|
Tournoi du 28-11-11
1 62,29 A.1 COENE Jacqueline -COLINET Eric
2 61,45 A.9 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry
3 54,05 A.4 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian
4 53,39 A10 GEUDVERT Marcelle -GEUDVERT Albert
5 52,94 A.6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
6 51,95 A12 DAPHNE Chantal -ROSOUX Louis
7 51,05 A13 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita
8 50,00 A.5 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques
9 44,47 A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
10 43,42 A.7 PARMENTIER Richard -SALFI Huguette
11 42,05 A.2 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
12 41,88 A.3 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine
13 41,05 A11 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 68,36 a.5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
2 57,03 a.9 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
3 55,65 a.3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
4 53,91 a.6 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
5 53,79 a.7 de WASSEIGE Claude -VAGMAN David
6 53,35 a12 HALLEUX Jean François -HUBLET Carlo
7 53,05 a10 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy
8 50,74 a13 LOUIS Serge -SARTIAU Gilbert
9 50,38 a11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
10 43,11 a.4 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques
11 40,23 a.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef
12 39,83 a.2 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert
13 30,59 a.8 de Bergeyck Christine -ROLIN Claire
PAIRE Nr : A.1 COENE Jacqueline -COLINET Eric
a.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 40,23 % 1 NS 3S S+2 460 14 63.64
2 NS 3C W = -140 20 90.91
3 NS 2P N-1 -50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 50,38 % 4 NS 3T N = 110 11 50.00
5 NS 4T E-1 50 20 90.91
6 NS 1S N+2 150 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 78,79 %
a10 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 53,05 % 7 NS 3S W+2 -660 6 27.27
8 NS 5CcE-3 500 22 100.00
9 NS 2P E = -110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
a.9 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 57,03 %10 NS 3S S+3 690 15 68.18
11 NS 3S W = -400 10 45.45
12 NS 2C N+1 140 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.8 de Bergeyck Christine -ROLIN Claire : 30,59 %13 NS Pass Passe 15 68.18
14 NS 6TcE-1 100 18 81.82
15 NS 2S N-1 -100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
a13 LOUIS Serge -SARTIAU Gilbert : 50,74 %16 NS 3S S+2 460 22 100.00
17 NS 3S N+1 430 10 45.45
18 NS 3C N+1 170 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 78,79 %
a.6 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,91 %19 NS 2S N-1 -50 4 18.18
20 NS 2S E = -120 19 86.36
21 NS 3S N = 600 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
a.5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 68,36 %22 NS 3S W-1 100 19 86.36
23 NS 1P W+2 -140 6 27.27
24 NS 3S S+1 430 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
a.4 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 43,11 %25 NS 3S W+1 -630 11 50.00
26 NS 4C E-1 100 17.5 79.55
27 NS 4C S+1 450 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 61,52 %
a.3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 55,65 %28 NS 3S W+2 -460 13.2 60.00
29 NS 1S W+2 -150 9.9 45.00
30 NS 4P W-2 100 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
Total : 411,1 / 660 = 62,29 %
PAIRE Nr : A.2 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
a.2 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 39,83 % 4 NS 2P W-2 200 19 86.36
5 NS 3T E+2 -150 4 18.18
6 NS 1S N = 90 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 40,23 % 7 NS 6ScE-2 500 22 100.00
8 NS 4C E-2 100 18 81.82
9 NS 2P E-1 100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 87,88 %
a11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 50,38 %10 NS 5K N = 600 6 27.27
11 NS 4C E = -420 4 18.18
12 NS 3P S = 140 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a10 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 53,05 %13 NS 2C E+1 -140 6 27.27
14 NS 5P S-2 -100 9 40.91
15 NS 2C W-1 50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.9 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 57,03 %16 NS 4P S+1 450 18 81.82
17 NS 2S S+3 210 0 0.00
18 NS 4C N-2 -200 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
a.8 de Bergeyck Christine -ROLIN Claire : 30,59 %19 NS 2S S+1 150 16 72.73
20 NS 2P W+2 -170 4 18.18
21 NS 3S N = 600 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
a12 HALLEUX Jean François -HUBLET Carlo : 53,35 %22 NS 3S E+2 -660 0 0.00
23 NS 2S E = -120 12 54.55
24 NS 3S S+2 460 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
a.6 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,91 %25 NS 3S W+1 -630 11 50.00
26 NS 3C E+1 -170 2.3 10.45
27 NS 3C S+3 230 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 20,30 %
a.5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 68,36 %28 NS 3S W+3 -490 4.5 20.45
29 NS 1S W+4 -210 0.1 0.45
30 NS 3C E = -140 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 15,30 %
a.4 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 43,11 %31 NS 1S W+3 -180 0 0.00
32 NS 4P S+2 480 9 40.91
33 NS 3C W+1 -170 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
Total : 277,5 / 660 = 42,05 %
PAIRE Nr : A.3 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine
a.5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 68,36 % 1 NS 6K N-3 -150 0 0.00
2 NS 4P E = -420 10 45.45
3 NS 3PcN-2 -300 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a.3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 55,65 % 7 NS 3S W+2 -660 6 27.27
8 NS 6K W = -920 0 0.00
9 NS 1S S = 90 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
a12 HALLEUX Jean François -HUBLET Carlo : 53,35 %10 NS 3S N+3 690 15 68.18
11 NS 4C E = -420 4 18.18
12 NS 3K E = -110 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 40,23 %13 NS 3C E-3 300 22 100.00
14 NS 5P N-1 -50 13 59.09
15 NS 2K S-1 -100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
a11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 50,38 %16 NS 3S S = 400 0 0.00
17 NS 3S S+1 430 10 45.45
18 NS 2C N+2 170 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a10 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 53,05 %19 NS 2S N+2 180 19 86.36
20 NS 2C W+2 -170 4 18.18
21 NS 3S N = 600 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
a.9 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 57,03 %22 NS 3K E = -110 16 72.73
23 NS 3S E = -600 0 0.00
24 NS 3S S-4 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,24 %
a13 LOUIS Serge -SARTIAU Gilbert : 50,74 %25 NS 3S W+2 -660 4.5 20.45
26 NS 4C E-1 100 17.5 79.55
27 NS 4C S+1 450 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
a.7 de WASSEIGE Claude -VAGMAN David : 53,79 %28 NS 3S E+2 -460 13.2 60.00
29 NS 1S W+2 -150 9.9 45.00
30 NS 3C E-1 50 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.6 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,91 %31 NS 1S W = -90 14 63.64
32 NS 3S S = 400 0 0.00
33 NS 3S W = -400 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
Total : 276,4 / 660 = 41,88 %
PAIRE Nr : A.4 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian
a.7 de WASSEIGE Claude -VAGMAN David : 53,79 % 1 NS 3S S+2 460 14 63.64
2 NS 4P E = -420 10 45.45
3 NS 2P N-1 -50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
a.6 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,91 % 4 NS 3K S = 110 11 50.00
5 NS 3TcE = -470 1 4.55
6 NS 2K E = -90 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 24,24 %
a.4 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 43,11 %10 NS 3S N+4 720 22 100.00
11 NS 3S W = -400 10 45.45
12 NS 3S E-2 100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
a13 LOUIS Serge -SARTIAU Gilbert : 50,74 %13 NS Pass Passe 15 68.18
14 NS 7PcS-3 -500 4 18.18
15 NS 2C E = -110 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.2 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 39,83 %16 NS 3S S+1 430 8 36.36
17 NS 3S N+2 460 19 86.36
18 NS 2C N+2 170 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
a.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 40,23 %19 NS 2S N = 120 12 54.55
20 NS 2C E = -110 22 100.00
21 NS 3S N = 600 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 50,38 %22 NS 3K E+1 -130 9 40.91
23 NS 2S E = -120 12 54.55
24 NS 3S N+3 490 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
a10 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 53,05 %25 NS 3S E = -600 18.6 84.55
26 NS 4C E-1 100 17.5 79.55
27 NS 4C S = 420 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 59,85 %
a.9 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 57,03 %28 NS 3S E+2 -460 13.2 60.00
29 NS 1S W+3 -180 4.5 20.45
30 NS 3K N = 110 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
a12 HALLEUX Jean François -HUBLET Carlo : 53,35 %31 NS 1S W = -90 14 63.64
32 NS 4P S+2 480 9 40.91
33 NS 4C E = -420 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
Total : 356,7 / 660 = 54,05 %
PAIRE Nr : A.5 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques
a13 LOUIS Serge -SARTIAU Gilbert : 50,74 % 1 NS 5P S-2 -100 2 9.09
2 NS 2P E+3 -200 14 63.64
3 NS 2P N-1 -50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.8 de Bergeyck Christine -ROLIN Claire : 30,59 % 4 NS 2P W-2 200 19 86.36
5 NS 2C S+2 170 22 100.00
6 NS 3S S-1 -50 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 75,76 %
a.7 de WASSEIGE Claude -VAGMAN David : 53,79 % 7 NS 3S E+1 -630 14 63.64
8 NS 5KcW = -550 4 18.18
9 NS 1S S-1 -50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 68,36 %13 NS 2C E+1 -140 6 27.27
14 NS 5PcN-1 -100 9 40.91
15 NS 1ScN-2 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.4 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 43,11 %16 NS 3S S+1 430 8 36.36
17 NS 3S N+2 460 19 86.36
18 NS 3S S-2 -200 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
a12 HALLEUX Jean François -HUBLET Carlo : 53,35 %19 NS 3S N-2 -100 0 0.00
20 NS 2S E+1 -150 11 50.00
21 NS 3S N+1 630 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
a.2 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 39,83 %22 NS 3S E-1 100 19 86.36
23 NS 2S W = -120 12 54.55
24 NS 3S N+3 490 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 75,76 %
a.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 40,23 %25 NS 3S W = -600 18.6 84.55
26 NS 2P E+1 -140 8.8 40.00
27 NS 4C S+1 450 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 59,85 %
a11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 50,38 %28 NS 3S W+4 -520 0.1 0.45
29 NS 1S W+1 -120 18.6 84.55
30 NS 3PcW-2 300 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 59,85 %
a10 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 53,05 %31 NS 1S W+2 -150 4 18.18
32 NS 3S S+3 490 18 81.82
33 NS 3S W+2 -460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 330,0 / 660 = 50,00 %
PAIRE Nr : A.6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
a11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 50,38 % 1 NS 3S S+1 430 5 22.73
2 NS 4C W+1 -450 3 13.64
3 NS 3P N-2 -100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 19,70 %
a10 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 53,05 % 4 NS 2P W-1 100 4 18.18
5 NS 4T E = -130 9 40.91
6 NS 1S W = -90 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
a12 HALLEUX Jean François -HUBLET Carlo : 53,35 % 7 NS 3S W = -600 18 81.82
8 NS 5C W-1 50 15 68.18
9 NS 1S S = 90 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
a.8 de Bergeyck Christine -ROLIN Claire : 30,59 %10 NS 3S N+3 690 15 68.18
11 NS 3S W-1 50 19 86.36
12 NS 2C N+1 140 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
a.6 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,91 %16 NS 3S S+1 430 8 36.36
17 NS 3S N+1 430 10 45.45
18 NS 2P W+1 -140 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 68,36 %19 NS 2S N-1 -50 4 18.18
20 NS 2S E = -120 19 86.36
21 NS 3S N = 600 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
a13 LOUIS Serge -SARTIAU Gilbert : 50,74 %22 NS 2K E+2 -130 9 40.91
23 NS 1S E+1 -120 12 54.55
24 NS 3S N+4 520 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
a.3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 55,65 %25 NS 3S W = -600 18.6 84.55
26 NS 4C E-1 100 17.5 79.55
27 NS 4C S+1 450 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 73,03 %
a.2 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 39,83 %28 NS 3S W+1 -430 20.8 94.55
29 NS 1S E+1 -120 18.6 84.55
30 NS 3KcS-1 -100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 73,03 %
a.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 40,23 %31 NS 2C W = -110 8 36.36
32 NS 4P S+2 480 9 40.91
33 NS 4C W = -420 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 349,4 / 660 = 52,94 %
PAIRE Nr : A.7 PARMENTIER Richard -SALFI Huguette
a.2 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 39,83 % 1 NS 3S S+2 460 14 63.64
2 NS 4C W+1 -450 3 13.64
3 NS 2P N-1 -50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
a.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 40,23 % 4 NS 2P W-2 200 19 86.36
5 NS 3T E+1 -130 9 40.91
6 NS 1S N+2 150 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
a11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 50,38 % 7 NS 3S W+2 -660 6 27.27
8 NS 5PcS-4 -800 2 9.09
9 NS 2K N-1 -50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 21,21 %
a13 LOUIS Serge -SARTIAU Gilbert : 50,74 %10 NS 3K N+3 170 2 9.09
11 NS 3S W+1 -430 0 0.00
12 NS 1S W+1 -120 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
a.9 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 57,03 %13 NS 2C E+1 -140 6 27.27
14 NS 5P S-1 -50 13 59.09
15 NS 2C W-1 50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
a.7 de WASSEIGE Claude -VAGMAN David : 53,79 %19 NS 2S S-1 -50 4 18.18
20 NS 3S E+1 -630 0 0.00
21 NS 3S N = 600 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.6 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,91 %22 NS 2S E = -120 14 63.64
23 NS 3S W-1 100 21 95.45
24 NS 4T N-1 -50 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 68,36 %25 NS 3S W+2 -660 4.5 20.45
26 NS 3C W = -140 8.8 40.00
27 NS 4C S = 420 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 25,30 %
a12 HALLEUX Jean François -HUBLET Carlo : 53,35 %28 NS 3S E+2 -460 13.2 60.00
29 NS 1S W+1 -120 18.6 84.55
30 NS 5KcS-4 -800 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
a.3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 55,65 %31 NS 1S W = -90 14 63.64
32 NS 4P S+3 510 20 90.91
33 NS 2C W+2 -170 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 75,76 %
Total : 286,6 / 660 = 43,42 %
PAIRE Nr : A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
a.4 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 43,11 % 1 NS 3S S+2 460 14 63.64
2 NS 3C W+1 -170 16 72.73
3 NS 2P N-1 -50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 55,65 % 4 NS 3K S = 110 11 50.00
5 NS 3TcE = -470 1 4.55
6 NS 2PcE = -670 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a.2 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 39,83 % 7 NS 3S E+1 -630 14 63.64
8 NS 5K W = -400 7 31.82
9 NS 1S S = 90 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
a.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 40,23 %10 NS 4K N+2 170 2 9.09
11 NS 1P E+2 -140 14 63.64
12 NS 3K E-1 50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
a11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 50,38 %13 NS Pass Passe 15 68.18
14 NS 5TcE = -550 1 4.55
15 NS 2T S-1 -100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a12 HALLEUX Jean François -HUBLET Carlo : 53,35 %16 NS 3S S+1 430 8 36.36
17 NS 3S S = 400 3 13.64
18 NS 3P W-1 50 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.8 de Bergeyck Christine -ROLIN Claire : 30,59 %22 NS 3K E+1 -130 9 40.91
23 NS 1P W+1 -110 18 81.82
24 NS 3S N+2 460 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
a.7 de WASSEIGE Claude -VAGMAN David : 53,79 %25 NS 3S W = -600 18.6 84.55
26 NS 3C E+1 -170 2.3 10.45
27 NS 4C S+2 480 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 63,18 %
a.6 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,91 %28 NS 3S W+3 -490 4.5 20.45
29 NS 2P N-2 -200 2.3 10.45
30 NS 3K S-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 26,97 %
a13 LOUIS Serge -SARTIAU Gilbert : 50,74 %31 NS 1S W = -90 14 63.64
32 NS 4P S+2 480 9 40.91
33 NS 4C W = -420 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
Total : 293,5 / 660 = 44,47 %
PAIRE Nr : A.9 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry
a.6 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,91 % 1 NS 4P S+1 450 8 36.36
2 NS 4C W+1 -450 3 13.64
3 NS 2P N-1 -50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
a12 HALLEUX Jean François -HUBLET Carlo : 53,35 % 4 NS 4C E-2 200 19 86.36
5 NS 1S W+1 -120 16 72.73
6 NS 2C W-1 100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 78,79 %
a.4 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 43,11 % 7 NS 5C W-1 100 20 90.91
8 NS 4PcS-1 -100 12 54.55
9 NS 1S S = 90 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 55,65 %10 NS 2K N+4 170 2 9.09
11 NS 3S W = -400 10 45.45
12 NS 3K E = -110 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
a.2 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 39,83 %13 NS Pass Passe 15 68.18
14 NS 6TcE-1 100 18 81.82
15 NS 2K N = 90 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 40,23 %16 NS 3S S+1 430 8 36.36
17 NS 3S N+1 430 10 45.45
18 NS 2C N+1 140 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
a13 LOUIS Serge -SARTIAU Gilbert : 50,74 %19 NS 2S N+2 180 19 86.36
20 NS 2S E+1 -150 11 50.00
21 NS 3S N = 600 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
a.9 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 57,03 %25 NS 6S W = -1440 0.1 0.45
26 NS 4C E-1 100 17.5 79.55
27 NS 4C S+2 480 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 58,18 %
a.8 de Bergeyck Christine -ROLIN Claire : 30,59 %28 NS 3S E+1 -430 20.8 94.55
29 NS 1S W+1 -120 18.6 84.55
30 NS 4PcW-2 300 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 91,21 %
a.7 de WASSEIGE Claude -VAGMAN David : 53,79 %31 NS 1S W = -90 14 63.64
32 NS 4P S+2 480 9 40.91
33 NS 3C W+1 -170 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
Total : 405,6 / 660 = 61,45 %
PAIRE Nr : A10 GEUDVERT Marcelle -GEUDVERT Albert
a.8 de Bergeyck Christine -ROLIN Claire : 30,59 % 1 NS 3S S+4 520 22 100.00
2 NS 3C W = -140 20 90.91
3 NS 2P N = 110 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 96,97 %
a.7 de WASSEIGE Claude -VAGMAN David : 53,79 % 4 NS 2P W-1 100 4 18.18
5 NS 3T E+1 -130 9 40.91
6 NS 2K E-1 100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a13 LOUIS Serge -SARTIAU Gilbert : 50,74 % 7 NS 3S W+2 -660 6 27.27
8 NS 5K W = -400 7 31.82
9 NS 1S S+1 120 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
a.5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 68,36 %10 NS 3S S+3 690 15 68.18
11 NS 4P E = -420 4 18.18
12 NS 3T W+1 -130 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
a.4 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 43,11 %13 NS Pass Passe 15 68.18
14 NS 5P S = 450 22 100.00
15 NS 1S N+1 120 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
a.3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 55,65 %16 NS 3S S+1 430 8 36.36
17 NS 3S S+2 460 19 86.36
18 NS 2P W+2 -170 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
a.2 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 39,83 %19 NS 3S S = 400 22 100.00
20 NS 2C W+1 -140 16 72.73
21 NS 4C N-1 -100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 40,23 %22 NS 2K E+2 -130 9 40.91
23 NS 1S E+1 -120 12 54.55
24 NS 3S S+1 430 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
a10 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 53,05 %28 NS 3S W+2 -460 13.2 60.00
29 NS 1S W+2 -150 9.9 45.00
30 NS 4KcS-3 -500 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 38,48 %
a.9 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 57,03 %31 NS 1S W+2 -150 4 18.18
32 NS 4P S+2 480 9 40.91
33 NS 3S W = -400 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
Total : 352,4 / 660 = 53,39 %
PAIRE Nr : A11 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
a10 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 53,05 % 1 NS 3S S+2 460 14 63.64
2 NS 2P E+1 -140 20 90.91
3 NS 2KcE+1 -380 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
a.9 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 57,03 % 4 NS 2P E-1 100 4 18.18
5 NS 4T E = -130 9 40.91
6 NS 1S N = 90 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
a.8 de Bergeyck Christine -ROLIN Claire : 30,59 % 7 NS 3S W+2 -660 6 27.27
8 NS 3K W+2 -150 10 45.45
9 NS 1S S-1 -50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.7 de WASSEIGE Claude -VAGMAN David : 53,79 %10 NS 3S N+1 630 8 36.36
11 NS 4P E-1 50 19 86.36
12 NS 3T W-2 100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a12 HALLEUX Jean François -HUBLET Carlo : 53,35 %13 NS 1ScN-2 -500 0 0.00
14 NS 6P S-3 -150 6 27.27
15 NS 1S N-1 -100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 21,21 %
a.5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 68,36 %16 NS 3S S+1 430 8 36.36
17 NS 3S N+1 430 10 45.45
18 NS 3P E-1 50 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
a.4 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 43,11 %19 NS Pass Passe 8 36.36
20 NS 2P W+2 -170 4 18.18
21 NS 3S N-1 -100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 19,70 %
a.3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 55,65 %22 NS 4T E+1 -150 3 13.64
23 NS 2S E+1 -150 3 13.64
24 NS 3S N+2 460 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
a.2 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 39,83 %25 NS 3S W+2 -660 4.5 20.45
26 NS 2C E+2 -170 2.3 10.45
27 NS 4C S+1 450 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 28,64 %
a11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 50,38 %31 NS 1S W-1 50 21 95.45
32 NS 4P S+2 480 9 40.91
33 NS 4C W-1 50 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
Total : 270,9 / 660 = 41,05 %
PAIRE Nr : A12 DAPHNE Chantal -ROSOUX Louis
a12 HALLEUX Jean François -HUBLET Carlo : 53,35 % 1 NS 3S S+3 490 20 90.91
2 NS 4P E+1 -450 3 13.64
3 NS 3P N-2 -100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
a.5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 68,36 % 4 NS 2P W+1 -140 0 0.00
5 NS 2S W = -120 16 72.73
6 NS 1S W = -90 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
a.9 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 57,03 % 7 NS 3S E+3 -690 0 0.00
8 NS 6K W-1 50 15 68.18
9 NS 1S W = -90 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
a.2 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 39,83 %10 NS 3S S+3 690 15 68.18
11 NS 4C E-1 50 19 86.36
12 NS 3K E = -110 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.6 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,91 %13 NS Pass Passe 15 68.18
14 NS 6TcE-1 100 18 81.82
15 NS 1S N+2 150 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
a10 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 53,05 %16 NS 4P S+1 450 18 81.82
17 NS 3S N+2 460 19 86.36
18 NS 2P W = -110 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 55,65 %19 NS 2S N = 120 12 54.55
20 NS 2S W+1 -150 11 50.00
21 NS 3S N+1 630 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.7 de WASSEIGE Claude -VAGMAN David : 53,79 %22 NS 3K E+2 -150 3 13.64
23 NS 2S E+1 -150 3 13.64
24 NS 3S S-3 -150 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 12,12 %
a.4 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 43,11 %28 NS 3S W+3 -490 4.5 20.45
29 NS 1S W+2 -150 9.9 45.00
30 NS 3C E = -140 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 30,15 %
a.8 de Bergeyck Christine -ROLIN Claire : 30,59 %31 NS 3S E-1 50 21 95.45
32 NS 6P S = 980 22 100.00
33 NS 4C W-1 50 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 96,97 %
Total : 342,9 / 660 = 51,95 %
PAIRE Nr : A13 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita
a.9 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 57,03 % 1 NS 3S N+1 430 5 22.73
2 NS 4P E = -420 10 45.45
3 NS 2P N-1 -50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
a13 LOUIS Serge -SARTIAU Gilbert : 50,74 % 4 NS 3T N = 110 11 50.00
5 NS 2S W = -120 16 72.73
6 NS 2S N-1 -50 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.6 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,91 % 7 NS 3S E+1 -630 14 63.64
8 NS 4C E-3 150 20 90.91
9 NS 1S S+1 120 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
a10 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 53,05 %10 NS 3S N+3 690 15 68.18
11 NS 3S W-1 50 19 86.36
12 NS 3T W+1 -130 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
a.3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 55,65 %13 NS 3C E+1 -170 2 9.09
14 NS 5TcE = -550 1 4.55
15 NS 2K N-1 -100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
a.7 de WASSEIGE Claude -VAGMAN David : 53,79 %16 NS 4P S+1 450 18 81.82
17 NS 5K N = 400 3 13.64
18 NS 4C N-1 -100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
a11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 50,38 %19 NS 2S N = 120 12 54.55
20 NS 2S E+1 -150 11 50.00
21 NS 3S N = 600 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
a.4 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 43,11 %22 NS 3S W-2 200 22 100.00
23 NS 3S W-1 100 21 95.45
24 NS 3S S+2 460 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 84,85 %
a.8 de Bergeyck Christine -ROLIN Claire : 30,59 %25 NS 3S W+1 -630 11 50.00
26 NS 3C E = -140 8.8 40.00
27 NS 4C S+1 450 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
a.5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 68,36 %31 NS 1S W+2 -150 4 18.18
32 NS 4P S+2 480 9 40.91
33 NS 4C W = -420 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
Total : 336,9 / 660 = 51,05 %
PAIRE Nr : a.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef
A.1 COENE Jacqueline -COLINET Eric : 62,29 % 1 EO 3S S+2 460 8 36.36
2 EO 3C W = -140 2 9.09
3 EO 2P N-1 -50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.7 PARMENTIER Richard -SALFI Huguette : 43,42 % 4 EO 2P W-2 200 3 13.64
5 EO 3T E+1 -130 13 59.09
6 EO 1S N+2 150 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
A.2 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 42,05 % 7 EO 6ScE-2 500 0 0.00
8 EO 4C E-2 100 4 18.18
9 EO 2P E-1 100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 12,12 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 44,47 %10 EO 4K N+2 170 20 90.91
11 EO 1P E+2 -140 8 36.36
12 EO 3K E-1 50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
A.3 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 41,88 %13 EO 3C E-3 300 0 0.00
14 EO 5P N-1 -50 9 40.91
15 EO 2K S-1 -100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
A.9 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 61,45 %16 EO 3S S+1 430 14 63.64
17 EO 3S N+1 430 12 54.55
18 EO 2C N+1 140 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
A.4 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 54,05 %19 EO 2S N = 120 10 45.45
20 EO 2C E = -110 0 0.00
21 EO 3S N = 600 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A10 GEUDVERT Marcelle -GEUDVERT Albert : 53,39 %22 EO 2K E+2 -130 13 59.09
23 EO 1S E+1 -120 10 45.45
24 EO 3S S+1 430 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
A.5 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,00 %25 EO 3S W = -600 3.4 15.45
26 EO 2P E+1 -140 13.2 60.00
27 EO 4C S+1 450 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 40,15 %
A.6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 52,94 %31 EO 2C W = -110 14 63.64
32 EO 4P S+2 480 13 59.09
33 EO 4C W = -420 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 265,5 / 660 = 40,23 %
PAIRE Nr : a.2 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert
A.7 PARMENTIER Richard -SALFI Huguette : 43,42 % 1 EO 3S S+2 460 8 36.36
2 EO 4C W+1 -450 19 86.36
3 EO 2P N-1 -50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
A.2 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 42,05 % 4 EO 2P W-2 200 3 13.64
5 EO 3T E+2 -150 18 81.82
6 EO 1S N = 90 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 44,47 % 7 EO 3S E+1 -630 8 36.36
8 EO 5K W = -400 15 68.18
9 EO 1S S = 90 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
A12 DAPHNE Chantal -ROSOUX Louis : 51,95 %10 EO 3S S+3 690 7 31.82
11 EO 4C E-1 50 3 13.64
12 EO 3K E = -110 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.9 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 61,45 %13 EO Pass Passe 7 31.82
14 EO 6TcE-1 100 4 18.18
15 EO 2K N = 90 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.4 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 54,05 %16 EO 3S S+1 430 14 63.64
17 EO 3S N+2 460 3 13.64
18 EO 2C N+2 170 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
A10 GEUDVERT Marcelle -GEUDVERT Albert : 53,39 %19 EO 3S S = 400 0 0.00
20 EO 2C W+1 -140 6 27.27
21 EO 4C N-1 -100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.5 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,00 %22 EO 3S E-1 100 3 13.64
23 EO 2S W = -120 10 45.45
24 EO 3S N+3 490 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 24,24 %
A11 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 41,05 %25 EO 3S W+2 -660 17.5 79.55
26 EO 2C E+2 -170 19.7 89.55
27 EO 4C S+1 450 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 71,36 %
A.6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 52,94 %28 EO 3S W+1 -430 1.2 5.45
29 EO 1S E+1 -120 3.4 15.45
30 EO 3KcS-1 -100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 26,97 %
Total : 262,9 / 660 = 39,83 %
PAIRE Nr : a.3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 44,47 % 4 EO 3K S = 110 11 50.00
5 EO 3TcE = -470 21 95.45
6 EO 2PcE = -670 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A.3 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 41,88 % 7 EO 3S W+2 -660 16 72.73
8 EO 6K W = -920 22 100.00
9 EO 1S S = 90 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
A.9 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 61,45 %10 EO 2K N+4 170 20 90.91
11 EO 3S W = -400 12 54.55
12 EO 3K E = -110 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
A13 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 51,05 %13 EO 3C E+1 -170 20 90.91
14 EO 5TcE = -550 21 95.45
15 EO 2K N-1 -100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
A10 GEUDVERT Marcelle -GEUDVERT Albert : 53,39 %16 EO 3S S+1 430 14 63.64
17 EO 3S S+2 460 3 13.64
18 EO 2P W+2 -170 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
A12 DAPHNE Chantal -ROSOUX Louis : 51,95 %19 EO 2S N = 120 10 45.45
20 EO 2S W+1 -150 11 50.00
21 EO 3S N+1 630 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A11 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 41,05 %22 EO 4T E+1 -150 19 86.36
23 EO 2S E+1 -150 19 86.36
24 EO 3S N+2 460 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
A.6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 52,94 %25 EO 3S W = -600 3.4 15.45
26 EO 4C E-1 100 4.5 20.45
27 EO 4C S+1 450 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 26,97 %
A.1 COENE Jacqueline -COLINET Eric : 62,29 %28 EO 3S W+2 -460 8.8 40.00
29 EO 1S W+2 -150 12.1 55.00
30 EO 4P W-2 100 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
A.7 PARMENTIER Richard -SALFI Huguette : 43,42 %31 EO 1S W = -90 8 36.36
32 EO 4P S+3 510 2 9.09
33 EO 2C W+2 -170 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 24,24 %
Total : 367,3 / 660 = 55,65 %
PAIRE Nr : a.4 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 44,47 % 1 EO 3S S+2 460 8 36.36
2 EO 3C W+1 -170 6 27.27
3 EO 2P N-1 -50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.9 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 61,45 % 7 EO 5C W-1 100 2 9.09
8 EO 4PcS-1 -100 10 45.45
9 EO 1S S = 90 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.4 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 54,05 %10 EO 3S N+4 720 0 0.00
11 EO 3S W = -400 12 54.55
12 EO 3S E-2 100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
A10 GEUDVERT Marcelle -GEUDVERT Albert : 53,39 %13 EO Pass Passe 7 31.82
14 EO 5P S = 450 0 0.00
15 EO 1S N+1 120 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
A.5 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,00 %16 EO 3S S+1 430 14 63.64
17 EO 3S N+2 460 3 13.64
18 EO 3S S-2 -200 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
A11 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 41,05 %19 EO Pass Passe 14 63.64
20 EO 2P W+2 -170 18 81.82
21 EO 3S N-1 -100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 80,30 %
A13 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 51,05 %22 EO 3S W-2 200 0 0.00
23 EO 3S W-1 100 1 4.55
24 EO 3S S+2 460 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 15,15 %
A.1 COENE Jacqueline -COLINET Eric : 62,29 %25 EO 3S W+1 -630 11 50.00
26 EO 4C E-1 100 4.5 20.45
27 EO 4C S+1 450 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 38,48 %
A12 DAPHNE Chantal -ROSOUX Louis : 51,95 %28 EO 3S W+3 -490 17.5 79.55
29 EO 1S W+2 -150 12.1 55.00
30 EO 3C E = -140 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 69,85 %
A.2 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 42,05 %31 EO 1S W+3 -180 22 100.00
32 EO 4P S+2 480 13 59.09
33 EO 3C W+1 -170 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
Total : 284,5 / 660 = 43,11 %
PAIRE Nr : a.5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
A.3 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 41,88 % 1 EO 6K N-3 -150 22 100.00
2 EO 4P E = -420 12 54.55
3 EO 3PcN-2 -300 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A12 DAPHNE Chantal -ROSOUX Louis : 51,95 % 4 EO 2P W+1 -140 22 100.00
5 EO 2S W = -120 6 27.27
6 EO 1S W = -90 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
A10 GEUDVERT Marcelle -GEUDVERT Albert : 53,39 %10 EO 3S S+3 690 7 31.82
11 EO 4P E = -420 18 81.82
12 EO 3T W+1 -130 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
A.5 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,00 %13 EO 2C E+1 -140 16 72.73
14 EO 5PcN-1 -100 13 59.09
15 EO 1ScN-2 -500 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A11 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 41,05 %16 EO 3S S+1 430 14 63.64
17 EO 3S N+1 430 12 54.55
18 EO 3P E-1 50 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
A.6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 52,94 %19 EO 2S N-1 -50 18 81.82
20 EO 2S E = -120 3 13.64
21 EO 3S N = 600 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
A.1 COENE Jacqueline -COLINET Eric : 62,29 %22 EO 3S W-1 100 3 13.64
23 EO 1P W+2 -140 16 72.73
24 EO 3S S+1 430 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
A.7 PARMENTIER Richard -SALFI Huguette : 43,42 %25 EO 3S W+2 -660 17.5 79.55
26 EO 3C W = -140 13.2 60.00
27 EO 4C S = 420 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 74,70 %
A.2 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 42,05 %28 EO 3S W+3 -490 17.5 79.55
29 EO 1S W+4 -210 21.9 99.55
30 EO 3C E = -140 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 84,70 %
A13 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 51,05 %31 EO 1S W+2 -150 18 81.82
32 EO 4P S+2 480 13 59.09
33 EO 4C W = -420 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
Total : 451,2 / 660 = 68,36 %
PAIRE Nr : a.6 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
A.9 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 61,45 % 1 EO 4P S+1 450 14 63.64
2 EO 4C W+1 -450 19 86.36
3 EO 2P N-1 -50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
A.4 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 54,05 % 4 EO 3K S = 110 11 50.00
5 EO 3TcE = -470 21 95.45
6 EO 2K E = -90 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 75,76 %
A13 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 51,05 % 7 EO 3S E+1 -630 8 36.36
8 EO 4C E-3 150 2 9.09
9 EO 1S S+1 120 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
A12 DAPHNE Chantal -ROSOUX Louis : 51,95 %13 EO Pass Passe 7 31.82
14 EO 6TcE-1 100 4 18.18
15 EO 1S N+2 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
A.6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 52,94 %16 EO 3S S+1 430 14 63.64
17 EO 3S N+1 430 12 54.55
18 EO 2P W+1 -140 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.1 COENE Jacqueline -COLINET Eric : 62,29 %19 EO 2S N-1 -50 18 81.82
20 EO 2S E = -120 3 13.64
21 EO 3S N = 600 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
A.7 PARMENTIER Richard -SALFI Huguette : 43,42 %22 EO 2S E = -120 8 36.36
23 EO 3S W-1 100 1 4.55
24 EO 4T N-1 -50 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.2 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 42,05 %25 EO 3S W+1 -630 11 50.00
26 EO 3C E+1 -170 19.7 89.55
27 EO 3C S+3 230 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 79,70 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 44,47 %28 EO 3S W+3 -490 17.5 79.55
29 EO 2P N-2 -200 19.7 89.55
30 EO 3K S-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 73,03 %
A.3 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 41,88 %31 EO 1S W = -90 8 36.36
32 EO 3S S = 400 22 100.00
33 EO 3S W = -400 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
Total : 355,8 / 660 = 53,91 %
PAIRE Nr : a.7 de WASSEIGE Claude -VAGMAN David
A.4 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 54,05 % 1 EO 3S S+2 460 8 36.36
2 EO 4P E = -420 12 54.55
3 EO 2P N-1 -50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
A10 GEUDVERT Marcelle -GEUDVERT Albert : 53,39 % 4 EO 2P W-1 100 18 81.82
5 EO 3T E+1 -130 13 59.09
6 EO 2K E-1 100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.5 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,00 % 7 EO 3S E+1 -630 8 36.36
8 EO 5KcW = -550 18 81.82
9 EO 1S S-1 -50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A11 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 41,05 %10 EO 3S N+1 630 14 63.64
11 EO 4P E-1 50 3 13.64
12 EO 3T W-2 100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A13 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 51,05 %16 EO 4P S+1 450 4 18.18
17 EO 5K N = 400 19 86.36
18 EO 4C N-1 -100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
A.7 PARMENTIER Richard -SALFI Huguette : 43,42 %19 EO 2S S-1 -50 18 81.82
20 EO 3S E+1 -630 22 100.00
21 EO 3S N = 600 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A12 DAPHNE Chantal -ROSOUX Louis : 51,95 %22 EO 3K E+2 -150 19 86.36
23 EO 2S E+1 -150 19 86.36
24 EO 3S S-3 -150 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 87,88 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 44,47 %25 EO 3S W = -600 3.4 15.45
26 EO 3C E+1 -170 19.7 89.55
27 EO 4C S+2 480 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 36,82 %
A.3 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 41,88 %28 EO 3S E+2 -460 8.8 40.00
29 EO 1S W+2 -150 12.1 55.00
30 EO 3C E-1 50 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.9 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 61,45 %31 EO 1S W = -90 8 36.36
32 EO 4P S+2 480 13 59.09
33 EO 3C W+1 -170 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
Total : 355,0 / 660 = 53,79 %
PAIRE Nr : a.8 de Bergeyck Christine -ROLIN Claire
A10 GEUDVERT Marcelle -GEUDVERT Albert : 53,39 % 1 EO 3S S+4 520 0 0.00
2 EO 3C W = -140 2 9.09
3 EO 2P N = 110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 3,03 %
A.5 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,00 % 4 EO 2P W-2 200 3 13.64
5 EO 2C S+2 170 0 0.00
6 EO 3S S-1 -50 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 24,24 %
A11 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 41,05 % 7 EO 3S W+2 -660 16 72.73
8 EO 3K W+2 -150 12 54.55
9 EO 1S S-1 -50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 52,94 %10 EO 3S N+3 690 7 31.82
11 EO 3S W-1 50 3 13.64
12 EO 2C N+1 140 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
A.1 COENE Jacqueline -COLINET Eric : 62,29 %13 EO Pass Passe 7 31.82
14 EO 6TcE-1 100 4 18.18
15 EO 2S N-1 -100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
A.2 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 42,05 %19 EO 2S S+1 150 6 27.27
20 EO 2P W+2 -170 18 81.82
21 EO 3S N = 600 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 44,47 %22 EO 3K E+1 -130 13 59.09
23 EO 1P W+1 -110 4 18.18
24 EO 3S N+2 460 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
A13 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 51,05 %25 EO 3S W+1 -630 11 50.00
26 EO 3C E = -140 13.2 60.00
27 EO 4C S+1 450 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
A.9 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 61,45 %28 EO 3S E+1 -430 1.2 5.45
29 EO 1S W+1 -120 3.4 15.45
30 EO 4PcW-2 300 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 8,79 %
A12 DAPHNE Chantal -ROSOUX Louis : 51,95 %31 EO 3S E-1 50 1 4.55
32 EO 6P S = 980 0 0.00
33 EO 4C W-1 50 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 3,03 %
Total : 201,9 / 660 = 30,59 %
PAIRE Nr : a.9 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
A13 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 51,05 % 1 EO 3S N+1 430 17 77.27
2 EO 4P E = -420 12 54.55
3 EO 2P N-1 -50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
A11 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 41,05 % 4 EO 2P E-1 100 18 81.82
5 EO 4T E = -130 13 59.09
6 EO 1S N = 90 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
A12 DAPHNE Chantal -ROSOUX Louis : 51,95 % 7 EO 3S E+3 -690 22 100.00
8 EO 6K W-1 50 7 31.82
9 EO 1S W = -90 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
A.1 COENE Jacqueline -COLINET Eric : 62,29 %10 EO 3S S+3 690 7 31.82
11 EO 3S W = -400 12 54.55
12 EO 2C N+1 140 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.7 PARMENTIER Richard -SALFI Huguette : 43,42 %13 EO 2C E+1 -140 16 72.73
14 EO 5P S-1 -50 9 40.91
15 EO 2C W-1 50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
A.2 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 42,05 %16 EO 4P S+1 450 4 18.18
17 EO 2S S+3 210 22 100.00
18 EO 4C N-2 -200 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
A.3 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 41,88 %22 EO 3K E = -110 6 27.27
23 EO 3S E = -600 22 100.00
24 EO 3S S-4 -200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,76 %
A.9 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 61,45 %25 EO 6S W = -1440 21.9 99.55
26 EO 4C E-1 100 4.5 20.45
27 EO 4C S+2 480 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 41,82 %
A.4 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 54,05 %28 EO 3S E+2 -460 8.8 40.00
29 EO 1S W+3 -180 17.5 79.55
30 EO 3K N = 110 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
A10 GEUDVERT Marcelle -GEUDVERT Albert : 53,39 %31 EO 1S W+2 -150 18 81.82
32 EO 4P S+2 480 13 59.09
33 EO 3S W = -400 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
Total : 376,4 / 660 = 57,03 %
PAIRE Nr : a10 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy
A11 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 41,05 % 1 EO 3S S+2 460 8 36.36
2 EO 2P E+1 -140 2 9.09
3 EO 2KcE+1 -380 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
A.6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 52,94 % 4 EO 2P W-1 100 18 81.82
5 EO 4T E = -130 13 59.09
6 EO 1S W = -90 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
A.1 COENE Jacqueline -COLINET Eric : 62,29 % 7 EO 3S W+2 -660 16 72.73
8 EO 5CcE-3 500 0 0.00
9 EO 2P E = -110 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
A13 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 51,05 %10 EO 3S N+3 690 7 31.82
11 EO 3S W-1 50 3 13.64
12 EO 3T W+1 -130 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
A.2 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 42,05 %13 EO 2C E+1 -140 16 72.73
14 EO 5P S-2 -100 13 59.09
15 EO 2C W-1 50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A12 DAPHNE Chantal -ROSOUX Louis : 51,95 %16 EO 4P S+1 450 4 18.18
17 EO 3S N+2 460 3 13.64
18 EO 2P W = -110 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.3 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 41,88 %19 EO 2S N+2 180 3 13.64
20 EO 2C W+2 -170 18 81.82
21 EO 3S N = 600 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
A.4 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 54,05 %25 EO 3S E = -600 3.4 15.45
26 EO 4C E-1 100 4.5 20.45
27 EO 4C S = 420 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 40,15 %
A10 GEUDVERT Marcelle -GEUDVERT Albert : 53,39 %28 EO 3S W+2 -460 8.8 40.00
29 EO 1S W+2 -150 12.1 55.00
30 EO 4KcS-3 -500 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 61,52 %
A.5 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,00 %31 EO 1S W+2 -150 18 81.82
32 EO 3S S+3 490 4 18.18
33 EO 3S W+2 -460 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 350,1 / 660 = 53,05 %
PAIRE Nr : a11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
A.6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 52,94 % 1 EO 3S S+1 430 17 77.27
2 EO 4C W+1 -450 19 86.36
3 EO 3P N-2 -100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 80,30 %
A.1 COENE Jacqueline -COLINET Eric : 62,29 % 4 EO 3T N = 110 11 50.00
5 EO 4T E-1 50 2 9.09
6 EO 1S N+2 150 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 21,21 %
A.7 PARMENTIER Richard -SALFI Huguette : 43,42 % 7 EO 3S W+2 -660 16 72.73
8 EO 5PcS-4 -800 20 90.91
9 EO 2K N-1 -50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 78,79 %
A.2 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 42,05 %10 EO 5K N = 600 16 72.73
11 EO 4C E = -420 18 81.82
12 EO 3P S = 140 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 44,47 %13 EO Pass Passe 7 31.82
14 EO 5TcE = -550 21 95.45
15 EO 2T S-1 -100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.3 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 41,88 %16 EO 3S S = 400 22 100.00
17 EO 3S S+1 430 12 54.55
18 EO 2C N+2 170 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A13 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 51,05 %19 EO 2S N = 120 10 45.45
20 EO 2S E+1 -150 11 50.00
21 EO 3S N = 600 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
A.4 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 54,05 %22 EO 3K E+1 -130 13 59.09
23 EO 2S E = -120 10 45.45
24 EO 3S N+3 490 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
A.5 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,00 %28 EO 3S W+4 -520 21.9 99.55
29 EO 1S W+1 -120 3.4 15.45
30 EO 3PcW-2 300 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 40,15 %
A11 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 41,05 %31 EO 1S W-1 50 1 4.55
32 EO 4P S+2 480 13 59.09
33 EO 4C W-1 50 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
Total : 332,5 / 660 = 50,38 %
PAIRE Nr : a12 HALLEUX Jean François -HUBLET Carlo
A12 DAPHNE Chantal -ROSOUX Louis : 51,95 % 1 EO 3S S+3 490 2 9.09
2 EO 4P E+1 -450 19 86.36
3 EO 3P N-2 -100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
A.9 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 61,45 % 4 EO 4C E-2 200 3 13.64
5 EO 1S W+1 -120 6 27.27
6 EO 2C W-1 100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 21,21 %
A.6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 52,94 % 7 EO 3S W = -600 4 18.18
8 EO 5C W-1 50 7 31.82
9 EO 1S S = 90 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
A.3 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 41,88 %10 EO 3S N+3 690 7 31.82
11 EO 4C E = -420 18 81.82
12 EO 3K E = -110 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A11 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 41,05 %13 EO 1ScN-2 -500 22 100.00
14 EO 6P S-3 -150 16 72.73
15 EO 1S N-1 -100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 78,79 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 44,47 %16 EO 3S S+1 430 14 63.64
17 EO 3S S = 400 19 86.36
18 EO 3P W-1 50 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.5 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,00 %19 EO 3S N-2 -100 22 100.00
20 EO 2S E+1 -150 11 50.00
21 EO 3S N+1 630 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
A.2 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 42,05 %22 EO 3S E+2 -660 22 100.00
23 EO 2S E = -120 10 45.45
24 EO 3S S+2 460 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
A.7 PARMENTIER Richard -SALFI Huguette : 43,42 %28 EO 3S E+2 -460 8.8 40.00
29 EO 1S W+1 -120 3.4 15.45
30 EO 5KcS-4 -800 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
A.4 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 54,05 %31 EO 1S W = -90 8 36.36
32 EO 4P S+2 480 13 59.09
33 EO 4C E = -420 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
Total : 352,1 / 660 = 53,35 %
PAIRE Nr : a13 LOUIS Serge -SARTIAU Gilbert
A.5 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,00 % 1 EO 5P S-2 -100 20 90.91
2 EO 2P E+3 -200 8 36.36
3 EO 2P N-1 -50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A13 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 51,05 % 4 EO 3T N = 110 11 50.00
5 EO 2S W = -120 6 27.27
6 EO 2S N-1 -50 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A10 GEUDVERT Marcelle -GEUDVERT Albert : 53,39 % 7 EO 3S W+2 -660 16 72.73
8 EO 5K W = -400 15 68.18
9 EO 1S S+1 120 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
A.7 PARMENTIER Richard -SALFI Huguette : 43,42 %10 EO 3K N+3 170 20 90.91
11 EO 3S W+1 -430 22 100.00
12 EO 1S W+1 -120 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
A.4 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 54,05 %13 EO Pass Passe 7 31.82
14 EO 7PcS-3 -500 18 81.82
15 EO 2C E = -110 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.1 COENE Jacqueline -COLINET Eric : 62,29 %16 EO 3S S+2 460 0 0.00
17 EO 3S N+1 430 12 54.55
18 EO 3C N+1 170 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 21,21 %
A.9 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 61,45 %19 EO 2S N+2 180 3 13.64
20 EO 2S E+1 -150 11 50.00
21 EO 3S N = 600 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
A.6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 52,94 %22 EO 2K E+2 -130 13 59.09
23 EO 1S E+1 -120 10 45.45
24 EO 3S N+4 520 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
A.3 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 41,88 %25 EO 3S W+2 -660 17.5 79.55
26 EO 4C E-1 100 4.5 20.45
27 EO 4C S+1 450 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 44,47 %31 EO 1S W = -90 8 36.36
32 EO 4P S+2 480 13 59.09
33 EO 4C W = -420 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
Total : 334,9 / 660 = 50,74 %
|
|