|
Tournoi du 29-10-09
1 60,74 7 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles
2 53,89 10 MATELART Marc -CASSART Guy
3 53,15 5 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette
4 52,04 8 FAULX Anne -BERNARD Jules
5 51,30 2 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert
6 49,44 4 NELIS Claude -ROSOUX Louis
7 48,52 6 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand
8 45,00 1 RAIMOND Yves -DELCARTE Emile
9 43,89 3 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine
10 42,04 9 VAN DOOREN Michele -THIRIFAYS Marie-Paule
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 63,52 17 JOBE Philippe -ROUSSEAU Willy
2 57,22 11 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme
3 55,93 14 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle
4 55,37 12 CORCEOVEI Horia -LIBERT Laurent
5 52,41 19 FRAITURE Louis -DE WULF Jean-Paul
6 46,48 13 LABYE Pascal -BRUYR Pascal
7 46,30 18 MOLS Bruno -VANDERHULST Jacques
8 45,56 16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de TERWANGNE Philippe
9 41,30 20 VAN DOOREN André -NAVEZ Camille
10 35,93 15 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc
PAIRE Nr : 1 RAIMOND Yves -DELCARTE Emile
11 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme : 57,22 % 1 NS 2C W+1 -140 2 11.11
2 NS 2C E = -110 12 66.67
3 NS 3T W+2 -150 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
13 LABYE Pascal -BRUYR Pascal : 46,48 % 4 NS 3C W-2 200 14 77.78
5 NS 4C N = 620 1 5.56
6 NS 3S S+1 430 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
12 CORCEOVEI Horia -LIBERT Laurent : 55,37 % 7 NS 4P N+1 650 7 38.89
8 NS 6K W-2 100 15 83.33
9 NS 1S W+1 -120 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 45,56 %10 NS 2P S = 110 9 50.00
11 NS 1S W = -90 6 33.33
12 NS 2P E = -110 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
17 JOBE Philippe -ROUSSEAU Willy : 63,52 %13 NS 3P E+1 -170 2 11.11
14 NS 3S N+3 490 9 50.00
15 NS 1S W+1 -120 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
18 MOLS Bruno -VANDERHULST Jacques : 46,30 %16 NS 4C W+2 -680 7 38.89
17 NS 4P S+1 450 8 44.44
18 NS 4C E-1 50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
19 FRAITURE Louis -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 52,41 %19 NS 1ScN-3 -500 16 88.89
20 NS 1S E+2 -150 2 11.11
21 NS 3T W = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
20 VAN DOOREN André -NAVEZ Camille : 41,30 %22 NS 3P E-3 300 12 66.67
23 NS 4P N-2 -200 5 27.78
24 NS 6K W-3 150 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
14 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 55,93 %25 NS 2C E+1 -140 0 0.00
26 NS 1S W+2 -150 2 11.11
27 NS 5TcS = 550 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
15 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc : 35,93 %28 NS 3T W-1 50 15 83.33
29 NS 2K E = -90 18 100.00
30 NS 4T N-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 243,0 / 540 = 45,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert
13 LABYE Pascal -BRUYR Pascal : 46,48 % 1 NS 1S S-1 -50 9 50.00
2 NS 1S S-4 -400 2 11.11
3 NS 5K E = -600 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
12 CORCEOVEI Horia -LIBERT Laurent : 55,37 % 4 NS 3KcN+1 870 18 100.00
5 NS 3S N+1 630 5 27.78
6 NS 5C S+1 480 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
11 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme : 57,22 % 7 NS 5P N = 650 7 38.89
8 NS 3PcN-6 -1400 0 0.00
9 NS 3K N+1 130 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
20 VAN DOOREN André -NAVEZ Camille : 41,30 %10 NS 1S S+2 150 15 83.33
11 NS 2C S = 110 15 83.33
12 NS 2P E = -110 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
14 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 55,93 %13 NS 4C N-1 -100 7 38.89
14 NS 3S N+4 520 16 88.89
15 NS 1S E+1 -120 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
15 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc : 35,93 %16 NS 4C E+1 -650 18 100.00
17 NS 6P S = 980 15 83.33
18 NS 4C E+1 -450 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 45,56 %19 NS 3S E+1 -630 7 38.89
20 NS 1S E = -90 9 50.00
21 NS 3T W = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
17 JOBE Philippe -ROUSSEAU Willy : 63,52 %22 NS 2PcE-3 800 18 100.00
23 NS 4P N-2 -200 5 27.78
24 NS 5K E = -400 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
18 MOLS Bruno -VANDERHULST Jacques : 46,30 %25 NS 2P E = -110 12 66.67
26 NS 1S W-1 100 18 100.00
27 NS 4K S-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
19 FRAITURE Louis -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 52,41 %28 NS 2T W+3 -150 2 11.11
29 NS 2C E+1 -140 7 38.89
30 NS 3T N-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
Total : 277,0 / 540 = 51,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine
12 CORCEOVEI Horia -LIBERT Laurent : 55,37 % 1 NS 3T S-1 -50 9 50.00
2 NS 1S W+2 -150 7 38.89
3 NS 4T E+1 -150 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
11 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme : 57,22 % 4 NS 2T S = 90 5 27.78
5 NS 4C N = 620 1 5.56
6 NS 3S S+2 460 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
13 LABYE Pascal -BRUYR Pascal : 46,48 % 7 NS 4P N+1 650 7 38.89
8 NS 3S W+1 -430 8 44.44
9 NS 1S W+1 -120 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
18 MOLS Bruno -VANDERHULST Jacques : 46,30 %10 NS 3S N-1 -100 4 22.22
11 NS 2C S = 110 15 83.33
12 NS 2P E-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
19 FRAITURE Louis -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 52,41 %13 NS 5CcS-1 -200 0 0.00
14 NS 3S S+2 460 4 22.22
15 NS 1S E = -90 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
20 VAN DOOREN André -NAVEZ Camille : 41,30 %16 NS 4C W+2 -680 7 38.89
17 NS 6P S-1 -50 3 16.67
18 NS 4C E+1 -450 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
14 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 55,93 %19 NS 3K W+1 -130 18 100.00
20 NS 1S E = -90 9 50.00
21 NS 2T W+1 -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
15 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc : 35,93 %22 NS 3S N+1 430 14 77.78
23 NS 3P N-1 -100 14 77.78
24 NS 4P N-4 -200 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 45,56 %25 NS 2C W = -110 12 66.67
26 NS 1S W = -90 13 72.22
27 NS 5TcS-1 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
17 JOBE Philippe -ROUSSEAU Willy : 63,52 %28 NS 2P W+1 -140 8 44.44
29 NS 3P N-3 -300 0 0.00
30 NS 1S E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
Total : 237,0 / 540 = 43,89 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 NELIS Claude -ROSOUX Louis
17 JOBE Philippe -ROUSSEAU Willy : 63,52 % 1 NS 4T N-2 -100 4 22.22
2 NS 2C E+3 -200 4 22.22
3 NS 3P N = 140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 45,56 % 4 NS 3P N-1 -100 2 11.11
5 NS 4C N+1 650 13 72.22
6 NS 3S S+2 460 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
15 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc : 35,93 % 7 NS 4P N+1 650 7 38.89
8 NS 3S E+2 -460 5 27.78
9 NS 2P N-2 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
14 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 55,93 %10 NS 2S N+1 150 15 83.33
11 NS 1S E+1 -120 0 0.00
12 NS 2P E = -110 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
20 VAN DOOREN André -NAVEZ Camille : 41,30 %13 NS 4C S-1 -100 7 38.89
14 NS 5S N+2 520 16 88.89
15 NS 3T W-3 150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
19 FRAITURE Louis -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 52,41 %16 NS 4C W+2 -680 7 38.89
17 NS 6P S = 980 15 83.33
18 NS 4C E+1 -450 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
18 MOLS Bruno -VANDERHULST Jacques : 46,30 %19 NS 3S W+1 -630 7 38.89
20 NS 1C E = -80 12 66.67
21 NS 1C N-1 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
13 LABYE Pascal -BRUYR Pascal : 46,48 %22 NS 2P E-2 200 10 55.56
23 NS 4P N-2 -200 5 27.78
24 NS 3S E+2 -460 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
12 CORCEOVEI Horia -LIBERT Laurent : 55,37 %25 NS 1S W+1 -120 3 16.67
26 NS 1S W+1 -120 7 38.89
27 NS 4P N = 420 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
11 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme : 57,22 %28 NS 3P E = -140 8 44.44
29 NS 2C E+1 -140 7 38.89
30 NS 1S N = 90 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 267,0 / 540 = 49,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette
18 MOLS Bruno -VANDERHULST Jacques : 46,30 % 1 NS 4TcN-2 -300 0 0.00
2 NS 1S W = -90 16 88.89
3 NS 4T E+1 -150 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
17 JOBE Philippe -ROUSSEAU Willy : 63,52 % 4 NS 3C W-1 100 9 50.00
5 NS 4C N+1 650 13 72.22
6 NS 3S S+2 460 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 45,56 % 7 NS 3PcN+2 1130 16 88.89
8 NS 6K W-3 150 18 100.00
9 NS 1S W+1 -120 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
11 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme : 57,22 %10 NS 3S N-1 -100 4 22.22
11 NS 2K S-2 -100 3 16.67
12 NS 2P E = -110 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
15 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc : 35,93 %13 NS 4C S = 620 15 83.33
14 NS 3S S+3 490 9 50.00
15 NS 3S W-2 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
14 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 55,93 %16 NS 4C W+2 -680 7 38.89
17 NS 6P S-1 -50 3 16.67
18 NS 4C E+1 -450 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
20 VAN DOOREN André -NAVEZ Camille : 41,30 %19 NS 3S E+1 -630 7 38.89
20 NS 3C E-3 300 18 100.00
21 NS 4S W-2 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
19 FRAITURE Louis -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 52,41 %22 NS 3T S-1 -50 3 16.67
23 NS 4P N-1 -100 14 77.78
24 NS 5T W-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
13 LABYE Pascal -BRUYR Pascal : 46,48 %25 NS 2C W = -110 12 66.67
26 NS 1S W = -90 13 72.22
27 NS 4P N = 420 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
12 CORCEOVEI Horia -LIBERT Laurent : 55,37 %28 NS 3P W = -140 8 44.44
29 NS 2PcN-1 -200 2 11.11
30 NS 2K E = -90 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
Total : 287,0 / 540 = 53,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand
19 FRAITURE Louis -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 52,41 % 1 NS 2C E-1 50 14 77.78
2 NS 2KcS-5 -1400 0 0.00
3 NS 3P N = 140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
18 MOLS Bruno -VANDERHULST Jacques : 46,30 % 4 NS 3K N+2 150 12 66.67
5 NS 4C N+1 650 13 72.22
6 NS 3S S+2 460 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
17 JOBE Philippe -ROUSSEAU Willy : 63,52 % 7 NS 4P N+1 650 7 38.89
8 NS 3S E+2 -460 5 27.78
9 NS 2CcS-2 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
12 CORCEOVEI Horia -LIBERT Laurent : 55,37 %10 NS 3TcS-2 -500 0 0.00
11 NS 2CcS-1 -100 3 16.67
12 NS 3P E-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
11 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme : 57,22 %13 NS 5C S-1 -100 7 38.89
14 NS 5T S+1 420 2 11.11
15 NS 2C N = 110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 45,56 %16 NS 4C W+2 -680 7 38.89
17 NS 6P S = 980 15 83.33
18 NS 4C E+1 -450 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
15 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc : 35,93 %19 NS 3S E+1 -630 7 38.89
20 NS 2C E-2 200 16 88.89
21 NS 2P E = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
14 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 55,93 %22 NS 3K N+3 170 7 38.89
23 NS 4P N-2 -200 5 27.78
24 NS 3P N-3 -150 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
20 VAN DOOREN André -NAVEZ Camille : 41,30 %25 NS 2C W = -110 12 66.67
26 NS 1S W+2 -150 2 11.11
27 NS 5T S-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
13 LABYE Pascal -BRUYR Pascal : 46,48 %28 NS 4T W-2 100 18 100.00
29 NS 2P N-1 -100 15 83.33
30 NS 2K E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
Total : 262,0 / 540 = 48,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles
20 VAN DOOREN André -NAVEZ Camille : 41,30 % 1 NS 3T N-1 -50 9 50.00
2 NS 2T W+1 -110 12 66.67
3 NS 3P N = 140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
19 FRAITURE Louis -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 52,41 % 4 NS 4P N-2 -200 0 0.00
5 NS 3S N+1 630 5 27.78
6 NS 3S S+2 460 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
18 MOLS Bruno -VANDERHULST Jacques : 46,30 % 7 NS 4P N+1 650 7 38.89
8 NS 3S E+3 -490 2 11.11
9 NS 1S W-1 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
13 LABYE Pascal -BRUYR Pascal : 46,48 %10 NS 2S N+1 150 15 83.33
11 NS 2C S+2 170 18 100.00
12 NS 2P E-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
12 CORCEOVEI Horia -LIBERT Laurent : 55,37 %13 NS 4C S = 620 15 83.33
14 NS 3S S+3 490 9 50.00
15 NS 3S E-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
11 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme : 57,22 %16 NS 3S W+2 -660 15 83.33
17 NS 6P S = 980 15 83.33
18 NS 4C E = -420 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
17 JOBE Philippe -ROUSSEAU Willy : 63,52 %19 NS 3S W+2 -630 7 38.89
20 NS 2S W = -120 5 27.78
21 NS 3P E-1 50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 45,56 %22 NS 3S S+2 460 16 88.89
23 NS 4P N-2 -200 5 27.78
24 NS 4C E-3 150 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
15 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc : 35,93 %25 NS 2C W = -110 12 66.67
26 NS 1S W+1 -120 7 38.89
27 NS 2P N+1 140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
14 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 55,93 %28 NS 3P W = -140 8 44.44
29 NS 1S W+1 -120 12 66.67
30 NS 3K E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 328,0 / 540 = 60,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 FAULX Anne -BERNARD Jules
14 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 55,93 % 1 NS 2T N = 90 16 88.89
2 NS 1S W+2 -150 7 38.89
3 NS 4T E = -130 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
20 VAN DOOREN André -NAVEZ Camille : 41,30 % 4 NS 2T S = 90 5 27.78
5 NS 4C N+1 650 13 72.22
6 NS 4P N = 420 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
19 FRAITURE Louis -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 52,41 % 7 NS 5PxN = 1200 18 100.00
8 NS 6K W-2 100 15 83.33
9 NS 1S W+1 -120 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
15 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc : 35,93 %10 NS 2S N+1 150 15 83.33
11 NS 1P N = 80 12 66.67
12 NS 3P E-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
13 LABYE Pascal -BRUYR Pascal : 46,48 %13 NS 4P E-1 100 12 66.67
14 NS 3S N+4 520 16 88.89
15 NS 3S E-2 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
12 CORCEOVEI Horia -LIBERT Laurent : 55,37 %16 NS 3S W+2 -660 15 83.33
17 NS 6P N-1 -50 3 16.67
18 NS 4C E+1 -450 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
11 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme : 57,22 %19 NS 3S E+1 -630 7 38.89
20 NS 1S E+1 -120 5 27.78
21 NS 2P E = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
18 MOLS Bruno -VANDERHULST Jacques : 46,30 %22 NS 3K N+3 170 7 38.89
23 NS 4P N-2 -200 5 27.78
24 NS 4T W = -130 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
17 JOBE Philippe -ROUSSEAU Willy : 63,52 %25 NS 1S E+1 -120 3 16.67
26 NS 1S W+2 -150 2 11.11
27 NS 4C W = -420 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 45,56 %28 NS 2P W+1 -140 8 44.44
29 NS 2C E+1 -140 7 38.89
30 NS 1S N+2 150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 281,0 / 540 = 52,04 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 VAN DOOREN Michele -THIRIFAYS Marie-Paule
15 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc : 35,93 % 1 NS 2T N+1 110 18 100.00
2 NS 1S W-1 50 18 100.00
3 NS 2T W+3 -150 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
14 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 55,93 % 4 NS 2C W-1 100 9 50.00
5 NS 4C N+1 650 13 72.22
6 NS 3S S-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
20 VAN DOOREN André -NAVEZ Camille : 41,30 % 7 NS 4P N+1 650 7 38.89
8 NS 6S E-1 50 11 61.11
9 NS 1S W+1 -120 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
17 JOBE Philippe -ROUSSEAU Willy : 63,52 %10 NS 3S N-1 -100 4 22.22
11 NS 1S W-1 50 10 55.56
12 NS 2P E-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 45,56 %13 NS 4C S-1 -100 7 38.89
14 NS 3S S = 400 0 0.00
15 NS Pass Passe 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
13 LABYE Pascal -BRUYR Pascal : 46,48 %16 NS 4C W+2 -680 7 38.89
17 NS 5P N+1 480 10 55.56
18 NS 4C E+1 -450 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
12 CORCEOVEI Horia -LIBERT Laurent : 55,37 %19 NS 3S E+1 -630 7 38.89
20 NS 2S E+2 -180 0 0.00
21 NS 3T W = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
11 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme : 57,22 %22 NS 3T S-2 -100 0 0.00
23 NS 4P N-1 -100 14 77.78
24 NS 3S E+2 -460 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
19 FRAITURE Louis -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 52,41 %25 NS 2C W = -110 12 66.67
26 NS 1S W = -90 13 72.22
27 NS 4PcN-2 -300 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
18 MOLS Bruno -VANDERHULST Jacques : 46,30 %28 NS 1PcW+2 -360 0 0.00
29 NS 1C E+2 -140 7 38.89
30 NS 3K E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
Total : 227,0 / 540 = 42,04 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 MATELART Marc -CASSART Guy
16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 45,56 % 1 NS 3T N-1 -50 9 50.00
2 NS 1P W+1 -110 12 66.67
3 NS 3P N+1 170 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
15 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc : 35,93 % 4 NS 2S E-4 400 16 88.89
5 NS 4C N+1 650 13 72.22
6 NS 3S S+1 430 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
14 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 55,93 % 7 NS 4P S+1 650 7 38.89
8 NS 6S E-1 50 11 61.11
9 NS 2C S-3 -150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
19 FRAITURE Louis -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 52,41 %10 NS 1P S+1 110 9 50.00
11 NS 2C S-1 -50 8 44.44
12 NS 3PcE-2 300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
18 MOLS Bruno -VANDERHULST Jacques : 46,30 %13 NS 4C S+1 650 18 100.00
14 NS 3S S+3 490 9 50.00
15 NS 2C N-1 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
17 JOBE Philippe -ROUSSEAU Willy : 63,52 %16 NS 6C E = -1430 0 0.00
17 NS 6P S-1 -50 3 16.67
18 NS 4C E+1 -450 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
13 LABYE Pascal -BRUYR Pascal : 46,48 %19 NS 3S E+1 -630 7 38.89
20 NS 3S E-1 100 14 77.78
21 NS 2P E = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
12 CORCEOVEI Horia -LIBERT Laurent : 55,37 %22 NS 5K N-1 -50 3 16.67
23 NS 4CcE-2 500 18 100.00
24 NS 3S E+1 -430 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
11 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme : 57,22 %25 NS 2C W = -110 12 66.67
26 NS 1S W = -90 13 72.22
27 NS 7KcS-3 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
20 VAN DOOREN André -NAVEZ Camille : 41,30 %28 NS 4T W-1 50 15 83.33
29 NS 2P N-1 -100 15 83.33
30 NS 2T N = 90 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
Total : 291,0 / 540 = 53,89 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme
1 RAIMOND Yves -DELCARTE Emile : 45,00 % 1 EO 2C W+1 -140 16 88.89
2 EO 2C E = -110 6 33.33
3 EO 3T W+2 -150 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
3 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 43,89 % 4 EO 2T S = 90 13 72.22
5 EO 4C N = 620 17 94.44
6 EO 3S S+2 460 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
2 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert : 51,30 % 7 EO 5P N = 650 11 61.11
8 EO 3PcN-6 -1400 18 100.00
9 EO 3K N+1 130 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
5 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 53,15 %10 EO 3S N-1 -100 14 77.78
11 EO 2K S-2 -100 15 83.33
12 EO 2P E = -110 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
6 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 48,52 %13 EO 5C S-1 -100 11 61.11
14 EO 5T S+1 420 16 88.89
15 EO 2C N = 110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
7 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles : 60,74 %16 EO 3S W+2 -660 3 16.67
17 EO 6P S = 980 3 16.67
18 EO 4C E = -420 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
8 FAULX Anne -BERNARD Jules : 52,04 %19 EO 3S E+1 -630 11 61.11
20 EO 1S E+1 -120 13 72.22
21 EO 2P E = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
9 VAN DOOREN Michele -THIRIFAYS Marie-Paule : 42,04 %22 EO 3T S-2 -100 18 100.00
23 EO 4P N-1 -100 4 22.22
24 EO 3S E+2 -460 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
10 MATELART Marc -CASSART Guy : 53,89 %25 EO 2C W = -110 6 33.33
26 EO 1S W = -90 5 27.78
27 EO 7KcS-3 -500 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
4 NELIS Claude -ROSOUX Louis : 49,44 %28 EO 3P E = -140 10 55.56
29 EO 2C E+1 -140 11 61.11
30 EO 1S N = 90 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 309,0 / 540 = 57,22 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 CORCEOVEI Horia -LIBERT Laurent
3 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 43,89 % 1 EO 3T S-1 -50 9 50.00
2 EO 1S W+2 -150 11 61.11
3 EO 4T E+1 -150 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
2 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert : 51,30 % 4 EO 3KcN+1 870 0 0.00
5 EO 3S N+1 630 13 72.22
6 EO 5C S+1 480 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
1 RAIMOND Yves -DELCARTE Emile : 45,00 % 7 EO 4P N+1 650 11 61.11
8 EO 6K W-2 100 3 16.67
9 EO 1S W+1 -120 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
6 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 48,52 %10 EO 3TcS-2 -500 18 100.00
11 EO 2CcS-1 -100 15 83.33
12 EO 3P E-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
7 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles : 60,74 %13 EO 4C S = 620 3 16.67
14 EO 3S S+3 490 9 50.00
15 EO 3S E-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
8 FAULX Anne -BERNARD Jules : 52,04 %16 EO 3S W+2 -660 3 16.67
17 EO 6P N-1 -50 15 83.33
18 EO 4C E+1 -450 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
9 VAN DOOREN Michele -THIRIFAYS Marie-Paule : 42,04 %19 EO 3S E+1 -630 11 61.11
20 EO 2S E+2 -180 18 100.00
21 EO 3T W = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
10 MATELART Marc -CASSART Guy : 53,89 %22 EO 5K N-1 -50 15 83.33
23 EO 4CcE-2 500 0 0.00
24 EO 3S E+1 -430 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
4 NELIS Claude -ROSOUX Louis : 49,44 %25 EO 1S W+1 -120 15 83.33
26 EO 1S W+1 -120 11 61.11
27 EO 4P N = 420 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
5 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 53,15 %28 EO 3P W = -140 10 55.56
29 EO 2PcN-1 -200 16 88.89
30 EO 2K E = -90 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
Total : 299,0 / 540 = 55,37 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 LABYE Pascal -BRUYR Pascal
2 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert : 51,30 % 1 EO 1S S-1 -50 9 50.00
2 EO 1S S-4 -400 16 88.89
3 EO 5K E = -600 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
1 RAIMOND Yves -DELCARTE Emile : 45,00 % 4 EO 3C W-2 200 4 22.22
5 EO 4C N = 620 17 94.44
6 EO 3S S+1 430 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
3 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 43,89 % 7 EO 4P N+1 650 11 61.11
8 EO 3S W+1 -430 10 55.56
9 EO 1S W+1 -120 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
7 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles : 60,74 %10 EO 2S N+1 150 3 16.67
11 EO 2C S+2 170 0 0.00
12 EO 2P E-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
8 FAULX Anne -BERNARD Jules : 52,04 %13 EO 4P E-1 100 6 33.33
14 EO 3S N+4 520 2 11.11
15 EO 3S E-2 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
9 VAN DOOREN Michele -THIRIFAYS Marie-Paule : 42,04 %16 EO 4C W+2 -680 11 61.11
17 EO 5P N+1 480 8 44.44
18 EO 4C E+1 -450 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
10 MATELART Marc -CASSART Guy : 53,89 %19 EO 3S E+1 -630 11 61.11
20 EO 3S E-1 100 4 22.22
21 EO 2P E = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
4 NELIS Claude -ROSOUX Louis : 49,44 %22 EO 2P E-2 200 8 44.44
23 EO 4P N-2 -200 13 72.22
24 EO 3S E+2 -460 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
5 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 53,15 %25 EO 2C W = -110 6 33.33
26 EO 1S W = -90 5 27.78
27 EO 4P N = 420 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
6 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 48,52 %28 EO 4T W-2 100 0 0.00
29 EO 2P N-1 -100 3 16.67
30 EO 2K E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
Total : 251,0 / 540 = 46,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle
8 FAULX Anne -BERNARD Jules : 52,04 % 1 EO 2T N = 90 2 11.11
2 EO 1S W+2 -150 11 61.11
3 EO 4T E = -130 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
9 VAN DOOREN Michele -THIRIFAYS Marie-Paule : 42,04 % 4 EO 2C W-1 100 9 50.00
5 EO 4C N+1 650 5 27.78
6 EO 3S S-1 -50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
10 MATELART Marc -CASSART Guy : 53,89 % 7 EO 4P S+1 650 11 61.11
8 EO 6S E-1 50 7 38.89
9 EO 2C S-3 -150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
4 NELIS Claude -ROSOUX Louis : 49,44 %10 EO 2S N+1 150 3 16.67
11 EO 1S E+1 -120 18 100.00
12 EO 2P E = -110 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
2 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert : 51,30 %13 EO 4C N-1 -100 11 61.11
14 EO 3S N+4 520 2 11.11
15 EO 1S E+1 -120 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
5 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 53,15 %16 EO 4C W+2 -680 11 61.11
17 EO 6P S-1 -50 15 83.33
18 EO 4C E+1 -450 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
3 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 43,89 %19 EO 3K W+1 -130 0 0.00
20 EO 1S E = -90 9 50.00
21 EO 2T W+1 -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
6 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 48,52 %22 EO 3K N+3 170 11 61.11
23 EO 4P N-2 -200 13 72.22
24 EO 3P N-3 -150 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
1 RAIMOND Yves -DELCARTE Emile : 45,00 %25 EO 2C E+1 -140 18 100.00
26 EO 1S W+2 -150 16 88.89
27 EO 5TcS = 550 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
7 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles : 60,74 %28 EO 3P W = -140 10 55.56
29 EO 1S W+1 -120 6 33.33
30 EO 3K E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 302,0 / 540 = 55,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc
9 VAN DOOREN Michele -THIRIFAYS Marie-Paule : 42,04 % 1 EO 2T N+1 110 0 0.00
2 EO 1S W-1 50 0 0.00
3 EO 2T W+3 -150 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
10 MATELART Marc -CASSART Guy : 53,89 % 4 EO 2S E-4 400 2 11.11
5 EO 4C N+1 650 5 27.78
6 EO 3S S+1 430 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
4 NELIS Claude -ROSOUX Louis : 49,44 % 7 EO 4P N+1 650 11 61.11
8 EO 3S E+2 -460 13 72.22
9 EO 2P N-2 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
8 FAULX Anne -BERNARD Jules : 52,04 %10 EO 2S N+1 150 3 16.67
11 EO 1P N = 80 6 33.33
12 EO 3P E-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
5 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 53,15 %13 EO 4C S = 620 3 16.67
14 EO 3S S+3 490 9 50.00
15 EO 3S W-2 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
2 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert : 51,30 %16 EO 4C E+1 -650 0 0.00
17 EO 6P S = 980 3 16.67
18 EO 4C E+1 -450 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
6 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 48,52 %19 EO 3S E+1 -630 11 61.11
20 EO 2C E-2 200 2 11.11
21 EO 2P E = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
3 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 43,89 %22 EO 3S N+1 430 4 22.22
23 EO 3P N-1 -100 4 22.22
24 EO 4P N-4 -200 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
7 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles : 60,74 %25 EO 2C W = -110 6 33.33
26 EO 1S W+1 -120 11 61.11
27 EO 2P N+1 140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
1 RAIMOND Yves -DELCARTE Emile : 45,00 %28 EO 3T W-1 50 3 16.67
29 EO 2K E = -90 0 0.00
30 EO 4T N-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 194,0 / 540 = 35,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de TERWANGNE Philippe
10 MATELART Marc -CASSART Guy : 53,89 % 1 EO 3T N-1 -50 9 50.00
2 EO 1P W+1 -110 6 33.33
3 EO 3P N+1 170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
4 NELIS Claude -ROSOUX Louis : 49,44 % 4 EO 3P N-1 -100 16 88.89
5 EO 4C N+1 650 5 27.78
6 EO 3S S+2 460 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
5 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 53,15 % 7 EO 3PcN+2 1130 2 11.11
8 EO 6K W-3 150 0 0.00
9 EO 1S W+1 -120 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
1 RAIMOND Yves -DELCARTE Emile : 45,00 %10 EO 2P S = 110 9 50.00
11 EO 1S W = -90 12 66.67
12 EO 2P E = -110 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
9 VAN DOOREN Michele -THIRIFAYS Marie-Paule : 42,04 %13 EO 4C S-1 -100 11 61.11
14 EO 3S S = 400 18 100.00
15 EO Pass Passe 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
6 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 48,52 %16 EO 4C W+2 -680 11 61.11
17 EO 6P S = 980 3 16.67
18 EO 4C E+1 -450 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
2 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert : 51,30 %19 EO 3S E+1 -630 11 61.11
20 EO 1S E = -90 9 50.00
21 EO 3T W = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
7 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles : 60,74 %22 EO 3S S+2 460 2 11.11
23 EO 4P N-2 -200 13 72.22
24 EO 4C E-3 150 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
3 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 43,89 %25 EO 2C W = -110 6 33.33
26 EO 1S W = -90 5 27.78
27 EO 5TcS-1 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
8 FAULX Anne -BERNARD Jules : 52,04 %28 EO 2P W+1 -140 10 55.56
29 EO 2C E+1 -140 11 61.11
30 EO 1S N+2 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 246,0 / 540 = 45,56 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 JOBE Philippe -ROUSSEAU Willy
4 NELIS Claude -ROSOUX Louis : 49,44 % 1 EO 4T N-2 -100 14 77.78
2 EO 2C E+3 -200 14 77.78
3 EO 3P N = 140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
5 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 53,15 % 4 EO 3C W-1 100 9 50.00
5 EO 4C N+1 650 5 27.78
6 EO 3S S+2 460 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
6 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 48,52 % 7 EO 4P N+1 650 11 61.11
8 EO 3S E+2 -460 13 72.22
9 EO 2CcS-2 -300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
9 VAN DOOREN Michele -THIRIFAYS Marie-Paule : 42,04 %10 EO 3S N-1 -100 14 77.78
11 EO 1S W-1 50 8 44.44
12 EO 2P E-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
1 RAIMOND Yves -DELCARTE Emile : 45,00 %13 EO 3P E+1 -170 16 88.89
14 EO 3S N+3 490 9 50.00
15 EO 1S W+1 -120 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
10 MATELART Marc -CASSART Guy : 53,89 %16 EO 6C E = -1430 18 100.00
17 EO 6P S-1 -50 15 83.33
18 EO 4C E+1 -450 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
7 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles : 60,74 %19 EO 3S W+2 -630 11 61.11
20 EO 2S W = -120 13 72.22
21 EO 3P E-1 50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
2 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert : 51,30 %22 EO 2PcE-3 800 0 0.00
23 EO 4P N-2 -200 13 72.22
24 EO 5K E = -400 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
8 FAULX Anne -BERNARD Jules : 52,04 %25 EO 1S E+1 -120 15 83.33
26 EO 1S W+2 -150 16 88.89
27 EO 4C W = -420 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
3 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 43,89 %28 EO 2P W+1 -140 10 55.56
29 EO 3P N-3 -300 18 100.00
30 EO 1S E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
Total : 343,0 / 540 = 63,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 MOLS Bruno -VANDERHULST Jacques
5 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 53,15 % 1 EO 4TcN-2 -300 18 100.00
2 EO 1S W = -90 2 11.11
3 EO 4T E+1 -150 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
6 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 48,52 % 4 EO 3K N+2 150 6 33.33
5 EO 4C N+1 650 5 27.78
6 EO 3S S+2 460 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
7 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles : 60,74 % 7 EO 4P N+1 650 11 61.11
8 EO 3S E+3 -490 16 88.89
9 EO 1S W-1 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
3 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 43,89 %10 EO 3S N-1 -100 14 77.78
11 EO 2C S = 110 3 16.67
12 EO 2P E-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
10 MATELART Marc -CASSART Guy : 53,89 %13 EO 4C S+1 650 0 0.00
14 EO 3S S+3 490 9 50.00
15 EO 2C N-1 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
1 RAIMOND Yves -DELCARTE Emile : 45,00 %16 EO 4C W+2 -680 11 61.11
17 EO 4P S+1 450 10 55.56
18 EO 4C E-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
4 NELIS Claude -ROSOUX Louis : 49,44 %19 EO 3S W+1 -630 11 61.11
20 EO 1C E = -80 6 33.33
21 EO 1C N-1 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
8 FAULX Anne -BERNARD Jules : 52,04 %22 EO 3K N+3 170 11 61.11
23 EO 4P N-2 -200 13 72.22
24 EO 4T W = -130 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
2 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert : 51,30 %25 EO 2P E = -110 6 33.33
26 EO 1S W-1 100 0 0.00
27 EO 4K S-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
9 VAN DOOREN Michele -THIRIFAYS Marie-Paule : 42,04 %28 EO 1PcW+2 -360 18 100.00
29 EO 1C E+2 -140 11 61.11
30 EO 3K E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
Total : 250,0 / 540 = 46,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 FRAITURE Louis -DE WULF Jean-Paul
6 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 48,52 % 1 EO 2C E-1 50 4 22.22
2 EO 2KcS-5 -1400 18 100.00
3 EO 3P N = 140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
7 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles : 60,74 % 4 EO 4P N-2 -200 18 100.00
5 EO 3S N+1 630 13 72.22
6 EO 3S S+2 460 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
8 FAULX Anne -BERNARD Jules : 52,04 % 7 EO 5PxN = 1200 0 0.00
8 EO 6K W-2 100 3 16.67
9 EO 1S W+1 -120 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
10 MATELART Marc -CASSART Guy : 53,89 %10 EO 1P S+1 110 9 50.00
11 EO 2C S-1 -50 10 55.56
12 EO 3PcE-2 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
3 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 43,89 %13 EO 5CcS-1 -200 18 100.00
14 EO 3S S+2 460 14 77.78
15 EO 1S E = -90 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
4 NELIS Claude -ROSOUX Louis : 49,44 %16 EO 4C W+2 -680 11 61.11
17 EO 6P S = 980 3 16.67
18 EO 4C E+1 -450 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
1 RAIMOND Yves -DELCARTE Emile : 45,00 %19 EO 1ScN-3 -500 2 11.11
20 EO 1S E+2 -150 16 88.89
21 EO 3T W = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
5 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 53,15 %22 EO 3T S-1 -50 15 83.33
23 EO 4P N-1 -100 4 22.22
24 EO 5T W-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
9 VAN DOOREN Michele -THIRIFAYS Marie-Paule : 42,04 %25 EO 2C W = -110 6 33.33
26 EO 1S W = -90 5 27.78
27 EO 4PcN-2 -300 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
2 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert : 51,30 %28 EO 2T W+3 -150 16 88.89
29 EO 2C E+1 -140 11 61.11
30 EO 3T N-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
Total : 283,0 / 540 = 52,41 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 VAN DOOREN André -NAVEZ Camille
7 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles : 60,74 % 1 EO 3T N-1 -50 9 50.00
2 EO 2T W+1 -110 6 33.33
3 EO 3P N = 140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
8 FAULX Anne -BERNARD Jules : 52,04 % 4 EO 2T S = 90 13 72.22
5 EO 4C N+1 650 5 27.78
6 EO 4P N = 420 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
9 VAN DOOREN Michele -THIRIFAYS Marie-Paule : 42,04 % 7 EO 4P N+1 650 11 61.11
8 EO 6S E-1 50 7 38.89
9 EO 1S W+1 -120 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
2 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert : 51,30 %10 EO 1S S+2 150 3 16.67
11 EO 2C S = 110 3 16.67
12 EO 2P E = -110 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
4 NELIS Claude -ROSOUX Louis : 49,44 %13 EO 4C S-1 -100 11 61.11
14 EO 5S N+2 520 2 11.11
15 EO 3T W-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
3 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 43,89 %16 EO 4C W+2 -680 11 61.11
17 EO 6P S-1 -50 15 83.33
18 EO 4C E+1 -450 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
5 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 53,15 %19 EO 3S E+1 -630 11 61.11
20 EO 3C E-3 300 0 0.00
21 EO 4S W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
1 RAIMOND Yves -DELCARTE Emile : 45,00 %22 EO 3P E-3 300 6 33.33
23 EO 4P N-2 -200 13 72.22
24 EO 6K W-3 150 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
6 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 48,52 %25 EO 2C W = -110 6 33.33
26 EO 1S W+2 -150 16 88.89
27 EO 5T S-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
10 MATELART Marc -CASSART Guy : 53,89 %28 EO 4T W-1 50 3 16.67
29 EO 2P N-1 -100 3 16.67
30 EO 2T N = 90 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
Total : 223,0 / 540 = 41,30 %
|
|