|
Tournoi du 28-01-13
1 57,96 10 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita
2 57,22 4 GROSFILS Colette -STEED Mercédès
3 56,30 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
4 55,19 5 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre
5 51,11 1 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
6 48,70 3 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
7 47,41 7 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon
8 45,56 6 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse
9 45,00 2 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert
10 44,44 9 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine
11 41,11 11 MOSSERAY Bernadette -ROSOUX Louis
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 60,00 22 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile
2 55,74 17 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian
3 55,00 19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
4 54,81 16 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean
5 52,78 21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
6 51,85 18 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
7 47,22 20 COOLEN Joseph -DELHEZ Jacques
8 46,67 15 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
9 45,56 13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David
10 43,52 14 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
11 36,85 12 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard
PAIRE Nr : 1 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
12 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 36,85 % 1 NS 4P W+1 -450 9 50.00
2 NS 4P W-2 100 15 83.33
3 NS 2C S+1 140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
22 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 60,00 % 4 NS 5P S-1 -100 5 27.78
5 NS 4C W+2 -480 5 27.78
6 NS 4P W+2 -680 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,78 % 7 NS 6P E-1 100 18 100.00
8 NS 4P W+1 -450 12 66.67
9 NS 1S E = -90 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
20 COOLEN Joseph -DELHEZ Jacques : 47,22 %10 NS 2S N+2 180 16 88.89
11 NS 4P N+1 450 14 77.78
12 NS 6KcN+1 1740 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 55,00 %13 NS 2P E+1 -140 5 27.78
14 NS 2C W = -110 5 27.78
15 NS 3S S = 600 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
18 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 51,85 %16 NS 5T S+1 420 1 5.56
17 NS 3S N+3 490 8 44.44
18 NS 1S N-1 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
17 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 55,74 %19 NS 2C W+1 -140 5 27.78
20 NS 5P N = 650 10 55.56
21 NS 6P S-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
16 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 54,81 %22 NS 2C E-1 100 4 22.22
23 NS 3T W-1 100 14 77.78
24 NS 6CcW = -1210 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
15 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 46,67 %25 NS 2C E+1 -140 10 55.56
26 NS 4P S+1 650 16 88.89
27 NS 5C N-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 43,52 %28 NS 2K S+2 130 11 61.11
29 NS 3S W-1 100 17 94.44
30 NS 4T S = 130 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
Total : 276,0 / 540 = 51,11 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 45,56 % 4 NS 3S S+1 630 16 88.89
5 NS 4C W+1 -450 15 83.33
6 NS 4P W+1 -650 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
12 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 36,85 % 7 NS 4P W+2 -680 5 27.78
8 NS 4P W+1 -450 12 66.67
9 NS 1S E+1 -120 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
22 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 60,00 %10 NS 3K S-1 -100 5 27.78
11 NS 2C S = 110 4 22.22
12 NS 3S S+2 660 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,78 %13 NS 3P W = -140 5 27.78
14 NS 3K E-1 50 12 66.67
15 NS 3S S = 600 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
20 COOLEN Joseph -DELHEZ Jacques : 47,22 %16 NS 3S S+3 490 11 61.11
17 NS 3S N+3 490 8 44.44
18 NS 1S N+1 120 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 55,00 %19 NS 3C W = -140 5 27.78
20 NS 3P N+2 200 0 0.00
21 NS 4P S+1 650 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
18 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 51,85 %22 NS 2T N+1 110 8 44.44
23 NS 3PcS-2 -500 2 11.11
24 NS 4C W+2 -480 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
17 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 55,74 %25 NS 3K S-2 -100 14 77.78
26 NS 4P S = 620 7 38.89
27 NS 4T N+1 150 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
16 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 54,81 %28 NS 3K S = 110 6 33.33
29 NS 3S W = -600 4 22.22
30 NS 4T S = 130 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
15 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 46,67 %31 NS 2T W+2 -130 0 0.00
32 NS 4P S-1 -50 1 5.56
33 NS 1S N = 90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
Total : 243,0 / 540 = 45,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
16 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 54,81 % 1 NS 4P E+1 -450 9 50.00
2 NS 2P W+1 -140 5 27.78
3 NS 3C S = 140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 43,52 % 7 NS 3S E+1 -630 15 83.33
8 NS 4P W+1 -450 12 66.67
9 NS 2P W = -110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 45,56 %10 NS 3S N-2 -200 1 5.56
11 NS 4P N+1 450 14 77.78
12 NS 3S N+2 660 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
12 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 36,85 %13 NS 2P W+1 -140 5 27.78
14 NS 3K E-1 50 12 66.67
15 NS 3S N+1 630 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
22 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 60,00 %16 NS 3S S+3 490 11 61.11
17 NS 3S S+3 490 8 44.44
18 NS 1S N-3 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,78 %19 NS 3C E = -140 5 27.78
20 NS 4C N = 620 2 11.11
21 NS 4P S+1 650 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
20 COOLEN Joseph -DELHEZ Jacques : 47,22 %22 NS 5T N-1 -50 1 5.56
23 NS 3S S = 600 18 100.00
24 NS 6CcW = -1210 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 55,00 %25 NS 3S N-4 -200 1 5.56
26 NS 4P S = 620 7 38.89
27 NS 4C N+1 450 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
18 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 51,85 %28 NS 4K S-1 -100 3 16.67
29 NS 2K E+2 -130 14 77.78
30 NS 3P S+1 170 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
17 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 55,74 %31 NS 2C N = 110 13 72.22
32 NS 4P S-1 -50 1 5.56
33 NS 2P W-2 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 263,0 / 540 = 48,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 GROSFILS Colette -STEED Mercédès
18 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 51,85 % 1 NS 4P E+1 -450 9 50.00
2 NS 2P W+1 -140 5 27.78
3 NS 2C S+1 140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
17 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 55,74 % 4 NS 5P S-1 -100 5 27.78
5 NS 4C W+2 -480 5 27.78
6 NS 4P W+1 -650 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
15 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 46,67 %10 NS 2C E-2 200 18 100.00
11 NS 3S N-3 -150 0 0.00
12 NS 6K N = 1370 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 43,52 %13 NS 2P W = -110 11 61.11
14 NS 2C E-2 100 18 100.00
15 NS 3S S+1 630 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 45,56 %16 NS 3S S+3 490 11 61.11
17 NS 2PcW-4 800 18 100.00
18 NS 1S N = 90 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
12 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 36,85 %19 NS 4C W-2 200 18 100.00
20 NS 4P N+1 650 10 55.56
21 NS 4P S+1 650 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
22 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 60,00 %22 NS 3T N = 110 8 44.44
23 NS 3PcS-2 -500 2 11.11
24 NS 5C W+1 -480 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,78 %25 NS 2C E+2 -170 5 27.78
26 NS 3P S+1 170 0 0.00
27 NS 4T N+1 150 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
20 COOLEN Joseph -DELHEZ Jacques : 47,22 %28 NS 2K S+3 150 17 94.44
29 NS 2C E+1 -140 11 61.11
30 NS 2S N+1 150 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 55,00 %31 NS 1S W-1 50 4 22.22
32 NS 3P S = 140 4 22.22
33 NS 2P W-2 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
Total : 309,0 / 540 = 57,22 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre
20 COOLEN Joseph -DELHEZ Jacques : 47,22 % 1 NS 5CcN-3 -500 1 5.56
2 NS 4P E-2 100 15 83.33
3 NS 2C N-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 55,00 % 4 NS 4P N = 620 10 55.56
5 NS 4C E+1 -450 15 83.33
6 NS 5P E+1 -680 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
18 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 51,85 % 7 NS 4P E+2 -680 5 27.78
8 NS 3S E+2 -460 3 16.67
9 NS 1S E = -90 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
16 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 54,81 %13 NS 3PcE = -730 0 0.00
14 NS 3K E+1 -130 2 11.11
15 NS 3S N+1 630 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
15 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 46,67 %16 NS 3S N+3 490 11 61.11
17 NS 3S N+3 490 8 44.44
18 NS 2P N-1 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 43,52 %19 NS 3S E-1 100 13 72.22
20 NS 4P N+1 650 10 55.56
21 NS 4P N+1 650 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 45,56 %22 NS 2T N+2 130 13 72.22
23 NS 2P N = 110 16 88.89
24 NS 5C E+1 -480 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
12 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 36,85 %25 NS 3K N-1 -50 17 94.44
26 NS 4P N+1 650 16 88.89
27 NS 5T N = 400 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
22 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 60,00 %28 NS 3K N+1 130 11 61.11
29 NS 3S E = -600 4 22.22
30 NS 3T N = 110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,78 %31 NS 2C N = 110 13 72.22
32 NS 4P N+1 450 16 88.89
33 NS 2T N = 90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
Total : 298,0 / 540 = 55,19 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse
22 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 60,00 % 1 NS 2CcN-1 -100 16 88.89
2 NS 2P W+1 -140 5 27.78
3 NS 4C S-2 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,78 % 4 NS 4P S = 620 10 55.56
5 NS 4C E+2 -480 5 27.78
6 NS 4P W+1 -650 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
20 COOLEN Joseph -DELHEZ Jacques : 47,22 % 7 NS 4P W+1 -650 10 55.56
8 NS 3S W+2 -460 3 16.67
9 NS 2P W+1 -140 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 55,00 %10 NS 2K S+2 130 14 77.78
11 NS 4P N+1 450 14 77.78
12 NS 6P N = 1430 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
17 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 55,74 %16 NS 3S S+3 490 11 61.11
17 NS 3S N+3 490 8 44.44
18 NS 1S N-2 -200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
16 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 54,81 %19 NS 4C W = -620 0 0.00
20 NS 4P N+1 650 10 55.56
21 NS 4P S+1 650 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
15 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 46,67 %22 NS 3T N = 110 8 44.44
23 NS 3P S-3 -300 6 33.33
24 NS 6C W = -980 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 43,52 %25 NS 3C E = -140 10 55.56
26 NS 4P S = 620 7 38.89
27 NS 4T N = 130 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 45,56 %28 NS 2K S+2 130 11 61.11
29 NS 3S W = -600 4 22.22
30 NS 3S N-1 -50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
12 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 36,85 %31 NS 1S S+1 120 16 88.89
32 NS 4P S+1 450 16 88.89
33 NS 1S W-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 246,0 / 540 = 45,56 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 45,56 % 1 NS 4P W+2 -480 4 22.22
2 NS 2S E+2 -180 0 0.00
3 NS 2C S = 110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
12 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 36,85 % 4 NS 4P S = 620 10 55.56
5 NS 4C W+2 -480 5 27.78
6 NS 4P E+2 -680 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
22 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 60,00 % 7 NS 6S E = -1440 1 5.56
8 NS 4P W+1 -450 12 66.67
9 NS 1S E-1 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,78 %10 NS 3S N-2 -200 1 5.56
11 NS 3C S = 140 7 38.89
12 NS 3S S+2 660 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
20 COOLEN Joseph -DELHEZ Jacques : 47,22 %13 NS 4P W-1 100 17 94.44
14 NS 3K E = -110 5 27.78
15 NS 3T N = 110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
18 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 51,85 %19 NS 4C W-1 100 13 72.22
20 NS 4P N+1 650 10 55.56
21 NS 4P S+1 650 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
17 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 55,74 %22 NS 3CcE-2 500 18 100.00
23 NS 3P S-2 -200 9 50.00
24 NS 6C W = -980 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
16 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 54,81 %25 NS 3C E = -140 10 55.56
26 NS 4P S = 620 7 38.89
27 NS 4T N = 130 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
15 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 46,67 %28 NS 3S N-1 -100 3 16.67
29 NS 4P E-1 100 17 94.44
30 NS 3S N = 400 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 43,52 %31 NS 3C N-1 -100 2 11.11
32 NS 4P S = 420 9 50.00
33 NS 3C W-5 250 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 256,0 / 540 = 47,41 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
15 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 46,67 % 1 NS 4CcN-1 -100 16 88.89
2 NS 3K E-3 150 18 100.00
3 NS 3C S = 140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 43,52 % 4 NS 3S S+1 630 16 88.89
5 NS 4C W+2 -480 5 27.78
6 NS 4P W+2 -680 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 45,56 % 7 NS 3S E+1 -630 15 83.33
8 NS 4P W+1 -450 12 66.67
9 NS 2P W+1 -140 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
12 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 36,85 %10 NS 2K S+1 110 11 61.11
11 NS 4P N+2 480 18 100.00
12 NS 6K N = 1370 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
22 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 60,00 %13 NS 3K N-1 -100 14 77.78
14 NS 3K E-1 50 12 66.67
15 NS 2S N+2 180 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,78 %16 NS 5T S+1 420 1 5.56
17 NS 3S N+3 490 8 44.44
18 NS 1S N = 90 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 55,00 %22 NS 5T N-1 -50 1 5.56
23 NS 3PcS-1 -200 9 50.00
24 NS 6C W = -980 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
18 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 51,85 %25 NS 3K S-1 -50 17 94.44
26 NS 4P S = 620 7 38.89
27 NS 3S S = 400 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
17 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 55,74 %28 NS 2K S+2 130 11 61.11
29 NS 3S W = -600 4 22.22
30 NS 2S N+1 150 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
16 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 54,81 %31 NS 1S N = 90 8 44.44
32 NS 4P S = 420 9 50.00
33 NS 2T S = 90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 304,0 / 540 = 56,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine
17 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 55,74 % 1 NS 5CcN-3 -500 1 5.56
2 NS 2P W+1 -140 5 27.78
3 NS 2C S+1 140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
16 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 54,81 % 4 NS 3S S+1 630 16 88.89
5 NS 4C E+1 -450 15 83.33
6 NS 4P W+2 -680 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
15 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 46,67 % 7 NS 6S E = -1440 1 5.56
8 NS 4P W+1 -450 12 66.67
9 NS 1S E = -90 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 43,52 %10 NS 3K S = 110 11 61.11
11 NS 2C S+1 140 7 38.89
12 NS 6S S-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 45,56 %13 NS 2P E+1 -140 5 27.78
14 NS 3C E-1 50 12 66.67
15 NS 2S N+1 150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
12 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 36,85 %16 NS 3S N+3 490 11 61.11
17 NS 3S N+3 490 8 44.44
18 NS 1S N+2 150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
22 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 60,00 %19 NS 3C W = -140 5 27.78
20 NS 4P N+1 650 10 55.56
21 NS 4P S = 620 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
20 COOLEN Joseph -DELHEZ Jacques : 47,22 %25 NS 2P N-4 -200 1 5.56
26 NS 4P S = 620 7 38.89
27 NS 4C S = 420 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 55,00 %28 NS 2C E = -110 0 0.00
29 NS 3C E = -140 11 61.11
30 NS 2S N+1 150 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
18 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 51,85 %31 NS 1S S = 90 8 44.44
32 NS 4P S = 420 9 50.00
33 NS 2T S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
Total : 240,0 / 540 = 44,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita
19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 55,00 % 1 NS 5P W = -450 9 50.00
2 NS 2K E-1 50 11 61.11
3 NS 4C N-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
18 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 51,85 % 4 NS 6C N-2 -200 1 5.56
5 NS 4C E+1 -450 15 83.33
6 NS 4P W+1 -650 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
17 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 55,74 % 7 NS 4P W+1 -650 10 55.56
8 NS 4P W+1 -450 12 66.67
9 NS 1S E+1 -120 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
16 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 54,81 %10 NS 2S N-1 -100 5 27.78
11 NS 2P N+4 230 10 55.56
12 NS 6S N = 1440 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
15 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 46,67 %13 NS 2S E-1 100 17 94.44
14 NS 3K E-1 50 12 66.67
15 NS 2S N+2 180 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 43,52 %16 NS 3S S+3 490 11 61.11
17 NS 3S N+3 490 8 44.44
18 NS 1S N = 90 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 45,56 %19 NS 4C W-1 100 13 72.22
20 NS 4P N+2 680 18 100.00
21 NS 4P N+1 650 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
12 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 36,85 %22 NS 2T E-4 400 16 88.89
23 NS 3P S-1 -100 12 66.67
24 NS 6CcW = -1210 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,78 %28 NS 1S S+2 150 17 94.44
29 NS 3S W = -600 4 22.22
30 NS 3S N-1 -50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
20 COOLEN Joseph -DELHEZ Jacques : 47,22 %31 NS 1S N+2 150 18 100.00
32 NS 4P S+1 450 16 88.89
33 NS 1S E-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
Total : 313,0 / 540 = 57,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 MOSSERAY Bernadette -ROSOUX Louis
21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,78 % 1 NS 5CcN-1 -100 16 88.89
2 NS 4P E-1 50 11 61.11
3 NS 3K E = -110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
20 COOLEN Joseph -DELHEZ Jacques : 47,22 % 4 NS 6P S-2 -200 1 5.56
5 NS 4C W+2 -480 5 27.78
6 NS 4P W+1 -650 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 55,00 % 7 NS 4P W+1 -650 10 55.56
8 NS 4P W+2 -480 0 0.00
9 NS 2P W = -110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
18 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 51,85 %10 NS 1S S = 90 8 44.44
11 NS 3C S-1 -50 2 11.11
12 NS 4P N+2 680 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
17 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 55,74 %13 NS 2P E = -110 11 61.11
14 NS 3P N-3 -150 0 0.00
15 NS 3P S-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
16 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 54,81 %16 NS 3S S+3 490 11 61.11
17 NS 3S N+3 490 8 44.44
18 NS 1S N-1 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
15 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 46,67 %19 NS 3S W-1 100 13 72.22
20 NS 4P N+1 650 10 55.56
21 NS 4P S = 620 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 43,52 %22 NS 3T N+1 130 13 72.22
23 NS 3PcS-2 -500 2 11.11
24 NS 5C W+1 -480 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 45,56 %25 NS 2C E+2 -170 5 27.78
26 NS 4P S+1 650 16 88.89
27 NS 3T N+1 130 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
22 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 60,00 %31 NS 1S S = 90 8 44.44
32 NS 4P S = 420 9 50.00
33 NS 1S E-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 222,0 / 540 = 41,11 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard
1 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,11 % 1 EO 4P W+1 -450 9 50.00
2 EO 4P W-2 100 3 16.67
3 EO 2C S+1 140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
7 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 47,41 % 4 EO 4P S = 620 8 44.44
5 EO 4C W+2 -480 13 72.22
6 EO 4P E+2 -680 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
2 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,00 % 7 EO 4P W+2 -680 13 72.22
8 EO 4P W+1 -450 6 33.33
9 EO 1S E+1 -120 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,30 %10 EO 2K S+1 110 7 38.89
11 EO 4P N+2 480 0 0.00
12 EO 6K N = 1370 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
3 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 48,70 %13 EO 2P W+1 -140 13 72.22
14 EO 3K E-1 50 6 33.33
15 EO 3S N+1 630 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
9 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 44,44 %16 EO 3S N+3 490 7 38.89
17 EO 3S N+3 490 10 55.56
18 EO 1S N+2 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
4 GROSFILS Colette -STEED Mercédès : 57,22 %19 EO 4C W-2 200 0 0.00
20 EO 4P N+1 650 8 44.44
21 EO 4P S+1 650 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
10 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 57,96 %22 EO 2T E-4 400 2 11.11
23 EO 3P S-1 -100 6 33.33
24 EO 6CcW = -1210 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
5 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 55,19 %25 EO 3K N-1 -50 1 5.56
26 EO 4P N+1 650 2 11.11
27 EO 5T N = 400 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
6 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,56 %31 EO 1S S+1 120 2 11.11
32 EO 4P S+1 450 2 11.11
33 EO 1S W-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 199,0 / 540 = 36,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David
7 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 47,41 % 1 EO 4P W+2 -480 14 77.78
2 EO 2S E+2 -180 18 100.00
3 EO 2C S = 110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
2 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,00 % 4 EO 3S S+1 630 2 11.11
5 EO 4C W+1 -450 3 16.67
6 EO 4P W+1 -650 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,30 % 7 EO 3S E+1 -630 3 16.67
8 EO 4P W+1 -450 6 33.33
9 EO 2P W+1 -140 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
3 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 48,70 %10 EO 3S N-2 -200 17 94.44
11 EO 4P N+1 450 4 22.22
12 EO 3S N+2 660 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
9 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 44,44 %13 EO 2P E+1 -140 13 72.22
14 EO 3C E-1 50 6 33.33
15 EO 2S N+1 150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
4 GROSFILS Colette -STEED Mercédès : 57,22 %16 EO 3S S+3 490 7 38.89
17 EO 2PcW-4 800 0 0.00
18 EO 1S N = 90 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
10 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 57,96 %19 EO 4C W-1 100 5 27.78
20 EO 4P N+2 680 0 0.00
21 EO 4P N+1 650 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
5 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 55,19 %22 EO 2T N+2 130 5 27.78
23 EO 2P N = 110 2 11.11
24 EO 5C E+1 -480 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
11 MOSSERAY Bernadette -ROSOUX Louis : 41,11 %25 EO 2C E+2 -170 13 72.22
26 EO 4P S+1 650 2 11.11
27 EO 3T N+1 130 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
6 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,56 %28 EO 2K S+2 130 7 38.89
29 EO 3S W = -600 14 77.78
30 EO 3S N-1 -50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
Total : 246,0 / 540 = 45,56 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,30 % 4 EO 3S S+1 630 2 11.11
5 EO 4C W+2 -480 13 72.22
6 EO 4P W+2 -680 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
3 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 48,70 % 7 EO 3S E+1 -630 3 16.67
8 EO 4P W+1 -450 6 33.33
9 EO 2P W = -110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
9 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 44,44 %10 EO 3K S = 110 7 38.89
11 EO 2C S+1 140 11 61.11
12 EO 6S S-1 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
4 GROSFILS Colette -STEED Mercédès : 57,22 %13 EO 2P W = -110 7 38.89
14 EO 2C E-2 100 0 0.00
15 EO 3S S+1 630 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
10 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 57,96 %16 EO 3S S+3 490 7 38.89
17 EO 3S N+3 490 10 55.56
18 EO 1S N = 90 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
5 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 55,19 %19 EO 3S E-1 100 5 27.78
20 EO 4P N+1 650 8 44.44
21 EO 4P N+1 650 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
11 MOSSERAY Bernadette -ROSOUX Louis : 41,11 %22 EO 3T N+1 130 5 27.78
23 EO 3PcS-2 -500 16 88.89
24 EO 5C W+1 -480 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
6 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,56 %25 EO 3C E = -140 8 44.44
26 EO 4P S = 620 11 61.11
27 EO 4T N = 130 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
1 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,11 %28 EO 2K S+2 130 7 38.89
29 EO 3S W-1 100 1 5.56
30 EO 4T S = 130 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
7 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 47,41 %31 EO 3C N-1 -100 16 88.89
32 EO 4P S = 420 9 50.00
33 EO 3C W-5 250 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 235,0 / 540 = 43,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,30 % 1 EO 4CcN-1 -100 2 11.11
2 EO 3K E-3 150 0 0.00
3 EO 3C S = 140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
9 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 44,44 % 7 EO 6S E = -1440 17 94.44
8 EO 4P W+1 -450 6 33.33
9 EO 1S E = -90 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
4 GROSFILS Colette -STEED Mercédès : 57,22 %10 EO 2C E-2 200 0 0.00
11 EO 3S N-3 -150 18 100.00
12 EO 6K N = 1370 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
10 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 57,96 %13 EO 2S E-1 100 1 5.56
14 EO 3K E-1 50 6 33.33
15 EO 2S N+2 180 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
5 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 55,19 %16 EO 3S N+3 490 7 38.89
17 EO 3S N+3 490 10 55.56
18 EO 2P N-1 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
11 MOSSERAY Bernadette -ROSOUX Louis : 41,11 %19 EO 3S W-1 100 5 27.78
20 EO 4P N+1 650 8 44.44
21 EO 4P S = 620 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
6 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,56 %22 EO 3T N = 110 10 55.56
23 EO 3P S-3 -300 12 66.67
24 EO 6C W = -980 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
1 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,11 %25 EO 2C E+1 -140 8 44.44
26 EO 4P S+1 650 2 11.11
27 EO 5C N-1 -50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
7 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 47,41 %28 EO 3S N-1 -100 15 83.33
29 EO 4P E-1 100 1 5.56
30 EO 3S N = 400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
2 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,00 %31 EO 2T W+2 -130 18 100.00
32 EO 4P S-1 -50 17 94.44
33 EO 1S N = 90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
Total : 252,0 / 540 = 46,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean
3 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 48,70 % 1 EO 4P E+1 -450 9 50.00
2 EO 2P W+1 -140 13 72.22
3 EO 3C S = 140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
9 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 44,44 % 4 EO 3S S+1 630 2 11.11
5 EO 4C E+1 -450 3 16.67
6 EO 4P W+2 -680 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
10 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 57,96 %10 EO 2S N-1 -100 13 72.22
11 EO 2P N+4 230 8 44.44
12 EO 6S N = 1440 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
5 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 55,19 %13 EO 3PcE = -730 18 100.00
14 EO 3K E+1 -130 16 88.89
15 EO 3S N+1 630 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
11 MOSSERAY Bernadette -ROSOUX Louis : 41,11 %16 EO 3S S+3 490 7 38.89
17 EO 3S N+3 490 10 55.56
18 EO 1S N-1 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
6 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,56 %19 EO 4C W = -620 18 100.00
20 EO 4P N+1 650 8 44.44
21 EO 4P S+1 650 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
1 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,11 %22 EO 2C E-1 100 14 77.78
23 EO 3T W-1 100 4 22.22
24 EO 6CcW = -1210 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
7 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 47,41 %25 EO 3C E = -140 8 44.44
26 EO 4P S = 620 11 61.11
27 EO 4T N = 130 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
2 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,00 %28 EO 3K S = 110 12 66.67
29 EO 3S W = -600 14 77.78
30 EO 4T S = 130 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,30 %31 EO 1S N = 90 10 55.56
32 EO 4P S = 420 9 50.00
33 EO 2T S = 90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 296,0 / 540 = 54,81 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian
9 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 44,44 % 1 EO 5CcN-3 -500 17 94.44
2 EO 2P W+1 -140 13 72.22
3 EO 2C S+1 140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
4 GROSFILS Colette -STEED Mercédès : 57,22 % 4 EO 5P S-1 -100 13 72.22
5 EO 4C W+2 -480 13 72.22
6 EO 4P W+1 -650 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
10 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 57,96 % 7 EO 4P W+1 -650 8 44.44
8 EO 4P W+1 -450 6 33.33
9 EO 1S E+1 -120 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 MOSSERAY Bernadette -ROSOUX Louis : 41,11 %13 EO 2P E = -110 7 38.89
14 EO 3P N-3 -150 18 100.00
15 EO 3P S-1 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
6 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,56 %16 EO 3S S+3 490 7 38.89
17 EO 3S N+3 490 10 55.56
18 EO 1S N-2 -200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
1 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,11 %19 EO 2C W+1 -140 13 72.22
20 EO 5P N = 650 8 44.44
21 EO 6P S-1 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
7 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 47,41 %22 EO 3CcE-2 500 0 0.00
23 EO 3P S-2 -200 9 50.00
24 EO 6C W = -980 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
2 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,00 %25 EO 3K S-2 -100 4 22.22
26 EO 4P S = 620 11 61.11
27 EO 4T N+1 150 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,30 %28 EO 2K S+2 130 7 38.89
29 EO 3S W = -600 14 77.78
30 EO 2S N+1 150 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
3 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 48,70 %31 EO 2C N = 110 5 27.78
32 EO 4P S-1 -50 17 94.44
33 EO 2P W-2 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 301,0 / 540 = 55,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
4 GROSFILS Colette -STEED Mercédès : 57,22 % 1 EO 4P E+1 -450 9 50.00
2 EO 2P W+1 -140 13 72.22
3 EO 2C S+1 140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
10 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 57,96 % 4 EO 6C N-2 -200 17 94.44
5 EO 4C E+1 -450 3 16.67
6 EO 4P W+1 -650 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
5 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 55,19 % 7 EO 4P E+2 -680 13 72.22
8 EO 3S E+2 -460 15 83.33
9 EO 1S E = -90 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
11 MOSSERAY Bernadette -ROSOUX Louis : 41,11 %10 EO 1S S = 90 10 55.56
11 EO 3C S-1 -50 16 88.89
12 EO 4P N+2 680 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
1 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,11 %16 EO 5T S+1 420 17 94.44
17 EO 3S N+3 490 10 55.56
18 EO 1S N-1 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
7 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 47,41 %19 EO 4C W-1 100 5 27.78
20 EO 4P N+1 650 8 44.44
21 EO 4P S+1 650 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
2 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,00 %22 EO 2T N+1 110 10 55.56
23 EO 3PcS-2 -500 16 88.89
24 EO 4C W+2 -480 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,30 %25 EO 3K S-1 -50 1 5.56
26 EO 4P S = 620 11 61.11
27 EO 3S S = 400 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
3 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 48,70 %28 EO 4K S-1 -100 15 83.33
29 EO 2K E+2 -130 4 22.22
30 EO 3P S+1 170 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
9 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 44,44 %31 EO 1S S = 90 10 55.56
32 EO 4P S = 420 9 50.00
33 EO 2T S-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
Total : 280,0 / 540 = 51,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
10 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 57,96 % 1 EO 5P W = -450 9 50.00
2 EO 2K E-1 50 7 38.89
3 EO 4C N-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
5 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 55,19 % 4 EO 4P N = 620 8 44.44
5 EO 4C E+1 -450 3 16.67
6 EO 5P E+1 -680 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
11 MOSSERAY Bernadette -ROSOUX Louis : 41,11 % 7 EO 4P W+1 -650 8 44.44
8 EO 4P W+2 -480 18 100.00
9 EO 2P W = -110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
6 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,56 %10 EO 2K S+2 130 4 22.22
11 EO 4P N+1 450 4 22.22
12 EO 6P N = 1430 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
1 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,11 %13 EO 2P E+1 -140 13 72.22
14 EO 2C W = -110 13 72.22
15 EO 3S S = 600 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
2 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,00 %19 EO 3C W = -140 13 72.22
20 EO 3P N+2 200 18 100.00
21 EO 4P S+1 650 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,30 %22 EO 5T N-1 -50 17 94.44
23 EO 3PcS-1 -200 9 50.00
24 EO 6C W = -980 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
3 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 48,70 %25 EO 3S N-4 -200 17 94.44
26 EO 4P S = 620 11 61.11
27 EO 4C N+1 450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
9 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 44,44 %28 EO 2C E = -110 18 100.00
29 EO 3C E = -140 7 38.89
30 EO 2S N+1 150 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
4 GROSFILS Colette -STEED Mercédès : 57,22 %31 EO 1S W-1 50 14 77.78
32 EO 3P S = 140 14 77.78
33 EO 2P W-2 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
Total : 297,0 / 540 = 55,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 COOLEN Joseph -DELHEZ Jacques
5 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 55,19 % 1 EO 5CcN-3 -500 17 94.44
2 EO 4P E-2 100 3 16.67
3 EO 2C N-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
11 MOSSERAY Bernadette -ROSOUX Louis : 41,11 % 4 EO 6P S-2 -200 17 94.44
5 EO 4C W+2 -480 13 72.22
6 EO 4P W+1 -650 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
6 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,56 % 7 EO 4P W+1 -650 8 44.44
8 EO 3S W+2 -460 15 83.33
9 EO 2P W+1 -140 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
1 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,11 %10 EO 2S N+2 180 2 11.11
11 EO 4P N+1 450 4 22.22
12 EO 6KcN+1 1740 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
7 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 47,41 %13 EO 4P W-1 100 1 5.56
14 EO 3K E = -110 13 72.22
15 EO 3T N = 110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
2 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,00 %16 EO 3S S+3 490 7 38.89
17 EO 3S N+3 490 10 55.56
18 EO 1S N+1 120 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
3 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 48,70 %22 EO 5T N-1 -50 17 94.44
23 EO 3S S = 600 0 0.00
24 EO 6CcW = -1210 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
9 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 44,44 %25 EO 2P N-4 -200 17 94.44
26 EO 4P S = 620 11 61.11
27 EO 4C S = 420 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
4 GROSFILS Colette -STEED Mercédès : 57,22 %28 EO 2K S+3 150 1 5.56
29 EO 2C E+1 -140 7 38.89
30 EO 2S N+1 150 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
10 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 57,96 %31 EO 1S N+2 150 0 0.00
32 EO 4P S+1 450 2 11.11
33 EO 1S E-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
Total : 255,0 / 540 = 47,22 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
11 MOSSERAY Bernadette -ROSOUX Louis : 41,11 % 1 EO 5CcN-1 -100 2 11.11
2 EO 4P E-1 50 7 38.89
3 EO 3K E = -110 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
6 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,56 % 4 EO 4P S = 620 8 44.44
5 EO 4C E+2 -480 13 72.22
6 EO 4P W+1 -650 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
1 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,11 % 7 EO 6P E-1 100 0 0.00
8 EO 4P W+1 -450 6 33.33
9 EO 1S E = -90 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
7 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 47,41 %10 EO 3S N-2 -200 17 94.44
11 EO 3C S = 140 11 61.11
12 EO 3S S+2 660 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
2 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,00 %13 EO 3P W = -140 13 72.22
14 EO 3K E-1 50 6 33.33
15 EO 3S S = 600 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,30 %16 EO 5T S+1 420 17 94.44
17 EO 3S N+3 490 10 55.56
18 EO 1S N = 90 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
3 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 48,70 %19 EO 3C E = -140 13 72.22
20 EO 4C N = 620 16 88.89
21 EO 4P S+1 650 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
4 GROSFILS Colette -STEED Mercédès : 57,22 %25 EO 2C E+2 -170 13 72.22
26 EO 3P S+1 170 18 100.00
27 EO 4T N+1 150 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
10 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 57,96 %28 EO 1S S+2 150 1 5.56
29 EO 3S W = -600 14 77.78
30 EO 3S N-1 -50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
5 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 55,19 %31 EO 2C N = 110 5 27.78
32 EO 4P N+1 450 2 11.11
33 EO 2T N = 90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
Total : 285,0 / 540 = 52,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile
6 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,56 % 1 EO 2CcN-1 -100 2 11.11
2 EO 2P W+1 -140 13 72.22
3 EO 4C S-2 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
1 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,11 % 4 EO 5P S-1 -100 13 72.22
5 EO 4C W+2 -480 13 72.22
6 EO 4P W+2 -680 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
7 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 47,41 % 7 EO 6S E = -1440 17 94.44
8 EO 4P W+1 -450 6 33.33
9 EO 1S E-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
2 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,00 %10 EO 3K S-1 -100 13 72.22
11 EO 2C S = 110 14 77.78
12 EO 3S S+2 660 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,30 %13 EO 3K N-1 -100 4 22.22
14 EO 3K E-1 50 6 33.33
15 EO 2S N+2 180 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
3 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 48,70 %16 EO 3S S+3 490 7 38.89
17 EO 3S S+3 490 10 55.56
18 EO 1S N-3 -300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
9 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 44,44 %19 EO 3C W = -140 13 72.22
20 EO 4P N+1 650 8 44.44
21 EO 4P S = 620 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
4 GROSFILS Colette -STEED Mercédès : 57,22 %22 EO 3T N = 110 10 55.56
23 EO 3PcS-2 -500 16 88.89
24 EO 5C W+1 -480 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
5 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 55,19 %28 EO 3K N+1 130 7 38.89
29 EO 3S E = -600 14 77.78
30 EO 3T N = 110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
11 MOSSERAY Bernadette -ROSOUX Louis : 41,11 %31 EO 1S S = 90 10 55.56
32 EO 4P S = 420 9 50.00
33 EO 1S E-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 324,0 / 540 = 60,00 %
|
|