|
Tournoi du 28-12-09
1 55,19 2 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
2 52,78 8 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean
3 52,22 5 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
4 50,93 9 DACHET Gérard -EVRARD Armand
5 50,00 6 LAENENS René -GODEFROIT Jean-Louis
6 49,26 1 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire
7 48,89 4 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques
8 47,22 7 GEUDVERT Marcelle -GEUDVERT Albert
9 46,85 10 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques
10 46,67 3 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 62,96 12 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand
2 58,33 11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine
3 52,41 20 HUBLET Carlo -SALME Victoria
4 50,37 18 HALLEUX Jean François -de WASSEIGE Claude
~ 50,37 14 STEED Adrian -STALMANS Francine
6 50,00 17 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WARNIER François
7 48,15 15 de TERWANGNE Philippe -MATELART Marc
8 47,59 16 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard
9 40,93 19 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
10 38,89 13 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga
PAIRE Nr : 1 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire
11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 58,33 % 1 NS 4PcS-1 -100 0 0.00
2 NS 3P S-1 -100 14 77.78
3 NS 3P S = 140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
13 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 38,89 % 4 NS 4P W-1 100 15 83.33
5 NS 3S E = -400 13 72.22
6 NS 3S W-1 100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
12 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 62,96 % 7 NS 4C N-2 -200 3 16.67
8 NS 4CcN-2 -300 6 33.33
9 NS 4K E = -130 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
16 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 47,59 %10 NS 2C W = -110 8 44.44
11 NS 2P N-2 -100 3 16.67
12 NS 3P W+1 -170 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
17 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WARNIER François : 50,00 %13 NS 5K E+1 -620 8 44.44
14 NS 5K E = -400 10 55.56
15 NS 4C W+2 -480 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
18 HALLEUX Jean François -de WASSEIGE Claude : 50,37 %16 NS 4C N+1 450 3 16.67
17 NS 4C E-1 50 14 77.78
18 NS 3S S-1 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
19 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 40,93 %19 NS 2K S+1 110 18 100.00
20 NS 4C N = 620 15 83.33
21 NS 3S S+1 630 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
20 HUBLET Carlo -SALME Victoria : 52,41 %22 NS 4P W+1 -650 6 33.33
23 NS 1S E = -90 12 66.67
24 NS 2P E+3 -200 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
14 STEED Adrian -STALMANS Francine : 50,37 %25 NS 1S E+3 -180 0 0.00
26 NS 4P E+1 -650 8 44.44
27 NS 3T E-2 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
15 de TERWANGNE Philippe -MATELART Marc : 48,15 %28 NS 1S E+1 -120 14 77.78
29 NS 5K N-1 -100 6 33.33
30 NS 2P E = -110 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
Total : 266,0 / 540 = 49,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
13 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 38,89 % 1 NS 4C S = 420 18 100.00
2 NS 3PcS = 730 18 100.00
3 NS 2C S+1 140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
12 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 62,96 % 4 NS 4PcW = -790 2 11.11
5 NS 3S E+2 -460 3 16.67
6 NS 3S W+2 -660 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 58,33 % 7 NS 4C N-2 -200 3 16.67
8 NS 4CcN-1 -100 12 66.67
9 NS 3P N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
20 HUBLET Carlo -SALME Victoria : 52,41 %10 NS 2C E = -110 8 44.44
11 NS 4PcE-3 500 18 100.00
12 NS 4PcE-1 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
14 STEED Adrian -STALMANS Francine : 50,37 %13 NS 3K E+3 -170 13 72.22
14 NS 6K E-1 50 15 83.33
15 NS 4C W+1 -450 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
15 de TERWANGNE Philippe -MATELART Marc : 48,15 %16 NS 3S N+3 490 14 77.78
17 NS 2PcS-2 -300 8 44.44
18 NS 3S S-1 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
16 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 47,59 %19 NS 3P N-3 -150 2 11.11
20 NS 1S N+1 120 3 16.67
21 NS 3S S+2 660 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
17 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WARNIER François : 50,00 %22 NS 4P W+1 -650 6 33.33
23 NS 1S E-1 100 17 94.44
24 NS 3CcS-2 -300 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
18 HALLEUX Jean François -de WASSEIGE Claude : 50,37 %25 NS 2S E-1 100 17 94.44
26 NS 4P E+1 -650 8 44.44
27 NS 2K S+1 110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
19 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 40,93 %28 NS 3P W = -140 10 55.56
29 NS 3ScS-3 -800 0 0.00
30 NS 2C W-2 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
Total : 298,0 / 540 = 55,19 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne
12 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 62,96 % 1 NS 3K E-1 50 6 33.33
2 NS 3C E+2 -200 8 44.44
3 NS 4K E-1 100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 58,33 % 4 NS 4T S-3 -300 6 33.33
5 NS 3S E = -400 13 72.22
6 NS 3S E = -600 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
13 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 38,89 % 7 NS 3S N-2 -200 3 16.67
8 NS 4C N-1 -50 14 77.78
9 NS 3P N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
18 HALLEUX Jean François -de WASSEIGE Claude : 50,37 %10 NS 2C E = -110 8 44.44
11 NS 4K N-1 -50 6 33.33
12 NS 4P E = -420 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
19 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 40,93 %13 NS 3K E+3 -170 13 72.22
14 NS 5K E = -400 10 55.56
15 NS 4C E+2 -480 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
20 HUBLET Carlo -SALME Victoria : 52,41 %16 NS 3S N+2 460 8 44.44
17 NS 5C E-1 50 14 77.78
18 NS 3S N-1 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
14 STEED Adrian -STALMANS Francine : 50,37 %19 NS 3T E = -110 6 33.33
20 NS 3S N-1 -100 0 0.00
21 NS 3S N+1 630 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
15 de TERWANGNE Philippe -MATELART Marc : 48,15 %22 NS 4P E+1 -650 6 33.33
23 NS 1S E+1 -120 6 33.33
24 NS 4K E+1 -150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
16 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 47,59 %25 NS 2P E = -110 11 61.11
26 NS 4P E+1 -650 8 44.44
27 NS 2P S = 110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
17 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WARNIER François : 50,00 %28 NS 2S E+2 -180 6 33.33
29 NS 3K N+2 150 12 66.67
30 NS 2C E+1 -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 252,0 / 540 = 46,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques
17 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WARNIER François : 50,00 % 1 NS 3K E-1 50 6 33.33
2 NS 3C E+2 -200 8 44.44
3 NS 4P S = 420 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
16 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 47,59 % 4 NS 4P W = -620 4 22.22
5 NS 6S E-3 150 18 100.00
6 NS 3S W-1 100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
15 de TERWANGNE Philippe -MATELART Marc : 48,15 % 7 NS 2C N+1 140 16 88.89
8 NS 2C E-4 200 16 88.89
9 NS 4PcN-2 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
14 STEED Adrian -STALMANS Francine : 50,37 %10 NS 2C W-1 100 17 94.44
11 NS 3ScS-2 -300 0 0.00
12 NS 3P W+1 -170 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
20 HUBLET Carlo -SALME Victoria : 52,41 %13 NS 3S E+2 -660 5 27.78
14 NS 3S W+1 -430 2 11.11
15 NS 4C W+2 -480 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
19 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 40,93 %16 NS 4C N+1 450 3 16.67
17 NS 4C E = -420 5 27.78
18 NS 1S S+1 120 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
18 HALLEUX Jean François -de WASSEIGE Claude : 50,37 %19 NS 2C E = -110 6 33.33
20 NS 4C N+1 650 18 100.00
21 NS 3S S = 600 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
13 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 38,89 %22 NS 4P W+1 -650 6 33.33
23 NS 1S E+1 -120 6 33.33
24 NS 2K W+1 -110 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
12 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 62,96 %25 NS 2P W = -110 11 61.11
26 NS 4P E+1 -650 8 44.44
27 NS 2K S+1 110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 58,33 %28 NS 4P W = -420 3 16.67
29 NS 3C E-1 100 9 50.00
30 NS 4C W = -420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
Total : 264,0 / 540 = 48,89 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
18 HALLEUX Jean François -de WASSEIGE Claude : 50,37 % 1 NS 4P S-1 -50 2 11.11
2 NS 4C E = -420 2 11.11
3 NS 3C S = 140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
17 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WARNIER François : 50,00 % 4 NS 3T S-2 -200 8 44.44
5 NS 6S E-2 100 16 88.89
6 NS 3S W+1 -630 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
16 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 47,59 % 7 NS 2C N = 110 12 66.67
8 NS 4CcN = 590 18 100.00
9 NS 3P N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 58,33 %10 NS 2C W = -110 8 44.44
11 NS 3P N-2 -100 3 16.67
12 NS 5TcS-2 -500 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
15 de TERWANGNE Philippe -MATELART Marc : 48,15 %13 NS 3S E+3 -690 1 5.56
14 NS 3CcS = 530 18 100.00
15 NS 6C W = -980 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
14 STEED Adrian -STALMANS Francine : 50,37 %16 NS 3S N+4 520 18 100.00
17 NS 5C E-2 100 18 100.00
18 NS 3S N-1 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
20 HUBLET Carlo -SALME Victoria : 52,41 %19 NS 3T W-1 100 15 83.33
20 NS 1S N+1 120 3 16.67
21 NS 3S S = 600 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
19 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 40,93 %22 NS 6P W-1 100 16 88.89
23 NS 1S E-1 100 17 94.44
24 NS 3P E+1 -170 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
13 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 38,89 %25 NS 2S E-1 100 17 94.44
26 NS 5P E = -650 8 44.44
27 NS 3T E-2 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
12 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 62,96 %28 NS 3P E+1 -170 8 44.44
29 NS 5K N = 600 18 100.00
30 NS 2C N+2 -170 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 282,0 / 540 = 52,22 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 LAENENS René -GODEFROIT Jean-Louis
19 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 40,93 % 1 NS 3P S+2 200 16 88.89
2 NS 4C E-2 100 16 88.89
3 NS 3C S = 140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
18 HALLEUX Jean François -de WASSEIGE Claude : 50,37 % 4 NS 4P W-1 100 15 83.33
5 NS 3S E+1 -430 8 44.44
6 NS 3S W = -600 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
17 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WARNIER François : 50,00 % 7 NS 4C N-2 -200 3 16.67
8 NS 4CcN-2 -300 6 33.33
9 NS 4C W-1 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
12 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 62,96 %10 NS 2C W = -110 8 44.44
11 NS 3C W-2 100 9 50.00
12 NS 4PcW = -590 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 58,33 %13 NS 3S E+2 -660 5 27.78
14 NS 3S W+2 -460 0 0.00
15 NS 5C W+1 -480 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
16 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 47,59 %16 NS 3S S+3 490 14 77.78
17 NS 4C E-1 50 14 77.78
18 NS 3S N+2 660 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
15 de TERWANGNE Philippe -MATELART Marc : 48,15 %19 NS 3T W = -110 6 33.33
20 NS 2C N+1 140 7 38.89
21 NS 3S S+2 660 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
14 STEED Adrian -STALMANS Francine : 50,37 %22 NS 4P W+1 -650 6 33.33
23 NS 1S E+2 -150 1 5.56
24 NS 4P E+3 -510 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
20 HUBLET Carlo -SALME Victoria : 52,41 %25 NS 2P W+1 -140 2 11.11
26 NS 4P W = -620 18 100.00
27 NS 2K S+1 110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
13 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 38,89 %28 NS 4P E+1 -450 0 0.00
29 NS 3CcE-1 200 15 83.33
30 NS 2C W = -110 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 270,0 / 540 = 50,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 GEUDVERT Marcelle -GEUDVERT Albert
20 HUBLET Carlo -SALME Victoria : 52,41 % 1 NS 2C S+2 170 12 66.67
2 NS 4PcS-1 -200 8 44.44
3 NS 2P S+1 140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
19 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 40,93 % 4 NS 5TcS-3 -800 0 0.00
5 NS 4P W+1 -450 6 33.33
6 NS 3S W = -600 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
18 HALLEUX Jean François -de WASSEIGE Claude : 50,37 % 7 NS 4C N-1 -100 9 50.00
8 NS 4CcS-2 -300 6 33.33
9 NS 3C W+1 -170 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
13 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 38,89 %10 NS 2C W = -110 8 44.44
11 NS 3S S+1 430 16 88.89
12 NS 3S S = 600 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
12 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 62,96 %13 NS 3S W+3 -690 1 5.56
14 NS 4P W = -420 5 27.78
15 NS 4C W+2 -480 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 58,33 %16 NS 3S S+2 460 8 44.44
17 NS 2P S-2 -100 10 55.56
18 NS 3S S+2 660 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
17 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WARNIER François : 50,00 %19 NS 3K S-2 -100 10 55.56
20 NS 2C N+2 170 12 66.67
21 NS 3S S = 600 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
16 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 47,59 %22 NS 4P W+1 -650 6 33.33
23 NS 1S E+2 -150 1 5.56
24 NS 3P W+1 -170 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
15 de TERWANGNE Philippe -MATELART Marc : 48,15 %25 NS 2S E = -120 5 27.78
26 NS 4P E+1 -650 8 44.44
27 NS 1S S+1 120 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
14 STEED Adrian -STALMANS Francine : 50,37 %28 NS 1S E = -90 18 100.00
29 NS 2C E = -110 4 22.22
30 NS 2C W+2 -170 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
Total : 255,0 / 540 = 47,22 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean
14 STEED Adrian -STALMANS Francine : 50,37 % 1 NS 3P S+1 170 12 66.67
2 NS 3C E+1 -170 12 66.67
3 NS 2C S+1 140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
20 HUBLET Carlo -SALME Victoria : 52,41 % 4 NS 2P W+1 -140 10 55.56
5 NS 3S E+2 -460 3 16.67
6 NS 3S W = -600 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
19 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 40,93 % 7 NS 4C N-1 -100 9 50.00
8 NS 3P E+1 -170 10 55.56
9 NS 4CcW-1 200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
15 de TERWANGNE Philippe -MATELART Marc : 48,15 %10 NS 2C W = -110 8 44.44
11 NS 3K S = 110 12 66.67
12 NS 3C W = -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
13 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 38,89 %13 NS 3K E+3 -170 13 72.22
14 NS 5K E = -400 10 55.56
15 NS 4C W+2 -480 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
12 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 62,96 %16 NS 3S S+2 460 8 44.44
17 NS 3S W+2 -460 1 5.56
18 NS 3S S-1 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 58,33 %19 NS 4KcS-4 -800 0 0.00
20 NS 1S N+2 150 10 55.56
21 NS 3S N+1 630 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
18 HALLEUX Jean François -de WASSEIGE Claude : 50,37 %22 NS 4P W+1 -650 6 33.33
23 NS 1S E = -90 12 66.67
24 NS 4K W = -130 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
17 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WARNIER François : 50,00 %25 NS 1P W+1 -110 11 61.11
26 NS 4P E+1 -650 8 44.44
27 NS 1S N+1 120 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
16 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 47,59 %28 NS 1S E+1 -120 14 77.78
29 NS 3S S-3 -300 2 11.11
30 NS 2C W+2 -170 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 285,0 / 540 = 52,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 DACHET Gérard -EVRARD Armand
15 de TERWANGNE Philippe -MATELART Marc : 48,15 % 1 NS 3C S+1 170 12 66.67
2 NS 4C E = -420 2 11.11
3 NS 3C S = 140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
14 STEED Adrian -STALMANS Francine : 50,37 % 4 NS 4P W-1 100 15 83.33
5 NS 4P W = -420 10 55.56
6 NS 4P E+1 -650 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
20 HUBLET Carlo -SALME Victoria : 52,41 % 7 NS 2C N+1 140 16 88.89
8 NS 5T E = -400 2 11.11
9 NS 4K E+1 -150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
17 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WARNIER François : 50,00 %10 NS 3P S-4 -400 0 0.00
11 NS 2P W-2 100 9 50.00
12 NS 4T S = 130 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
16 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 47,59 %13 NS 3K E+2 -150 18 100.00
14 NS 3S W-1 50 15 83.33
15 NS 4C W+2 -480 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
13 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 38,89 %16 NS 3S N+3 490 14 77.78
17 NS 4C E = -420 5 27.78
18 NS 3S S-1 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
12 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 62,96 %19 NS 3T W-1 100 15 83.33
20 NS 2C N+1 140 7 38.89
21 NS 3S N = 600 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 58,33 %22 NS 6P W-1 100 16 88.89
23 NS 1S E = -90 12 66.67
24 NS 2P E+3 -200 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
19 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 40,93 %25 NS 2S E = -120 5 27.78
26 NS 4P E+1 -650 8 44.44
27 NS 2K S+1 110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
18 HALLEUX Jean François -de WASSEIGE Claude : 50,37 %28 NS 1S E+1 -120 14 77.78
29 NS 3C E-1 100 9 50.00
30 NS 3C W+1 -170 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 275,0 / 540 = 50,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques
16 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 47,59 % 1 NS 3K E-1 50 6 33.33
2 NS 4C E = -420 2 11.11
3 NS 4T W-1 100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
15 de TERWANGNE Philippe -MATELART Marc : 48,15 % 4 NS 4P -1 100 15 83.33
5 NS 6C E = -980 0 0.00
6 NS 3S W = -600 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
14 STEED Adrian -STALMANS Francine : 50,37 % 7 NS 2C N+1 140 16 88.89
8 NS 5T E+2 -440 0 0.00
9 NS 5K E-1 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
19 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 40,93 %10 NS 3C W-1 100 17 94.44
11 NS 1S S+2 150 14 77.78
12 NS 5TcS-2 -500 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
18 HALLEUX Jean François -de WASSEIGE Claude : 50,37 %13 NS 3K E+3 -170 13 72.22
14 NS 4P W = -420 5 27.78
15 NS 4C W+1 -450 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
17 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WARNIER François : 50,00 %16 NS 5K S+1 420 0 0.00
17 NS 3S W+2 -460 1 5.56
18 NS 3S N+2 660 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
13 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 38,89 %19 NS 2K S = 90 12 66.67
20 NS 4C N = 620 15 83.33
21 NS 2S N-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
12 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 62,96 %22 NS 6P W-1 100 16 88.89
23 NS 1S E+1 -120 6 33.33
24 NS 2P E+2 -170 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 58,33 %25 NS 2P W = -110 11 61.11
26 NS 4P E+1 -650 8 44.44
27 NS 1S N-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
20 HUBLET Carlo -SALME Victoria : 52,41 %28 NS 4P W = -420 3 16.67
29 NS 4C E-2 200 15 83.33
30 NS 2C W+2 -170 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 253,0 / 540 = 46,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine
1 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 49,26 % 1 EO 4PcS-1 -100 18 100.00
2 EO 3P S-1 -100 4 22.22
3 EO 3P S = 140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
3 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 46,67 % 4 EO 4T S-3 -300 12 66.67
5 EO 3S E = -400 5 27.78
6 EO 3S E = -600 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 55,19 % 7 EO 4C N-2 -200 15 83.33
8 EO 4CcN-1 -100 6 33.33
9 EO 3P N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
5 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,22 %10 EO 2C W = -110 10 55.56
11 EO 3P N-2 -100 15 83.33
12 EO 5TcS-2 -500 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
6 LAENENS René -GODEFROIT Jean-Louis : 50,00 %13 EO 3S E+2 -660 13 72.22
14 EO 3S W+2 -460 18 100.00
15 EO 5C W+1 -480 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
7 GEUDVERT Marcelle -GEUDVERT Albert : 47,22 %16 EO 3S S+2 460 10 55.56
17 EO 2P S-2 -100 8 44.44
18 EO 3S S+2 660 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
8 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 52,78 %19 EO 4KcS-4 -800 18 100.00
20 EO 1S N+2 150 8 44.44
21 EO 3S N+1 630 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
9 DACHET Gérard -EVRARD Armand : 50,93 %22 EO 6P W-1 100 2 11.11
23 EO 1S E = -90 6 33.33
24 EO 2P E+3 -200 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
10 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,85 %25 EO 2P W = -110 7 38.89
26 EO 4P E+1 -650 10 55.56
27 EO 1S N-1 -50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
4 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 48,89 %28 EO 4P W = -420 15 83.33
29 EO 3C E-1 100 9 50.00
30 EO 4C W = -420 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
Total : 315,0 / 540 = 58,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand
3 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 46,67 % 1 EO 3K E-1 50 12 66.67
2 EO 3C E+2 -200 10 55.56
3 EO 4K E-1 100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 55,19 % 4 EO 4PcW = -790 16 88.89
5 EO 3S E+2 -460 15 83.33
6 EO 3S W+2 -660 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
1 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 49,26 % 7 EO 4C N-2 -200 15 83.33
8 EO 4CcN-2 -300 12 66.67
9 EO 4K E = -130 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
6 LAENENS René -GODEFROIT Jean-Louis : 50,00 %10 EO 2C W = -110 10 55.56
11 EO 3C W-2 100 9 50.00
12 EO 4PcW = -590 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
7 GEUDVERT Marcelle -GEUDVERT Albert : 47,22 %13 EO 3S W+3 -690 17 94.44
14 EO 4P W = -420 13 72.22
15 EO 4C W+2 -480 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
8 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 52,78 %16 EO 3S S+2 460 10 55.56
17 EO 3S W+2 -460 17 94.44
18 EO 3S S-1 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
9 DACHET Gérard -EVRARD Armand : 50,93 %19 EO 3T W-1 100 3 16.67
20 EO 2C N+1 140 11 61.11
21 EO 3S N = 600 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
10 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,85 %22 EO 6P W-1 100 2 11.11
23 EO 1S E+1 -120 12 66.67
24 EO 2P E+2 -170 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
4 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 48,89 %25 EO 2P W = -110 7 38.89
26 EO 4P E+1 -650 10 55.56
27 EO 2K S+1 110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
5 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,22 %28 EO 3P E+1 -170 10 55.56
29 EO 5K N = 600 0 0.00
30 EO 2C N+2 -170 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 340,0 / 540 = 62,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga
2 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 55,19 % 1 EO 4C S = 420 0 0.00
2 EO 3PcS = 730 0 0.00
3 EO 2C S+1 140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
1 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 49,26 % 4 EO 4P W-1 100 3 16.67
5 EO 3S E = -400 5 27.78
6 EO 3S W-1 100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
3 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 46,67 % 7 EO 3S N-2 -200 15 83.33
8 EO 4C N-1 -50 4 22.22
9 EO 3P N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
7 GEUDVERT Marcelle -GEUDVERT Albert : 47,22 %10 EO 2C W = -110 10 55.56
11 EO 3S S+1 430 2 11.11
12 EO 3S S = 600 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
8 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 52,78 %13 EO 3K E+3 -170 5 27.78
14 EO 5K E = -400 8 44.44
15 EO 4C W+2 -480 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
9 DACHET Gérard -EVRARD Armand : 50,93 %16 EO 3S N+3 490 4 22.22
17 EO 4C E = -420 13 72.22
18 EO 3S S-1 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
10 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,85 %19 EO 2K S = 90 6 33.33
20 EO 4C N = 620 3 16.67
21 EO 2S N-1 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
4 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 48,89 %22 EO 4P W+1 -650 12 66.67
23 EO 1S E+1 -120 12 66.67
24 EO 2K W+1 -110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
5 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,22 %25 EO 2S E-1 100 1 5.56
26 EO 5P E = -650 10 55.56
27 EO 3T E-2 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
6 LAENENS René -GODEFROIT Jean-Louis : 50,00 %28 EO 4P E+1 -450 18 100.00
29 EO 3CcE-1 200 3 16.67
30 EO 2C W = -110 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 210,0 / 540 = 38,89 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 STEED Adrian -STALMANS Francine
8 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 52,78 % 1 EO 3P S+1 170 6 33.33
2 EO 3C E+1 -170 6 33.33
3 EO 2C S+1 140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
9 DACHET Gérard -EVRARD Armand : 50,93 % 4 EO 4P W-1 100 3 16.67
5 EO 4P W = -420 8 44.44
6 EO 4P E+1 -650 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
10 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,85 % 7 EO 2C N+1 140 2 11.11
8 EO 5T E+2 -440 18 100.00
9 EO 5K E-1 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
4 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 48,89 %10 EO 2C W-1 100 1 5.56
11 EO 3ScS-2 -300 18 100.00
12 EO 3P W+1 -170 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 55,19 %13 EO 3K E+3 -170 5 27.78
14 EO 6K E-1 50 3 16.67
15 EO 4C W+1 -450 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
5 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,22 %16 EO 3S N+4 520 0 0.00
17 EO 5C E-2 100 0 0.00
18 EO 3S N-1 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
3 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 46,67 %19 EO 3T E = -110 12 66.67
20 EO 3S N-1 -100 18 100.00
21 EO 3S N+1 630 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
6 LAENENS René -GODEFROIT Jean-Louis : 50,00 %22 EO 4P W+1 -650 12 66.67
23 EO 1S E+2 -150 17 94.44
24 EO 4P E+3 -510 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
1 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 49,26 %25 EO 1S E+3 -180 18 100.00
26 EO 4P E+1 -650 10 55.56
27 EO 3T E-2 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
7 GEUDVERT Marcelle -GEUDVERT Albert : 47,22 %28 EO 1S E = -90 0 0.00
29 EO 2C E = -110 14 77.78
30 EO 2C W+2 -170 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
Total : 272,0 / 540 = 50,37 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 de TERWANGNE Philippe -MATELART Marc
9 DACHET Gérard -EVRARD Armand : 50,93 % 1 EO 3C S+1 170 6 33.33
2 EO 4C E = -420 16 88.89
3 EO 3C S = 140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
10 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,85 % 4 EO 4P -1 100 3 16.67
5 EO 6C E = -980 18 100.00
6 EO 3S W = -600 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
4 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 48,89 % 7 EO 2C N+1 140 2 11.11
8 EO 2C E-4 200 2 11.11
9 EO 4PcN-2 -300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
8 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 52,78 %10 EO 2C W = -110 10 55.56
11 EO 3K S = 110 6 33.33
12 EO 3C W = -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
5 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,22 %13 EO 3S E+3 -690 17 94.44
14 EO 3CcS = 530 0 0.00
15 EO 6C W = -980 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 55,19 %16 EO 3S N+3 490 4 22.22
17 EO 2PcS-2 -300 10 55.56
18 EO 3S S-1 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
6 LAENENS René -GODEFROIT Jean-Louis : 50,00 %19 EO 3T W = -110 12 66.67
20 EO 2C N+1 140 11 61.11
21 EO 3S S+2 660 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
3 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 46,67 %22 EO 4P E+1 -650 12 66.67
23 EO 1S E+1 -120 12 66.67
24 EO 4K E+1 -150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
7 GEUDVERT Marcelle -GEUDVERT Albert : 47,22 %25 EO 2S E = -120 13 72.22
26 EO 4P E+1 -650 10 55.56
27 EO 1S S+1 120 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
1 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 49,26 %28 EO 1S E+1 -120 4 22.22
29 EO 5K N-1 -100 12 66.67
30 EO 2P E = -110 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
Total : 260,0 / 540 = 48,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard
10 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,85 % 1 EO 3K E-1 50 12 66.67
2 EO 4C E = -420 16 88.89
3 EO 4T W-1 100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
4 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 48,89 % 4 EO 4P W = -620 14 77.78
5 EO 6S E-3 150 0 0.00
6 EO 3S W-1 100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
5 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,22 % 7 EO 2C N = 110 6 33.33
8 EO 4CcN = 590 0 0.00
9 EO 3P N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
1 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 49,26 %10 EO 2C W = -110 10 55.56
11 EO 2P N-2 -100 15 83.33
12 EO 3P W+1 -170 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
9 DACHET Gérard -EVRARD Armand : 50,93 %13 EO 3K E+2 -150 0 0.00
14 EO 3S W-1 50 3 16.67
15 EO 4C W+2 -480 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
6 LAENENS René -GODEFROIT Jean-Louis : 50,00 %16 EO 3S S+3 490 4 22.22
17 EO 4C E-1 50 4 22.22
18 EO 3S N+2 660 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 55,19 %19 EO 3P N-3 -150 16 88.89
20 EO 1S N+1 120 15 83.33
21 EO 3S S+2 660 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
7 GEUDVERT Marcelle -GEUDVERT Albert : 47,22 %22 EO 4P W+1 -650 12 66.67
23 EO 1S E+2 -150 17 94.44
24 EO 3P W+1 -170 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
3 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 46,67 %25 EO 2P E = -110 7 38.89
26 EO 4P E+1 -650 10 55.56
27 EO 2P S = 110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
8 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 52,78 %28 EO 1S E+1 -120 4 22.22
29 EO 3S S-3 -300 16 88.89
30 EO 2C W+2 -170 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 257,0 / 540 = 47,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WARNIER François
4 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 48,89 % 1 EO 3K E-1 50 12 66.67
2 EO 3C E+2 -200 10 55.56
3 EO 4P S = 420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
5 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,22 % 4 EO 3T S-2 -200 10 55.56
5 EO 6S E-2 100 2 11.11
6 EO 3S W+1 -630 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
6 LAENENS René -GODEFROIT Jean-Louis : 50,00 % 7 EO 4C N-2 -200 15 83.33
8 EO 4CcN-2 -300 12 66.67
9 EO 4C W-1 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
9 DACHET Gérard -EVRARD Armand : 50,93 %10 EO 3P S-4 -400 18 100.00
11 EO 2P W-2 100 9 50.00
12 EO 4T S = 130 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
1 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 49,26 %13 EO 5K E+1 -620 10 55.56
14 EO 5K E = -400 8 44.44
15 EO 4C W+2 -480 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
10 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,85 %16 EO 5K S+1 420 18 100.00
17 EO 3S W+2 -460 17 94.44
18 EO 3S N+2 660 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
7 GEUDVERT Marcelle -GEUDVERT Albert : 47,22 %19 EO 3K S-2 -100 8 44.44
20 EO 2C N+2 170 6 33.33
21 EO 3S S = 600 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 55,19 %22 EO 4P W+1 -650 12 66.67
23 EO 1S E-1 100 1 5.56
24 EO 3CcS-2 -300 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
8 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 52,78 %25 EO 1P W+1 -110 7 38.89
26 EO 4P E+1 -650 10 55.56
27 EO 1S N+1 120 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
3 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 46,67 %28 EO 2S E+2 -180 12 66.67
29 EO 3K N+2 150 6 33.33
30 EO 2C E+1 -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 270,0 / 540 = 50,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 HALLEUX Jean François -de WASSEIGE Claude
5 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,22 % 1 EO 4P S-1 -50 16 88.89
2 EO 4C E = -420 16 88.89
3 EO 3C S = 140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
6 LAENENS René -GODEFROIT Jean-Louis : 50,00 % 4 EO 4P W-1 100 3 16.67
5 EO 3S E+1 -430 10 55.56
6 EO 3S W = -600 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
7 GEUDVERT Marcelle -GEUDVERT Albert : 47,22 % 7 EO 4C N-1 -100 9 50.00
8 EO 4CcS-2 -300 12 66.67
9 EO 3C W+1 -170 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
3 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 46,67 %10 EO 2C E = -110 10 55.56
11 EO 4K N-1 -50 12 66.67
12 EO 4P E = -420 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
10 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,85 %13 EO 3K E+3 -170 5 27.78
14 EO 4P W = -420 13 72.22
15 EO 4C W+1 -450 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
1 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 49,26 %16 EO 4C N+1 450 15 83.33
17 EO 4C E-1 50 4 22.22
18 EO 3S S-1 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
4 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 48,89 %19 EO 2C E = -110 12 66.67
20 EO 4C N+1 650 0 0.00
21 EO 3S S = 600 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
8 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 52,78 %22 EO 4P W+1 -650 12 66.67
23 EO 1S E = -90 6 33.33
24 EO 4K W = -130 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 55,19 %25 EO 2S E-1 100 1 5.56
26 EO 4P E+1 -650 10 55.56
27 EO 2K S+1 110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
9 DACHET Gérard -EVRARD Armand : 50,93 %28 EO 1S E+1 -120 4 22.22
29 EO 3C E-1 100 9 50.00
30 EO 3C W+1 -170 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 272,0 / 540 = 50,37 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
6 LAENENS René -GODEFROIT Jean-Louis : 50,00 % 1 EO 3P S+2 200 2 11.11
2 EO 4C E-2 100 2 11.11
3 EO 3C S = 140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
7 GEUDVERT Marcelle -GEUDVERT Albert : 47,22 % 4 EO 5TcS-3 -800 18 100.00
5 EO 4P W+1 -450 12 66.67
6 EO 3S W = -600 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
8 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 52,78 % 7 EO 4C N-1 -100 9 50.00
8 EO 3P E+1 -170 8 44.44
9 EO 4CcW-1 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
10 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,85 %10 EO 3C W-1 100 1 5.56
11 EO 1S S+2 150 4 22.22
12 EO 5TcS-2 -500 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
3 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 46,67 %13 EO 3K E+3 -170 5 27.78
14 EO 5K E = -400 8 44.44
15 EO 4C E+2 -480 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
4 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 48,89 %16 EO 4C N+1 450 15 83.33
17 EO 4C E = -420 13 72.22
18 EO 1S S+1 120 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
1 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 49,26 %19 EO 2K S+1 110 0 0.00
20 EO 4C N = 620 3 16.67
21 EO 3S S+1 630 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
5 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,22 %22 EO 6P W-1 100 2 11.11
23 EO 1S E-1 100 1 5.56
24 EO 3P E+1 -170 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
9 DACHET Gérard -EVRARD Armand : 50,93 %25 EO 2S E = -120 13 72.22
26 EO 4P E+1 -650 10 55.56
27 EO 2K S+1 110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 55,19 %28 EO 3P W = -140 8 44.44
29 EO 3ScS-3 -800 18 100.00
30 EO 2C W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
Total : 221,0 / 540 = 40,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 HUBLET Carlo -SALME Victoria
7 GEUDVERT Marcelle -GEUDVERT Albert : 47,22 % 1 EO 2C S+2 170 6 33.33
2 EO 4PcS-1 -200 10 55.56
3 EO 2P S+1 140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
8 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 52,78 % 4 EO 2P W+1 -140 8 44.44
5 EO 3S E+2 -460 15 83.33
6 EO 3S W = -600 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
9 DACHET Gérard -EVRARD Armand : 50,93 % 7 EO 2C N+1 140 2 11.11
8 EO 5T E = -400 16 88.89
9 EO 4K E+1 -150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 55,19 %10 EO 2C E = -110 10 55.56
11 EO 4PcE-3 500 0 0.00
12 EO 4PcE-1 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
4 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 48,89 %13 EO 3S E+2 -660 13 72.22
14 EO 3S W+1 -430 16 88.89
15 EO 4C W+2 -480 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
3 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 46,67 %16 EO 3S N+2 460 10 55.56
17 EO 5C E-1 50 4 22.22
18 EO 3S N-1 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
5 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,22 %19 EO 3T W-1 100 3 16.67
20 EO 1S N+1 120 15 83.33
21 EO 3S S = 600 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
1 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 49,26 %22 EO 4P W+1 -650 12 66.67
23 EO 1S E = -90 6 33.33
24 EO 2P E+3 -200 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
6 LAENENS René -GODEFROIT Jean-Louis : 50,00 %25 EO 2P W+1 -140 16 88.89
26 EO 4P W = -620 0 0.00
27 EO 2K S+1 110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
10 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,85 %28 EO 4P W = -420 15 83.33
29 EO 4C E-2 200 3 16.67
30 EO 2C W+2 -170 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 283,0 / 540 = 52,41 %
|
|