|
Tournoi du 25-10-12
1 58,89 12 DOPCHIE Thierry -CASSART Guy
2 58,04 7 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -STEED Mercédès
3 54,93 10 VAN DOOREN André -de TERWANGNE Philippe
4 53,44 9 MAHY Alain -HERBOTS Jean-Marie
5 51,44 3 STEED Adrian -BONMARIAGE François
6 50,89 11 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul
7 49,96 2 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
8 47,89 1 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon
9 45,78 5 CHANTRAINE René -VUYST Michele
10 45,15 6 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard
11 43,04 4 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard
12 40,56 8 HALLEUX Jean François -NELIS Claude
PAIRE Nr : 1 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon
4 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 43,04 % 1 NS 3P N-1 -50 2.6 26.00
2 NS 4P E-1 50 7.4 74.00
3 NS 3P W = -140 3.8 38.00 µ Tbl = 46,00 %
10 VAN DOOREN André -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 54,93 % 4 NS 4C W-2 200 9 90.00
5 NS 4P E = -420 5 50.00
6 NS 3S N = 400 4 40.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
7 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -STEED Mercédès : 58,04 %10 EO 1P W+1 -110 0.5 5.00
11 EO 3P S+1 170 9.5 95.00
12 EO 3K N = 110 2 20.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
11 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 50,89 %13 EO 3T S = 110 5 50.00
14 EO 3S S+1 430 5 50.00
15 EO 3K W+1 -130 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 MAHY Alain -HERBOTS Jean-Marie : 53,44 %16 EO 2T N-2 -100 5 50.00
17 EO 3S E-1 50 9.8 98.00
18 EO 4P E+1 -450 8.6 86.00 µ Tbl = 78,00 %
2 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 49,96 %19 NS 6P N = 980 5 50.00
20 NS 3T N-1 -100 0.5 5.00
21 NS 4C E+2 -480 2 20.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
12 DOPCHIE Thierry -CASSART Guy : 58,89 %22 EO 4K S-1 -50 2 20.00
23 EO 3S E-1 100 3 30.00
24 EO 3S S-2 -100 7 70.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
8 HALLEUX Jean François -NELIS Claude : 40,56 %28 EO 4C N = 620 3.8 38.00
29 EO 2S N = 120 2.6 26.00
30 EO 1S E-1 50 2.6 26.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
3 STEED Adrian -BONMARIAGE François : 51,44 %31 EO 3S N-1 -100 7.4 74.00
32 EO 2S S-2 -100 1.4 14.00
33 EO 1T N+3 130 9.8 98.00 µ Tbl = 62,00 %
Total : 129,3 / 270 = 47,89 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
3 STEED Adrian -BONMARIAGE François : 51,44 % 1 NS 4C S-1 -50 2.6 26.00
2 NS 6P E-2 100 9.8 98.00
3 NS 3P W = -140 3.8 38.00 µ Tbl = 54,00 %
11 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 50,89 % 4 EO 3S W-1 100 6 60.00
5 EO 4P E = -420 5 50.00
6 EO 3S S = 400 6 60.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
4 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 43,04 % 7 EO 3S W-1 100 0.5 5.00
8 EO 3S N = 400 3.5 35.00
9 EO 3K S+1 130 9.5 95.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
6 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,15 %10 NS 2C N-2 -200 0.5 5.00
11 NS 4P S = 420 5 50.00
12 NS 3K N = 110 8 80.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
8 HALLEUX Jean François -NELIS Claude : 40,56 %13 EO 3T S-1 -100 7.4 74.00
14 EO 3S S = 400 9.8 98.00
15 EO 3K W+2 -150 8.6 86.00 µ Tbl = 86,00 %
1 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 47,89 %19 EO 6P N = 980 5 50.00
20 EO 3T N-1 -100 9.5 95.00
21 EO 4C E+2 -480 8 80.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
9 MAHY Alain -HERBOTS Jean-Marie : 53,44 %22 NS 2T S-1 -50 8 80.00
23 NS 2P E-1 100 7 70.00
24 NS 3S S-2 -100 3 30.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -VUYST Michele : 45,78 %25 NS 4K W = -130 1.4 14.00
26 NS 3C N-1 -100 0.2 2.00
27 NS 4K S = 130 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 22,00 %
12 DOPCHIE Thierry -CASSART Guy : 58,89 %31 EO 4C S+1 650 0.2 2.00
32 EO 2C S-2 -100 1.4 14.00
33 EO 6C N = 980 0.2 2.00 µ Tbl = 6,00 %
Total : 134,9 / 270 = 49,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 STEED Adrian -BONMARIAGE François
2 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 49,96 % 1 EO 4C S-1 -50 7.4 74.00
2 EO 6P E-2 100 0.2 2.00
3 EO 3P W = -140 6.2 62.00 µ Tbl = 46,00 %
8 HALLEUX Jean François -NELIS Claude : 40,56 % 4 NS 3P N-1 -100 1 10.00
5 NS 4P E = -420 5 50.00
6 NS 3S S+2 460 10 100.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
12 DOPCHIE Thierry -CASSART Guy : 58,89 % 7 EO 3S W+1 -630 8 80.00
8 EO 3S N = 400 3.5 35.00
9 EO 3S S+1 430 2 20.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
7 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -STEED Mercédès : 58,04 %13 NS 3KcE-1 200 8.6 86.00
14 NS 3S S+1 430 5 50.00
15 NS 2T N = 90 9.8 98.00 µ Tbl = 78,00 %
11 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 50,89 %16 EO 2K N-1 -50 0.2 2.00
17 EO 5K E-2 100 3.8 38.00
18 EO 4P E-1 50 1.4 14.00 µ Tbl = 18,00 %
10 VAN DOOREN André -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 54,93 %22 EO 2C N-2 -100 9 90.00
23 EO 1S W+1 -120 10 100.00
24 EO 3S S-3 -150 10 100.00 µ Tbl = 96,67 %
4 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 43,04 %25 NS 5K W-1 100 5 50.00
26 NS 2P N = 110 7.4 74.00
27 NS 5K S-1 -50 0.2 2.00 µ Tbl = 42,00 %
6 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,15 %28 NS 4C N = 620 6.2 62.00
29 NS 1S N+1 120 7.4 74.00
30 NS 1S E = -90 0.2 2.00 µ Tbl = 46,00 %
1 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 47,89 %31 NS 3S N-1 -100 2.6 26.00
32 NS 2S S-2 -100 8.6 86.00
33 NS 1T N+3 130 0.2 2.00 µ Tbl = 38,00 %
Total : 138,9 / 270 = 51,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard
1 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 47,89 % 1 EO 3P N-1 -50 7.4 74.00
2 EO 4P E-1 50 2.6 26.00
3 EO 3P W = -140 6.2 62.00 µ Tbl = 54,00 %
7 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -STEED Mercédès : 58,04 % 4 NS 3P N-1 -100 1 10.00
5 NS 4P E = -420 5 50.00
6 NS 4T N+1 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
2 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 49,96 % 7 NS 3S W-1 100 9.5 95.00
8 NS 3S N = 400 6.5 65.00
9 NS 3K S+1 130 0.5 5.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
12 DOPCHIE Thierry -CASSART Guy : 58,89 %10 EO 1S E+1 -120 3.5 35.00
11 EO 4P S+1 450 0.5 5.00
12 EO 4K N-1 -100 6.5 65.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
8 HALLEUX Jean François -NELIS Claude : 40,56 %16 NS 2P S-3 -150 0.2 2.00
17 NS 4T W-2 100 6.2 62.00
18 NS 4P E = -420 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,00 %
10 VAN DOOREN André -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 54,93 %19 EO 6P N = 980 5 50.00
20 EO 2C S+2 170 0.5 5.00
21 EO 4C E = -420 0.5 5.00 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
11 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 50,89 %22 NS 2C N-2 -100 1 10.00
23 NS 3P W-1 100 7 70.00
24 NS 4C S-1 -50 8 80.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
3 STEED Adrian -BONMARIAGE François : 51,44 %25 EO 5K W-1 100 5 50.00
26 EO 2P N = 110 2.6 26.00
27 EO 5K S-1 -50 9.8 98.00 µ Tbl = 58,00 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -VUYST Michele : 45,78 %28 NS 4C N = 620 6.2 62.00
29 NS 1S N+1 120 7.4 74.00
30 NS 2C S-1 -50 2.6 26.00 µ Tbl = 54,00 %
Total : 116,2 / 270 = 43,04 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 CHANTRAINE René -VUYST Michele
9 MAHY Alain -HERBOTS Jean-Marie : 53,44 % 1 EO 3P N = 140 0.2 2.00
2 EO 4P E = -420 5 50.00
3 EO 2K W-3 300 0.2 2.00 µ Tbl = 18,00 %
6 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,15 % 4 NS 2P N = 110 6 60.00
5 NS 4P E = -420 5 50.00
6 NS 3S N+1 430 8 80.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
12 DOPCHIE Thierry -CASSART Guy : 58,89 %13 EO 3KcE-1 200 1.4 14.00
14 EO 3S S+2 460 0.2 2.00
15 EO 3K W+2 -150 8.6 86.00 µ Tbl = 34,00 %
7 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -STEED Mercédès : 58,04 %16 EO 2P S-2 -100 5 50.00
17 EO 4T W-2 100 3.8 38.00
18 EO 4P E-1 50 1.4 14.00 µ Tbl = 34,00 %
11 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 50,89 %19 NS 6P N = 980 5 50.00
20 NS 2C S = 110 5 50.00
21 NS 4C E+2 -480 2 20.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
8 HALLEUX Jean François -NELIS Claude : 40,56 %22 NS 2C N-1 -50 8 80.00
23 NS 4P E-1 100 7 70.00
24 NS 4C S-1 -50 8 80.00 µ Tbl = 76,67 %
2 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 49,96 %25 EO 4K W = -130 8.6 86.00
26 EO 3C N-1 -100 9.8 98.00
27 EO 4K S = 130 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 78,00 %
4 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 43,04 %28 EO 4C N = 620 3.8 38.00
29 EO 1S N+1 120 2.6 26.00
30 EO 2C S-1 -50 7.4 74.00 µ Tbl = 46,00 %
10 VAN DOOREN André -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 54,93 %31 NS 3S N-2 -200 0.2 2.00
32 NS 3T W = -110 3.8 38.00
33 NS 3C S+1 170 2.6 26.00 µ Tbl = 22,00 %
Total : 123,6 / 270 = 45,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard
10 VAN DOOREN André -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 54,93 % 1 NS 3K E-1 50 7.4 74.00
2 NS 4P E+1 -450 1.4 14.00
3 NS 2P W+1 -140 3.8 38.00 µ Tbl = 42,00 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -VUYST Michele : 45,78 % 4 EO 2P N = 110 4 40.00
5 EO 4P E = -420 5 50.00
6 EO 3S N+1 430 2 20.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
9 MAHY Alain -HERBOTS Jean-Marie : 53,44 % 7 NS 3S W = -600 6.5 65.00
8 NS 3S N-1 -50 0.5 5.00
9 NS 3T W-2 200 3.5 35.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
2 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 49,96 %10 EO 2C N-2 -200 9.5 95.00
11 EO 4P S = 420 5 50.00
12 EO 3K N = 110 2 20.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
12 DOPCHIE Thierry -CASSART Guy : 58,89 %16 EO 2P S-2 -100 5 50.00
17 EO 5K E-2 100 3.8 38.00
18 EO 4P E+1 -450 8.6 86.00 µ Tbl = 58,00 %
8 HALLEUX Jean François -NELIS Claude : 40,56 %19 EO 6P N = 980 5 50.00
20 EO 3T N = 110 5 50.00
21 EO 4C W+1 -450 3.5 35.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
7 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -STEED Mercédès : 58,04 %22 NS 1S W = -90 4 40.00
23 NS 1S W = -90 2 20.00
24 NS 3K N-1 -50 8 80.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
3 STEED Adrian -BONMARIAGE François : 51,44 %28 EO 4C N = 620 3.8 38.00
29 EO 1S N+1 120 2.6 26.00
30 EO 1S E = -90 9.8 98.00 µ Tbl = 54,00 %
11 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 50,89 %31 NS 3S N = 600 5 50.00
32 NS 1S W+1 -120 0.2 2.00
33 NS 4C N = 420 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 34,00 %
Total : 121,9 / 270 = 45,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -STEED Mercédès
11 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 50,89 % 1 EO 4P N-1 -50 7.4 74.00
2 EO 4P E+1 -450 8.6 86.00
3 EO 3P W = -140 6.2 62.00 µ Tbl = 74,00 %
4 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 43,04 % 4 EO 3P N-1 -100 9 90.00
5 EO 4P E = -420 5 50.00
6 EO 4T N+1 150 10 100.00 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
10 VAN DOOREN André -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 54,93 % 7 NS 3S W+1 -630 2 20.00
8 NS 3S N = 400 6.5 65.00
9 NS 3S S+1 430 8 80.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
1 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 47,89 %10 NS 1P W+1 -110 9.5 95.00
11 NS 3P S+1 170 0.5 5.00
12 NS 3K N = 110 8 80.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
3 STEED Adrian -BONMARIAGE François : 51,44 %13 EO 3KcE-1 200 1.4 14.00
14 EO 3S S+1 430 5 50.00
15 EO 2T N = 90 0.2 2.00 µ Tbl = 22,00 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -VUYST Michele : 45,78 %16 NS 2P S-2 -100 5 50.00
17 NS 4T W-2 100 6.2 62.00
18 NS 4P E-1 50 8.6 86.00 µ Tbl = 66,00 %
6 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,15 %22 EO 1S W = -90 6 60.00
23 EO 1S W = -90 8 80.00
24 EO 3K N-1 -50 2 20.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
9 MAHY Alain -HERBOTS Jean-Marie : 53,44 %25 NS 3K W+1 -130 1.4 14.00
26 NS 2T E-1 100 3.8 38.00
27 NS 4PcW-2 300 9.8 98.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
8 HALLEUX Jean François -NELIS Claude : 40,56 %31 NS 3S N+1 630 7.4 74.00
32 NS 3T W = -110 3.8 38.00
33 NS 5C N = 450 7.4 74.00 µ Tbl = 62,00 %
Total : 156,7 / 270 = 58,04 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 HALLEUX Jean François -NELIS Claude
3 STEED Adrian -BONMARIAGE François : 51,44 % 4 EO 3P N-1 -100 9 90.00
5 EO 4P E = -420 5 50.00
6 EO 3S S+2 460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
9 MAHY Alain -HERBOTS Jean-Marie : 53,44 %10 NS 1S E+2 -150 3.5 35.00
11 NS 4P N = 420 5 50.00
12 NS 1S S-3 -300 0.5 5.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
2 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 49,96 %13 NS 3T S-1 -100 2.6 26.00
14 NS 3S S = 400 0.2 2.00
15 NS 3K W+2 -150 1.4 14.00 µ Tbl = 14,00 %
4 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 43,04 %16 EO 2P S-3 -150 9.8 98.00
17 EO 4T W-2 100 3.8 38.00
18 EO 4P E = -420 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,00 %
6 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,15 %19 NS 6P N = 980 5 50.00
20 NS 3T N = 110 5 50.00
21 NS 4C W+1 -450 6.5 65.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -VUYST Michele : 45,78 %22 EO 2C N-1 -50 2 20.00
23 EO 4P E-1 100 3 30.00
24 EO 4C S-1 -50 2 20.00 µ Tbl = 23,33 %
10 VAN DOOREN André -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 54,93 %25 EO 3T W-4 400 0.2 2.00
26 EO 2C N+1 140 0.2 2.00
27 EO 3P W-1 50 7.4 74.00 µ Tbl = 26,00 %
1 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 47,89 %28 NS 4C N = 620 6.2 62.00
29 NS 2S N = 120 7.4 74.00
30 NS 1S E-1 50 7.4 74.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
7 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -STEED Mercédès : 58,04 %31 EO 3S N+1 630 2.6 26.00
32 EO 3T W = -110 6.2 62.00
33 EO 5C N = 450 2.6 26.00 µ Tbl = 38,00 %
Total : 109,5 / 270 = 40,56 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 MAHY Alain -HERBOTS Jean-Marie
5 CHANTRAINE René -VUYST Michele : 45,78 % 1 NS 3P N = 140 9.8 98.00
2 NS 4P E = -420 5 50.00
3 NS 2K W-3 300 9.8 98.00 µ Tbl = 82,00 %
12 DOPCHIE Thierry -CASSART Guy : 58,89 % 4 EO 3C W-2 200 1 10.00
5 EO 4P E = -420 5 50.00
6 EO 5T N = 400 6 60.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
6 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,15 % 7 EO 3S W = -600 3.5 35.00
8 EO 3S N-1 -50 9.5 95.00
9 EO 3T W-2 200 6.5 65.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
8 HALLEUX Jean François -NELIS Claude : 40,56 %10 EO 1S E+2 -150 6.5 65.00
11 EO 4P N = 420 5 50.00
12 EO 1S S-3 -300 9.5 95.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
10 VAN DOOREN André -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 54,93 %13 EO 3P W = -140 9.8 98.00
14 EO 3S S+1 430 5 50.00
15 EO 3P E-1 50 2.6 26.00 µ Tbl = 58,00 %
1 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 47,89 %16 NS 2T N-2 -100 5 50.00
17 NS 3S E-1 50 0.2 2.00
18 NS 4P E+1 -450 1.4 14.00 µ Tbl = 22,00 %
2 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 49,96 %22 EO 2T S-1 -50 2 20.00
23 EO 2P E-1 100 3 30.00
24 EO 3S S-2 -100 7 70.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
7 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -STEED Mercédès : 58,04 %25 EO 3K W+1 -130 8.6 86.00
26 EO 2T E-1 100 6.2 62.00
27 EO 4PcW-2 300 0.2 2.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 50,89 %28 NS 4C N = 620 6.2 62.00
29 NS 3K S = 110 2.6 26.00
30 NS 1S E-1 50 7.4 74.00 µ Tbl = 54,00 %
Total : 144,3 / 270 = 53,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 VAN DOOREN André -de TERWANGNE Philippe
6 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,15 % 1 EO 3K E-1 50 2.6 26.00
2 EO 4P E+1 -450 8.6 86.00
3 EO 2P W+1 -140 6.2 62.00 µ Tbl = 58,00 %
1 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 47,89 % 4 EO 4C W-2 200 1 10.00
5 EO 4P E = -420 5 50.00
6 EO 3S N = 400 6 60.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
7 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -STEED Mercédès : 58,04 % 7 EO 3S W+1 -630 8 80.00
8 EO 3S N = 400 3.5 35.00
9 EO 3S S+1 430 2 20.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
9 MAHY Alain -HERBOTS Jean-Marie : 53,44 %13 NS 3P W = -140 0.2 2.00
14 NS 3S S+1 430 5 50.00
15 NS 3P E-1 50 7.4 74.00 µ Tbl = 42,00 %
4 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 43,04 %19 NS 6P N = 980 5 50.00
20 NS 2C S+2 170 9.5 95.00
21 NS 4C E = -420 9.5 95.00 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
3 STEED Adrian -BONMARIAGE François : 51,44 %22 NS 2C N-2 -100 1 10.00
23 NS 1S W+1 -120 0 0.00
24 NS 3S S-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 3,33 %
8 HALLEUX Jean François -NELIS Claude : 40,56 %25 NS 3T W-4 400 9.8 98.00
26 NS 2C N+1 140 9.8 98.00
27 NS 3P W-1 50 2.6 26.00 µ Tbl = 74,00 %
12 DOPCHIE Thierry -CASSART Guy : 58,89 %28 EO 4C N-1 -100 9.8 98.00
29 EO 2P E-1 100 9.8 98.00
30 EO 3K W-1 50 2.6 26.00 µ Tbl = 74,00 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -VUYST Michele : 45,78 %31 EO 3S N-2 -200 9.8 98.00
32 EO 3T W = -110 6.2 62.00
33 EO 3C S+1 170 7.4 74.00 µ Tbl = 78,00 %
Total : 148,3 / 270 = 54,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul
7 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -STEED Mercédès : 58,04 % 1 NS 4P N-1 -50 2.6 26.00
2 NS 4P E+1 -450 1.4 14.00
3 NS 3P W = -140 3.8 38.00 µ Tbl = 26,00 %
2 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 49,96 % 4 NS 3S W-1 100 4 40.00
5 NS 4P E = -420 5 50.00
6 NS 3S S = 400 4 40.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
1 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 47,89 %13 NS 3T S = 110 5 50.00
14 NS 3S S+1 430 5 50.00
15 NS 3K W+1 -130 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
3 STEED Adrian -BONMARIAGE François : 51,44 %16 NS 2K N-1 -50 9.8 98.00
17 NS 5K E-2 100 6.2 62.00
18 NS 4P E-1 50 8.6 86.00 µ Tbl = 82,00 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -VUYST Michele : 45,78 %19 EO 6P N = 980 5 50.00
20 EO 2C S = 110 5 50.00
21 EO 4C E+2 -480 8 80.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
4 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 43,04 %22 EO 2C N-2 -100 9 90.00
23 EO 3P W-1 100 3 30.00
24 EO 4C S-1 -50 2 20.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
12 DOPCHIE Thierry -CASSART Guy : 58,89 %25 EO 5K W-2 200 2.6 26.00
26 EO 3K W-1 100 6.2 62.00
27 EO 4K S+2 170 2.6 26.00 µ Tbl = 38,00 %
9 MAHY Alain -HERBOTS Jean-Marie : 53,44 %28 EO 4C N = 620 3.8 38.00
29 EO 3K S = 110 7.4 74.00
30 EO 1S E-1 50 2.6 26.00 µ Tbl = 46,00 %
6 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,15 %31 EO 3S N = 600 5 50.00
32 EO 1S W+1 -120 9.8 98.00
33 EO 4C N = 420 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,00 %
Total : 137,4 / 270 = 50,89 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 DOPCHIE Thierry -CASSART Guy
9 MAHY Alain -HERBOTS Jean-Marie : 53,44 % 4 NS 3C W-2 200 9 90.00
5 NS 4P E = -420 5 50.00
6 NS 5T N = 400 4 40.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
3 STEED Adrian -BONMARIAGE François : 51,44 % 7 NS 3S W+1 -630 2 20.00
8 NS 3S N = 400 6.5 65.00
9 NS 3S S+1 430 8 80.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
4 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 43,04 %10 NS 1S E+1 -120 6.5 65.00
11 NS 4P S+1 450 9.5 95.00
12 NS 4K N-1 -100 3.5 35.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -VUYST Michele : 45,78 %13 NS 3KcE-1 200 8.6 86.00
14 NS 3S S+2 460 9.8 98.00
15 NS 3K W+2 -150 1.4 14.00 µ Tbl = 66,00 %
6 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,15 %16 NS 2P S-2 -100 5 50.00
17 NS 5K E-2 100 6.2 62.00
18 NS 4P E+1 -450 1.4 14.00 µ Tbl = 42,00 %
1 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 47,89 %22 NS 4K S-1 -50 8 80.00
23 NS 3S E-1 100 7 70.00
24 NS 3S S-2 -100 3 30.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
11 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 50,89 %25 NS 5K W-2 200 7.4 74.00
26 NS 3K W-1 100 3.8 38.00
27 NS 4K S+2 170 7.4 74.00 µ Tbl = 62,00 %
10 VAN DOOREN André -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 54,93 %28 NS 4C N-1 -100 0.2 2.00
29 NS 2P E-1 100 0.2 2.00
30 NS 3K W-1 50 7.4 74.00 µ Tbl = 26,00 %
2 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 49,96 %31 NS 4C S+1 650 9.8 98.00
32 NS 2C S-2 -100 8.6 86.00
33 NS 6C N = 980 9.8 98.00 µ Tbl = 94,00 %
Total : 159,0 / 270 = 58,89 %
|
|