|
Tournoi du 23-05-11
1 66,44 9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
2 59,26 7 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita
3 52,08 4 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
~ 52,08 5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
5 51,85 1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
6 49,31 3 CASSART Guy -HUBLET Carlo
7 45,83 6 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine
8 44,91 8 MATELART Marc -de VIRON Baudouin
9 28,24 2 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 61,57 18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
2 57,18 10 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne
3 51,16 13 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie
4 50,93 16 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François
5 50,69 15 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
6 50,00 14 WARNIER François -LILIEN Raymond
7 45,37 12 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse
8 44,91 11 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard
9 38,19 17 VERBOIS Léon -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
PAIRE Nr : 1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
10 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 57,18 % 1 NS 3K S = 110 10 62.50
2 NS 4P N-1 -100 4 25.00
3 NS 4P E+1 -650 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 61,57 % 4 NS 4C W = -620 1 6.25
5 NS 4P E = -420 15 93.75
6 NS 6PcS-1 -100 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
17 VERBOIS Léon -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 38,19 % 7 NS 3P W = -140 5 31.25
8 NS 3S E+1 -430 8 50.00
9 NS 2P N-2 -100 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
16 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 50,93 %10 NS 3S N+1 630 11 68.75
11 NS 3K E = -110 2 12.50
12 NS 4P E = -420 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
15 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 50,69 %13 NS 4P N+1 650 8 50.00
14 NS 4C N = 420 13 81.25
15 NS 4P E = -420 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
14 WARNIER François -LILIEN Raymond : 50,00 %16 NS 4C E-1 100 13 81.25
17 NS 4CcE-1 100 5 31.25
18 NS 2S E+2 -180 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
13 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 51,16 %19 NS 3C S = 140 14 87.50
20 NS 2S W-1 100 14 87.50
21 NS 3S N = 600 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
12 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,37 %22 NS 6P E = -1430 6 37.50
23 NS 2C N = 110 10 62.50
24 NS 3K W-1 50 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
11 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 44,91 %25 NS 3C W = -140 2 12.50
26 NS 4P N+1 650 9 56.25
27 NS 4T E = -130 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
Total : 224,0 / 432 = 51,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef
12 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,37 % 1 NS Pass Passe 6 37.50
2 NS 3S S-1 -100 4 25.00
3 NS 3P E+2 -200 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
11 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 44,91 % 4 NS 1S E+3 -180 5 31.25
5 NS 4P E+1 -450 6 37.50
6 NS 4P S = 420 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
10 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 57,18 % 7 NS 2P W+1 -140 5 31.25
8 NS 3S W+3 -490 2 12.50
9 NS 1S W+2 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,58 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 61,57 %10 NS 2K N+1 110 0 0.00
11 NS 2C E+1 -140 0 0.00
12 NS 4C E+1 -450 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 6,25 %
17 VERBOIS Léon -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 38,19 %13 NS 4C N+3 710 15 93.75
14 NS 4C N = 420 13 81.25
15 NS 4P E = -420 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
16 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 50,93 %16 NS 4C E = -620 0 0.00
17 NS 3K N = 110 10 62.50
18 NS 3S E+2 -460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
15 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 50,69 %19 NS 5K E = -600 0 0.00
20 NS 3S E+4 -720 2 12.50
21 NS 3K N = 110 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 8,33 %
14 WARNIER François -LILIEN Raymond : 50,00 %22 NS 6P E+1 -1460 1 6.25
23 NS 1S E = -90 8 50.00
24 NS 2CcN-3 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
13 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 51,16 %25 NS 3C W = -140 2 12.50
26 NS 4P N = 620 2 12.50
27 NS 2S W+2 -180 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 8,33 %
Total : 122,0 / 432 = 28,24 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 CASSART Guy -HUBLET Carlo
14 WARNIER François -LILIEN Raymond : 50,00 % 1 NS 3S N-1 -50 1 6.25
2 NS 4P N-1 -100 4 25.00
3 NS 4P E+1 -650 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
13 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 51,16 % 4 NS 4C W-1 100 15 93.75
5 NS 4P E = -420 15 93.75
6 NS 6P S-1 -50 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
12 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,37 % 7 NS 2P W+1 -140 5 31.25
8 NS 3S E+2 -460 5 31.25
9 NS 2P N-2 -100 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
11 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 44,91 %10 NS 3S S+1 630 11 68.75
11 NS 2P S = 110 8 50.00
12 NS 2P E+3 -200 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
10 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 57,18 %13 NS 4C N+3 710 15 93.75
14 NS 5C N-1 -50 6 37.50
15 NS 4PcE = -590 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 61,57 %16 NS 3C E+3 -230 2 12.50
17 NS 4K N-1 -50 0 0.00
18 NS 3S E+1 -430 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 14,58 %
17 VERBOIS Léon -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 38,19 %19 NS 5KcE-2 500 16 100.00
20 NS 5T E = -600 7 43.75
21 NS 3S N = 600 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
16 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 50,93 %22 NS 6P E = -1430 6 37.50
23 NS 3S E-3 300 14 87.50
24 NS 2CcN+1 570 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
15 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 50,69 %25 NS 4P S-2 -100 6 37.50
26 NS 4P N+1 650 9 56.25
27 NS 4T W = -130 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
Total : 213,0 / 432 = 49,31 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
16 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 50,93 % 1 NS 4P W-3 150 16 100.00
2 NS 4C N-2 -200 0 0.00
3 NS 4P W+1 -650 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
15 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 50,69 % 4 NS 1S E+3 -180 5 31.25
5 NS 4P E+1 -450 6 37.50
6 NS 4P S+1 450 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
14 WARNIER François -LILIEN Raymond : 50,00 % 7 NS 4P W-1 100 12 75.00
8 NS 3S E+4 -520 0 0.00
9 NS 3S W-2 200 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
13 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 51,16 %10 NS 3S N+1 630 11 68.75
11 NS 2P N = 110 8 50.00
12 NS 4C E = -420 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
12 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,37 %13 NS 4C N+1 650 8 50.00
14 NS 4C N = 420 13 81.25
15 NS 4P E = -420 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
11 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 44,91 %16 NS 2C E = -110 8 50.00
17 NS 3KcN+1 570 14 87.50
18 NS 3S E-1 50 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
10 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 57,18 %19 NS 4K E = -130 5 31.25
20 NS 3KcN-3 -800 0 0.00
21 NS 3S N = 600 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 61,57 %22 NS 6P E+1 -1460 1 6.25
23 NS 3T E = -110 6 37.50
24 NS 3C N-3 -150 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
17 VERBOIS Léon -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 38,19 %25 NS 3C W = -140 2 12.50
26 NS 4P N+2 680 16 100.00
27 NS 4T W-1 50 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 225,0 / 432 = 52,08 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 61,57 % 1 NS 3S N-1 -50 1 6.25
2 NS 2P N+3 200 12 75.00
3 NS 4P E+1 -650 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
17 VERBOIS Léon -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 38,19 % 4 NS 1S N-1 -100 12 75.00
5 NS 4P E+1 -450 6 37.50
6 NS 6P N-1 -50 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
16 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 50,93 % 7 NS 2P E+1 -140 5 31.25
8 NS 3S E+2 -460 5 31.25
9 NS 4T E-2 200 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
15 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 50,69 %10 NS 2S N+1 150 2 12.50
11 NS 3P N = 140 13 81.25
12 NS 4C E+1 -450 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
14 WARNIER François -LILIEN Raymond : 50,00 %13 NS 4C N+2 680 12 75.00
14 NS 5CcN-1 -100 1 6.25
15 NS 3P E+1 -170 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
13 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 51,16 %16 NS 2C E+1 -140 6 37.50
17 NS 3CcE-1 100 5 31.25
18 NS 3S E+1 -430 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
12 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,37 %19 NS 3CcN-1 -100 10 62.50
20 NS 5T E = -600 7 43.75
21 NS 3S N = 600 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
11 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 44,91 %22 NS 6P E-1 100 15 93.75
23 NS 2CcN = 670 16 100.00
24 NS 2C N-2 -100 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
10 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 57,18 %25 NS 4P E-1 100 12 75.00
26 NS 4P N+1 650 9 56.25
27 NS 1S E+1 -120 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
Total : 225,0 / 432 = 52,08 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine
11 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 44,91 % 1 NS Pass Passe 6 37.50
2 NS 4P N = 620 15 93.75
3 NS 4P E+1 -650 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
10 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 57,18 % 4 NS 4C W = -620 1 6.25
5 NS 4P E+1 -450 6 37.50
6 NS 4P S = 420 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 61,57 % 7 NS 2P W+1 -140 5 31.25
8 NS 5T W = -400 11 68.75
9 NS 2K S = 90 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
17 VERBOIS Léon -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 38,19 %10 NS 3S N = 600 6 37.50
11 NS 2K E = -90 4 25.00
12 NS 4C E-1 50 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
16 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 50,93 %13 NS 4C N = 620 3 18.75
14 NS 5C N-1 -50 6 37.50
15 NS 4P E = -420 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
15 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 50,69 %16 NS 4C E-1 100 13 81.25
17 NS 2S E-2 100 5 31.25
18 NS 3S E+1 -430 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
14 WARNIER François -LILIEN Raymond : 50,00 %19 NS 4K E = -130 5 31.25
20 NS 4P W = -620 4 25.00
21 NS 3S N = 600 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
13 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 51,16 %22 NS 6P E = -1430 6 37.50
23 NS 3T E+1 -130 2 12.50
24 NS 2CcN-1 -100 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
12 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,37 %25 NS 4C W-1 100 12 75.00
26 NS 4P N+1 650 9 56.25
27 NS 4T W = -130 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
Total : 198,0 / 432 = 45,83 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita
13 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 51,16 % 1 NS 2S N = 120 13 81.25
2 NS 2P N+2 170 10 62.50
3 NS 4P E+1 -650 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
12 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,37 % 4 NS 1S E+1 -120 10 62.50
5 NS 4P E+1 -450 6 37.50
6 NS 6P S-2 -100 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
11 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 44,91 % 7 NS 1S N+1 120 14 87.50
8 NS 3T W+2 -150 14 87.50
9 NS 1P N+1 110 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
10 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 57,18 %10 NS 3S N+2 660 16 100.00
11 NS 2P N = 110 8 50.00
12 NS 4P E = -420 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 61,57 %13 NS 4C N = 620 3 18.75
14 NS 4C N = 420 13 81.25
15 NS 4P E+1 -450 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
17 VERBOIS Léon -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 38,19 %16 NS 4C E-1 100 13 81.25
17 NS 2PcN = 470 12 75.00
18 NS 3S E = -400 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
16 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 50,93 %19 NS 4K E = -130 5 31.25
20 NS 1S W = -90 12 75.00
21 NS 3S N = 600 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
15 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 50,69 %22 NS 4P E+1 -650 12 75.00
23 NS 3T E+1 -130 2 12.50
24 NS 2C N-2 -100 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
14 WARNIER François -LILIEN Raymond : 50,00 %25 NS 4C W-1 100 12 75.00
26 NS 5P N = 650 9 56.25
27 NS 3C S-1 -50 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
Total : 256,0 / 432 = 59,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -de VIRON Baudouin
15 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 50,69 % 1 NS 2S N = 120 13 81.25
2 NS 2P N+1 140 8 50.00
3 NS 4P E+1 -650 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
14 WARNIER François -LILIEN Raymond : 50,00 % 4 NS 2C W+1 -140 8 50.00
5 NS 4P E+1 -450 6 37.50
6 NS 3S N+2 460 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
13 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 51,16 % 7 NS 2P W+1 -140 5 31.25
8 NS 2K E+1 -110 16 100.00
9 NS 2P N-2 -100 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
12 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,37 %10 NS 1S W-2 200 4 25.00
11 NS 3P N = 140 13 81.25
12 NS 4P E+1 -450 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
11 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 44,91 %13 NS 2C N+2 170 0 0.00
14 NS 5CcN-1 -100 1 6.25
15 NS 4PcE = -590 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 4,17 %
10 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 57,18 %16 NS 3T S-4 -200 4 25.00
17 NS 4CcE-1 100 5 31.25
18 NS 3S W+1 -430 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 61,57 %19 NS 3C N-1 -50 12 75.00
20 NS 3S W-2 200 16 100.00
21 NS 3PcE-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
17 VERBOIS Léon -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 38,19 %22 NS 6P E-1 100 15 93.75
23 NS 5TcE-1 200 12 75.00
24 NS 2C N-2 -100 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
16 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 50,93 %25 NS 4C W-1 100 12 75.00
26 NS 3KcE-1 200 0 0.00
27 NS 2S W+1 -150 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
Total : 194,0 / 432 = 44,91 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
17 VERBOIS Léon -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 38,19 % 1 NS Pass Passe 6 37.50
2 NS 4P N = 620 15 93.75
3 NS 4P E+1 -650 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
16 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 50,93 % 4 NS 4P W-1 100 15 93.75
5 NS 4P E+1 -450 6 37.50
6 NS 3S N+2 460 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
15 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 50,69 % 7 NS 4P E-2 200 16 100.00
8 NS 5T E = -400 11 68.75
9 NS 3ScW-2 500 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 89,58 %
14 WARNIER François -LILIEN Raymond : 50,00 %10 NS 3S N+1 630 11 68.75
11 NS 2C E-3 150 16 100.00
12 NS 4P E+1 -450 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
13 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 51,16 %13 NS 4C N+1 650 8 50.00
14 NS 5C N-1 -50 6 37.50
15 NS 4P E+1 -450 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
12 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,37 %16 NS 4C E-1 100 13 81.25
17 NS 4CcW-5 1100 16 100.00
18 NS 3S W-1 50 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 91,67 %
11 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 44,91 %19 NS 4K E = -130 5 31.25
20 NS 3T E+2 -150 10 62.50
21 NS 3S N = 600 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
10 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 57,18 %22 NS 4P E+2 -680 10 62.50
23 NS 3T W+1 -130 2 12.50
24 NS 2S E-1 50 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 61,57 %25 NS 3C W-1 100 12 75.00
26 NS 4P N+1 650 9 56.25
27 NS 2C S = 110 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
Total : 287,0 / 432 = 66,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,85 % 1 EO 3K S = 110 6 37.50
2 EO 4P N-1 -100 12 75.00
3 EO 4P E+1 -650 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
6 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 45,83 % 4 EO 4C W = -620 15 93.75
5 EO 4P E+1 -450 10 62.50
6 EO 4P S = 420 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
2 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 28,24 % 7 EO 2P W+1 -140 11 68.75
8 EO 3S W+3 -490 14 87.50
9 EO 1S W+2 -150 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,42 %
7 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 59,26 %10 EO 3S N+2 660 0 0.00
11 EO 2P N = 110 8 50.00
12 EO 4P E = -420 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
3 CASSART Guy -HUBLET Carlo : 49,31 %13 EO 4C N+3 710 1 6.25
14 EO 5C N-1 -50 10 62.50
15 EO 4PcE = -590 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
8 MATELART Marc -de VIRON Baudouin : 44,91 %16 EO 3T S-4 -200 12 75.00
17 EO 4CcE-1 100 11 68.75
18 EO 3S W+1 -430 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
4 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,08 %19 EO 4K E = -130 11 68.75
20 EO 3KcN-3 -800 16 100.00
21 EO 3S N = 600 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 66,44 %22 EO 4P E+2 -680 6 37.50
23 EO 3T W+1 -130 14 87.50
24 EO 2S E-1 50 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 52,08 %25 EO 4P E-1 100 4 25.00
26 EO 4P N+1 650 7 43.75
27 EO 1S E+1 -120 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
Total : 247,0 / 432 = 57,18 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard
6 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 45,83 % 1 EO Pass Passe 10 62.50
2 EO 4P N = 620 1 6.25
3 EO 4P E+1 -650 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
2 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 28,24 % 4 EO 1S E+3 -180 11 68.75
5 EO 4P E+1 -450 10 62.50
6 EO 4P S = 420 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
7 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 59,26 % 7 EO 1S N+1 120 2 12.50
8 EO 3T W+2 -150 2 12.50
9 EO 1P N+1 110 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
3 CASSART Guy -HUBLET Carlo : 49,31 %10 EO 3S S+1 630 5 31.25
11 EO 2P S = 110 8 50.00
12 EO 2P E+3 -200 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
8 MATELART Marc -de VIRON Baudouin : 44,91 %13 EO 2C N+2 170 16 100.00
14 EO 5CcN-1 -100 15 93.75
15 EO 4PcE = -590 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 95,83 %
4 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,08 %16 EO 2C E = -110 8 50.00
17 EO 3KcN+1 570 2 12.50
18 EO 3S E-1 50 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 66,44 %19 EO 4K E = -130 11 68.75
20 EO 3T E+2 -150 6 37.50
21 EO 3S N = 600 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 52,08 %22 EO 6P E-1 100 1 6.25
23 EO 2CcN = 670 0 0.00
24 EO 2C N-2 -100 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,85 %25 EO 3C W = -140 14 87.50
26 EO 4P N+1 650 7 43.75
27 EO 4T E = -130 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
Total : 194,0 / 432 = 44,91 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse
2 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 28,24 % 1 EO Pass Passe 10 62.50
2 EO 3S S-1 -100 12 75.00
3 EO 3P E+2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
7 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 59,26 % 4 EO 1S E+1 -120 6 37.50
5 EO 4P E+1 -450 10 62.50
6 EO 6P S-2 -100 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
3 CASSART Guy -HUBLET Carlo : 49,31 % 7 EO 2P W+1 -140 11 68.75
8 EO 3S E+2 -460 11 68.75
9 EO 2P N-2 -100 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
8 MATELART Marc -de VIRON Baudouin : 44,91 %10 EO 1S W-2 200 12 75.00
11 EO 3P N = 140 3 18.75
12 EO 4P E+1 -450 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
4 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,08 %13 EO 4C N+1 650 8 50.00
14 EO 4C N = 420 3 18.75
15 EO 4P E = -420 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 66,44 %16 EO 4C E-1 100 3 18.75
17 EO 4CcW-5 1100 0 0.00
18 EO 3S W-1 50 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 8,33 %
5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 52,08 %19 EO 3CcN-1 -100 6 37.50
20 EO 5T E = -600 9 56.25
21 EO 3S N = 600 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,85 %22 EO 6P E = -1430 10 62.50
23 EO 2C N = 110 6 37.50
24 EO 3K W-1 50 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
6 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 45,83 %25 EO 4C W-1 100 4 25.00
26 EO 4P N+1 650 7 43.75
27 EO 4T W = -130 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
Total : 196,0 / 432 = 45,37 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie
7 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 59,26 % 1 EO 2S N = 120 3 18.75
2 EO 2P N+2 170 6 37.50
3 EO 4P E+1 -650 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
3 CASSART Guy -HUBLET Carlo : 49,31 % 4 EO 4C W-1 100 1 6.25
5 EO 4P E = -420 1 6.25
6 EO 6P S-1 -50 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
8 MATELART Marc -de VIRON Baudouin : 44,91 % 7 EO 2P W+1 -140 11 68.75
8 EO 2K E+1 -110 0 0.00
9 EO 2P N-2 -100 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
4 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,08 %10 EO 3S N+1 630 5 31.25
11 EO 2P N = 110 8 50.00
12 EO 4C E = -420 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 66,44 %13 EO 4C N+1 650 8 50.00
14 EO 5C N-1 -50 10 62.50
15 EO 4P E+1 -450 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 52,08 %16 EO 2C E+1 -140 10 62.50
17 EO 3CcE-1 100 11 68.75
18 EO 3S E+1 -430 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,85 %19 EO 3C S = 140 2 12.50
20 EO 2S W-1 100 2 12.50
21 EO 3S N = 600 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
6 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 45,83 %22 EO 6P E = -1430 10 62.50
23 EO 3T E+1 -130 14 87.50
24 EO 2CcN-1 -100 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
2 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 28,24 %25 EO 3C W = -140 14 87.50
26 EO 4P N = 620 14 87.50
27 EO 2S W+2 -180 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 91,67 %
Total : 221,0 / 432 = 51,16 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 WARNIER François -LILIEN Raymond
3 CASSART Guy -HUBLET Carlo : 49,31 % 1 EO 3S N-1 -50 15 93.75
2 EO 4P N-1 -100 12 75.00
3 EO 4P E+1 -650 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
8 MATELART Marc -de VIRON Baudouin : 44,91 % 4 EO 2C W+1 -140 8 50.00
5 EO 4P E+1 -450 10 62.50
6 EO 3S N+2 460 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
4 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,08 % 7 EO 4P W-1 100 4 25.00
8 EO 3S E+4 -520 16 100.00
9 EO 3S W-2 200 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 66,44 %10 EO 3S N+1 630 5 31.25
11 EO 2C E-3 150 0 0.00
12 EO 4P E+1 -450 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 52,08 %13 EO 4C N+2 680 4 25.00
14 EO 5CcN-1 -100 15 93.75
15 EO 3P E+1 -170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,85 %16 EO 4C E-1 100 3 18.75
17 EO 4CcE-1 100 11 68.75
18 EO 2S E+2 -180 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
6 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 45,83 %19 EO 4K E = -130 11 68.75
20 EO 4P W = -620 12 75.00
21 EO 3S N = 600 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
2 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 28,24 %22 EO 6P E+1 -1460 15 93.75
23 EO 1S E = -90 8 50.00
24 EO 2CcN-3 -500 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
7 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 59,26 %25 EO 4C W-1 100 4 25.00
26 EO 5P N = 650 7 43.75
27 EO 3C S-1 -50 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
Total : 216,0 / 432 = 50,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
8 MATELART Marc -de VIRON Baudouin : 44,91 % 1 EO 2S N = 120 3 18.75
2 EO 2P N+1 140 8 50.00
3 EO 4P E+1 -650 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
4 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,08 % 4 EO 1S E+3 -180 11 68.75
5 EO 4P E+1 -450 10 62.50
6 EO 4P S+1 450 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 66,44 % 7 EO 4P E-2 200 0 0.00
8 EO 5T E = -400 5 31.25
9 EO 3ScW-2 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 10,42 %
5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 52,08 %10 EO 2S N+1 150 14 87.50
11 EO 3P N = 140 3 18.75
12 EO 4C E+1 -450 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,85 %13 EO 4P N+1 650 8 50.00
14 EO 4C N = 420 3 18.75
15 EO 4P E = -420 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
6 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 45,83 %16 EO 4C E-1 100 3 18.75
17 EO 2S E-2 100 11 68.75
18 EO 3S E+1 -430 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
2 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 28,24 %19 EO 5K E = -600 16 100.00
20 EO 3S E+4 -720 14 87.50
21 EO 3K N = 110 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 91,67 %
7 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 59,26 %22 EO 4P E+1 -650 4 25.00
23 EO 3T E+1 -130 14 87.50
24 EO 2C N-2 -100 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
3 CASSART Guy -HUBLET Carlo : 49,31 %25 EO 4P S-2 -100 10 62.50
26 EO 4P N+1 650 7 43.75
27 EO 4T W = -130 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
Total : 219,0 / 432 = 50,69 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François
4 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,08 % 1 EO 4P W-3 150 0 0.00
2 EO 4C N-2 -200 16 100.00
3 EO 4P W+1 -650 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 66,44 % 4 EO 4P W-1 100 1 6.25
5 EO 4P E+1 -450 10 62.50
6 EO 3S N+2 460 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 52,08 % 7 EO 2P E+1 -140 11 68.75
8 EO 3S E+2 -460 11 68.75
9 EO 4T E-2 200 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,85 %10 EO 3S N+1 630 5 31.25
11 EO 3K E = -110 14 87.50
12 EO 4P E = -420 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
6 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 45,83 %13 EO 4C N = 620 13 81.25
14 EO 5C N-1 -50 10 62.50
15 EO 4P E = -420 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
2 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 28,24 %16 EO 4C E = -620 16 100.00
17 EO 3K N = 110 6 37.50
18 EO 3S E+2 -460 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
7 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 59,26 %19 EO 4K E = -130 11 68.75
20 EO 1S W = -90 4 25.00
21 EO 3S N = 600 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
3 CASSART Guy -HUBLET Carlo : 49,31 %22 EO 6P E = -1430 10 62.50
23 EO 3S E-3 300 2 12.50
24 EO 2CcN+1 570 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
8 MATELART Marc -de VIRON Baudouin : 44,91 %25 EO 4C W-1 100 4 25.00
26 EO 3KcE-1 200 16 100.00
27 EO 2S W+1 -150 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
Total : 220,0 / 432 = 50,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 VERBOIS Léon -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 66,44 % 1 EO Pass Passe 10 62.50
2 EO 4P N = 620 1 6.25
3 EO 4P E+1 -650 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 52,08 % 4 EO 1S N-1 -100 4 25.00
5 EO 4P E+1 -450 10 62.50
6 EO 6P N-1 -50 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,85 % 7 EO 3P W = -140 11 68.75
8 EO 3S E+1 -430 8 50.00
9 EO 2P N-2 -100 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
6 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 45,83 %10 EO 3S N = 600 10 62.50
11 EO 2K E = -90 12 75.00
12 EO 4C E-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
2 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 28,24 %13 EO 4C N+3 710 1 6.25
14 EO 4C N = 420 3 18.75
15 EO 4P E = -420 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
7 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 59,26 %16 EO 4C E-1 100 3 18.75
17 EO 2PcN = 470 4 25.00
18 EO 3S E = -400 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
3 CASSART Guy -HUBLET Carlo : 49,31 %19 EO 5KcE-2 500 0 0.00
20 EO 5T E = -600 9 56.25
21 EO 3S N = 600 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
8 MATELART Marc -de VIRON Baudouin : 44,91 %22 EO 6P E-1 100 1 6.25
23 EO 5TcE-1 200 4 25.00
24 EO 2C N-2 -100 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
4 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,08 %25 EO 3C W = -140 14 87.50
26 EO 4P N+2 680 0 0.00
27 EO 4T W-1 50 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 165,0 / 432 = 38,19 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 52,08 % 1 EO 3S N-1 -50 15 93.75
2 EO 2P N+3 200 4 25.00
3 EO 4P E+1 -650 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,85 % 4 EO 4C W = -620 15 93.75
5 EO 4P E = -420 1 6.25
6 EO 6PcS-1 -100 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
6 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 45,83 % 7 EO 2P W+1 -140 11 68.75
8 EO 5T W = -400 5 31.25
9 EO 2K S = 90 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
2 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 28,24 %10 EO 2K N+1 110 16 100.00
11 EO 2C E+1 -140 16 100.00
12 EO 4C E+1 -450 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 93,75 %
7 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 59,26 %13 EO 4C N = 620 13 81.25
14 EO 4C N = 420 3 18.75
15 EO 4P E+1 -450 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
3 CASSART Guy -HUBLET Carlo : 49,31 %16 EO 3C E+3 -230 14 87.50
17 EO 4K N-1 -50 16 100.00
18 EO 3S E+1 -430 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 85,42 %
8 MATELART Marc -de VIRON Baudouin : 44,91 %19 EO 3C N-1 -50 4 25.00
20 EO 3S W-2 200 0 0.00
21 EO 3PcE-1 100 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
4 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,08 %22 EO 6P E+1 -1460 15 93.75
23 EO 3T E = -110 10 62.50
24 EO 3C N-3 -150 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 66,44 %25 EO 3C W-1 100 4 25.00
26 EO 4P N+1 650 7 43.75
27 EO 2C S = 110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
Total : 266,0 / 432 = 61,57 %
|
|