|
Tournoi du 23-11-09
1 62,22 4 MACAUX Lucienne -NIGOT Pierre
2 54,81 2 EVRARD Armand -GELISSEN Edouard
3 52,22 3 PETIT Jean -DAPHNE Chantal
4 51,85 10 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
5 50,93 7 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne
6 49,44 5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
7 47,59 6 de WASSEIGE Claude -MASSAUX Jacques
8 45,37 1 HUBLET Carlo -HALLEUX Jean François
9 42,96 8 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques
10 42,59 9 COURTOIS Christian -ADAMANTIADIS
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 63,70 17 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand
2 55,74 13 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
3 55,00 16 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
4 52,78 15 de TERWANGNE Philippe -MATELART Marc
5 50,00 20 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire
6 48,15 19 CASSART Guy -KINET Martine
~ 48,15 11 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques
8 45,19 14 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard
9 40,93 12 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSART Jean
10 40,37 18 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert
PAIRE Nr : 1 HUBLET Carlo -HALLEUX Jean François
11 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,15 % 1 NS 2C W+1 -140 0 0.00
2 NS 5C S-2 -200 3 16.67
3 NS 3S W+2 -660 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 5,56 %
13 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 55,74 % 4 NS 3S E-1 100 14 77.78
5 NS 3K E+2 -150 8 44.44
6 NS 3S N = 400 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
12 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSART Jean : 40,93 % 7 NS 3S W+1 -630 9 50.00
8 NS 3S S+2 460 18 100.00
9 NS 2C N-2 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
16 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,00 %10 NS 3S S-3 -300 0 0.00
11 NS 3S W = -400 9 50.00
12 NS 3S W+1 -430 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
17 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 63,70 %13 NS 3P S-1 -100 7 38.89
14 NS 3S N-1 -50 6 33.33
15 NS 5C S-2 -200 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
18 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 40,37 %16 NS 5K W-1 100 10 55.56
17 NS 4C E-1 50 15 83.33
18 NS 3S N+2 660 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
19 CASSART Guy -KINET Martine : 48,15 %19 NS 2PcS-3 -500 14 77.78
20 NS 4P S+2 680 11 61.11
21 NS 3S S-2 -200 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
20 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 50,00 %22 NS 4C N-2 -100 1 5.56
23 NS 4C S+2 680 6 33.33
24 NS 4P S+1 450 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
14 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 45,19 %25 NS 5K N-3 -150 4 22.22
26 NS 2P N+2 170 12 66.67
27 NS 3PcE-2 300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
15 de TERWANGNE Philippe -MATELART Marc : 52,78 %28 NS 3S S-1 -100 3 16.67
29 NS 4P E+2 -680 4 22.22
30 NS 4P E = -420 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
Total : 245,0 / 540 = 45,37 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 EVRARD Armand -GELISSEN Edouard
13 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 55,74 % 1 NS 1S E = -90 13 72.22
2 NS 5CcS-1 -200 3 16.67
3 NS 3S E = -600 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
12 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSART Jean : 40,93 % 4 NS 3T W+1 -130 10 55.56
5 NS 4C W-1 50 13 72.22
6 NS 3S N = 400 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
11 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,15 % 7 NS 3S W+1 -630 9 50.00
8 NS 5K S = 400 16 88.89
9 NS 1S E+3 -180 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
20 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 50,00 %10 NS 2S S-2 -200 2 11.11
11 NS 4C W-1 50 15 83.33
12 NS 3S W+2 -460 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
14 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 45,19 %13 NS 4PcN-2 -500 0 0.00
14 NS 4P S = 420 14 77.78
15 NS 5C S-2 -200 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
15 de TERWANGNE Philippe -MATELART Marc : 52,78 %16 NS 6K W-2 200 17 94.44
17 NS 4C E-1 50 15 83.33
18 NS 3S N+2 660 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
16 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,00 %19 NS 3S W = -600 6 33.33
20 NS 4P S+2 680 11 61.11
21 NS 4C N = 620 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
17 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 63,70 %22 NS 4C N-1 -50 8 44.44
23 NS 4C S+2 680 6 33.33
24 NS 4PcN-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
18 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 40,37 %25 NS 4K N-1 -50 16 88.89
26 NS 2P N+1 140 7 38.89
27 NS 2C N+1 140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
19 CASSART Guy -KINET Martine : 48,15 %28 NS 2P E-2 100 11 61.11
29 NS 5CcN-2 -500 14 77.78
30 NS 4P E-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
Total : 296,0 / 540 = 54,81 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 PETIT Jean -DAPHNE Chantal
12 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSART Jean : 40,93 % 1 NS 2P N-2 420 18 100.00
2 NS 4C E = -200 3 16.67
3 NS 4C E = -620 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
11 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,15 % 4 NS 3T W+3 -170 8 44.44
5 NS 3K E+2 -150 8 44.44
6 NS 3S N = 400 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
13 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 55,74 % 7 NS 3S W+1 -630 9 50.00
8 NS 2S S = 120 4 22.22
9 NS 2TcW+1 -380 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
18 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 40,37 %10 NS 3S S-1 -100 6 33.33
11 NS 4C W-2 100 18 100.00
12 NS 4CcE-1 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
19 CASSART Guy -KINET Martine : 48,15 %13 NS 1K N+1 90 12 66.67
14 NS 4P S = 420 14 77.78
15 NS 5TcE-1 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
20 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 50,00 %16 NS 5K E-1 100 10 55.56
17 NS 3C E+1 -170 7 38.89
18 NS 3S N+2 660 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
14 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 45,19 %19 NS 3S W = -600 6 33.33
20 NS 4P S+1 650 1 5.56
21 NS 4C N-2 -200 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
15 de TERWANGNE Philippe -MATELART Marc : 52,78 %22 NS 4C N = 420 18 100.00
23 NS 6C S+1 1460 18 100.00
24 NS 5CcE-1 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
16 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,00 %25 NS 5K N-2 -100 10 55.56
26 NS 2P N+1 140 7 38.89
27 NS 4CcN-1 -100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
17 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 63,70 %28 NS 2P E-2 100 11 61.11
29 NS 4P E+2 -680 4 22.22
30 NS 4P E-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
Total : 282,0 / 540 = 52,22 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 MACAUX Lucienne -NIGOT Pierre
17 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 63,70 % 1 NS 1S W+1 -120 4 22.22
2 NS 3P E+1 -170 8 44.44
3 NS 2TcN-2 -300 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
16 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,00 % 4 NS 1S W+1 -120 12 66.67
5 NS 3S W-2 100 17 94.44
6 NS 3S N = 400 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
15 de TERWANGNE Philippe -MATELART Marc : 52,78 % 7 NS 3S W+1 -630 9 50.00
8 NS 4T W-2 100 2 11.11
9 NS 3S W-2 200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
14 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 45,19 %10 NS 4C S = 620 16 88.89
11 NS 3S W = -400 9 50.00
12 NS 3S E+2 -460 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
20 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 50,00 %13 NS 3P N-1 -100 7 38.89
14 NS 4P S = 420 14 77.78
15 NS 2P S+2 170 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
19 CASSART Guy -KINET Martine : 48,15 %16 NS 5K W-1 100 10 55.56
17 NS 2C E+1 -140 11 61.11
18 NS 3S N+1 630 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
18 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 40,37 %19 NS 2K W+1 -110 16 88.89
20 NS 4P S+2 680 11 61.11
21 NS 4C N = 620 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
13 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 55,74 %22 NS 4C N-1 -50 8 44.44
23 NS 5C S+1 680 6 33.33
24 NS 4P S = 420 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
12 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSART Jean : 40,93 %25 NS 4K N-2 -100 10 55.56
26 NS 2P S = 110 2 11.11
27 NS 3C N+1 170 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
11 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,15 %28 NS 2S S = 120 17 94.44
29 NS 3P E+3 -230 16 88.89
30 NS 4P E-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
Total : 336,0 / 540 = 62,22 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
18 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 40,37 % 1 NS 2C W = -110 9 50.00
2 NS 4C S = 620 16 88.89
3 NS 4C E = -620 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
17 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 63,70 % 4 NS 3S W-2 200 17 94.44
5 NS 4C W+1 -450 0 0.00
6 NS 3S N-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
16 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,00 % 7 NS 3S W+1 -630 9 50.00
8 NS 2C S+3 200 12 66.67
9 NS 3T W = -110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
11 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,15 %10 NS 4C S = 620 16 88.89
11 NS 4C W = -420 3 16.67
12 NS 3S W+1 -430 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
15 de TERWANGNE Philippe -MATELART Marc : 52,78 %13 NS 1K N+2 110 15 83.33
14 NS 4P S-1 -50 6 33.33
15 NS 5T E = -400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
14 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 45,19 %16 NS 3S W+2 -660 1 5.56
17 NS 4C E-2 100 18 100.00
18 NS 3S N+2 660 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
20 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 50,00 %19 NS 3S W = -600 6 33.33
20 NS 4P S+2 680 11 61.11
21 NS 4C N-1 -100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
19 CASSART Guy -KINET Martine : 48,15 %22 NS 4C N-1 -50 8 44.44
23 NS 4C S+2 680 6 33.33
24 NS 4P S-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
13 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 55,74 %25 NS 5K S-2 -100 10 55.56
26 NS 2P N+2 170 12 66.67
27 NS 4C N-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
12 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSART Jean : 40,93 %28 NS 3S S-1 -100 3 16.67
29 NS 5P W-1 100 18 100.00
30 NS 4P E-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 267,0 / 540 = 49,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 de WASSEIGE Claude -MASSAUX Jacques
19 CASSART Guy -KINET Martine : 48,15 % 1 NS 1S W-1 50 16 88.89
2 NS 4C E = 620 16 88.89
3 NS 4C E = -620 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
18 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 40,37 % 4 NS 3S E = -600 2 11.11
5 NS 3C W+2 -200 2 11.11
6 NS 3S N = 400 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
17 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 63,70 % 7 NS 3S W+1 -630 9 50.00
8 NS 1P W-3 150 8 44.44
9 NS 3T W+1 -130 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
12 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSART Jean : 40,93 %10 NS 4C S = 620 16 88.89
11 NS 3S W-1 50 15 83.33
12 NS 3S E+2 -460 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
11 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,15 %13 NS 1K N-1 -100 7 38.89
14 NS 3S N-2 -100 2 11.11
15 NS 4T E+1 -150 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
16 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,00 %16 NS 5K W-1 100 10 55.56
17 NS 3C E+1 -170 7 38.89
18 NS 3S N+2 660 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
15 de TERWANGNE Philippe -MATELART Marc : 52,78 %19 NS 3S W = -600 6 33.33
20 NS 4P N+2 680 11 61.11
21 NS 4CcN-3 -800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
14 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 45,19 %22 NS 2C N+1 140 15 83.33
23 NS 4C S+3 710 15 83.33
24 NS 4P S-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
20 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 50,00 %25 NS 2K N+1 110 18 100.00
26 NS 1S S+1 120 4 22.22
27 NS 2C N = 110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
13 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 55,74 %28 NS 3T S-1 -100 3 16.67
29 NS 4P E+2 -680 4 22.22
30 NS 2C E+1 -140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
Total : 257,0 / 540 = 47,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne
20 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 50,00 % 1 NS 3T E = -110 9 50.00
2 NS 2C S+2 170 12 66.67
3 NS 4C E = -620 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
19 CASSART Guy -KINET Martine : 48,15 % 4 NS 3S W+1 -630 0 0.00
5 NS 3K E+2 -150 8 44.44
6 NS 3S N = 400 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
18 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 40,37 % 7 NS 3S W+1 -630 9 50.00
8 NS 1P W-1 50 0 0.00
9 NS 3K S-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
13 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 55,74 %10 NS 3S S = 600 12 66.67
11 NS 3S E = -400 9 50.00
12 NS 3S E+3 -490 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
12 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSART Jean : 40,93 %13 NS 1K N+3 130 18 100.00
14 NS 4P N = 420 14 77.78
15 NS 5T N-1 -100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
11 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,15 %16 NS 6K W-2 200 17 94.44
17 NS 3C E = -140 11 61.11
18 NS 3S N+2 660 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
17 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 63,70 %19 NS 3S W = -600 6 33.33
20 NS 4P S+2 680 11 61.11
21 NS 4C N = 620 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
16 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,00 %22 NS Pass -100 1 5.56
23 NS 4C S+2 680 6 33.33
24 NS 2P S+2 170 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
15 de TERWANGNE Philippe -MATELART Marc : 52,78 %25 NS 3P E+1 -170 2 11.11
26 NS 3T W-2 200 16 88.89
27 NS 4PcE-1 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
14 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 45,19 %28 NS 3K S = 110 14 77.78
29 NS 4P E+2 -680 4 22.22
30 NS 2P E+1 -140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 275,0 / 540 = 50,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques
14 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 45,19 % 1 NS 1S W+1 -120 4 22.22
2 NS 4C S = 620 16 88.89
3 NS 4C W-1 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
20 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 50,00 % 4 NS 2P S-2 -200 6 33.33
5 NS 4C W-1 50 13 72.22
6 NS 3T S+1 130 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
19 CASSART Guy -KINET Martine : 48,15 % 7 NS 3S W+1 -630 9 50.00
8 NS 2C N+1 140 6 33.33
9 NS 3S W-2 200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
15 de TERWANGNE Philippe -MATELART Marc : 52,78 %10 NS 4C N-1 -100 6 33.33
11 NS 4C W = -420 3 16.67
12 NS 3S E+2 -460 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
13 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 55,74 %13 NS 4P S-2 -200 2 11.11
14 NS 4P S-1 -50 6 33.33
15 NS 6T E-2 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
12 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSART Jean : 40,93 %16 NS 5K W-1 100 10 55.56
17 NS 4C E+1 -450 2 11.11
18 NS 3S N+2 660 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
11 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,15 %19 NS 3S E = -600 6 33.33
20 NS 4P S+1 650 1 5.56
21 NS 3C N+2 200 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
18 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 40,37 %22 NS 4C N-1 -50 8 44.44
23 NS 4C S+3 710 15 83.33
24 NS 4P S-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
17 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 63,70 %25 NS 3P E+2 -200 0 0.00
26 NS 2P S+2 170 12 66.67
27 NS 4C N-2 -100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
16 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,00 %28 NS 2P W-1 50 8 44.44
29 NS 4P E+1 -650 10 55.56
30 NS 4P E = -420 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
Total : 232,0 / 540 = 42,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 COURTOIS Christian -ADAMANTIADIS
15 de TERWANGNE Philippe -MATELART Marc : 52,78 % 1 NS 1S W = -90 13 72.22
2 NS 5PcE-1 100 10 55.56
3 NS 4C W = -620 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
14 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 45,19 % 4 NS 3S E-2 200 17 94.44
5 NS 3S W-2 100 17 94.44
6 NS 1S N+2 150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
20 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 50,00 % 7 NS 3S W+1 -630 9 50.00
8 NS 3K N+3 170 10 55.56
9 NS 3T W+1 -130 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
17 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 63,70 %10 NS 2S S-1 -100 6 33.33
11 NS 3S W+1 -430 0 0.00
12 NS 3S W+1 -460 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
16 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,00 %13 NS 3P S-1 -100 7 38.89
14 NS 6K S-3 -150 0 0.00
15 NS 5C S-1 -100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
13 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 55,74 %16 NS 4K W = -130 4 22.22
17 NS 4C E = -420 4 22.22
18 NS 3S N+1 630 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
12 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSART Jean : 40,93 %19 NS 3S W = -600 6 33.33
20 NS 4P S+2 680 11 61.11
21 NS 3S N-1 -100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
11 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,15 %22 NS 3C N = 140 15 83.33
23 NS 4C S+2 680 6 33.33
24 NS 4P S-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
19 CASSART Guy -KINET Martine : 48,15 %25 NS 4K N-2 -100 10 55.56
26 NS 2K N = 90 0 0.00
27 NS 3C N-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
18 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 40,37 %28 NS 2S S-1 -100 3 16.67
29 NS 4P E = -620 12 66.67
30 NS 4PcE-1 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 230,0 / 540 = 42,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
16 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,00 % 1 NS 1S W+1 -120 4 22.22
2 NS 5C S-2 -200 3 16.67
3 NS 4C E = -620 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
15 de TERWANGNE Philippe -MATELART Marc : 52,78 % 4 NS 1S W+5 -240 4 22.22
5 NS 3K E+3 -170 4 22.22
6 NS 3S N = 400 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
14 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 45,19 % 7 NS 3S E+1 -630 9 50.00
8 NS 3C N+3 230 14 77.78
9 NS 2S E-1 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
19 CASSART Guy -KINET Martine : 48,15 %10 NS 2C S+2 170 10 55.56
11 NS 3S W = -400 9 50.00
12 NS 3S E+2 -460 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
18 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 40,37 %13 NS 1K N+2 110 15 83.33
14 NS 4P S = 420 14 77.78
15 NS 3T E+2 -150 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
17 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 63,70 %16 NS 3S W+2 -660 1 5.56
17 NS 5TcN-4 -800 0 0.00
18 NS 3S S+2 660 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
13 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 55,74 %19 NS 2P S-2 -100 18 100.00
20 NS 4P S+2 680 11 61.11
21 NS 2C N+2 170 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
12 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSART Jean : 40,93 %22 NS 4C N-1 -50 8 44.44
23 NS 4C S+2 680 6 33.33
24 NS 4P S = 420 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
11 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,15 %25 NS 4K N-2 -100 10 55.56
26 NS 4P N = 620 18 100.00
27 NS 4K W-3 150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
20 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 50,00 %28 NS 2S N = 120 17 94.44
29 NS 4P E+2 -680 4 22.22
30 NS 3C W+1 -170 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 280,0 / 540 = 51,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques
1 HUBLET Carlo -HALLEUX Jean François : 45,37 % 1 EO 2C W+1 -140 18 100.00
2 EO 5C S-2 -200 15 83.33
3 EO 3S W+2 -660 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 94,44 %
3 PETIT Jean -DAPHNE Chantal : 52,22 % 4 EO 3T W+3 -170 10 55.56
5 EO 3K E+2 -150 10 55.56
6 EO 3S N = 400 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
2 EVRARD Armand -GELISSEN Edouard : 54,81 % 7 EO 3S W+1 -630 9 50.00
8 EO 5K S = 400 2 11.11
9 EO 1S E+3 -180 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,44 %10 EO 4C S = 620 2 11.11
11 EO 4C W = -420 15 83.33
12 EO 3S W+1 -430 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
6 de WASSEIGE Claude -MASSAUX Jacques : 47,59 %13 EO 1K N-1 -100 11 61.11
14 EO 3S N-2 -100 16 88.89
15 EO 4T E+1 -150 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
7 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,93 %16 EO 6K W-2 200 1 5.56
17 EO 3C E = -140 7 38.89
18 EO 3S N+2 660 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
8 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 42,96 %19 EO 3S E = -600 12 66.67
20 EO 4P S+1 650 17 94.44
21 EO 3C N+2 200 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
9 COURTOIS Christian -ADAMANTIADIS : 42,59 %22 EO 3C N = 140 3 16.67
23 EO 4C S+2 680 12 66.67
24 EO 4P S-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
10 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,85 %25 EO 4K N-2 -100 8 44.44
26 EO 4P N = 620 0 0.00
27 EO 4K W-3 150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
4 MACAUX Lucienne -NIGOT Pierre : 62,22 %28 EO 2S S = 120 1 5.56
29 EO 3P E+3 -230 2 11.11
30 EO 4P E-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
Total : 260,0 / 540 = 48,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSART Jean
3 PETIT Jean -DAPHNE Chantal : 52,22 % 1 EO 2P N-2 420 0 0.00
2 EO 4C E = -200 15 83.33
3 EO 4C E = -620 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
2 EVRARD Armand -GELISSEN Edouard : 54,81 % 4 EO 3T W+1 -130 8 44.44
5 EO 4C W-1 50 5 27.78
6 EO 3S N = 400 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
1 HUBLET Carlo -HALLEUX Jean François : 45,37 % 7 EO 3S W+1 -630 9 50.00
8 EO 3S S+2 460 0 0.00
9 EO 2C N-2 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
6 de WASSEIGE Claude -MASSAUX Jacques : 47,59 %10 EO 4C S = 620 2 11.11
11 EO 3S W-1 50 3 16.67
12 EO 3S E+2 -460 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
7 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,93 %13 EO 1K N+3 130 0 0.00
14 EO 4P N = 420 4 22.22
15 EO 5T N-1 -100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
8 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 42,96 %16 EO 5K W-1 100 8 44.44
17 EO 4C E+1 -450 16 88.89
18 EO 3S N+2 660 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
9 COURTOIS Christian -ADAMANTIADIS : 42,59 %19 EO 3S W = -600 12 66.67
20 EO 4P S+2 680 7 38.89
21 EO 3S N-1 -100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
10 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,85 %22 EO 4C N-1 -50 10 55.56
23 EO 4C S+2 680 12 66.67
24 EO 4P S = 420 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
4 MACAUX Lucienne -NIGOT Pierre : 62,22 %25 EO 4K N-2 -100 8 44.44
26 EO 2P S = 110 16 88.89
27 EO 3C N+1 170 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,44 %28 EO 3S S-1 -100 15 83.33
29 EO 5P W-1 100 0 0.00
30 EO 4P E-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 221,0 / 540 = 40,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
2 EVRARD Armand -GELISSEN Edouard : 54,81 % 1 EO 1S E = -90 5 27.78
2 EO 5CcS-1 -200 15 83.33
3 EO 3S E = -600 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
1 HUBLET Carlo -HALLEUX Jean François : 45,37 % 4 EO 3S E-1 100 4 22.22
5 EO 3K E+2 -150 10 55.56
6 EO 3S N = 400 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
3 PETIT Jean -DAPHNE Chantal : 52,22 % 7 EO 3S W+1 -630 9 50.00
8 EO 2S S = 120 14 77.78
9 EO 2TcW+1 -380 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
7 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,93 %10 EO 3S S = 600 6 33.33
11 EO 3S E = -400 9 50.00
12 EO 3S E+3 -490 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
8 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 42,96 %13 EO 4P S-2 -200 16 88.89
14 EO 4P S-1 -50 12 66.67
15 EO 6T E-2 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
9 COURTOIS Christian -ADAMANTIADIS : 42,59 %16 EO 4K W = -130 14 77.78
17 EO 4C E = -420 14 77.78
18 EO 3S N+1 630 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
10 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,85 %19 EO 2P S-2 -100 0 0.00
20 EO 4P S+2 680 7 38.89
21 EO 2C N+2 170 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
4 MACAUX Lucienne -NIGOT Pierre : 62,22 %22 EO 4C N-1 -50 10 55.56
23 EO 5C S+1 680 12 66.67
24 EO 4P S = 420 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,44 %25 EO 5K S-2 -100 8 44.44
26 EO 2P N+2 170 6 33.33
27 EO 4C N-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
6 de WASSEIGE Claude -MASSAUX Jacques : 47,59 %28 EO 3T S-1 -100 15 83.33
29 EO 4P E+2 -680 14 77.78
30 EO 2C E+1 -140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
Total : 301,0 / 540 = 55,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard
8 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 42,96 % 1 EO 1S W+1 -120 14 77.78
2 EO 4C S = 620 2 11.11
3 EO 4C W-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
9 COURTOIS Christian -ADAMANTIADIS : 42,59 % 4 EO 3S E-2 200 1 5.56
5 EO 3S W-2 100 1 5.56
6 EO 1S N+2 150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
10 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,85 % 7 EO 3S E+1 -630 9 50.00
8 EO 3C N+3 230 4 22.22
9 EO 2S E-1 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
4 MACAUX Lucienne -NIGOT Pierre : 62,22 %10 EO 4C S = 620 2 11.11
11 EO 3S W = -400 9 50.00
12 EO 3S E+2 -460 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
2 EVRARD Armand -GELISSEN Edouard : 54,81 %13 EO 4PcN-2 -500 18 100.00
14 EO 4P S = 420 4 22.22
15 EO 5C S-2 -200 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,44 %16 EO 3S W+2 -660 17 94.44
17 EO 4C E-2 100 0 0.00
18 EO 3S N+2 660 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
3 PETIT Jean -DAPHNE Chantal : 52,22 %19 EO 3S W = -600 12 66.67
20 EO 4P S+1 650 17 94.44
21 EO 4C N-2 -200 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
6 de WASSEIGE Claude -MASSAUX Jacques : 47,59 %22 EO 2C N+1 140 3 16.67
23 EO 4C S+3 710 3 16.67
24 EO 4P S-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
1 HUBLET Carlo -HALLEUX Jean François : 45,37 %25 EO 5K N-3 -150 14 77.78
26 EO 2P N+2 170 6 33.33
27 EO 3PcE-2 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
7 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,93 %28 EO 3K S = 110 4 22.22
29 EO 4P E+2 -680 14 77.78
30 EO 2P E+1 -140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 244,0 / 540 = 45,19 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 de TERWANGNE Philippe -MATELART Marc
9 COURTOIS Christian -ADAMANTIADIS : 42,59 % 1 EO 1S W = -90 5 27.78
2 EO 5PcE-1 100 8 44.44
3 EO 4C W = -620 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
10 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,85 % 4 EO 1S W+5 -240 14 77.78
5 EO 3K E+3 -170 14 77.78
6 EO 3S N = 400 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
4 MACAUX Lucienne -NIGOT Pierre : 62,22 % 7 EO 3S W+1 -630 9 50.00
8 EO 4T W-2 100 16 88.89
9 EO 3S W-2 200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
8 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 42,96 %10 EO 4C N-1 -100 12 66.67
11 EO 4C W = -420 15 83.33
12 EO 3S E+2 -460 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,44 %13 EO 1K N+2 110 3 16.67
14 EO 4P S-1 -50 12 66.67
15 EO 5T E = -400 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
2 EVRARD Armand -GELISSEN Edouard : 54,81 %16 EO 6K W-2 200 1 5.56
17 EO 4C E-1 50 3 16.67
18 EO 3S N+2 660 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
6 de WASSEIGE Claude -MASSAUX Jacques : 47,59 %19 EO 3S W = -600 12 66.67
20 EO 4P N+2 680 7 38.89
21 EO 4CcN-3 -800 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
3 PETIT Jean -DAPHNE Chantal : 52,22 %22 EO 4C N = 420 0 0.00
23 EO 6C S+1 1460 0 0.00
24 EO 5CcE-1 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
7 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,93 %25 EO 3P E+1 -170 16 88.89
26 EO 3T W-2 200 2 11.11
27 EO 4PcE-1 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
1 HUBLET Carlo -HALLEUX Jean François : 45,37 %28 EO 3S S-1 -100 15 83.33
29 EO 4P E+2 -680 14 77.78
30 EO 4P E = -420 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
Total : 285,0 / 540 = 52,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
10 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,85 % 1 EO 1S W+1 -120 14 77.78
2 EO 5C S-2 -200 15 83.33
3 EO 4C E = -620 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
4 MACAUX Lucienne -NIGOT Pierre : 62,22 % 4 EO 1S W+1 -120 6 33.33
5 EO 3S W-2 100 1 5.56
6 EO 3S N = 400 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,44 % 7 EO 3S W+1 -630 9 50.00
8 EO 2C S+3 200 6 33.33
9 EO 3T W = -110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
1 HUBLET Carlo -HALLEUX Jean François : 45,37 %10 EO 3S S-3 -300 18 100.00
11 EO 3S W = -400 9 50.00
12 EO 3S W+1 -430 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
9 COURTOIS Christian -ADAMANTIADIS : 42,59 %13 EO 3P S-1 -100 11 61.11
14 EO 6K S-3 -150 18 100.00
15 EO 5C S-1 -100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
6 de WASSEIGE Claude -MASSAUX Jacques : 47,59 %16 EO 5K W-1 100 8 44.44
17 EO 3C E+1 -170 11 61.11
18 EO 3S N+2 660 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
2 EVRARD Armand -GELISSEN Edouard : 54,81 %19 EO 3S W = -600 12 66.67
20 EO 4P S+2 680 7 38.89
21 EO 4C N = 620 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
7 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,93 %22 EO Pass -100 17 94.44
23 EO 4C S+2 680 12 66.67
24 EO 2P S+2 170 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
3 PETIT Jean -DAPHNE Chantal : 52,22 %25 EO 5K N-2 -100 8 44.44
26 EO 2P N+1 140 11 61.11
27 EO 4CcN-1 -100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
8 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 42,96 %28 EO 2P W-1 50 10 55.56
29 EO 4P E+1 -650 8 44.44
30 EO 4P E = -420 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
Total : 297,0 / 540 = 55,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand
4 MACAUX Lucienne -NIGOT Pierre : 62,22 % 1 EO 1S W+1 -120 14 77.78
2 EO 3P E+1 -170 10 55.56
3 EO 2TcN-2 -300 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,44 % 4 EO 3S W-2 200 1 5.56
5 EO 4C W+1 -450 18 100.00
6 EO 3S N-1 -50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
6 de WASSEIGE Claude -MASSAUX Jacques : 47,59 % 7 EO 3S W+1 -630 9 50.00
8 EO 1P W-3 150 10 55.56
9 EO 3T W+1 -130 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
9 COURTOIS Christian -ADAMANTIADIS : 42,59 %10 EO 2S S-1 -100 12 66.67
11 EO 3S W+1 -430 18 100.00
12 EO 3S W+1 -460 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
1 HUBLET Carlo -HALLEUX Jean François : 45,37 %13 EO 3P S-1 -100 11 61.11
14 EO 3S N-1 -50 12 66.67
15 EO 5C S-2 -200 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
10 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,85 %16 EO 3S W+2 -660 17 94.44
17 EO 5TcN-4 -800 18 100.00
18 EO 3S S+2 660 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
7 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,93 %19 EO 3S W = -600 12 66.67
20 EO 4P S+2 680 7 38.89
21 EO 4C N = 620 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
2 EVRARD Armand -GELISSEN Edouard : 54,81 %22 EO 4C N-1 -50 10 55.56
23 EO 4C S+2 680 12 66.67
24 EO 4PcN-1 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
8 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 42,96 %25 EO 3P E+2 -200 18 100.00
26 EO 2P S+2 170 6 33.33
27 EO 4C N-2 -100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
3 PETIT Jean -DAPHNE Chantal : 52,22 %28 EO 2P E-2 100 7 38.89
29 EO 4P E+2 -680 14 77.78
30 EO 4P E-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
Total : 344,0 / 540 = 63,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert
5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,44 % 1 EO 2C W = -110 9 50.00
2 EO 4C S = 620 2 11.11
3 EO 4C E = -620 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
6 de WASSEIGE Claude -MASSAUX Jacques : 47,59 % 4 EO 3S E = -600 16 88.89
5 EO 3C W+2 -200 16 88.89
6 EO 3S N = 400 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
7 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,93 % 7 EO 3S W+1 -630 9 50.00
8 EO 1P W-1 50 18 100.00
9 EO 3K S-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
3 PETIT Jean -DAPHNE Chantal : 52,22 %10 EO 3S S-1 -100 12 66.67
11 EO 4C W-2 100 0 0.00
12 EO 4CcE-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
10 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,85 %13 EO 1K N+2 110 3 16.67
14 EO 4P S = 420 4 22.22
15 EO 3T E+2 -150 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
1 HUBLET Carlo -HALLEUX Jean François : 45,37 %16 EO 5K W-1 100 8 44.44
17 EO 4C E-1 50 3 16.67
18 EO 3S N+2 660 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
4 MACAUX Lucienne -NIGOT Pierre : 62,22 %19 EO 2K W+1 -110 2 11.11
20 EO 4P S+2 680 7 38.89
21 EO 4C N = 620 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
8 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 42,96 %22 EO 4C N-1 -50 10 55.56
23 EO 4C S+3 710 3 16.67
24 EO 4P S-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
2 EVRARD Armand -GELISSEN Edouard : 54,81 %25 EO 4K N-1 -50 2 11.11
26 EO 2P N+1 140 11 61.11
27 EO 2C N+1 140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
9 COURTOIS Christian -ADAMANTIADIS : 42,59 %28 EO 2S S-1 -100 15 83.33
29 EO 4P E = -620 6 33.33
30 EO 4PcE-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 218,0 / 540 = 40,37 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 CASSART Guy -KINET Martine
6 de WASSEIGE Claude -MASSAUX Jacques : 47,59 % 1 EO 1S W-1 50 2 11.11
2 EO 4C E = 620 2 11.11
3 EO 4C E = -620 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
7 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,93 % 4 EO 3S W+1 -630 18 100.00
5 EO 3K E+2 -150 10 55.56
6 EO 3S N = 400 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
8 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 42,96 % 7 EO 3S W+1 -630 9 50.00
8 EO 2C N+1 140 12 66.67
9 EO 3S W-2 200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
10 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,85 %10 EO 2C S+2 170 8 44.44
11 EO 3S W = -400 9 50.00
12 EO 3S E+2 -460 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
3 PETIT Jean -DAPHNE Chantal : 52,22 %13 EO 1K N+1 90 6 33.33
14 EO 4P S = 420 4 22.22
15 EO 5TcE-1 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
4 MACAUX Lucienne -NIGOT Pierre : 62,22 %16 EO 5K W-1 100 8 44.44
17 EO 2C E+1 -140 7 38.89
18 EO 3S N+1 630 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
1 HUBLET Carlo -HALLEUX Jean François : 45,37 %19 EO 2PcS-3 -500 4 22.22
20 EO 4P S+2 680 7 38.89
21 EO 3S S-2 -200 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,44 %22 EO 4C N-1 -50 10 55.56
23 EO 4C S+2 680 12 66.67
24 EO 4P S-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
9 COURTOIS Christian -ADAMANTIADIS : 42,59 %25 EO 4K N-2 -100 8 44.44
26 EO 2K N = 90 18 100.00
27 EO 3C N-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
2 EVRARD Armand -GELISSEN Edouard : 54,81 %28 EO 2P E-2 100 7 38.89
29 EO 5CcN-2 -500 4 22.22
30 EO 4P E-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
Total : 260,0 / 540 = 48,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire
7 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,93 % 1 EO 3T E = -110 9 50.00
2 EO 2C S+2 170 6 33.33
3 EO 4C E = -620 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
8 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 42,96 % 4 EO 2P S-2 -200 12 66.67
5 EO 4C W-1 50 5 27.78
6 EO 3T S+1 130 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
9 COURTOIS Christian -ADAMANTIADIS : 42,59 % 7 EO 3S W+1 -630 9 50.00
8 EO 3K N+3 170 8 44.44
9 EO 3T W+1 -130 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
2 EVRARD Armand -GELISSEN Edouard : 54,81 %10 EO 2S S-2 -200 16 88.89
11 EO 4C W-1 50 3 16.67
12 EO 3S W+2 -460 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
4 MACAUX Lucienne -NIGOT Pierre : 62,22 %13 EO 3P N-1 -100 11 61.11
14 EO 4P S = 420 4 22.22
15 EO 2P S+2 170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
3 PETIT Jean -DAPHNE Chantal : 52,22 %16 EO 5K E-1 100 8 44.44
17 EO 3C E+1 -170 11 61.11
18 EO 3S N+2 660 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,44 %19 EO 3S W = -600 12 66.67
20 EO 4P S+2 680 7 38.89
21 EO 4C N-1 -100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
1 HUBLET Carlo -HALLEUX Jean François : 45,37 %22 EO 4C N-2 -100 17 94.44
23 EO 4C S+2 680 12 66.67
24 EO 4P S+1 450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
6 de WASSEIGE Claude -MASSAUX Jacques : 47,59 %25 EO 2K N+1 110 0 0.00
26 EO 1S S+1 120 14 77.78
27 EO 2C N = 110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
10 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,85 %28 EO 2S N = 120 1 5.56
29 EO 4P E+2 -680 14 77.78
30 EO 3C W+1 -170 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 270,0 / 540 = 50,00 %
|
|