|
Tournoi du 05-06-17
Lundi
1 63,23 A.3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
2 57,67 A.2 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal
3 56,35 A.5 LIBERT Laurent -HUBLET Carlo
4 50,00 A.7 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette
5 49,47 A.8 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette
6 48,41 A.6 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph
7 40,21 A.4 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse
8 34,66 A.1 FRAITURE Louis -ARICKX Roger
9 0,00 A.9 -
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 55,95 a.4 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
2 55,65 a.5 JANSSENS Pierre -MATELART Marc
3 53,27 a.3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -GERARD Francis
4 52,68 a.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques
5 50,89 a.6 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René
6 49,40 a.1 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
7 46,73 a.7 VAN DOOREN Michele -DOUETTE André
8 44,35 a.8 AUBRY Vincent -ERPICUM Patrice
9 41,07 a.9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
PAIRE Nr : A.1 FRAITURE Louis -ARICKX Roger
a.1 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 49,40 % 1 NS 1P E+2 -140 6 42.86
2 NS 3S E = -400 0 0.00
3 NS 3S S = 400 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a.9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 41,07 % 4 NS 1S S+1 120 5 35.71
5 NS 3P W = -140 3 21.43
6 NS 3C N-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 19,05 %
a.8 AUBRY Vincent -ERPICUM Patrice : 44,35 % 7 NS 2T E+4 -170 8 57.14
8 NS 2C W+1 -140 1 7.14
9 NS 3S N-2 -100 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
a.7 VAN DOOREN Michele -DOUETTE André : 46,73 %10 NS 2K S = 90 6 42.86
11 NS 4C E = -420 2 14.29
12 NS 3P W = -140 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
a.6 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 50,89 %13 NS 6S W = -1440 2 14.29
14 NS 2S S+1 150 10 71.43
15 NS 3S E = -400 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
a.5 JANSSENS Pierre -MATELART Marc : 55,65 %16 NS 4P N = 420 10 71.43
17 NS 6P E = -980 3 21.43
18 NS 2S E = -120 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a.4 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 55,95 %19 NS 2T W-1 100 11 78.57
20 NS 3S W+3 -690 0 0.00
21 NS 2S W+3 -210 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
a.3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -GERARD Francis : 53,27 %22 NS 5P E-1 100 14 100.00
23 NS 4P S-3 -300 0 0.00
24 NS 2K W = -90 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
a.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 52,68 %25 NS 3S N-1 -50 3 21.43
26 NS 3S E+2 -660 1 7.14
27 NS 3S E = -400 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
Total : 131,0 / 378 = 34,66 %
PAIRE Nr : A.2 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal
a.3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -GERARD Francis : 53,27 % 1 NS 2P E+1 -140 6 42.86
2 NS 2K N = 90 14 100.00
3 NS 3S S-3 -150 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 52,68 % 4 NS 1S S+3 180 12 85.71
5 NS 3C N+1 170 11 78.57
6 NS 3S N = 400 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 85,71 %
a.1 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 49,40 % 7 NS 3S E+2 -660 0 0.00
8 NS 3P S-2 -100 5 35.71
9 NS 3S S-1 -50 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
a.9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 41,07 %10 NS 2S W-3 300 14 100.00
11 NS 3C E = -140 6 42.86
12 NS 4P E-3 150 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
a.8 AUBRY Vincent -ERPICUM Patrice : 44,35 %13 NS 5C W+1 -680 11 78.57
14 NS 2S S+1 150 10 71.43
15 NS 3S E = -400 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
a.7 VAN DOOREN Michele -DOUETTE André : 46,73 %16 NS 4P N = 420 10 71.43
17 NS 4C E+2 -480 11 78.57
18 NS 3K W+1 -130 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a.6 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 50,89 %19 NS 2C N-2 -100 4 28.57
20 NS 3S W+2 -660 4 28.57
21 NS 2S W+1 -150 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
a.5 JANSSENS Pierre -MATELART Marc : 55,65 %22 NS 4P W+1 -650 6 42.86
23 NS 3K N = 110 6 42.86
24 NS 5K W-2 100 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
a.4 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 55,95 %25 NS 4C N+1 450 12 85.71
26 NS 3S E+1 -630 8 57.14
27 NS 3S E+1 -430 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
Total : 218,0 / 378 = 57,67 %
PAIRE Nr : A.3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
a.5 JANSSENS Pierre -MATELART Marc : 55,65 % 1 NS 2P W+1 -140 6 42.86
2 NS 1S E+1 -120 8 57.14
3 NS 3S S-2 -100 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
a.4 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 55,95 % 4 NS 1S S+1 120 5 35.71
5 NS 3C N = 140 6 42.86
6 NS 2T W-1 100 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
a.3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -GERARD Francis : 53,27 % 7 NS 3T E+2 -150 13 92.86
8 NS 4C W-1 50 13 92.86
9 NS 3S S-1 -50 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 85,71 %
a.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 52,68 %10 NS 1S W-1 100 10 71.43
11 NS 4C E-1 50 11 78.57
12 NS 4P E-2 100 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
a.1 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 49,40 %13 NS 3S W+3 -690 8 57.14
14 NS 3KcE-2 300 14 100.00
15 NS 3S E-1 50 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
a.9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 41,07 %16 NS 3P N+2 200 5 35.71
17 NS 4P E+2 -480 11 78.57
18 NS 3K E = -110 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
a.8 AUBRY Vincent -ERPICUM Patrice : 44,35 %19 NS 1S W+1 -120 1 7.14
20 NS 4C W = -620 11 78.57
21 NS 1P N = 80 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
a.7 VAN DOOREN Michele -DOUETTE André : 46,73 %22 NS 4P W+1 -650 6 42.86
23 NS 3K N+2 150 11 78.57
24 NS 3C E-1 50 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
a.6 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 50,89 %25 NS 4C N+1 450 12 85.71
26 NS 3S W = -600 14 100.00
27 NS 3S E+2 -460 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
Total : 239,0 / 378 = 63,23 %
PAIRE Nr : A.4 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse
a.7 VAN DOOREN Michele -DOUETTE André : 46,73 % 1 NS 3P W-1 50 13 92.86
2 NS 1S E+3 -180 2 14.29
3 NS 3S N-3 -150 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
a.6 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 50,89 % 4 NS 1S N+1 120 5 35.71
5 NS 3C N+1 170 11 78.57
6 NS 3S W-3 300 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
a.5 JANSSENS Pierre -MATELART Marc : 55,65 % 7 NS 4P E = -620 4 28.57
8 NS 3T N-1 -50 9 64.29
9 NS 3S S-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
a.4 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 55,95 %10 NS 1S W+1 -120 0 0.00
11 NS 4C E-1 50 11 78.57
12 NS 2P N-4 -400 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
a.3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -GERARD Francis : 53,27 %13 NS 6S W = -1440 2 14.29
14 NS 1S N-1 -50 2 14.29
15 NS 3S E-1 50 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 52,68 %16 NS 2P N+2 170 2 14.29
17 NS 6P E = -980 3 21.43
18 NS 1C N = 80 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
a.1 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 49,40 %19 NS 2S W-1 100 11 78.57
20 NS 3S W+2 -660 4 28.57
21 NS 3PcN = 730 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
a.9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 41,07 %22 NS 4P E+1 -650 6 42.86
23 NS 2K N+3 150 11 78.57
24 NS 2K W+1 -110 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a.8 AUBRY Vincent -ERPICUM Patrice : 44,35 %25 NS 6S N-3 -150 0 0.00
26 NS 3S E+2 -660 1 7.14
27 NS 3S E+2 -460 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 14,29 %
Total : 152,0 / 378 = 40,21 %
PAIRE Nr : A.5 LIBERT Laurent -HUBLET Carlo
a.9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 41,07 % 1 NS 2C S-3 -150 2 14.29
2 NS 1S E = -90 12 85.71
3 NS 3CcE-3 800 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.8 AUBRY Vincent -ERPICUM Patrice : 44,35 % 4 NS 1S S+2 150 10 71.43
5 NS 3C N+1 170 11 78.57
6 NS 3S N = 400 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 80,95 %
a.7 VAN DOOREN Michele -DOUETTE André : 46,73 % 7 NS 3T E+3 -170 8 57.14
8 NS 2C W+1 -140 1 7.14
9 NS 3S S-1 -50 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
a.6 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 50,89 %10 NS 2K S = 90 6 42.86
11 NS 4C E = -420 2 14.29
12 NS 4P E-2 100 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
a.5 JANSSENS Pierre -MATELART Marc : 55,65 %13 NS 6C W = -1430 6 42.86
14 NS 2C S+1 140 5 35.71
15 NS 3S E-1 50 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.4 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 55,95 %16 NS 4P N+1 450 14 100.00
17 NS 5P E+1 -480 11 78.57
18 NS 2S E = -120 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
a.3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -GERARD Francis : 53,27 %19 NS 2C N-1 -50 6 42.86
20 NS 3S W+1 -630 8 57.14
21 NS 4C S-2 -200 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
a.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 52,68 %22 NS 4P W+1 -650 6 42.86
23 NS 4P S-2 -200 3 21.43
24 NS 2K W = -90 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.1 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 49,40 %25 NS 4C N+1 450 12 85.71
26 NS 3S E+1 -630 8 57.14
27 NS 7S E-3 150 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 80,95 %
Total : 213,0 / 378 = 56,35 %
PAIRE Nr : A.6 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph
a.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 52,68 % 1 NS 2P W+2 -170 0 0.00
2 NS 1S E+1 -120 8 57.14
3 NS 3S S-2 -100 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
a.1 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 49,40 % 4 NS 1S S = 90 0 0.00
5 NS 2C N+2 170 11 78.57
6 NS 3S N-2 -100 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
a.9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 41,07 % 7 NS 3T E+2 -150 13 92.86
8 NS 3T N-1 -50 9 64.29
9 NS 3S S-1 -50 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
a.8 AUBRY Vincent -ERPICUM Patrice : 44,35 %10 NS 1P N+1 110 12 85.71
11 NS 4C E-1 50 11 78.57
12 NS 4P E-3 150 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 85,71 %
a.7 VAN DOOREN Michele -DOUETTE André : 46,73 %13 NS 6C W-1 100 14 100.00
14 NS 2S S+1 150 10 71.43
15 NS 3S E-2 100 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,48 %
a.6 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 50,89 %16 NS 3CcE-1 200 5 35.71
17 NS 6P E = -980 3 21.43
18 NS 3K W+1 -130 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
a.5 JANSSENS Pierre -MATELART Marc : 55,65 %19 NS 1S W+1 -120 1 7.14
20 NS 3S W+2 -660 4 28.57
21 NS 3T W = -110 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
a.4 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 55,95 %22 NS 4P E+1 -650 6 42.86
23 NS 4P N-2 -200 3 21.43
24 NS 3K W = -110 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
a.3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -GERARD Francis : 53,27 %25 NS 3S N-1 -50 3 21.43
26 NS 3S E+1 -630 8 57.14
27 NS 3S W+1 -430 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
Total : 183,0 / 378 = 48,41 %
PAIRE Nr : A.7 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette
a.4 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 55,95 % 1 NS 3K N-1 -50 10 71.43
2 NS 1S E+1 -120 8 57.14
3 NS 1S S+1 120 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -GERARD Francis : 53,27 % 4 NS 1S N+1 120 5 35.71
5 NS 4CcN-1 -200 0 0.00
6 NS 2T W = -90 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
a.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 52,68 % 7 NS 4T E+2 -170 8 57.14
8 NS 3C W-1 50 13 92.86
9 NS 3S N-1 -50 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
a.1 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 49,40 %10 NS 3K S-1 -100 2 14.29
11 NS 4C E = -420 2 14.29
12 NS 4P E = -420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,52 %
a.9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 41,07 %13 NS 4C W+2 -680 11 78.57
14 NS 2C N+1 140 5 35.71
15 NS 3S E = -400 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
a.8 AUBRY Vincent -ERPICUM Patrice : 44,35 %16 NS 4P N = 420 10 71.43
17 NS 6P E = -980 3 21.43
18 NS 1S W = -90 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
a.7 VAN DOOREN Michele -DOUETTE André : 46,73 %19 NS 2T W-1 100 11 78.57
20 NS 4C W = -620 11 78.57
21 NS 3T W = -110 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
a.6 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 50,89 %22 NS 4P E+1 -650 6 42.86
23 NS 3K N+3 170 14 100.00
24 NS 3K W-1 50 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
a.5 JANSSENS Pierre -MATELART Marc : 55,65 %25 NS 1S N+1 120 6 42.86
26 NS 3S E+1 -630 8 57.14
27 NS 3S E+3 -490 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
Total : 189,0 / 378 = 50,00 %
PAIRE Nr : A.8 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette
a.6 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 50,89 % 1 NS 3P E-1 50 13 92.86
2 NS 1S E+2 -150 4 28.57
3 NS 3S S-1 -50 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
a.5 JANSSENS Pierre -MATELART Marc : 55,65 % 4 NS 2P W-2 200 14 100.00
5 NS 3P E = -140 3 21.43
6 NS 3T W-2 200 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
a.4 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 55,95 % 7 NS 3S W+1 -630 2 14.29
8 NS 4T N-2 -100 5 35.71
9 NS 3S S-2 -100 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
a.3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -GERARD Francis : 53,27 %10 NS 2K S = 90 6 42.86
11 NS 4P E-1 50 11 78.57
12 NS 3P E = -140 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 52,68 %13 NS 6S E = -1440 2 14.29
14 NS 3S N-3 -150 0 0.00
15 NS 3S E+1 -430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 4,76 %
a.1 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 49,40 %16 NS 3P N = 140 0 0.00
17 NS 4P E+2 -480 11 78.57
18 NS 2S E-3 150 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
a.9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 41,07 %19 NS 2T W-1 100 11 78.57
20 NS 3S W = -600 14 100.00
21 NS 1P N-1 -100 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
a.8 AUBRY Vincent -ERPICUM Patrice : 44,35 %22 NS 4P W+1 -650 6 42.86
23 NS 3K N+1 130 8 57.14
24 NS 3S W-2 100 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
a.7 VAN DOOREN Michele -DOUETTE André : 46,73 %25 NS 4C N = 420 8 57.14
26 NS 3S E+1 -630 8 57.14
27 NS 6K E = -920 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
Total : 187,0 / 378 = 49,47 %
PAIRE Nr : A.9 -
a.8 AUBRY Vincent -ERPICUM Patrice : 44,35 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.7 VAN DOOREN Michele -DOUETTE André : 46,73 % 4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.6 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 50,89 % 7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.5 JANSSENS Pierre -MATELART Marc : 55,65 %10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.4 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 55,95 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -GERARD Francis : 53,27 %16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 52,68 %19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.1 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 49,40 %22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 41,07 %25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00
27 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 378 = 0,00 %
PAIRE Nr : a.1 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -ARICKX Roger : 34,66 % 1 EO 1P E+2 -140 8 57.14
2 EO 3S E = -400 14 100.00
3 EO 3S S = 400 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A.6 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 48,41 % 4 EO 1S S = 90 14 100.00
5 EO 2C N+2 170 3 21.43
6 EO 3S N-2 -100 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
A.2 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 57,67 % 7 EO 3S E+2 -660 14 100.00
8 EO 3P S-2 -100 9 64.29
9 EO 3S S-1 -50 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
A.7 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 50,00 %10 EO 3K S-1 -100 12 85.71
11 EO 4C E = -420 12 85.71
12 EO 4P E = -420 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,48 %
A.3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 63,23 %13 EO 3S W+3 -690 6 42.86
14 EO 3KcE-2 300 0 0.00
15 EO 3S E-1 50 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
A.8 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 49,47 %16 EO 3P N = 140 14 100.00
17 EO 4P E+2 -480 3 21.43
18 EO 2S E-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
A.4 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,21 %19 EO 2S W-1 100 3 21.43
20 EO 3S W+2 -660 10 71.43
21 EO 3PcN = 730 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
A.9 - : 0,00 %22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.5 LIBERT Laurent -HUBLET Carlo : 56,35 %25 EO 4C N+1 450 2 14.29
26 EO 3S E+1 -630 6 42.86
27 EO 7S E-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 19,05 %
Total : 166,0 / 336 = 49,40 %
PAIRE Nr : a.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques
A.6 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 48,41 % 1 EO 2P W+2 -170 14 100.00
2 EO 1S E+1 -120 6 42.86
3 EO 3S S-2 -100 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
A.2 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 57,67 % 4 EO 1S S+3 180 2 14.29
5 EO 3C N+1 170 3 21.43
6 EO 3S N = 400 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 14,29 %
A.7 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 50,00 % 7 EO 4T E+2 -170 6 42.86
8 EO 3C W-1 50 1 7.14
9 EO 3S N-1 -50 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
A.3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 63,23 %10 EO 1S W-1 100 4 28.57
11 EO 4C E-1 50 3 21.43
12 EO 4P E-2 100 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
A.8 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 49,47 %13 EO 6S E = -1440 12 85.71
14 EO 3S N-3 -150 14 100.00
15 EO 3S E+1 -430 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 95,24 %
A.4 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,21 %16 EO 2P N+2 170 12 85.71
17 EO 6P E = -980 11 78.57
18 EO 1C N = 80 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
A.9 - : 0,00 %19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.5 LIBERT Laurent -HUBLET Carlo : 56,35 %22 EO 4P W+1 -650 8 57.14
23 EO 4P S-2 -200 11 78.57
24 EO 2K W = -90 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -ARICKX Roger : 34,66 %25 EO 3S N-1 -50 11 78.57
26 EO 3S E+2 -660 13 92.86
27 EO 3S E = -400 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
Total : 177,0 / 336 = 52,68 %
PAIRE Nr : a.3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -GERARD Francis
A.2 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 57,67 % 1 EO 2P E+1 -140 8 57.14
2 EO 2K N = 90 0 0.00
3 EO 3S S-3 -150 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.7 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 50,00 % 4 EO 1S N+1 120 9 64.29
5 EO 4CcN-1 -200 14 100.00
6 EO 2T W = -90 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
A.3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 63,23 % 7 EO 3T E+2 -150 1 7.14
8 EO 4C W-1 50 1 7.14
9 EO 3S S-1 -50 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 14,29 %
A.8 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 49,47 %10 EO 2K S = 90 8 57.14
11 EO 4P E-1 50 3 21.43
12 EO 3P E = -140 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.4 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,21 %13 EO 6S W = -1440 12 85.71
14 EO 1S N-1 -50 12 85.71
15 EO 3S E-1 50 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.9 - : 0,00 %16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.5 LIBERT Laurent -HUBLET Carlo : 56,35 %19 EO 2C N-1 -50 8 57.14
20 EO 3S W+1 -630 6 42.86
21 EO 4C S-2 -200 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -ARICKX Roger : 34,66 %22 EO 5P E-1 100 0 0.00
23 EO 4P S-3 -300 14 100.00
24 EO 2K W = -90 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A.6 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 48,41 %25 EO 3S N-1 -50 11 78.57
26 EO 3S E+1 -630 6 42.86
27 EO 3S W+1 -430 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
Total : 179,0 / 336 = 53,27 %
PAIRE Nr : a.4 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
A.7 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 50,00 % 1 EO 3K N-1 -50 4 28.57
2 EO 1S E+1 -120 6 42.86
3 EO 1S S+1 120 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 63,23 % 4 EO 1S S+1 120 9 64.29
5 EO 3C N = 140 8 57.14
6 EO 2T W-1 100 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
A.8 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 49,47 % 7 EO 3S W+1 -630 12 85.71
8 EO 4T N-2 -100 9 64.29
9 EO 3S S-2 -100 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
A.4 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,21 %10 EO 1S W+1 -120 14 100.00
11 EO 4C E-1 50 3 21.43
12 EO 2P N-4 -400 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
A.9 - : 0,00 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.5 LIBERT Laurent -HUBLET Carlo : 56,35 %16 EO 4P N+1 450 0 0.00
17 EO 5P E+1 -480 3 21.43
18 EO 2S E = -120 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -ARICKX Roger : 34,66 %19 EO 2T W-1 100 3 21.43
20 EO 3S W+3 -690 14 100.00
21 EO 2S W+3 -210 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
A.6 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 48,41 %22 EO 4P E+1 -650 8 57.14
23 EO 4P N-2 -200 11 78.57
24 EO 3K W = -110 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
A.2 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 57,67 %25 EO 4C N+1 450 2 14.29
26 EO 3S E+1 -630 6 42.86
27 EO 3S E+1 -430 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
Total : 188,0 / 336 = 55,95 %
PAIRE Nr : a.5 JANSSENS Pierre -MATELART Marc
A.3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 63,23 % 1 EO 2P W+1 -140 8 57.14
2 EO 1S E+1 -120 6 42.86
3 EO 3S S-2 -100 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A.8 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 49,47 % 4 EO 2P W-2 200 0 0.00
5 EO 3P E = -140 11 78.57
6 EO 3T W-2 200 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
A.4 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,21 % 7 EO 4P E = -620 10 71.43
8 EO 3T N-1 -50 5 35.71
9 EO 3S S-3 -150 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
A.9 - : 0,00 %10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.5 LIBERT Laurent -HUBLET Carlo : 56,35 %13 EO 6C W = -1430 8 57.14
14 EO 2C S+1 140 9 64.29
15 EO 3S E-1 50 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -ARICKX Roger : 34,66 %16 EO 4P N = 420 4 28.57
17 EO 6P E = -980 11 78.57
18 EO 2S E = -120 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A.6 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 48,41 %19 EO 1S W+1 -120 13 92.86
20 EO 3S W+2 -660 10 71.43
21 EO 3T W = -110 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
A.2 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 57,67 %22 EO 4P W+1 -650 8 57.14
23 EO 3K N = 110 8 57.14
24 EO 5K W-2 100 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
A.7 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 50,00 %25 EO 1S N+1 120 8 57.14
26 EO 3S E+1 -630 6 42.86
27 EO 3S E+3 -490 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
Total : 187,0 / 336 = 55,65 %
PAIRE Nr : a.6 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René
A.8 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 49,47 % 1 EO 3P E-1 50 1 7.14
2 EO 1S E+2 -150 10 71.43
3 EO 3S S-1 -50 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
A.4 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,21 % 4 EO 1S N+1 120 9 64.29
5 EO 3C N+1 170 3 21.43
6 EO 3S W-3 300 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
A.9 - : 0,00 % 7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.5 LIBERT Laurent -HUBLET Carlo : 56,35 %10 EO 2K S = 90 8 57.14
11 EO 4C E = -420 12 85.71
12 EO 4P E-2 100 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -ARICKX Roger : 34,66 %13 EO 6S W = -1440 12 85.71
14 EO 2S S+1 150 4 28.57
15 EO 3S E = -400 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
A.6 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 48,41 %16 EO 3CcE-1 200 9 64.29
17 EO 6P E = -980 11 78.57
18 EO 3K W+1 -130 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
A.2 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 57,67 %19 EO 2C N-2 -100 10 71.43
20 EO 3S W+2 -660 10 71.43
21 EO 2S W+1 -150 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
A.7 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 50,00 %22 EO 4P E+1 -650 8 57.14
23 EO 3K N+3 170 0 0.00
24 EO 3K W-1 50 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
A.3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 63,23 %25 EO 4C N+1 450 2 14.29
26 EO 3S W = -600 0 0.00
27 EO 3S E+2 -460 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
Total : 171,0 / 336 = 50,89 %
PAIRE Nr : a.7 VAN DOOREN Michele -DOUETTE André
A.4 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,21 % 1 EO 3P W-1 50 1 7.14
2 EO 1S E+3 -180 12 85.71
3 EO 3S N-3 -150 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
A.9 - : 0,00 % 4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.5 LIBERT Laurent -HUBLET Carlo : 56,35 % 7 EO 3T E+3 -170 6 42.86
8 EO 2C W+1 -140 13 92.86
9 EO 3S S-1 -50 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -ARICKX Roger : 34,66 %10 EO 2K S = 90 8 57.14
11 EO 4C E = -420 12 85.71
12 EO 3P W = -140 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
A.6 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 48,41 %13 EO 6C W-1 100 0 0.00
14 EO 2S S+1 150 4 28.57
15 EO 3S E-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,52 %
A.2 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 57,67 %16 EO 4P N = 420 4 28.57
17 EO 4C E+2 -480 3 21.43
18 EO 3K W+1 -130 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.7 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 50,00 %19 EO 2T W-1 100 3 21.43
20 EO 4C W = -620 3 21.43
21 EO 3T W = -110 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
A.3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 63,23 %22 EO 4P W+1 -650 8 57.14
23 EO 3K N+2 150 3 21.43
24 EO 3C E-1 50 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
A.8 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 49,47 %25 EO 4C N = 420 6 42.86
26 EO 3S E+1 -630 6 42.86
27 EO 6K E = -920 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
Total : 157,0 / 336 = 46,73 %
PAIRE Nr : a.8 AUBRY Vincent -ERPICUM Patrice
A.9 - : 0,00 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.5 LIBERT Laurent -HUBLET Carlo : 56,35 % 4 EO 1S S+2 150 4 28.57
5 EO 3C N+1 170 3 21.43
6 EO 3S N = 400 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 19,05 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -ARICKX Roger : 34,66 % 7 EO 2T E+4 -170 6 42.86
8 EO 2C W+1 -140 13 92.86
9 EO 3S N-2 -100 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
A.6 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 48,41 %10 EO 1P N+1 110 2 14.29
11 EO 4C E-1 50 3 21.43
12 EO 4P E-3 150 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 14,29 %
A.2 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 57,67 %13 EO 5C W+1 -680 3 21.43
14 EO 2S S+1 150 4 28.57
15 EO 3S E = -400 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
A.7 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 50,00 %16 EO 4P N = 420 4 28.57
17 EO 6P E = -980 11 78.57
18 EO 1S W = -90 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
A.3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 63,23 %19 EO 1S W+1 -120 13 92.86
20 EO 4C W = -620 3 21.43
21 EO 1P N = 80 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
A.8 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 49,47 %22 EO 4P W+1 -650 8 57.14
23 EO 3K N+1 130 6 42.86
24 EO 3S W-2 100 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
A.4 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,21 %25 EO 6S N-3 -150 14 100.00
26 EO 3S E+2 -660 13 92.86
27 EO 3S E+2 -460 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 85,71 %
Total : 149,0 / 336 = 44,35 %
PAIRE Nr : a.9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
A.5 LIBERT Laurent -HUBLET Carlo : 56,35 % 1 EO 2C S-3 -150 12 85.71
2 EO 1S E = -90 2 14.29
3 EO 3CcE-3 800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -ARICKX Roger : 34,66 % 4 EO 1S S+1 120 9 64.29
5 EO 3P W = -140 11 78.57
6 EO 3C N-3 -150 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 80,95 %
A.6 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 48,41 % 7 EO 3T E+2 -150 1 7.14
8 EO 3T N-1 -50 5 35.71
9 EO 3S S-1 -50 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
A.2 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 57,67 %10 EO 2S W-3 300 0 0.00
11 EO 3C E = -140 8 57.14
12 EO 4P E-3 150 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
A.7 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 50,00 %13 EO 4C W+2 -680 3 21.43
14 EO 2C N+1 140 9 64.29
15 EO 3S E = -400 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
A.3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 63,23 %16 EO 3P N+2 200 9 64.29
17 EO 4P E+2 -480 3 21.43
18 EO 3K E = -110 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
A.8 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 49,47 %19 EO 2T W-1 100 3 21.43
20 EO 3S W = -600 0 0.00
21 EO 1P N-1 -100 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
A.4 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,21 %22 EO 4P E+1 -650 8 57.14
23 EO 2K N+3 150 3 21.43
24 EO 2K W+1 -110 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A.9 - : 0,00 %25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00
27 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 138,0 / 336 = 41,07 %
|
|