|
Tournoi du 23-08-10
1 61,71 3 HALLEUX Jean François -LIBERT Laurent
2 60,88 6 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile
3 55,23 5 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire
4 53,31 7 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne
5 52,48 1 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CASSART Guy
6 51,10 11 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
7 47,93 12 VERBOIS Léon -SALFI Huguette
8 47,52 2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
9 46,28 4 GELISSEN Edouard -MASSAUX Jacques
10 42,84 8 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine
11 41,46 10 DACHET Gérard -STIENON Annie
12 39,26 9 FRAITURE Louis -de WASSEIGE Claude
13 0,00 13 -
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 66,06 14 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
2 59,24 19 VANDAM Cécile -DELTOUR Emile
3 56,52 20 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
4 55,61 17 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga
5 53,94 16 HUBLET Carlo -de TERWANGNE Philippe
6 53,17 25 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques
7 52,58 22 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
8 46,06 23 EVRARD Armand -DASSY Renée
9 44,90 15 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean
10 43,79 21 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques
11 43,03 18 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse
12 41,21 26 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Christian
13 34,09 24 NIGOT Pierre -MACAUX Lucienne
PAIRE Nr : 1 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CASSART Guy
14 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 66,06 % 1 NS 3S W = -400 3 13.64
2 NS 4P S-2 -200 0 0.00
3 NS 2C S-1 -50 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
24 NIGOT Pierre -MACAUX Lucienne : 34,09 % 4 NS 2C S = 110 9 40.91
5 NS 3S W = -400 14 63.64
6 NS 3S N+2 460 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
23 EVRARD Armand -DASSY Renée : 46,06 % 7 NS 3C S = 140 14 63.64
8 NS 2P S-1 -50 19 86.36
9 NS 3C N = 140 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
22 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,58 %10 NS 1S E = -90 14 63.64
11 NS 2T S+1 110 0 0.00
12 NS 4P N = 620 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
21 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 43,79 %13 NS 3P N-1 -100 12 54.55
14 NS 2P S+1 140 16 72.73
15 NS 3S N-1 -100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
26 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Christian : 41,21 %16 NS 4PcN-2 -300 19 86.36
17 NS 2P E-2 100 17 77.27
18 NS 3S S+3 690 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
19 VANDAM Cécile -DELTOUR Emile : 59,24 %19 NS 2P S = 110 20 90.91
20 NS 2C S-1 -100 14 63.64
21 NS 3S N-1 -100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
18 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 43,03 %22 NS 1S W = -90 14 63.64
23 NS 3P S+1 170 1 4.55
24 NS 3S E = -400 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
17 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 55,61 %25 NS 2S N-1 -50 12 54.55
26 NS 3S E+2 -660 1 4.55
27 NS 3P S+3 230 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
16 HUBLET Carlo -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 53,94 %28 NS 1S N+1 120 9 40.91
29 NS 3S S+2 660 13 59.09
30 NS 2P W+1 -140 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
15 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 44,90 %31 NS 4C E-1 50 17 77.27
32 NS 2P N-1 -50 12 54.55
33 NS 2K N = 90 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
Total : 381,0 / 726 = 52,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
16 HUBLET Carlo -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 53,94 % 1 NS 1S W+3 -180 6 27.27
2 NS 2P S+1 140 17 77.27
3 NS 2C S = 110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
15 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 44,90 % 4 NS 2C S = 110 9 40.91
5 NS 3S W-2 100 22 100.00
6 NS 3S N+1 430 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
14 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 66,06 % 7 NS 3T W = -110 2 9.09
8 NS 2T W+1 -110 13 59.09
9 NS 4C N-1 -50 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
24 NIGOT Pierre -MACAUX Lucienne : 34,09 %10 NS 1S E = -90 14 63.64
11 NS 1S S+2 150 10 45.45
12 NS 4P S = 620 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
23 EVRARD Armand -DASSY Renée : 46,06 %13 NS 4P N-2 -200 5 22.73
14 NS 2T N-2 -100 2 9.09
15 NS 4C N = 620 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
22 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,58 %16 NS 5C E-1 100 22 100.00
17 NS 2S E-2 100 17 77.27
18 NS 3S S = 600 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
21 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 43,79 %19 NS 2K N-1 -50 10 45.45
20 NS 3C S-2 -200 3 13.64
21 NS 3S N = 600 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
25 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,17 %22 NS 1S W+1 -120 4 18.18
23 NS 4C S = 620 11 50.00
24 NS 3S E+2 -460 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
19 VANDAM Cécile -DELTOUR Emile : 59,24 %25 NS 2S E-2 200 20 90.91
26 NS 3S E+1 -630 7 31.82
27 NS 2P S+2 170 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
18 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 43,03 %28 NS 2C W-3 150 19 86.36
29 NS 3S S+3 690 21 95.45
30 NS 2P W = -110 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 87,88 %
17 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 55,61 %31 NS 3TcS-2 -500 0 0.00
32 NS 1S E+1 -120 5 22.73
33 NS 2P S-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 7,58 %
Total : 345,0 / 726 = 47,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 HALLEUX Jean François -LIBERT Laurent
18 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 43,03 % 1 NS 3S W-1 50 16 72.73
2 NS 3P S = 140 17 77.27
3 NS 2C S = 110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
17 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 55,61 % 4 NS 2C S = 110 9 40.91
5 NS 3S W = -400 14 63.64
6 NS 2PcW-3 800 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
16 HUBLET Carlo -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 53,94 % 7 NS 3CcS+1 930 22 100.00
8 NS 3S E-1 50 22 100.00
9 NS 4C N = 420 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 92,42 %
25 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,17 %10 NS 1S E-1 100 21 95.45
11 NS 1S S+2 150 10 45.45
12 NS 3P N+2 200 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
14 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 66,06 %13 NS 3S S-1 -100 12 54.55
14 NS 1S W-1 50 11 50.00
15 NS 4C N+1 650 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
24 NIGOT Pierre -MACAUX Lucienne : 34,09 %16 NS 4C E = -620 15 68.18
17 NS 2K W-2 100 17 77.27
18 NS 3S S+3 690 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
23 EVRARD Armand -DASSY Renée : 46,06 %19 NS 2P S+1 140 22 100.00
20 NS 3C S-1 -100 14 63.64
21 NS 3S N = 600 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 78,79 %
22 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,58 %22 NS 1S W = -90 14 63.64
23 NS 2C S+3 200 4 18.18
24 NS 3S E+2 -460 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
26 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Christian : 41,21 %25 NS 3S E = -600 2 9.09
26 NS 3S E+2 -660 1 4.55
27 NS 4C N+2 480 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
20 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 56,52 %28 NS 1S N+1 120 9 40.91
29 NS 3S S+3 690 21 95.45
30 NS 2P W+1 -140 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
19 VANDAM Cécile -DELTOUR Emile : 59,24 %31 NS 3C W = -140 10 45.45
32 NS 1S E+1 -120 5 22.73
33 NS 3P S-2 -100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
Total : 448,0 / 726 = 61,71 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 GELISSEN Edouard -MASSAUX Jacques
20 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 56,52 % 1 NS 3S W-1 50 16 72.73
2 NS 4P S-1 -100 5 22.73
3 NS 3C N-1 -50 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
19 VANDAM Cécile -DELTOUR Emile : 59,24 % 4 NS 2C S = 110 9 40.91
5 NS 3S W+1 -430 7 31.82
6 NS 3S N+2 460 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
18 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 43,03 % 7 NS 3C S = 140 14 63.64
8 NS 3P S-3 -150 1 4.55
9 NS 4C N = 420 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
17 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 55,61 %10 NS 1S E = -90 14 63.64
11 NS 3S N+1 430 21 95.45
12 NS 4P S = 620 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 75,76 %
26 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Christian : 41,21 %13 NS 4P N-3 -300 1 4.55
14 NS 1S W-1 50 11 50.00
15 NS 3S N-1 -100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
15 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 44,90 %16 NS 5CcE = -850 0 0.00
17 NS 1S W-2 100 17 77.27
18 NS 4P N+2 680 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
14 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 66,06 %19 NS 1S W+1 -120 0 0.00
20 NS 3C S-2 -200 3 13.64
21 NS 3S S-1 -100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
24 NIGOT Pierre -MACAUX Lucienne : 34,09 %22 NS 1S E = -90 14 63.64
23 NS 4P S = 620 11 50.00
24 NS 3S E+2 -460 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
23 EVRARD Armand -DASSY Renée : 46,06 %25 NS 2S E-2 200 20 90.91
26 NS 2S E+2 -180 16 72.73
27 NS 3C N+3 230 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 80,30 %
22 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,58 %28 NS 1S N+2 150 19 86.36
29 NS 3S N+2 660 13 59.09
30 NS 2P W+1 -140 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
25 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,17 %31 NS 3C E+1 -170 4 18.18
32 NS 1S E+1 -120 5 22.73
33 NS 2P S-2 -100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 21,21 %
Total : 336,0 / 726 = 46,28 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire
26 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Christian : 41,21 % 1 NS 2K W+1 -110 12 54.55
2 NS 2P S+1 140 17 77.27
3 NS 3C N+1 170 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
21 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 43,79 % 4 NS 3C S = 140 19 86.36
5 NS 3S W-1 50 20 90.91
6 NS 3S N+1 430 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
20 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 56,52 % 7 NS 3C S = 140 14 63.64
8 NS 1S E+2 -150 1 4.55
9 NS 4C S = 420 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
19 VANDAM Cécile -DELTOUR Emile : 59,24 %10 NS 1S E+2 -150 2 9.09
11 NS 1S S+3 180 15 68.18
12 NS 3P S+2 200 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
18 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 43,03 %13 NS 2P N = 110 18 81.82
14 NS 1S W = -90 5 22.73
15 NS 4P N+1 650 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
17 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 55,61 %16 NS 5C E = -650 9 40.91
17 NS 2C W-1 50 8 36.36
18 NS 3S N+3 690 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
25 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,17 %19 NS 2P S-1 -50 10 45.45
20 NS 2C S = 110 21 95.45
21 NS 3S N = 600 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
15 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 44,90 %22 NS 1S W-1 100 19 86.36
23 NS 4P S+2 680 22 100.00
24 NS 3S E+2 -460 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 84,85 %
14 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 66,06 %25 NS 3S E = -600 2 9.09
26 NS 3S W+1 -630 7 31.82
27 NS 2P S+1 140 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 21,21 %
24 NIGOT Pierre -MACAUX Lucienne : 34,09 %28 NS 2S N+1 150 19 86.36
29 NS 3S S+1 630 5 22.73
30 NS 2P W+1 -140 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
23 EVRARD Armand -DASSY Renée : 46,06 %31 NS 4C W-1 50 17 77.27
32 NS 1S E+3 -180 0 0.00
33 NS 3K N-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
Total : 401,0 / 726 = 55,23 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile
24 NIGOT Pierre -MACAUX Lucienne : 34,09 % 1 NS 2P E-1 50 16 72.73
2 NS 3P N+1 170 22 100.00
3 NS 3CcE-4 1100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
23 EVRARD Armand -DASSY Renée : 46,06 % 4 NS 2P N = 110 9 40.91
5 NS 3S E = -400 14 63.64
6 NS 3S N+1 430 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
25 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,17 % 7 NS 3T E-1 100 8 36.36
8 NS 1S E+1 -120 7 31.82
9 NS 4C N-1 -50 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
21 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 43,79 %10 NS 2P N-1 -100 8 36.36
11 NS 3S N+1 430 21 95.45
12 NS 4P N+1 650 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
20 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 56,52 %13 NS 2P N-1 -100 12 54.55
14 NS 3P N+1 170 20 90.91
15 NS 4C N = 620 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
19 VANDAM Cécile -DELTOUR Emile : 59,24 %16 NS 5C E = -650 9 40.91
17 NS 2K N = 90 10 45.45
18 NS 4P N+2 680 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
18 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 43,03 %19 NS 1S N = 90 17 77.27
20 NS 2C N = 110 21 95.45
21 NS 3S N+1 630 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
26 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Christian : 41,21 %22 NS 3S E-4 400 22 100.00
23 NS 4P N+1 650 19 86.36
24 NS 3S E+2 -460 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 84,85 %
16 HUBLET Carlo -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 53,94 %25 NS 3S E = -600 2 9.09
26 NS 3S E = -600 13 59.09
27 NS 2P N+3 200 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
15 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 44,90 %28 NS 1S N+1 120 9 40.91
29 NS 3S N+2 660 13 59.09
30 NS 3P E = -140 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
14 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 66,06 %31 NS 2C E+2 -170 4 18.18
32 NS 2P N = 110 17 77.27
33 NS 3CcE-1 100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
Total : 442,0 / 726 = 60,88 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne
15 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 44,90 % 1 NS 3S W+1 -430 0 0.00
2 NS 2P N+1 140 17 77.27
3 NS 2S W-3 300 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
14 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 66,06 % 4 NS 2C S = 110 9 40.91
5 NS 3S W = -400 14 63.64
6 NS 3S N+2 460 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
24 NIGOT Pierre -MACAUX Lucienne : 34,09 % 7 NS 2C S-1 -100 5 22.73
8 NS 1S W+1 -120 7 31.82
9 NS 4C N = 420 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
26 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Christian : 41,21 %10 NS 1S E+1 -120 5 22.73
11 NS 1S N+3 180 15 68.18
12 NS 4P N = 620 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
22 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,58 %13 NS 4P N-1 -100 12 54.55
14 NS 1S W-1 50 11 50.00
15 NS 4C N-1 -100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
21 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 43,79 %16 NS 4C W = -620 15 68.18
17 NS 2S W-2 100 17 77.27
18 NS 3S S+3 690 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
20 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 56,52 %19 NS 3T W = -110 2 9.09
20 NS 2S W-1 100 18 81.82
21 NS 3S N-1 -100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
19 VANDAM Cécile -DELTOUR Emile : 59,24 %22 NS 1S W+1 -120 4 18.18
23 NS 4P S = 620 11 50.00
24 NS 3S E+2 -460 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
18 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 43,03 %25 NS 2S E-1 100 15 68.18
26 NS 3S E = -600 13 59.09
27 NS 2P S+3 200 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
25 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,17 %28 NS 1S N+1 120 9 40.91
29 NS 3S N+1 630 5 22.73
30 NS 4P E-1 50 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
16 HUBLET Carlo -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 53,94 %31 NS 4P W-3 150 21 95.45
32 NS 2C S-1 -50 12 54.55
33 NS 2P S-2 -100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
Total : 387,0 / 726 = 53,31 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine
17 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 55,61 % 1 NS 2P E+1 -140 9 40.91
2 NS 2C S = 110 9 40.91
3 NS 2C S = 110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
16 HUBLET Carlo -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 53,94 % 4 NS 2C N+1 140 19 86.36
5 NS 3S W+2 -460 2 9.09
6 NS 3S N+2 460 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
15 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 44,90 % 7 NS 3C S-1 -100 5 22.73
8 NS 2K S-1 -50 19 86.36
9 NS 3C N = 140 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
14 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 66,06 %10 NS 1S E = -90 14 63.64
11 NS 2T S+2 130 5 22.73
12 NS 3P S+1 170 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
24 NIGOT Pierre -MACAUX Lucienne : 34,09 %13 NS 4P N-2 -200 5 22.73
14 NS 2P S+2 170 20 90.91
15 NS 4C N+1 650 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
25 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,17 %16 NS 4C E+2 -680 3 13.64
17 NS 1S W = -90 6 27.27
18 NS 3S S = 600 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 19,70 %
22 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,58 %19 NS 2P S-1 -50 10 45.45
20 NS 3CcS-2 -500 0 0.00
21 NS 3S S = 600 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
21 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 43,79 %22 NS 2P S-2 -100 10 45.45
23 NS 4P S+1 650 19 86.36
24 NS 6S W = -990 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
20 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 56,52 %25 NS 2S E = -120 9 40.91
26 NS 3S E+1 -630 7 31.82
27 NS 2P S+1 140 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
19 VANDAM Cécile -DELTOUR Emile : 59,24 %28 NS 1S N+1 120 9 40.91
29 NS 3S S = 600 1 4.55
30 NS 2P W+1 -140 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
26 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Christian : 41,21 %31 NS 2C E+1 -140 10 45.45
32 NS 2K N-1 -50 12 54.55
33 NS 2P S = 110 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
Total : 311,0 / 726 = 42,84 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 FRAITURE Louis -de WASSEIGE Claude
19 VANDAM Cécile -DELTOUR Emile : 59,24 % 1 NS 3S W = -400 3 13.64
2 NS 3T W = -110 2 9.09
3 NS 2C S = 110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 24,24 %
25 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,17 % 4 NS 2C S = 110 9 40.91
5 NS 3S W+2 -460 2 9.09
6 NS 3S N+1 430 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
17 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 55,61 % 7 NS 3C S = 140 14 63.64
8 NS 2S W = -120 7 31.82
9 NS 3C N = 140 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
16 HUBLET Carlo -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 53,94 %10 NS 3K W-1 100 21 95.45
11 NS 1S S+1 120 2 9.09
12 NS 3P S+1 170 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
15 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 44,90 %13 NS 2P N+1 140 21 95.45
14 NS 2P S+2 170 20 90.91
15 NS 3S N-1 -100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
14 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 66,06 %16 NS 4C E+1 -650 9 40.91
17 NS 1S W+1 -120 0 0.00
18 NS 4P N+1 650 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
26 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Christian : 41,21 %19 NS 2P S-1 -50 10 45.45
20 NS 2C S-1 -100 14 63.64
21 NS 4P S-1 -100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
23 EVRARD Armand -DASSY Renée : 46,06 %22 NS 1S W-1 100 19 86.36
23 NS 4C S = 620 11 50.00
24 NS 3S W+3 -490 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
22 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,58 %25 NS 2S E+1 -150 6 27.27
26 NS 3S E+1 -630 7 31.82
27 NS 4K E-2 100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
21 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 43,79 %28 NS 1S N+2 150 19 86.36
29 NS 3S S = 600 1 4.55
30 NS 3P W = -140 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
20 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 56,52 %31 NS 2P E+1 -140 10 45.45
32 NS 2P N = 110 17 77.27
33 NS 3KcN-1 -100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
Total : 285,0 / 726 = 39,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 DACHET Gérard -STIENON Annie
21 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 43,79 % 1 NS 2P E+1 -140 9 40.91
2 NS 1P S+1 110 9 40.91
3 NS 3C S-1 -50 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
20 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 56,52 % 4 NS 3C S-1 -100 0 0.00
5 NS 3S E = -400 14 63.64
6 NS 3S N+1 430 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
26 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Christian : 41,21 % 7 NS 4T W-2 200 20 90.91
8 NS 1S W+1 -120 7 31.82
9 NS 4C N = 420 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
18 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 43,03 %10 NS 1S E+1 -120 5 22.73
11 NS 2T S+2 130 5 22.73
12 NS 3P S+1 170 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
17 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 55,61 %13 NS 4P N-1 -100 12 54.55
14 NS 1S W+1 -120 0 0.00
15 NS 4C N = 620 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
16 HUBLET Carlo -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 53,94 %16 NS 5C E = -650 9 40.91
17 NS 2T W+1 -110 2 9.09
18 NS 3S S = 600 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
15 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 44,90 %19 NS 2P S-1 -50 10 45.45
20 NS 1S W+2 -150 8 36.36
21 NS 3S S-1 -100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
14 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 66,06 %22 NS 1S W+1 -120 4 18.18
23 NS 4P S = 620 11 50.00
24 NS 3S W+3 -490 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
25 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,17 %25 NS 2S E-2 200 20 90.91
26 NS 2K E-1 100 21 95.45
27 NS 3P S+1 170 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 75,76 %
23 EVRARD Armand -DASSY Renée : 46,06 %28 NS 1S N = 90 2 9.09
29 NS 3S S+2 660 13 59.09
30 NS 2P W = -110 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
22 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,58 %31 NS 3C W+1 -170 4 18.18
32 NS 3CcS = 530 22 100.00
33 NS 4C E-1 50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
Total : 301,0 / 726 = 41,46 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
23 EVRARD Armand -DASSY Renée : 46,06 % 1 NS 3S E-2 100 21 95.45
2 NS 2S N = 120 12 54.55
3 NS 2C S-1 -50 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
22 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,58 % 4 NS 2C S+2 170 22 100.00
5 NS 3S W+1 -430 7 31.82
6 NS 3S N+2 460 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
21 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 43,79 % 7 NS 2C S+1 140 14 63.64
8 NS 3T W = -110 13 59.09
9 NS 4C N = 420 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
20 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 56,52 %10 NS 2P N-2 -200 0 0.00
11 NS 3S N = 400 18 81.82
12 NS 4P N = 620 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
25 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,17 %13 NS 3P N = 140 21 95.45
14 NS 1S W = -90 5 22.73
15 NS 4C N = 620 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
18 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 43,03 %16 NS 4PcN-2 -300 19 86.36
17 NS 2K N-2 -100 4 18.18
18 NS 3S N-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
17 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 55,61 %19 NS 1S N = 90 17 77.27
20 NS 1S W+2 -150 8 36.36
21 NS 3S S-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
16 HUBLET Carlo -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 53,94 %22 NS 1S W+1 -120 4 18.18
23 NS 2P S+2 170 1 4.55
24 NS 3S W+3 -490 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 15,15 %
15 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 44,90 %25 NS 1S E+1 -120 9 40.91
26 NS 6T E-1 100 21 95.45
27 NS 4C N-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
26 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Christian : 41,21 %28 NS 1S N+1 120 9 40.91
29 NS 3S N+2 660 13 59.09
30 NS 2P W = -110 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
24 NIGOT Pierre -MACAUX Lucienne : 34,09 %31 NS 3S E-3 150 21 95.45
32 NS 1S E+1 -120 5 22.73
33 NS 2S N = 120 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
Total : 371,0 / 726 = 51,10 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 VERBOIS Léon -SALFI Huguette
25 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,17 % 1 NS 3S E-2 100 21 95.45
2 NS 3P S-1 -100 5 22.73
3 NS 2C N+1 140 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
18 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 43,03 % 4 NS 2C S = 110 9 40.91
5 NS 3S W+2 -460 2 9.09
6 NS 3S N+2 460 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
22 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,58 % 7 NS 3S E = -600 0 0.00
8 NS 1S S-2 -100 16 72.73
9 NS 4C N-1 -50 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
15 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 44,90 %10 NS 1S E = -90 14 63.64
11 NS 1S S+2 150 10 45.45
12 NS 4P S = 620 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
19 VANDAM Cécile -DELTOUR Emile : 59,24 %13 NS 4P N-3 -300 1 4.55
14 NS 1S W-1 50 11 50.00
15 NS 4C N = 620 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
23 EVRARD Armand -DASSY Renée : 46,06 %16 NS 4C E+2 -680 3 13.64
17 NS 2K W-2 100 17 77.27
18 NS 4P N+2 680 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
16 HUBLET Carlo -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 53,94 %19 NS 2K N-2 -100 4 18.18
20 NS 1S W+2 -150 8 36.36
21 NS 3S N = 600 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
20 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 56,52 %22 NS 1S E+1 -120 4 18.18
23 NS 4P S = 620 11 50.00
24 NS 3S E+3 -490 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
24 NIGOT Pierre -MACAUX Lucienne : 34,09 %25 NS 2S E-1 100 15 68.18
26 NS 3T E+2 -150 18 81.82
27 NS 4C N+2 480 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
17 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 55,61 %28 NS 3S N-2 -200 0 0.00
29 NS 3S S+2 660 13 59.09
30 NS 2P W+1 -140 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
21 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 43,79 %31 NS 3T S-1 -100 14 63.64
32 NS 3S E-3 300 20 90.91
33 NS 2P S-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
Total : 348,0 / 726 = 47,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 -
22 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,58 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
26 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Christian : 41,21 % 4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
19 VANDAM Cécile -DELTOUR Emile : 59,24 % 7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
23 EVRARD Armand -DASSY Renée : 46,06 %10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
16 HUBLET Carlo -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 53,94 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
20 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 56,52 %16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
24 NIGOT Pierre -MACAUX Lucienne : 34,09 %19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
17 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 55,61 %22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
21 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 43,79 %25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00
27 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
14 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 66,06 %28 NS BYE 0 0.00
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
18 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 43,03 %31 NS BYE 0 0.00
32 NS BYE 0 0.00
33 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 726 = 0,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
1 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CASSART Guy : 52,48 % 1 EO 3S W = -400 19 86.36
2 EO 4P S-2 -200 22 100.00
3 EO 2C S-1 -50 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
7 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 53,31 % 4 EO 2C S = 110 13 59.09
5 EO 3S W = -400 8 36.36
6 EO 3S N+2 460 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 47,52 % 7 EO 3T W = -110 20 90.91
8 EO 2T W+1 -110 9 40.91
9 EO 4C N-1 -50 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
8 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 42,84 %10 EO 1S E = -90 8 36.36
11 EO 2T S+2 130 17 77.27
12 EO 3P S+1 170 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
3 HALLEUX Jean François -LIBERT Laurent : 61,71 %13 EO 3S S-1 -100 10 45.45
14 EO 1S W-1 50 11 50.00
15 EO 4C N+1 650 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
9 FRAITURE Louis -de WASSEIGE Claude : 39,26 %16 EO 4C E+1 -650 13 59.09
17 EO 1S W+1 -120 22 100.00
18 EO 4P N+1 650 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
4 GELISSEN Edouard -MASSAUX Jacques : 46,28 %19 EO 1S W+1 -120 22 100.00
20 EO 3C S-2 -200 19 86.36
21 EO 3S S-1 -100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
10 DACHET Gérard -STIENON Annie : 41,46 %22 EO 1S W+1 -120 18 81.82
23 EO 4P S = 620 11 50.00
24 EO 3S W+3 -490 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
5 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 55,23 %25 EO 3S E = -600 20 90.91
26 EO 3S W+1 -630 15 68.18
27 EO 2P S+1 140 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 78,79 %
13 - : 0,00 %28 EO BYE 0 0.00
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile : 60,88 %31 EO 2C E+2 -170 18 81.82
32 EO 2P N = 110 5 22.73
33 EO 3CcE-1 100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
Total : 436,0 / 660 = 66,06 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean
7 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 53,31 % 1 EO 3S W+1 -430 22 100.00
2 EO 2P N+1 140 5 22.73
3 EO 2S W-3 300 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 47,52 % 4 EO 2C S = 110 13 59.09
5 EO 3S W-2 100 0 0.00
6 EO 3S N+1 430 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
8 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 42,84 % 7 EO 3C S-1 -100 17 77.27
8 EO 2K S-1 -50 3 13.64
9 EO 3C N = 140 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
12 VERBOIS Léon -SALFI Huguette : 47,93 %10 EO 1S E = -90 8 36.36
11 EO 1S S+2 150 12 54.55
12 EO 4P S = 620 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
9 FRAITURE Louis -de WASSEIGE Claude : 39,26 %13 EO 2P N+1 140 1 4.55
14 EO 2P S+2 170 2 9.09
15 EO 3S N-1 -100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
4 GELISSEN Edouard -MASSAUX Jacques : 46,28 %16 EO 5CcE = -850 22 100.00
17 EO 1S W-2 100 5 22.73
18 EO 4P N+2 680 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
10 DACHET Gérard -STIENON Annie : 41,46 %19 EO 2P S-1 -50 12 54.55
20 EO 1S W+2 -150 14 63.64
21 EO 3S S-1 -100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
5 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 55,23 %22 EO 1S W-1 100 3 13.64
23 EO 4P S+2 680 0 0.00
24 EO 3S E+2 -460 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 15,15 %
11 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,10 %25 EO 1S E+1 -120 13 59.09
26 EO 6T E-1 100 1 4.55
27 EO 4C N-1 -50 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
6 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile : 60,88 %28 EO 1S N+1 120 13 59.09
29 EO 3S N+2 660 9 40.91
30 EO 3P E = -140 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
1 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CASSART Guy : 52,48 %31 EO 4C E-1 50 5 22.73
32 EO 2P N-1 -50 10 45.45
33 EO 2K N = 90 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
Total : 326,0 / 726 = 44,90 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 HUBLET Carlo -de TERWANGNE Philippe
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 47,52 % 1 EO 1S W+3 -180 16 72.73
2 EO 2P S+1 140 5 22.73
3 EO 2C S = 110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
8 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 42,84 % 4 EO 2C N+1 140 3 13.64
5 EO 3S W+2 -460 20 90.91
6 EO 3S N+2 460 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
3 HALLEUX Jean François -LIBERT Laurent : 61,71 % 7 EO 3CcS+1 930 0 0.00
8 EO 3S E-1 50 0 0.00
9 EO 4C N = 420 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 7,58 %
9 FRAITURE Louis -de WASSEIGE Claude : 39,26 %10 EO 3K W-1 100 1 4.55
11 EO 1S S+1 120 20 90.91
12 EO 3P S+1 170 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
13 - : 0,00 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
10 DACHET Gérard -STIENON Annie : 41,46 %16 EO 5C E = -650 13 59.09
17 EO 2T W+1 -110 20 90.91
18 EO 3S S = 600 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
12 VERBOIS Léon -SALFI Huguette : 47,93 %19 EO 2K N-2 -100 18 81.82
20 EO 1S W+2 -150 14 63.64
21 EO 3S N = 600 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
11 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,10 %22 EO 1S W+1 -120 18 81.82
23 EO 2P S+2 170 21 95.45
24 EO 3S W+3 -490 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 84,85 %
6 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile : 60,88 %25 EO 3S E = -600 20 90.91
26 EO 3S E = -600 9 40.91
27 EO 2P N+3 200 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
1 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CASSART Guy : 52,48 %28 EO 1S N+1 120 13 59.09
29 EO 3S S+2 660 9 40.91
30 EO 2P W+1 -140 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
7 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 53,31 %31 EO 4P W-3 150 1 4.55
32 EO 2C S-1 -50 10 45.45
33 EO 2P S-2 -100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
Total : 356,0 / 660 = 53,94 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga
8 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 42,84 % 1 EO 2P E+1 -140 13 59.09
2 EO 2C S = 110 13 59.09
3 EO 2C S = 110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
3 HALLEUX Jean François -LIBERT Laurent : 61,71 % 4 EO 2C S = 110 13 59.09
5 EO 3S W = -400 8 36.36
6 EO 2PcW-3 800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
9 FRAITURE Louis -de WASSEIGE Claude : 39,26 % 7 EO 3C S = 140 8 36.36
8 EO 2S W = -120 15 68.18
9 EO 3C N = 140 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
4 GELISSEN Edouard -MASSAUX Jacques : 46,28 %10 EO 1S E = -90 8 36.36
11 EO 3S N+1 430 1 4.55
12 EO 4P S = 620 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 24,24 %
10 DACHET Gérard -STIENON Annie : 41,46 %13 EO 4P N-1 -100 10 45.45
14 EO 1S W+1 -120 22 100.00
15 EO 4C N = 620 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
5 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 55,23 %16 EO 5C E = -650 13 59.09
17 EO 2C W-1 50 14 63.64
18 EO 3S N+3 690 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
11 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,10 %19 EO 1S N = 90 5 22.73
20 EO 1S W+2 -150 14 63.64
21 EO 3S S-2 -200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
13 - : 0,00 %22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
1 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CASSART Guy : 52,48 %25 EO 2S N-1 -50 10 45.45
26 EO 3S E+2 -660 21 95.45
27 EO 3P S+3 230 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
12 VERBOIS Léon -SALFI Huguette : 47,93 %28 EO 3S N-2 -200 22 100.00
29 EO 3S S+2 660 9 40.91
30 EO 2P W+1 -140 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 47,52 %31 EO 3TcS-2 -500 22 100.00
32 EO 1S E+1 -120 17 77.27
33 EO 2P S-3 -150 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 92,42 %
Total : 367,0 / 660 = 55,61 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse
3 HALLEUX Jean François -LIBERT Laurent : 61,71 % 1 EO 3S W-1 50 6 27.27
2 EO 3P S = 140 5 22.73
3 EO 2C S = 110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
12 VERBOIS Léon -SALFI Huguette : 47,93 % 4 EO 2C S = 110 13 59.09
5 EO 3S W+2 -460 20 90.91
6 EO 3S N+2 460 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
4 GELISSEN Edouard -MASSAUX Jacques : 46,28 % 7 EO 3C S = 140 8 36.36
8 EO 3P S-3 -150 21 95.45
9 EO 4C N = 420 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
10 DACHET Gérard -STIENON Annie : 41,46 %10 EO 1S E+1 -120 17 77.27
11 EO 2T S+2 130 17 77.27
12 EO 3P S+1 170 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
5 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 55,23 %13 EO 2P N = 110 4 18.18
14 EO 1S W = -90 17 77.27
15 EO 4P N+1 650 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
11 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,10 %16 EO 4PcN-2 -300 3 13.64
17 EO 2K N-2 -100 18 81.82
18 EO 3S N-1 -100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
6 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile : 60,88 %19 EO 1S N = 90 5 22.73
20 EO 2C N = 110 1 4.55
21 EO 3S N+1 630 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
1 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CASSART Guy : 52,48 %22 EO 1S W = -90 8 36.36
23 EO 3P S+1 170 21 95.45
24 EO 3S E = -400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
7 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 53,31 %25 EO 2S E-1 100 7 31.82
26 EO 3S E = -600 9 40.91
27 EO 2P S+3 200 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 47,52 %28 EO 2C W-3 150 3 13.64
29 EO 3S S+3 690 1 4.55
30 EO 2P W = -110 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 12,12 %
13 - : 0,00 %31 EO BYE 0 0.00
32 EO BYE 0 0.00
33 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 284,0 / 660 = 43,03 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 VANDAM Cécile -DELTOUR Emile
9 FRAITURE Louis -de WASSEIGE Claude : 39,26 % 1 EO 3S W = -400 19 86.36
2 EO 3T W = -110 20 90.91
3 EO 2C S = 110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 75,76 %
4 GELISSEN Edouard -MASSAUX Jacques : 46,28 % 4 EO 2C S = 110 13 59.09
5 EO 3S W+1 -430 15 68.18
6 EO 3S N+2 460 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
13 - : 0,00 % 7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
5 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 55,23 %10 EO 1S E+2 -150 20 90.91
11 EO 1S S+3 180 7 31.82
12 EO 3P S+2 200 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
12 VERBOIS Léon -SALFI Huguette : 47,93 %13 EO 4P N-3 -300 21 95.45
14 EO 1S W-1 50 11 50.00
15 EO 4C N = 620 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
6 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile : 60,88 %16 EO 5C E = -650 13 59.09
17 EO 2K N = 90 12 54.55
18 EO 4P N+2 680 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
1 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CASSART Guy : 52,48 %19 EO 2P S = 110 2 9.09
20 EO 2C S-1 -100 8 36.36
21 EO 3S N-1 -100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
7 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 53,31 %22 EO 1S W+1 -120 18 81.82
23 EO 4P S = 620 11 50.00
24 EO 3S E+2 -460 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 47,52 %25 EO 2S E-2 200 2 9.09
26 EO 3S E+1 -630 15 68.18
27 EO 2P S+2 170 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
8 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 42,84 %28 EO 1S N+1 120 13 59.09
29 EO 3S S = 600 21 95.45
30 EO 2P W+1 -140 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
3 HALLEUX Jean François -LIBERT Laurent : 61,71 %31 EO 3C W = -140 12 54.55
32 EO 1S E+1 -120 17 77.27
33 EO 3P S-2 -100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
Total : 391,0 / 660 = 59,24 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
4 GELISSEN Edouard -MASSAUX Jacques : 46,28 % 1 EO 3S W-1 50 6 27.27
2 EO 4P S-1 -100 17 77.27
3 EO 3C N-1 -50 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
10 DACHET Gérard -STIENON Annie : 41,46 % 4 EO 3C S-1 -100 22 100.00
5 EO 3S E = -400 8 36.36
6 EO 3S N+1 430 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
5 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 55,23 % 7 EO 3C S = 140 8 36.36
8 EO 1S E+2 -150 21 95.45
9 EO 4C S = 420 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
11 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,10 %10 EO 2P N-2 -200 22 100.00
11 EO 3S N = 400 4 18.18
12 EO 4P N = 620 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
6 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile : 60,88 %13 EO 2P N-1 -100 10 45.45
14 EO 3P N+1 170 2 9.09
15 EO 4C N = 620 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
13 - : 0,00 %16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
7 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 53,31 %19 EO 3T W = -110 20 90.91
20 EO 2S W-1 100 4 18.18
21 EO 3S N-1 -100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
12 VERBOIS Léon -SALFI Huguette : 47,93 %22 EO 1S E+1 -120 18 81.82
23 EO 4P S = 620 11 50.00
24 EO 3S E+3 -490 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
8 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 42,84 %25 EO 2S E = -120 13 59.09
26 EO 3S E+1 -630 15 68.18
27 EO 2P S+1 140 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
3 HALLEUX Jean François -LIBERT Laurent : 61,71 %28 EO 1S N+1 120 13 59.09
29 EO 3S S+3 690 1 4.55
30 EO 2P W+1 -140 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
9 FRAITURE Louis -de WASSEIGE Claude : 39,26 %31 EO 2P E+1 -140 12 54.55
32 EO 2P N = 110 5 22.73
33 EO 3KcN-1 -100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
Total : 373,0 / 660 = 56,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques
10 DACHET Gérard -STIENON Annie : 41,46 % 1 EO 2P E+1 -140 13 59.09
2 EO 1P S+1 110 13 59.09
3 EO 3C S-1 -50 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
5 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 55,23 % 4 EO 3C S = 140 3 13.64
5 EO 3S W-1 50 2 9.09
6 EO 3S N+1 430 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
11 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,10 % 7 EO 2C S+1 140 8 36.36
8 EO 3T W = -110 9 40.91
9 EO 4C N = 420 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
6 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile : 60,88 %10 EO 2P N-1 -100 14 63.64
11 EO 3S N+1 430 1 4.55
12 EO 4P N+1 650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
1 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CASSART Guy : 52,48 %13 EO 3P N-1 -100 10 45.45
14 EO 2P S+1 140 6 27.27
15 EO 3S N-1 -100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
7 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 53,31 %16 EO 4C W = -620 7 31.82
17 EO 2S W-2 100 5 22.73
18 EO 3S S+3 690 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 47,52 %19 EO 2K N-1 -50 12 54.55
20 EO 3C S-2 -200 19 86.36
21 EO 3S N = 600 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
8 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 42,84 %22 EO 2P S-2 -100 12 54.55
23 EO 4P S+1 650 3 13.64
24 EO 6S W = -990 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
13 - : 0,00 %25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00
27 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
9 FRAITURE Louis -de WASSEIGE Claude : 39,26 %28 EO 1S N+2 150 3 13.64
29 EO 3S S = 600 21 95.45
30 EO 3P W = -140 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
12 VERBOIS Léon -SALFI Huguette : 47,93 %31 EO 3T S-1 -100 8 36.36
32 EO 3S E-3 300 2 9.09
33 EO 2P S-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
Total : 289,0 / 660 = 43,79 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
13 - : 0,00 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
11 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,10 % 4 EO 2C S+2 170 0 0.00
5 EO 3S W+1 -430 15 68.18
6 EO 3S N+2 460 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
12 VERBOIS Léon -SALFI Huguette : 47,93 % 7 EO 3S E = -600 22 100.00
8 EO 1S S-2 -100 6 27.27
9 EO 4C N-1 -50 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
1 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CASSART Guy : 52,48 %10 EO 1S E = -90 8 36.36
11 EO 2T S+1 110 22 100.00
12 EO 4P N = 620 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
7 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 53,31 %13 EO 4P N-1 -100 10 45.45
14 EO 1S W-1 50 11 50.00
15 EO 4C N-1 -100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 47,52 %16 EO 5C E-1 100 0 0.00
17 EO 2S E-2 100 5 22.73
18 EO 3S S = 600 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
8 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 42,84 %19 EO 2P S-1 -50 12 54.55
20 EO 3CcS-2 -500 22 100.00
21 EO 3S S = 600 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
3 HALLEUX Jean François -LIBERT Laurent : 61,71 %22 EO 1S W = -90 8 36.36
23 EO 2C S+3 200 18 81.82
24 EO 3S E+2 -460 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 FRAITURE Louis -de WASSEIGE Claude : 39,26 %25 EO 2S E+1 -150 16 72.73
26 EO 3S E+1 -630 15 68.18
27 EO 4K E-2 100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
4 GELISSEN Edouard -MASSAUX Jacques : 46,28 %28 EO 1S N+2 150 3 13.64
29 EO 3S N+2 660 9 40.91
30 EO 2P W+1 -140 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
10 DACHET Gérard -STIENON Annie : 41,46 %31 EO 3C W+1 -170 18 81.82
32 EO 3CcS = 530 0 0.00
33 EO 4C E-1 50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
Total : 347,0 / 660 = 52,58 %
PAIRE Nr : 23 EVRARD Armand -DASSY Renée
11 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,10 % 1 EO 3S E-2 100 1 4.55
2 EO 2S N = 120 10 45.45
3 EO 2C S-1 -50 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
6 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile : 60,88 % 4 EO 2P N = 110 13 59.09
5 EO 3S E = -400 8 36.36
6 EO 3S N+1 430 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
1 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CASSART Guy : 52,48 % 7 EO 3C S = 140 8 36.36
8 EO 2P S-1 -50 3 13.64
9 EO 3C N = 140 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
13 - : 0,00 %10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 47,52 %13 EO 4P N-2 -200 17 77.27
14 EO 2T N-2 -100 20 90.91
15 EO 4C N = 620 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
12 VERBOIS Léon -SALFI Huguette : 47,93 %16 EO 4C E+2 -680 19 86.36
17 EO 2K W-2 100 5 22.73
18 EO 4P N+2 680 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
3 HALLEUX Jean François -LIBERT Laurent : 61,71 %19 EO 2P S+1 140 0 0.00
20 EO 3C S-1 -100 8 36.36
21 EO 3S N = 600 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 21,21 %
9 FRAITURE Louis -de WASSEIGE Claude : 39,26 %22 EO 1S W-1 100 3 13.64
23 EO 4C S = 620 11 50.00
24 EO 3S W+3 -490 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
4 GELISSEN Edouard -MASSAUX Jacques : 46,28 %25 EO 2S E-2 200 2 9.09
26 EO 2S E+2 -180 6 27.27
27 EO 3C N+3 230 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 19,70 %
10 DACHET Gérard -STIENON Annie : 41,46 %28 EO 1S N = 90 20 90.91
29 EO 3S S+2 660 9 40.91
30 EO 2P W = -110 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
5 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 55,23 %31 EO 4C W-1 50 5 22.73
32 EO 1S E+3 -180 22 100.00
33 EO 3K N-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
Total : 304,0 / 660 = 46,06 %
PAIRE Nr : 24 NIGOT Pierre -MACAUX Lucienne
6 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile : 60,88 % 1 EO 2P E-1 50 6 27.27
2 EO 3P N+1 170 0 0.00
3 EO 3CcE-4 1100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
1 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CASSART Guy : 52,48 % 4 EO 2C S = 110 13 59.09
5 EO 3S W = -400 8 36.36
6 EO 3S N+2 460 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
7 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 53,31 % 7 EO 2C S-1 -100 17 77.27
8 EO 1S W+1 -120 15 68.18
9 EO 4C N = 420 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 47,52 %10 EO 1S E = -90 8 36.36
11 EO 1S S+2 150 12 54.55
12 EO 4P S = 620 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
8 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 42,84 %13 EO 4P N-2 -200 17 77.27
14 EO 2P S+2 170 2 9.09
15 EO 4C N+1 650 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
3 HALLEUX Jean François -LIBERT Laurent : 61,71 %16 EO 4C E = -620 7 31.82
17 EO 2K W-2 100 5 22.73
18 EO 3S S+3 690 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
13 - : 0,00 %19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
4 GELISSEN Edouard -MASSAUX Jacques : 46,28 %22 EO 1S E = -90 8 36.36
23 EO 4P S = 620 11 50.00
24 EO 3S E+2 -460 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
12 VERBOIS Léon -SALFI Huguette : 47,93 %25 EO 2S E-1 100 7 31.82
26 EO 3T E+2 -150 4 18.18
27 EO 4C N+2 480 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
5 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 55,23 %28 EO 2S N+1 150 3 13.64
29 EO 3S S+1 630 17 77.27
30 EO 2P W+1 -140 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
11 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,10 %31 EO 3S E-3 150 1 4.55
32 EO 1S E+1 -120 17 77.27
33 EO 2S N = 120 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
Total : 225,0 / 660 = 34,09 %
PAIRE Nr : 25 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques
12 VERBOIS Léon -SALFI Huguette : 47,93 % 1 EO 3S E-2 100 1 4.55
2 EO 3P S-1 -100 17 77.27
3 EO 2C N+1 140 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
9 FRAITURE Louis -de WASSEIGE Claude : 39,26 % 4 EO 2C S = 110 13 59.09
5 EO 3S W+2 -460 20 90.91
6 EO 3S N+1 430 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
6 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile : 60,88 % 7 EO 3T E-1 100 14 63.64
8 EO 1S E+1 -120 15 68.18
9 EO 4C N-1 -50 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
3 HALLEUX Jean François -LIBERT Laurent : 61,71 %10 EO 1S E-1 100 1 4.55
11 EO 1S S+2 150 12 54.55
12 EO 3P N+2 200 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
11 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,10 %13 EO 3P N = 140 1 4.55
14 EO 1S W = -90 17 77.27
15 EO 4C N = 620 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
8 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 42,84 %16 EO 4C E+2 -680 19 86.36
17 EO 1S W = -90 16 72.73
18 EO 3S S = 600 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 80,30 %
5 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 55,23 %19 EO 2P S-1 -50 12 54.55
20 EO 2C S = 110 1 4.55
21 EO 3S N = 600 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 47,52 %22 EO 1S W+1 -120 18 81.82
23 EO 4C S = 620 11 50.00
24 EO 3S E+2 -460 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
10 DACHET Gérard -STIENON Annie : 41,46 %25 EO 2S E-2 200 2 9.09
26 EO 2K E-1 100 1 4.55
27 EO 3P S+1 170 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 24,24 %
7 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 53,31 %28 EO 1S N+1 120 13 59.09
29 EO 3S N+1 630 17 77.27
30 EO 4P E-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
4 GELISSEN Edouard -MASSAUX Jacques : 46,28 %31 EO 3C E+1 -170 18 81.82
32 EO 1S E+1 -120 17 77.27
33 EO 2P S-2 -100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 78,79 %
Total : 386,0 / 726 = 53,17 %
PAIRE Nr : 26 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Christian
5 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 55,23 % 1 EO 2K W+1 -110 10 45.45
2 EO 2P S+1 140 5 22.73
3 EO 3C N+1 170 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
13 - : 0,00 % 4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
10 DACHET Gérard -STIENON Annie : 41,46 % 7 EO 4T W-2 200 2 9.09
8 EO 1S W+1 -120 15 68.18
9 EO 4C N = 420 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
7 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 53,31 %10 EO 1S E+1 -120 17 77.27
11 EO 1S N+3 180 7 31.82
12 EO 4P N = 620 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
4 GELISSEN Edouard -MASSAUX Jacques : 46,28 %13 EO 4P N-3 -300 21 95.45
14 EO 1S W-1 50 11 50.00
15 EO 3S N-1 -100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
1 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CASSART Guy : 52,48 %16 EO 4PcN-2 -300 3 13.64
17 EO 2P E-2 100 5 22.73
18 EO 3S S+3 690 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
9 FRAITURE Louis -de WASSEIGE Claude : 39,26 %19 EO 2P S-1 -50 12 54.55
20 EO 2C S-1 -100 8 36.36
21 EO 4P S-1 -100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
6 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile : 60,88 %22 EO 3S E-4 400 0 0.00
23 EO 4P N+1 650 3 13.64
24 EO 3S E+2 -460 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 15,15 %
3 HALLEUX Jean François -LIBERT Laurent : 61,71 %25 EO 3S E = -600 20 90.91
26 EO 3S E+2 -660 21 95.45
27 EO 4C N+2 480 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
11 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,10 %28 EO 1S N+1 120 13 59.09
29 EO 3S N+2 660 9 40.91
30 EO 2P W = -110 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
8 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 42,84 %31 EO 2C E+1 -140 12 54.55
32 EO 2K N-1 -50 10 45.45
33 EO 2P S = 110 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
Total : 272,0 / 660 = 41,21 %
|
|