|
Tournoi du 30-04-12
1 63,33 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
2 62,59 7 de VIRON Baudouin -LIBERT Laurent
3 57,41 4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
4 55,56 11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -SALFI Huguette
5 49,26 2 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane
6 47,59 1 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François
7 44,44 6 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Josef
8 43,52 10 DE MONTEBELLO France -DE BONVOISIN Pierre
9 42,78 3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert
10 42,04 9 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier
11 41,48 5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 59,07 18 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
2 56,30 12 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian
3 54,26 21 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
4 52,59 15 DELTOUR Emile -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie
5 50,74 14 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard
6 50,00 19 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal
7 49,26 13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
~ 49,26 22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
9 48,15 20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
10 43,89 17 VERBOIS Léon -NELIS Claude
11 36,48 16 COLLET Claudine -DELHEZ Jacques
PAIRE Nr : 1 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François
12 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 56,30 % 1 NS 3S E+1 -430 3 16.67
2 NS 2K W-3 150 14 77.78
3 NS 4C S+1 450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 49,26 % 4 NS 4K N = 130 7 38.89
5 NS 2P N+1 140 10 55.56
6 NS 3P E = -140 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
21 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 54,26 % 7 NS 2C S+3 200 4 22.22
8 NS 4P W+2 -480 4 22.22
9 NS 5C N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,15 %10 NS 2C S+2 170 12 66.67
11 NS 4C N-8 -400 0 0.00
12 NS 3K N+2 150 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
19 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 50,00 %13 NS 4P W = -620 10 55.56
14 NS 3S E+2 -460 4 22.22
15 NS 2C N+1 140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
18 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,07 %16 NS 2P W+1 -140 10 55.56
17 NS 3S E+1 -430 10 55.56
18 NS 3S E+3 -490 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
17 VERBOIS Léon -NELIS Claude : 43,89 %19 NS 2P N+2 170 14 77.78
20 NS 4P S+1 650 11 61.11
21 NS 3S W = -400 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
16 COLLET Claudine -DELHEZ Jacques : 36,48 %22 NS 2P N+1 140 16 88.89
23 NS 3P E-3 300 18 100.00
24 NS 4C N-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
15 DELTOUR Emile -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 52,59 %25 NS 2P S = 110 5 27.78
26 NS 4C W+1 -650 5 27.78
27 NS 4P E-1 50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
14 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 50,74 %28 NS 1S E-2 100 11 61.11
29 NS 1S W+1 -120 7 38.89
30 NS 2K E-2 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 257,0 / 540 = 47,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane
13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 49,26 % 4 NS 3K N+1 130 7 38.89
5 NS 2P N+1 140 10 55.56
6 NS 4P E-2 200 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
12 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 56,30 % 7 NS 3C S+2 200 4 22.22
8 NS 3S W+3 -490 1 5.56
9 NS 4C N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 49,26 %10 NS 2C S+1 140 8 44.44
11 NS 4PcS = 590 18 100.00
12 NS 3S S-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
21 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 54,26 %13 NS 4P W+1 -650 3 16.67
14 NS 3S W+2 -460 4 22.22
15 NS 3C N-1 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,15 %16 NS 2C W+1 -140 10 55.56
17 NS 4C W+1 -450 6 33.33
18 NS 3S W+2 -460 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
19 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 50,00 %19 NS 3P N+1 170 14 77.78
20 NS 4P S+1 650 11 61.11
21 NS 3S W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
18 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,07 %22 NS 2P N = 110 9 50.00
23 NS 3C N-1 -100 9 50.00
24 NS 3C N = 140 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
17 VERBOIS Léon -NELIS Claude : 43,89 %25 NS 2P S+1 140 13 72.22
26 NS 4C E+1 -650 5 27.78
27 NS 4P W-1 50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
16 COLLET Claudine -DELHEZ Jacques : 36,48 %28 NS 3S N-1 -100 2 11.11
29 NS 1S W-2 200 18 100.00
30 NS 2T N = 90 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
15 DELTOUR Emile -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 52,59 %31 NS 3S W+3 -490 8 44.44
32 NS 4P W+1 -650 10 55.56
33 NS 3S E-2 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 266,0 / 540 = 49,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert
16 COLLET Claudine -DELHEZ Jacques : 36,48 % 1 NS 3S E = -400 9 50.00
2 NS 2K W-2 100 8 44.44
3 NS 3S N+2 460 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
14 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 50,74 % 7 NS 1S E-3 300 14 77.78
8 NS 4C E = -420 8 44.44
9 NS 5C S-2 -100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 49,26 %10 NS 2C S = 110 4 22.22
11 NS 4P S = 420 13 72.22
12 NS 5K N = 600 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
12 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 56,30 %13 NS 4P E+2 -680 0 0.00
14 NS 3S E+1 -430 13 72.22
15 NS 3C N = 140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 49,26 %16 NS 3C W = -140 10 55.56
17 NS 5K W = -400 16 88.89
18 NS 3S W+2 -460 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
21 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 54,26 %19 NS 2P N+1 140 7 38.89
20 NS 3P S+2 200 1 5.56
21 NS 3S W = -400 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,15 %22 NS 2P N-2 -100 0 0.00
23 NS 1S S = 90 12 66.67
24 NS 4T E = -130 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
19 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 50,00 %25 NS 3S S-1 -50 1 5.56
26 NS 4C W+1 -650 5 27.78
27 NS 4P E+1 -450 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
18 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,07 %28 NS 2T W = -90 4 22.22
29 NS 2S E = -120 7 38.89
30 NS 2C N-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
17 VERBOIS Léon -NELIS Claude : 43,89 %31 NS 4C W+2 -480 18 100.00
32 NS 4P W+1 -650 10 55.56
33 NS 3K E+2 -150 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
Total : 231,0 / 540 = 42,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
18 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,07 % 1 NS 3S E = -400 9 50.00
2 NS 1S S+3 180 17 94.44
3 NS 3S S = 400 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
17 VERBOIS Léon -NELIS Claude : 43,89 % 4 NS 4K N = 130 7 38.89
5 NS 2P N+1 140 10 55.56
6 NS 4P E-3 300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
15 DELTOUR Emile -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 52,59 %10 NS 2KcW-2 500 16 88.89
11 NS 4P S = 420 13 72.22
12 NS 3P N+1 170 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
14 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 50,74 %13 NS 4P W = -620 10 55.56
14 NS 3S W+1 -430 13 72.22
15 NS 3C N-1 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 49,26 %16 NS 2C W+2 -170 1 5.56
17 NS 4C W+1 -450 6 33.33
18 NS 3S W+2 -460 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
12 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 56,30 %19 NS 4PcN = 590 18 100.00
20 NS 4P S+1 650 11 61.11
21 NS 3S W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 49,26 %22 NS 2P N = 110 9 50.00
23 NS 3C N-1 -100 9 50.00
24 NS 4C N-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
21 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 54,26 %25 NS 2C E-3 300 18 100.00
26 NS 4C E = -620 14 77.78
27 NS 4P E+1 -450 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,15 %28 NS 2P S+1 140 17 94.44
29 NS 2S E-1 100 16 88.89
30 NS 2T N = 90 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
19 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 50,00 %31 NS 3S W+3 -490 8 44.44
32 NS 4P W+1 -650 10 55.56
33 NS 5P W = -450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 310,0 / 540 = 57,41 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,15 % 1 NS 3S E = -400 9 50.00
2 NS 3T S+1 130 12 66.67
3 NS 4C S+1 450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
19 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 50,00 % 4 NS 3K N+1 130 7 38.89
5 NS 2P N+1 140 10 55.56
6 NS 2P E = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
18 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,07 % 7 NS 3C N+2 200 4 22.22
8 NS 3S W+3 -490 1 5.56
9 NS 5C S-2 -100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
16 COLLET Claudine -DELHEZ Jacques : 36,48 %13 NS 2C W+2 -170 17 94.44
14 NS 3S E+1 -430 13 72.22
15 NS 2C N+1 140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
15 DELTOUR Emile -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 52,59 %16 NS 2C W+1 -140 10 55.56
17 NS 4C W+1 -450 6 33.33
18 NS 3S W+3 -490 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
14 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 50,74 %19 NS 2P N = 110 2 11.11
20 NS 4P S+1 650 11 61.11
21 NS 3S W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 49,26 %22 NS 2P N-1 -50 3 16.67
23 NS 2P E = -110 3 16.67
24 NS 3T E+1 -130 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
12 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 56,30 %25 NS 2P S-1 -50 1 5.56
26 NS 4C W+2 -680 0 0.00
27 NS 4P E+1 -450 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 5,56 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 49,26 %28 NS 2P S = 110 14 77.78
29 NS 2K E+1 -110 14 77.78
30 NS 3K E-3 150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
21 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 54,26 %31 NS 3S W+3 -490 8 44.44
32 NS 5P W = -650 10 55.56
33 NS 3C N-3 -150 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 224,0 / 540 = 41,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Josef
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 49,26 % 1 NS 3S E+2 -460 0 0.00
2 NS 3P N-2 -200 1 5.56
3 NS 2C S+2 170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 1,85 %
21 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 54,26 % 4 NS 3K N+1 130 7 38.89
5 NS 2P N+1 140 10 55.56
6 NS 4P W-1 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,15 % 7 NS 4C N+1 650 17 94.44
8 NS 3S W = -400 12 66.67
9 NS 4C S-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
19 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 50,00 %10 NS 2C S+2 170 12 66.67
11 NS 5PcS-1 -100 2 11.11
12 NS 5K N = 600 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
17 VERBOIS Léon -NELIS Claude : 43,89 %16 NS 1P W+2 -140 10 55.56
17 NS 4C W = -420 13 72.22
18 NS 3S W+2 -460 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
16 COLLET Claudine -DELHEZ Jacques : 36,48 %19 NS 2P N+1 140 7 38.89
20 NS 4P S+1 650 11 61.11
21 NS 3S W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
15 DELTOUR Emile -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 52,59 %22 NS 2P N = 110 9 50.00
23 NS 2P E = -110 3 16.67
24 NS 1S W+1 -120 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
14 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 50,74 %25 NS 2C S = 110 5 27.78
26 NS 4C W = -620 14 77.78
27 NS 4P E-1 50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 49,26 %28 NS 1S E+1 -120 0 0.00
29 NS 1S W+2 -150 0 0.00
30 NS 2KcE-1 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
12 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 56,30 %31 NS 3S W+3 -490 8 44.44
32 NS 4P W+1 -650 10 55.56
33 NS 4P W = -420 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 240,0 / 540 = 44,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 de VIRON Baudouin -LIBERT Laurent
13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 49,26 % 1 NS 3S E-1 50 16 88.89
2 NS 1S S+3 180 17 94.44
3 NS 5C S = 450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
12 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 56,30 % 4 NS 3P S = 140 14 77.78
5 NS 3C W-2 100 1 5.56
6 NS 4P E-2 200 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 49,26 % 7 NS 2C N+4 230 11 61.11
8 NS 5S W-2 100 18 100.00
9 NS 4C N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
21 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 54,26 %10 NS 4C S = 620 18 100.00
11 NS 4P S = 420 13 72.22
12 NS 4K N+1 150 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,15 %13 NS 4P E = -620 10 55.56
14 NS 3S W+1 -430 13 72.22
15 NS 2C N+1 140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
18 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,07 %19 NS 3P N+1 170 14 77.78
20 NS 4P S+1 650 11 61.11
21 NS 3S W-2 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
17 VERBOIS Léon -NELIS Claude : 43,89 %22 NS 2P N = 110 9 50.00
23 NS 2P E = -110 3 16.67
24 NS 3C N = 140 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
16 COLLET Claudine -DELHEZ Jacques : 36,48 %25 NS 2P S+1 140 13 72.22
26 NS 3S W+1 -630 10 55.56
27 NS 1S E+1 -120 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
15 DELTOUR Emile -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 52,59 %28 NS 2P S+1 140 17 94.44
29 NS 1S W+1 -120 7 38.89
30 NS 3K S-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
14 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 50,74 %31 NS 3S W+3 -490 8 44.44
32 NS 4P W+1 -650 10 55.56
33 NS 3C N-2 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
Total : 338,0 / 540 = 62,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
15 DELTOUR Emile -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 52,59 % 1 NS 3S E = -400 9 50.00
2 NS 3T S = 110 10 55.56
3 NS 4C S+2 480 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
14 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 50,74 % 4 NS 4P S = 620 17 94.44
5 NS 1S S+3 180 18 100.00
6 NS 4PcS-6 -1400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 49,26 % 7 NS 2C N+4 230 11 61.11
8 NS 3S W-1 50 16 88.89
9 NS 4C N = 420 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
12 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 56,30 %10 NS 2C N+2 170 12 66.67
11 NS 4P S = 420 13 72.22
12 NS 3P N+2 200 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 49,26 %13 NS 4P W = -620 10 55.56
14 NS 3S W = -400 18 100.00
15 NS 4C N-1 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
21 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 54,26 %16 NS 3C W+1 -170 1 5.56
17 NS 4C W = -420 13 72.22
18 NS 3S W+2 -460 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
19 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 50,00 %22 NS 2P N+1 140 16 88.89
23 NS 2S S = 120 16 88.89
24 NS 4C N-2 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
18 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,07 %25 NS 2P S+1 140 13 72.22
26 NS 4C W+1 -650 5 27.78
27 NS 4P E = -420 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
17 VERBOIS Léon -NELIS Claude : 43,89 %28 NS 1ScE-1 100 11 61.11
29 NS 1S W+1 -120 7 38.89
30 NS 3P S-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
16 COLLET Claudine -DELHEZ Jacques : 36,48 %31 NS 3S W+3 -490 8 44.44
32 NS 4P W = -620 18 100.00
33 NS 2CcE-2 300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
Total : 342,0 / 540 = 63,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier
17 VERBOIS Léon -NELIS Claude : 43,89 % 1 NS 3S E-1 50 16 88.89
2 NS 2K W = -90 6 33.33
3 NS 4C S+1 450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
16 COLLET Claudine -DELHEZ Jacques : 36,48 % 4 NS 4P S = 620 17 94.44
5 NS 2S E-2 100 1 5.56
6 NS 4P E-2 200 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
15 DELTOUR Emile -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 52,59 % 7 NS 3C N+2 200 4 22.22
8 NS 3S W = -400 12 66.67
9 NS 4C S-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
14 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 50,74 %10 NS 3K W = -110 1 5.56
11 NS 5P S-1 -50 5 27.78
12 NS 3K N+2 150 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 49,26 %13 NS 4P E = -620 10 55.56
14 NS 3S W+2 -460 4 22.22
15 NS 3C N-1 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
12 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 56,30 %16 NS 2P W+1 -140 10 55.56
17 NS 4C W+2 -480 2 11.11
18 NS 3S E+2 -460 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 49,26 %19 NS 3P N = 140 7 38.89
20 NS 2P S+3 200 1 5.56
21 NS 3S W = -400 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,15 %25 NS 1S S+1 120 8 44.44
26 NS 4C W-1 100 18 100.00
27 NS 4P W-1 50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
19 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 50,00 %28 NS 1S W-1 50 7 38.89
29 NS 1S W+1 -120 7 38.89
30 NS 2K W-2 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
18 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,07 %31 NS 3S W+3 -490 8 44.44
32 NS 3S E+2 -660 1 5.56
33 NS 4P N = -420 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
Total : 227,0 / 540 = 42,04 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 DE MONTEBELLO France -DE BONVOISIN Pierre
19 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 50,00 % 1 NS 3S W+1 -430 3 16.67
2 NS 2C W+1 -140 4 22.22
3 NS 4C S+1 450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
18 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,07 % 4 NS 3K N+1 130 7 38.89
5 NS 2P N+1 140 10 55.56
6 NS 4P E-2 200 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
17 VERBOIS Léon -NELIS Claude : 43,89 % 7 NS 2C N+3 200 4 22.22
8 NS 4P E+1 -450 6 33.33
9 NS Pass Passe 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
16 COLLET Claudine -DELHEZ Jacques : 36,48 %10 NS 2T N+2 130 6 33.33
11 NS 3P S+1 170 8 44.44
12 NS 4K N+1 150 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
15 DELTOUR Emile -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 52,59 %13 NS 4P E+1 -650 3 16.67
14 NS 3S W+2 -460 4 22.22
15 NS 4C N-1 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
14 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 50,74 %16 NS 4C W-1 100 18 100.00
17 NS 3S E+3 -490 0 0.00
18 NS 3S W+2 -460 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 49,26 %19 NS 2P N+1 140 7 38.89
20 NS 4P S+1 650 11 61.11
21 NS 3S W-2 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
12 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 56,30 %22 NS 2P N+1 140 16 88.89
23 NS 1P E+1 -110 3 16.67
24 NS 4PcN-4 -800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
21 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 54,26 %28 NS 1S W-1 50 7 38.89
29 NS 1S W+1 -120 7 38.89
30 NS 2T S+1 110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,15 %31 NS 3S W+3 -490 8 44.44
32 NS 3S W+2 -660 1 5.56
33 NS 3K S+1 130 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
Total : 235,0 / 540 = 43,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -SALFI Huguette
21 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 54,26 % 1 NS 3S E-1 50 16 88.89
2 NS 1S S-2 -200 1 5.56
3 NS 4C S+2 480 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,15 % 4 NS 4P S-2 -200 0 0.00
5 NS 2P N+1 140 10 55.56
6 NS 2P E+1 -140 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
19 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 50,00 % 7 NS 4C S+1 650 17 94.44
8 NS 3S W = -400 12 66.67
9 NS 4C N = 420 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
18 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,07 %10 NS 2C W = -110 1 5.56
11 NS 5P S-1 -50 5 27.78
12 NS 3K N+2 150 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
17 VERBOIS Léon -NELIS Claude : 43,89 %13 NS 2C W+2 -170 17 94.44
14 NS 3S E+2 -460 4 22.22
15 NS 2C N+1 140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
16 COLLET Claudine -DELHEZ Jacques : 36,48 %16 NS 2C W+1 -140 10 55.56
17 NS 5C W-1 50 18 100.00
18 NS 3S W+2 -460 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
15 DELTOUR Emile -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 52,59 %19 NS Pass Passe 0 0.00
20 NS 4P S+1 650 11 61.11
21 NS 3S W-2 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
14 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 50,74 %22 NS 2P N-1 -50 3 16.67
23 NS 2P E-1 100 14 77.78
24 NS 4C N-2 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 49,26 %25 NS 2P S+1 140 13 72.22
26 NS 4C W = -620 14 77.78
27 NS 4P E = -420 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 49,26 %31 NS 3S W+3 -490 8 44.44
32 NS 4P W+1 -650 10 55.56
33 NS 3C E-3 150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 300,0 / 540 = 55,56 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian
1 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 47,59 % 1 EO 3S E+1 -430 15 83.33
2 EO 2K W-3 150 4 22.22
3 EO 4C S+1 450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
7 de VIRON Baudouin -LIBERT Laurent : 62,59 % 4 EO 3P S = 140 4 22.22
5 EO 3C W-2 100 17 94.44
6 EO 4P E-2 200 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
2 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 49,26 % 7 EO 3C S+2 200 14 77.78
8 EO 3S W+3 -490 17 94.44
9 EO 4C N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 63,33 %10 EO 2C N+2 170 6 33.33
11 EO 4P S = 420 5 27.78
12 EO 3P N+2 200 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,78 %13 EO 4P E+2 -680 18 100.00
14 EO 3S E+1 -430 5 27.78
15 EO 3C N = 140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 42,04 %16 EO 2P W+1 -140 8 44.44
17 EO 4C W+2 -480 16 88.89
18 EO 3S E+2 -460 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,41 %19 EO 4PcN = 590 0 0.00
20 EO 4P S+1 650 7 38.89
21 EO 3S W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
10 DE MONTEBELLO France -DE BONVOISIN Pierre : 43,52 %22 EO 2P N+1 140 2 11.11
23 EO 1P E+1 -110 15 83.33
24 EO 4PcN-4 -800 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 41,48 %25 EO 2P S-1 -50 17 94.44
26 EO 4C W+2 -680 18 100.00
27 EO 4P E+1 -450 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 94,44 %
6 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Josef : 44,44 %31 EO 3S W+3 -490 10 55.56
32 EO 4P W+1 -650 8 44.44
33 EO 4P W = -420 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 304,0 / 540 = 56,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
7 de VIRON Baudouin -LIBERT Laurent : 62,59 % 1 EO 3S E-1 50 2 11.11
2 EO 1S S+3 180 1 5.56
3 EO 5C S = 450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
2 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 49,26 % 4 EO 3K N+1 130 11 61.11
5 EO 2P N+1 140 8 44.44
6 EO 4P E-2 200 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 63,33 % 7 EO 2C N+4 230 7 38.89
8 EO 3S W-1 50 2 11.11
9 EO 4C N = 420 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,78 %10 EO 2C S = 110 14 77.78
11 EO 4P S = 420 5 27.78
12 EO 5K N = 600 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
9 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 42,04 %13 EO 4P E = -620 8 44.44
14 EO 3S W+2 -460 14 77.78
15 EO 3C N-1 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,41 %16 EO 2C W+2 -170 17 94.44
17 EO 4C W+1 -450 12 66.67
18 EO 3S W+2 -460 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
10 DE MONTEBELLO France -DE BONVOISIN Pierre : 43,52 %19 EO 2P N+1 140 11 61.11
20 EO 4P S+1 650 7 38.89
21 EO 3S W-2 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 41,48 %22 EO 2P N-1 -50 15 83.33
23 EO 2P E = -110 15 83.33
24 EO 3T E+1 -130 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -SALFI Huguette : 55,56 %25 EO 2P S+1 140 5 27.78
26 EO 4C W = -620 4 22.22
27 EO 4P E = -420 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
6 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Josef : 44,44 %28 EO 1S E+1 -120 18 100.00
29 EO 1S W+2 -150 18 100.00
30 EO 2KcE-1 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
Total : 266,0 / 540 = 49,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 63,33 % 4 EO 4P S = 620 1 5.56
5 EO 1S S+3 180 0 0.00
6 EO 4PcS-6 -1400 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,78 % 7 EO 1S E-3 300 4 22.22
8 EO 4C E = -420 10 55.56
9 EO 5C S-2 -100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
9 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 42,04 %10 EO 3K W = -110 17 94.44
11 EO 5P S-1 -50 13 72.22
12 EO 3K N+2 150 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,41 %13 EO 4P W = -620 8 44.44
14 EO 3S W+1 -430 5 27.78
15 EO 3C N-1 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
10 DE MONTEBELLO France -DE BONVOISIN Pierre : 43,52 %16 EO 4C W-1 100 0 0.00
17 EO 3S E+3 -490 18 100.00
18 EO 3S W+2 -460 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 41,48 %19 EO 2P N = 110 16 88.89
20 EO 4P S+1 650 7 38.89
21 EO 3S W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -SALFI Huguette : 55,56 %22 EO 2P N-1 -50 15 83.33
23 EO 2P E-1 100 4 22.22
24 EO 4C N-2 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
6 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Josef : 44,44 %25 EO 2C S = 110 13 72.22
26 EO 4C W = -620 4 22.22
27 EO 4P E-1 50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
1 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 47,59 %28 EO 1S E-2 100 7 38.89
29 EO 1S W+1 -120 11 61.11
30 EO 2K E-2 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
7 de VIRON Baudouin -LIBERT Laurent : 62,59 %31 EO 3S W+3 -490 10 55.56
32 EO 4P W+1 -650 8 44.44
33 EO 3C N-2 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
Total : 274,0 / 540 = 50,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 DELTOUR Emile -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 63,33 % 1 EO 3S E = -400 9 50.00
2 EO 3T S = 110 8 44.44
3 EO 4C S+2 480 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
9 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 42,04 % 7 EO 3C N+2 200 14 77.78
8 EO 3S W = -400 6 33.33
9 EO 4C S-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,41 %10 EO 2KcW-2 500 2 11.11
11 EO 4P S = 420 5 27.78
12 EO 3P N+1 170 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
10 DE MONTEBELLO France -DE BONVOISIN Pierre : 43,52 %13 EO 4P E+1 -650 15 83.33
14 EO 3S W+2 -460 14 77.78
15 EO 4C N-1 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 41,48 %16 EO 2C W+1 -140 8 44.44
17 EO 4C W+1 -450 12 66.67
18 EO 3S W+3 -490 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -SALFI Huguette : 55,56 %19 EO Pass Passe 18 100.00
20 EO 4P S+1 650 7 38.89
21 EO 3S W-2 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
6 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Josef : 44,44 %22 EO 2P N = 110 9 50.00
23 EO 2P E = -110 15 83.33
24 EO 1S W+1 -120 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
1 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 47,59 %25 EO 2P S = 110 13 72.22
26 EO 4C W+1 -650 13 72.22
27 EO 4P E-1 50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
7 de VIRON Baudouin -LIBERT Laurent : 62,59 %28 EO 2P S+1 140 1 5.56
29 EO 1S W+1 -120 11 61.11
30 EO 3K S-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
2 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 49,26 %31 EO 3S W+3 -490 10 55.56
32 EO 4P W+1 -650 8 44.44
33 EO 3S E-2 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 284,0 / 540 = 52,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 COLLET Claudine -DELHEZ Jacques
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,78 % 1 EO 3S E = -400 9 50.00
2 EO 2K W-2 100 10 55.56
3 EO 3S N+2 460 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
9 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 42,04 % 4 EO 4P S = 620 1 5.56
5 EO 2S E-2 100 17 94.44
6 EO 4P E-2 200 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
10 DE MONTEBELLO France -DE BONVOISIN Pierre : 43,52 %10 EO 2T N+2 130 12 66.67
11 EO 3P S+1 170 10 55.56
12 EO 4K N+1 150 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 41,48 %13 EO 2C W+2 -170 1 5.56
14 EO 3S E+1 -430 5 27.78
15 EO 2C N+1 140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -SALFI Huguette : 55,56 %16 EO 2C W+1 -140 8 44.44
17 EO 5C W-1 50 0 0.00
18 EO 3S W+2 -460 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
6 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Josef : 44,44 %19 EO 2P N+1 140 11 61.11
20 EO 4P S+1 650 7 38.89
21 EO 3S W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
1 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 47,59 %22 EO 2P N+1 140 2 11.11
23 EO 3P E-3 300 0 0.00
24 EO 4C N-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
7 de VIRON Baudouin -LIBERT Laurent : 62,59 %25 EO 2P S+1 140 5 27.78
26 EO 3S W+1 -630 8 44.44
27 EO 1S E+1 -120 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
2 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 49,26 %28 EO 3S N-1 -100 16 88.89
29 EO 1S W-2 200 0 0.00
30 EO 2T N = 90 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 63,33 %31 EO 3S W+3 -490 10 55.56
32 EO 4P W = -620 0 0.00
33 EO 2CcE-2 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
Total : 197,0 / 540 = 36,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 VERBOIS Léon -NELIS Claude
9 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 42,04 % 1 EO 3S E-1 50 2 11.11
2 EO 2K W = -90 12 66.67
3 EO 4C S+1 450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,41 % 4 EO 4K N = 130 11 61.11
5 EO 2P N+1 140 8 44.44
6 EO 4P E-3 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
10 DE MONTEBELLO France -DE BONVOISIN Pierre : 43,52 % 7 EO 2C N+3 200 14 77.78
8 EO 4P E+1 -450 12 66.67
9 EO Pass Passe 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -SALFI Huguette : 55,56 %13 EO 2C W+2 -170 1 5.56
14 EO 3S E+2 -460 14 77.78
15 EO 2C N+1 140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
6 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Josef : 44,44 %16 EO 1P W+2 -140 8 44.44
17 EO 4C W = -420 5 27.78
18 EO 3S W+2 -460 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
1 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 47,59 %19 EO 2P N+2 170 4 22.22
20 EO 4P S+1 650 7 38.89
21 EO 3S W = -400 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
7 de VIRON Baudouin -LIBERT Laurent : 62,59 %22 EO 2P N = 110 9 50.00
23 EO 2P E = -110 15 83.33
24 EO 3C N = 140 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
2 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 49,26 %25 EO 2P S+1 140 5 27.78
26 EO 4C E+1 -650 13 72.22
27 EO 4P W-1 50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 63,33 %28 EO 1ScE-1 100 7 38.89
29 EO 1S W+1 -120 11 61.11
30 EO 3P S-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,78 %31 EO 4C W+2 -480 0 0.00
32 EO 4P W+1 -650 8 44.44
33 EO 3K E+2 -150 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
Total : 237,0 / 540 = 43,89 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,41 % 1 EO 3S E = -400 9 50.00
2 EO 1S S+3 180 1 5.56
3 EO 3S S = 400 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
10 DE MONTEBELLO France -DE BONVOISIN Pierre : 43,52 % 4 EO 3K N+1 130 11 61.11
5 EO 2P N+1 140 8 44.44
6 EO 4P E-2 200 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 41,48 % 7 EO 3C N+2 200 14 77.78
8 EO 3S W+3 -490 17 94.44
9 EO 5C S-2 -100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -SALFI Huguette : 55,56 %10 EO 2C W = -110 17 94.44
11 EO 5P S-1 -50 13 72.22
12 EO 3K N+2 150 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
1 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 47,59 %16 EO 2P W+1 -140 8 44.44
17 EO 3S E+1 -430 8 44.44
18 EO 3S E+3 -490 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
7 de VIRON Baudouin -LIBERT Laurent : 62,59 %19 EO 3P N+1 170 4 22.22
20 EO 4P S+1 650 7 38.89
21 EO 3S W-2 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
2 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 49,26 %22 EO 2P N = 110 9 50.00
23 EO 3C N-1 -100 9 50.00
24 EO 3C N = 140 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 63,33 %25 EO 2P S+1 140 5 27.78
26 EO 4C W+1 -650 13 72.22
27 EO 4P E = -420 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,78 %28 EO 2T W = -90 14 77.78
29 EO 2S E = -120 11 61.11
30 EO 2C N-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
9 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 42,04 %31 EO 3S W+3 -490 10 55.56
32 EO 3S E+2 -660 17 94.44
33 EO 4P N = -420 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
Total : 319,0 / 540 = 59,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal
10 DE MONTEBELLO France -DE BONVOISIN Pierre : 43,52 % 1 EO 3S W+1 -430 15 83.33
2 EO 2C W+1 -140 14 77.78
3 EO 4C S+1 450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 41,48 % 4 EO 3K N+1 130 11 61.11
5 EO 2P N+1 140 8 44.44
6 EO 2P E = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -SALFI Huguette : 55,56 % 7 EO 4C S+1 650 1 5.56
8 EO 3S W = -400 6 33.33
9 EO 4C N = 420 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
6 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Josef : 44,44 %10 EO 2C S+2 170 6 33.33
11 EO 5PcS-1 -100 16 88.89
12 EO 5K N = 600 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
1 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 47,59 %13 EO 4P W = -620 8 44.44
14 EO 3S E+2 -460 14 77.78
15 EO 2C N+1 140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
2 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 49,26 %19 EO 3P N+1 170 4 22.22
20 EO 4P S+1 650 7 38.89
21 EO 3S W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 63,33 %22 EO 2P N+1 140 2 11.11
23 EO 2S S = 120 2 11.11
24 EO 4C N-2 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,78 %25 EO 3S S-1 -50 17 94.44
26 EO 4C W+1 -650 13 72.22
27 EO 4P E+1 -450 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
9 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 42,04 %28 EO 1S W-1 50 11 61.11
29 EO 1S W+1 -120 11 61.11
30 EO 2K W-2 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,41 %31 EO 3S W+3 -490 10 55.56
32 EO 4P W+1 -650 8 44.44
33 EO 5P W = -450 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 270,0 / 540 = 50,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 41,48 % 1 EO 3S E = -400 9 50.00
2 EO 3T S+1 130 6 33.33
3 EO 4C S+1 450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -SALFI Huguette : 55,56 % 4 EO 4P S-2 -200 18 100.00
5 EO 2P N+1 140 8 44.44
6 EO 2P E+1 -140 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
6 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Josef : 44,44 % 7 EO 4C N+1 650 1 5.56
8 EO 3S W = -400 6 33.33
9 EO 4C S-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
1 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 47,59 %10 EO 2C S+2 170 6 33.33
11 EO 4C N-8 -400 18 100.00
12 EO 3K N+2 150 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
7 de VIRON Baudouin -LIBERT Laurent : 62,59 %13 EO 4P E = -620 8 44.44
14 EO 3S W+1 -430 5 27.78
15 EO 2C N+1 140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
2 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 49,26 %16 EO 2C W+1 -140 8 44.44
17 EO 4C W+1 -450 12 66.67
18 EO 3S W+2 -460 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,78 %22 EO 2P N-2 -100 18 100.00
23 EO 1S S = 90 6 33.33
24 EO 4T E = -130 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
9 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 42,04 %25 EO 1S S+1 120 10 55.56
26 EO 4C W-1 100 0 0.00
27 EO 4P W-1 50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,41 %28 EO 2P S+1 140 1 5.56
29 EO 2S E-1 100 2 11.11
30 EO 2T N = 90 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
10 DE MONTEBELLO France -DE BONVOISIN Pierre : 43,52 %31 EO 3S W+3 -490 10 55.56
32 EO 3S W+2 -660 17 94.44
33 EO 3K S+1 130 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
Total : 260,0 / 540 = 48,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -SALFI Huguette : 55,56 % 1 EO 3S E-1 50 2 11.11
2 EO 1S S-2 -200 17 94.44
3 EO 4C S+2 480 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
6 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Josef : 44,44 % 4 EO 3K N+1 130 11 61.11
5 EO 2P N+1 140 8 44.44
6 EO 4P W-1 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
1 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 47,59 % 7 EO 2C S+3 200 14 77.78
8 EO 4P W+2 -480 14 77.78
9 EO 5C N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
7 de VIRON Baudouin -LIBERT Laurent : 62,59 %10 EO 4C S = 620 0 0.00
11 EO 4P S = 420 5 27.78
12 EO 4K N+1 150 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
2 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 49,26 %13 EO 4P W+1 -650 15 83.33
14 EO 3S W+2 -460 14 77.78
15 EO 3C N-1 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 63,33 %16 EO 3C W+1 -170 17 94.44
17 EO 4C W = -420 5 27.78
18 EO 3S W+2 -460 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,78 %19 EO 2P N+1 140 11 61.11
20 EO 3P S+2 200 17 94.44
21 EO 3S W = -400 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,41 %25 EO 2C E-3 300 0 0.00
26 EO 4C E = -620 4 22.22
27 EO 4P E+1 -450 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
10 DE MONTEBELLO France -DE BONVOISIN Pierre : 43,52 %28 EO 1S W-1 50 11 61.11
29 EO 1S W+1 -120 11 61.11
30 EO 2T S+1 110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 41,48 %31 EO 3S W+3 -490 10 55.56
32 EO 5P W = -650 8 44.44
33 EO 3C N-3 -150 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 293,0 / 540 = 54,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
6 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Josef : 44,44 % 1 EO 3S E+2 -460 18 100.00
2 EO 3P N-2 -200 17 94.44
3 EO 2C S+2 170 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 98,15 %
1 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 47,59 % 4 EO 4K N = 130 11 61.11
5 EO 2P N+1 140 8 44.44
6 EO 3P E = -140 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
7 de VIRON Baudouin -LIBERT Laurent : 62,59 % 7 EO 2C N+4 230 7 38.89
8 EO 5S W-2 100 0 0.00
9 EO 4C N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
2 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 49,26 %10 EO 2C S+1 140 10 55.56
11 EO 4PcS = 590 0 0.00
12 EO 3S S-1 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 63,33 %13 EO 4P W = -620 8 44.44
14 EO 3S W = -400 0 0.00
15 EO 4C N-1 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,78 %16 EO 3C W = -140 8 44.44
17 EO 5K W = -400 2 11.11
18 EO 3S W+2 -460 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
9 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 42,04 %19 EO 3P N = 140 11 61.11
20 EO 2P S+3 200 17 94.44
21 EO 3S W = -400 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,41 %22 EO 2P N = 110 9 50.00
23 EO 3C N-1 -100 9 50.00
24 EO 4C N-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 41,48 %28 EO 2P S = 110 4 22.22
29 EO 2K E+1 -110 4 22.22
30 EO 3K E-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -SALFI Huguette : 55,56 %31 EO 3S W+3 -490 10 55.56
32 EO 4P W+1 -650 8 44.44
33 EO 3C E-3 150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 266,0 / 540 = 49,26 %
|
|