|
Tournoi du 26-03-12
1 63,52 A.3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
2 59,44 A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
3 57,78 A.1 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
4 55,37 A.6 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
5 48,52 A.4 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile
6 46,48 A.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAGMAN David
7 45,00 A.5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
8 43,15 A.7 DELHEZ Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard
9 41,67 A10 SALFI Huguette -WUYARD Alphonse
10 39,07 A.9 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 58,33 a.8 MASSART Jean -DOUETTE Albert
2 57,78 a.4 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian
3 57,41 a.3 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
4 53,52 a.6 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques
5 53,33 a.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
6 50,00 a.7 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
7 48,70 a.5 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude
8 43,89 a.9 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef
9 42,04 a.1 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga
10 35,00 a10 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard
PAIRE Nr : A.1 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
a.1 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 42,04 % 1 NS 1S S+1 120 18 100.00
2 NS 2T E = -90 10 55.56
3 NS 2T S = 90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a.3 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,41 % 4 NS 4C E-1 100 5 27.78
5 NS 1S E-1 50 9 50.00
6 NS 2C N-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 53,33 % 7 NS 3S S+3 690 14 77.78
8 NS 3S N = 400 9 50.00
9 NS 3C E-1 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.6 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,52 %10 NS 3S N-1 -100 6 33.33
11 NS 3S W = -400 7 38.89
12 NS 4C S+1 650 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.7 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 50,00 %13 NS 1S W = -90 14 77.78
14 NS 1S E-1 50 12 66.67
15 NS 1S S = 90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.8 MASSART Jean -DOUETTE Albert : 58,33 %16 NS 4C N+1 450 13 72.22
17 NS 2P N+3 200 16 88.89
18 NS 2P W+2 -170 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
a.9 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 43,89 %19 NS 2C E+1 -140 12 66.67
20 NS 5C E-1 100 17 94.44
21 NS 3S E+2 -460 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
a10 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 35,00 %22 NS 2T S = 90 12 66.67
23 NS 2C E = -110 12 66.67
24 NS 4PcE-4 800 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
a.4 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 57,78 %25 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 22.22
26 NS 3S E-2 200 9 50.00
27 NS 4C S+3 510 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
a.5 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 48,70 %28 NS 4C N+1 650 13 72.22
29 NS 6S W = -1440 6 33.33
30 NS 2P N-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 312,0 / 540 = 57,78 %
PAIRE Nr : A.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAGMAN David
a.3 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,41 % 1 NS 2T S-3 -150 2 11.11
2 NS 2P W+1 -140 5 27.78
3 NS 1S S-2 -100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
a.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 53,33 % 4 NS 4C W-1 100 5 27.78
5 NS 1S E-1 50 9 50.00
6 NS 1S N = 90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.1 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 42,04 % 7 NS 3S S+2 660 7 38.89
8 NS 3S N = 400 9 50.00
9 NS 4C E-2 200 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a10 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 35,00 %10 NS 3S N = 600 15 83.33
11 NS 3S W-1 50 13 72.22
12 NS 5KcW-2 300 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.4 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 57,78 %13 NS 1S N-3 -300 0 0.00
14 NS 1S W+2 -150 3 16.67
15 NS 1S S = 90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
a.5 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 48,70 %16 NS 4C N = 420 5 27.78
17 NS 3P N = 140 2 11.11
18 NS 2P W+2 -170 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.6 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,52 %19 NS 4C E-1 100 16 88.89
20 NS 4C E+1 -650 6 33.33
21 NS 3S E+2 -460 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.7 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 50,00 %22 NS 2T S = 90 12 66.67
23 NS 3C W-1 100 16 88.89
24 NS 4C N-2 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.8 MASSART Jean -DOUETTE Albert : 58,33 %25 NS 3S W-1 100 18 100.00
26 NS 1S E-2 200 9 50.00
27 NS 4C S+3 510 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.9 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 43,89 %28 NS 6ScS-3 -800 0 0.00
29 NS 3S E+1 -630 16 88.89
30 NS 3TcW-2 300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 251,0 / 540 = 46,48 %
PAIRE Nr : A.3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
a.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 53,33 % 1 NS 2C E+1 -140 6 33.33
2 NS 2P W-1 50 16 88.89
3 NS 2T S = 90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.1 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 42,04 % 4 NS 4CcE-1 200 15 83.33
5 NS 1S E-1 50 9 50.00
6 NS 2K E-2 200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
a.3 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,41 % 7 NS 3S S+3 690 14 77.78
8 NS 3S N+1 430 16 88.89
9 NS 4C E = -620 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.8 MASSART Jean -DOUETTE Albert : 58,33 %10 NS 4P N-1 -100 6 33.33
11 NS 3S W+2 -460 0 0.00
12 NS 4C S+1 650 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.9 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 43,89 %13 NS 2K N = 90 16 88.89
14 NS 2P E+1 -140 6 33.33
15 NS 1S S+1 120 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a10 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 35,00 %16 NS 4C N+1 450 13 72.22
17 NS 2P N+2 170 10 55.56
18 NS 2P W+2 -170 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
a.4 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 57,78 %19 NS 4C E-1 100 16 88.89
20 NS 6C E-1 100 17 94.44
21 NS 3S E+3 -490 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
a.5 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 48,70 %22 NS 2T S = 90 12 66.67
23 NS 4C W-2 200 18 100.00
24 NS 4CcN = 590 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
a.6 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,52 %25 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 22.22
26 NS 2S E-2 200 9 50.00
27 NS 6C S+1 1010 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.7 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 50,00 %28 NS 4C N+1 650 13 72.22
29 NS 6S E = -1440 6 33.33
30 NS 2C E-2 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 343,0 / 540 = 63,52 %
PAIRE Nr : A.4 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile
a.7 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 50,00 % 1 NS 1T S-1 -50 14 77.78
2 NS 3T E = -110 8 44.44
3 NS 1S S+2 150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
a.6 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,52 % 4 NS 4C W-1 100 5 27.78
5 NS 1S E = -90 2 11.11
6 NS 2C S = 110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.5 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 48,70 % 7 NS 3S S+1 630 2 11.11
8 NS 3S N-2 -100 0 0.00
9 NS 4C E-2 200 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
a.4 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 57,78 %10 NS 4P S-1 -100 6 33.33
11 NS 4C E = -420 4 22.22
12 NS 4C S = 620 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a10 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 35,00 %13 NS 2C S-1 -100 10 55.56
14 NS 3T W = -110 8 44.44
15 NS 1S S+1 120 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.9 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 43,89 %16 NS 4C N = 420 5 27.78
17 NS 2P N+1 140 2 11.11
18 NS 2P E+1 -140 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.8 MASSART Jean -DOUETTE Albert : 58,33 %19 NS 4C E = -620 4 22.22
20 NS 4C E+1 -650 6 33.33
21 NS 3S W+4 -520 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
a.3 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,41 %22 NS 2T S = 90 12 66.67
23 NS 2C E+1 -140 5 27.78
24 NS 4C N-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 53,33 %25 NS 3S E+1 -630 10 55.56
26 NS 3S E-4 400 17 94.44
27 NS 6C S = 980 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
a.1 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 42,04 %28 NS 4C N+1 650 13 72.22
29 NS 6S E = -1440 6 33.33
30 NS 2P S = 110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
Total : 262,0 / 540 = 48,52 %
PAIRE Nr : A.5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
a.8 MASSART Jean -DOUETTE Albert : 58,33 % 1 NS 2P E = -110 11 61.11
2 NS 2P W+1 -140 5 27.78
3 NS 1S S = 90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.7 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 50,00 % 4 NS 4C W-1 100 5 27.78
5 NS 1S E-1 50 9 50.00
6 NS 2C S = 110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.6 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,52 % 7 NS 3S S+2 660 7 38.89
8 NS 1S S+3 180 3 16.67
9 NS 4C E-1 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.1 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 42,04 %10 NS 4P S-1 -100 6 33.33
11 NS 3S E = -400 7 38.89
12 NS 4C N+1 650 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.5 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 48,70 %13 NS 2K N-2 -200 2 11.11
14 NS 3C N-1 -50 10 55.56
15 NS 1S S+1 120 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.4 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 57,78 %16 NS 4C N-1 -50 1 5.56
17 NS 2P N+2 170 10 55.56
18 NS 3KcS-4 -1100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
a10 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 35,00 %19 NS 4C E = -620 4 22.22
20 NS 4C E+1 -650 6 33.33
21 NS 6S W-1 50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.9 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 43,89 %22 NS 3T S-1 -50 4 22.22
23 NS 2P E = -110 12 66.67
24 NS 4C N = 420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.3 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,41 %25 NS 3S W+2 -660 4 22.22
26 NS 2S E-2 200 9 50.00
27 NS 6C S+1 1010 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 53,33 %28 NS 6C N-1 -100 4 22.22
29 NS 4S E+2 -690 14 77.78
30 NS 2P N-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 243,0 / 540 = 45,00 %
PAIRE Nr : A.6 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
a.9 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 43,89 % 1 NS 2P E = -110 11 61.11
2 NS 1P E = -80 12 66.67
3 NS 1S N+1 120 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
a.8 MASSART Jean -DOUETTE Albert : 58,33 % 4 NS 4P N-1 -100 0 0.00
5 NS 1S E-1 50 9 50.00
6 NS 2C N = 110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.7 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 50,00 % 7 NS 3S N+1 630 2 11.11
8 NS 2S N+2 180 3 16.67
9 NS 3S E-1 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
a.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 53,33 %10 NS 3S N = 600 15 83.33
11 NS 3S E-1 50 13 72.22
12 NS 4C N = 620 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a.1 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 42,04 %13 NS 2P E = -110 5 27.78
14 NS 2C N = 110 16 88.89
15 NS 1S N+1 120 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
a.6 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,52 %16 NS 4C N+1 450 13 72.22
17 NS 2P N+2 170 10 55.56
18 NS 3P E+1 -170 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
a.5 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 48,70 %19 NS 3S E = -600 10 55.56
20 NS 4C E = -620 12 66.67
21 NS 3S E+4 -520 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.4 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 57,78 %22 NS 2P E-1 100 18 100.00
23 NS 3C E = -140 5 27.78
24 NS 4C N-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a10 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 35,00 %25 NS 1CcN-3 -500 14 77.78
26 NS 3S E-3 300 14 77.78
27 NS 6C N+1 1010 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
a.3 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,41 %28 NS 4C N = 620 6 33.33
29 NS 6S E = -1440 6 33.33
30 NS 2P N-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 299,0 / 540 = 55,37 %
PAIRE Nr : A.7 DELHEZ Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard
a10 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 35,00 % 1 NS 2C W+1 -140 6 33.33
2 NS 2P W-1 50 16 88.89
3 NS 2C W-1 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.9 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 43,89 % 4 NS 2P N+1 140 10 55.56
5 NS 2T N-2 -200 0 0.00
6 NS 2C N = 110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.8 MASSART Jean -DOUETTE Albert : 58,33 % 7 NS 3S S+1 630 2 11.11
8 NS 3S N = 400 9 50.00
9 NS 4C E = -620 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
a.3 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,41 %10 NS 5P S-1 -100 6 33.33
11 NS 3S W-1 50 13 72.22
12 NS 3C S+1 170 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 53,33 %13 NS 2P E = -110 5 27.78
14 NS 1S W+2 -150 3 16.67
15 NS 1S S = 90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
a.1 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 42,04 %16 NS 4C N+1 450 13 72.22
17 NS 2P N+2 170 10 55.56
18 NS 4P E = -420 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.7 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 50,00 %19 NS 4C E = -620 4 22.22
20 NS 4C E+1 -650 6 33.33
21 NS 6Sc -1 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.6 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,52 %22 NS 2T S-1 -50 4 22.22
23 NS 3C E = -140 5 27.78
24 NS 4C N = 420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.5 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 48,70 %25 NS 2T W+2 -130 16 88.89
26 NS 3S W = -600 0 0.00
27 NS 4C S+3 510 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.4 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 57,78 %28 NS 4C N+1 650 13 72.22
29 NS 6S E = -1440 6 33.33
30 NS 2C E-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 233,0 / 540 = 43,15 %
PAIRE Nr : A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
a.4 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 57,78 % 1 NS 3TcS-2 -300 0 0.00
2 NS 3KcN-1 -200 2 11.11
3 NS 1S S = 90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
a10 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 35,00 % 4 NS 4CcW-1 200 15 83.33
5 NS 2T S = 90 16 88.89
6 NS 3T N-3 -150 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.9 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 43,89 % 7 NS 3S S+3 690 14 77.78
8 NS 3S N+1 430 16 88.89
9 NS 4C E-3 300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
a.5 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 48,70 %10 NS 4P S = 620 18 100.00
11 NS 3S W-3 150 18 100.00
12 NS 4C S+1 650 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 94,44 %
a.3 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,41 %13 NS 2C S-1 -100 10 55.56
14 NS 2C N = 110 16 88.89
15 NS 1S S+1 120 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
a.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 53,33 %16 NS 4C N+1 450 13 72.22
17 NS 2P N+2 170 10 55.56
18 NS 3K S-4 -400 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.1 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 42,04 %19 NS 4C E = -620 4 22.22
20 NS 5PcN-2 -500 14 77.78
21 NS 5K E = -400 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.8 MASSART Jean -DOUETTE Albert : 58,33 %22 NS 2K N = 90 12 66.67
23 NS 3C E = -140 5 27.78
24 NS 4C N-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
a.7 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 50,00 %25 NS 3S W+3 -690 0 0.00
26 NS 3S W-4 400 17 94.44
27 NS 6C S+1 1010 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.6 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,52 %28 NS 4C N+1 650 13 72.22
29 NS 6S E = -1440 6 33.33
30 NS 3T W-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 321,0 / 540 = 59,44 %
PAIRE Nr : A.9 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon
a.5 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 48,70 % 1 NS 3P W-1 50 16 88.89
2 NS 3CcS-4 -1100 0 0.00
3 NS 3S S-2 -100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.4 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 57,78 % 4 NS 4C W-2 200 15 83.33
5 NS 1CcW-1 100 18 100.00
6 NS 4C S-3 -150 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a10 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 35,00 % 7 NS 3S S+3 690 14 77.78
8 NS 3S N+1 430 16 88.89
9 NS 4C E-1 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
a.7 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 50,00 %10 NS 3P S = 140 12 66.67
11 NS 3S E+1 -430 2 11.11
12 NS 5K W-3 150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
a.6 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,52 %13 NS 1S N-1 -100 10 55.56
14 NS 1S W+3 -180 0 0.00
15 NS 2K S = 90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
a.3 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,41 %16 NS 4C N+1 450 13 72.22
17 NS 2P N+1 140 2 11.11
18 NS 2P W+2 -170 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 53,33 %19 NS 4C E-1 100 16 88.89
20 NS 4C E+2 -680 0 0.00
21 NS 6K E = -920 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.1 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 42,04 %22 NS 3T S-2 -100 0 0.00
23 NS 2C E = -110 12 66.67
24 NS 3S S-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.9 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 43,89 %25 NS 3S W+1 -630 10 55.56
26 NS 3K E-1 100 3 16.67
27 NS 4C S+3 510 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
a.8 MASSART Jean -DOUETTE Albert : 58,33 %28 NS 6CcN-2 -500 2 11.11
29 NS 6S E = -1440 6 33.33
30 NS 1S N-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
Total : 211,0 / 540 = 39,07 %
PAIRE Nr : A10 SALFI Huguette -WUYARD Alphonse
a.6 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,52 % 1 NS 2C W+1 -140 6 33.33
2 NS 3P W-1 50 16 88.89
3 NS 3P N-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.5 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 48,70 % 4 NS 4C E-2 200 15 83.33
5 NS 1S E-1 50 9 50.00
6 NS 2K N-2 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.4 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 57,78 % 7 NS 3S S+3 690 14 77.78
8 NS 3S N = 400 9 50.00
9 NS 3C E = -140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.9 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 43,89 %10 NS 4P N-2 -200 0 0.00
11 NS 3C E-1 50 13 72.22
12 NS 3T N+1 130 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
a.8 MASSART Jean -DOUETTE Albert : 58,33 %13 NS 2C E-1 100 18 100.00
14 NS 2C N = 110 16 88.89
15 NS 3K S-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.7 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 50,00 %16 NS 4C N-1 -50 1 5.56
17 NS 4P N = 420 18 100.00
18 NS 3KcN-4 -1100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.3 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,41 %19 NS 4C E = -620 4 22.22
20 NS 4C E+1 -650 6 33.33
21 NS 6S W = -990 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
a.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 53,33 %22 NS 3T S-1 -50 4 22.22
23 NS 2C E+2 -170 0 0.00
24 NS 4C N-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
a.1 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 42,04 %25 NS 3S E+1 -630 10 55.56
26 NS 1S E-1 100 3 16.67
27 NS 6C S+1 1010 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a10 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 35,00 %28 NS 4C N+1 650 13 72.22
29 NS 6S E-2 200 18 100.00
30 NS 2P S-2 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 225,0 / 540 = 41,67 %
PAIRE Nr : a.1 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga
A.1 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,78 % 1 EO 1S S+1 120 0 0.00
2 EO 2T E = -90 8 44.44
3 EO 2T S = 90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A.3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 63,52 % 4 EO 4CcE-1 200 3 16.67
5 EO 1S E-1 50 9 50.00
6 EO 2K E-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
A.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAGMAN David : 46,48 % 7 EO 3S S+2 660 11 61.11
8 EO 3S N = 400 9 50.00
9 EO 4C E-2 200 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A.5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,00 %10 EO 4P S-1 -100 12 66.67
11 EO 3S E = -400 11 61.11
12 EO 4C N+1 650 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.6 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 55,37 %13 EO 2P E = -110 13 72.22
14 EO 2C N = 110 2 11.11
15 EO 1S N+1 120 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
A.7 DELHEZ Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,15 %16 EO 4C N+1 450 5 27.78
17 EO 2P N+2 170 8 44.44
18 EO 4P E = -420 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,44 %19 EO 4C E = -620 14 77.78
20 EO 5PcN-2 -500 4 22.22
21 EO 5K E = -400 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.9 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 39,07 %22 EO 3T S-2 -100 18 100.00
23 EO 2C E = -110 6 33.33
24 EO 3S S-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A10 SALFI Huguette -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,67 %25 EO 3S E+1 -630 8 44.44
26 EO 1S E-1 100 15 83.33
27 EO 6C S+1 1010 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.4 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 48,52 %28 EO 4C N+1 650 5 27.78
29 EO 6S E = -1440 12 66.67
30 EO 2P S = 110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
Total : 227,0 / 540 = 42,04 %
PAIRE Nr : a.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
A.3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 63,52 % 1 EO 2C E+1 -140 12 66.67
2 EO 2P W-1 50 2 11.11
3 EO 2T S = 90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAGMAN David : 46,48 % 4 EO 4C W-1 100 13 72.22
5 EO 1S E-1 50 9 50.00
6 EO 1S N = 90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.1 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,78 % 7 EO 3S S+3 690 4 22.22
8 EO 3S N = 400 9 50.00
9 EO 3C E-1 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.6 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 55,37 %10 EO 3S N = 600 3 16.67
11 EO 3S E-1 50 5 27.78
12 EO 4C N = 620 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A.7 DELHEZ Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,15 %13 EO 2P E = -110 13 72.22
14 EO 1S W+2 -150 15 83.33
15 EO 1S S = 90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,44 %16 EO 4C N+1 450 5 27.78
17 EO 2P N+2 170 8 44.44
18 EO 3K S-4 -400 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.9 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 39,07 %19 EO 4C E-1 100 2 11.11
20 EO 4C E+2 -680 18 100.00
21 EO 6K E = -920 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A10 SALFI Huguette -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,67 %22 EO 3T S-1 -50 14 77.78
23 EO 2C E+2 -170 18 100.00
24 EO 4C N-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
A.4 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 48,52 %25 EO 3S E+1 -630 8 44.44
26 EO 3S E-4 400 1 5.56
27 EO 6C S = 980 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
A.5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,00 %28 EO 6C N-1 -100 14 77.78
29 EO 4S E+2 -690 4 22.22
30 EO 2P N-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 288,0 / 540 = 53,33 %
PAIRE Nr : a.3 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
A.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAGMAN David : 46,48 % 1 EO 2T S-3 -150 16 88.89
2 EO 2P W+1 -140 13 72.22
3 EO 1S S-2 -100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
A.1 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,78 % 4 EO 4C E-1 100 13 72.22
5 EO 1S E-1 50 9 50.00
6 EO 2C N-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A.3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 63,52 % 7 EO 3S S+3 690 4 22.22
8 EO 3S N+1 430 2 11.11
9 EO 4C E = -620 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A.7 DELHEZ Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,15 %10 EO 5P S-1 -100 12 66.67
11 EO 3S W-1 50 5 27.78
12 EO 3C S+1 170 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,44 %13 EO 2C S-1 -100 8 44.44
14 EO 2C N = 110 2 11.11
15 EO 1S S+1 120 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
A.9 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 39,07 %16 EO 4C N+1 450 5 27.78
17 EO 2P N+1 140 16 88.89
18 EO 2P W+2 -170 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A10 SALFI Huguette -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,67 %19 EO 4C E = -620 14 77.78
20 EO 4C E+1 -650 12 66.67
21 EO 6S W = -990 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
A.4 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 48,52 %22 EO 2T S = 90 6 33.33
23 EO 2C E+1 -140 13 72.22
24 EO 4C N-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,00 %25 EO 3S W+2 -660 14 77.78
26 EO 2S E-2 200 9 50.00
27 EO 6C S+1 1010 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.6 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 55,37 %28 EO 4C N = 620 12 66.67
29 EO 6S E = -1440 12 66.67
30 EO 2P N-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 310,0 / 540 = 57,41 %
PAIRE Nr : a.4 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,44 % 1 EO 3TcS-2 -300 18 100.00
2 EO 3KcN-1 -200 16 88.89
3 EO 1S S = 90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
A.9 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 39,07 % 4 EO 4C W-2 200 3 16.67
5 EO 1CcW-1 100 0 0.00
6 EO 4C S-3 -150 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A10 SALFI Huguette -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,67 % 7 EO 3S S+3 690 4 22.22
8 EO 3S N = 400 9 50.00
9 EO 3C E = -140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.4 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 48,52 %10 EO 4P S-1 -100 12 66.67
11 EO 4C E = -420 14 77.78
12 EO 4C S = 620 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAGMAN David : 46,48 %13 EO 1S N-3 -300 18 100.00
14 EO 1S W+2 -150 15 83.33
15 EO 1S S = 90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
A.5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,00 %16 EO 4C N-1 -50 17 94.44
17 EO 2P N+2 170 8 44.44
18 EO 3KcS-4 -1100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
A.3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 63,52 %19 EO 4C E-1 100 2 11.11
20 EO 6C E-1 100 1 5.56
21 EO 3S E+3 -490 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
A.6 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 55,37 %22 EO 2P E-1 100 0 0.00
23 EO 3C E = -140 13 72.22
24 EO 4C N-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.1 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,78 %25 EO 3S E+2 -660 14 77.78
26 EO 3S E-2 200 9 50.00
27 EO 4C S+3 510 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
A.7 DELHEZ Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,15 %28 EO 4C N+1 650 5 27.78
29 EO 6S E = -1440 12 66.67
30 EO 2C E-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 312,0 / 540 = 57,78 %
PAIRE Nr : a.5 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude
A.9 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 39,07 % 1 EO 3P W-1 50 2 11.11
2 EO 3CcS-4 -1100 18 100.00
3 EO 3S S-2 -100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A10 SALFI Huguette -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,67 % 4 EO 4C E-2 200 3 16.67
5 EO 1S E-1 50 9 50.00
6 EO 2K N-2 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.4 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 48,52 % 7 EO 3S S+1 630 16 88.89
8 EO 3S N-2 -100 18 100.00
9 EO 4C E-2 200 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,44 %10 EO 4P S = 620 0 0.00
11 EO 3S W-3 150 0 0.00
12 EO 4C S+1 650 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 5,56 %
A.5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,00 %13 EO 2K N-2 -200 16 88.89
14 EO 3C N-1 -50 8 44.44
15 EO 1S S+1 120 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAGMAN David : 46,48 %16 EO 4C N = 420 13 72.22
17 EO 3P N = 140 16 88.89
18 EO 2P W+2 -170 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.6 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 55,37 %19 EO 3S E = -600 8 44.44
20 EO 4C E = -620 6 33.33
21 EO 3S E+4 -520 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 63,52 %22 EO 2T S = 90 6 33.33
23 EO 4C W-2 200 0 0.00
24 EO 4CcN = 590 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
A.7 DELHEZ Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,15 %25 EO 2T W+2 -130 2 11.11
26 EO 3S W = -600 18 100.00
27 EO 4C S+3 510 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.1 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,78 %28 EO 4C N+1 650 5 27.78
29 EO 6S W = -1440 12 66.67
30 EO 2P N-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 263,0 / 540 = 48,70 %
PAIRE Nr : a.6 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques
A10 SALFI Huguette -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,67 % 1 EO 2C W+1 -140 12 66.67
2 EO 3P W-1 50 2 11.11
3 EO 3P N-3 -150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.4 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 48,52 % 4 EO 4C W-1 100 13 72.22
5 EO 1S E = -90 16 88.89
6 EO 2C S = 110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A.5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,00 % 7 EO 3S S+2 660 11 61.11
8 EO 1S S+3 180 15 83.33
9 EO 4C E-1 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.1 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,78 %10 EO 3S N-1 -100 12 66.67
11 EO 3S W = -400 11 61.11
12 EO 4C S+1 650 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.9 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 39,07 %13 EO 1S N-1 -100 8 44.44
14 EO 1S W+3 -180 18 100.00
15 EO 2K S = 90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
A.6 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 55,37 %16 EO 4C N+1 450 5 27.78
17 EO 2P N+2 170 8 44.44
18 EO 3P E+1 -170 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
A.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAGMAN David : 46,48 %19 EO 4C E-1 100 2 11.11
20 EO 4C E+1 -650 12 66.67
21 EO 3S E+2 -460 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.7 DELHEZ Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,15 %22 EO 2T S-1 -50 14 77.78
23 EO 3C E = -140 13 72.22
24 EO 4C N = 420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 63,52 %25 EO 3S E+2 -660 14 77.78
26 EO 2S E-2 200 9 50.00
27 EO 6C S+1 1010 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,44 %28 EO 4C N+1 650 5 27.78
29 EO 6S E = -1440 12 66.67
30 EO 3T W-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 289,0 / 540 = 53,52 %
PAIRE Nr : a.7 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
A.4 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 48,52 % 1 EO 1T S-1 -50 4 22.22
2 EO 3T E = -110 10 55.56
3 EO 1S S+2 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
A.5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,00 % 4 EO 4C W-1 100 13 72.22
5 EO 1S E-1 50 9 50.00
6 EO 2C S = 110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.6 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 55,37 % 7 EO 3S N+1 630 16 88.89
8 EO 2S N+2 180 15 83.33
9 EO 3S E-1 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
A.9 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 39,07 %10 EO 3P S = 140 6 33.33
11 EO 3S E+1 -430 16 88.89
12 EO 5K W-3 150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
A.1 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,78 %13 EO 1S W = -90 4 22.22
14 EO 1S E-1 50 6 33.33
15 EO 1S S = 90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A10 SALFI Huguette -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,67 %16 EO 4C N-1 -50 17 94.44
17 EO 4P N = 420 0 0.00
18 EO 3KcN-4 -1100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A.7 DELHEZ Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,15 %19 EO 4C E = -620 14 77.78
20 EO 4C E+1 -650 12 66.67
21 EO 6Sc -1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAGMAN David : 46,48 %22 EO 2T S = 90 6 33.33
23 EO 3C W-1 100 2 11.11
24 EO 4C N-2 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,44 %25 EO 3S W+3 -690 18 100.00
26 EO 3S W-4 400 1 5.56
27 EO 6C S+1 1010 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A.3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 63,52 %28 EO 4C N+1 650 5 27.78
29 EO 6S E = -1440 12 66.67
30 EO 2C E-2 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 270,0 / 540 = 50,00 %
PAIRE Nr : a.8 MASSART Jean -DOUETTE Albert
A.5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,00 % 1 EO 2P E = -110 7 38.89
2 EO 2P W+1 -140 13 72.22
3 EO 1S S = 90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.6 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 55,37 % 4 EO 4P N-1 -100 18 100.00
5 EO 1S E-1 50 9 50.00
6 EO 2C N = 110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.7 DELHEZ Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,15 % 7 EO 3S S+1 630 16 88.89
8 EO 3S N = 400 9 50.00
9 EO 4C E = -620 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
A.3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 63,52 %10 EO 4P N-1 -100 12 66.67
11 EO 3S W+2 -460 18 100.00
12 EO 4C S+1 650 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A10 SALFI Huguette -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,67 %13 EO 2C E-1 100 0 0.00
14 EO 2C N = 110 2 11.11
15 EO 3K S-1 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.1 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,78 %16 EO 4C N+1 450 5 27.78
17 EO 2P N+3 200 2 11.11
18 EO 2P W+2 -170 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
A.4 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 48,52 %19 EO 4C E = -620 14 77.78
20 EO 4C E+1 -650 12 66.67
21 EO 3S W+4 -520 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,44 %22 EO 2K N = 90 6 33.33
23 EO 3C E = -140 13 72.22
24 EO 4C N-3 -150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
A.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAGMAN David : 46,48 %25 EO 3S W-1 100 0 0.00
26 EO 1S E-2 200 9 50.00
27 EO 4C S+3 510 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.9 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 39,07 %28 EO 6CcN-2 -500 16 88.89
29 EO 6S E = -1440 12 66.67
30 EO 1S N-3 -150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
Total : 315,0 / 540 = 58,33 %
PAIRE Nr : a.9 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef
A.6 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 55,37 % 1 EO 2P E = -110 7 38.89
2 EO 1P E = -80 6 33.33
3 EO 1S N+1 120 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
A.7 DELHEZ Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,15 % 4 EO 2P N+1 140 8 44.44
5 EO 2T N-2 -200 18 100.00
6 EO 2C N = 110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,44 % 7 EO 3S S+3 690 4 22.22
8 EO 3S N+1 430 2 11.11
9 EO 4C E-3 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
A10 SALFI Huguette -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,67 %10 EO 4P N-2 -200 18 100.00
11 EO 3C E-1 50 5 27.78
12 EO 3T N+1 130 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
A.3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 63,52 %13 EO 2K N = 90 2 11.11
14 EO 2P E+1 -140 12 66.67
15 EO 1S S+1 120 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.4 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 48,52 %16 EO 4C N = 420 13 72.22
17 EO 2P N+1 140 16 88.89
18 EO 2P E+1 -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.1 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,78 %19 EO 2C E+1 -140 6 33.33
20 EO 5C E-1 100 1 5.56
21 EO 3S E+2 -460 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
A.5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,00 %22 EO 3T S-1 -50 14 77.78
23 EO 2P E = -110 6 33.33
24 EO 4C N = 420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.9 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 39,07 %25 EO 3S W+1 -630 8 44.44
26 EO 3K E-1 100 15 83.33
27 EO 4C S+3 510 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
A.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAGMAN David : 46,48 %28 EO 6ScS-3 -800 18 100.00
29 EO 3S E+1 -630 2 11.11
30 EO 3TcW-2 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 237,0 / 540 = 43,89 %
PAIRE Nr : a10 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard
A.7 DELHEZ Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,15 % 1 EO 2C W+1 -140 12 66.67
2 EO 2P W-1 50 2 11.11
3 EO 2C W-1 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,44 % 4 EO 4CcW-1 200 3 16.67
5 EO 2T S = 90 2 11.11
6 EO 3T N-3 -150 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.9 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 39,07 % 7 EO 3S S+3 690 4 22.22
8 EO 3S N+1 430 2 11.11
9 EO 4C E-1 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
A.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAGMAN David : 46,48 %10 EO 3S N = 600 3 16.67
11 EO 3S W-1 50 5 27.78
12 EO 5KcW-2 300 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.4 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 48,52 %13 EO 2C S-1 -100 8 44.44
14 EO 3T W = -110 10 55.56
15 EO 1S S+1 120 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 63,52 %16 EO 4C N+1 450 5 27.78
17 EO 2P N+2 170 8 44.44
18 EO 2P W+2 -170 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
A.5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,00 %19 EO 4C E = -620 14 77.78
20 EO 4C E+1 -650 12 66.67
21 EO 6S W-1 50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.1 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,78 %22 EO 2T S = 90 6 33.33
23 EO 2C E = -110 6 33.33
24 EO 4PcE-4 800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
A.6 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 55,37 %25 EO 1CcN-3 -500 4 22.22
26 EO 3S E-3 300 4 22.22
27 EO 6C N+1 1010 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
A10 SALFI Huguette -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,67 %28 EO 4C N+1 650 5 27.78
29 EO 6S E-2 200 0 0.00
30 EO 2P S-2 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 189,0 / 540 = 35,00 %
|
|