|
Tournoi du 27-09-10
1 66,20 4 de WASSEIGE Claude -FRAITURE Louis
2 57,18 10 HUBLET Carlo -SALME Victoria
3 55,09 8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
4 53,94 1 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian
5 53,70 9 GELISSEN Edouard -VERBOIS Léon
6 45,60 2 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean
7 44,21 5 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse
8 42,82 6 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSAUX Jacques
9 40,74 3 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga
10 40,51 7 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 61,25 15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
2 55,21 17 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
3 53,33 13 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CLERIN François-Xavier
4 51,25 11 BRIOT Fernand -MATELART Marc
5 50,62 16 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard
6 48,33 14 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne
7 46,46 12 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
8 42,92 18 MACAUX Lucienne -NIGOT Pierre
9 40,62 19 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques
10 0,00 20 -
PAIRE Nr : 1 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian
11 BRIOT Fernand -MATELART Marc : 51,25 % 1 NS 3T N = 110 12 75.00
2 NS 3T N-1 -100 6 37.50
3 NS 2P N+2 170 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
13 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CLERIN François-Xavier : 53,33 % 4 NS 3S E+1 -630 12 75.00
5 NS 4C N = 620 12 75.00
6 NS 4T S = 130 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
12 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 46,46 % 7 NS 3C N = 140 12 75.00
8 NS 2P E+1 -140 7 43.75
9 NS 3S N+2 460 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
16 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 50,62 %10 NS 4P S+2 680 6 37.50
11 NS 5T W+1 -420 4 25.00
12 NS 3S W+1 -430 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
17 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,21 %13 NS 4C N+1 650 9 56.25
14 NS 3P N-1 -50 1 6.25
15 NS 3P S+1 170 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
18 MACAUX Lucienne -NIGOT Pierre : 42,92 %16 NS 3C S-1 -50 11 68.75
17 NS 1S W-1 50 16 100.00
18 NS 1S W = -90 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
19 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,62 %19 NS 4C N = 420 7 43.75
20 NS 4C N = 620 11 68.75
21 NS 3S S+2 660 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
20 - : 0,00 %22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
14 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 48,33 %25 NS 4C W = -620 4 25.00
26 NS 2P N = 110 10 62.50
27 NS 2P S+1 140 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 61,25 %28 NS 6T E = -920 0 0.00
29 NS 3S W = -600 5 31.25
30 NS 3S N-2 -100 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
Total : 233,0 / 432 = 53,94 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean
13 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CLERIN François-Xavier : 53,33 % 1 NS 3C E+1 -170 0 0.00
2 NS 3K E-2 100 15 93.75
3 NS 2K S = 90 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
12 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 46,46 % 4 NS 3S E+3 -690 0 0.00
5 NS 4C N = 620 12 75.00
6 NS 5T S = 400 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
11 BRIOT Fernand -MATELART Marc : 51,25 % 7 NS 3C N-1 -100 2 12.50
8 NS 4P E = -420 1 6.25
9 NS 3T S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 6,25 %
20 - : 0,00 %10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
14 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 48,33 %13 NS 4C N+1 650 9 56.25
14 NS 3P N = 140 10 62.50
15 NS 4P S-1 -100 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 61,25 %16 NS 4CcS-4 -800 0 0.00
17 NS 2T S-4 -200 0 0.00
18 NS 2P S+1 140 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
16 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 50,62 %19 NS 4C N = 420 7 43.75
20 NS 4C N = 620 11 68.75
21 NS 3S N+1 630 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
17 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,21 %22 NS 3K S+1 130 6 37.50
23 NS 2C E+1 -140 7 43.75
24 NS 5P S-1 -50 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
18 MACAUX Lucienne -NIGOT Pierre : 42,92 %25 NS 4C E-1 100 14 87.50
26 NS 2P N = 110 10 62.50
27 NS 3S N = 400 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
19 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,62 %28 NS 3S E-2 100 12 75.00
29 NS 3S W = -600 5 31.25
30 NS 2C S-1 -50 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
Total : 197,0 / 432 = 45,60 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga
12 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 46,46 % 1 NS 4C E-2 100 8 50.00
2 NS 3K E = -110 2 12.50
3 NS 3T N = 110 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
11 BRIOT Fernand -MATELART Marc : 51,25 % 4 NS 3S E+1 -630 12 75.00
5 NS 5C N-1 -100 1 6.25
6 NS 3P W+2 -200 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
13 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CLERIN François-Xavier : 53,33 % 7 NS 3T S-1 -100 2 12.50
8 NS 4P E = -420 1 6.25
9 NS 3S N+1 430 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
18 MACAUX Lucienne -NIGOT Pierre : 42,92 %10 NS 4P S+2 680 6 37.50
11 NS 6P E-2 100 11 68.75
12 NS 3S W+2 -460 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
19 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,62 %13 NS 4C N+1 650 9 56.25
14 NS 2P N+1 140 10 62.50
15 NS 4P S = 620 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
20 - : 0,00 %16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
14 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 48,33 %19 NS 4C N = 420 7 43.75
20 NS 1T S+1 90 2 12.50
21 NS 3S S+4 720 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 61,25 %22 NS 5K N-1 -50 2 12.50
23 NS 3C W = -140 7 43.75
24 NS 3S N-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
16 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 50,62 %25 NS 4C W = -620 4 25.00
26 NS 3T W-1 100 4 25.00
27 NS 1S N+2 150 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
17 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,21 %28 NS 3S W+4 -520 3 18.75
29 NS 3S W-1 100 14 87.50
30 NS 1S W = -90 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
Total : 176,0 / 432 = 40,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 de WASSEIGE Claude -FRAITURE Louis
17 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,21 % 1 NS 3T N = 110 12 75.00
2 NS 2K E-1 50 11 68.75
3 NS 2T N = 90 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
16 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 50,62 % 4 NS 3S W+1 -630 12 75.00
5 NS 4C N = 620 12 75.00
6 NS 5T S-1 -50 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 61,25 % 7 NS 3C N = 140 12 75.00
8 NS 2P E+2 -170 4 25.00
9 NS 3S N+1 430 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
14 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 48,33 %10 NS 5P S+1 680 6 37.50
11 NS 6P E-2 100 11 68.75
12 NS 3S W = -400 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
20 - : 0,00 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
19 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,62 %16 NS 2S E-2 200 15 93.75
17 NS 2C S-1 -50 14 87.50
18 NS 3T W = -110 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
18 MACAUX Lucienne -NIGOT Pierre : 42,92 %19 NS 5C N = 450 16 100.00
20 NS 4C N = 620 11 68.75
21 NS 3S S+2 660 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
13 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CLERIN François-Xavier : 53,33 %22 NS 2K N+3 150 12 75.00
23 NS 3C E = -140 7 43.75
24 NS 5P S = 450 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
12 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 46,46 %25 NS 4C W-1 100 14 87.50
26 NS 2P N = 110 10 62.50
27 NS 1P S+2 140 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
11 BRIOT Fernand -MATELART Marc : 51,25 %28 NS 3S W-2 100 12 75.00
29 NS 3S W-1 100 14 87.50
30 NS 2S W-2 100 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 87,50 %
Total : 286,0 / 432 = 66,20 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse
18 MACAUX Lucienne -NIGOT Pierre : 42,92 % 1 NS 3C E = -140 3 18.75
2 NS 3K E-1 50 11 68.75
3 NS 2P N+2 170 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
17 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,21 % 4 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 25.00
5 NS 3C N = 140 4 25.00
6 NS 3P W = -140 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
16 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 50,62 % 7 NS 2K E = -90 7 43.75
8 NS 4K S-2 -100 12 75.00
9 NS 3S N+1 430 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
11 BRIOT Fernand -MATELART Marc : 51,25 %10 NS 4P S+3 710 15 93.75
11 NS 6S E+1 -1020 1 6.25
12 NS 6P E-4 200 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 61,25 %13 NS 4C N+1 650 9 56.25
14 NS 3P N-1 -50 1 6.25
15 NS 4P S = 620 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
14 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 48,33 %16 NS 2P E-2 200 15 93.75
17 NS 1S W+1 -120 5 31.25
18 NS 1S W+3 -180 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
20 - : 0,00 %19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
19 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,62 %22 NS 2K N+2 130 6 37.50
23 NS 3C E = -140 7 43.75
24 NS 4P S+1 450 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
13 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CLERIN François-Xavier : 53,33 %25 NS 4C W = -620 4 25.00
26 NS 2P N-1 -100 0 0.00
27 NS 2P S = 110 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 10,42 %
12 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 46,46 %28 NS 5T E = -400 6 37.50
29 NS 3S E = -600 5 31.25
30 NS 2K E+1 -110 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
Total : 191,0 / 432 = 44,21 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSAUX Jacques
19 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,62 % 1 NS 4CcE-2 300 16 100.00
2 NS 3K E = -110 2 12.50
3 NS 3K E = -110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
18 MACAUX Lucienne -NIGOT Pierre : 42,92 % 4 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 25.00
5 NS 2C N+2 170 6 37.50
6 NS 4PcW = -790 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
17 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,21 % 7 NS 2T S-1 -100 2 12.50
8 NS 2P E = -110 10 62.50
9 NS 3S N = 400 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
12 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 46,46 %10 NS 4P S+2 680 6 37.50
11 NS 6S W+1 -1020 1 6.25
12 NS 3S E-1 50 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
11 BRIOT Fernand -MATELART Marc : 51,25 %13 NS 3S N+2 660 16 100.00
14 NS 3P N = 140 10 62.50
15 NS 4P S-1 -100 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
16 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 50,62 %16 NS 3C S-2 -100 5 31.25
17 NS 1S W = -90 10 62.50
18 NS 3P S-1 -100 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 61,25 %19 NS 4C N = 420 7 43.75
20 NS 4C N = 620 11 68.75
21 NS 5T S = 600 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
14 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 48,33 %22 NS 2K N+3 150 12 75.00
23 NS 4C E-1 100 16 100.00
24 NS 3S N-2 -100 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
20 - : 0,00 %25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00
27 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
13 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CLERIN François-Xavier : 53,33 %28 NS 3S W+4 -520 3 18.75
29 NS 3S E-1 100 14 87.50
30 NS 2K E+1 -110 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
Total : 185,0 / 432 = 42,82 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert
20 - : 0,00 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
19 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,62 % 4 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 25.00
5 NS 3P S-1 -100 1 6.25
6 NS 4T S = 130 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
18 MACAUX Lucienne -NIGOT Pierre : 42,92 % 7 NS 1S E = -90 7 43.75
8 NS 1P E = -80 14 87.50
9 NS 2C S+1 140 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
13 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CLERIN François-Xavier : 53,33 %10 NS 4P S+3 710 15 93.75
11 NS 5P W-1 50 6 37.50
12 NS 3T W+2 -150 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
12 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 46,46 %13 NS 4C S+1 650 9 56.25
14 NS 4C E-3 150 16 100.00
15 NS 4P S = 620 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
11 BRIOT Fernand -MATELART Marc : 51,25 %16 NS 2C S-2 -100 5 31.25
17 NS 1S W = -90 10 62.50
18 NS 3T W = -110 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
17 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,21 %19 NS 4C N = 420 7 43.75
20 NS 3TcS-3 -800 0 0.00
21 NS 2T S+4 170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,58 %
16 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 50,62 %22 NS 3S S-2 -100 0 0.00
23 NS 2C E+1 -140 7 43.75
24 NS 4P S = 420 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 61,25 %25 NS 4C W = -620 4 25.00
26 NS 3K E-1 100 4 25.00
27 NS 2S N = 120 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
14 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 48,33 %28 NS 3K W-2 100 12 75.00
29 NS 3S W = -600 5 31.25
30 NS 1S W+1 -120 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
Total : 175,0 / 432 = 40,51 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
14 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 48,33 % 1 NS 3C E = -140 3 18.75
2 NS 3K E-2 100 15 93.75
3 NS 2T N+1 110 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
20 - : 0,00 % 4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
19 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,62 % 7 NS 2C N+2 170 16 100.00
8 NS 3C N-1 -50 16 100.00
9 NS 3S N+1 430 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 87,50 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 61,25 %10 NS 4P S+2 680 6 37.50
11 NS 6P W-2 100 11 68.75
12 NS 3S W+2 -460 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
13 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CLERIN François-Xavier : 53,33 %13 NS 6C N-1 -100 1 6.25
14 NS 2P N+1 140 10 62.50
15 NS 3P S+1 170 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
12 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 46,46 %16 NS 3C S-2 -100 5 31.25
17 NS 1S W = -90 10 62.50
18 NS 3S W-2 100 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
11 BRIOT Fernand -MATELART Marc : 51,25 %19 NS 4C N = 420 7 43.75
20 NS 4C N = 620 11 68.75
21 NS 1S S+5 240 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
18 MACAUX Lucienne -NIGOT Pierre : 42,92 %22 NS 2K N+3 150 12 75.00
23 NS 3C E = -140 7 43.75
24 NS 4P S = 420 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
17 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,21 %25 NS 4C W-1 100 14 87.50
26 NS 3P N = 140 15 93.75
27 NS 2P S+1 140 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
16 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 50,62 %28 NS 3S W-2 100 12 75.00
29 NS 3S W+1 -630 0 0.00
30 NS 1S W = -90 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
Total : 238,0 / 432 = 55,09 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 GELISSEN Edouard -VERBOIS Léon
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 61,25 % 1 NS 4T N-2 -100 6 37.50
2 NS 2K E = -90 8 50.00
3 NS 3T S = 110 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
14 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 48,33 % 4 NS 3S E+1 -630 12 75.00
5 NS 4C N = 620 12 75.00
6 NS 4T S = 130 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
20 - : 0,00 % 7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
17 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,21 %10 NS 4P S+2 680 6 37.50
11 NS 6P E-2 100 11 68.75
12 NS 3S W-1 50 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
16 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 50,62 %13 NS 4C N+1 650 9 56.25
14 NS 3C E-1 50 4 25.00
15 NS 4P N+1 650 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
13 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CLERIN François-Xavier : 53,33 %16 NS 2C S-2 -100 5 31.25
17 NS 1S W+2 -150 2 12.50
18 NS 3P S = 140 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
12 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 46,46 %19 NS 4C N = 420 7 43.75
20 NS 2C S+2 170 4 25.00
21 NS 3S S+1 630 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
11 BRIOT Fernand -MATELART Marc : 51,25 %22 NS 2K N+2 130 6 37.50
23 NS 2C E+1 -140 7 43.75
24 NS 4P S = 420 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
19 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,62 %25 NS 3C W+1 -170 10 62.50
26 NS 2P N+1 140 15 93.75
27 NS 1P S+1 110 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
18 MACAUX Lucienne -NIGOT Pierre : 42,92 %28 NS 3S W-2 100 12 75.00
29 NS 2P N-2 -200 10 62.50
30 NS 2K E+1 -110 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
Total : 232,0 / 432 = 53,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 HUBLET Carlo -SALME Victoria
16 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 50,62 % 1 NS 3T N = 110 12 75.00
2 NS 2C W = -110 2 12.50
3 NS 2S S = 120 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 61,25 % 4 NS 3S E+1 -630 12 75.00
5 NS 4C N = 620 12 75.00
6 NS 3P W = -140 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
14 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 48,33 % 7 NS 2C N+1 140 12 75.00
8 NS 2P E+1 -140 7 43.75
9 NS 3S N+1 430 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
19 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,62 %10 NS 4P S+2 680 6 37.50
11 NS 6PcW-2 300 16 100.00
12 NS 3T W+1 -130 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
18 MACAUX Lucienne -NIGOT Pierre : 42,92 %13 NS 6C N-1 -100 1 6.25
14 NS 3P N = 140 10 62.50
15 NS 3S N+1 630 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
17 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,21 %16 NS 2C S-1 -50 11 68.75
17 NS 1S W+1 -120 5 31.25
18 NS 3S W-1 50 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
13 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CLERIN François-Xavier : 53,33 %19 NS 4C N = 420 7 43.75
20 NS 4C N = 620 11 68.75
21 NS 3S N+2 660 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
12 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 46,46 %22 NS 3S S+1 430 16 100.00
23 NS 2C E+1 -140 7 43.75
24 NS 2P S+2 170 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
11 BRIOT Fernand -MATELART Marc : 51,25 %25 NS 4C W = -620 4 25.00
26 NS 3T W-1 100 4 25.00
27 NS 1S N+2 150 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
20 - : 0,00 %28 NS BYE 0 0.00
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 247,0 / 432 = 57,18 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 BRIOT Fernand -MATELART Marc
1 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian : 53,94 % 1 EO 3T N = 110 4 25.00
2 EO 3T N-1 -100 10 62.50
3 EO 2P N+2 170 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
3 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 40,74 % 4 EO 3S E+1 -630 4 25.00
5 EO 5C N-1 -100 15 93.75
6 EO 3P W+2 -200 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
2 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 45,60 % 7 EO 3C N-1 -100 14 87.50
8 EO 4P E = -420 15 93.75
9 EO 3T S-2 -100 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 93,75 %
5 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 44,21 %10 EO 4P S+3 710 1 6.25
11 EO 6S E+1 -1020 15 93.75
12 EO 6P E-4 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
6 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSAUX Jacques : 42,82 %13 EO 3S N+2 660 0 0.00
14 EO 3P N = 140 6 37.50
15 EO 4P S-1 -100 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
7 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 40,51 %16 EO 2C S-2 -100 11 68.75
17 EO 1S W = -90 6 37.50
18 EO 3T W = -110 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 55,09 %19 EO 4C N = 420 9 56.25
20 EO 4C N = 620 5 31.25
21 EO 1S S+5 240 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
9 GELISSEN Edouard -VERBOIS Léon : 53,70 %22 EO 2K N+2 130 10 62.50
23 EO 2C E+1 -140 9 56.25
24 EO 4P S = 420 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
10 HUBLET Carlo -SALME Victoria : 57,18 %25 EO 4C W = -620 12 75.00
26 EO 3T W-1 100 12 75.00
27 EO 1S N+2 150 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
4 de WASSEIGE Claude -FRAITURE Louis : 66,20 %28 EO 3S W-2 100 4 25.00
29 EO 3S W-1 100 2 12.50
30 EO 2S W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 12,50 %
Total : 246,0 / 480 = 51,25 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
3 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 40,74 % 1 EO 4C E-2 100 8 50.00
2 EO 3K E = -110 14 87.50
3 EO 3T N = 110 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
2 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 45,60 % 4 EO 3S E+3 -690 16 100.00
5 EO 4C N = 620 4 25.00
6 EO 5T S = 400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
1 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian : 53,94 % 7 EO 3C N = 140 4 25.00
8 EO 2P E+1 -140 9 56.25
9 EO 3S N+2 460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
6 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSAUX Jacques : 42,82 %10 EO 4P S+2 680 10 62.50
11 EO 6S W+1 -1020 15 93.75
12 EO 3S E-1 50 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
7 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 40,51 %13 EO 4C S+1 650 7 43.75
14 EO 4C E-3 150 0 0.00
15 EO 4P S = 620 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 55,09 %16 EO 3C S-2 -100 11 68.75
17 EO 1S W = -90 6 37.50
18 EO 3S W-2 100 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
9 GELISSEN Edouard -VERBOIS Léon : 53,70 %19 EO 4C N = 420 9 56.25
20 EO 2C S+2 170 12 75.00
21 EO 3S S+1 630 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
10 HUBLET Carlo -SALME Victoria : 57,18 %22 EO 3S S+1 430 0 0.00
23 EO 2C E+1 -140 9 56.25
24 EO 2P S+2 170 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
4 de WASSEIGE Claude -FRAITURE Louis : 66,20 %25 EO 4C W-1 100 2 12.50
26 EO 2P N = 110 6 37.50
27 EO 1P S+2 140 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
5 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 44,21 %28 EO 5T E = -400 10 62.50
29 EO 3S E = -600 11 68.75
30 EO 2K E+1 -110 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
Total : 223,0 / 480 = 46,46 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CLERIN François-Xavier
2 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 45,60 % 1 EO 3C E+1 -170 16 100.00
2 EO 3K E-2 100 1 6.25
3 EO 2K S = 90 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
1 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian : 53,94 % 4 EO 3S E+1 -630 4 25.00
5 EO 4C N = 620 4 25.00
6 EO 4T S = 130 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
3 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 40,74 % 7 EO 3T S-1 -100 14 87.50
8 EO 4P E = -420 15 93.75
9 EO 3S N+1 430 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
7 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 40,51 %10 EO 4P S+3 710 1 6.25
11 EO 5P W-1 50 10 62.50
12 EO 3T W+2 -150 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 55,09 %13 EO 6C N-1 -100 15 93.75
14 EO 2P N+1 140 6 37.50
15 EO 3P S+1 170 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
9 GELISSEN Edouard -VERBOIS Léon : 53,70 %16 EO 2C S-2 -100 11 68.75
17 EO 1S W+2 -150 14 87.50
18 EO 3P S = 140 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
10 HUBLET Carlo -SALME Victoria : 57,18 %19 EO 4C N = 420 9 56.25
20 EO 4C N = 620 5 31.25
21 EO 3S N+2 660 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
4 de WASSEIGE Claude -FRAITURE Louis : 66,20 %22 EO 2K N+3 150 4 25.00
23 EO 3C E = -140 9 56.25
24 EO 5P S = 450 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
5 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 44,21 %25 EO 4C W = -620 12 75.00
26 EO 2P N-1 -100 16 100.00
27 EO 2P S = 110 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 89,58 %
6 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSAUX Jacques : 42,82 %28 EO 3S W+4 -520 13 81.25
29 EO 3S E-1 100 2 12.50
30 EO 2K E+1 -110 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
Total : 256,0 / 480 = 53,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne
8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 55,09 % 1 EO 3C E = -140 13 81.25
2 EO 3K E-2 100 1 6.25
3 EO 2T N+1 110 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
9 GELISSEN Edouard -VERBOIS Léon : 53,70 % 4 EO 3S E+1 -630 4 25.00
5 EO 4C N = 620 4 25.00
6 EO 4T S = 130 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
10 HUBLET Carlo -SALME Victoria : 57,18 % 7 EO 2C N+1 140 4 25.00
8 EO 2P E+1 -140 9 56.25
9 EO 3S N+1 430 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
4 de WASSEIGE Claude -FRAITURE Louis : 66,20 %10 EO 5P S+1 680 10 62.50
11 EO 6P E-2 100 5 31.25
12 EO 3S W = -400 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
2 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 45,60 %13 EO 4C N+1 650 7 43.75
14 EO 3P N = 140 6 37.50
15 EO 4P S-1 -100 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
5 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 44,21 %16 EO 2P E-2 200 1 6.25
17 EO 1S W+1 -120 11 68.75
18 EO 1S W+3 -180 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
3 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 40,74 %19 EO 4C N = 420 9 56.25
20 EO 1T S+1 90 14 87.50
21 EO 3S S+4 720 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
6 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSAUX Jacques : 42,82 %22 EO 2K N+3 150 4 25.00
23 EO 4C E-1 100 0 0.00
24 EO 3S N-2 -100 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
1 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian : 53,94 %25 EO 4C W = -620 12 75.00
26 EO 2P N = 110 6 37.50
27 EO 2P S+1 140 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
7 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 40,51 %28 EO 3K W-2 100 4 25.00
29 EO 3S W = -600 11 68.75
30 EO 1S W+1 -120 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
Total : 232,0 / 480 = 48,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
9 GELISSEN Edouard -VERBOIS Léon : 53,70 % 1 EO 4T N-2 -100 10 62.50
2 EO 2K E = -90 8 50.00
3 EO 3T S = 110 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
10 HUBLET Carlo -SALME Victoria : 57,18 % 4 EO 3S E+1 -630 4 25.00
5 EO 4C N = 620 4 25.00
6 EO 3P W = -140 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
4 de WASSEIGE Claude -FRAITURE Louis : 66,20 % 7 EO 3C N = 140 4 25.00
8 EO 2P E+2 -170 12 75.00
9 EO 3S N+1 430 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 55,09 %10 EO 4P S+2 680 10 62.50
11 EO 6P W-2 100 5 31.25
12 EO 3S W+2 -460 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
5 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 44,21 %13 EO 4C N+1 650 7 43.75
14 EO 3P N-1 -50 15 93.75
15 EO 4P S = 620 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
2 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 45,60 %16 EO 4CcS-4 -800 16 100.00
17 EO 2T S-4 -200 16 100.00
18 EO 2P S+1 140 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
6 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSAUX Jacques : 42,82 %19 EO 4C N = 420 9 56.25
20 EO 4C N = 620 5 31.25
21 EO 5T S = 600 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
3 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 40,74 %22 EO 5K N-1 -50 14 87.50
23 EO 3C W = -140 9 56.25
24 EO 3S N-3 -150 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
7 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 40,51 %25 EO 4C W = -620 12 75.00
26 EO 3K E-1 100 12 75.00
27 EO 2S N = 120 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
1 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian : 53,94 %28 EO 6T E = -920 16 100.00
29 EO 3S W = -600 11 68.75
30 EO 3S N-2 -100 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
Total : 294,0 / 480 = 61,25 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard
10 HUBLET Carlo -SALME Victoria : 57,18 % 1 EO 3T N = 110 4 25.00
2 EO 2C W = -110 14 87.50
3 EO 2S S = 120 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
4 de WASSEIGE Claude -FRAITURE Louis : 66,20 % 4 EO 3S W+1 -630 4 25.00
5 EO 4C N = 620 4 25.00
6 EO 5T S-1 -50 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
5 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 44,21 % 7 EO 2K E = -90 9 56.25
8 EO 4K S-2 -100 4 25.00
9 EO 3S N+1 430 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
1 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian : 53,94 %10 EO 4P S+2 680 10 62.50
11 EO 5T W+1 -420 12 75.00
12 EO 3S W+1 -430 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
9 GELISSEN Edouard -VERBOIS Léon : 53,70 %13 EO 4C N+1 650 7 43.75
14 EO 3C E-1 50 12 75.00
15 EO 4P N+1 650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
6 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSAUX Jacques : 42,82 %16 EO 3C S-2 -100 11 68.75
17 EO 1S W = -90 6 37.50
18 EO 3P S-1 -100 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
2 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 45,60 %19 EO 4C N = 420 9 56.25
20 EO 4C N = 620 5 31.25
21 EO 3S N+1 630 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
7 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 40,51 %22 EO 3S S-2 -100 16 100.00
23 EO 2C E+1 -140 9 56.25
24 EO 4P S = 420 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
3 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 40,74 %25 EO 4C W = -620 12 75.00
26 EO 3T W-1 100 12 75.00
27 EO 1S N+2 150 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 55,09 %28 EO 3S W-2 100 4 25.00
29 EO 3S W+1 -630 16 100.00
30 EO 1S W = -90 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
Total : 243,0 / 480 = 50,62 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
4 de WASSEIGE Claude -FRAITURE Louis : 66,20 % 1 EO 3T N = 110 4 25.00
2 EO 2K E-1 50 5 31.25
3 EO 2T N = 90 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
5 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 44,21 % 4 EO 3S E+2 -660 12 75.00
5 EO 3C N = 140 12 75.00
6 EO 3P W = -140 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
6 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSAUX Jacques : 42,82 % 7 EO 2T S-1 -100 14 87.50
8 EO 2P E = -110 6 37.50
9 EO 3S N = 400 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
9 GELISSEN Edouard -VERBOIS Léon : 53,70 %10 EO 4P S+2 680 10 62.50
11 EO 6P E-2 100 5 31.25
12 EO 3S W-1 50 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
1 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian : 53,94 %13 EO 4C N+1 650 7 43.75
14 EO 3P N-1 -50 15 93.75
15 EO 3P S+1 170 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
10 HUBLET Carlo -SALME Victoria : 57,18 %16 EO 2C S-1 -50 5 31.25
17 EO 1S W+1 -120 11 68.75
18 EO 3S W-1 50 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
7 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 40,51 %19 EO 4C N = 420 9 56.25
20 EO 3TcS-3 -800 16 100.00
21 EO 2T S+4 170 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,42 %
2 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 45,60 %22 EO 3K S+1 130 10 62.50
23 EO 2C E+1 -140 9 56.25
24 EO 5P S-1 -50 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 55,09 %25 EO 4C W-1 100 2 12.50
26 EO 3P N = 140 1 6.25
27 EO 2P S+1 140 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
3 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 40,74 %28 EO 3S W+4 -520 13 81.25
29 EO 3S W-1 100 2 12.50
30 EO 1S W = -90 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
Total : 265,0 / 480 = 55,21 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 MACAUX Lucienne -NIGOT Pierre
5 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 44,21 % 1 EO 3C E = -140 13 81.25
2 EO 3K E-1 50 5 31.25
3 EO 2P N+2 170 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
6 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSAUX Jacques : 42,82 % 4 EO 3S E+2 -660 12 75.00
5 EO 2C N+2 170 10 62.50
6 EO 4PcW = -790 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
7 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 40,51 % 7 EO 1S E = -90 9 56.25
8 EO 1P E = -80 2 12.50
9 EO 2C S+1 140 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
3 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 40,74 %10 EO 4P S+2 680 10 62.50
11 EO 6P E-2 100 5 31.25
12 EO 3S W+2 -460 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
10 HUBLET Carlo -SALME Victoria : 57,18 %13 EO 6C N-1 -100 15 93.75
14 EO 3P N = 140 6 37.50
15 EO 3S N+1 630 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
1 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian : 53,94 %16 EO 3C S-1 -50 5 31.25
17 EO 1S W-1 50 0 0.00
18 EO 1S W = -90 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
4 de WASSEIGE Claude -FRAITURE Louis : 66,20 %19 EO 5C N = 450 0 0.00
20 EO 4C N = 620 5 31.25
21 EO 3S S+2 660 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 55,09 %22 EO 2K N+3 150 4 25.00
23 EO 3C E = -140 9 56.25
24 EO 4P S = 420 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
2 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 45,60 %25 EO 4C E-1 100 2 12.50
26 EO 2P N = 110 6 37.50
27 EO 3S N = 400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
9 GELISSEN Edouard -VERBOIS Léon : 53,70 %28 EO 3S W-2 100 4 25.00
29 EO 2P N-2 -200 6 37.50
30 EO 2K E+1 -110 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
Total : 206,0 / 480 = 42,92 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques
6 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSAUX Jacques : 42,82 % 1 EO 4CcE-2 300 0 0.00
2 EO 3K E = -110 14 87.50
3 EO 3K E = -110 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
7 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 40,51 % 4 EO 3S E+2 -660 12 75.00
5 EO 3P S-1 -100 15 93.75
6 EO 4T S = 130 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 55,09 % 7 EO 2C N+2 170 0 0.00
8 EO 3C N-1 -50 0 0.00
9 EO 3S N+1 430 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 12,50 %
10 HUBLET Carlo -SALME Victoria : 57,18 %10 EO 4P S+2 680 10 62.50
11 EO 6PcW-2 300 0 0.00
12 EO 3T W+1 -130 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
3 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 40,74 %13 EO 4C N+1 650 7 43.75
14 EO 2P N+1 140 6 37.50
15 EO 4P S = 620 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
4 de WASSEIGE Claude -FRAITURE Louis : 66,20 %16 EO 2S E-2 200 1 6.25
17 EO 2C S-1 -50 2 12.50
18 EO 3T W = -110 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
1 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian : 53,94 %19 EO 4C N = 420 9 56.25
20 EO 4C N = 620 5 31.25
21 EO 3S S+2 660 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
5 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 44,21 %22 EO 2K N+2 130 10 62.50
23 EO 3C E = -140 9 56.25
24 EO 4P S+1 450 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
9 GELISSEN Edouard -VERBOIS Léon : 53,70 %25 EO 3C W+1 -170 6 37.50
26 EO 2P N+1 140 1 6.25
27 EO 1P S+1 110 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
2 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 45,60 %28 EO 3S E-2 100 4 25.00
29 EO 3S W = -600 11 68.75
30 EO 2C S-1 -50 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
Total : 195,0 / 480 = 40,62 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 -
7 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 40,51 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 55,09 % 4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
9 GELISSEN Edouard -VERBOIS Léon : 53,70 % 7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
2 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 45,60 %10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
4 de WASSEIGE Claude -FRAITURE Louis : 66,20 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
3 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 40,74 %16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
5 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 44,21 %19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
1 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian : 53,94 %22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSAUX Jacques : 42,82 %25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00
27 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
10 HUBLET Carlo -SALME Victoria : 57,18 %28 EO BYE 0 0.00
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 480 = 0,00 %
|
|