|
Tournoi du 25-04-11
1 61,40 9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
2 61,20 5 VANDAM Cécile -VANDAM Jean
3 59,00 2 de VIRON Baudouin -MATELART Marc
4 58,27 4 BABIKOW Georges -COENE Jacqueline
5 55,13 8 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy
6 47,87 10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
7 47,73 12 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HUBLET Carlo
8 46,87 3 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon
9 45,27 1 BRIOT Marie-Louise -MASSAUX Jacques
10 44,80 6 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle
11 37,47 11 HALLEUX Jean François -LIBERT Laurent
12 35,00 7 COLOT Jacques -FRAITURE Louis
PAIRE Nr : 1 BRIOT Marie-Louise -MASSAUX Jacques
4 BABIKOW Georges -COENE Jacqueline : 58,27 % 1 NS 2S N-1 -50 2.6 26.00
2 NS 3S E+4 -520 1.4 14.00
3 NS 1PxE+1 -1120 0.2 2.00 µ Tbl = 14,00 %
10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 47,87 % 4 NS 3S E = -600 1 10.00
5 NS 6P E = -980 10 100.00
6 NS 3C W+1 -170 2 20.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
7 COLOT Jacques -FRAITURE Louis : 35,00 %10 EO 2P S = 110 2.6 26.00
11 EO 3S W+1 -430 8.6 86.00
12 EO 4C N+2 680 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,00 %
11 HALLEUX Jean François -LIBERT Laurent : 37,47 %13 EO 3K S = 110 5 50.00
14 EO 3C S = 140 0.2 2.00
15 EO 3S S = 600 3.8 38.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 61,40 %16 EO 1S N = 90 5 50.00
17 EO 3S N+2 460 4 40.00
18 EO 3S E+1 -430 6 60.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
2 de VIRON Baudouin -MATELART Marc : 59,00 %19 NS 2P S+1 140 0.2 2.00
20 NS 4PcW-2 500 0.2 2.00
21 NS 2T E+1 -110 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 18,00 %
12 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HUBLET Carlo : 47,73 %22 EO 3S E+3 -690 10 100.00
23 EO 2S S-1 -100 9 90.00
24 EO 4P N = 420 2 20.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
6 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 44,80 %25 NS 3K E+1 -130 5 50.00
26 NS 1S W+1 -120 10 100.00
27 NS 3S S = 400 8 80.00 µ Tbl = 76,67 %
8 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 55,13 %28 EO 3K N = 110 0.2 2.00
29 EO 3PcW-2 500 1.4 14.00
30 EO 3S W+1 -430 7.4 74.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
3 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 46,87 %31 EO 2P N-1 -100 6 60.00
32 EO 3S N+1 430 4 40.00
33 EO 3S W+1 -430 10 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 135,8 / 300 = 45,27 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 de VIRON Baudouin -MATELART Marc
3 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 46,87 % 1 NS 2P S+1 140 9.8 98.00
2 NS 3S E+2 -460 5 50.00
3 NS 1S S = 90 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,00 %
11 HALLEUX Jean François -LIBERT Laurent : 37,47 % 4 EO 3S E = -600 9 90.00
5 EO 7P E = -1510 9 90.00
6 EO 2C E = -110 4 40.00 µ Tbl = 73,33 %
4 BABIKOW Georges -COENE Jacqueline : 58,27 % 7 EO 4P N = 620 7.4 74.00
8 EO 3CcN-2 -300 9.8 98.00
9 EO 3K N+2 150 2.6 26.00 µ Tbl = 66,00 %
6 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 44,80 %10 NS 4CcW-1 200 9.8 98.00
11 NS 3S W = -400 7.4 74.00
12 NS 5C N+1 680 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,00 %
8 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 55,13 %13 EO 3C E = -140 9.8 98.00
14 EO 3T E = -110 7.4 74.00
15 EO 4T S+2 170 7.4 74.00 µ Tbl = 82,00 %
10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 47,87 %16 EO 1S N+1 120 0 0.00
17 EO 3S N+1 430 10 100.00
18 EO 3P E+1 -170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
1 BRIOT Marie-Louise -MASSAUX Jacques : 45,27 %19 EO 2P S+1 140 9.8 98.00
20 EO 4PcW-2 500 9.8 98.00
21 EO 2T E+1 -110 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 82,00 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 61,40 %22 NS 4C W+1 -650 6 60.00
23 NS 3S S-1 -100 1 10.00
24 NS 3P N+1 170 4 40.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
5 VANDAM Cécile -VANDAM Jean : 61,20 %25 NS 4P W+1 -650 0 0.00
26 NS 3C W+1 -170 5 50.00
27 NS 5C N-1 -50 2 20.00 µ Tbl = 23,33 %
12 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HUBLET Carlo : 47,73 %31 EO 2P N-1 -100 6 60.00
32 EO 3S S+1 430 4 40.00
33 EO 3S E = -400 6 60.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
Total : 177,0 / 300 = 59,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon
2 de VIRON Baudouin -MATELART Marc : 59,00 % 1 EO 2P S+1 140 0.2 2.00
2 EO 3S E+2 -460 5 50.00
3 EO 1S S = 90 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 34,00 %
8 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 55,13 % 4 NS 3S W-1 100 6 60.00
5 NS 6P E+1 -1010 6 60.00
6 NS 2P S-3 -150 4 40.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
12 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HUBLET Carlo : 47,73 % 7 EO 4P S = 620 7.4 74.00
8 EO 3T W-1 50 3.8 38.00
9 EO 3K S = 110 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,00 %
5 VANDAM Cécile -VANDAM Jean : 61,20 %10 EO 2C E+2 -170 7.4 74.00
11 EO 3S E = -400 2.6 26.00
12 EO 5C N+1 680 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
7 COLOT Jacques -FRAITURE Louis : 35,00 %13 NS 3C E-1 100 2.6 26.00
14 NS 4T E-1 50 6.2 62.00
15 NS 3S S = 600 6.2 62.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 HALLEUX Jean François -LIBERT Laurent : 37,47 %16 EO 1S N-1 -50 9 90.00
17 EO 3S N+2 460 4 40.00
18 EO 3S E+2 -460 9 90.00 µ Tbl = 73,33 %
10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 47,87 %22 EO 4C W+1 -650 4 40.00
23 EO 2S N = 120 4 40.00
24 EO 4P N-1 -50 9 90.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
4 BABIKOW Georges -COENE Jacqueline : 58,27 %25 NS 4K E = -130 5 50.00
26 NS 1S W+2 -150 8 80.00
27 NS 3S S-1 -50 2 20.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
6 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 44,80 %28 NS 2C W = -110 3.8 38.00
29 NS 2P W-1 100 0.2 2.00
30 NS 3S E+2 -460 0.2 2.00 µ Tbl = 14,00 %
1 BRIOT Marie-Louise -MASSAUX Jacques : 45,27 %31 NS 2P N-1 -100 4 40.00
32 NS 3S N+1 430 6 60.00
33 NS 3S W+1 -430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 140,6 / 300 = 46,87 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 BABIKOW Georges -COENE Jacqueline
1 BRIOT Marie-Louise -MASSAUX Jacques : 45,27 % 1 EO 2S N-1 -50 7.4 74.00
2 EO 3S E+4 -520 8.6 86.00
3 EO 1PxE+1 -1120 9.8 98.00 µ Tbl = 86,00 %
7 COLOT Jacques -FRAITURE Louis : 35,00 % 4 NS 3S E-4 400 10 100.00
5 NS 6P E+1 -1010 6 60.00
6 NS 2P N-2 -100 8 80.00 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
2 de VIRON Baudouin -MATELART Marc : 59,00 % 7 NS 4P N = 620 2.6 26.00
8 NS 3CcN-2 -300 0.2 2.00
9 NS 3K N+2 150 7.4 74.00 µ Tbl = 34,00 %
12 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HUBLET Carlo : 47,73 %10 EO 4C E = -620 9.8 98.00
11 EO 3S W+1 -430 8.6 86.00
12 EO 5C N+1 680 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 78,00 %
8 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 55,13 %16 NS 1S N-1 -50 1 10.00
17 NS 3S N+2 460 6 60.00
18 NS 3S E = -400 7 70.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 47,87 %19 EO 3S S+1 430 7.4 74.00
20 EO 4C S+1 650 3.8 38.00
21 EO 3S S-3 -300 9.8 98.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
11 HALLEUX Jean François -LIBERT Laurent : 37,47 %22 NS 4C E+1 -650 6 60.00
23 NS 1P E-1 100 4 40.00
24 NS 4PcN = 590 10 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
3 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 46,87 %25 EO 4K E = -130 5 50.00
26 EO 1S W+2 -150 2 20.00
27 EO 3S S-1 -50 8 80.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
5 VANDAM Cécile -VANDAM Jean : 61,20 %28 NS 2C E = -110 3.8 38.00
29 NS 3K N+2 150 2.6 26.00
30 NS 3S E = -400 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,00 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 61,40 %31 EO 3C E-1 50 1 10.00
32 EO 3S N = 400 8 80.00
33 EO 3S W-1 50 1 10.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 174,8 / 300 = 58,27 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 VANDAM Cécile -VANDAM Jean
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 61,40 % 1 EO 1S N-1 -50 7.4 74.00
2 EO 6T W-2 100 0.2 2.00
3 EO 3KcN-3 -500 7.4 74.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
6 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 44,80 % 4 NS 3S E-1 100 6 60.00
5 NS 6P E+1 -1010 6 60.00
6 NS 2P N-1 -50 10 100.00 µ Tbl = 73,33 %
3 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 46,87 %10 NS 2C E+2 -170 2.6 26.00
11 NS 3S E = -400 7.4 74.00
12 NS 5C N+1 680 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
12 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HUBLET Carlo : 47,73 %13 EO 3K S+1 130 2.6 26.00
14 EO 4CcS-2 -300 9.8 98.00
15 EO 3S S+1 630 0.2 2.00 µ Tbl = 42,00 %
7 COLOT Jacques -FRAITURE Louis : 35,00 %16 EO 2P S = 110 2 20.00
17 EO 3S N+2 460 4 40.00
18 EO 3S W+2 -460 9 90.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 HALLEUX Jean François -LIBERT Laurent : 37,47 %19 NS 4P N+1 450 5 50.00
20 NS 4C N+2 680 9.8 98.00
21 NS 2P E-1 50 8.6 86.00 µ Tbl = 78,00 %
8 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 55,13 %22 NS 4C E+1 -650 6 60.00
23 NS 2T N+2 130 8 80.00
24 NS 4P N-1 -50 1 10.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
2 de VIRON Baudouin -MATELART Marc : 59,00 %25 EO 4P W+1 -650 10 100.00
26 EO 3C W+1 -170 5 50.00
27 EO 5C N-1 -50 8 80.00 µ Tbl = 76,67 %
4 BABIKOW Georges -COENE Jacqueline : 58,27 %28 EO 2C E = -110 6.2 62.00
29 EO 3K N+2 150 7.4 74.00
30 EO 3S E = -400 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,00 %
10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 47,87 %31 NS 3K E-1 50 9 90.00
32 NS 3S N+1 430 6 60.00
33 NS 3S E-1 50 9 90.00 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
Total : 183,6 / 300 = 61,20 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle
10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 47,87 % 1 NS 1S N = 90 7.4 74.00
2 NS 3S E+4 -520 1.4 14.00
3 NS 3P E-1 100 7.4 74.00 µ Tbl = 54,00 %
5 VANDAM Cécile -VANDAM Jean : 61,20 % 4 EO 3S E-1 100 4 40.00
5 EO 6P E+1 -1010 4 40.00
6 EO 2P N-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 26,67 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 61,40 % 7 NS 4P S = 620 2.6 26.00
8 NS 1S W-1 50 6.2 62.00
9 NS 2PcW+1 -870 0.2 2.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
2 de VIRON Baudouin -MATELART Marc : 59,00 %10 EO 4CcW-1 200 0.2 2.00
11 EO 3S W = -400 2.6 26.00
12 EO 5C N+1 680 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 26,00 %
12 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HUBLET Carlo : 47,73 %16 EO 1S N = 90 5 50.00
17 EO 3S N+2 460 4 40.00
18 EO 3S E = -400 3 30.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
8 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 55,13 %19 EO 3S S+3 490 1.4 14.00
20 EO 4C S+1 650 3.8 38.00
21 EO 2S S-2 -200 7.4 74.00 µ Tbl = 42,00 %
7 COLOT Jacques -FRAITURE Louis : 35,00 %22 NS 4C W+1 -650 6 60.00
23 NS 3S N = 600 10 100.00
24 NS 4KcE-2 300 6 60.00 µ Tbl = 73,33 %
1 BRIOT Marie-Louise -MASSAUX Jacques : 45,27 %25 EO 3K E+1 -130 5 50.00
26 EO 1S W+1 -120 0 0.00
27 EO 3S S = 400 2 20.00 µ Tbl = 23,33 %
3 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 46,87 %28 EO 2C W = -110 6.2 62.00
29 EO 2P W-1 100 9.8 98.00
30 EO 3S E+2 -460 9.8 98.00 µ Tbl = 86,00 %
11 HALLEUX Jean François -LIBERT Laurent : 37,47 %31 NS 3P N-2 -200 0 0.00
32 NS 3ScN+1 650 10 100.00
33 NS 3S E = -400 4 40.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
Total : 134,4 / 300 = 44,80 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 COLOT Jacques -FRAITURE Louis
11 HALLEUX Jean François -LIBERT Laurent : 37,47 % 1 EO 1S N-1 -50 7.4 74.00
2 EO 6S E-1 50 2.6 26.00
3 EO 2S W-3 300 0.2 2.00 µ Tbl = 34,00 %
4 BABIKOW Georges -COENE Jacqueline : 58,27 % 4 EO 3S E-4 400 0 0.00
5 EO 6P E+1 -1010 4 40.00
6 EO 2P N-2 -100 2 20.00 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 47,87 % 7 NS 4P S+1 650 8.6 86.00
8 NS 2C S-1 -50 2.6 26.00
9 NS 2P W = -110 2.6 26.00 µ Tbl = 46,00 %
1 BRIOT Marie-Louise -MASSAUX Jacques : 45,27 %10 NS 2P S = 110 7.4 74.00
11 NS 3S W+1 -430 1.4 14.00
12 NS 4C N+2 680 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,00 %
3 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 46,87 %13 EO 3C E-1 100 7.4 74.00
14 EO 4T E-1 50 3.8 38.00
15 EO 3S S = 600 3.8 38.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
5 VANDAM Cécile -VANDAM Jean : 61,20 %16 NS 2P S = 110 8 80.00
17 NS 3S N+2 460 6 60.00
18 NS 3S W+2 -460 1 10.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
12 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HUBLET Carlo : 47,73 %19 EO 3S S+3 490 1.4 14.00
20 EO 4C S = 620 7.4 74.00
21 EO 2T E-1 50 1.4 14.00 µ Tbl = 34,00 %
6 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 44,80 %22 EO 4C W+1 -650 4 40.00
23 EO 3S N = 600 0 0.00
24 EO 4KcE-2 300 4 40.00 µ Tbl = 26,67 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 61,40 %25 NS 4TcS-3 -500 2 20.00
26 NS 4C W = -620 1 10.00
27 NS 4C N-1 -50 2 20.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
8 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 55,13 %31 NS 2P N-1 -100 4 40.00
32 NS 3K S+1 130 0 0.00
33 NS 3S W = -400 4 40.00 µ Tbl = 26,67 %
Total : 105,0 / 300 = 35,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy
3 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 46,87 % 4 EO 3S W-1 100 4 40.00
5 EO 6P E+1 -1010 4 40.00
6 EO 2P S-3 -150 6 60.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
11 HALLEUX Jean François -LIBERT Laurent : 37,47 % 7 NS 4P S+1 650 8.6 86.00
8 NS 2C S = 110 9.8 98.00
9 NS 3PcE-1 200 9.8 98.00 µ Tbl = 94,00 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 61,40 %10 NS 4C W-1 100 5 50.00
11 NS 3S W = -400 7.4 74.00
12 NS 4C N+2 680 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,00 %
2 de VIRON Baudouin -MATELART Marc : 59,00 %13 NS 3C E = -140 0.2 2.00
14 NS 3T E = -110 2.6 26.00
15 NS 4T S+2 170 2.6 26.00 µ Tbl = 18,00 %
4 BABIKOW Georges -COENE Jacqueline : 58,27 %16 EO 1S N-1 -50 9 90.00
17 EO 3S N+2 460 4 40.00
18 EO 3S E = -400 3 30.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
6 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 44,80 %19 NS 3S S+3 490 8.6 86.00
20 NS 4C S+1 650 6.2 62.00
21 NS 2S S-2 -200 2.6 26.00 µ Tbl = 58,00 %
5 VANDAM Cécile -VANDAM Jean : 61,20 %22 EO 4C E+1 -650 4 40.00
23 EO 2T N+2 130 2 20.00
24 EO 4P N-1 -50 9 90.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 47,87 %25 EO 5K E-1 100 0 0.00
26 EO 3C W+1 -170 5 50.00
27 EO 2P S = 110 4 40.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
1 BRIOT Marie-Louise -MASSAUX Jacques : 45,27 %28 NS 3K N = 110 9.8 98.00
29 NS 3PcW-2 500 8.6 86.00
30 NS 3S W+1 -430 2.6 26.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
7 COLOT Jacques -FRAITURE Louis : 35,00 %31 EO 2P N-1 -100 6 60.00
32 EO 3K S+1 130 10 100.00
33 EO 3S W = -400 6 60.00 µ Tbl = 73,33 %
Total : 165,4 / 300 = 55,13 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
5 VANDAM Cécile -VANDAM Jean : 61,20 % 1 NS 1S N-1 -50 2.6 26.00
2 NS 6T W-2 100 9.8 98.00
3 NS 3KcN-3 -500 2.6 26.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
12 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HUBLET Carlo : 47,73 % 4 EO 3S E-1 100 4 40.00
5 EO 7P E = -1510 9 90.00
6 EO 4C W = -620 10 100.00 µ Tbl = 76,67 %
6 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 44,80 % 7 EO 4P S = 620 7.4 74.00
8 EO 1S W-1 50 3.8 38.00
9 EO 2PcW+1 -870 9.8 98.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
8 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 55,13 %10 EO 4C W-1 100 5 50.00
11 EO 3S W = -400 2.6 26.00
12 EO 4C N+2 680 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,00 %
10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 47,87 %13 EO 3C W-2 200 0.2 2.00
14 EO 4T E-1 50 3.8 38.00
15 EO 3S S-1 -100 9.8 98.00 µ Tbl = 46,00 %
1 BRIOT Marie-Louise -MASSAUX Jacques : 45,27 %16 NS 1S N = 90 5 50.00
17 NS 3S N+2 460 6 60.00
18 NS 3S E+1 -430 4 40.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
2 de VIRON Baudouin -MATELART Marc : 59,00 %22 EO 4C W+1 -650 4 40.00
23 EO 3S S-1 -100 9 90.00
24 EO 3P N+1 170 6 60.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
7 COLOT Jacques -FRAITURE Louis : 35,00 %25 EO 4TcS-3 -500 8 80.00
26 EO 4C W = -620 9 90.00
27 EO 4C N-1 -50 8 80.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
11 HALLEUX Jean François -LIBERT Laurent : 37,47 %28 NS 3K N-1 -100 7.4 74.00
29 NS 3PcW-1 200 5 50.00
30 NS 1P S-2 -100 7.4 74.00 µ Tbl = 66,00 %
4 BABIKOW Georges -COENE Jacqueline : 58,27 %31 NS 3C E-1 50 9 90.00
32 NS 3S N = 400 2 20.00
33 NS 3S W-1 50 9 90.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 184,2 / 300 = 61,40 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
6 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 44,80 % 1 EO 1S N = 90 2.6 26.00
2 EO 3S E+4 -520 8.6 86.00
3 EO 3P E-1 100 2.6 26.00 µ Tbl = 46,00 %
1 BRIOT Marie-Louise -MASSAUX Jacques : 45,27 % 4 EO 3S E = -600 9 90.00
5 EO 6P E = -980 0 0.00
6 EO 3C W+1 -170 8 80.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
7 COLOT Jacques -FRAITURE Louis : 35,00 % 7 EO 4P S+1 650 1.4 14.00
8 EO 2C S-1 -50 7.4 74.00
9 EO 2P W = -110 7.4 74.00 µ Tbl = 54,00 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 61,40 %13 NS 3C W-2 200 9.8 98.00
14 NS 4T E-1 50 6.2 62.00
15 NS 3S S-1 -100 0.2 2.00 µ Tbl = 54,00 %
2 de VIRON Baudouin -MATELART Marc : 59,00 %16 NS 1S N+1 120 10 100.00
17 NS 3S N+1 430 0 0.00
18 NS 3P E+1 -170 10 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
4 BABIKOW Georges -COENE Jacqueline : 58,27 %19 NS 3S S+1 430 2.6 26.00
20 NS 4C S+1 650 6.2 62.00
21 NS 3S S-3 -300 0.2 2.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
3 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 46,87 %22 NS 4C W+1 -650 6 60.00
23 NS 2S N = 120 6 60.00
24 NS 4P N-1 -50 1 10.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
8 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 55,13 %25 NS 5K E-1 100 10 100.00
26 NS 3C W+1 -170 5 50.00
27 NS 2P S = 110 6 60.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
12 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HUBLET Carlo : 47,73 %28 EO 2C W+1 -140 9.8 98.00
29 EO 3PcW-2 500 1.4 14.00
30 EO 6C E-3 150 0.2 2.00 µ Tbl = 38,00 %
5 VANDAM Cécile -VANDAM Jean : 61,20 %31 EO 3K E-1 50 1 10.00
32 EO 3S N+1 430 4 40.00
33 EO 3S E-1 50 1 10.00 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
Total : 143,6 / 300 = 47,87 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 HALLEUX Jean François -LIBERT Laurent
7 COLOT Jacques -FRAITURE Louis : 35,00 % 1 NS 1S N-1 -50 2.6 26.00
2 NS 6S E-1 50 7.4 74.00
3 NS 2S W-3 300 9.8 98.00 µ Tbl = 66,00 %
2 de VIRON Baudouin -MATELART Marc : 59,00 % 4 NS 3S E = -600 1 10.00
5 NS 7P E = -1510 1 10.00
6 NS 2C E = -110 6 60.00 µ Tbl = 26,67 %
8 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 55,13 % 7 EO 4P S+1 650 1.4 14.00
8 EO 2C S = 110 0.2 2.00
9 EO 3PcE-1 200 0.2 2.00 µ Tbl = 6,00 %
1 BRIOT Marie-Louise -MASSAUX Jacques : 45,27 %13 NS 3K S = 110 5 50.00
14 NS 3C S = 140 9.8 98.00
15 NS 3S S = 600 6.2 62.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
3 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 46,87 %16 NS 1S N-1 -50 1 10.00
17 NS 3S N+2 460 6 60.00
18 NS 3S E+2 -460 1 10.00 µ Tbl = 26,67 %
5 VANDAM Cécile -VANDAM Jean : 61,20 %19 EO 4P N+1 450 5 50.00
20 EO 4C N+2 680 0.2 2.00
21 EO 2P E-1 50 1.4 14.00 µ Tbl = 22,00 %
4 BABIKOW Georges -COENE Jacqueline : 58,27 %22 EO 4C E+1 -650 4 40.00
23 EO 1P E-1 100 6 60.00
24 EO 4PcN = 590 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
12 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HUBLET Carlo : 47,73 %25 EO 4TcS-1 -100 2 20.00
26 EO 4C W = -620 9 90.00
27 EO 4C N+1 450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 61,40 %28 EO 3K N-1 -100 2.6 26.00
29 EO 3PcW-1 200 5 50.00
30 EO 1P S-2 -100 2.6 26.00 µ Tbl = 34,00 %
6 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 44,80 %31 EO 3P N-2 -200 10 100.00
32 EO 3ScN+1 650 0 0.00
33 EO 3S E = -400 6 60.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
Total : 112,4 / 300 = 37,47 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HUBLET Carlo
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 61,40 % 4 NS 3S E-1 100 6 60.00
5 NS 7P E = -1510 1 10.00
6 NS 4C W = -620 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 23,33 %
3 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 46,87 % 7 NS 4P S = 620 2.6 26.00
8 NS 3T W-1 50 6.2 62.00
9 NS 3K S = 110 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,00 %
4 BABIKOW Georges -COENE Jacqueline : 58,27 %10 NS 4C E = -620 0.2 2.00
11 NS 3S W+1 -430 1.4 14.00
12 NS 5C N+1 680 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 22,00 %
5 VANDAM Cécile -VANDAM Jean : 61,20 %13 NS 3K S+1 130 7.4 74.00
14 NS 4CcS-2 -300 0.2 2.00
15 NS 3S S+1 630 9.8 98.00 µ Tbl = 58,00 %
6 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 44,80 %16 NS 1S N = 90 5 50.00
17 NS 3S N+2 460 6 60.00
18 NS 3S E = -400 7 70.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
7 COLOT Jacques -FRAITURE Louis : 35,00 %19 NS 3S S+3 490 8.6 86.00
20 NS 4C S = 620 2.6 26.00
21 NS 2T E-1 50 8.6 86.00 µ Tbl = 66,00 %
1 BRIOT Marie-Louise -MASSAUX Jacques : 45,27 %22 NS 3S E+3 -690 0 0.00
23 NS 2S S-1 -100 1 10.00
24 NS 4P N = 420 8 80.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
11 HALLEUX Jean François -LIBERT Laurent : 37,47 %25 NS 4TcS-1 -100 8 80.00
26 NS 4C W = -620 1 10.00
27 NS 4C N+1 450 10 100.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 47,87 %28 NS 2C W+1 -140 0.2 2.00
29 NS 3PcW-2 500 8.6 86.00
30 NS 6C E-3 150 9.8 98.00 µ Tbl = 62,00 %
2 de VIRON Baudouin -MATELART Marc : 59,00 %31 NS 2P N-1 -100 4 40.00
32 NS 3S S+1 430 6 60.00
33 NS 3S E = -400 4 40.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
Total : 143,2 / 300 = 47,73 %
|
|