|
Tournoi du 26-12-11
1 62,96 A.4 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy
2 56,67 A.2 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe
3 53,33 A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
4 51,67 A.1 VAGMAN David -CLERIN François-Xavier
5 50,56 A.3 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
6 50,19 A.7 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine
7 49,63 A10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
~ 49,63 A11 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin
9 48,15 A.6 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry
10 39,63 A.5 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
11 37,59 A.9 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 64,63 a.3 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie
2 58,70 a.1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
3 57,04 a.4 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
4 56,67 a.6 LAENENS René -CHANTRAINE René
5 48,52 a.7 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques
6 47,41 a.5 HALLEUX Jean François -STEED Mercédès
7 44,44 a11 MOLS Bruno -LIBERT Laurent
8 43,70 a.2 POULAERT Gilbert -ROGIERS Marga
9 42,96 a.9 MASSART Jean -DOUETTE Albert
~ 42,96 a10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
~ 42,96 a.8 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse
PAIRE Nr : A.1 VAGMAN David -CLERIN François-Xavier
a.1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 58,70 % 1 NS 3T W = -110 9 50.00
2 NS 2C S+2 170 18 100.00
3 NS 3S E+2 -660 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a11 MOLS Bruno -LIBERT Laurent : 44,44 % 4 NS 4P N+1 650 18 100.00
5 NS 3C S = 140 8 44.44
6 NS 6S W-1 100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 42,96 % 7 NS 2C E+2 -170 16 88.89
8 NS 3C W-2 100 15 83.33
9 NS Pass Passe 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
a.9 MASSART Jean -DOUETTE Albert : 42,96 %10 NS 5T E = -600 6 33.33
11 NS 3S N+1 430 11 61.11
12 NS 2S E-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.8 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,96 %13 NS 4P W-2 200 14 77.78
14 NS 3S S+1 430 12 66.67
15 NS 2P E+1 -140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.7 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,52 %16 NS 3S N = 400 7 38.89
17 NS 3S E+1 -430 4 22.22
18 NS 3C E = -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
a.6 LAENENS René -CHANTRAINE René : 56,67 %19 NS 3S N+2 460 17 94.44
20 NS 4P S = 620 9 50.00
21 NS 2P W+1 -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
a.5 HALLEUX Jean François -STEED Mercédès : 47,41 %22 NS 1S S = 90 6 33.33
23 NS 2T N+3 150 4 22.22
24 NS 4P W = -420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.4 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 57,04 %25 NS 3S W = -600 9 50.00
26 NS 5T N-2 -200 5 27.78
27 NS 2P W = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.3 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 64,63 %28 NS 3S E+1 -430 1 5.56
29 NS 3S E+1 -630 4 22.22
30 NS 3P W = -140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
Total : 279,0 / 540 = 51,67 %
PAIRE Nr : A.2 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe
a.2 POULAERT Gilbert -ROGIERS Marga : 43,70 % 4 NS 4P N-1 -100 8 44.44
5 NS 2C S+3 200 16 88.89
6 NS 3S W+2 -660 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 58,70 % 7 NS 4C E-1 100 18 100.00
8 NS 4C W-1 50 12 66.67
9 NS 2P W+1 -140 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a11 MOLS Bruno -LIBERT Laurent : 44,44 %10 NS 3S E-5 500 18 100.00
11 NS 3S N+1 430 11 61.11
12 NS 2S W = -120 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 42,96 %13 NS 3S E+2 -660 0 0.00
14 NS 3S N+1 430 12 66.67
15 NS 3KcS = 670 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.9 MASSART Jean -DOUETTE Albert : 42,96 %16 NS 3S S = 400 7 38.89
17 NS 3S E-2 100 18 100.00
18 NS 3S S-4 -400 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.8 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,96 %19 NS 3S S+1 430 12 66.67
20 NS 3S N+3 690 17 94.44
21 NS 2P E+1 -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
a.7 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,52 %22 NS 1P N = 80 4 22.22
23 NS 1S W-6 600 11 61.11
24 NS 4P W = -420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.6 LAENENS René -CHANTRAINE René : 56,67 %25 NS 3S E+2 -660 2 11.11
26 NS 4S S-1 -100 15 83.33
27 NS 2P W-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.5 HALLEUX Jean François -STEED Mercédès : 47,41 %28 NS 4K W = -130 9 50.00
29 NS 3S W+1 -630 4 22.22
30 NS 4P E-1 50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.4 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 57,04 %31 NS 3S E+1 -430 5 27.78
32 NS 4S E+2 -690 11 61.11
33 NS 1S E+1 -120 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 306,0 / 540 = 56,67 %
PAIRE Nr : A.3 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
a.5 HALLEUX Jean François -STEED Mercédès : 47,41 % 1 NS 2T W+2 -130 2 11.11
2 NS 2K E-2 100 8 44.44
3 NS 2S E+1 -150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.3 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 64,63 % 7 NS 3C E+2 -200 14 77.78
8 NS 2C W+1 -140 4 22.22
9 NS 2P W = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.2 POULAERT Gilbert -ROGIERS Marga : 43,70 %10 NS 3T E+1 -130 12 66.67
11 NS 3S S+1 430 11 61.11
12 NS 2S E = -120 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 58,70 %13 NS 4P W-1 100 6 33.33
14 NS 3S S+1 430 12 66.67
15 NS 2P E+1 -140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a11 MOLS Bruno -LIBERT Laurent : 44,44 %16 NS 3S S+1 430 13 72.22
17 NS 3S W+1 -430 4 22.22
18 NS 3C E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 42,96 %19 NS 3S N = 400 8 44.44
20 NS 3S S+1 630 13 72.22
21 NS 3P W = -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.9 MASSART Jean -DOUETTE Albert : 42,96 %22 NS 2K S+1 110 12 66.67
23 NS 3S S+2 660 18 100.00
24 NS 4P W = -420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
a.8 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,96 %25 NS 3T E = -110 14 77.78
26 NS 4P W = -620 2 11.11
27 NS 2T N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.7 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,52 %28 NS 4K W = -130 9 50.00
29 NS 3S W+1 -630 4 22.22
30 NS 4P W-1 50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.6 LAENENS René -CHANTRAINE René : 56,67 %31 NS 3S W = -400 13 72.22
32 NS 6S E = -1440 0 0.00
33 NS 1S E+2 -150 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 273,0 / 540 = 50,56 %
PAIRE Nr : A.4 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy
a.7 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,52 % 1 NS 2C S-1 -50 16 88.89
2 NS 3P N = 140 16 88.89
3 NS 3K E = -110 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
a.6 LAENENS René -CHANTRAINE René : 56,67 % 4 NS 4P N-2 -200 2 11.11
5 NS 3C S+1 170 12 66.67
6 NS 6S W-2 200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.4 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 57,04 %10 NS 3S E+1 -630 2 11.11
11 NS 3S S+1 430 11 61.11
12 NS 1P N = 80 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.3 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 64,63 %13 NS 5KcE-1 200 14 77.78
14 NS 3S S+1 430 12 66.67
15 NS 2P E+1 -140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.2 POULAERT Gilbert -ROGIERS Marga : 43,70 %16 NS 3S N+2 460 16 88.89
17 NS 3S W-1 50 15 83.33
18 NS 3CcE-2 300 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
a.1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 58,70 %19 NS 3S N+2 460 17 94.44
20 NS 6P S-2 -200 0 0.00
21 NS 4P W = -420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
a11 MOLS Bruno -LIBERT Laurent : 44,44 %22 NS 2K S+2 130 16 88.89
23 NS 3S N+1 630 16 88.89
24 NS 4P W = -420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
a10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 42,96 %25 NS 3S E+2 -660 2 11.11
26 NS 3C E = -140 10 55.56
27 NS 1S E+1 -120 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
a.9 MASSART Jean -DOUETTE Albert : 42,96 %28 NS 4K W = -130 9 50.00
29 NS 3S W = -600 11 61.11
30 NS 3S S-2 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.8 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,96 %31 NS 3S E-1 50 16 88.89
32 NS 5C W-1 100 18 100.00
33 NS 1S E+1 -120 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 92,59 %
Total : 340,0 / 540 = 62,96 %
PAIRE Nr : A.5 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
a.9 MASSART Jean -DOUETTE Albert : 42,96 % 1 NS 3T W = -110 9 50.00
2 NS 2T S+1 110 11 61.11
3 NS 3T E+3 -170 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.8 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,96 % 4 NS 4P N = 620 16 88.89
5 NS 4C S-1 -100 2 11.11
6 NS 6S W-1 100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.7 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,52 % 7 NS 4C E+1 -650 7 38.89
8 NS 2C W+2 -170 1 5.56
9 NS 1S E = -90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
a.5 HALLEUX Jean François -STEED Mercédès : 47,41 %13 NS 3S W = -600 2 11.11
14 NS 3S S+2 460 18 100.00
15 NS 2P E+1 -140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.4 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 57,04 %16 NS 3S S = 400 7 38.89
17 NS 3S W = -400 10 55.56
18 NS 3C E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.3 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 64,63 %19 NS 3K N+1 130 3 16.67
20 NS 4C N-1 -100 4 22.22
21 NS 3P W+1 -170 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
a.2 POULAERT Gilbert -ROGIERS Marga : 43,70 %22 NS 3S S-1 -50 2 11.11
23 NS 3S N = 600 11 61.11
24 NS 4P W = -420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 58,70 %25 NS 3S W+2 -660 2 11.11
26 NS 5T N-2 -200 5 27.78
27 NS 2P W = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
a11 MOLS Bruno -LIBERT Laurent : 44,44 %28 NS 3S E+1 -430 1 5.56
29 NS 3S E+1 -630 4 22.22
30 NS 3P W = -140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
a10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 42,96 %31 NS 3S E+1 -430 5 27.78
32 NS 4S E+2 -690 11 61.11
33 NS 1S E+2 -150 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
Total : 214,0 / 540 = 39,63 %
PAIRE Nr : A.6 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry
a11 MOLS Bruno -LIBERT Laurent : 44,44 % 1 NS 3S W-2 100 18 100.00
2 NS 2C S = 110 11 61.11
3 NS 2P E+2 -170 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
a10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 42,96 % 4 NS 4P N-2 -200 2 11.11
5 NS 4C S = 620 18 100.00
6 NS 6S W-1 100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.9 MASSART Jean -DOUETTE Albert : 42,96 % 7 NS 3PcN-5 -1400 0 0.00
8 NS 2C W = -110 9 50.00
9 NS 2P W-1 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.8 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,96 %10 NS 3T E+2 -150 10 55.56
11 NS 3S N = 400 1 5.56
12 NS 3S E-2 100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.6 LAENENS René -CHANTRAINE René : 56,67 %16 NS 3CcW-2 500 18 100.00
17 NS 3S W = -400 10 55.56
18 NS 3ScS-2 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.5 HALLEUX Jean François -STEED Mercédès : 47,41 %19 NS 3S S+1 430 12 66.67
20 NS 4P S = 620 9 50.00
21 NS 3C N-1 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a.4 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 57,04 %22 NS 2T W = -90 0 0.00
23 NS 3K W = -110 0 0.00
24 NS 4P W = -420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
a.3 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 64,63 %25 NS 3S W+1 -630 6 33.33
26 NS 3CcE = -730 0 0.00
27 NS 2P W = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
a.2 POULAERT Gilbert -ROGIERS Marga : 43,70 %28 NS 4K W-2 100 18 100.00
29 NS 3S W-1 100 16 88.89
30 NS 3PcW = -530 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 58,70 %31 NS 3S E+1 -430 5 27.78
32 NS 6K W = -1370 4 22.22
33 NS 1S W+2 -150 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
Total : 260,0 / 540 = 48,15 %
PAIRE Nr : A.7 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine
a.2 POULAERT Gilbert -ROGIERS Marga : 43,70 % 1 NS 3T W = -110 9 50.00
2 NS 2S N = 120 14 77.78
3 NS 3CcN-4 -800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 58,70 % 4 NS 4P N-2 -200 2 11.11
5 NS 3K E-1 50 6 33.33
6 NS 6S W-1 100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a11 MOLS Bruno -LIBERT Laurent : 44,44 % 7 NS 3S W = -600 12 66.67
8 NS 4C W-2 100 15 83.33
9 NS 2S E = -120 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 42,96 %10 NS 3S E-4 400 16 88.89
11 NS 3S N = 400 1 5.56
12 NS 2S E = -120 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.9 MASSART Jean -DOUETTE Albert : 42,96 %13 NS 4PcW-1 200 14 77.78
14 NS 3S S-1 -50 2 11.11
15 NS 1S N-1 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.7 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,52 %19 NS 3K N+2 150 6 33.33
20 NS 4P S-1 -100 4 22.22
21 NS 3P W+1 -170 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
a.6 LAENENS René -CHANTRAINE René : 56,67 %22 NS 1S W-1 100 8 44.44
23 NS 4KcW-1 200 6 33.33
24 NS 4P W = -420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.5 HALLEUX Jean François -STEED Mercédès : 47,41 %25 NS 3S E-2 200 18 100.00
26 NS 4T N-1 -100 15 83.33
27 NS 3S E-2 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
a.4 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 57,04 %28 NS 3K W+1 -130 9 50.00
29 NS 3S W-1 100 16 88.89
30 NS 2P W+2 -170 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.3 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 64,63 %31 NS 3S E+1 -430 5 27.78
32 NS 3S W+3 -690 11 61.11
33 NS 1P W+2 -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
Total : 271,0 / 540 = 50,19 %
PAIRE Nr : A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
a.4 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 57,04 % 1 NS 3T W = -110 9 50.00
2 NS 2P N-1 -100 3 16.67
3 NS 3S E+2 -660 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
a.3 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 64,63 % 4 NS 4P N-1 -100 8 44.44
5 NS 3C S+1 170 12 66.67
6 NS 3S W+3 -690 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.2 POULAERT Gilbert -ROGIERS Marga : 43,70 % 7 NS 4CcE = -790 4 22.22
8 NS 4TcE-5 1100 18 100.00
9 NS 2C S-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 58,70 %10 NS 3S E+1 -630 2 11.11
11 NS 3S S+1 430 11 61.11
12 NS 2S E = -120 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
a11 MOLS Bruno -LIBERT Laurent : 44,44 %13 NS 4P W-2 200 14 77.78
14 NS 3S S+1 430 12 66.67
15 NS 2P E+1 -140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 42,96 %16 NS 3S S+1 430 13 72.22
17 NS 3S W-1 50 15 83.33
18 NS 4CcE-3 500 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
a.8 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,96 %22 NS 2K S+1 110 12 66.67
23 NS 5T N = 600 11 61.11
24 NS 4P W = -420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.7 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,52 %25 NS 2P W+1 -140 12 66.67
26 NS 3S S = 600 18 100.00
27 NS 3P W-3 150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
a.6 LAENENS René -CHANTRAINE René : 56,67 %28 NS 3K W+2 -150 4 22.22
29 NS 3S W-1 100 16 88.89
30 NS 2P W+2 -170 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.5 HALLEUX Jean François -STEED Mercédès : 47,41 %31 NS 3S E = -400 13 72.22
32 NS 6K W = -1370 4 22.22
33 NS 3C N-3 -150 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 288,0 / 540 = 53,33 %
PAIRE Nr : A.9 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef
a.6 LAENENS René -CHANTRAINE René : 56,67 % 1 NS 3S E+1 -430 0 0.00
2 NS 2S N-1 -100 3 16.67
3 NS 5T E+1 -620 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
a.5 HALLEUX Jean François -STEED Mercédès : 47,41 % 4 NS 4P N-1 -100 8 44.44
5 NS 4C S-1 -100 2 11.11
6 NS 3S W+2 -660 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
a.4 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 57,04 % 7 NS 4C E = -620 10 55.56
8 NS 2S E = -120 6 33.33
9 NS 1S E-1 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.3 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 64,63 %10 NS 3S E+1 -630 2 11.11
11 NS 3S N+1 430 11 61.11
12 NS 2S E = -120 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
a.2 POULAERT Gilbert -ROGIERS Marga : 43,70 %13 NS 4S E-1 100 6 33.33
14 NS 4C N-2 -100 0 0.00
15 NS 2P E = -110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 58,70 %16 NS 3S N-1 -50 2 11.11
17 NS 3S W = -400 10 55.56
18 NS 3C E-2 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a11 MOLS Bruno -LIBERT Laurent : 44,44 %19 NS 2K N+2 130 3 16.67
20 NS 3S N+1 630 13 72.22
21 NS 3P E+1 -170 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.9 MASSART Jean -DOUETTE Albert : 42,96 %25 NS 3S E-1 100 16 88.89
26 NS 3C E = -140 10 55.56
27 NS 3S E+1 -430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.8 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,96 %28 NS 5K W-1 50 15 83.33
29 NS 3S W+1 -630 4 22.22
30 NS 1PcW+2 -360 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.7 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,52 %31 NS 3S E+1 -430 5 27.78
32 NS 3S E+3 -690 11 61.11
33 NS 1S W+3 -180 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
Total : 203,0 / 540 = 37,59 %
PAIRE Nr : A10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
a.8 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,96 % 1 NS 3T W = -110 9 50.00
2 NS 3S N-2 -200 0 0.00
3 NS 3S E+1 -630 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
a.7 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,52 % 4 NS 2P N+1 140 13 72.22
5 NS 3C S-1 -100 2 11.11
6 NS 6S E-2 200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.6 LAENENS René -CHANTRAINE René : 56,67 % 7 NS 4PcN-4 -1100 2 11.11
8 NS 2C W+2 -170 1 5.56
9 NS 2P W+1 -140 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 7,41 %
a.5 HALLEUX Jean François -STEED Mercédès : 47,41 %10 NS 3K S-1 -100 14 77.78
11 NS 3S N+1 430 11 61.11
12 NS 2S E-2 100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
a.4 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 57,04 %13 NS 4P W-1 100 6 33.33
14 NS 3S S = 400 5 27.78
15 NS 1S E+1 -120 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.3 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 64,63 %16 NS 3S S = 400 7 38.89
17 NS 3S E+2 -460 0 0.00
18 NS 4K S-2 -200 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
a.2 POULAERT Gilbert -ROGIERS Marga : 43,70 %19 NS 5K S-1 -50 0 0.00
20 NS 3S N+3 690 17 94.44
21 NS 2C N = 110 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
a.1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 58,70 %22 NS 2K S+1 110 12 66.67
23 NS 3S S = 600 11 61.11
24 NS 4P W = -420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 42,96 %28 NS 3S E-1 50 15 83.33
29 NS 3S W = -600 11 61.11
30 NS 3P W = -140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.9 MASSART Jean -DOUETTE Albert : 42,96 %31 NS 3S E+1 -430 5 27.78
32 NS 5K W+1 -620 16 88.89
33 NS 1S E+1 -120 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
Total : 268,0 / 540 = 49,63 %
PAIRE Nr : A11 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin
a10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 42,96 % 1 NS 3T W = -110 9 50.00
2 NS 3K E-1 50 6 33.33
3 NS 2P E = -110 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.9 MASSART Jean -DOUETTE Albert : 42,96 % 4 NS 3P N = 140 13 72.22
5 NS 3C S+1 170 12 66.67
6 NS 3S W+2 -660 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.8 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,96 % 7 NS 4C E+1 -650 7 38.89
8 NS 2C W = -110 9 50.00
9 NS 1S N+1 120 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.7 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,52 %10 NS 4K S-3 -300 8 44.44
11 NS 3S N+1 430 11 61.11
12 NS 2S W-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.6 LAENENS René -CHANTRAINE René : 56,67 %13 NS 4P W-2 200 14 77.78
14 NS 3S S = 400 5 27.78
15 NS 2P E+1 -140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.5 HALLEUX Jean François -STEED Mercédès : 47,41 %16 NS 3S S-2 -100 0 0.00
17 NS 3S E+1 -430 4 22.22
18 NS 3CcE-3 500 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.4 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 57,04 %19 NS 3S N+1 430 12 66.67
20 NS 3S N-1 -100 4 22.22
21 NS 3P W+2 -200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.3 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 64,63 %22 NS 1S W-3 300 18 100.00
23 NS 2T N+2 130 2 11.11
24 NS 3S W+1 -430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.2 POULAERT Gilbert -ROGIERS Marga : 43,70 %25 NS 3S E = -600 9 50.00
26 NS 3C E = -140 10 55.56
27 NS 3S W-4 200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a11 MOLS Bruno -LIBERT Laurent : 44,44 %31 NS 3C E-3 150 18 100.00
32 NS 6K W = -1370 4 22.22
33 NS 1S E+3 -180 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
Total : 268,0 / 540 = 49,63 %
PAIRE Nr : a.1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
A.1 VAGMAN David -CLERIN François-Xavier : 51,67 % 1 EO 3T W = -110 9 50.00
2 EO 2C S+2 170 0 0.00
3 EO 3S E+2 -660 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.7 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 50,19 % 4 EO 4P N-2 -200 16 88.89
5 EO 3K E-1 50 12 66.67
6 EO 6S W-1 100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.2 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 56,67 % 7 EO 4C E-1 100 0 0.00
8 EO 4C W-1 50 6 33.33
9 EO 2P W+1 -140 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 53,33 %10 EO 3S E+1 -630 16 88.89
11 EO 3S S+1 430 7 38.89
12 EO 2S E = -120 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
A.3 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,56 %13 EO 4P W-1 100 12 66.67
14 EO 3S S+1 430 6 33.33
15 EO 2P E+1 -140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.9 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 37,59 %16 EO 3S N-1 -50 16 88.89
17 EO 3S W = -400 8 44.44
18 EO 3C E-2 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.4 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 62,96 %19 EO 3S N+2 460 1 5.56
20 EO 6P S-2 -200 18 100.00
21 EO 4P W = -420 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
A10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 49,63 %22 EO 2K S+1 110 6 33.33
23 EO 3S S = 600 7 38.89
24 EO 4P W = -420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.5 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 39,63 %25 EO 3S W+2 -660 16 88.89
26 EO 5T N-2 -200 13 72.22
27 EO 2P W = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
A.6 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 48,15 %31 EO 3S E+1 -430 13 72.22
32 EO 6K W = -1370 14 77.78
33 EO 1S W+2 -150 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
Total : 317,0 / 540 = 58,70 %
PAIRE Nr : a.2 POULAERT Gilbert -ROGIERS Marga
A.7 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 50,19 % 1 EO 3T W = -110 9 50.00
2 EO 2S N = 120 4 22.22
3 EO 3CcN-4 -800 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.2 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 56,67 % 4 EO 4P N-1 -100 10 55.56
5 EO 2C S+3 200 2 11.11
6 EO 3S W+2 -660 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 53,33 % 7 EO 4CcE = -790 14 77.78
8 EO 4TcE-5 1100 0 0.00
9 EO 2C S-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.3 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,56 %10 EO 3T E+1 -130 6 33.33
11 EO 3S S+1 430 7 38.89
12 EO 2S E = -120 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.9 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 37,59 %13 EO 4S E-1 100 12 66.67
14 EO 4C N-2 -100 18 100.00
15 EO 2P E = -110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A.4 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 62,96 %16 EO 3S N+2 460 2 11.11
17 EO 3S W-1 50 3 16.67
18 EO 3CcE-2 300 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
A10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 49,63 %19 EO 5K S-1 -50 18 100.00
20 EO 3S N+3 690 1 5.56
21 EO 2C N = 110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
A.5 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 39,63 %22 EO 3S S-1 -50 16 88.89
23 EO 3S N = 600 7 38.89
24 EO 4P W = -420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A11 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 49,63 %25 EO 3S E = -600 9 50.00
26 EO 3C E = -140 8 44.44
27 EO 3S W-4 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A.6 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 48,15 %28 EO 4K W-2 100 0 0.00
29 EO 3S W-1 100 2 11.11
30 EO 3PcW = -530 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 236,0 / 540 = 43,70 %
PAIRE Nr : a.3 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 53,33 % 4 EO 4P N-1 -100 10 55.56
5 EO 3C S+1 170 6 33.33
6 EO 3S W+3 -690 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A.3 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,56 % 7 EO 3C E+2 -200 4 22.22
8 EO 2C W+1 -140 14 77.78
9 EO 2P W = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.9 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 37,59 %10 EO 3S E+1 -630 16 88.89
11 EO 3S N+1 430 7 38.89
12 EO 2S E = -120 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
A.4 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 62,96 %13 EO 5KcE-1 200 4 22.22
14 EO 3S S+1 430 6 33.33
15 EO 2P E+1 -140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 49,63 %16 EO 3S S = 400 11 61.11
17 EO 3S E+2 -460 18 100.00
18 EO 4K S-2 -200 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
A.5 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 39,63 %19 EO 3K N+1 130 15 83.33
20 EO 4C N-1 -100 14 77.78
21 EO 3P W+1 -170 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
A11 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 49,63 %22 EO 1S W-3 300 0 0.00
23 EO 2T N+2 130 16 88.89
24 EO 3S W+1 -430 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A.6 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 48,15 %25 EO 3S W+1 -630 12 66.67
26 EO 3CcE = -730 18 100.00
27 EO 2P W = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
A.1 VAGMAN David -CLERIN François-Xavier : 51,67 %28 EO 3S E+1 -430 17 94.44
29 EO 3S E+1 -630 14 77.78
30 EO 3P W = -140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
A.7 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 50,19 %31 EO 3S E+1 -430 13 72.22
32 EO 3S W+3 -690 7 38.89
33 EO 1P W+2 -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
Total : 349,0 / 540 = 64,63 %
PAIRE Nr : a.4 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 53,33 % 1 EO 3T W = -110 9 50.00
2 EO 2P N-1 -100 15 83.33
3 EO 3S E+2 -660 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
A.9 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 37,59 % 7 EO 4C E = -620 8 44.44
8 EO 2S E = -120 12 66.67
9 EO 1S E-1 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A.4 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 62,96 %10 EO 3S E+1 -630 16 88.89
11 EO 3S S+1 430 7 38.89
12 EO 1P N = 80 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 49,63 %13 EO 4P W-1 100 12 66.67
14 EO 3S S = 400 13 72.22
15 EO 1S E+1 -120 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.5 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 39,63 %16 EO 3S S = 400 11 61.11
17 EO 3S W = -400 8 44.44
18 EO 3C E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A11 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 49,63 %19 EO 3S N+1 430 6 33.33
20 EO 3S N-1 -100 14 77.78
21 EO 3P W+2 -200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.6 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 48,15 %22 EO 2T W = -90 18 100.00
23 EO 3K W = -110 18 100.00
24 EO 4P W = -420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
A.1 VAGMAN David -CLERIN François-Xavier : 51,67 %25 EO 3S W = -600 9 50.00
26 EO 5T N-2 -200 13 72.22
27 EO 2P W = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A.7 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 50,19 %28 EO 3K W+1 -130 9 50.00
29 EO 3S W-1 100 2 11.11
30 EO 2P W+2 -170 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.2 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 56,67 %31 EO 3S E+1 -430 13 72.22
32 EO 4S E+2 -690 7 38.89
33 EO 1S E+1 -120 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 308,0 / 540 = 57,04 %
PAIRE Nr : a.5 HALLEUX Jean François -STEED Mercédès
A.3 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,56 % 1 EO 2T W+2 -130 16 88.89
2 EO 2K E-2 100 10 55.56
3 EO 2S E+1 -150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.9 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 37,59 % 4 EO 4P N-1 -100 10 55.56
5 EO 4C S-1 -100 16 88.89
6 EO 3S W+2 -660 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
A10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 49,63 %10 EO 3K S-1 -100 4 22.22
11 EO 3S N+1 430 7 38.89
12 EO 2S E-2 100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
A.5 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 39,63 %13 EO 3S W = -600 16 88.89
14 EO 3S S+2 460 0 0.00
15 EO 2P E+1 -140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A11 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 49,63 %16 EO 3S S-2 -100 18 100.00
17 EO 3S E+1 -430 14 77.78
18 EO 3CcE-3 500 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.6 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 48,15 %19 EO 3S S+1 430 6 33.33
20 EO 4P S = 620 9 50.00
21 EO 3C N-1 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A.1 VAGMAN David -CLERIN François-Xavier : 51,67 %22 EO 1S S = 90 12 66.67
23 EO 2T N+3 150 14 77.78
24 EO 4P W = -420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A.7 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 50,19 %25 EO 3S E-2 200 0 0.00
26 EO 4T N-1 -100 3 16.67
27 EO 3S E-2 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
A.2 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 56,67 %28 EO 4K W = -130 9 50.00
29 EO 3S W+1 -630 14 77.78
30 EO 4P E-1 50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 53,33 %31 EO 3S E = -400 5 27.78
32 EO 6K W = -1370 14 77.78
33 EO 3C N-3 -150 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 256,0 / 540 = 47,41 %
PAIRE Nr : a.6 LAENENS René -CHANTRAINE René
A.9 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 37,59 % 1 EO 3S E+1 -430 18 100.00
2 EO 2S N-1 -100 15 83.33
3 EO 5T E+1 -620 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
A.4 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 62,96 % 4 EO 4P N-2 -200 16 88.89
5 EO 3C S+1 170 6 33.33
6 EO 6S W-2 200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 49,63 % 7 EO 4PcN-4 -1100 16 88.89
8 EO 2C W+2 -170 17 94.44
9 EO 2P W+1 -140 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 92,59 %
A11 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 49,63 %13 EO 4P W-2 200 4 22.22
14 EO 3S S = 400 13 72.22
15 EO 2P E+1 -140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.6 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 48,15 %16 EO 3CcW-2 500 0 0.00
17 EO 3S W = -400 8 44.44
18 EO 3ScS-2 -500 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.1 VAGMAN David -CLERIN François-Xavier : 51,67 %19 EO 3S N+2 460 1 5.56
20 EO 4P S = 620 9 50.00
21 EO 2P W+1 -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
A.7 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 50,19 %22 EO 1S W-1 100 10 55.56
23 EO 4KcW-1 200 12 66.67
24 EO 4P W = -420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.2 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 56,67 %25 EO 3S E+2 -660 16 88.89
26 EO 4S S-1 -100 3 16.67
27 EO 2P W-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 53,33 %28 EO 3K W+2 -150 14 77.78
29 EO 3S W-1 100 2 11.11
30 EO 2P W+2 -170 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.3 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,56 %31 EO 3S W = -400 5 27.78
32 EO 6S E = -1440 18 100.00
33 EO 1S E+2 -150 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 306,0 / 540 = 56,67 %
PAIRE Nr : a.7 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques
A.4 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 62,96 % 1 EO 2C S-1 -50 2 11.11
2 EO 3P N = 140 2 11.11
3 EO 3K E = -110 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
A10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 49,63 % 4 EO 2P N+1 140 5 27.78
5 EO 3C S-1 -100 16 88.89
6 EO 6S E-2 200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.5 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 39,63 % 7 EO 4C E+1 -650 11 61.11
8 EO 2C W+2 -170 17 94.44
9 EO 1S E = -90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
A11 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 49,63 %10 EO 4K S-3 -300 10 55.56
11 EO 3S N+1 430 7 38.89
12 EO 2S W-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.1 VAGMAN David -CLERIN François-Xavier : 51,67 %16 EO 3S N = 400 11 61.11
17 EO 3S E+1 -430 14 77.78
18 EO 3C E = -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
A.7 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 50,19 %19 EO 3K N+2 150 12 66.67
20 EO 4P S-1 -100 14 77.78
21 EO 3P W+1 -170 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
A.2 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 56,67 %22 EO 1P N = 80 14 77.78
23 EO 1S W-6 600 7 38.89
24 EO 4P W = -420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 53,33 %25 EO 2P W+1 -140 6 33.33
26 EO 3S S = 600 0 0.00
27 EO 3P W-3 150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
A.3 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,56 %28 EO 4K W = -130 9 50.00
29 EO 3S W+1 -630 14 77.78
30 EO 4P W-1 50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.9 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 37,59 %31 EO 3S E+1 -430 13 72.22
32 EO 3S E+3 -690 7 38.89
33 EO 1S W+3 -180 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
Total : 262,0 / 540 = 48,52 %
PAIRE Nr : a.8 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse
A10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 49,63 % 1 EO 3T W = -110 9 50.00
2 EO 3S N-2 -200 18 100.00
3 EO 3S E+1 -630 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
A.5 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 39,63 % 4 EO 4P N = 620 2 11.11
5 EO 4C S-1 -100 16 88.89
6 EO 6S W-1 100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A11 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 49,63 % 7 EO 4C E+1 -650 11 61.11
8 EO 2C W = -110 9 50.00
9 EO 1S N+1 120 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.6 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 48,15 %10 EO 3T E+2 -150 8 44.44
11 EO 3S N = 400 17 94.44
12 EO 3S E-2 100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.1 VAGMAN David -CLERIN François-Xavier : 51,67 %13 EO 4P W-2 200 4 22.22
14 EO 3S S+1 430 6 33.33
15 EO 2P E+1 -140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A.2 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 56,67 %19 EO 3S S+1 430 6 33.33
20 EO 3S N+3 690 1 5.56
21 EO 2P E+1 -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 53,33 %22 EO 2K S+1 110 6 33.33
23 EO 5T N = 600 7 38.89
24 EO 4P W = -420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.3 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,56 %25 EO 3T E = -110 4 22.22
26 EO 4P W = -620 16 88.89
27 EO 2T N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.9 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 37,59 %28 EO 5K W-1 50 3 16.67
29 EO 3S W+1 -630 14 77.78
30 EO 1PcW+2 -360 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.4 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 62,96 %31 EO 3S E-1 50 2 11.11
32 EO 5C W-1 100 0 0.00
33 EO 1S E+1 -120 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 7,41 %
Total : 232,0 / 540 = 42,96 %
PAIRE Nr : a.9 MASSART Jean -DOUETTE Albert
A.5 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 39,63 % 1 EO 3T W = -110 9 50.00
2 EO 2T S+1 110 7 38.89
3 EO 3T E+3 -170 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A11 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 49,63 % 4 EO 3P N = 140 5 27.78
5 EO 3C S+1 170 6 33.33
6 EO 3S W+2 -660 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.6 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 48,15 % 7 EO 3PcN-5 -1400 18 100.00
8 EO 2C W = -110 9 50.00
9 EO 2P W-1 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.1 VAGMAN David -CLERIN François-Xavier : 51,67 %10 EO 5T E = -600 12 66.67
11 EO 3S N+1 430 7 38.89
12 EO 2S E-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.7 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 50,19 %13 EO 4PcW-1 200 4 22.22
14 EO 3S S-1 -50 16 88.89
15 EO 1S N-1 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.2 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 56,67 %16 EO 3S S = 400 11 61.11
17 EO 3S E-2 100 0 0.00
18 EO 3S S-4 -400 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,56 %22 EO 2K S+1 110 6 33.33
23 EO 3S S+2 660 0 0.00
24 EO 4P W = -420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
A.9 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 37,59 %25 EO 3S E-1 100 2 11.11
26 EO 3C E = -140 8 44.44
27 EO 3S E+1 -430 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.4 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 62,96 %28 EO 4K W = -130 9 50.00
29 EO 3S W = -600 7 38.89
30 EO 3S S-2 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 49,63 %31 EO 3S E+1 -430 13 72.22
32 EO 5K W+1 -620 2 11.11
33 EO 1S E+1 -120 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
Total : 232,0 / 540 = 42,96 %
PAIRE Nr : a10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
A11 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 49,63 % 1 EO 3T W = -110 9 50.00
2 EO 3K E-1 50 12 66.67
3 EO 2P E = -110 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.6 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 48,15 % 4 EO 4P N-2 -200 16 88.89
5 EO 4C S = 620 0 0.00
6 EO 6S W-1 100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A.1 VAGMAN David -CLERIN François-Xavier : 51,67 % 7 EO 2C E+2 -170 2 11.11
8 EO 3C W-2 100 3 16.67
9 EO Pass Passe 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
A.7 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 50,19 %10 EO 3S E-4 400 2 11.11
11 EO 3S N = 400 17 94.44
12 EO 2S E = -120 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.2 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 56,67 %13 EO 3S E+2 -660 18 100.00
14 EO 3S N+1 430 6 33.33
15 EO 3KcS = 670 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 53,33 %16 EO 3S S+1 430 5 27.78
17 EO 3S W-1 50 3 16.67
18 EO 4CcE-3 500 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
A.3 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,56 %19 EO 3S N = 400 10 55.56
20 EO 3S S+1 630 5 27.78
21 EO 3P W = -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.4 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 62,96 %25 EO 3S E+2 -660 16 88.89
26 EO 3C E = -140 8 44.44
27 EO 1S E+1 -120 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
A10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 49,63 %28 EO 3S E-1 50 3 16.67
29 EO 3S W = -600 7 38.89
30 EO 3P W = -140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.5 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 39,63 %31 EO 3S E+1 -430 13 72.22
32 EO 4S E+2 -690 7 38.89
33 EO 1S E+2 -150 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
Total : 232,0 / 540 = 42,96 %
PAIRE Nr : a11 MOLS Bruno -LIBERT Laurent
A.6 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 48,15 % 1 EO 3S W-2 100 0 0.00
2 EO 2C S = 110 7 38.89
3 EO 2P E+2 -170 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
A.1 VAGMAN David -CLERIN François-Xavier : 51,67 % 4 EO 4P N+1 650 0 0.00
5 EO 3C S = 140 10 55.56
6 EO 6S W-1 100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A.7 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 50,19 % 7 EO 3S W = -600 6 33.33
8 EO 4C W-2 100 3 16.67
9 EO 2S E = -120 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A.2 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 56,67 %10 EO 3S E-5 500 0 0.00
11 EO 3S N+1 430 7 38.89
12 EO 2S W = -120 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 53,33 %13 EO 4P W-2 200 4 22.22
14 EO 3S S+1 430 6 33.33
15 EO 2P E+1 -140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A.3 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,56 %16 EO 3S S+1 430 5 27.78
17 EO 3S W+1 -430 14 77.78
18 EO 3C E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.9 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 37,59 %19 EO 2K N+2 130 15 83.33
20 EO 3S N+1 630 5 27.78
21 EO 3P E+1 -170 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.4 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 62,96 %22 EO 2K S+2 130 2 11.11
23 EO 3S N+1 630 2 11.11
24 EO 4P W = -420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
A.5 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 39,63 %28 EO 3S E+1 -430 17 94.44
29 EO 3S E+1 -630 14 77.78
30 EO 3P W = -140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
A11 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 49,63 %31 EO 3C E-3 150 0 0.00
32 EO 6K W = -1370 14 77.78
33 EO 1S E+3 -180 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
Total : 240,0 / 540 = 44,44 %
|
|