|
Tournoi du 01-08-16
Lundi
1 60,95 9 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent
2 60,29 4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David
3 59,26 3 GROSFILS Colette -BERGER Jean Marie
4 52,88 8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie
5 52,33 10 ARICKX Roger -VAn GYSEGHEM
6 49,30 2 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane
7 48,60 6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
8 48,58 11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
9 44,67 12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine
10 42,84 5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
11 40,62 7 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse
12 39,73 1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 62,70 23 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
2 57,35 21 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal
3 52,49 22 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
4 51,46 20 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques
5 50,93 19 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele
6 50,16 16 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette
7 49,71 14 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
8 49,55 13 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René
9 49,36 24 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
10 47,45 17 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette
11 45,84 15 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
12 32,96 18 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert
PAIRE Nr : 1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques
13 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 49,55 % 1 NS 3P N+1 170 16 88.89
2 NS 1S E = -90 10 55.56
3 NS 3S S-2 -100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
23 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 62,70 % 4 NS 1S E+1 -120 2 11.11
5 NS 3S E+2 -460 6 33.33
6 NS 3S E+2 -660 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
22 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 52,49 % 7 NS 2S W-2 200 14 77.78
8 NS 3S W = -400 8 44.44
9 NS 2P W = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
21 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 57,35 %10 NS 4P E = -620 8 44.44
11 NS 4P S-1 -50 5 27.78
12 NS 3S W+2 -460 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
20 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,46 %13 NS 2K S+1 110 12 66.67
14 NS 4P E+1 -450 1 5.56
15 NS 2P S+3 200 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
19 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 50,93 %16 NS 1S E = -90 9 50.00
17 NS 3C W+2 -200 7.9 43.89
18 NS 1S W+1 -120 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
18 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 32,96 %19 NS 6S W+1 -1470 7 38.89
20 NS 4C E+2 -680 2 11.11
21 NS Ajust 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
17 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 47,45 %22 NS 3S W-2 200 16 88.89
23 NS 1S N+1 120 4 22.22
24 NS 3S E+1 -430 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
16 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 50,16 %25 NS 3S W+2 -660 0.1 0.56
26 NS 2PcS = 670 17.9 99.44
27 NS 4C S+2 480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 193,1 / 486 = 39,73 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane
14 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 49,71 % 4 NS 2K E-1 100 12 66.67
5 NS 3S E+2 -460 6 33.33
6 NS 3S E = -600 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
13 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 49,55 % 7 NS 2S E = -120 5 27.78
8 NS 3S E+1 -430 2 11.11
9 NS 2T N+1 110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
23 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 62,70 %10 NS 4P E+1 -650 1 5.56
11 NS 3C E = -140 0 0.00
12 NS 3S E-2 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
22 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 52,49 %13 NS 2S N-1 -100 4 22.22
14 NS 2S E = -120 10 55.56
15 NS 3S N+2 660 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
21 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 57,35 %16 NS 3T N-2 -100 4.6 25.56
17 NS 5KcN-1 -100 15.7 87.22
18 NS 1S W = -90 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 56,30 %
20 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,46 %19 NS 6S W = -1440 13 72.22
20 NS 4C E = -620 10 55.56
21 NS 1P W+1 -110 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 55,19 %
24 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,36 %22 NS 3S E-2 200 16 88.89
23 NS 3S N-1 -100 1 5.56
24 NS 3S E+2 -460 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
18 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 32,96 %25 NS 2C W+1 -140 5.7 31.67
26 NS 2P S-1 -100 15.7 87.22
27 NS 4C S+2 480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 56,30 %
17 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 47,45 %28 NS 4C S+2 680 16 88.89
29 NS 2C E+1 -140 7 38.89
30 NS 4P N-1 -50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 239,6 / 486 = 49,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 GROSFILS Colette -BERGER Jean Marie
15 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,84 % 7 NS 4C E-2 200 14 77.78
8 NS 2C W = -110 13 72.22
9 NS 1S S = 90 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
24 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,36 %10 NS 3S E = -600 14 77.78
11 NS 3P S = 140 16 88.89
12 NS 3S W+1 -430 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
13 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 49,55 %13 NS 1T N+1 90 10 55.56
14 NS 4P E-1 50 12 66.67
15 NS 4C N-1 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
23 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 62,70 %16 NS 2K W-1 100 15.7 87.22
17 NS 4C E+1 -450 1.2 6.67
18 NS 3S W-1 50 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
22 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 52,49 %19 NS 6S W = -1440 13 72.22
20 NS 4P W-1 100 18 100.00
21 NS 3S E-1 50 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 84,44 %
21 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 57,35 %22 NS 3S E-1 100 12 66.67
23 NS 3S N = 600 13 72.22
24 NS 3S E+3 -490 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
20 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,46 %25 NS 2S E = -120 9 50.00
26 NS 3S E+2 -660 0.1 0.56
27 NS 4C S+2 480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
19 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 50,93 %28 NS 3C S+1 170 2 11.11
29 NS 2C E = -110 14 77.78
30 NS 4P S = 420 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
18 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 32,96 %31 NS 3K W-2 100 15 83.33
32 NS 3S E-1 100 12 66.67
33 NS 3K E-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
Total : 288,0 / 486 = 59,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David
19 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 50,93 % 1 NS 4T E = -130 4 22.22
2 NS 2P S = 110 16 88.89
3 NS 3C W-2 200 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
16 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 50,16 %10 NS 3P E+1 -170 16 88.89
11 NS 2P S = 110 12 66.67
12 NS 3S W = -400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
15 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,84 %13 NS 2S N+1 150 16 88.89
14 NS 4P E-2 100 16 88.89
15 NS 2P S+3 200 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
14 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 49,71 %16 NS 1S E-1 100 15.7 87.22
17 NS 3P E+2 -200 7.9 43.89
18 NS 1S W+1 -120 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
13 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 49,55 %19 NS 3S W+1 -630 18 100.00
20 NS 4C E = -620 10 55.56
21 NS 3P W-2 100 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 85,00 %
23 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 62,70 %22 NS 2K S-3 -150 0 0.00
23 NS 3T N+3 170 7 38.89
24 NS 3S E+2 -460 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
22 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 52,49 %25 NS 2S E-3 300 17.9 99.44
26 NS 3S E = -600 13.4 74.44
27 NS 4C S+2 480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,63 %
21 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 57,35 %28 NS 4PcW-1 100 0 0.00
29 NS 2C W = -110 14 77.78
30 NS 3P S+1 170 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
24 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,36 %31 NS 2S E = -120 5 27.78
32 NS 4C W-1 100 12 66.67
33 NS 4C E-4 200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
Total : 293,0 / 486 = 60,29 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
21 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 57,35 % 1 NS 3P N-2 -100 9 50.00
2 NS 3P S-1 -100 5 27.78
3 NS 3P N = 140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
20 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,46 % 4 NS 2P S = 110 16 88.89
5 NS 3S E+2 -460 6 33.33
6 NS 3S W+2 -660 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
17 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 47,45 %13 NS 1T N-1 -100 4 22.22
14 NS 3PcW-1 100 16 88.89
15 NS 4C N-1 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
16 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 50,16 %16 NS 1S E+1 -120 0.1 0.56
17 NS 4C W+1 -450 1.2 6.67
18 NS 1S W-2 100 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
24 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,36 %19 NS 7S E = -2220 0 0.00
20 NS 4C E+2 -680 2 11.11
21 NS 1S E = -90 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 22,41 %
14 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 49,71 %22 NS 1S E+1 -120 6 33.33
23 NS 5T N+1 620 18 100.00
24 NS 4CcN-2 -300 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
13 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 49,55 %25 NS 3C W-1 100 12.3 68.33
26 NS 3S E+1 -630 5.7 31.67
27 NS 4C S+2 480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
23 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 62,70 %28 NS 5P W-4 200 4 22.22
29 NS 1S W+3 -180 1 5.56
30 NS 4C N = 420 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
22 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 52,49 %31 NS 2S E = -120 5 27.78
32 NS 4C W-2 200 16 88.89
33 NS 5KcN-2 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 208,2 / 486 = 42,84 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
23 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 62,70 % 1 NS 2P N-2 -100 9 50.00
2 NS 1S E+2 -150 1 5.56
3 NS 3P N+1 170 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
22 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 52,49 % 4 NS 2S E-1 100 12 66.67
5 NS 3S E+2 -460 6 33.33
6 NS 3S E+2 -660 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
24 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,36 % 7 NS 3P E = -140 2 11.11
8 NS 3S E+1 -430 2 11.11
9 NS 3K W = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
18 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 32,96 %16 NS 2K W-1 100 15.7 87.22
17 NS 4C W-1 50 17.9 99.44
18 NS 3S W-2 100 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 93,33 %
17 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 47,45 %19 NS 6K W = -1370 16 88.89
20 NS 4C E = -620 10 55.56
21 NS 1S E+1 -120 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 54,44 %
16 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 50,16 %22 NS 2T E+1 -110 9 50.00
23 NS 3S N = 600 13 72.22
24 NS 3S E+2 -460 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
15 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,84 %25 NS 2C W+1 -140 5.7 31.67
26 NS 3S E+1 -630 5.7 31.67
27 NS 4C S+2 480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,78 %
14 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 49,71 %28 NS 4C S+2 680 16 88.89
29 NS 2C W+1 -140 7 38.89
30 NS 4KcW-1 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
13 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 49,55 %31 NS 2S E-2 100 15 83.33
32 NS 4C W = -620 0 0.00
33 NS 4P E-2 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 236,2 / 486 = 48,60 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse
14 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 49,71 % 1 NS 3PcN-3 -500 0 0.00
2 NS 2P S+1 140 18 100.00
3 NS 3P N-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
13 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 49,55 % 4 NS 1P N = 80 8 44.44
5 NS 3S E+2 -460 6 33.33
6 NS 3S W+2 -660 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
23 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 62,70 % 7 NS 2S W-1 100 9 50.00
8 NS 3S W = -400 8 44.44
9 NS 3K W = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
22 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 52,49 %10 NS 4P E+1 -650 1 5.56
11 NS 3P S-1 -50 5 27.78
12 NS 3S W+2 -460 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
19 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 50,93 %19 NS 6S W+1 -1470 7 38.89
20 NS 2C E+2 -170 16 88.89
21 NS 1S W+1 -120 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 48,89 %
18 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 32,96 %22 NS 3S E-2 200 16 88.89
23 NS 3S S = 600 13 72.22
24 NS 5T W = -400 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
17 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 47,45 %25 NS 4C W-1 100 12.3 68.33
26 NS 3S E+1 -630 5.7 31.67
27 NS 4C S+2 480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
24 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,36 %28 NS 4C S = 620 10 55.56
29 NS 2C E+1 -140 7 38.89
30 NS 3P S = 140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
15 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,84 %31 NS 1S S-2 -200 0 0.00
32 NS 2C W+2 -170 3 16.67
33 NS 3P E = -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
Total : 197,4 / 486 = 40,62 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie
16 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 50,16 % 1 NS 3P N-2 -100 9 50.00
2 NS 3P S-1 -100 5 27.78
3 NS 4P N = 420 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
15 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,84 % 4 NS 3P N+1 170 18 100.00
5 NS 3S E = -400 18 100.00
6 NS 3S W = -600 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
14 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 49,71 % 7 NS 2S W = -120 5 27.78
8 NS 3S W+1 -430 2 11.11
9 NS 2P W+1 -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
13 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 49,55 %10 NS 4P E = -620 8 44.44
11 NS 4C W-1 50 9 50.00
12 NS 3S E-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
23 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 62,70 %13 NS 3S N-3 -300 0 0.00
14 NS 4P W = -420 5 27.78
15 NS 5C N+1 680 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
20 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,46 %22 NS 2T E+2 -130 3 16.67
23 NS 3S N-1 -100 1 5.56
24 NS 5T W = -400 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
19 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 50,93 %25 NS 2S E-2 200 15.7 87.22
26 NS 4C W = -620 11.2 62.22
27 NS 4C S+1 450 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
18 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 32,96 %28 NS 4C S+2 680 16 88.89
29 NS 3K N = 110 18 100.00
30 NS 4P S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
17 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 47,45 %31 NS 2C S = 110 18 100.00
32 NS 3S E-3 300 18 100.00
33 NS 2S S-4 -200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
Total : 257,0 / 486 = 52,88 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent
18 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 32,96 % 1 NS 4C W-3 150 14 77.78
2 NS 1S E = -90 10 55.56
3 NS 3P N+1 170 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
24 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,36 % 4 NS 3K E-1 100 12 66.67
5 NS 3S E+1 -430 15 83.33
6 NS 1S W+2 -150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
16 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 50,16 % 7 NS 3P W-2 200 14 77.78
8 NS 2C W = -110 13 72.22
9 NS 3T N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
15 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,84 %10 NS 4P E = -620 8 44.44
11 NS 2P S+1 140 16 88.89
12 NS 3C E-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
14 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 49,71 %13 NS 2S N = 120 14 77.78
14 NS 4P E = -420 5 27.78
15 NS 4C N+1 650 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
13 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 49,55 %16 NS 2P W = -110 2.3 12.78
17 NS 3P E = -140 13.4 74.44
18 NS 3K W = -110 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
21 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 57,35 %25 NS 3S E = -600 2.3 12.78
26 NS 3S E+1 -630 5.7 31.67
27 NS 6C S = 980 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
20 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,46 %28 NS 4C S+1 650 12 66.67
29 NS 2C E = -110 14 77.78
30 NS 4P S = 420 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
19 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 50,93 %31 NS 2P W-1 50 11 61.11
32 NS 3C W = -140 6 33.33
33 NS 5K N-3 -150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 296,2 / 486 = 60,95 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 ARICKX Roger -VAn GYSEGHEM
20 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,46 % 1 NS 3P N-2 -100 9 50.00
2 NS 1S E = -90 10 55.56
3 NS 3P N-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
19 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 50,93 % 4 NS 2C W+1 -140 0 0.00
5 NS 3S E+1 -430 15 83.33
6 NS 3S W = -600 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
18 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 32,96 % 7 NS 4C W-3 300 18 100.00
8 NS 3S W-1 50 17 94.44
9 NS 2T N+1 110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 94,44 %
17 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 47,45 %10 NS 4P E-1 100 18 100.00
11 NS 2C W = -110 2 11.11
12 NS 3S W = -400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
16 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 50,16 %13 NS 1S W-2 200 18 100.00
14 NS 4P E+1 -450 1 5.56
15 NS 4C N-1 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
15 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,84 %16 NS 2K W = -90 9 50.00
17 NS 3P E+2 -200 7.9 43.89
18 NS 3C S-1 -100 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
14 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 49,71 %19 NS 6S E+1 -1470 7 38.89
20 NS 4C W = -620 10 55.56
21 NS 3S E-1 50 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 58,52 %
22 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 52,49 %28 NS 3C N+3 230 7 38.89
29 NS 2S E+2 -180 1 5.56
30 NS 3P S+1 170 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
21 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 57,35 %31 NS 2P W+1 -140 2 11.11
32 NS 4C W-1 100 12 66.67
33 NS 4P E-2 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 254,3 / 486 = 52,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
22 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 52,49 % 1 NS 3C W-5 250 18 100.00
2 NS 1S E+2 -150 1 5.56
3 NS 3P N-2 -100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
21 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 57,35 % 4 NS 3K E = -110 4 22.22
5 NS 3S E+2 -460 6 33.33
6 NS 3S W+1 -630 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
20 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,46 % 7 NS 3S W = -600 0 0.00
8 NS 3S W-1 50 17 94.44
9 NS 3T N = 110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
19 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 50,93 %10 NS 4P E = -620 8 44.44
11 NS 4C W-1 50 9 50.00
12 NS 3S W-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
24 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,36 %13 NS 3K N-1 -100 4 22.22
14 NS 3S E-2 100 16 88.89
15 NS 4P S+1 650 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
17 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 47,45 %16 NS 1S E = -90 9 50.00
17 NS 3C W+2 -200 7.9 43.89
18 NS 1S W = -90 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
16 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 50,16 %19 NS 6S E+1 -1470 7 38.89
20 NS 4C E+2 -680 2 11.11
21 NS 1S E = -90 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 35,37 %
15 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,84 %22 NS 2C W = -110 9 50.00
23 NS 4T N+2 170 7 38.89
24 NS 5T W-1 50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
23 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 62,70 %31 NS 2P E = -110 8 44.44
32 NS 2C E+2 -170 3 16.67
33 NS 4K N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 236,1 / 486 = 48,58 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine
24 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,36 % 1 NS 3PcN-2 -300 2 11.11
2 NS 1S E-1 50 14 77.78
3 NS 3C W-2 200 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
17 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 47,45 % 4 NS 1S E = -90 6 33.33
5 NS 3S E+2 -460 6 33.33
6 NS 2C W+2 -170 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
21 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 57,35 % 7 NS 2S W-1 100 9 50.00
8 NS 3S E = -400 8 44.44
9 NS 2K W+2 -130 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
14 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 49,71 %10 NS 4P E = -620 8 44.44
11 NS 3P S = 140 16 88.89
12 NS 3S W+1 -430 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
18 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 32,96 %13 NS 1T N = 70 8 44.44
14 NS 2P W+1 -140 8 44.44
15 NS 3S N+1 630 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
15 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,84 %19 NS 7C E = -2210 2 11.11
20 NS 4C E = -620 10 55.56
21 NS 1K E+3 -130 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 22,41 %
19 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 50,93 %22 NS 2T E+2 -130 3 16.67
23 NS 3S N = 600 13 72.22
24 NS 3S E+2 -460 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
16 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 50,16 %28 NS 3C S+3 230 7 38.89
29 NS 2C W+1 -140 7 38.89
30 NS 3C N+1 170 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
20 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,46 %31 NS 3P W-1 50 11 61.11
32 NS 1S N = 90 8 44.44
33 NS 4K N-2 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 217,1 / 486 = 44,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 39,73 % 1 EO 3P N+1 170 2 11.11
2 EO 1S E = -90 8 44.44
3 EO 3S S-2 -100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
7 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,62 % 4 EO 1P N = 80 10 55.56
5 EO 3S E+2 -460 12 66.67
6 EO 3S W+2 -660 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
2 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 49,30 % 7 EO 2S E = -120 13 72.22
8 EO 3S E+1 -430 16 88.89
9 EO 2T N+1 110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 52,88 %10 EO 4P E = -620 10 55.56
11 EO 4C W-1 50 9 50.00
12 EO 3S E-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
3 GROSFILS Colette -BERGER Jean Marie : 59,26 %13 EO 1T N+1 90 8 44.44
14 EO 4P E-1 50 6 33.33
15 EO 4C N-1 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
9 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 60,95 %16 EO 2P W = -110 15.7 87.22
17 EO 3P E = -140 4.6 25.56
18 EO 3K W = -110 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 60,29 %19 EO 3S W+1 -630 0 0.00
20 EO 4C E = -620 8 44.44
21 EO 3P W-2 100 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 15,00 %
5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 42,84 %25 EO 3C W-1 100 5.7 31.67
26 EO 3S E+1 -630 12.3 68.33
27 EO 4C S+2 480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 48,60 %31 EO 2S E-2 100 3 16.67
32 EO 4C W = -620 18 100.00
33 EO 4P E-2 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 240,8 / 486 = 49,55 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
7 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,62 % 1 EO 3PcN-3 -500 18 100.00
2 EO 2P S+1 140 0 0.00
3 EO 3P N-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
2 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 49,30 % 4 EO 2K E-1 100 6 33.33
5 EO 3S E+2 -460 12 66.67
6 EO 3S E = -600 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 52,88 % 7 EO 2S W = -120 13 72.22
8 EO 3S W+1 -430 16 88.89
9 EO 2P W+1 -140 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 44,67 %10 EO 4P E = -620 10 55.56
11 EO 3P S = 140 2 11.11
12 EO 3S W+1 -430 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
9 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 60,95 %13 EO 2S N = 120 4 22.22
14 EO 4P E = -420 13 72.22
15 EO 4C N+1 650 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 60,29 %16 EO 1S E-1 100 2.3 12.78
17 EO 3P E+2 -200 10.1 56.11
18 EO 1S W+1 -120 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
10 ARICKX Roger -VAn GYSEGHEM : 52,33 %19 EO 6S E+1 -1470 11 61.11
20 EO 4C W = -620 8 44.44
21 EO 3S E-1 50 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 41,48 %
5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 42,84 %22 EO 1S E+1 -120 12 66.67
23 EO 5T N+1 620 0 0.00
24 EO 4CcN-2 -300 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 48,60 %28 EO 4C S+2 680 2 11.11
29 EO 2C W+1 -140 11 61.11
30 EO 4KcW-1 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 241,6 / 486 = 49,71 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 52,88 % 4 EO 3P N+1 170 0 0.00
5 EO 3S E = -400 0 0.00
6 EO 3S W = -600 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
3 GROSFILS Colette -BERGER Jean Marie : 59,26 % 7 EO 4C E-2 200 4 22.22
8 EO 2C W = -110 5 27.78
9 EO 1S S = 90 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
9 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 60,95 %10 EO 4P E = -620 10 55.56
11 EO 2P S+1 140 2 11.11
12 EO 3C E-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 60,29 %13 EO 2S N+1 150 2 11.11
14 EO 4P E-2 100 2 11.11
15 EO 2P S+3 200 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
10 ARICKX Roger -VAn GYSEGHEM : 52,33 %16 EO 2K W = -90 9 50.00
17 EO 3P E+2 -200 10.1 56.11
18 EO 3C S-1 -100 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 44,67 %19 EO 7C E = -2210 16 88.89
20 EO 4C E = -620 8 44.44
21 EO 1K E+3 -130 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 77,59 %
11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 48,58 %22 EO 2C W = -110 9 50.00
23 EO 4T N+2 170 11 61.11
24 EO 5T W-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 48,60 %25 EO 2C W+1 -140 12.3 68.33
26 EO 3S E+1 -630 12.3 68.33
27 EO 4C S+2 480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,22 %
7 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,62 %31 EO 1S S-2 -200 18 100.00
32 EO 2C W+2 -170 15 83.33
33 EO 3P E = -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
Total : 222,8 / 486 = 45,84 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 52,88 % 1 EO 3P N-2 -100 9 50.00
2 EO 3P S-1 -100 13 72.22
3 EO 4P N = 420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
9 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 60,95 % 7 EO 3P W-2 200 4 22.22
8 EO 2C W = -110 5 27.78
9 EO 3T N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 60,29 %10 EO 3P E+1 -170 2 11.11
11 EO 2P S = 110 6 33.33
12 EO 3S W = -400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
10 ARICKX Roger -VAn GYSEGHEM : 52,33 %13 EO 1S W-2 200 0 0.00
14 EO 4P E+1 -450 17 94.44
15 EO 4C N-1 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 42,84 %16 EO 1S E+1 -120 17.9 99.44
17 EO 4C W+1 -450 16.8 93.33
18 EO 1S W-2 100 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 48,58 %19 EO 6S E+1 -1470 11 61.11
20 EO 4C E+2 -680 16 88.89
21 EO 1S E = -90 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 64,63 %
6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 48,60 %22 EO 2T E+1 -110 9 50.00
23 EO 3S N = 600 5 27.78
24 EO 3S E+2 -460 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 39,73 %25 EO 3S W+2 -660 17.9 99.44
26 EO 2PcS = 670 0.1 0.56
27 EO 4C S+2 480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 44,67 %28 EO 3C S+3 230 11 61.11
29 EO 2C W+1 -140 11 61.11
30 EO 3C N+1 170 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 243,8 / 486 = 50,16 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette
12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 44,67 % 4 EO 1S E = -90 12 66.67
5 EO 3S E+2 -460 12 66.67
6 EO 2C W+2 -170 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
10 ARICKX Roger -VAn GYSEGHEM : 52,33 %10 EO 4P E-1 100 0 0.00
11 EO 2C W = -110 16 88.89
12 EO 3S W = -400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 42,84 %13 EO 1T N-1 -100 14 77.78
14 EO 3PcW-1 100 2 11.11
15 EO 4C N-1 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 48,58 %16 EO 1S E = -90 9 50.00
17 EO 3C W+2 -200 10.1 56.11
18 EO 1S W = -90 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 48,60 %19 EO 6K W = -1370 2 11.11
20 EO 4C E = -620 8 44.44
21 EO 1S E+1 -120 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 45,56 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 39,73 %22 EO 3S W-2 200 2 11.11
23 EO 1S N+1 120 14 77.78
24 EO 3S E+1 -430 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
7 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,62 %25 EO 4C W-1 100 5.7 31.67
26 EO 3S E+1 -630 12.3 68.33
27 EO 4C S+2 480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
2 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 49,30 %28 EO 4C S+2 680 2 11.11
29 EO 2C E+1 -140 11 61.11
30 EO 4P N-1 -50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 52,88 %31 EO 2C S = 110 0 0.00
32 EO 3S E-3 300 0 0.00
33 EO 2S S-4 -200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
Total : 230,6 / 486 = 47,45 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert
9 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 60,95 % 1 EO 4C W-3 150 4 22.22
2 EO 1S E = -90 8 44.44
3 EO 3P N+1 170 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
10 ARICKX Roger -VAn GYSEGHEM : 52,33 % 7 EO 4C W-3 300 0 0.00
8 EO 3S W-1 50 1 5.56
9 EO 2T N+1 110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 5,56 %
12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 44,67 %13 EO 1T N = 70 10 55.56
14 EO 2P W+1 -140 10 55.56
15 EO 3S N+1 630 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 48,60 %16 EO 2K W-1 100 2.3 12.78
17 EO 4C W-1 50 0.1 0.56
18 EO 3S W-2 100 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 6,67 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 39,73 %19 EO 6S W+1 -1470 11 61.11
20 EO 4C E+2 -680 16 88.89
21 EO Ajust 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
7 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,62 %22 EO 3S E-2 200 2 11.11
23 EO 3S S = 600 5 27.78
24 EO 5T W = -400 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
2 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 49,30 %25 EO 2C W+1 -140 12.3 68.33
26 EO 2P S-1 -100 2.3 12.78
27 EO 4C S+2 480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 43,70 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 52,88 %28 EO 4C S+2 680 2 11.11
29 EO 3K N = 110 0 0.00
30 EO 4P S-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
3 GROSFILS Colette -BERGER Jean Marie : 59,26 %31 EO 3K W-2 100 3 16.67
32 EO 3S E-1 100 6 33.33
33 EO 3K E-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
Total : 160,2 / 486 = 32,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 60,29 % 1 EO 4T E = -130 14 77.78
2 EO 2P S = 110 2 11.11
3 EO 3C W-2 200 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
10 ARICKX Roger -VAn GYSEGHEM : 52,33 % 4 EO 2C W+1 -140 18 100.00
5 EO 3S E+1 -430 3 16.67
6 EO 3S W = -600 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 48,58 %10 EO 4P E = -620 10 55.56
11 EO 4C W-1 50 9 50.00
12 EO 3S W-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 39,73 %16 EO 1S E = -90 9 50.00
17 EO 3C W+2 -200 10.1 56.11
18 EO 1S W+1 -120 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
7 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,62 %19 EO 6S W+1 -1470 11 61.11
20 EO 2C E+2 -170 2 11.11
21 EO 1S W+1 -120 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 51,11 %
12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 44,67 %22 EO 2T E+2 -130 15 83.33
23 EO 3S N = 600 5 27.78
24 EO 3S E+2 -460 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 52,88 %25 EO 2S E-2 200 2.3 12.78
26 EO 4C W = -620 6.8 37.78
27 EO 4C S+1 450 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
3 GROSFILS Colette -BERGER Jean Marie : 59,26 %28 EO 3C S+1 170 16 88.89
29 EO 2C E = -110 4 22.22
30 EO 4P S = 420 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
9 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 60,95 %31 EO 2P W-1 50 7 38.89
32 EO 3C W = -140 12 66.67
33 EO 5K N-3 -150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 247,5 / 486 = 50,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques
10 ARICKX Roger -VAn GYSEGHEM : 52,33 % 1 EO 3P N-2 -100 9 50.00
2 EO 1S E = -90 8 44.44
3 EO 3P N-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 42,84 % 4 EO 2P S = 110 2 11.11
5 EO 3S E+2 -460 12 66.67
6 EO 3S W+2 -660 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 48,58 % 7 EO 3S W = -600 18 100.00
8 EO 3S W-1 50 1 5.56
9 EO 3T N = 110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 39,73 %13 EO 2K S+1 110 6 33.33
14 EO 4P E+1 -450 17 94.44
15 EO 2P S+3 200 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
2 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 49,30 %19 EO 6S W = -1440 5 27.78
20 EO 4C E = -620 8 44.44
21 EO 1P W+1 -110 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 44,81 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 52,88 %22 EO 2T E+2 -130 15 83.33
23 EO 3S N-1 -100 17 94.44
24 EO 5T W = -400 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
3 GROSFILS Colette -BERGER Jean Marie : 59,26 %25 EO 2S E = -120 9 50.00
26 EO 3S E+2 -660 17.9 99.44
27 EO 4C S+2 480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
9 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 60,95 %28 EO 4C S+1 650 6 33.33
29 EO 2C E = -110 4 22.22
30 EO 4P S = 420 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 44,67 %31 EO 3P W-1 50 7 38.89
32 EO 1S N = 90 10 55.56
33 EO 4K N-2 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 250,1 / 486 = 51,46 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal
5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 42,84 % 1 EO 3P N-2 -100 9 50.00
2 EO 3P S-1 -100 13 72.22
3 EO 3P N = 140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 48,58 % 4 EO 3K E = -110 14 77.78
5 EO 3S E+2 -460 12 66.67
6 EO 3S W+1 -630 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 44,67 % 7 EO 2S W-1 100 9 50.00
8 EO 3S E = -400 10 55.56
9 EO 2K W+2 -130 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 39,73 %10 EO 4P E = -620 10 55.56
11 EO 4P S-1 -50 13 72.22
12 EO 3S W+2 -460 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
2 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 49,30 %16 EO 3T N-2 -100 13.4 74.44
17 EO 5KcN-1 -100 2.3 12.78
18 EO 1S W = -90 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 43,70 %
3 GROSFILS Colette -BERGER Jean Marie : 59,26 %22 EO 3S E-1 100 6 33.33
23 EO 3S N = 600 5 27.78
24 EO 3S E+3 -490 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
9 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 60,95 %25 EO 3S E = -600 15.7 87.22
26 EO 3S E+1 -630 12.3 68.33
27 EO 6C S = 980 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 60,29 %28 EO 4PcW-1 100 18 100.00
29 EO 2C W = -110 4 22.22
30 EO 3P S+1 170 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
10 ARICKX Roger -VAn GYSEGHEM : 52,33 %31 EO 2P W+1 -140 16 88.89
32 EO 4C W-1 100 6 33.33
33 EO 4P E-2 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 278,7 / 486 = 57,35 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 48,58 % 1 EO 3C W-5 250 0 0.00
2 EO 1S E+2 -150 17 94.44
3 EO 3P N-2 -100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 48,60 % 4 EO 2S E-1 100 6 33.33
5 EO 3S E+2 -460 12 66.67
6 EO 3S E+2 -660 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 39,73 % 7 EO 2S W-2 200 4 22.22
8 EO 3S W = -400 10 55.56
9 EO 2P W = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
7 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,62 %10 EO 4P E+1 -650 17 94.44
11 EO 3P S-1 -50 13 72.22
12 EO 3S W+2 -460 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
2 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 49,30 %13 EO 2S N-1 -100 14 77.78
14 EO 2S E = -120 8 44.44
15 EO 3S N+2 660 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
3 GROSFILS Colette -BERGER Jean Marie : 59,26 %19 EO 6S W = -1440 5 27.78
20 EO 4P W-1 100 0 0.00
21 EO 3S E-1 50 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 15,56 %
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 60,29 %25 EO 2S E-3 300 0.1 0.56
26 EO 3S E = -600 4.6 25.56
27 EO 4C S+2 480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,37 %
10 ARICKX Roger -VAn GYSEGHEM : 52,33 %28 EO 3C N+3 230 11 61.11
29 EO 2S E+2 -180 17 94.44
30 EO 3P S+1 170 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 42,84 %31 EO 2S E = -120 13 72.22
32 EO 4C W-2 200 2 11.11
33 EO 5KcN-2 -300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 255,1 / 486 = 52,49 %
PAIRE Nr : 23 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 48,60 % 1 EO 2P N-2 -100 9 50.00
2 EO 1S E+2 -150 17 94.44
3 EO 3P N+1 170 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 39,73 % 4 EO 1S E+1 -120 16 88.89
5 EO 3S E+2 -460 12 66.67
6 EO 3S E+2 -660 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
7 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,62 % 7 EO 2S W-1 100 9 50.00
8 EO 3S W = -400 10 55.56
9 EO 3K W = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
2 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 49,30 %10 EO 4P E+1 -650 17 94.44
11 EO 3C E = -140 18 100.00
12 EO 3S E-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 52,88 %13 EO 3S N-3 -300 18 100.00
14 EO 4P W = -420 13 72.22
15 EO 5C N+1 680 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
3 GROSFILS Colette -BERGER Jean Marie : 59,26 %16 EO 2K W-1 100 2.3 12.78
17 EO 4C E+1 -450 16.8 93.33
18 EO 3S W-1 50 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 60,29 %22 EO 2K S-3 -150 18 100.00
23 EO 3T N+3 170 11 61.11
24 EO 3S E+2 -460 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 42,84 %28 EO 5P W-4 200 14 77.78
29 EO 1S W+3 -180 17 94.44
30 EO 4C N = 420 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 48,58 %31 EO 2P E = -110 10 55.56
32 EO 2C E+2 -170 15 83.33
33 EO 4K N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 304,7 / 486 = 62,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 24 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 44,67 % 1 EO 3PcN-2 -300 16 88.89
2 EO 1S E-1 50 4 22.22
3 EO 3C W-2 200 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
9 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 60,95 % 4 EO 3K E-1 100 6 33.33
5 EO 3S E+1 -430 3 16.67
6 EO 1S W+2 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 48,60 % 7 EO 3P E = -140 16 88.89
8 EO 3S E+1 -430 16 88.89
9 EO 3K W = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
3 GROSFILS Colette -BERGER Jean Marie : 59,26 %10 EO 3S E = -600 4 22.22
11 EO 3P S = 140 2 11.11
12 EO 3S W+1 -430 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 48,58 %13 EO 3K N-1 -100 14 77.78
14 EO 3S E-2 100 2 11.11
15 EO 4P S+1 650 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 42,84 %19 EO 7S E = -2220 18 100.00
20 EO 4C E+2 -680 16 88.89
21 EO 1S E = -90 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 77,59 %
2 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 49,30 %22 EO 3S E-2 200 2 11.11
23 EO 3S N-1 -100 17 94.44
24 EO 3S E+2 -460 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
7 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,62 %28 EO 4C S = 620 8 44.44
29 EO 2C E+1 -140 11 61.11
30 EO 3P S = 140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 60,29 %31 EO 2S E = -120 13 72.22
32 EO 4C W-1 100 6 33.33
33 EO 4C E-4 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
Total : 239,9 / 486 = 49,36 %
|
|