|
Tournoi du 25-06-12
1 59,61 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
2 54,48 3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine
3 53,44 9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques
4 52,09 2 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile
5 51,96 5 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard
6 50,39 7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
7 49,83 1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
8 47,50 10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
9 42,91 4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -DELHEZ Jacques
10 37,72 6 COOLEN Josef -COLLET Claudine
11 0,00 11 -
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 59,12 16 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
2 56,98 20 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard
3 56,21 21 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude
4 52,08 15 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga
5 51,05 13 MOSSERAY Etienne -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie
6 50,56 18 ROSOUX Louis -MOSSERAY Bernadette
7 49,49 14 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAGMAN David
8 47,72 12 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile
9 45,08 22 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
10 43,89 17 SALFI Huguette -VERBOIS Léon
11 38,15 19 YERNAUX Philippe -MASSAUX Joel
PAIRE Nr : 1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
12 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 47,72 % 1 NS 7P N-1 -50 0.1 0.56
2 NS 3S E+1 -430 13.4 74.44
3 NS 5T N+1 420 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 43,70 %
22 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 45,08 % 4 NS 4P W+1 -650 2.3 12.78
5 NS 3S W+3 -490 11.2 62.22
6 NS 3S S+1 430 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
21 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 56,21 % 7 NS 4P S = 620 7.9 43.89
8 NS 3K E-1 50 10.1 56.11
9 NS 3S E-1 100 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 58,15 %
20 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 56,98 %10 NS 4P N-1 -100 0.1 0.56
11 NS 3S W = -400 9 50.00
12 NS 1S E-1 50 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 23,15 %
19 YERNAUX Philippe -MASSAUX Joel : 38,15 %13 NS 4C S = 620 6.8 37.78
14 NS 4P N+2 480 4.6 25.56
15 NS 3K W-2 100 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
18 ROSOUX Louis -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 50,56 %16 NS 2P E = -110 1.2 6.67
17 NS Pass 50 9 50.00
18 NS 3S E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
17 SALFI Huguette -VERBOIS Léon : 43,89 %19 NS 4C W = -620 5.7 31.67
20 NS 5P E-1 100 17.9 99.44
21 NS 2S N+2 180 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
16 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 59,12 %22 NS 4C N+1 450 9 50.00
23 NS 3CcE-1 200 17.9 99.44
24 NS 4T W+1 -150 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 78,89 %
15 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 52,08 %25 NS 4C N-1 -50 6.8 37.78
26 NS 2C S+2 170 5.7 31.67
27 NS 4P N = 420 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAGMAN David : 49,49 %28 NS 4C N-1 -100 8 44.44
29 NS 4C E+1 -650 8 44.44
30 NS 5KcE-2 300 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 269,1 / 540 = 49,83 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile
13 MOSSERAY Etienne -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 51,05 % 4 NS 4P E+1 -650 2.3 12.78
5 NS 6C W = -980 5.7 31.67
6 NS 3S S+1 430 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
12 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 47,72 % 7 NS 4P S = 620 7.9 43.89
8 NS 2S S-1 -50 4.6 25.56
9 NS 3S E-1 100 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
22 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 45,08 %10 NS 3P S+1 170 13.4 74.44
11 NS 3S E = -400 9 50.00
12 NS 1ScN+1 380 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 74,63 %
21 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 56,21 %13 NS 4C S = 620 6.8 37.78
14 NS 6P N = 980 13.4 74.44
15 NS 1S E+1 -120 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
20 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 56,98 %16 NS 1S S-1 -50 11.2 62.22
17 NS 3C E+2 50 9 50.00
18 NS 2C E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
19 YERNAUX Philippe -MASSAUX Joel : 38,15 %19 NS 2P S-1 -50 13.4 74.44
20 NS 4P E+2 -680 9 50.00
21 NS 3S N+1 630 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 74,63 %
18 ROSOUX Louis -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 50,56 %22 NS 4C N+1 450 9 50.00
23 NS 2P N = 110 14.6 81.11
24 NS 3S W = -400 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
17 SALFI Huguette -VERBOIS Léon : 43,89 %25 NS 4C N-1 -50 6.8 37.78
26 NS 5T W-2 200 14.6 81.11
27 NS 4P N-1 -50 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
16 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 59,12 %28 NS 4C N-1 -100 8 44.44
29 NS 4C E+1 -650 8 44.44
30 NS 4KcE-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
15 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 52,08 %31 NS 4P W = -420 14.6 81.11
32 NS 3K N-1 -50 3.4 18.89
33 NS 4C N = 420 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
Total : 281,3 / 540 = 52,09 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine
16 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 59,12 % 1 NS 6P N = 980 7.9 43.89
2 NS 3S W+1 -430 13.4 74.44
3 NS 5T N = 400 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAGMAN David : 49,49 % 7 NS 4P S = 620 7.9 43.89
8 NS 2S S = 120 13.4 74.44
9 NS 3S E = -600 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
13 MOSSERAY Etienne -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 51,05 %10 NS 2P N+2 170 13.4 74.44
11 NS 3S E = -400 9 50.00
12 NS 1P N = 80 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
12 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 47,72 %13 NS 4C N = 620 6.8 37.78
14 NS 6P N = 980 13.4 74.44
15 NS 3C S = 140 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
22 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 45,08 %16 NS 1S S-1 -50 11.2 62.22
17 NS 4C W+1 50 9 50.00
18 NS 2C E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
21 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 56,21 %19 NS 3PcS = 530 15.7 87.22
20 NS 5P E+1 -680 9 50.00
21 NS 2S N+1 150 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
20 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 56,98 %22 NS 4C N+1 450 9 50.00
23 NS 2P N = 110 14.6 81.11
24 NS 3S E+1 -430 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
19 YERNAUX Philippe -MASSAUX Joel : 38,15 %25 NS 2C N+1 140 15.7 87.22
26 NS 3C S+1 170 5.7 31.67
27 NS 3S S = 400 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 52,22 %
18 ROSOUX Louis -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 50,56 %28 NS 4C N-1 -100 8 44.44
29 NS 4C E+1 -650 8 44.44
30 NS 4C S = 420 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
17 SALFI Huguette -VERBOIS Léon : 43,89 %31 NS 6S W-2 100 17.9 99.44
32 NS 3K N = 110 10.1 56.11
33 NS 5PcW-2 300 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
Total : 294,2 / 540 = 54,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -DELHEZ Jacques
18 ROSOUX Louis -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 50,56 % 1 NS 6P N = 980 7.9 43.89
2 NS 3S E+1 -430 13.4 74.44
3 NS 3S N+1 430 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 64,26 %
17 SALFI Huguette -VERBOIS Léon : 43,89 % 4 NS 4P W = -620 11.2 62.22
5 NS 4C W+2 -480 15.7 87.22
6 NS 3S N-3 -150 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
15 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 52,08 %10 NS 2P N+1 140 5.7 31.67
11 NS 3S W = -400 9 50.00
12 NS 1S W-1 50 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAGMAN David : 49,49 %13 NS 4C S = 620 6.8 37.78
14 NS 4P N+3 510 7.9 43.89
15 NS 3T S-2 -200 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 29,44 %
13 MOSSERAY Etienne -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 51,05 %16 NS 1S N-1 -50 11.2 62.22
17 NS 3C W+1 50 9 50.00
18 NS 2C W = -110 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
12 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 47,72 %19 NS 4C W = -620 5.7 31.67
20 NS 5P E+1 -680 9 50.00
21 NS 2S N+1 150 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 39,81 %
22 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 45,08 %22 NS 4C N+1 450 9 50.00
23 NS 2S S-1 -100 7.9 43.89
24 NS 3S W = -400 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
21 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 56,21 %25 NS 4C S-1 -50 6.8 37.78
26 NS 2C S+2 170 5.7 31.67
27 NS 4P N-1 -50 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 27,41 %
20 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 56,98 %28 NS 4C N-1 -100 8 44.44
29 NS 4C E+1 -650 8 44.44
30 NS 3C S+1 170 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
19 YERNAUX Philippe -MASSAUX Joel : 38,15 %31 NS 4P W = -420 14.6 81.11
32 NS 3S S-1 -50 3.4 18.89
33 NS 4C N+1 450 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 58,15 %
Total : 231,7 / 540 = 42,91 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard
20 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 56,98 % 1 NS 6C S+1 1010 15.7 87.22
2 NS 3S E+2 -460 3.4 18.89
3 NS 3T N+1 130 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
19 YERNAUX Philippe -MASSAUX Joel : 38,15 % 4 NS 3P W+2 -200 17.9 99.44
5 NS 4C W+2 -480 15.7 87.22
6 NS 3S S-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 78,89 %
18 ROSOUX Louis -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 50,56 % 7 NS 5P S = 650 17.9 99.44
8 NS 2S S-1 -50 4.6 25.56
9 NS 3S E+1 -630 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
16 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 59,12 %13 NS 4C S = 620 6.8 37.78
14 NS 4P N+1 450 1.2 6.67
15 NS 2K W+1 -110 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 29,44 %
15 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 52,08 %16 NS 1S S-1 -50 11.2 62.22
17 NS 3C W+1 50 9 50.00
18 NS 2C E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAGMAN David : 49,49 %19 NS 3P S-3 -150 11.2 62.22
20 NS 4P E+2 -680 9 50.00
21 NS 4C S-2 -200 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
13 MOSSERAY Etienne -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 51,05 %22 NS 3S N+1 430 1.2 6.67
23 NS 3K S-1 -100 7.9 43.89
24 NS 3P W+1 -170 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
12 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 47,72 %25 NS 2C N+1 140 15.7 87.22
26 NS 2C S+3 200 14.6 81.11
27 NS 4P N = 420 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 80,93 %
22 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 45,08 %28 NS 4C N-1 -100 8 44.44
29 NS 6C E-1 100 18 100.00
30 NS 2C S+2 170 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
21 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 56,21 %31 NS 4P E+1 -450 6.8 37.78
32 NS 2P N = 110 10.1 56.11
33 NS 5C N = 450 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
Total : 280,6 / 540 = 51,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 COOLEN Josef -COLLET Claudine
22 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 45,08 % 1 NS 4C N+3 510 2.3 12.78
2 NS 3S E+2 -460 3.4 18.89
3 NS 3T N+1 130 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 12,78 %
21 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 56,21 % 4 NS 4P W+1 -650 2.3 12.78
5 NS 6CcW = -1210 1.2 6.67
6 NS 3S S-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 23,15 %
20 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 56,98 % 7 NS 4P S = 620 7.9 43.89
8 NS 3S S-2 -100 0.1 0.56
9 NS 3S E-1 100 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
19 YERNAUX Philippe -MASSAUX Joel : 38,15 %10 NS 4P N = 620 17.9 99.44
11 NS 3S E-1 50 15.7 87.22
12 NS 2S N-1 -100 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
17 SALFI Huguette -VERBOIS Léon : 43,89 %16 NS 1S N-2 -100 4.6 25.56
17 NS 1C E+3 50 9 50.00
18 NS 3S E-3 150 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
16 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 59,12 %19 NS 4CcW+3 -1390 0.1 0.56
20 NS 4P E+3 -710 2.3 12.78
21 NS 1S N+2 150 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 17,04 %
15 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 52,08 %22 NS 3S N+1 430 1.2 6.67
23 NS 3K S-2 -200 1.2 6.67
24 NS 5T E = -400 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 19,07 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAGMAN David : 49,49 %25 NS 2P N+1 140 15.7 87.22
26 NS 4C S-1 -100 0.1 0.56
27 NS 4P N = 420 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
13 MOSSERAY Etienne -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 51,05 %28 NS 4C N-2 -200 0 0.00
29 NS 4C E+1 -650 8 44.44
30 NS 4C S = 420 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
12 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 47,72 %31 NS 3S W+2 -460 2.3 12.78
32 NS 2C W-1 100 6.8 37.78
33 NS 5PcW-3 500 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 203,7 / 540 = 37,72 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
13 MOSSERAY Etienne -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 51,05 % 1 NS 6P N = 980 7.9 43.89
2 NS 3S E+2 -460 3.4 18.89
3 NS 5T N+1 420 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
12 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 47,72 % 4 NS 4P W = -620 11.2 62.22
5 NS 4C W+2 -480 15.7 87.22
6 NS 3S S-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
22 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 45,08 % 7 NS 4P S = 620 7.9 43.89
8 NS 2C N+1 140 16.8 93.33
9 NS 3S E-1 100 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 70,56 %
21 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 56,21 %10 NS 3P N = 140 5.7 31.67
11 NS 3S E+1 -430 2.3 12.78
12 NS 1S N+1 120 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
20 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 56,98 %13 NS 4C N = 620 6.8 37.78
14 NS 6P N+1 1010 17.9 99.44
15 NS 3C N-2 -200 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
18 ROSOUX Louis -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 50,56 %19 NS 4KcE-3 800 17.9 99.44
20 NS 6P E = -1430 0.1 0.56
21 NS 2S N+1 150 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
17 SALFI Huguette -VERBOIS Léon : 43,89 %22 NS 4C N+2 480 16.8 93.33
23 NS 3P N-1 -100 7.9 43.89
24 NS 5KcN-3 -500 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
16 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 59,12 %25 NS 2C N-1 -50 6.8 37.78
26 NS 3C S+1 170 5.7 31.67
27 NS 4P N-1 -50 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 27,41 %
15 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 52,08 %28 NS 4C N = 620 16 88.89
29 NS 4C E+1 -650 8 44.44
30 NS 4C S = 420 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAGMAN David : 49,49 %31 NS 4P W+1 -450 6.8 37.78
32 NS 3P N = 140 13.4 74.44
33 NS 4C N = 420 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
Total : 272,1 / 540 = 50,39 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
15 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 52,08 % 1 NS 6C S+1 1010 15.7 87.22
2 NS 3S E+1 -430 13.4 74.44
3 NS 3S N+3 490 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAGMAN David : 49,49 % 4 NS 4P W = -620 11.2 62.22
5 NS 4C W+3 -510 9 50.00
6 NS 3S S+1 430 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
13 MOSSERAY Etienne -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 51,05 % 7 NS 4P S = 620 7.9 43.89
8 NS 2C N+1 140 16.8 93.33
9 NS 4TcS-4 -800 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
12 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 47,72 %10 NS 2P N+1 140 5.7 31.67
11 NS 1ScS-3 -500 0.1 0.56
12 NS 1S N+1 120 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
22 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 45,08 %13 NS 4C N+1 650 16.8 93.33
14 NS 4P N+3 510 7.9 43.89
15 NS 3C S+1 170 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 78,89 %
21 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 56,21 %16 NS 1S S-1 -50 11.2 62.22
17 NS 1S W-1 50 9 50.00
18 NS 3S E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
19 YERNAUX Philippe -MASSAUX Joel : 38,15 %22 NS 4C N+2 480 16.8 93.33
23 NS 3P N-2 -200 1.2 6.67
24 NS 2K N+1 110 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
18 ROSOUX Louis -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 50,56 %25 NS 4C S-2 -100 0.1 0.56
26 NS 3C S+2 200 14.6 81.11
27 NS 4P N = 420 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
17 SALFI Huguette -VERBOIS Léon : 43,89 %28 NS 4C N+2 680 18 100.00
29 NS 4C E+1 -650 8 44.44
30 NS 4C S = 420 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
16 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 59,12 %31 NS 4P W+1 -450 6.8 37.78
32 NS 3S S-3 -150 0.1 0.56
33 NS 5C N = 450 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
Total : 321,9 / 540 = 59,61 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques
17 SALFI Huguette -VERBOIS Léon : 43,89 % 1 NS 6P N = 980 7.9 43.89
2 NS 3S E+2 -460 3.4 18.89
3 NS 5T N+2 440 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
16 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 59,12 % 4 NS 4P W = -620 11.2 62.22
5 NS 6C E = -980 5.7 31.67
6 NS 3S S-2 -100 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
15 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 52,08 % 7 NS 4P S = 620 7.9 43.89
8 NS 3C N-1 -50 4.6 25.56
9 NS 3S E = -600 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 33,70 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAGMAN David : 49,49 %10 NS 3P N+1 170 13.4 74.44
11 NS 3S W = -400 9 50.00
12 NS 2S N+1 150 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 70,56 %
13 MOSSERAY Etienne -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 51,05 %13 NS 4C S+1 650 16.8 93.33
14 NS 6P N = 980 13.4 74.44
15 NS 2K W+1 -110 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 70,56 %
12 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 47,72 %16 NS 2P E = -110 1.2 6.67
17 NS Pass 50 9 50.00
18 NS 2CcE-1 100 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
22 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 45,08 %19 NS 3C W+1 -170 9 50.00
20 NS 5P E+1 -680 9 50.00
21 NS 2S N+1 150 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
20 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 56,98 %25 NS 4C N-1 -50 6.8 37.78
26 NS 2C S+3 200 14.6 81.11
27 NS 4P N = 420 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
19 YERNAUX Philippe -MASSAUX Joel : 38,15 %28 NS 4C N-1 -100 8 44.44
29 NS 4C E+1 -650 8 44.44
30 NS 4C S = 420 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
18 ROSOUX Louis -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 50,56 %31 NS 3S W+1 -430 11.2 62.22
32 NS 3S S+2 460 17.9 99.44
33 NS 5PcW-2 300 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 58,15 %
Total : 288,6 / 540 = 53,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
19 YERNAUX Philippe -MASSAUX Joel : 38,15 % 1 NS 6C S+1 1010 15.7 87.22
2 NS 3S E+1 -430 13.4 74.44
3 NS 3S N = 400 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
18 ROSOUX Louis -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 50,56 % 4 NS 4P W = -620 11.2 62.22
5 NS 6CcW = -1210 1.2 6.67
6 NS 4P N-2 -100 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 29,26 %
17 SALFI Huguette -VERBOIS Léon : 43,89 % 7 NS 4P S = 620 7.9 43.89
8 NS 3K E-1 50 10.1 56.11
9 NS 3S E-1 100 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 58,15 %
16 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 59,12 %10 NS 3P N = 140 5.7 31.67
11 NS 3S W-2 100 17.9 99.44
12 NS 1S N = 90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
15 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 52,08 %13 NS 4C S = 620 6.8 37.78
14 NS 4P N+1 450 1.2 6.67
15 NS 3K W-2 100 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAGMAN David : 49,49 %16 NS 1S S = 90 17.9 99.44
17 NS Pass 50 9 50.00
18 NS 4TcS-3 -800 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
13 MOSSERAY Etienne -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 51,05 %19 NS 4C W+1 -650 2.3 12.78
20 NS 5P E = -650 15.7 87.22
21 NS 3S N = 600 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
12 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 47,72 %22 NS 4C N+1 450 9 50.00
23 NS 4P N-1 -100 7.9 43.89
24 NS 3S E = -400 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
21 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 56,21 %28 NS 4C N-1 -100 8 44.44
29 NS 4C E+1 -650 8 44.44
30 NS 2C S = 110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
20 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 56,98 %31 NS 4P W+2 -480 0.1 0.56
32 NS 3S S = 400 15.7 87.22
33 NS 4PcW-2 300 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
Total : 256,5 / 540 = 47,50 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 -
21 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 56,21 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
20 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 56,98 % 4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
19 YERNAUX Philippe -MASSAUX Joel : 38,15 % 7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
18 ROSOUX Louis -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 50,56 %10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
17 SALFI Huguette -VERBOIS Léon : 43,89 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
16 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 59,12 %16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
15 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 52,08 %19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAGMAN David : 49,49 %22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
13 MOSSERAY Etienne -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 51,05 %25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00
27 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
22 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 45,08 %31 NS BYE 0 0.00
32 NS BYE 0 0.00
33 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 594 = 0,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 49,83 % 1 EO 7P N-1 -50 17.9 99.44
2 EO 3S E+1 -430 4.6 25.56
3 EO 5T N+1 420 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 56,30 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 50,39 % 4 EO 4P W = -620 6.8 37.78
5 EO 4C W+2 -480 2.3 12.78
6 EO 3S S-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
2 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile : 52,09 % 7 EO 4P S = 620 10.1 56.11
8 EO 2S S-1 -50 13.4 74.44
9 EO 3S E-1 100 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,61 %10 EO 2P N+1 140 12.3 68.33
11 EO 1ScS-3 -500 17.9 99.44
12 EO 1S N+1 120 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 54,48 %13 EO 4C N = 620 11.2 62.22
14 EO 6P N = 980 4.6 25.56
15 EO 3C S = 140 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,44 %16 EO 2P E = -110 16.8 93.33
17 EO Pass 50 9 50.00
18 EO 2CcE-1 100 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -DELHEZ Jacques : 42,91 %19 EO 4C W = -620 12.3 68.33
20 EO 5P E+1 -680 9 50.00
21 EO 2S N+1 150 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 60,19 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 47,50 %22 EO 4C N+1 450 9 50.00
23 EO 4P N-1 -100 10.1 56.11
24 EO 3S E = -400 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
5 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 51,96 %25 EO 2C N+1 140 2.3 12.78
26 EO 2C S+3 200 3.4 18.89
27 EO 4P N = 420 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 19,07 %
6 COOLEN Josef -COLLET Claudine : 37,72 %31 EO 3S W+2 -460 15.7 87.22
32 EO 2C W-1 100 11.2 62.22
33 EO 5PcW-3 500 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 257,7 / 540 = 47,72 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 MOSSERAY Etienne -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie
7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 50,39 % 1 EO 6P N = 980 10.1 56.11
2 EO 3S E+2 -460 14.6 81.11
3 EO 5T N+1 420 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
2 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile : 52,09 % 4 EO 4P E+1 -650 15.7 87.22
5 EO 6C W = -980 12.3 68.33
6 EO 3S S+1 430 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,61 % 7 EO 4P S = 620 10.1 56.11
8 EO 2C N+1 140 1.2 6.67
9 EO 4TcS-4 -800 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 54,48 %10 EO 2P N+2 170 4.6 25.56
11 EO 3S E = -400 9 50.00
12 EO 1P N = 80 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,44 %13 EO 4C S+1 650 1.2 6.67
14 EO 6P N = 980 4.6 25.56
15 EO 2K W+1 -110 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 29,44 %
4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -DELHEZ Jacques : 42,91 %16 EO 1S N-1 -50 6.8 37.78
17 EO 3C W+1 50 9 50.00
18 EO 2C W = -110 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 47,50 %19 EO 4C W+1 -650 15.7 87.22
20 EO 5P E = -650 2.3 12.78
21 EO 3S N = 600 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
5 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 51,96 %22 EO 3S N+1 430 16.8 93.33
23 EO 3K S-1 -100 10.1 56.11
24 EO 3P W+1 -170 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
11 - : 0,00 %25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00
27 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 COOLEN Josef -COLLET Claudine : 37,72 %28 EO 4C N-2 -200 18 100.00
29 EO 4C E+1 -650 10 55.56
30 EO 4C S = 420 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 248,1 / 486 = 51,05 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAGMAN David
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,61 % 4 EO 4P W = -620 6.8 37.78
5 EO 4C W+3 -510 9 50.00
6 EO 3S S+1 430 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 54,48 % 7 EO 4P S = 620 10.1 56.11
8 EO 2S S = 120 4.6 25.56
9 EO 3S E = -600 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,44 %10 EO 3P N+1 170 4.6 25.56
11 EO 3S W = -400 9 50.00
12 EO 2S N+1 150 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 29,44 %
4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -DELHEZ Jacques : 42,91 %13 EO 4C S = 620 11.2 62.22
14 EO 4P N+3 510 10.1 56.11
15 EO 3T S-2 -200 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 70,56 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 47,50 %16 EO 1S S = 90 0.1 0.56
17 EO Pass 50 9 50.00
18 EO 4TcS-3 -800 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
5 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 51,96 %19 EO 3P S-3 -150 6.8 37.78
20 EO 4P E+2 -680 9 50.00
21 EO 4C S-2 -200 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
11 - : 0,00 %22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 COOLEN Josef -COLLET Claudine : 37,72 %25 EO 2P N+1 140 2.3 12.78
26 EO 4C S-1 -100 17.9 99.44
27 EO 4P N = 420 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 49,83 %28 EO 4C N-1 -100 10 55.56
29 EO 4C E+1 -650 10 55.56
30 EO 5KcE-2 300 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 50,39 %31 EO 4P W+1 -450 11.2 62.22
32 EO 3P N = 140 4.6 25.56
33 EO 4C N = 420 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
Total : 240,5 / 486 = 49,49 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,61 % 1 EO 6C S+1 1010 2.3 12.78
2 EO 3S E+1 -430 4.6 25.56
3 EO 3S N+3 490 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,44 % 7 EO 4P S = 620 10.1 56.11
8 EO 3C N-1 -50 13.4 74.44
9 EO 3S E = -600 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 66,30 %
4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -DELHEZ Jacques : 42,91 %10 EO 2P N+1 140 12.3 68.33
11 EO 3S W = -400 9 50.00
12 EO 1S W-1 50 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 47,50 %13 EO 4C S = 620 11.2 62.22
14 EO 4P N+1 450 16.8 93.33
15 EO 3K W-2 100 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
5 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 51,96 %16 EO 1S S-1 -50 6.8 37.78
17 EO 3C W+1 50 9 50.00
18 EO 2C E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
11 - : 0,00 %19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 COOLEN Josef -COLLET Claudine : 37,72 %22 EO 3S N+1 430 16.8 93.33
23 EO 3K S-2 -200 16.8 93.33
24 EO 5T E = -400 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 80,93 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 49,83 %25 EO 4C N-1 -50 11.2 62.22
26 EO 2C S+2 170 12.3 68.33
27 EO 4P N = 420 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 50,39 %28 EO 4C N = 620 2 11.11
29 EO 4C E+1 -650 10 55.56
30 EO 4C S = 420 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
2 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile : 52,09 %31 EO 4P W = -420 3.4 18.89
32 EO 3K N-1 -50 14.6 81.11
33 EO 4C N = 420 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
Total : 253,1 / 486 = 52,08 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 54,48 % 1 EO 6P N = 980 10.1 56.11
2 EO 3S W+1 -430 4.6 25.56
3 EO 5T N = 400 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,44 % 4 EO 4P W = -620 6.8 37.78
5 EO 6C E = -980 12.3 68.33
6 EO 3S S-2 -100 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 47,50 %10 EO 3P N = 140 12.3 68.33
11 EO 3S W-2 100 0.1 0.56
12 EO 1S N = 90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
5 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 51,96 %13 EO 4C S = 620 11.2 62.22
14 EO 4P N+1 450 16.8 93.33
15 EO 2K W+1 -110 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 70,56 %
11 - : 0,00 %16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 COOLEN Josef -COLLET Claudine : 37,72 %19 EO 4CcW+3 -1390 17.9 99.44
20 EO 4P E+3 -710 15.7 87.22
21 EO 1S N+2 150 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 82,96 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 49,83 %22 EO 4C N+1 450 9 50.00
23 EO 3CcE-1 200 0.1 0.56
24 EO 4T W+1 -150 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 21,11 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 50,39 %25 EO 2C N-1 -50 11.2 62.22
26 EO 3C S+1 170 12.3 68.33
27 EO 4P N-1 -50 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 72,59 %
2 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile : 52,09 %28 EO 4C N-1 -100 10 55.56
29 EO 4C E+1 -650 10 55.56
30 EO 4KcE-1 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,61 %31 EO 4P W+1 -450 11.2 62.22
32 EO 3S S-3 -150 17.9 99.44
33 EO 5C N = 450 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
Total : 287,3 / 486 = 59,12 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 SALFI Huguette -VERBOIS Léon
9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,44 % 1 EO 6P N = 980 10.1 56.11
2 EO 3S E+2 -460 14.6 81.11
3 EO 5T N+2 440 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -DELHEZ Jacques : 42,91 % 4 EO 4P W = -620 6.8 37.78
5 EO 4C W+2 -480 2.3 12.78
6 EO 3S N-3 -150 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 47,50 % 7 EO 4P S = 620 10.1 56.11
8 EO 3K E-1 50 7.9 43.89
9 EO 3S E-1 100 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 41,85 %
11 - : 0,00 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 COOLEN Josef -COLLET Claudine : 37,72 %16 EO 1S N-2 -100 13.4 74.44
17 EO 1C E+3 50 9 50.00
18 EO 3S E-3 150 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 49,83 %19 EO 4C W = -620 12.3 68.33
20 EO 5P E-1 100 0.1 0.56
21 EO 2S N+2 180 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 50,39 %22 EO 4C N+2 480 1.2 6.67
23 EO 3P N-1 -100 10.1 56.11
24 EO 5KcN-3 -500 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
2 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile : 52,09 %25 EO 4C N-1 -50 11.2 62.22
26 EO 5T W-2 200 3.4 18.89
27 EO 4P N-1 -50 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,61 %28 EO 4C N+2 680 0 0.00
29 EO 4C E+1 -650 10 55.56
30 EO 4C S = 420 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 54,48 %31 EO 6S W-2 100 0.1 0.56
32 EO 3K N = 110 7.9 43.89
33 EO 5PcW-2 300 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
Total : 213,3 / 486 = 43,89 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 ROSOUX Louis -MOSSERAY Bernadette
4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -DELHEZ Jacques : 42,91 % 1 EO 6P N = 980 10.1 56.11
2 EO 3S E+1 -430 4.6 25.56
3 EO 3S N+1 430 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 35,74 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 47,50 % 4 EO 4P W = -620 6.8 37.78
5 EO 6CcW = -1210 16.8 93.33
6 EO 4P N-2 -100 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 70,74 %
5 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 51,96 % 7 EO 5P S = 650 0.1 0.56
8 EO 2S S-1 -50 13.4 74.44
9 EO 3S E+1 -630 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
11 - : 0,00 %10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 49,83 %16 EO 2P E = -110 16.8 93.33
17 EO Pass 50 9 50.00
18 EO 3S E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 50,39 %19 EO 4KcE-3 800 0.1 0.56
20 EO 6P E = -1430 17.9 99.44
21 EO 2S N+1 150 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
2 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile : 52,09 %22 EO 4C N+1 450 9 50.00
23 EO 2P N = 110 3.4 18.89
24 EO 3S W = -400 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,61 %25 EO 4C S-2 -100 17.9 99.44
26 EO 3C S+2 200 3.4 18.89
27 EO 4P N = 420 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 54,48 %28 EO 4C N-1 -100 10 55.56
29 EO 4C E+1 -650 10 55.56
30 EO 4C S = 420 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,44 %31 EO 3S W+1 -430 6.8 37.78
32 EO 3S S+2 460 0.1 0.56
33 EO 5PcW-2 300 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 41,85 %
Total : 245,7 / 486 = 50,56 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 YERNAUX Philippe -MASSAUX Joel
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 47,50 % 1 EO 6C S+1 1010 2.3 12.78
2 EO 3S E+1 -430 4.6 25.56
3 EO 3S N = 400 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
5 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 51,96 % 4 EO 3P W+2 -200 0.1 0.56
5 EO 4C W+2 -480 2.3 12.78
6 EO 3S S-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 21,11 %
11 - : 0,00 % 7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 COOLEN Josef -COLLET Claudine : 37,72 %10 EO 4P N = 620 0.1 0.56
11 EO 3S E-1 50 2.3 12.78
12 EO 2S N-1 -100 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 49,83 %13 EO 4C S = 620 11.2 62.22
14 EO 4P N+2 480 13.4 74.44
15 EO 3K W-2 100 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
2 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile : 52,09 %19 EO 2P S-1 -50 4.6 25.56
20 EO 4P E+2 -680 9 50.00
21 EO 3S N+1 630 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 25,37 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,61 %22 EO 4C N+2 480 1.2 6.67
23 EO 3P N-2 -200 16.8 93.33
24 EO 2K N+1 110 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 54,48 %25 EO 2C N+1 140 2.3 12.78
26 EO 3C S+1 170 12.3 68.33
27 EO 3S S = 400 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 47,78 %
9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,44 %28 EO 4C N-1 -100 10 55.56
29 EO 4C E+1 -650 10 55.56
30 EO 4C S = 420 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -DELHEZ Jacques : 42,91 %31 EO 4P W = -420 3.4 18.89
32 EO 3S S-1 -50 14.6 81.11
33 EO 4C N+1 450 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 41,85 %
Total : 185,4 / 486 = 38,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard
5 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 51,96 % 1 EO 6C S+1 1010 2.3 12.78
2 EO 3S E+2 -460 14.6 81.11
3 EO 3T N+1 130 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
11 - : 0,00 % 4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 COOLEN Josef -COLLET Claudine : 37,72 % 7 EO 4P S = 620 10.1 56.11
8 EO 3S S-2 -100 17.9 99.44
9 EO 3S E-1 100 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 49,83 %10 EO 4P N-1 -100 17.9 99.44
11 EO 3S W = -400 9 50.00
12 EO 1S E-1 50 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 76,85 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 50,39 %13 EO 4C N = 620 11.2 62.22
14 EO 6P N+1 1010 0.1 0.56
15 EO 3C N-2 -200 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
2 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile : 52,09 %16 EO 1S S-1 -50 6.8 37.78
17 EO 3C E+2 50 9 50.00
18 EO 2C E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 54,48 %22 EO 4C N+1 450 9 50.00
23 EO 2P N = 110 3.4 18.89
24 EO 3S E+1 -430 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,44 %25 EO 4C N-1 -50 11.2 62.22
26 EO 2C S+3 200 3.4 18.89
27 EO 4P N = 420 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -DELHEZ Jacques : 42,91 %28 EO 4C N-1 -100 10 55.56
29 EO 4C E+1 -650 10 55.56
30 EO 3C S+1 170 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 47,50 %31 EO 4P W+2 -480 17.9 99.44
32 EO 3S S = 400 2.3 12.78
33 EO 4PcW-2 300 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
Total : 276,9 / 486 = 56,98 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude
11 - : 0,00 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 COOLEN Josef -COLLET Claudine : 37,72 % 4 EO 4P W+1 -650 15.7 87.22
5 EO 6CcW = -1210 16.8 93.33
6 EO 3S S-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 76,85 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 49,83 % 7 EO 4P S = 620 10.1 56.11
8 EO 3K E-1 50 7.9 43.89
9 EO 3S E-1 100 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 41,85 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 50,39 %10 EO 3P N = 140 12.3 68.33
11 EO 3S E+1 -430 15.7 87.22
12 EO 1S N+1 120 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
2 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile : 52,09 %13 EO 4C S = 620 11.2 62.22
14 EO 6P N = 980 4.6 25.56
15 EO 1S E+1 -120 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,61 %16 EO 1S S-1 -50 6.8 37.78
17 EO 1S W-1 50 9 50.00
18 EO 3S E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 54,48 %19 EO 3PcS = 530 2.3 12.78
20 EO 5P E+1 -680 9 50.00
21 EO 2S N+1 150 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -DELHEZ Jacques : 42,91 %25 EO 4C S-1 -50 11.2 62.22
26 EO 2C S+2 170 12.3 68.33
27 EO 4P N-1 -50 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 72,59 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 47,50 %28 EO 4C N-1 -100 10 55.56
29 EO 4C E+1 -650 10 55.56
30 EO 2C S = 110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
5 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 51,96 %31 EO 4P E+1 -450 11.2 62.22
32 EO 2P N = 110 7.9 43.89
33 EO 5C N = 450 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
Total : 273,2 / 486 = 56,21 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
6 COOLEN Josef -COLLET Claudine : 37,72 % 1 EO 4C N+3 510 15.7 87.22
2 EO 3S E+2 -460 14.6 81.11
3 EO 3T N+1 130 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 87,22 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 49,83 % 4 EO 4P W+1 -650 15.7 87.22
5 EO 3S W+3 -490 6.8 37.78
6 EO 3S S+1 430 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 50,39 % 7 EO 4P S = 620 10.1 56.11
8 EO 2C N+1 140 1.2 6.67
9 EO 3S E-1 100 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 29,44 %
2 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile : 52,09 %10 EO 3P S+1 170 4.6 25.56
11 EO 3S E = -400 9 50.00
12 EO 1ScN+1 380 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 25,37 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,61 %13 EO 4C N+1 650 1.2 6.67
14 EO 4P N+3 510 10.1 56.11
15 EO 3C S+1 170 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 21,11 %
3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 54,48 %16 EO 1S S-1 -50 6.8 37.78
17 EO 4C W+1 50 9 50.00
18 EO 2C E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,44 %19 EO 3C W+1 -170 9 50.00
20 EO 5P E+1 -680 9 50.00
21 EO 2S N+1 150 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -DELHEZ Jacques : 42,91 %22 EO 4C N+1 450 9 50.00
23 EO 2S S-1 -100 10.1 56.11
24 EO 3S W = -400 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
5 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 51,96 %28 EO 4C N-1 -100 10 55.56
29 EO 6C E-1 100 0 0.00
30 EO 2C S+2 170 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
11 - : 0,00 %31 EO BYE 0 0.00
32 EO BYE 0 0.00
33 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 219,1 / 486 = 45,08 %
|
|