|
Tournoi du 29-08-11
1 59,63 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
2 56,67 11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
3 53,33 9 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse
4 52,59 1 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HUBLET Carlo
5 49,07 6 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
6 48,52 7 LAGRANGE-NICAISE Elisabet-DELTOUR Emile
7 47,78 3 FRAITURE Louis -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
8 46,67 10 LAMOTTE André -MONSEUR CLaudine
9 46,48 2 DAPHNE Chantal -ROSOUX Louis
10 45,19 4 BRIOT Marie-Louise -MASSAUX Jacques
11 44,07 5 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 65,93 17 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie
2 57,59 19 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
3 55,93 12 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry
4 55,74 16 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
5 53,33 18 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
6 50,19 14 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette
7 47,59 20 DEGUELLE Jacques -ALLARD Guy
8 45,74 15 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
9 42,04 21 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane
10 41,67 13 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques
11 34,26 22 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef
PAIRE Nr : 1 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HUBLET Carlo
12 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 55,93 % 1 NS 4P N-1 -50 5 27.78
2 NS 2P S+1 140 15 83.33
3 NS 4P N-2 -100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
22 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 34,26 % 4 NS 3S S+1 630 15 83.33
5 NS 3K S-1 -100 4 22.22
6 NS 2S W-1 100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
21 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 42,04 % 7 NS 1ScE-3 800 18 100.00
8 NS 2C S+1 140 8 44.44
9 NS 3S W-1 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
20 DEGUELLE Jacques -ALLARD Guy : 47,59 %10 NS 4P W = -620 6 33.33
11 NS 3S W-2 100 15 83.33
12 NS 4KcW-2 300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
19 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 57,59 %13 NS 3P W = -140 3 16.67
14 NS 4TcE-4 800 18 100.00
15 NS 4P S = 620 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
18 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 53,33 %16 NS 1P N-1 -50 4 22.22
17 NS 4TcE-2 300 9 50.00
18 NS 2P S-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
17 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 65,93 %19 NS 4C S-2 -100 1 5.56
20 NS 2P W = -110 1 5.56
21 NS 3P E-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
16 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 55,74 %22 NS 3S E+1 -630 11 61.11
23 NS 3S W-2 200 17 94.44
24 NS 2P S+3 200 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
15 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 45,74 %25 NS 2C S+1 140 11 61.11
26 NS 1K S+2 110 15 83.33
27 NS 4C S+1 450 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
14 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 50,19 %28 NS 1S W-1 50 12 66.67
29 NS 1S N-1 -100 5 27.78
30 NS 4TcS-5 -1100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
Total : 284,0 / 540 = 52,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 DAPHNE Chantal -ROSOUX Louis
13 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 41,67 % 4 NS 3S S-3 -300 1 5.56
5 NS 4CcW-4 800 18 100.00
6 NS 3T S+1 130 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
12 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 55,93 % 7 NS 2C S+2 170 6 33.33
8 NS 2S E-3 150 10 55.56
9 NS 3S W+1 -630 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
22 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 34,26 %10 NS 3P E = -140 17 94.44
11 NS 3ScE-2 300 18 100.00
12 NS 1S E+1 -120 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
21 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 42,04 %13 NS 3P W-1 100 11 61.11
14 NS 2P N = 110 10 55.56
15 NS 4P S-1 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
20 DEGUELLE Jacques -ALLARD Guy : 47,59 %16 NS 3S S-1 -50 4 22.22
17 NS 3T E-1 50 4 22.22
18 NS 2C E+1 -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
19 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 57,59 %19 NS 4C S-2 -100 1 5.56
20 NS 2C S+1 140 15 83.33
21 NS 4C N+1 650 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
18 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 53,33 %22 NS 3S E+3 -690 1 5.56
23 NS 3S E = -600 6 33.33
24 NS 3S N = 400 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
17 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 65,93 %25 NS 2C S = 110 3 16.67
26 NS 3S S-2 -200 1 5.56
27 NS 4C S+1 450 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
16 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 55,74 %28 NS 1S W+1 -120 3 16.67
29 NS 1S N-3 -300 1 5.56
30 NS 4C W-1 50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
15 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 45,74 %31 NS 2P S = 110 17 94.44
32 NS 6S N+1 1020 12 66.67
33 NS 3P E-2 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 251,0 / 540 = 46,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 FRAITURE Louis -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
16 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 55,74 % 1 NS 5PcS-4 -800 0 0.00
2 NS 2P S = 110 11 61.11
3 NS 4P N-2 -100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
14 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 50,19 % 7 NS 2C S+3 200 11 61.11
8 NS 3C S+1 170 13 72.22
9 NS 3S W+2 -660 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
13 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 41,67 %10 NS 4P W = -620 6 33.33
11 NS 3T W-2 100 15 83.33
12 NS 2P N-1 -100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
12 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 55,93 %13 NS 4P W-1 100 11 61.11
14 NS 3S S-3 -150 0 0.00
15 NS 2P S+2 170 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
22 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 34,26 %16 NS 2S N+1 150 18 100.00
17 NS 2C S = 110 6 33.33
18 NS 2P S = 110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
21 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 42,04 %19 NS 2S N = 120 11 61.11
20 NS 3T W-1 100 7 38.89
21 NS 4C N = 620 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
20 DEGUELLE Jacques -ALLARD Guy : 47,59 %22 NS 3S E+3 -690 1 5.56
23 NS 3S E = -600 6 33.33
24 NS 3S N = 400 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
19 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 57,59 %25 NS 2CcS+1 570 18 100.00
26 NS 5K S-2 -200 1 5.56
27 NS 4C S-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
18 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 53,33 %28 NS 1S W = -90 7 38.89
29 NS 1S N+1 120 16 88.89
30 NS 3C W+1 -170 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
17 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 65,93 %31 NS 2K E+1 -110 5 27.78
32 NS 6S N = 990 3 16.67
33 NS 3PcW-2 300 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 258,0 / 540 = 47,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 BRIOT Marie-Louise -MASSAUX Jacques
18 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 53,33 % 1 NS 2P E-3 150 14 77.78
2 NS 4P S-1 -100 5 27.78
3 NS 4P N-2 -100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
17 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 65,93 % 4 NS 3S N-1 -100 5 27.78
5 NS 3C W-1 50 10 55.56
6 NS 2S W = -120 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
15 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 45,74 %10 NS 4P W = -620 6 33.33
11 NS 2S N-3 -150 2 11.11
12 NS 1S E+2 -150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
14 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 50,19 %13 NS 2P W+1 -140 3 16.67
14 NS 3P S-2 -100 3 16.67
15 NS 5P S-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
13 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 41,67 %16 NS 1P N+2 140 15 83.33
17 NS 3S N = 400 12 66.67
18 NS 2P S+1 140 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
12 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 55,93 %19 NS 2S N = 120 11 61.11
20 NS 2C S+1 140 15 83.33
21 NS 3T S = 110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
22 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 34,26 %22 NS 1K E+4 -150 18 100.00
23 NS 1P E+3 -170 12 66.67
24 NS 3P S+1 170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
21 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 42,04 %25 NS 2C S+1 140 11 61.11
26 NS 1K S+2 110 15 83.33
27 NS 4PcE-3 500 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
20 DEGUELLE Jacques -ALLARD Guy : 47,59 %28 NS 3S W = -400 0 0.00
29 NS 2K S = 90 11 61.11
30 NS 3C W+1 -170 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
19 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 57,59 %31 NS 3K E = -110 5 27.78
32 NS 6P S = 980 0 0.00
33 NS 3C S = 140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
Total : 244,0 / 540 = 45,19 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard
20 DEGUELLE Jacques -ALLARD Guy : 47,59 % 1 NS 3S N = 400 17 94.44
2 NS 4P S-1 -100 5 27.78
3 NS 3P N-1 -50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
19 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 57,59 % 4 NS 3S S = 600 9 50.00
5 NS 2C W-1 50 10 55.56
6 NS 3K W = -110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
18 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 53,33 % 7 NS 2C S+2 170 6 33.33
8 NS 3P E = -140 1 5.56
9 NS 3S W+1 -630 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
16 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 55,74 %13 NS 4P W = -620 0 0.00
14 NS 3S S-1 -50 7 38.89
15 NS 4P S-1 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
15 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 45,74 %16 NS 1P N = 80 9 50.00
17 NS 3TcW = -470 0 0.00
18 NS 2P S-2 -200 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
14 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 50,19 %19 NS 2S N = 120 11 61.11
20 NS 2C S = 110 11 61.11
21 NS 3T S-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
13 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 41,67 %22 NS 4K E+2 -170 16 88.89
23 NS 5K W-2 200 17 94.44
24 NS 2P S+3 200 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
12 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 55,93 %25 NS 2C S+1 140 11 61.11
26 NS 2C E+1 -140 4 22.22
27 NS 4C S+1 450 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
22 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 34,26 %28 NS 1S W+1 -120 3 16.67
29 NS 1S N = 90 11 61.11
30 NS 2C W+1 -140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
21 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 42,04 %31 NS 3K E = -110 5 27.78
32 NS 7S N = 1520 17 94.44
33 NS 2C S+1 140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
Total : 238,0 / 540 = 44,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
22 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 34,26 % 1 NS 3S N = 400 17 94.44
2 NS 2P S+1 140 15 83.33
3 NS 3P N-1 -50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
21 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 42,04 % 4 NS 3S S+1 630 15 83.33
5 NS 2C W = -110 1 5.56
6 NS 2S W = -120 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
20 DEGUELLE Jacques -ALLARD Guy : 47,59 % 7 NS 2C S+1 140 1 5.56
8 NS 3CcS = 530 17 94.44
9 NS 3S W+1 -630 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
19 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 57,59 %10 NS 4P W = -620 6 33.33
11 NS 1S E = -90 11 61.11
12 NS 2PcN-2 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
17 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 65,93 %16 NS 1P N = 80 9 50.00
17 NS 2S N-1 -50 2 11.11
18 NS 4P N-3 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
16 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 55,74 %19 NS 2S S-1 -50 5 27.78
20 NS 2C S = 110 11 61.11
21 NS 3P W-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
15 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 45,74 %22 NS 3S E = -600 14 77.78
23 NS 4P E = -620 0 0.00
24 NS 4C N = 420 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
14 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 50,19 %25 NS 2C S+1 140 11 61.11
26 NS 3K S = 110 15 83.33
27 NS 5C S = 450 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
13 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 41,67 %28 NS 2C W-1 50 12 66.67
29 NS 2C W-2 200 18 100.00
30 NS 3C E = -140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
12 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 55,93 %31 NS 2C N-1 -100 11 61.11
32 NS 6S S+1 1020 12 66.67
33 NS 2P E-1 50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 265,0 / 540 = 49,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 LAGRANGE-NICAISE Elisabet-DELTOUR Emile
13 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 41,67 % 1 NS 3K N = 110 11 61.11
2 NS 2P S = 110 11 61.11
3 NS 4P N-2 -100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
12 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 55,93 % 4 NS 3S N-3 -300 1 5.56
5 NS 3C W-1 50 10 55.56
6 NS 3K W-1 100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
22 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 34,26 % 7 NS 2C S+4 230 14 77.78
8 NS 2P E-2 100 4 22.22
9 NS 3CcN-3 -500 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
21 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 42,04 %10 NS 4P W = -620 6 33.33
11 NS 3S W = -400 0 0.00
12 NS 3KcW-1 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
20 DEGUELLE Jacques -ALLARD Guy : 47,59 %13 NS 3P W-1 100 11 61.11
14 NS 2S S-1 -50 7 38.89
15 NS 4P S = 620 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
18 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 53,33 %19 NS 2S N+2 180 18 100.00
20 NS 2P W = -110 1 5.56
21 NS 3C N = 140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
17 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 65,93 %22 NS 4C W+1 -650 6 33.33
23 NS 3S E = -600 6 33.33
24 NS 2P S+3 200 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
16 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 55,74 %25 NS 2C S+1 140 11 61.11
26 NS 3K S-1 -100 6 33.33
27 NS 4C S+1 450 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
15 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 45,74 %28 NS 2C W-1 50 12 66.67
29 NS 2C W-1 100 14 77.78
30 NS 1S E+4 -210 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
14 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 50,19 %31 NS 3K E+1 -130 0 0.00
32 NS 6S N+1 1020 12 66.67
33 NS 3PcE-2 300 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 262,0 / 540 = 48,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
15 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 45,74 % 1 NS 3K S = 110 11 61.11
2 NS 4P S-1 -100 5 27.78
3 NS 4P N-2 -100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
14 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 50,19 % 4 NS 3S N = 600 9 50.00
5 NS 3C W-1 50 10 55.56
6 NS 5K W-2 200 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
13 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 41,67 % 7 NS 2C S+3 200 11 61.11
8 NS 3C S+1 170 13 72.22
9 NS 4CcN-3 -500 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
12 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 55,93 %10 NS 3P W+1 -170 14 77.78
11 NS 1S E+1 -120 4 22.22
12 NS 2P N-3 -300 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
22 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 34,26 %13 NS 5TcW-3 800 18 100.00
14 NS 3S S+1 430 16 88.89
15 NS 4P S = 620 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
21 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 42,04 %16 NS 1P N+2 140 15 83.33
17 NS 3KcE-2 300 9 50.00
18 NS 2P S = 110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
19 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 57,59 %22 NS 4C W+1 -650 6 33.33
23 NS 3S E = -600 6 33.33
24 NS 1TcW-3 500 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
18 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 53,33 %25 NS 2C S = 110 3 16.67
26 NS 3K S = 110 15 83.33
27 NS 4C S+1 450 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
17 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 65,93 %28 NS 3S W-2 100 17 94.44
29 NS 1S N-1 -100 5 27.78
30 NS 3C W = -140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
16 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 55,74 %31 NS 3S W-2 100 14 77.78
32 NS 6S N = 990 3 16.67
33 NS 2C S+2 170 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
Total : 322,0 / 540 = 59,63 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse
17 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 65,93 % 1 NS 2K S = 90 8 44.44
2 NS 4P S-2 -200 0 0.00
3 NS 4P N-2 -100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
16 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 55,74 % 4 NS 3S N-1 -100 5 27.78
5 NS 2C W = -110 1 5.56
6 NS 4CcN = 590 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
15 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 45,74 % 7 NS 4C S = 620 16 88.89
8 NS 3CcS = 530 17 94.44
9 NS 4T E+1 -150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
14 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 50,19 %10 NS 3P W = -140 17 94.44
11 NS 3T W = -110 7 38.89
12 NS 2P N-1 -100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
13 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 41,67 %13 NS 3P W-1 100 11 61.11
14 NS 3S S-2 -100 3 16.67
15 NS 5CcE-4 800 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
12 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 55,93 %16 NS 1P N-1 -50 4 22.22
17 NS 3KcE-3 500 15 83.33
18 NS 2P S-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
22 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 34,26 %19 NS 2S N = 120 11 61.11
20 NS 2P W-1 100 7 38.89
21 NS 3C N+1 170 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
20 DEGUELLE Jacques -ALLARD Guy : 47,59 %25 NS 2C S+1 140 11 61.11
26 NS 1K S+1 90 10 55.56
27 NS 4C S+1 450 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
19 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 57,59 %28 NS 1S W = -90 7 38.89
29 NS 1S N-3 -300 1 5.56
30 NS 3C W = -140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
18 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 53,33 %31 NS 3K E = -110 5 27.78
32 NS 7S N = 1520 17 94.44
33 NS 2P E-1 50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
Total : 288,0 / 540 = 53,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 LAMOTTE André -MONSEUR CLaudine
19 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 57,59 % 1 NS 3K S-2 -100 2 11.11
2 NS 2P S+2 170 18 100.00
3 NS 5P N-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
18 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 53,33 % 4 NS 4P N = 620 12 66.67
5 NS 3C W-1 50 10 55.56
6 NS 4CcN = 590 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
17 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 65,93 % 7 NS 2C S+2 170 6 33.33
8 NS 3P E = -140 1 5.56
9 NS 3S W = -600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
16 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 55,74 %10 NS 4P W = -620 6 33.33
11 NS 2T W = -90 11 61.11
12 NS 2S E = -120 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
15 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 45,74 %13 NS 4P W-1 100 11 61.11
14 NS 3T E-3 150 12 66.67
15 NS 4P S-1 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
14 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 50,19 %16 NS 2P N-2 -100 0 0.00
17 NS 3CcE-4 800 18 100.00
18 NS 2P S = 110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
13 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 41,67 %19 NS 4P N-1 -50 5 27.78
20 NS 2T W = -90 4 22.22
21 NS 1S E-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
12 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 55,93 %22 NS 3S E+1 -630 11 61.11
23 NS 3S E = -600 6 33.33
24 NS 2P S+3 200 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
21 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 42,04 %28 NS 3S W-2 100 17 94.44
29 NS 1C W = -80 8 44.44
30 NS 3C W+1 -170 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
20 DEGUELLE Jacques -ALLARD Guy : 47,59 %31 NS 3C N-1 -100 11 61.11
32 NS 6P S+1 1010 7 38.89
33 NS 3C S = 140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 252,0 / 540 = 46,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
21 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 42,04 % 1 NS 2K S-1 -50 5 27.78
2 NS 4P S-1 -100 5 27.78
3 NS 3P N-1 -50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
20 DEGUELLE Jacques -ALLARD Guy : 47,59 % 4 NS 3S N+2 660 18 100.00
5 NS 2C E-2 100 16 88.89
6 NS 3C S+1 170 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
19 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 57,59 % 7 NS 2C S+1 140 1 5.56
8 NS 2C S = 110 6 33.33
9 NS 3S W = -600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
18 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 53,33 %10 NS 4P W = -620 6 33.33
11 NS 2T E+1 -110 7 38.89
12 NS 3K E-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
17 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 65,93 %13 NS 4P W-1 100 11 61.11
14 NS 3S S = 400 14 77.78
15 NS 4P S-1 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
16 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 55,74 %16 NS 1P N+1 110 12 66.67
17 NS 5TcW-3 500 15 83.33
18 NS 2P N-2 -200 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
15 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 45,74 %19 NS 3C S = 140 16 88.89
20 NS 3K E-2 200 18 100.00
21 NS 3C N = 140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
14 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 50,19 %22 NS 4C W+1 -650 6 33.33
23 NS 3S E-1 100 14 77.78
24 NS 4P S+1 450 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
13 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 41,67 %25 NS 2S E-1 100 0 0.00
26 NS 1T S = 70 8 44.44
27 NS 4C S+1 450 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
22 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 34,26 %31 NS 2P S = 110 17 94.44
32 NS 6P S+1 1010 7 38.89
33 NS 2C S+1 140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 306,0 / 540 = 56,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry
1 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HUBLET Carlo : 52,59 % 1 EO 4P N-1 -50 13 72.22
2 EO 2P S+1 140 3 16.67
3 EO 4P N-2 -100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
7 LAGRANGE-NICAISE Elisabet-DELTOUR Emile : 48,52 % 4 EO 3S N-3 -300 17 94.44
5 EO 3C W-1 50 8 44.44
6 EO 3K W-1 100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
2 DAPHNE Chantal -ROSOUX Louis : 46,48 % 7 EO 2C S+2 170 12 66.67
8 EO 2S E-3 150 8 44.44
9 EO 3S W+1 -630 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,63 %10 EO 3P W+1 -170 4 22.22
11 EO 1S E+1 -120 14 77.78
12 EO 2P N-3 -300 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 47,78 %13 EO 4P W-1 100 7 38.89
14 EO 3S S-3 -150 18 100.00
15 EO 2P S+2 170 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
9 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse : 53,33 %16 EO 1P N-1 -50 14 77.78
17 EO 3KcE-3 500 3 16.67
18 EO 2P S-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
4 BRIOT Marie-Louise -MASSAUX Jacques : 45,19 %19 EO 2S N = 120 7 38.89
20 EO 2C S+1 140 3 16.67
21 EO 3T S = 110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
10 LAMOTTE André -MONSEUR CLaudine : 46,67 %22 EO 3S E+1 -630 7 38.89
23 EO 3S E = -600 12 66.67
24 EO 2P S+3 200 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
5 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 44,07 %25 EO 2C S+1 140 7 38.89
26 EO 2C E+1 -140 14 77.78
27 EO 4C S+1 450 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
6 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 49,07 %31 EO 2C N-1 -100 7 38.89
32 EO 6S S+1 1020 6 33.33
33 EO 2P E-1 50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 302,0 / 540 = 55,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques
7 LAGRANGE-NICAISE Elisabet-DELTOUR Emile : 48,52 % 1 EO 3K N = 110 7 38.89
2 EO 2P S = 110 7 38.89
3 EO 4P N-2 -100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
2 DAPHNE Chantal -ROSOUX Louis : 46,48 % 4 EO 3S S-3 -300 17 94.44
5 EO 4CcW-4 800 0 0.00
6 EO 3T S+1 130 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,63 % 7 EO 2C S+3 200 7 38.89
8 EO 3C S+1 170 5 27.78
9 EO 4CcN-3 -500 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 47,78 %10 EO 4P W = -620 12 66.67
11 EO 3T W-2 100 3 16.67
12 EO 2P N-1 -100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
9 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse : 53,33 %13 EO 3P W-1 100 7 38.89
14 EO 3S S-2 -100 15 83.33
15 EO 5CcE-4 800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
4 BRIOT Marie-Louise -MASSAUX Jacques : 45,19 %16 EO 1P N+2 140 3 16.67
17 EO 3S N = 400 6 33.33
18 EO 2P S+1 140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
10 LAMOTTE André -MONSEUR CLaudine : 46,67 %19 EO 4P N-1 -50 13 72.22
20 EO 2T W = -90 14 77.78
21 EO 1S E-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
5 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 44,07 %22 EO 4K E+2 -170 2 11.11
23 EO 5K W-2 200 1 5.56
24 EO 2P S+3 200 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,67 %25 EO 2S E-1 100 18 100.00
26 EO 1T S = 70 10 55.56
27 EO 4C S+1 450 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
6 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 49,07 %28 EO 2C W-1 50 6 33.33
29 EO 2C W-2 200 0 0.00
30 EO 3C E = -140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
Total : 225,0 / 540 = 41,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,63 % 4 EO 3S N = 600 9 50.00
5 EO 3C W-1 50 8 44.44
6 EO 5K W-2 200 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 47,78 % 7 EO 2C S+3 200 7 38.89
8 EO 3C S+1 170 5 27.78
9 EO 3S W+2 -660 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
9 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse : 53,33 %10 EO 3P W = -140 1 5.56
11 EO 3T W = -110 11 61.11
12 EO 2P N-1 -100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
4 BRIOT Marie-Louise -MASSAUX Jacques : 45,19 %13 EO 2P W+1 -140 15 83.33
14 EO 3P S-2 -100 15 83.33
15 EO 5P S-2 -200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
10 LAMOTTE André -MONSEUR CLaudine : 46,67 %16 EO 2P N-2 -100 18 100.00
17 EO 3CcE-4 800 0 0.00
18 EO 2P S = 110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
5 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 44,07 %19 EO 2S N = 120 7 38.89
20 EO 2C S = 110 7 38.89
21 EO 3T S-1 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,67 %22 EO 4C W+1 -650 12 66.67
23 EO 3S E-1 100 4 22.22
24 EO 4P S+1 450 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
6 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 49,07 %25 EO 2C S+1 140 7 38.89
26 EO 3K S = 110 3 16.67
27 EO 5C S = 450 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
1 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HUBLET Carlo : 52,59 %28 EO 1S W-1 50 6 33.33
29 EO 1S N-1 -100 13 72.22
30 EO 4TcS-5 -1100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
7 LAGRANGE-NICAISE Elisabet-DELTOUR Emile : 48,52 %31 EO 3K E+1 -130 18 100.00
32 EO 6S N+1 1020 6 33.33
33 EO 3PcE-2 300 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 271,0 / 540 = 50,19 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,63 % 1 EO 3K S = 110 7 38.89
2 EO 4P S-1 -100 13 72.22
3 EO 4P N-2 -100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
9 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse : 53,33 % 7 EO 4C S = 620 2 11.11
8 EO 3CcS = 530 1 5.56
9 EO 4T E+1 -150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
4 BRIOT Marie-Louise -MASSAUX Jacques : 45,19 %10 EO 4P W = -620 12 66.67
11 EO 2S N-3 -150 16 88.89
12 EO 1S E+2 -150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
10 LAMOTTE André -MONSEUR CLaudine : 46,67 %13 EO 4P W-1 100 7 38.89
14 EO 3T E-3 150 6 33.33
15 EO 4P S-1 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
5 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 44,07 %16 EO 1P N = 80 9 50.00
17 EO 3TcW = -470 18 100.00
18 EO 2P S-2 -200 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,67 %19 EO 3C S = 140 2 11.11
20 EO 3K E-2 200 0 0.00
21 EO 3C N = 140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
6 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 49,07 %22 EO 3S E = -600 4 22.22
23 EO 4P E = -620 18 100.00
24 EO 4C N = 420 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
1 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HUBLET Carlo : 52,59 %25 EO 2C S+1 140 7 38.89
26 EO 1K S+2 110 3 16.67
27 EO 4C S+1 450 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
7 LAGRANGE-NICAISE Elisabet-DELTOUR Emile : 48,52 %28 EO 2C W-1 50 6 33.33
29 EO 2C W-1 100 4 22.22
30 EO 1S E+4 -210 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
2 DAPHNE Chantal -ROSOUX Louis : 46,48 %31 EO 2P S = 110 1 5.56
32 EO 6S N+1 1020 6 33.33
33 EO 3P E-2 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 247,0 / 540 = 45,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
3 FRAITURE Louis -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 47,78 % 1 EO 5PcS-4 -800 18 100.00
2 EO 2P S = 110 7 38.89
3 EO 4P N-2 -100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
9 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse : 53,33 % 4 EO 3S N-1 -100 13 72.22
5 EO 2C W = -110 17 94.44
6 EO 4CcN = 590 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
10 LAMOTTE André -MONSEUR CLaudine : 46,67 %10 EO 4P W = -620 12 66.67
11 EO 2T W = -90 7 38.89
12 EO 2S E = -120 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
5 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 44,07 %13 EO 4P W = -620 18 100.00
14 EO 3S S-1 -50 11 61.11
15 EO 4P S-1 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,67 %16 EO 1P N+1 110 6 33.33
17 EO 5TcW-3 500 3 16.67
18 EO 2P N-2 -200 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
6 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 49,07 %19 EO 2S S-1 -50 13 72.22
20 EO 2C S = 110 7 38.89
21 EO 3P W-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
1 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HUBLET Carlo : 52,59 %22 EO 3S E+1 -630 7 38.89
23 EO 3S W-2 200 1 5.56
24 EO 2P S+3 200 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
7 LAGRANGE-NICAISE Elisabet-DELTOUR Emile : 48,52 %25 EO 2C S+1 140 7 38.89
26 EO 3K S-1 -100 12 66.67
27 EO 4C S+1 450 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
2 DAPHNE Chantal -ROSOUX Louis : 46,48 %28 EO 1S W+1 -120 15 83.33
29 EO 1S N-3 -300 17 94.44
30 EO 4C W-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,63 %31 EO 3S W-2 100 4 22.22
32 EO 6S N = 990 15 83.33
33 EO 2C S+2 170 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
Total : 301,0 / 540 = 55,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie
9 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse : 53,33 % 1 EO 2K S = 90 10 55.56
2 EO 4P S-2 -200 18 100.00
3 EO 4P N-2 -100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
4 BRIOT Marie-Louise -MASSAUX Jacques : 45,19 % 4 EO 3S N-1 -100 13 72.22
5 EO 3C W-1 50 8 44.44
6 EO 2S W = -120 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
10 LAMOTTE André -MONSEUR CLaudine : 46,67 % 7 EO 2C S+2 170 12 66.67
8 EO 3P E = -140 17 94.44
9 EO 3S W = -600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,67 %13 EO 4P W-1 100 7 38.89
14 EO 3S S = 400 4 22.22
15 EO 4P S-1 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
6 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 49,07 %16 EO 1P N = 80 9 50.00
17 EO 2S N-1 -50 16 88.89
18 EO 4P N-3 -300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
1 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HUBLET Carlo : 52,59 %19 EO 4C S-2 -100 17 94.44
20 EO 2P W = -110 17 94.44
21 EO 3P E-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
7 LAGRANGE-NICAISE Elisabet-DELTOUR Emile : 48,52 %22 EO 4C W+1 -650 12 66.67
23 EO 3S E = -600 12 66.67
24 EO 2P S+3 200 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
2 DAPHNE Chantal -ROSOUX Louis : 46,48 %25 EO 2C S = 110 15 83.33
26 EO 3S S-2 -200 17 94.44
27 EO 4C S+1 450 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,63 %28 EO 3S W-2 100 1 5.56
29 EO 1S N-1 -100 13 72.22
30 EO 3C W = -140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 47,78 %31 EO 2K E+1 -110 13 72.22
32 EO 6S N = 990 15 83.33
33 EO 3PcW-2 300 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 356,0 / 540 = 65,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
4 BRIOT Marie-Louise -MASSAUX Jacques : 45,19 % 1 EO 2P E-3 150 4 22.22
2 EO 4P S-1 -100 13 72.22
3 EO 4P N-2 -100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
10 LAMOTTE André -MONSEUR CLaudine : 46,67 % 4 EO 4P N = 620 6 33.33
5 EO 3C W-1 50 8 44.44
6 EO 4CcN = 590 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
5 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 44,07 % 7 EO 2C S+2 170 12 66.67
8 EO 3P E = -140 17 94.44
9 EO 3S W+1 -630 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,67 %10 EO 4P W = -620 12 66.67
11 EO 2T E+1 -110 11 61.11
12 EO 3K E-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
1 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HUBLET Carlo : 52,59 %16 EO 1P N-1 -50 14 77.78
17 EO 4TcE-2 300 9 50.00
18 EO 2P S-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
7 LAGRANGE-NICAISE Elisabet-DELTOUR Emile : 48,52 %19 EO 2S N+2 180 0 0.00
20 EO 2P W = -110 17 94.44
21 EO 3C N = 140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
2 DAPHNE Chantal -ROSOUX Louis : 46,48 %22 EO 3S E+3 -690 17 94.44
23 EO 3S E = -600 12 66.67
24 EO 3S N = 400 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,63 %25 EO 2C S = 110 15 83.33
26 EO 3K S = 110 3 16.67
27 EO 4C S+1 450 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 47,78 %28 EO 1S W = -90 11 61.11
29 EO 1S N+1 120 2 11.11
30 EO 3C W+1 -170 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
9 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse : 53,33 %31 EO 3K E = -110 13 72.22
32 EO 7S N = 1520 1 5.56
33 EO 2P E-1 50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
Total : 288,0 / 540 = 53,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
10 LAMOTTE André -MONSEUR CLaudine : 46,67 % 1 EO 3K S-2 -100 16 88.89
2 EO 2P S+2 170 0 0.00
3 EO 5P N-3 -150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
5 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 44,07 % 4 EO 3S S = 600 9 50.00
5 EO 2C W-1 50 8 44.44
6 EO 3K W = -110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,67 % 7 EO 2C S+1 140 17 94.44
8 EO 2C S = 110 12 66.67
9 EO 3S W = -600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
6 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 49,07 %10 EO 4P W = -620 12 66.67
11 EO 1S E = -90 7 38.89
12 EO 2PcN-2 -500 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
1 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HUBLET Carlo : 52,59 %13 EO 3P W = -140 15 83.33
14 EO 4TcE-4 800 0 0.00
15 EO 4P S = 620 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
2 DAPHNE Chantal -ROSOUX Louis : 46,48 %19 EO 4C S-2 -100 17 94.44
20 EO 2C S+1 140 3 16.67
21 EO 4C N+1 650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,63 %22 EO 4C W+1 -650 12 66.67
23 EO 3S E = -600 12 66.67
24 EO 1TcW-3 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 47,78 %25 EO 2CcS+1 570 0 0.00
26 EO 5K S-2 -200 17 94.44
27 EO 4C S-1 -50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
9 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse : 53,33 %28 EO 1S W = -90 11 61.11
29 EO 1S N-3 -300 17 94.44
30 EO 3C W = -140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
4 BRIOT Marie-Louise -MASSAUX Jacques : 45,19 %31 EO 3K E = -110 13 72.22
32 EO 6P S = 980 18 100.00
33 EO 3C S = 140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
Total : 311,0 / 540 = 57,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 DEGUELLE Jacques -ALLARD Guy
5 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 44,07 % 1 EO 3S N = 400 1 5.56
2 EO 4P S-1 -100 13 72.22
3 EO 3P N-1 -50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,67 % 4 EO 3S N+2 660 0 0.00
5 EO 2C E-2 100 2 11.11
6 EO 3C S+1 170 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
6 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 49,07 % 7 EO 2C S+1 140 17 94.44
8 EO 3CcS = 530 1 5.56
9 EO 3S W+1 -630 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
1 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HUBLET Carlo : 52,59 %10 EO 4P W = -620 12 66.67
11 EO 3S W-2 100 3 16.67
12 EO 4KcW-2 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
7 LAGRANGE-NICAISE Elisabet-DELTOUR Emile : 48,52 %13 EO 3P W-1 100 7 38.89
14 EO 2S S-1 -50 11 61.11
15 EO 4P S = 620 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
2 DAPHNE Chantal -ROSOUX Louis : 46,48 %16 EO 3S S-1 -50 14 77.78
17 EO 3T E-1 50 14 77.78
18 EO 2C E+1 -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 47,78 %22 EO 3S E+3 -690 17 94.44
23 EO 3S E = -600 12 66.67
24 EO 3S N = 400 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
9 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse : 53,33 %25 EO 2C S+1 140 7 38.89
26 EO 1K S+1 90 8 44.44
27 EO 4C S+1 450 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
4 BRIOT Marie-Louise -MASSAUX Jacques : 45,19 %28 EO 3S W = -400 18 100.00
29 EO 2K S = 90 7 38.89
30 EO 3C W+1 -170 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
10 LAMOTTE André -MONSEUR CLaudine : 46,67 %31 EO 3C N-1 -100 7 38.89
32 EO 6P S+1 1010 11 61.11
33 EO 3C S = 140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 257,0 / 540 = 47,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane
11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,67 % 1 EO 2K S-1 -50 13 72.22
2 EO 4P S-1 -100 13 72.22
3 EO 3P N-1 -50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
6 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 49,07 % 4 EO 3S S+1 630 3 16.67
5 EO 2C W = -110 17 94.44
6 EO 2S W = -120 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
1 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HUBLET Carlo : 52,59 % 7 EO 1ScE-3 800 0 0.00
8 EO 2C S+1 140 10 55.56
9 EO 3S W-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
7 LAGRANGE-NICAISE Elisabet-DELTOUR Emile : 48,52 %10 EO 4P W = -620 12 66.67
11 EO 3S W = -400 18 100.00
12 EO 3KcW-1 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
2 DAPHNE Chantal -ROSOUX Louis : 46,48 %13 EO 3P W-1 100 7 38.89
14 EO 2P N = 110 8 44.44
15 EO 4P S-1 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,63 %16 EO 1P N+2 140 3 16.67
17 EO 3KcE-2 300 9 50.00
18 EO 2P S = 110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 47,78 %19 EO 2S N = 120 7 38.89
20 EO 3T W-1 100 11 61.11
21 EO 4C N = 620 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
4 BRIOT Marie-Louise -MASSAUX Jacques : 45,19 %25 EO 2C S+1 140 7 38.89
26 EO 1K S+2 110 3 16.67
27 EO 4PcE-3 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
10 LAMOTTE André -MONSEUR CLaudine : 46,67 %28 EO 3S W-2 100 1 5.56
29 EO 1C W = -80 10 55.56
30 EO 3C W+1 -170 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
5 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 44,07 %31 EO 3K E = -110 13 72.22
32 EO 7S N = 1520 1 5.56
33 EO 2C S+1 140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
Total : 227,0 / 540 = 42,04 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef
6 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 49,07 % 1 EO 3S N = 400 1 5.56
2 EO 2P S+1 140 3 16.67
3 EO 3P N-1 -50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
1 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HUBLET Carlo : 52,59 % 4 EO 3S S+1 630 3 16.67
5 EO 3K S-1 -100 14 77.78
6 EO 2S W-1 100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
7 LAGRANGE-NICAISE Elisabet-DELTOUR Emile : 48,52 % 7 EO 2C S+4 230 4 22.22
8 EO 2P E-2 100 14 77.78
9 EO 3CcN-3 -500 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
2 DAPHNE Chantal -ROSOUX Louis : 46,48 %10 EO 3P E = -140 1 5.56
11 EO 3ScE-2 300 0 0.00
12 EO 1S E+1 -120 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,63 %13 EO 5TcW-3 800 0 0.00
14 EO 3S S+1 430 2 11.11
15 EO 4P S = 620 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 47,78 %16 EO 2S N+1 150 0 0.00
17 EO 2C S = 110 12 66.67
18 EO 2P S = 110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
9 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse : 53,33 %19 EO 2S N = 120 7 38.89
20 EO 2P W-1 100 11 61.11
21 EO 3C N+1 170 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
4 BRIOT Marie-Louise -MASSAUX Jacques : 45,19 %22 EO 1K E+4 -150 0 0.00
23 EO 1P E+3 -170 6 33.33
24 EO 3P S+1 170 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
5 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 44,07 %28 EO 1S W+1 -120 15 83.33
29 EO 1S N = 90 7 38.89
30 EO 2C W+1 -140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,67 %31 EO 2P S = 110 1 5.56
32 EO 6P S+1 1010 11 61.11
33 EO 2C S+1 140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 185,0 / 540 = 34,26 %
|
|