|
Tournoi du 01-02-16
1 63,79 1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
2 62,04 9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
3 59,11 13 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
4 55,04 7 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand
5 54,28 4 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques
6 52,64 5 GROSFILS Colette -POWIS Vinciane
7 50,47 6 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David
8 49,68 10 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse
9 49,46 8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges
10 47,22 14 VAN DOOREN Michele -HOGGE Colette
11 43,97 11 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
12 43,92 12 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
13 38,68 3 POULAERT Gilbert -COLLET Claudine
14 29,85 2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga
15 0,00 15 -
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 63,12 16 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
2 58,76 29 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre
3 57,92 26 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René
4 56,27 17 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
5 55,57 25 COSTE Thierry -COSTE Pascale
6 50,96 21 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
7 50,82 27 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard
8 49,22 19 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
9 47,36 24 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
10 44,68 23 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
11 44,04 20 PAQUET Anne -ARICKX Roger
12 43,90 22 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
13 43,42 28 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
14 43,15 30 MASSAUX Joel -PETERS Annik
15 41,36 18 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
PAIRE Nr : 1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
16 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 63,12 % 1 NS 2P W = -110 12 50.00
2 NS 2S S-1 -100 2 8.33
3 NS 2S S = 120 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 40,28 %
26 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 57,92 % 4 NS 1S W+2 -150 14 58.33
5 NS 3S S+3 690 23 95.83
6 NS 5K S-1 -50 1 4.17 µ Tbl = 52,78 %
25 COSTE Thierry -COSTE Pascale : 55,57 % 7 NS 4C W-1 100 23 95.83
8 NS 4C W+2 -480 9 37.50
9 NS 3S S+3 490 17 70.83 µ Tbl = 68,06 %
24 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,36 %10 NS 4KcE-1 200 20 83.33
11 NS 5T W+1 -420 22 91.67
12 NS 3P S+1 170 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
30 MASSAUX Joel -PETERS Annik : 43,15 %13 NS 4P S-1 -100 12 50.00
14 NS 4C N+1 450 16 66.67
15 NS 2P E+2 -170 23 95.83 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
28 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,42 %16 NS 6S S = 990 19 79.17
17 NS 4C W-3 150 24 100.00
18 NS 3S E+1 -430 13 54.17 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
21 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,96 %19 NS 1S N+3 180 6 25.00
20 NS 3T S = 110 23 95.83
21 NS 3S S+1 630 18 75.00 µ Tbl = 65,28 %
20 PAQUET Anne -ARICKX Roger : 44,04 %22 NS 3S S+2 460 15 62.50
23 NS 3S N+1 630 23 95.83
24 NS 1S S+1 120 7 29.17 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
19 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 49,22 %25 NS 3C W+3 -230 18.5 77.08
26 NS 3P S+1 170 14.2 59.17
27 NS 3S N-1 -50 6.6 27.50 µ Tbl = 54,58 %
18 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 41,36 %28 NS 3C W = -140 12 50.00
29 NS 2P W+2 -170 13.1 54.58
30 NS 3S E-3 150 23.9 99.58 µ Tbl = 68,06 %
Total : 459,3 / 720 = 63,79 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga
17 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 56,27 % 4 NS 3S W = -600 9 37.50
5 NS 3C S = 140 2 8.33
6 NS 4P N-1 -50 1 4.17 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
16 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 63,12 % 7 NS 2C E+1 -140 11 45.83
8 NS 4C W+2 -480 9 37.50
9 NS 3S S+2 460 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 40,28 %
26 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 57,92 %10 NS 5TcS-2 -500 4 16.67
11 NS 6T W+1 -940 3 12.50
12 NS 4K W-1 50 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 13,89 %
25 COSTE Thierry -COSTE Pascale : 55,57 %13 NS 2P S = 110 16 66.67
14 NS 1P S = 80 0 0.00
15 NS 4P E+1 -450 6 25.00 µ Tbl = 30,56 %
24 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,36 %16 NS 3S S+2 460 2 8.33
17 NS 3S W+3 -490 0 0.00
18 NS 3S W+1 -430 13 54.17 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
29 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 58,76 %19 NS 2S N-2 -100 0 0.00
20 NS 1C W+1 -110 8 33.33
21 NS 4C N = 620 11 45.83 µ Tbl = 26,39 %
27 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,82 %22 NS 4C N+2 480 21 87.50
23 NS 2C N = 110 6 25.00
24 NS 1S E-2 100 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 40,28 %
21 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,96 %25 NS 3C W+2 -200 22.8 95.00
26 NS 4C S-2 -200 0.1 0.42
27 NS 3S N-1 -50 6.6 27.50 µ Tbl = 40,97 %
20 PAQUET Anne -ARICKX Roger : 44,04 %28 NS 4C W = -420 4.4 18.33
29 NS 4P W-1 100 18.5 77.08
30 NS 3C W = -140 21.8 90.83 µ Tbl = 62,08 %
19 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 49,22 %31 NS 3S S-2 -200 1.2 5.00
32 NS 4C S-2 -100 1.2 5.00
33 NS 6S W = -990 2.3 9.58 µ Tbl = 6,53 %
Total : 214,9 / 720 = 29,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 POULAERT Gilbert -COLLET Claudine
20 PAQUET Anne -ARICKX Roger : 44,04 % 1 NS 2P W = -110 12 50.00
2 NS 1S N+2 150 16 66.67
3 NS 2S S = 120 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 59,72 %
18 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 41,36 % 7 NS 2C E+1 -140 11 45.83
8 NS 3S E+3 -490 2 8.33
9 NS 6S S = 990 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 51,39 %
27 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,82 %10 NS 4CcN-4 -1100 0 0.00
11 NS 6T W = -920 10 41.67
12 NS 2P S+1 140 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 26,39 %
16 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 63,12 %13 NS 4P S-2 -200 5 20.83
14 NS 2S S = 120 2 8.33
15 NS 4P E+2 -480 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 12,50 %
26 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 57,92 %16 NS 6S S = 990 19 79.17
17 NS 3S W = -400 13 54.17
18 NS 3S W+2 -460 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 48,61 %
25 COSTE Thierry -COSTE Pascale : 55,57 %19 NS 1S N+5 240 22 91.67
20 NS 2P N-3 -300 0 0.00
21 NS 4C N = 620 11 45.83 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
30 MASSAUX Joel -PETERS Annik : 43,15 %22 NS 4C N = 420 5 20.83
23 NS 3C N-1 -100 2 8.33
24 NS 1S S+1 120 7 29.17 µ Tbl = 19,44 %
28 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,42 %25 NS 4KcN-4 -800 0.1 0.42
26 NS 3P S = 140 6.6 27.50
27 NS 3S N-1 -50 6.6 27.50 µ Tbl = 18,47 %
22 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 43,90 %28 NS 4C W+1 -450 0.1 0.42
29 NS 4C W-1 100 18.5 77.08
30 NS 3C W+1 -170 16.3 67.92 µ Tbl = 48,47 %
21 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,96 %31 NS 6S N+1 1470 22.8 95.00
32 NS 4C N-2 -100 1.2 5.00
33 NS 4C E+2 -480 16.3 67.92 µ Tbl = 55,97 %
Total : 278,5 / 720 = 38,68 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques
22 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 43,90 % 1 NS 2P W+1 -140 6 25.00
2 NS 2TcE-4 800 24 100.00
3 NS 3K N = 110 12 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
21 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,96 % 4 NS 3S E = -600 9 37.50
5 NS 3C S+2 200 6 25.00
6 NS 3P N = 140 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 34,72 %
19 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 49,22 %10 NS 3K E = -110 14 58.33
11 NS 3K E+4 -190 24 100.00
12 NS 4P S = 620 20 83.33 µ Tbl = 80,56 %
28 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,42 %13 NS 4P S-2 -200 5 20.83
14 NS 3C N+1 170 4 16.67
15 NS 4P E = -420 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 31,94 %
17 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 56,27 %16 NS 6P N = 980 8 33.33
17 NS 3S W = -400 13 54.17
18 NS 3S E+1 -430 13 54.17 µ Tbl = 47,22 %
16 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 63,12 %19 NS 1S N+4 210 16 66.67
20 NS 1S E = -90 16 66.67
21 NS 4C N = 620 11 45.83 µ Tbl = 59,72 %
26 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 57,92 %22 NS 4C N+1 450 10 41.67
23 NS 1S N+2 150 15 62.50
24 NS 1ScW-3 500 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,06 %
25 COSTE Thierry -COSTE Pascale : 55,57 %25 NS 4C W+2 -680 8.8 36.67
26 NS 3P S+1 170 14.2 59.17
27 NS 3S N = 400 18.5 77.08 µ Tbl = 57,64 %
29 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 58,76 %28 NS 4C E-1 50 19.6 81.67
29 NS 4P W = -620 7.7 32.08
30 NS 4C W = -420 5.5 22.92 µ Tbl = 45,56 %
27 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,82 %31 NS 6T S-1 -100 5.5 22.92
32 NS 2C N+1 140 13.1 54.58
33 NS 2C N+1 140 23.9 99.58 µ Tbl = 59,03 %
Total : 390,8 / 720 = 54,28 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 GROSFILS Colette -POWIS Vinciane
28 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,42 % 1 NS 2C N-1 -50 20 83.33
2 NS 2T E-3 150 16 66.67
3 NS 3C W-1 100 7 29.17 µ Tbl = 59,72 %
23 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 44,68 % 4 NS 3K E = -110 18 75.00
5 NS 4C S+1 650 14 58.33
6 NS 3P N+1 170 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
22 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 43,90 % 7 NS 2C E+1 -140 11 45.83
8 NS 3S E+2 -460 17 70.83
9 NS 3S S+2 460 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 51,39 %
20 PAQUET Anne -ARICKX Roger : 44,04 %13 NS 4P S = 620 23 95.83
14 NS 4C N+1 450 16 66.67
15 NS 4P E+2 -480 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 56,94 %
29 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 58,76 %16 NS 6P S = 980 8 33.33
17 NS 3S W+1 -430 7 29.17
18 NS 3S E+2 -460 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
27 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,82 %19 NS 1S N+3 180 6 25.00
20 NS 1S W = -90 16 66.67
21 NS 4C N = 620 11 45.83 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
17 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 56,27 %22 NS 4C N+1 450 10 41.67
23 NS 2S S = 120 9 37.50
24 NS 1S S+3 180 20 83.33 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
16 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 63,12 %25 NS 2C W+4 -230 18.5 77.08
26 NS 3P S = 140 6.6 27.50
27 NS 3S N = 400 18.5 77.08 µ Tbl = 60,56 %
26 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 57,92 %28 NS 5K S-2 -200 8.8 36.67
29 NS 4P W+1 -650 0.1 0.42
30 NS 3C E+2 -200 9.8 40.83 µ Tbl = 25,97 %
30 MASSAUX Joel -PETERS Annik : 43,15 %31 NS 6S S+1 1470 22.8 95.00
32 NS 3C N = 140 13.1 54.58
33 NS 4C E = -420 21.8 90.83 µ Tbl = 80,14 %
Total : 379,0 / 720 = 52,64 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David
26 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 57,92 % 1 NS 3C N-2 -100 17 70.83
2 NS 1S N+2 150 16 66.67
3 NS 2C W-1 100 7 29.17 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
29 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 58,76 % 4 NS 3S W = -600 9 37.50
5 NS 4C S+1 650 14 58.33
6 NS 2P N+2 170 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
27 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,82 % 7 NS 2C E+1 -140 11 45.83
8 NS 3S W+2 -460 17 70.83
9 NS 3S S+2 460 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 51,39 %
23 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 44,68 %10 NS 4P W-3 300 22 91.67
11 NS 4PcS-3 -500 20 83.33
12 NS 2P S+1 140 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
21 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,96 %16 NS 6P N = 980 8 33.33
17 NS 3S W+1 -430 7 29.17
18 NS 3S E+2 -460 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
30 MASSAUX Joel -PETERS Annik : 43,15 %19 NS 1S N+3 180 6 25.00
20 NS 2P N-2 -200 3 12.50
21 NS 4C N+1 650 20 83.33 µ Tbl = 40,28 %
28 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,42 %22 NS 4C N+2 480 21 87.50
23 NS 3S N+1 630 23 95.83
24 NS 1S S+1 120 7 29.17 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
18 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 41,36 %25 NS 2C E+3 -200 22.8 95.00
26 NS 3P N+1 170 14.2 59.17
27 NS 3S N-1 -50 6.6 27.50 µ Tbl = 60,56 %
17 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 56,27 %28 NS 4C W-1 50 19.6 81.67
29 NS 4P W-1 100 18.5 77.08
30 NS 4C W+1 -450 2.3 9.58 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
16 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 63,12 %31 NS 6S S-2 -200 1.2 5.00
32 NS 2C S = 110 8.8 36.67
33 NS 6C E = -980 4.4 18.33 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
Total : 363,4 / 720 = 50,47 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand
17 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 56,27 % 1 NS 3S E-1 50 23 95.83
2 NS 1S N = 90 4 16.67
3 NS 3C E-1 100 7 29.17 µ Tbl = 47,22 %
16 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 63,12 % 4 NS 3S E+1 -630 3 12.50
5 NS 3C S+2 200 6 25.00
6 NS 3K S+1 130 6 25.00 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
30 MASSAUX Joel -PETERS Annik : 43,15 % 7 NS 4C E = -620 0 0.00
8 NS 4C W+2 -480 9 37.50
9 NS 3S N+4 520 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 43,06 %
28 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,42 %10 NS 4C N-2 -200 6 25.00
11 NS 6K E+1 -940 3 12.50
12 NS 3P S+2 200 18 75.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
24 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,36 %13 NS 4P S = 620 23 95.83
14 NS 4C N+1 450 16 66.67
15 NS 2P E+2 -170 23 95.83 µ Tbl = 86,11 %
22 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 43,90 %19 NS 1S N+3 180 6 25.00
20 NS 2S E-1 100 20 83.33
21 NS 5TcW-4 800 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
21 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,96 %22 NS 4C N+2 480 21 87.50
23 NS 1S N+2 150 15 62.50
24 NS 1S S+3 180 20 83.33 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
29 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 58,76 %25 NS 4C W+2 -680 8.8 36.67
26 NS 5T W-2 200 20.7 86.25
27 NS 3S N-1 -50 6.6 27.50 µ Tbl = 50,14 %
27 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,82 %28 NS 4C W-1 50 19.6 81.67
29 NS 4P W-1 100 18.5 77.08
30 NS 4C W = -420 5.5 22.92 µ Tbl = 60,56 %
18 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 41,36 %31 NS 6T S-1 -100 5.5 22.92
32 NS 3S N+2 460 21.8 90.83
33 NS 4C E+2 -480 16.3 67.92 µ Tbl = 60,56 %
Total : 396,3 / 720 = 55,04 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges
19 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 49,22 % 1 NS 3P E = -140 6 25.00
2 NS 1S N+2 150 16 66.67
3 NS 3C W-1 100 7 29.17 µ Tbl = 40,28 %
18 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 41,36 % 4 NS 3S E+1 -630 3 12.50
5 NS 4C S+2 680 19 79.17
6 NS 4K S = 130 6 25.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
17 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 56,27 % 7 NS 3C E = -140 11 45.83
8 NS 4C W+1 -450 23 95.83
9 NS 3S S+3 490 17 70.83 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
16 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 63,12 %10 NS 3K E = -110 14 58.33
11 NS 6K E+1 -940 3 12.50
12 NS 3P S+1 170 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 43,06 %
29 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 58,76 %13 NS 2P S+1 140 19 79.17
14 NS 4C N+1 450 16 66.67
15 NS 4P W+2 -480 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 51,39 %
27 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,82 %16 NS 6P S = 980 8 33.33
17 NS 3S W+1 -430 7 29.17
18 NS 3S W+1 -430 13 54.17 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
23 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 44,68 %22 NS 4C N+2 480 21 87.50
23 NS 2S N = 120 9 37.50
24 NS 1S S+2 150 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
22 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 43,90 %25 NS 4C E+2 -680 8.8 36.67
26 NS 3P N = 140 6.6 27.50
27 NS 3S N = 400 18.5 77.08 µ Tbl = 47,08 %
30 MASSAUX Joel -PETERS Annik : 43,15 %28 NS 4C W-1 50 19.6 81.67
29 NS 4P W = -620 7.7 32.08
30 NS 3C W+2 -200 9.8 40.83 µ Tbl = 51,53 %
28 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,42 %31 NS 6T S = 1370 13.1 54.58
32 NS 2PcE-2 500 23.9 99.58
33 NS 6C E+1 -1010 0.1 0.42 µ Tbl = 51,53 %
Total : 356,1 / 720 = 49,46 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
29 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 58,76 % 1 NS 3S E+1 -430 0 0.00
2 NS 1S N+2 150 16 66.67
3 NS 2S S+2 180 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 52,78 %
27 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,82 % 4 NS 3S W = -600 9 37.50
5 NS 3C S+2 200 6 25.00
6 NS 3P N+1 170 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 43,06 %
19 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 49,22 % 7 NS 4C E-1 100 23 95.83
8 NS 3S E+2 -460 17 70.83
9 NS 3S S+1 430 4 16.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
18 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 41,36 %10 NS 6ScE-3 800 24 100.00
11 NS 6K E = -920 10 41.67
12 NS 5KcW-4 800 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 80,56 %
17 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 56,27 %13 NS 4P S-1 -100 12 50.00
14 NS 4C N+1 450 16 66.67
15 NS 4P E = -420 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
30 MASSAUX Joel -PETERS Annik : 43,15 %16 NS 6S S = 990 19 79.17
17 NS 4C E-2 100 22 91.67
18 NS 2C W+1 -140 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,28 %
28 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,42 %19 NS 1S N+4 210 16 66.67
20 NS 2P N-1 -100 12 50.00
21 NS 5KcE-6 1400 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
24 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,36 %25 NS 4C W+2 -680 8.8 36.67
26 NS 3P N+2 200 20.7 86.25
27 NS 3S N+1 430 23.9 99.58 µ Tbl = 74,17 %
23 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 44,68 %28 NS 3C W = -140 12 50.00
29 NS 3S E+1 -630 2.3 9.58
30 NS 3C W+1 -170 16.3 67.92 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
22 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 43,90 %31 NS 3S S+2 660 9.8 40.83
32 NS 2P E-1 100 6.6 27.50
33 NS 4C E+2 -480 16.3 67.92 µ Tbl = 45,42 %
Total : 446,7 / 720 = 62,04 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse
23 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 44,68 % 1 NS 3P W = -140 6 25.00
2 NS 1S N+1 120 6 25.00
3 NS 3K S+1 130 19 79.17 µ Tbl = 43,06 %
30 MASSAUX Joel -PETERS Annik : 43,15 % 4 NS 4T W-1 100 20 83.33
5 NS 3C S+3 230 10 41.67
6 NS 4P N+1 450 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
28 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,42 % 7 NS 2C E+1 -140 11 45.83
8 NS 4C W+2 -480 9 37.50
9 NS 3S S+3 490 17 70.83 µ Tbl = 51,39 %
20 PAQUET Anne -ARICKX Roger : 44,04 %10 NS 4K E = -130 8 33.33
11 NS 6T W = -920 10 41.67
12 NS 2P S+2 170 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
19 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 49,22 %13 NS 4P S-1 -100 12 50.00
14 NS 4C N+1 450 16 66.67
15 NS 4P E = -420 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
18 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 41,36 %16 NS 6S S = 990 19 79.17
17 NS 3K W = -110 16 66.67
18 NS 3S E+1 -430 13 54.17 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
17 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 56,27 %19 NS 1S N+3 180 6 25.00
20 NS 2P N-2 -200 3 12.50
21 NS 3C N+1 170 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 15,28 %
29 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 58,76 %22 NS 6C N-1 -50 1 4.17
23 NS 2C N+2 170 20 83.33
24 NS 2P W-3 150 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 48,61 %
25 COSTE Thierry -COSTE Pascale : 55,57 %28 NS 4C W = -420 4.4 18.33
29 NS 4P W-2 200 23.9 99.58
30 NS 4C W+2 -480 0.1 0.42 µ Tbl = 39,44 %
24 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,36 %31 NS 6S N = 1440 17.4 72.50
32 NS 2C N+1 140 13.1 54.58
33 NS 3S W+3 -490 8.8 36.67 µ Tbl = 54,58 %
Total : 357,7 / 720 = 49,68 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
25 COSTE Thierry -COSTE Pascale : 55,57 % 1 NS 2P W+2 -170 2 8.33
2 NS 2K S-2 -200 0 0.00
3 NS 2P E-2 200 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 36,11 %
24 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,36 % 4 NS 3T W+1 -130 16 66.67
5 NS 3P W-1 50 0 0.00
6 NS 2P N+2 170 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
23 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 44,68 % 7 NS 2C E+1 -140 11 45.83
8 NS 3S E+2 -460 17 70.83
9 NS 3K N+2 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
29 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 58,76 %10 NS 3K E = -110 14 58.33
11 NS 6K E+1 -940 3 12.50
12 NS 4K W-1 50 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
27 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,82 %13 NS 2P S+1 140 19 79.17
14 NS 2C N+3 200 6 25.00
15 NS 4P E = -420 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
20 PAQUET Anne -ARICKX Roger : 44,04 %16 NS 6S N-2 -100 0 0.00
17 NS 4C E-1 50 19 79.17
18 NS 4C W = -420 20 83.33 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
19 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 49,22 %19 NS 1S N+4 210 16 66.67
20 NS 1S W = -90 16 66.67
21 NS 4C N = 620 11 45.83 µ Tbl = 59,72 %
18 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 41,36 %22 NS 3S N+2 460 15 62.50
23 NS 3S N-1 -100 2 8.33
24 NS 1S S+3 180 20 83.33 µ Tbl = 51,39 %
30 MASSAUX Joel -PETERS Annik : 43,15 %25 NS 4C W+2 -680 8.8 36.67
26 NS 3P S+1 170 14.2 59.17
27 NS 3S N-1 -50 6.6 27.50 µ Tbl = 41,11 %
26 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 57,92 %31 NS 3S S+2 660 9.8 40.83
32 NS 4C S-1 -50 4.4 18.33
33 NS 3S W+3 -490 8.8 36.67 µ Tbl = 31,94 %
Total : 316,6 / 720 = 43,97 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
27 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,82 % 1 NS 2C N-2 -100 17 70.83
2 NS 1S N+2 150 16 66.67
3 NS 4K S = 130 19 79.17 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
20 PAQUET Anne -ARICKX Roger : 44,04 % 4 NS 3S W+2 -660 0 0.00
5 NS 4C S+2 680 19 79.17
6 NS 3C N+1 170 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 48,61 %
24 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,36 % 7 NS 2C W+1 -140 11 45.83
8 NS 3S E+3 -490 2 8.33
9 NS 3S N = 400 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
17 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 56,27 %10 NS 3S E = -600 2 8.33
11 NS 4PcS-4 -800 15 62.50
12 NS 4K W-1 50 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
21 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,96 %13 NS 4C S-3 -300 0 0.00
14 NS 4C S+1 450 16 66.67
15 NS 4P E = -420 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
25 COSTE Thierry -COSTE Pascale : 55,57 %16 NS 6P N = 980 8 33.33
17 NS 3S W+2 -460 2 8.33
18 NS 3S W+2 -460 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 18,06 %
18 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 41,36 %19 NS 1S N+4 210 16 66.67
20 NS 3T S = 110 23 95.83
21 NS 5TcE-3 500 4 16.67 µ Tbl = 59,72 %
22 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 43,90 %22 NS 4C S = 420 5 20.83
23 NS 3S N-1 -100 2 8.33
24 NS 1S S+2 150 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
19 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 49,22 %28 NS 4C W-1 50 19.6 81.67
29 NS 4P W = -620 7.7 32.08
30 NS 3C W+1 -170 16.3 67.92 µ Tbl = 60,56 %
23 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 44,68 %31 NS 6S N = 1440 17.4 72.50
32 NS 3C N+1 170 17.4 72.50
33 NS 3S W+3 -490 8.8 36.67 µ Tbl = 60,56 %
Total : 316,2 / 720 = 43,92 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
24 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,36 % 1 NS 2P W-1 50 23 95.83
2 NS 1S N+2 150 16 66.67
3 NS 3S S-1 -50 1 4.17 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
28 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,42 % 4 NS 5T W-2 200 23 95.83
5 NS 3S S+3 690 23 95.83
6 NS 3S S = 400 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 94,44 %
21 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,96 % 7 NS 2C E+1 -140 11 45.83
8 NS 4C W+1 -450 23 95.83
9 NS 3S S+3 490 17 70.83 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
25 COSTE Thierry -COSTE Pascale : 55,57 %10 NS 3K E = -110 14 58.33
11 NS 5PcN-4 -800 15 62.50
12 NS 3K W-1 50 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
18 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 41,36 %13 NS 4P S-2 -200 5 20.83
14 NS 4C N+1 450 16 66.67
15 NS 4P E = -420 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 48,61 %
22 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 43,90 %16 NS 6S S = 990 19 79.17
17 NS 3T W-1 50 19 79.17
18 NS 3S W = -400 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
26 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 57,92 %19 NS 1S N+4 210 16 66.67
20 NS 2C W = -110 8 33.33
21 NS 5C N-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
19 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 49,22 %22 NS 6C N-1 -50 1 4.17
23 NS 1S N+2 150 15 62.50
24 NS 2S S = 120 7 29.17 µ Tbl = 31,94 %
23 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 44,68 %25 NS 4C W+2 -680 8.8 36.67
26 NS 4P N = 620 23.9 99.58
27 NS 3S N-1 -50 6.6 27.50 µ Tbl = 54,58 %
20 PAQUET Anne -ARICKX Roger : 44,04 %31 NS 6S S = 1440 17.4 72.50
32 NS 3C N+2 200 19.6 81.67
33 NS 4C E+2 -480 16.3 67.92 µ Tbl = 74,03 %
Total : 425,6 / 720 = 59,11 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 VAN DOOREN Michele -HOGGE Colette
21 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,96 % 1 NS 2P W = -110 12 50.00
2 NS 2C S+1 140 8 33.33
3 NS 4K S-1 -50 1 4.17 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
25 COSTE Thierry -COSTE Pascale : 55,57 % 4 NS 5T W-2 200 23 95.83
5 NS 4C S+1 650 14 58.33
6 NS 4K S = 130 6 25.00 µ Tbl = 59,72 %
29 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 58,76 % 7 NS 2C E+1 -140 11 45.83
8 NS 3S E+3 -490 2 8.33
9 NS 3S N+2 460 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 30,56 %
22 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 43,90 %10 NS 3K E = -110 14 58.33
11 NS 3S E+4 -520 18 75.00
12 NS 3PcS = 730 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
26 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 57,92 %13 NS 4P S-2 -200 5 20.83
14 NS 4C N+1 450 16 66.67
15 NS 4P E = -420 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 48,61 %
19 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 49,22 %16 NS 6S N = 990 19 79.17
17 NS 3S W+1 -430 7 29.17
18 NS 3S W+1 -430 13 54.17 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
23 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 44,68 %19 NS 3S N+1 430 24 100.00
20 NS 1C W+1 -110 8 33.33
21 NS 4C N = 620 11 45.83 µ Tbl = 59,72 %
16 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 63,12 %22 NS 4C N+1 450 10 41.67
23 NS 1S N+2 150 15 62.50
24 NS 1S S = 90 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 34,72 %
20 PAQUET Anne -ARICKX Roger : 44,04 %25 NS 4C W+2 -680 8.8 36.67
26 NS 3T E+1 -130 2.3 9.58
27 NS 3S N = 400 18.5 77.08 µ Tbl = 41,11 %
24 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,36 %28 NS 4C W = -420 4.4 18.33
29 NS 4P W = -620 7.7 32.08
30 NS 3C E+1 -170 16.3 67.92 µ Tbl = 39,44 %
Total : 340,0 / 720 = 47,22 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 -
22 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 43,90 % 4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
26 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 57,92 % 7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
30 MASSAUX Joel -PETERS Annik : 43,15 %10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
23 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 44,68 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
16 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 63,12 %16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
20 PAQUET Anne -ARICKX Roger : 44,04 %19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
24 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,36 %22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
17 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 56,27 %25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00
27 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
21 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,96 %28 NS BYE 0 0.00
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
25 COSTE Thierry -COSTE Pascale : 55,57 %31 NS BYE 0 0.00
32 NS BYE 0 0.00
33 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 792 = 0,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 63,79 % 1 EO 2P W = -110 12 50.00
2 EO 2S S-1 -100 22 91.67
3 EO 2S S = 120 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 59,72 %
7 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 55,04 % 4 EO 3S E+1 -630 21 87.50
5 EO 3C S+2 200 18 75.00
6 EO 3K S+1 130 18 75.00 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 29,85 % 7 EO 2C E+1 -140 13 54.17
8 EO 4C W+2 -480 15 62.50
9 EO 3S S+2 460 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 59,72 %
8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges : 49,46 %10 EO 3K E = -110 10 41.67
11 EO 6K E+1 -940 21 87.50
12 EO 3P S+1 170 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 56,94 %
3 POULAERT Gilbert -COLLET Claudine : 38,68 %13 EO 4P S-2 -200 19 79.17
14 EO 2S S = 120 22 91.67
15 EO 4P E+2 -480 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 87,50 %
15 - : 0,00 %16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
4 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 54,28 %19 EO 1S N+4 210 8 33.33
20 EO 1S E = -90 8 33.33
21 EO 4C N = 620 13 54.17 µ Tbl = 40,28 %
14 VAN DOOREN Michele -HOGGE Colette : 47,22 %22 EO 4C N+1 450 14 58.33
23 EO 1S N+2 150 9 37.50
24 EO 1S S = 90 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 65,28 %
5 GROSFILS Colette -POWIS Vinciane : 52,64 %25 EO 2C W+4 -230 5.5 22.92
26 EO 3P S = 140 17.4 72.50
27 EO 3S N = 400 5.5 22.92 µ Tbl = 39,44 %
6 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 50,47 %31 EO 6S S-2 -200 22.8 95.00
32 EO 2C S = 110 15.2 63.33
33 EO 6C E = -980 19.6 81.67 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
Total : 409,0 / 648 = 63,12 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
7 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 55,04 % 1 EO 3S E-1 50 1 4.17
2 EO 1S N = 90 20 83.33
3 EO 3C E-1 100 17 70.83 µ Tbl = 52,78 %
2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 29,85 % 4 EO 3S W = -600 15 62.50
5 EO 3C S = 140 22 91.67
6 EO 4P N-1 -50 23 95.83 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges : 49,46 % 7 EO 3C E = -140 13 54.17
8 EO 4C W+1 -450 1 4.17
9 EO 3S S+3 490 7 29.17 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
12 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 43,92 %10 EO 3S E = -600 22 91.67
11 EO 4PcS-4 -800 9 37.50
12 EO 4K W-1 50 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 62,04 %13 EO 4P S-1 -100 12 50.00
14 EO 4C N+1 450 8 33.33
15 EO 4P E = -420 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
4 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 54,28 %16 EO 6P N = 980 16 66.67
17 EO 3S W = -400 11 45.83
18 EO 3S E+1 -430 11 45.83 µ Tbl = 52,78 %
10 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,68 %19 EO 1S N+3 180 18 75.00
20 EO 2P N-2 -200 21 87.50
21 EO 3C N+1 170 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 84,72 %
5 GROSFILS Colette -POWIS Vinciane : 52,64 %22 EO 4C N+1 450 14 58.33
23 EO 2S S = 120 15 62.50
24 EO 1S S+3 180 4 16.67 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
15 - : 0,00 %25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00
27 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 50,47 %28 EO 4C W-1 50 4.4 18.33
29 EO 4P W-1 100 5.5 22.92
30 EO 4C W+1 -450 21.7 90.42 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
Total : 364,6 / 648 = 56,27 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges : 49,46 % 4 EO 3S E+1 -630 21 87.50
5 EO 4C S+2 680 5 20.83
6 EO 4K S = 130 18 75.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
3 POULAERT Gilbert -COLLET Claudine : 38,68 % 7 EO 2C E+1 -140 13 54.17
8 EO 3S E+3 -490 22 91.67
9 EO 6S S = 990 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 48,61 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 62,04 %10 EO 6ScE-3 800 0 0.00
11 EO 6K E = -920 14 58.33
12 EO 5KcW-4 800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 19,44 %
13 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 59,11 %13 EO 4P S-2 -200 19 79.17
14 EO 4C N+1 450 8 33.33
15 EO 4P E = -420 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 51,39 %
10 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,68 %16 EO 6S S = 990 5 20.83
17 EO 3K W = -110 8 33.33
18 EO 3S E+1 -430 11 45.83 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
12 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 43,92 %19 EO 1S N+4 210 8 33.33
20 EO 3T S = 110 1 4.17
21 EO 5TcE-3 500 20 83.33 µ Tbl = 40,28 %
11 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,97 %22 EO 3S N+2 460 9 37.50
23 EO 3S N-1 -100 22 91.67
24 EO 1S S+3 180 4 16.67 µ Tbl = 48,61 %
6 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 50,47 %25 EO 2C E+3 -200 1.2 5.00
26 EO 3P N+1 170 9.8 40.83
27 EO 3S N-1 -50 17.4 72.50 µ Tbl = 39,44 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 63,79 %28 EO 3C W = -140 12 50.00
29 EO 2P W+2 -170 10.9 45.42
30 EO 3S E-3 150 0.1 0.42 µ Tbl = 31,94 %
7 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 55,04 %31 EO 6T S-1 -100 18.5 77.08
32 EO 3S N+2 460 2.2 9.17
33 EO 4C E+2 -480 7.7 32.08 µ Tbl = 39,44 %
Total : 297,8 / 720 = 41,36 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges : 49,46 % 1 EO 3P E = -140 18 75.00
2 EO 1S N+2 150 8 33.33
3 EO 3C W-1 100 17 70.83 µ Tbl = 59,72 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 62,04 % 7 EO 4C E-1 100 1 4.17
8 EO 3S E+2 -460 7 29.17
9 EO 3S S+1 430 20 83.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
4 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 54,28 %10 EO 3K E = -110 10 41.67
11 EO 3K E+4 -190 0 0.00
12 EO 4P S = 620 4 16.67 µ Tbl = 19,44 %
10 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,68 %13 EO 4P S-1 -100 12 50.00
14 EO 4C N+1 450 8 33.33
15 EO 4P E = -420 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
14 VAN DOOREN Michele -HOGGE Colette : 47,22 %16 EO 6S N = 990 5 20.83
17 EO 3S W+1 -430 17 70.83
18 EO 3S W+1 -430 11 45.83 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
11 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,97 %19 EO 1S N+4 210 8 33.33
20 EO 1S W = -90 8 33.33
21 EO 4C N = 620 13 54.17 µ Tbl = 40,28 %
13 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 59,11 %22 EO 6C N-1 -50 23 95.83
23 EO 1S N+2 150 9 37.50
24 EO 2S S = 120 17 70.83 µ Tbl = 68,06 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 63,79 %25 EO 3C W+3 -230 5.5 22.92
26 EO 3P S+1 170 9.8 40.83
27 EO 3S N-1 -50 17.4 72.50 µ Tbl = 45,42 %
12 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 43,92 %28 EO 4C W-1 50 4.4 18.33
29 EO 4P W = -620 16.3 67.92
30 EO 3C W+1 -170 7.7 32.08 µ Tbl = 39,44 %
2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 29,85 %31 EO 3S S-2 -200 22.8 95.00
32 EO 4C S-2 -100 22.8 95.00
33 EO 6S W = -990 21.7 90.42 µ Tbl = 93,47 %
Total : 354,4 / 720 = 49,22 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 PAQUET Anne -ARICKX Roger
3 POULAERT Gilbert -COLLET Claudine : 38,68 % 1 EO 2P W = -110 12 50.00
2 EO 1S N+2 150 8 33.33
3 EO 2S S = 120 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 40,28 %
12 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 43,92 % 4 EO 3S W+2 -660 24 100.00
5 EO 4C S+2 680 5 20.83
6 EO 3C N+1 170 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 51,39 %
10 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,68 %10 EO 4K E = -130 16 66.67
11 EO 6T W = -920 14 58.33
12 EO 2P S+2 170 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
5 GROSFILS Colette -POWIS Vinciane : 52,64 %13 EO 4P S = 620 1 4.17
14 EO 4C N+1 450 8 33.33
15 EO 4P E+2 -480 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 43,06 %
11 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,97 %16 EO 6S N-2 -100 24 100.00
17 EO 4C E-1 50 5 20.83
18 EO 4C W = -420 4 16.67 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
15 - : 0,00 %19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 63,79 %22 EO 3S S+2 460 9 37.50
23 EO 3S N+1 630 1 4.17
24 EO 1S S+1 120 17 70.83 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
14 VAN DOOREN Michele -HOGGE Colette : 47,22 %25 EO 4C W+2 -680 15.2 63.33
26 EO 3T E+1 -130 21.7 90.42
27 EO 3S N = 400 5.5 22.92 µ Tbl = 58,89 %
2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 29,85 %28 EO 4C W = -420 19.6 81.67
29 EO 4P W-1 100 5.5 22.92
30 EO 3C W = -140 2.2 9.17 µ Tbl = 37,92 %
13 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 59,11 %31 EO 6S S = 1440 6.6 27.50
32 EO 3C N+2 200 4.4 18.33
33 EO 4C E+2 -480 7.7 32.08 µ Tbl = 25,97 %
Total : 285,4 / 648 = 44,04 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
14 VAN DOOREN Michele -HOGGE Colette : 47,22 % 1 EO 2P W = -110 12 50.00
2 EO 2C S+1 140 16 66.67
3 EO 4K S-1 -50 23 95.83 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
4 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 54,28 % 4 EO 3S E = -600 15 62.50
5 EO 3C S+2 200 18 75.00
6 EO 3P N = 140 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 65,28 %
13 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 59,11 % 7 EO 2C E+1 -140 13 54.17
8 EO 4C W+1 -450 1 4.17
9 EO 3S S+3 490 7 29.17 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
12 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 43,92 %13 EO 4C S-3 -300 24 100.00
14 EO 4C S+1 450 8 33.33
15 EO 4P E = -420 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
6 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 50,47 %16 EO 6P N = 980 16 66.67
17 EO 3S W+1 -430 17 70.83
18 EO 3S E+2 -460 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 63,79 %19 EO 1S N+3 180 18 75.00
20 EO 3T S = 110 1 4.17
21 EO 3S S+1 630 6 25.00 µ Tbl = 34,72 %
7 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 55,04 %22 EO 4C N+2 480 3 12.50
23 EO 1S N+2 150 9 37.50
24 EO 1S S+3 180 4 16.67 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 29,85 %25 EO 3C W+2 -200 1.2 5.00
26 EO 4C S-2 -200 23.9 99.58
27 EO 3S N-1 -50 17.4 72.50 µ Tbl = 59,03 %
15 - : 0,00 %28 EO BYE 0 0.00
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
3 POULAERT Gilbert -COLLET Claudine : 38,68 %31 EO 6S N+1 1470 1.2 5.00
32 EO 4C N-2 -100 22.8 95.00
33 EO 4C E+2 -480 7.7 32.08 µ Tbl = 44,03 %
Total : 330,2 / 648 = 50,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
4 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 54,28 % 1 EO 2P W+1 -140 18 75.00
2 EO 2TcE-4 800 0 0.00
3 EO 3K N = 110 12 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
15 - : 0,00 % 4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
5 GROSFILS Colette -POWIS Vinciane : 52,64 % 7 EO 2C E+1 -140 13 54.17
8 EO 3S E+2 -460 7 29.17
9 EO 3S S+2 460 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 48,61 %
14 VAN DOOREN Michele -HOGGE Colette : 47,22 %10 EO 3K E = -110 10 41.67
11 EO 3S E+4 -520 6 25.00
12 EO 3PcS = 730 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
13 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 59,11 %16 EO 6S S = 990 5 20.83
17 EO 3T W-1 50 5 20.83
18 EO 3S W = -400 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
7 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 55,04 %19 EO 1S N+3 180 18 75.00
20 EO 2S E-1 100 4 16.67
21 EO 5TcW-4 800 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
12 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 43,92 %22 EO 4C S = 420 19 79.17
23 EO 3S N-1 -100 22 91.67
24 EO 1S S+2 150 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges : 49,46 %25 EO 4C E+2 -680 15.2 63.33
26 EO 3P N = 140 17.4 72.50
27 EO 3S N = 400 5.5 22.92 µ Tbl = 52,92 %
3 POULAERT Gilbert -COLLET Claudine : 38,68 %28 EO 4C W+1 -450 23.9 99.58
29 EO 4C W-1 100 5.5 22.92
30 EO 3C W+1 -170 7.7 32.08 µ Tbl = 51,53 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 62,04 %31 EO 3S S+2 660 14.2 59.17
32 EO 2P E-1 100 17.4 72.50
33 EO 4C E+2 -480 7.7 32.08 µ Tbl = 54,58 %
Total : 284,5 / 648 = 43,90 %
PAIRE Nr : 23 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
10 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,68 % 1 EO 3P W = -140 18 75.00
2 EO 1S N+1 120 18 75.00
3 EO 3K S+1 130 5 20.83 µ Tbl = 56,94 %
5 GROSFILS Colette -POWIS Vinciane : 52,64 % 4 EO 3K E = -110 6 25.00
5 EO 4C S+1 650 10 41.67
6 EO 3P N+1 170 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
11 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,97 % 7 EO 2C E+1 -140 13 54.17
8 EO 3S E+2 -460 7 29.17
9 EO 3K N+2 150 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
6 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 50,47 %10 EO 4P W-3 300 2 8.33
11 EO 4PcS-3 -500 4 16.67
12 EO 2P S+1 140 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
15 - : 0,00 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
14 VAN DOOREN Michele -HOGGE Colette : 47,22 %19 EO 3S N+1 430 0 0.00
20 EO 1C W+1 -110 16 66.67
21 EO 4C N = 620 13 54.17 µ Tbl = 40,28 %
8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges : 49,46 %22 EO 4C N+2 480 3 12.50
23 EO 2S N = 120 15 62.50
24 EO 1S S+2 150 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
13 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 59,11 %25 EO 4C W+2 -680 15.2 63.33
26 EO 4P N = 620 0.1 0.42
27 EO 3S N-1 -50 17.4 72.50 µ Tbl = 45,42 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 62,04 %28 EO 3C W = -140 12 50.00
29 EO 3S E+1 -630 21.7 90.42
30 EO 3C W+1 -170 7.7 32.08 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
12 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 43,92 %31 EO 6S N = 1440 6.6 27.50
32 EO 3C N+1 170 6.6 27.50
33 EO 3S W+3 -490 15.2 63.33 µ Tbl = 39,44 %
Total : 289,5 / 648 = 44,68 %
PAIRE Nr : 24 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
13 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 59,11 % 1 EO 2P W-1 50 1 4.17
2 EO 1S N+2 150 8 33.33
3 EO 3S S-1 -50 23 95.83 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
11 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,97 % 4 EO 3T W+1 -130 8 33.33
5 EO 3P W-1 50 24 100.00
6 EO 2P N+2 170 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
12 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 43,92 % 7 EO 2C W+1 -140 13 54.17
8 EO 3S E+3 -490 22 91.67
9 EO 3S N = 400 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 63,79 %10 EO 4KcE-1 200 4 16.67
11 EO 5T W+1 -420 2 8.33
12 EO 3P S+1 170 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
7 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 55,04 %13 EO 4P S = 620 1 4.17
14 EO 4C N+1 450 8 33.33
15 EO 2P E+2 -170 1 4.17 µ Tbl = 13,89 %
2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 29,85 %16 EO 3S S+2 460 22 91.67
17 EO 3S W+3 -490 24 100.00
18 EO 3S W+1 -430 11 45.83 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
15 - : 0,00 %22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 62,04 %25 EO 4C W+2 -680 15.2 63.33
26 EO 3P N+2 200 3.3 13.75
27 EO 3S N+1 430 0.1 0.42 µ Tbl = 25,83 %
14 VAN DOOREN Michele -HOGGE Colette : 47,22 %28 EO 4C W = -420 19.6 81.67
29 EO 4P W = -620 16.3 67.92
30 EO 3C E+1 -170 7.7 32.08 µ Tbl = 60,56 %
10 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,68 %31 EO 6S N = 1440 6.6 27.50
32 EO 2C N+1 140 10.9 45.42
33 EO 3S W+3 -490 15.2 63.33 µ Tbl = 45,42 %
Total : 306,9 / 648 = 47,36 %
PAIRE Nr : 25 COSTE Thierry -COSTE Pascale
11 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,97 % 1 EO 2P W+2 -170 22 91.67
2 EO 2K S-2 -200 24 100.00
3 EO 2P E-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 63,89 %
14 VAN DOOREN Michele -HOGGE Colette : 47,22 % 4 EO 5T W-2 200 1 4.17
5 EO 4C S+1 650 10 41.67
6 EO 4K S = 130 18 75.00 µ Tbl = 40,28 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 63,79 % 7 EO 4C W-1 100 1 4.17
8 EO 4C W+2 -480 15 62.50
9 EO 3S S+3 490 7 29.17 µ Tbl = 31,94 %
13 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 59,11 %10 EO 3K E = -110 10 41.67
11 EO 5PcN-4 -800 9 37.50
12 EO 3K W-1 50 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 29,85 %13 EO 2P S = 110 8 33.33
14 EO 1P S = 80 24 100.00
15 EO 4P E+1 -450 18 75.00 µ Tbl = 69,44 %
12 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 43,92 %16 EO 6P N = 980 16 66.67
17 EO 3S W+2 -460 22 91.67
18 EO 3S W+2 -460 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 81,94 %
3 POULAERT Gilbert -COLLET Claudine : 38,68 %19 EO 1S N+5 240 2 8.33
20 EO 2P N-3 -300 24 100.00
21 EO 4C N = 620 13 54.17 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
4 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 54,28 %25 EO 4C W+2 -680 15.2 63.33
26 EO 3P S+1 170 9.8 40.83
27 EO 3S N = 400 5.5 22.92 µ Tbl = 42,36 %
10 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,68 %28 EO 4C W = -420 19.6 81.67
29 EO 4P W-2 200 0.1 0.42
30 EO 4C W+2 -480 23.9 99.58 µ Tbl = 60,56 %
15 - : 0,00 %31 EO BYE 0 0.00
32 EO BYE 0 0.00
33 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 360,1 / 648 = 55,57 %
PAIRE Nr : 26 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René
6 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 50,47 % 1 EO 3C N-2 -100 7 29.17
2 EO 1S N+2 150 8 33.33
3 EO 2C W-1 100 17 70.83 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 63,79 % 4 EO 1S W+2 -150 10 41.67
5 EO 3S S+3 690 1 4.17
6 EO 5K S-1 -50 23 95.83 µ Tbl = 47,22 %
15 - : 0,00 % 7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 29,85 %10 EO 5TcS-2 -500 20 83.33
11 EO 6T W+1 -940 21 87.50
12 EO 4K W-1 50 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 86,11 %
14 VAN DOOREN Michele -HOGGE Colette : 47,22 %13 EO 4P S-2 -200 19 79.17
14 EO 4C N+1 450 8 33.33
15 EO 4P E = -420 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 51,39 %
3 POULAERT Gilbert -COLLET Claudine : 38,68 %16 EO 6S S = 990 5 20.83
17 EO 3S W = -400 11 45.83
18 EO 3S W+2 -460 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 51,39 %
13 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 59,11 %19 EO 1S N+4 210 8 33.33
20 EO 2C W = -110 16 66.67
21 EO 5C N-1 -100 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
4 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 54,28 %22 EO 4C N+1 450 14 58.33
23 EO 1S N+2 150 9 37.50
24 EO 1ScW-3 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,94 %
5 GROSFILS Colette -POWIS Vinciane : 52,64 %28 EO 5K S-2 -200 15.2 63.33
29 EO 4P W+1 -650 23.9 99.58
30 EO 3C E+2 -200 14.2 59.17 µ Tbl = 74,03 %
11 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,97 %31 EO 3S S+2 660 14.2 59.17
32 EO 4C S-1 -50 19.6 81.67
33 EO 3S W+3 -490 15.2 63.33 µ Tbl = 68,06 %
Total : 375,3 / 648 = 57,92 %
PAIRE Nr : 27 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard
12 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 43,92 % 1 EO 2C N-2 -100 7 29.17
2 EO 1S N+2 150 8 33.33
3 EO 4K S = 130 5 20.83 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 62,04 % 4 EO 3S W = -600 15 62.50
5 EO 3C S+2 200 18 75.00
6 EO 3P N+1 170 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 56,94 %
6 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 50,47 % 7 EO 2C E+1 -140 13 54.17
8 EO 3S W+2 -460 7 29.17
9 EO 3S S+2 460 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 48,61 %
3 POULAERT Gilbert -COLLET Claudine : 38,68 %10 EO 4CcN-4 -1100 24 100.00
11 EO 6T W = -920 14 58.33
12 EO 2P S+1 140 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 73,61 %
11 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,97 %13 EO 2P S+1 140 5 20.83
14 EO 2C N+3 200 18 75.00
15 EO 4P E = -420 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges : 49,46 %16 EO 6P S = 980 16 66.67
17 EO 3S W+1 -430 17 70.83
18 EO 3S W+1 -430 11 45.83 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
5 GROSFILS Colette -POWIS Vinciane : 52,64 %19 EO 1S N+3 180 18 75.00
20 EO 1S W = -90 8 33.33
21 EO 4C N = 620 13 54.17 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 29,85 %22 EO 4C N+2 480 3 12.50
23 EO 2C N = 110 18 75.00
24 EO 1S E-2 100 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 59,72 %
7 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 55,04 %28 EO 4C W-1 50 4.4 18.33
29 EO 4P W-1 100 5.5 22.92
30 EO 4C W = -420 18.5 77.08 µ Tbl = 39,44 %
4 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 54,28 %31 EO 6T S-1 -100 18.5 77.08
32 EO 2C N+1 140 10.9 45.42
33 EO 2C N+1 140 0.1 0.42 µ Tbl = 40,97 %
Total : 365,9 / 720 = 50,82 %
PAIRE Nr : 28 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
5 GROSFILS Colette -POWIS Vinciane : 52,64 % 1 EO 2C N-1 -50 4 16.67
2 EO 2T E-3 150 8 33.33
3 EO 3C W-1 100 17 70.83 µ Tbl = 40,28 %
13 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 59,11 % 4 EO 5T W-2 200 1 4.17
5 EO 3S S+3 690 1 4.17
6 EO 3S S = 400 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 5,56 %
10 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,68 % 7 EO 2C E+1 -140 13 54.17
8 EO 4C W+2 -480 15 62.50
9 EO 3S S+3 490 7 29.17 µ Tbl = 48,61 %
7 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 55,04 %10 EO 4C N-2 -200 18 75.00
11 EO 6K E+1 -940 21 87.50
12 EO 3P S+2 200 6 25.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
4 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 54,28 %13 EO 4P S-2 -200 19 79.17
14 EO 3C N+1 170 20 83.33
15 EO 4P E = -420 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 68,06 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 63,79 %16 EO 6S S = 990 5 20.83
17 EO 4C W-3 150 0 0.00
18 EO 3S E+1 -430 11 45.83 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 62,04 %19 EO 1S N+4 210 8 33.33
20 EO 2P N-1 -100 12 50.00
21 EO 5KcE-6 1400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
6 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 50,47 %22 EO 4C N+2 480 3 12.50
23 EO 3S N+1 630 1 4.17
24 EO 1S S+1 120 17 70.83 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
3 POULAERT Gilbert -COLLET Claudine : 38,68 %25 EO 4KcN-4 -800 23.9 99.58
26 EO 3P S = 140 17.4 72.50
27 EO 3S N-1 -50 17.4 72.50 µ Tbl = 81,53 %
8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges : 49,46 %31 EO 6T S = 1370 10.9 45.42
32 EO 2PcE-2 500 0.1 0.42
33 EO 6C E+1 -1010 23.9 99.58 µ Tbl = 48,47 %
Total : 312,6 / 720 = 43,42 %
PAIRE Nr : 29 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 62,04 % 1 EO 3S E+1 -430 24 100.00
2 EO 1S N+2 150 8 33.33
3 EO 2S S+2 180 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 47,22 %
6 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 50,47 % 4 EO 3S W = -600 15 62.50
5 EO 4C S+1 650 10 41.67
6 EO 2P N+2 170 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
14 VAN DOOREN Michele -HOGGE Colette : 47,22 % 7 EO 2C E+1 -140 13 54.17
8 EO 3S E+3 -490 22 91.67
9 EO 3S N+2 460 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 69,44 %
11 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,97 %10 EO 3K E = -110 10 41.67
11 EO 6K E+1 -940 21 87.50
12 EO 4K W-1 50 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges : 49,46 %13 EO 2P S+1 140 5 20.83
14 EO 4C N+1 450 8 33.33
15 EO 4P W+2 -480 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 48,61 %
5 GROSFILS Colette -POWIS Vinciane : 52,64 %16 EO 6P S = 980 16 66.67
17 EO 3S W+1 -430 17 70.83
18 EO 3S E+2 -460 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 29,85 %19 EO 2S N-2 -100 24 100.00
20 EO 1C W+1 -110 16 66.67
21 EO 4C N = 620 13 54.17 µ Tbl = 73,61 %
10 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,68 %22 EO 6C N-1 -50 23 95.83
23 EO 2C N+2 170 4 16.67
24 EO 2P W-3 150 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 51,39 %
7 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 55,04 %25 EO 4C W+2 -680 15.2 63.33
26 EO 5T W-2 200 3.3 13.75
27 EO 3S N-1 -50 17.4 72.50 µ Tbl = 49,86 %
4 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 54,28 %28 EO 4C E-1 50 4.4 18.33
29 EO 4P W = -620 16.3 67.92
30 EO 4C W = -420 18.5 77.08 µ Tbl = 54,44 %
Total : 423,1 / 720 = 58,76 %
PAIRE Nr : 30 MASSAUX Joel -PETERS Annik
10 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,68 % 4 EO 4T W-1 100 4 16.67
5 EO 3C S+3 230 14 58.33
6 EO 4P N+1 450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
7 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 55,04 % 7 EO 4C E = -620 24 100.00
8 EO 4C W+2 -480 15 62.50
9 EO 3S N+4 520 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 56,94 %
15 - : 0,00 %10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 63,79 %13 EO 4P S-1 -100 12 50.00
14 EO 4C N+1 450 8 33.33
15 EO 2P E+2 -170 1 4.17 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 62,04 %16 EO 6S S = 990 5 20.83
17 EO 4C E-2 100 2 8.33
18 EO 2C W+1 -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,72 %
6 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 50,47 %19 EO 1S N+3 180 18 75.00
20 EO 2P N-2 -200 21 87.50
21 EO 4C N+1 650 4 16.67 µ Tbl = 59,72 %
3 POULAERT Gilbert -COLLET Claudine : 38,68 %22 EO 4C N = 420 19 79.17
23 EO 3C N-1 -100 22 91.67
24 EO 1S S+1 120 17 70.83 µ Tbl = 80,56 %
11 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,97 %25 EO 4C W+2 -680 15.2 63.33
26 EO 3P S+1 170 9.8 40.83
27 EO 3S N-1 -50 17.4 72.50 µ Tbl = 58,89 %
8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges : 49,46 %28 EO 4C W-1 50 4.4 18.33
29 EO 4P W = -620 16.3 67.92
30 EO 3C W+2 -200 14.2 59.17 µ Tbl = 48,47 %
5 GROSFILS Colette -POWIS Vinciane : 52,64 %31 EO 6S S+1 1470 1.2 5.00
32 EO 3C N = 140 10.9 45.42
33 EO 4C E = -420 2.2 9.17 µ Tbl = 19,86 %
Total : 279,6 / 648 = 43,15 %
|
|