|
Tournoi du 30-01-12
1 60,93 A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
2 58,89 A.5 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse
3 56,48 A.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
4 52,78 A10 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean
5 51,67 A11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon
6 51,11 A.7 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
7 50,19 A.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
8 48,33 A.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAGMAN David
9 40,56 A.3 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques
10 40,19 A.4 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine
11 38,89 A.6 COLLIN Jean-Marie -PAQUET Anne
12 0,00 A12 -
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 64,20 a.6 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian
2 60,49 a.7 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie
3 57,04 a11 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin
4 55,14 a.3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
5 54,32 a.9 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
6 52,88 a.4 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
7 49,38 a.8 BUSLAIN Marianne -MASSINON Henry
8 47,74 a12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude
9 41,77 a.5 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
10 40,93 a.1 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga
11 40,12 a10 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
12 36,21 a.2 PARMENTIER Richard -de WASSEIGE Ariane
PAIRE Nr : A.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAGMAN David
a.1 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 40,93 % 1 NS 3P W-2 100 13 72.22
2 NS 1P S = 80 12 66.67
3 NS 3S W = -600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a11 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 57,04 % 4 NS 4K E-1 100 10 55.56
5 NS 3S E = -400 8 44.44
6 NS 2C S+1 140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a10 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 40,12 % 7 NS 2C N-1 -100 7 38.89
8 NS 4C S+2 480 11 61.11
9 NS 4C W+1 -650 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.9 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 54,32 %10 NS 3S S = 600 7 38.89
11 NS 4CcW-3 500 18 100.00
12 NS 4C N-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.8 BUSLAIN Marianne -MASSINON Henry : 49,38 %13 NS 3C S-1 -100 2 11.11
14 NS 4P W-1 50 13 72.22
15 NS 1S S+4 210 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.7 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 60,49 %16 NS 1S W-2 200 12 66.67
17 NS 3S N-2 -100 2 11.11
18 NS 3S W = -400 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
a.6 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 64,20 %19 NS 4P S-1 -50 4 22.22
20 NS 1S E+1 -120 3 16.67
21 NS 1S S+1 120 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.5 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 41,77 %22 NS 3S E+1 -630 13 72.22
23 NS 6K W = -1370 0 0.00
24 NS 2K W-1 50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.4 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,88 %25 NS 2C S-2 -100 4 22.22
26 NS 2P E+3 -200 0 0.00
27 NS 4C E-1 50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,14 %28 NS 3S S+1 630 11 61.11
29 NS 3S W+2 -660 0 0.00
30 NS 3S S = 400 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 261,0 / 540 = 48,33 %
PAIRE Nr : A.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
a.2 PARMENTIER Richard -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 36,21 % 4 NS 3K E-3 300 12 66.67
5 NS 2S W+1 -150 17 94.44
6 NS 2C S = 110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.1 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 40,93 % 7 NS 2K S = 90 16 88.89
8 NS 4C S+2 480 11 61.11
9 NS 4C E = -620 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
a11 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 57,04 %10 NS 3S S = 600 7 38.89
11 NS 1P E+1 -110 5 27.78
12 NS 4T W-2 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
a10 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 40,12 %13 NS 2C S+1 140 16 88.89
14 NS 5KcN = 550 17 94.44
15 NS 2P E-3 150 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
a.9 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 54,32 %16 NS 4P N+1 450 17 94.44
17 NS 4P N-1 -50 10 55.56
18 NS 3S E-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
a.8 BUSLAIN Marianne -MASSINON Henry : 49,38 %19 NS 4P S-1 -50 4 22.22
20 NS 1S E = -90 16 88.89
21 NS 1S S-1 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 47,74 %22 NS 3S E = -600 18 100.00
23 NS 3S E+2 -660 8 44.44
24 NS 2C W = -110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a.6 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 64,20 %25 NS 1S W = -90 8 44.44
26 NS 3C E-1 100 13 72.22
27 NS 3S W+1 -430 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.5 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 41,77 %28 NS 3S S = 600 2 11.11
29 NS 3S E = -600 14 77.78
30 NS 4P N-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.4 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,88 %31 NS 4K S+1 150 3 16.67
32 NS 2S W = -120 16 88.89
33 NS 4C N-2 -100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 305,0 / 540 = 56,48 %
PAIRE Nr : A.3 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques
a.5 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 41,77 % 1 NS 3P W-1 50 8 44.44
2 NS 2P S-1 -100 7 38.89
3 NS 3S W = -600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,14 % 7 NS 2C N-1 -100 7 38.89
8 NS 3S S+1 430 4 22.22
9 NS 4C E+1 -650 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
a12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 47,74 %10 NS 3S S = 600 7 38.89
11 NS 3P E-1 50 16 88.89
12 NS 2C N+1 140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.1 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 40,93 %13 NS 1C S+2 140 16 88.89
14 NS 2P W+1 -140 4 22.22
15 NS 2K S+1 110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a11 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 57,04 %16 NS 1S W-1 100 0 0.00
17 NS 4P N-2 -100 2 11.11
18 NS 4P E = -420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 3,70 %
a10 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 40,12 %19 NS 4P S = 420 12 66.67
20 NS 1S W = -90 16 88.89
21 NS 2P N-1 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.9 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 54,32 %22 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 22.22
23 NS 3P N-1 -100 18 100.00
24 NS 2P E+2 -170 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.8 BUSLAIN Marianne -MASSINON Henry : 49,38 %25 NS 2T N = 90 12 66.67
26 NS 3P E-1 100 13 72.22
27 NS 3S E+2 -460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.7 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 60,49 %28 NS 3S S+1 630 11 61.11
29 NS 3S E+1 -630 5 27.78
30 NS 3S S-2 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.6 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 64,20 %31 NS 3C S+3 230 9 50.00
32 NS 3S W+3 -690 0 0.00
33 NS 2C N+1 140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 219,0 / 540 = 40,56 %
PAIRE Nr : A.4 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine
a.7 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 60,49 % 1 NS 2P W-1 50 8 44.44
2 NS 4P S-2 -200 1 5.56
3 NS 3S W+1 -630 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
a.6 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 64,20 % 4 NS 3K E = -110 2 11.11
5 NS 1S E+4 -210 10 55.56
6 NS 2C S = 110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
a.4 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,88 %10 NS 3S S = 600 7 38.89
11 NS 4K W = -130 2 11.11
12 NS 4T E-2 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
a.3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,14 %13 NS 2S E-1 100 4 22.22
14 NS 5KcN-1 -100 8 44.44
15 NS 2K S+1 110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
a.2 PARMENTIER Richard -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 36,21 %16 NS 2C W-2 200 12 66.67
17 NS 2P S+1 140 18 100.00
18 NS 3P W = -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.1 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 40,93 %19 NS 3S S+2 460 18 100.00
20 NS 2S W = -120 3 16.67
21 NS 1S S-2 -200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a11 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 57,04 %22 NS 3S E+1 -630 13 72.22
23 NS 3S E+3 -690 4 22.22
24 NS 2P E+2 -170 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a10 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 40,12 %25 NS 1S W+2 -150 0 0.00
26 NS 3P E-1 100 13 72.22
27 NS 3S W = -400 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.9 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 54,32 %28 NS 3S S+1 630 11 61.11
29 NS 3S E = -600 14 77.78
30 NS 3S S-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 47,74 %31 NS 4C S+1 650 16 88.89
32 NS 3S W = -600 9 50.00
33 NS 4C N-2 -100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
Total : 217,0 / 540 = 40,19 %
PAIRE Nr : A.5 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse
a.9 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 54,32 % 1 NS 3P W-2 100 13 72.22
2 NS 3C W = -140 4 22.22
3 NS 3S W = -600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.8 BUSLAIN Marianne -MASSINON Henry : 49,38 % 4 NS 4KcE-3 800 18 100.00
5 NS 2S E+2 -180 12 66.67
6 NS 3C S = 140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
a.7 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 60,49 % 7 NS 2C N-1 -100 7 38.89
8 NS 4C S+2 480 11 61.11
9 NS 4C E+1 -650 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.5 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 41,77 %13 NS 2C S = 110 9 50.00
14 NS 5KcN = 550 17 94.44
15 NS 2P E-2 100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.4 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,88 %16 NS 2P N+3 200 12 66.67
17 NS 4P N-1 -50 10 55.56
18 NS 4P E-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 47,74 %19 NS 2P S+2 170 10 55.56
20 NS 1S W+1 -120 3 16.67
21 NS 1S S+1 120 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.2 PARMENTIER Richard -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 36,21 %22 NS 3S E+1 -630 13 72.22
23 NS 5K W+1 -620 14 77.78
24 NS 1S N-2 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
a.1 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 40,93 %25 NS 3PcW-2 500 18 100.00
26 NS 2P E+1 -140 6 33.33
27 NS 3P W = -140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a11 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 57,04 %28 NS 3S S+1 630 11 61.11
29 NS 3S E+1 -630 5 27.78
30 NS 3P S+1 170 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a10 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 40,12 %31 NS 3C S+3 230 9 50.00
32 NS 3S W+1 -630 6 33.33
33 NS 4C N = 420 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 318,0 / 540 = 58,89 %
PAIRE Nr : A.6 COLLIN Jean-Marie -PAQUET Anne
a11 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 57,04 % 1 NS 3C S-2 -100 0 0.00
2 NS 3K N-1 -100 7 38.89
3 NS 3S W = -600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
a10 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 40,12 % 4 NS 2K E = -90 7 38.89
5 NS 3S E+1 -430 5 27.78
6 NS 2C S = 110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
a12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 47,74 % 7 NS 3K S-2 -200 0 0.00
8 NS 3C N+1 170 0 0.00
9 NS 4C E = -620 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
a.8 BUSLAIN Marianne -MASSINON Henry : 49,38 %10 NS 3S S = 600 7 38.89
11 NS 5TcS-2 -300 0 0.00
12 NS 4T E-2 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
a.6 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 64,20 %16 NS 2P N+1 140 3 16.67
17 NS 4P N-2 -100 2 11.11
18 NS 2S E+1 -150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
a.5 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 41,77 %19 NS 3S S+1 430 15 83.33
20 NS 1S E = -90 16 88.89
21 NS 1S S = 90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
a.4 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,88 %22 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 22.22
23 NS 5K E+1 -620 14 77.78
24 NS 4P E = -420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,14 %25 NS 2P E-1 100 14 77.78
26 NS 3C E-1 100 13 72.22
27 NS 3S W-3 150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
a.2 PARMENTIER Richard -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 36,21 %28 NS 3S S = 600 2 11.11
29 NS 3S E = -600 14 77.78
30 NS 4P S-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.1 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 40,93 %31 NS 2K S+3 150 3 16.67
32 NS 4K E = -130 14 77.78
33 NS 3S N-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
Total : 210,0 / 540 = 38,89 %
PAIRE Nr : A.7 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
a.2 PARMENTIER Richard -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 36,21 % 1 NS 3C S = 140 17 94.44
2 NS 3K N = 110 18 100.00
3 NS 3S W = -600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
a.1 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 40,93 % 4 NS 5K E-4 400 14 77.78
5 NS 3P W+1 -170 14 77.78
6 NS 3K W-2 200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
a11 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 57,04 % 7 NS 2K S-1 -100 7 38.89
8 NS 4C S = 420 2 11.11
9 NS 4C W-1 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a10 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 40,12 %10 NS 3S S+1 630 18 100.00
11 NS 3S N-1 -50 13 72.22
12 NS 2C N+2 170 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
a.9 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 54,32 %13 NS 2P E+1 -140 0 0.00
14 NS 6KcN-2 -300 2 11.11
15 NS 3P E-2 100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 5,56 %
a.7 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 60,49 %19 NS 3S S+1 430 15 83.33
20 NS 2P S-1 -100 10 55.56
21 NS 2K E = -90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.6 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 64,20 %22 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 22.22
23 NS 3S W+2 -660 8 44.44
24 NS 2P E+2 -170 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
a.5 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 41,77 %25 NS 2C S-2 -100 4 22.22
26 NS 3P E = -140 6 33.33
27 NS 3S W = -400 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 47,74 %28 NS 3S S+2 660 18 100.00
29 NS 3S W+1 -630 5 27.78
30 NS 4P N-2 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,14 %31 NS 2K S+3 150 3 16.67
32 NS 4CcN-2 -300 12 66.67
33 NS 4C N-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 276,0 / 540 = 51,11 %
PAIRE Nr : A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
a.4 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,88 % 1 NS 3C S-1 -50 3 16.67
2 NS 2C W-2 100 15 83.33
3 NS 3S W-1 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,14 % 4 NS 3KcE-2 500 16 88.89
5 NS 2CcS-2 -500 0 0.00
6 NS 2C S = 110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.2 PARMENTIER Richard -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 36,21 % 7 NS 2K S = 90 16 88.89
8 NS 4C S+2 480 11 61.11
9 NS 3C E+1 -170 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
a.1 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 40,93 %10 NS 3S S = 600 7 38.89
11 NS 3S N-1 -50 13 72.22
12 NS 2C N+2 170 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a11 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 57,04 %13 NS 2C S = 110 9 50.00
14 NS 6KcN-1 -100 8 44.44
15 NS 2S S = 120 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 47,74 %16 NS 4P N+1 450 17 94.44
17 NS 3S N-1 -50 10 55.56
18 NS 3S W-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
a.8 BUSLAIN Marianne -MASSINON Henry : 49,38 %22 NS 3S E+1 -630 13 72.22
23 NS 5K W+1 -620 14 77.78
24 NS 3P E = -140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
a.7 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 60,49 %25 NS 2K E-2 200 16 88.89
26 NS 3C E = -140 6 33.33
27 NS 3S W = -400 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.6 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 64,20 %28 NS 3S S+1 630 11 61.11
29 NS 3S E+1 -630 5 27.78
30 NS 4P N-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.5 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 41,77 %31 NS 4C S+2 680 18 100.00
32 NS 3S W = -600 9 50.00
33 NS 4C N+1 450 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
Total : 329,0 / 540 = 60,93 %
PAIRE Nr : A.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
a.6 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 64,20 % 1 NS 3C S-1 -50 3 16.67
2 NS 2PcS-1 -200 1 5.56
3 NS 3S W = -600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
a12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 47,74 % 4 NS 3K E = -110 2 11.11
5 NS 1S E+2 -150 17 94.44
6 NS 3K W-2 200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.4 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,88 % 7 NS 2C N-1 -100 7 38.89
8 NS 4C S+2 480 11 61.11
9 NS 4C E = -620 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,14 %10 NS 3S S = 600 7 38.89
11 NS 1P E = -80 10 55.56
12 NS 2C N+2 170 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.2 PARMENTIER Richard -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 36,21 %13 NS 2C S = 110 9 50.00
14 NS 5KcN-1 -100 8 44.44
15 NS 1S S+4 210 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.1 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 40,93 %16 NS 2P N+2 170 7 38.89
17 NS 2P S = 110 16 88.89
18 NS 4P W-2 100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
a11 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 57,04 %19 NS 4P S-1 -50 4 22.22
20 NS 1S W+1 -120 3 16.67
21 NS 1S S+1 120 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.9 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 54,32 %25 NS 3T N-2 -100 4 22.22
26 NS 4C E-2 200 18 100.00
27 NS 3S W+1 -430 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.8 BUSLAIN Marianne -MASSINON Henry : 49,38 %28 NS 3S S = 600 2 11.11
29 NS 3S E = -600 14 77.78
30 NS 4P N-2 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.7 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 60,49 %31 NS 5K N = 600 14 77.78
32 NS 3S W+2 -660 3 16.67
33 NS 4C N-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 271,0 / 540 = 50,19 %
PAIRE Nr : A10 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean
a.8 BUSLAIN Marianne -MASSINON Henry : 49,38 % 1 NS 2P W-1 50 8 44.44
2 NS 3C W-1 50 10 55.56
3 NS 3S W = -600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.7 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 60,49 % 4 NS 3K E = -110 2 11.11
5 NS 3S E+2 -460 2 11.11
6 NS 2C S = 110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
a.6 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 64,20 % 7 NS 2K S-1 -100 7 38.89
8 NS 4C N+3 510 18 100.00
9 NS 4C E+1 -650 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.5 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 41,77 %10 NS 4C N = 620 16 88.89
11 NS 2P E = -110 5 27.78
12 NS 4TcW-2 300 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
a.4 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,88 %13 NS 2C S+1 140 16 88.89
14 NS 5P W-1 50 13 72.22
15 NS 1S N+2 150 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
a.3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,14 %16 NS 2P N+1 140 3 16.67
17 NS 3S N-1 -50 10 55.56
18 NS 4P W-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.2 PARMENTIER Richard -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 36,21 %19 NS 4P S-1 -50 4 22.22
20 NS 2P S-1 -100 10 55.56
21 NS 1S S+1 120 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.1 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 40,93 %22 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 22.22
23 NS 3S E+2 -660 8 44.44
24 NS 1S N-1 -50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a10 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 40,12 %28 NS 3S S+1 630 11 61.11
29 NS 3S W = -600 14 77.78
30 NS 3C S = 140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
a.9 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 54,32 %31 NS 3K S+2 150 3 16.67
32 NS 3S W+2 -660 3 16.67
33 NS 4C N = 420 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 285,0 / 540 = 52,78 %
PAIRE Nr : A11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon
a10 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 40,12 % 1 NS 3C S = 140 17 94.44
2 NS 3C W-2 100 15 83.33
3 NS 3S W = -600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
a.9 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 54,32 % 4 NS 1S E = -90 7 38.89
5 NS 3S E+1 -430 5 27.78
6 NS 2C S+1 140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.8 BUSLAIN Marianne -MASSINON Henry : 49,38 % 7 NS 2K S = 90 16 88.89
8 NS 4C S+2 480 11 61.11
9 NS 4C E+1 -650 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.7 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 60,49 %10 NS 3S S = 600 7 38.89
11 NS 3S N-2 -100 8 44.44
12 NS 5TcE-2 300 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 47,74 %13 NS 2C S = 110 9 50.00
14 NS 4P W = -420 0 0.00
15 NS 2K S+2 130 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.5 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 41,77 %16 NS 2P N+2 170 7 38.89
17 NS 4P N-1 -50 10 55.56
18 NS 4P W-2 100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.4 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,88 %19 NS 4P S-1 -50 4 22.22
20 NS 2P S-1 -100 10 55.56
21 NS 2P N-2 -200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
a.3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,14 %22 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 22.22
23 NS 4CcS-4 -1100 2 11.11
24 NS 2C E = -110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
a.2 PARMENTIER Richard -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 36,21 %25 NS 1S S-1 -50 10 55.56
26 NS 3P E+1 -170 2 11.11
27 NS 3C E = -140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a11 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 57,04 %31 NS 4CcW-3 500 12 66.67
32 NS 4PcN-1 -100 18 100.00
33 NS 3C N = 140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
Total : 279,0 / 540 = 51,67 %
PAIRE Nr : A12 -
a12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 47,74 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.5 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 41,77 % 4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.9 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 54,32 % 7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.2 PARMENTIER Richard -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 36,21 %10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.6 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 64,20 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a10 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 40,12 %16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,14 %19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.7 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 60,49 %22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.4 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,88 %28 NS BYE 0 0.00
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.8 BUSLAIN Marianne -MASSINON Henry : 49,38 %31 NS BYE 0 0.00
32 NS BYE 0 0.00
33 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 594 = 0,00 %
PAIRE Nr : a.1 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga
A.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAGMAN David : 48,33 % 1 EO 3P W-2 100 5 27.78
2 EO 1P S = 80 6 33.33
3 EO 3S W = -600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.7 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,11 % 4 EO 5K E-4 400 4 22.22
5 EO 3P W+1 -170 4 22.22
6 EO 3K W-2 200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
A.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,48 % 7 EO 2K S = 90 2 11.11
8 EO 4C S+2 480 7 38.89
9 EO 4C E = -620 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 60,93 %10 EO 3S S = 600 11 61.11
11 EO 3S N-1 -50 5 27.78
12 EO 2C N+2 170 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.3 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,56 %13 EO 1C S+2 140 2 11.11
14 EO 2P W+1 -140 14 77.78
15 EO 2K S+1 110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 50,19 %16 EO 2P N+2 170 11 61.11
17 EO 2P S = 110 2 11.11
18 EO 4P W-2 100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
A.4 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 40,19 %19 EO 3S S+2 460 0 0.00
20 EO 2S W = -120 15 83.33
21 EO 1S S-2 -200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A10 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 52,78 %22 EO 3S E+2 -660 14 77.78
23 EO 3S E+2 -660 10 55.56
24 EO 1S N-1 -50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.5 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse : 58,89 %25 EO 3PcW-2 500 0 0.00
26 EO 2P E+1 -140 12 66.67
27 EO 3P W = -140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A.6 COLLIN Jean-Marie -PAQUET Anne : 38,89 %31 EO 2K S+3 150 15 83.33
32 EO 4K E = -130 4 22.22
33 EO 3S N-3 -150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
Total : 221,0 / 540 = 40,93 %
PAIRE Nr : a.2 PARMENTIER Richard -de WASSEIGE Ariane
A.7 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,11 % 1 EO 3C S = 140 1 5.56
2 EO 3K N = 110 0 0.00
3 EO 3S W = -600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
A.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,48 % 4 EO 3K E-3 300 6 33.33
5 EO 2S W+1 -150 1 5.56
6 EO 2C S = 110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 60,93 % 7 EO 2K S = 90 2 11.11
8 EO 4C S+2 480 7 38.89
9 EO 3C E+1 -170 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
A12 - : 0,00 %10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 50,19 %13 EO 2C S = 110 9 50.00
14 EO 5KcN-1 -100 10 55.56
15 EO 1S S+4 210 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.4 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 40,19 %16 EO 2C W-2 200 6 33.33
17 EO 2P S+1 140 0 0.00
18 EO 3P W = -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A10 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 52,78 %19 EO 4P S-1 -50 14 77.78
20 EO 2P S-1 -100 8 44.44
21 EO 1S S+1 120 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.5 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse : 58,89 %22 EO 3S E+1 -630 5 27.78
23 EO 5K W+1 -620 4 22.22
24 EO 1S N-2 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
A11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 51,67 %25 EO 1S S-1 -50 8 44.44
26 EO 3P E+1 -170 16 88.89
27 EO 3C E = -140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.6 COLLIN Jean-Marie -PAQUET Anne : 38,89 %28 EO 3S S = 600 16 88.89
29 EO 3S E = -600 4 22.22
30 EO 4P S-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 176,0 / 486 = 36,21 %
PAIRE Nr : a.3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 60,93 % 4 EO 3KcE-2 500 2 11.11
5 EO 2CcS-2 -500 18 100.00
6 EO 2C S = 110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A.3 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,56 % 7 EO 2C N-1 -100 11 61.11
8 EO 3S S+1 430 14 77.78
9 EO 4C E+1 -650 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
A.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 50,19 %10 EO 3S S = 600 11 61.11
11 EO 1P E = -80 8 44.44
12 EO 2C N+2 170 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.4 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 40,19 %13 EO 2S E-1 100 14 77.78
14 EO 5KcN-1 -100 10 55.56
15 EO 2K S+1 110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
A10 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 52,78 %16 EO 2P N+1 140 15 83.33
17 EO 3S N-1 -50 8 44.44
18 EO 4P W-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A12 - : 0,00 %19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 51,67 %22 EO 3S E+2 -660 14 77.78
23 EO 4CcS-4 -1100 16 88.89
24 EO 2C E = -110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
A.6 COLLIN Jean-Marie -PAQUET Anne : 38,89 %25 EO 2P E-1 100 4 22.22
26 EO 3C E-1 100 5 27.78
27 EO 3S W-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
A.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAGMAN David : 48,33 %28 EO 3S S+1 630 7 38.89
29 EO 3S W+2 -660 18 100.00
30 EO 3S S = 400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.7 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,11 %31 EO 2K S+3 150 15 83.33
32 EO 4CcN-2 -300 6 33.33
33 EO 4C N-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 268,0 / 486 = 55,14 %
PAIRE Nr : a.4 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 60,93 % 1 EO 3C S-1 -50 15 83.33
2 EO 2C W-2 100 3 16.67
3 EO 3S W-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 50,19 % 7 EO 2C N-1 -100 11 61.11
8 EO 4C S+2 480 7 38.89
9 EO 4C E = -620 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.4 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 40,19 %10 EO 3S S = 600 11 61.11
11 EO 4K W = -130 16 88.89
12 EO 4T E-2 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
A10 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 52,78 %13 EO 2C S+1 140 2 11.11
14 EO 5P W-1 50 5 27.78
15 EO 1S N+2 150 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
A.5 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse : 58,89 %16 EO 2P N+3 200 6 33.33
17 EO 4P N-1 -50 8 44.44
18 EO 4P E-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 51,67 %19 EO 4P S-1 -50 14 77.78
20 EO 2P S-1 -100 8 44.44
21 EO 2P N-2 -200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
A.6 COLLIN Jean-Marie -PAQUET Anne : 38,89 %22 EO 3S E+2 -660 14 77.78
23 EO 5K E+1 -620 4 22.22
24 EO 4P E = -420 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAGMAN David : 48,33 %25 EO 2C S-2 -100 14 77.78
26 EO 2P E+3 -200 18 100.00
27 EO 4C E-1 50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A12 - : 0,00 %28 EO BYE 0 0.00
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,48 %31 EO 4K S+1 150 15 83.33
32 EO 2S W = -120 2 11.11
33 EO 4C N-2 -100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 257,0 / 486 = 52,88 %
PAIRE Nr : a.5 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
A.3 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,56 % 1 EO 3P W-1 50 10 55.56
2 EO 2P S-1 -100 11 61.11
3 EO 3S W = -600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A12 - : 0,00 % 4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A10 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 52,78 %10 EO 4C N = 620 2 11.11
11 EO 2P E = -110 13 72.22
12 EO 4TcW-2 300 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
A.5 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse : 58,89 %13 EO 2C S = 110 9 50.00
14 EO 5KcN = 550 1 5.56
15 EO 2P E-2 100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 51,67 %16 EO 2P N+2 170 11 61.11
17 EO 4P N-1 -50 8 44.44
18 EO 4P W-2 100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.6 COLLIN Jean-Marie -PAQUET Anne : 38,89 %19 EO 3S S+1 430 3 16.67
20 EO 1S E = -90 2 11.11
21 EO 1S S = 90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
A.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAGMAN David : 48,33 %22 EO 3S E+1 -630 5 27.78
23 EO 6K W = -1370 18 100.00
24 EO 2K W-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A.7 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,11 %25 EO 2C S-2 -100 14 77.78
26 EO 3P E = -140 12 66.67
27 EO 3S W = -400 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,48 %28 EO 3S S = 600 16 88.89
29 EO 3S E = -600 4 22.22
30 EO 4P N-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 60,93 %31 EO 4C S+2 680 0 0.00
32 EO 3S W = -600 9 50.00
33 EO 4C N+1 450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
Total : 203,0 / 486 = 41,77 %
PAIRE Nr : a.6 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian
A.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 50,19 % 1 EO 3C S-1 -50 15 83.33
2 EO 2PcS-1 -200 17 94.44
3 EO 3S W = -600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
A.4 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 40,19 % 4 EO 3K E = -110 16 88.89
5 EO 1S E+4 -210 8 44.44
6 EO 2C S = 110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
A10 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 52,78 % 7 EO 2K S-1 -100 11 61.11
8 EO 4C N+3 510 0 0.00
9 EO 4C E+1 -650 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A12 - : 0,00 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.6 COLLIN Jean-Marie -PAQUET Anne : 38,89 %16 EO 2P N+1 140 15 83.33
17 EO 4P N-2 -100 16 88.89
18 EO 2S E+1 -150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
A.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAGMAN David : 48,33 %19 EO 4P S-1 -50 14 77.78
20 EO 1S E+1 -120 15 83.33
21 EO 1S S+1 120 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.7 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,11 %22 EO 3S E+2 -660 14 77.78
23 EO 3S W+2 -660 10 55.56
24 EO 2P E+2 -170 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
A.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,48 %25 EO 1S W = -90 10 55.56
26 EO 3C E-1 100 5 27.78
27 EO 3S W+1 -430 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 60,93 %28 EO 3S S+1 630 7 38.89
29 EO 3S E+1 -630 13 72.22
30 EO 4P N-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.3 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,56 %31 EO 3C S+3 230 9 50.00
32 EO 3S W+3 -690 18 100.00
33 EO 2C N+1 140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 312,0 / 486 = 64,20 %
PAIRE Nr : a.7 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie
A.4 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 40,19 % 1 EO 2P W-1 50 10 55.56
2 EO 4P S-2 -200 17 94.44
3 EO 3S W+1 -630 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
A10 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 52,78 % 4 EO 3K E = -110 16 88.89
5 EO 3S E+2 -460 16 88.89
6 EO 2C S = 110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
A.5 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse : 58,89 % 7 EO 2C N-1 -100 11 61.11
8 EO 4C S+2 480 7 38.89
9 EO 4C E+1 -650 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 51,67 %10 EO 3S S = 600 11 61.11
11 EO 3S N-2 -100 10 55.56
12 EO 5TcE-2 300 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAGMAN David : 48,33 %16 EO 1S W-2 200 6 33.33
17 EO 3S N-2 -100 16 88.89
18 EO 3S W = -400 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
A.7 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,11 %19 EO 3S S+1 430 3 16.67
20 EO 2P S-1 -100 8 44.44
21 EO 2K E = -90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A12 - : 0,00 %22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 60,93 %25 EO 2K E-2 200 2 11.11
26 EO 3C E = -140 12 66.67
27 EO 3S W = -400 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.3 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,56 %28 EO 3S S+1 630 7 38.89
29 EO 3S E+1 -630 13 72.22
30 EO 3S S-2 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 50,19 %31 EO 5K N = 600 4 22.22
32 EO 3S W+2 -660 15 83.33
33 EO 4C N-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 294,0 / 486 = 60,49 %
PAIRE Nr : a.8 BUSLAIN Marianne -MASSINON Henry
A10 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 52,78 % 1 EO 2P W-1 50 10 55.56
2 EO 3C W-1 50 8 44.44
3 EO 3S W = -600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.5 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse : 58,89 % 4 EO 4KcE-3 800 0 0.00
5 EO 2S E+2 -180 6 33.33
6 EO 3C S = 140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
A11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 51,67 % 7 EO 2K S = 90 2 11.11
8 EO 4C S+2 480 7 38.89
9 EO 4C E+1 -650 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A.6 COLLIN Jean-Marie -PAQUET Anne : 38,89 %10 EO 3S S = 600 11 61.11
11 EO 5TcS-2 -300 18 100.00
12 EO 4T E-2 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
A.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAGMAN David : 48,33 %13 EO 3C S-1 -100 16 88.89
14 EO 4P W-1 50 5 27.78
15 EO 1S S+4 210 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,48 %19 EO 4P S-1 -50 14 77.78
20 EO 1S E = -90 2 11.11
21 EO 1S S-1 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 60,93 %22 EO 3S E+1 -630 5 27.78
23 EO 5K W+1 -620 4 22.22
24 EO 3P E = -140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
A.3 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,56 %25 EO 2T N = 90 6 33.33
26 EO 3P E-1 100 5 27.78
27 EO 3S E+2 -460 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 50,19 %28 EO 3S S = 600 16 88.89
29 EO 3S E = -600 4 22.22
30 EO 4P N-2 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A12 - : 0,00 %31 EO BYE 0 0.00
32 EO BYE 0 0.00
33 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 240,0 / 486 = 49,38 %
PAIRE Nr : a.9 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
A.5 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse : 58,89 % 1 EO 3P W-2 100 5 27.78
2 EO 3C W = -140 14 77.78
3 EO 3S W = -600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 51,67 % 4 EO 1S E = -90 11 61.11
5 EO 3S E+1 -430 13 72.22
6 EO 2C S+1 140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A12 - : 0,00 % 7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAGMAN David : 48,33 %10 EO 3S S = 600 11 61.11
11 EO 4CcW-3 500 0 0.00
12 EO 4C N-1 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.7 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,11 %13 EO 2P E+1 -140 18 100.00
14 EO 6KcN-2 -300 16 88.89
15 EO 3P E-2 100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 94,44 %
A.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,48 %16 EO 4P N+1 450 1 5.56
17 EO 4P N-1 -50 8 44.44
18 EO 3S E-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
A.3 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,56 %22 EO 3S E+2 -660 14 77.78
23 EO 3P N-1 -100 0 0.00
24 EO 2P E+2 -170 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 50,19 %25 EO 3T N-2 -100 14 77.78
26 EO 4C E-2 200 0 0.00
27 EO 3S W+1 -430 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.4 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 40,19 %28 EO 3S S+1 630 7 38.89
29 EO 3S E = -600 4 22.22
30 EO 3S S-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A10 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 52,78 %31 EO 3K S+2 150 15 83.33
32 EO 3S W+2 -660 15 83.33
33 EO 4C N = 420 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 264,0 / 486 = 54,32 %
PAIRE Nr : a10 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
A11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 51,67 % 1 EO 3C S = 140 1 5.56
2 EO 3C W-2 100 3 16.67
3 EO 3S W = -600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
A.6 COLLIN Jean-Marie -PAQUET Anne : 38,89 % 4 EO 2K E = -90 11 61.11
5 EO 3S E+1 -430 13 72.22
6 EO 2C S = 110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
A.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAGMAN David : 48,33 % 7 EO 2C N-1 -100 11 61.11
8 EO 4C S+2 480 7 38.89
9 EO 4C W+1 -650 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.7 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,11 %10 EO 3S S+1 630 0 0.00
11 EO 3S N-1 -50 5 27.78
12 EO 2C N+2 170 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
A.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,48 %13 EO 2C S+1 140 2 11.11
14 EO 5KcN = 550 1 5.56
15 EO 2P E-3 150 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
A12 - : 0,00 %16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.3 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,56 %19 EO 4P S = 420 6 33.33
20 EO 1S W = -90 2 11.11
21 EO 2P N-1 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.4 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 40,19 %25 EO 1S W+2 -150 18 100.00
26 EO 3P E-1 100 5 27.78
27 EO 3S W = -400 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A10 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 52,78 %28 EO 3S S+1 630 7 38.89
29 EO 3S W = -600 4 22.22
30 EO 3C S = 140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
A.5 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse : 58,89 %31 EO 3C S+3 230 9 50.00
32 EO 3S W+1 -630 12 66.67
33 EO 4C N = 420 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 195,0 / 486 = 40,12 %
PAIRE Nr : a11 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin
A.6 COLLIN Jean-Marie -PAQUET Anne : 38,89 % 1 EO 3C S-2 -100 18 100.00
2 EO 3K N-1 -100 11 61.11
3 EO 3S W = -600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
A.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAGMAN David : 48,33 % 4 EO 4K E-1 100 8 44.44
5 EO 3S E = -400 10 55.56
6 EO 2C S+1 140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.7 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,11 % 7 EO 2K S-1 -100 11 61.11
8 EO 4C S = 420 16 88.89
9 EO 4C W-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,48 %10 EO 3S S = 600 11 61.11
11 EO 1P E+1 -110 13 72.22
12 EO 4T W-2 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 60,93 %13 EO 2C S = 110 9 50.00
14 EO 6KcN-1 -100 10 55.56
15 EO 2S S = 120 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.3 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,56 %16 EO 1S W-1 100 18 100.00
17 EO 4P N-2 -100 16 88.89
18 EO 4P E = -420 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 96,30 %
A.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 50,19 %19 EO 4P S-1 -50 14 77.78
20 EO 1S W+1 -120 15 83.33
21 EO 1S S+1 120 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.4 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 40,19 %22 EO 3S E+1 -630 5 27.78
23 EO 3S E+3 -690 14 77.78
24 EO 2P E+2 -170 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.5 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse : 58,89 %28 EO 3S S+1 630 7 38.89
29 EO 3S E+1 -630 13 72.22
30 EO 3P S+1 170 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 51,67 %31 EO 4CcW-3 500 6 33.33
32 EO 4PcN-1 -100 0 0.00
33 EO 3C N = 140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
Total : 308,0 / 540 = 57,04 %
PAIRE Nr : a12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude
A12 - : 0,00 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 50,19 % 4 EO 3K E = -110 16 88.89
5 EO 1S E+2 -150 1 5.56
6 EO 3K W-2 200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.6 COLLIN Jean-Marie -PAQUET Anne : 38,89 % 7 EO 3K S-2 -200 18 100.00
8 EO 3C N+1 170 18 100.00
9 EO 4C E = -620 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
A.3 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,56 %10 EO 3S S = 600 11 61.11
11 EO 3P E-1 50 2 11.11
12 EO 2C N+1 140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 51,67 %13 EO 2C S = 110 9 50.00
14 EO 4P W = -420 18 100.00
15 EO 2K S+2 130 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 60,93 %16 EO 4P N+1 450 1 5.56
17 EO 3S N-1 -50 8 44.44
18 EO 3S W-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
A.5 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse : 58,89 %19 EO 2P S+2 170 8 44.44
20 EO 1S W+1 -120 15 83.33
21 EO 1S S+1 120 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,48 %22 EO 3S E = -600 0 0.00
23 EO 3S E+2 -660 10 55.56
24 EO 2C W = -110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A.7 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,11 %28 EO 3S S+2 660 0 0.00
29 EO 3S W+1 -630 13 72.22
30 EO 4P N-2 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.4 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 40,19 %31 EO 4C S+1 650 2 11.11
32 EO 3S W = -600 9 50.00
33 EO 4C N-2 -100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
Total : 232,0 / 486 = 47,74 %
|
|