|
Tournoi du 03-07-17
Lundi
1 66,08 A13 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie
2 64,56 A.6 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre
3 60,67 A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
4 52,09 A.5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
5 51,85 A.1 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal
6 50,83 A.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
7 50,58 A.7 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette
8 47,85 A10 VAN DOOREN Michele -SALFI Huguette
9 45,21 A.3 NUYENS Danette -GROSFILS Colette
10 43,48 A.2 ERPICUM Patrice -AUBRY Vincent
11 43,05 A12 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
12 37,38 A11 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle
13 36,05 A.4 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 61,88 a10 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane
2 56,70 a.7 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette
3 53,62 a.8 LIBERT Laurent -HUBLET Carlo
4 52,20 a.9 PIETQUIN Joseph -VUYTS Michèle
5 51,35 a.5 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
6 50,97 a.4 LEBRUN Robert -ARICKX Roger
7 50,23 a13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
8 50,20 a11 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard
9 49,67 a.3 MOLS Bruno -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
10 47,55 a.1 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier
11 46,73 a12 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques
12 46,50 a.2 BERGER Jean Marie -DELHEZ Jacques
13 32,09 a.6 COLLET Claudine -PAQUET Anne
PAIRE Nr : A.1 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal
a.1 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 47,55 % 1 NS 3S S = 400 4.5 20.45
2 NS 3S E+2 -460 1 4.55
3 NS 3K W+1 -130 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 35,61 %
a11 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,20 % 4 NS 4P W+1 -650 8 36.36
5 NS 6P N+1 1460 17 77.27
6 NS 4C E-2 200 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
a10 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 61,88 % 7 NS 3S S-2 -200 2 9.09
8 NS 2S N-1 -50 7 31.82
9 NS 4K E-1 100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.9 PIETQUIN Joseph -VUYTS Michèle : 52,20 %10 NS 2P S = 110 22 100.00
11 NS 3K W = -110 14 63.64
12 NS 4P N-1 -100 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
a.8 LIBERT Laurent -HUBLET Carlo : 53,62 %13 NS 3S E = -600 6 27.27
14 NS 3S W = -400 13 59.09
15 NS 7TcW-3 500 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
a13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 50,23 %16 NS 2C N+1 140 22 100.00
17 NS 3S S = 400 7 31.82
18 NS 3P E+2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
a.6 COLLET Claudine -PAQUET Anne : 32,09 %19 NS 3T W-2 200 22 100.00
20 NS 3S E+1 -630 7 31.82
21 NS 5P E = -450 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
a.5 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 51,35 %22 NS 3S N+3 490 5 22.73
23 NS 5T S = 600 18 81.82
24 NS 6S E+1 -1020 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
a.4 LEBRUN Robert -ARICKX Roger : 50,97 %25 NS 4P N+1 450 13.2 60.00
26 NS 3P E-2 200 12.1 55.00
27 NS 3S W+2 -460 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 45,15 %
a.3 MOLS Bruno -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 49,67 %28 NS 3S W+1 -430 16.5 75.00
29 NS 4C E-1 100 18.6 84.55
30 NS 1T S-1 -50 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 66,52 %
Total : 342,2 / 660 = 51,85 %
PAIRE Nr : A.2 ERPICUM Patrice -AUBRY Vincent
a.2 BERGER Jean Marie -DELHEZ Jacques : 46,50 % 4 NS 4P W+1 -650 8 36.36
5 NS 4P N+2 680 4 18.18
6 NS 5CcE-3 800 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
a.1 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 47,55 % 7 NS 3S S-3 -300 0 0.00
8 NS 3S N-3 -150 0 0.00
9 NS 4K E = -130 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 6,06 %
a11 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,20 %10 NS 2KcW+1 -380 0 0.00
11 NS 4K W-1 50 17 77.27
12 NS 4P N-2 -200 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a10 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 61,88 %13 NS 3CcN-3 -800 0 0.00
14 NS 3S E+1 -430 5 22.73
15 NS 6P E-2 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 24,24 %
a.9 PIETQUIN Joseph -VUYTS Michèle : 52,20 %16 NS 4P E+1 -650 5 22.73
17 NS 3S S+2 460 18 81.82
18 NS 2S N = 120 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
a.8 LIBERT Laurent -HUBLET Carlo : 53,62 %19 NS 3K W = -110 9 40.91
20 NS 3S W+3 -690 3 13.64
21 NS 5P E = -450 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
a12 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,73 %22 NS 6S N = 990 17 77.27
23 NS 3S N-1 -100 11 50.00
24 NS 6P E+1 -1010 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
a.6 COLLET Claudine -PAQUET Anne : 32,09 %25 NS 5P N = 450 13.2 60.00
26 NS 4P E-3 300 17.5 79.55
27 NS 6S W-1 50 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 66,52 %
a.5 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 51,35 %28 NS 3S W+2 -460 7.7 35.00
29 NS 3C E = -140 6.6 30.00
30 NS 1T S-1 -50 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
a.4 LEBRUN Robert -ARICKX Roger : 50,97 %31 NS 4P N = 620 22 100.00
32 NS 3S S+1 430 16 72.73
33 NS 6S N-1 -50 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
Total : 287,0 / 660 = 43,48 %
PAIRE Nr : A.3 NUYENS Danette -GROSFILS Colette
a.5 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 51,35 % 1 NS 3S S = 400 4.5 20.45
2 NS 3S W = -400 12 54.55
3 NS 3S E+1 -630 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 44,70 %
a.3 MOLS Bruno -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 49,67 % 7 NS 3S S-1 -100 9 40.91
8 NS 2S N+1 150 21 95.45
9 NS 4TcN-1 -100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a12 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,73 %10 NS 3K W+1 -130 15 68.18
11 NS 3K W+2 -150 8 36.36
12 NS 4P N-2 -200 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
a.1 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 47,55 %13 NS 3T W+2 -150 12 54.55
14 NS 3S W+1 -430 5 22.73
15 NS 6P W-4 200 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
a11 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,20 %16 NS 3P E+2 -200 15 68.18
17 NS 3S S-1 -50 0 0.00
18 NS 1S E-1 50 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
a10 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 61,88 %19 NS 2P N-1 -50 17 77.27
20 NS 5K W+1 -620 16 72.73
21 NS 5P E = -450 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.9 PIETQUIN Joseph -VUYTS Michèle : 52,20 %22 NS 3S N+3 490 5 22.73
23 NS 3C W = -140 8 36.36
24 NS 6S E+1 -1020 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 50,23 %25 NS 4P S+1 450 13.2 60.00
26 NS 3S W-6 600 21.9 99.55
27 NS 6S W = -990 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.7 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 56,70 %28 NS 3S W+2 -460 7.7 35.00
29 NS 2C E+1 -140 6.6 30.00
30 NS 2S S-2 -100 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 25,15 %
a.6 COLLET Claudine -PAQUET Anne : 32,09 %31 NS 4PcN-1 -200 8 36.36
32 NS 3S S+1 430 16 72.73
33 NS 3S S+2 460 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
Total : 298,4 / 660 = 45,21 %
PAIRE Nr : A.4 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
a.7 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 56,70 % 1 NS 3T N+1 130 0.1 0.45
2 NS 3S E = -400 12 54.55
3 NS 3S E+2 -660 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 31,97 %
a.6 COLLET Claudine -PAQUET Anne : 32,09 % 4 NS 4P W+1 -650 8 36.36
5 NS 4P N+2 680 4 18.18
6 NS 4C E-2 200 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.4 LEBRUN Robert -ARICKX Roger : 50,97 %10 NS 2K W+3 -150 8 36.36
11 NS 2C N = 110 21 95.45
12 NS 4P N-2 -200 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
a13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 50,23 %13 NS 2CcN-2 -500 10 45.45
14 NS 3S W+1 -430 5 22.73
15 NS 6CcS-2 -500 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.2 BERGER Jean Marie -DELHEZ Jacques : 46,50 %16 NS 4P E+1 -650 5 22.73
17 NS 3S S = 400 7 31.82
18 NS 2C S = 110 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.1 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 47,55 %19 NS 2C E+1 -140 3 13.64
20 NS 5K W+1 -620 16 72.73
21 NS 6PcE-1 100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
a11 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,20 %22 NS 3S N+3 490 5 22.73
23 NS 3S N-3 -300 2 9.09
24 NS 6S E+1 -1020 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a10 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 61,88 %25 NS 3S S-3 -150 0.1 0.45
26 NS 3P E-2 200 12.1 55.00
27 NS 3P E+2 -200 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 28,48 %
a.9 PIETQUIN Joseph -VUYTS Michèle : 52,20 %28 NS 3ScW+2 -750 0.1 0.45
29 NS 3C E = -140 6.6 30.00
30 NS 1T S = 70 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a12 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,73 %31 NS 3C W = -140 11 50.00
32 NS 2K N+1 110 0 0.00
33 NS 3S S+3 490 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
Total : 237,9 / 660 = 36,05 %
PAIRE Nr : A.5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
a13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 50,23 % 1 NS 3S S+1 430 13.2 60.00
2 NS 3S E-2 100 21 95.45
3 NS 6KcW = -1540 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 51,82 %
a.8 LIBERT Laurent -HUBLET Carlo : 53,62 % 4 NS 4P W+1 -650 8 36.36
5 NS 6S S+1 1470 22 100.00
6 NS 3S W = -600 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
a.7 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 56,70 % 7 NS 3S S-1 -100 9 40.91
8 NS 3K N-1 -50 7 31.82
9 NS 3T S = 110 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
a.5 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 51,35 %13 NS 3S E = -600 6 27.27
14 NS 3S W+1 -430 5 22.73
15 NS 6S N-2 -200 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.4 LEBRUN Robert -ARICKX Roger : 50,97 %16 NS 4P E+1 -650 5 22.73
17 NS 3S S+2 460 18 81.82
18 NS 2C S = 110 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
a12 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,73 %19 NS 2C E+1 -140 3 13.64
20 NS 4C W = -620 16 72.73
21 NS 5P E-1 50 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.2 BERGER Jean Marie -DELHEZ Jacques : 46,50 %22 NS 3S S+3 490 5 22.73
23 NS 3S S-2 -200 5 22.73
24 NS 6S W-4 200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
a.1 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 47,55 %25 NS 3S S+2 460 21.9 99.55
26 NS 2P E-1 100 6.6 30.00
27 NS 2C E-1 50 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 63,18 %
a11 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,20 %28 NS 3S W+1 -430 16.5 75.00
29 NS 3C W = -140 6.6 30.00
30 NS 2S S = 120 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 66,52 %
a10 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 61,88 %31 NS 3S S-4 -400 4 18.18
32 NS 3S S = 400 9 40.91
33 NS 3S S+3 490 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
Total : 343,8 / 660 = 52,09 %
PAIRE Nr : A.6 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre
a11 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,20 % 1 NS 3S S+2 460 20.8 94.55
2 NS 3S E+1 -430 5 22.73
3 NS 3S E+2 -660 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 52,73 %
a10 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 61,88 % 4 NS 6P W-2 200 22 100.00
5 NS 5P N+2 710 10 45.45
6 NS 4C E-1 100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
a12 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,73 % 7 NS 2CcE-3 800 22 100.00
8 NS 3S N-1 -50 7 31.82
9 NS 4K E = -130 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.8 LIBERT Laurent -HUBLET Carlo : 53,62 %10 NS 1S W+2 -150 8 36.36
11 NS 3S E = -400 4 18.18
12 NS 4P N = 620 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
a.6 COLLET Claudine -PAQUET Anne : 32,09 %16 NS 3P E+1 -170 20 90.91
17 NS 3S S+2 460 18 81.82
18 NS 3S W-3 150 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
a.5 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 51,35 %19 NS 3T E-1 100 20 90.91
20 NS 5K W+1 -620 16 72.73
21 NS 4P E+1 -450 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
a13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 50,23 %22 NS 6C N = 980 11 50.00
23 NS 3S N+2 660 22 100.00
24 NS 6T W = -920 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
a.3 MOLS Bruno -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 49,67 %25 NS 4P N+1 450 13.2 60.00
26 NS 2P E+1 -140 2.3 10.45
27 NS 6S W-2 100 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.2 BERGER Jean Marie -DELHEZ Jacques : 46,50 %28 NS 2K E+2 -130 21.9 99.55
29 NS 3C W = -140 6.6 30.00
30 NS 1S S = 90 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
a.1 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 47,55 %31 NS 3P N+1 170 17 77.27
32 NS 3S N+1 430 16 72.73
33 NS 3S N+3 490 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
Total : 426,1 / 660 = 64,56 %
PAIRE Nr : A.7 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette
a.2 BERGER Jean Marie -DELHEZ Jacques : 46,50 % 1 NS 3S S+1 430 13.2 60.00
2 NS 3P E-1 50 17 77.27
3 NS 3P N-2 -100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 76,06 %
a.1 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 47,55 % 4 NS 4P W+1 -650 8 36.36
5 NS 6P N+1 1460 17 77.27
6 NS 4C E = -620 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a11 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,20 % 7 NS 3S S-1 -100 9 40.91
8 NS 3P W-1 50 13 59.09
9 NS 2K E+1 -110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 50,23 %10 NS 4K W+1 -150 8 36.36
11 NS 4K W-1 50 17 77.27
12 NS 4PcN-2 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
a.9 PIETQUIN Joseph -VUYTS Michèle : 52,20 %13 NS 3S E = -600 6 27.27
14 NS 3S E+2 -460 0 0.00
15 NS 6CcS-2 -500 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
a.7 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 56,70 %19 NS 2C E = -110 9 40.91
20 NS 5K W+1 -620 16 72.73
21 NS 5P E = -450 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.6 COLLET Claudine -PAQUET Anne : 32,09 %22 NS 6S N = 990 17 77.27
23 NS 2P N+1 140 14 63.64
24 NS 6P E-1 50 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.5 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 51,35 %25 NS 4P N+1 450 13.2 60.00
26 NS 4P E-2 200 12.1 55.00
27 NS 6P E-1 50 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
a12 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,73 %28 NS 3S W+2 -460 7.7 35.00
29 NS 4C E-1 100 18.6 84.55
30 NS 2S S = 120 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 71,36 %
a.3 MOLS Bruno -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 49,67 %31 NS 3S E = -400 4 18.18
32 NS 3S N = 400 9 40.91
33 NS 4P N = 420 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
Total : 333,8 / 660 = 50,58 %
PAIRE Nr : A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
a.4 LEBRUN Robert -ARICKX Roger : 50,97 % 1 NS 3S S+1 430 13.2 60.00
2 NS 4C W-2 100 21 95.45
3 NS 5KcW = -750 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 57,88 %
a.3 MOLS Bruno -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 49,67 % 4 NS 3S E-1 100 20 90.91
5 NS 6S S-1 -100 0 0.00
6 NS 4CcE-2 500 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
a.2 BERGER Jean Marie -DELHEZ Jacques : 46,50 % 7 NS 2S S-1 -100 9 40.91
8 NS 2C N+1 140 18 81.82
9 NS 3K E = -110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
a.1 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 47,55 %10 NS 3P S-1 -100 20 90.91
11 NS 2C N = 110 21 95.45
12 NS 4P N-1 -100 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
a11 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,20 %13 NS 3S E-2 200 22 100.00
14 NS 3S W-1 50 19 86.36
15 NS 6TcW-1 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 78,79 %
a12 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,73 %16 NS 3P E+2 -200 15 68.18
17 NS 3S S = 400 7 31.82
18 NS 2C S = 110 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
a.8 LIBERT Laurent -HUBLET Carlo : 53,62 %22 NS 6S N = 990 17 77.27
23 NS 5T S = 600 18 81.82
24 NS 6S W+1 -1020 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
a.7 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 56,70 %25 NS 4P N+1 450 13.2 60.00
26 NS 3C N-4 -400 0.1 0.45
27 NS 6S W-2 100 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
a.6 COLLET Claudine -PAQUET Anne : 32,09 %28 NS 3S W+2 -460 7.7 35.00
29 NS 4C E-1 100 18.6 84.55
30 NS 2S S-1 -50 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 53,18 %
a13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 50,23 %31 NS 4C W-2 100 14 63.64
32 NS 3S S = 400 9 40.91
33 NS 3S S+3 490 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
Total : 400,4 / 660 = 60,67 %
PAIRE Nr : A.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
a.6 COLLET Claudine -PAQUET Anne : 32,09 % 1 NS 3S S+1 430 13.2 60.00
2 NS 3S E-1 50 17 77.27
3 NS 2C W+1 -140 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a12 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,73 % 4 NS 4C W+1 -650 8 36.36
5 NS 5P N+2 710 10 45.45
6 NS 4CcE-2 500 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
a.4 LEBRUN Robert -ARICKX Roger : 50,97 % 7 NS 2S S-1 -100 9 40.91
8 NS 2S N-1 -50 7 31.82
9 NS 3K E+1 -130 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
a.3 MOLS Bruno -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 49,67 %10 NS 1S E+2 -150 8 36.36
11 NS 3K W+1 -130 11 50.00
12 NS 4P N-1 -100 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
a.2 BERGER Jean Marie -DELHEZ Jacques : 46,50 %13 NS 3T W-1 100 19 86.36
14 NS 3S E = -400 13 59.09
15 NS 6K S = 1370 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
a.1 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 47,55 %16 NS 2P E+3 -200 15 68.18
17 NS 3S S+1 430 14 63.64
18 NS 2C S = 110 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
a13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 50,23 %19 NS 3S W = -600 0 0.00
20 NS 5K W+1 -620 16 72.73
21 NS 4P E+2 -480 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
a.9 PIETQUIN Joseph -VUYTS Michèle : 52,20 %25 NS 3P N+2 200 3.4 15.45
26 NS 2P E-2 200 12.1 55.00
27 NS 6S W-1 50 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 43,48 %
a.8 LIBERT Laurent -HUBLET Carlo : 53,62 %28 NS 3S W+2 -460 7.7 35.00
29 NS 4C E-1 100 18.6 84.55
30 NS 1T S = 70 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 61,52 %
a.7 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 56,70 %31 NS 3C W = -140 11 50.00
32 NS 2K N+2 130 4 18.18
33 NS 3S N+1 430 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
Total : 335,5 / 660 = 50,83 %
PAIRE Nr : A10 VAN DOOREN Michele -SALFI Huguette
a.8 LIBERT Laurent -HUBLET Carlo : 53,62 % 1 NS 3S S+1 430 13.2 60.00
2 NS 3S E+1 -430 5 22.73
3 NS 6K W = -1370 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 30,61 %
a.7 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 56,70 % 4 NS 4P W+1 -650 8 36.36
5 NS 6P N+1 1460 17 77.27
6 NS 6CcE-4 1100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
a13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 50,23 % 7 NS 2S S = 120 16 72.73
8 NS 2S N = 120 16 72.73
9 NS 5K E-1 100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 75,76 %
a.5 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 51,35 %10 NS 3K W = -110 18 81.82
11 NS 3S E+2 -460 1 4.55
12 NS 3P N = 140 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
a.4 LEBRUN Robert -ARICKX Roger : 50,97 %13 NS 2T W = -90 16 72.73
14 NS 3S W = -400 13 59.09
15 NS 7CcN-3 -800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
a.3 MOLS Bruno -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 49,67 %16 NS 4P E+1 -650 5 22.73
17 NS 3S S = 400 7 31.82
18 NS 2C S = 110 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.2 BERGER Jean Marie -DELHEZ Jacques : 46,50 %19 NS 2P N-1 -50 17 77.27
20 NS 3S W+1 -630 7 31.82
21 NS 4P E+2 -480 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
a.1 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 47,55 %22 NS 6C N = 980 11 50.00
23 NS 4P N-1 -100 11 50.00
24 NS 6P W+1 -1010 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
a10 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 61,88 %28 NS 3S W+2 -460 7.7 35.00
29 NS 3C E = -140 6.6 30.00
30 NS 2S S-2 -100 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 25,15 %
a.9 PIETQUIN Joseph -VUYTS Michèle : 52,20 %31 NS 3CcW+2 -730 0 0.00
32 NS 3S N = 400 9 40.91
33 NS 6S N = 990 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
Total : 315,8 / 660 = 47,85 %
PAIRE Nr : A11 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle
a10 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 61,88 % 1 NS 40%40% Ajust 8.8 40.00
2 NS 3S E+2 -460 1 4.55
3 NS 3S E+3 -690 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 23,94 %
a.9 PIETQUIN Joseph -VUYTS Michèle : 52,20 % 4 NS 3S E = -600 18 81.82
5 NS 6P N+1 1460 17 77.27
6 NS 4PcN-4 -800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
a.8 LIBERT Laurent -HUBLET Carlo : 53,62 % 7 NS 3S S-1 -100 9 40.91
8 NS 3C N-2 -100 2 9.09
9 NS 4K E = -130 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.7 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 56,70 %10 NS 3P N-2 -200 2 9.09
11 NS 3K W+1 -130 11 50.00
12 NS 4P N-2 -200 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a12 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,73 %13 NS 3T E = -110 14 63.64
14 NS 3S E = -400 13 59.09
15 NS 7KcN-1 -200 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
a.5 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 51,35 %16 NS 4P E+1 -650 5 22.73
17 NS 3S S = 400 7 31.82
18 NS 2C S = 110 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.4 LEBRUN Robert -ARICKX Roger : 50,97 %19 NS 3K E+1 -130 6 27.27
20 NS 4PcN-4 -1100 0 0.00
21 NS 4P E+1 -450 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
a.3 MOLS Bruno -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 49,67 %22 NS 6S N+1 1020 22 100.00
23 NS 4K N-2 -200 5 22.73
24 NS 6S E+1 -1020 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
a.2 BERGER Jean Marie -DELHEZ Jacques : 46,50 %25 NS 4P N+1 450 13.2 60.00
26 NS 2P E = -110 4.5 20.45
27 NS 6S W = -990 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 28,64 %
a11 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,20 %31 NS 4CcE-2 300 20 90.91
32 NS 1S N+1 120 2 9.09
33 NS 3S S+3 490 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
Total : 246,7 / 660 = 37,38 %
PAIRE Nr : A12 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
a12 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,73 % 1 NS 3S S = 400 4.5 20.45
2 NS 4P E = -420 8 36.36
3 NS 3S E-2 200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.5 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 51,35 % 4 NS 4P W+1 -650 8 36.36
5 NS 5P N+1 680 4 18.18
6 NS 4C E-2 200 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.9 PIETQUIN Joseph -VUYTS Michèle : 52,20 % 7 NS 3S S+1 630 18 81.82
8 NS 3P W-1 50 13 59.09
9 NS 2K E+2 -130 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
a.2 BERGER Jean Marie -DELHEZ Jacques : 46,50 %10 NS 2K W+3 -150 8 36.36
11 NS 3T E+3 -170 6 27.27
12 NS 2P N+1 140 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.6 COLLET Claudine -PAQUET Anne : 32,09 %13 NS 3S E-1 100 19 86.36
14 NS 6K E-2 100 22 100.00
15 NS 7TcW-3 500 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 89,39 %
a10 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 61,88 %16 NS 4P E+1 -650 5 22.73
17 NS 3S S = 400 7 31.82
18 NS 3C S-1 -100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 21,21 %
a.3 MOLS Bruno -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 49,67 %19 NS 2P N-2 -100 13 59.09
20 NS 3S E+3 -690 3 13.64
21 NS 5P E = -450 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.7 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 56,70 %22 NS 7C N-1 -50 0 0.00
23 NS 3CcW = -730 0 0.00
24 NS 6S W+1 -1020 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 7,58 %
a.4 LEBRUN Robert -ARICKX Roger : 50,97 %28 NS 3CcS-1 -200 19.7 89.55
29 NS 3C E = -140 6.6 30.00
30 NS 2S S-2 -100 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
a.8 LIBERT Laurent -HUBLET Carlo : 53,62 %31 NS 3S E = -400 4 18.18
32 NS 3S S+2 460 21 95.45
33 NS 5C S-1 -50 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
Total : 284,1 / 660 = 43,05 %
PAIRE Nr : A13 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie
a.9 PIETQUIN Joseph -VUYTS Michèle : 52,20 % 1 NS 3S S+2 460 20.8 94.55
2 NS 3S E = -400 12 54.55
3 NS 3S E+1 -630 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 69,39 %
a13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 50,23 % 4 NS 4P W+1 -650 8 36.36
5 NS 5P N+2 710 10 45.45
6 NS 4C E-3 300 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
a.6 COLLET Claudine -PAQUET Anne : 32,09 % 7 NS 3S S+2 660 20 90.91
8 NS 2S N+1 150 21 95.45
9 NS 5K E-1 100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 89,39 %
a10 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 61,88 %10 NS 3K W+1 -130 15 68.18
11 NS 3S E+2 -460 1 4.55
12 NS 4P N-1 -100 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
a.3 MOLS Bruno -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 49,67 %13 NS 3S E+1 -630 2 9.09
14 NS 3S W-1 50 19 86.36
15 NS 7TcW-3 500 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.7 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 56,70 %16 NS 3P E+2 -200 15 68.18
17 NS 3S S+3 490 22 100.00
18 NS 2C S = 110 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
a11 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,20 %19 NS 3P N-2 -100 13 59.09
20 NS 4C E = -620 16 72.73
21 NS 4P E+1 -450 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
a.4 LEBRUN Robert -ARICKX Roger : 50,97 %22 NS 6S S = 990 17 77.27
23 NS 3S N = 600 18 81.82
24 NS 4C W+3 -510 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 80,30 %
a.8 LIBERT Laurent -HUBLET Carlo : 53,62 %25 NS 3P N+2 200 3.4 15.45
26 NS 4P E-4 400 19.7 89.55
27 NS 6P E-1 50 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.5 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 51,35 %31 NS 3P N+1 170 17 77.27
32 NS 3S N+2 460 21 95.45
33 NS 3S S+3 490 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 80,30 %
Total : 436,1 / 660 = 66,08 %
PAIRE Nr : a.1 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier
A.1 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 51,85 % 1 EO 3S S = 400 17.5 79.55
2 EO 3S E+2 -460 21 95.45
3 EO 3K W+1 -130 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 64,39 %
A.7 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 50,58 % 4 EO 4P W+1 -650 14 63.64
5 EO 6P N+1 1460 5 22.73
6 EO 4C E = -620 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.2 ERPICUM Patrice -AUBRY Vincent : 43,48 % 7 EO 3S S-3 -300 22 100.00
8 EO 3S N-3 -150 22 100.00
9 EO 4K E = -130 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 93,94 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 60,67 %10 EO 3P S-1 -100 2 9.09
11 EO 2C N = 110 1 4.55
12 EO 4P N-1 -100 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
A.3 NUYENS Danette -GROSFILS Colette : 45,21 %13 EO 3T W+2 -150 10 45.45
14 EO 3S W+1 -430 17 77.27
15 EO 6P W-4 200 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
A.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 50,83 %16 EO 2P E+3 -200 7 31.82
17 EO 3S S+1 430 8 36.36
18 EO 2C S = 110 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
A.4 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 36,05 %19 EO 2C E+1 -140 19 86.36
20 EO 5K W+1 -620 6 27.27
21 EO 6PcE-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
A10 VAN DOOREN Michele -SALFI Huguette : 47,85 %22 EO 6C N = 980 11 50.00
23 EO 4P N-1 -100 11 50.00
24 EO 6P W+1 -1010 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
A.5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 52,09 %25 EO 3S S+2 460 0.1 0.45
26 EO 2P E-1 100 15.4 70.00
27 EO 2C E-1 50 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 36,82 %
A.6 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre : 64,56 %31 EO 3P N+1 170 5 22.73
32 EO 3S N+1 430 6 27.27
33 EO 3S N+3 490 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
Total : 313,8 / 660 = 47,55 %
PAIRE Nr : a.2 BERGER Jean Marie -DELHEZ Jacques
A.7 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 50,58 % 1 EO 3S S+1 430 8.8 40.00
2 EO 3P E-1 50 5 22.73
3 EO 3P N-2 -100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 23,94 %
A.2 ERPICUM Patrice -AUBRY Vincent : 43,48 % 4 EO 4P W+1 -650 14 63.64
5 EO 4P N+2 680 18 81.82
6 EO 5CcE-3 800 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 60,67 % 7 EO 2S S-1 -100 13 59.09
8 EO 2C N+1 140 4 18.18
9 EO 3K E = -110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
A12 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 43,05 %10 EO 2K W+3 -150 14 63.64
11 EO 3T E+3 -170 16 72.73
12 EO 2P N+1 140 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 50,83 %13 EO 3T W-1 100 3 13.64
14 EO 3S E = -400 9 40.91
15 EO 6K S = 1370 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
A.4 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 36,05 %16 EO 4P E+1 -650 17 77.27
17 EO 3S S = 400 15 68.18
18 EO 2C S = 110 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A10 VAN DOOREN Michele -SALFI Huguette : 47,85 %19 EO 2P N-1 -50 5 22.73
20 EO 3S W+1 -630 15 68.18
21 EO 4P E+2 -480 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
A.5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 52,09 %22 EO 3S S+3 490 17 77.27
23 EO 3S S-2 -200 17 77.27
24 EO 6S W-4 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
A11 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 37,38 %25 EO 4P N+1 450 8.8 40.00
26 EO 2P E = -110 17.5 79.55
27 EO 6S W = -990 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 71,36 %
A.6 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre : 64,56 %28 EO 2K E+2 -130 0.1 0.45
29 EO 3C W = -140 15.4 70.00
30 EO 1S S = 90 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
Total : 306,9 / 660 = 46,50 %
PAIRE Nr : a.3 MOLS Bruno -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 60,67 % 4 EO 3S E-1 100 2 9.09
5 EO 6S S-1 -100 22 100.00
6 EO 4CcE-2 500 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
A.3 NUYENS Danette -GROSFILS Colette : 45,21 % 7 EO 3S S-1 -100 13 59.09
8 EO 2S N+1 150 1 4.55
9 EO 4TcN-1 -100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 50,83 %10 EO 1S E+2 -150 14 63.64
11 EO 3K W+1 -130 11 50.00
12 EO 4P N-1 -100 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
A13 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie : 66,08 %13 EO 3S E+1 -630 20 90.91
14 EO 3S W-1 50 3 13.64
15 EO 7TcW-3 500 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A10 VAN DOOREN Michele -SALFI Huguette : 47,85 %16 EO 4P E+1 -650 17 77.27
17 EO 3S S = 400 15 68.18
18 EO 2C S = 110 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A12 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 43,05 %19 EO 2P N-2 -100 9 40.91
20 EO 3S E+3 -690 19 86.36
21 EO 5P E = -450 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A11 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 37,38 %22 EO 6S N+1 1020 0 0.00
23 EO 4K N-2 -200 17 77.27
24 EO 6S E+1 -1020 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
A.6 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre : 64,56 %25 EO 4P N+1 450 8.8 40.00
26 EO 2P E+1 -140 19.7 89.55
27 EO 6S W-2 100 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.1 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 51,85 %28 EO 3S W+1 -430 5.5 25.00
29 EO 4C E-1 100 3.4 15.45
30 EO 1T S-1 -50 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 33,48 %
A.7 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 50,58 %31 EO 3S E = -400 18 81.82
32 EO 3S N = 400 13 59.09
33 EO 4P N = 420 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
Total : 327,8 / 660 = 49,67 %
PAIRE Nr : a.4 LEBRUN Robert -ARICKX Roger
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 60,67 % 1 EO 3S S+1 430 8.8 40.00
2 EO 4C W-2 100 1 4.55
3 EO 5KcW = -750 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 42,12 %
A.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 50,83 % 7 EO 2S S-1 -100 13 59.09
8 EO 2S N-1 -50 15 68.18
9 EO 3K E+1 -130 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
A.4 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 36,05 %10 EO 2K W+3 -150 14 63.64
11 EO 2C N = 110 1 4.55
12 EO 4P N-2 -200 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
A10 VAN DOOREN Michele -SALFI Huguette : 47,85 %13 EO 2T W = -90 6 27.27
14 EO 3S W = -400 9 40.91
15 EO 7CcN-3 -800 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
A.5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 52,09 %16 EO 4P E+1 -650 17 77.27
17 EO 3S S+2 460 4 18.18
18 EO 2C S = 110 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
A11 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 37,38 %19 EO 3K E+1 -130 16 72.73
20 EO 4PcN-4 -1100 22 100.00
21 EO 4P E+1 -450 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
A13 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie : 66,08 %22 EO 6S S = 990 5 22.73
23 EO 3S N = 600 4 18.18
24 EO 4C W+3 -510 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 19,70 %
A.1 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 51,85 %25 EO 4P N+1 450 8.8 40.00
26 EO 3P E-2 200 9.9 45.00
27 EO 3S W+2 -460 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 54,85 %
A12 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 43,05 %28 EO 3CcS-1 -200 2.3 10.45
29 EO 3C E = -140 15.4 70.00
30 EO 2S S-2 -100 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
A.2 ERPICUM Patrice -AUBRY Vincent : 43,48 %31 EO 4P N = 620 0 0.00
32 EO 3S S+1 430 6 27.27
33 EO 6S N-1 -50 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
Total : 336,4 / 660 = 50,97 %
PAIRE Nr : a.5 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
A.3 NUYENS Danette -GROSFILS Colette : 45,21 % 1 EO 3S S = 400 17.5 79.55
2 EO 3S W = -400 10 45.45
3 EO 3S E+1 -630 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 55,30 %
A12 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 43,05 % 4 EO 4P W+1 -650 14 63.64
5 EO 5P N+1 680 18 81.82
6 EO 4C E-2 200 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A10 VAN DOOREN Michele -SALFI Huguette : 47,85 %10 EO 3K W = -110 4 18.18
11 EO 3S E+2 -460 21 95.45
12 EO 3P N = 140 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
A.5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 52,09 %13 EO 3S E = -600 16 72.73
14 EO 3S W+1 -430 17 77.27
15 EO 6S N-2 -200 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A11 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 37,38 %16 EO 4P E+1 -650 17 77.27
17 EO 3S S = 400 15 68.18
18 EO 2C S = 110 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.6 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre : 64,56 %19 EO 3T E-1 100 2 9.09
20 EO 5K W+1 -620 6 27.27
21 EO 4P E+1 -450 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
A.1 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 51,85 %22 EO 3S N+3 490 17 77.27
23 EO 5T S = 600 4 18.18
24 EO 6S E+1 -1020 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
A.7 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 50,58 %25 EO 4P N+1 450 8.8 40.00
26 EO 4P E-2 200 9.9 45.00
27 EO 6P E-1 50 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
A.2 ERPICUM Patrice -AUBRY Vincent : 43,48 %28 EO 3S W+2 -460 14.3 65.00
29 EO 3C E = -140 15.4 70.00
30 EO 1T S-1 -50 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
A13 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie : 66,08 %31 EO 3P N+1 170 5 22.73
32 EO 3S N+2 460 1 4.55
33 EO 3S S+3 490 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 19,70 %
Total : 338,9 / 660 = 51,35 %
PAIRE Nr : a.6 COLLET Claudine -PAQUET Anne
A.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 50,83 % 1 EO 3S S+1 430 8.8 40.00
2 EO 3S E-1 50 5 22.73
3 EO 2C W+1 -140 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A.4 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 36,05 % 4 EO 4P W+1 -650 14 63.64
5 EO 4P N+2 680 18 81.82
6 EO 4C E-2 200 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A13 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie : 66,08 % 7 EO 3S S+2 660 2 9.09
8 EO 2S N+1 150 1 4.55
9 EO 5K E-1 100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 10,61 %
A12 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 43,05 %13 EO 3S E-1 100 3 13.64
14 EO 6K E-2 100 0 0.00
15 EO 7TcW-3 500 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 10,61 %
A.6 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre : 64,56 %16 EO 3P E+1 -170 2 9.09
17 EO 3S S+2 460 4 18.18
18 EO 3S W-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
A.1 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 51,85 %19 EO 3T W-2 200 0 0.00
20 EO 3S E+1 -630 15 68.18
21 EO 5P E = -450 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
A.7 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 50,58 %22 EO 6S N = 990 5 22.73
23 EO 2P N+1 140 8 36.36
24 EO 6P E-1 50 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.2 ERPICUM Patrice -AUBRY Vincent : 43,48 %25 EO 5P N = 450 8.8 40.00
26 EO 4P E-3 300 4.5 20.45
27 EO 6S W-1 50 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 33,48 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 60,67 %28 EO 3S W+2 -460 14.3 65.00
29 EO 4C E-1 100 3.4 15.45
30 EO 2S S-1 -50 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 46,82 %
A.3 NUYENS Danette -GROSFILS Colette : 45,21 %31 EO 4PcN-1 -200 14 63.64
32 EO 3S S+1 430 6 27.27
33 EO 3S S+2 460 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
Total : 211,8 / 660 = 32,09 %
PAIRE Nr : a.7 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette
A.4 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 36,05 % 1 EO 3T N+1 130 21.9 99.55
2 EO 3S E = -400 10 45.45
3 EO 3S E+2 -660 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 68,03 %
A10 VAN DOOREN Michele -SALFI Huguette : 47,85 % 4 EO 4P W+1 -650 14 63.64
5 EO 6P N+1 1460 5 22.73
6 EO 6CcE-4 1100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
A.5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 52,09 % 7 EO 3S S-1 -100 13 59.09
8 EO 3K N-1 -50 15 68.18
9 EO 3T S = 110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
A11 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 37,38 %10 EO 3P N-2 -200 20 90.91
11 EO 3K W+1 -130 11 50.00
12 EO 4P N-2 -200 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A13 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie : 66,08 %16 EO 3P E+2 -200 7 31.82
17 EO 3S S+3 490 0 0.00
18 EO 2C S = 110 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
A.7 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 50,58 %19 EO 2C E = -110 13 59.09
20 EO 5K W+1 -620 6 27.27
21 EO 5P E = -450 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A12 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 43,05 %22 EO 7C N-1 -50 22 100.00
23 EO 3CcW = -730 22 100.00
24 EO 6S W+1 -1020 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 92,42 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 60,67 %25 EO 4P N+1 450 8.8 40.00
26 EO 3C N-4 -400 21.9 99.55
27 EO 6S W-2 100 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
A.3 NUYENS Danette -GROSFILS Colette : 45,21 %28 EO 3S W+2 -460 14.3 65.00
29 EO 2C E+1 -140 15.4 70.00
30 EO 2S S-2 -100 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 74,85 %
A.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 50,83 %31 EO 3C W = -140 11 50.00
32 EO 2K N+2 130 18 81.82
33 EO 3S N+1 430 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
Total : 374,2 / 660 = 56,70 %
PAIRE Nr : a.8 LIBERT Laurent -HUBLET Carlo
A10 VAN DOOREN Michele -SALFI Huguette : 47,85 % 1 EO 3S S+1 430 8.8 40.00
2 EO 3S E+1 -430 17 77.27
3 EO 6K W = -1370 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 69,39 %
A.5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 52,09 % 4 EO 4P W+1 -650 14 63.64
5 EO 6S S+1 1470 0 0.00
6 EO 3S W = -600 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
A11 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 37,38 % 7 EO 3S S-1 -100 13 59.09
8 EO 3C N-2 -100 20 90.91
9 EO 4K E = -130 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.6 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre : 64,56 %10 EO 1S W+2 -150 14 63.64
11 EO 3S E = -400 18 81.82
12 EO 4P N = 620 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
A.1 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 51,85 %13 EO 3S E = -600 16 72.73
14 EO 3S W = -400 9 40.91
15 EO 7TcW-3 500 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
A.2 ERPICUM Patrice -AUBRY Vincent : 43,48 %19 EO 3K W = -110 13 59.09
20 EO 3S W+3 -690 19 86.36
21 EO 5P E = -450 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 60,67 %22 EO 6S N = 990 5 22.73
23 EO 5T S = 600 4 18.18
24 EO 6S W+1 -1020 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
A13 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie : 66,08 %25 EO 3P N+2 200 18.6 84.55
26 EO 4P E-4 400 2.3 10.45
27 EO 6P E-1 50 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 50,83 %28 EO 3S W+2 -460 14.3 65.00
29 EO 4C E-1 100 3.4 15.45
30 EO 1T S = 70 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 38,48 %
A12 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 43,05 %31 EO 3S E = -400 18 81.82
32 EO 3S S+2 460 1 4.55
33 EO 5C S-1 -50 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
Total : 353,9 / 660 = 53,62 %
PAIRE Nr : a.9 PIETQUIN Joseph -VUYTS Michèle
A13 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie : 66,08 % 1 EO 3S S+2 460 1.2 5.45
2 EO 3S E = -400 10 45.45
3 EO 3S E+1 -630 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 30,61 %
A11 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 37,38 % 4 EO 3S E = -600 4 18.18
5 EO 6P N+1 1460 5 22.73
6 EO 4PcN-4 -800 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
A12 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 43,05 % 7 EO 3S S+1 630 4 18.18
8 EO 3P W-1 50 9 40.91
9 EO 2K E+2 -130 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
A.1 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 51,85 %10 EO 2P S = 110 0 0.00
11 EO 3K W = -110 8 36.36
12 EO 4P N-1 -100 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
A.7 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 50,58 %13 EO 3S E = -600 16 72.73
14 EO 3S E+2 -460 22 100.00
15 EO 6CcS-2 -500 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
A.2 ERPICUM Patrice -AUBRY Vincent : 43,48 %16 EO 4P E+1 -650 17 77.27
17 EO 3S S+2 460 4 18.18
18 EO 2S N = 120 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
A.3 NUYENS Danette -GROSFILS Colette : 45,21 %22 EO 3S N+3 490 17 77.27
23 EO 3C W = -140 14 63.64
24 EO 6S E+1 -1020 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 50,83 %25 EO 3P N+2 200 18.6 84.55
26 EO 2P E-2 200 9.9 45.00
27 EO 6S W-1 50 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 56,52 %
A.4 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 36,05 %28 EO 3ScW+2 -750 21.9 99.55
29 EO 3C E = -140 15.4 70.00
30 EO 1T S = 70 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A10 VAN DOOREN Michele -SALFI Huguette : 47,85 %31 EO 3CcW+2 -730 22 100.00
32 EO 3S N = 400 13 59.09
33 EO 6S N = 990 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
Total : 344,5 / 660 = 52,20 %
PAIRE Nr : a10 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane
A11 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 37,38 % 1 EO 40%40% Ajust 8.8 40.00
2 EO 3S E+2 -460 21 95.45
3 EO 3S E+3 -690 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 69,39 %
A.6 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre : 64,56 % 4 EO 6P W-2 200 0 0.00
5 EO 5P N+2 710 12 54.55
6 EO 4C E-1 100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
A.1 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 51,85 % 7 EO 3S S-2 -200 20 90.91
8 EO 2S N-1 -50 15 68.18
9 EO 4K E-1 100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A13 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie : 66,08 %10 EO 3K W+1 -130 7 31.82
11 EO 3S E+2 -460 21 95.45
12 EO 4P N-1 -100 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
A.2 ERPICUM Patrice -AUBRY Vincent : 43,48 %13 EO 3CcN-3 -800 22 100.00
14 EO 3S E+1 -430 17 77.27
15 EO 6P E-2 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 75,76 %
A12 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 43,05 %16 EO 4P E+1 -650 17 77.27
17 EO 3S S = 400 15 68.18
18 EO 3C S-1 -100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 78,79 %
A.3 NUYENS Danette -GROSFILS Colette : 45,21 %19 EO 2P N-1 -50 5 22.73
20 EO 5K W+1 -620 6 27.27
21 EO 5P E = -450 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.4 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 36,05 %25 EO 3S S-3 -150 21.9 99.55
26 EO 3P E-2 200 9.9 45.00
27 EO 3P E+2 -200 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 71,52 %
A10 VAN DOOREN Michele -SALFI Huguette : 47,85 %28 EO 3S W+2 -460 14.3 65.00
29 EO 3C E = -140 15.4 70.00
30 EO 2S S-2 -100 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 74,85 %
A.5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 52,09 %31 EO 3S S-4 -400 18 81.82
32 EO 3S S = 400 13 59.09
33 EO 3S S+3 490 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
Total : 408,4 / 660 = 61,88 %
PAIRE Nr : a11 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard
A.6 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre : 64,56 % 1 EO 3S S+2 460 1.2 5.45
2 EO 3S E+1 -430 17 77.27
3 EO 3S E+2 -660 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 47,27 %
A.1 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 51,85 % 4 EO 4P W+1 -650 14 63.64
5 EO 6P N+1 1460 5 22.73
6 EO 4C E-2 200 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
A.7 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 50,58 % 7 EO 3S S-1 -100 13 59.09
8 EO 3P W-1 50 9 40.91
9 EO 2K E+1 -110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.2 ERPICUM Patrice -AUBRY Vincent : 43,48 %10 EO 2KcW+1 -380 22 100.00
11 EO 4K W-1 50 5 22.73
12 EO 4P N-2 -200 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 60,67 %13 EO 3S E-2 200 0 0.00
14 EO 3S W-1 50 3 13.64
15 EO 6TcW-1 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 21,21 %
A.3 NUYENS Danette -GROSFILS Colette : 45,21 %16 EO 3P E+2 -200 7 31.82
17 EO 3S S-1 -50 22 100.00
18 EO 1S E-1 50 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
A13 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie : 66,08 %19 EO 3P N-2 -100 9 40.91
20 EO 4C E = -620 6 27.27
21 EO 4P E+1 -450 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
A.4 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 36,05 %22 EO 3S N+3 490 17 77.27
23 EO 3S N-3 -300 20 90.91
24 EO 6S E+1 -1020 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A.5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 52,09 %28 EO 3S W+1 -430 5.5 25.00
29 EO 3C W = -140 15.4 70.00
30 EO 2S S = 120 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 33,48 %
A11 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 37,38 %31 EO 4CcE-2 300 2 9.09
32 EO 1S N+1 120 20 90.91
33 EO 3S S+3 490 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
Total : 331,3 / 660 = 50,20 %
PAIRE Nr : a12 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques
A12 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 43,05 % 1 EO 3S S = 400 17.5 79.55
2 EO 4P E = -420 14 63.64
3 EO 3S E-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 50,83 % 4 EO 4C W+1 -650 14 63.64
5 EO 5P N+2 710 12 54.55
6 EO 4CcE-2 500 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
A.6 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre : 64,56 % 7 EO 2CcE-3 800 0 0.00
8 EO 3S N-1 -50 15 68.18
9 EO 4K E = -130 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 NUYENS Danette -GROSFILS Colette : 45,21 %10 EO 3K W+1 -130 7 31.82
11 EO 3K W+2 -150 14 63.64
12 EO 4P N-2 -200 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
A11 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 37,38 %13 EO 3T E = -110 8 36.36
14 EO 3S E = -400 9 40.91
15 EO 7KcN-1 -200 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 60,67 %16 EO 3P E+2 -200 7 31.82
17 EO 3S S = 400 15 68.18
18 EO 2C S = 110 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
A.5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 52,09 %19 EO 2C E+1 -140 19 86.36
20 EO 4C W = -620 6 27.27
21 EO 5P E-1 50 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.2 ERPICUM Patrice -AUBRY Vincent : 43,48 %22 EO 6S N = 990 5 22.73
23 EO 3S N-1 -100 11 50.00
24 EO 6P E+1 -1010 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
A.7 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 50,58 %28 EO 3S W+2 -460 14.3 65.00
29 EO 4C E-1 100 3.4 15.45
30 EO 2S S = 120 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 28,64 %
A.4 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 36,05 %31 EO 3C W = -140 11 50.00
32 EO 2K N+1 110 22 100.00
33 EO 3S S+3 490 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
Total : 308,4 / 660 = 46,73 %
PAIRE Nr : a13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
A.5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 52,09 % 1 EO 3S S+1 430 8.8 40.00
2 EO 3S E-2 100 1 4.55
3 EO 6KcW = -1540 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 48,18 %
A13 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie : 66,08 % 4 EO 4P W+1 -650 14 63.64
5 EO 5P N+2 710 12 54.55
6 EO 4C E-3 300 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
A10 VAN DOOREN Michele -SALFI Huguette : 47,85 % 7 EO 2S S = 120 6 27.27
8 EO 2S N = 120 6 27.27
9 EO 5K E-1 100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 24,24 %
A.7 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 50,58 %10 EO 4K W+1 -150 14 63.64
11 EO 4K W-1 50 5 22.73
12 EO 4PcN-2 -500 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
A.4 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 36,05 %13 EO 2CcN-2 -500 12 54.55
14 EO 3S W+1 -430 17 77.27
15 EO 6CcS-2 -500 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.1 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 51,85 %16 EO 2C N+1 140 0 0.00
17 EO 3S S = 400 15 68.18
18 EO 3P E+2 -200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
A.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 50,83 %19 EO 3S W = -600 22 100.00
20 EO 5K W+1 -620 6 27.27
21 EO 4P E+2 -480 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
A.6 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre : 64,56 %22 EO 6C N = 980 11 50.00
23 EO 3S N+2 660 0 0.00
24 EO 6T W = -920 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
A.3 NUYENS Danette -GROSFILS Colette : 45,21 %25 EO 4P S+1 450 8.8 40.00
26 EO 3S W-6 600 0.1 0.45
27 EO 6S W = -990 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 60,67 %31 EO 4C W-2 100 8 36.36
32 EO 3S S = 400 13 59.09
33 EO 3S S+3 490 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
Total : 331,5 / 660 = 50,23 %
|
|