|
Tournoi du 27-06-11
1 58,33 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
2 58,15 1 VANDAM Jean -VANDAM Cécile
3 52,04 9 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François
4 51,85 5 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
5 51,67 7 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph
6 48,89 3 STEED Adrian -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
7 46,30 2 CLERIN François-Xavier -DELHEZ Jacques
8 44,63 4 DUBOIS Yves -COURTOIS Chantal
9 44,07 6 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques
~ 44,07 10 VERBOIS Léon -MOSSERAY Bernadette
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 59,44 20 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe
2 57,59 17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
3 53,70 13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
4 53,15 19 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne
5 50,37 11 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile
6 50,00 18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
7 49,63 14 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga
8 47,96 16 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard
9 39,44 15 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse
10 38,70 12 COOLEN Josef -ARICKX Roger
PAIRE Nr : 1 VANDAM Jean -VANDAM Cécile
11 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 50,37 % 1 NS 4P E = -420 3 16.67
2 NS 2S E-2 100 13 72.22
3 NS 6C N-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 53,70 % 4 NS 3S N+1 630 16 88.89
5 NS 2K E = -90 9 50.00
6 NS 6C N = 980 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
12 COOLEN Josef -ARICKX Roger : 38,70 % 7 NS 1S N = 90 13 72.22
8 NS 3P N = 140 16 88.89
9 NS 6P N = 980 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
16 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 47,96 %10 NS 4P N+1 650 17 94.44
11 NS 4C E+1 -450 12 66.67
12 NS 4C N = 620 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 57,59 %13 NS 3S E = -600 10 55.56
14 NS 6P E+1 -1010 1 5.56
15 NS 2S N-3 -300 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 50,00 %16 NS 4C N-1 -50 8 44.44
17 NS 2P E-2 100 10 55.56
18 NS 3S E = -400 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
19 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,15 %19 NS 5K N-1 -50 2 11.11
20 NS 4C E-2 200 18 100.00
21 NS 2P N = 110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
20 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 59,44 %22 NS 3S E+1 -630 15 83.33
23 NS 6TcN-2 -500 11 61.11
24 NS 2C E+1 -140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
14 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 49,63 %25 NS 3S N-1 -50 7 38.89
26 NS 5K E = -600 2 11.11
27 NS 3P E-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
15 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 39,44 %28 NS 2S E-1 50 13 72.22
29 NS 3S N+2 660 17 94.44
30 NS 4C N = 420 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
Total : 314,0 / 540 = 58,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 CLERIN François-Xavier -DELHEZ Jacques
13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 53,70 % 1 NS 4P E = -420 3 16.67
2 NS 2S W-2 100 13 72.22
3 NS 6CcS-3 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
12 COOLEN Josef -ARICKX Roger : 38,70 % 4 NS 3S N+1 630 16 88.89
5 NS 2C W = -110 4 22.22
6 NS 4C S+2 480 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
11 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 50,37 % 7 NS 3K N-3 -300 0 0.00
8 NS 3KcW-1 100 12 66.67
9 NS 4P N+2 480 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
20 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 59,44 %10 NS 4P N+1 650 17 94.44
11 NS 4PcN-3 -500 8 44.44
12 NS 3S W-4 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
14 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 49,63 %13 NS 2S E-1 100 17 94.44
14 NS 6P E = -980 10 55.56
15 NS 2S N-3 -300 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
15 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 39,44 %16 NS 3K N = 110 16 88.89
17 NS 3C N = 140 17 94.44
18 NS 3S E = -400 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
16 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 47,96 %19 NS 3T S = 110 5 27.78
20 NS 2PcS-3 -800 0 0.00
21 NS 3CcW-3 500 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 57,59 %22 NS 3S W+2 -660 6 33.33
23 NS 4P E+2 -680 3 16.67
24 NS 3K S-2 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 50,00 %25 NS 3C S-3 -150 1 5.56
26 NS 5P E-2 200 11 61.11
27 NS 2P E = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
19 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,15 %28 NS 2S W = -120 5 27.78
29 NS 3T N+1 130 4 22.22
30 NS 4C N+2 480 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
Total : 250,0 / 540 = 46,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 STEED Adrian -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
12 COOLEN Josef -ARICKX Roger : 38,70 % 1 NS 4K N-2 -100 16 88.89
2 NS 2T W = -90 6 33.33
3 NS 3S S+1 430 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
11 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 50,37 % 4 NS 2P S = 110 6 33.33
5 NS 2K E = -90 9 50.00
6 NS 6C N = 980 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 53,70 % 7 NS 1S N-1 -100 9 50.00
8 NS 3P S-1 -50 10 55.56
9 NS 4P S = 420 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 50,00 %10 NS 3P N+1 170 2 11.11
11 NS 4C E+1 -450 12 66.67
12 NS 4C S = 620 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
19 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,15 %13 NS 3S E+1 -630 2 11.11
14 NS 6P E = -980 10 55.56
15 NS 3C S-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
20 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 59,44 %16 NS 4C S-1 -50 8 44.44
17 NS 3C N-1 -50 3 16.67
18 NS 3S W+1 -430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
14 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 49,63 %19 NS 3K N+1 130 11 61.11
20 NS 3S W = -600 11 61.11
21 NS 3S N-1 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
15 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 39,44 %22 NS 3S W+2 -660 6 33.33
23 NS 5TcS-2 -500 11 61.11
24 NS 2C W-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
16 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 47,96 %25 NS 3KcW-2 500 18 100.00
26 NS 5P W-2 200 11 61.11
27 NS 2P E = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 57,59 %28 NS 2S W-1 50 13 72.22
29 NS 3T N+1 130 4 22.22
30 NS 4C S = 420 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 264,0 / 540 = 48,89 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 DUBOIS Yves -COURTOIS Chantal
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 57,59 % 1 NS 3C W+1 -170 11 61.11
2 NS 2S E = -120 3 16.67
3 NS 3S S+1 430 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
16 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 47,96 % 4 NS 3S S = 600 10 55.56
5 NS 2C W = -110 4 22.22
6 NS 6C S = 980 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
15 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 39,44 % 7 NS 1S N = 90 13 72.22
8 NS 4K W = -130 3 16.67
9 NS 3S N+1 430 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
14 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 49,63 %10 NS 2P N+3 200 9 50.00
11 NS 4PcN-4 -800 2 11.11
12 NS 4C S = 620 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
20 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 59,44 %13 NS 3S E+1 -630 2 11.11
14 NS 6P E = -980 10 55.56
15 NS 2K E-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
19 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,15 %16 NS 4C S-1 -50 8 44.44
17 NS 3C N-1 -50 3 16.67
18 NS 4P E = -420 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 50,00 %19 NS 3K N+1 130 11 61.11
20 NS 3S W = -600 11 61.11
21 NS 3T S+2 150 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 53,70 %22 NS 3S W+1 -630 15 83.33
23 NS 5P E+1 -680 3 16.67
24 NS 2P E+2 -170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
12 COOLEN Josef -ARICKX Roger : 38,70 %25 NS 2C S+1 140 12 66.67
26 NS 4P W-1 100 5 27.78
27 NS 1P E = -80 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 50,37 %28 NS 2S W-1 50 13 72.22
29 NS 4T N = 130 4 22.22
30 NS 3C N+1 170 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 241,0 / 540 = 44,63 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 50,00 % 1 NS 5T W-1 50 18 100.00
2 NS 3S W-1 50 9 50.00
3 NS 4CxN+1 1080 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 57,59 % 4 NS 5TcN-2 -500 0 0.00
5 NS 3S E-2 100 18 100.00
6 NS 3S N+2 460 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
16 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 47,96 % 7 NS 2P W = -110 5 27.78
8 NS 2P S+1 140 16 88.89
9 NS 6P S = 980 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
11 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 50,37 %10 NS 3P N+2 200 9 50.00
11 NS 4PcN-4 -800 2 11.11
12 NS 4C S = 620 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
15 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 39,44 %13 NS 3S E = -600 10 55.56
14 NS 6P E = -980 10 55.56
15 NS 3C N-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
14 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 49,63 %16 NS 3S N-2 -100 0 0.00
17 NS 3C N = 140 17 94.44
18 NS 4P E = -420 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
20 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 59,44 %19 NS 3K N = 110 5 27.78
20 NS 3S W = -600 11 61.11
21 NS 2P N-1 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
19 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,15 %22 NS 3S W+1 -630 15 83.33
23 NS 5P E+1 -680 3 16.67
24 NS 2P N-3 -150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 53,70 %25 NS 2C S-1 -50 7 38.89
26 NS 6P W-3 300 16 88.89
27 NS 2P E+1 -140 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
12 COOLEN Josef -ARICKX Roger : 38,70 %28 NS 2S W-1 50 13 72.22
29 NS 5T N = 600 10 55.56
30 NS 4C S+2 480 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
Total : 280,0 / 540 = 51,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques
19 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,15 % 1 NS 4P E = -420 3 16.67
2 NS 2S W-1 50 9 50.00
3 NS 5C S-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 50,00 % 4 NS 3S S = 600 10 55.56
5 NS 2P E = -110 4 22.22
6 NS 4C S+2 480 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 57,59 % 7 NS 2S E = -120 2 11.11
8 NS 4PcN-1 -100 7 38.89
9 NS 6P S = 980 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
12 COOLEN Josef -ARICKX Roger : 38,70 %10 NS 2P N+3 200 9 50.00
11 NS 3P N-2 -100 18 100.00
12 NS 4C S = 620 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
11 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 50,37 %13 NS 3S E = -600 10 55.56
14 NS 6P E = -980 10 55.56
15 NS 3CxS-1 -400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
16 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 47,96 %16 NS 4C S-1 -50 8 44.44
17 NS 3K S+1 130 14 77.78
18 NS 2P E+2 -170 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
15 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 39,44 %19 NS 4K N+1 150 16 88.89
20 NS 4C W = -620 6 33.33
21 NS 3S S-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
14 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 49,63 %22 NS 3S W+3 -690 0 0.00
23 NS 5TcN-1 -200 14 77.78
24 NS 1P E+2 -140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
20 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 59,44 %25 NS 4P E-2 200 14 77.78
26 NS 4P W = -620 0 0.00
27 NS 2P E = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 53,70 %28 NS 2S W = -120 5 27.78
29 NS 5T N = 600 10 55.56
30 NS 3C S+1 170 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 238,0 / 540 = 44,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph
20 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 59,44 % 1 NS 3C W+1 -170 11 61.11
2 NS 3S W-3 150 17 94.44
3 NS 6C S-2 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
19 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,15 % 4 NS 3S S+1 630 16 88.89
5 NS 2K W-1 50 13 72.22
6 NS 6C S-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 50,00 % 7 NS 3T E = -110 5 27.78
8 NS 4CcE = -590 0 0.00
9 NS 6P S-1 -50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 53,70 %10 NS 2P N+3 200 9 50.00
11 NS 5TcE = -550 6 33.33
12 NS 4C N+1 650 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
12 COOLEN Josef -ARICKX Roger : 38,70 %13 NS 3S E = -600 10 55.56
14 NS 4P E+2 -480 18 100.00
15 NS 3C S-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
11 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 50,37 %16 NS 4C N-1 -50 8 44.44
17 NS 3P E-2 100 10 55.56
18 NS 5P E-1 50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 57,59 %19 NS 3S N-2 -100 0 0.00
20 NS 4C W+1 -650 2 11.11
21 NS 2P N+1 140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
16 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 47,96 %22 NS 3S E+2 -660 6 33.33
23 NS 4C W+2 -680 3 16.67
24 NS 3S S-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
15 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 39,44 %25 NS 3C S-2 -100 4 22.22
26 NS 5PcE-1 200 11 61.11
27 NS 4K S+1 150 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
14 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 49,63 %28 NS 2S W-2 100 18 100.00
29 NS 3S S+2 660 17 94.44
30 NS 2C S+4 230 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
Total : 279,0 / 540 = 51,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
14 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 49,63 % 1 NS 4P E = -420 3 16.67
2 NS 2S E = -120 3 16.67
3 NS 5C S = 450 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
20 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 59,44 % 4 NS 3S S-1 -100 4 22.22
5 NS 3T N-2 -200 0 0.00
6 NS 6C S = 980 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
19 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,15 % 7 NS 1S N-1 -100 9 50.00
8 NS 3P S = 140 16 88.89
9 NS 4P S+1 450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
15 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 39,44 %10 NS 2P N+3 200 9 50.00
11 NS 4PcN-2 -300 16 88.89
12 NS 4C S = 620 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 53,70 %13 NS 3S E-1 100 17 94.44
14 NS 6P E = -980 10 55.56
15 NS 2P N-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
12 COOLEN Josef -ARICKX Roger : 38,70 %16 NS 4C S = 420 18 100.00
17 NS 3C N-1 -50 3 16.67
18 NS 4P E = -420 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 50,37 %19 NS 1C W-3 300 18 100.00
20 NS 3S W+1 -630 4 22.22
21 NS 3ScN+2 1150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 50,00 %22 NS 3S W+2 -660 6 33.33
23 NS 5T S-1 -100 16 88.89
24 NS 3PcE-1 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 57,59 %25 NS 2C S = 110 10 55.56
26 NS 6PcE-3 800 18 100.00
27 NS 4K S+1 150 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
16 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 47,96 %28 NS 2CcS-1 -200 0 0.00
29 NS 3S S+1 630 14 77.78
30 NS 3C S+3 230 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 315,0 / 540 = 58,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François
15 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 39,44 % 1 NS 3P E+1 -170 11 61.11
2 NS 3S E-3 150 17 94.44
3 NS 3S N = 400 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
14 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 49,63 % 4 NS 4P S-2 -200 2 11.11
5 NS 1S W-1 50 13 72.22
6 NS 6C S = 980 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
20 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 59,44 % 7 NS 1S N+1 120 16 88.89
8 NS 4K W = -130 3 16.67
9 NS 6S S-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 57,59 %10 NS 2K N-1 -100 0 0.00
11 NS 4C W+1 -450 12 66.67
12 NS 5TcW-2 300 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
16 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 47,96 %13 NS 3S E+1 -630 2 11.11
14 NS 6P E+1 -1010 1 5.56
15 NS 3K E-2 100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 53,70 %16 NS 4C S-1 -50 8 44.44
17 NS 4C N-1 -50 3 16.67
18 NS 4P W = -420 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
12 COOLEN Josef -ARICKX Roger : 38,70 %19 NS 3K N+1 130 11 61.11
20 NS 2S W+1 -150 16 88.89
21 NS 4T S+1 150 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
11 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 50,37 %22 NS 3S W+1 -630 15 83.33
23 NS 6P E-1 100 18 100.00
24 NS 3S S = 400 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 94,44 %
19 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,15 %25 NS 3S N+1 430 16 88.89
26 NS 6P E-2 200 11 61.11
27 NS 2P E-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 50,00 %28 NS 2S W = -120 5 27.78
29 NS 5T N = 600 10 55.56
30 NS 3T N-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
Total : 281,0 / 540 = 52,04 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 VERBOIS Léon -MOSSERAY Bernadette
16 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 47,96 % 1 NS 3C W+1 -170 11 61.11
2 NS 2S W+1 -150 0 0.00
3 NS 4C S = 420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
15 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 39,44 % 4 NS 3S N = 600 10 55.56
5 NS 1S N = 90 16 88.89
6 NS 4C S+2 480 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
14 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 49,63 % 7 NS 2P W-3 300 18 100.00
8 NS 4P S-2 -100 7 38.89
9 NS 4P N+2 480 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
19 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,15 %10 NS 3P N+2 200 9 50.00
11 NS 3PcN-4 -800 2 11.11
12 NS 4C S = 620 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 50,00 %13 NS 3S W = -600 10 55.56
14 NS 6P E = -980 10 55.56
15 NS 3K E-2 100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 57,59 %16 NS 4C S-1 -50 8 44.44
17 NS 3P E-2 100 10 55.56
18 NS 4P E = -420 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 53,70 %19 NS 2K N+2 130 11 61.11
20 NS 3S W = -600 11 61.11
21 NS 3S N-1 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
12 COOLEN Josef -ARICKX Roger : 38,70 %22 NS 3S W+2 -660 6 33.33
23 NS 5C W = -650 8 44.44
24 NS 3C N-3 -150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
11 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 50,37 %25 NS 3C S-3 -150 1 5.56
26 NS 5P E-1 100 5 27.78
27 NS 2P E+1 -140 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
20 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 59,44 %28 NS 2S W = -120 5 27.78
29 NS 5T N-1 -100 0 0.00
30 NS 4C S = 420 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
Total : 238,0 / 540 = 44,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile
1 VANDAM Jean -VANDAM Cécile : 58,15 % 1 EO 4P E = -420 15 83.33
2 EO 2S E-2 100 5 27.78
3 EO 6C N-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
3 STEED Adrian -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 48,89 % 4 EO 2P S = 110 12 66.67
5 EO 2K E = -90 9 50.00
6 EO 6C N = 980 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -DELHEZ Jacques : 46,30 % 7 EO 3K N-3 -300 18 100.00
8 EO 3KcW-1 100 6 33.33
9 EO 4P N+2 480 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
5 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,85 %10 EO 3P N+2 200 9 50.00
11 EO 4PcN-4 -800 16 88.89
12 EO 4C S = 620 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
6 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,07 %13 EO 3S E = -600 8 44.44
14 EO 6P E = -980 8 44.44
15 EO 3CxS-1 -400 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
7 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 51,67 %16 EO 4C N-1 -50 10 55.56
17 EO 3P E-2 100 8 44.44
18 EO 5P E-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 58,33 %19 EO 1C W-3 300 0 0.00
20 EO 3S W+1 -630 14 77.78
21 EO 3ScN+2 1150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
9 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 52,04 %22 EO 3S W+1 -630 3 16.67
23 EO 6P E-1 100 0 0.00
24 EO 3S S = 400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 5,56 %
10 VERBOIS Léon -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 44,07 %25 EO 3C S-3 -150 17 94.44
26 EO 5P E-1 100 13 72.22
27 EO 2P E+1 -140 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
4 DUBOIS Yves -COURTOIS Chantal : 44,63 %28 EO 2S W-1 50 5 27.78
29 EO 4T N = 130 14 77.78
30 EO 3C N+1 170 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 272,0 / 540 = 50,37 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 COOLEN Josef -ARICKX Roger
3 STEED Adrian -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 48,89 % 1 EO 4K N-2 -100 2 11.11
2 EO 2T W = -90 12 66.67
3 EO 3S S+1 430 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -DELHEZ Jacques : 46,30 % 4 EO 3S N+1 630 2 11.11
5 EO 2C W = -110 14 77.78
6 EO 4C S+2 480 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
1 VANDAM Jean -VANDAM Cécile : 58,15 % 7 EO 1S N = 90 5 27.78
8 EO 3P N = 140 2 11.11
9 EO 6P N = 980 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
6 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,07 %10 EO 2P N+3 200 9 50.00
11 EO 3P N-2 -100 0 0.00
12 EO 4C S = 620 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
7 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 51,67 %13 EO 3S E = -600 8 44.44
14 EO 4P E+2 -480 0 0.00
15 EO 3C S-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 58,33 %16 EO 4C S = 420 0 0.00
17 EO 3C N-1 -50 15 83.33
18 EO 4P E = -420 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 52,04 %19 EO 3K N+1 130 7 38.89
20 EO 2S W+1 -150 2 11.11
21 EO 4T S+1 150 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
10 VERBOIS Léon -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 44,07 %22 EO 3S W+2 -660 12 66.67
23 EO 5C W = -650 10 55.56
24 EO 3C N-3 -150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
4 DUBOIS Yves -COURTOIS Chantal : 44,63 %25 EO 2C S+1 140 6 33.33
26 EO 4P W-1 100 13 72.22
27 EO 1P E = -80 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
5 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,85 %28 EO 2S W-1 50 5 27.78
29 EO 5T N = 600 8 44.44
30 EO 4C S+2 480 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
Total : 209,0 / 540 = 38,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -DELHEZ Jacques : 46,30 % 1 EO 4P E = -420 15 83.33
2 EO 2S W-2 100 5 27.78
3 EO 6CcS-3 -500 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
1 VANDAM Jean -VANDAM Cécile : 58,15 % 4 EO 3S N+1 630 2 11.11
5 EO 2K E = -90 9 50.00
6 EO 6C N = 980 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
3 STEED Adrian -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 48,89 % 7 EO 1S N-1 -100 9 50.00
8 EO 3P S-1 -50 8 44.44
9 EO 4P S = 420 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
7 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 51,67 %10 EO 2P N+3 200 9 50.00
11 EO 5TcE = -550 12 66.67
12 EO 4C N+1 650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 58,33 %13 EO 3S E-1 100 1 5.56
14 EO 6P E = -980 8 44.44
15 EO 2P N-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
9 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 52,04 %16 EO 4C S-1 -50 10 55.56
17 EO 4C N-1 -50 15 83.33
18 EO 4P W = -420 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
10 VERBOIS Léon -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 44,07 %19 EO 2K N+2 130 7 38.89
20 EO 3S W = -600 7 38.89
21 EO 3S N-1 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
4 DUBOIS Yves -COURTOIS Chantal : 44,63 %22 EO 3S W+1 -630 3 16.67
23 EO 5P E+1 -680 15 83.33
24 EO 2P E+2 -170 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
5 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,85 %25 EO 2C S-1 -50 11 61.11
26 EO 6P W-3 300 2 11.11
27 EO 2P E+1 -140 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
6 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,07 %28 EO 2S W = -120 13 72.22
29 EO 5T N = 600 8 44.44
30 EO 3C S+1 170 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 290,0 / 540 = 53,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 58,33 % 1 EO 4P E = -420 15 83.33
2 EO 2S E = -120 15 83.33
3 EO 5C S = 450 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
9 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 52,04 % 4 EO 4P S-2 -200 16 88.89
5 EO 1S W-1 50 5 27.78
6 EO 6C S = 980 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
10 VERBOIS Léon -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 44,07 % 7 EO 2P W-3 300 0 0.00
8 EO 4P S-2 -100 11 61.11
9 EO 4P N+2 480 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
4 DUBOIS Yves -COURTOIS Chantal : 44,63 %10 EO 2P N+3 200 9 50.00
11 EO 4PcN-4 -800 16 88.89
12 EO 4C S = 620 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -DELHEZ Jacques : 46,30 %13 EO 2S E-1 100 1 5.56
14 EO 6P E = -980 8 44.44
15 EO 2S N-3 -300 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
5 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,85 %16 EO 3S N-2 -100 18 100.00
17 EO 3C N = 140 1 5.56
18 EO 4P E = -420 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
3 STEED Adrian -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 48,89 %19 EO 3K N+1 130 7 38.89
20 EO 3S W = -600 7 38.89
21 EO 3S N-1 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
6 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,07 %22 EO 3S W+3 -690 18 100.00
23 EO 5TcN-1 -200 4 22.22
24 EO 1P E+2 -140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
1 VANDAM Jean -VANDAM Cécile : 58,15 %25 EO 3S N-1 -50 11 61.11
26 EO 5K E = -600 16 88.89
27 EO 3P E-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
7 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 51,67 %28 EO 2S W-2 100 0 0.00
29 EO 3S S+2 660 1 5.56
30 EO 2C S+4 230 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
Total : 268,0 / 540 = 49,63 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse
9 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 52,04 % 1 EO 3P E+1 -170 7 38.89
2 EO 3S E-3 150 1 5.56
3 EO 3S N = 400 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
10 VERBOIS Léon -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 44,07 % 4 EO 3S N = 600 8 44.44
5 EO 1S N = 90 2 11.11
6 EO 4C S+2 480 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
4 DUBOIS Yves -COURTOIS Chantal : 44,63 % 7 EO 1S N = 90 5 27.78
8 EO 4K W = -130 15 83.33
9 EO 3S N+1 430 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 58,33 %10 EO 2P N+3 200 9 50.00
11 EO 4PcN-2 -300 2 11.11
12 EO 4C S = 620 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
5 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,85 %13 EO 3S E = -600 8 44.44
14 EO 6P E = -980 8 44.44
15 EO 3C N-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -DELHEZ Jacques : 46,30 %16 EO 3K N = 110 2 11.11
17 EO 3C N = 140 1 5.56
18 EO 3S E = -400 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
6 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,07 %19 EO 4K N+1 150 2 11.11
20 EO 4C W = -620 12 66.67
21 EO 3S S-2 -200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
3 STEED Adrian -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 48,89 %22 EO 3S W+2 -660 12 66.67
23 EO 5TcS-2 -500 7 38.89
24 EO 2C W-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
7 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 51,67 %25 EO 3C S-2 -100 14 77.78
26 EO 5PcE-1 200 7 38.89
27 EO 4K S+1 150 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
1 VANDAM Jean -VANDAM Cécile : 58,15 %28 EO 2S E-1 50 5 27.78
29 EO 3S N+2 660 1 5.56
30 EO 4C N = 420 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
Total : 213,0 / 540 = 39,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard
10 VERBOIS Léon -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 44,07 % 1 EO 3C W+1 -170 7 38.89
2 EO 2S W+1 -150 18 100.00
3 EO 4C S = 420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
4 DUBOIS Yves -COURTOIS Chantal : 44,63 % 4 EO 3S S = 600 8 44.44
5 EO 2C W = -110 14 77.78
6 EO 6C S = 980 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
5 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,85 % 7 EO 2P W = -110 13 72.22
8 EO 2P S+1 140 2 11.11
9 EO 6P S = 980 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
1 VANDAM Jean -VANDAM Cécile : 58,15 %10 EO 4P N+1 650 1 5.56
11 EO 4C E+1 -450 6 33.33
12 EO 4C N = 620 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
9 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 52,04 %13 EO 3S E+1 -630 16 88.89
14 EO 6P E+1 -1010 17 94.44
15 EO 3K E-2 100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
6 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,07 %16 EO 4C S-1 -50 10 55.56
17 EO 3K S+1 130 4 22.22
18 EO 2P E+2 -170 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -DELHEZ Jacques : 46,30 %19 EO 3T S = 110 13 72.22
20 EO 2PcS-3 -800 18 100.00
21 EO 3CcW-3 500 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
7 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 51,67 %22 EO 3S E+2 -660 12 66.67
23 EO 4C W+2 -680 15 83.33
24 EO 3S S-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
3 STEED Adrian -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 48,89 %25 EO 3KcW-2 500 0 0.00
26 EO 5P W-2 200 7 38.89
27 EO 2P E = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 58,33 %28 EO 2CcS-1 -200 18 100.00
29 EO 3S S+1 630 4 22.22
30 EO 3C S+3 230 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 259,0 / 540 = 47,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
4 DUBOIS Yves -COURTOIS Chantal : 44,63 % 1 EO 3C W+1 -170 7 38.89
2 EO 2S E = -120 15 83.33
3 EO 3S S+1 430 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
5 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,85 % 4 EO 5TcN-2 -500 18 100.00
5 EO 3S E-2 100 0 0.00
6 EO 3S N+2 460 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
6 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,07 % 7 EO 2S E = -120 16 88.89
8 EO 4PcN-1 -100 11 61.11
9 EO 6P S = 980 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
9 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 52,04 %10 EO 2K N-1 -100 18 100.00
11 EO 4C W+1 -450 6 33.33
12 EO 5TcW-2 300 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
1 VANDAM Jean -VANDAM Cécile : 58,15 %13 EO 3S E = -600 8 44.44
14 EO 6P E+1 -1010 17 94.44
15 EO 2S N-3 -300 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
10 VERBOIS Léon -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 44,07 %16 EO 4C S-1 -50 10 55.56
17 EO 3P E-2 100 8 44.44
18 EO 4P E = -420 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
7 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 51,67 %19 EO 3S N-2 -100 18 100.00
20 EO 4C W+1 -650 16 88.89
21 EO 2P N+1 140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -DELHEZ Jacques : 46,30 %22 EO 3S W+2 -660 12 66.67
23 EO 4P E+2 -680 15 83.33
24 EO 3K S-2 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 58,33 %25 EO 2C S = 110 8 44.44
26 EO 6PcE-3 800 0 0.00
27 EO 4K S+1 150 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
3 STEED Adrian -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 48,89 %28 EO 2S W-1 50 5 27.78
29 EO 3T N+1 130 14 77.78
30 EO 4C S = 420 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 311,0 / 540 = 57,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
5 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,85 % 1 EO 5T W-1 50 0 0.00
2 EO 3S W-1 50 9 50.00
3 EO 4CxN+1 1080 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
6 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,07 % 4 EO 3S S = 600 8 44.44
5 EO 2P E = -110 14 77.78
6 EO 4C S+2 480 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
7 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 51,67 % 7 EO 3T E = -110 13 72.22
8 EO 4CcE = -590 18 100.00
9 EO 6P S-1 -50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
3 STEED Adrian -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 48,89 %10 EO 3P N+1 170 16 88.89
11 EO 4C E+1 -450 6 33.33
12 EO 4C S = 620 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
10 VERBOIS Léon -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 44,07 %13 EO 3S W = -600 8 44.44
14 EO 6P E = -980 8 44.44
15 EO 3K E-2 100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
1 VANDAM Jean -VANDAM Cécile : 58,15 %16 EO 4C N-1 -50 10 55.56
17 EO 2P E-2 100 8 44.44
18 EO 3S E = -400 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
4 DUBOIS Yves -COURTOIS Chantal : 44,63 %19 EO 3K N+1 130 7 38.89
20 EO 3S W = -600 7 38.89
21 EO 3T S+2 150 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 58,33 %22 EO 3S W+2 -660 12 66.67
23 EO 5T S-1 -100 2 11.11
24 EO 3PcE-1 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -DELHEZ Jacques : 46,30 %25 EO 3C S-3 -150 17 94.44
26 EO 5P E-2 200 7 38.89
27 EO 2P E = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
9 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 52,04 %28 EO 2S W = -120 13 72.22
29 EO 5T N = 600 8 44.44
30 EO 3T N-1 -50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
Total : 270,0 / 540 = 50,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne
6 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,07 % 1 EO 4P E = -420 15 83.33
2 EO 2S W-1 50 9 50.00
3 EO 5C S-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
7 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 51,67 % 4 EO 3S S+1 630 2 11.11
5 EO 2K W-1 50 5 27.78
6 EO 6C S-1 -50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 58,33 % 7 EO 1S N-1 -100 9 50.00
8 EO 3P S = 140 2 11.11
9 EO 4P S+1 450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
10 VERBOIS Léon -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 44,07 %10 EO 3P N+2 200 9 50.00
11 EO 3PcN-4 -800 16 88.89
12 EO 4C S = 620 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
3 STEED Adrian -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 48,89 %13 EO 3S E+1 -630 16 88.89
14 EO 6P E = -980 8 44.44
15 EO 3C S-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
4 DUBOIS Yves -COURTOIS Chantal : 44,63 %16 EO 4C S-1 -50 10 55.56
17 EO 3C N-1 -50 15 83.33
18 EO 4P E = -420 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
1 VANDAM Jean -VANDAM Cécile : 58,15 %19 EO 5K N-1 -50 16 88.89
20 EO 4C E-2 200 0 0.00
21 EO 2P N = 110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
5 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,85 %22 EO 3S W+1 -630 3 16.67
23 EO 5P E+1 -680 15 83.33
24 EO 2P N-3 -150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
9 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 52,04 %25 EO 3S N+1 430 2 11.11
26 EO 6P E-2 200 7 38.89
27 EO 2P E-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -DELHEZ Jacques : 46,30 %28 EO 2S W = -120 13 72.22
29 EO 3T N+1 130 14 77.78
30 EO 4C N+2 480 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
Total : 287,0 / 540 = 53,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe
7 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 51,67 % 1 EO 3C W+1 -170 7 38.89
2 EO 3S W-3 150 1 5.56
3 EO 6C S-2 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 58,33 % 4 EO 3S S-1 -100 14 77.78
5 EO 3T N-2 -200 18 100.00
6 EO 6C S = 980 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
9 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 52,04 % 7 EO 1S N+1 120 2 11.11
8 EO 4K W = -130 15 83.33
9 EO 6S S-3 -150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -DELHEZ Jacques : 46,30 %10 EO 4P N+1 650 1 5.56
11 EO 4PcN-3 -500 10 55.56
12 EO 3S W-4 200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
4 DUBOIS Yves -COURTOIS Chantal : 44,63 %13 EO 3S E+1 -630 16 88.89
14 EO 6P E = -980 8 44.44
15 EO 2K E-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
3 STEED Adrian -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 48,89 %16 EO 4C S-1 -50 10 55.56
17 EO 3C N-1 -50 15 83.33
18 EO 3S W+1 -430 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
5 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,85 %19 EO 3K N = 110 13 72.22
20 EO 3S W = -600 7 38.89
21 EO 2P N-1 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
1 VANDAM Jean -VANDAM Cécile : 58,15 %22 EO 3S E+1 -630 3 16.67
23 EO 6TcN-2 -500 7 38.89
24 EO 2C E+1 -140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
6 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,07 %25 EO 4P E-2 200 4 22.22
26 EO 4P W = -620 18 100.00
27 EO 2P E = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
10 VERBOIS Léon -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 44,07 %28 EO 2S W = -120 13 72.22
29 EO 5T N-1 -100 18 100.00
30 EO 4C S = 420 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
Total : 321,0 / 540 = 59,44 %
|
|