|
Tournoi du 04-01-16
1 62,94 8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges
2 58,05 10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
3 57,96 5 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
4 55,70 7 de WASSEIGE Ariane -STEED Mercédès
5 53,70 11 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
6 51,83 3 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette
7 51,67 9 CLERIN François-Xavier -WUYARD Alphonse
8 51,65 4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David
9 46,91 12 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
10 41,79 6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
11 40,45 2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
12 27,41 1 ROGIERS Marga -MICHAUX Hélène
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 64,63 13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
2 58,17 16 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent
3 56,34 21 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
4 51,77 15 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
5 51,05 23 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert
6 50,62 24 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard
7 49,59 20 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal
8 48,60 22 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
9 46,56 18 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude
10 46,05 19 SALFI Huguette -LAENENS René
11 38,33 17 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
12 38,23 14 FRAITURE Louis -ARICKX Roger
PAIRE Nr : 1 ROGIERS Marga -MICHAUX Hélène
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 64,63 % 1 NS 4C E = -420 5 27.78
2 NS 6S W = -990 1 5.56
3 NS 3PcS-3 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
23 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 51,05 % 4 NS 3K S+2 150 1 5.56
5 NS 3S N+1 630 0 0.00
6 NS 3P E+1 -170 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
22 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,60 % 7 NS 4C E = -620 1 5.56
8 NS 3K E+1 -130 5 27.78
9 NS 3K S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
21 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 56,34 %10 NS 4K S-2 -200 0 0.00
11 NS 1S E+2 -150 8 44.44
12 NS 2PcW = -470 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
20 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 49,59 %13 NS 3S S+3 690 17 94.44
14 NS 2P W+1 -140 11 61.11
15 NS 1S S = 90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
19 SALFI Huguette -LAENENS René : 46,05 %16 NS 1S E+2 -150 4.6 25.56
17 NS 3C W-1 50 4.6 25.56
18 NS 6P E = -980 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 17,22 %
18 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 46,56 %19 NS 2P N+1 140 4 22.22
20 NS 4P E = -620 8 44.44
21 NS 2P N+1 140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
17 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 38,33 %22 NS 4P W+1 -650 12 66.67
23 NS 2P W+1 -140 6 33.33
24 NS 2S W = -120 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
16 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 58,17 %25 NS 4C W+1 -650 4.6 25.56
26 NS 3S S+1 630 5.7 31.67
27 NS 3P N = 140 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 27,59 %
Total : 133,2 / 486 = 27,41 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
14 FRAITURE Louis -ARICKX Roger : 38,23 % 4 NS 6C S+1 1460 18 100.00
5 NS 3S S+3 690 5 27.78
6 NS 4PcE = -790 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 64,63 % 7 NS 4C E = -620 1 5.56
8 NS 2C S-2 -100 12 66.67
9 NS 4S S+2 490 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
23 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 51,05 %10 NS 2C N = 110 6 33.33
11 NS 3T W+2 -150 8 44.44
12 NS 3S N-1 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
22 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,60 %13 NS 3S S+3 690 17 94.44
14 NS 4P W = -420 3 16.67
15 NS 1S S = 90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
21 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 56,34 %16 NS 2P S-1 -50 13.4 74.44
17 NS 1S N-1 -50 1.2 6.67
18 NS 3K E+2 -150 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 45,74 %
20 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 49,59 %19 NS 4P N-2 -100 0 0.00
20 NS 4P E = -620 8 44.44
21 NS 1ScE+1 -280 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
24 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,62 %22 NS 3S W+3 -690 4 22.22
23 NS 4C S-2 -200 0 0.00
24 NS 1S E+2 -150 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
18 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 46,56 %25 NS 3K E+1 -130 17.9 99.44
26 NS 2T S+1 110 0.1 0.56
27 NS 3S S+3 490 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
17 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 38,33 %28 NS 2S E-2 100 18 100.00
29 NS 2K S-3 -300 2 11.11
30 NS 3P E-2 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 196,6 / 486 = 40,45 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette
15 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 51,77 % 7 NS 4C E-1 100 16 88.89
8 NS 3S E-1 50 16 88.89
9 NS 3S S+3 490 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
24 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,62 %10 NS 2C N = 110 6 33.33
11 NS 3K W+1 -130 12 66.67
12 NS 2K W-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 64,63 %13 NS 4P N+1 650 7 38.89
14 NS 4TcN-3 -500 0 0.00
15 NS 1S S+2 150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
23 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 51,05 %16 NS 2P S-1 -50 13.4 74.44
17 NS 3S N = 400 17.9 99.44
18 NS 3S W-1 50 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 85,00 %
22 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,60 %19 NS 2P N+3 200 12 66.67
20 NS 4P E-1 100 15 83.33
21 NS 3P N = 140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
21 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 56,34 %22 NS 3S W+3 -690 4 22.22
23 NS 4P W-1 100 13 72.22
24 NS 1S E+1 -120 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
20 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 49,59 %25 NS 3C W+2 -200 11.2 62.22
26 NS 4C S+2 680 15.7 87.22
27 NS 4P N-1 -50 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
19 SALFI Huguette -LAENENS René : 46,05 %28 NS 1S E+1 -120 6 33.33
29 NS 3S W = -600 0 0.00
30 NS 3P E-3 150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
18 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 46,56 %31 NS 1S N-2 -200 1 5.56
32 NS 4C N = 420 6 33.33
33 NS 2S S-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
Total : 251,9 / 486 = 51,83 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David
19 SALFI Huguette -LAENENS René : 46,05 % 1 NS 4C E = -420 5 27.78
2 NS 3S W+2 -460 14 77.78
3 NS 2P W = -110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
16 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 58,17 %10 NS 2C N = 110 6 33.33
11 NS 3C N-3 -150 8 44.44
12 NS 2K E+1 -110 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
15 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 51,77 %13 NS 4P N+1 650 7 38.89
14 NS 3CcN-2 -300 6 33.33
15 NS 1S S = 90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -ARICKX Roger : 38,23 %16 NS 3C W+1 -170 1.2 6.67
17 NS 2S N = 120 13.4 74.44
18 NS 5K E = -400 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 64,63 %19 NS 3P N+1 170 8 44.44
20 NS 4P E-1 100 15 83.33
21 NS 2S S-2 -200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
23 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 51,05 %22 NS 3S W-1 100 18 100.00
23 NS 2P W+1 -140 6 33.33
24 NS 1C N = 80 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
22 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,60 %25 NS 2C W+1 -140 15.7 87.22
26 NS 3S S+2 660 13.4 74.44
27 NS 3S S+1 430 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 82,96 %
21 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 56,34 %28 NS 1S E-1 50 15 83.33
29 NS 2P E = -110 6 33.33
30 NS 3P E = -140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
24 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,62 %31 NS 1S N-1 -100 14 77.78
32 NS 4C N+1 450 13 72.22
33 NS 2S S = 120 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
Total : 251,0 / 486 = 51,65 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
21 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 56,34 % 1 NS 2C E+1 -140 13 72.22
2 NS 3S W+3 -490 7 38.89
3 NS 1S N-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
20 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 49,59 % 4 NS 3C S+4 260 7 38.89
5 NS 6S N = 1440 16 88.89
6 NS 3P E+1 -170 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
17 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 38,33 %13 NS 6P N-1 -100 0 0.00
14 NS 3P W-1 50 16 88.89
15 NS 1S S = 90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
16 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 58,17 %16 NS 2P S-1 -50 13.4 74.44
17 NS 2CcW-2 300 15.7 87.22
18 NS 4P E = -420 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 58,15 %
24 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,62 %19 NS 2P N+2 170 8 44.44
20 NS 4P E-1 100 15 83.33
21 NS 4TcW-2 300 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -ARICKX Roger : 38,23 %22 NS 4P W = -620 16 88.89
23 NS 2P W-1 100 13 72.22
24 NS 1S E-3 150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 64,63 %25 NS 4C W+1 -650 4.6 25.56
26 NS 3S S+1 630 5.7 31.67
27 NS 2C S+2 170 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,74 %
23 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 51,05 %28 NS 1S E+1 -120 6 33.33
29 NS 4PcE-1 200 13 72.22
30 NS 3P E-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
22 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,60 %31 NS 2P E+1 -140 8 44.44
32 NS 4P S+1 450 13 72.22
33 NS 1S S+1 120 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 281,7 / 486 = 57,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
23 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 51,05 % 1 NS 3PcS-3 -500 0 0.00
2 NS 3S W+3 -490 7 38.89
3 NS 2C E = -110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
22 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,60 % 4 NS 3K S+2 150 1 5.56
5 NS 3S N+3 690 5 27.78
6 NS 4P E-1 100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
24 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,62 % 7 NS 3S W = -600 9 50.00
8 NS 2C N-2 -100 12 66.67
9 NS 3S N+2 460 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
18 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 46,56 %16 NS 2C W+2 -170 1.2 6.67
17 NS 1S N = 90 9 50.00
18 NS 4P W-1 50 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
17 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 38,33 %19 NS 2PcN+1 570 18 100.00
20 NS 4P E-1 100 15 83.33
21 NS 3P N-1 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
16 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 58,17 %22 NS 3S W+2 -660 10 55.56
23 NS 3P W = -140 6 33.33
24 NS 1S E+2 -150 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
15 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 51,77 %25 NS 4C W+1 -650 4.6 25.56
26 NS 4C N+1 650 10.1 56.11
27 NS 2C S+1 140 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 35,74 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -ARICKX Roger : 38,23 %28 NS 1S E+2 -150 2 11.11
29 NS 3S W-2 200 13 72.22
30 NS 3S E-3 150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 64,63 %31 NS 2P E+1 -140 8 44.44
32 NS 2P S+1 140 2 11.11
33 NS 2K N = 90 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
Total : 203,1 / 486 = 41,79 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 de WASSEIGE Ariane -STEED Mercédès
14 FRAITURE Louis -ARICKX Roger : 38,23 % 1 NS 3T W-2 100 18 100.00
2 NS 4P W+2 -480 12 66.67
3 NS 1S N-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 64,63 % 4 NS 3C S+4 260 7 38.89
5 NS 3S N+3 690 5 27.78
6 NS 4P E = -620 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
23 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 51,05 % 7 NS 3S W = -600 9 50.00
8 NS 2P E-2 100 18 100.00
9 NS 3S S+3 490 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
22 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,60 %10 NS 2C N = 110 6 33.33
11 NS 1S E+3 -180 3 16.67
12 NS 1S N+1 120 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
19 SALFI Huguette -LAENENS René : 46,05 %19 NS 4P N+2 480 15 83.33
20 NS 4P E+1 -650 2 11.11
21 NS 4T E-4 200 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
18 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 46,56 %22 NS 3S W+3 -690 4 22.22
23 NS 4P W-2 200 18 100.00
24 NS 1S E = -90 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
17 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 38,33 %25 NS 3C W+1 -170 13.4 74.44
26 NS 4C S+1 650 10.1 56.11
27 NS 3S N = 400 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 64,26 %
24 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,62 %28 NS 1S E+1 -120 6 33.33
29 NS 4P E-3 300 18 100.00
30 NS 4K S-5 -250 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
15 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 51,77 %31 NS 2P E+1 -140 8 44.44
32 NS 4P S+1 450 13 72.22
33 NS 2S S = 120 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 270,7 / 486 = 55,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges
16 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 58,17 % 1 NS 3S E = -400 8 44.44
2 NS 6S W-2 100 18 100.00
3 NS 2C E+1 -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
15 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 51,77 % 4 NS 4C N+3 710 16 88.89
5 NS 6S N = 1440 16 88.89
6 NS 2P E+2 -170 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -ARICKX Roger : 38,23 % 7 NS 3S W = -600 9 50.00
8 NS 3K E = -110 8 44.44
9 NS 6T N = 920 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 64,63 %10 NS 4C N = 620 18 100.00
11 NS 3S E = -400 0 0.00
12 NS 2K W = -90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
23 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 51,05 %13 NS 4P S+2 680 14 77.78
14 NS 4P W = -420 3 16.67
15 NS 1S S = 90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
20 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 49,59 %22 NS 3S W+1 -630 14 77.78
23 NS 3P W-1 100 13 72.22
24 NS 2T E+1 -110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
19 SALFI Huguette -LAENENS René : 46,05 %25 NS 4C W+1 -650 4.6 25.56
26 NS 3S S+3 690 17.9 99.44
27 NS 4P N = 420 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
18 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 46,56 %28 NS 1S E = -90 11 61.11
29 NS 2S W-2 200 13 72.22
30 NS 3P E-3 150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
17 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 38,33 %31 NS 1S N-1 -100 14 77.78
32 NS 4C N = 420 6 33.33
33 NS 2P N+2 170 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
Total : 305,9 / 486 = 62,94 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 CLERIN François-Xavier -WUYARD Alphonse
18 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 46,56 % 1 NS 4C E-1 50 16 88.89
2 NS 6S W-1 50 16 88.89
3 NS 2P W-1 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 92,59 %
24 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,62 % 4 NS 4C N+2 680 12 66.67
5 NS 3S N+4 720 10 55.56
6 NS 3P E+1 -170 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
16 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 58,17 % 7 NS 3S W = -600 9 50.00
8 NS 2K E+2 -130 5 27.78
9 NS 3S S+3 490 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
15 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 51,77 %10 NS 2C N+1 140 13 72.22
11 NS 2S E+2 -180 3 16.67
12 NS 2K W = -90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -ARICKX Roger : 38,23 %13 NS 4P N+1 650 7 38.89
14 NS 3P W = -140 11 61.11
15 NS 1S S = 90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 64,63 %16 NS 2S E = -120 6.8 37.78
17 NS 1S N = 90 9 50.00
18 NS 3P E+1 -170 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 41,85 %
21 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 56,34 %25 NS 4C W+1 -650 4.6 25.56
26 NS 3S N = 600 2.3 12.78
27 NS 3P N = 140 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 21,30 %
20 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 49,59 %28 NS 1S E = -90 11 61.11
29 NS 2S W-1 100 8 44.44
30 NS 3P E-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
19 SALFI Huguette -LAENENS René : 46,05 %31 NS 3C W+1 -170 4 22.22
32 NS 3S S+2 460 18 100.00
33 NS 1S S+2 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
Total : 251,1 / 486 = 51,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
20 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 49,59 % 1 NS 4C E+1 -450 2 11.11
2 NS 3S E+3 -490 7 38.89
3 NS 2C E+2 -170 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
19 SALFI Huguette -LAENENS René : 46,05 % 4 NS 3S N+3 690 14 77.78
5 NS 6S N = 1440 16 88.89
6 NS 4P E = -620 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
18 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 46,56 % 7 NS 3S E = -600 9 50.00
8 NS 5TcN-2 -300 1 5.56
9 NS 6S N = 990 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
17 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 38,33 %10 NS 2C N+1 140 13 72.22
11 NS 2C N-2 -100 14 77.78
12 NS 1S N = 90 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
16 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 58,17 %13 NS 4P N+1 650 7 38.89
14 NS 4P E-1 50 16 88.89
15 NS 1S N = 90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
15 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 51,77 %16 NS 2PcN-1 -100 9 50.00
17 NS 2S N-1 -50 1.2 6.67
18 NS 6P E-2 100 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -ARICKX Roger : 38,23 %19 NS 4P N+2 480 15 83.33
20 NS 4P E = -620 8 44.44
21 NS 4TcE-3 500 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
22 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,60 %28 NS 1S E-1 50 15 83.33
29 NS 3S E-2 200 13 72.22
30 NS 3P E-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
21 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 56,34 %31 NS 1S N-1 -100 14 77.78
32 NS 4C N+1 450 13 72.22
33 NS 2S N = 120 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
Total : 282,1 / 486 = 58,05 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
22 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,60 % 1 NS 3C E = -140 13 72.22
2 NS 3S W+3 -490 7 38.89
3 NS 2C E+2 -170 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
21 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 56,34 % 4 NS 3K S+3 170 4 22.22
5 NS 3S N+3 690 5 27.78
6 NS 2S W-1 100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
20 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 49,59 % 7 NS 4C E-3 300 18 100.00
8 NS 2S N-2 -100 12 66.67
9 NS 3S S+4 520 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
19 SALFI Huguette -LAENENS René : 46,05 %10 NS 2C N+2 170 16 88.89
11 NS 3P W-2 100 16 88.89
12 NS 3K W = -110 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
24 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,62 %13 NS 4P N+1 650 7 38.89
14 NS 4P W-1 50 16 88.89
15 NS 1S S = 90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
17 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 38,33 %16 NS 3S E-3 300 17.9 99.44
17 NS 1S N = 90 9 50.00
18 NS 3K E+2 -150 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
16 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 58,17 %19 NS 2P N+2 170 8 44.44
20 NS 4P E+1 -650 2 11.11
21 NS 4P N = 620 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
15 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 51,77 %22 NS 3S W+3 -690 4 22.22
23 NS 2P W+2 -170 2 11.11
24 NS 2K W = -90 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
23 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 51,05 %31 NS 1S N-2 -200 1 5.56
32 NS 4P S = 420 6 33.33
33 NS 1S S+2 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 261,0 / 486 = 53,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
24 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,62 % 1 NS 3P S-3 -150 10 55.56
2 NS 6S W = -990 1 5.56
3 NS 1S N-2 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
17 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 38,33 % 4 NS 4C S+1 650 10 55.56
5 NS 6C S = 1430 12 66.67
6 NS 3P E+1 -170 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
21 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 56,34 % 7 NS 3S E = -600 9 50.00
8 NS 3TcS-2 -300 1 5.56
9 NS 6S S = 990 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -ARICKX Roger : 38,23 %10 NS 2C N = 110 6 33.33
11 NS 2C N = 110 18 100.00
12 NS 2T N = 90 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
18 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 46,56 %13 NS 5P N = 650 7 38.89
14 NS 3P W+1 -170 8 44.44
15 NS 1S S = 90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
15 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 51,77 %19 NS 4P N-1 -50 2 11.11
20 NS 4P E+1 -650 2 11.11
21 NS 4T W-3 150 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
19 SALFI Huguette -LAENENS René : 46,05 %22 NS 3S W+3 -690 4 22.22
23 NS 3P W-1 100 13 72.22
24 NS 3K W-2 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
16 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 58,17 %28 NS 3T N-2 -200 0 0.00
29 NS 3P E = -140 4 22.22
30 NS 4P E-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
20 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 49,59 %31 NS 3P E-2 100 18 100.00
32 NS 4P S-1 -50 0 0.00
33 NS 2S S = 120 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
Total : 228,0 / 486 = 46,91 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
1 ROGIERS Marga -MICHAUX Hélène : 27,41 % 1 EO 4C E = -420 13 72.22
2 EO 6S W = -990 17 94.44
3 EO 3PcS-3 -500 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
7 de WASSEIGE Ariane -STEED Mercédès : 55,70 % 4 EO 3C S+4 260 11 61.11
5 EO 3S N+3 690 13 72.22
6 EO 4P E = -620 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 40,45 % 7 EO 4C E = -620 17 94.44
8 EO 2C S-2 -100 6 33.33
9 EO 4S S+2 490 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges : 62,94 %10 EO 4C N = 620 0 0.00
11 EO 3S E = -400 18 100.00
12 EO 2K W = -90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
3 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 51,83 %13 EO 4P N+1 650 11 61.11
14 EO 4TcN-3 -500 18 100.00
15 EO 1S S+2 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
9 CLERIN François-Xavier -WUYARD Alphonse : 51,67 %16 EO 2S E = -120 11.2 62.22
17 EO 1S N = 90 9 50.00
18 EO 3P E+1 -170 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 58,15 %
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 51,65 %19 EO 3P N+1 170 10 55.56
20 EO 4P E-1 100 3 16.67
21 EO 2S S-2 -200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
5 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 57,96 %25 EO 4C W+1 -650 13.4 74.44
26 EO 3S S+1 630 12.3 68.33
27 EO 2C S+2 170 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,26 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 41,79 %31 EO 2P E+1 -140 10 55.56
32 EO 2P S+1 140 16 88.89
33 EO 2K N = 90 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
Total : 314,1 / 486 = 64,63 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 FRAITURE Louis -ARICKX Roger
7 de WASSEIGE Ariane -STEED Mercédès : 55,70 % 1 EO 3T W-2 100 0 0.00
2 EO 4P W+2 -480 6 33.33
3 EO 1S N-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 40,45 % 4 EO 6C S+1 1460 0 0.00
5 EO 3S S+3 690 13 72.22
6 EO 4PcE = -790 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges : 62,94 % 7 EO 3S W = -600 9 50.00
8 EO 3K E = -110 10 55.56
9 EO 6T N = 920 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
12 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 46,91 %10 EO 2C N = 110 12 66.67
11 EO 2C N = 110 0 0.00
12 EO 2T N = 90 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
9 CLERIN François-Xavier -WUYARD Alphonse : 51,67 %13 EO 4P N+1 650 11 61.11
14 EO 3P W = -140 7 38.89
15 EO 1S S = 90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 51,65 %16 EO 3C W+1 -170 16.8 93.33
17 EO 2S N = 120 4.6 25.56
18 EO 5K E = -400 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 58,05 %19 EO 4P N+2 480 3 16.67
20 EO 4P E = -620 10 55.56
21 EO 4TcE-3 500 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
5 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 57,96 %22 EO 4P W = -620 2 11.11
23 EO 2P W-1 100 5 27.78
24 EO 1S E-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 41,79 %28 EO 1S E+2 -150 16 88.89
29 EO 3S W-2 200 5 27.78
30 EO 3S E-3 150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
Total : 185,8 / 486 = 38,23 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges : 62,94 % 4 EO 4C N+3 710 2 11.11
5 EO 6S N = 1440 2 11.11
6 EO 2P E+2 -170 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
3 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 51,83 % 7 EO 4C E-1 100 2 11.11
8 EO 3S E-1 50 2 11.11
9 EO 3S S+3 490 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
9 CLERIN François-Xavier -WUYARD Alphonse : 51,67 %10 EO 2C N+1 140 5 27.78
11 EO 2S E+2 -180 15 83.33
12 EO 2K W = -90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 51,65 %13 EO 4P N+1 650 11 61.11
14 EO 3CcN-2 -300 12 66.67
15 EO 1S S = 90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 58,05 %16 EO 2PcN-1 -100 9 50.00
17 EO 2S N-1 -50 16.8 93.33
18 EO 6P E-2 100 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
12 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 46,91 %19 EO 4P N-1 -50 16 88.89
20 EO 4P E+1 -650 16 88.89
21 EO 4T W-3 150 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
11 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,70 %22 EO 3S W+3 -690 14 77.78
23 EO 2P W+2 -170 16 88.89
24 EO 2K W = -90 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 41,79 %25 EO 4C W+1 -650 13.4 74.44
26 EO 4C N+1 650 7.9 43.89
27 EO 2C S+1 140 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 64,26 %
7 de WASSEIGE Ariane -STEED Mercédès : 55,70 %31 EO 2P E+1 -140 10 55.56
32 EO 4P S+1 450 5 27.78
33 EO 2S S = 120 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 251,6 / 486 = 51,77 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent
8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges : 62,94 % 1 EO 3S E = -400 10 55.56
2 EO 6S W-2 100 0 0.00
3 EO 2C E+1 -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
9 CLERIN François-Xavier -WUYARD Alphonse : 51,67 % 7 EO 3S W = -600 9 50.00
8 EO 2K E+2 -130 13 72.22
9 EO 3S S+3 490 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 51,65 %10 EO 2C N = 110 12 66.67
11 EO 3C N-3 -150 10 55.56
12 EO 2K E+1 -110 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 58,05 %13 EO 4P N+1 650 11 61.11
14 EO 4P E-1 50 2 11.11
15 EO 1S N = 90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
5 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 57,96 %16 EO 2P S-1 -50 4.6 25.56
17 EO 2CcW-2 300 2.3 12.78
18 EO 4P E = -420 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 41,85 %
11 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,70 %19 EO 2P N+2 170 10 55.56
20 EO 4P E+1 -650 16 88.89
21 EO 4P N = 620 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 41,79 %22 EO 3S W+2 -660 8 44.44
23 EO 3P W = -140 12 66.67
24 EO 1S E+2 -150 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
1 ROGIERS Marga -MICHAUX Hélène : 27,41 %25 EO 4C W+1 -650 13.4 74.44
26 EO 3S S+1 630 12.3 68.33
27 EO 3P N = 140 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 72,41 %
12 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 46,91 %28 EO 3T N-2 -200 18 100.00
29 EO 3P E = -140 14 77.78
30 EO 4P E-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
Total : 282,7 / 486 = 58,17 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
12 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 46,91 % 4 EO 4C S+1 650 8 44.44
5 EO 6C S = 1430 6 33.33
6 EO 3P E+1 -170 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 58,05 %10 EO 2C N+1 140 5 27.78
11 EO 2C N-2 -100 4 22.22
12 EO 1S N = 90 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
5 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 57,96 %13 EO 6P N-1 -100 18 100.00
14 EO 3P W-1 50 2 11.11
15 EO 1S S = 90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
11 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,70 %16 EO 3S E-3 300 0.1 0.56
17 EO 1S N = 90 9 50.00
18 EO 3K E+2 -150 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 41,79 %19 EO 2PcN+1 570 0 0.00
20 EO 4P E-1 100 3 16.67
21 EO 3P N-1 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
1 ROGIERS Marga -MICHAUX Hélène : 27,41 %22 EO 4P W+1 -650 6 33.33
23 EO 2P W+1 -140 12 66.67
24 EO 2S W = -120 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
7 de WASSEIGE Ariane -STEED Mercédès : 55,70 %25 EO 3C W+1 -170 4.6 25.56
26 EO 4C S+1 650 7.9 43.89
27 EO 3S N = 400 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 35,74 %
2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 40,45 %28 EO 2S E-2 100 0 0.00
29 EO 2K S-3 -300 16 88.89
30 EO 3P E-2 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges : 62,94 %31 EO 1S N-1 -100 4 22.22
32 EO 4C N = 420 12 66.67
33 EO 2P N+2 170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
Total : 186,3 / 486 = 38,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude
9 CLERIN François-Xavier -WUYARD Alphonse : 51,67 % 1 EO 4C E-1 50 2 11.11
2 EO 6S W-1 50 2 11.11
3 EO 2P W-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 7,41 %
10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 58,05 % 7 EO 3S E = -600 9 50.00
8 EO 5TcN-2 -300 17 94.44
9 EO 6S N = 990 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
12 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 46,91 %13 EO 5P N = 650 11 61.11
14 EO 3P W+1 -170 10 55.56
15 EO 1S S = 90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 41,79 %16 EO 2C W+2 -170 16.8 93.33
17 EO 1S N = 90 9 50.00
18 EO 4P W-1 50 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
1 ROGIERS Marga -MICHAUX Hélène : 27,41 %19 EO 2P N+1 140 14 77.78
20 EO 4P E = -620 10 55.56
21 EO 2P N+1 140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
7 de WASSEIGE Ariane -STEED Mercédès : 55,70 %22 EO 3S W+3 -690 14 77.78
23 EO 4P W-2 200 0 0.00
24 EO 1S E = -90 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 40,45 %25 EO 3K E+1 -130 0.1 0.56
26 EO 2T S+1 110 17.9 99.44
27 EO 3S S+3 490 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges : 62,94 %28 EO 1S E = -90 7 38.89
29 EO 2S W-2 200 5 27.78
30 EO 3P E-3 150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
3 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 51,83 %31 EO 1S N-2 -200 17 94.44
32 EO 4C N = 420 12 66.67
33 EO 2S S-1 -50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
Total : 226,3 / 486 = 46,56 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 SALFI Huguette -LAENENS René
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 51,65 % 1 EO 4C E = -420 13 72.22
2 EO 3S W+2 -460 4 22.22
3 EO 2P W = -110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 58,05 % 4 EO 3S N+3 690 4 22.22
5 EO 6S N = 1440 2 11.11
6 EO 4P E = -620 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
11 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,70 %10 EO 2C N+2 170 2 11.11
11 EO 3P W-2 100 2 11.11
12 EO 3K W = -110 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
1 ROGIERS Marga -MICHAUX Hélène : 27,41 %16 EO 1S E+2 -150 13.4 74.44
17 EO 3C W-1 50 13.4 74.44
18 EO 6P E = -980 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 82,78 %
7 de WASSEIGE Ariane -STEED Mercédès : 55,70 %19 EO 4P N+2 480 3 16.67
20 EO 4P E+1 -650 16 88.89
21 EO 4T E-4 200 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
12 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 46,91 %22 EO 3S W+3 -690 14 77.78
23 EO 3P W-1 100 5 27.78
24 EO 3K W-2 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges : 62,94 %25 EO 4C W+1 -650 13.4 74.44
26 EO 3S S+3 690 0.1 0.56
27 EO 4P N = 420 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
3 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 51,83 %28 EO 1S E+1 -120 12 66.67
29 EO 3S W = -600 18 100.00
30 EO 3P E-3 150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
9 CLERIN François-Xavier -WUYARD Alphonse : 51,67 %31 EO 3C W+1 -170 14 77.78
32 EO 3S S+2 460 0 0.00
33 EO 1S S+2 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
Total : 223,8 / 486 = 46,05 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal
10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 58,05 % 1 EO 4C E+1 -450 16 88.89
2 EO 3S E+3 -490 11 61.11
3 EO 2C E+2 -170 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
5 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 57,96 % 4 EO 3C S+4 260 11 61.11
5 EO 6S N = 1440 2 11.11
6 EO 3P E+1 -170 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
11 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,70 % 7 EO 4C E-3 300 0 0.00
8 EO 2S N-2 -100 6 33.33
9 EO 3S S+4 520 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
1 ROGIERS Marga -MICHAUX Hélène : 27,41 %13 EO 3S S+3 690 1 5.56
14 EO 2P W+1 -140 7 38.89
15 EO 1S S = 90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 40,45 %19 EO 4P N-2 -100 18 100.00
20 EO 4P E = -620 10 55.56
21 EO 1ScE+1 -280 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges : 62,94 %22 EO 3S W+1 -630 4 22.22
23 EO 3P W-1 100 5 27.78
24 EO 2T E+1 -110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
3 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 51,83 %25 EO 3C W+2 -200 6.8 37.78
26 EO 4C S+2 680 2.3 12.78
27 EO 4P N-1 -50 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 CLERIN François-Xavier -WUYARD Alphonse : 51,67 %28 EO 1S E = -90 7 38.89
29 EO 2S W-1 100 10 55.56
30 EO 3P E-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
12 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 46,91 %31 EO 3P E-2 100 0 0.00
32 EO 4P S-1 -50 18 100.00
33 EO 2S S = 120 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
Total : 241,0 / 486 = 49,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
5 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 57,96 % 1 EO 2C E+1 -140 5 27.78
2 EO 3S W+3 -490 11 61.11
3 EO 1S N-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
11 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,70 % 4 EO 3K S+3 170 14 77.78
5 EO 3S N+3 690 13 72.22
6 EO 2S W-1 100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
12 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 46,91 % 7 EO 3S E = -600 9 50.00
8 EO 3TcS-2 -300 17 94.44
9 EO 6S S = 990 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
1 ROGIERS Marga -MICHAUX Hélène : 27,41 %10 EO 4K S-2 -200 18 100.00
11 EO 1S E+2 -150 10 55.56
12 EO 2PcW = -470 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 40,45 %16 EO 2P S-1 -50 4.6 25.56
17 EO 1S N-1 -50 16.8 93.33
18 EO 3K E+2 -150 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 54,26 %
3 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 51,83 %22 EO 3S W+3 -690 14 77.78
23 EO 4P W-1 100 5 27.78
24 EO 1S E+1 -120 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
9 CLERIN François-Xavier -WUYARD Alphonse : 51,67 %25 EO 4C W+1 -650 13.4 74.44
26 EO 3S N = 600 15.7 87.22
27 EO 3P N = 140 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 78,70 %
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 51,65 %28 EO 1S E-1 50 3 16.67
29 EO 2P E = -110 12 66.67
30 EO 3P E = -140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 58,05 %31 EO 1S N-1 -100 4 22.22
32 EO 4C N+1 450 5 27.78
33 EO 2S N = 120 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
Total : 273,8 / 486 = 56,34 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
11 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,70 % 1 EO 3C E = -140 5 27.78
2 EO 3S W+3 -490 11 61.11
3 EO 2C E+2 -170 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 41,79 % 4 EO 3K S+2 150 17 94.44
5 EO 3S N+3 690 13 72.22
6 EO 4P E-1 100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
1 ROGIERS Marga -MICHAUX Hélène : 27,41 % 7 EO 4C E = -620 17 94.44
8 EO 3K E+1 -130 13 72.22
9 EO 3K S-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
7 de WASSEIGE Ariane -STEED Mercédès : 55,70 %10 EO 2C N = 110 12 66.67
11 EO 1S E+3 -180 15 83.33
12 EO 1S N+1 120 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 40,45 %13 EO 3S S+3 690 1 5.56
14 EO 4P W = -420 15 83.33
15 EO 1S S = 90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
3 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 51,83 %19 EO 2P N+3 200 6 33.33
20 EO 4P E-1 100 3 16.67
21 EO 3P N = 140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 51,65 %25 EO 2C W+1 -140 2.3 12.78
26 EO 3S S+2 660 4.6 25.56
27 EO 3S S+1 430 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 17,04 %
10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 58,05 %28 EO 1S E-1 50 3 16.67
29 EO 3S E-2 200 5 27.78
30 EO 3P E-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
5 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 57,96 %31 EO 2P E+1 -140 10 55.56
32 EO 4P S+1 450 5 27.78
33 EO 1S S+1 120 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 236,2 / 486 = 48,60 %
PAIRE Nr : 23 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 41,79 % 1 EO 3PcS-3 -500 18 100.00
2 EO 3S W+3 -490 11 61.11
3 EO 2C E = -110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
1 ROGIERS Marga -MICHAUX Hélène : 27,41 % 4 EO 3K S+2 150 17 94.44
5 EO 3S N+1 630 18 100.00
6 EO 3P E+1 -170 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
7 de WASSEIGE Ariane -STEED Mercédès : 55,70 % 7 EO 3S W = -600 9 50.00
8 EO 2P E-2 100 0 0.00
9 EO 3S S+3 490 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 40,45 %10 EO 2C N = 110 12 66.67
11 EO 3T W+2 -150 10 55.56
12 EO 3S N-1 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges : 62,94 %13 EO 4P S+2 680 4 22.22
14 EO 4P W = -420 15 83.33
15 EO 1S S = 90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
3 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 51,83 %16 EO 2P S-1 -50 4.6 25.56
17 EO 3S N = 400 0.1 0.56
18 EO 3S W-1 50 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 15,00 %
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 51,65 %22 EO 3S W-1 100 0 0.00
23 EO 2P W+1 -140 12 66.67
24 EO 1C N = 80 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
5 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 57,96 %28 EO 1S E+1 -120 12 66.67
29 EO 4PcE-1 200 5 27.78
30 EO 3P E-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
11 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,70 %31 EO 1S N-2 -200 17 94.44
32 EO 4P S = 420 12 66.67
33 EO 1S S+2 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 248,1 / 486 = 51,05 %
PAIRE Nr : 24 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard
12 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 46,91 % 1 EO 3P S-3 -150 8 44.44
2 EO 6S W = -990 17 94.44
3 EO 1S N-2 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
9 CLERIN François-Xavier -WUYARD Alphonse : 51,67 % 4 EO 4C N+2 680 6 33.33
5 EO 3S N+4 720 8 44.44
6 EO 3P E+1 -170 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 41,79 % 7 EO 3S W = -600 9 50.00
8 EO 2C N-2 -100 6 33.33
9 EO 3S N+2 460 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
3 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 51,83 %10 EO 2C N = 110 12 66.67
11 EO 3K W+1 -130 6 33.33
12 EO 2K W-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
11 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,70 %13 EO 4P N+1 650 11 61.11
14 EO 4P W-1 50 2 11.11
15 EO 1S S = 90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
5 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 57,96 %19 EO 2P N+2 170 10 55.56
20 EO 4P E-1 100 3 16.67
21 EO 4TcW-2 300 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 40,45 %22 EO 3S W+3 -690 14 77.78
23 EO 4C S-2 -200 18 100.00
24 EO 1S E+2 -150 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
7 de WASSEIGE Ariane -STEED Mercédès : 55,70 %28 EO 1S E+1 -120 12 66.67
29 EO 4P E-3 300 0 0.00
30 EO 4K S-5 -250 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 51,65 %31 EO 1S N-1 -100 4 22.22
32 EO 4C N+1 450 5 27.78
33 EO 2S S = 120 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
Total : 246,0 / 486 = 50,62 %
|
|