|
Tournoi du 28-04-12
1 63,51 2 MULLER Philippe -DIMITRIU Pia
2 56,06 3 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
3 55,30 5 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -LEFEVRE Raymond
4 52,65 1 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert
5 52,40 11 MARCHAL Christian -MAYENCE Jean-Philippe
6 51,26 9 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul
7 49,62 10 GHIERCHE Jacques -LEDECQ Eric
8 48,23 8 DEBLECKER Michel -DELAEVER Chrisitan
9 47,85 6 DEPELSMAKER Anne -ROOSELEERS
10 45,71 13 BOUDAULT Jean-Paul -DEPELSMAKER Marie
11 43,18 7 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEGEVE
12 42,42 12 D'AGOSTINO -FRANCOIS Jean-Marc
13 41,79 4 STUART Anne-Marie -GILLAIN Françoise
14 0,00 14 -
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 57,36 23 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
2 55,68 27 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy
3 54,80 26 COURTOIS Chantal -GOBBE Amélie
4 54,58 16 de TERWANGNE Philippe -LIBERT Laurent
5 54,44 25 NELIS Claude -COLLET Claudine
6 52,22 21 CLERIN François-Xavier -FRAITURE Louis
7 51,25 28 COLLET Christine -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
8 50,28 15 DEFOOR Jacques -LELEU Eva
9 49,12 17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
10 48,89 20 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard
11 46,81 22 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
12 43,47 19 VUYTS Michèle -GERARD Francis
13 40,97 18 LAMOTTE André -DEGUELLE Jacques
14 39,17 24 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian
PAIRE Nr : 1 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert
15 DEFOOR Jacques -LELEU Eva : 50,28 % 1 NS 4P E-2 100 22 91.67
2 NS 2S S-1 -100 0 0.00
3 NS 6P N-1 -50 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
25 NELIS Claude -COLLET Claudine : 54,44 % 4 NS 3S E-1 100 18 75.00
5 NS 3S N-2 -200 1 4.17
6 NS 3P N-1 -50 1 4.17 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
24 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 39,17 % 7 NS 3S N+1 630 13 54.17
8 NS 5K N = 400 17 70.83
9 NS 3P E+2 -200 19 79.17 µ Tbl = 68,06 %
23 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,36 %10 NS 6S W-3 300 24 100.00
11 NS 3S S = 400 10 41.67
12 NS 1S W+1 -120 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
22 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 46,81 %13 NS 3S N+3 690 22 91.67
14 NS 3S N+3 490 24 100.00
15 NS 4TcW-2 300 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 97,22 %
27 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 55,68 %16 NS 4C E-1 100 23 95.83
17 NS 3C W+2 -200 16 66.67
18 NS 3T W-2 100 1 4.17 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
20 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 48,89 %19 NS 2C E = -110 0 0.00
20 NS 3S N+1 630 20 83.33
21 NS 3S N = 600 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 40,28 %
19 VUYTS Michèle -GERARD Francis : 43,47 %22 NS 3S E = -600 0 0.00
23 NS 3S N+2 660 16 66.67
24 NS 2C W+1 -140 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 51,39 %
18 LAMOTTE André -DEGUELLE Jacques : 40,97 %25 NS 5TcW+1 -950 1 4.17
26 NS 3S S = 600 17 70.83
27 NS 4C W-1 50 19 79.17 µ Tbl = 51,39 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,12 %28 NS 3S N+1 630 19 79.17
29 NS 3S W+1 -630 6 25.00
30 NS 5KcW-3 500 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 65,28 %
28 COLLET Christine -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 51,25 %31 NS 4P E+1 -450 7 29.17
32 NS 4P E = -620 6 25.00
33 NS 2C W-1 50 1 4.17 µ Tbl = 19,44 %
Total : 417,0 / 792 = 52,65 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 MULLER Philippe -DIMITRIU Pia
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,12 % 1 NS 4P E-1 50 13 54.17
2 NS 1S N+3 180 22 91.67
3 NS 6S N = 990 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,94 %
16 de TERWANGNE Philippe -LIBERT Laurent : 54,58 % 4 NS 2S E = -120 7 29.17
5 NS 3S N-2 -200 1 4.17
6 NS 2P N+1 140 18 75.00 µ Tbl = 36,11 %
15 DEFOOR Jacques -LELEU Eva : 50,28 % 7 NS 3S S+2 660 21 87.50
8 NS 5K N = 400 17 70.83
9 NS 5T N-1 -50 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 86,11 %
25 NELIS Claude -COLLET Claudine : 54,44 %10 NS 4C W+2 -680 11 45.83
11 NS 3S S+1 430 22 91.67
12 NS 3TcW = -470 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
24 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 39,17 %13 NS 3S N+3 690 22 91.67
14 NS 3S N+2 460 19 79.17
15 NS 2T W = -90 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
23 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,36 %16 NS 4C E+2 -680 1 4.17
17 NS 2T W-1 50 24 100.00
18 NS 1S N+1 120 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
28 COLLET Christine -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 51,25 %19 NS 3TcS = 470 24 100.00
20 NS 3S N+1 630 20 83.33
21 NS 4P N+1 650 23 95.83 µ Tbl = 93,06 %
26 COURTOIS Chantal -GOBBE Amélie : 54,80 %22 NS 2CcS = 470 21 87.50
23 NS 3S N+2 660 16 66.67
24 NS 1C W+2 -140 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 80,56 %
20 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 48,89 %25 NS 3S W+1 -630 5 20.83
26 NS 3S N-2 -200 3 12.50
27 NS 4P S-3 -150 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 30,56 %
19 VUYTS Michèle -GERARD Francis : 43,47 %28 NS 3S S+1 630 19 79.17
29 NS 3S W = -600 16 66.67
30 NS 5KcW-2 300 11 45.83 µ Tbl = 63,89 %
18 LAMOTTE André -DEGUELLE Jacques : 40,97 %31 NS 4P E+1 -450 7 29.17
32 NS 3P E+1 -170 19 79.17
33 NS 1S N+1 120 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 503,0 / 792 = 63,51 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
19 VUYTS Michèle -GERARD Francis : 43,47 % 1 NS 4P E-1 50 13 54.17
2 NS 1S N+2 150 16 66.67
3 NS 4P S = 420 17 70.83 µ Tbl = 63,89 %
18 LAMOTTE André -DEGUELLE Jacques : 40,97 % 4 NS 2S E = -120 7 29.17
5 NS 5T N-1 -100 8 33.33
6 NS 2P N = 110 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 31,94 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,12 % 7 NS 3S S+2 660 21 87.50
8 NS 5K N = 400 17 70.83
9 NS 4P E+1 -650 11 45.83 µ Tbl = 68,06 %
26 COURTOIS Chantal -GOBBE Amélie : 54,80 %10 NS 4C E+2 -680 11 45.83
11 NS 3S S+1 430 22 91.67
12 NS 1S W-3 150 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 76,39 %
15 DEFOOR Jacques -LELEU Eva : 50,28 %13 NS 3S N+2 660 14 58.33
14 NS 6K N-1 -50 3 12.50
15 NS 2C N-1 -100 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 43,06 %
25 NELIS Claude -COLLET Claudine : 54,44 %16 NS 3S W = -600 15 62.50
17 NS 3C E+2 -200 16 66.67
18 NS 2C N = 110 5 20.83 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
24 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 39,17 %19 NS 2S S = 120 12 50.00
20 NS 3S N+1 630 20 83.33
21 NS 4P S-1 -100 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 48,61 %
23 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,36 %22 NS 3S E-4 400 17 70.83
23 NS 2P W-3 300 5 20.83
24 NS 2C W+2 -170 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 43,06 %
27 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 55,68 %25 NS 4C W = -620 9 37.50
26 NS 3S N = 600 17 70.83
27 NS 5K W-1 50 19 79.17 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
21 CLERIN François-Xavier -FRAITURE Louis : 52,22 %28 NS 2C S+2 170 8 33.33
29 NS 4S W-1 100 22 91.67
30 NS 5KcW-3 500 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
20 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 48,89 %31 NS 3S E = -400 21 87.50
32 NS 3P W+2 -200 15 62.50
33 NS 2K N+1 110 5 20.83 µ Tbl = 56,94 %
Total : 444,0 / 792 = 56,06 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 STUART Anne-Marie -GILLAIN Françoise
21 CLERIN François-Xavier -FRAITURE Louis : 52,22 % 1 NS 2P E+1 -140 6 25.00
2 NS 2P W-2 100 2 8.33
3 NS 4P S = 420 17 70.83 µ Tbl = 34,72 %
20 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 48,89 % 4 NS 3S E-1 100 18 75.00
5 NS 3S N-1 -100 8 33.33
6 NS 2P N+1 140 18 75.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
19 VUYTS Michèle -GERARD Francis : 43,47 % 7 NS 3S S+2 660 21 87.50
8 NS 3S S-2 -100 2 8.33
9 NS 4P E+1 -650 11 45.83 µ Tbl = 47,22 %
18 LAMOTTE André -DEGUELLE Jacques : 40,97 %10 NS 5C W+1 -680 11 45.83
11 NS 3S S = 400 10 41.67
12 NS 2CcS = 670 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
27 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 55,68 %13 NS 3S N+2 660 14 58.33
14 NS 3K N+2 150 8 33.33
15 NS 2C S-2 -200 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
16 de TERWANGNE Philippe -LIBERT Laurent : 54,58 %16 NS 3S W = -600 15 62.50
17 NS 3TcS-2 -300 8 33.33
18 NS 2C N = 110 5 20.83 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
15 DEFOOR Jacques -LELEU Eva : 50,28 %19 NS 1S S+1 120 12 50.00
20 NS 3S N = 600 8 33.33
21 NS 3S N = 600 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 40,28 %
25 NELIS Claude -COLLET Claudine : 54,44 %22 NS 2C N+1 140 10 41.67
23 NS 2P W-3 300 5 20.83
24 NS 2C W+2 -170 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
24 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 39,17 %25 NS 3PcN-1 -100 16 66.67
26 NS 3T S+2 150 10 41.67
27 NS 4C W = -420 6 25.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
28 COLLET Christine -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 51,25 %28 NS 3S N-3 -300 0 0.00
29 NS 3S W+1 -630 6 25.00
30 NS 3C S = 140 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 12,50 %
26 COURTOIS Chantal -GOBBE Amélie : 54,80 %31 NS 4P W+1 -450 7 29.17
32 NS 5KcN-5 -1100 0 0.00
33 NS 1S N+3 180 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 43,06 %
Total : 331,0 / 792 = 41,79 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -LEFEVRE Raymond
27 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 55,68 % 1 NS 4P E+1 -450 1 4.17
2 NS 3S N = 600 24 100.00
3 NS 6P N-1 -50 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 48,61 %
22 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 46,81 % 4 NS 2S E-1 100 18 75.00
5 NS 3S N-1 -100 8 33.33
6 NS 2P N+1 140 18 75.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
21 CLERIN François-Xavier -FRAITURE Louis : 52,22 % 7 NS 3S S+1 630 13 54.17
8 NS 5K N = 400 17 70.83
9 NS 4PcW = -790 4 16.67 µ Tbl = 47,22 %
20 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 48,89 %10 NS 4C W+1 -650 20 83.33
11 NS 3S S = 400 10 41.67
12 NS 2C S+1 140 20 83.33 µ Tbl = 69,44 %
19 VUYTS Michèle -GERARD Francis : 43,47 %13 NS 3S N+3 690 22 91.67
14 NS 3S N+2 460 19 79.17
15 NS 3C S-2 -200 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 68,06 %
28 COLLET Christine -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 51,25 %16 NS 4C W+2 -680 1 4.17
17 NS 2C E+3 -200 16 66.67
18 NS 3C N = 140 17 70.83 µ Tbl = 47,22 %
26 COURTOIS Chantal -GOBBE Amélie : 54,80 %19 NS 1S S+1 120 12 50.00
20 NS 3S N = 600 8 33.33
21 NS 4P S = 620 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
16 de TERWANGNE Philippe -LIBERT Laurent : 54,58 %22 NS 3S E-1 100 7 29.17
23 NS 3S N+2 660 16 66.67
24 NS 1C W+3 -170 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
15 DEFOOR Jacques -LELEU Eva : 50,28 %25 NS 2P N-1 -50 18 75.00
26 NS 3S N-2 -200 3 12.50
27 NS 4C W = -420 6 25.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
25 NELIS Claude -COLLET Claudine : 54,44 %28 NS 3S S+1 630 19 79.17
29 NS 3S W = -600 16 66.67
30 NS 4KcW-2 300 11 45.83 µ Tbl = 63,89 %
24 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 39,17 %31 NS 2P E+2 -170 24 100.00
32 NS 3K N-3 -150 22 91.67
33 NS 2T N+1 110 5 20.83 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
Total : 438,0 / 792 = 55,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 DEPELSMAKER Anne -ROOSELEERS
25 NELIS Claude -COLLET Claudine : 54,44 % 1 NS 3S W-1 50 13 54.17
2 NS 1S N+2 150 16 66.67
3 NS 6S S-2 -100 4 16.67 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
28 COLLET Christine -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 51,25 % 4 NS 4C E-1 100 18 75.00
5 NS 3S N+2 660 20 83.33
6 NS 2P N+1 140 18 75.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
26 COURTOIS Chantal -GOBBE Amélie : 54,80 % 7 NS 3S N+1 630 13 54.17
8 NS 3S S-2 -100 2 8.33
9 NS 4P E+1 -650 11 45.83 µ Tbl = 36,11 %
22 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 46,81 %10 NS 4C E+2 -680 11 45.83
11 NS 2T S+2 130 2 8.33
12 NS 1S W = -90 12 50.00 µ Tbl = 34,72 %
21 CLERIN François-Xavier -FRAITURE Louis : 52,22 %13 NS 3S N+1 630 5 20.83
14 NS 5K N = 400 11 45.83
15 NS 4C S-3 -300 1 4.17 µ Tbl = 23,61 %
20 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 48,89 %16 NS 4C E = -620 9 37.50
17 NS 4C E+1 -450 2 8.33
18 NS 2C N+1 140 17 70.83 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
19 VUYTS Michèle -GERARD Francis : 43,47 %19 NS 1ScS+1 280 22 91.67
20 NS 3S N = 600 8 33.33
21 NS 4C N = 620 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 63,89 %
27 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 55,68 %22 NS 3CcS-2 -300 2 8.33
23 NS 2K S+3 150 0 0.00
24 NS 1C W+3 -170 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 15,28 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,12 %25 NS 2PcN-2 -300 13 54.17
26 NS 5T S+1 620 23 95.83
27 NS 4PcS-3 -500 1 4.17 µ Tbl = 51,39 %
16 de TERWANGNE Philippe -LIBERT Laurent : 54,58 %28 NS 2S N = 120 4 16.67
29 NS 4P W-2 200 24 100.00
30 NS 4C S = 420 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
15 DEFOOR Jacques -LELEU Eva : 50,28 %31 NS 4P E = -420 18 75.00
32 NS 4K N-2 -100 24 100.00
33 NS 2S N = 120 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
Total : 379,0 / 792 = 47,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEGEVE
16 de TERWANGNE Philippe -LIBERT Laurent : 54,58 % 1 NS 4P E = -420 4 16.67
2 NS 1S N+1 120 7 29.17
3 NS 4P S = 420 17 70.83 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
15 DEFOOR Jacques -LELEU Eva : 50,28 % 4 NS 2S E = -120 7 29.17
5 NS 3S N = 600 14 58.33
6 NS 2P N+1 140 18 75.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
25 NELIS Claude -COLLET Claudine : 54,44 % 7 NS 3S S = 600 6 25.00
8 NS 2C W-2 100 6 25.00
9 NS 2P E+2 -170 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 47,22 %
27 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 55,68 %10 NS 6C W = -1430 2 8.33
11 NS 3S S = 400 10 41.67
12 NS 1S W-1 50 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 36,11 %
23 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,36 %13 NS 3T N+1 130 0 0.00
14 NS 5K N = 400 11 45.83
15 NS 2T W-1 50 20 83.33 µ Tbl = 43,06 %
22 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 46,81 %16 NS 2C E+2 -170 18 75.00
17 NS 2C E+3 -200 16 66.67
18 NS 3C N = 140 17 70.83 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
21 CLERIN François-Xavier -FRAITURE Louis : 52,22 %19 NS 1T S+1 90 7 29.17
20 NS 3S N = 600 8 33.33
21 NS 3S S+1 630 20 83.33 µ Tbl = 48,61 %
20 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 48,89 %22 NS 3S E-5 500 24 100.00
23 NS 1S N+3 180 2 8.33
24 NS 1C W+4 -200 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
28 COLLET Christine -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 51,25 %25 NS 3S E+1 -630 5 20.83
26 NS 3T S+2 150 10 41.67
27 NS 3PcS-2 -300 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 34,72 %
26 COURTOIS Chantal -GOBBE Amélie : 54,80 %28 NS 3S S-1 -100 2 8.33
29 NS 3S W = -600 16 66.67
30 NS 4C N-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,12 %31 NS 4P W+1 -450 7 29.17
32 NS 4P E = -620 6 25.00
33 NS 2S S = 120 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
Total : 342,0 / 792 = 43,18 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 DEBLECKER Michel -DELAEVER Chrisitan
18 LAMOTTE André -DEGUELLE Jacques : 40,97 % 1 NS 4P E-2 100 22 91.67
2 NS 1S S+1 120 7 29.17
3 NS 4P S = 420 17 70.83 µ Tbl = 63,89 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,12 % 4 NS 2S E+1 -150 0 0.00
5 NS 3S N+2 660 20 83.33
6 NS 2P N+1 140 18 75.00 µ Tbl = 52,78 %
16 de TERWANGNE Philippe -LIBERT Laurent : 54,58 % 7 NS 3S S+1 630 13 54.17
8 NS 5K N = 400 17 70.83
9 NS 4P E+1 -650 11 45.83 µ Tbl = 56,94 %
15 DEFOOR Jacques -LELEU Eva : 50,28 %10 NS 4C W+2 -680 11 45.83
11 NS 3S S = 400 10 41.67
12 NS 1S W+2 -150 4 16.67 µ Tbl = 34,72 %
28 COLLET Christine -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 51,25 %13 NS 3S S+1 630 5 20.83
14 NS 5K N-1 -50 3 12.50
15 NS 3T W-1 50 20 83.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
26 COURTOIS Chantal -GOBBE Amélie : 54,80 %16 NS 4C E-1 100 23 95.83
17 NS 4C E = -420 5 20.83
18 NS 3T W-2 100 1 4.17 µ Tbl = 40,28 %
23 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,36 %19 NS 2S S-1 -50 3 12.50
20 NS 4C N-2 -200 0 0.00
21 NS 3S S = 600 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
22 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 46,81 %22 NS 3S E-2 200 13 54.17
23 NS 3S N+2 660 16 66.67
24 NS 3P S-3 -150 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
21 CLERIN François-Xavier -FRAITURE Louis : 52,22 %25 NS 5T W-1 100 21 87.50
26 NS 4T S+1 150 10 41.67
27 NS 3C W = -140 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 65,28 %
20 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 48,89 %28 NS 3S S = 600 12 50.00
29 NS 3S W = -600 16 66.67
30 NS 4C S = 420 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
27 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 55,68 %31 NS 4P W+1 -450 7 29.17
32 NS 4P E = -620 6 25.00
33 NS 1S N+1 120 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
Total : 382,0 / 792 = 48,23 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul
28 COLLET Christine -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 51,25 % 1 NS 4P E-1 50 13 54.17
2 NS 1S N+2 150 16 66.67
3 NS 6P S-2 -100 4 16.67 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
26 COURTOIS Chantal -GOBBE Amélie : 54,80 % 4 NS 2S E = -120 7 29.17
5 NS 3S N+2 660 20 83.33
6 NS 2P S = 110 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 48,61 %
18 LAMOTTE André -DEGUELLE Jacques : 40,97 % 7 NS 3S S+2 660 21 87.50
8 NS 5K N = 400 17 70.83
9 NS 3P E+2 -200 19 79.17 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,12 %10 NS 4C W+2 -680 11 45.83
11 NS 6S S-2 -100 0 0.00
12 NS 1S W+1 -120 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 26,39 %
16 de TERWANGNE Philippe -LIBERT Laurent : 54,58 %13 NS 3S S+1 630 5 20.83
14 NS 3S S+2 460 19 79.17
15 NS 3C N-2 -200 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
15 DEFOOR Jacques -LELEU Eva : 50,28 %16 NS 4C E = -620 9 37.50
17 NS 4C E+2 -480 0 0.00
18 NS 2C N+1 140 17 70.83 µ Tbl = 36,11 %
27 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 55,68 %19 NS 1T S+1 90 7 29.17
20 NS 3S N+1 630 20 83.33
21 NS 4P S = 620 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 59,72 %
24 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 39,17 %22 NS 3S E-2 200 13 54.17
23 NS 3S N+2 660 16 66.67
24 NS 1C W+2 -140 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 69,44 %
23 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,36 %25 NS 4PcN-2 -300 13 54.17
26 NS 5T S+1 620 23 95.83
27 NS 3S W-4 200 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 80,56 %
22 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 46,81 %28 NS 3T N+2 150 6 25.00
29 NS 3S W+1 -630 6 25.00
30 NS 3C N+1 170 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
21 CLERIN François-Xavier -FRAITURE Louis : 52,22 %31 NS 4P W+1 -450 7 29.17
32 NS 5KcN-3 -500 12 50.00
33 NS 1S N+1 120 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
Total : 406,0 / 792 = 51,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 GHIERCHE Jacques -LEDECQ Eric
22 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 46,81 % 1 NS 4P E-2 100 22 91.67
2 NS 1S N+1 120 7 29.17
3 NS 5P S = 450 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
21 CLERIN François-Xavier -FRAITURE Louis : 52,22 % 4 NS 2S E = -120 7 29.17
5 NS 3S N+2 660 20 83.33
6 NS 2P N+1 140 18 75.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
27 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 55,68 % 7 NS 3S S = 600 6 25.00
8 NS 3K S+2 150 8 33.33
9 NS 4P E+1 -650 11 45.83 µ Tbl = 34,72 %
19 VUYTS Michèle -GERARD Francis : 43,47 %10 NS 4C W+2 -680 11 45.83
11 NS 3S S = 400 10 41.67
12 NS 2P N-2 -200 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 31,94 %
18 LAMOTTE André -DEGUELLE Jacques : 40,97 %13 NS 3S S+2 660 14 58.33
14 NS 3S N+2 460 19 79.17
15 NS 2C S-2 -200 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 56,94 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,12 %16 NS 2P N-3 -150 20 83.33
17 NS 4C E = -420 5 20.83
18 NS 2C N+1 140 17 70.83 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
16 de TERWANGNE Philippe -LIBERT Laurent : 54,58 %19 NS 3CcE-1 200 20 83.33
20 NS 3S N = 600 8 33.33
21 NS 3S S = 600 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 51,39 %
28 COLLET Christine -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 51,25 %22 NS 2CcS = 470 21 87.50
23 NS 3S N+2 660 16 66.67
24 NS 3C W+1 -170 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 63,89 %
26 COURTOIS Chantal -GOBBE Amélie : 54,80 %25 NS 5T W-1 100 21 87.50
26 NS 3S N-2 -200 3 12.50
27 NS 3PcS-3 -500 1 4.17 µ Tbl = 34,72 %
24 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 39,17 %28 NS 3S N = 600 12 50.00
29 NS 3S W = -600 16 66.67
30 NS 3C N = 140 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 43,06 %
23 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,36 %31 NS 4P W+1 -450 7 29.17
32 NS 4P E = -620 6 25.00
33 NS 1S N+1 120 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
Total : 393,0 / 792 = 49,62 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 MARCHAL Christian -MAYENCE Jean-Philippe
24 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 39,17 % 1 NS 4P E-1 50 13 54.17
2 NS 1S N+2 150 16 66.67
3 NS 6P S-2 -100 4 16.67 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
23 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,36 % 4 NS 3S E-2 200 24 100.00
5 NS 3S N+2 660 20 83.33
6 NS 3C W-1 100 4 16.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
22 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 46,81 % 7 NS 6S S-2 -200 1 4.17
8 NS 5K N = 400 17 70.83
9 NS 3PcE+2 -1130 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
28 COLLET Christine -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 51,25 %10 NS 6C W+1 -1460 0 0.00
11 NS 3S S+1 430 22 91.67
12 NS 2C S = 110 17 70.83 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
26 COURTOIS Chantal -GOBBE Amélie : 54,80 %13 NS 3S N+2 660 14 58.33
14 NS 6K N-1 -50 3 12.50
15 NS 4C S-3 -300 1 4.17 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
19 VUYTS Michèle -GERARD Francis : 43,47 %16 NS 4C E = -620 9 37.50
17 NS 3C E+2 -200 16 66.67
18 NS 2C N+1 140 17 70.83 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
18 LAMOTTE André -DEGUELLE Jacques : 40,97 %19 NS 2S S+1 150 17 70.83
20 NS 3S N+1 630 20 83.33
21 NS 4P N+1 650 23 95.83 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,12 %22 NS 3K E-1 100 7 29.17
23 NS 3S N+2 660 16 66.67
24 NS 2C W+1 -140 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
16 de TERWANGNE Philippe -LIBERT Laurent : 54,58 %25 NS 3ScE+1 -950 1 4.17
26 NS 5T S = 600 17 70.83
27 NS 4P S-4 -200 12 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
27 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 55,68 %28 NS 3S S+3 690 24 100.00
29 NS 3S W+1 -630 6 25.00
30 NS 4C S = 420 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 63,89 %
25 NELIS Claude -COLLET Claudine : 54,44 %31 NS 3S E = -400 21 87.50
32 NS 3P W+2 -200 15 62.50
33 NS 1S W-1 50 1 4.17 µ Tbl = 51,39 %
Total : 415,0 / 792 = 52,40 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 D'AGOSTINO -FRANCOIS Jean-Marc
26 COURTOIS Chantal -GOBBE Amélie : 54,80 % 1 NS 4P E+1 -450 1 4.17
2 NS 1S N+2 150 16 66.67
3 NS 5P S-1 -50 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
19 VUYTS Michèle -GERARD Francis : 43,47 % 4 NS 3S E-1 100 18 75.00
5 NS 3S N-1 -100 8 33.33
6 NS 3P N-1 -50 1 4.17 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
23 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,36 % 7 NS 3S S-2 -200 1 4.17
8 NS 3S S-2 -100 2 8.33
9 NS 4PcE+1 -990 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 6,94 %
16 de TERWANGNE Philippe -LIBERT Laurent : 54,58 %10 NS 4C W+2 -680 11 45.83
11 NS 3S S = 400 10 41.67
12 NS 1S W+1 -120 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,28 %
20 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 48,89 %13 NS 3S N+2 660 14 58.33
14 NS 3S N+1 430 14 58.33
15 NS 3T W-1 50 20 83.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
24 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 39,17 %16 NS 4C E+1 -650 4 16.67
17 NS 3C E+1 -170 22 91.67
18 NS 3C N = 140 17 70.83 µ Tbl = 59,72 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,12 %19 NS 1S S+2 150 17 70.83
20 NS 3S N = 600 8 33.33
21 NS 3S S-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 34,72 %
21 CLERIN François-Xavier -FRAITURE Louis : 52,22 %22 NS 2C S-1 -50 4 16.67
23 NS 3S N+2 660 16 66.67
24 NS 3CcW = -530 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
25 NELIS Claude -COLLET Claudine : 54,44 %25 NS 3P N = 140 24 100.00
26 NS 3S N-2 -200 3 12.50
27 NS 5CcW-2 300 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
18 LAMOTTE André -DEGUELLE Jacques : 40,97 %28 NS 3S S = 600 12 50.00
29 NS 3S W+2 -660 0 0.00
30 NS 5KcW-3 500 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 47,22 %
22 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 46,81 %31 NS 4P W+1 -450 7 29.17
32 NS 4P E = -620 6 25.00
33 NS 1S N+1 120 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
Total : 336,0 / 792 = 42,42 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 BOUDAULT Jean-Paul -DEPELSMAKER Marie
23 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,36 % 1 NS 4P E-1 50 13 54.17
2 NS 1S S+1 120 7 29.17
3 NS 6P S-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
27 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 55,68 % 4 NS 2S E = -120 7 29.17
5 NS 3S N-1 -100 8 33.33
6 NS 2P N = 110 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 31,94 %
20 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 48,89 % 7 NS 3S S = 600 6 25.00
8 NS 5K N = 400 17 70.83
9 NS 4P E+1 -650 11 45.83 µ Tbl = 47,22 %
24 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 39,17 %10 NS 7C W-1 100 22 91.67
11 NS 4C N = 420 18 75.00
12 NS 2C S = 110 17 70.83 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,12 %13 NS 3S S+1 630 5 20.83
14 NS 6K N-1 -50 3 12.50
15 NS 3C N-2 -200 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
21 CLERIN François-Xavier -FRAITURE Louis : 52,22 %16 NS 4C E = -620 9 37.50
17 NS 3T S-5 -250 10 41.67
18 NS 2C N+1 140 17 70.83 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
25 NELIS Claude -COLLET Claudine : 54,44 %19 NS 3T S-1 -50 3 12.50
20 NS 3S N = 600 8 33.33
21 NS 4P S-1 -100 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 19,44 %
18 LAMOTTE André -DEGUELLE Jacques : 40,97 %22 NS 3S E-4 400 17 70.83
23 NS 3S N+2 660 16 66.67
24 NS 3C W+1 -170 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
22 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 46,81 %25 NS 4C W = -620 9 37.50
26 NS 5T S = 600 17 70.83
27 NS 4C W = -420 6 25.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
15 DEFOOR Jacques -LELEU Eva : 50,28 %28 NS 3S S+1 630 19 79.17
29 NS 3S W+1 -630 6 25.00
30 NS 4K W-3 150 6 25.00 µ Tbl = 43,06 %
19 VUYTS Michèle -GERARD Francis : 43,47 %31 NS 3S E+1 -430 16 66.67
32 NS 3P E+1 -170 19 79.17
33 NS 1S N+2 150 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
Total : 362,0 / 792 = 45,71 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 -
20 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 48,89 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
24 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 39,17 % 4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
28 COLLET Christine -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 51,25 % 7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
21 CLERIN François-Xavier -FRAITURE Louis : 52,22 %10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
25 NELIS Claude -COLLET Claudine : 54,44 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
18 LAMOTTE André -DEGUELLE Jacques : 40,97 %16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
22 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 46,81 %19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
15 DEFOOR Jacques -LELEU Eva : 50,28 %22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
19 VUYTS Michèle -GERARD Francis : 43,47 %25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00
27 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
23 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,36 %28 NS BYE 0 0.00
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
16 de TERWANGNE Philippe -LIBERT Laurent : 54,58 %31 NS BYE 0 0.00
32 NS BYE 0 0.00
33 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 792 = 0,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 DEFOOR Jacques -LELEU Eva
1 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert : 52,65 % 1 EO 4P E-2 100 2 8.33
2 EO 2S S-1 -100 24 100.00
3 EO 6P N-1 -50 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
7 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEGEVE : 43,18 % 4 EO 2S E = -120 17 70.83
5 EO 3S N = 600 10 41.67
6 EO 2P N+1 140 6 25.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
2 MULLER Philippe -DIMITRIU Pia : 63,51 % 7 EO 3S S+2 660 3 12.50
8 EO 5K N = 400 7 29.17
9 EO 5T N-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 13,89 %
8 DEBLECKER Michel -DELAEVER Chrisitan : 48,23 %10 EO 4C W+2 -680 13 54.17
11 EO 3S S = 400 14 58.33
12 EO 1S W+2 -150 20 83.33 µ Tbl = 65,28 %
3 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,06 %13 EO 3S N+2 660 10 41.67
14 EO 6K N-1 -50 21 87.50
15 EO 2C N-1 -100 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 56,94 %
9 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 51,26 %16 EO 4C E = -620 15 62.50
17 EO 4C E+2 -480 24 100.00
18 EO 2C N+1 140 7 29.17 µ Tbl = 63,89 %
4 STUART Anne-Marie -GILLAIN Françoise : 41,79 %19 EO 1S S+1 120 12 50.00
20 EO 3S N = 600 16 66.67
21 EO 3S N = 600 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 59,72 %
14 - : 0,00 %22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
5 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -LEFEVRE Raymond : 55,30 %25 EO 2P N-1 -50 6 25.00
26 EO 3S N-2 -200 21 87.50
27 EO 4C W = -420 18 75.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
13 BOUDAULT Jean-Paul -DEPELSMAKER Marie : 45,71 %28 EO 3S S+1 630 5 20.83
29 EO 3S W+1 -630 18 75.00
30 EO 4K W-3 150 18 75.00 µ Tbl = 56,94 %
6 DEPELSMAKER Anne -ROOSELEERS : 47,85 %31 EO 4P E = -420 6 25.00
32 EO 4K N-2 -100 0 0.00
33 EO 2S N = 120 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
Total : 362,0 / 720 = 50,28 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 de TERWANGNE Philippe -LIBERT Laurent
7 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEGEVE : 43,18 % 1 EO 4P E = -420 20 83.33
2 EO 1S N+1 120 17 70.83
3 EO 4P S = 420 7 29.17 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
2 MULLER Philippe -DIMITRIU Pia : 63,51 % 4 EO 2S E = -120 17 70.83
5 EO 3S N-2 -200 23 95.83
6 EO 2P N+1 140 6 25.00 µ Tbl = 63,89 %
8 DEBLECKER Michel -DELAEVER Chrisitan : 48,23 % 7 EO 3S S+1 630 11 45.83
8 EO 5K N = 400 7 29.17
9 EO 4P E+1 -650 13 54.17 µ Tbl = 43,06 %
12 D'AGOSTINO -FRANCOIS Jean-Marc : 42,42 %10 EO 4C W+2 -680 13 54.17
11 EO 3S S = 400 14 58.33
12 EO 1S W+1 -120 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 59,72 %
9 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 51,26 %13 EO 3S S+1 630 19 79.17
14 EO 3S S+2 460 5 20.83
15 EO 3C N-2 -200 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
4 STUART Anne-Marie -GILLAIN Françoise : 41,79 %16 EO 3S W = -600 9 37.50
17 EO 3TcS-2 -300 16 66.67
18 EO 2C N = 110 19 79.17 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
10 GHIERCHE Jacques -LEDECQ Eric : 49,62 %19 EO 3CcE-1 200 4 16.67
20 EO 3S N = 600 16 66.67
21 EO 3S S = 600 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 48,61 %
5 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -LEFEVRE Raymond : 55,30 %22 EO 3S E-1 100 17 70.83
23 EO 3S N+2 660 8 33.33
24 EO 1C W+3 -170 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
11 MARCHAL Christian -MAYENCE Jean-Philippe : 52,40 %25 EO 3ScE+1 -950 23 95.83
26 EO 5T S = 600 7 29.17
27 EO 4P S-4 -200 12 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
6 DEPELSMAKER Anne -ROOSELEERS : 47,85 %28 EO 2S N = 120 20 83.33
29 EO 4P W-2 200 0 0.00
30 EO 4C S = 420 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
14 - : 0,00 %31 EO BYE 0 0.00
32 EO BYE 0 0.00
33 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 393,0 / 720 = 54,58 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
2 MULLER Philippe -DIMITRIU Pia : 63,51 % 1 EO 4P E-1 50 11 45.83
2 EO 1S N+3 180 2 8.33
3 EO 6S N = 990 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,06 %
8 DEBLECKER Michel -DELAEVER Chrisitan : 48,23 % 4 EO 2S E+1 -150 24 100.00
5 EO 3S N+2 660 4 16.67
6 EO 2P N+1 140 6 25.00 µ Tbl = 47,22 %
3 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,06 % 7 EO 3S S+2 660 3 12.50
8 EO 5K N = 400 7 29.17
9 EO 4P E+1 -650 13 54.17 µ Tbl = 31,94 %
9 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 51,26 %10 EO 4C W+2 -680 13 54.17
11 EO 6S S-2 -100 24 100.00
12 EO 1S W+1 -120 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 73,61 %
13 BOUDAULT Jean-Paul -DEPELSMAKER Marie : 45,71 %13 EO 3S S+1 630 19 79.17
14 EO 6K N-1 -50 21 87.50
15 EO 3C N-2 -200 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
10 GHIERCHE Jacques -LEDECQ Eric : 49,62 %16 EO 2P N-3 -150 4 16.67
17 EO 4C E = -420 19 79.17
18 EO 2C N+1 140 7 29.17 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
12 D'AGOSTINO -FRANCOIS Jean-Marc : 42,42 %19 EO 1S S+2 150 7 29.17
20 EO 3S N = 600 16 66.67
21 EO 3S S-2 -200 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 65,28 %
11 MARCHAL Christian -MAYENCE Jean-Philippe : 52,40 %22 EO 3K E-1 100 17 70.83
23 EO 3S N+2 660 8 33.33
24 EO 2C W+1 -140 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
6 DEPELSMAKER Anne -ROOSELEERS : 47,85 %25 EO 2PcN-2 -300 11 45.83
26 EO 5T S+1 620 1 4.17
27 EO 4PcS-3 -500 23 95.83 µ Tbl = 48,61 %
1 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert : 52,65 %28 EO 3S N+1 630 5 20.83
29 EO 3S W+1 -630 18 75.00
30 EO 5KcW-3 500 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 34,72 %
7 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEGEVE : 43,18 %31 EO 4P W+1 -450 17 70.83
32 EO 4P E = -620 18 75.00
33 EO 2S S = 120 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
Total : 389,0 / 792 = 49,12 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 LAMOTTE André -DEGUELLE Jacques
8 DEBLECKER Michel -DELAEVER Chrisitan : 48,23 % 1 EO 4P E-2 100 2 8.33
2 EO 1S S+1 120 17 70.83
3 EO 4P S = 420 7 29.17 µ Tbl = 36,11 %
3 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,06 % 4 EO 2S E = -120 17 70.83
5 EO 5T N-1 -100 16 66.67
6 EO 2P N = 110 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 68,06 %
9 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 51,26 % 7 EO 3S S+2 660 3 12.50
8 EO 5K N = 400 7 29.17
9 EO 3P E+2 -200 5 20.83 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
4 STUART Anne-Marie -GILLAIN Françoise : 41,79 %10 EO 5C W+1 -680 13 54.17
11 EO 3S S = 400 14 58.33
12 EO 2CcS = 670 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
10 GHIERCHE Jacques -LEDECQ Eric : 49,62 %13 EO 3S S+2 660 10 41.67
14 EO 3S N+2 460 5 20.83
15 EO 2C S-2 -200 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 43,06 %
14 - : 0,00 %16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
11 MARCHAL Christian -MAYENCE Jean-Philippe : 52,40 %19 EO 2S S+1 150 7 29.17
20 EO 3S N+1 630 4 16.67
21 EO 4P N+1 650 1 4.17 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
13 BOUDAULT Jean-Paul -DEPELSMAKER Marie : 45,71 %22 EO 3S E-4 400 7 29.17
23 EO 3S N+2 660 8 33.33
24 EO 3C W+1 -170 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
1 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert : 52,65 %25 EO 5TcW+1 -950 23 95.83
26 EO 3S S = 600 7 29.17
27 EO 4C W-1 50 5 20.83 µ Tbl = 48,61 %
12 D'AGOSTINO -FRANCOIS Jean-Marc : 42,42 %28 EO 3S S = 600 12 50.00
29 EO 3S W+2 -660 24 100.00
30 EO 5KcW-3 500 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 52,78 %
2 MULLER Philippe -DIMITRIU Pia : 63,51 %31 EO 4P E+1 -450 17 70.83
32 EO 3P E+1 -170 5 20.83
33 EO 1S N+1 120 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 295,0 / 720 = 40,97 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 VUYTS Michèle -GERARD Francis
3 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,06 % 1 EO 4P E-1 50 11 45.83
2 EO 1S N+2 150 8 33.33
3 EO 4P S = 420 7 29.17 µ Tbl = 36,11 %
12 D'AGOSTINO -FRANCOIS Jean-Marc : 42,42 % 4 EO 3S E-1 100 6 25.00
5 EO 3S N-1 -100 16 66.67
6 EO 3P N-1 -50 23 95.83 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
4 STUART Anne-Marie -GILLAIN Françoise : 41,79 % 7 EO 3S S+2 660 3 12.50
8 EO 3S S-2 -100 22 91.67
9 EO 4P E+1 -650 13 54.17 µ Tbl = 52,78 %
10 GHIERCHE Jacques -LEDECQ Eric : 49,62 %10 EO 4C W+2 -680 13 54.17
11 EO 3S S = 400 14 58.33
12 EO 2P N-2 -200 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 68,06 %
5 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -LEFEVRE Raymond : 55,30 %13 EO 3S N+3 690 2 8.33
14 EO 3S N+2 460 5 20.83
15 EO 3C S-2 -200 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 31,94 %
11 MARCHAL Christian -MAYENCE Jean-Philippe : 52,40 %16 EO 4C E = -620 15 62.50
17 EO 3C E+2 -200 8 33.33
18 EO 2C N+1 140 7 29.17 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
6 DEPELSMAKER Anne -ROOSELEERS : 47,85 %19 EO 1ScS+1 280 2 8.33
20 EO 3S N = 600 16 66.67
21 EO 4C N = 620 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 36,11 %
1 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert : 52,65 %22 EO 3S E = -600 24 100.00
23 EO 3S N+2 660 8 33.33
24 EO 2C W+1 -140 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 48,61 %
14 - : 0,00 %25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00
27 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
2 MULLER Philippe -DIMITRIU Pia : 63,51 %28 EO 3S S+1 630 5 20.83
29 EO 3S W = -600 8 33.33
30 EO 5KcW-2 300 13 54.17 µ Tbl = 36,11 %
13 BOUDAULT Jean-Paul -DEPELSMAKER Marie : 45,71 %31 EO 3S E+1 -430 8 33.33
32 EO 3P E+1 -170 5 20.83
33 EO 1S N+2 150 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
Total : 313,0 / 720 = 43,47 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard
14 - : 0,00 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
4 STUART Anne-Marie -GILLAIN Françoise : 41,79 % 4 EO 3S E-1 100 6 25.00
5 EO 3S N-1 -100 16 66.67
6 EO 2P N+1 140 6 25.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
13 BOUDAULT Jean-Paul -DEPELSMAKER Marie : 45,71 % 7 EO 3S S = 600 18 75.00
8 EO 5K N = 400 7 29.17
9 EO 4P E+1 -650 13 54.17 µ Tbl = 52,78 %
5 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -LEFEVRE Raymond : 55,30 %10 EO 4C W+1 -650 4 16.67
11 EO 3S S = 400 14 58.33
12 EO 2C S+1 140 4 16.67 µ Tbl = 30,56 %
12 D'AGOSTINO -FRANCOIS Jean-Marc : 42,42 %13 EO 3S N+2 660 10 41.67
14 EO 3S N+1 430 10 41.67
15 EO 3T W-1 50 4 16.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
6 DEPELSMAKER Anne -ROOSELEERS : 47,85 %16 EO 4C E = -620 15 62.50
17 EO 4C E+1 -450 22 91.67
18 EO 2C N+1 140 7 29.17 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
1 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert : 52,65 %19 EO 2C E = -110 24 100.00
20 EO 3S N+1 630 4 16.67
21 EO 3S N = 600 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 59,72 %
7 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEGEVE : 43,18 %22 EO 3S E-5 500 0 0.00
23 EO 1S N+3 180 22 91.67
24 EO 1C W+4 -200 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
2 MULLER Philippe -DIMITRIU Pia : 63,51 %25 EO 3S W+1 -630 19 79.17
26 EO 3S N-2 -200 21 87.50
27 EO 4P S-3 -150 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 69,44 %
8 DEBLECKER Michel -DELAEVER Chrisitan : 48,23 %28 EO 3S S = 600 12 50.00
29 EO 3S W = -600 8 33.33
30 EO 4C S = 420 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
3 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,06 %31 EO 3S E = -400 3 12.50
32 EO 3P W+2 -200 9 37.50
33 EO 2K N+1 110 19 79.17 µ Tbl = 43,06 %
Total : 352,0 / 720 = 48,89 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 CLERIN François-Xavier -FRAITURE Louis
4 STUART Anne-Marie -GILLAIN Françoise : 41,79 % 1 EO 2P E+1 -140 18 75.00
2 EO 2P W-2 100 22 91.67
3 EO 4P S = 420 7 29.17 µ Tbl = 65,28 %
10 GHIERCHE Jacques -LEDECQ Eric : 49,62 % 4 EO 2S E = -120 17 70.83
5 EO 3S N+2 660 4 16.67
6 EO 2P N+1 140 6 25.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
5 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -LEFEVRE Raymond : 55,30 % 7 EO 3S S+1 630 11 45.83
8 EO 5K N = 400 7 29.17
9 EO 4PcW = -790 20 83.33 µ Tbl = 52,78 %
14 - : 0,00 %10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 DEPELSMAKER Anne -ROOSELEERS : 47,85 %13 EO 3S N+1 630 19 79.17
14 EO 5K N = 400 13 54.17
15 EO 4C S-3 -300 23 95.83 µ Tbl = 76,39 %
13 BOUDAULT Jean-Paul -DEPELSMAKER Marie : 45,71 %16 EO 4C E = -620 15 62.50
17 EO 3T S-5 -250 14 58.33
18 EO 2C N+1 140 7 29.17 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
7 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEGEVE : 43,18 %19 EO 1T S+1 90 17 70.83
20 EO 3S N = 600 16 66.67
21 EO 3S S+1 630 4 16.67 µ Tbl = 51,39 %
12 D'AGOSTINO -FRANCOIS Jean-Marc : 42,42 %22 EO 2C S-1 -50 20 83.33
23 EO 3S N+2 660 8 33.33
24 EO 3CcW = -530 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
8 DEBLECKER Michel -DELAEVER Chrisitan : 48,23 %25 EO 5T W-1 100 3 12.50
26 EO 4T S+1 150 14 58.33
27 EO 3C W = -140 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 34,72 %
3 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,06 %28 EO 2C S+2 170 16 66.67
29 EO 4S W-1 100 2 8.33
30 EO 5KcW-3 500 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
9 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 51,26 %31 EO 4P W+1 -450 17 70.83
32 EO 5KcN-3 -500 12 50.00
33 EO 1S N+1 120 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
Total : 376,0 / 720 = 52,22 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
10 GHIERCHE Jacques -LEDECQ Eric : 49,62 % 1 EO 4P E-2 100 2 8.33
2 EO 1S N+1 120 17 70.83
3 EO 5P S = 450 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
5 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -LEFEVRE Raymond : 55,30 % 4 EO 2S E-1 100 6 25.00
5 EO 3S N-1 -100 16 66.67
6 EO 2P N+1 140 6 25.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
11 MARCHAL Christian -MAYENCE Jean-Philippe : 52,40 % 7 EO 6S S-2 -200 23 95.83
8 EO 5K N = 400 7 29.17
9 EO 3PcE+2 -1130 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
6 DEPELSMAKER Anne -ROOSELEERS : 47,85 %10 EO 4C E+2 -680 13 54.17
11 EO 2T S+2 130 22 91.67
12 EO 1S W = -90 12 50.00 µ Tbl = 65,28 %
1 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert : 52,65 %13 EO 3S N+3 690 2 8.33
14 EO 3S N+3 490 0 0.00
15 EO 4TcW-2 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 2,78 %
7 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEGEVE : 43,18 %16 EO 2C E+2 -170 6 25.00
17 EO 2C E+3 -200 8 33.33
18 EO 3C N = 140 7 29.17 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
14 - : 0,00 %19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
8 DEBLECKER Michel -DELAEVER Chrisitan : 48,23 %22 EO 3S E-2 200 11 45.83
23 EO 3S N+2 660 8 33.33
24 EO 3P S-3 -150 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
13 BOUDAULT Jean-Paul -DEPELSMAKER Marie : 45,71 %25 EO 4C W = -620 15 62.50
26 EO 5T S = 600 7 29.17
27 EO 4C W = -420 18 75.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
9 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 51,26 %28 EO 3T N+2 150 18 75.00
29 EO 3S W+1 -630 18 75.00
30 EO 3C N+1 170 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
12 D'AGOSTINO -FRANCOIS Jean-Marc : 42,42 %31 EO 4P W+1 -450 17 70.83
32 EO 4P E = -620 18 75.00
33 EO 1S N+1 120 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
Total : 337,0 / 720 = 46,81 %
PAIRE Nr : 23 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
13 BOUDAULT Jean-Paul -DEPELSMAKER Marie : 45,71 % 1 EO 4P E-1 50 11 45.83
2 EO 1S S+1 120 17 70.83
3 EO 6P S-3 -150 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
11 MARCHAL Christian -MAYENCE Jean-Philippe : 52,40 % 4 EO 3S E-2 200 0 0.00
5 EO 3S N+2 660 4 16.67
6 EO 3C W-1 100 20 83.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
12 D'AGOSTINO -FRANCOIS Jean-Marc : 42,42 % 7 EO 3S S-2 -200 23 95.83
8 EO 3S S-2 -100 22 91.67
9 EO 4PcE+1 -990 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 93,06 %
1 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert : 52,65 %10 EO 6S W-3 300 0 0.00
11 EO 3S S = 400 14 58.33
12 EO 1S W+1 -120 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
7 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEGEVE : 43,18 %13 EO 3T N+1 130 24 100.00
14 EO 5K N = 400 13 54.17
15 EO 2T W-1 50 4 16.67 µ Tbl = 56,94 %
2 MULLER Philippe -DIMITRIU Pia : 63,51 %16 EO 4C E+2 -680 23 95.83
17 EO 2T W-1 50 0 0.00
18 EO 1S N+1 120 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
8 DEBLECKER Michel -DELAEVER Chrisitan : 48,23 %19 EO 2S S-1 -50 21 87.50
20 EO 4C N-2 -200 24 100.00
21 EO 3S S = 600 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
3 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,06 %22 EO 3S E-4 400 7 29.17
23 EO 2P W-3 300 19 79.17
24 EO 2C W+2 -170 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 56,94 %
9 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 51,26 %25 EO 4PcN-2 -300 11 45.83
26 EO 5T S+1 620 1 4.17
27 EO 3S W-4 200 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 19,44 %
14 - : 0,00 %28 EO BYE 0 0.00
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
10 GHIERCHE Jacques -LEDECQ Eric : 49,62 %31 EO 4P W+1 -450 17 70.83
32 EO 4P E = -620 18 75.00
33 EO 1S N+1 120 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
Total : 413,0 / 720 = 57,36 %
PAIRE Nr : 24 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian
11 MARCHAL Christian -MAYENCE Jean-Philippe : 52,40 % 1 EO 4P E-1 50 11 45.83
2 EO 1S N+2 150 8 33.33
3 EO 6P S-2 -100 20 83.33 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
14 - : 0,00 % 4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
1 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert : 52,65 % 7 EO 3S N+1 630 11 45.83
8 EO 5K N = 400 7 29.17
9 EO 3P E+2 -200 5 20.83 µ Tbl = 31,94 %
13 BOUDAULT Jean-Paul -DEPELSMAKER Marie : 45,71 %10 EO 7C W-1 100 2 8.33
11 EO 4C N = 420 6 25.00
12 EO 2C S = 110 7 29.17 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
2 MULLER Philippe -DIMITRIU Pia : 63,51 %13 EO 3S N+3 690 2 8.33
14 EO 3S N+2 460 5 20.83
15 EO 2T W = -90 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
12 D'AGOSTINO -FRANCOIS Jean-Marc : 42,42 %16 EO 4C E+1 -650 20 83.33
17 EO 3C E+1 -170 2 8.33
18 EO 3C N = 140 7 29.17 µ Tbl = 40,28 %
3 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,06 %19 EO 2S S = 120 12 50.00
20 EO 3S N+1 630 4 16.67
21 EO 4P S-1 -100 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 51,39 %
9 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 51,26 %22 EO 3S E-2 200 11 45.83
23 EO 3S N+2 660 8 33.33
24 EO 1C W+2 -140 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 30,56 %
4 STUART Anne-Marie -GILLAIN Françoise : 41,79 %25 EO 3PcN-1 -100 8 33.33
26 EO 3T S+2 150 14 58.33
27 EO 4C W = -420 18 75.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
10 GHIERCHE Jacques -LEDECQ Eric : 49,62 %28 EO 3S N = 600 12 50.00
29 EO 3S W = -600 8 33.33
30 EO 3C N = 140 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 56,94 %
5 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -LEFEVRE Raymond : 55,30 %31 EO 2P E+2 -170 0 0.00
32 EO 3K N-3 -150 2 8.33
33 EO 2T N+1 110 19 79.17 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
Total : 282,0 / 720 = 39,17 %
PAIRE Nr : 25 NELIS Claude -COLLET Claudine
6 DEPELSMAKER Anne -ROOSELEERS : 47,85 % 1 EO 3S W-1 50 11 45.83
2 EO 1S N+2 150 8 33.33
3 EO 6S S-2 -100 20 83.33 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
1 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert : 52,65 % 4 EO 3S E-1 100 6 25.00
5 EO 3S N-2 -200 23 95.83
6 EO 3P N-1 -50 23 95.83 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
7 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEGEVE : 43,18 % 7 EO 3S S = 600 18 75.00
8 EO 2C W-2 100 18 75.00
9 EO 2P E+2 -170 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 52,78 %
2 MULLER Philippe -DIMITRIU Pia : 63,51 %10 EO 4C W+2 -680 13 54.17
11 EO 3S S+1 430 2 8.33
12 EO 3TcW = -470 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
14 - : 0,00 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
3 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,06 %16 EO 3S W = -600 9 37.50
17 EO 3C E+2 -200 8 33.33
18 EO 2C N = 110 19 79.17 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
13 BOUDAULT Jean-Paul -DEPELSMAKER Marie : 45,71 %19 EO 3T S-1 -50 21 87.50
20 EO 3S N = 600 16 66.67
21 EO 4P S-1 -100 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 80,56 %
4 STUART Anne-Marie -GILLAIN Françoise : 41,79 %22 EO 2C N+1 140 14 58.33
23 EO 2P W-3 300 19 79.17
24 EO 2C W+2 -170 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
12 D'AGOSTINO -FRANCOIS Jean-Marc : 42,42 %25 EO 3P N = 140 0 0.00
26 EO 3S N-2 -200 21 87.50
27 EO 5CcW-2 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
5 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -LEFEVRE Raymond : 55,30 %28 EO 3S S+1 630 5 20.83
29 EO 3S W = -600 8 33.33
30 EO 4KcW-2 300 13 54.17 µ Tbl = 36,11 %
11 MARCHAL Christian -MAYENCE Jean-Philippe : 52,40 %31 EO 3S E = -400 3 12.50
32 EO 3P W+2 -200 9 37.50
33 EO 1S W-1 50 23 95.83 µ Tbl = 48,61 %
Total : 392,0 / 720 = 54,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 26 COURTOIS Chantal -GOBBE Amélie
12 D'AGOSTINO -FRANCOIS Jean-Marc : 42,42 % 1 EO 4P E+1 -450 23 95.83
2 EO 1S N+2 150 8 33.33
3 EO 5P S-1 -50 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
9 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 51,26 % 4 EO 2S E = -120 17 70.83
5 EO 3S N+2 660 4 16.67
6 EO 2P S = 110 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 51,39 %
6 DEPELSMAKER Anne -ROOSELEERS : 47,85 % 7 EO 3S N+1 630 11 45.83
8 EO 3S S-2 -100 22 91.67
9 EO 4P E+1 -650 13 54.17 µ Tbl = 63,89 %
3 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,06 %10 EO 4C E+2 -680 13 54.17
11 EO 3S S+1 430 2 8.33
12 EO 1S W-3 150 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 23,61 %
11 MARCHAL Christian -MAYENCE Jean-Philippe : 52,40 %13 EO 3S N+2 660 10 41.67
14 EO 6K N-1 -50 21 87.50
15 EO 4C S-3 -300 23 95.83 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
8 DEBLECKER Michel -DELAEVER Chrisitan : 48,23 %16 EO 4C E-1 100 1 4.17
17 EO 4C E = -420 19 79.17
18 EO 3T W-2 100 23 95.83 µ Tbl = 59,72 %
5 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -LEFEVRE Raymond : 55,30 %19 EO 1S S+1 120 12 50.00
20 EO 3S N = 600 16 66.67
21 EO 4P S = 620 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
2 MULLER Philippe -DIMITRIU Pia : 63,51 %22 EO 2CcS = 470 3 12.50
23 EO 3S N+2 660 8 33.33
24 EO 1C W+2 -140 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 19,44 %
10 GHIERCHE Jacques -LEDECQ Eric : 49,62 %25 EO 5T W-1 100 3 12.50
26 EO 3S N-2 -200 21 87.50
27 EO 3PcS-3 -500 23 95.83 µ Tbl = 65,28 %
7 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEGEVE : 43,18 %28 EO 3S S-1 -100 22 91.67
29 EO 3S W = -600 8 33.33
30 EO 4C N-1 -50 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
4 STUART Anne-Marie -GILLAIN Françoise : 41,79 %31 EO 4P W+1 -450 17 70.83
32 EO 5KcN-5 -1100 24 100.00
33 EO 1S N+3 180 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 56,94 %
Total : 434,0 / 792 = 54,80 %
PAIRE Nr : 27 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy
5 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -LEFEVRE Raymond : 55,30 % 1 EO 4P E+1 -450 23 95.83
2 EO 3S N = 600 0 0.00
3 EO 6P N-1 -50 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 51,39 %
13 BOUDAULT Jean-Paul -DEPELSMAKER Marie : 45,71 % 4 EO 2S E = -120 17 70.83
5 EO 3S N-1 -100 16 66.67
6 EO 2P N = 110 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 68,06 %
10 GHIERCHE Jacques -LEDECQ Eric : 49,62 % 7 EO 3S S = 600 18 75.00
8 EO 3K S+2 150 16 66.67
9 EO 4P E+1 -650 13 54.17 µ Tbl = 65,28 %
7 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEGEVE : 43,18 %10 EO 6C W = -1430 22 91.67
11 EO 3S S = 400 14 58.33
12 EO 1S W-1 50 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 63,89 %
4 STUART Anne-Marie -GILLAIN Françoise : 41,79 %13 EO 3S N+2 660 10 41.67
14 EO 3K N+2 150 16 66.67
15 EO 2C S-2 -200 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
1 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert : 52,65 %16 EO 4C E-1 100 1 4.17
17 EO 3C W+2 -200 8 33.33
18 EO 3T W-2 100 23 95.83 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
9 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 51,26 %19 EO 1T S+1 90 17 70.83
20 EO 3S N+1 630 4 16.67
21 EO 4P S = 620 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,28 %
6 DEPELSMAKER Anne -ROOSELEERS : 47,85 %22 EO 3CcS-2 -300 22 91.67
23 EO 2K S+3 150 24 100.00
24 EO 1C W+3 -170 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 84,72 %
3 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,06 %25 EO 4C W = -620 15 62.50
26 EO 3S N = 600 7 29.17
27 EO 5K W-1 50 5 20.83 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
11 MARCHAL Christian -MAYENCE Jean-Philippe : 52,40 %28 EO 3S S+3 690 0 0.00
29 EO 3S W+1 -630 18 75.00
30 EO 4C S = 420 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 36,11 %
8 DEBLECKER Michel -DELAEVER Chrisitan : 48,23 %31 EO 4P W+1 -450 17 70.83
32 EO 4P E = -620 18 75.00
33 EO 1S N+1 120 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
Total : 441,0 / 792 = 55,68 %
PAIRE Nr : 28 COLLET Christine -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
9 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 51,26 % 1 EO 4P E-1 50 11 45.83
2 EO 1S N+2 150 8 33.33
3 EO 6P S-2 -100 20 83.33 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
6 DEPELSMAKER Anne -ROOSELEERS : 47,85 % 4 EO 4C E-1 100 6 25.00
5 EO 3S N+2 660 4 16.67
6 EO 2P N+1 140 6 25.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
14 - : 0,00 % 7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
11 MARCHAL Christian -MAYENCE Jean-Philippe : 52,40 %10 EO 6C W+1 -1460 24 100.00
11 EO 3S S+1 430 2 8.33
12 EO 2C S = 110 7 29.17 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
8 DEBLECKER Michel -DELAEVER Chrisitan : 48,23 %13 EO 3S S+1 630 19 79.17
14 EO 5K N-1 -50 21 87.50
15 EO 3T W-1 50 4 16.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
5 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -LEFEVRE Raymond : 55,30 %16 EO 4C W+2 -680 23 95.83
17 EO 2C E+3 -200 8 33.33
18 EO 3C N = 140 7 29.17 µ Tbl = 52,78 %
2 MULLER Philippe -DIMITRIU Pia : 63,51 %19 EO 3TcS = 470 0 0.00
20 EO 3S N+1 630 4 16.67
21 EO 4P N+1 650 1 4.17 µ Tbl = 6,94 %
10 GHIERCHE Jacques -LEDECQ Eric : 49,62 %22 EO 2CcS = 470 3 12.50
23 EO 3S N+2 660 8 33.33
24 EO 3C W+1 -170 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 36,11 %
7 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEGEVE : 43,18 %25 EO 3S E+1 -630 19 79.17
26 EO 3T S+2 150 14 58.33
27 EO 3PcS-2 -300 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 65,28 %
4 STUART Anne-Marie -GILLAIN Françoise : 41,79 %28 EO 3S N-3 -300 24 100.00
29 EO 3S W+1 -630 18 75.00
30 EO 3C S = 140 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 87,50 %
1 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert : 52,65 %31 EO 4P E+1 -450 17 70.83
32 EO 4P E = -620 18 75.00
33 EO 2C W-1 50 23 95.83 µ Tbl = 80,56 %
Total : 369,0 / 720 = 51,25 %
|
|