|
Tournoi du 05-12-16
Lundi
1 58,94 14 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
2 57,33 3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
3 57,04 1 FRAITURE Louis -MATELART Marc
4 54,42 9 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
5 53,93 12 VUYTS Michèle -PIETQUIN Joseph
6 51,14 5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
7 50,56 13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
8 49,24 11 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard
9 47,82 4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David
10 47,35 10 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger
11 47,12 2 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse
12 46,04 7 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine
13 40,24 6 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette
14 39,10 8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 60,85 26 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent
2 56,18 27 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane
3 53,39 21 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert
4 51,78 17 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette
5 51,33 24 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
6 51,22 19 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -DEGUELLE Jacques
7 50,94 28 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
8 50,79 16 BERGER Jean Marie -COLLIN Jean-Marie
9 50,57 23 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René
10 50,28 22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
11 48,31 15 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques
12 48,11 25 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
13 45,94 20 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
14 30,04 18 ROMAIN Roberte -DEMARTHE DINA
PAIRE Nr : 1 FRAITURE Louis -MATELART Marc
15 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 48,31 % 1 NS 1S E+1 -120 4 16.67
2 NS 4C S+2 680 9 37.50
3 NS 3T E+1 -130 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 30,56 %
25 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,11 % 4 NS 2P N+3 200 22 91.67
5 NS 4P E-3 150 17 70.83
6 NS 2P S-1 -50 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 68,06 %
24 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,33 % 7 NS 3T S = 110 19 79.17
8 NS 4CcN-3 -500 0 0.00
9 NS 4P E-1 100 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 47,22 %
23 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 50,57 %10 NS 4P S+1 650 24 100.00
11 NS 2S N = 120 9 37.50
12 NS 4C S = 620 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 50,28 %13 NS 3P W = -140 4 16.67
14 NS 3T E+1 -130 0 0.00
15 NS 6P E-1 50 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
27 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 56,18 %16 NS 5T W = -600 19 79.17
17 NS 4P E = -420 9 37.50
18 NS 6S E-1 50 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
20 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,94 %19 NS 1S N+1 120 18 75.00
20 NS 3K S-2 -200 1 4.17
21 NS 4P W-1 50 6 25.00 µ Tbl = 34,72 %
19 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -DEGUELLE Jacques : 51,22 %22 NS 4PcW-2 500 24 100.00
23 NS 5KcW-2 500 23.9 99.58
24 NS 3T N-1 -50 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 70,69 %
18 ROMAIN Roberte -DEMARTHE DINA : 30,04 %25 NS 1S E-1 100 18.5 77.08
26 NS 4C N = 620 23.9 99.58
27 NS 3S N+1 430 21.8 90.83 µ Tbl = 89,17 %
17 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 51,78 %28 NS 2P E = -110 14.2 59.17
29 NS 2P N-1 -100 12 50.00
30 NS 3K S+1 130 17.4 72.50 µ Tbl = 60,56 %
Total : 410,7 / 720 = 57,04 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse
16 BERGER Jean Marie -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 50,79 % 4 NS 2P S+1 140 18 75.00
5 NS 4P E-1 50 14 58.33
6 NS 2S N+1 150 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
15 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 48,31 % 7 NS 1S N+4 210 24 100.00
8 NS 3S N+2 460 24 100.00
9 NS 4P E-1 100 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 87,50 %
25 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,11 %10 NS 3P S+1 170 7 29.17
11 NS 2S N-1 -50 2 8.33
12 NS 4C S+1 650 23 95.83 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
24 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,33 %13 NS 3C S = 140 17 70.83
14 NS 4KcN+1 610 24 100.00
15 NS 7S E = -1520 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 59,72 %
23 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 50,57 %16 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 16.67
17 NS 3S W-1 50 19 79.17
18 NS 3S E+2 -460 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
28 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 50,94 %19 NS 2S N-1 -50 6 25.00
20 NS 2P W = -110 4 16.67
21 NS 4C S-1 -100 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
26 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 60,85 %22 NS 4K E-1 100 12 50.00
23 NS 5K W-1 100 9.8 40.83
24 NS 4PcE-2 300 20 83.33 µ Tbl = 58,06 %
20 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,94 %25 NS 3C N-3 -150 0.1 0.42
26 NS 2S S-1 -100 7.7 32.08
27 NS 3S N = 400 8.8 36.67 µ Tbl = 23,06 %
19 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -DEGUELLE Jacques : 51,22 %28 NS 3S N-2 -200 8.8 36.67
29 NS 3C S-2 -200 1.2 5.00
30 NS 3S N-3 -150 0.1 0.42 µ Tbl = 14,03 %
18 ROMAIN Roberte -DEMARTHE DINA : 30,04 %31 NS 1S E+1 -120 7.7 32.08
32 NS 2S N-3 -150 2.3 9.58
33 NS 1S N-2 -100 21.8 90.83 µ Tbl = 44,17 %
Total : 339,3 / 720 = 47,12 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
19 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -DEGUELLE Jacques : 51,22 % 1 NS 1S E-1 50 23 95.83
2 NS 4C S+2 680 9 37.50
3 NS 3T E+1 -130 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 56,94 %
17 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 51,78 % 7 NS 3C E-1 100 11 45.83
8 NS 3S N+1 430 21 87.50
9 NS 4P E-1 100 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 65,28 %
26 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 60,85 %10 NS 5PcS-1 -200 0 0.00
11 NS 1S N+1 120 9 37.50
12 NS 4C S = 620 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
15 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 48,31 %13 NS 3C S = 140 17 70.83
14 NS 5K N = 400 22 91.67
15 NS 7S E = -1520 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 56,94 %
25 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,11 %16 NS 3S E+1 -630 11 45.83
17 NS 4P E-1 50 19 79.17
18 NS 3K W+2 -150 20 83.33 µ Tbl = 69,44 %
24 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,33 %19 NS 1S N+1 120 18 75.00
20 NS 3T N = 110 18 75.00
21 NS 4C S = 620 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
23 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 50,57 %22 NS 4T N-3 -150 6 25.00
23 NS 4T N+2 170 15.3 63.75
24 NS 4T N-1 -50 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 33,75 %
27 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 56,18 %25 NS 2P W-1 100 18.5 77.08
26 NS 1S S+2 150 18.5 77.08
27 NS 3S N = 400 8.8 36.67 µ Tbl = 63,61 %
21 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 53,39 %28 NS 3S N-3 -300 2.3 9.58
29 NS 1S W+1 -120 4.4 18.33
30 NS 3S N = 400 23.9 99.58 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
20 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,94 %31 NS 3S E-1 50 22.8 95.00
32 NS 1S N = 90 22.8 95.00
33 NS 2T W+1 -110 18.5 77.08 µ Tbl = 89,03 %
Total : 412,8 / 720 = 57,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David
21 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 53,39 % 1 NS 1S E = -90 15 62.50
2 NS 4C S+2 680 9 37.50
3 NS 3T E+1 -130 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
20 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,94 % 4 NS Pass Passe 7 29.17
5 NS 4PcE-2 300 21 87.50
6 NS 4T S-1 -50 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 52,78 %
18 ROMAIN Roberte -DEMARTHE DINA : 30,04 %10 NS 4P S = 620 18 75.00
11 NS 1S S+2 150 17 70.83
12 NS 4C S = 620 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
27 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 56,18 %13 NS 4P E-1 100 13 54.17
14 NS 5T E-1 50 5 20.83
15 NS 7S E = -1520 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
16 BERGER Jean Marie -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 50,79 %16 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 16.67
17 NS 3S W+1 -430 4 16.67
18 NS 4C E+1 -450 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
15 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 48,31 %19 NS 1S N = 90 12 50.00
20 NS 1S S-1 -100 8 33.33
21 NS 4PcW-2 300 11 45.83 µ Tbl = 43,06 %
25 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,11 %22 NS 4K E-2 200 19 79.17
23 NS 4T N = 130 13.1 54.58
24 NS 3T S = 110 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 65,42 %
24 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,33 %25 NS 1S S-2 -100 2.3 9.58
26 NS 3KcE-2 500 21.8 90.83
27 NS 3S N = 400 8.8 36.67 µ Tbl = 45,69 %
28 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 50,94 %28 NS 3S S-1 -100 18.5 77.08
29 NS 3K E = -110 7.7 32.08
30 NS 2S N+1 150 21.8 90.83 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
26 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 60,85 %31 NS 1S E+1 -120 7.7 32.08
32 NS 2K E = -90 14.2 59.17
33 NS 2S E+1 -150 4.4 18.33 µ Tbl = 36,53 %
Total : 344,3 / 720 = 47,82 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
27 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 56,18 % 1 NS 1S E+1 -120 4 16.67
2 NS 4C S+2 680 9 37.50
3 NS 4T E-1 100 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 47,22 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 50,28 % 4 NS 4P S = 620 24 100.00
5 NS 5C N-2 -200 4 16.67
6 NS 2S N = 120 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 68,06 %
21 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 53,39 % 7 NS 3S S-2 -200 0 0.00
8 NS 4P S-1 -50 7 29.17
9 NS 3S W = -600 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
19 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -DEGUELLE Jacques : 51,22 %13 NS 4C S = 620 23 95.83
14 NS 4K S = 130 12 50.00
15 NS 4S W+3 -520 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
28 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 50,94 %16 NS 5T W = -600 19 79.17
17 NS 2S W+4 -240 14 58.33
18 NS 3S E+2 -460 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 59,72 %
26 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 60,85 %19 NS 2T N+2 130 22 91.67
20 NS 1C W-1 100 14 58.33
21 NS 5C S-1 -100 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 52,78 %
16 BERGER Jean Marie -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 50,79 %22 NS 4P W-2 200 19 79.17
23 NS 4K W = -130 3.3 13.75
24 NS 4KcW-3 500 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,31 %
15 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 48,31 %25 NS 1S S-1 -50 6.6 27.50
26 NS 2S S+1 150 18.5 77.08
27 NS 3S S = 400 8.8 36.67 µ Tbl = 47,08 %
25 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,11 %28 NS 3S S-2 -200 8.8 36.67
29 NS 2C S = 110 17.4 72.50
30 NS 3K S+1 130 17.4 72.50 µ Tbl = 60,56 %
24 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,33 %31 NS 1S E+1 -120 7.7 32.08
32 NS 4C S-2 -100 6.6 27.50
33 NS 3S E+1 -430 0.1 0.42 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
Total : 368,2 / 720 = 51,14 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette
25 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,11 % 1 NS 1S E+1 -120 4 16.67
2 NS 4C S+2 680 9 37.50
3 NS 3T E+1 -130 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 30,56 %
28 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 50,94 % 4 NS Pass Passe 7 29.17
5 NS 3P E = -140 10 41.67
6 NS 2P S-4 -200 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 26,39 %
26 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 60,85 % 7 NS 3C E-1 100 11 45.83
8 NS 3C N = 140 17 70.83
9 NS 4P E = -620 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 43,06 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 50,28 %10 NS 2P S+2 170 7 29.17
11 NS 1S N+1 120 9 37.50
12 NS 4C S = 620 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 34,72 %
20 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,94 %16 NS 6T W-1 100 24 100.00
17 NS 5T E-2 100 23 95.83
18 NS 3S E+3 -490 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 68,06 %
19 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -DEGUELLE Jacques : 51,22 %19 NS 2S N-3 -150 0 0.00
20 NS 3T N-1 -100 8 33.33
21 NS 4C S+1 650 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 40,28 %
27 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 56,18 %22 NS 3S E+2 -660 0 0.00
23 NS 50%50% Ajust 12 50.00
24 NS 3P E = -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
17 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 51,78 %25 NS 2P W-1 100 18.5 77.08
26 NS 1C N = 80 10.9 45.42
27 NS 3S N = 400 8.8 36.67 µ Tbl = 53,06 %
16 BERGER Jean Marie -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 50,79 %28 NS 3S N-3 -300 2.3 9.58
29 NS 3CcS-1 -200 1.2 5.00
30 NS 3S N-1 -50 5.5 22.92 µ Tbl = 12,50 %
15 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 48,31 %31 NS 1S E = -90 17.4 72.50
32 NS 2K E = -90 14.2 59.17
33 NS 2S E-1 50 23.9 99.58 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
Total : 289,7 / 720 = 40,24 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine
16 BERGER Jean Marie -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 50,79 % 1 NS 1S E = -90 15 62.50
2 NS 4C S+2 680 9 37.50
3 NS 3T E+1 -130 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
15 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 48,31 % 4 NS 2P S+1 140 18 75.00
5 NS 4P E = -420 1 4.17
6 NS 4TcN-2 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 26,39 %
25 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,11 % 7 NS 3C E-1 100 11 45.83
8 NS 2C N = 110 12 50.00
9 NS 4P E-1 100 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 52,78 %
27 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 56,18 %10 NS 3P S+1 170 7 29.17
11 NS 1S N+1 120 9 37.50
12 NS 4C S = 620 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 34,72 %
23 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 50,57 %13 NS 4P W-1 100 13 54.17
14 NS 5T E-1 50 5 20.83
15 NS 4P E+2 -480 18 75.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
21 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 53,39 %19 NS 1S N = 90 12 50.00
20 NS 2S S-1 -100 8 33.33
21 NS 4PcW-2 300 11 45.83 µ Tbl = 43,06 %
20 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,94 %22 NS 3S E = -600 2 8.33
23 NS 5K W-2 200 18.5 77.08
24 NS 3P E-2 100 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 42,36 %
28 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 50,94 %25 NS 2P W-1 100 18.5 77.08
26 NS 1S E-1 100 13.1 54.58
27 NS 3S N+1 430 21.8 90.83 µ Tbl = 74,17 %
26 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 60,85 %28 NS 2P E = -110 14.2 59.17
29 NS 3K E = -110 7.7 32.08
30 NS 4T W-2 100 10.9 45.42 µ Tbl = 45,56 %
17 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 51,78 %31 NS 1S E+2 -150 1.2 5.00
32 NS 2S N-1 -50 19.6 81.67
33 NS 2S W = -120 12 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,56 %
Total : 331,5 / 720 = 46,04 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
18 ROMAIN Roberte -DEMARTHE DINA : 30,04 % 1 NS 1S E-1 50 23 95.83
2 NS 6C S = 1430 22 91.67
3 NS 3S W-3 300 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 95,83 %
17 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 51,78 % 4 NS 2P S+1 140 18 75.00
5 NS 4P E-3 150 17 70.83
6 NS 3T N-1 -50 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
16 BERGER Jean Marie -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 50,79 % 7 NS 3C E-2 200 22 91.67
8 NS 3C N-1 -50 7 29.17
9 NS 4P E = -620 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
15 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 48,31 %10 NS 3P S+2 200 12 50.00
11 NS 1S N-2 -100 0 0.00
12 NS 4C S = 620 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
28 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 50,94 %13 NS 3P W = -140 4 16.67
14 NS 3K N+2 150 18 75.00
15 NS 6S E+1 -1020 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
26 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 60,85 %16 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 16.67
17 NS 4P E+1 -450 1 4.17
18 NS 3S E+3 -490 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 9,72 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 50,28 %22 NS 3K E-1 100 12 50.00
23 NS 5TcN-1 -200 0.1 0.42
24 NS 3P E-1 50 6 25.00 µ Tbl = 25,14 %
21 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 53,39 %25 NS 2C N-1 -50 6.6 27.50
26 NS 2C N-2 -200 2.3 9.58
27 NS 3S N = 400 8.8 36.67 µ Tbl = 24,58 %
20 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,94 %28 NS 3S N-1 -100 18.5 77.08
29 NS 3C S-1 -100 12 50.00
30 NS 2P N-1 -50 5.5 22.92 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
27 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 56,18 %31 NS 1S E+2 -150 1.2 5.00
32 NS 2S N-4 -200 0.1 0.42
33 NS 2S E+1 -150 4.4 18.33 µ Tbl = 7,92 %
Total : 281,5 / 720 = 39,10 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
28 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 50,94 % 1 NS 1S E = -90 15 62.50
2 NS 4C S+2 680 9 37.50
3 NS 3T E+1 -130 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
26 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 60,85 % 4 NS Pass Passe 7 29.17
5 NS 5CcN = 850 24 100.00
6 NS 3T N-1 -50 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 56,94 %
18 ROMAIN Roberte -DEMARTHE DINA : 30,04 % 7 NS 3T N = 110 19 79.17
8 NS 2S S = 120 14 58.33
9 NS 4P E-2 200 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 76,39 %
17 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 51,78 %10 NS 4P S-1 -100 2 8.33
11 NS 1S S+1 120 9 37.50
12 NS 4C S = 620 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
16 BERGER Jean Marie -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 50,79 %13 NS 4C S = 620 23 95.83
14 NS 5K N-1 -50 2 8.33
15 NS 6P E = -980 13 54.17 µ Tbl = 52,78 %
15 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 48,31 %16 NS 3S E+1 -630 11 45.83
17 NS 4P E = -420 9 37.50
18 NS 4T E = -130 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
27 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 56,18 %19 NS 2P N-1 -50 6 25.00
20 NS 1S S+1 120 20 83.33
21 NS 5C S = 650 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 65,28 %
23 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 50,57 %25 NS 2P W-1 100 18.5 77.08
26 NS 3S N-2 -200 2.3 9.58
27 NS 3S N+1 430 21.8 90.83 µ Tbl = 59,17 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 50,28 %28 NS 3S S-2 -200 8.8 36.67
29 NS 1C S+2 140 21.8 90.83
30 NS 3T E-1 50 8.8 36.67 µ Tbl = 54,72 %
21 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 53,39 %31 NS 1S E-1 50 22.8 95.00
32 NS 3S N-2 -100 6.6 27.50
33 NS 2S E+1 -150 4.4 18.33 µ Tbl = 46,94 %
Total : 391,8 / 720 = 54,42 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 50,28 % 1 NS 1S E = -90 15 62.50
2 NS 4C S+2 680 9 37.50
3 NS 3T E+1 -130 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
21 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 53,39 % 4 NS Pass Passe 7 29.17
5 NS 2P E+1 -140 10 41.67
6 NS 3T N-1 -50 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
27 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 56,18 % 7 NS 3T N-1 -100 3 12.50
8 NS 4K S-1 -50 7 29.17
9 NS 4P E-1 100 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 34,72 %
19 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -DEGUELLE Jacques : 51,22 %10 NS 3P S+1 170 7 29.17
11 NS 1S N+1 120 9 37.50
12 NS 4C S = 620 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 34,72 %
18 ROMAIN Roberte -DEMARTHE DINA : 30,04 %13 NS 3C S+1 170 20 83.33
14 NS 3K N+1 130 12 50.00
15 NS 3S W+2 -460 20 83.33 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
17 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 51,78 %16 NS 5S E = -660 4 16.67
17 NS 4P E+1 -450 1 4.17
18 NS 3S W+1 -430 18 75.00 µ Tbl = 31,94 %
16 BERGER Jean Marie -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 50,79 %19 NS 1S N+1 120 18 75.00
20 NS 2P W-1 100 14 58.33
21 NS 4C S = 620 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 65,28 %
28 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 50,94 %22 NS 4CcS-2 -300 4 16.67
23 NS 5KxW-1 400 21.8 90.83
24 NS 4P E-2 100 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 49,72 %
24 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,33 %28 NS 4C N-3 -300 2.3 9.58
29 NS 2C S = 110 17.4 72.50
30 NS 3K S+1 130 17.4 72.50 µ Tbl = 51,53 %
23 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 50,57 %31 NS 1S E = -90 17.4 72.50
32 NS 2S N-2 -100 6.6 27.50
33 NS 2S E = -120 12 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 340,9 / 720 = 47,35 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard
24 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,33 % 1 NS 1S E = -90 15 62.50
2 NS 6C S = 1430 22 91.67
3 NS 3T E+1 -130 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 63,89 %
23 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 50,57 % 4 NS Pass Passe 7 29.17
5 NS 4P E = -420 1 4.17
6 NS 2T N = 90 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 50,28 % 7 NS 3C E-1 100 11 45.83
8 NS 3C N = 140 17 70.83
9 NS 4P E = -620 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 43,06 %
28 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 50,94 %10 NS 4P S = 620 18 75.00
11 NS 1S E-3 150 17 70.83
12 NS 4C S+1 650 23 95.83 µ Tbl = 80,56 %
26 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 60,85 %13 NS 3P W = -140 4 16.67
14 NS 3K N+1 130 12 50.00
15 NS 6S W+1 -1020 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
19 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -DEGUELLE Jacques : 51,22 %16 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 16.67
17 NS 4P E = -420 9 37.50
18 NS 3S E+2 -460 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 31,94 %
18 ROMAIN Roberte -DEMARTHE DINA : 30,04 %19 NS 2C S-1 -50 6 25.00
20 NS 1S S+2 150 22 91.67
21 NS 4C S+1 650 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 68,06 %
17 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 51,78 %22 NS 3P W-3 300 22 91.67
23 NS 5T N-1 -100 6.6 27.50
24 NS 3T S = 110 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 60,56 %
16 BERGER Jean Marie -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 50,79 %25 NS 1S S = 90 10.9 45.42
26 NS 4C N-2 -200 2.3 9.58
27 NS 3S N = 400 8.8 36.67 µ Tbl = 30,56 %
25 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,11 %31 NS 1S E+1 -120 7.7 32.08
32 NS 2K E = -90 14.2 59.17
33 NS 2S E = -120 12 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,08 %
Total : 354,5 / 720 = 49,24 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 VUYTS Michèle -PIETQUIN Joseph
26 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 60,85 % 1 NS 1S E+1 -120 4 16.67
2 NS 5C N+1 680 9 37.50
3 NS 3T E+1 -130 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 30,56 %
19 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -DEGUELLE Jacques : 51,22 % 4 NS Pass Passe 7 29.17
5 NS 3P E = -140 10 41.67
6 NS 3T N = 110 18 75.00 µ Tbl = 48,61 %
23 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 50,57 % 7 NS 3C E-1 100 11 45.83
8 NS 3S S-2 -100 2 8.33
9 NS 6PcE-2 500 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 51,39 %
16 BERGER Jean Marie -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 50,79 %10 NS 4P S = 620 18 75.00
11 NS 1S N+3 180 20 83.33
12 NS 4C S = 620 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 65,28 %
20 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,94 %13 NS 3P E = -140 4 16.67
14 NS 3K N+2 150 18 75.00
15 NS 4P E+1 -450 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
24 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,33 %16 NS 5T W+1 -620 15 62.50
17 NS 4P E = -420 9 37.50
18 NS 3S E+3 -490 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 36,11 %
17 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 51,78 %19 NS 1S N-2 -100 2 8.33
20 NS 2P W-1 100 14 58.33
21 NS 4P W-2 100 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
21 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 53,39 %22 NS 3C S-1 -50 8 33.33
23 NS 5KcE-1 200 18.5 77.08
24 NS 3T N+1 130 18 75.00 µ Tbl = 61,81 %
18 ROMAIN Roberte -DEMARTHE DINA : 30,04 %28 NS 3PcE-2 300 23.9 99.58
29 NS 2P N = 110 17.4 72.50
30 NS 2C S = 110 13.1 54.58 µ Tbl = 75,56 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 50,28 %31 NS 2C S-1 -100 13.1 54.58
32 NS 1S N = 90 22.8 95.00
33 NS 2K E+1 -110 18.5 77.08 µ Tbl = 75,56 %
Total : 388,3 / 720 = 53,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
23 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 50,57 % 1 NS 1S E = -90 15 62.50
2 NS 4C S+2 680 9 37.50
3 NS 2T W+2 -130 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
27 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 56,18 % 4 NS Pass Passe 7 29.17
5 NS 5PcE-2 300 21 87.50
6 NS 1S N+1 120 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 68,06 %
20 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,94 % 7 NS 3T S-1 -100 3 12.50
8 NS 3S S+1 430 21 87.50
9 NS 4P E-1 100 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
24 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,33 %10 NS 4P S = 620 18 75.00
11 NS 1ScN+1 280 22 91.67
12 NS 4C S = 620 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 68,06 %
17 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 51,78 %13 NS 3P W = -140 4 16.67
14 NS 3K N+2 150 18 75.00
15 NS 6S W+1 -1020 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
21 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 53,39 %16 NS 5T W+1 -620 15 62.50
17 NS 3P E+2 -200 16 66.67
18 NS 3S E+2 -460 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 56,94 %
25 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,11 %19 NS 2P N+1 140 24 100.00
20 NS 3T N-2 -200 1 4.17
21 NS 5C S-1 -100 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
18 ROMAIN Roberte -DEMARTHE DINA : 30,04 %22 NS 3C S+1 170 16 66.67
23 NS 4K W = -130 3.3 13.75
24 NS 3P E-2 100 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 40,69 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 50,28 %25 NS 2C N-1 -50 6.6 27.50
26 NS 3S N-1 -100 7.7 32.08
27 NS 3S N = 400 8.8 36.67 µ Tbl = 32,08 %
19 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -DEGUELLE Jacques : 51,22 %31 NS 1S E = -90 17.4 72.50
32 NS 2K E = -90 14.2 59.17
33 NS 1S W+1 -120 12 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,56 %
Total : 364,0 / 720 = 50,56 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
20 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,94 % 1 NS 2S E = -120 4 16.67
2 NS 6C S = 1430 22 91.67
3 NS 4T E-1 100 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 65,28 %
24 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,33 % 4 NS Pass Passe 7 29.17
5 NS 2P E+2 -170 6 25.00
6 NS 3TcN-1 -100 4 16.67 µ Tbl = 23,61 %
28 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 50,94 % 7 NS 3C E-1 100 11 45.83
8 NS 3S N-1 -50 7 29.17
9 NS 4P E = -620 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
21 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 53,39 %10 NS 4P S = 620 18 75.00
11 NS 3S N = 400 24 100.00
12 NS 3S S+1 630 20 83.33 µ Tbl = 86,11 %
25 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,11 %13 NS 4C S-1 -100 10 41.67
14 NS 6T E-2 100 8 33.33
15 NS 6P E = -980 13 54.17 µ Tbl = 43,06 %
18 ROMAIN Roberte -DEMARTHE DINA : 30,04 %16 NS 2S E = -120 22 91.67
17 NS 3S W-2 100 23 95.83
18 NS 3S E+2 -460 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 76,39 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 50,28 %19 NS 2K N = 90 12 50.00
20 NS 2ScW-2 500 24 100.00
21 NS 4C S+1 650 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
15 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 48,31 %22 NS 3P W-1 100 12 50.00
23 NS 5K W-1 100 9.8 40.83
24 NS 3S S = 400 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 60,83 %
19 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -DEGUELLE Jacques : 51,22 %25 NS 2P W-1 100 18.5 77.08
26 NS 3T S = 110 15.3 63.75
27 NS 3S N = 400 8.8 36.67 µ Tbl = 59,17 %
23 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 50,57 %28 NS 2S S = 120 21.8 90.83
29 NS 3S S+1 630 23.9 99.58
30 NS 4CcS-1 -100 2.3 9.58 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 424,4 / 720 = 58,94 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques
1 FRAITURE Louis -MATELART Marc : 57,04 % 1 EO 1S E+1 -120 20 83.33
2 EO 4C S+2 680 15 62.50
3 EO 3T E+1 -130 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 69,44 %
7 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 46,04 % 4 EO 2P S+1 140 6 25.00
5 EO 4P E = -420 23 95.83
6 EO 4TcN-2 -300 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 73,61 %
2 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,12 % 7 EO 1S N+4 210 0 0.00
8 EO 3S N+2 460 0 0.00
9 EO 4P E-1 100 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 12,50 %
8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 39,10 %10 EO 3P S+2 200 12 50.00
11 EO 1S N-2 -100 24 100.00
12 EO 4C S = 620 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,33 %13 EO 3C S = 140 7 29.17
14 EO 5K N = 400 2 8.33
15 EO 7S E = -1520 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 43,06 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 54,42 %16 EO 3S E+1 -630 13 54.17
17 EO 4P E = -420 15 62.50
18 EO 4T E = -130 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 47,82 %19 EO 1S N = 90 12 50.00
20 EO 1S S-1 -100 16 66.67
21 EO 4PcW-2 300 13 54.17 µ Tbl = 56,94 %
14 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 58,94 %22 EO 3P W-1 100 12 50.00
23 EO 5K W-1 100 14.2 59.17
24 EO 3S S = 400 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 39,17 %
5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,14 %25 EO 1S S-1 -50 17.4 72.50
26 EO 2S S+1 150 5.5 22.92
27 EO 3S S = 400 15.2 63.33 µ Tbl = 52,92 %
6 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 40,24 %31 EO 1S E = -90 6.6 27.50
32 EO 2K E = -90 9.8 40.83
33 EO 2S E-1 50 0.1 0.42 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
Total : 347,8 / 720 = 48,31 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 BERGER Jean Marie -COLLIN Jean-Marie
7 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 46,04 % 1 EO 1S E = -90 9 37.50
2 EO 4C S+2 680 15 62.50
3 EO 3T E+1 -130 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
2 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,12 % 4 EO 2P S+1 140 6 25.00
5 EO 4P E-1 50 10 41.67
6 EO 2S N+1 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 39,10 % 7 EO 3C E-2 200 2 8.33
8 EO 3C N-1 -50 17 70.83
9 EO 4P E = -620 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
12 VUYTS Michèle -PIETQUIN Joseph : 53,93 %10 EO 4P S = 620 6 25.00
11 EO 1S N+3 180 4 16.67
12 EO 4C S = 620 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 34,72 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 54,42 %13 EO 4C S = 620 1 4.17
14 EO 5K N-1 -50 22 91.67
15 EO 6P E = -980 11 45.83 µ Tbl = 47,22 %
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 47,82 %16 EO 3S E+2 -660 20 83.33
17 EO 3S W+1 -430 20 83.33
18 EO 4C E+1 -450 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
10 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger : 47,35 %19 EO 1S N+1 120 6 25.00
20 EO 2P W-1 100 10 41.67
21 EO 4C S = 620 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 34,72 %
5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,14 %22 EO 4P W-2 200 5 20.83
23 EO 4K W = -130 20.7 86.25
24 EO 4KcW-3 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,69 %
11 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,24 %25 EO 1S S = 90 13.1 54.58
26 EO 4C N-2 -200 21.7 90.42
27 EO 3S N = 400 15.2 63.33 µ Tbl = 69,44 %
6 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 40,24 %28 EO 3S N-3 -300 21.7 90.42
29 EO 3CcS-1 -200 22.8 95.00
30 EO 3S N-1 -50 18.5 77.08 µ Tbl = 87,50 %
Total : 365,7 / 720 = 50,79 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette
8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 39,10 % 4 EO 2P S+1 140 6 25.00
5 EO 4P E-3 150 7 29.17
6 EO 3T N-1 -50 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,33 % 7 EO 3C E-1 100 13 54.17
8 EO 3S N+1 430 3 12.50
9 EO 4P E-1 100 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 34,72 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 54,42 %10 EO 4P S-1 -100 22 91.67
11 EO 1S S+1 120 15 62.50
12 EO 4C S = 620 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,56 %13 EO 3P W = -140 20 83.33
14 EO 3K N+2 150 6 25.00
15 EO 6S W+1 -1020 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
10 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger : 47,35 %16 EO 5S E = -660 20 83.33
17 EO 4P E+1 -450 23 95.83
18 EO 3S W+1 -430 6 25.00 µ Tbl = 68,06 %
12 VUYTS Michèle -PIETQUIN Joseph : 53,93 %19 EO 1S N-2 -100 22 91.67
20 EO 2P W-1 100 10 41.67
21 EO 4P W-2 100 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
11 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,24 %22 EO 3P W-3 300 2 8.33
23 EO 5T N-1 -100 17.4 72.50
24 EO 3T S = 110 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 39,44 %
6 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 40,24 %25 EO 2P W-1 100 5.5 22.92
26 EO 1C N = 80 13.1 54.58
27 EO 3S N = 400 15.2 63.33 µ Tbl = 46,94 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -MATELART Marc : 57,04 %28 EO 2P E = -110 9.8 40.83
29 EO 2P N-1 -100 12 50.00
30 EO 3K S+1 130 6.6 27.50 µ Tbl = 39,44 %
7 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 46,04 %31 EO 1S E+2 -150 22.8 95.00
32 EO 2S N-1 -50 4.4 18.33
33 EO 2S W = -120 12 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,44 %
Total : 372,8 / 720 = 51,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 ROMAIN Roberte -DEMARTHE DINA
8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 39,10 % 1 EO 1S E-1 50 1 4.17
2 EO 6C S = 1430 2 8.33
3 EO 3S W-3 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 4,17 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 54,42 % 7 EO 3T N = 110 5 20.83
8 EO 2S S = 120 10 41.67
9 EO 4P E-2 200 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 23,61 %
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 47,82 %10 EO 4P S = 620 6 25.00
11 EO 1S S+2 150 7 29.17
12 EO 4C S = 620 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
10 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger : 47,35 %13 EO 3C S+1 170 4 16.67
14 EO 3K N+1 130 12 50.00
15 EO 3S W+2 -460 4 16.67 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
14 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 58,94 %16 EO 2S E = -120 2 8.33
17 EO 3S W-2 100 1 4.17
18 EO 3S E+2 -460 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 23,61 %
11 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,24 %19 EO 2C S-1 -50 18 75.00
20 EO 1S S+2 150 2 8.33
21 EO 4C S+1 650 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 31,94 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,56 %22 EO 3C S+1 170 8 33.33
23 EO 4K W = -130 20.7 86.25
24 EO 3P E-2 100 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 59,31 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -MATELART Marc : 57,04 %25 EO 1S E-1 100 5.5 22.92
26 EO 4C N = 620 0.1 0.42
27 EO 3S N+1 430 2.2 9.17 µ Tbl = 10,83 %
12 VUYTS Michèle -PIETQUIN Joseph : 53,93 %28 EO 3PcE-2 300 0.1 0.42
29 EO 2P N = 110 6.6 27.50
30 EO 2C S = 110 10.9 45.42 µ Tbl = 24,44 %
2 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,12 %31 EO 1S E+1 -120 16.3 67.92
32 EO 2S N-3 -150 21.7 90.42
33 EO 1S N-2 -100 2.2 9.17 µ Tbl = 55,83 %
Total : 216,3 / 720 = 30,04 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -DEGUELLE Jacques
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,33 % 1 EO 1S E-1 50 1 4.17
2 EO 4C S+2 680 15 62.50
3 EO 3T E+1 -130 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 43,06 %
12 VUYTS Michèle -PIETQUIN Joseph : 53,93 % 4 EO Pass Passe 17 70.83
5 EO 3P E = -140 14 58.33
6 EO 3T N = 110 6 25.00 µ Tbl = 51,39 %
10 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger : 47,35 %10 EO 3P S+1 170 17 70.83
11 EO 1S N+1 120 15 62.50
12 EO 4C S = 620 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 65,28 %
5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,14 %13 EO 4C S = 620 1 4.17
14 EO 4K S = 130 12 50.00
15 EO 4S W+3 -520 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
11 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,24 %16 EO 3S E+2 -660 20 83.33
17 EO 4P E = -420 15 62.50
18 EO 3S E+2 -460 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 68,06 %
6 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 40,24 %19 EO 2S N-3 -150 24 100.00
20 EO 3T N-1 -100 16 66.67
21 EO 4C S+1 650 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 59,72 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -MATELART Marc : 57,04 %22 EO 4PcW-2 500 0 0.00
23 EO 5KcW-2 500 0.1 0.42
24 EO 3T N-1 -50 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 29,31 %
14 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 58,94 %25 EO 2P W-1 100 5.5 22.92
26 EO 3T S = 110 8.7 36.25
27 EO 3S N = 400 15.2 63.33 µ Tbl = 40,83 %
2 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,12 %28 EO 3S N-2 -200 15.2 63.33
29 EO 3C S-2 -200 22.8 95.00
30 EO 3S N-3 -150 23.9 99.58 µ Tbl = 85,97 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,56 %31 EO 1S E = -90 6.6 27.50
32 EO 2K E = -90 9.8 40.83
33 EO 1S W+1 -120 12 50.00 µ Tbl = 39,44 %
Total : 368,8 / 720 = 51,22 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
14 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 58,94 % 1 EO 2S E = -120 20 83.33
2 EO 6C S = 1430 2 8.33
3 EO 4T E-1 100 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 34,72 %
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 47,82 % 4 EO Pass Passe 17 70.83
5 EO 4PcE-2 300 3 12.50
6 EO 4T S-1 -50 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 47,22 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,56 % 7 EO 3T S-1 -100 21 87.50
8 EO 3S S+1 430 3 12.50
9 EO 4P E-1 100 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
12 VUYTS Michèle -PIETQUIN Joseph : 53,93 %13 EO 3P E = -140 20 83.33
14 EO 3K N+2 150 6 25.00
15 EO 4P E+1 -450 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
6 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 40,24 %16 EO 6T W-1 100 0 0.00
17 EO 5T E-2 100 1 4.17
18 EO 3S E+3 -490 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 31,94 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -MATELART Marc : 57,04 %19 EO 1S N+1 120 6 25.00
20 EO 3K S-2 -200 23 95.83
21 EO 4P W-1 50 18 75.00 µ Tbl = 65,28 %
7 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 46,04 %22 EO 3S E = -600 22 91.67
23 EO 5K W-2 200 5.5 22.92
24 EO 3P E-2 100 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 57,64 %
2 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,12 %25 EO 3C N-3 -150 23.9 99.58
26 EO 2S S-1 -100 16.3 67.92
27 EO 3S N = 400 15.2 63.33 µ Tbl = 76,94 %
8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 39,10 %28 EO 3S N-1 -100 5.5 22.92
29 EO 3C S-1 -100 12 50.00
30 EO 2P N-1 -50 18.5 77.08 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,33 %31 EO 3S E-1 50 1.2 5.00
32 EO 1S N = 90 1.2 5.00
33 EO 2T W+1 -110 5.5 22.92 µ Tbl = 10,97 %
Total : 330,8 / 720 = 45,94 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 47,82 % 1 EO 1S E = -90 9 37.50
2 EO 4C S+2 680 15 62.50
3 EO 3T E+1 -130 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
10 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger : 47,35 % 4 EO Pass Passe 17 70.83
5 EO 2P E+1 -140 14 58.33
6 EO 3T N-1 -50 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,14 % 7 EO 3S S-2 -200 24 100.00
8 EO 4P S-1 -50 17 70.83
9 EO 3S W = -600 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
14 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 58,94 %10 EO 4P S = 620 6 25.00
11 EO 3S N = 400 0 0.00
12 EO 3S S+1 630 4 16.67 µ Tbl = 13,89 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,56 %16 EO 5T W+1 -620 9 37.50
17 EO 3P E+2 -200 8 33.33
18 EO 3S E+2 -460 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 43,06 %
7 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 46,04 %19 EO 1S N = 90 12 50.00
20 EO 2S S-1 -100 16 66.67
21 EO 4PcW-2 300 13 54.17 µ Tbl = 56,94 %
12 VUYTS Michèle -PIETQUIN Joseph : 53,93 %22 EO 3C S-1 -50 16 66.67
23 EO 5KcE-1 200 5.5 22.92
24 EO 3T N+1 130 6 25.00 µ Tbl = 38,19 %
8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 39,10 %25 EO 2C N-1 -50 17.4 72.50
26 EO 2C N-2 -200 21.7 90.42
27 EO 3S N = 400 15.2 63.33 µ Tbl = 75,42 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,33 %28 EO 3S N-3 -300 21.7 90.42
29 EO 1S W+1 -120 19.6 81.67
30 EO 3S N = 400 0.1 0.42 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 54,42 %31 EO 1S E-1 50 1.2 5.00
32 EO 3S N-2 -100 17.4 72.50
33 EO 2S E+1 -150 19.6 81.67 µ Tbl = 53,06 %
Total : 384,4 / 720 = 53,39 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
10 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger : 47,35 % 1 EO 1S E = -90 9 37.50
2 EO 4C S+2 680 15 62.50
3 EO 3T E+1 -130 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,14 % 4 EO 4P S = 620 0 0.00
5 EO 5C N-2 -200 20 83.33
6 EO 2S N = 120 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 31,94 %
11 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,24 % 7 EO 3C E-1 100 13 54.17
8 EO 3C N = 140 7 29.17
9 EO 4P E = -620 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 56,94 %
6 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 40,24 %10 EO 2P S+2 170 17 70.83
11 EO 1S N+1 120 15 62.50
12 EO 4C S = 620 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 65,28 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -MATELART Marc : 57,04 %13 EO 3P W = -140 20 83.33
14 EO 3T E+1 -130 24 100.00
15 EO 6P E-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
14 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 58,94 %19 EO 2K N = 90 12 50.00
20 EO 2ScW-2 500 0 0.00
21 EO 4C S+1 650 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 39,10 %22 EO 3K E-1 100 12 50.00
23 EO 5TcN-1 -200 23.9 99.58
24 EO 3P E-1 50 18 75.00 µ Tbl = 74,86 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,56 %25 EO 2C N-1 -50 17.4 72.50
26 EO 3S N-1 -100 16.3 67.92
27 EO 3S N = 400 15.2 63.33 µ Tbl = 67,92 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 54,42 %28 EO 3S S-2 -200 15.2 63.33
29 EO 1C S+2 140 2.2 9.17
30 EO 3T E-1 50 15.2 63.33 µ Tbl = 45,28 %
12 VUYTS Michèle -PIETQUIN Joseph : 53,93 %31 EO 2C S-1 -100 10.9 45.42
32 EO 1S N = 90 1.2 5.00
33 EO 2K E+1 -110 5.5 22.92 µ Tbl = 24,44 %
Total : 362,0 / 720 = 50,28 %
PAIRE Nr : 23 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,56 % 1 EO 1S E = -90 9 37.50
2 EO 4C S+2 680 15 62.50
3 EO 2T W+2 -130 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
11 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,24 % 4 EO Pass Passe 17 70.83
5 EO 4P E = -420 23 95.83
6 EO 2T N = 90 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
12 VUYTS Michèle -PIETQUIN Joseph : 53,93 % 7 EO 3C E-1 100 13 54.17
8 EO 3S S-2 -100 22 91.67
9 EO 6PcE-2 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 48,61 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -MATELART Marc : 57,04 %10 EO 4P S+1 650 0 0.00
11 EO 2S N = 120 15 62.50
12 EO 4C S = 620 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
7 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 46,04 %13 EO 4P W-1 100 11 45.83
14 EO 5T E-1 50 19 79.17
15 EO 4P E+2 -480 6 25.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
2 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,12 %16 EO 3S E+2 -660 20 83.33
17 EO 3S W-1 50 5 20.83
18 EO 3S E+2 -460 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,33 %22 EO 4T N-3 -150 18 75.00
23 EO 4T N+2 170 8.7 36.25
24 EO 4T N-1 -50 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 66,25 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 54,42 %25 EO 2P W-1 100 5.5 22.92
26 EO 3S N-2 -200 21.7 90.42
27 EO 3S N+1 430 2.2 9.17 µ Tbl = 40,83 %
14 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 58,94 %28 EO 2S S = 120 2.2 9.17
29 EO 3S S+1 630 0.1 0.42
30 EO 4CcS-1 -100 21.7 90.42 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
10 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger : 47,35 %31 EO 1S E = -90 6.6 27.50
32 EO 2S N-2 -100 17.4 72.50
33 EO 2S E = -120 12 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 364,1 / 720 = 50,57 %
PAIRE Nr : 24 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
11 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,24 % 1 EO 1S E = -90 9 37.50
2 EO 6C S = 1430 2 8.33
3 EO 3T E+1 -130 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 36,11 %
14 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 58,94 % 4 EO Pass Passe 17 70.83
5 EO 2P E+2 -170 18 75.00
6 EO 3TcN-1 -100 20 83.33 µ Tbl = 76,39 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -MATELART Marc : 57,04 % 7 EO 3T S = 110 5 20.83
8 EO 4CcN-3 -500 24 100.00
9 EO 4P E-1 100 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 52,78 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,56 %10 EO 4P S = 620 6 25.00
11 EO 1ScN+1 280 2 8.33
12 EO 4C S = 620 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 31,94 %
2 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,12 %13 EO 3C S = 140 7 29.17
14 EO 4KcN+1 610 0 0.00
15 EO 7S E = -1520 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 40,28 %
12 VUYTS Michèle -PIETQUIN Joseph : 53,93 %16 EO 5T W+1 -620 9 37.50
17 EO 4P E = -420 15 62.50
18 EO 3S E+3 -490 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 63,89 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,33 %19 EO 1S N+1 120 6 25.00
20 EO 3T N = 110 6 25.00
21 EO 4C S = 620 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 47,82 %25 EO 1S S-2 -100 21.7 90.42
26 EO 3KcE-2 500 2.2 9.17
27 EO 3S N = 400 15.2 63.33 µ Tbl = 54,31 %
10 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger : 47,35 %28 EO 4C N-3 -300 21.7 90.42
29 EO 2C S = 110 6.6 27.50
30 EO 3K S+1 130 6.6 27.50 µ Tbl = 48,47 %
5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,14 %31 EO 1S E+1 -120 16.3 67.92
32 EO 4C S-2 -100 17.4 72.50
33 EO 3S E+1 -430 23.9 99.58 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
Total : 369,6 / 720 = 51,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 25 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
6 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 40,24 % 1 EO 1S E+1 -120 20 83.33
2 EO 4C S+2 680 15 62.50
3 EO 3T E+1 -130 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 69,44 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -MATELART Marc : 57,04 % 4 EO 2P N+3 200 2 8.33
5 EO 4P E-3 150 7 29.17
6 EO 2P S-1 -50 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 31,94 %
7 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 46,04 % 7 EO 3C E-1 100 13 54.17
8 EO 2C N = 110 12 50.00
9 EO 4P E-1 100 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 47,22 %
2 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,12 %10 EO 3P S+1 170 17 70.83
11 EO 2S N-1 -50 22 91.67
12 EO 4C S+1 650 1 4.17 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
14 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 58,94 %13 EO 4C S-1 -100 14 58.33
14 EO 6T E-2 100 16 66.67
15 EO 6P E = -980 11 45.83 µ Tbl = 56,94 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,33 %16 EO 3S E+1 -630 13 54.17
17 EO 4P E-1 50 5 20.83
18 EO 3K W+2 -150 4 16.67 µ Tbl = 30,56 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,56 %19 EO 2P N+1 140 0 0.00
20 EO 3T N-2 -200 23 95.83
21 EO 5C S-1 -100 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 47,82 %22 EO 4K E-2 200 5 20.83
23 EO 4T N = 130 10.9 45.42
24 EO 3T S = 110 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 34,58 %
5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,14 %28 EO 3S S-2 -200 15.2 63.33
29 EO 2C S = 110 6.6 27.50
30 EO 3K S+1 130 6.6 27.50 µ Tbl = 39,44 %
11 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,24 %31 EO 1S E+1 -120 16.3 67.92
32 EO 2K E = -90 9.8 40.83
33 EO 2S E = -120 12 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,92 %
Total : 346,4 / 720 = 48,11 %
PAIRE Nr : 26 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent
12 VUYTS Michèle -PIETQUIN Joseph : 53,93 % 1 EO 1S E+1 -120 20 83.33
2 EO 5C N+1 680 15 62.50
3 EO 3T E+1 -130 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 69,44 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 54,42 % 4 EO Pass Passe 17 70.83
5 EO 5CcN = 850 0 0.00
6 EO 3T N-1 -50 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 43,06 %
6 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 40,24 % 7 EO 3C E-1 100 13 54.17
8 EO 3C N = 140 7 29.17
9 EO 4P E = -620 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 56,94 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,33 %10 EO 5PcS-1 -200 24 100.00
11 EO 1S N+1 120 15 62.50
12 EO 4C S = 620 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
11 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,24 %13 EO 3P W = -140 20 83.33
14 EO 3K N+1 130 12 50.00
15 EO 6S W+1 -1020 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 39,10 %16 EO 3S E+2 -660 20 83.33
17 EO 4P E+1 -450 23 95.83
18 EO 3S E+3 -490 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 90,28 %
5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,14 %19 EO 2T N+2 130 2 8.33
20 EO 1C W-1 100 10 41.67
21 EO 5C S-1 -100 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 47,22 %
2 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,12 %22 EO 4K E-1 100 12 50.00
23 EO 5K W-1 100 14.2 59.17
24 EO 4PcE-2 300 4 16.67 µ Tbl = 41,94 %
7 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 46,04 %28 EO 2P E = -110 9.8 40.83
29 EO 3K E = -110 16.3 67.92
30 EO 4T W-2 100 13.1 54.58 µ Tbl = 54,44 %
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 47,82 %31 EO 1S E+1 -120 16.3 67.92
32 EO 2K E = -90 9.8 40.83
33 EO 2S E+1 -150 19.6 81.67 µ Tbl = 63,47 %
Total : 438,1 / 720 = 60,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 27 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane
5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,14 % 1 EO 1S E+1 -120 20 83.33
2 EO 4C S+2 680 15 62.50
3 EO 4T E-1 100 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 52,78 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,56 % 4 EO Pass Passe 17 70.83
5 EO 5PcE-2 300 3 12.50
6 EO 1S N+1 120 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 31,94 %
10 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger : 47,35 % 7 EO 3T N-1 -100 21 87.50
8 EO 4K S-1 -50 17 70.83
9 EO 4P E-1 100 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 65,28 %
7 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 46,04 %10 EO 3P S+1 170 17 70.83
11 EO 1S N+1 120 15 62.50
12 EO 4C S = 620 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 65,28 %
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 47,82 %13 EO 4P E-1 100 11 45.83
14 EO 5T E-1 50 19 79.17
15 EO 7S E = -1520 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -MATELART Marc : 57,04 %16 EO 5T W = -600 5 20.83
17 EO 4P E = -420 15 62.50
18 EO 6S E-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 54,42 %19 EO 2P N-1 -50 18 75.00
20 EO 1S S+1 120 4 16.67
21 EO 5C S = 650 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 34,72 %
6 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 40,24 %22 EO 3S E+2 -660 24 100.00
23 EO 50%50% Ajust 12 50.00
24 EO 3P E = -140 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,33 %25 EO 2P W-1 100 5.5 22.92
26 EO 1S S+2 150 5.5 22.92
27 EO 3S N = 400 15.2 63.33 µ Tbl = 36,39 %
8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 39,10 %31 EO 1S E+2 -150 22.8 95.00
32 EO 2S N-4 -200 23.9 99.58
33 EO 2S E+1 -150 19.6 81.67 µ Tbl = 92,08 %
Total : 404,5 / 720 = 56,18 %
PAIRE Nr : 28 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
9 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 54,42 % 1 EO 1S E = -90 9 37.50
2 EO 4C S+2 680 15 62.50
3 EO 3T E+1 -130 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
6 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 40,24 % 4 EO Pass Passe 17 70.83
5 EO 3P E = -140 14 58.33
6 EO 2P S-4 -200 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 73,61 %
14 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 58,94 % 7 EO 3C E-1 100 13 54.17
8 EO 3S N-1 -50 17 70.83
9 EO 4P E = -620 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
11 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,24 %10 EO 4P S = 620 6 25.00
11 EO 1S E-3 150 7 29.17
12 EO 4C S+1 650 1 4.17 µ Tbl = 19,44 %
8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 39,10 %13 EO 3P W = -140 20 83.33
14 EO 3K N+2 150 6 25.00
15 EO 6S E+1 -1020 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,14 %16 EO 5T W = -600 5 20.83
17 EO 2S W+4 -240 10 41.67
18 EO 3S E+2 -460 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 40,28 %
2 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,12 %19 EO 2S N-1 -50 18 75.00
20 EO 2P W = -110 20 83.33
21 EO 4C S-1 -100 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
10 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger : 47,35 %22 EO 4CcS-2 -300 20 83.33
23 EO 5KxW-1 400 2.2 9.17
24 EO 4P E-2 100 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 50,28 %
7 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 46,04 %25 EO 2P W-1 100 5.5 22.92
26 EO 1S E-1 100 10.9 45.42
27 EO 3S N+1 430 2.2 9.17 µ Tbl = 25,83 %
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 47,82 %28 EO 3S S-1 -100 5.5 22.92
29 EO 3K E = -110 16.3 67.92
30 EO 2S N+1 150 2.2 9.17 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 366,8 / 720 = 50,94 %
|
|