S W+1 -1470 18 100.00
21 EO 2P S+2 170 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
2 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,93 %22 EO 3S W+1 -630 15 83.33
23 EO 4PcW-1 200 1 5.56
24 EO 3S S-2 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 64,63 %25 EO 3S S = 400 13 72.22
26 EO 3K W-2 200 4 22.22
27 EO 4P S = 420 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
3 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 59,07 %28 EO 4C E = -420 15 83.33
29 EO 4P N-1 -100 17 94.44
30 EO 3S E = -400 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
Total : 324,0 / 540 = 60,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane
5 de TERWANGNE Philippe -WALSCHAERTS Carine : 47,04 % 1 EO 3P E-4 200 8 44.44
2 EO 3K S = 110 0 0.00
3 EO 1S N+2 150 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 54,26 % 4 EO 4P N = 620 2 11.11
5 EO 4P S-2 -200 13 72.22
6 EO 4P N+1 450 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
7 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 44,07 % 7 EO 4C N+1 650 3 16.67
8 EO 4PcE-3 500 2 11.11
9 EO 2C W-1 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
3 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 59,07 %10 EO 5T E+1 -620 11 61.11
11 EO 4K N+1 150 9 50.00
12 EO 3S E+2 -460 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
10 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,30 %13 EO 3S E+4 -720 15 83.33
14 EO 4C N-2 -100 15 83.33
15 EO 2K N+2 130 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
1 VERBOIS Léon -ARICKX Roger : 39,26 %16 EO 4PcN-2 -300 17 94.44
17 EO 3S W = -400 15 83.33
18 EO 2P N+1 140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
4 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 51,30 %19 EO 2C E+2 -170 10 55.56
20 EO 3S W = -600 2 11.11
21 EO 4P S+1 650 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 64,63 %22 EO 3S W-1 100 3 16.67
23 EO 4P W+1 -650 13 72.22
24 EO 1S N = 90 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
2 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,93 %25 EO 3S N = 400 13 72.22
26 EO 2K W-1 100 10 55.56
27 EO 6P S-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 43,15 %28 EO 3S E+1 -430 18 100.00
29 EO 4P S+1 650 0 0.00
30 EO 3S E-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
Total : 243,0 / 540 = 45,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 54,26 % 1 EO 6P S-4 -200 18 100.00
2 EO 3C N-3 -300 18 100.00
3 EO 1S N+2 150 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
7 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 44,07 % 4 EO 1P N+2 140 16 88.89
5 EO 3T N-1 -100 9 50.00
6 EO 4P N+1 450 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 64,63 % 7 EO 4C S = 620 12 66.67
8 EO 3K W = -110 18 100.00
9 EO 4C W-2 200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
10 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,30 %10 EO 5T E+1 -620 11 61.11
11 EO 3K S+2 150 9 50.00
12 EO 1S W+5 -240 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
3 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 59,07 %13 EO 3S E+2 -660 5 27.78
14 EO 4C S+1 450 5 27.78
15 EO 2K N+2 130 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
4 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 51,30 %16 EO 4P N-1 -50 3 16.67
17 EO 4KcS-2 -300 10 55.56
18 EO 3P N-1 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
1 VERBOIS Léon -ARICKX Roger : 39,26 %19 EO 2C E+3 -200 18 100.00
20 EO 3S W+1 -630 6 33.33
21 EO 4P S-1 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
5 de TERWANGNE Philippe -WALSCHAERTS Carine : 47,04 %22 EO 3S W = -600 10 55.56
23 EO 4P W = -620 8 44.44
24 EO 1S N-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 43,15 %25 EO 3S S-1 -50 18 100.00
26 EO 3K W-3 300 2 11.11
27 EO 4P S = 420 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
2 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,93 %28 EO 4C W-2 100 6 33.33
29 EO 4P S = 620 2 11.11
30 EO 3S E-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
Total : 286,0 / 540 = 52,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
7 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 44,07 % 1 EO 4P S-3 -150 16 88.89
2 EO 3T E = -110 6 33.33
3 EO 2C W = -110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 64,63 % 4 EO 4PcN+1 990 0 0.00
5 EO 3T N-1 -100 9 50.00
6 EO 4P S+1 450 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 43,15 % 7 EO 4C N+1 650 3 16.67
8 EO 4PcE-3 500 2 11.11
9 EO 3T E = -110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
2 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,93 %10 EO 4T E+3 -190 4 22.22
11 EO 5K S = 400 0 0.00
12 EO 2T E+4 -170 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
4 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 51,30 %13 EO 3S S+1 630 0 0.00
14 EO 4P S+2 480 1 5.56
15 EO 2K N+1 110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
3 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 59,07 %16 EO 4T S-2 -100 10 55.56
17 EO 3ScE-2 300 0 0.00
18 EO 3P N = 140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
5 de TERWANGNE Philippe -WALSCHAERTS Carine : 47,04 %19 EO 2C E+2 -170 10 55.56
20 EO 4P E+1 -650 9 50.00
21 EO 2P S+2 170 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
1 VERBOIS Léon -ARICKX Roger : 39,26 %22 EO 3S W+2 -660 18 100.00
23 EO 3S W+2 -660 17 94.44
24 EO 1C W-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 54,26 %25 EO 3S S+1 430 7 38.89
26 EO 3P N-3 -300 16 88.89
27 EO 4P S = 420 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
10 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,30 %28 EO 3C W-2 100 6 33.33
29 EO 2P S+2 170 7 38.89
30 EO 3S E-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 217,0 / 540 = 40,19 %
|
|