|
Tournoi du 28-06-10
1 57,87 4 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph
2 55,09 1 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
~ 55,09 7 VANDAM Jean -VANDAM Cécile
4 52,08 8 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
5 50,69 9 FRAITURE Louis -de WASSEIGE Claude
6 49,77 3 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques
7 46,30 5 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
8 43,06 2 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire
9 40,05 6 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 64,81 18 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian
2 57,41 11 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette
3 52,78 14 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
4 50,93 17 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
5 50,69 16 WUYARD Alphonse -PARMENTIER Richard
6 49,54 10 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard
7 47,22 13 GEUDVERT Albert -WARNIER François
8 44,44 12 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline
9 32,18 15 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques
PAIRE Nr : 1 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
10 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 49,54 % 1 NS 3P N-1 -50 3 18.75
2 NS 2P N = 110 13 81.25
3 NS 2P S-1 -50 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
18 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian : 64,81 % 4 NS 5P E+1 -680 5 31.25
5 NS 3K S-2 -200 1 6.25
6 NS 2K N+3 150 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
17 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 50,93 % 7 NS 5T S-1 -100 10 62.50
8 NS 3S E+3 -490 2 12.50
9 NS 2P S+1 140 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
16 WUYARD Alphonse -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,69 %10 NS 3P W-1 100 13 81.25
11 NS 5P S-4 -200 8 50.00
12 NS 2S E+1 -150 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
15 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 32,18 %13 NS 4P W = -620 10 62.50
14 NS 4P N = 420 12 75.00
15 NS 4C S+1 650 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
14 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,78 %16 NS 5K W = -600 2 12.50
17 NS 3S N+1 430 5 31.25
18 NS 4P W+1 -450 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
13 GEUDVERT Albert -WARNIER François : 47,22 %19 NS 3P S = 140 13 81.25
20 NS 3S S+1 630 7 43.75
21 NS 4K E-2 100 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
12 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 44,44 %22 NS 5K S = 400 8 50.00
23 NS 4C E = -620 6 37.50
24 NS 1S S+2 150 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
11 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 57,41 %25 NS 1S S+4 210 13 81.25
26 NS 4K E = -130 6 37.50
27 NS 4K E = -130 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
Total : 238,0 / 432 = 55,09 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire
12 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 44,44 % 1 NS 2P N = 110 7 43.75
2 NS 3P N-1 -100 3 18.75
3 NS 1S E = -90 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
11 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 57,41 % 4 NS 6S W = -1440 0 0.00
5 NS 2C W-1 50 10 62.50
6 NS 2P E-2 200 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
10 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 49,54 % 7 NS 3S N-2 -200 3 18.75
8 NS 6K W = -920 0 0.00
9 NS 2P S = 110 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
18 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian : 64,81 %10 NS 2T E+1 -110 8 50.00
11 NS 4C W+1 -450 4 25.00
12 NS 3S E+1 -430 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
17 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 50,93 %13 NS 4P E = -620 10 62.50
14 NS 3C S = 140 4 25.00
15 NS 2P W+1 -140 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
16 WUYARD Alphonse -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,69 %16 NS 5K W = -600 2 12.50
17 NS 3S S+2 460 11 68.75
18 NS 4P E = -420 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
15 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 32,18 %19 NS 4C W-2 200 16 100.00
20 NS 3S S+2 660 12 75.00
21 NS 3S W-3 150 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 91,67 %
14 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,78 %22 NS 4P W-1 100 4 25.00
23 NS 4P W+1 -650 1 6.25
24 NS 2T N = 90 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
13 GEUDVERT Albert -WARNIER François : 47,22 %25 NS 2C E-2 200 10 62.50
26 NS 1S E-2 200 16 100.00
27 NS 3K E+2 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
Total : 186,0 / 432 = 43,06 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques
14 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,78 % 1 NS 2P N+1 140 11 68.75
2 NS 2P N = 110 13 81.25
3 NS 2S E+1 -150 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
13 GEUDVERT Albert -WARNIER François : 47,22 % 4 NS 6S W-1 100 14 87.50
5 NS 1S W = -90 6 37.50
6 NS 1S W = -90 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
12 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 44,44 % 7 NS 3C E-2 200 16 100.00
8 NS 3S E+2 -460 7 43.75
9 NS 3P S-1 -50 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
11 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 57,41 %10 NS 2P W+1 -140 5 31.25
11 NS 4C W+1 -450 4 25.00
12 NS 3S E+1 -430 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
10 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 49,54 %13 NS 3S E-2 200 16 100.00
14 NS 3C S+1 170 7 43.75
15 NS 3C S+2 200 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
18 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian : 64,81 %16 NS 6K W-1 100 14 87.50
17 NS 3S N+1 430 5 31.25
18 NS 6P W-1 50 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
17 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 50,93 %19 NS 2C W = -110 8 50.00
20 NS 3S S = 600 3 18.75
21 NS 3K E = -110 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
16 WUYARD Alphonse -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,69 %22 NS 4P W = -620 0 0.00
23 NS 4P W = -620 6 37.50
24 NS 1S S+1 120 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
15 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 32,18 %25 NS 1S S+2 150 6 37.50
26 NS 2P S = 110 13 81.25
27 NS 3K E = -110 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
Total : 215,0 / 432 = 49,77 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph
16 WUYARD Alphonse -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,69 % 1 NS 2P N = 110 7 43.75
2 NS 1S E-2 100 8 50.00
3 NS 1S S = 90 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
15 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 32,18 % 4 NS 6P W = -1430 2 12.50
5 NS 1S N+1 120 15 93.75
6 NS 2ScW-4 1100 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
14 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,78 % 7 NS 3S N-1 -100 10 62.50
8 NS 5K W+1 -420 14 87.50
9 NS 3TcE-2 500 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
13 GEUDVERT Albert -WARNIER François : 47,22 %10 NS 4C W-1 100 13 81.25
11 NS 5TcS-3 -500 0 0.00
12 NS 3S E = -400 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
12 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 44,44 %13 NS 4P E+1 -650 2 12.50
14 NS 5TcE-4 800 16 100.00
15 NS 4PcE-1 100 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
11 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 57,41 %16 NS 5K E = -600 2 12.50
17 NS 3S S+3 490 16 100.00
18 NS 4P W+1 -450 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
10 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 49,54 %19 NS 3P S = 140 13 81.25
20 NS 3S S = 600 3 18.75
21 NS 2K E = -90 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
18 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian : 64,81 %22 NS 6CcN-1 -100 2 12.50
23 NS 4C E+1 -650 1 6.25
24 NS 1ScN+1 280 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
17 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 50,93 %25 NS 2P E-3 300 16 100.00
26 NS 3P N-1 -100 10 62.50
27 NS 4K E = -130 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
Total : 250,0 / 432 = 57,87 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
18 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian : 64,81 % 1 NS 2P N+2 170 14 87.50
2 NS 2P N-1 -100 3 18.75
3 NS 2TcS-2 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
17 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 50,93 % 4 NS 4P E+1 -650 9 56.25
5 NS 1S N+1 120 15 93.75
6 NS 2P E = -110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
16 WUYARD Alphonse -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,69 % 7 NS 3S N-1 -100 10 62.50
8 NS 3S E+1 -430 12 75.00
9 NS Pass Passe 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
15 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 32,18 %10 NS 4P W+1 -650 0 0.00
11 NS 5PcW-1 100 14 87.50
12 NS 3S E-1 50 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
14 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,78 %13 NS 4P E = -620 10 62.50
14 NS 4C S-1 -50 1 6.25
15 NS 3P W = -140 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
13 GEUDVERT Albert -WARNIER François : 47,22 %16 NS 6CcN-3 -500 6 37.50
17 NS 3S N+2 460 11 68.75
18 NS 3S W+3 -490 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
12 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 44,44 %19 NS 2C W+1 -140 3 18.75
20 NS 3S S+1 630 7 43.75
21 NS 4K E-1 50 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
11 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 57,41 %22 NS 5PcW-1 200 6 37.50
23 NS 4C E = -620 6 37.50
24 NS 1S S = 90 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
10 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 49,54 %25 NS 2S N+3 210 13 81.25
26 NS 4P S-2 -200 2 12.50
27 NS 3P N-2 -100 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
Total : 200,0 / 432 = 46,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine
11 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 57,41 % 1 NS 3P N-1 -50 3 18.75
2 NS 2P N-1 -100 3 18.75
3 NS 2S S-3 -150 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
10 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 49,54 % 4 NS 4P E+2 -680 5 31.25
5 NS 2K S-2 -200 1 6.25
6 NS 3S S-1 -50 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
18 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian : 64,81 % 7 NS 3S N-2 -200 3 18.75
8 NS 3S E+2 -460 7 43.75
9 NS 2T N = -90 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
17 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 50,93 %10 NS 2P W+2 -170 2 12.50
11 NS 5TcN-1 -100 11 68.75
12 NS 2S E = -120 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
16 WUYARD Alphonse -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,69 %13 NS 4P E+1 -650 2 12.50
14 NS 4P N = 420 12 75.00
15 NS 3P W = -140 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
15 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 32,18 %16 NS 5C N-2 -100 10 62.50
17 NS 3S N+2 460 11 68.75
18 NS 4P E+1 -450 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
14 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,78 %19 NS 4C W-1 100 10 62.50
20 NS 3S S-1 -100 0 0.00
21 NS 3K E-1 50 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
13 GEUDVERT Albert -WARNIER François : 47,22 %22 NS 5PcW-2 500 12 75.00
23 NS 3C E+1 -170 13 81.25
24 NS 2C W-3 150 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
12 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 44,44 %25 NS 1S S+1 120 2 12.50
26 NS 4T W = -130 6 37.50
27 NS 4T W = -130 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
Total : 173,0 / 432 = 40,05 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 VANDAM Jean -VANDAM Cécile
13 GEUDVERT Albert -WARNIER François : 47,22 % 1 NS 2P N+1 140 11 68.75
2 NS 2P N = 110 13 81.25
3 NS 1S E+1 -120 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
12 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 44,44 % 4 NS 4P E+1 -650 9 56.25
5 NS 2T E-1 50 10 62.50
6 NS 2P E-3 300 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
11 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 57,41 % 7 NS 5T N-1 -100 10 62.50
8 NS 3S E+2 -460 7 43.75
9 NS 3T E-2 200 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
10 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 49,54 %10 NS 4P E-1 100 13 81.25
11 NS 4P N+1 450 16 100.00
12 NS 3S E = -400 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
18 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian : 64,81 %13 NS 4P E+1 -650 2 12.50
14 NS 4C N-1 -50 1 6.25
15 NS 4PcE-1 100 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
17 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 50,93 %16 NS 5CcN-2 -300 8 50.00
17 NS 4C N-1 -50 0 0.00
18 NS 5CcN-3 -800 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
16 WUYARD Alphonse -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,69 %19 NS 2C E+1 -140 3 18.75
20 NS 3S N+3 690 15 93.75
21 NS 2T E = -90 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
15 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 32,18 %22 NS 6PcE-3 800 16 100.00
23 NS 3S E = -600 10 62.50
24 NS 1S N+1 120 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
14 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,78 %25 NS 1S N+3 180 8 50.00
26 NS 2P N = 110 13 81.25
27 NS 3T E+1 -130 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
Total : 238,0 / 432 = 55,09 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
15 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 32,18 % 1 NS 3S S-2 -100 0 0.00
2 NS 2P N = 110 13 81.25
3 NS 2T W-1 100 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
14 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,78 % 4 NS 6P E-1 100 14 87.50
5 NS 2K S-1 -100 4 25.00
6 NS 3K N+1 130 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
13 GEUDVERT Albert -WARNIER François : 47,22 % 7 NS 3S N-1 -100 10 62.50
8 NS 3S E+2 -460 7 43.75
9 NS 4P S-1 -50 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
12 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 44,44 %10 NS 3P W = -140 5 31.25
11 NS 5TcN-1 -100 11 68.75
12 NS 3S E-1 50 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
11 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 57,41 %13 NS 4P E = -620 10 62.50
14 NS 4C S = 420 12 75.00
15 NS 5C S-1 -100 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
10 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 49,54 %16 NS 6K W-1 100 14 87.50
17 NS 5T S = 400 2 12.50
18 NS 5CcN-4 -1100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
18 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian : 64,81 %19 NS 3C W = -140 3 18.75
20 NS 3S S+3 690 15 93.75
21 NS 3K E = -110 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
17 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 50,93 %22 NS 5K S+1 420 10 62.50
23 NS 4P E-1 100 16 100.00
24 NS 1S S+2 150 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
16 WUYARD Alphonse -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,69 %25 NS 1S S+1 120 2 12.50
26 NS 4K E = -130 6 37.50
27 NS 2K E+2 -130 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
Total : 225,0 / 432 = 52,08 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 FRAITURE Louis -de WASSEIGE Claude
17 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 50,93 % 1 NS 3S N = 400 16 100.00
2 NS 3P N-1 -100 3 18.75
3 NS 2K W = -90 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
16 WUYARD Alphonse -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,69 % 4 NS 6P E-1 100 14 87.50
5 NS 1S E-1 50 10 62.50
6 NS 3K N = 110 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
15 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 32,18 % 7 NS 6ScN-3 -800 0 0.00
8 NS 4C E-2 100 16 100.00
9 NS 2P S = 110 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
14 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,78 %10 NS 4P W-1 100 13 81.25
11 NS 4C W+1 -450 4 25.00
12 NS 2S E+2 -180 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
13 GEUDVERT Albert -WARNIER François : 47,22 %13 NS 4P E = -620 10 62.50
14 NS 3P N+1 170 7 43.75
15 NS 2P W+1 -140 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
12 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 44,44 %16 NS 6K W-1 100 14 87.50
17 NS 3S S+2 460 11 68.75
18 NS 6P E-1 50 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
11 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 57,41 %19 NS 3C W = -140 3 18.75
20 NS 4P N+1 650 10 62.50
21 NS 3K E = -110 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
10 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 49,54 %22 NS 5CcN = 650 14 87.50
23 NS 3C E+1 -170 13 81.25
24 NS 3S S-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
18 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian : 64,81 %25 NS 1S S+1 120 2 12.50
26 NS 4PcS-2 -500 0 0.00
27 NS 3K E+1 -130 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
Total : 219,0 / 432 = 50,69 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard
1 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 55,09 % 1 EO 3P N-1 -50 13 81.25
2 EO 2P N = 110 3 18.75
3 EO 2P S-1 -50 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
6 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 40,05 % 4 EO 4P E+2 -680 11 68.75
5 EO 2K S-2 -200 15 93.75
6 EO 3S S-1 -50 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
2 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 43,06 % 7 EO 3S N-2 -200 13 81.25
8 EO 6K W = -920 16 100.00
9 EO 2P S = 110 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
7 VANDAM Jean -VANDAM Cécile : 55,09 %10 EO 4P E-1 100 3 18.75
11 EO 4P N+1 450 0 0.00
12 EO 3S E = -400 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
3 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 49,77 %13 EO 3S E-2 200 0 0.00
14 EO 3C S+1 170 9 56.25
15 EO 3C S+2 200 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
8 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 52,08 %16 EO 6K W-1 100 2 12.50
17 EO 5T S = 400 14 87.50
18 EO 5CcN-4 -1100 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
4 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 57,87 %19 EO 3P S = 140 3 18.75
20 EO 3S S = 600 13 81.25
21 EO 2K E = -90 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
9 FRAITURE Louis -de WASSEIGE Claude : 50,69 %22 EO 5CcN = 650 2 12.50
23 EO 3C E+1 -170 3 18.75
24 EO 3S S-1 -50 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
5 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 46,30 %25 EO 2S N+3 210 3 18.75
26 EO 4P S-2 -200 14 87.50
27 EO 3P N-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
Total : 214,0 / 432 = 49,54 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette
6 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 40,05 % 1 EO 3P N-1 -50 13 81.25
2 EO 2P N-1 -100 13 81.25
3 EO 2S S-3 -150 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
2 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 43,06 % 4 EO 6S W = -1440 16 100.00
5 EO 2C W-1 50 6 37.50
6 EO 2P E-2 200 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
7 VANDAM Jean -VANDAM Cécile : 55,09 % 7 EO 5T N-1 -100 6 37.50
8 EO 3S E+2 -460 9 56.25
9 EO 3T E-2 200 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
3 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 49,77 %10 EO 2P W+1 -140 11 68.75
11 EO 4C W+1 -450 12 75.00
12 EO 3S E+1 -430 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
8 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 52,08 %13 EO 4P E = -620 6 37.50
14 EO 4C S = 420 4 25.00
15 EO 5C S-1 -100 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
4 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 57,87 %16 EO 5K E = -600 14 87.50
17 EO 3S S+3 490 0 0.00
18 EO 4P W+1 -450 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
9 FRAITURE Louis -de WASSEIGE Claude : 50,69 %19 EO 3C W = -140 13 81.25
20 EO 4P N+1 650 6 37.50
21 EO 3K E = -110 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
5 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 46,30 %22 EO 5PcW-1 200 10 62.50
23 EO 4C E = -620 10 62.50
24 EO 1S S = 90 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
1 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 55,09 %25 EO 1S S+4 210 3 18.75
26 EO 4K E = -130 10 62.50
27 EO 4K E = -130 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
Total : 248,0 / 432 = 57,41 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline
2 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 43,06 % 1 EO 2P N = 110 9 56.25
2 EO 3P N-1 -100 13 81.25
3 EO 1S E = -90 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
7 VANDAM Jean -VANDAM Cécile : 55,09 % 4 EO 4P E+1 -650 7 43.75
5 EO 2T E-1 50 6 37.50
6 EO 2P E-3 300 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
3 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 49,77 % 7 EO 3C E-2 200 0 0.00
8 EO 3S E+2 -460 9 56.25
9 EO 3P S-1 -50 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
8 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 52,08 %10 EO 3P W = -140 11 68.75
11 EO 5TcN-1 -100 5 31.25
12 EO 3S E-1 50 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
4 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 57,87 %13 EO 4P E+1 -650 14 87.50
14 EO 5TcE-4 800 0 0.00
15 EO 4PcE-1 100 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
9 FRAITURE Louis -de WASSEIGE Claude : 50,69 %16 EO 6K W-1 100 2 12.50
17 EO 3S S+2 460 5 31.25
18 EO 6P E-1 50 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
5 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 46,30 %19 EO 2C W+1 -140 13 81.25
20 EO 3S S+1 630 9 56.25
21 EO 4K E-1 50 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
1 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 55,09 %22 EO 5K S = 400 8 50.00
23 EO 4C E = -620 10 62.50
24 EO 1S S+2 150 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
6 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 40,05 %25 EO 1S S+1 120 14 87.50
26 EO 4T W = -130 10 62.50
27 EO 4T W = -130 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
Total : 192,0 / 432 = 44,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 GEUDVERT Albert -WARNIER François
7 VANDAM Jean -VANDAM Cécile : 55,09 % 1 EO 2P N+1 140 5 31.25
2 EO 2P N = 110 3 18.75
3 EO 1S E+1 -120 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
3 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 49,77 % 4 EO 6S W-1 100 2 12.50
5 EO 1S W = -90 10 62.50
6 EO 1S W = -90 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
8 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 52,08 % 7 EO 3S N-1 -100 6 37.50
8 EO 3S E+2 -460 9 56.25
9 EO 4P S-1 -50 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
4 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 57,87 %10 EO 4C W-1 100 3 18.75
11 EO 5TcS-3 -500 16 100.00
12 EO 3S E = -400 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
9 FRAITURE Louis -de WASSEIGE Claude : 50,69 %13 EO 4P E = -620 6 37.50
14 EO 3P N+1 170 9 56.25
15 EO 2P W+1 -140 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
5 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 46,30 %16 EO 6CcN-3 -500 10 62.50
17 EO 3S N+2 460 5 31.25
18 EO 3S W+3 -490 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
1 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 55,09 %19 EO 3P S = 140 3 18.75
20 EO 3S S+1 630 9 56.25
21 EO 4K E-2 100 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
6 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 40,05 %22 EO 5PcW-2 500 4 25.00
23 EO 3C E+1 -170 3 18.75
24 EO 2C W-3 150 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
2 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 43,06 %25 EO 2C E-2 200 6 37.50
26 EO 1S E-2 200 0 0.00
27 EO 3K E+2 -150 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
Total : 204,0 / 432 = 47,22 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
3 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 49,77 % 1 EO 2P N+1 140 5 31.25
2 EO 2P N = 110 3 18.75
3 EO 2S E+1 -150 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
8 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 52,08 % 4 EO 6P E-1 100 2 12.50
5 EO 2K S-1 -100 12 75.00
6 EO 3K N+1 130 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
4 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 57,87 % 7 EO 3S N-1 -100 6 37.50
8 EO 5K W+1 -420 2 12.50
9 EO 3TcE-2 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
9 FRAITURE Louis -de WASSEIGE Claude : 50,69 %10 EO 4P W-1 100 3 18.75
11 EO 4C W+1 -450 12 75.00
12 EO 2S E+2 -180 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
5 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 46,30 %13 EO 4P E = -620 6 37.50
14 EO 4C S-1 -50 15 93.75
15 EO 3P W = -140 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
1 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 55,09 %16 EO 5K W = -600 14 87.50
17 EO 3S N+1 430 11 68.75
18 EO 4P W+1 -450 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
6 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 40,05 %19 EO 4C W-1 100 6 37.50
20 EO 3S S-1 -100 16 100.00
21 EO 3K E-1 50 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
2 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 43,06 %22 EO 4P W-1 100 12 75.00
23 EO 4P W+1 -650 15 93.75
24 EO 2T N = 90 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
7 VANDAM Jean -VANDAM Cécile : 55,09 %25 EO 1S N+3 180 8 50.00
26 EO 2P N = 110 3 18.75
27 EO 3T E+1 -130 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
Total : 228,0 / 432 = 52,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques
8 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 52,08 % 1 EO 3S S-2 -100 16 100.00
2 EO 2P N = 110 3 18.75
3 EO 2T W-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
4 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 57,87 % 4 EO 6P W = -1430 14 87.50
5 EO 1S N+1 120 1 6.25
6 EO 2ScW-4 1100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
9 FRAITURE Louis -de WASSEIGE Claude : 50,69 % 7 EO 6ScN-3 -800 16 100.00
8 EO 4C E-2 100 0 0.00
9 EO 2P S = 110 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
5 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 46,30 %10 EO 4P W+1 -650 16 100.00
11 EO 5PcW-1 100 2 12.50
12 EO 3S E-1 50 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
1 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 55,09 %13 EO 4P W = -620 6 37.50
14 EO 4P N = 420 4 25.00
15 EO 4C S+1 650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
6 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 40,05 %16 EO 5C N-2 -100 6 37.50
17 EO 3S N+2 460 5 31.25
18 EO 4P E+1 -450 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
2 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 43,06 %19 EO 4C W-2 200 0 0.00
20 EO 3S S+2 660 4 25.00
21 EO 3S W-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 8,33 %
7 VANDAM Jean -VANDAM Cécile : 55,09 %22 EO 6PcE-3 800 0 0.00
23 EO 3S E = -600 6 37.50
24 EO 1S N+1 120 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
3 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 49,77 %25 EO 1S S+2 150 10 62.50
26 EO 2P S = 110 3 18.75
27 EO 3K E = -110 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
Total : 139,0 / 432 = 32,18 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 WUYARD Alphonse -PARMENTIER Richard
4 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 57,87 % 1 EO 2P N = 110 9 56.25
2 EO 1S E-2 100 8 50.00
3 EO 1S S = 90 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
9 FRAITURE Louis -de WASSEIGE Claude : 50,69 % 4 EO 6P E-1 100 2 12.50
5 EO 1S E-1 50 6 37.50
6 EO 3K N = 110 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
5 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 46,30 % 7 EO 3S N-1 -100 6 37.50
8 EO 3S E+1 -430 4 25.00
9 EO Pass Passe 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
1 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 55,09 %10 EO 3P W-1 100 3 18.75
11 EO 5P S-4 -200 8 50.00
12 EO 2S E+1 -150 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
6 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 40,05 %13 EO 4P E+1 -650 14 87.50
14 EO 4P N = 420 4 25.00
15 EO 3P W = -140 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
2 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 43,06 %16 EO 5K W = -600 14 87.50
17 EO 3S S+2 460 5 31.25
18 EO 4P E = -420 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
7 VANDAM Jean -VANDAM Cécile : 55,09 %19 EO 2C E+1 -140 13 81.25
20 EO 3S N+3 690 1 6.25
21 EO 2T E = -90 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
3 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 49,77 %22 EO 4P W = -620 16 100.00
23 EO 4P W = -620 10 62.50
24 EO 1S S+1 120 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
8 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 52,08 %25 EO 1S S+1 120 14 87.50
26 EO 4K E = -130 10 62.50
27 EO 2K E+2 -130 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
Total : 219,0 / 432 = 50,69 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
9 FRAITURE Louis -de WASSEIGE Claude : 50,69 % 1 EO 3S N = 400 0 0.00
2 EO 3P N-1 -100 13 81.25
3 EO 2K W = -90 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
5 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 46,30 % 4 EO 4P E+1 -650 7 43.75
5 EO 1S N+1 120 1 6.25
6 EO 2P E = -110 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
1 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 55,09 % 7 EO 5T S-1 -100 6 37.50
8 EO 3S E+3 -490 14 87.50
9 EO 2P S+1 140 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
6 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 40,05 %10 EO 2P W+2 -170 14 87.50
11 EO 5TcN-1 -100 5 31.25
12 EO 2S E = -120 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
2 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 43,06 %13 EO 4P E = -620 6 37.50
14 EO 3C S = 140 12 75.00
15 EO 2P W+1 -140 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
7 VANDAM Jean -VANDAM Cécile : 55,09 %16 EO 5CcN-2 -300 8 50.00
17 EO 4C N-1 -50 16 100.00
18 EO 5CcN-3 -800 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
3 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 49,77 %19 EO 2C W = -110 8 50.00
20 EO 3S S = 600 13 81.25
21 EO 3K E = -110 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
8 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 52,08 %22 EO 5K S+1 420 6 37.50
23 EO 4P E-1 100 0 0.00
24 EO 1S S+2 150 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
4 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 57,87 %25 EO 2P E-3 300 0 0.00
26 EO 3P N-1 -100 6 37.50
27 EO 4K E = -130 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
Total : 220,0 / 432 = 50,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian
5 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 46,30 % 1 EO 2P N+2 170 2 12.50
2 EO 2P N-1 -100 13 81.25
3 EO 2TcS-2 -300 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
1 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 55,09 % 4 EO 5P E+1 -680 11 68.75
5 EO 3K S-2 -200 15 93.75
6 EO 2K N+3 150 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
6 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 40,05 % 7 EO 3S N-2 -200 13 81.25
8 EO 3S E+2 -460 9 56.25
9 EO 2T N = -90 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
2 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 43,06 %10 EO 2T E+1 -110 8 50.00
11 EO 4C W+1 -450 12 75.00
12 EO 3S E+1 -430 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
7 VANDAM Jean -VANDAM Cécile : 55,09 %13 EO 4P E+1 -650 14 87.50
14 EO 4C N-1 -50 15 93.75
15 EO 4PcE-1 100 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
3 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 49,77 %16 EO 6K W-1 100 2 12.50
17 EO 3S N+1 430 11 68.75
18 EO 6P W-1 50 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
8 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 52,08 %19 EO 3C W = -140 13 81.25
20 EO 3S S+3 690 1 6.25
21 EO 3K E = -110 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
4 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 57,87 %22 EO 6CcN-1 -100 14 87.50
23 EO 4C E+1 -650 15 93.75
24 EO 1ScN+1 280 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
9 FRAITURE Louis -de WASSEIGE Claude : 50,69 %25 EO 1S S+1 120 14 87.50
26 EO 4PcS-2 -500 16 100.00
27 EO 3K E+1 -130 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
Total : 280,0 / 432 = 64,81 %
|
|