|
Tournoi du 25-07-11
1 65,43 5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
2 58,40 12 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph
3 55,37 10 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine
4 51,79 6 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert
5 50,96 9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon
6 50,80 4 CLERIN François-Xavier -MASSAUX Jacques
7 50,14 7 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
8 49,45 2 VAGMAN David -SALFI Huguette
9 44,90 11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
10 43,80 8 de Wasseige -WARNIER François
11 40,74 1 FLACHS Georges -GROSFILS Colette
12 37,60 3 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 62,26 13 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile
2 55,92 19 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
3 55,79 16 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude
4 54,10 14 de VIRON Baudouin -BRIOT Fernand
5 50,96 15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
6 50,55 20 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse
7 49,86 21 ROSOUX Louis -DAPHNE Chantal
8 48,07 18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
9 46,56 17 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie
10 44,60 24 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean
11 42,56 23 HUBLET Carlo -LIBERT Laurent
12 38,15 22 STIENON Annie -DACHET Gérard
PAIRE Nr : 1 FLACHS Georges -GROSFILS Colette
13 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 62,26 % 1 NS 3C E+2 -200 4 18.18
2 NS 3S N+2 660 12 54.55
3 NS 3S E+1 -630 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
23 HUBLET Carlo -LIBERT Laurent : 42,56 % 4 NS 3C N = 140 13 59.09
5 NS 3T E-2 100 19 86.36
6 NS 4C N-1 -50 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
22 STIENON Annie -DACHET Gérard : 38,15 % 7 NS 3C N+2 200 16 72.73
8 NS 6S N+1 1020 18 81.82
9 NS 3S E = -600 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 75,76 %
21 ROSOUX Louis -DAPHNE Chantal : 49,86 %10 NS 4C E-1 100 18 81.82
11 NS 2S E = -120 10 45.45
12 NS 4C E+1 -450 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
20 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 50,55 %13 NS 3S N = 600 16 72.73
14 NS 3P N-1 -50 4 18.18
15 NS 2K E-1 50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
19 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 55,92 %16 NS 5P N = 450 15 68.18
17 NS 4P E-2 100 8 36.36
18 NS 3P E-1 50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 48,07 %19 NS 1P E+1 -110 13 59.09
20 NS 1S E = -90 9 40.91
21 NS 5TcS-1 -200 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
17 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 46,56 %22 NS 4K N-3 -150 0 0.00
23 NS 2C E+1 -140 6 27.27
24 NS 3C W-1 50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
16 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 55,79 %25 NS 2C W = -110 12 54.55
26 NS 3S N = 600 7 31.82
27 NS 3S W+2 -460 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,96 %28 NS 2K E = -90 5 22.73
29 NS 3T S-3 -300 0 0.00
30 NS 3S S = 400 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
14 de VIRON Baudouin -BRIOT Fernand : 54,10 %31 NS 3S E = -400 4 18.18
32 NS 3S N-1 -50 0 -2.20 0.00 -10.00 %
33 NS 1K E+2 -110 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 8,79 %
Total : 295,8 / 726 = 40,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 VAGMAN David -SALFI Huguette
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,96 % 1 NS 3C E = -140 12 54.55
2 NS 3S S+2 660 12 54.55
3 NS 2C W+2 -170 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
14 de VIRON Baudouin -BRIOT Fernand : 54,10 % 4 NS 3C N = 140 13 59.09
5 NS 2C S-2 -200 8 36.36
6 NS 4C N = 420 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
13 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 62,26 % 7 NS 4C N = 620 20 90.91
8 NS 6S N = 990 10 45.45
9 NS 3S E+1 -630 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
23 HUBLET Carlo -LIBERT Laurent : 42,56 %10 NS 4C E-1 100 18 81.82
11 NS 1S E+2 -150 8 36.36
12 NS 4C E+1 -450 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
22 STIENON Annie -DACHET Gérard : 38,15 %13 NS 4P N-1 -100 6 27.27
14 NS 3K E-1 50 7 31.82
15 NS 4C N-1 -100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
21 ROSOUX Louis -DAPHNE Chantal : 49,86 %16 NS 4P E+1 -650 3 13.64
17 NS 4C S = 420 22 100.00
18 NS 4T S-1 -100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
20 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 50,55 %19 NS 2C S-2 -100 17 77.27
20 NS 2P N-2 -200 1 4.55
21 NS 5CcW-2 300 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
24 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 44,60 %22 NS 3K S-1 -50 7 31.82
23 NS 3C W = -140 6 27.27
24 NS 2C W-1 50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 48,07 %25 NS 2P E+2 -170 4 18.18
26 NS 3S N = 600 7 31.82
27 NS 3S E = -400 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
17 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 46,56 %28 NS 2C N-1 -100 2 9.09
29 NS 2P S-1 -100 11 50.00
30 NS 4P S+2 480 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
16 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 55,79 %31 NS 3PcW = -530 2 9.09
32 NS 3S N+1 430 9 40.91
33 NS 2S S-1 -50 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
Total : 359,0 / 726 = 49,45 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef
17 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 46,56 % 1 NS 4K N-2 -100 14 63.64
2 NS 4C N+1 650 1 4.55
3 NS 4C W = -620 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
16 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 55,79 % 4 NS 3T E = -110 3 13.64
5 NS 2C S-1 -100 15 68.18
6 NS 4C N = 420 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,96 % 7 NS 4C N = 620 20 90.91
8 NS 3S N+3 490 0 0.00
9 NS 3S E+1 -630 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
24 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 44,60 %10 NS 4C E = -620 6 27.27
11 NS 3S E = -400 2 9.09
12 NS 4C E = -420 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
13 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 62,26 %13 NS 3S S-4 -400 0 0.00
14 NS 3C E-2 100 10 45.45
15 NS 1C S+2 140 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
23 HUBLET Carlo -LIBERT Laurent : 42,56 %16 NS 4C E+2 -680 0 0.00
17 NS 2C S = 110 10 45.45
18 NS 1S S-2 -200 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
22 STIENON Annie -DACHET Gérard : 38,15 %19 NS 3S W = -600 0 0.00
20 NS 2P S = 110 20 90.91
21 NS 5C W-1 50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
21 ROSOUX Louis -DAPHNE Chantal : 49,86 %22 NS 3T N = 110 15 68.18
23 NS 3C E-2 200 22 100.00
24 NS 3S E-2 100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 87,88 %
20 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 50,55 %25 NS 3P E+1 -170 4 18.18
26 NS 3S N-1 -100 0 0.00
27 NS 3S E+2 -460 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 19,70 %
19 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 55,92 %28 NS 2P S-2 -200 0 0.00
29 NS 1S E+1 -120 5 22.73
30 NS 3S S = 400 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 48,07 %31 NS 2PcE+2 -670 0 0.00
32 NS 1S S+2 150 2 9.09
33 NS 1K E+1 -90 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
Total : 273,0 / 726 = 37,60 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 CLERIN François-Xavier -MASSAUX Jacques
19 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 55,92 % 1 NS -420 1 4.55
2 NS 660 12 54.55
3 NS -630 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 48,07 % 4 NS -130 0 0.00
5 NS -110 12 54.55
6 NS 170 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
17 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 46,56 % 7 NS 170 12 54.55
8 NS 1020 18 81.82
9 NS -600 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
16 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 55,79 %10 NS 5C E = -650 0 0.00
11 NS 2C W = -110 12 54.55
12 NS 4C E = -420 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,96 %13 NS 3P N = 140 10 45.45
14 NS 3T E-4 200 16 72.73
15 NS 2C S+1 140 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
14 de VIRON Baudouin -BRIOT Fernand : 54,10 %16 NS 5KcN-1 -100 6 27.27
17 NS 3CcS-1 -100 3 13.64
18 NS 3T S = 110 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
13 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 62,26 %19 NS 2TcS-2 -300 2 9.09
20 NS 1S E-1 100 15 68.18
21 NS 5TcS-1 -200 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
23 HUBLET Carlo -LIBERT Laurent : 42,56 %22 NS 2K S-1 -50 7 31.82
23 NS 1S N-1 -100 17 77.27
24 NS 3S E = -400 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
22 STIENON Annie -DACHET Gérard : 38,15 %25 NS 3C W-3 300 20 90.91
26 NS 3S S+1 630 15 68.18
27 NS 3T W+1 -130 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 84,85 %
21 ROSOUX Louis -DAPHNE Chantal : 49,86 %28 NS 3K E-2 100 15 68.18
29 NS 3K W-1 100 22 100.00
30 NS 3S S+1 430 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
24 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 44,60 %31 NS 100 21 95.45
32 NS 430 9 -2.20 40.91 -10.00 %
33 NS -100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 54,24 %
Total : 368,8 / 726 = 50,80 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
21 ROSOUX Louis -DAPHNE Chantal : 49,86 % 1 NS 4K N-1 -50 18 81.82
2 NS 3S N+2 660 12 54.55
3 NS 2C E+2 -170 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
20 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 50,55 % 4 NS 5T E-3 300 20 90.91
5 NS 3KcE = -470 4 18.18
6 NS 4P N-1 -50 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
19 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 55,92 % 7 NS 3T N = 110 6 27.27
8 NS 6S N+1 1020 18 81.82
9 NS 3S E = -600 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 48,07 %10 NS 5C E-1 100 18 81.82
11 NS 3C E-2 100 22 100.00
12 NS 3C E+2 -200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 93,94 %
17 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 46,56 %13 NS 4P N = 620 19 86.36
14 NS 4KcE-3 500 21 95.45
15 NS 2P E-2 100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 75,76 %
16 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 55,79 %16 NS 4K N+1 150 10 45.45
17 NS 3P E = -140 0 0.00
18 NS 1S N+1 120 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
24 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 44,60 %19 NS 2C N-2 -100 17 77.27
20 NS 1S E-2 200 22 100.00
21 NS 5C E-1 50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 80,30 %
14 de VIRON Baudouin -BRIOT Fernand : 54,10 %22 NS 3K N-1 -50 7 31.82
23 NS 3C E = -140 6 27.27
24 NS 3T E-1 50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
13 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 62,26 %25 NS 2P E+2 -170 4 18.18
26 NS 3S N+2 660 20 90.91
27 NS 3S E+3 -490 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
23 HUBLET Carlo -LIBERT Laurent : 42,56 %28 NS 2C N = 110 22 100.00
29 NS 1S E = -90 17 77.27
30 NS 4P N+1 450 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
22 STIENON Annie -DACHET Gérard : 38,15 %31 NS 4P E-1 50 16 72.73
32 NS 3S N+2 460 17 77.27
33 NS 1ScN+1 280 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
Total : 475,0 / 726 = 65,43 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert
23 HUBLET Carlo -LIBERT Laurent : 42,56 % 1 NS 4K N-1 -50 18 81.82
2 NS 5C N+1 680 22 100.00
3 NS 3S E = -600 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 78,79 %
22 STIENON Annie -DACHET Gérard : 38,15 % 4 NS 2C S+1 140 13 59.09
5 NS 2C S = 110 22 100.00
6 NS 4C N = 420 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 80,30 %
24 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 44,60 % 7 NS 2P W = -110 2 9.09
8 NS 4P S+3 510 3 13.64
9 NS 3S E+1 -630 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
20 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 50,55 %10 NS 4C E-1 100 18 81.82
11 NS 3S E = -400 2 9.09
12 NS 4C E = -420 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
19 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 55,92 %13 NS 4P N-1 -100 6 27.27
14 NS 2P N = 110 12 54.55
15 NS 3C S+1 170 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 48,07 %16 NS 5KcN = 550 19 86.36
17 NS 3C S = 140 16 72.73
18 NS 2T S = 90 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
17 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 46,56 %19 NS 2K E+2 -130 9 40.91
20 NS 2P S-2 -200 1 4.55
21 NS 4C W-1 50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
16 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 55,79 %22 NS 2K S = 90 12 54.55
23 NS 3C E = -140 6 27.27
24 NS 2C W+1 -140 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,96 %25 NS 3K S-1 -50 16 72.73
26 NS 3S S = 600 7 31.82
27 NS 3S E+2 -460 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
14 de VIRON Baudouin -BRIOT Fernand : 54,10 %28 NS 2K E = -90 5 22.73
29 NS 3K W = -110 8 36.36
30 NS 4P S+1 450 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
13 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 62,26 %31 NS 3S E-1 50 16 72.73
32 NS 3S S+1 430 9 40.91
33 NS 3P W = -140 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
Total : 376,0 / 726 = 51,79 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
14 de VIRON Baudouin -BRIOT Fernand : 54,10 % 1 NS 4K N-1 -50 18 81.82
2 NS 3S S+2 660 12 54.55
3 NS 3S W = -600 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
13 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 62,26 % 4 NS 3T W = -110 3 13.64
5 NS 3K W+1 -130 10 45.45
6 NS 2T S = 90 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
23 HUBLET Carlo -LIBERT Laurent : 42,56 % 7 NS 3C N+1 170 12 54.55
8 NS 6P S+1 1010 12 54.55
9 NS 3S E = -600 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
22 STIENON Annie -DACHET Gérard : 38,15 %10 NS 4C E-1 100 18 81.82
11 NS 2S E-1 50 17 77.27
12 NS 4C E+1 -450 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
21 ROSOUX Louis -DAPHNE Chantal : 49,86 %13 NS 4P N+1 650 22 100.00
14 NS 5KcE-2 300 18 81.82
15 NS 2P W = -110 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
20 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 50,55 %16 NS 5C E = -650 3 13.64
17 NS 5K E-1 50 6 27.27
18 NS 3P E-1 50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
19 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 55,92 %19 NS 2P E+2 -170 4 18.18
20 NS 2P N-1 -100 5 22.73
21 NS 2CcW+2 -670 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 48,07 %22 NS 3S N = 400 22 100.00
23 NS 2C E+1 -140 6 27.27
24 NS 2S E+2 -180 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
17 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 46,56 %25 NS 3K S-2 -100 14 63.64
26 NS 3S N+1 630 15 68.18
27 NS 3S W+2 -460 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
24 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 44,60 %28 NS 3K E-2 100 15 68.18
29 NS 2K W = -90 17 77.27
30 NS 4P N+1 450 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,96 %31 NS 2K E+2 -130 10 45.45
32 NS 3S S+1 430 9 40.91
33 NS 2S N-2 -100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
Total : 364,0 / 726 = 50,14 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 de Wasseige -WARNIER François
16 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 55,79 % 1 NS 2P N-3 -150 10 45.45
2 NS 3S S+2 660 12 54.55
3 NS 4C W+1 -650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,96 % 4 NS 2C S+3 200 18 81.82
5 NS 3CcS-3 -800 0 0.00
6 NS 4C N-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
14 de VIRON Baudouin -BRIOT Fernand : 54,10 % 7 NS 4CcN-2 -500 0 0.00
8 NS 6S N+1 1020 18 81.82
9 NS 3S E-1 100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
13 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 62,26 %10 NS 4C E = -620 6 27.27
11 NS 2S E+2 -180 6 27.27
12 NS 4C E+2 -480 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 19,70 %
23 HUBLET Carlo -LIBERT Laurent : 42,56 %13 NS 1S N+3 180 14 63.64
14 NS 3S W = -400 0 0.00
15 NS 4C S-1 -100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
24 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 44,60 %16 NS 3P N = 140 8 36.36
17 NS 3C S = 140 16 72.73
18 NS 3P E-3 150 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
21 ROSOUX Louis -DAPHNE Chantal : 49,86 %19 NS 1P E+2 -140 6 27.27
20 NS 1S W = -90 9 40.91
21 NS 5TcS-1 -200 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
20 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 50,55 %22 NS 3C N-1 -50 7 31.82
23 NS 1S N-1 -100 17 77.27
24 NS 2C W+1 -140 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
19 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 55,92 %25 NS 2P W+1 -140 10 45.45
26 NS 3S S+1 630 15 68.18
27 NS 3S W+1 -430 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 48,07 %28 NS 2K E-2 100 15 68.18
29 NS 1S E+1 -120 5 22.73
30 NS 4C S-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
17 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 46,56 %31 NS 3S E-1 50 16 72.73
32 NS 3S S+3 490 21 95.45
33 NS 2S S-2 -100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
Total : 318,0 / 726 = 43,80 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 48,07 % 1 NS 3C E+1 -170 7 31.82
2 NS 3S S+2 660 12 54.55
3 NS 3S W = -600 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
24 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 44,60 % 4 NS 4T W-1 100 7 31.82
5 NS 2C S-1 -100 15 68.18
6 NS 4C N = 420 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
16 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 55,79 % 7 NS 2S S+1 150 8 36.36
8 NS 4P S+3 510 3 13.64
9 NS 3S W+1 -630 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,96 %10 NS 5K S-3 -300 12 54.55
11 NS 3S E = -400 2 9.09
12 NS 4C E = -420 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
14 de VIRON Baudouin -BRIOT Fernand : 54,10 %13 NS 4P N = 620 19 86.36
14 NS 4C E-3 150 14 63.64
15 NS 3T S-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
13 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 62,26 %16 NS 5KcN = 550 19 86.36
17 NS 3C S = 140 16 72.73
18 NS 4T S-1 -100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
23 HUBLET Carlo -LIBERT Laurent : 42,56 %19 NS 2P E = -110 13 59.09
20 NS 1S E-1 100 15 68.18
21 NS 5CcE-1 100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
22 STIENON Annie -DACHET Gérard : 38,15 %22 NS 4C N-2 -100 2 9.09
23 NS 3C E-1 100 20 90.91
24 NS 3K S-1 -50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
21 ROSOUX Louis -DAPHNE Chantal : 49,86 %25 NS 3P E+1 -170 4 18.18
26 NS 2S S+2 180 2 9.09
27 NS 3S W+2 -460 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
20 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 50,55 %28 NS 2K E-1 50 8 36.36
29 NS 1S E = -90 17 77.27
30 NS 4P S+1 450 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
19 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 55,92 %31 NS 3S E-2 100 21 95.45
32 NS 3S S+1 430 9 40.91
33 NS 1K E+1 -90 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
Total : 370,0 / 726 = 50,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine
20 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 50,55 % 1 NS 3K N = 110 22 100.00
2 NS 3S S+2 660 12 54.55
3 NS 2C W+1 -140 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 84,85 %
19 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 55,92 % 4 NS 4T E-1 100 7 31.82
5 NS 3KcW-1 100 19 86.36
6 NS 4C N-1 -50 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 48,07 % 7 NS 2C N+2 170 12 54.55
8 NS 6P S = 980 8 36.36
9 NS 3S E = -600 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
17 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 46,56 %10 NS 4C E = -620 6 27.27
11 NS 3S E-1 50 17 77.27
12 NS 4C E = -420 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
16 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 55,79 %13 NS 1S W+1 -120 2 9.09
14 NS 4K E = -130 2 9.09
15 NS 3C S = 140 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,96 %16 NS 4PcN+1 690 22 100.00
17 NS 3C S = 140 16 72.73
18 NS 3TcS-1 -200 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
14 de VIRON Baudouin -BRIOT Fernand : 54,10 %19 NS 2K E+2 -130 9 40.91
20 NS 1S S-1 -100 5 22.73
21 NS 4TcS = 710 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
13 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 62,26 %22 NS 3T N = 110 15 68.18
23 NS 3C E = -140 6 27.27
24 NS 3KcS-3 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
24 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 44,60 %25 NS 3S N+1 430 22 100.00
26 NS 630 15 68.18
27 NS 3T W+1 -130 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 87,88 %
22 STIENON Annie -DACHET Gérard : 38,15 %28 NS 3K E-2 100 15 68.18
29 NS 2P S-1 -100 11 50.00
30 NS 3S S+1 430 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
21 ROSOUX Louis -DAPHNE Chantal : 49,86 %31 NS 2S W+2 -180 8 36.36
32 NS 3S S+1 430 9 40.91
33 NS 1K E = -70 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 402,0 / 726 = 55,37 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
22 STIENON Annie -DACHET Gérard : 38,15 % 1 NS 3C E+1 -170 7 31.82
2 NS 3S S+2 660 12 54.55
3 NS 3S W+1 -630 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
21 ROSOUX Louis -DAPHNE Chantal : 49,86 % 4 NS 2C S+1 140 13 59.09
5 NS 3CcS-2 -500 2 9.09
6 NS 4C N-1 -50 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
20 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 50,55 % 7 NS 4C N = 620 20 90.91
8 NS 6S N+1 1020 18 81.82
9 NS 3S E+2 -660 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
19 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 55,92 %10 NS 4C E = -620 6 27.27
11 NS 3S E-1 50 17 77.27
12 NS 4C E+2 -480 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
24 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 44,60 %13 NS 2S N+1 150 12 54.55
14 NS 3C E-1 50 7 31.82
15 NS 3C S = 140 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
17 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 46,56 %16 NS 5K N = 400 12 54.55
17 NS 4C S-2 -100 3 13.64
18 NS 3T S-1 -100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
16 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 55,79 %19 NS 3S W-1 100 21 95.45
20 NS 1S E-1 100 15 68.18
21 NS 4CcW = -590 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,96 %22 NS 2S N+1 150 20 90.91
23 NS 3C E = -140 6 27.27
24 NS 4P E-2 100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
14 de VIRON Baudouin -BRIOT Fernand : 54,10 %25 NS 3P W+1 -170 4 18.18
26 NS 3S S = 600 7 31.82
27 NS 3S W+3 -490 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
13 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 62,26 %28 NS 3K E-2 100 15 68.18
29 NS 1S E+2 -150 2 9.09
30 NS 3S S = 400 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
23 HUBLET Carlo -LIBERT Laurent : 42,56 %31 NS 2S E = -120 12 54.55
32 NS 3S N+2 460 17 77.27
33 NS 1S N-1 -50 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
Total : 326,0 / 726 = 44,90 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph
24 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 44,60 % 1 NS 4C W = -420 1 4.55
2 NS 4C N+1 650 1 4.55
3 NS 2C W+2 -170 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
17 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 46,56 % 4 NS 2P W-4 400 22 100.00
5 NS 3P N-3 -300 6 27.27
6 NS 4C S = 420 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
21 ROSOUX Louis -DAPHNE Chantal : 49,86 % 7 NS 4C N-1 -100 4 18.18
8 NS 3S N+4 520 6 27.27
9 NS 3S E+1 -630 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 24,24 %
14 de VIRON Baudouin -BRIOT Fernand : 54,10 %10 NS 4C E = -620 6 27.27
11 NS 3S E-1 50 17 77.27
12 NS 4C E = -420 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 48,07 %13 NS 3S N-1 -100 6 27.27
14 NS 4CcW-3 500 21 95.45
15 NS 2C S+3 200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
22 STIENON Annie -DACHET Gérard : 38,15 %16 NS 5P N = 450 15 68.18
17 NS 2C S+1 140 16 72.73
18 NS 1S S+1 120 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 75,76 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,96 %19 NS 4P E-1 100 21 95.45
20 NS 1S E-1 100 15 68.18
21 NS 5T S-1 -100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
19 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 55,92 %22 NS 2S N = 120 18 81.82
23 NS 2C E = -110 14 63.64
24 NS 3S E+1 -430 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
23 HUBLET Carlo -LIBERT Laurent : 42,56 %25 NS 4P W-2 200 18 81.82
26 NS 3ScS = 750 22 100.00
27 NS 3S W+2 -460 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
16 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 55,79 %28 NS 1S W-2 100 15 68.18
29 NS 2K W = -90 17 77.27
30 NS 4P N+1 450 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
20 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 50,55 %31 NS 2C S-2 -200 6 27.27
32 NS 3S S+3 490 21 95.45
33 NS 2P W+1 -140 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
Total : 424,0 / 726 = 58,40 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile
1 FLACHS Georges -GROSFILS Colette : 40,74 % 1 EO 3C E+2 -200 18 81.82
2 EO 3S N+2 660 10 45.45
3 EO 3S E+1 -630 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
7 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,14 % 4 EO 3T W = -110 19 86.36
5 EO 3K W+1 -130 12 54.55
6 EO 2T S = 90 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
2 VAGMAN David -SALFI Huguette : 49,45 % 7 EO 4C N = 620 2 9.09
8 EO 6S N = 990 12 54.55
9 EO 3S E+1 -630 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
8 de Wasseige -WARNIER François : 43,80 %10 EO 4C E = -620 16 72.73
11 EO 2S E+2 -180 16 72.73
12 EO 4C E+2 -480 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 80,30 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 37,60 %13 EO 3S S-4 -400 22 100.00
14 EO 3C E-2 100 12 54.55
15 EO 1C S+2 140 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 50,96 %16 EO 5KcN = 550 3 13.64
17 EO 3C S = 140 6 27.27
18 EO 4T S-1 -100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
4 CLERIN François-Xavier -MASSAUX Jacques : 50,80 %19 EO 2TcS-2 -300 20 90.91
20 EO 1S E-1 100 7 31.82
21 EO 5TcS-1 -200 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
10 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 55,37 %22 EO 3T N = 110 7 31.82
23 EO 3C E = -140 16 72.73
24 EO 3KcS-3 -500 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 65,43 %25 EO 2P E+2 -170 18 81.82
26 EO 3S N+2 660 2 9.09
27 EO 3S E+3 -490 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 44,90 %28 EO 3K E-2 100 7 31.82
29 EO 1S E+2 -150 20 90.91
30 EO 3S S = 400 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
6 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 51,79 %31 EO 3S E-1 50 6 27.27
32 EO 3S S+1 430 13 59.09
33 EO 3P W = -140 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
Total : 452,0 / 726 = 62,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 de VIRON Baudouin -BRIOT Fernand
7 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,14 % 1 EO 4K N-1 -50 4 18.18
2 EO 3S S+2 660 10 45.45
3 EO 3S W = -600 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
2 VAGMAN David -SALFI Huguette : 49,45 % 4 EO 3C N = 140 9 40.91
5 EO 2C S-2 -200 14 63.64
6 EO 4C N = 420 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
8 de Wasseige -WARNIER François : 43,80 % 7 EO 4CcN-2 -500 22 100.00
8 EO 6S N+1 1020 4 18.18
9 EO 3S E-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
12 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 58,40 %10 EO 4C E = -620 16 72.73
11 EO 3S E-1 50 5 22.73
12 EO 4C E = -420 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 50,96 %13 EO 4P N = 620 3 13.64
14 EO 4C E-3 150 8 36.36
15 EO 3T S-2 -200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
4 CLERIN François-Xavier -MASSAUX Jacques : 50,80 %16 EO 5KcN-1 -100 16 72.73
17 EO 3CcS-1 -100 19 86.36
18 EO 3T S = 110 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
10 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 55,37 %19 EO 2K E+2 -130 13 59.09
20 EO 1S S-1 -100 17 77.27
21 EO 4TcS = 710 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 65,43 %22 EO 3K N-1 -50 15 68.18
23 EO 3C E = -140 16 72.73
24 EO 3T E-1 50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 44,90 %25 EO 3P W+1 -170 18 81.82
26 EO 3S S = 600 15 68.18
27 EO 3S W+3 -490 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
6 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 51,79 %28 EO 2K E = -90 17 77.27
29 EO 3K W = -110 14 63.64
30 EO 4P S+1 450 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
1 FLACHS Georges -GROSFILS Colette : 40,74 %31 EO 3S E = -400 18 81.82
32 EO 3S N-1 -50 22 -2.20 100.00 -10.00 %
33 EO 1K E+2 -110 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 84,55 %
Total : 392,8 / 726 = 54,10 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
2 VAGMAN David -SALFI Huguette : 49,45 % 1 EO 3C E = -140 10 45.45
2 EO 3S S+2 660 10 45.45
3 EO 2C W+2 -170 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
8 de Wasseige -WARNIER François : 43,80 % 4 EO 2C S+3 200 4 18.18
5 EO 3CcS-3 -800 22 100.00
6 EO 4C N-2 -100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 37,60 % 7 EO 4C N = 620 2 9.09
8 EO 3S N+3 490 22 100.00
9 EO 3S E+1 -630 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 50,96 %10 EO 5K S-3 -300 10 45.45
11 EO 3S E = -400 20 90.91
12 EO 4C E = -420 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
4 CLERIN François-Xavier -MASSAUX Jacques : 50,80 %13 EO 3P N = 140 12 54.55
14 EO 3T E-4 200 6 27.27
15 EO 2C S+1 140 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
10 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 55,37 %16 EO 4PcN+1 690 0 0.00
17 EO 3C S = 140 6 27.27
18 EO 3TcS-1 -200 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
12 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 58,40 %19 EO 4P E-1 100 1 4.55
20 EO 1S E-1 100 7 31.82
21 EO 5T S-1 -100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 44,90 %22 EO 2S N+1 150 2 9.09
23 EO 3C E = -140 16 72.73
24 EO 4P E-2 100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
6 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 51,79 %25 EO 3K S-1 -50 6 27.27
26 EO 3S S = 600 15 68.18
27 EO 3S E+2 -460 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
1 FLACHS Georges -GROSFILS Colette : 40,74 %28 EO 2K E = -90 17 77.27
29 EO 3T S-3 -300 22 100.00
30 EO 3S S = 400 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
7 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,14 %31 EO 2K E+2 -130 12 54.55
32 EO 3S S+1 430 13 59.09
33 EO 2S N-2 -100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
Total : 370,0 / 726 = 50,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude
8 de Wasseige -WARNIER François : 43,80 % 1 EO 2P N-3 -150 12 54.55
2 EO 3S S+2 660 10 45.45
3 EO 4C W+1 -650 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 37,60 % 4 EO 3T E = -110 19 86.36
5 EO 2C S-1 -100 7 31.82
6 EO 4C N = 420 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 50,96 % 7 EO 2S S+1 150 14 63.64
8 EO 4P S+3 510 19 86.36
9 EO 3S W+1 -630 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
4 CLERIN François-Xavier -MASSAUX Jacques : 50,80 %10 EO 5C E = -650 22 100.00
11 EO 2C W = -110 10 45.45
12 EO 4C E = -420 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
10 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 55,37 %13 EO 1S W+1 -120 20 90.91
14 EO 4K E = -130 20 90.91
15 EO 3C S = 140 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 65,43 %16 EO 4K N+1 150 12 54.55
17 EO 3P E = -140 22 100.00
18 EO 1S N+1 120 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 44,90 %19 EO 3S W-1 100 1 4.55
20 EO 1S E-1 100 7 31.82
21 EO 4CcW = -590 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
6 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 51,79 %22 EO 2K S = 90 10 45.45
23 EO 3C E = -140 16 72.73
24 EO 2C W+1 -140 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
1 FLACHS Georges -GROSFILS Colette : 40,74 %25 EO 2C W = -110 10 45.45
26 EO 3S N = 600 15 68.18
27 EO 3S W+2 -460 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
12 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 58,40 %28 EO 1S W-2 100 7 31.82
29 EO 2K W = -90 5 22.73
30 EO 4P N+1 450 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
2 VAGMAN David -SALFI Huguette : 49,45 %31 EO 3PcW = -530 20 90.91
32 EO 3S N+1 430 13 59.09
33 EO 2S S-1 -50 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
Total : 405,0 / 726 = 55,79 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie
3 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 37,60 % 1 EO 4K N-2 -100 8 36.36
2 EO 4C N+1 650 21 95.45
3 EO 4C W = -620 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
12 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 58,40 % 4 EO 2P W-4 400 0 0.00
5 EO 3P N-3 -300 16 72.73
6 EO 4C S = 420 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
4 CLERIN François-Xavier -MASSAUX Jacques : 50,80 % 7 EO 170 10 45.45
8 EO 1020 4 18.18
9 EO -600 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
10 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 55,37 %10 EO 4C E = -620 16 72.73
11 EO 3S E-1 50 5 22.73
12 EO 4C E = -420 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 65,43 %13 EO 4P N = 620 3 13.64
14 EO 4KcE-3 500 1 4.55
15 EO 2P E-2 100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 24,24 %
11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 44,90 %16 EO 5K N = 400 10 45.45
17 EO 4C S-2 -100 19 86.36
18 EO 3T S-1 -100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
6 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 51,79 %19 EO 2K E+2 -130 13 59.09
20 EO 2P S-2 -200 21 95.45
21 EO 4C W-1 50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
1 FLACHS Georges -GROSFILS Colette : 40,74 %22 EO 4K N-3 -150 22 100.00
23 EO 2C E+1 -140 16 72.73
24 EO 3C W-1 50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
7 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,14 %25 EO 3K S-2 -100 8 36.36
26 EO 3S N+1 630 7 31.82
27 EO 3S W+2 -460 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
2 VAGMAN David -SALFI Huguette : 49,45 %28 EO 2C N-1 -100 20 90.91
29 EO 2P S-1 -100 11 50.00
30 EO 4P S+2 480 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
8 de Wasseige -WARNIER François : 43,80 %31 EO 3S E-1 50 6 27.27
32 EO 3S S+3 490 1 4.55
33 EO 2S S-2 -100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
Total : 338,0 / 726 = 46,56 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 50,96 % 1 EO 3C E+1 -170 15 68.18
2 EO 3S S+2 660 10 45.45
3 EO 3S W = -600 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
4 CLERIN François-Xavier -MASSAUX Jacques : 50,80 % 4 EO -130 22 100.00
5 EO -110 10 45.45
6 EO 170 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
10 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 55,37 % 7 EO 2C N+2 170 10 45.45
8 EO 6P S = 980 14 63.64
9 EO 3S E = -600 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 65,43 %10 EO 5C E-1 100 4 18.18
11 EO 3C E-2 100 0 0.00
12 EO 3C E+2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 6,06 %
12 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 58,40 %13 EO 3S N-1 -100 16 72.73
14 EO 4CcW-3 500 1 4.55
15 EO 2C S+3 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
6 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 51,79 %16 EO 5KcN = 550 3 13.64
17 EO 3C S = 140 6 27.27
18 EO 2T S = 90 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
1 FLACHS Georges -GROSFILS Colette : 40,74 %19 EO 1P E+1 -110 9 40.91
20 EO 1S E = -90 13 59.09
21 EO 5TcS-1 -200 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
7 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,14 %22 EO 3S N = 400 0 0.00
23 EO 2C E+1 -140 16 72.73
24 EO 2S E+2 -180 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
2 VAGMAN David -SALFI Huguette : 49,45 %25 EO 2P E+2 -170 18 81.82
26 EO 3S N = 600 15 68.18
27 EO 3S E = -400 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
8 de Wasseige -WARNIER François : 43,80 %28 EO 2K E-2 100 7 31.82
29 EO 1S E+1 -120 17 77.27
30 EO 4C S-1 -50 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 37,60 %31 EO 2PcE+2 -670 22 100.00
32 EO 1S S+2 150 20 90.91
33 EO 1K E+1 -90 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
Total : 349,0 / 726 = 48,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
4 CLERIN François-Xavier -MASSAUX Jacques : 50,80 % 1 EO -420 21 95.45
2 EO 660 10 45.45
3 EO -630 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
10 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 55,37 % 4 EO 4T E-1 100 15 68.18
5 EO 3KcW-1 100 3 13.64
6 EO 4C N-1 -50 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 65,43 % 7 EO 3T N = 110 16 72.73
8 EO 6S N+1 1020 4 18.18
9 EO 3S E = -600 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 44,90 %10 EO 4C E = -620 16 72.73
11 EO 3S E-1 50 5 22.73
12 EO 4C E+2 -480 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
6 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 51,79 %13 EO 4P N-1 -100 16 72.73
14 EO 2P N = 110 10 45.45
15 EO 3C S+1 170 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
1 FLACHS Georges -GROSFILS Colette : 40,74 %16 EO 5P N = 450 7 31.82
17 EO 4P E-2 100 14 63.64
18 EO 3P E-1 50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
7 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,14 %19 EO 2P E+2 -170 18 81.82
20 EO 2P N-1 -100 17 77.27
21 EO 2CcW+2 -670 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
12 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 58,40 %22 EO 2S N = 120 4 18.18
23 EO 2C E = -110 8 36.36
24 EO 3S E+1 -430 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
8 de Wasseige -WARNIER François : 43,80 %25 EO 2P W+1 -140 12 54.55
26 EO 3S S+1 630 7 31.82
27 EO 3S W+1 -430 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 37,60 %28 EO 2P S-2 -200 22 100.00
29 EO 1S E+1 -120 17 77.27
30 EO 3S S = 400 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 50,96 %31 EO 3S E-2 100 1 4.55
32 EO 3S S+1 430 13 59.09
33 EO 1K E+1 -90 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
Total : 406,0 / 726 = 55,92 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse
10 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 55,37 % 1 EO 3K N = 110 0 0.00
2 EO 3S S+2 660 10 45.45
3 EO 2C W+1 -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 15,15 %
5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 65,43 % 4 EO 5T E-3 300 2 9.09
5 EO 3KcE = -470 18 81.82
6 EO 4P N-1 -50 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 44,90 % 7 EO 4C N = 620 2 9.09
8 EO 6S N+1 1020 4 18.18
9 EO 3S E+2 -660 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
6 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 51,79 %10 EO 4C E-1 100 4 18.18
11 EO 3S E = -400 20 90.91
12 EO 4C E = -420 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
1 FLACHS Georges -GROSFILS Colette : 40,74 %13 EO 3S N = 600 6 27.27
14 EO 3P N-1 -50 18 81.82
15 EO 2K E-1 50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
7 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,14 %16 EO 5C E = -650 19 86.36
17 EO 5K E-1 50 16 72.73
18 EO 3P E-1 50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
2 VAGMAN David -SALFI Huguette : 49,45 %19 EO 2C S-2 -100 5 22.73
20 EO 2P N-2 -200 21 95.45
21 EO 5CcW-2 300 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
8 de Wasseige -WARNIER François : 43,80 %22 EO 3C N-1 -50 15 68.18
23 EO 1S N-1 -100 5 22.73
24 EO 2C W+1 -140 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 37,60 %25 EO 3P E+1 -170 18 81.82
26 EO 3S N-1 -100 22 100.00
27 EO 3S E+2 -460 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 80,30 %
9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 50,96 %28 EO 2K E-1 50 14 63.64
29 EO 1S E = -90 5 22.73
30 EO 4P S+1 450 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
12 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 58,40 %31 EO 2C S-2 -200 16 72.73
32 EO 3S S+3 490 1 4.55
33 EO 2P W+1 -140 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
Total : 367,0 / 726 = 50,55 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 ROSOUX Louis -DAPHNE Chantal
5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 65,43 % 1 EO 4K N-1 -50 4 18.18
2 EO 3S N+2 660 10 45.45
3 EO 2C E+2 -170 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 44,90 % 4 EO 2C S+1 140 9 40.91
5 EO 3CcS-2 -500 20 90.91
6 EO 4C N-1 -50 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
12 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 58,40 % 7 EO 4C N-1 -100 18 81.82
8 EO 3S N+4 520 16 72.73
9 EO 3S E+1 -630 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 75,76 %
1 FLACHS Georges -GROSFILS Colette : 40,74 %10 EO 4C E-1 100 4 18.18
11 EO 2S E = -120 12 54.55
12 EO 4C E+1 -450 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
7 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,14 %13 EO 4P N+1 650 0 0.00
14 EO 5KcE-2 300 4 18.18
15 EO 2P W = -110 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
2 VAGMAN David -SALFI Huguette : 49,45 %16 EO 4P E+1 -650 19 86.36
17 EO 4C S = 420 0 0.00
18 EO 4T S-1 -100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
8 de Wasseige -WARNIER François : 43,80 %19 EO 1P E+2 -140 16 72.73
20 EO 1S W = -90 13 59.09
21 EO 5TcS-1 -200 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 37,60 %22 EO 3T N = 110 7 31.82
23 EO 3C E-2 200 0 0.00
24 EO 3S E-2 100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 12,12 %
9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 50,96 %25 EO 3P E+1 -170 18 81.82
26 EO 2S S+2 180 20 90.91
27 EO 3S W+2 -460 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
4 CLERIN François-Xavier -MASSAUX Jacques : 50,80 %28 EO 3K E-2 100 7 31.82
29 EO 3K W-1 100 0 0.00
30 EO 3S S+1 430 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
10 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 55,37 %31 EO 2S W+2 -180 14 63.64
32 EO 3S S+1 430 13 59.09
33 EO 1K E = -70 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 362,0 / 726 = 49,86 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 STIENON Annie -DACHET Gérard
11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 44,90 % 1 EO 3C E+1 -170 15 68.18
2 EO 3S S+2 660 10 45.45
3 EO 3S W+1 -630 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
6 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 51,79 % 4 EO 2C S+1 140 9 40.91
5 EO 2C S = 110 0 0.00
6 EO 4C N = 420 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 19,70 %
1 FLACHS Georges -GROSFILS Colette : 40,74 % 7 EO 3C N+2 200 6 27.27
8 EO 6S N+1 1020 4 18.18
9 EO 3S E = -600 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 24,24 %
7 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,14 %10 EO 4C E-1 100 4 18.18
11 EO 2S E-1 50 5 22.73
12 EO 4C E+1 -450 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
2 VAGMAN David -SALFI Huguette : 49,45 %13 EO 4P N-1 -100 16 72.73
14 EO 3K E-1 50 15 68.18
15 EO 4C N-1 -100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
12 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 58,40 %16 EO 5P N = 450 7 31.82
17 EO 2C S+1 140 6 27.27
18 EO 1S S+1 120 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 24,24 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 37,60 %19 EO 3S W = -600 22 100.00
20 EO 2P S = 110 2 9.09
21 EO 5C W-1 50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 50,96 %22 EO 4C N-2 -100 20 90.91
23 EO 3C E-1 100 2 9.09
24 EO 3K S-1 -50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
4 CLERIN François-Xavier -MASSAUX Jacques : 50,80 %25 EO 3C W-3 300 2 9.09
26 EO 3S S+1 630 7 31.82
27 EO 3T W+1 -130 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 15,15 %
10 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 55,37 %28 EO 3K E-2 100 7 31.82
29 EO 2P S-1 -100 11 50.00
30 EO 3S S+1 430 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 65,43 %31 EO 4P E-1 50 6 27.27
32 EO 3S N+2 460 5 22.73
33 EO 1ScN+1 280 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
Total : 277,0 / 726 = 38,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 23 HUBLET Carlo -LIBERT Laurent
6 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 51,79 % 1 EO 4K N-1 -50 4 18.18
2 EO 5C N+1 680 0 0.00
3 EO 3S E = -600 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 21,21 %
1 FLACHS Georges -GROSFILS Colette : 40,74 % 4 EO 3C N = 140 9 40.91
5 EO 3T E-2 100 3 13.64
6 EO 4C N-1 -50 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
7 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,14 % 7 EO 3C N+1 170 10 45.45
8 EO 6P S+1 1010 10 45.45
9 EO 3S E = -600 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
2 VAGMAN David -SALFI Huguette : 49,45 %10 EO 4C E-1 100 4 18.18
11 EO 1S E+2 -150 14 63.64
12 EO 4C E+1 -450 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
8 de Wasseige -WARNIER François : 43,80 %13 EO 1S N+3 180 8 36.36
14 EO 3S W = -400 22 100.00
15 EO 4C S-1 -100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 37,60 %16 EO 4C E+2 -680 22 100.00
17 EO 2C S = 110 12 54.55
18 EO 1S S-2 -200 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 50,96 %19 EO 2P E = -110 9 40.91
20 EO 1S E-1 100 7 31.82
21 EO 5CcE-1 100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
4 CLERIN François-Xavier -MASSAUX Jacques : 50,80 %22 EO 2K S-1 -50 15 68.18
23 EO 1S N-1 -100 5 22.73
24 EO 3S E = -400 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
12 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 58,40 %25 EO 4P W-2 200 4 18.18
26 EO 3ScS = 750 0 0.00
27 EO 3S W+2 -460 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 65,43 %28 EO 2C N = 110 0 0.00
29 EO 1S E = -90 5 22.73
30 EO 4P N+1 450 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 44,90 %31 EO 2S E = -120 10 45.45
32 EO 3S N+2 460 5 22.73
33 EO 1S N-1 -50 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
Total : 309,0 / 726 = 42,56 %
PAIRE Nr : 24 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean
12 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 58,40 % 1 EO 4C W = -420 21 95.45
2 EO 4C N+1 650 21 95.45
3 EO 2C W+2 -170 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 50,96 % 4 EO 4T W-1 100 15 68.18
5 EO 2C S-1 -100 7 31.82
6 EO 4C N = 420 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
6 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 51,79 % 7 EO 2P W = -110 20 90.91
8 EO 4P S+3 510 19 86.36
9 EO 3S E+1 -630 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 37,60 %10 EO 4C E = -620 16 72.73
11 EO 3S E = -400 20 90.91
12 EO 4C E = -420 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 44,90 %13 EO 2S N+1 150 10 45.45
14 EO 3C E-1 50 15 68.18
15 EO 3C S = 140 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
8 de Wasseige -WARNIER François : 43,80 %16 EO 3P N = 140 14 63.64
17 EO 3C S = 140 6 27.27
18 EO 3P E-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 65,43 %19 EO 2C N-2 -100 5 22.73
20 EO 1S E-2 200 0 0.00
21 EO 5C E-1 50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 19,70 %
2 VAGMAN David -SALFI Huguette : 49,45 %22 EO 3K S-1 -50 15 68.18
23 EO 3C W = -140 16 72.73
24 EO 2C W-1 50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
10 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 55,37 %25 EO 3S N+1 430 0 0.00
26 EO 630 7 31.82
27 EO 3T W+1 -130 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 12,12 %
7 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,14 %28 EO 3K E-2 100 7 31.82
29 EO 2K W = -90 5 22.73
30 EO 4P N+1 450 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
4 CLERIN François-Xavier -MASSAUX Jacques : 50,80 %31 EO 100 1 4.55
32 EO 430 13 -2.20 59.09 -10.00 %
33 EO -100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 39,09 %
Total : 323,8 / 726 = 44,60 %
|
|