|
Tournoi du 25-01-10
1 59,36 7 DELTOUR Emile -VANDAM Jean
2 55,83 11 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian
3 54,14 9 DACHET Gérard -STIENON Annie
4 54,05 8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
5 53,17 1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
6 51,06 12 HUBLET Carlo -de TERWANGNE Philippe
7 50,26 4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -CASSART Guy
8 49,09 5 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean
9 47,29 10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
10 46,64 6 WUYARD Alphonse -PARMENTIER Richard
11 45,65 13 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
12 42,48 3 de WASSEIGE Claude -FRAITURE Louis
13 40,95 2 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 64,15 18 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand
2 56,70 21 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard
3 55,68 22 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques
4 53,36 26 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques
5 53,11 14 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon
6 49,62 17 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
7 47,45 16 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire
8 47,24 25 EVRARD Armand -SALFI Huguette
9 47,23 23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
10 46,36 19 DOUMONT Hervé -TELLIN Jean-Pierre
11 43,77 20 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CLERIN François-Xavier
12 43,36 15 GODEFROIT Jean-Louis -DUMORTIER Henry
13 41,98 24 MATELART Marc -NELIS Claude
PAIRE Nr : 1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
14 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 53,11 % 1 NS 5C N-1 -50 7 31.82
2 NS 6C N-2 -200 2 9.09
3 NS 4C E+2 -680 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
24 MATELART Marc -NELIS Claude : 41,98 % 4 NS 4C W+2 -680 0 0.00
5 NS 4P W = -420 16 72.73
6 NS 3C N+2 200 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,23 % 7 NS 4C N+1 650 20 90.91
8 NS 4S E+3 -520 13 59.09
9 NS 3S E+1 -630 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
22 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 55,68 %10 NS 4P N+2 680 20 90.91
11 NS 3S W = -400 11 50.00
12 NS 2C W-1 50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
21 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 56,70 %13 NS 4K E-3 300 16 72.73
14 NS 2C N = 110 11 50.00
15 NS 3S S-1 -100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
26 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 53,36 %16 NS 5T N-1 -50 16 72.73
17 NS 3P W = -140 12 54.55
18 NS 4T E = -130 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
19 DOUMONT Hervé -TELLIN Jean-Pierre : 46,36 %19 NS 2K W+3 -150 3 13.64
20 NS 3S E+1 -630 3 13.64
21 NS Pass Passe 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
18 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 64,15 %22 NS 6P S = 980 20 90.91
23 NS 4P N+3 710 10 45.45
24 NS 4P N+1 450 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
17 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,62 %25 NS 2C E-1 100 17.5 79.55
26 NS 3C N = 140 14.3 65.00
27 NS 4P S-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,85 %
16 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 47,45 %28 NS 4P S = 620 15.4 70.00
29 NS 4P W = -620 19.7 89.55
30 NS 2S W+1 -150 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 69,85 %
Total : 350,9 / 660 = 53,17 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert
15 GODEFROIT Jean-Louis -DUMORTIER Henry : 43,36 % 4 NS 3S W+2 -660 3 13.64
5 NS 4P W = -420 16 72.73
6 NS 2C N+2 170 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
14 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 53,11 % 7 NS 4C N = 620 11 50.00
8 NS 3S W+4 -520 13 59.09
9 NS 3S E = -600 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
24 MATELART Marc -NELIS Claude : 41,98 %10 NS 4P N-1 -100 1 4.55
11 NS 6C E-1 50 20 90.91
12 NS 4C W-2 100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,23 %13 NS 2P N = 110 4 18.18
14 NS 1S W+1 -120 0 0.00
15 NS 3S S = 600 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
22 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 55,68 %16 NS 3C E+1 -170 9 40.91
17 NS 3PcW = -530 0 0.00
18 NS 2P W = -110 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
21 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 56,70 %19 NS 2K W+2 -130 9 40.91
20 NS 4C W = -620 9 40.91
21 NS 2K E+1 -110 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
25 EVRARD Armand -SALFI Huguette : 47,24 %22 NS 5TcW-2 500 16 72.73
23 NS 6P N = 1430 12 54.55
24 NS 3S S+2 460 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
19 DOUMONT Hervé -TELLIN Jean-Pierre : 46,36 %25 NS 3K N-2 -100 9.9 45.00
26 NS 2P W = -110 0.1 0.45
27 NS 4P S-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
18 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 64,15 %28 NS 3P S+1 170 6.6 30.00
29 NS 4P W+1 -650 7.7 35.00
30 NS 2S W+1 -150 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,33 %
17 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,62 %31 NS 4P S-2 -200 8 36.36
32 NS Pass Moyen 11 50.00
33 NS 4P N+2 480 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
Total : 270,3 / 660 = 40,95 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 de WASSEIGE Claude -FRAITURE Louis
18 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 64,15 % 1 NS 4C N-1 -50 7 31.82
2 NS 6P N-1 -100 7 31.82
3 NS 4C E+2 -680 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
16 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 47,45 % 7 NS 4C N = 620 11 50.00
8 NS 5T W+2 -440 19 86.36
9 NS 3S E+1 -630 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
25 EVRARD Armand -SALFI Huguette : 47,24 %10 NS 4P N = 620 7 31.82
11 NS 4P E = -420 3 13.64
12 NS 3K E-1 50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
14 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 53,11 %13 NS 1S E-2 200 10 45.45
14 NS 2C N = 110 11 50.00
15 NS 3S S+1 660 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
24 MATELART Marc -NELIS Claude : 41,98 %16 NS 4C E = -620 3 13.64
17 NS 2P W+1 -140 12 54.55
18 NS 3P W-2 100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,23 %19 NS 1S S-2 -100 19 86.36
20 NS 4C W = -620 9 40.91
21 NS 3K E-1 50 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
22 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 55,68 %22 NS 4P N = 420 13 59.09
23 NS 7S S-2 -200 0 0.00
24 NS 3S S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 19,70 %
26 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 53,36 %25 NS 3P E-1 100 17.5 79.55
26 NS 4C N-1 -100 3.4 15.45
27 NS 4P S-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
20 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CLERIN François-Xavier : 43,77 %28 NS 3C E-1 50 1.2 5.45
29 NS 4P E+1 -650 7.7 35.00
30 NS 3S W = -400 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 16,97 %
19 DOUMONT Hervé -TELLIN Jean-Pierre : 46,36 %31 NS 4P S-1 -100 12 54.55
32 NS 4P W+1 -650 2.3 10.45
33 NS 4P N+2 480 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 29,24 %
Total : 280,4 / 660 = 42,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -CASSART Guy
20 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CLERIN François-Xavier : 43,77 % 1 NS 4P N = 420 15 68.18
2 NS 2C S+3 200 10 45.45
3 NS 6C W = -1430 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
19 DOUMONT Hervé -TELLIN Jean-Pierre : 46,36 % 4 NS 3S W+2 -660 3 13.64
5 NS 3P W+1 -170 22 100.00
6 NS 4C N = 420 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
17 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,62 %10 NS 4P N+1 650 13 59.09
11 NS 3S W = -400 11 50.00
12 NS 2C W+1 -140 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
26 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 53,36 %13 NS 3S W-5 500 22 100.00
14 NS 3S S-1 -50 3 13.64
15 NS 2K S+4 170 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
15 GODEFROIT Jean-Louis -DUMORTIER Henry : 43,36 %16 NS 3C E+1 -140 13 59.09
17 NS 2P W+1 -140 12 54.55
18 NS 2S W+1 -150 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
14 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 53,11 %19 NS 2K W+1 -110 15 68.18
20 NS 3S W+1 -630 3 13.64
21 NS 2K W+2 -130 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
24 MATELART Marc -NELIS Claude : 41,98 %22 NS 6P S = 980 20 90.91
23 NS 6P S+1 1460 19 86.36
24 NS 4P S+1 450 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 78,79 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,23 %25 NS 3K N-3 -150 5.5 25.00
26 NS 3CcS = 730 19.7 89.55
27 NS 4P S-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,85 %
22 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 55,68 %28 NS 3P S+1 170 6.6 30.00
29 NS 4P E+1 -650 7.7 35.00
30 NS 3S W = -400 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 25,15 %
25 EVRARD Armand -SALFI Huguette : 47,24 %31 NS 4PcS = 790 22 100.00
32 NS 4P W = -620 9.9 45.00
33 NS 6P N+1 1010 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 75,61 %
Total : 331,7 / 660 = 50,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean
26 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 53,36 % 1 NS 4C S = 420 15 68.18
2 NS 6C S-2 -200 2 9.09
3 NS 4C W+2 -680 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
21 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 56,70 % 4 NS 4C W = -620 13 59.09
5 NS 4P W+1 -450 5 22.73
6 NS 4C N+1 450 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
20 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CLERIN François-Xavier : 43,77 % 7 NS 4C N = 620 11 50.00
8 NS 5K W+2 -440 19 86.36
9 NS 3C W = -140 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
18 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 64,15 %13 NS 3K W-1 100 2 9.09
14 NS 2C N+1 140 18 81.82
15 NS 3S S-1 -100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
17 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,62 %16 NS 4C E-1 100 20 90.91
17 NS 2P W+1 -140 12 54.55
18 NS 4T E+1 -150 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
25 EVRARD Armand -SALFI Huguette : 47,24 %19 NS 2KcW+3 -780 0 0.00
20 NS 4C W = -620 9 40.91
21 NS 3K E = -110 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 24,24 %
15 GODEFROIT Jean-Louis -DUMORTIER Henry : 43,36 %22 NS 6C N-1 -50 4 18.18
23 NS 6P S+1 1460 19 86.36
24 NS 3S N+2 460 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
14 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 53,11 %25 NS 4T S-4 -200 0.1 0.45
26 NS 4PcW-3 800 21.9 99.55
27 NS 4P S-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
24 MATELART Marc -NELIS Claude : 41,98 %28 NS 4C S = 620 15.4 70.00
29 NS 4P E+1 -650 7.7 35.00
30 NS 2S W+1 -150 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,23 %31 NS 6ScN-6 -1700 0 0.00
32 NS 4P W = -620 9.9 45.00
33 NS 6C N+1 1010 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 42,27 %
Total : 324,0 / 660 = 49,09 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 WUYARD Alphonse -PARMENTIER Richard
24 MATELART Marc -NELIS Claude : 41,98 % 1 NS 4C N-1 -100 1 4.55
2 NS 5TcE-4 800 22 100.00
3 NS 4C E+2 -680 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,23 % 4 NS 3S W-2 200 20 90.91
5 NS 4P W+1 -450 5 22.73
6 NS 2P E-3 300 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
25 EVRARD Armand -SALFI Huguette : 47,24 % 7 NS 4C N-1 -100 2 9.09
8 NS 6K W+1 -940 6 27.27
9 NS 3S E-1 100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
21 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 56,70 %10 NS 4P N-1 -100 1 4.55
11 NS 4P E = -420 3 13.64
12 NS 2C W+2 -170 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
19 DOUMONT Hervé -TELLIN Jean-Pierre : 46,36 %16 NS 2C E+1 -140 13 59.09
17 NS 2P W+1 -140 12 54.55
18 NS 2K N+2 130 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
18 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 64,15 %19 NS 2K W+2 -130 9 40.91
20 NS 4C W = -620 9 40.91
21 NS 4K E-1 50 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
26 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 53,36 %22 NS 3T S-1 -50 4 18.18
23 NS 3S S+2 660 5 22.73
24 NS 3S S = 400 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 19,70 %
16 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 47,45 %25 NS 2K N-2 -100 9.9 45.00
26 NS 3C S = 140 14.3 65.00
27 NS 4P S-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
15 GODEFROIT Jean-Louis -DUMORTIER Henry : 43,36 %28 NS 4P S = 620 15.4 70.00
29 NS 4P W+1 -650 7.7 35.00
30 NS 2S W+1 -150 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
14 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 53,11 %31 NS 4P S-3 -300 5 22.73
32 NS 2P W+3 -200 16.5 75.00
33 NS 6S S = 990 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 53,79 %
Total : 307,8 / 660 = 46,64 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 DELTOUR Emile -VANDAM Jean
15 GODEFROIT Jean-Louis -DUMORTIER Henry : 43,36 % 1 NS 4C N = 420 15 68.18
2 NS 4C S = 620 13 59.09
3 NS 4P E+2 -680 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
14 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 53,11 % 4 NS 4C W+1 -650 7 31.82
5 NS 4P W = -420 16 72.73
6 NS 4C N+1 450 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
24 MATELART Marc -NELIS Claude : 41,98 % 7 NS 4C N+1 650 20 90.91
8 NS 6T W+1 -940 6 27.27
9 NS 3S E-1 100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
26 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 53,36 %10 NS 4P N+1 650 13 59.09
11 NS 3P E+2 -200 16 72.73
12 NS 3S W = -400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
22 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 55,68 %13 NS 3K E-2 200 10 45.45
14 NS 2C N = 110 11 50.00
15 NS 3S S = 600 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
20 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CLERIN François-Xavier : 43,77 %19 NS 2K W+1 -110 15 68.18
20 NS 3S W-1 100 18 81.82
21 NS 2C S = 110 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
19 DOUMONT Hervé -TELLIN Jean-Pierre : 46,36 %22 NS 2S E = -120 0 0.00
23 NS 6P S+1 1460 19 86.36
24 NS 3S S+3 490 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
18 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 64,15 %25 NS 1S S-3 -150 5.5 25.00
26 NS 3C N = 140 14.3 65.00
27 NS 4P S-2 -100 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
25 EVRARD Armand -SALFI Huguette : 47,24 %28 NS 3P S+1 170 6.6 30.00
29 NS 4P E = -620 19.7 89.55
30 NS 2S W+1 -150 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 56,52 %
16 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 47,45 %31 NS 4S N-1 -100 12 54.55
32 NS 2P W+3 -200 16.5 75.00
33 NS 6P N+1 1010 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
Total : 391,8 / 660 = 59,36 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
17 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,62 % 1 NS 4C S = 420 15 68.18
2 NS 4C N = 620 13 59.09
3 NS 6C W = -1430 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
16 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 47,45 % 4 NS 3S W-2 200 20 90.91
5 NS 4P W+1 -450 5 22.73
6 NS 2C N+2 170 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
15 GODEFROIT Jean-Louis -DUMORTIER Henry : 43,36 % 7 NS 4C S = 620 11 50.00
8 NS 3S W+4 -520 13 59.09
9 NS 3C W+1 -170 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
14 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 53,11 %10 NS 4P N+2 680 20 90.91
11 NS 4P E = -420 3 13.64
12 NS 3C W = -140 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
24 MATELART Marc -NELIS Claude : 41,98 %13 NS 3S E-4 400 19 86.36
14 NS 2C N = 110 11 50.00
15 NS 3S S = 600 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
25 EVRARD Armand -SALFI Huguette : 47,24 %16 NS 4C E-1 100 20 90.91
17 NS 2P W+1 -140 12 54.55
18 NS 3S W = -400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
21 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 56,70 %22 NS 4P W-1 100 9 40.91
23 NS 6S N = 1440 14 63.64
24 NS 4S S = 430 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
20 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CLERIN François-Xavier : 43,77 %25 NS 1S N+1 120 21.9 99.55
26 NS 4C N-1 -100 3.4 15.45
27 NS 4P S = 420 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 69,85 %
19 DOUMONT Hervé -TELLIN Jean-Pierre : 46,36 %28 NS 4P S = 620 15.4 70.00
29 NS 4P E = -620 19.7 89.55
30 NS 2S W = -120 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 81,36 %
26 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 53,36 %31 NS 3S N = 600 16 72.73
32 NS 4P W = -620 9.9 45.00
33 NS 3S S+4 520 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 54,39 %
Total : 356,7 / 660 = 54,05 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 DACHET Gérard -STIENON Annie
19 DOUMONT Hervé -TELLIN Jean-Pierre : 46,36 % 1 NS 4CcN-1 -100 1 4.55
2 NS 3S S+1 630 16 72.73
3 NS 3S E+3 -690 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
25 EVRARD Armand -SALFI Huguette : 47,24 % 4 NS 4C W = -620 13 59.09
5 NS 4P W = -420 16 72.73
6 NS 4C N = 420 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
17 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,62 % 7 NS 3S N-1 -100 2 9.09
8 NS 3S W+4 -520 13 59.09
9 NS 4C W = -620 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
16 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 47,45 %10 NS 4P N+1 650 13 59.09
11 NS 3S W = -400 11 50.00
12 NS 2C W = -110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
15 GODEFROIT Jean-Louis -DUMORTIER Henry : 43,36 %13 NS 5T W-4 400 19 86.36
14 NS 2C N = 110 11 50.00
15 NS 3S S+3 690 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
14 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 53,11 %16 NS 4C E-1 100 20 90.91
17 NS 2P W+1 -140 12 54.55
18 NS 3T E+2 -150 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
26 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 53,36 %19 NS 3T E+1 -130 9 40.91
20 NS 3C E-2 200 22 100.00
21 NS 3K E = -110 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
22 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 55,68 %25 NS 1P E+3 -170 2.3 10.45
26 NS 3P W-1 100 7.7 35.00
27 NS 3P S-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
21 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 56,70 %28 NS 3PcS+1 930 21.9 99.55
29 NS 4P E+1 -650 7.7 35.00
30 NS 3S W-1 50 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 78,03 %
20 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CLERIN François-Xavier : 43,77 %31 NS 3S N-1 -100 12 54.55
32 NS 2P W+2 -170 20.8 94.55
33 NS 4P N+1 450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 49,70 %
Total : 357,3 / 660 = 54,14 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
21 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 56,70 % 1 NS 3S N+2 460 20 90.91
2 NS 6C N-1 -100 7 31.82
3 NS 4C E+2 -680 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
20 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CLERIN François-Xavier : 43,77 % 4 NS 3S W-2 200 20 90.91
5 NS 4P W = -420 16 72.73
6 NS 2C N+3 200 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
26 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 53,36 % 7 NS 3S S+1 630 16 72.73
8 NS 6S E+1 -1020 0 0.00
9 NS 3C W-1 100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
18 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 64,15 %10 NS 4P N = 620 7 31.82
11 NS 4P E = -420 3 13.64
12 NS 2C W+1 -140 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 24,24 %
17 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,62 %13 NS 3S E-2 200 10 45.45
14 NS 2C N = 110 11 50.00
15 NS 3S N = 600 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
16 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 47,45 %16 NS 4C E = -620 3 13.64
17 NS 2P W+1 -140 12 54.55
18 NS 3S W-1 50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
15 GODEFROIT Jean-Louis -DUMORTIER Henry : 43,36 %19 NS 1S S-1 -50 22 100.00
20 NS 2C W+1 -140 14 63.64
21 NS 3K E = -110 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
14 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 53,11 %22 NS 6P S-1 -50 4 18.18
23 NS 3S S+3 690 8 36.36
24 NS 4P N = 420 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,23 %28 NS 4C E-1 50 1.2 5.45
29 NS 4P W+1 -650 7.7 35.00
30 NS 3S W = -400 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 16,97 %
22 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 55,68 %31 NS 3S N+2 660 20 90.91
32 NS 4P W = -620 9.9 45.00
33 NS 6C N = 980 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 63,48 %
Total : 312,1 / 660 = 47,29 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,23 % 1 NS 3S N+3 490 22 100.00
2 NS 4C N+1 650 19 86.36
3 NS 6T E = -1370 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
22 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 55,68 % 4 NS 4C E = -620 13 59.09
5 NS 4P E+1 -450 5 22.73
6 NS 3C N+2 200 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
21 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 56,70 % 7 NS 4C N-1 -100 2 9.09
8 NS 6S E = -990 2 9.09
9 NS 3S E-1 100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
20 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CLERIN François-Xavier : 43,77 %10 NS 4P N+2 680 20 90.91
11 NS 1P E+3 -170 18 81.82
12 NS 2P E-2 100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
25 EVRARD Armand -SALFI Huguette : 47,24 %13 NS 1S E-2 200 10 45.45
14 NS 2S N+3 210 22 100.00
15 NS 3S N = 600 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
18 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 64,15 %16 NS 4C E = -620 3 13.64
17 NS 2P E+2 -170 2 9.09
18 NS 2S E+1 -150 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
17 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,62 %19 NS 2K E+2 -130 9 40.91
20 NS 4C E-1 100 18 81.82
21 NS 3K E = -110 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
16 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 47,45 %22 NS 4P N = 420 13 59.09
23 NS 6S N-1 -100 2 9.09
24 NS 4C N+1 450 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
15 GODEFROIT Jean-Louis -DUMORTIER Henry : 43,36 %25 NS 2T N = 90 13.2 60.00
26 NS 3P E-1 100 7.7 35.00
27 NS 4P N = 420 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 63,18 %
24 MATELART Marc -NELIS Claude : 41,98 %31 NS 3S N+1 630 18 81.82
32 NS 2P E+2 -170 20.8 94.55
33 NS 5KcE-5 1100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 92,12 %
Total : 368,5 / 660 = 55,83 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 HUBLET Carlo -de TERWANGNE Philippe
25 EVRARD Armand -SALFI Huguette : 47,24 % 1 NS 6S N-1 -50 7 31.82
2 NS 5C S = 650 19 86.36
3 NS 6C W = -1430 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
18 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 64,15 % 4 NS 4C W+1 -650 7 31.82
5 NS 4P W+1 -450 5 22.73
6 NS 3C N+2 200 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
22 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 55,68 % 7 NS 4C N+1 650 20 90.91
8 NS 6K E+1 -940 6 27.27
9 NS 3S S = 400 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
15 GODEFROIT Jean-Louis -DUMORTIER Henry : 43,36 %10 NS 4P N+1 650 13 59.09
11 NS 3S W = -400 11 50.00
12 NS 2C W = -110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
19 DOUMONT Hervé -TELLIN Jean-Pierre : 46,36 %13 NS 2C S-2 -200 0 0.00
14 NS 2P E-3 150 20 90.91
15 NS 3S S+3 690 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,23 %16 NS 3C E+1 -170 9 40.91
17 NS 2P W+1 -140 12 54.55
18 NS 3S W-3 150 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
16 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 47,45 %19 NS 1S S-2 -100 19 86.36
20 NS 4C W-1 100 18 81.82
21 NS 3K E = -110 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
20 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CLERIN François-Xavier : 43,77 %22 NS 6P S = 980 20 90.91
23 NS 3S S+2 660 5 22.73
24 NS Pass Passe 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
17 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,62 %28 NS 4P S = 620 15.4 70.00
29 NS 4P W+1 -650 7.7 35.00
30 NS 2S W = -120 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 63,18 %
21 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 56,70 %31 NS 6S N-4 -400 2 9.09
32 NS 4P W+1 -650 2.3 10.45
33 NS 4C N+2 480 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 14,09 %
Total : 337,0 / 660 = 51,06 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
22 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 55,68 % 1 NS 4C N-1 -50 7 31.82
2 NS 6C S-2 -200 2 9.09
3 NS 4C E+2 -680 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
26 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 53,36 % 4 NS 4C E = -620 13 59.09
5 NS 4P W+1 -450 5 22.73
6 NS 3C N+3 200 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
19 DOUMONT Hervé -TELLIN Jean-Pierre : 46,36 % 7 NS 3C N+2 200 6 27.27
8 NS 6S E-1 50 22 100.00
9 NS 2P W-1 100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,23 %10 NS 5TcE-2 500 4 18.18
11 NS 5S E-2 100 22 100.00
12 NS 5KcE-2 300 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
16 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 47,45 %13 NS 4C E-2 200 10 45.45
14 NS 3T S-1 -50 3 13.64
15 NS 3S S = 600 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
20 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CLERIN François-Xavier : 43,77 %16 NS 4C E = -620 3 13.64
17 NS 1S S = 90 22 100.00
18 NS 3T E+2 -150 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
24 MATELART Marc -NELIS Claude : 41,98 %19 NS 2K W+3 -150 3 13.64
20 NS 4C W+1 -650 0 0.00
21 NS 1S W = -90 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
17 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,62 %22 NS 4P W-1 100 9 40.91
23 NS 6P S+1 1460 19 86.36
24 NS 4P N+1 450 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
21 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 56,70 %25 NS 3P E-1 100 17.5 79.55
26 NS 3C N = 140 14.3 65.00
27 NS 4P S-2 -100 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
18 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 64,15 %31 NS 3S N-3 -300 5 22.73
32 NS 4P W+1 -650 2.3 10.45
33 NS 4C N+2 480 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 18,64 %
Total : 301,3 / 660 = 45,65 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 53,17 % 1 EO 5C N-1 -50 15 68.18
2 EO 6C N-2 -200 20 90.91
3 EO 4C E+2 -680 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
7 DELTOUR Emile -VANDAM Jean : 59,36 % 4 EO 4C W+1 -650 15 68.18
5 EO 4P W = -420 6 27.27
6 EO 4C N+1 450 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
2 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 40,95 % 7 EO 4C N = 620 11 50.00
8 EO 3S W+4 -520 9 40.91
9 EO 3S E = -600 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,05 %10 EO 4P N+2 680 2 9.09
11 EO 4P E = -420 19 86.36
12 EO 3C W = -140 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
3 de WASSEIGE Claude -FRAITURE Louis : 42,48 %13 EO 1S E-2 200 12 54.55
14 EO 2C N = 110 11 50.00
15 EO 3S S+1 660 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
9 DACHET Gérard -STIENON Annie : 54,14 %16 EO 4C E-1 100 2 9.09
17 EO 2P W+1 -140 10 45.45
18 EO 3T E+2 -150 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -CASSART Guy : 50,26 %19 EO 2K W+1 -110 7 31.82
20 EO 3S W+1 -630 19 86.36
21 EO 2K W+2 -130 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 47,29 %22 EO 6P S-1 -50 18 81.82
23 EO 3S S+3 690 14 63.64
24 EO 4P N = 420 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
5 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 49,09 %25 EO 4T S-4 -200 21.9 99.55
26 EO 4PcW-3 800 0.1 0.45
27 EO 4P S-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
6 WUYARD Alphonse -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,64 %31 EO 4P S-3 -300 17 77.27
32 EO 2P W+3 -200 5.5 25.00
33 EO 6S S = 990 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 46,21 %
Total : 350,5 / 660 = 53,11 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 GODEFROIT Jean-Louis -DUMORTIER Henry
7 DELTOUR Emile -VANDAM Jean : 59,36 % 1 EO 4C N = 420 7 31.82
2 EO 4C S = 620 9 40.91
3 EO 4P E+2 -680 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
2 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 40,95 % 4 EO 3S W+2 -660 19 86.36
5 EO 4P W = -420 6 27.27
6 EO 2C N+2 170 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,05 % 7 EO 4C S = 620 11 50.00
8 EO 3S W+4 -520 9 40.91
9 EO 3C W+1 -170 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
12 HUBLET Carlo -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 51,06 %10 EO 4P N+1 650 9 40.91
11 EO 3S W = -400 11 50.00
12 EO 2C W = -110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
9 DACHET Gérard -STIENON Annie : 54,14 %13 EO 5T W-4 400 3 13.64
14 EO 2C N = 110 11 50.00
15 EO 3S S+3 690 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -CASSART Guy : 50,26 %16 EO 3C E+1 -140 9 40.91
17 EO 2P W+1 -140 10 45.45
18 EO 2S W+1 -150 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 47,29 %19 EO 1S S-1 -50 0 0.00
20 EO 2C W+1 -140 8 36.36
21 EO 3K E = -110 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
5 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 49,09 %22 EO 6C N-1 -50 18 81.82
23 EO 6P S+1 1460 3 13.64
24 EO 3S N+2 460 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
11 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 55,83 %25 EO 2T N = 90 8.8 40.00
26 EO 3P E-1 100 14.3 65.00
27 EO 4P N = 420 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 36,82 %
6 WUYARD Alphonse -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,64 %28 EO 4P S = 620 6.6 30.00
29 EO 4P W+1 -650 14.3 65.00
30 EO 2S W+1 -150 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
Total : 286,2 / 660 = 43,36 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire
8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,05 % 4 EO 3S W-2 200 2 9.09
5 EO 4P W+1 -450 17 77.27
6 EO 2C N+2 170 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
3 de WASSEIGE Claude -FRAITURE Louis : 42,48 % 7 EO 4C N = 620 11 50.00
8 EO 5T W+2 -440 3 13.64
9 EO 3S E+1 -630 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
9 DACHET Gérard -STIENON Annie : 54,14 %10 EO 4P N+1 650 9 40.91
11 EO 3S W = -400 11 50.00
12 EO 2C W = -110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
13 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 45,65 %13 EO 4C E-2 200 12 54.55
14 EO 3T S-1 -50 19 86.36
15 EO 3S S = 600 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 47,29 %16 EO 4C E = -620 19 86.36
17 EO 2P W+1 -140 10 45.45
18 EO 3S W-1 50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
12 HUBLET Carlo -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 51,06 %19 EO 1S S-2 -100 3 13.64
20 EO 4C W-1 100 4 18.18
21 EO 3K E = -110 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
11 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 55,83 %22 EO 4P N = 420 9 40.91
23 EO 6S N-1 -100 20 90.91
24 EO 4C N+1 450 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
6 WUYARD Alphonse -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,64 %25 EO 2K N-2 -100 12.1 55.00
26 EO 3C S = 140 7.7 35.00
27 EO 4P S-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 53,17 %28 EO 4P S = 620 6.6 30.00
29 EO 4P W = -620 2.3 10.45
30 EO 2S W+1 -150 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 30,15 %
7 DELTOUR Emile -VANDAM Jean : 59,36 %31 EO 4S N-1 -100 10 45.45
32 EO 2P W+3 -200 5.5 25.00
33 EO 6P N+1 1010 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
Total : 313,2 / 660 = 47,45 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,05 % 1 EO 4C S = 420 7 31.82
2 EO 4C N = 620 9 40.91
3 EO 6C W = -1430 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
9 DACHET Gérard -STIENON Annie : 54,14 % 7 EO 3S N-1 -100 20 90.91
8 EO 3S W+4 -520 9 40.91
9 EO 4C W = -620 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -CASSART Guy : 50,26 %10 EO 4P N+1 650 9 40.91
11 EO 3S W = -400 11 50.00
12 EO 2C W+1 -140 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 47,29 %13 EO 3S E-2 200 12 54.55
14 EO 2C N = 110 11 50.00
15 EO 3S N = 600 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
5 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 49,09 %16 EO 4C E-1 100 2 9.09
17 EO 2P W+1 -140 10 45.45
18 EO 4T E+1 -150 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
11 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 55,83 %19 EO 2K E+2 -130 13 59.09
20 EO 4C E-1 100 4 18.18
21 EO 3K E = -110 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
13 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 45,65 %22 EO 4P W-1 100 13 59.09
23 EO 6P S+1 1460 3 13.64
24 EO 4P N+1 450 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 53,17 %25 EO 2C E-1 100 4.5 20.45
26 EO 3C N = 140 7.7 35.00
27 EO 4P S-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,15 %
12 HUBLET Carlo -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 51,06 %28 EO 4P S = 620 6.6 30.00
29 EO 4P W+1 -650 14.3 65.00
30 EO 2S W = -120 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 36,82 %
2 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 40,95 %31 EO 4P S-2 -200 14 63.64
32 EO Pass Moyen 11 50.00
33 EO 4P N+2 480 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
Total : 327,5 / 660 = 49,62 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand
3 de WASSEIGE Claude -FRAITURE Louis : 42,48 % 1 EO 4C N-1 -50 15 68.18
2 EO 6P N-1 -100 15 68.18
3 EO 4C E+2 -680 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
12 HUBLET Carlo -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 51,06 % 4 EO 4C W+1 -650 15 68.18
5 EO 4P W+1 -450 17 77.27
6 EO 3C N+2 200 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 47,29 %10 EO 4P N = 620 15 68.18
11 EO 4P E = -420 19 86.36
12 EO 2C W+1 -140 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 75,76 %
5 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 49,09 %13 EO 3K W-1 100 20 90.91
14 EO 2C N+1 140 4 18.18
15 EO 3S S-1 -100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
11 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 55,83 %16 EO 4C E = -620 19 86.36
17 EO 2P E+2 -170 20 90.91
18 EO 2S E+1 -150 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
6 WUYARD Alphonse -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,64 %19 EO 2K W+2 -130 13 59.09
20 EO 4C W = -620 13 59.09
21 EO 4K E-1 50 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 53,17 %22 EO 6P S = 980 2 9.09
23 EO 4P N+3 710 12 54.55
24 EO 4P N+1 450 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
7 DELTOUR Emile -VANDAM Jean : 59,36 %25 EO 1S S-3 -150 16.5 75.00
26 EO 3C N = 140 7.7 35.00
27 EO 4P S-2 -100 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
2 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 40,95 %28 EO 3P S+1 170 15.4 70.00
29 EO 4P W+1 -650 14.3 65.00
30 EO 2S W+1 -150 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,67 %
13 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 45,65 %31 EO 3S N-3 -300 17 77.27
32 EO 4P W+1 -650 19.7 89.55
33 EO 4C N+2 480 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 81,36 %
Total : 423,4 / 660 = 64,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 DOUMONT Hervé -TELLIN Jean-Pierre
9 DACHET Gérard -STIENON Annie : 54,14 % 1 EO 4CcN-1 -100 21 95.45
2 EO 3S S+1 630 6 27.27
3 EO 3S E+3 -690 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -CASSART Guy : 50,26 % 4 EO 3S W+2 -660 19 86.36
5 EO 3P W+1 -170 0 0.00
6 EO 4C N = 420 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
13 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 45,65 % 7 EO 3C N+2 200 16 72.73
8 EO 6S E-1 50 0 0.00
9 EO 2P W-1 100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
12 HUBLET Carlo -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 51,06 %13 EO 2C S-2 -200 22 100.00
14 EO 2P E-3 150 2 9.09
15 EO 3S S+3 690 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
6 WUYARD Alphonse -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,64 %16 EO 2C E+1 -140 9 40.91
17 EO 2P W+1 -140 10 45.45
18 EO 2K N+2 130 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 53,17 %19 EO 2K W+3 -150 19 86.36
20 EO 3S E+1 -630 19 86.36
21 EO Pass Passe 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
7 DELTOUR Emile -VANDAM Jean : 59,36 %22 EO 2S E = -120 22 100.00
23 EO 6P S+1 1460 3 13.64
24 EO 3S S+3 490 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
2 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 40,95 %25 EO 3K N-2 -100 12.1 55.00
26 EO 2P W = -110 21.9 99.55
27 EO 4P S-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,05 %28 EO 4P S = 620 6.6 30.00
29 EO 4P E = -620 2.3 10.45
30 EO 2S W = -120 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 18,64 %
3 de WASSEIGE Claude -FRAITURE Louis : 42,48 %31 EO 4P S-1 -100 10 45.45
32 EO 4P W+1 -650 19.7 89.55
33 EO 4P N+2 480 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 70,76 %
Total : 306,0 / 660 = 46,36 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CLERIN François-Xavier
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -CASSART Guy : 50,26 % 1 EO 4P N = 420 7 31.82
2 EO 2C S+3 200 12 54.55
3 EO 6C W = -1430 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 47,29 % 4 EO 3S W-2 200 2 9.09
5 EO 4P W = -420 6 27.27
6 EO 2C N+3 200 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
5 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 49,09 % 7 EO 4C N = 620 11 50.00
8 EO 5K W+2 -440 3 13.64
9 EO 3C W = -140 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
11 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 55,83 %10 EO 4P N+2 680 2 9.09
11 EO 1P E+3 -170 4 18.18
12 EO 2P E-2 100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
13 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 45,65 %16 EO 4C E = -620 19 86.36
17 EO 1S S = 90 0 0.00
18 EO 3T E+2 -150 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
7 DELTOUR Emile -VANDAM Jean : 59,36 %19 EO 2K W+1 -110 7 31.82
20 EO 3S W-1 100 4 18.18
21 EO 2C S = 110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
12 HUBLET Carlo -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 51,06 %22 EO 6P S = 980 2 9.09
23 EO 3S S+2 660 17 77.27
24 EO Pass Passe 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,05 %25 EO 1S N+1 120 0.1 0.45
26 EO 4C N-1 -100 18.6 84.55
27 EO 4P S = 420 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 30,15 %
3 de WASSEIGE Claude -FRAITURE Louis : 42,48 %28 EO 3C E-1 50 20.8 94.55
29 EO 4P E+1 -650 14.3 65.00
30 EO 3S W = -400 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 83,03 %
9 DACHET Gérard -STIENON Annie : 54,14 %31 EO 3S N-1 -100 10 45.45
32 EO 2P W+2 -170 1.2 5.45
33 EO 4P N+1 450 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,30 %
Total : 288,9 / 660 = 43,77 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard
10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 47,29 % 1 EO 3S N+2 460 2 9.09
2 EO 6C N-1 -100 15 68.18
3 EO 4C E+2 -680 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
5 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 49,09 % 4 EO 4C W = -620 9 40.91
5 EO 4P W+1 -450 17 77.27
6 EO 4C N+1 450 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
11 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 55,83 % 7 EO 4C N-1 -100 20 90.91
8 EO 6S E = -990 20 90.91
9 EO 3S E-1 100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
6 WUYARD Alphonse -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,64 %10 EO 4P N-1 -100 21 95.45
11 EO 4P E = -420 19 86.36
12 EO 2C W+2 -170 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 53,17 %13 EO 4K E-3 300 6 27.27
14 EO 2C N = 110 11 50.00
15 EO 3S S-1 -100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
2 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 40,95 %19 EO 2K W+2 -130 13 59.09
20 EO 4C W = -620 13 59.09
21 EO 2K E+1 -110 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,05 %22 EO 4P W-1 100 13 59.09
23 EO 6S N = 1440 8 36.36
24 EO 4S S = 430 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
13 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 45,65 %25 EO 3P E-1 100 4.5 20.45
26 EO 3C N = 140 7.7 35.00
27 EO 4P S-2 -100 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 DACHET Gérard -STIENON Annie : 54,14 %28 EO 3PcS+1 930 0.1 0.45
29 EO 4P E+1 -650 14.3 65.00
30 EO 3S W-1 50 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 21,97 %
12 HUBLET Carlo -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 51,06 %31 EO 6S N-4 -400 20 90.91
32 EO 4P W+1 -650 19.7 89.55
33 EO 4C N+2 480 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 85,91 %
Total : 374,2 / 660 = 56,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques
13 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 45,65 % 1 EO 4C N-1 -50 15 68.18
2 EO 6C S-2 -200 20 90.91
3 EO 4C E+2 -680 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
11 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 55,83 % 4 EO 4C E = -620 9 40.91
5 EO 4P E+1 -450 17 77.27
6 EO 3C N+2 200 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
12 HUBLET Carlo -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 51,06 % 7 EO 4C N+1 650 2 9.09
8 EO 6K E+1 -940 16 72.73
9 EO 3S S = 400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 53,17 %10 EO 4P N+2 680 2 9.09
11 EO 3S W = -400 11 50.00
12 EO 2C W-1 50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
7 DELTOUR Emile -VANDAM Jean : 59,36 %13 EO 3K E-2 200 12 54.55
14 EO 2C N = 110 11 50.00
15 EO 3S S = 600 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
2 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 40,95 %16 EO 3C E+1 -170 13 59.09
17 EO 3PcW = -530 22 100.00
18 EO 2P W = -110 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
3 de WASSEIGE Claude -FRAITURE Louis : 42,48 %22 EO 4P N = 420 9 40.91
23 EO 7S S-2 -200 22 100.00
24 EO 3S S-2 -100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 80,30 %
9 DACHET Gérard -STIENON Annie : 54,14 %25 EO 1P E+3 -170 19.7 89.55
26 EO 3P W-1 100 14.3 65.00
27 EO 3P S-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -CASSART Guy : 50,26 %28 EO 3P S+1 170 15.4 70.00
29 EO 4P E+1 -650 14.3 65.00
30 EO 3S W = -400 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 74,85 %
10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 47,29 %31 EO 3S N+2 660 2 9.09
32 EO 4P W = -620 12.1 55.00
33 EO 6C N = 980 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 36,52 %
Total : 367,5 / 660 = 55,68 %
PAIRE Nr : 23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
11 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 55,83 % 1 EO 3S N+3 490 0 0.00
2 EO 4C N+1 650 3 13.64
3 EO 6T E = -1370 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
6 WUYARD Alphonse -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,64 % 4 EO 3S W-2 200 2 9.09
5 EO 4P W+1 -450 17 77.27
6 EO 2P E-3 300 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 53,17 % 7 EO 4C N+1 650 2 9.09
8 EO 4S E+3 -520 9 40.91
9 EO 3S E+1 -630 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
13 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 45,65 %10 EO 5TcE-2 500 18 81.82
11 EO 5S E-2 100 0 0.00
12 EO 5KcE-2 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
2 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 40,95 %13 EO 2P N = 110 18 81.82
14 EO 1S W+1 -120 22 100.00
15 EO 3S S = 600 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
12 HUBLET Carlo -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 51,06 %16 EO 3C E+1 -170 13 59.09
17 EO 2P W+1 -140 10 45.45
18 EO 3S W-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
3 de WASSEIGE Claude -FRAITURE Louis : 42,48 %19 EO 1S S-2 -100 3 13.64
20 EO 4C W = -620 13 59.09
21 EO 3K E-1 50 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -CASSART Guy : 50,26 %25 EO 3K N-3 -150 16.5 75.00
26 EO 3CcS = 730 2.3 10.45
27 EO 4P S-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,15 %
10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 47,29 %28 EO 4C E-1 50 20.8 94.55
29 EO 4P W+1 -650 14.3 65.00
30 EO 3S W = -400 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 83,03 %
5 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 49,09 %31 EO 6ScN-6 -1700 22 100.00
32 EO 4P W = -620 12.1 55.00
33 EO 6C N+1 1010 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 57,73 %
Total : 311,7 / 660 = 47,23 %
PAIRE Nr : 24 MATELART Marc -NELIS Claude
6 WUYARD Alphonse -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,64 % 1 EO 4C N-1 -100 21 95.45
2 EO 5TcE-4 800 0 0.00
3 EO 4C E+2 -680 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 53,17 % 4 EO 4C W+2 -680 22 100.00
5 EO 4P W = -420 6 27.27
6 EO 3C N+2 200 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
7 DELTOUR Emile -VANDAM Jean : 59,36 % 7 EO 4C N+1 650 2 9.09
8 EO 6T W+1 -940 16 72.73
9 EO 3S E-1 100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
2 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 40,95 %10 EO 4P N-1 -100 21 95.45
11 EO 6C E-1 50 2 9.09
12 EO 4C W-2 100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,05 %13 EO 3S E-4 400 3 13.64
14 EO 2C N = 110 11 50.00
15 EO 3S S = 600 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
3 de WASSEIGE Claude -FRAITURE Louis : 42,48 %16 EO 4C E = -620 19 86.36
17 EO 2P W+1 -140 10 45.45
18 EO 3P W-2 100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
13 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 45,65 %19 EO 2K W+3 -150 19 86.36
20 EO 4C W+1 -650 22 100.00
21 EO 1S W = -90 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -CASSART Guy : 50,26 %22 EO 6P S = 980 2 9.09
23 EO 6P S+1 1460 3 13.64
24 EO 4P S+1 450 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 21,21 %
5 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 49,09 %28 EO 4C S = 620 6.6 30.00
29 EO 4P E+1 -650 14.3 65.00
30 EO 2S W+1 -150 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
11 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 55,83 %31 EO 3S N+1 630 4 18.18
32 EO 2P E+2 -170 1.2 5.45
33 EO 5KcE-5 1100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 7,88 %
Total : 277,1 / 660 = 41,98 %
PAIRE Nr : 25 EVRARD Armand -SALFI Huguette
12 HUBLET Carlo -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 51,06 % 1 EO 6S N-1 -50 15 68.18
2 EO 5C S = 650 3 13.64
3 EO 6C W = -1430 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
9 DACHET Gérard -STIENON Annie : 54,14 % 4 EO 4C W = -620 9 40.91
5 EO 4P W = -420 6 27.27
6 EO 4C N = 420 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
6 WUYARD Alphonse -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,64 % 7 EO 4C N-1 -100 20 90.91
8 EO 6K W+1 -940 16 72.73
9 EO 3S E-1 100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
3 de WASSEIGE Claude -FRAITURE Louis : 42,48 %10 EO 4P N = 620 15 68.18
11 EO 4P E = -420 19 86.36
12 EO 3K E-1 50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
11 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 55,83 %13 EO 1S E-2 200 12 54.55
14 EO 2S N+3 210 0 0.00
15 EO 3S N = 600 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,05 %16 EO 4C E-1 100 2 9.09
17 EO 2P W+1 -140 10 45.45
18 EO 3S W = -400 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
5 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 49,09 %19 EO 2KcW+3 -780 22 100.00
20 EO 4C W = -620 13 59.09
21 EO 3K E = -110 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 75,76 %
2 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 40,95 %22 EO 5TcW-2 500 6 27.27
23 EO 6P N = 1430 10 45.45
24 EO 3S S+2 460 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
7 DELTOUR Emile -VANDAM Jean : 59,36 %28 EO 3P S+1 170 15.4 70.00
29 EO 4P E = -620 2.3 10.45
30 EO 2S W+1 -150 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 43,48 %
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -CASSART Guy : 50,26 %31 EO 4PcS = 790 0 0.00
32 EO 4P W = -620 12.1 55.00
33 EO 6P N+1 1010 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 24,39 %
Total : 311,8 / 660 = 47,24 %
PAIRE Nr : 26 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques
5 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 49,09 % 1 EO 4C S = 420 7 31.82
2 EO 6C S-2 -200 20 90.91
3 EO 4C W+2 -680 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
13 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 45,65 % 4 EO 4C E = -620 9 40.91
5 EO 4P W+1 -450 17 77.27
6 EO 3C N+3 200 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 47,29 % 7 EO 3S S+1 630 6 27.27
8 EO 6S E+1 -1020 22 100.00
9 EO 3C W-1 100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
7 DELTOUR Emile -VANDAM Jean : 59,36 %10 EO 4P N+1 650 9 40.91
11 EO 3P E+2 -200 6 27.27
12 EO 3S W = -400 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -CASSART Guy : 50,26 %13 EO 3S W-5 500 0 0.00
14 EO 3S S-1 -50 19 86.36
15 EO 2K S+4 170 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 53,17 %16 EO 5T N-1 -50 6 27.27
17 EO 3P W = -140 10 45.45
18 EO 4T E = -130 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
9 DACHET Gérard -STIENON Annie : 54,14 %19 EO 3T E+1 -130 13 59.09
20 EO 3C E-2 200 0 0.00
21 EO 3K E = -110 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
6 WUYARD Alphonse -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,64 %22 EO 3T S-1 -50 18 81.82
23 EO 3S S+2 660 17 77.27
24 EO 3S S = 400 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 80,30 %
3 de WASSEIGE Claude -FRAITURE Louis : 42,48 %25 EO 3P E-1 100 4.5 20.45
26 EO 4C N-1 -100 18.6 84.55
27 EO 4P S-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,05 %31 EO 3S N = 600 6 27.27
32 EO 4P W = -620 12.1 55.00
33 EO 3S S+4 520 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 45,61 %
Total : 352,2 / 660 = 53,36 %
|
|