|
Tournoi du 28-09-09
1 60,19 8 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire
2 59,72 2 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques
3 58,80 3 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
4 50,93 7 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph
5 48,84 6 EVRARD Armand -MASSAUX Jacques
6 47,45 5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
7 46,76 1 WARNIER François -GOFFINET Marcel
8 44,44 4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -DACHET Gérard
9 41,44 9 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine
~ 41,44 10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 61,67 16 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian
2 59,17 14 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand
3 57,08 17 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
4 52,50 19 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean
5 48,75 18 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
6 48,12 13 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
7 47,08 15 VERBOIS Léon -Gelissen
8 42,29 12 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques
9 33,33 11 POULAERT Gilbert -VAN HERCK Paul
10 0,00 20 -
PAIRE Nr : 1 WARNIER François -GOFFINET Marcel
11 POULAERT Gilbert -VAN HERCK Paul : 33,33 % 1 NS 2P E+1 -140 3 18.75
2 NS 2S W-3 150 16 100.00
3 NS 1P N-1 -50 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
13 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 48,12 % 4 NS 2S W+1 -150 7 43.75
5 NS 3S W+2 -460 4 25.00
6 NS 3CcE-2 500 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
12 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques : 42,29 % 7 NS 1S W+2 -150 6 37.50
8 NS 3S N+2 460 16 100.00
9 NS 1S N = 90 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
16 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 61,67 %10 NS 4C W+2 -680 3 18.75
11 NS 3S E+1 -430 8 50.00
12 NS 4C E+2 -480 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
17 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 57,08 %13 NS 2S S+1 150 12 75.00
14 NS 3C N+1 170 13 81.25
15 NS 3S E = -400 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
18 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,75 %16 NS 4P S-1 -50 1 6.25
17 NS 3S S-1 -50 5 31.25
18 NS 3S W+3 -490 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
19 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 52,50 %19 NS 4P E+1 -650 3 18.75
20 NS 4K E-3 300 16 100.00
21 NS 4P S+1 650 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
20 - : 0,00 %22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
14 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 59,17 %25 NS 3T N-2 -100 5 31.25
26 NS 4P E = -620 3 18.75
27 NS 5K N-2 -100 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
15 VERBOIS Léon -Gelissen : 47,08 %28 NS 3S E-1 50 8 50.00
29 NS 1S N = 90 5 31.25
30 NS 2C E+1 -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
Total : 202,0 / 432 = 46,76 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques
13 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 48,12 % 1 NS 2P E-1 50 14 87.50
2 NS 1S W+1 -120 8 50.00
3 NS 1S S-1 -50 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
12 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques : 42,29 % 4 NS 2C W = -110 16 100.00
5 NS 3S W+1 -430 11 68.75
6 NS 3S N = 400 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 85,42 %
11 POULAERT Gilbert -VAN HERCK Paul : 33,33 % 7 NS 2P S = 110 16 100.00
8 NS 4P S = 420 9 56.25
9 NS 1C N+1 110 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,42 %
20 - : 0,00 %10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
14 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 59,17 %13 NS 2K N+1 110 1 6.25
14 NS 3C N = 140 7 43.75
15 NS 3S W+1 -430 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
15 VERBOIS Léon -Gelissen : 47,08 %16 NS 3S S = 400 8 50.00
17 NS 1S S+2 150 16 100.00
18 NS 3S W+3 -490 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
16 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 61,67 %19 NS 4P E+1 -650 3 18.75
20 NS 4C W-2 200 14 87.50
21 NS 5K N = 600 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
17 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 57,08 %22 NS 5TcN-3 -500 0 0.00
23 NS 4PcE-1 200 15 93.75
24 NS 3S W+2 -460 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
18 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,75 %25 NS 1S N = 90 15 93.75
26 NS 5P W-2 200 15 93.75
27 NS 4P S-2 -100 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
19 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 52,50 %28 NS 5K W-2 100 15 93.75
29 NS 1S N = 90 5 31.25
30 NS 2S W = -120 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
Total : 258,0 / 432 = 59,72 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
12 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques : 42,29 % 1 NS 1S S-1 -50 9 56.25
2 NS 2C S-3 -300 2 12.50
3 NS 1P N-1 -50 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 POULAERT Gilbert -VAN HERCK Paul : 33,33 % 4 NS 1S E+2 -150 7 43.75
5 NS 3S E+2 -460 4 25.00
6 NS 3S N-1 -50 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
13 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 48,12 % 7 NS 1S W+1 -120 11 68.75
8 NS 4P S+1 450 14 87.50
9 NS 1S S = 90 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
18 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,75 %10 NS 4C W = -620 13 81.25
11 NS 3S E-2 100 16 100.00
12 NS 3S E = -400 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
19 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 52,50 %13 NS 2P S+1 140 7 43.75
14 NS 3C S = 140 7 43.75
15 NS 4P W+1 -450 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
20 - : 0,00 %16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
14 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 59,17 %19 NS 4P E = -620 12 75.00
20 NS 2P W+1 -140 4 25.00
21 NS 4P S+1 650 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
15 VERBOIS Léon -Gelissen : 47,08 %22 NS 3S N-2 -100 5 31.25
23 NS 4PcE-1 200 15 93.75
24 NS 4K E+2 -170 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
16 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 61,67 %25 NS 1S N-2 -100 5 31.25
26 NS 5P W-2 200 15 93.75
27 NS 4P S-2 -100 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
17 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 57,08 %28 NS 3S E-1 50 8 50.00
29 NS 2C N+2 170 14 87.50
30 NS 2S W-1 50 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
Total : 254,0 / 432 = 58,80 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -DACHET Gérard
17 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 57,08 % 1 NS 3C N-1 -50 9 56.25
2 NS 1S N-1 -100 14 87.50
3 NS 1S W+2 -150 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
16 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 61,67 % 4 NS 2C W+2 -170 2 12.50
5 NS 3S W+1 -430 11 68.75
6 NS 3S N-5 -250 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
15 VERBOIS Léon -Gelissen : 47,08 % 7 NS 1S W+1 -120 11 68.75
8 NS 3S N+1 430 12 75.00
9 NS 2C N-1 -50 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
14 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 59,17 %10 NS 6C E = -1430 0 0.00
11 NS 3S E+2 -460 2 12.50
12 NS 3S E+1 -430 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
20 - : 0,00 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
19 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 52,50 %16 NS 3S N = 400 8 50.00
17 NS 4C N-1 -50 5 31.25
18 NS 3S W+2 -460 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
18 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,75 %19 NS 4P E = -620 12 75.00
20 NS 2P W+1 -140 4 25.00
21 NS 4C N+1 650 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
13 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 48,12 %22 NS 3S N-2 -100 5 31.25
23 NS 5CcN-3 -800 0 0.00
24 NS 3K E+2 -150 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
12 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques : 42,29 %25 NS 3S N-4 -200 0 0.00
26 NS 4P W = -620 3 18.75
27 NS 3P S+1 170 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
11 POULAERT Gilbert -VAN HERCK Paul : 33,33 %28 NS 5K W-2 100 15 93.75
29 NS 1S N = 90 5 31.25
30 NS 2C E = -110 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
Total : 192,0 / 432 = 44,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
18 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,75 % 1 NS 3C S = 140 16 100.00
2 NS 1S W+1 -120 8 50.00
3 NS 1S S-2 -100 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
17 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 57,08 % 4 NS 2C W = -170 2 12.50
5 NS 3S W+2 -460 4 25.00
6 NS 3S N-2 -100 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
16 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 61,67 % 7 NS 3K S-1 -100 14 87.50
8 NS 3S N = 400 6 37.50
9 NS 2T S-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
11 POULAERT Gilbert -VAN HERCK Paul : 33,33 %10 NS 4C W = -620 13 81.25
11 NS 3S E = -400 13 81.25
12 NS 5S E-1 50 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 85,42 %
15 VERBOIS Léon -Gelissen : 47,08 %13 NS 2P S+1 140 7 43.75
14 NS 4C N-1 -50 2 12.50
15 NS 3S E-2 100 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
14 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 59,17 %16 NS 3S S = 400 8 50.00
17 NS 3T W-1 50 8 50.00
18 NS 3S W+2 -460 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
20 - : 0,00 %19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
19 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 52,50 %22 NS 3S N-2 -100 5 31.25
23 NS 4C N-1 -100 9 56.25
24 NS 3S E+2 -460 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
13 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 48,12 %25 NS 2P E = -110 2 12.50
26 NS 6P W-1 100 10 62.50
27 NS 4P S-2 -100 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
12 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques : 42,29 %28 NS 3S W = -400 1 6.25
29 NS 1S N = 90 5 31.25
30 NS 3S W-1 50 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
Total : 205,0 / 432 = 47,45 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 EVRARD Armand -MASSAUX Jacques
19 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 52,50 % 1 NS 4CcN-2 -300 0 0.00
2 NS 1S W+1 -120 8 50.00
3 NS 2S W = -120 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
18 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,75 % 4 NS 2C W+1 -140 12 75.00
5 NS 3S W+2 -460 4 25.00
6 NS 1S N+1 120 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
17 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 57,08 % 7 NS 1S W+2 -150 6 37.50
8 NS 4P S-1 -50 2 12.50
9 NS 2T S-1 -50 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
12 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques : 42,29 %10 NS 3S W+1 -630 10 62.50
11 NS 3S E+1 -430 8 50.00
12 NS 3S E = -400 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
11 POULAERT Gilbert -VAN HERCK Paul : 33,33 %13 NS 1S N+1 120 4 25.00
14 NS 4C N = 420 16 100.00
15 NS 3S E-1 50 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
16 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 61,67 %16 NS 3S S = 400 8 50.00
17 NS 1S S-2 -100 1 6.25
18 NS 3S W+2 -460 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
15 VERBOIS Léon -Gelissen : 47,08 %19 NS 4P E = -620 12 75.00
20 NS 4C W = -620 0 0.00
21 NS 4P S+1 650 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
14 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 59,17 %22 NS 3S N = 400 16 100.00
23 NS 3P E+1 -170 6 37.50
24 NS 3S E+2 -460 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
20 - : 0,00 %25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00
27 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
13 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 48,12 %28 NS 3S E = -400 1 6.25
29 NS 3T N = 110 12 75.00
30 NS 2C E-1 50 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
Total : 211,0 / 432 = 48,84 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph
20 - : 0,00 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
19 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 52,50 % 4 NS 2C W+1 -140 12 75.00
5 NS 3S W = -400 15 93.75
6 NS 3S N-1 -50 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
18 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,75 % 7 NS 1S W+3 -180 1 6.25
8 NS 4P S-1 -50 2 12.50
9 NS 1S N = 90 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
13 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 48,12 %10 NS 5C E = -650 7 43.75
11 NS 3S E+1 -430 8 50.00
12 NS 3S E+2 -460 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
12 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques : 42,29 %13 NS 3S N = 600 16 100.00
14 NS 1S N+2 150 10 62.50
15 NS 3S E = -400 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
11 POULAERT Gilbert -VAN HERCK Paul : 33,33 %16 NS 3S S+1 430 15 93.75
17 NS 2C N = 110 12 75.00
18 NS 4P W-1 50 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 89,58 %
17 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 57,08 %19 NS 4P E+1 -650 3 18.75
20 NS 2P W = -110 8 50.00
21 NS 3S N-1 -100 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
16 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 61,67 %22 NS 3P E-1 100 12 75.00
23 NS 4C N-2 -200 3 18.75
24 NS 3S W+2 -460 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
15 VERBOIS Léon -Gelissen : 47,08 %25 NS 1S N-1 -50 10 62.50
26 NS 3S W+1 -630 0 0.00
27 NS 3K N+2 150 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
14 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 59,17 %28 NS 3S W-1 50 8 50.00
29 NS 1S N = 90 5 31.25
30 NS 2K N-2 -100 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
Total : 220,0 / 432 = 50,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire
14 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 59,17 % 1 NS 3P E = -140 3 18.75
2 NS 1S W+1 -120 8 50.00
3 NS 1S W = -90 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
20 - : 0,00 % 4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
19 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 52,50 % 7 NS 1S W+3 -180 1 6.25
8 NS 4P S = 420 9 56.25
9 NS 1S S = 90 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
15 VERBOIS Léon -Gelissen : 47,08 %10 NS 4C E+1 -650 7 43.75
11 NS 3S E = -400 13 81.25
12 NS 3S E-1 50 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
13 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 48,12 %13 NS 2S S+1 150 12 75.00
14 NS 2C N+2 170 13 81.25
15 NS 3S W-1 50 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
12 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques : 42,29 %16 NS 3S S+1 430 15 93.75
17 NS 2C N = 110 12 75.00
18 NS 3S W+3 -490 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
11 POULAERT Gilbert -VAN HERCK Paul : 33,33 %19 NS 4P E = -620 12 75.00
20 NS 4P W-1 100 11 68.75
21 NS 3K N+3 170 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
18 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,75 %22 NS 3K N = 110 14 87.50
23 NS 3C N+1 170 12 75.00
24 NS 3S W+4 -520 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
17 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 57,08 %25 NS 1S N = 90 15 93.75
26 NS 6P W-1 100 10 62.50
27 NS 3K N = 110 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
16 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 61,67 %28 NS 3S E-1 50 8 50.00
29 NS 3P S+2 200 16 100.00
30 NS 2S E = -120 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
Total : 260,0 / 432 = 60,19 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine
15 VERBOIS Léon -Gelissen : 47,08 % 1 NS 3S S-1 -50 9 56.25
2 NS 1S W+1 -120 8 50.00
3 NS 1S S-3 -150 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
14 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 59,17 % 4 NS 2C W+2 -170 2 12.50
5 NS 3S W = -400 15 93.75
6 NS 2T S = 90 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
20 - : 0,00 % 7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
17 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 57,08 %10 NS 4C E+2 -680 3 18.75
11 NS 3S E+2 -460 2 12.50
12 NS 4P W+1 -450 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
16 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 61,67 %13 NS 2P S = 110 1 6.25
14 NS 4C N-1 -50 2 12.50
15 NS 3S W+2 -460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 6,25 %
13 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 48,12 %16 NS 3S S = 400 8 50.00
17 NS 3K S = 110 12 75.00
18 NS 3S W+3 -490 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
12 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques : 42,29 %19 NS 4P E = -620 12 75.00
20 NS 4C W-1 100 11 68.75
21 NS 3S S-1 -100 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
11 POULAERT Gilbert -VAN HERCK Paul : 33,33 %22 NS 3S N-2 -100 5 31.25
23 NS 4C N-1 -100 9 56.25
24 NS 5K E = -400 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
19 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 52,50 %25 NS 1S N-1 -50 10 62.50
26 NS 4P W-1 100 10 62.50
27 NS 4T N-1 -50 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
18 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,75 %28 NS 3S E-1 50 8 50.00
29 NS 1S N = 90 5 31.25
30 NS 2C E = -110 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
Total : 179,0 / 432 = 41,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
16 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 61,67 % 1 NS 4C N-1 -50 9 56.25
2 NS 2ScN-2 -500 0 0.00
3 NS 1P N-1 -50 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
15 VERBOIS Léon -Gelissen : 47,08 % 4 NS 2C W+1 -140 12 75.00
5 NS 3S E+2 -460 4 25.00
6 NS 1S N+2 150 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
14 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 59,17 % 7 NS 1S W+2 -150 6 37.50
8 NS 4P S-1 -50 2 12.50
9 NS 2C N-1 -50 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
19 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 52,50 %10 NS 6S W-2 200 16 100.00
11 NS 3S E+2 -460 2 12.50
12 NS 3S E+2 -460 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
18 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,75 %13 NS 1S N+2 150 12 75.00
14 NS 4C N-1 -50 2 12.50
15 NS 3S W+1 -430 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
17 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 57,08 %16 NS 4P S-1 -50 1 6.25
17 NS 3C N-2 -100 1 6.25
18 NS 3S W+2 -460 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
13 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 48,12 %19 NS 4P E+1 -650 3 18.75
20 NS 3P W = -140 4 25.00
21 NS 3S N-1 -100 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
12 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques : 42,29 %22 NS 3S N-1 -50 10 62.50
23 NS 4C N-2 -200 3 18.75
24 NS 3S W+1 -430 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
11 POULAERT Gilbert -VAN HERCK Paul : 33,33 %25 NS 1S N-1 -50 10 62.50
26 NS 3S W = -600 6 37.50
27 NS 3S N+2 460 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
20 - : 0,00 %28 NS BYE 0 0.00
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 179,0 / 432 = 41,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 POULAERT Gilbert -VAN HERCK Paul
1 WARNIER François -GOFFINET Marcel : 46,76 % 1 EO 2P E+1 -140 13 81.25
2 EO 2S W-3 150 0 0.00
3 EO 1P N-1 -50 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 58,80 % 4 EO 1S E+2 -150 9 56.25
5 EO 3S E+2 -460 12 75.00
6 EO 3S N-1 -50 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
2 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 59,72 % 7 EO 2P S = 110 0 0.00
8 EO 4P S = 420 7 43.75
9 EO 1C N+1 110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,58 %
5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 47,45 %10 EO 4C W = -620 3 18.75
11 EO 3S E = -400 3 18.75
12 EO 5S E-1 50 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 14,58 %
6 EVRARD Armand -MASSAUX Jacques : 48,84 %13 EO 1S N+1 120 12 75.00
14 EO 4C N = 420 0 0.00
15 EO 3S E-1 50 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
7 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 50,93 %16 EO 3S S+1 430 1 6.25
17 EO 2C N = 110 4 25.00
18 EO 4P W-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 10,42 %
8 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 60,19 %19 EO 4P E = -620 4 25.00
20 EO 4P W-1 100 5 31.25
21 EO 3K N+3 170 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
9 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 41,44 %22 EO 3S N-2 -100 11 68.75
23 EO 4C N-1 -100 7 43.75
24 EO 5K E = -400 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 41,44 %25 EO 1S N-1 -50 6 37.50
26 EO 3S W = -600 10 62.50
27 EO 3S N+2 460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -DACHET Gérard : 44,44 %28 EO 5K W-2 100 1 6.25
29 EO 1S N = 90 11 68.75
30 EO 2C E = -110 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
Total : 160,0 / 480 = 33,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques
3 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 58,80 % 1 EO 1S S-1 -50 7 43.75
2 EO 2C S-3 -300 14 87.50
3 EO 1P N-1 -50 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
2 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 59,72 % 4 EO 2C W = -110 0 0.00
5 EO 3S W+1 -430 5 31.25
6 EO 3S N = 400 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 14,58 %
1 WARNIER François -GOFFINET Marcel : 46,76 % 7 EO 1S W+2 -150 10 62.50
8 EO 3S N+2 460 0 0.00
9 EO 1S N = 90 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
6 EVRARD Armand -MASSAUX Jacques : 48,84 %10 EO 3S W+1 -630 6 37.50
11 EO 3S E+1 -430 8 50.00
12 EO 3S E = -400 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
7 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 50,93 %13 EO 3S N = 600 0 0.00
14 EO 1S N+2 150 6 37.50
15 EO 3S E = -400 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
8 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 60,19 %16 EO 3S S+1 430 1 6.25
17 EO 2C N = 110 4 25.00
18 EO 3S W+3 -490 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
9 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 41,44 %19 EO 4P E = -620 4 25.00
20 EO 4C W-1 100 5 31.25
21 EO 3S S-1 -100 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 41,44 %22 EO 3S N-1 -50 6 37.50
23 EO 4C N-2 -200 13 81.25
24 EO 3S W+1 -430 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -DACHET Gérard : 44,44 %25 EO 3S N-4 -200 16 100.00
26 EO 4P W = -620 13 81.25
27 EO 3P S+1 170 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 47,45 %28 EO 3S W = -400 15 93.75
29 EO 1S N = 90 11 68.75
30 EO 3S W-1 50 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
Total : 203,0 / 480 = 42,29 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
2 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 59,72 % 1 EO 2P E-1 50 2 12.50
2 EO 1S W+1 -120 8 50.00
3 EO 1S S-1 -50 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
1 WARNIER François -GOFFINET Marcel : 46,76 % 4 EO 2S W+1 -150 9 56.25
5 EO 3S W+2 -460 12 75.00
6 EO 3CcE-2 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 58,80 % 7 EO 1S W+1 -120 5 31.25
8 EO 4P S+1 450 2 12.50
9 EO 1S S = 90 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
7 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 50,93 %10 EO 5C E = -650 9 56.25
11 EO 3S E+1 -430 8 50.00
12 EO 3S E+2 -460 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
8 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 60,19 %13 EO 2S S+1 150 4 25.00
14 EO 2C N+2 170 3 18.75
15 EO 3S W-1 50 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
9 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 41,44 %16 EO 3S S = 400 8 50.00
17 EO 3K S = 110 4 25.00
18 EO 3S W+3 -490 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 41,44 %19 EO 4P E+1 -650 13 81.25
20 EO 3P W = -140 12 75.00
21 EO 3S N-1 -100 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -DACHET Gérard : 44,44 %22 EO 3S N-2 -100 11 68.75
23 EO 5CcN-3 -800 16 100.00
24 EO 3K E+2 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 47,45 %25 EO 2P E = -110 14 87.50
26 EO 6P W-1 100 6 37.50
27 EO 4P S-2 -100 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
6 EVRARD Armand -MASSAUX Jacques : 48,84 %28 EO 3S E = -400 15 93.75
29 EO 3T N = 110 4 25.00
30 EO 2C E-1 50 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
Total : 231,0 / 480 = 48,12 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand
8 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 60,19 % 1 EO 3P E = -140 13 81.25
2 EO 1S W+1 -120 8 50.00
3 EO 1S W = -90 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
9 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 41,44 % 4 EO 2C W+2 -170 14 87.50
5 EO 3S W = -400 1 6.25
6 EO 2T S = 90 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 41,44 % 7 EO 1S W+2 -150 10 62.50
8 EO 4P S-1 -50 14 87.50
9 EO 2C N-1 -50 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -DACHET Gérard : 44,44 %10 EO 6C E = -1430 16 100.00
11 EO 3S E+2 -460 14 87.50
12 EO 3S E+1 -430 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
2 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 59,72 %13 EO 2K N+1 110 15 93.75
14 EO 3C N = 140 9 56.25
15 EO 3S W+1 -430 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 47,45 %16 EO 3S S = 400 8 50.00
17 EO 3T W-1 50 8 50.00
18 EO 3S W+2 -460 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 58,80 %19 EO 4P E = -620 4 25.00
20 EO 2P W+1 -140 12 75.00
21 EO 4P S+1 650 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
6 EVRARD Armand -MASSAUX Jacques : 48,84 %22 EO 3S N = 400 0 0.00
23 EO 3P E+1 -170 10 62.50
24 EO 3S E+2 -460 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
1 WARNIER François -GOFFINET Marcel : 46,76 %25 EO 3T N-2 -100 11 68.75
26 EO 4P E = -620 13 81.25
27 EO 5K N-2 -100 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
7 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 50,93 %28 EO 3S W-1 50 8 50.00
29 EO 1S N = 90 11 68.75
30 EO 2K N-2 -100 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
Total : 284,0 / 480 = 59,17 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 VERBOIS Léon -Gelissen
9 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 41,44 % 1 EO 3S S-1 -50 7 43.75
2 EO 1S W+1 -120 8 50.00
3 EO 1S S-3 -150 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 41,44 % 4 EO 2C W+1 -140 4 25.00
5 EO 3S E+2 -460 12 75.00
6 EO 1S N+2 150 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -DACHET Gérard : 44,44 % 7 EO 1S W+1 -120 5 31.25
8 EO 3S N+1 430 4 25.00
9 EO 2C N-1 -50 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
8 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 60,19 %10 EO 4C E+1 -650 9 56.25
11 EO 3S E = -400 3 18.75
12 EO 3S E-1 50 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 47,45 %13 EO 2P S+1 140 9 56.25
14 EO 4C N-1 -50 14 87.50
15 EO 3S E-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
2 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 59,72 %16 EO 3S S = 400 8 50.00
17 EO 1S S+2 150 0 0.00
18 EO 3S W+3 -490 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
6 EVRARD Armand -MASSAUX Jacques : 48,84 %19 EO 4P E = -620 4 25.00
20 EO 4C W = -620 16 100.00
21 EO 4P S+1 650 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 58,80 %22 EO 3S N-2 -100 11 68.75
23 EO 4PcE-1 200 1 6.25
24 EO 4K E+2 -170 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
7 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 50,93 %25 EO 1S N-1 -50 6 37.50
26 EO 3S W+1 -630 16 100.00
27 EO 3K N+2 150 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
1 WARNIER François -GOFFINET Marcel : 46,76 %28 EO 3S E-1 50 8 50.00
29 EO 1S N = 90 11 68.75
30 EO 2C E+1 -140 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
Total : 226,0 / 480 = 47,08 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian
10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 41,44 % 1 EO 4C N-1 -50 7 43.75
2 EO 2ScN-2 -500 16 100.00
3 EO 1P N-1 -50 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -DACHET Gérard : 44,44 % 4 EO 2C W+2 -170 14 87.50
5 EO 3S W+1 -430 5 31.25
6 EO 3S N-5 -250 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 47,45 % 7 EO 3K S-1 -100 2 12.50
8 EO 3S N = 400 10 62.50
9 EO 2T S-3 -150 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
1 WARNIER François -GOFFINET Marcel : 46,76 %10 EO 4C W+2 -680 13 81.25
11 EO 3S E+1 -430 8 50.00
12 EO 4C E+2 -480 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
9 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 41,44 %13 EO 2P S = 110 15 93.75
14 EO 4C N-1 -50 14 87.50
15 EO 3S W+2 -460 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 93,75 %
6 EVRARD Armand -MASSAUX Jacques : 48,84 %16 EO 3S S = 400 8 50.00
17 EO 1S S-2 -100 15 93.75
18 EO 3S W+2 -460 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
2 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 59,72 %19 EO 4P E+1 -650 13 81.25
20 EO 4C W-2 200 2 12.50
21 EO 5K N = 600 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
7 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 50,93 %22 EO 3P E-1 100 4 25.00
23 EO 4C N-2 -200 13 81.25
24 EO 3S W+2 -460 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 58,80 %25 EO 1S N-2 -100 11 68.75
26 EO 5P W-2 200 1 6.25
27 EO 4P S-2 -100 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
8 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 60,19 %28 EO 3S E-1 50 8 50.00
29 EO 3P S+2 200 0 0.00
30 EO 2S E = -120 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
Total : 296,0 / 480 = 61,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -DACHET Gérard : 44,44 % 1 EO 3C N-1 -50 7 43.75
2 EO 1S N-1 -100 2 12.50
3 EO 1S W+2 -150 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 47,45 % 4 EO 2C W = -170 14 87.50
5 EO 3S W+2 -460 12 75.00
6 EO 3S N-2 -100 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
6 EVRARD Armand -MASSAUX Jacques : 48,84 % 7 EO 1S W+2 -150 10 62.50
8 EO 4P S-1 -50 14 87.50
9 EO 2T S-1 -50 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
9 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 41,44 %10 EO 4C E+2 -680 13 81.25
11 EO 3S E+2 -460 14 87.50
12 EO 4P W+1 -450 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
1 WARNIER François -GOFFINET Marcel : 46,76 %13 EO 2S S+1 150 4 25.00
14 EO 3C N+1 170 3 18.75
15 EO 3S E = -400 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 41,44 %16 EO 4P S-1 -50 15 93.75
17 EO 3C N-2 -100 15 93.75
18 EO 3S W+2 -460 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
7 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 50,93 %19 EO 4P E+1 -650 13 81.25
20 EO 2P W = -110 8 50.00
21 EO 3S N-1 -100 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
2 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 59,72 %22 EO 5TcN-3 -500 16 100.00
23 EO 4PcE-1 200 1 6.25
24 EO 3S W+2 -460 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
8 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 60,19 %25 EO 1S N = 90 1 6.25
26 EO 6P W-1 100 6 37.50
27 EO 3K N = 110 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 58,80 %28 EO 3S E-1 50 8 50.00
29 EO 2C N+2 170 2 12.50
30 EO 2S W-1 50 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
Total : 274,0 / 480 = 57,08 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 47,45 % 1 EO 3C S = 140 0 0.00
2 EO 1S W+1 -120 8 50.00
3 EO 1S S-2 -100 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
6 EVRARD Armand -MASSAUX Jacques : 48,84 % 4 EO 2C W+1 -140 4 25.00
5 EO 3S W+2 -460 12 75.00
6 EO 1S N+1 120 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
7 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 50,93 % 7 EO 1S W+3 -180 15 93.75
8 EO 4P S-1 -50 14 87.50
9 EO 1S N = 90 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 58,80 %10 EO 4C W = -620 3 18.75
11 EO 3S E-2 100 0 0.00
12 EO 3S E = -400 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 41,44 %13 EO 1S N+2 150 4 25.00
14 EO 4C N-1 -50 14 87.50
15 EO 3S W+1 -430 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
1 WARNIER François -GOFFINET Marcel : 46,76 %16 EO 4P S-1 -50 15 93.75
17 EO 3S S-1 -50 11 68.75
18 EO 3S W+3 -490 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -DACHET Gérard : 44,44 %19 EO 4P E = -620 4 25.00
20 EO 2P W+1 -140 12 75.00
21 EO 4C N+1 650 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
8 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 60,19 %22 EO 3K N = 110 2 12.50
23 EO 3C N+1 170 4 25.00
24 EO 3S W+4 -520 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
2 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 59,72 %25 EO 1S N = 90 1 6.25
26 EO 5P W-2 200 1 6.25
27 EO 4P S-2 -100 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
9 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 41,44 %28 EO 3S E-1 50 8 50.00
29 EO 1S N = 90 11 68.75
30 EO 2C E = -110 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
Total : 234,0 / 480 = 48,75 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean
6 EVRARD Armand -MASSAUX Jacques : 48,84 % 1 EO 4CcN-2 -300 16 100.00
2 EO 1S W+1 -120 8 50.00
3 EO 2S W = -120 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
7 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 50,93 % 4 EO 2C W+1 -140 4 25.00
5 EO 3S W = -400 1 6.25
6 EO 3S N-1 -50 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
8 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 60,19 % 7 EO 1S W+3 -180 15 93.75
8 EO 4P S = 420 7 43.75
9 EO 1S S = 90 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 41,44 %10 EO 6S W-2 200 0 0.00
11 EO 3S E+2 -460 14 87.50
12 EO 3S E+2 -460 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 58,80 %13 EO 2P S+1 140 9 56.25
14 EO 3C S = 140 9 56.25
15 EO 4P W+1 -450 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -DACHET Gérard : 44,44 %16 EO 3S N = 400 8 50.00
17 EO 4C N-1 -50 11 68.75
18 EO 3S W+2 -460 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
1 WARNIER François -GOFFINET Marcel : 46,76 %19 EO 4P E+1 -650 13 81.25
20 EO 4K E-3 300 0 0.00
21 EO 4P S+1 650 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 47,45 %22 EO 3S N-2 -100 11 68.75
23 EO 4C N-1 -100 7 43.75
24 EO 3S E+2 -460 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
9 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 41,44 %25 EO 1S N-1 -50 6 37.50
26 EO 4P W-1 100 6 37.50
27 EO 4T N-1 -50 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
2 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 59,72 %28 EO 5K W-2 100 1 6.25
29 EO 1S N = 90 11 68.75
30 EO 2S W = -120 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
Total : 252,0 / 480 = 52,50 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 -
7 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 50,93 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
8 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 60,19 % 4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
9 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 41,44 % 7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
2 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 59,72 %10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -DACHET Gérard : 44,44 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 58,80 %16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 47,45 %19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
1 WARNIER François -GOFFINET Marcel : 46,76 %22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 EVRARD Armand -MASSAUX Jacques : 48,84 %25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00
27 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 41,44 %28 EO BYE 0 0.00
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 480 = 0,00 %
|
|