|
Tournoi du 26-07-10
1 71,06 9 HUBLET Carlo -de TERWANGNE Philippe
2 56,94 7 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
3 55,79 2 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
4 53,47 3 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
5 52,08 4 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean
6 48,38 1 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile
7 43,06 8 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon
8 42,59 5 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert
9 41,20 10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
10 35,42 6 LIBERT Laurent -HALLEUX Jean François
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 61,67 19 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
2 56,67 18 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard
3 56,25 11 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire
~ 56,25 16 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian
5 54,17 12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
6 48,54 15 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
7 45,42 13 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse
8 37,08 14 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne
9 33,96 17 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques
10 0,00 20 -
PAIRE Nr : 1 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile
11 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 56,25 % 1 NS 3S N+2 460 8 50.00
2 NS 1S W-1 50 8 50.00
3 NS 2S N-5 -250 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
13 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,42 % 4 NS 3T S-1 -100 16 100.00
5 NS 3PcN-3 -800 0 0.00
6 NS 4C E+1 -650 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 54,17 % 7 NS 3S S-1 -100 9 56.25
8 NS 4C E-1 50 15 93.75
9 NS 5T W+1 -620 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
16 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 56,25 %10 NS 4P E-1 100 11 68.75
11 NS 4P W = -420 3 18.75
12 NS 4P W = -420 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
17 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 33,96 %13 NS 4CcE-4 1100 16 100.00
14 NS 1S N+1 120 5 31.25
15 NS 3S N-1 -100 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
18 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 56,67 %16 NS 4P W = -620 1 6.25
17 NS 2T W-3 150 16 100.00
18 NS 3S E = -400 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
19 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 61,67 %19 NS 4P S-1 -50 5 31.25
20 NS 6S E = -1440 1 6.25
21 NS 4C W = -420 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
20 - : 0,00 %22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
14 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 37,08 %25 NS 4C N-1 -50 13 81.25
26 NS 4PcW+1 990 16 100.00
27 NS 2P E-1 50 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
15 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,54 %28 NS 2C S+1 140 14 87.50
29 NS 4P W+1 -650 3 18.75
30 NS 3C W = -140 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
Total : 209,0 / 432 = 48,38 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
13 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,42 % 1 NS 3S N+2 460 8 50.00
2 NS 1S W-2 100 14 87.50
3 NS 3S N-3 -150 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 54,17 % 4 NS 2C E+1 -140 8 50.00
5 NS 3P N-3 -300 6 37.50
6 NS 5C E = -650 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
11 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 56,25 % 7 NS 1S S+1 120 16 100.00
8 NS 3C E = -140 8 50.00
9 NS 3S E+1 -630 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
20 - : 0,00 %10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
14 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 37,08 %13 NS 5K S = 600 11 68.75
14 NS 2C N+1 140 14 87.50
15 NS 4K S = 130 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
15 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,54 %16 NS 4P W-1 100 11 68.75
17 NS 2C E = -110 6 37.50
18 NS 6S E-2 100 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
16 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 56,25 %19 NS 4PcN = 590 14 87.50
20 NS 6S E = -1440 1 6.25
21 NS 4C E = -420 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
17 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 33,96 %22 NS 4C S = 420 14 87.50
23 NS 1S S = 90 10 62.50
24 NS 2S N+1 150 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
18 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 56,67 %25 NS 2T W+2 -130 6 37.50
26 NS 5TcW-3 800 14 87.50
27 NS 3K N-1 -50 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
19 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 61,67 %28 NS 1C N = 80 4 25.00
29 NS 5TcS-2 -500 8 50.00
30 NS 2C W = -110 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
Total : 241,0 / 432 = 55,79 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 54,17 % 1 NS 3S N+2 460 8 50.00
2 NS 1S W-1 50 8 50.00
3 NS 2S N = 120 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
11 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 56,25 % 4 NS 2C W+1 -140 8 50.00
5 NS 3K W+2 -150 11 68.75
6 NS 4C E = -620 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
13 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,42 % 7 NS 2S S-1 -100 9 56.25
8 NS 3C E = -140 8 50.00
9 NS 3S E = -600 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
18 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 56,67 %10 NS 2P E+1 -140 8 50.00
11 NS 4P W = -420 3 18.75
12 NS 4P W = -420 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
19 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 61,67 %13 NS 5K N = 600 11 68.75
14 NS 1S N+1 120 5 31.25
15 NS 4K S-1 -100 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
20 - : 0,00 %16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
14 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 37,08 %19 NS 2S S-1 -50 5 31.25
20 NS 4C E+2 -680 14 87.50
21 NS 4C E = -420 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
15 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,54 %22 NS 4C N+1 450 16 100.00
23 NS 1S S+1 120 14 87.50
24 NS 2S N+1 150 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 91,67 %
16 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 56,25 %25 NS 3T W+1 -130 6 37.50
26 NS 4T E-2 200 2 12.50
27 NS 3K N = 110 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
17 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 33,96 %28 NS 1S N = 90 7 43.75
29 NS 4P W+1 -650 3 18.75
30 NS 2C W = -110 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
Total : 231,0 / 432 = 53,47 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean
17 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 33,96 % 1 NS 3ScN+2 750 16 100.00
2 NS 1S W-3 150 16 100.00
3 NS 2S S = 120 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 97,92 %
16 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 56,25 % 4 NS 2C W+1 -140 8 50.00
5 NS 5KcW = -550 4 25.00
6 NS 5C E = -650 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
15 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,54 % 7 NS 2P W = -110 2 12.50
8 NS 3C E = -140 8 50.00
9 NS 5T W+1 -620 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
14 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 37,08 %10 NS 5P W-1 100 11 68.75
11 NS 2P W+2 -170 10 62.50
12 NS 4P W = -420 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
20 - : 0,00 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
19 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 61,67 %16 NS 5CcS-3 -500 4 25.00
17 NS 3C E-1 50 13 81.25
18 NS 3S E+2 -460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
18 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 56,67 %19 NS 4PcN-1 -100 0 0.00
20 NS 4C E+2 -680 14 87.50
21 NS 4C E = -420 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
13 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,42 %22 NS 3C S+1 170 11 68.75
23 NS 2K E-1 100 12 75.00
24 NS 2S N = 120 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 54,17 %25 NS 2T W+2 -130 6 37.50
26 NS 4T W-3 300 6 37.50
27 NS 3S N+1 430 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
11 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 56,25 %28 NS 2K W-2 100 10 62.50
29 NS 4P W+1 -650 3 18.75
30 NS 2S S-2 -100 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
Total : 225,0 / 432 = 52,08 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert
18 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 56,67 % 1 NS 3S N+2 460 8 50.00
2 NS 1S W = -90 2 12.50
3 NS 2P E = -110 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
17 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 33,96 % 4 NS 1C W+2 -140 8 50.00
5 NS 2P N-1 -100 16 100.00
6 NS 4C E+1 -650 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
16 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 56,25 % 7 NS 1S S-1 -100 9 56.25
8 NS 3C E+1 -170 2 12.50
9 NS 3S E+3 -690 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
11 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 56,25 %10 NS 4P E = -620 1 6.25
11 NS 3P W+1 -170 10 62.50
12 NS 4P W = -420 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
15 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,54 %13 NS 4K S = 130 5 31.25
14 NS 1S N+1 120 5 31.25
15 NS 4K S-1 -100 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
14 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 37,08 %16 NS 4P W-1 100 11 68.75
17 NS 2C E = -110 6 37.50
18 NS 3S E+1 -430 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
20 - : 0,00 %19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
19 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 61,67 %22 NS 2S S = 120 4 25.00
23 NS 3K E-3 300 16 100.00
24 NS 2S N-1 -50 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
13 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,42 %25 NS 3C N-2 -100 10 62.50
26 NS 4TcW-2 500 10 62.50
27 NS 1S N+1 120 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 54,17 %28 NS 1S N = 90 7 43.75
29 NS 5P W = -650 3 18.75
30 NS 2C W-1 50 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
Total : 184,0 / 432 = 42,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 LIBERT Laurent -HALLEUX Jean François
19 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 61,67 % 1 NS 3S N+2 460 8 50.00
2 NS 1S W+1 -120 0 0.00
3 NS 1S N-1 -50 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
18 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 56,67 % 4 NS 2C W+2 -170 0 0.00
5 NS 3KcW+2 -670 2 12.50
6 NS 5C E-1 100 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
17 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 33,96 % 7 NS 4T N-1 -100 9 56.25
8 NS 3C W = -140 8 50.00
9 NS 5T W = -600 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 54,17 %10 NS 2C E+2 -170 5 31.25
11 NS 4P W = -420 3 18.75
12 NS 4P W = -420 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
11 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 56,25 %13 NS 5K S-1 -100 1 6.25
14 NS 1S N+1 120 5 31.25
15 NS 3S N-5 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 12,50 %
16 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 56,25 %16 NS 4P W-1 100 11 68.75
17 NS 3C W+1 -170 0 0.00
18 NS 3S W+1 -430 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
15 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,54 %19 NS 4P N-1 -50 5 31.25
20 NS 6C E = -1430 5 31.25
21 NS 4C W = -420 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
14 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 37,08 %22 NS 2C N+1 140 8 50.00
23 NS 1S S-1 -100 7 43.75
24 NS 2S N = 120 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
20 - : 0,00 %25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00
27 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
13 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,42 %28 NS 1S W-1 50 2 12.50
29 NS 5T S-3 -300 10 62.50
30 NS 2P N-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
Total : 153,0 / 432 = 35,42 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
20 - : 0,00 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
19 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 61,67 % 4 NS 2C W+1 -140 8 50.00
5 NS 4K W+1 -150 11 68.75
6 NS 4C E = -620 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
18 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 56,67 % 7 NS 2P W = -110 2 12.50
8 NS 2C E-1 50 15 93.75
9 NS 6S W-3 300 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
13 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,42 %10 NS 2C E+2 -170 5 31.25
11 NS 4PcW-1 100 16 100.00
12 NS 3P W+1 -170 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 54,17 %13 NS 5K N-1 -100 1 6.25
14 NS 1S N+1 120 5 31.25
15 NS 2S N+1 150 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
11 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 56,25 %16 NS 4P W-1 100 11 68.75
17 NS 3K N-2 -100 10 62.50
18 NS 3S E = -400 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
17 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 33,96 %19 NS 2P N+2 170 12 75.00
20 NS 3S W+3 -690 9 56.25
21 NS 4C E = -420 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
16 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 56,25 %22 NS 2S S = 120 4 25.00
23 NS 2P N-2 -200 2 12.50
24 NS 3S N-1 -50 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
15 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,54 %25 NS 4C N-1 -50 13 81.25
26 NS 3T W-2 200 2 12.50
27 NS 3S N-2 -100 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
14 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 37,08 %28 NS 1S N+2 150 16 100.00
29 NS 4P W-1 100 15 93.75
30 NS 3C W-1 50 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 91,67 %
Total : 246,0 / 432 = 56,94 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon
14 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 37,08 % 1 NS 5K S = 400 0 0.00
2 NS 1S W-1 50 8 50.00
3 NS 2S N-2 -100 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
20 - : 0,00 % 4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
19 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 61,67 % 7 NS 2P W = -110 2 12.50
8 NS 3S E+1 -430 0 0.00
9 NS 3S E+2 -660 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 8,33 %
15 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,54 %10 NS 4P W-2 200 15 93.75
11 NS 3P W+1 -170 10 62.50
12 NS 4P W = -420 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
13 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,42 %13 NS 5K S = 600 11 68.75
14 NS 1S N+1 120 5 31.25
15 NS 3S N-1 -100 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 54,17 %16 NS 4P W = -620 1 6.25
17 NS 2C E+1 -140 2 12.50
18 NS 3S W+1 -430 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 14,58 %
11 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 56,25 %19 NS 4P N-1 -50 5 31.25
20 NS 4C E+2 -680 14 87.50
21 NS 4C E = -420 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
18 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 56,67 %22 NS 2S S = 120 4 25.00
23 NS 2P N-2 -200 2 12.50
24 NS 3S S-1 -50 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
17 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 33,96 %25 NS 2C S+1 140 16 100.00
26 NS 3C E-4 400 8 50.00
27 NS 3K N = 110 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
16 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 56,25 %28 NS 1S N+1 120 12 75.00
29 NS 3P W+1 -170 12 75.00
30 NS 3C W-1 50 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
Total : 186,0 / 432 = 43,06 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 HUBLET Carlo -de TERWANGNE Philippe
15 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,54 % 1 NS 3S N+2 460 8 50.00
2 NS 1S W-1 50 8 50.00
3 NS 3S N-2 -100 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
14 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 37,08 % 4 NS 2C W+1 -140 8 50.00
5 NS 3K W+2 -150 11 68.75
6 NS 5C E-1 100 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
20 - : 0,00 % 7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
17 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 33,96 %10 NS 4C E-2 200 15 93.75
11 NS 5T S-2 -100 14 87.50
12 NS 4P W-1 50 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 93,75 %
16 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 56,25 %13 NS 3S N = 600 11 68.75
14 NS 2C N+2 170 16 100.00
15 NS 3K S+1 130 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
13 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,42 %16 NS 4P E-1 100 11 68.75
17 NS 1S W-1 50 13 81.25
18 NS 6S E-2 100 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 54,17 %19 NS 3PcS+1 630 16 100.00
20 NS 6C E = -1430 5 31.25
21 NS 4C E-1 50 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
11 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 56,25 %22 NS 3C S+1 170 11 68.75
23 NS 1S S-1 -100 7 43.75
24 NS 2S N+1 150 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
19 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 61,67 %25 NS 4CcN-2 -300 2 12.50
26 NS 4P S+1 650 12 75.00
27 NS 2C W-3 150 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
18 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 56,67 %28 NS 3S N-1 -100 0 0.00
29 NS 4P W-1 100 15 93.75
30 NS 3C W-1 50 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
Total : 307,0 / 432 = 71,06 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
16 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 56,25 % 1 NS 3S N+2 460 8 50.00
2 NS 1S W-1 50 8 50.00
3 NS 2S N-2 -100 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
15 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,54 % 4 NS 2C W+1 -140 8 50.00
5 NS 3K W+2 -150 11 68.75
6 NS 4C E = -620 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
14 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 37,08 % 7 NS 2P W-1 100 14 87.50
8 NS 2C E+1 -140 8 50.00
9 NS 6S E-3 300 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
19 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 61,67 %10 NS 4P W = -620 1 6.25
11 NS 4P E = -420 3 18.75
12 NS 4P E = -420 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
18 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 56,67 %13 NS 4K S = 130 5 31.25
14 NS 3K N+1 130 12 75.00
15 NS 5KcS-1 -200 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
17 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 33,96 %16 NS 4P E-1 100 11 68.75
17 NS 2P W = -110 6 37.50
18 NS 3S E = -400 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
13 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,42 %19 NS 2P S+1 140 10 62.50
20 NS 3S W+3 -690 9 56.25
21 NS 4C E+1 -450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 54,17 %22 NS 3S S-1 -50 0 0.00
23 NS 3C S-2 -200 2 12.50
24 NS 2S N = 120 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
11 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 56,25 %25 NS 2TcW+2 -580 0 0.00
26 NS 3P S+2 200 2 12.50
27 NS 3S N-2 -100 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 6,25 %
20 - : 0,00 %28 NS BYE 0 0.00
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 178,0 / 432 = 41,20 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire
1 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 48,38 % 1 EO 3S N+2 460 8 50.00
2 EO 1S W-1 50 8 50.00
3 EO 2S N-5 -250 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
3 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,47 % 4 EO 2C W+1 -140 8 50.00
5 EO 3K W+2 -150 5 31.25
6 EO 4C E = -620 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
2 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 55,79 % 7 EO 1S S+1 120 0 0.00
8 EO 3C E = -140 8 50.00
9 EO 3S E+1 -630 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
5 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,59 %10 EO 4P E = -620 15 93.75
11 EO 3P W+1 -170 6 37.50
12 EO 4P W = -420 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
6 LIBERT Laurent -HALLEUX Jean François : 35,42 %13 EO 5K S-1 -100 15 93.75
14 EO 1S N+1 120 11 68.75
15 EO 3S N-5 -500 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 87,50 %
7 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 56,94 %16 EO 4P W-1 100 5 31.25
17 EO 3K N-2 -100 6 37.50
18 EO 3S E = -400 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
8 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 43,06 %19 EO 4P N-1 -50 11 68.75
20 EO 4C E+2 -680 2 12.50
21 EO 4C E = -420 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
9 HUBLET Carlo -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 71,06 %22 EO 3C S+1 170 5 31.25
23 EO 1S S-1 -100 9 56.25
24 EO 2S N+1 150 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 41,20 %25 EO 2TcW+2 -580 16 100.00
26 EO 3P S+2 200 14 87.50
27 EO 3S N-2 -100 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 93,75 %
4 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 52,08 %28 EO 2K W-2 100 6 37.50
29 EO 4P W+1 -650 13 81.25
30 EO 2S S-2 -100 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
Total : 270,0 / 480 = 56,25 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
3 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,47 % 1 EO 3S N+2 460 8 50.00
2 EO 1S W-1 50 8 50.00
3 EO 2S N = 120 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
2 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 55,79 % 4 EO 2C E+1 -140 8 50.00
5 EO 3P N-3 -300 10 62.50
6 EO 5C E = -650 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
1 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 48,38 % 7 EO 3S S-1 -100 7 43.75
8 EO 4C E-1 50 1 6.25
9 EO 5T W+1 -620 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
6 LIBERT Laurent -HALLEUX Jean François : 35,42 %10 EO 2C E+2 -170 11 68.75
11 EO 4P W = -420 13 81.25
12 EO 4P W = -420 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
7 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 56,94 %13 EO 5K N-1 -100 15 93.75
14 EO 1S N+1 120 11 68.75
15 EO 2S N+1 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
8 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 43,06 %16 EO 4P W = -620 15 93.75
17 EO 2C E+1 -140 14 87.50
18 EO 3S W+1 -430 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 85,42 %
9 HUBLET Carlo -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 71,06 %19 EO 3PcS+1 630 0 0.00
20 EO 6C E = -1430 11 68.75
21 EO 4C E-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 41,20 %22 EO 3S S-1 -50 16 100.00
23 EO 3C S-2 -200 14 87.50
24 EO 2S N = 120 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
4 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 52,08 %25 EO 2T W+2 -130 10 62.50
26 EO 4T W-3 300 10 62.50
27 EO 3S N+1 430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
5 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,59 %28 EO 1S N = 90 9 56.25
29 EO 5P W = -650 13 81.25
30 EO 2C W-1 50 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
Total : 260,0 / 480 = 54,17 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse
2 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 55,79 % 1 EO 3S N+2 460 8 50.00
2 EO 1S W-2 100 2 12.50
3 EO 3S N-3 -150 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
1 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 48,38 % 4 EO 3T S-1 -100 0 0.00
5 EO 3PcN-3 -800 16 100.00
6 EO 4C E+1 -650 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
3 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,47 % 7 EO 2S S-1 -100 7 43.75
8 EO 3C E = -140 8 50.00
9 EO 3S E = -600 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
7 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 56,94 %10 EO 2C E+2 -170 11 68.75
11 EO 4PcW-1 100 0 0.00
12 EO 3P W+1 -170 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
8 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 43,06 %13 EO 5K S = 600 5 31.25
14 EO 1S N+1 120 11 68.75
15 EO 3S N-1 -100 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
9 HUBLET Carlo -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 71,06 %16 EO 4P E-1 100 5 31.25
17 EO 1S W-1 50 3 18.75
18 EO 6S E-2 100 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 41,20 %19 EO 2P S+1 140 6 37.50
20 EO 3S W+3 -690 7 43.75
21 EO 4C E+1 -450 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
4 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 52,08 %22 EO 3C S+1 170 5 31.25
23 EO 2K E-1 100 4 25.00
24 EO 2S N = 120 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
5 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,59 %25 EO 3C N-2 -100 6 37.50
26 EO 4TcW-2 500 6 37.50
27 EO 1S N+1 120 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
6 LIBERT Laurent -HALLEUX Jean François : 35,42 %28 EO 1S W-1 50 14 87.50
29 EO 5T S-3 -300 6 37.50
30 EO 2P N-3 -150 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
Total : 218,0 / 480 = 45,42 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne
8 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 43,06 % 1 EO 5K S = 400 16 100.00
2 EO 1S W-1 50 8 50.00
3 EO 2S N-2 -100 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
9 HUBLET Carlo -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 71,06 % 4 EO 2C W+1 -140 8 50.00
5 EO 3K W+2 -150 5 31.25
6 EO 5C E-1 100 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 41,20 % 7 EO 2P W-1 100 2 12.50
8 EO 2C E+1 -140 8 50.00
9 EO 6S E-3 300 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
4 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 52,08 %10 EO 5P W-1 100 5 31.25
11 EO 2P W+2 -170 6 37.50
12 EO 4P W = -420 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
2 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 55,79 %13 EO 5K S = 600 5 31.25
14 EO 2C N+1 140 2 12.50
15 EO 4K S = 130 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
5 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,59 %16 EO 4P W-1 100 5 31.25
17 EO 2C E = -110 10 62.50
18 EO 3S E+1 -430 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
3 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,47 %19 EO 2S S-1 -50 11 68.75
20 EO 4C E+2 -680 2 12.50
21 EO 4C E = -420 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
6 LIBERT Laurent -HALLEUX Jean François : 35,42 %22 EO 2C N+1 140 8 50.00
23 EO 1S S-1 -100 9 56.25
24 EO 2S N = 120 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
1 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 48,38 %25 EO 4C N-1 -50 3 18.75
26 EO 4PcW+1 990 0 0.00
27 EO 2P E-1 50 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
7 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 56,94 %28 EO 1S N+2 150 0 0.00
29 EO 4P W-1 100 1 6.25
30 EO 3C W-1 50 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 8,33 %
Total : 178,0 / 480 = 37,08 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
9 HUBLET Carlo -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 71,06 % 1 EO 3S N+2 460 8 50.00
2 EO 1S W-1 50 8 50.00
3 EO 3S N-2 -100 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 41,20 % 4 EO 2C W+1 -140 8 50.00
5 EO 3K W+2 -150 5 31.25
6 EO 4C E = -620 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
4 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 52,08 % 7 EO 2P W = -110 14 87.50
8 EO 3C E = -140 8 50.00
9 EO 5T W+1 -620 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
8 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 43,06 %10 EO 4P W-2 200 1 6.25
11 EO 3P W+1 -170 6 37.50
12 EO 4P W = -420 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
5 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,59 %13 EO 4K S = 130 11 68.75
14 EO 1S N+1 120 11 68.75
15 EO 4K S-1 -100 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
2 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 55,79 %16 EO 4P W-1 100 5 31.25
17 EO 2C E = -110 10 62.50
18 EO 6S E-2 100 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
6 LIBERT Laurent -HALLEUX Jean François : 35,42 %19 EO 4P N-1 -50 11 68.75
20 EO 6C E = -1430 11 68.75
21 EO 4C W = -420 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
3 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,47 %22 EO 4C N+1 450 0 0.00
23 EO 1S S+1 120 2 12.50
24 EO 2S N+1 150 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 8,33 %
7 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 56,94 %25 EO 4C N-1 -50 3 18.75
26 EO 3T W-2 200 14 87.50
27 EO 3S N-2 -100 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
1 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 48,38 %28 EO 2C S+1 140 2 12.50
29 EO 4P W+1 -650 13 81.25
30 EO 3C W = -140 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
Total : 233,0 / 480 = 48,54 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 41,20 % 1 EO 3S N+2 460 8 50.00
2 EO 1S W-1 50 8 50.00
3 EO 2S N-2 -100 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
4 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 52,08 % 4 EO 2C W+1 -140 8 50.00
5 EO 5KcW = -550 12 75.00
6 EO 5C E = -650 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
5 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,59 % 7 EO 1S S-1 -100 7 43.75
8 EO 3C E+1 -170 14 87.50
9 EO 3S E+3 -690 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
1 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 48,38 %10 EO 4P E-1 100 5 31.25
11 EO 4P W = -420 13 81.25
12 EO 4P W = -420 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
9 HUBLET Carlo -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 71,06 %13 EO 3S N = 600 5 31.25
14 EO 2C N+2 170 0 0.00
15 EO 3K S+1 130 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
6 LIBERT Laurent -HALLEUX Jean François : 35,42 %16 EO 4P W-1 100 5 31.25
17 EO 3C W+1 -170 16 100.00
18 EO 3S W+1 -430 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
2 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 55,79 %19 EO 4PcN = 590 2 12.50
20 EO 6S E = -1440 15 93.75
21 EO 4C E = -420 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
7 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 56,94 %22 EO 2S S = 120 12 75.00
23 EO 2P N-2 -200 14 87.50
24 EO 3S N-1 -50 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
3 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,47 %25 EO 3T W+1 -130 10 62.50
26 EO 4T E-2 200 14 87.50
27 EO 3K N = 110 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
8 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 43,06 %28 EO 1S N+1 120 4 25.00
29 EO 3P W+1 -170 4 25.00
30 EO 3C W-1 50 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
Total : 270,0 / 480 = 56,25 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques
4 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 52,08 % 1 EO 3ScN+2 750 0 0.00
2 EO 1S W-3 150 0 0.00
3 EO 2S S = 120 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 2,08 %
5 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,59 % 4 EO 1C W+2 -140 8 50.00
5 EO 2P N-1 -100 0 0.00
6 EO 4C E+1 -650 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
6 LIBERT Laurent -HALLEUX Jean François : 35,42 % 7 EO 4T N-1 -100 7 43.75
8 EO 3C W = -140 8 50.00
9 EO 5T W = -600 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
9 HUBLET Carlo -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 71,06 %10 EO 4C E-2 200 1 6.25
11 EO 5T S-2 -100 2 12.50
12 EO 4P W-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 6,25 %
1 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 48,38 %13 EO 4CcE-4 1100 0 0.00
14 EO 1S N+1 120 11 68.75
15 EO 3S N-1 -100 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 41,20 %16 EO 4P E-1 100 5 31.25
17 EO 2P W = -110 10 62.50
18 EO 3S E = -400 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
7 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 56,94 %19 EO 2P N+2 170 4 25.00
20 EO 3S W+3 -690 7 43.75
21 EO 4C E = -420 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
2 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 55,79 %22 EO 4C S = 420 2 12.50
23 EO 1S S = 90 6 37.50
24 EO 2S N+1 150 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
8 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 43,06 %25 EO 2C S+1 140 0 0.00
26 EO 3C E-4 400 8 50.00
27 EO 3K N = 110 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
3 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,47 %28 EO 1S N = 90 9 56.25
29 EO 4P W+1 -650 13 81.25
30 EO 2C W = -110 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
Total : 163,0 / 480 = 33,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard
5 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,59 % 1 EO 3S N+2 460 8 50.00
2 EO 1S W = -90 14 87.50
3 EO 2P E = -110 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
6 LIBERT Laurent -HALLEUX Jean François : 35,42 % 4 EO 2C W+2 -170 16 100.00
5 EO 3KcW+2 -670 14 87.50
6 EO 5C E-1 100 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
7 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 56,94 % 7 EO 2P W = -110 14 87.50
8 EO 2C E-1 50 1 6.25
9 EO 6S W-3 300 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
3 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,47 %10 EO 2P E+1 -140 8 50.00
11 EO 4P W = -420 13 81.25
12 EO 4P W = -420 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 41,20 %13 EO 4K S = 130 11 68.75
14 EO 3K N+1 130 4 25.00
15 EO 5KcS-1 -200 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
1 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 48,38 %16 EO 4P W = -620 15 93.75
17 EO 2T W-3 150 0 0.00
18 EO 3S E = -400 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
4 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 52,08 %19 EO 4PcN-1 -100 16 100.00
20 EO 4C E+2 -680 2 12.50
21 EO 4C E = -420 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
8 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 43,06 %22 EO 2S S = 120 12 75.00
23 EO 2P N-2 -200 14 87.50
24 EO 3S S-1 -50 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
2 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 55,79 %25 EO 2T W+2 -130 10 62.50
26 EO 5TcW-3 800 2 12.50
27 EO 3K N-1 -50 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 HUBLET Carlo -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 71,06 %28 EO 3S N-1 -100 16 100.00
29 EO 4P W-1 100 1 6.25
30 EO 3C W-1 50 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
Total : 272,0 / 480 = 56,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
6 LIBERT Laurent -HALLEUX Jean François : 35,42 % 1 EO 3S N+2 460 8 50.00
2 EO 1S W+1 -120 16 100.00
3 EO 1S N-1 -50 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
7 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 56,94 % 4 EO 2C W+1 -140 8 50.00
5 EO 4K W+1 -150 5 31.25
6 EO 4C E = -620 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
8 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 43,06 % 7 EO 2P W = -110 14 87.50
8 EO 3S E+1 -430 16 100.00
9 EO 3S E+2 -660 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 91,67 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 41,20 %10 EO 4P W = -620 15 93.75
11 EO 4P E = -420 13 81.25
12 EO 4P E = -420 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
3 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,47 %13 EO 5K N = 600 5 31.25
14 EO 1S N+1 120 11 68.75
15 EO 4K S-1 -100 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
4 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 52,08 %16 EO 5CcS-3 -500 12 75.00
17 EO 3C E-1 50 3 18.75
18 EO 3S E+2 -460 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
1 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 48,38 %19 EO 4P S-1 -50 11 68.75
20 EO 6S E = -1440 15 93.75
21 EO 4C W = -420 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
5 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,59 %22 EO 2S S = 120 12 75.00
23 EO 3K E-3 300 0 0.00
24 EO 2S N-1 -50 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
9 HUBLET Carlo -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 71,06 %25 EO 4CcN-2 -300 14 87.50
26 EO 4P S+1 650 4 25.00
27 EO 2C W-3 150 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
2 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 55,79 %28 EO 1C N = 80 12 75.00
29 EO 5TcS-2 -500 8 50.00
30 EO 2C W = -110 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
Total : 296,0 / 480 = 61,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 -
7 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 56,94 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
8 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 43,06 % 4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
9 HUBLET Carlo -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 71,06 % 7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
2 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 55,79 %10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
4 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 52,08 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
3 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,47 %16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
5 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,59 %19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
1 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 48,38 %22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 LIBERT Laurent -HALLEUX Jean François : 35,42 %25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00
27 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 41,20 %28 EO BYE 0 0.00
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 480 = 0,00 %
|
|