|
Tournoi du 03-04-17
Lundi
1 59,26 A.4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David
2 57,41 A.5 LIBERT Laurent -LIGOT Xavier
3 56,85 A.7 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle
4 55,19 A.8 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
5 50,93 A.3 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette
6 50,00 A.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques
7 49,44 A.2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
8 44,07 A11 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse
9 43,89 A10 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
~ 43,89 A.9 BELSACK GABRIEL -LEBLU Pascaline
11 39,07 A.6 WILLEMS Jacques -de NICOLAS Bernard
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 60,93 a.3 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre
2 60,56 a.4 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
3 59,63 a.6 PIETQUIN Joseph -VUYTS Michèle
4 53,52 a.2 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
5 49,63 a.9 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal
6 47,78 a.5 MOLS Bruno -ARICKX Roger
7 47,22 a.1 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
8 45,56 a.8 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
9 44,63 a11 DELHEZ Jacques -COURTOIS Patrick
10 42,59 a.7 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette
11 37,96 a10 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert
PAIRE Nr : A.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques
a.1 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,22 % 1 NS 2P E-1 50 13 72.22
2 NS 4C S+2 680 11 61.11
3 NS 3C W+2 -200 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a11 DELHEZ Jacques -COURTOIS Patrick : 44,63 % 4 NS 2P E-1 100 15 83.33
5 NS 4C S+1 650 16 88.89
6 NS 1S E-1 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
a10 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 37,96 % 7 NS 2C W = -110 12 66.67
8 NS 2P E = -110 18 100.00
9 NS 4P W = -620 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a.9 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 49,63 %10 NS 3S W-1 100 15 83.33
11 NS 2K E+1 -110 4 22.22
12 NS 3K E+1 -130 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.8 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,56 %13 NS 2K E-2 200 13 72.22
14 NS 3S S-2 -100 0 0.00
15 NS 4C S+1 650 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.7 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 42,59 %16 NS 1S W+3 -180 0 0.00
17 NS 3P E+2 -200 12 66.67
18 NS 2P E+1 -140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.6 PIETQUIN Joseph -VUYTS Michèle : 59,63 %19 NS 4P W+1 -650 1 5.56
20 NS 2P W+2 -170 5 27.78
21 NS 3S E-2 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.5 MOLS Bruno -ARICKX Roger : 47,78 %22 NS 4C N = 420 1 5.56
23 NS 3T W-3 300 18 100.00
24 NS 3C S+2 200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.4 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 60,56 %25 NS 2S W-2 200 16 88.89
26 NS 2S W+3 -210 2 11.11
27 NS 1C W+2 -140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.3 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre : 60,93 %28 NS 4C E+1 -450 8 44.44
29 NS 3S N-3 -300 0 0.00
30 NS 4C E+1 -450 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
Total : 270,0 / 540 = 50,00 %
PAIRE Nr : A.2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
a.2 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 53,52 % 4 NS 2T S-1 -100 6 33.33
5 NS 4C S-1 -100 1 5.56
6 NS 2P W+1 -140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
a.1 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,22 % 7 NS 1S S+3 180 18 100.00
8 NS 4P E+3 -510 0 0.00
9 NS 3P W+1 -170 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a11 DELHEZ Jacques -COURTOIS Patrick : 44,63 %10 NS 2S E-2 200 18 100.00
11 NS 2K E+1 -110 4 22.22
12 NS 3P N-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a10 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 37,96 %13 NS 2K E-1 100 2 11.11
14 NS 2C S+1 140 16 88.89
15 NS 4C S = 620 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.9 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 49,63 %16 NS 2C S-1 -50 15 83.33
17 NS 4P E+1 -450 3 16.67
18 NS 3C E-1 50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
a.8 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,56 %19 NS 2P W+2 -170 14 77.78
20 NS 2P S = 110 18 100.00
21 NS 3T E+1 -130 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
a.7 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 42,59 %22 NS 6C S = 980 18 100.00
23 NS 3P S-1 -100 1 5.56
24 NS 2C S+3 200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.6 PIETQUIN Joseph -VUYTS Michèle : 59,63 %25 NS 3C S-1 -50 12 66.67
26 NS 3S W-1 100 14 77.78
27 NS 2P S-2 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
a.5 MOLS Bruno -ARICKX Roger : 47,78 %28 NS 3S E+1 -430 10 55.56
29 NS 3T N-1 -100 7 38.89
30 NS 4C E+1 -450 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.4 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 60,56 %31 NS 4C S-1 -100 7 38.89
32 NS 2T E+3 -150 6 33.33
33 NS 3S W+2 -460 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
Total : 267,0 / 540 = 49,44 %
PAIRE Nr : A.3 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette
a.5 MOLS Bruno -ARICKX Roger : 47,78 % 1 NS 1P E = -80 9 50.00
2 NS 4C S+2 680 11 61.11
3 NS 4TcS-1 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
a.3 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre : 60,93 % 7 NS 1S E+1 -120 8 44.44
8 NS 4P E = -420 3 16.67
9 NS 4P W = -620 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.2 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 53,52 %10 NS 3S W = -600 6 33.33
11 NS 2K E = -90 11 61.11
12 NS 3K E = -110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.1 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,22 %13 NS 2T N+1 110 4 22.22
14 NS 3C S-1 -50 4 22.22
15 NS 4C N = 620 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
a11 DELHEZ Jacques -COURTOIS Patrick : 44,63 %16 NS 3K W = -110 9 50.00
17 NS 3P W+2 -200 12 66.67
18 NS 3S E+2 -460 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a10 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 37,96 %19 NS 4P W-1 100 17 94.44
20 NS 1S W+3 -180 2 11.11
21 NS 2C S+1 140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
a.9 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 49,63 %22 NS 4C S+2 480 11 61.11
23 NS 3K E-2 200 16 88.89
24 NS 4C S+1 450 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
a.8 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,56 %25 NS 2P W = -110 5 27.78
26 NS 2S W-1 100 14 77.78
27 NS 3TcE+1 -570 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.7 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 42,59 %28 NS 4C E = -420 12 66.67
29 NS 3T N+1 130 16 88.89
30 NS 7C E-2 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
a.6 PIETQUIN Joseph -VUYTS Michèle : 59,63 %31 NS 4C S-1 -100 7 38.89
32 NS 1S E+2 -150 6 33.33
33 NS 5KcN-3 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
Total : 275,0 / 540 = 50,93 %
PAIRE Nr : A.4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David
a.7 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 42,59 % 1 NS 2C E = -110 6 33.33
2 NS 4C S+1 650 1 5.56
3 NS 3C W+2 -200 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.6 PIETQUIN Joseph -VUYTS Michèle : 59,63 % 4 NS 1S W+1 -120 1 5.56
5 NS 4PcW-3 500 7 38.89
6 NS 3S W-1 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.4 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 60,56 %10 NS 3K W+1 -130 12 66.67
11 NS 2K E+1 -110 4 22.22
12 NS 2K E+1 -110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.3 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre : 60,93 %13 NS 2P S+3 200 13 72.22
14 NS 1S S = 90 8 44.44
15 NS 4C S+1 650 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.2 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 53,52 %16 NS 2S W+1 -150 2 11.11
17 NS 3P E+1 -170 16 88.89
18 NS 2K S-1 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.1 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,22 %19 NS 4P W = -620 7 38.89
20 NS 4C W-1 100 15 83.33
21 NS 3CcS = 730 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
a11 DELHEZ Jacques -COURTOIS Patrick : 44,63 %22 NS 4C N = 420 1 5.56
23 NS 2P S+2 170 14 77.78
24 NS 4C S+1 450 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a10 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 37,96 %25 NS 2T N-1 -50 12 66.67
26 NS 3S W-1 100 14 77.78
27 NS 2P S-1 -50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
a.9 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 49,63 %28 NS 6C E-4 200 18 100.00
29 NS 3T N+1 130 16 88.89
30 NS 5C E = -450 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
a.8 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,56 %31 NS 4C S-1 -100 7 38.89
32 NS 2T E+1 -110 11 61.11
33 NS 4T E = -130 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 320,0 / 540 = 59,26 %
PAIRE Nr : A.5 LIBERT Laurent -LIGOT Xavier
a.9 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 49,63 % 1 NS 2C E+1 -140 4 22.22
2 NS 4C S+2 680 11 61.11
3 NS 2C E+2 -170 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.8 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,56 % 4 NS 1S N-1 -100 6 33.33
5 NS 4PcW-4 800 18 100.00
6 NS 3S E-1 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.7 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 42,59 % 7 NS 2C W = -110 12 66.67
8 NS 2P E+2 -170 10 55.56
9 NS 2P W+1 -140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
a.5 MOLS Bruno -ARICKX Roger : 47,78 %13 NS 4P S = 620 16 88.89
14 NS 2C S = 110 11 61.11
15 NS 4C S = 620 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.4 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 60,56 %16 NS 2K W+1 -110 9 50.00
17 NS 2P W+3 -200 12 66.67
18 NS 2KcS-2 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.3 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre : 60,93 %19 NS 4P W = -620 7 38.89
20 NS 4C E = -620 0 0.00
21 NS 3S E+1 -430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
a.2 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 53,52 %22 NS 4C S+2 480 11 61.11
23 NS 1P S = 80 4 22.22
24 NS 4PcW-4 800 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.1 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,22 %25 NS 3S E-3 300 18 100.00
26 NS 3S W-3 300 18 100.00
27 NS 2T W+1 -110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
a11 DELHEZ Jacques -COURTOIS Patrick : 44,63 %28 NS 3S W+2 -460 5 27.78
29 NS 4T N-1 -100 7 38.89
30 NS 4C E+1 -450 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a10 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 37,96 %31 NS 2C S+1 140 16 88.89
32 NS 2C N-2 -100 15 83.33
33 NS 4T E = -130 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
Total : 310,0 / 540 = 57,41 %
PAIRE Nr : A.6 WILLEMS Jacques -de NICOLAS Bernard
a11 DELHEZ Jacques -COURTOIS Patrick : 44,63 % 1 NS 3S W+1 -430 0 0.00
2 NS 4C N+1 650 1 5.56
3 NS 3TcS-3 -500 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
a10 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 37,96 % 4 NS 1S W+1 -120 1 5.56
5 NS 2C S+1 140 4 22.22
6 NS 2C S-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
a.9 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 49,63 % 7 NS 2C W+1 -140 4 22.22
8 NS 3P E+1 -170 10 55.56
9 NS 4P W = -620 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.8 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,56 %10 NS 2S W-1 100 15 83.33
11 NS 1P E = -80 15 83.33
12 NS 3K E = -110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
a.6 PIETQUIN Joseph -VUYTS Michèle : 59,63 %16 NS 1S W+1 -120 4 22.22
17 NS 2P W+4 -230 7 38.89
18 NS 4P W = -420 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
a.5 MOLS Bruno -ARICKX Roger : 47,78 %19 NS 4P W = -620 7 38.89
20 NS 2C W+1 -140 10 55.56
21 NS 4P W-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.4 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 60,56 %22 NS 4C S+2 480 11 61.11
23 NS 3P S-1 -100 1 5.56
24 NS 4C S+1 450 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.3 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre : 60,93 %25 NS 2K E+2 -130 1 5.56
26 NS 2S W+2 -180 4 22.22
27 NS 3P S-2 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.2 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 53,52 %28 NS 4C E-1 50 15 83.33
29 NS 3S S-2 -200 2 11.11
30 NS 3PcS-4 -800 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.1 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,22 %31 NS 4C S-1 -100 7 38.89
32 NS 3S W = -600 2 11.11
33 NS 4T E = -130 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 211,0 / 540 = 39,07 %
PAIRE Nr : A.7 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle
a.2 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 53,52 % 1 NS 2P E-1 50 13 72.22
2 NS 4C S+2 680 11 61.11
3 NS 4C W = -620 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.1 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,22 % 4 NS 1S W = -90 10 55.56
5 NS 4C S = 620 12 66.67
6 NS 2S E = -120 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a11 DELHEZ Jacques -COURTOIS Patrick : 44,63 % 7 NS 3C W-1 100 16 88.89
8 NS 3C W = -140 15 83.33
9 NS 4P W-2 200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
a10 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 37,96 %10 NS 3P S-2 -200 10 55.56
11 NS 2T S-1 -50 18 100.00
12 NS 3K E = -110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
a.9 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 49,63 %13 NS 2P S+2 170 10 55.56
14 NS 2C S+1 140 16 88.89
15 NS 4C S = 620 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.7 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 42,59 %19 NS 4P W-1 100 17 94.44
20 NS 2C W+1 -140 10 55.56
21 NS 4C S-1 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a.6 PIETQUIN Joseph -VUYTS Michèle : 59,63 %22 NS 4C S+2 480 11 61.11
23 NS 2P S+1 140 10 55.56
24 NS 5TcE-2 300 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.5 MOLS Bruno -ARICKX Roger : 47,78 %25 NS 2K E+2 -130 1 5.56
26 NS 1S W+1 -120 8 44.44
27 NS 3T W = -110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.4 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 60,56 %28 NS 3S W+3 -490 1 5.56
29 NS 5T N-1 -100 7 38.89
30 NS 4C E+1 -450 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.3 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre : 60,93 %31 NS 4C S-1 -100 7 38.89
32 NS 3S W+2 -660 0 0.00
33 NS 3KcN = 470 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 307,0 / 540 = 56,85 %
PAIRE Nr : A.8 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
a.4 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 60,56 % 1 NS 2P E-2 100 16 88.89
2 NS 4C S+2 680 11 61.11
3 NS 5TcS-5 -1100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.3 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre : 60,93 % 4 NS 2P E-1 100 15 83.33
5 NS 4PcW-3 500 7 38.89
6 NS 3S E = -600 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.2 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 53,52 % 7 NS 2C W = -110 12 66.67
8 NS 2P E+1 -140 15 83.33
9 NS 3S W+1 -630 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.1 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,22 %10 NS 3S E = -600 6 33.33
11 NS 2P E = -110 4 22.22
12 NS 1K E+2 -110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a11 DELHEZ Jacques -COURTOIS Patrick : 44,63 %13 NS 4P S+1 650 18 100.00
14 NS 4C S-1 -50 4 22.22
15 NS 4C S+1 650 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a10 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 37,96 %16 NS 2P S = 110 18 100.00
17 NS 2C N-1 -50 18 100.00
18 NS 1P W+1 -110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
a.8 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,56 %22 NS 4C S+2 480 11 61.11
23 NS 1P S+2 140 10 55.56
24 NS 4C N+2 480 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a.7 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 42,59 %25 NS 2T N-1 -50 12 66.67
26 NS 2S W = -120 8 44.44
27 NS 3P S-1 -50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a.6 PIETQUIN Joseph -VUYTS Michèle : 59,63 %28 NS 3S W+3 -490 1 5.56
29 NS 3K N+1 130 16 88.89
30 NS 4PcS-5 -1100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
a.5 MOLS Bruno -ARICKX Roger : 47,78 %31 NS 4C S-1 -100 7 38.89
32 NS 2T E+1 -110 11 61.11
33 NS 5T E = -400 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
Total : 298,0 / 540 = 55,19 %
PAIRE Nr : A.9 BELSACK GABRIEL -LEBLU Pascaline
a.6 PIETQUIN Joseph -VUYTS Michèle : 59,63 % 1 NS 4C E-3 150 18 100.00
2 NS 4C S+2 680 11 61.11
3 NS 3S E+1 -630 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.5 MOLS Bruno -ARICKX Roger : 47,78 % 4 NS 2P E-1 100 15 83.33
5 NS 4C S = 620 12 66.67
6 NS 2C E-2 200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
a.4 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 60,56 % 7 NS 3C W+1 -170 0 0.00
8 NS 3P E+1 -170 10 55.56
9 NS 4P W = -620 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
a.3 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre : 60,93 %10 NS 2PcS-3 -800 0 0.00
11 NS 2K E = -90 11 61.11
12 NS 3K E+1 -130 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
a.2 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 53,52 %13 NS 3S S-1 -100 0 0.00
14 NS 2C S+1 140 16 88.89
15 NS 3S S = 600 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
a.1 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,22 %16 NS 2K W+1 -110 9 50.00
17 NS 3P E+3 -230 7 38.89
18 NS 2S W+1 -150 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a11 DELHEZ Jacques -COURTOIS Patrick : 44,63 %19 NS 4P W = -620 7 38.89
20 NS 3C W+1 -170 5 27.78
21 NS 4P W = -420 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
a.9 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 49,63 %25 NS 2P W = -110 5 27.78
26 NS 3S W = -600 0 0.00
27 NS 3T W+1 -130 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
a.8 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,56 %28 NS 4C W-1 50 15 83.33
29 NS 1S S+1 120 12 66.67
30 NS 5C E+1 -480 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.7 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 42,59 %31 NS 4C S-1 -100 7 38.89
32 NS 2C N-2 -100 15 83.33
33 NS 4T E = -130 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 237,0 / 540 = 43,89 %
PAIRE Nr : A10 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
a.8 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,56 % 1 NS 2PcS-2 -300 2 11.11
2 NS 4C S+2 680 11 61.11
3 NS 4C W+1 -650 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
a.7 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 42,59 % 4 NS 2T S-1 -100 6 33.33
5 NS 4C S = 620 12 66.67
6 NS 3S E-2 200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
a.6 PIETQUIN Joseph -VUYTS Michèle : 59,63 % 7 NS 2C E+1 -140 4 22.22
8 NS 4P E = -420 3 16.67
9 NS 4P W = -620 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
a.5 MOLS Bruno -ARICKX Roger : 47,78 %10 NS 3S E+1 -630 2 11.11
11 NS 1P E = -80 15 83.33
12 NS 3K E+1 -130 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.4 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 60,56 %13 NS 3T N+1 130 6 33.33
14 NS 4C S-1 -50 4 22.22
15 NS 4C S+1 650 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.3 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre : 60,93 %16 NS 2K W+1 -110 9 50.00
17 NS 4P E+1 -450 3 16.67
18 NS 4C E-1 50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.2 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 53,52 %19 NS 2P W+3 -200 12 66.67
20 NS 4C E-1 100 15 83.33
21 NS 4T E = -130 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.1 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,22 %22 NS 4C S+2 480 11 61.11
23 NS 3P S = 140 10 55.56
24 NS 3C N+2 200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a10 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 37,96 %28 NS 3S W+2 -460 5 27.78
29 NS 3S N-1 -100 7 38.89
30 NS 4C E+1 -450 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.9 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 49,63 %31 NS 4C S-1 -100 7 38.89
32 NS 2T E+3 -150 6 33.33
33 NS 5T E = -400 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 237,0 / 540 = 43,89 %
PAIRE Nr : A11 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse
a10 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 37,96 % 1 NS 1P E = -80 9 50.00
2 NS 4C N+2 680 11 61.11
3 NS 4TcS-3 -500 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.9 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 49,63 % 4 NS 2P E-1 100 15 83.33
5 NS 4C S-1 -100 1 5.56
6 NS 3S E = -600 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
a.8 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,56 % 7 NS 3C W = -140 4 22.22
8 NS 2P E+3 -200 6 33.33
9 NS 4P W = -620 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
a.7 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 42,59 %10 NS 3S E = -600 6 33.33
11 NS 2K E+1 -110 4 22.22
12 NS 3K E = -110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.6 PIETQUIN Joseph -VUYTS Michèle : 59,63 %13 NS 2P S+1 140 8 44.44
14 NS 2C S = 110 11 61.11
15 NS 3S S = 600 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.5 MOLS Bruno -ARICKX Roger : 47,78 %16 NS 3T N-1 -50 15 83.33
17 NS 4P E+2 -480 0 0.00
18 NS 2P W = -110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.4 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 60,56 %19 NS 4P W+1 -650 1 5.56
20 NS 3C W = -140 10 55.56
21 NS 3P W+1 -170 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
a.3 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre : 60,93 %22 NS 4C S+1 450 4 22.22
23 NS 2P S = 110 6 33.33
24 NS 4C S+1 450 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.2 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 53,52 %25 NS 3T N-2 -100 8 44.44
26 NS 2S W = -120 8 44.44
27 NS 1S N-3 -150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a11 DELHEZ Jacques -COURTOIS Patrick : 44,63 %31 NS 3C S+1 170 18 100.00
32 NS 5T E-1 100 18 100.00
33 NS 3K N-2 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 96,30 %
Total : 238,0 / 540 = 44,07 %
PAIRE Nr : a.1 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
A.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 50,00 % 1 EO 2P E-1 50 5 27.78
2 EO 4C S+2 680 7 38.89
3 EO 3C W+2 -200 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A.7 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 56,85 % 4 EO 1S W = -90 8 44.44
5 EO 4C S = 620 6 33.33
6 EO 2S E = -120 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,44 % 7 EO 1S S+3 180 0 0.00
8 EO 4P E+3 -510 18 100.00
9 EO 3P W+1 -170 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.8 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,19 %10 EO 3S E = -600 12 66.67
11 EO 2P E = -110 14 77.78
12 EO 1K E+2 -110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.3 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 50,93 %13 EO 2T N+1 110 14 77.78
14 EO 3C S-1 -50 14 77.78
15 EO 4C N = 620 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
A.9 BELSACK GABRIEL -LEBLU Pascaline : 43,89 %16 EO 2K W+1 -110 9 50.00
17 EO 3P E+3 -230 11 61.11
18 EO 2S W+1 -150 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 59,26 %19 EO 4P W = -620 11 61.11
20 EO 4C W-1 100 3 16.67
21 EO 3CcS = 730 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
A10 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 43,89 %22 EO 4C S+2 480 7 38.89
23 EO 3P S = 140 8 44.44
24 EO 3C N+2 200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.5 LIBERT Laurent -LIGOT Xavier : 57,41 %25 EO 3S E-3 300 0 0.00
26 EO 3S W-3 300 0 0.00
27 EO 2T W+1 -110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
A.6 WILLEMS Jacques -de NICOLAS Bernard : 39,07 %31 EO 4C S-1 -100 11 61.11
32 EO 3S W = -600 16 88.89
33 EO 4T E = -130 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 255,0 / 540 = 47,22 %
PAIRE Nr : a.2 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
A.7 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 56,85 % 1 EO 2P E-1 50 5 27.78
2 EO 4C S+2 680 7 38.89
3 EO 4C W = -620 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,44 % 4 EO 2T S-1 -100 12 66.67
5 EO 4C S-1 -100 17 94.44
6 EO 2P W+1 -140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
A.8 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,19 % 7 EO 2C W = -110 6 33.33
8 EO 2P E+1 -140 3 16.67
9 EO 3S W+1 -630 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 50,93 %10 EO 3S W = -600 12 66.67
11 EO 2K E = -90 7 38.89
12 EO 3K E = -110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.9 BELSACK GABRIEL -LEBLU Pascaline : 43,89 %13 EO 3S S-1 -100 18 100.00
14 EO 2C S+1 140 2 11.11
15 EO 3S S = 600 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
A.4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 59,26 %16 EO 2S W+1 -150 16 88.89
17 EO 3P E+1 -170 2 11.11
18 EO 2K S-1 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A10 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 43,89 %19 EO 2P W+3 -200 6 33.33
20 EO 4C E-1 100 3 16.67
21 EO 4T E = -130 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.5 LIBERT Laurent -LIGOT Xavier : 57,41 %22 EO 4C S+2 480 7 38.89
23 EO 1P S = 80 14 77.78
24 EO 4PcW-4 800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A11 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 44,07 %25 EO 3T N-2 -100 10 55.56
26 EO 2S W = -120 10 55.56
27 EO 1S N-3 -150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.6 WILLEMS Jacques -de NICOLAS Bernard : 39,07 %28 EO 4C E-1 50 3 16.67
29 EO 3S S-2 -200 16 88.89
30 EO 3PcS-4 -800 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
Total : 289,0 / 540 = 53,52 %
PAIRE Nr : a.3 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre
A.8 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,19 % 4 EO 2P E-1 100 3 16.67
5 EO 4PcW-3 500 11 61.11
6 EO 3S E = -600 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.3 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 50,93 % 7 EO 1S E+1 -120 10 55.56
8 EO 4P E = -420 15 83.33
9 EO 4P W = -620 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.9 BELSACK GABRIEL -LEBLU Pascaline : 43,89 %10 EO 2PcS-3 -800 18 100.00
11 EO 2K E = -90 7 38.89
12 EO 3K E+1 -130 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
A.4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 59,26 %13 EO 2P S+3 200 5 27.78
14 EO 1S S = 90 10 55.56
15 EO 4C S+1 650 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A10 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 43,89 %16 EO 2K W+1 -110 9 50.00
17 EO 4P E+1 -450 15 83.33
18 EO 4C E-1 50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.5 LIBERT Laurent -LIGOT Xavier : 57,41 %19 EO 4P W = -620 11 61.11
20 EO 4C E = -620 18 100.00
21 EO 3S E+1 -430 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
A11 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 44,07 %22 EO 4C S+1 450 14 77.78
23 EO 2P S = 110 12 66.67
24 EO 4C S+1 450 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.6 WILLEMS Jacques -de NICOLAS Bernard : 39,07 %25 EO 2K E+2 -130 17 94.44
26 EO 2S W+2 -180 14 77.78
27 EO 3P S-2 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 50,00 %28 EO 4C E+1 -450 10 55.56
29 EO 3S N-3 -300 18 100.00
30 EO 4C E+1 -450 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.7 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 56,85 %31 EO 4C S-1 -100 11 61.11
32 EO 3S W+2 -660 18 100.00
33 EO 3KcN = 470 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 329,0 / 540 = 60,93 %
PAIRE Nr : a.4 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
A.8 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,19 % 1 EO 2P E-2 100 2 11.11
2 EO 4C S+2 680 7 38.89
3 EO 5TcS-5 -1100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.9 BELSACK GABRIEL -LEBLU Pascaline : 43,89 % 7 EO 3C W+1 -170 18 100.00
8 EO 3P E+1 -170 8 44.44
9 EO 4P W = -620 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
A.4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 59,26 %10 EO 3K W+1 -130 6 33.33
11 EO 2K E+1 -110 14 77.78
12 EO 2K E+1 -110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A10 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 43,89 %13 EO 3T N+1 130 12 66.67
14 EO 4C S-1 -50 14 77.78
15 EO 4C S+1 650 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.5 LIBERT Laurent -LIGOT Xavier : 57,41 %16 EO 2K W+1 -110 9 50.00
17 EO 2P W+3 -200 6 33.33
18 EO 2KcS-2 -500 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A11 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 44,07 %19 EO 4P W+1 -650 17 94.44
20 EO 3C W = -140 8 44.44
21 EO 3P W+1 -170 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
A.6 WILLEMS Jacques -de NICOLAS Bernard : 39,07 %22 EO 4C S+2 480 7 38.89
23 EO 3P S-1 -100 17 94.44
24 EO 4C S+1 450 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 50,00 %25 EO 2S W-2 200 2 11.11
26 EO 2S W+3 -210 16 88.89
27 EO 1C W+2 -140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.7 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 56,85 %28 EO 3S W+3 -490 17 94.44
29 EO 5T N-1 -100 11 61.11
30 EO 4C E+1 -450 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,44 %31 EO 4C S-1 -100 11 61.11
32 EO 2T E+3 -150 12 66.67
33 EO 3S W+2 -460 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
Total : 327,0 / 540 = 60,56 %
PAIRE Nr : a.5 MOLS Bruno -ARICKX Roger
A.3 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 50,93 % 1 EO 1P E = -80 9 50.00
2 EO 4C S+2 680 7 38.89
3 EO 4TcS-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
A.9 BELSACK GABRIEL -LEBLU Pascaline : 43,89 % 4 EO 2P E-1 100 3 16.67
5 EO 4C S = 620 6 33.33
6 EO 2C E-2 200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
A10 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 43,89 %10 EO 3S E+1 -630 16 88.89
11 EO 1P E = -80 3 16.67
12 EO 3K E+1 -130 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.5 LIBERT Laurent -LIGOT Xavier : 57,41 %13 EO 4P S = 620 2 11.11
14 EO 2C S = 110 7 38.89
15 EO 4C S = 620 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A11 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 44,07 %16 EO 3T N-1 -50 3 16.67
17 EO 4P E+2 -480 18 100.00
18 EO 2P W = -110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.6 WILLEMS Jacques -de NICOLAS Bernard : 39,07 %19 EO 4P W = -620 11 61.11
20 EO 2C W+1 -140 8 44.44
21 EO 4P W-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 50,00 %22 EO 4C N = 420 17 94.44
23 EO 3T W-3 300 0 0.00
24 EO 3C S+2 200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.7 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 56,85 %25 EO 2K E+2 -130 17 94.44
26 EO 1S W+1 -120 10 55.56
27 EO 3T W = -110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,44 %28 EO 3S E+1 -430 8 44.44
29 EO 3T N-1 -100 11 61.11
30 EO 4C E+1 -450 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.8 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,19 %31 EO 4C S-1 -100 11 61.11
32 EO 2T E+1 -110 7 38.89
33 EO 5T E = -400 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
Total : 258,0 / 540 = 47,78 %
PAIRE Nr : a.6 PIETQUIN Joseph -VUYTS Michèle
A.9 BELSACK GABRIEL -LEBLU Pascaline : 43,89 % 1 EO 4C E-3 150 0 0.00
2 EO 4C S+2 680 7 38.89
3 EO 3S E+1 -630 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 59,26 % 4 EO 1S W+1 -120 17 94.44
5 EO 4PcW-3 500 11 61.11
6 EO 3S W-1 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A10 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 43,89 % 7 EO 2C E+1 -140 14 77.78
8 EO 4P E = -420 15 83.33
9 EO 4P W = -620 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
A11 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 44,07 %13 EO 2P S+1 140 10 55.56
14 EO 2C S = 110 7 38.89
15 EO 3S S = 600 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A.6 WILLEMS Jacques -de NICOLAS Bernard : 39,07 %16 EO 1S W+1 -120 14 77.78
17 EO 2P W+4 -230 11 61.11
18 EO 4P W = -420 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
A.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 50,00 %19 EO 4P W+1 -650 17 94.44
20 EO 2P W+2 -170 13 72.22
21 EO 3S E-2 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A.7 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 56,85 %22 EO 4C S+2 480 7 38.89
23 EO 2P S+1 140 8 44.44
24 EO 5TcE-2 300 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,44 %25 EO 3C S-1 -50 6 33.33
26 EO 3S W-1 100 4 22.22
27 EO 2P S-2 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
A.8 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,19 %28 EO 3S W+3 -490 17 94.44
29 EO 3K N+1 130 2 11.11
30 EO 4PcS-5 -1100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
A.3 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 50,93 %31 EO 4C S-1 -100 11 61.11
32 EO 1S E+2 -150 12 66.67
33 EO 5KcN-3 -500 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
Total : 322,0 / 540 = 59,63 %
PAIRE Nr : a.7 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette
A.4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 59,26 % 1 EO 2C E = -110 12 66.67
2 EO 4C S+1 650 17 94.44
3 EO 3C W+2 -200 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A10 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 43,89 % 4 EO 2T S-1 -100 12 66.67
5 EO 4C S = 620 6 33.33
6 EO 3S E-2 200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
A.5 LIBERT Laurent -LIGOT Xavier : 57,41 % 7 EO 2C W = -110 6 33.33
8 EO 2P E+2 -170 8 44.44
9 EO 2P W+1 -140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
A11 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 44,07 %10 EO 3S E = -600 12 66.67
11 EO 2K E+1 -110 14 77.78
12 EO 3K E = -110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 50,00 %16 EO 1S W+3 -180 18 100.00
17 EO 3P E+2 -200 6 33.33
18 EO 2P E+1 -140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A.7 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 56,85 %19 EO 4P W-1 100 1 5.56
20 EO 2C W+1 -140 8 44.44
21 EO 4C S-1 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A.2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,44 %22 EO 6C S = 980 0 0.00
23 EO 3P S-1 -100 17 94.44
24 EO 2C S+3 200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.8 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,19 %25 EO 2T N-1 -50 6 33.33
26 EO 2S W = -120 10 55.56
27 EO 3P S-1 -50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A.3 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 50,93 %28 EO 4C E = -420 6 33.33
29 EO 3T N+1 130 2 11.11
30 EO 7C E-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
A.9 BELSACK GABRIEL -LEBLU Pascaline : 43,89 %31 EO 4C S-1 -100 11 61.11
32 EO 2C N-2 -100 3 16.67
33 EO 4T E = -130 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 230,0 / 540 = 42,59 %
PAIRE Nr : a.8 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
A10 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 43,89 % 1 EO 2PcS-2 -300 16 88.89
2 EO 4C S+2 680 7 38.89
3 EO 4C W+1 -650 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
A.5 LIBERT Laurent -LIGOT Xavier : 57,41 % 4 EO 1S N-1 -100 12 66.67
5 EO 4PcW-4 800 0 0.00
6 EO 3S E-1 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A11 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 44,07 % 7 EO 3C W = -140 14 77.78
8 EO 2P E+3 -200 12 66.67
9 EO 4P W = -620 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
A.6 WILLEMS Jacques -de NICOLAS Bernard : 39,07 %10 EO 2S W-1 100 3 16.67
11 EO 1P E = -80 3 16.67
12 EO 3K E = -110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
A.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 50,00 %13 EO 2K E-2 200 5 27.78
14 EO 3S S-2 -100 18 100.00
15 EO 4C S+1 650 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,44 %19 EO 2P W+2 -170 4 22.22
20 EO 2P S = 110 0 0.00
21 EO 3T E+1 -130 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
A.8 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,19 %22 EO 4C S+2 480 7 38.89
23 EO 1P S+2 140 8 44.44
24 EO 4C N+2 480 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A.3 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 50,93 %25 EO 2P W = -110 13 72.22
26 EO 2S W-1 100 4 22.22
27 EO 3TcE+1 -570 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.9 BELSACK GABRIEL -LEBLU Pascaline : 43,89 %28 EO 4C W-1 50 3 16.67
29 EO 1S S+1 120 6 33.33
30 EO 5C E+1 -480 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A.4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 59,26 %31 EO 4C S-1 -100 11 61.11
32 EO 2T E+1 -110 7 38.89
33 EO 4T E = -130 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 246,0 / 540 = 45,56 %
PAIRE Nr : a.9 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal
A.5 LIBERT Laurent -LIGOT Xavier : 57,41 % 1 EO 2C E+1 -140 14 77.78
2 EO 4C S+2 680 7 38.89
3 EO 2C E+2 -170 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A11 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 44,07 % 4 EO 2P E-1 100 3 16.67
5 EO 4C S-1 -100 17 94.44
6 EO 3S E = -600 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
A.6 WILLEMS Jacques -de NICOLAS Bernard : 39,07 % 7 EO 2C W+1 -140 14 77.78
8 EO 3P E+1 -170 8 44.44
9 EO 4P W = -620 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 50,00 %10 EO 3S W-1 100 3 16.67
11 EO 2K E+1 -110 14 77.78
12 EO 3K E+1 -130 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.7 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 56,85 %13 EO 2P S+2 170 8 44.44
14 EO 2C S+1 140 2 11.11
15 EO 4C S = 620 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,44 %16 EO 2C S-1 -50 3 16.67
17 EO 4P E+1 -450 15 83.33
18 EO 3C E-1 50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
A.3 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 50,93 %22 EO 4C S+2 480 7 38.89
23 EO 3K E-2 200 2 11.11
24 EO 4C S+1 450 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
A.9 BELSACK GABRIEL -LEBLU Pascaline : 43,89 %25 EO 2P W = -110 13 72.22
26 EO 3S W = -600 18 100.00
27 EO 3T W+1 -130 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
A.4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 59,26 %28 EO 6C E-4 200 0 0.00
29 EO 3T N+1 130 2 11.11
30 EO 5C E = -450 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
A10 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 43,89 %31 EO 4C S-1 -100 11 61.11
32 EO 2T E+3 -150 12 66.67
33 EO 5T E = -400 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 268,0 / 540 = 49,63 %
PAIRE Nr : a10 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert
A11 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 44,07 % 1 EO 1P E = -80 9 50.00
2 EO 4C N+2 680 7 38.89
3 EO 4TcS-3 -500 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.6 WILLEMS Jacques -de NICOLAS Bernard : 39,07 % 4 EO 1S W+1 -120 17 94.44
5 EO 2C S+1 140 14 77.78
6 EO 2C S-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
A.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 50,00 % 7 EO 2C W = -110 6 33.33
8 EO 2P E = -110 0 0.00
9 EO 4P W = -620 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A.7 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 56,85 %10 EO 3P S-2 -200 8 44.44
11 EO 2T S-1 -50 0 0.00
12 EO 3K E = -110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
A.2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,44 %13 EO 2K E-1 100 16 88.89
14 EO 2C S+1 140 2 11.11
15 EO 4C S = 620 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.8 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,19 %16 EO 2P S = 110 0 0.00
17 EO 2C N-1 -50 0 0.00
18 EO 1P W+1 -110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
A.3 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 50,93 %19 EO 4P W-1 100 1 5.56
20 EO 1S W+3 -180 16 88.89
21 EO 2C S+1 140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
A.4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 59,26 %25 EO 2T N-1 -50 6 33.33
26 EO 3S W-1 100 4 22.22
27 EO 2P S-1 -50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
A10 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 43,89 %28 EO 3S W+2 -460 13 72.22
29 EO 3S N-1 -100 11 61.11
30 EO 4C E+1 -450 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.5 LIBERT Laurent -LIGOT Xavier : 57,41 %31 EO 2C S+1 140 2 11.11
32 EO 2C N-2 -100 3 16.67
33 EO 4T E = -130 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
Total : 205,0 / 540 = 37,96 %
PAIRE Nr : a11 DELHEZ Jacques -COURTOIS Patrick
A.6 WILLEMS Jacques -de NICOLAS Bernard : 39,07 % 1 EO 3S W+1 -430 18 100.00
2 EO 4C N+1 650 17 94.44
3 EO 3TcS-3 -500 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
A.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 50,00 % 4 EO 2P E-1 100 3 16.67
5 EO 4C S+1 650 2 11.11
6 EO 1S E-1 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
A.7 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 56,85 % 7 EO 3C W-1 100 2 11.11
8 EO 3C W = -140 3 16.67
9 EO 4P W-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
A.2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,44 %10 EO 2S E-2 200 0 0.00
11 EO 2K E+1 -110 14 77.78
12 EO 3P N-2 -200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.8 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,19 %13 EO 4P S+1 650 0 0.00
14 EO 4C S-1 -50 14 77.78
15 EO 4C S+1 650 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A.3 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 50,93 %16 EO 3K W = -110 9 50.00
17 EO 3P W+2 -200 6 33.33
18 EO 3S E+2 -460 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.9 BELSACK GABRIEL -LEBLU Pascaline : 43,89 %19 EO 4P W = -620 11 61.11
20 EO 3C W+1 -170 13 72.22
21 EO 4P W = -420 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
A.4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 59,26 %22 EO 4C N = 420 17 94.44
23 EO 2P S+2 170 4 22.22
24 EO 4C S+1 450 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.5 LIBERT Laurent -LIGOT Xavier : 57,41 %28 EO 3S W+2 -460 13 72.22
29 EO 4T N-1 -100 11 61.11
30 EO 4C E+1 -450 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A11 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 44,07 %31 EO 3C S+1 170 0 0.00
32 EO 5T E-1 100 0 0.00
33 EO 3K N-2 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 3,70 %
Total : 241,0 / 540 = 44,63 %
|
|