|
Tournoi du 03-10-16
Lundi
1 63,36 5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
2 59,79 8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie
3 59,28 11 VUYTS Michèle -NELIS Claude
4 56,76 2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
5 56,10 12 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele
6 54,00 3 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier
7 50,32 10 COLLIGNON Francis -COLLIGNON Véro
8 47,65 7 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
9 47,60 1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
10 46,72 14 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
11 44,13 15 COURTOIS Patrick -DELHEZ Jacques
12 43,00 9 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard
13 41,72 13 ERPICUM Patrice -AUBRY Jean
14 40,88 6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
15 38,83 4 GROSFILS Colette -TULKENS
16 0,00 16 -
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 65,51 24 MEYER Jean -LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre
2 64,06 31 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
3 58,54 30 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin
4 55,83 21 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger
5 55,75 27 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René
6 53,40 17 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand
7 53,28 18 NIGOT Pierre -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
8 51,18 19 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel
9 47,25 26 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
10 45,99 29 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
11 45,57 25 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert
12 45,23 20 BERGER Jean Marie -COLLIN Jean-Marie
13 42,88 28 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette
14 42,32 32 LIBERT Laurent -de KERCHOVE Pauline
15 37,49 23 VANKERKOVE -VINCKE
16 34,13 22 DECONINCK -DECRAENE
PAIRE Nr : 1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
17 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 53,40 % 1 NS 3S S = 400 19.5 75.00
2 NS 5KcE-5 1100 25.9 99.62
3 NS 4P N = 420 14.1 54.23 µ Tbl = 76,28 %
27 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 55,75 % 4 NS 3S W+1 -630 11 42.31
5 NS 2P S-2 -200 1 3.85
6 NS 3S S-2 -100 4 15.38 µ Tbl = 20,51 %
26 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 47,25 % 7 NS 2P S = 110 18 69.23
8 NS 1S W-1 50 4 15.38
9 NS 3S S = 400 25 96.15 µ Tbl = 60,26 %
25 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,57 %10 NS 3S N+1 630 18 69.23
11 NS 6S E = -990 1 3.85
12 NS 2C W-1 50 15 57.69 µ Tbl = 43,59 %
31 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 64,06 %13 NS 4C W = -620 3 11.54
14 NS 2P N+1 140 13 50.00
15 NS 3S N-3 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,51 %
29 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 45,99 %16 NS 5P N = 450 5 19.23
17 NS 6P W = -980 0 0.00
18 NS 4P E = -420 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 21,79 %
22 DECONINCK -DECRAENE : 34,13 %19 NS 4C W-1 100 25 96.15
20 NS 3S W+2 -660 14 53.85
21 NS 6T N = 1370 20 76.92 µ Tbl = 75,64 %
21 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger : 55,83 %22 NS 6TcN-2 -300 2 7.69
23 NS 1S E = -90 16 61.54
24 NS 5PcS-4 -800 2 7.69 µ Tbl = 25,64 %
20 BERGER Jean Marie -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 45,23 %25 NS 3K S = 110 5.5 21.15
26 NS 2C S = 110 21.6 83.08
27 NS 4C S+1 450 22.7 87.31 µ Tbl = 63,85 %
32 LIBERT Laurent -de KERCHOVE Pauline : 42,32 %28 NS 620 22.7 87.31
29 NS 5K S+1 620 20.5 78.85
30 NS 5C N-1 -50 9.8 37.69 µ Tbl = 67,95 %
Total : 371,3 / 780 = 47,60 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
18 NIGOT Pierre -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 53,28 % 4 NS 3S W+1 -630 11 42.31
5 NS 2C S+2 170 23 88.46
6 NS 3K S+1 130 17 65.38 µ Tbl = 65,38 %
17 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 53,40 % 7 NS 2C W+2 -170 4 15.38
8 NS 2S W-1 50 4 15.38
9 NS 3T S+1 130 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 28,21 %
27 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 55,75 %10 NS 3S N+1 630 18 69.23
11 NS 6S E-2 100 23 88.46
12 NS 2C W = -110 7 26.92 µ Tbl = 61,54 %
26 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 47,25 %13 NS 4C E = -620 3 11.54
14 NS 2P N+2 170 21 80.77
15 NS 3S N = 600 25 96.15 µ Tbl = 62,82 %
32 LIBERT Laurent -de KERCHOVE Pauline : 42,32 %16 NS 4P N+3 510 19 73.08
17 NS 5P E-1 50 25 96.15
18 NS 2C E+4 -230 16 61.54 µ Tbl = 76,92 %
30 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 58,54 %19 NS 4C E = -620 14 53.85
20 NS 3S W+3 -690 6 23.08
21 NS 3S N+3 690 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 43,59 %
28 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 42,88 %22 NS 4KcE-1 200 16 61.54
23 NS 1S E = -90 16 61.54
24 NS 4C E = -420 6 23.08 µ Tbl = 48,72 %
22 DECONINCK -DECRAENE : 34,13 %25 NS 4P N = 420 25.9 99.62
26 NS 4C N-1 -100 17.3 66.54
27 NS 4C S+1 450 22.7 87.31 µ Tbl = 84,49 %
21 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger : 55,83 %28 NS 4C N-1 -100 3.3 12.69
29 NS 3S N-1 -100 9.8 37.69
30 NS 5T N+1 420 25.9 99.62 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
20 BERGER Jean Marie -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 45,23 %31 NS 4C S+1 650 21.6 83.08
32 NS 4P E+2 -680 8.7 33.46
33 NS 3S E+1 -430 5.5 21.15 µ Tbl = 45,90 %
Total : 442,7 / 780 = 56,76 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier
21 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger : 55,83 % 1 NS 3S S = 400 19.5 75.00
2 NS 5P S = 650 11.9 45.77
3 NS 4P N = 420 14.1 54.23 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
19 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 51,18 % 7 NS 1S E-2 200 26 100.00
8 NS 1S W-2 100 12 46.15
9 NS 2T S+2 130 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
28 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 42,88 %10 NS 3S N+1 630 18 69.23
11 NS 6S E = -990 1 3.85
12 NS 3C W-2 100 22 84.62 µ Tbl = 52,56 %
17 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 53,40 %13 NS 3C W+1 -170 14 53.85
14 NS 2K E-1 50 3 11.54
15 NS 2C N = 110 18 69.23 µ Tbl = 44,87 %
27 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 55,75 %16 NS 4P N+1 450 5 19.23
17 NS 4P E = -420 13 50.00
18 NS 3S W+2 -460 6 23.08 µ Tbl = 30,77 %
26 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 47,25 %19 NS 4C W = -620 14 53.85
20 NS 3S W+3 -690 6 23.08
21 NS 3S N+3 690 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 43,59 %
31 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 64,06 %22 NS 5TcN = 550 26 100.00
23 NS 1S E = -90 16 61.54
24 NS 4C E = -420 6 23.08 µ Tbl = 61,54 %
29 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 45,99 %25 NS 4K N-1 -50 0.1 0.38
26 NS 3C S+1 170 25.9 99.62
27 NS 3C S+1 170 16.2 62.31 µ Tbl = 54,10 %
23 VANKERKOVE -VINCKE : 37,49 %28 NS 2C N+1 140 11.9 45.77
29 NS 3S N-1 -100 9.8 37.69
30 NS 4P W-1 50 17.3 66.54 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
22 DECONINCK -DECRAENE : 34,13 %31 NS 4C S+1 650 21.6 83.08
32 NS 2P E+3 -200 21.6 83.08
33 NS 3S E = -400 17.3 66.54 µ Tbl = 77,56 %
Total : 421,2 / 780 = 54,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 GROSFILS Colette -TULKENS
23 VANKERKOVE -VINCKE : 37,49 % 1 NS 2T S+1 110 5.5 21.15
2 NS 4C S-2 -200 1.2 4.62
3 NS 4P N = 420 14.1 54.23 µ Tbl = 26,67 %
22 DECONINCK -DECRAENE : 34,13 % 4 NS 3S W+1 -630 11 42.31
5 NS 2P S = 110 15 57.69
6 NS 2K N+3 150 26 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
20 BERGER Jean Marie -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 45,23 %10 NS 5K S-3 -300 0 0.00
11 NS 6S W-2 100 23 88.46
12 NS 3C W-1 50 15 57.69 µ Tbl = 48,72 %
29 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 45,99 %13 NS 3P N-1 -100 20 76.92
14 NS 2K E-1 50 3 11.54
15 NS 1S N-1 -100 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 44,87 %
18 NIGOT Pierre -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 53,28 %16 NS 4P N+1 450 5 19.23
17 NS 4P E = -420 13 50.00
18 NS 4C S+2 680 24 92.31 µ Tbl = 53,85 %
17 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 53,40 %19 NS 4C W = -620 14 53.85
20 NS 3S W+4 -720 0 0.00
21 NS 3S N+1 630 1 3.85 µ Tbl = 19,23 %
27 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 55,75 %22 NS 2S W-2 200 16 61.54
23 NS 2C N-1 -100 3 11.54
24 NS 4C E = -420 6 23.08 µ Tbl = 32,05 %
32 LIBERT Laurent -de KERCHOVE Pauline : 42,32 %25 NS 2P N = 110 5.5 21.15
26 NS 2P E+2 -170 7.6 29.23
27 NS 3P W-3 150 10.8 41.54 µ Tbl = 30,64 %
30 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 58,54 %28 NS 4C N = 620 22.7 87.31
29 NS 4P S-2 -200 0.1 0.38
30 NS 3P E+2 -200 4.4 16.92 µ Tbl = 34,87 %
28 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 42,88 %31 NS 4C S = 620 9.8 37.69
32 NS 4P E+2 -680 8.7 33.46
33 NS 3S E+1 -430 5.5 21.15 µ Tbl = 30,77 %
Total : 302,9 / 780 = 38,83 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
29 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 45,99 % 1 NS 3T S = 110 5.5 21.15
2 NS 4P N+2 680 19.5 75.00
3 NS 4P N = 420 14.1 54.23 µ Tbl = 50,13 %
24 MEYER Jean -LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre : 65,51 % 4 NS 3S E+3 -690 3 11.54
5 NS 2C S = 110 15 57.69
6 NS 3P S = 140 23 88.46 µ Tbl = 52,56 %
23 VANKERKOVE -VINCKE : 37,49 % 7 NS 2P S+2 170 23 88.46
8 NS 2P N = 110 20 76.92
9 NS 4K W-2 200 22 84.62 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
21 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger : 55,83 %13 NS 4C W = -620 3 11.54
14 NS 3P N+1 170 21 80.77
15 NS 3S N-1 -100 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 46,15 %
30 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 58,54 %16 NS 4P N+1 450 5 19.23
17 NS 4P E = -420 13 50.00
18 NS 4C S+2 680 24 92.31 µ Tbl = 53,85 %
28 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 42,88 %19 NS 3C W+1 -170 20 76.92
20 NS 3S W+1 -630 19 73.08
21 NS 6S N = 1440 24 92.31 µ Tbl = 80,77 %
18 NIGOT Pierre -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 53,28 %22 NS 2K E+1 -110 9 34.62
23 NS 1S E = -90 16 61.54
24 NS 4C E-2 100 23 88.46 µ Tbl = 61,54 %
17 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 53,40 %25 NS 4CcE-1 200 21.6 83.08
26 NS 3P E-1 100 19.5 75.00
27 NS 4C S+1 450 22.7 87.31 µ Tbl = 81,79 %
27 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 55,75 %28 NS 4C N = 620 22.7 87.31
29 NS 4C N = 620 20.5 78.85
30 NS 4P W-1 50 17.3 66.54 µ Tbl = 77,56 %
31 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 64,06 %31 NS 4C N = 620 9.8 37.69
32 NS 4P E+2 -680 8.7 33.46
33 NS 3S E = -400 17.3 66.54 µ Tbl = 45,90 %
Total : 494,2 / 780 = 63,36 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
32 LIBERT Laurent -de KERCHOVE Pauline : 42,32 % 1 NS 1S S+2 150 8.7 33.46
2 NS 4P N+1 650 11.9 45.77
3 NS 4P N = 420 14.1 54.23 µ Tbl = 44,49 %
30 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 58,54 % 4 NS 3S W+4 -720 0 0.00
5 NS 2P W-1 50 5 19.23
6 NS 4P N-5 -250 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 6,41 %
28 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 42,88 % 7 NS 1P S+3 170 23 88.46
8 NS 1S W-2 100 12 46.15
9 NS 3T S = 110 4 15.38 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
24 MEYER Jean -LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre : 65,51 %10 NS 3K S+2 150 10 38.46
11 NS 3S W+1 -430 8 30.77
12 NS 2P S-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 23,08 %
22 DECONINCK -DECRAENE : 34,13 %16 NS 4P N+1 450 5 19.23
17 NS 4P E = -420 13 50.00
18 NS 3S N+1 630 20 76.92 µ Tbl = 48,72 %
31 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 64,06 %19 NS 4C E = -620 14 53.85
20 NS 3S E+3 -690 6 23.08
21 NS 4P S+2 680 7 26.92 µ Tbl = 34,62 %
29 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 45,99 %22 NS 4TcN = 510 24 92.31
23 NS 1S E = -90 16 61.54
24 NS 4CcE-2 300 26 100.00 µ Tbl = 84,62 %
19 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 51,18 %25 NS 4K S = 130 13 50.00
26 NS 3T S-2 -200 3.3 12.69
27 NS 3K N+2 150 10.8 41.54 µ Tbl = 34,74 %
18 NIGOT Pierre -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 53,28 %28 NS 4C N-1 -100 3.3 12.69
29 NS 3S N+1 630 23.8 91.54
30 NS 4P W = -420 1.2 4.62 µ Tbl = 36,28 %
17 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 53,40 %31 NS 4C N = 620 9.8 37.69
32 NS 4P E+2 -680 8.7 33.46
33 NS 3S E = -400 17.3 66.54 µ Tbl = 45,90 %
Total : 318,9 / 780 = 40,88 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
18 NIGOT Pierre -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 53,28 % 1 NS 2S N+2 180 10.8 41.54
2 NS 4P N+2 680 19.5 75.00
3 NS 4P S = 420 14.1 54.23 µ Tbl = 56,92 %
17 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 53,40 % 4 NS 3S E+3 -690 3 11.54
5 NS 2P W-2 100 10 38.46
6 NS 4K S = 130 17 65.38 µ Tbl = 38,46 %
31 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 64,06 % 7 NS 3K N-2 -200 1 3.85
8 NS 2C E+1 -140 0 0.00
9 NS 3T S = 110 4 15.38 µ Tbl = 6,41 %
29 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 45,99 %10 NS 4P N-1 -100 4 15.38
11 NS 4P E = -420 11 42.31
12 NS 1S W+1 -120 4 15.38 µ Tbl = 24,36 %
25 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,57 %13 NS 2P N = 110 22 84.62
14 NS 2P N+2 170 21 80.77
15 NS 2P N+1 140 20 76.92 µ Tbl = 80,77 %
23 VANKERKOVE -VINCKE : 37,49 %19 NS 2K E+2 -130 22 84.62
20 NS 3S W+2 -660 14 53.85
21 NS 6S N = 1440 24 92.31 µ Tbl = 76,92 %
32 LIBERT Laurent -de KERCHOVE Pauline : 42,32 %22 NS 2K W+1 -110 9 34.62
23 NS 1S E = -90 16 61.54
24 NS 4C E-1 50 19 73.08 µ Tbl = 56,41 %
30 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 58,54 %25 NS 5K N = 400 23.8 91.54
26 NS 2P W+3 -200 3.3 12.69
27 NS 2P W-2 100 2.2 8.46 µ Tbl = 37,56 %
28 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 42,88 %28 NS 4C N-1 -100 3.3 12.69
29 NS 3S N-1 -100 9.8 37.69
30 NS 4P W-1 50 17.3 66.54 µ Tbl = 38,97 %
19 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 51,18 %31 NS 4C S = 620 9.8 37.69
32 NS 3P W+3 -230 19.5 75.00
33 NS 3S E = -400 17.3 66.54 µ Tbl = 59,74 %
Total : 371,7 / 780 = 47,65 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie
20 BERGER Jean Marie -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 45,23 % 1 NS 3S S = 400 19.5 75.00
2 NS 4P N+2 680 19.5 75.00
3 NS 4P N = 420 14.1 54.23 µ Tbl = 68,08 %
19 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 51,18 % 4 NS 2T E = -90 22 84.62
5 NS 2C S+1 140 19 73.08
6 NS 3S N-2 -100 4 15.38 µ Tbl = 57,69 %
18 NIGOT Pierre -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 53,28 % 7 NS 1S N = 90 12 46.15
8 NS 2P N = 110 20 76.92
9 NS 3K W+1 -130 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 41,03 %
32 LIBERT Laurent -de KERCHOVE Pauline : 42,32 %10 NS 3S N+2 660 24 92.31
11 NS 6S W-2 100 23 88.46
12 NS 3C W-3 150 26 100.00 µ Tbl = 93,59 %
30 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 58,54 %13 NS 3PcN+1 930 26 100.00
14 NS 4P S-1 -50 0 0.00
15 NS 3S N-2 -200 4 15.38 µ Tbl = 38,46 %
28 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 42,88 %16 NS 6P N+1 1010 25 96.15
17 NS 5P E-1 50 25 96.15
18 NS 4C E+1 -450 9 34.62 µ Tbl = 75,64 %
24 MEYER Jean -LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre : 65,51 %22 NS 4KcE = -710 0 0.00
23 NS 3T E = -110 0 0.00
24 NS 3C E+1 -170 13 50.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
23 VANKERKOVE -VINCKE : 37,49 %25 NS 2S N+1 150 19.5 75.00
26 NS 2C N+1 140 23.8 91.54
27 NS 4C S+1 450 22.7 87.31 µ Tbl = 84,62 %
31 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 64,06 %28 NS 4C N = 620 22.7 87.31
29 NS 4C N-1 -100 9.8 37.69
30 NS 5C S-1 -50 9.8 37.69 µ Tbl = 54,23 %
29 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 45,99 %31 NS 4C N+1 650 21.6 83.08
32 NS 2T W+3 -150 25.9 99.62
33 NS 3S E+1 -430 5.5 21.15 µ Tbl = 67,95 %
Total : 466,4 / 780 = 59,79 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard
30 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 58,54 % 1 NS 4PcN-2 -300 0.1 0.38
2 NS 4P N = 620 8.7 33.46
3 NS 4P N = 420 14.1 54.23 µ Tbl = 29,36 %
28 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 42,88 % 4 NS 3S W-1 100 25 96.15
5 NS 2C S-2 -200 1 3.85
6 NS 3C W-1 100 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 48,72 %
20 BERGER Jean Marie -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 45,23 % 7 NS 3T W = -110 6 23.08
8 NS 1S W-2 100 12 46.15
9 NS 3S S = 400 25 96.15 µ Tbl = 55,13 %
19 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 51,18 %10 NS 3S S = 600 13 50.00
11 NS 6P E-1 50 16 61.54
12 NS 2C W = -110 7 26.92 µ Tbl = 46,15 %
18 NIGOT Pierre -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 53,28 %13 NS 3C W+1 -170 14 53.85
14 NS 2P N+2 170 21 80.77
15 NS 2S N-2 -200 4 15.38 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
31 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 64,06 %16 NS 4P N+1 450 5 19.23
17 NS 4P E = -420 13 50.00
18 NS 4C E+2 -480 4 15.38 µ Tbl = 28,21 %
29 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 45,99 %19 NS 4C E+1 -650 3 11.54
20 NS 6S E-2 200 26 100.00
21 NS 6S S = 1440 24 92.31 µ Tbl = 67,95 %
25 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,57 %25 NS 3K S+1 130 13 50.00
26 NS 3P E = -140 13 50.00
27 NS 3K N+2 150 10.8 41.54 µ Tbl = 47,18 %
24 MEYER Jean -LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre : 65,51 %28 NS 3C N-1 -100 3.3 12.69
29 NS 3S N-1 -100 9.8 37.69
30 NS 4P W-1 50 17.3 66.54 µ Tbl = 38,97 %
32 LIBERT Laurent -de KERCHOVE Pauline : 42,32 %31 NS 6C S-1 -100 0.1 0.38
32 NS 4P E+2 -680 8.7 33.46
33 NS 3S E+1 -430 5.5 21.15 µ Tbl = 18,33 %
Total : 335,4 / 780 = 43,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 COLLIGNON Francis -COLLIGNON Véro
24 MEYER Jean -LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre : 65,51 % 1 NS 3S S = 400 19.5 75.00
2 NS 3P N = 140 4.4 16.92
3 NS 4P N = 420 14.1 54.23 µ Tbl = 48,72 %
31 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 64,06 % 4 NS 3S E+2 -660 6 23.08
5 NS 1S E-2 100 10 38.46
6 NS 4P N-1 -50 9 34.62 µ Tbl = 32,05 %
29 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 45,99 % 7 NS 3P S-2 -200 1 3.85
8 NS 1S W-3 150 26 100.00
9 NS 2T S+2 130 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 52,56 %
21 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger : 55,83 %10 NS 2K S = 90 6 23.08
11 NS 4P E+2 -480 5 19.23
12 NS 1S W = -90 10 38.46 µ Tbl = 26,92 %
20 BERGER Jean Marie -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 45,23 %13 NS 2C W+2 -170 14 53.85
14 NS 2P N = 110 8 30.77
15 NS 2S S+1 150 22 84.62 µ Tbl = 56,41 %
19 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 51,18 %16 NS 4P N+2 480 14 53.85
17 NS 4P E = -420 13 50.00
18 NS 6C E = -980 1 3.85 µ Tbl = 35,90 %
32 LIBERT Laurent -de KERCHOVE Pauline : 42,32 %19 NS 3S W-1 100 25 96.15
20 NS 3S W+1 -630 19 73.08
21 NS 3S N+3 690 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 74,36 %
30 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 58,54 %22 NS 2P E+1 -140 4 15.38
23 NS 1S E = -90 16 61.54
24 NS 4C E-1 50 19 73.08 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
26 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 47,25 %28 NS 2C N+2 170 16.2 62.31
29 NS 3S N-1 -100 9.8 37.69
30 NS 4P W = -420 1.2 4.62 µ Tbl = 34,87 %
25 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,57 %31 NS 4C S+1 650 21.6 83.08
32 NS 2P E+2 -170 23.8 91.54
33 NS 3S E-1 50 25.9 99.62 µ Tbl = 91,41 %
Total : 392,5 / 780 = 50,32 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 VUYTS Michèle -NELIS Claude
26 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 47,25 % 1 NS 3S S = 400 19.5 75.00
2 NS 4P N+2 680 19.5 75.00
3 NS 4P S = 420 14.1 54.23 µ Tbl = 68,08 %
25 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,57 % 4 NS 3S W+1 -630 11 42.31
5 NS 2C S+2 170 23 88.46
6 NS 4P S-2 -100 4 15.38 µ Tbl = 48,72 %
32 LIBERT Laurent -de KERCHOVE Pauline : 42,32 % 7 NS 2P S = 110 18 69.23
8 NS 1S W-2 100 12 46.15
9 NS 3T S+1 130 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 56,41 %
30 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 58,54 %10 NS 3S N+2 660 24 92.31
11 NS 7C E-2 100 23 88.46
12 NS 2S W-2 100 22 84.62 µ Tbl = 88,46 %
28 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 42,88 %13 NS 3C W+1 -170 14 53.85
14 NS 2P N+2 170 21 80.77
15 NS 3S S = 600 25 96.15 µ Tbl = 76,92 %
21 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger : 55,83 %16 NS 4P N+3 510 19 73.08
17 NS 4P E = -420 13 50.00
18 NS 6P E-1 50 18 69.23 µ Tbl = 64,10 %
20 BERGER Jean Marie -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 45,23 %19 NS 4C E+1 -650 3 11.54
20 NS 5T W-1 100 24 92.31
21 NS 3S S+1 630 1 3.85 µ Tbl = 35,90 %
19 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 51,18 %22 NS 3K W = -110 9 34.62
23 NS 1S W = -90 16 61.54
24 NS 2C E+2 -170 13 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,72 %
31 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 64,06 %25 NS 3K S+1 130 13 50.00
26 NS 2P W+1 -140 13 50.00
27 NS 3P E-2 100 2.2 8.46 µ Tbl = 36,15 %
27 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 55,75 %31 NS 4C S+1 650 21.6 83.08
32 NS 4P E+2 -680 8.7 33.46
33 NS 2S E+1 -150 23.8 91.54 µ Tbl = 69,36 %
Total : 462,4 / 780 = 59,28 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele
28 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 42,88 % 1 NS 3S S = 400 19.5 75.00
2 NS 5P N+1 680 19.5 75.00
3 NS 4P N = 420 14.1 54.23 µ Tbl = 68,08 %
21 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger : 55,83 % 4 NS 5K W = -600 17 65.38
5 NS 1S E-2 100 10 38.46
6 NS 3K S+1 130 17 65.38 µ Tbl = 56,41 %
25 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,57 % 7 NS 3P S-1 -100 9 34.62
8 NS 2P N = 110 20 76.92
9 NS 2K S+2 130 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 55,13 %
18 NIGOT Pierre -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 53,28 %10 NS 3S S-2 -200 2 7.69
11 NS 4P W = -420 11 42.31
12 NS 3C W-1 50 15 57.69 µ Tbl = 35,90 %
22 DECONINCK -DECRAENE : 34,13 %13 NS 3P N = 140 24 92.31
14 NS 2P N+2 170 21 80.77
15 NS 4P S-1 -100 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 73,08 %
26 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 47,25 %16 NS 6P N+1 1010 25 96.15
17 NS 4P E = -420 13 50.00
18 NS 3S W = -400 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
19 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 51,18 %19 NS 4C E = -620 14 53.85
20 NS 3T W+2 -150 22 84.62
21 NS 3S N+3 690 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 64,10 %
23 VANKERKOVE -VINCKE : 37,49 %22 NS 3K E = -110 9 34.62
23 NS 1S E = -90 16 61.54
24 NS 3C E = -140 16 61.54 µ Tbl = 52,56 %
20 BERGER Jean Marie -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 45,23 %28 NS 3C N = 140 11.9 45.77
29 NS 3S N-1 -100 9.8 37.69
30 NS 5P E-2 100 23.8 91.54 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
24 MEYER Jean -LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre : 65,51 %31 NS 4C S = 620 9.8 37.69
32 NS 4P E+2 -680 8.7 33.46
33 NS 3S E+1 -430 5.5 21.15 µ Tbl = 30,77 %
Total : 437,6 / 780 = 56,10 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 ERPICUM Patrice -AUBRY Jean
25 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,57 % 1 NS 2C E-2 100 2.2 8.46
2 NS 4P N-2 -200 1.2 4.62
3 NS 4P N = 420 14.1 54.23 µ Tbl = 22,44 %
29 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 45,99 % 4 NS 2T E+2 -130 20 76.92
5 NS 2C S+1 140 19 73.08
6 NS 3K S+1 130 17 65.38 µ Tbl = 71,79 %
22 DECONINCK -DECRAENE : 34,13 % 7 NS 1S E-1 100 14 53.85
8 NS 2P N+1 140 24 92.31
9 NS 3T S+1 130 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
26 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 47,25 %10 NS 3K S = 110 8 30.77
11 NS 6S W-1 50 16 61.54
12 NS 3C W-1 50 15 57.69 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
19 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 51,18 %13 NS 2C W+3 -200 8 30.77
14 NS 2P N = 110 8 30.77
15 NS 3S N-2 -200 4 15.38 µ Tbl = 25,64 %
23 VANKERKOVE -VINCKE : 37,49 %16 NS 4P N+2 480 14 53.85
17 NS 4P E = -420 13 50.00
18 NS 4C E+1 -450 9 34.62 µ Tbl = 46,15 %
27 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 55,75 %19 NS 4C W+1 -650 3 11.54
20 NS 3S W+3 -690 6 23.08
21 NS 3S N+2 660 4 15.38 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
20 BERGER Jean Marie -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 45,23 %22 NS 3S E-2 200 16 61.54
23 NS 1S E = -90 16 61.54
24 NS 3S E = -400 10 38.46 µ Tbl = 53,85 %
24 MEYER Jean -LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre : 65,51 %25 NS 3C E-1 100 2.2 8.46
26 NS 3P E = -140 13 50.00
27 NS 3C S = 140 6.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 27,82 %
21 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger : 55,83 %31 NS 2T N+2 130 2.2 8.46
32 NS 4P E+2 -680 8.7 33.46
33 NS 3S E = -400 17.3 66.54 µ Tbl = 36,15 %
Total : 325,4 / 780 = 41,72 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
22 DECONINCK -DECRAENE : 34,13 % 1 NS 3S S = 400 19.5 75.00
2 NS 3C S+1 170 6.5 25.00
3 NS 3P N+1 170 0.1 0.38 µ Tbl = 33,46 %
26 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 47,25 % 4 NS 3S W = -600 17 65.38
5 NS 1S E-1 50 5 19.23
6 NS 2P N+1 140 23 88.46 µ Tbl = 57,69 %
30 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 58,54 % 7 NS 2P S-1 -100 9 34.62
8 NS 1S W-2 100 12 46.15
9 NS 3T N = 110 4 15.38 µ Tbl = 32,05 %
23 VANKERKOVE -VINCKE : 37,49 %10 NS 3S N+2 660 24 92.31
11 NS 4P E+2 -480 5 19.23
12 NS 4C W-2 100 22 84.62 µ Tbl = 65,38 %
27 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 55,75 %13 NS 3C W+1 -170 14 53.85
14 NS 2P S = 110 8 30.77
15 NS 1S S-1 -100 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 43,59 %
20 BERGER Jean Marie -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 45,23 %16 NS 6P N = 980 22 84.62
17 NS 4P E+1 -450 2 7.69
18 NS 4C S+2 680 24 92.31 µ Tbl = 61,54 %
24 MEYER Jean -LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre : 65,51 %19 NS 3S W+1 -630 8 30.77
20 NS 3S E+3 -690 6 23.08
21 NS 3S N+3 690 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 35,90 %
17 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 53,40 %22 NS 5KcE-2 500 22 84.62
23 NS 1S E = -90 16 61.54
24 NS 5KcN-5 -1100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 48,72 %
21 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger : 55,83 %25 NS 4K N = 130 13 50.00
26 NS 3P E+1 -170 7.6 29.23
27 NS 3C S+1 170 16.2 62.31 µ Tbl = 47,18 %
25 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,57 %28 NS 2C N+2 170 16.2 62.31
29 NS 3S S-1 -100 9.8 37.69
30 NS 3P W = -140 6.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
Total : 364,4 / 780 = 46,72 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 COURTOIS Patrick -DELHEZ Jacques
23 VANKERKOVE -VINCKE : 37,49 % 4 NS 3S E-1 100 25 96.15
5 NS 3S S = 600 26 100.00
6 NS 5K S-1 -50 9 34.62 µ Tbl = 76,92 %
27 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 55,75 % 7 NS 2P S = 110 18 69.23
8 NS 1S W-1 50 4 15.38
9 NS 4T S = 130 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 46,15 %
31 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 64,06 %10 NS 3S N = 600 13 50.00
11 NS 7P E-1 50 16 61.54
12 NS 1S W+2 -150 2 7.69 µ Tbl = 39,74 %
24 MEYER Jean -LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre : 65,51 %13 NS 4C W = -620 3 11.54
14 NS 2P S+1 140 13 50.00
15 NS 3S S-1 -100 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 35,90 %
17 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 53,40 %16 NS 4P N+2 480 14 53.85
17 NS 4P E = -420 13 50.00
18 NS 6C E = -980 1 3.85 µ Tbl = 35,90 %
21 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger : 55,83 %19 NS 4C E+1 -650 3 11.54
20 NS 3S W+2 -660 14 53.85
21 NS 4P S+2 680 7 26.92 µ Tbl = 30,77 %
25 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,57 %22 NS 3S E-3 300 20 76.92
23 NS 2K S-1 -100 3 11.54
24 NS 4CcE-1 100 23 88.46 µ Tbl = 58,97 %
18 NIGOT Pierre -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 53,28 %25 NS 3K S+1 130 13 50.00
26 NS 4C N-3 -300 0.1 0.38
27 NS 3P W-2 100 2.2 8.46 µ Tbl = 19,62 %
22 DECONINCK -DECRAENE : 34,13 %28 NS 2C N = 110 8.7 33.46
29 NS 4C N+1 650 25.9 99.62
30 NS 4P W-1 50 17.3 66.54 µ Tbl = 66,54 %
26 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 47,25 %31 NS 4C S = 620 9.8 37.69
32 NS 4P E+2 -680 8.7 33.46
33 NS 3S E+1 -430 5.5 21.15 µ Tbl = 30,77 %
Total : 344,2 / 780 = 44,13 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 -
27 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 55,75 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
24 MEYER Jean -LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre : 65,51 % 7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
17 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 53,40 %10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
32 LIBERT Laurent -de KERCHOVE Pauline : 42,32 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
25 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,57 %16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
18 NIGOT Pierre -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 53,28 %19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
22 DECONINCK -DECRAENE : 34,13 %22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
26 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 47,25 %25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00
27 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
19 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 51,18 %28 NS BYE 0 0.00
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
23 VANKERKOVE -VINCKE : 37,49 %31 NS BYE 0 0.00
32 NS BYE 0 0.00
33 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 858 = 0,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand
1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 47,60 % 1 EO 3S S = 400 6.5 25.00
2 EO 5KcE-5 1100 0.1 0.38
3 EO 4P N = 420 11.9 45.77 µ Tbl = 23,72 %
7 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,65 % 4 EO 3S E+3 -690 23 88.46
5 EO 2P W-2 100 16 61.54
6 EO 4K S = 130 9 34.62 µ Tbl = 61,54 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 56,76 % 7 EO 2C W+2 -170 22 84.62
8 EO 2S W-1 50 22 84.62
9 EO 3T S+1 130 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 71,79 %
16 - : 0,00 %10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
3 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 54,00 %13 EO 3C W+1 -170 12 46.15
14 EO 2K E-1 50 23 88.46
15 EO 2C N = 110 8 30.77 µ Tbl = 55,13 %
15 COURTOIS Patrick -DELHEZ Jacques : 44,13 %16 EO 4P N+2 480 12 46.15
17 EO 4P E = -420 13 50.00
18 EO 6C E = -980 25 96.15 µ Tbl = 64,10 %
4 GROSFILS Colette -TULKENS : 38,83 %19 EO 4C W = -620 12 46.15
20 EO 3S W+4 -720 26 100.00
21 EO 3S N+1 630 25 96.15 µ Tbl = 80,77 %
14 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 46,72 %22 EO 5KcE-2 500 4 15.38
23 EO 1S E = -90 10 38.46
24 EO 5KcN-5 -1100 26 100.00 µ Tbl = 51,28 %
5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 63,36 %25 EO 4CcE-1 200 4.4 16.92
26 EO 3P E-1 100 6.5 25.00
27 EO 4C S+1 450 3.3 12.69 µ Tbl = 18,21 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 40,88 %31 EO 4C N = 620 16.2 62.31
32 EO 4P E+2 -680 17.3 66.54
33 EO 3S E = -400 8.7 33.46 µ Tbl = 54,10 %
Total : 374,9 / 702 = 53,40 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 NIGOT Pierre -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
7 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,65 % 1 EO 2S N+2 180 15.2 58.46
2 EO 4P N+2 680 6.5 25.00
3 EO 4P S = 420 11.9 45.77 µ Tbl = 43,08 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 56,76 % 4 EO 3S W+1 -630 15 57.69
5 EO 2C S+2 170 3 11.54
6 EO 3K S+1 130 9 34.62 µ Tbl = 34,62 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 59,79 % 7 EO 1S N = 90 14 53.85
8 EO 2P N = 110 6 23.08
9 EO 3K W+1 -130 26 100.00 µ Tbl = 58,97 %
12 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 56,10 %10 EO 3S S-2 -200 24 92.31
11 EO 4P W = -420 15 57.69
12 EO 3C W-1 50 11 42.31 µ Tbl = 64,10 %
9 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,00 %13 EO 3C W+1 -170 12 46.15
14 EO 2P N+2 170 5 19.23
15 EO 2S N-2 -200 22 84.62 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
4 GROSFILS Colette -TULKENS : 38,83 %16 EO 4P N+1 450 21 80.77
17 EO 4P E = -420 13 50.00
18 EO 4C S+2 680 2 7.69 µ Tbl = 46,15 %
16 - : 0,00 %19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 63,36 %22 EO 2K E+1 -110 17 65.38
23 EO 1S E = -90 10 38.46
24 EO 4C E-2 100 3 11.54 µ Tbl = 38,46 %
15 COURTOIS Patrick -DELHEZ Jacques : 44,13 %25 EO 3K S+1 130 13 50.00
26 EO 4C N-3 -300 25.9 99.62
27 EO 3P W-2 100 23.8 91.54 µ Tbl = 80,38 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 40,88 %28 EO 4C N-1 -100 22.7 87.31
29 EO 3S N+1 630 2.2 8.46
30 EO 4P W = -420 24.8 95.38 µ Tbl = 63,72 %
Total : 374,0 / 702 = 53,28 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 59,79 % 4 EO 2T E = -90 4 15.38
5 EO 2C S+1 140 7 26.92
6 EO 3S N-2 -100 22 84.62 µ Tbl = 42,31 %
3 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 54,00 % 7 EO 1S E-2 200 0 0.00
8 EO 1S W-2 100 14 53.85
9 EO 2T S+2 130 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
9 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,00 %10 EO 3S S = 600 13 50.00
11 EO 6P E-1 50 10 38.46
12 EO 2C W = -110 19 73.08 µ Tbl = 53,85 %
13 ERPICUM Patrice -AUBRY Jean : 41,72 %13 EO 2C W+3 -200 18 69.23
14 EO 2P N = 110 18 69.23
15 EO 3S N-2 -200 22 84.62 µ Tbl = 74,36 %
10 COLLIGNON Francis -COLLIGNON Véro : 50,32 %16 EO 4P N+2 480 12 46.15
17 EO 4P E = -420 13 50.00
18 EO 6C E = -980 25 96.15 µ Tbl = 64,10 %
12 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 56,10 %19 EO 4C E = -620 12 46.15
20 EO 3T W+2 -150 4 15.38
21 EO 3S N+3 690 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 35,90 %
11 VUYTS Michèle -NELIS Claude : 59,28 %22 EO 3K W = -110 17 65.38
23 EO 1S W = -90 10 38.46
24 EO 2C E+2 -170 13 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,28 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 40,88 %25 EO 4K S = 130 13 50.00
26 EO 3T S-2 -200 22.7 87.31
27 EO 3K N+2 150 15.2 58.46 µ Tbl = 65,26 %
16 - : 0,00 %28 EO BYE 0 0.00
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
7 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,65 %31 EO 4C S = 620 16.2 62.31
32 EO 3P W+3 -230 6.5 25.00
33 EO 3S E = -400 8.7 33.46 µ Tbl = 40,26 %
Total : 359,3 / 702 = 51,18 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 BERGER Jean Marie -COLLIN Jean-Marie
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 59,79 % 1 EO 3S S = 400 6.5 25.00
2 EO 4P N+2 680 6.5 25.00
3 EO 4P N = 420 11.9 45.77 µ Tbl = 31,92 %
9 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,00 % 7 EO 3T W = -110 20 76.92
8 EO 1S W-2 100 14 53.85
9 EO 3S S = 400 1 3.85 µ Tbl = 44,87 %
4 GROSFILS Colette -TULKENS : 38,83 %10 EO 5K S-3 -300 26 100.00
11 EO 6S W-2 100 3 11.54
12 EO 3C W-1 50 11 42.31 µ Tbl = 51,28 %
10 COLLIGNON Francis -COLLIGNON Véro : 50,32 %13 EO 2C W+2 -170 12 46.15
14 EO 2P N = 110 18 69.23
15 EO 2S S+1 150 4 15.38 µ Tbl = 43,59 %
14 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 46,72 %16 EO 6P N = 980 4 15.38
17 EO 4P E+1 -450 24 92.31
18 EO 4C S+2 680 2 7.69 µ Tbl = 38,46 %
11 VUYTS Michèle -NELIS Claude : 59,28 %19 EO 4C E+1 -650 23 88.46
20 EO 5T W-1 100 2 7.69
21 EO 3S S+1 630 25 96.15 µ Tbl = 64,10 %
13 ERPICUM Patrice -AUBRY Jean : 41,72 %22 EO 3S E-2 200 10 38.46
23 EO 1S E = -90 10 38.46
24 EO 3S E = -400 16 61.54 µ Tbl = 46,15 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 47,60 %25 EO 3K S = 110 20.5 78.85
26 EO 2C S = 110 4.4 16.92
27 EO 4C S+1 450 3.3 12.69 µ Tbl = 36,15 %
12 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 56,10 %28 EO 3C N = 140 14.1 54.23
29 EO 3S N-1 -100 16.2 62.31
30 EO 5P E-2 100 2.2 8.46 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 56,76 %31 EO 4C S+1 650 4.4 16.92
32 EO 4P E+2 -680 17.3 66.54
33 EO 3S E+1 -430 20.5 78.85 µ Tbl = 54,10 %
Total : 352,8 / 780 = 45,23 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger
3 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 54,00 % 1 EO 3S S = 400 6.5 25.00
2 EO 5P S = 650 14.1 54.23
3 EO 4P N = 420 11.9 45.77 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
12 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 56,10 % 4 EO 5K W = -600 9 34.62
5 EO 1S E-2 100 16 61.54
6 EO 3K S+1 130 9 34.62 µ Tbl = 43,59 %
10 COLLIGNON Francis -COLLIGNON Véro : 50,32 %10 EO 2K S = 90 20 76.92
11 EO 4P E+2 -480 21 80.77
12 EO 1S W = -90 16 61.54 µ Tbl = 73,08 %
5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 63,36 %13 EO 4C W = -620 23 88.46
14 EO 3P N+1 170 5 19.23
15 EO 3S N-1 -100 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 53,85 %
11 VUYTS Michèle -NELIS Claude : 59,28 %16 EO 4P N+3 510 7 26.92
17 EO 4P E = -420 13 50.00
18 EO 6P E-1 50 8 30.77 µ Tbl = 35,90 %
15 COURTOIS Patrick -DELHEZ Jacques : 44,13 %19 EO 4C E+1 -650 23 88.46
20 EO 3S W+2 -660 12 46.15
21 EO 4P S+2 680 19 73.08 µ Tbl = 69,23 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 47,60 %22 EO 6TcN-2 -300 24 92.31
23 EO 1S E = -90 10 38.46
24 EO 5PcS-4 -800 24 92.31 µ Tbl = 74,36 %
14 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 46,72 %25 EO 4K N = 130 13 50.00
26 EO 3P E+1 -170 18.4 70.77
27 EO 3C S+1 170 9.8 37.69 µ Tbl = 52,82 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 56,76 %28 EO 4C N-1 -100 22.7 87.31
29 EO 3S N-1 -100 16.2 62.31
30 EO 5T N+1 420 0.1 0.38 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
13 ERPICUM Patrice -AUBRY Jean : 41,72 %31 EO 2T N+2 130 23.8 91.54
32 EO 4P E+2 -680 17.3 66.54
33 EO 3S E = -400 8.7 33.46 µ Tbl = 63,85 %
Total : 435,5 / 780 = 55,83 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 DECONINCK -DECRAENE
14 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 46,72 % 1 EO 3S S = 400 6.5 25.00
2 EO 3C S+1 170 19.5 75.00
3 EO 3P N+1 170 25.9 99.62 µ Tbl = 66,54 %
4 GROSFILS Colette -TULKENS : 38,83 % 4 EO 3S W+1 -630 15 57.69
5 EO 2P S = 110 11 42.31
6 EO 2K N+3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
13 ERPICUM Patrice -AUBRY Jean : 41,72 % 7 EO 1S E-1 100 12 46.15
8 EO 2P N+1 140 2 7.69
9 EO 3T S+1 130 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
12 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 56,10 %13 EO 3P N = 140 2 7.69
14 EO 2P N+2 170 5 19.23
15 EO 4P S-1 -100 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 26,92 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 40,88 %16 EO 4P N+1 450 21 80.77
17 EO 4P E = -420 13 50.00
18 EO 3S N+1 630 6 23.08 µ Tbl = 51,28 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 47,60 %19 EO 4C W-1 100 1 3.85
20 EO 3S W+2 -660 12 46.15
21 EO 6T N = 1370 6 23.08 µ Tbl = 24,36 %
16 - : 0,00 %22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 56,76 %25 EO 4P N = 420 0.1 0.38
26 EO 4C N-1 -100 8.7 33.46
27 EO 4C S+1 450 3.3 12.69 µ Tbl = 15,51 %
15 COURTOIS Patrick -DELHEZ Jacques : 44,13 %28 EO 2C N = 110 17.3 66.54
29 EO 4C N+1 650 0.1 0.38
30 EO 4P W-1 50 8.7 33.46 µ Tbl = 33,46 %
3 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 54,00 %31 EO 4C S+1 650 4.4 16.92
32 EO 2P E+3 -200 4.4 16.92
33 EO 3S E = -400 8.7 33.46 µ Tbl = 22,44 %
Total : 239,6 / 702 = 34,13 %
PAIRE Nr : 23 VANKERKOVE -VINCKE
4 GROSFILS Colette -TULKENS : 38,83 % 1 EO 2T S+1 110 20.5 78.85
2 EO 4C S-2 -200 24.8 95.38
3 EO 4P N = 420 11.9 45.77 µ Tbl = 73,33 %
15 COURTOIS Patrick -DELHEZ Jacques : 44,13 % 4 EO 3S E-1 100 1 3.85
5 EO 3S S = 600 0 0.00
6 EO 5K S-1 -50 17 65.38 µ Tbl = 23,08 %
5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 63,36 % 7 EO 2P S+2 170 3 11.54
8 EO 2P N = 110 6 23.08
9 EO 4K W-2 200 4 15.38 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
14 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 46,72 %10 EO 3S N+2 660 2 7.69
11 EO 4P E+2 -480 21 80.77
12 EO 4C W-2 100 4 15.38 µ Tbl = 34,62 %
13 ERPICUM Patrice -AUBRY Jean : 41,72 %16 EO 4P N+2 480 12 46.15
17 EO 4P E = -420 13 50.00
18 EO 4C E+1 -450 17 65.38 µ Tbl = 53,85 %
7 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,65 %19 EO 2K E+2 -130 4 15.38
20 EO 3S W+2 -660 12 46.15
21 EO 6S N = 1440 2 7.69 µ Tbl = 23,08 %
12 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 56,10 %22 EO 3K E = -110 17 65.38
23 EO 1S E = -90 10 38.46
24 EO 3C E = -140 10 38.46 µ Tbl = 47,44 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 59,79 %25 EO 2S N+1 150 6.5 25.00
26 EO 2C N+1 140 2.2 8.46
27 EO 4C S+1 450 3.3 12.69 µ Tbl = 15,38 %
3 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 54,00 %28 EO 2C N+1 140 14.1 54.23
29 EO 3S N-1 -100 16.2 62.31
30 EO 4P W-1 50 8.7 33.46 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
16 - : 0,00 %31 EO BYE 0 0.00
32 EO BYE 0 0.00
33 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 263,2 / 702 = 37,49 %
PAIRE Nr : 24 MEYER Jean -LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre
10 COLLIGNON Francis -COLLIGNON Véro : 50,32 % 1 EO 3S S = 400 6.5 25.00
2 EO 3P N = 140 21.6 83.08
3 EO 4P N = 420 11.9 45.77 µ Tbl = 51,28 %
5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 63,36 % 4 EO 3S E+3 -690 23 88.46
5 EO 2C S = 110 11 42.31
6 EO 3P S = 140 3 11.54 µ Tbl = 47,44 %
16 - : 0,00 % 7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 40,88 %10 EO 3K S+2 150 16 61.54
11 EO 3S W+1 -430 18 69.23
12 EO 2P S-2 -200 26 100.00 µ Tbl = 76,92 %
15 COURTOIS Patrick -DELHEZ Jacques : 44,13 %13 EO 4C W = -620 23 88.46
14 EO 2P S+1 140 13 50.00
15 EO 3S S-1 -100 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 64,10 %
14 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 46,72 %19 EO 3S W+1 -630 18 69.23
20 EO 3S E+3 -690 20 76.92
21 EO 3S N+3 690 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 64,10 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 59,79 %22 EO 4KcE = -710 26 100.00
23 EO 3T E = -110 26 100.00
24 EO 3C E+1 -170 13 50.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
13 ERPICUM Patrice -AUBRY Jean : 41,72 %25 EO 3C E-1 100 23.8 91.54
26 EO 3P E = -140 13 50.00
27 EO 3C S = 140 19.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 72,18 %
9 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,00 %28 EO 3C N-1 -100 22.7 87.31
29 EO 3S N-1 -100 16.2 62.31
30 EO 4P W-1 50 8.7 33.46 µ Tbl = 61,03 %
12 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 56,10 %31 EO 4C S = 620 16.2 62.31
32 EO 4P E+2 -680 17.3 66.54
33 EO 3S E+1 -430 20.5 78.85 µ Tbl = 69,23 %
Total : 459,9 / 702 = 65,51 %
PAIRE Nr : 25 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert
13 ERPICUM Patrice -AUBRY Jean : 41,72 % 1 EO 2C E-2 100 23.8 91.54
2 EO 4P N-2 -200 24.8 95.38
3 EO 4P N = 420 11.9 45.77 µ Tbl = 77,56 %
11 VUYTS Michèle -NELIS Claude : 59,28 % 4 EO 3S W+1 -630 15 57.69
5 EO 2C S+2 170 3 11.54
6 EO 4P S-2 -100 22 84.62 µ Tbl = 51,28 %
12 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 56,10 % 7 EO 3P S-1 -100 17 65.38
8 EO 2P N = 110 6 23.08
9 EO 2K S+2 130 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 44,87 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 47,60 %10 EO 3S N+1 630 8 30.77
11 EO 6S E = -990 25 96.15
12 EO 2C W-1 50 11 42.31 µ Tbl = 56,41 %
7 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,65 %13 EO 2P N = 110 4 15.38
14 EO 2P N+2 170 5 19.23
15 EO 2P N+1 140 6 23.08 µ Tbl = 19,23 %
16 - : 0,00 %16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
15 COURTOIS Patrick -DELHEZ Jacques : 44,13 %22 EO 3S E-3 300 6 23.08
23 EO 2K S-1 -100 23 88.46
24 EO 4CcE-1 100 3 11.54 µ Tbl = 41,03 %
9 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,00 %25 EO 3K S+1 130 13 50.00
26 EO 3P E = -140 13 50.00
27 EO 3K N+2 150 15.2 58.46 µ Tbl = 52,82 %
14 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 46,72 %28 EO 2C N+2 170 9.8 37.69
29 EO 3S S-1 -100 16.2 62.31
30 EO 3P W = -140 19.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
10 COLLIGNON Francis -COLLIGNON Véro : 50,32 %31 EO 4C S+1 650 4.4 16.92
32 EO 2P E+2 -170 2.2 8.46
33 EO 3S E-1 50 0.1 0.38 µ Tbl = 8,59 %
Total : 319,9 / 702 = 45,57 %
PAIRE Nr : 26 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
11 VUYTS Michèle -NELIS Claude : 59,28 % 1 EO 3S S = 400 6.5 25.00
2 EO 4P N+2 680 6.5 25.00
3 EO 4P S = 420 11.9 45.77 µ Tbl = 31,92 %
14 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 46,72 % 4 EO 3S W = -600 9 34.62
5 EO 1S E-1 50 21 80.77
6 EO 2P N+1 140 3 11.54 µ Tbl = 42,31 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 47,60 % 7 EO 2P S = 110 8 30.77
8 EO 1S W-1 50 22 84.62
9 EO 3S S = 400 1 3.85 µ Tbl = 39,74 %
13 ERPICUM Patrice -AUBRY Jean : 41,72 %10 EO 3K S = 110 18 69.23
11 EO 6S W-1 50 10 38.46
12 EO 3C W-1 50 11 42.31 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 56,76 %13 EO 4C E = -620 23 88.46
14 EO 2P N+2 170 5 19.23
15 EO 3S N = 600 1 3.85 µ Tbl = 37,18 %
12 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 56,10 %16 EO 6P N+1 1010 1 3.85
17 EO 4P E = -420 13 50.00
18 EO 3S W = -400 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
3 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 54,00 %19 EO 4C W = -620 12 46.15
20 EO 3S W+3 -690 20 76.92
21 EO 3S N+3 690 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 56,41 %
16 - : 0,00 %25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00
27 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
10 COLLIGNON Francis -COLLIGNON Véro : 50,32 %28 EO 2C N+2 170 9.8 37.69
29 EO 3S N-1 -100 16.2 62.31
30 EO 4P W = -420 24.8 95.38 µ Tbl = 65,13 %
15 COURTOIS Patrick -DELHEZ Jacques : 44,13 %31 EO 4C S = 620 16.2 62.31
32 EO 4P E+2 -680 17.3 66.54
33 EO 3S E+1 -430 20.5 78.85 µ Tbl = 69,23 %
Total : 331,7 / 702 = 47,25 %
PAIRE Nr : 27 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René
16 - : 0,00 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 47,60 % 4 EO 3S W+1 -630 15 57.69
5 EO 2P S-2 -200 25 96.15
6 EO 3S S-2 -100 22 84.62 µ Tbl = 79,49 %
15 COURTOIS Patrick -DELHEZ Jacques : 44,13 % 7 EO 2P S = 110 8 30.77
8 EO 1S W-1 50 22 84.62
9 EO 4T S = 130 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 53,85 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 56,76 %10 EO 3S N+1 630 8 30.77
11 EO 6S E-2 100 3 11.54
12 EO 2C W = -110 19 73.08 µ Tbl = 38,46 %
14 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 46,72 %13 EO 3C W+1 -170 12 46.15
14 EO 2P S = 110 18 69.23
15 EO 1S S-1 -100 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 56,41 %
3 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 54,00 %16 EO 4P N+1 450 21 80.77
17 EO 4P E = -420 13 50.00
18 EO 3S W+2 -460 20 76.92 µ Tbl = 69,23 %
13 ERPICUM Patrice -AUBRY Jean : 41,72 %19 EO 4C W+1 -650 23 88.46
20 EO 3S W+3 -690 20 76.92
21 EO 3S N+2 660 22 84.62 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
4 GROSFILS Colette -TULKENS : 38,83 %22 EO 2S W-2 200 10 38.46
23 EO 2C N-1 -100 23 88.46
24 EO 4C E = -420 20 76.92 µ Tbl = 67,95 %
5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 63,36 %28 EO 4C N = 620 3.3 12.69
29 EO 4C N = 620 5.5 21.15
30 EO 4P W-1 50 8.7 33.46 µ Tbl = 22,44 %
11 VUYTS Michèle -NELIS Claude : 59,28 %31 EO 4C S+1 650 4.4 16.92
32 EO 4P E+2 -680 17.3 66.54
33 EO 2S E+1 -150 2.2 8.46 µ Tbl = 30,64 %
Total : 391,4 / 702 = 55,75 %
PAIRE Nr : 28 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette
12 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 56,10 % 1 EO 3S S = 400 6.5 25.00
2 EO 5P N+1 680 6.5 25.00
3 EO 4P N = 420 11.9 45.77 µ Tbl = 31,92 %
9 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,00 % 4 EO 3S W-1 100 1 3.85
5 EO 2C S-2 -200 25 96.15
6 EO 3C W-1 100 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 51,28 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 40,88 % 7 EO 1P S+3 170 3 11.54
8 EO 1S W-2 100 14 53.85
9 EO 3T S = 110 22 84.62 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
3 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 54,00 %10 EO 3S N+1 630 8 30.77
11 EO 6S E = -990 25 96.15
12 EO 3C W-2 100 4 15.38 µ Tbl = 47,44 %
11 VUYTS Michèle -NELIS Claude : 59,28 %13 EO 3C W+1 -170 12 46.15
14 EO 2P N+2 170 5 19.23
15 EO 3S S = 600 1 3.85 µ Tbl = 23,08 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 59,79 %16 EO 6P N+1 1010 1 3.85
17 EO 5P E-1 50 1 3.85
18 EO 4C E+1 -450 17 65.38 µ Tbl = 24,36 %
5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 63,36 %19 EO 3C W+1 -170 6 23.08
20 EO 3S W+1 -630 7 26.92
21 EO 6S N = 1440 2 7.69 µ Tbl = 19,23 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 56,76 %22 EO 4KcE-1 200 10 38.46
23 EO 1S E = -90 10 38.46
24 EO 4C E = -420 20 76.92 µ Tbl = 51,28 %
7 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,65 %28 EO 4C N-1 -100 22.7 87.31
29 EO 3S N-1 -100 16.2 62.31
30 EO 4P W-1 50 8.7 33.46 µ Tbl = 61,03 %
4 GROSFILS Colette -TULKENS : 38,83 %31 EO 4C S = 620 16.2 62.31
32 EO 4P E+2 -680 17.3 66.54
33 EO 3S E+1 -430 20.5 78.85 µ Tbl = 69,23 %
Total : 334,5 / 780 = 42,88 %
PAIRE Nr : 29 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 63,36 % 1 EO 3T S = 110 20.5 78.85
2 EO 4P N+2 680 6.5 25.00
3 EO 4P N = 420 11.9 45.77 µ Tbl = 49,87 %
13 ERPICUM Patrice -AUBRY Jean : 41,72 % 4 EO 2T E+2 -130 6 23.08
5 EO 2C S+1 140 7 26.92
6 EO 3K S+1 130 9 34.62 µ Tbl = 28,21 %
10 COLLIGNON Francis -COLLIGNON Véro : 50,32 % 7 EO 3P S-2 -200 25 96.15
8 EO 1S W-3 150 0 0.00
9 EO 2T S+2 130 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 47,44 %
7 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,65 %10 EO 4P N-1 -100 22 84.62
11 EO 4P E = -420 15 57.69
12 EO 1S W+1 -120 22 84.62 µ Tbl = 75,64 %
4 GROSFILS Colette -TULKENS : 38,83 %13 EO 3P N-1 -100 6 23.08
14 EO 2K E-1 50 23 88.46
15 EO 1S N-1 -100 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 55,13 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 47,60 %16 EO 5P N = 450 21 80.77
17 EO 6P W = -980 26 100.00
18 EO 4P E = -420 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 78,21 %
9 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,00 %19 EO 4C E+1 -650 23 88.46
20 EO 6S E-2 200 0 0.00
21 EO 6S S = 1440 2 7.69 µ Tbl = 32,05 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 40,88 %22 EO 4TcN = 510 2 7.69
23 EO 1S E = -90 10 38.46
24 EO 4CcE-2 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 15,38 %
3 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 54,00 %25 EO 4K N-1 -50 25.9 99.62
26 EO 3C S+1 170 0.1 0.38
27 EO 3C S+1 170 9.8 37.69 µ Tbl = 45,90 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 59,79 %31 EO 4C N+1 650 4.4 16.92
32 EO 2T W+3 -150 0.1 0.38
33 EO 3S E+1 -430 20.5 78.85 µ Tbl = 32,05 %
Total : 358,7 / 780 = 45,99 %
PAIRE Nr : 30 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin
9 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,00 % 1 EO 4PcN-2 -300 25.9 99.62
2 EO 4P N = 620 17.3 66.54
3 EO 4P N = 420 11.9 45.77 µ Tbl = 70,64 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 40,88 % 4 EO 3S W+4 -720 26 100.00
5 EO 2P W-1 50 21 80.77
6 EO 4P N-5 -250 26 100.00 µ Tbl = 93,59 %
14 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 46,72 % 7 EO 2P S-1 -100 17 65.38
8 EO 1S W-2 100 14 53.85
9 EO 3T N = 110 22 84.62 µ Tbl = 67,95 %
11 VUYTS Michèle -NELIS Claude : 59,28 %10 EO 3S N+2 660 2 7.69
11 EO 7C E-2 100 3 11.54
12 EO 2S W-2 100 4 15.38 µ Tbl = 11,54 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 59,79 %13 EO 3PcN+1 930 0 0.00
14 EO 4P S-1 -50 26 100.00
15 EO 3S N-2 -200 22 84.62 µ Tbl = 61,54 %
5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 63,36 %16 EO 4P N+1 450 21 80.77
17 EO 4P E = -420 13 50.00
18 EO 4C S+2 680 2 7.69 µ Tbl = 46,15 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 56,76 %19 EO 4C E = -620 12 46.15
20 EO 3S W+3 -690 20 76.92
21 EO 3S N+3 690 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 56,41 %
10 COLLIGNON Francis -COLLIGNON Véro : 50,32 %22 EO 2P E+1 -140 22 84.62
23 EO 1S E = -90 10 38.46
24 EO 4C E-1 50 7 26.92 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
7 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,65 %25 EO 5K N = 400 2.2 8.46
26 EO 2P W+3 -200 22.7 87.31
27 EO 2P W-2 100 23.8 91.54 µ Tbl = 62,44 %
4 GROSFILS Colette -TULKENS : 38,83 %28 EO 4C N = 620 3.3 12.69
29 EO 4P S-2 -200 25.9 99.62
30 EO 3P E+2 -200 21.6 83.08 µ Tbl = 65,13 %
Total : 456,6 / 780 = 58,54 %
PAIRE Nr : 31 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
10 COLLIGNON Francis -COLLIGNON Véro : 50,32 % 4 EO 3S E+2 -660 20 76.92
5 EO 1S E-2 100 16 61.54
6 EO 4P N-1 -50 17 65.38 µ Tbl = 67,95 %
7 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,65 % 7 EO 3K N-2 -200 25 96.15
8 EO 2C E+1 -140 26 100.00
9 EO 3T S = 110 22 84.62 µ Tbl = 93,59 %
15 COURTOIS Patrick -DELHEZ Jacques : 44,13 %10 EO 3S N = 600 13 50.00
11 EO 7P E-1 50 10 38.46
12 EO 1S W+2 -150 24 92.31 µ Tbl = 60,26 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 47,60 %13 EO 4C W = -620 23 88.46
14 EO 2P N+1 140 13 50.00
15 EO 3S N-3 -300 26 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,49 %
9 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,00 %16 EO 4P N+1 450 21 80.77
17 EO 4P E = -420 13 50.00
18 EO 4C E+2 -480 22 84.62 µ Tbl = 71,79 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 40,88 %19 EO 4C E = -620 12 46.15
20 EO 3S E+3 -690 20 76.92
21 EO 4P S+2 680 19 73.08 µ Tbl = 65,38 %
3 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 54,00 %22 EO 5TcN = 550 0 0.00
23 EO 1S E = -90 10 38.46
24 EO 4C E = -420 20 76.92 µ Tbl = 38,46 %
11 VUYTS Michèle -NELIS Claude : 59,28 %25 EO 3K S+1 130 13 50.00
26 EO 2P W+1 -140 13 50.00
27 EO 3P E-2 100 23.8 91.54 µ Tbl = 63,85 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 59,79 %28 EO 4C N = 620 3.3 12.69
29 EO 4C N-1 -100 16.2 62.31
30 EO 5C S-1 -50 16.2 62.31 µ Tbl = 45,77 %
5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 63,36 %31 EO 4C N = 620 16.2 62.31
32 EO 4P E+2 -680 17.3 66.54
33 EO 3S E = -400 8.7 33.46 µ Tbl = 54,10 %
Total : 499,7 / 780 = 64,06 %
PAIRE Nr : 32 LIBERT Laurent -de KERCHOVE Pauline
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 40,88 % 1 EO 1S S+2 150 17.3 66.54
2 EO 4P N+1 650 14.1 54.23
3 EO 4P N = 420 11.9 45.77 µ Tbl = 55,51 %
11 VUYTS Michèle -NELIS Claude : 59,28 % 7 EO 2P S = 110 8 30.77
8 EO 1S W-2 100 14 53.85
9 EO 3T S+1 130 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 43,59 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 59,79 %10 EO 3S N+2 660 2 7.69
11 EO 6S W-2 100 3 11.54
12 EO 3C W-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 6,41 %
16 - : 0,00 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 56,76 %16 EO 4P N+3 510 7 26.92
17 EO 5P E-1 50 1 3.85
18 EO 2C E+4 -230 10 38.46 µ Tbl = 23,08 %
10 COLLIGNON Francis -COLLIGNON Véro : 50,32 %19 EO 3S W-1 100 1 3.85
20 EO 3S W+1 -630 7 26.92
21 EO 3S N+3 690 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 25,64 %
7 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,65 %22 EO 2K W+1 -110 17 65.38
23 EO 1S E = -90 10 38.46
24 EO 4C E-1 50 7 26.92 µ Tbl = 43,59 %
4 GROSFILS Colette -TULKENS : 38,83 %25 EO 2P N = 110 20.5 78.85
26 EO 2P E+2 -170 18.4 70.77
27 EO 3P W-3 150 15.2 58.46 µ Tbl = 69,36 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 47,60 %28 EO 620 3.3 12.69
29 EO 5K S+1 620 5.5 21.15
30 EO 5C N-1 -50 16.2 62.31 µ Tbl = 32,05 %
9 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,00 %31 EO 6C S-1 -100 25.9 99.62
32 EO 4P E+2 -680 17.3 66.54
33 EO 3S E+1 -430 20.5 78.85 µ Tbl = 81,67 %
Total : 297,1 / 702 = 42,32 %
|
|