|
Tournoi du 25-08-11
1 61,09 8 MATELART Marc -JOBE Philippe
2 59,93 1 CASSART Guy -MARCHAL Christian
3 58,66 7 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul
4 51,48 9 DUTRIFOY Pol -BRIOT Fernand
5 50,32 3 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles
6 46,39 2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine
7 44,07 6 RAIMOND Yves -DELCARTE Emile
8 41,20 4 VAN DOOREN André -BONMARIAGE François
9 36,90 5 VAN AVERMAET Martine -COLLET Claudine
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 57,08 10 STEED Adrian -COLINET Eric
2 55,00 14 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme
3 53,84 11 DARDENNE Philippe -CORCEOVEI Horia
4 52,80 12 de TERWANGNE Philippe -de WASSEIGE Ariane
5 52,69 18 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude
6 46,32 16 MARTIN Hubert -MARTIN Nathalie
7 45,74 17 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard
8 44,35 15 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc
9 42,13 13 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard
PAIRE Nr : 1 CASSART Guy -MARCHAL Christian
10 STEED Adrian -COLINET Eric : 57,08 % 1 NS 3C W+1 -170 5 31.25
2 NS 4T E+1 -150 7 43.75
3 NS 3C S = 140 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
18 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 52,69 % 4 NS 1S W+1 -120 7 43.75
5 NS 4P S+1 650 13 81.25
6 NS 2T E+3 -150 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
17 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,74 % 7 NS 5CcW = -850 2 12.50
8 NS 4T N = 130 16 100.00
9 NS 4P W-1 100 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
16 MARTIN Hubert -MARTIN Nathalie : 46,32 %10 NS 4P N = 620 8 50.00
11 NS 2C N = 110 8 50.00
12 NS 3S N+1 630 15.9 99.37 µ Tbl = 66,46 %
15 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc : 44,35 %13 NS 2P E-1 100 9 56.25
14 NS 2P S+1 140 11 68.75
15 NS 1S S-3 -300 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
14 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme : 55,00 %16 NS 3S N+2 460 16 100.00
17 NS 3S E+3 -490 5 31.25
18 NS 3S N = 600 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
13 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 42,13 %19 NS 2T W-4 400 14 87.50
20 NS 1S E = -90 9 56.25
21 NS 3T E-2 100 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
12 de TERWANGNE Philippe -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 52,80 %22 NS 4P N = 420 15 93.75
23 NS 2C N-1 -100 8 50.00
24 NS 6K N-1 -50 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 DARDENNE Philippe -CORCEOVEI Horia : 53,84 %25 NS 2C W = -110 7 43.75
26 NS 3KcN+2 1070 16 100.00
27 NS 4PcS+1 690 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
Total : 258,9 / 432 = 59,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine
12 de TERWANGNE Philippe -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 52,80 % 1 NS 3C W = -140 11 68.75
2 NS 4T E+1 -150 7 43.75
3 NS 3C S = 140 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
11 DARDENNE Philippe -CORCEOVEI Horia : 53,84 % 4 NS 2TcN-2 -500 0 0.00
5 NS 3S N = 600 5 31.25
6 NS 3S E+1 -630 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
10 STEED Adrian -COLINET Eric : 57,08 % 7 NS 5CcW = -850 2 12.50
8 NS 5T N-2 -100 5 31.25
9 NS 3S E+1 -630 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,58 %
18 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 52,69 %10 NS 3S N = 600 0 0.00
11 NS 3C S = 140 12 75.00
12 NS 3S N = 600 11.4 71.25 µ Tbl = 48,75 %
17 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,74 %13 NS 1S N = 90 3 18.75
14 NS 1S N+2 150 15 93.75
15 NS 1S S+3 180 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
16 MARTIN Hubert -MARTIN Nathalie : 46,32 %16 NS 3S N-1 -50 7 43.75
17 NS 3S E+3 -490 5 31.25
18 NS 3S N+1 630 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
15 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc : 44,35 %19 NS 2TcW-2 500 16 100.00
20 NS 1S E = -90 9 56.25
21 NS 3T E-1 50 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
14 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme : 55,00 %22 NS 3P N = 140 12 75.00
23 NS 3CcS-1 -200 1 6.25
24 NS 3S S+2 460 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
13 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 42,13 %25 NS 2S E+1 -150 4 25.00
26 NS 3S S+1 630 9 56.25
27 NS 4P S+1 450 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
Total : 200,4 / 432 = 46,39 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles
14 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme : 55,00 % 1 NS 3S W = -400 1 6.25
2 NS 4CcN = 790 16 100.00
3 NS 3C S = 140 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
13 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 42,13 % 4 NS 2S E-1 100 14 87.50
5 NS 4P N+1 650 13 81.25
6 NS 3S E = -600 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
12 de TERWANGNE Philippe -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 52,80 % 7 NS 4P N = 620 14 87.50
8 NS 5T N-1 -50 10 62.50
9 NS 4P E-1 100 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
11 DARDENNE Philippe -CORCEOVEI Horia : 53,84 %10 NS 4P N = 620 8 50.00
11 NS 2C N+1 140 12 75.00
12 NS 3S N-1 -100 2.4 15.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
10 STEED Adrian -COLINET Eric : 57,08 %13 NS 1S N = 90 3 18.75
14 NS 1S N+1 120 6 37.50
15 NS 1S S+1 120 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
18 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 52,69 %16 NS 3S N-1 -50 7 43.75
17 NS 3S E+3 -490 5 31.25
18 NS 3S N+2 660 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
17 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,74 %19 NS 3S N-2 -100 2 12.50
20 NS 1S E-1 100 14 87.50
21 NS 1S E = -90 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
16 MARTIN Hubert -MARTIN Nathalie : 46,32 %22 NS 4P N-2 -100 1 6.25
23 NS 3C S-1 -100 8 50.00
24 NS 6S N-1 -50 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
15 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc : 44,35 %25 NS 2S E-1 100 13 81.25
26 NS 4TcE-1 200 6 37.50
27 NS 4P S = 420 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
Total : 217,4 / 432 = 50,32 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 VAN DOOREN André -BONMARIAGE François
16 MARTIN Hubert -MARTIN Nathalie : 46,32 % 1 NS 4C W-1 50 16 100.00
2 NS 5TxE = -800 0 0.00
3 NS 3C S = 140 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
15 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc : 44,35 % 4 NS 2P S-1 -100 10 62.50
5 NS 3S N = 600 5 31.25
6 NS 2S E+1 -150 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
14 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme : 55,00 % 7 NS 5CcW = -850 2 12.50
8 NS 5TcN-1 -100 5 31.25
9 NS 4CcN-2 -300 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
13 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 42,13 %10 NS 4P N = 620 8 50.00
11 NS 4P S-1 -50 4 25.00
12 NS 50%50% Moyen 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
12 de TERWANGNE Philippe -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 52,80 %13 NS 2T W-3 300 16 100.00
14 NS 1S N+2 150 15 93.75
15 NS 2K E-1 50 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
11 DARDENNE Philippe -CORCEOVEI Horia : 53,84 %16 NS 3S N-1 -50 7 43.75
17 NS 3S E+3 -490 5 31.25
18 NS 3S N = 600 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
10 STEED Adrian -COLINET Eric : 57,08 %19 NS 2PcW+1 -870 0 0.00
20 NS 1S E+1 -120 1 6.25
21 NS 2S E-1 50 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
18 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 52,69 %22 NS 2P N = 110 9 56.25
23 NS 2P S-2 -200 1 6.25
24 NS 3K N+2 150 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
17 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,74 %25 NS 3P S-1 -50 10 62.50
26 NS 4K N+2 170 4 25.00
27 NS 4P S = 420 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
Total : 178,0 / 432 = 41,20 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 VAN AVERMAET Martine -COLLET Claudine
18 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 52,69 % 1 NS 3C W+1 -170 5 31.25
2 NS 5TcE = -550 2 12.50
3 NS 4C S-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,58 %
17 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,74 % 4 NS 1TcN-1 -200 4 25.00
5 NS 3S N-1 -100 0 0.00
6 NS 3S E+1 -630 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 14,58 %
16 MARTIN Hubert -MARTIN Nathalie : 46,32 % 7 NS 4PcN = 790 16 100.00
8 NS 2C E+1 -140 0 0.00
9 NS 6S E-3 300 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
15 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc : 44,35 %10 NS 4P N+1 650 16 100.00
11 NS 3T W = -110 2 12.50
12 NS 3S N-1 -100 2.4 15.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
14 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme : 55,00 %13 NS 2P W = -110 0 0.00
14 NS 2C E-1 50 0 0.00
15 NS 2P N = 110 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 14,58 %
13 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 42,13 %16 NS 3S N-1 -50 7 43.75
17 NS 3S E+2 -460 13 81.25
18 NS 3S N+1 630 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
12 de TERWANGNE Philippe -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 52,80 %19 NS 3P W-1 100 8 50.00
20 NS 2P W = -110 5 31.25
21 NS 4C W-2 100 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
11 DARDENNE Philippe -CORCEOVEI Horia : 53,84 %22 NS 4P N-2 -100 1 6.25
23 NS 2P E = -110 4 25.00
24 NS 3S S+3 490 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
10 STEED Adrian -COLINET Eric : 57,08 %25 NS 3K W = -110 7 43.75
26 NS 3P W = -140 2 12.50
27 NS 2P S+2 170 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
Total : 159,4 / 432 = 36,90 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 RAIMOND Yves -DELCARTE Emile
11 DARDENNE Philippe -CORCEOVEI Horia : 53,84 % 1 NS 3S W = -400 1 6.25
2 NS 5T E = -400 4 25.00
3 NS 3C S = 140 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
10 STEED Adrian -COLINET Eric : 57,08 % 4 NS 2K W = -90 12 75.00
5 NS 3P S+2 200 2 12.50
6 NS 1S E+3 -180 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
18 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 52,69 % 7 NS 4P N-1 -100 7 43.75
8 NS 4C E-1 50 13 81.25
9 NS 4P E-1 100 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
17 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,74 %10 NS 4P N = 620 8 50.00
11 NS 1P N+3 170 16 100.00
12 NS 3S N = 600 11.4 71.25 µ Tbl = 73,75 %
16 MARTIN Hubert -MARTIN Nathalie : 46,32 %13 NS 2P E-1 100 9 56.25
14 NS 1S N+1 120 6 37.50
15 NS 3P N-3 -300 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
15 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc : 44,35 %16 NS 3S N-1 -50 7 43.75
17 NS 3S E+3 -490 5 31.25
18 NS 3S N+1 630 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
14 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme : 55,00 %19 NS 1S N = 90 6 37.50
20 NS 1S E+1 -120 1 6.25
21 NS 3S W+1 -430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,58 %
13 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 42,13 %22 NS 4P N = 420 15 93.75
23 NS 2P W-1 100 12 75.00
24 NS 3S S+2 460 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
12 de TERWANGNE Philippe -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 52,80 %25 NS 3S W = -600 0 0.00
26 NS 3S S+1 630 9 56.25
27 NS 4P S-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
Total : 190,4 / 432 = 44,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul
13 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 42,13 % 1 NS 3C W = -140 11 68.75
2 NS 3K N+1 130 12 75.00
3 NS 3C S = 140 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
12 de TERWANGNE Philippe -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 52,80 % 4 NS 2S E = -120 7 43.75
5 NS 4P S+1 650 13 81.25
6 NS 3S E+2 -660 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
11 DARDENNE Philippe -CORCEOVEI Horia : 53,84 % 7 NS 5CcW-1 200 12 75.00
8 NS 5TcN-1 -100 5 31.25
9 NS 5K E-1 100 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
10 STEED Adrian -COLINET Eric : 57,08 %10 NS 4P N = 620 8 50.00
11 NS 1S W-1 50 6 37.50
12 NS 3S N = 600 11.4 71.25 µ Tbl = 52,92 %
18 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 52,69 %13 NS 1S N+1 120 14 87.50
14 NS 1S N = 90 2 12.50
15 NS 1S S+1 120 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
17 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,74 %16 NS 3S N-1 -50 7 43.75
17 NS 3S E = -400 16 100.00
18 NS 3S N = 600 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
16 MARTIN Hubert -MARTIN Nathalie : 46,32 %19 NS 3PcE-1 200 12 75.00
20 NS 2K S = 90 12 75.00
21 NS 3S W-1 50 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
15 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc : 44,35 %22 NS 3S S-1 -50 5 31.25
23 NS 3C N-1 -100 8 50.00
24 NS 6T S = 920 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
14 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme : 55,00 %25 NS 3S E-2 200 16 100.00
26 NS 3KcN = 670 12 75.00
27 NS 4P S = 420 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
Total : 253,4 / 432 = 58,66 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -JOBE Philippe
15 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc : 44,35 % 1 NS 3C W = -140 11 68.75
2 NS 2K N+1 110 10 62.50
3 NS 2C S+2 170 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
14 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme : 55,00 % 4 NS 1C W-2 200 16 100.00
5 NS 4P S = 620 8 50.00
6 NS 3S E-2 200 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
13 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 42,13 % 7 NS 4P N-1 -100 7 43.75
8 NS 5TcN-1 -100 5 31.25
9 NS 3S E = -600 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
12 de TERWANGNE Philippe -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 52,80 %10 NS 4P N = 620 8 50.00
11 NS 3TcE = -470 0 0.00
12 NS 2S N+2 180 6.9 43.13 µ Tbl = 31,04 %
11 DARDENNE Philippe -CORCEOVEI Horia : 53,84 %13 NS 2T W-1 100 9 56.25
14 NS 2P S+1 140 11 68.75
15 NS 1S S+2 150 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
10 STEED Adrian -COLINET Eric : 57,08 %16 NS 3S N-1 -50 7 43.75
17 NS 3S E+2 -460 13 81.25
18 NS 3S N+1 630 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
18 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 52,69 %19 NS 2S N-1 -50 4 25.00
20 NS 3S E-2 200 16 100.00
21 NS 3C W-1 50 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
17 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,74 %22 NS 3S S-1 -50 5 31.25
23 NS 3C N = 140 14 87.50
24 NS 3S S+3 490 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
16 MARTIN Hubert -MARTIN Nathalie : 46,32 %25 NS 2S E-1 100 13 81.25
26 NS 3S S+3 690 14 87.50
27 NS 4P S = 420 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
Total : 263,9 / 432 = 61,09 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 DUTRIFOY Pol -BRIOT Fernand
17 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,74 % 1 NS 3C W = -140 11 68.75
2 NS 2C S+3 200 14 87.50
3 NS 3C S = 140 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
16 MARTIN Hubert -MARTIN Nathalie : 46,32 % 4 NS 2C N-3 -300 2 12.50
5 NS 4P N+1 650 13 81.25
6 NS 3T W+1 -130 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
15 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc : 44,35 % 7 NS 5C W-1 100 10 62.50
8 NS 4C E-1 50 13 81.25
9 NS 3S E = -600 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
14 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme : 55,00 %10 NS 4P N = 620 8 50.00
11 NS 2C S+1 140 12 75.00
12 NS 3S N-1 -100 2.4 15.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
13 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 42,13 %13 NS 2P E-1 100 9 56.25
14 NS 1S N+1 120 6 37.50
15 NS 3T S = 110 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
12 de TERWANGNE Philippe -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 52,80 %16 NS 3S N-1 -50 7 43.75
17 NS 3S E+3 -490 5 31.25
18 NS 3S N-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
11 DARDENNE Philippe -CORCEOVEI Horia : 53,84 %19 NS 3C S+1 170 10 62.50
20 NS 2P W = -110 5 31.25
21 NS 3S W-1 50 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
10 STEED Adrian -COLINET Eric : 57,08 %22 NS 2P N = 110 9 56.25
23 NS 3CcN = 730 16 100.00
24 NS 6T S = 920 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
18 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 52,69 %25 NS 4PcS-2 -300 2 12.50
26 NS 3PcE = -730 0 0.00
27 NS 4P S+1 450 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
Total : 222,4 / 432 = 51,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 STEED Adrian -COLINET Eric
1 CASSART Guy -MARCHAL Christian : 59,93 % 1 EO 3C W+1 -170 11 68.75
2 EO 4T E+1 -150 9 56.25
3 EO 3C S = 140 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
6 RAIMOND Yves -DELCARTE Emile : 44,07 % 4 EO 2K W = -90 4 25.00
5 EO 3P S+2 200 14 87.50
6 EO 1S E+3 -180 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 46,39 % 7 EO 5CcW = -850 14 87.50
8 EO 5T N-2 -100 11 68.75
9 EO 3S E+1 -630 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,42 %
7 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 58,66 %10 EO 4P N = 620 8 50.00
11 EO 1S W-1 50 10 62.50
12 EO 3S N = 600 4.6 28.75 µ Tbl = 47,08 %
3 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles : 50,32 %13 EO 1S N = 90 13 81.25
14 EO 1S N+1 120 10 62.50
15 EO 1S S+1 120 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
8 MATELART Marc -JOBE Philippe : 61,09 %16 EO 3S N-1 -50 9 56.25
17 EO 3S E+2 -460 3 18.75
18 EO 3S N+1 630 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
4 VAN DOOREN André -BONMARIAGE François : 41,20 %19 EO 2PcW+1 -870 16 100.00
20 EO 1S E+1 -120 15 93.75
21 EO 2S E-1 50 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
9 DUTRIFOY Pol -BRIOT Fernand : 51,48 %22 EO 2P N = 110 7 43.75
23 EO 3CcN = 730 0 0.00
24 EO 6T S = 920 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
5 VAN AVERMAET Martine -COLLET Claudine : 36,90 %25 EO 3K W = -110 9 56.25
26 EO 3P W = -140 14 87.50
27 EO 2P S+2 170 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
Total : 246,6 / 432 = 57,08 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 DARDENNE Philippe -CORCEOVEI Horia
6 RAIMOND Yves -DELCARTE Emile : 44,07 % 1 EO 3S W = -400 15 93.75
2 EO 5T E = -400 12 75.00
3 EO 3C S = 140 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 46,39 % 4 EO 2TcN-2 -500 16 100.00
5 EO 3S N = 600 11 68.75
6 EO 3S E+1 -630 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
7 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 58,66 % 7 EO 5CcW-1 200 4 25.00
8 EO 5TcN-1 -100 11 68.75
9 EO 5K E-1 100 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
3 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles : 50,32 %10 EO 4P N = 620 8 50.00
11 EO 2C N+1 140 4 25.00
12 EO 3S N-1 -100 13.6 85.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
8 MATELART Marc -JOBE Philippe : 61,09 %13 EO 2T W-1 100 7 43.75
14 EO 2P S+1 140 5 31.25
15 EO 1S S+2 150 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
4 VAN DOOREN André -BONMARIAGE François : 41,20 %16 EO 3S N-1 -50 9 56.25
17 EO 3S E+3 -490 11 68.75
18 EO 3S N = 600 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
9 DUTRIFOY Pol -BRIOT Fernand : 51,48 %19 EO 3C S+1 170 6 37.50
20 EO 2P W = -110 11 68.75
21 EO 3S W-1 50 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
5 VAN AVERMAET Martine -COLLET Claudine : 36,90 %22 EO 4P N-2 -100 15 93.75
23 EO 2P E = -110 12 75.00
24 EO 3S S+3 490 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
1 CASSART Guy -MARCHAL Christian : 59,93 %25 EO 2C W = -110 9 56.25
26 EO 3KcN+2 1070 0 0.00
27 EO 4PcS+1 690 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
Total : 232,6 / 432 = 53,84 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 de TERWANGNE Philippe -de WASSEIGE Ariane
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 46,39 % 1 EO 3C W = -140 5 31.25
2 EO 4T E+1 -150 9 56.25
3 EO 3C S = 140 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
7 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 58,66 % 4 EO 2S E = -120 9 56.25
5 EO 4P S+1 650 3 18.75
6 EO 3S E+2 -660 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
3 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles : 50,32 % 7 EO 4P N = 620 2 12.50
8 EO 5T N-1 -50 6 37.50
9 EO 4P E-1 100 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
8 MATELART Marc -JOBE Philippe : 61,09 %10 EO 4P N = 620 8 50.00
11 EO 3TcE = -470 16 100.00
12 EO 2S N+2 180 9.1 56.88 µ Tbl = 68,96 %
4 VAN DOOREN André -BONMARIAGE François : 41,20 %13 EO 2T W-3 300 0 0.00
14 EO 1S N+2 150 1 6.25
15 EO 2K E-1 50 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
9 DUTRIFOY Pol -BRIOT Fernand : 51,48 %16 EO 3S N-1 -50 9 56.25
17 EO 3S E+3 -490 11 68.75
18 EO 3S N-1 -100 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
5 VAN AVERMAET Martine -COLLET Claudine : 36,90 %19 EO 3P W-1 100 8 50.00
20 EO 2P W = -110 11 68.75
21 EO 4C W-2 100 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
1 CASSART Guy -MARCHAL Christian : 59,93 %22 EO 4P N = 420 1 6.25
23 EO 2C N-1 -100 8 50.00
24 EO 6K N-1 -50 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
6 RAIMOND Yves -DELCARTE Emile : 44,07 %25 EO 3S W = -600 16 100.00
26 EO 3S S+1 630 7 43.75
27 EO 4P S-1 -50 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
Total : 228,1 / 432 = 52,80 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard
7 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 58,66 % 1 EO 3C W = -140 5 31.25
2 EO 3K N+1 130 4 25.00
3 EO 3C S = 140 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
3 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles : 50,32 % 4 EO 2S E-1 100 2 12.50
5 EO 4P N+1 650 3 18.75
6 EO 3S E = -600 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
8 MATELART Marc -JOBE Philippe : 61,09 % 7 EO 4P N-1 -100 9 56.25
8 EO 5TcN-1 -100 11 68.75
9 EO 3S E = -600 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
4 VAN DOOREN André -BONMARIAGE François : 41,20 %10 EO 4P N = 620 8 50.00
11 EO 4P S-1 -50 12 75.00
12 EO 50%50% Moyen 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
9 DUTRIFOY Pol -BRIOT Fernand : 51,48 %13 EO 2P E-1 100 7 43.75
14 EO 1S N+1 120 10 62.50
15 EO 3T S = 110 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
5 VAN AVERMAET Martine -COLLET Claudine : 36,90 %16 EO 3S N-1 -50 9 56.25
17 EO 3S E+2 -460 3 18.75
18 EO 3S N+1 630 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
1 CASSART Guy -MARCHAL Christian : 59,93 %19 EO 2T W-4 400 2 12.50
20 EO 1S E = -90 7 43.75
21 EO 3T E-2 100 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
6 RAIMOND Yves -DELCARTE Emile : 44,07 %22 EO 4P N = 420 1 6.25
23 EO 2P W-1 100 4 25.00
24 EO 3S S+2 460 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 46,39 %25 EO 2S E+1 -150 12 75.00
26 EO 3S S+1 630 7 43.75
27 EO 4P S+1 450 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
Total : 182,0 / 432 = 42,13 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme
3 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles : 50,32 % 1 EO 3S W = -400 15 93.75
2 EO 4CcN = 790 0 0.00
3 EO 3C S = 140 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
8 MATELART Marc -JOBE Philippe : 61,09 % 4 EO 1C W-2 200 0 0.00
5 EO 4P S = 620 8 50.00
6 EO 3S E-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
4 VAN DOOREN André -BONMARIAGE François : 41,20 % 7 EO 5CcW = -850 14 87.50
8 EO 5TcN-1 -100 11 68.75
9 EO 4CcN-2 -300 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
9 DUTRIFOY Pol -BRIOT Fernand : 51,48 %10 EO 4P N = 620 8 50.00
11 EO 2C S+1 140 4 25.00
12 EO 3S N-1 -100 13.6 85.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
5 VAN AVERMAET Martine -COLLET Claudine : 36,90 %13 EO 2P W = -110 16 100.00
14 EO 2C E-1 50 16 100.00
15 EO 2P N = 110 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 85,42 %
1 CASSART Guy -MARCHAL Christian : 59,93 %16 EO 3S N+2 460 0 0.00
17 EO 3S E+3 -490 11 68.75
18 EO 3S N = 600 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
6 RAIMOND Yves -DELCARTE Emile : 44,07 %19 EO 1S N = 90 10 62.50
20 EO 1S E+1 -120 15 93.75
21 EO 3S W+1 -430 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,42 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 46,39 %22 EO 3P N = 140 4 25.00
23 EO 3CcS-1 -200 15 93.75
24 EO 3S S+2 460 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
7 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 58,66 %25 EO 3S E-2 200 0 0.00
26 EO 3KcN = 670 4 25.00
27 EO 4P S = 420 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
Total : 237,6 / 432 = 55,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc
8 MATELART Marc -JOBE Philippe : 61,09 % 1 EO 3C W = -140 5 31.25
2 EO 2K N+1 110 6 37.50
3 EO 2C S+2 170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
4 VAN DOOREN André -BONMARIAGE François : 41,20 % 4 EO 2P S-1 -100 6 37.50
5 EO 3S N = 600 11 68.75
6 EO 2S E+1 -150 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
9 DUTRIFOY Pol -BRIOT Fernand : 51,48 % 7 EO 5C W-1 100 6 37.50
8 EO 4C E-1 50 3 18.75
9 EO 3S E = -600 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
5 VAN AVERMAET Martine -COLLET Claudine : 36,90 %10 EO 4P N+1 650 0 0.00
11 EO 3T W = -110 14 87.50
12 EO 3S N-1 -100 13.6 85.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
1 CASSART Guy -MARCHAL Christian : 59,93 %13 EO 2P E-1 100 7 43.75
14 EO 2P S+1 140 5 31.25
15 EO 1S S-3 -300 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
6 RAIMOND Yves -DELCARTE Emile : 44,07 %16 EO 3S N-1 -50 9 56.25
17 EO 3S E+3 -490 11 68.75
18 EO 3S N+1 630 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 46,39 %19 EO 2TcW-2 500 0 0.00
20 EO 1S E = -90 7 43.75
21 EO 3T E-1 50 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
7 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 58,66 %22 EO 3S S-1 -50 11 68.75
23 EO 3C N-1 -100 8 50.00
24 EO 6T S = 920 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
3 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles : 50,32 %25 EO 2S E-1 100 3 18.75
26 EO 4TcE-1 200 10 62.50
27 EO 4P S = 420 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
Total : 191,6 / 432 = 44,35 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 MARTIN Hubert -MARTIN Nathalie
4 VAN DOOREN André -BONMARIAGE François : 41,20 % 1 EO 4C W-1 50 0 0.00
2 EO 5TxE = -800 16 100.00
3 EO 3C S = 140 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 DUTRIFOY Pol -BRIOT Fernand : 51,48 % 4 EO 2C N-3 -300 14 87.50
5 EO 4P N+1 650 3 18.75
6 EO 3T W+1 -130 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
5 VAN AVERMAET Martine -COLLET Claudine : 36,90 % 7 EO 4PcN = 790 0 0.00
8 EO 2C E+1 -140 16 100.00
9 EO 6S E-3 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
1 CASSART Guy -MARCHAL Christian : 59,93 %10 EO 4P N = 620 8 50.00
11 EO 2C N = 110 8 50.00
12 EO 3S N+1 630 0.1 0.63 µ Tbl = 33,54 %
6 RAIMOND Yves -DELCARTE Emile : 44,07 %13 EO 2P E-1 100 7 43.75
14 EO 1S N+1 120 10 62.50
15 EO 3P N-3 -300 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 46,39 %16 EO 3S N-1 -50 9 56.25
17 EO 3S E+3 -490 11 68.75
18 EO 3S N+1 630 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
7 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 58,66 %19 EO 3PcE-1 200 4 25.00
20 EO 2K S = 90 4 25.00
21 EO 3S W-1 50 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
3 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles : 50,32 %22 EO 4P N-2 -100 15 93.75
23 EO 3C S-1 -100 8 50.00
24 EO 6S N-1 -50 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
8 MATELART Marc -JOBE Philippe : 61,09 %25 EO 2S E-1 100 3 18.75
26 EO 3S S+3 690 2 12.50
27 EO 4P S = 420 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
Total : 200,1 / 432 = 46,32 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard
9 DUTRIFOY Pol -BRIOT Fernand : 51,48 % 1 EO 3C W = -140 5 31.25
2 EO 2C S+3 200 2 12.50
3 EO 3C S = 140 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
5 VAN AVERMAET Martine -COLLET Claudine : 36,90 % 4 EO 1TcN-1 -200 12 75.00
5 EO 3S N-1 -100 16 100.00
6 EO 3S E+1 -630 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 85,42 %
1 CASSART Guy -MARCHAL Christian : 59,93 % 7 EO 5CcW = -850 14 87.50
8 EO 4T N = 130 0 0.00
9 EO 4P W-1 100 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
6 RAIMOND Yves -DELCARTE Emile : 44,07 %10 EO 4P N = 620 8 50.00
11 EO 1P N+3 170 0 0.00
12 EO 3S N = 600 4.6 28.75 µ Tbl = 26,25 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 46,39 %13 EO 1S N = 90 13 81.25
14 EO 1S N+2 150 1 6.25
15 EO 1S S+3 180 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
7 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 58,66 %16 EO 3S N-1 -50 9 56.25
17 EO 3S E = -400 0 0.00
18 EO 3S N = 600 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
3 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles : 50,32 %19 EO 3S N-2 -100 14 87.50
20 EO 1S E-1 100 2 12.50
21 EO 1S E = -90 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
8 MATELART Marc -JOBE Philippe : 61,09 %22 EO 3S S-1 -50 11 68.75
23 EO 3C N = 140 2 12.50
24 EO 3S S+3 490 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
4 VAN DOOREN André -BONMARIAGE François : 41,20 %25 EO 3P S-1 -50 6 37.50
26 EO 4K N+2 170 12 75.00
27 EO 4P S = 420 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
Total : 197,6 / 432 = 45,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude
5 VAN AVERMAET Martine -COLLET Claudine : 36,90 % 1 EO 3C W+1 -170 11 68.75
2 EO 5TcE = -550 14 87.50
3 EO 4C S-1 -50 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,42 %
1 CASSART Guy -MARCHAL Christian : 59,93 % 4 EO 1S W+1 -120 9 56.25
5 EO 4P S+1 650 3 18.75
6 EO 2T E+3 -150 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
6 RAIMOND Yves -DELCARTE Emile : 44,07 % 7 EO 4P N-1 -100 9 56.25
8 EO 4C E-1 50 3 18.75
9 EO 4P E-1 100 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 46,39 %10 EO 3S N = 600 16 100.00
11 EO 3C S = 140 4 25.00
12 EO 3S N = 600 4.6 28.75 µ Tbl = 51,25 %
7 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 58,66 %13 EO 1S N+1 120 2 12.50
14 EO 1S N = 90 14 87.50
15 EO 1S S+1 120 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
3 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles : 50,32 %16 EO 3S N-1 -50 9 56.25
17 EO 3S E+3 -490 11 68.75
18 EO 3S N+2 660 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
8 MATELART Marc -JOBE Philippe : 61,09 %19 EO 2S N-1 -50 12 75.00
20 EO 3S E-2 200 0 0.00
21 EO 3C W-1 50 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
4 VAN DOOREN André -BONMARIAGE François : 41,20 %22 EO 2P N = 110 7 43.75
23 EO 2P S-2 -200 15 93.75
24 EO 3K N+2 150 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
9 DUTRIFOY Pol -BRIOT Fernand : 51,48 %25 EO 4PcS-2 -300 14 87.50
26 EO 3PcE = -730 16 100.00
27 EO 4P S+1 450 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
Total : 227,6 / 432 = 52,69 %
|
|