|
Tournoi du 29-06-09
Duplicate du Lu 29 juin 2009
1 57,99 1 DEWART Léon -MATELART Marc
2 55,65 8 COLLIN Jean-Marie -EVRARD Armand
3 54,96 3 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile
4 54,27 11 KINET Martine -REGNIER Franz
5 52,07 12 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
6 50,96 4 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
7 49,45 6 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte
8 49,17 7 BOUVY Claire -VANDERBISSE Julia
9 45,87 5 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette
10 43,66 10 ANEZO Nathalie -MUSPRATT Jean-Marc
11 43,11 9 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse
12 42,84 2 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques
13 0,00 13 -
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 55,15 18 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean
2 53,94 24 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard
3 53,18 14 CASSART Guy -FRAITURE Louis
4 51,52 23 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
5 51,21 16 POULAERT Gilbert -ROGIERS Marga
~ 51,21 21 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
7 51,06 17 COURTOIS Serge -ADAMANTIADIS
8 49,39 19 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine
9 49,09 22 MOSSERAY Bernadette -LAENENS René
10 49,04 15 GOFFINET Marcel -WARNIER François
11 48,48 20 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon
12 46,28 25 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François
13 40,91 26 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques
PAIRE Nr : 1 DEWART Léon -MATELART Marc
14 CASSART Guy -FRAITURE Louis : 53,18 % 1 NS 3S E-3 150 20 90.91
2 NS 5K S+2 640 18 81.82
3 NS 6S S = 990 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
24 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,94 % 4 NS 4P N+1 650 17 77.27
5 NS 2C N-1 -100 11 50.00
6 NS 4P E-1 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
23 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,52 % 7 NS 4C W-1 100 15 68.18
8 NS 5T N-2 -100 4 18.18
9 NS 2P S = 110 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
22 MOSSERAY Bernadette -LAENENS René : 49,09 %10 NS 3C W-1 100 7 31.82
11 NS 3S E+2 -460 10 45.45
12 NS 2P E+1 -140 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
21 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,21 %13 NS 4P N+3 710 20 90.91
14 NS 3S E-1 50 9 40.91
15 NS 3S S+2 660 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 75,76 %
26 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,91 %16 NS 2P N-1 -50 8 36.36
17 NS 7TcS-3 -500 2 9.09
18 NS 1S S+1 120 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
19 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 49,39 %19 NS 4C S+2 480 11 50.00
20 NS 4C N+1 650 16 72.73
21 NS 3S E+1 -430 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
18 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 55,15 %22 NS 6S E-2 200 21 95.45
23 NS 1S N+1 120 12 54.55
24 NS 3S W = -400 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
17 COURTOIS Serge -ADAMANTIADIS : 51,06 %25 NS 3C W = -140 4 18.18
26 NS 1S S = 90 13 59.09
27 NS 4C E = -420 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
16 POULAERT Gilbert -ROGIERS Marga : 51,21 %28 NS 3C W = -140 14 63.64
29 NS 2C N = 110 21 95.45
30 NS 2T W+2 -130 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
15 GOFFINET Marcel -WARNIER François : 49,04 %31 NS 5P S+1 680 12 54.55
32 NS 4P S-2 -100 0 0.00
33 NS 3S S+1 430 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
Total : 421,0 / 726 = 57,99 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques
16 POULAERT Gilbert -ROGIERS Marga : 51,21 % 1 NS 3S E-1 50 12 54.55
2 NS 5P E-2 100 6 27.27
3 NS 6C N = 980 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
15 GOFFINET Marcel -WARNIER François : 49,04 % 4 NS 4C N = 620 12 54.55
5 NS 2P W+2 -170 4 18.18
6 NS 1S W = -90 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
14 CASSART Guy -FRAITURE Louis : 53,18 % 7 NS 3K W-2 200 20 90.91
8 NS 3T N = 110 18 81.82
9 NS 3T W = -110 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
24 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,94 %10 NS 3S S-1 -100 4 18.18
11 NS 3S E+3 -490 2 9.09
12 NS 4P E-1 50 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
23 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,52 %13 NS 4P N+3 710 20 90.91
14 NS 3S W+1 -430 0 0.00
15 NS 3S S+2 660 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
22 MOSSERAY Bernadette -LAENENS René : 49,09 %16 NS 4T S-1 -50 8 36.36
17 NS 5P E+1 -480 7 31.82
18 NS 2K N = 90 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
21 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,21 %19 NS 4C S+2 480 11 50.00
20 NS 5C N-1 -100 1 4.55
21 NS 3S E+1 -430 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
25 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 46,28 %22 NS 3S W+2 -660 3 13.64
23 NS 3K W+1 -130 2 9.09
24 NS 3S W = -400 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
19 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 49,39 %25 NS 2C W = -110 7 31.82
26 NS 1S S-1 -100 5 22.73
27 NS 3TcS-2 -300 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
18 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 55,15 %28 NS 2TcS = 180 22 100.00
29 NS 3K W = -110 9 40.91
30 NS 4C E = -420 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
17 COURTOIS Serge -ADAMANTIADIS : 51,06 %31 NS 4CcS+1 990 18 81.82
32 NS 3S S = 400 3 13.64
33 NS 3S S = 400 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
Total : 311,0 / 726 = 42,84 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile
18 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 55,15 % 1 NS 3S E = -400 2 9.09
2 NS 5PcE-2 300 12 54.55
3 NS 4C N+3 510 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
17 COURTOIS Serge -ADAMANTIADIS : 51,06 % 4 NS 4P N-1 -100 3 13.64
5 NS 2P E = -110 8 36.36
6 NS 4P E-1 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
16 POULAERT Gilbert -ROGIERS Marga : 51,21 % 7 NS 2P N-1 -100 9 40.91
8 NS 3C E-1 50 12 54.55
9 NS 2P N-1 -50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
25 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 46,28 %10 NS 4C E-2 200 16 72.73
11 NS 4P E+1 -450 17 77.27
12 NS 2P E+1 -140 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
14 CASSART Guy -FRAITURE Louis : 53,18 %13 NS 4P N+3 710 20 90.91
14 NS 3S E-1 50 9 40.91
15 NS 5TcN-1 -200 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
24 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,94 %16 NS 4CcE-2 500 17 77.27
17 NS 5P E = -450 11 50.00
18 NS 2C E-2 100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
23 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,52 %19 NS 4C N+2 480 11 50.00
20 NS 5CcN = 850 22 100.00
21 NS 3S E+1 -430 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
22 MOSSERAY Bernadette -LAENENS René : 49,09 %22 NS 3S E = -600 16 72.73
23 NS 2C E-2 200 19 86.36
24 NS 3S E = -400 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 75,76 %
26 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,91 %25 NS 1S N = 90 19 86.36
26 NS 1S N = 90 13 59.09
27 NS 3S N-3 -150 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 78,79 %
20 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 48,48 %28 NS 2C E+2 -170 8 36.36
29 NS 3K E+1 -130 2 9.09
30 NS 6C E-4 200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
19 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 49,39 %31 NS 5P N+1 680 12 54.55
32 NS 3S N+2 460 13 59.09
33 NS 3S N = 400 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
Total : 399,0 / 726 = 54,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
20 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 48,48 % 1 NS 3S E = -400 2 9.09
2 NS 5KcN+2 1150 22 100.00
3 NS 6C N = 980 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
19 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 49,39 % 4 NS 4P N+1 650 17 77.27
5 NS 2C N-1 -100 11 50.00
6 NS 4P E-1 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
18 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 55,15 % 7 NS 2P N = 110 18 81.82
8 NS 3C E-1 50 12 54.55
9 NS 2T E = -90 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
17 COURTOIS Serge -ADAMANTIADIS : 51,06 %10 NS 2S E-4 400 20 90.91
11 NS 3S E+2 -460 10 45.45
12 NS 2P E = -110 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
26 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,91 %13 NS 4P N+2 680 12 54.55
14 NS 4C E-3 150 21 95.45
15 NS 4T N+1 150 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
15 GOFFINET Marcel -WARNIER François : 49,04 %16 NS 3T N = 110 12 54.55
17 NS 4P E+1 -450 11 50.00
18 NS 3PcE = -530 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
14 CASSART Guy -FRAITURE Louis : 53,18 %19 NS 4C N+1 450 4 18.18
20 NS 4C N = 620 7 31.82
21 NS 3S E+1 -430 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
24 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,94 %22 NS 3S E+2 -660 3 13.64
23 NS 2C E-2 200 19 86.36
24 NS 3S E+1 -430 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
23 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,52 %25 NS 2C E-1 100 22 100.00
26 NS 1S E+2 -150 2 9.09
27 NS 3S E = -400 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
22 MOSSERAY Bernadette -LAENENS René : 49,09 %28 NS 2S E-1 50 20 90.91
29 NS 3K E+1 -130 2 9.09
30 NS 3K E+1 -130 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
25 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 46,28 %31 NS 4K E+1 -150 0 0.00
32 NS 3S N+3 490 20 90.91
33 NS 3S N+1 430 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
Total : 370,0 / 726 = 50,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette
26 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,91 % 1 NS 2S E-1 50 12 54.55
2 NS 3P E = -140 2 9.09
3 NS 7S N-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 21,21 %
21 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,21 % 4 NS 4P N+1 650 17 77.27
5 NS 4T N-3 -300 0 0.00
6 NS 4P E-1 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
20 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 48,48 % 7 NS 2P S-1 -100 9 40.91
8 NS 5TcN-3 -500 0 0.00
9 NS 2P S = 110 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
19 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 49,39 %10 NS 3K N+1 130 12 54.55
11 NS 3S E-1 50 22 100.00
12 NS 2P E+1 -140 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
18 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 55,15 %13 NS 4P N+2 680 12 54.55
14 NS 3S E-1 50 9 40.91
15 NS 5C S-3 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
17 COURTOIS Serge -ADAMANTIADIS : 51,06 %16 NS 4T S-2 -100 3 13.64
17 NS 6P E-2 100 22 100.00
18 NS 2P W-1 50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
25 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 46,28 %19 NS 6C S = 980 20 90.91
20 NS 4C S = 620 7 31.82
21 NS 3S E-2 100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
15 GOFFINET Marcel -WARNIER François : 49,04 %22 NS 3S W+1 -630 11 50.00
23 NS 2K W+1 -110 5 22.73
24 NS 3S W = -400 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
14 CASSART Guy -FRAITURE Louis : 53,18 %25 NS 2C W = -110 7 31.82
26 NS 1C W = -80 8 36.36
27 NS 5TcS-4 -800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
24 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,94 %28 NS 3PcN-2 -500 2 9.09
29 NS 2C N-1 -100 16 72.73
30 NS 4C E-1 50 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
23 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,52 %31 NS 7KcE-4 800 16 72.73
32 NS 3S N+2 460 13 59.09
33 NS 3S S = 400 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
Total : 333,0 / 726 = 45,87 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte
24 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,94 % 1 NS 3S E = -400 2 9.09
2 NS 5PcE-2 300 12 54.55
3 NS 6C S+1 1010 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
23 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,52 % 4 NS 4P N-1 -100 3 13.64
5 NS 2T N+1 110 19 86.36
6 NS 3S E-1 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
25 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 46,28 % 7 NS 4C E-1 100 15 68.18
8 NS 4C W-2 100 16 72.73
9 NS 2P S = 110 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
21 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,21 %10 NS 2P E-1 100 7 31.82
11 NS 3S W+3 -490 2 9.09
12 NS 2P E+2 -170 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
20 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 48,48 %13 NS 4P N+2 680 12 54.55
14 NS 3S E-1 50 9 40.91
15 NS 4C N-1 -100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
19 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 49,39 %16 NS 3C E = -140 0 0.00
17 NS 5P E-1 50 19 86.36
18 NS 3K S-2 -200 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
18 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 55,15 %19 NS 6C S = 980 20 90.91
20 NS 4C N+1 650 16 72.73
21 NS 3S E+2 -460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
26 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,91 %22 NS 3S W-2 200 21 95.45
23 NS 1S N+2 150 14 63.64
24 NS 3S E = -400 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 75,76 %
16 POULAERT Gilbert -ROGIERS Marga : 51,21 %25 NS 1S S-2 -100 11 50.00
26 NS 1S S = 90 13 59.09
27 NS 3C E+1 -170 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
15 GOFFINET Marcel -WARNIER François : 49,04 %28 NS 3C E+1 -170 8 36.36
29 NS 3K W = -110 9 40.91
30 NS 5C E-1 50 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
14 CASSART Guy -FRAITURE Louis : 53,18 %31 NS 5K E-2 100 6 27.27
32 NS 3S S+2 460 13 59.09
33 NS 3S S = 400 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
Total : 359,0 / 726 = 49,45 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 BOUVY Claire -VANDERBISSE Julia
15 GOFFINET Marcel -WARNIER François : 49,04 % 1 NS 3S E-4 200 22 100.00
2 NS 3PcE = -530 0 0.00
3 NS 4C N+2 480 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
14 CASSART Guy -FRAITURE Louis : 53,18 % 4 NS 3P N+2 200 10 45.45
5 NS 3P E = -140 6 27.27
6 NS 3P E = -140 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
24 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,94 % 7 NS 1S E+3 -180 2 9.09
8 NS 3PcS = 530 22 100.00
9 NS 3C E = -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
26 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,91 %10 NS 2K N+3 150 14 63.64
11 NS 3S E+2 -460 10 45.45
12 NS 3S E-2 100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
22 MOSSERAY Bernadette -LAENENS René : 49,09 %13 NS 4P N+2 680 12 54.55
14 NS 3S W-1 50 9 40.91
15 NS 3S S+1 630 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
21 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,21 %16 NS 4CcE-2 500 17 77.27
17 NS 4P E+2 -480 7 31.82
18 NS 2K N+1 110 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
20 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 48,48 %19 NS 4C S+2 480 11 50.00
20 NS 4C N+1 650 16 72.73
21 NS 4C E = -420 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
19 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 49,39 %22 NS 3S W+1 -630 11 50.00
23 NS 2C E-2 200 19 86.36
24 NS 3S E+1 -430 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
18 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 55,15 %25 NS 1S S-1 -50 15 68.18
26 NS 1S S-2 -200 0 0.00
27 NS 3TcS-1 -100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
25 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 46,28 %28 NS 2K E = -90 18 81.82
29 NS 3K W = -110 9 40.91
30 NS 3C E+2 -200 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
16 POULAERT Gilbert -ROGIERS Marga : 51,21 %31 NS 3T W-1 50 4 18.18
32 NS 3S N+1 430 7 31.82
33 NS 3S N = 400 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
Total : 357,0 / 726 = 49,17 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 COLLIN Jean-Marie -EVRARD Armand
17 COURTOIS Serge -ADAMANTIADIS : 51,06 % 1 NS 3S E-2 100 17 77.27
2 NS 5K S+2 640 18 81.82
3 NS 6C N+1 1010 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 84,85 %
16 POULAERT Gilbert -ROGIERS Marga : 51,21 % 4 NS 4P N-1 -100 3 13.64
5 NS 2C N = 110 19 86.36
6 NS 1P E+2 -140 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
15 GOFFINET Marcel -WARNIER François : 49,04 % 7 NS 1S W+1 -120 5 22.73
8 NS 4T N = 130 20 90.91
9 NS 4TcW-2 500 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
14 CASSART Guy -FRAITURE Louis : 53,18 %10 NS 3KcN+1 870 22 100.00
11 NS 5P E = -450 17 77.27
12 NS 2P E+2 -170 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
24 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,94 %13 NS 4P N = 620 0 0.00
14 NS 3S E-1 50 9 40.91
15 NS 3S S+1 630 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
25 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 46,28 %16 NS 2S S-1 -50 8 36.36
17 NS 6TcS-2 -300 15 68.18
18 NS 2K N-1 -100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
22 MOSSERAY Bernadette -LAENENS René : 49,09 %19 NS 4C S+1 450 4 18.18
20 NS 4C N+1 650 16 72.73
21 NS 3S W+1 -430 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
21 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,21 %22 NS 3S W+1 -630 11 50.00
23 NS 2C E-1 100 9 40.91
24 NS 3S E+1 -430 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
20 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 48,48 %25 NS 3T S-2 -100 11 50.00
26 NS 2P E-3 300 22 100.00
27 NS 4C E+1 -450 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
19 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 49,39 %28 NS 3C E = -140 14 63.64
29 NS 2C N-1 -100 16 72.73
30 NS 4C E-1 50 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
26 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,91 %31 NS 3C S+1 170 8 36.36
32 NS 3S N+3 490 20 90.91
33 NS 3S S+1 430 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
Total : 404,0 / 726 = 55,65 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse
19 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 49,39 % 1 NS 2S E = -120 6 27.27
2 NS 5P E-2 100 6 27.27
3 NS 4C N+3 510 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
25 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 46,28 % 4 NS 5P N-1 -100 3 13.64
5 NS 2C N-2 -200 2 9.09
6 NS 4P E-1 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
17 COURTOIS Serge -ADAMANTIADIS : 51,06 % 7 NS 1P S = 80 12 54.55
8 NS 4T N-1 -50 8 36.36
9 NS 2P S = 110 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
16 POULAERT Gilbert -ROGIERS Marga : 51,21 %10 NS 3K N = 110 10 45.45
11 NS 3P E = -140 20 90.91
12 NS 4P E-1 50 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
15 GOFFINET Marcel -WARNIER François : 49,04 %13 NS 4P N+1 650 4 18.18
14 NS 3S E-2 100 17 77.27
15 NS 5T S = 600 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
14 CASSART Guy -FRAITURE Louis : 53,18 %16 NS 5T S-2 -100 3 13.64
17 NS 6P E-1 50 19 86.36
18 NS 2P W-2 100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
26 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,91 %19 NS 4C S+3 510 16 72.73
20 NS 4C N = 620 7 31.82
21 NS 1T E+2 -110 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
23 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,52 %22 NS 3S W+2 -660 3 13.64
23 NS 2S N-2 -200 0 0.00
24 NS 3S W = -400 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
22 MOSSERAY Bernadette -LAENENS René : 49,09 %25 NS 1S S-3 -150 2 9.09
26 NS 1S E-2 200 19 86.36
27 NS 4C E+1 -450 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
21 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,21 %28 NS 3C E+1 -170 8 36.36
29 NS 3K W+1 -130 2 9.09
30 NS 4C E+1 -450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 15,15 %
20 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 48,48 %31 NS 4K E = -130 2 9.09
32 NS 3S S+1 430 7 31.82
33 NS 3S S+1 430 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
Total : 313,0 / 726 = 43,11 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 ANEZO Nathalie -MUSPRATT Jean-Marc
21 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,21 % 1 NS 2S E-2 100 17 77.27
2 NS 4PcE-1 100 6 27.27
3 NS 6S S = 990 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
20 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 48,48 % 4 NS 4P N+1 650 17 77.27
5 NS 2T N = 90 15 68.18
6 NS 1P E+2 -140 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
26 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,91 % 7 NS 3P S-2 -200 0 0.00
8 NS 3C E-1 50 12 54.55
9 NS 2P S = 110 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
18 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 55,15 %10 NS 2C W+1 -140 0 0.00
11 NS 3S E+3 -490 2 9.09
12 NS 3P E+1 -170 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 6,06 %
17 COURTOIS Serge -ADAMANTIADIS : 51,06 %13 NS 4P N+2 680 12 54.55
14 NS 4C W = -420 2 9.09
15 NS 4T S+1 150 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
16 POULAERT Gilbert -ROGIERS Marga : 51,21 %16 NS 4TcS = 510 21 95.45
17 NS 7TcS-3 -500 2 9.09
18 NS 1S N+1 120 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
15 GOFFINET Marcel -WARNIER François : 49,04 %19 NS 6C S = 980 20 90.91
20 NS 5C N-1 -100 1 4.55
21 NS 1S E+3 -180 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
14 CASSART Guy -FRAITURE Louis : 53,18 %22 NS 3S E+2 -660 3 13.64
23 NS 2C E-1 100 9 40.91
24 NS 3S E = -400 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
25 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 46,28 %25 NS 1S S = 90 19 86.36
26 NS 1S S-1 -100 5 22.73
27 NS 3C E+1 -170 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
23 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,52 %28 NS 4CcW = -590 0 0.00
29 NS 2P W = -110 9 40.91
30 NS 4C E = -420 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
22 MOSSERAY Bernadette -LAENENS René : 49,09 %31 NS 6P S = 1430 20 90.91
32 NS 3S S = 400 3 13.64
33 NS 3S N = 400 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
Total : 317,0 / 726 = 43,66 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 KINET Martine -REGNIER Franz
23 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,52 % 1 NS 2P W = -110 8 36.36
2 NS 5K N+2 640 18 81.82
3 NS 4C N+2 480 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
22 MOSSERAY Bernadette -LAENENS René : 49,09 % 4 NS 4P S+2 680 22 100.00
5 NS 4T N = 130 22 100.00
6 NS 3P E-2 200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 100,00 %
21 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,21 % 7 NS 3K W-3 300 22 100.00
8 NS 3S N-2 -100 4 18.18
9 NS 2P N+1 140 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
20 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 48,48 %10 NS 2C E = -110 2 9.09
11 NS 3S E+2 -460 10 45.45
12 NS 4P E-1 50 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
25 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 46,28 %13 NS 4P N+1 650 4 18.18
14 NS 3S E-3 150 21 95.45
15 NS 3S S+1 630 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
18 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 55,15 %16 NS 4T S = 130 14 63.64
17 NS 7TcN-3 -500 2 9.09
18 NS 2P E = -110 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
17 COURTOIS Serge -ADAMANTIADIS : 51,06 %19 NS 4C N+1 450 4 18.18
20 NS 4C N = 620 7 31.82
21 NS 3S E+1 -430 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
16 POULAERT Gilbert -ROGIERS Marga : 51,21 %22 NS 3S E+1 -630 11 50.00
23 NS 2K E+1 -110 5 22.73
24 NS 3S E+1 -430 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
15 GOFFINET Marcel -WARNIER François : 49,04 %25 NS 1S N-1 -50 15 68.18
26 NS 2C E-2 200 19 86.36
27 NS 3C E+1 -170 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 75,76 %
26 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,91 %28 NS 3C E = -140 14 63.64
29 NS 2C N = 110 21 95.45
30 NS 3S E = -400 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
24 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,94 %31 NS 5P N+1 680 12 54.55
32 NS 3S N+2 460 13 59.09
33 NS 3S N = 400 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
Total : 394,0 / 726 = 54,27 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
25 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 46,28 % 1 NS 3P W-1 50 12 54.55
2 NS 5PcE-2 300 12 54.55
3 NS 3S N+3 490 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
18 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 55,15 % 4 NS 3C N = 140 8 36.36
5 NS 2T N = 90 15 68.18
6 NS 4P E-1 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
22 MOSSERAY Bernadette -LAENENS René : 49,09 % 7 NS 1S W+1 -120 5 22.73
8 NS 4PcS-1 -100 4 18.18
9 NS 3P S-1 -50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 24,24 %
15 GOFFINET Marcel -WARNIER François : 49,04 %10 NS 3T E-3 300 18 81.82
11 NS 3S E+2 -460 10 45.45
12 NS 2P E+1 -140 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
19 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 49,39 %13 NS 4P N+1 650 4 18.18
14 NS 3S E-2 100 17 77.27
15 NS 3S S+1 630 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
23 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,52 %16 NS 4TcN = 510 21 95.45
17 NS 6TcS-2 -300 15 68.18
18 NS 2P W+1 -140 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
16 POULAERT Gilbert -ROGIERS Marga : 51,21 %19 NS 4C S = 420 0 0.00
20 NS 5C N = 650 16 72.73
21 NS 3S E+1 -430 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
20 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 48,48 %22 NS 3T E+2 -150 18 81.82
23 NS 2C E-2 200 19 86.36
24 NS 3S W = -400 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 78,79 %
24 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,94 %25 NS 3C E+1 -170 0 0.00
26 NS 1S S = 90 13 59.09
27 NS 4C E = -420 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
17 COURTOIS Serge -ADAMANTIADIS : 51,06 %28 NS 4C E = -420 4 18.18
29 NS 2C N-1 -100 16 72.73
30 NS 4C E-1 50 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
21 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,21 %31 NS 6PcN = 1660 22 100.00
32 NS 3S N+3 490 20 90.91
33 NS 3S S = 400 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
Total : 378,0 / 726 = 52,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 -
22 MOSSERAY Bernadette -LAENENS René : 49,09 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
26 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,91 % 4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
19 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 49,39 % 7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
23 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,52 %10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
16 POULAERT Gilbert -ROGIERS Marga : 51,21 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
20 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 48,48 %16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
24 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,94 %19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
17 COURTOIS Serge -ADAMANTIADIS : 51,06 %22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
21 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,21 %25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00
27 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
14 CASSART Guy -FRAITURE Louis : 53,18 %28 NS BYE 0 0.00
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
18 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 55,15 %31 NS BYE 0 0.00
32 NS BYE 0 0.00
33 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 726 = 0,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 CASSART Guy -FRAITURE Louis
1 DEWART Léon -MATELART Marc : 57,99 % 1 EO 3S E-3 150 2 9.09
2 EO 5K S+2 640 4 18.18
3 EO 6S S = 990 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
7 BOUVY Claire -VANDERBISSE Julia : 49,17 % 4 EO 3P N+2 200 12 54.55
5 EO 3P E = -140 16 72.73
6 EO 3P E = -140 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
2 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques : 42,84 % 7 EO 3K W-2 200 2 9.09
8 EO 3T N = 110 4 18.18
9 EO 3T W = -110 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
8 COLLIN Jean-Marie -EVRARD Armand : 55,65 %10 EO 3KcN+1 870 0 0.00
11 EO 5P E = -450 5 22.73
12 EO 2P E+2 -170 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
3 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile : 54,96 %13 EO 4P N+3 710 2 9.09
14 EO 3S E-1 50 13 59.09
15 EO 5TcN-1 -200 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
9 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 43,11 %16 EO 5T S-2 -100 19 86.36
17 EO 6P E-1 50 3 13.64
18 EO 2P W-2 100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
4 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 50,96 %19 EO 4C N+1 450 18 81.82
20 EO 4C N = 620 15 68.18
21 EO 3S E+1 -430 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
10 ANEZO Nathalie -MUSPRATT Jean-Marc : 43,66 %22 EO 3S E+2 -660 19 86.36
23 EO 2C E-1 100 13 59.09
24 EO 3S E = -400 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
5 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette : 45,87 %25 EO 2C W = -110 15 68.18
26 EO 1C W = -80 14 63.64
27 EO 5TcS-4 -800 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
13 - : 0,00 %28 EO BYE 0 0.00
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 49,45 %31 EO 5K E-2 100 16 72.73
32 EO 3S S+2 460 9 40.91
33 EO 3S S = 400 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
Total : 351,0 / 660 = 53,18 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 GOFFINET Marcel -WARNIER François
7 BOUVY Claire -VANDERBISSE Julia : 49,17 % 1 EO 3S E-4 200 0 0.00
2 EO 3PcE = -530 22 100.00
3 EO 4C N+2 480 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
2 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques : 42,84 % 4 EO 4C N = 620 10 45.45
5 EO 2P W+2 -170 18 81.82
6 EO 1S W = -90 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
8 COLLIN Jean-Marie -EVRARD Armand : 55,65 % 7 EO 1S W+1 -120 17 77.27
8 EO 4T N = 130 2 9.09
9 EO 4TcW-2 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
12 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 52,07 %10 EO 3T E-3 300 4 18.18
11 EO 3S E+2 -460 12 54.55
12 EO 2P E+1 -140 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
9 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 43,11 %13 EO 4P N+1 650 18 81.82
14 EO 3S E-2 100 5 22.73
15 EO 5T S = 600 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
4 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 50,96 %16 EO 3T N = 110 10 45.45
17 EO 4P E+1 -450 11 50.00
18 EO 3PcE = -530 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
10 ANEZO Nathalie -MUSPRATT Jean-Marc : 43,66 %19 EO 6C S = 980 2 9.09
20 EO 5C N-1 -100 21 95.45
21 EO 1S E+3 -180 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
5 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette : 45,87 %22 EO 3S W+1 -630 11 50.00
23 EO 2K W+1 -110 17 77.27
24 EO 3S W = -400 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
11 KINET Martine -REGNIER Franz : 54,27 %25 EO 1S N-1 -50 7 31.82
26 EO 2C E-2 200 3 13.64
27 EO 3C E+1 -170 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 24,24 %
6 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 49,45 %28 EO 3C E+1 -170 14 63.64
29 EO 3K W = -110 13 59.09
30 EO 5C E-1 50 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
1 DEWART Léon -MATELART Marc : 57,99 %31 EO 5P S+1 680 10 45.45
32 EO 4P S-2 -100 22 100.00
33 EO 3S S+1 430 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
Total : 356,0 / 726 = 49,04 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 POULAERT Gilbert -ROGIERS Marga
2 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques : 42,84 % 1 EO 3S E-1 50 10 45.45
2 EO 5P E-2 100 16 72.73
3 EO 6C N = 980 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
8 COLLIN Jean-Marie -EVRARD Armand : 55,65 % 4 EO 4P N-1 -100 19 86.36
5 EO 2C N = 110 3 13.64
6 EO 1P E+2 -140 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
3 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile : 54,96 % 7 EO 2P N-1 -100 13 59.09
8 EO 3C E-1 50 10 45.45
9 EO 2P N-1 -50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
9 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 43,11 %10 EO 3K N = 110 12 54.55
11 EO 3P E = -140 2 9.09
12 EO 4P E-1 50 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
13 - : 0,00 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
10 ANEZO Nathalie -MUSPRATT Jean-Marc : 43,66 %16 EO 4TcS = 510 1 4.55
17 EO 7TcS-3 -500 20 90.91
18 EO 1S N+1 120 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
12 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 52,07 %19 EO 4C S = 420 22 100.00
20 EO 5C N = 650 6 27.27
21 EO 3S E+1 -430 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
11 KINET Martine -REGNIER Franz : 54,27 %22 EO 3S E+1 -630 11 50.00
23 EO 2K E+1 -110 17 77.27
24 EO 3S E+1 -430 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
6 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 49,45 %25 EO 1S S-2 -100 11 50.00
26 EO 1S S = 90 9 40.91
27 EO 3C E+1 -170 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
1 DEWART Léon -MATELART Marc : 57,99 %28 EO 3C W = -140 8 36.36
29 EO 2C N = 110 1 4.55
30 EO 2T W+2 -130 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
7 BOUVY Claire -VANDERBISSE Julia : 49,17 %31 EO 3T W-1 50 18 81.82
32 EO 3S N+1 430 15 68.18
33 EO 3S N = 400 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
Total : 338,0 / 660 = 51,21 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 COURTOIS Serge -ADAMANTIADIS
8 COLLIN Jean-Marie -EVRARD Armand : 55,65 % 1 EO 3S E-2 100 5 22.73
2 EO 5K S+2 640 4 18.18
3 EO 6C N+1 1010 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 15,15 %
3 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile : 54,96 % 4 EO 4P N-1 -100 19 86.36
5 EO 2P E = -110 14 63.64
6 EO 4P E-1 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
9 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 43,11 % 7 EO 1P S = 80 10 45.45
8 EO 4T N-1 -50 14 63.64
9 EO 2P S = 110 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
4 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 50,96 %10 EO 2S E-4 400 2 9.09
11 EO 3S E+2 -460 12 54.55
12 EO 2P E = -110 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
10 ANEZO Nathalie -MUSPRATT Jean-Marc : 43,66 %13 EO 4P N+2 680 10 45.45
14 EO 4C W = -420 20 90.91
15 EO 4T S+1 150 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
5 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette : 45,87 %16 EO 4T S-2 -100 19 86.36
17 EO 6P E-2 100 0 0.00
18 EO 2P W-1 50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
11 KINET Martine -REGNIER Franz : 54,27 %19 EO 4C N+1 450 18 81.82
20 EO 4C N = 620 15 68.18
21 EO 3S E+1 -430 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
13 - : 0,00 %22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
1 DEWART Léon -MATELART Marc : 57,99 %25 EO 3C W = -140 18 81.82
26 EO 1S S = 90 9 40.91
27 EO 4C E = -420 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
12 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 52,07 %28 EO 4C E = -420 18 81.82
29 EO 2C N-1 -100 6 27.27
30 EO 4C E-1 50 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
2 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques : 42,84 %31 EO 4CcS+1 990 4 18.18
32 EO 3S S = 400 19 86.36
33 EO 3S S = 400 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
Total : 337,0 / 660 = 51,06 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean
3 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile : 54,96 % 1 EO 3S E = -400 20 90.91
2 EO 5PcE-2 300 10 45.45
3 EO 4C N+3 510 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
12 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 52,07 % 4 EO 3C N = 140 14 63.64
5 EO 2T N = 90 7 31.82
6 EO 4P E-1 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
4 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 50,96 % 7 EO 2P N = 110 4 18.18
8 EO 3C E-1 50 10 45.45
9 EO 2T E = -90 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
10 ANEZO Nathalie -MUSPRATT Jean-Marc : 43,66 %10 EO 2C W+1 -140 22 100.00
11 EO 3S E+3 -490 20 90.91
12 EO 3P E+1 -170 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 93,94 %
5 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette : 45,87 %13 EO 4P N+2 680 10 45.45
14 EO 3S E-1 50 13 59.09
15 EO 5C S-3 -300 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
11 KINET Martine -REGNIER Franz : 54,27 %16 EO 4T S = 130 8 36.36
17 EO 7TcN-3 -500 20 90.91
18 EO 2P E = -110 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
6 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 49,45 %19 EO 6C S = 980 2 9.09
20 EO 4C N+1 650 6 27.27
21 EO 3S E+2 -460 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
1 DEWART Léon -MATELART Marc : 57,99 %22 EO 6S E-2 200 1 4.55
23 EO 1S N+1 120 10 45.45
24 EO 3S W = -400 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
7 BOUVY Claire -VANDERBISSE Julia : 49,17 %25 EO 1S S-1 -50 7 31.82
26 EO 1S S-2 -200 22 100.00
27 EO 3TcS-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
2 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques : 42,84 %28 EO 2TcS = 180 0 0.00
29 EO 3K W = -110 13 59.09
30 EO 4C E = -420 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
13 - : 0,00 %31 EO BYE 0 0.00
32 EO BYE 0 0.00
33 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 364,0 / 660 = 55,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine
9 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 43,11 % 1 EO 2S E = -120 16 72.73
2 EO 5P E-2 100 16 72.73
3 EO 4C N+3 510 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
4 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 50,96 % 4 EO 4P N+1 650 5 22.73
5 EO 2C N-1 -100 11 50.00
6 EO 4P E-1 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
13 - : 0,00 % 7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
5 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette : 45,87 %10 EO 3K N+1 130 10 45.45
11 EO 3S E-1 50 0 0.00
12 EO 2P E+1 -140 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
12 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 52,07 %13 EO 4P N+1 650 18 81.82
14 EO 3S E-2 100 5 22.73
15 EO 3S S+1 630 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
6 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 49,45 %16 EO 3C E = -140 22 100.00
17 EO 5P E-1 50 3 13.64
18 EO 3K S-2 -200 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
1 DEWART Léon -MATELART Marc : 57,99 %19 EO 4C S+2 480 11 50.00
20 EO 4C N+1 650 6 27.27
21 EO 3S E+1 -430 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
7 BOUVY Claire -VANDERBISSE Julia : 49,17 %22 EO 3S W+1 -630 11 50.00
23 EO 2C E-2 200 3 13.64
24 EO 3S E+1 -430 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
2 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques : 42,84 %25 EO 2C W = -110 15 68.18
26 EO 1S S-1 -100 17 77.27
27 EO 3TcS-2 -300 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
8 COLLIN Jean-Marie -EVRARD Armand : 55,65 %28 EO 3C E = -140 8 36.36
29 EO 2C N-1 -100 6 27.27
30 EO 4C E-1 50 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
3 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile : 54,96 %31 EO 5P N+1 680 10 45.45
32 EO 3S N+2 460 9 40.91
33 EO 3S N = 400 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
Total : 326,0 / 660 = 49,39 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon
4 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 50,96 % 1 EO 3S E = -400 20 90.91
2 EO 5KcN+2 1150 0 0.00
3 EO 6C N = 980 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
10 ANEZO Nathalie -MUSPRATT Jean-Marc : 43,66 % 4 EO 4P N+1 650 5 22.73
5 EO 2T N = 90 7 31.82
6 EO 1P E+2 -140 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
5 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette : 45,87 % 7 EO 2P S-1 -100 13 59.09
8 EO 5TcN-3 -500 22 100.00
9 EO 2P S = 110 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
11 KINET Martine -REGNIER Franz : 54,27 %10 EO 2C E = -110 20 90.91
11 EO 3S E+2 -460 12 54.55
12 EO 4P E-1 50 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
6 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 49,45 %13 EO 4P N+2 680 10 45.45
14 EO 3S E-1 50 13 59.09
15 EO 4C N-1 -100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
13 - : 0,00 %16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
7 BOUVY Claire -VANDERBISSE Julia : 49,17 %19 EO 4C S+2 480 11 50.00
20 EO 4C N+1 650 6 27.27
21 EO 4C E = -420 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
12 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 52,07 %22 EO 3T E+2 -150 4 18.18
23 EO 2C E-2 200 3 13.64
24 EO 3S W = -400 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 21,21 %
8 COLLIN Jean-Marie -EVRARD Armand : 55,65 %25 EO 3T S-2 -100 11 50.00
26 EO 2P E-3 300 0 0.00
27 EO 4C E+1 -450 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
3 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile : 54,96 %28 EO 2C E+2 -170 14 63.64
29 EO 3K E+1 -130 20 90.91
30 EO 6C E-4 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
9 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 43,11 %31 EO 4K E = -130 20 90.91
32 EO 3S S+1 430 15 68.18
33 EO 3S S+1 430 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
Total : 320,0 / 660 = 48,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
10 ANEZO Nathalie -MUSPRATT Jean-Marc : 43,66 % 1 EO 2S E-2 100 5 22.73
2 EO 4PcE-1 100 16 72.73
3 EO 6S S = 990 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
5 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette : 45,87 % 4 EO 4P N+1 650 5 22.73
5 EO 4T N-3 -300 22 100.00
6 EO 4P E-1 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
11 KINET Martine -REGNIER Franz : 54,27 % 7 EO 3K W-3 300 0 0.00
8 EO 3S N-2 -100 18 81.82
9 EO 2P N+1 140 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
6 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 49,45 %10 EO 2P E-1 100 15 68.18
11 EO 3S W+3 -490 20 90.91
12 EO 2P E+2 -170 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
1 DEWART Léon -MATELART Marc : 57,99 %13 EO 4P N+3 710 2 9.09
14 EO 3S E-1 50 13 59.09
15 EO 3S S+2 660 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 24,24 %
7 BOUVY Claire -VANDERBISSE Julia : 49,17 %16 EO 4CcE-2 500 5 22.73
17 EO 4P E+2 -480 15 68.18
18 EO 2K N+1 110 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
2 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques : 42,84 %19 EO 4C S+2 480 11 50.00
20 EO 5C N-1 -100 21 95.45
21 EO 3S E+1 -430 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
8 COLLIN Jean-Marie -EVRARD Armand : 55,65 %22 EO 3S W+1 -630 11 50.00
23 EO 2C E-1 100 13 59.09
24 EO 3S E+1 -430 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
13 - : 0,00 %25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00
27 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
9 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 43,11 %28 EO 3C E+1 -170 14 63.64
29 EO 3K W+1 -130 20 90.91
30 EO 4C E+1 -450 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 84,85 %
12 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 52,07 %31 EO 6PcN = 1660 0 0.00
32 EO 3S N+3 490 2 9.09
33 EO 3S S = 400 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
Total : 338,0 / 660 = 51,21 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 MOSSERAY Bernadette -LAENENS René
13 - : 0,00 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
11 KINET Martine -REGNIER Franz : 54,27 % 4 EO 4P S+2 680 0 0.00
5 EO 4T N = 130 0 0.00
6 EO 3P E-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
12 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 52,07 % 7 EO 1S W+1 -120 17 77.27
8 EO 4PcS-1 -100 18 81.82
9 EO 3P S-1 -50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 75,76 %
1 DEWART Léon -MATELART Marc : 57,99 %10 EO 3C W-1 100 15 68.18
11 EO 3S E+2 -460 12 54.55
12 EO 2P E+1 -140 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
7 BOUVY Claire -VANDERBISSE Julia : 49,17 %13 EO 4P N+2 680 10 45.45
14 EO 3S W-1 50 13 59.09
15 EO 3S S+1 630 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
2 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques : 42,84 %16 EO 4T S-1 -50 14 63.64
17 EO 5P E+1 -480 15 68.18
18 EO 2K N = 90 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
8 COLLIN Jean-Marie -EVRARD Armand : 55,65 %19 EO 4C S+1 450 18 81.82
20 EO 4C N+1 650 6 27.27
21 EO 3S W+1 -430 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
3 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile : 54,96 %22 EO 3S E = -600 6 27.27
23 EO 2C E-2 200 3 13.64
24 EO 3S E = -400 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 24,24 %
9 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 43,11 %25 EO 1S S-3 -150 20 90.91
26 EO 1S E-2 200 3 13.64
27 EO 4C E+1 -450 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
4 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 50,96 %28 EO 2S E-1 50 2 9.09
29 EO 3K E+1 -130 20 90.91
30 EO 3K E+1 -130 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
10 ANEZO Nathalie -MUSPRATT Jean-Marc : 43,66 %31 EO 6P S = 1430 2 9.09
32 EO 3S S = 400 19 86.36
33 EO 3S N = 400 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
Total : 324,0 / 660 = 49,09 %
PAIRE Nr : 23 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
11 KINET Martine -REGNIER Franz : 54,27 % 1 EO 2P W = -110 14 63.64
2 EO 5K N+2 640 4 18.18
3 EO 4C N+2 480 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
6 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 49,45 % 4 EO 4P N-1 -100 19 86.36
5 EO 2T N+1 110 3 13.64
6 EO 3S E-1 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
1 DEWART Léon -MATELART Marc : 57,99 % 7 EO 4C W-1 100 7 31.82
8 EO 5T N-2 -100 18 81.82
9 EO 2P S = 110 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
13 - : 0,00 %10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
2 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques : 42,84 %13 EO 4P N+3 710 2 9.09
14 EO 3S W+1 -430 22 100.00
15 EO 3S S+2 660 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
12 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 52,07 %16 EO 4TcN = 510 1 4.55
17 EO 6TcS-2 -300 7 31.82
18 EO 2P W+1 -140 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
3 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile : 54,96 %19 EO 4C N+2 480 11 50.00
20 EO 5CcN = 850 0 0.00
21 EO 3S E+1 -430 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
9 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 43,11 %22 EO 3S W+2 -660 19 86.36
23 EO 2S N-2 -200 22 100.00
24 EO 3S W = -400 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
4 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 50,96 %25 EO 2C E-1 100 0 0.00
26 EO 1S E+2 -150 20 90.91
27 EO 3S E = -400 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
10 ANEZO Nathalie -MUSPRATT Jean-Marc : 43,66 %28 EO 4CcW = -590 22 100.00
29 EO 2P W = -110 13 59.09
30 EO 4C E = -420 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
5 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette : 45,87 %31 EO 7KcE-4 800 6 27.27
32 EO 3S N+2 460 9 40.91
33 EO 3S S = 400 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
Total : 340,0 / 660 = 51,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 24 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard
6 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 49,45 % 1 EO 3S E = -400 20 90.91
2 EO 5PcE-2 300 10 45.45
3 EO 6C S+1 1010 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
1 DEWART Léon -MATELART Marc : 57,99 % 4 EO 4P N+1 650 5 22.73
5 EO 2C N-1 -100 11 50.00
6 EO 4P E-1 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
7 BOUVY Claire -VANDERBISSE Julia : 49,17 % 7 EO 1S E+3 -180 20 90.91
8 EO 3PcS = 530 0 0.00
9 EO 3C E = -140 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
2 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques : 42,84 %10 EO 3S S-1 -100 18 81.82
11 EO 3S E+3 -490 20 90.91
12 EO 4P E-1 50 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
8 COLLIN Jean-Marie -EVRARD Armand : 55,65 %13 EO 4P N = 620 22 100.00
14 EO 3S E-1 50 13 59.09
15 EO 3S S+1 630 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
3 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile : 54,96 %16 EO 4CcE-2 500 5 22.73
17 EO 5P E = -450 11 50.00
18 EO 2C E-2 100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
13 - : 0,00 %19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
4 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 50,96 %22 EO 3S E+2 -660 19 86.36
23 EO 2C E-2 200 3 13.64
24 EO 3S E+1 -430 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
12 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 52,07 %25 EO 3C E+1 -170 22 100.00
26 EO 1S S = 90 9 40.91
27 EO 4C E = -420 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
5 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette : 45,87 %28 EO 3PcN-2 -500 20 90.91
29 EO 2C N-1 -100 6 27.27
30 EO 4C E-1 50 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
11 KINET Martine -REGNIER Franz : 54,27 %31 EO 5P N+1 680 10 45.45
32 EO 3S N+2 460 9 40.91
33 EO 3S N = 400 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
Total : 356,0 / 660 = 53,94 %
PAIRE Nr : 25 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François
12 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 52,07 % 1 EO 3P W-1 50 10 45.45
2 EO 5PcE-2 300 10 45.45
3 EO 3S N+3 490 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
9 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 43,11 % 4 EO 5P N-1 -100 19 86.36
5 EO 2C N-2 -200 20 90.91
6 EO 4P E-1 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
6 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 49,45 % 7 EO 4C E-1 100 7 31.82
8 EO 4C W-2 100 6 27.27
9 EO 2P S = 110 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
3 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile : 54,96 %10 EO 4C E-2 200 6 27.27
11 EO 4P E+1 -450 5 22.73
12 EO 2P E+1 -140 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
11 KINET Martine -REGNIER Franz : 54,27 %13 EO 4P N+1 650 18 81.82
14 EO 3S E-3 150 1 4.55
15 EO 3S S+1 630 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
8 COLLIN Jean-Marie -EVRARD Armand : 55,65 %16 EO 2S S-1 -50 14 63.64
17 EO 6TcS-2 -300 7 31.82
18 EO 2K N-1 -100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
5 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette : 45,87 %19 EO 6C S = 980 2 9.09
20 EO 4C S = 620 15 68.18
21 EO 3S E-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
2 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques : 42,84 %22 EO 3S W+2 -660 19 86.36
23 EO 3K W+1 -130 20 90.91
24 EO 3S W = -400 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
10 ANEZO Nathalie -MUSPRATT Jean-Marc : 43,66 %25 EO 1S S = 90 3 13.64
26 EO 1S S-1 -100 17 77.27
27 EO 3C E+1 -170 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
7 BOUVY Claire -VANDERBISSE Julia : 49,17 %28 EO 2K E = -90 4 18.18
29 EO 3K W = -110 13 59.09
30 EO 3C E+2 -200 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
4 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 50,96 %31 EO 4K E+1 -150 22 100.00
32 EO 3S N+3 490 2 9.09
33 EO 3S N+1 430 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
Total : 336,0 / 726 = 46,28 %
PAIRE Nr : 26 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques
5 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette : 45,87 % 1 EO 2S E-1 50 10 45.45
2 EO 3P E = -140 20 90.91
3 EO 7S N-1 -50 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 78,79 %
13 - : 0,00 % 4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
10 ANEZO Nathalie -MUSPRATT Jean-Marc : 43,66 % 7 EO 3P S-2 -200 22 100.00
8 EO 3C E-1 50 10 45.45
9 EO 2P S = 110 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
7 BOUVY Claire -VANDERBISSE Julia : 49,17 %10 EO 2K N+3 150 8 36.36
11 EO 3S E+2 -460 12 54.55
12 EO 3S E-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
4 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 50,96 %13 EO 4P N+2 680 10 45.45
14 EO 4C E-3 150 1 4.55
15 EO 4T N+1 150 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
1 DEWART Léon -MATELART Marc : 57,99 %16 EO 2P N-1 -50 14 63.64
17 EO 7TcS-3 -500 20 90.91
18 EO 1S S+1 120 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
9 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 43,11 %19 EO 4C S+3 510 6 27.27
20 EO 4C N = 620 15 68.18
21 EO 1T E+2 -110 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
6 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 49,45 %22 EO 3S W-2 200 1 4.55
23 EO 1S N+2 150 8 36.36
24 EO 3S E = -400 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 24,24 %
3 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile : 54,96 %25 EO 1S N = 90 3 13.64
26 EO 1S N = 90 9 40.91
27 EO 3S N-3 -150 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 21,21 %
11 KINET Martine -REGNIER Franz : 54,27 %28 EO 3C E = -140 8 36.36
29 EO 2C N = 110 1 4.55
30 EO 3S E = -400 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
8 COLLIN Jean-Marie -EVRARD Armand : 55,65 %31 EO 3C S+1 170 14 63.64
32 EO 3S N+3 490 2 9.09
33 EO 3S S+1 430 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
Total : 270,0 / 660 = 40,91 %
|
|