|
Tournoi du 06-03-17
Lundi
1 62,09 4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David
2 57,41 1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques
3 56,11 2 CASSART Guy -FRAITURE Louis
4 55,43 11 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte
5 50,24 5 COLLIN Jean-Marie -BERGER Jean Marie
6 49,69 7 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse
7 49,59 9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
8 48,30 3 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
9 42,93 8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
10 40,19 6 RAYMOND Yves -DEMARTE
11 38,02 10 VAN AVERMAET Martine -VAN DOOREN Michele
12 0,00 12 -
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 66,87 24 MOLS Bruno -MATELART Marc
2 57,76 19 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent
3 56,38 15 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel
4 56,32 22 CHANTRAINE René -WILLEMS Jacques
5 54,88 20 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René
6 53,33 16 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
7 48,81 18 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger
8 47,57 17 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette
9 44,79 14 JANSSENS Pierre -CORCEOVEI Horia
10 41,30 13 JAUMOTTE Jean-Marie -ALLART Michel
11 37,59 23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
12 36,77 21 HENRARD Françoise -HENRY Kateline
PAIRE Nr : 1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques
13 JAUMOTTE Jean-Marie -ALLART Michel : 41,30 % 1 NS 5K N+1 420 11 61.11
2 NS 6P N = 1430 18 100.00
3 NS 4P N-3 -150 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 37,59 % 4 NS 1C E+2 -140 6 33.33
5 NS 4P S+1 650 17 94.44
6 NS 3C N = 140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
22 CHANTRAINE René -WILLEMS Jacques : 56,32 % 7 NS 2P E-1 100 12 66.67
8 NS 3S E = -400 11 61.11
9 NS 4C E-3 300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
21 HENRARD Françoise -HENRY Kateline : 36,77 %10 NS 1S N+3 180 7 38.89
11 NS 3K S = 110 11 61.11
12 NS 3S N = 600 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
20 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 54,88 %13 NS 2C N = 110 5 27.78
14 NS 1S E-1 50 12 66.67
15 NS 1S W+2 -150 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
19 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 57,76 %16 NS Pass Passe 2 11.11
17 NS 2CcE-2 300 18 100.00
18 NS 1S W-2 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
18 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger : 48,81 %19 NS 4P W-1 100 13 72.22
20 NS 3S E-3 300 17 94.44
21 NS 3C W-2 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
17 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 47,57 %22 NS 2K N+2 130 3 16.67
23 NS 2K W-1 100 14 77.78
24 NS 1S W = -90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
16 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,33 %25 NS 4C E = -620 4 22.22
26 NS 1S S = 90 11 61.11
27 NS 3S W = -400 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
15 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 56,38 %28 NS 3P S+1 170 5 27.78
29 NS 1S E+1 -120 12 66.67
30 NS 3S W = -400 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 310,0 / 540 = 57,41 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 CASSART Guy -FRAITURE Louis
14 JANSSENS Pierre -CORCEOVEI Horia : 44,79 % 4 NS 3S W-1 100 16 88.89
5 NS 3S S = 600 6 33.33
6 NS 3S N+1 430 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
13 JAUMOTTE Jean-Marie -ALLART Michel : 41,30 % 7 NS 2K N+1 110 18 100.00
8 NS 3S E = -400 11 61.11
9 NS 3C E-1 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 37,59 %10 NS 1S N+3 180 7 38.89
11 NS 2C W-2 100 6 33.33
12 NS 3S N+2 660 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
22 CHANTRAINE René -WILLEMS Jacques : 56,32 %13 NS 2C N+1 140 12 66.67
14 NS 1S E = -90 7 38.89
15 NS 3S W+1 -430 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
21 HENRARD Françoise -HENRY Kateline : 36,77 %16 NS 4C N = 420 18 100.00
17 NS 3C E-2 100 11 61.11
18 NS 2C N+1 140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
20 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 54,88 %19 NS 4T E-2 200 18 100.00
20 NS 3K W = -110 5 27.78
21 NS 2PcS-1 -200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
24 MOLS Bruno -MATELART Marc : 66,87 %22 NS 3S N = 400 14 77.78
23 NS 1P N-2 -200 3 16.67
24 NS 1S W = -90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
18 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger : 48,81 %25 NS 4C E = -620 4 22.22
26 NS 3S N-2 -200 2 11.11
27 NS 3S E-1 50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
17 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 47,57 %28 NS 5P S-1 -100 0 0.00
29 NS 2C N-2 -200 10 55.56
30 NS 3S W+1 -430 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
16 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,33 %31 NS 3CcE-2 300 18 100.00
32 NS 3K W+2 -150 5 27.78
33 NS 5K E-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
Total : 303,0 / 540 = 56,11 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
17 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 47,57 % 1 NS 6TcW-3 500 15 83.33
2 NS 4P N-1 -100 1 5.56
3 NS 2P N-1 -50 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 60,74 %
15 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 56,38 % 7 NS 3K N-2 -200 0 0.00
8 NS 3S E = -400 11 61.11
9 NS 3C E = -140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
24 MOLS Bruno -MATELART Marc : 66,87 %10 NS 2S S+1 150 0 0.00
11 NS 1S S+1 120 14 77.78
12 NS 3C S+1 170 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
13 JAUMOTTE Jean-Marie -ALLART Michel : 41,30 %13 NS 1S S+2 150 15 83.33
14 NS 2C S-2 -100 3 16.67
15 NS 2T W = -90 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 37,59 %16 NS 4T S+1 150 11 61.11
17 NS 3C E-2 100 11 61.11
18 NS 2T S+2 130 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
22 CHANTRAINE René -WILLEMS Jacques : 56,32 %19 NS 3S E+1 -630 4 22.22
20 NS 2S S = 120 10 55.56
21 NS 4P S-1 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
21 HENRARD Françoise -HENRY Kateline : 36,77 %22 NS 3S S = 400 14 77.78
23 NS 3C S = 140 18 100.00
24 NS 2K W-3 150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
20 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 54,88 %25 NS 5CcE-1 200 14 77.78
26 NS 3S S-2 -200 2 11.11
27 NS 3S W = -400 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
19 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 57,76 %28 NS 4P S = 620 10 55.56
29 NS 3S E-1 100 16 88.89
30 NS 4TcS-3 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
18 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger : 48,81 %31 NS 3S S-1 -100 2 11.11
32 NS 2K E+3 -150 5 27.78
33 NS 4K E = -130 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
Total : 260,8 / 540 = 48,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David
19 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 57,76 % 1 NS 5K N = 400 4 22.22
2 NS 4P N+1 650 12 66.67
3 NS 3PcN-1 -100 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 52,41 %
18 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger : 48,81 % 4 NS 2C E = -110 12 66.67
5 NS 4P S+1 650 17 94.44
6 NS 3C N+1 170 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
16 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,33 %10 NS 1S N+3 180 7 38.89
11 NS 2C W-2 100 6 33.33
12 NS 3C S+2 200 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
15 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 56,38 %13 NS 2S S = 120 10 55.56
14 NS 1S E-2 100 17 94.44
15 NS 3S W = -400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
14 JANSSENS Pierre -CORCEOVEI Horia : 44,79 %16 NS 3C N = 140 8 44.44
17 NS 4C E-4 200 16 88.89
18 NS 1S W-2 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
13 JAUMOTTE Jean-Marie -ALLART Michel : 41,30 %19 NS 4P W-1 100 13 72.22
20 NS 2P S = 110 8 44.44
21 NS 3P S+1 170 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 37,59 %22 NS 2TcW-2 500 18 100.00
23 NS 2C S = 110 16 88.89
24 NS 3KcW-4 800 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 96,30 %
22 CHANTRAINE René -WILLEMS Jacques : 56,32 %25 NS 4C E = -620 4 22.22
26 NS 1S S = 90 11 61.11
27 NS 3S W+1 -430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
21 HENRARD Françoise -HENRY Kateline : 36,77 %28 NS 4P S+1 650 15 83.33
29 NS 3S E-1 100 16 88.89
30 NS 3K E+1 -130 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
24 MOLS Bruno -MATELART Marc : 66,87 %31 NS 4P W-2 100 12 66.67
32 NS 3C N-2 -100 14 77.78
33 NS 3K E+1 -130 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
Total : 335,3 / 540 = 62,09 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 COLLIN Jean-Marie -BERGER Jean Marie
21 HENRARD Françoise -HENRY Kateline : 36,77 % 1 NS 5K N = 400 4 22.22
2 NS 4P N+3 710 16 88.89
3 NS 4PcN-3 -500 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 41,30 %
20 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 54,88 % 4 NS 2C E+1 -140 6 33.33
5 NS 3S S = 600 6 33.33
6 NS 3S N = 400 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
19 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 57,76 % 7 NS 3T E = -110 4 22.22
8 NS 3S E+2 -460 1 5.56
9 NS 4K S-3 -150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
17 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 47,57 %13 NS 2C N = 110 5 27.78
14 NS 2K S-2 -100 3 16.67
15 NS 2T W+1 -110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
16 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,33 %16 NS 3P W-2 200 15 83.33
17 NS 2CcE-1 100 11 61.11
18 NS 1S W-2 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
24 MOLS Bruno -MATELART Marc : 66,87 %19 NS 3S E = -600 6 33.33
20 NS 2PcN-2 -500 0 0.00
21 NS 2P S-1 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
14 JANSSENS Pierre -CORCEOVEI Horia : 44,79 %22 NS 3S N = 400 14 77.78
23 NS 3S N-2 -200 3 16.67
24 NS 1S S+1 120 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
13 JAUMOTTE Jean-Marie -ALLART Michel : 41,30 %25 NS 3C E+1 -170 10 55.56
26 NS 1S S+1 120 18 100.00
27 NS 4P E-1 50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 37,59 %28 NS 4PcS = 790 18 100.00
29 NS 3S E = -600 4 22.22
30 NS 4K E = -130 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
22 CHANTRAINE René -WILLEMS Jacques : 56,32 %31 NS 2C E-1 50 4 22.22
32 NS 4C N-2 -100 14 77.78
33 NS 3PcW-1 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 271,3 / 540 = 50,24 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 RAYMOND Yves -DEMARTE
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 37,59 % 1 NS 5K N = 400 4 22.22
2 NS 4P N = 620 6 33.33
3 NS 50%50% Ajust 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
22 CHANTRAINE René -WILLEMS Jacques : 56,32 % 4 NS 2C E+1 -140 6 33.33
5 NS 4P S-1 -100 0 0.00
6 NS 3K E-2 200 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
24 MOLS Bruno -MATELART Marc : 66,87 % 7 NS 1S E+2 -150 2 11.11
8 NS 3S E+2 -460 1 5.56
9 NS 4P W = -620 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 5,56 %
20 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 54,88 %10 NS 1S N+4 210 14 77.78
11 NS 1KcS+1 240 18 100.00
12 NS 2C S = 110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
18 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger : 48,81 %16 NS 2P W-1 100 5 27.78
17 NS 3S E = -400 2 11.11
18 NS 1S W-1 50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
17 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 47,57 %19 NS 3S E-1 100 13 72.22
20 NS 2C E-2 200 13 72.22
21 NS 1P S = 80 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
16 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,33 %22 NS 2P E-2 200 10 55.56
23 NS 2P N-3 -300 0 0.00
24 NS 1S E = -90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
15 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 56,38 %25 NS 4C E-1 100 12 66.67
26 NS 2K N-1 -100 7 38.89
27 NS 1S W+2 -150 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
14 JANSSENS Pierre -CORCEOVEI Horia : 44,79 %28 NS 4T N = 130 2 11.11
29 NS 3S E-1 100 16 88.89
30 NS 3S W+2 -460 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
13 JAUMOTTE Jean-Marie -ALLART Michel : 41,30 %31 NS 4P E-2 100 12 66.67
32 NS 2K E+1 -110 10 55.56
33 NS 2P E = -110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 217,0 / 540 = 40,19 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse
14 JANSSENS Pierre -CORCEOVEI Horia : 44,79 % 1 NS 5KcN = 550 18 100.00
2 NS 4P N+1 650 12 66.67
3 NS 4PcN-3 -500 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 59,81 %
13 JAUMOTTE Jean-Marie -ALLART Michel : 41,30 % 4 NS 2C E-1 100 16 88.89
5 NS 3S S = 600 6 33.33
6 NS 3C N+2 200 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 37,59 % 7 NS 2T E = -90 6 33.33
8 NS 3S E+1 -430 4 22.22
9 NS 3K S = 110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
22 CHANTRAINE René -WILLEMS Jacques : 56,32 %10 NS 1S N+3 180 7 38.89
11 NS 1S N = 90 2 11.11
12 NS 4C N+1 650 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
21 HENRARD Françoise -HENRY Kateline : 36,77 %13 NS 2C N = 110 5 27.78
14 NS 1S E-1 50 12 66.67
15 NS 3S W-1 50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
19 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 57,76 %19 NS 3S W+3 -690 0 0.00
20 NS 3P N-2 -200 2 11.11
21 NS 2P S = 110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
18 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger : 48,81 %22 NS 2S N+2 180 8 44.44
23 NS 2P N-1 -100 9 50.00
24 NS 3KcW-2 300 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
17 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 47,57 %25 NS 4P W-4 400 18 100.00
26 NS 3T N-1 -100 7 38.89
27 NS 3S W-1 50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
24 MOLS Bruno -MATELART Marc : 66,87 %28 NS 4P N+1 650 15 83.33
29 NS 3S E = -600 4 22.22
30 NS 3S W+2 -460 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
15 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 56,38 %31 NS 5KcN-2 -500 0 0.00
32 NS 4CcN-2 -300 1 5.56
33 NS 4K E = -130 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 5,56 %
Total : 268,3 / 540 = 49,69 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
16 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,33 % 1 NS 5K N = 400 4 22.22
2 NS 4P N = 620 6 33.33
3 NS 4PcN-2 -300 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 31,11 %
15 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 56,38 % 4 NS 4K S-2 -200 0 0.00
5 NS 4P S = 620 11 61.11
6 NS 2S S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
14 JANSSENS Pierre -CORCEOVEI Horia : 44,79 % 7 NS 3S E-1 100 12 66.67
8 NS 2S E+3 -210 18 100.00
9 NS 3P W = -140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
13 JAUMOTTE Jean-Marie -ALLART Michel : 41,30 %10 NS 1S N+3 180 7 38.89
11 NS 2S W-2 100 6 33.33
12 NS 3S N-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 37,59 %13 NS 2S S+1 150 15 83.33
14 NS 1S E-2 100 17 94.44
15 NS 3S W+1 -430 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
24 MOLS Bruno -MATELART Marc : 66,87 %16 NS 3P W-2 200 15 83.33
17 NS 2C E-1 50 5 27.78
18 NS 1S W = -90 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
20 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 54,88 %22 NS 3S S-1 -50 0 0.00
23 NS 3S N-1 -100 9 50.00
24 NS 1S W+1 -120 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
19 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 57,76 %25 NS 4C E = -620 4 22.22
26 NS 2C W-1 100 15 83.33
27 NS 3S W = -400 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
18 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger : 48,81 %28 NS 4P S = 620 10 55.56
29 NS 3S E = -600 4 22.22
30 NS 3S W = -400 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
17 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 47,57 %31 NS 1CcE-1 100 12 66.67
32 NS 4C N-2 -100 14 77.78
33 NS 3P W-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
Total : 231,8 / 540 = 42,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
18 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger : 48,81 % 1 NS 7TcW-3 500 15 83.33
2 NS 4P N = 620 6 33.33
3 NS 3P N-1 -50 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
24 MOLS Bruno -MATELART Marc : 66,87 % 4 NS 2C E+1 -140 6 33.33
5 NS 3P N+2 200 2 11.11
6 NS 2C N+1 140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
16 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,33 % 7 NS 3P E-1 100 12 66.67
8 NS 3S E = -400 11 61.11
9 NS 3C E-1 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
15 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 56,38 %10 NS 3S N+2 660 18 100.00
11 NS 2K S+3 150 16 88.89
12 NS 3S N = 600 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
14 JANSSENS Pierre -CORCEOVEI Horia : 44,79 %13 NS 2K E-2 200 18 100.00
14 NS 2C W = -110 0 0.00
15 NS 5T E = -400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
13 JAUMOTTE Jean-Marie -ALLART Michel : 41,30 %16 NS 4T S+1 150 11 61.11
17 NS 3S W-1 50 5 27.78
18 NS 1S W-2 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 37,59 %19 NS 4CcN-1 -100 8 44.44
20 NS 2K W+1 -110 5 27.78
21 NS 1P S+4 200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
21 HENRARD Françoise -HENRY Kateline : 36,77 %25 NS 4C E = -620 4 22.22
26 NS 3S S-2 -200 2 11.11
27 NS 3S W = -400 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
20 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 54,88 %28 NS 3P S+1 170 5 27.78
29 NS 3S E = -600 4 22.22
30 NS 3S W+2 -460 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
19 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 57,76 %31 NS 3C E-2 100 12 66.67
32 NS 4CcN-2 -300 1 5.56
33 NS 3S W-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 267,8 / 540 = 49,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 VAN AVERMAET Martine -VAN DOOREN Michele
20 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 54,88 % 1 NS 5K N+1 420 11 61.11
2 NS 4P N+1 650 12 66.67
3 NS 4PcN-3 -500 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 46,85 %
19 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 57,76 % 4 NS 2C E+1 -140 6 33.33
5 NS 4P S = 620 11 61.11
6 NS 2T S+1 110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
18 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger : 48,81 % 7 NS 2C W-1 100 12 66.67
8 NS 3S E = -400 11 61.11
9 NS 2C E = -110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
17 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 47,57 %10 NS 1S N+3 180 7 38.89
11 NS 3K S = 110 11 61.11
12 NS 3C S+1 170 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
16 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,33 %13 NS 2C N-1 -100 0 0.00
14 NS 1S E = -90 7 38.89
15 NS 3S W+1 -430 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
15 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 56,38 %16 NS 2P W-1 100 5 27.78
17 NS 2CcE-1 100 11 61.11
18 NS 1S W-1 50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
14 JANSSENS Pierre -CORCEOVEI Horia : 44,79 %19 NS 3S E+2 -660 2 11.11
20 NS 2C E-2 200 13 72.22
21 NS 4P S-3 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
13 JAUMOTTE Jean-Marie -ALLART Michel : 41,30 %22 NS 2K S+2 130 3 16.67
23 NS 1P N-1 -100 9 50.00
24 NS 1S S+1 120 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
22 CHANTRAINE René -WILLEMS Jacques : 56,32 %28 NS 4P S = 620 10 55.56
29 NS 3S E = -600 4 22.22
30 NS 3S W+2 -460 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
21 HENRARD Françoise -HENRY Kateline : 36,77 %31 NS 2K N = 90 6 33.33
32 NS 3K E+1 -130 8 44.44
33 NS 3K E = -110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 205,3 / 540 = 38,02 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte
22 CHANTRAINE René -WILLEMS Jacques : 56,32 % 1 NS 5K N = 400 4 22.22
2 NS 4P N-1 -100 1 5.56
3 NS 4P N-2 -100 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 32,04 %
21 HENRARD Françoise -HENRY Kateline : 36,77 % 4 NS 3C W-1 100 16 88.89
5 NS 3S S+1 630 14 77.78
6 NS 4C N+1 450 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
20 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 54,88 % 7 NS 3S W-1 100 12 66.67
8 NS 3S E = -400 11 61.11
9 NS 3C E-1 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
19 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 57,76 %10 NS 2K E-4 400 16 88.89
11 NS 2C W-1 50 0 0.00
12 NS 3S N = 600 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
24 MOLS Bruno -MATELART Marc : 66,87 %13 NS 2C N = 110 5 27.78
14 NS 1S E-1 50 12 66.67
15 NS 3S W+1 -430 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
17 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 47,57 %16 NS 2P W = -110 0 0.00
17 NS 2CcE = -470 0 0.00
18 NS 1ScS+2 580 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
16 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,33 %19 NS 5T E-1 100 13 72.22
20 NS 3C E-3 300 17 94.44
21 NS 4P S-1 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
15 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 56,38 %22 NS 3K N+2 150 6 33.33
23 NS 3S N-1 -100 9 50.00
24 NS 1S W = -90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
14 JANSSENS Pierre -CORCEOVEI Horia : 44,79 %25 NS 5P W-3 300 16 88.89
26 NS 2C W-1 100 15 83.33
27 NS 3S W = -400 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 37,59 %31 NS 3C E-2 100 12 66.67
32 NS 3C N-1 -50 18 100.00
33 NS 3C S-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
Total : 299,3 / 540 = 55,43 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 -
24 MOLS Bruno -MATELART Marc : 66,87 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
17 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 47,57 % 4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
21 HENRARD Françoise -HENRY Kateline : 36,77 % 7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
14 JANSSENS Pierre -CORCEOVEI Horia : 44,79 %10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
18 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger : 48,81 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
22 CHANTRAINE René -WILLEMS Jacques : 56,32 %16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
15 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 56,38 %19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
19 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 57,76 %22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
16 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,33 %28 NS BYE 0 0.00
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
20 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 54,88 %31 NS BYE 0 0.00
32 NS BYE 0 0.00
33 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 594 = 0,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 JAUMOTTE Jean-Marie -ALLART Michel
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 57,41 % 1 EO 5K N+1 420 7 38.89
2 EO 6P N = 1430 0 0.00
3 EO 4P N-3 -150 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
7 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,69 % 4 EO 2C E-1 100 2 11.11
5 EO 3S S = 600 12 66.67
6 EO 3C N+2 200 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
2 CASSART Guy -FRAITURE Louis : 56,11 % 7 EO 2K N+1 110 0 0.00
8 EO 3S E = -400 7 38.89
9 EO 3C E-1 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 42,93 %10 EO 1S N+3 180 11 61.11
11 EO 2S W-2 100 12 66.67
12 EO 3S N-2 -200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
3 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 48,30 %13 EO 1S S+2 150 3 16.67
14 EO 2C S-2 -100 15 83.33
15 EO 2T W = -90 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 49,59 %16 EO 4T S+1 150 7 38.89
17 EO 3S W-1 50 13 72.22
18 EO 1S W-2 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 62,09 %19 EO 4P W-1 100 5 27.78
20 EO 2P S = 110 10 55.56
21 EO 3P S+1 170 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
10 VAN AVERMAET Martine -VAN DOOREN Michele : 38,02 %22 EO 2K S+2 130 15 83.33
23 EO 1P N-1 -100 9 50.00
24 EO 1S S+1 120 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
5 COLLIN Jean-Marie -BERGER Jean Marie : 50,24 %25 EO 3C E+1 -170 8 44.44
26 EO 1S S+1 120 0 0.00
27 EO 4P E-1 50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
6 RAYMOND Yves -DEMARTE : 40,19 %31 EO 4P E-2 100 6 33.33
32 EO 2K E+1 -110 8 44.44
33 EO 2P E = -110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 223,0 / 540 = 41,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 JANSSENS Pierre -CORCEOVEI Horia
7 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,69 % 1 EO 5KcN = 550 0 0.00
2 EO 4P N+1 650 6 33.33
3 EO 4PcN-3 -500 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 40,19 %
2 CASSART Guy -FRAITURE Louis : 56,11 % 4 EO 3S W-1 100 2 11.11
5 EO 3S S = 600 12 66.67
6 EO 3S N+1 430 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 42,93 % 7 EO 3S E-1 100 6 33.33
8 EO 2S E+3 -210 0 0.00
9 EO 3P W = -140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
12 - : 0,00 %10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 49,59 %13 EO 2K E-2 200 0 0.00
14 EO 2C W = -110 18 100.00
15 EO 5T E = -400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 62,09 %16 EO 3C N = 140 10 55.56
17 EO 4C E-4 200 2 11.11
18 EO 1S W-2 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
10 VAN AVERMAET Martine -VAN DOOREN Michele : 38,02 %19 EO 3S E+2 -660 16 88.89
20 EO 2C E-2 200 5 27.78
21 EO 4P S-3 -300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
5 COLLIN Jean-Marie -BERGER Jean Marie : 50,24 %22 EO 3S N = 400 4 22.22
23 EO 3S N-2 -200 15 83.33
24 EO 1S S+1 120 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
11 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 55,43 %25 EO 5P W-3 300 2 11.11
26 EO 2C W-1 100 3 16.67
27 EO 3S W = -400 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
6 RAYMOND Yves -DEMARTE : 40,19 %28 EO 4T N = 130 16 88.89
29 EO 3S E-1 100 2 11.11
30 EO 3S W+2 -460 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
Total : 217,7 / 486 = 44,79 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel
8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 42,93 % 4 EO 4K S-2 -200 18 100.00
5 EO 4P S = 620 7 38.89
6 EO 2S S-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
3 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 48,30 % 7 EO 3K N-2 -200 18 100.00
8 EO 3S E = -400 7 38.89
9 EO 3C E = -140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 49,59 %10 EO 3S N+2 660 0 0.00
11 EO 2K S+3 150 2 11.11
12 EO 3S N = 600 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 62,09 %13 EO 2S S = 120 8 44.44
14 EO 1S E-2 100 1 5.56
15 EO 3S W = -400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
10 VAN AVERMAET Martine -VAN DOOREN Michele : 38,02 %16 EO 2P W-1 100 13 72.22
17 EO 2CcE-1 100 7 38.89
18 EO 1S W-1 50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
12 - : 0,00 %19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
11 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 55,43 %22 EO 3K N+2 150 12 66.67
23 EO 3S N-1 -100 9 50.00
24 EO 1S W = -90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
6 RAYMOND Yves -DEMARTE : 40,19 %25 EO 4C E-1 100 6 33.33
26 EO 2K N-1 -100 11 61.11
27 EO 1S W+2 -150 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 57,41 %28 EO 3P S+1 170 13 72.22
29 EO 1S E+1 -120 6 33.33
30 EO 3S W = -400 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
7 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,69 %31 EO 5KcN-2 -500 18 100.00
32 EO 4CcN-2 -300 17 94.44
33 EO 4K E = -130 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 94,44 %
Total : 274,0 / 486 = 56,38 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 42,93 % 1 EO 5K N = 400 14 77.78
2 EO 4P N = 620 12 66.67
3 EO 4PcN-2 -300 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 68,89 %
9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 49,59 % 7 EO 3P E-1 100 6 33.33
8 EO 3S E = -400 7 38.89
9 EO 3C E-1 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 62,09 %10 EO 1S N+3 180 11 61.11
11 EO 2C W-2 100 12 66.67
12 EO 3C S+2 200 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
10 VAN AVERMAET Martine -VAN DOOREN Michele : 38,02 %13 EO 2C N-1 -100 18 100.00
14 EO 1S E = -90 11 61.11
15 EO 3S W+1 -430 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
5 COLLIN Jean-Marie -BERGER Jean Marie : 50,24 %16 EO 3P W-2 200 3 16.67
17 EO 2CcE-1 100 7 38.89
18 EO 1S W-2 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
11 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 55,43 %19 EO 5T E-1 100 5 27.78
20 EO 3C E-3 300 1 5.56
21 EO 4P S-1 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
6 RAYMOND Yves -DEMARTE : 40,19 %22 EO 2P E-2 200 8 44.44
23 EO 2P N-3 -300 18 100.00
24 EO 1S E = -90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 57,41 %25 EO 4C E = -620 14 77.78
26 EO 1S S = 90 7 38.89
27 EO 3S W = -400 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
12 - : 0,00 %28 EO BYE 0 0.00
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
2 CASSART Guy -FRAITURE Louis : 56,11 %31 EO 3CcE-2 300 0 0.00
32 EO 3K W+2 -150 13 72.22
33 EO 5K E-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
Total : 259,2 / 486 = 53,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette
3 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 48,30 % 1 EO 6TcW-3 500 3 16.67
2 EO 4P N-1 -100 17 94.44
3 EO 2P N-1 -50 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 39,26 %
12 - : 0,00 % 4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
10 VAN AVERMAET Martine -VAN DOOREN Michele : 38,02 %10 EO 1S N+3 180 11 61.11
11 EO 3K S = 110 7 38.89
12 EO 3C S+1 170 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
5 COLLIN Jean-Marie -BERGER Jean Marie : 50,24 %13 EO 2C N = 110 13 72.22
14 EO 2K S-2 -100 15 83.33
15 EO 2T W+1 -110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
11 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 55,43 %16 EO 2P W = -110 18 100.00
17 EO 2CcE = -470 18 100.00
18 EO 1ScS+2 580 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
6 RAYMOND Yves -DEMARTE : 40,19 %19 EO 3S E-1 100 5 27.78
20 EO 2C E-2 200 5 27.78
21 EO 1P S = 80 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 57,41 %22 EO 2K N+2 130 15 83.33
23 EO 2K W-1 100 4 22.22
24 EO 1S W = -90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
7 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,69 %25 EO 4P W-4 400 0 0.00
26 EO 3T N-1 -100 11 61.11
27 EO 3S W-1 50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
2 CASSART Guy -FRAITURE Louis : 56,11 %28 EO 5P S-1 -100 18 100.00
29 EO 2C N-2 -200 8 44.44
30 EO 3S W+1 -430 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 42,93 %31 EO 1CcE-1 100 6 33.33
32 EO 4C N-2 -100 4 22.22
33 EO 3P W-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
Total : 231,2 / 486 = 47,57 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger
9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 49,59 % 1 EO 7TcW-3 500 3 16.67
2 EO 4P N = 620 12 66.67
3 EO 3P N-1 -50 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 62,09 % 4 EO 2C E = -110 6 33.33
5 EO 4P S+1 650 1 5.56
6 EO 3C N+1 170 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
10 VAN AVERMAET Martine -VAN DOOREN Michele : 38,02 % 7 EO 2C W-1 100 6 33.33
8 EO 3S E = -400 7 38.89
9 EO 2C E = -110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
12 - : 0,00 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 RAYMOND Yves -DEMARTE : 40,19 %16 EO 2P W-1 100 13 72.22
17 EO 3S E = -400 16 88.89
18 EO 1S W-1 50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 57,41 %19 EO 4P W-1 100 5 27.78
20 EO 3S E-3 300 1 5.56
21 EO 3C W-2 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
7 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,69 %22 EO 2S N+2 180 10 55.56
23 EO 2P N-1 -100 9 50.00
24 EO 3KcW-2 300 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
2 CASSART Guy -FRAITURE Louis : 56,11 %25 EO 4C E = -620 14 77.78
26 EO 3S N-2 -200 16 88.89
27 EO 3S E-1 50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 42,93 %28 EO 4P S = 620 8 44.44
29 EO 3S E = -600 14 77.78
30 EO 3S W = -400 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
3 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 48,30 %31 EO 3S S-1 -100 16 88.89
32 EO 2K E+3 -150 13 72.22
33 EO 4K E = -130 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
Total : 237,2 / 486 = 48,81 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 62,09 % 1 EO 5K N = 400 14 77.78
2 EO 4P N+1 650 6 33.33
3 EO 3PcN-1 -100 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 47,59 %
10 VAN AVERMAET Martine -VAN DOOREN Michele : 38,02 % 4 EO 2C E+1 -140 12 66.67
5 EO 4P S = 620 7 38.89
6 EO 2T S+1 110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
5 COLLIN Jean-Marie -BERGER Jean Marie : 50,24 % 7 EO 3T E = -110 14 77.78
8 EO 3S E+2 -460 17 94.44
9 EO 4K S-3 -150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
11 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 55,43 %10 EO 2K E-4 400 2 11.11
11 EO 2C W-1 50 18 100.00
12 EO 3S N = 600 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 57,41 %16 EO Pass Passe 16 88.89
17 EO 2CcE-2 300 0 0.00
18 EO 1S W-2 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
7 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,69 %19 EO 3S W+3 -690 18 100.00
20 EO 3P N-2 -200 16 88.89
21 EO 2P S = 110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
12 - : 0,00 %22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 42,93 %25 EO 4C E = -620 14 77.78
26 EO 2C W-1 100 3 16.67
27 EO 3S W = -400 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
3 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 48,30 %28 EO 4P S = 620 8 44.44
29 EO 3S E-1 100 2 11.11
30 EO 4TcS-3 -500 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 49,59 %31 EO 3C E-2 100 6 33.33
32 EO 4CcN-2 -300 17 94.44
33 EO 3S W-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 280,7 / 486 = 57,76 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René
10 VAN AVERMAET Martine -VAN DOOREN Michele : 38,02 % 1 EO 5K N+1 420 7 38.89
2 EO 4P N+1 650 6 33.33
3 EO 4PcN-3 -500 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 53,15 %
5 COLLIN Jean-Marie -BERGER Jean Marie : 50,24 % 4 EO 2C E+1 -140 12 66.67
5 EO 3S S = 600 12 66.67
6 EO 3S N = 400 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
11 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 55,43 % 7 EO 3S W-1 100 6 33.33
8 EO 3S E = -400 7 38.89
9 EO 3C E-1 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
6 RAYMOND Yves -DEMARTE : 40,19 %10 EO 1S N+4 210 4 22.22
11 EO 1KcS+1 240 0 0.00
12 EO 2C S = 110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 57,41 %13 EO 2C N = 110 13 72.22
14 EO 1S E-1 50 6 33.33
15 EO 1S W+2 -150 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
2 CASSART Guy -FRAITURE Louis : 56,11 %19 EO 4T E-2 200 0 0.00
20 EO 3K W = -110 13 72.22
21 EO 2PcS-1 -200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 42,93 %22 EO 3S S-1 -50 18 100.00
23 EO 3S N-1 -100 9 50.00
24 EO 1S W+1 -120 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
3 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 48,30 %25 EO 5CcE-1 200 4 22.22
26 EO 3S S-2 -200 16 88.89
27 EO 3S W = -400 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 49,59 %28 EO 3P S+1 170 13 72.22
29 EO 3S E = -600 14 77.78
30 EO 3S W+2 -460 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
12 - : 0,00 %31 EO BYE 0 0.00
32 EO BYE 0 0.00
33 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 266,7 / 486 = 54,88 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 HENRARD Françoise -HENRY Kateline
5 COLLIN Jean-Marie -BERGER Jean Marie : 50,24 % 1 EO 5K N = 400 14 77.78
2 EO 4P N+3 710 2 11.11
3 EO 4PcN-3 -500 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 58,70 %
11 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 55,43 % 4 EO 3C W-1 100 2 11.11
5 EO 3S S+1 630 4 22.22
6 EO 4C N+1 450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
12 - : 0,00 % 7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 57,41 %10 EO 1S N+3 180 11 61.11
11 EO 3K S = 110 7 38.89
12 EO 3S N = 600 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
7 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,69 %13 EO 2C N = 110 13 72.22
14 EO 1S E-1 50 6 33.33
15 EO 3S W-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
2 CASSART Guy -FRAITURE Louis : 56,11 %16 EO 4C N = 420 0 0.00
17 EO 3C E-2 100 7 38.89
18 EO 2C N+1 140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
3 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 48,30 %22 EO 3S S = 400 4 22.22
23 EO 3C S = 140 0 0.00
24 EO 2K W-3 150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 49,59 %25 EO 4C E = -620 14 77.78
26 EO 3S S-2 -200 16 88.89
27 EO 3S W = -400 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 62,09 %28 EO 4P S+1 650 3 16.67
29 EO 3S E-1 100 2 11.11
30 EO 3K E+1 -130 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
10 VAN AVERMAET Martine -VAN DOOREN Michele : 38,02 %31 EO 2K N = 90 12 66.67
32 EO 3K E+1 -130 10 55.56
33 EO 3K E = -110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 178,7 / 486 = 36,77 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 CHANTRAINE René -WILLEMS Jacques
11 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 55,43 % 1 EO 5K N = 400 14 77.78
2 EO 4P N-1 -100 17 94.44
3 EO 4P N-2 -100 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 67,96 %
6 RAYMOND Yves -DEMARTE : 40,19 % 4 EO 2C E+1 -140 12 66.67
5 EO 4P S-1 -100 18 100.00
6 EO 3K E-2 200 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 57,41 % 7 EO 2P E-1 100 6 33.33
8 EO 3S E = -400 7 38.89
9 EO 4C E-3 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
7 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,69 %10 EO 1S N+3 180 11 61.11
11 EO 1S N = 90 16 88.89
12 EO 4C N+1 650 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
2 CASSART Guy -FRAITURE Louis : 56,11 %13 EO 2C N+1 140 6 33.33
14 EO 1S E = -90 11 61.11
15 EO 3S W+1 -430 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
12 - : 0,00 %16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
3 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 48,30 %19 EO 3S E+1 -630 14 77.78
20 EO 2S S = 120 8 44.44
21 EO 4P S-1 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 62,09 %25 EO 4C E = -620 14 77.78
26 EO 1S S = 90 7 38.89
27 EO 3S W+1 -430 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
10 VAN AVERMAET Martine -VAN DOOREN Michele : 38,02 %28 EO 4P S = 620 8 44.44
29 EO 3S E = -600 14 77.78
30 EO 3S W+2 -460 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
5 COLLIN Jean-Marie -BERGER Jean Marie : 50,24 %31 EO 2C E-1 50 14 77.78
32 EO 4C N-2 -100 4 22.22
33 EO 3PcW-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 273,7 / 486 = 56,32 %
PAIRE Nr : 23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
6 RAYMOND Yves -DEMARTE : 40,19 % 1 EO 5K N = 400 14 77.78
2 EO 4P N = 620 12 66.67
3 EO 50%50% Ajust 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 57,41 % 4 EO 1C E+2 -140 12 66.67
5 EO 4P S+1 650 1 5.56
6 EO 3C N = 140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
7 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,69 % 7 EO 2T E = -90 12 66.67
8 EO 3S E+1 -430 14 77.78
9 EO 3K S = 110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
2 CASSART Guy -FRAITURE Louis : 56,11 %10 EO 1S N+3 180 11 61.11
11 EO 2C W-2 100 12 66.67
12 EO 3S N+2 660 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 42,93 %13 EO 2S S+1 150 3 16.67
14 EO 1S E-2 100 1 5.56
15 EO 3S W+1 -430 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
3 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 48,30 %16 EO 4T S+1 150 7 38.89
17 EO 3C E-2 100 7 38.89
18 EO 2T S+2 130 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 49,59 %19 EO 4CcN-1 -100 10 55.56
20 EO 2K W+1 -110 13 72.22
21 EO 1P S+4 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 62,09 %22 EO 2TcW-2 500 0 0.00
23 EO 2C S = 110 2 11.11
24 EO 3KcW-4 800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 3,70 %
5 COLLIN Jean-Marie -BERGER Jean Marie : 50,24 %28 EO 4PcS = 790 0 0.00
29 EO 3S E = -600 14 77.78
30 EO 4K E = -130 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
11 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 55,43 %31 EO 3C E-2 100 6 33.33
32 EO 3C N-1 -50 0 0.00
33 EO 3C S-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
Total : 203,0 / 540 = 37,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 24 MOLS Bruno -MATELART Marc
12 - : 0,00 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 49,59 % 4 EO 2C E+1 -140 12 66.67
5 EO 3P N+2 200 16 88.89
6 EO 2C N+1 140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
6 RAYMOND Yves -DEMARTE : 40,19 % 7 EO 1S E+2 -150 16 88.89
8 EO 3S E+2 -460 17 94.44
9 EO 4P W = -620 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 94,44 %
3 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 48,30 %10 EO 2S S+1 150 18 100.00
11 EO 1S S+1 120 4 22.22
12 EO 3C S+1 170 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
11 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 55,43 %13 EO 2C N = 110 13 72.22
14 EO 1S E-1 50 6 33.33
15 EO 3S W+1 -430 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 42,93 %16 EO 3P W-2 200 3 16.67
17 EO 2C E-1 50 13 72.22
18 EO 1S W = -90 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
5 COLLIN Jean-Marie -BERGER Jean Marie : 50,24 %19 EO 3S E = -600 12 66.67
20 EO 2PcN-2 -500 18 100.00
21 EO 2P S-1 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
2 CASSART Guy -FRAITURE Louis : 56,11 %22 EO 3S N = 400 4 22.22
23 EO 1P N-2 -200 15 83.33
24 EO 1S W = -90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
7 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,69 %28 EO 4P N+1 650 3 16.67
29 EO 3S E = -600 14 77.78
30 EO 3S W+2 -460 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 62,09 %31 EO 4P W-2 100 6 33.33
32 EO 3C N-2 -100 4 22.22
33 EO 3K E+1 -130 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
Total : 325,0 / 486 = 66,87 %
|
|