|
Tournoi du 07-11-16
Lundi
1 58,21 8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie
2 56,00 1 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane
3 54,32 7 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
4 53,57 2 MEYER Jean -VANDERVORST Mike
5 53,31 4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
6 52,93 13 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
7 49,72 11 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse
8 48,35 5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
9 48,17 14 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
10 47,53 12 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
11 45,69 9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
12 44,69 6 WILLEMS Jacques -GROSFILS Colette
13 44,44 3 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques
14 43,28 10 de NICOLAS Bernard -GERARD Francis
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 62,01 22 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand
2 55,71 21 PIETQUIN Joseph -VUYTS Michèle
3 54,99 27 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Chantal
4 53,53 28 VAN DOOREN Michele -THIRIFAY Marie-Paule
5 53,25 24 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -DEGUELLE Jacques
6 50,31 26 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René
7 49,82 19 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
8 47,82 23 BERGER Jean Marie -COLLIN Jean-Marie
9 46,93 20 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
10 46,78 18 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
11 46,49 17 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert
12 44,97 15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
13 44,29 16 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel
14 42,90 25 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette
PAIRE Nr : 1 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 44,97 % 1 NS 3K E+1 -130 14 58.33
2 NS 1S E-2 100 21 87.50
3 NS 4P N+1 450 22.8 95.00 µ Tbl = 80,28 %
25 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 42,90 % 4 NS 2P N+2 170 24 100.00
5 NS 3K S+3 170 12 50.00
6 NS 2P E+2 -170 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 80,56 %
24 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -DEGUELLE Jacques : 53,25 % 7 NS 3T N = 110 8 33.33
8 NS 3K S = 110 19 79.17
9 NS 3S W+2 -660 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
23 BERGER Jean Marie -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 47,82 %10 NS 3K S = 110 18 75.00
11 NS 2P E+1 -140 15 62.50
12 NS 3P S = 140 20 83.33 µ Tbl = 73,61 %
22 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 62,01 %13 NS 3S W+2 -660 1 4.17
14 NS 2P S = 110 12 50.00
15 NS 2P E-1 50 18 75.00 µ Tbl = 43,06 %
27 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Chantal : 54,99 %16 NS 2C S = 110 17 70.83
17 NS 2C W+2 -170 12 50.00
18 NS 2C E+2 -170 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 73,61 %
20 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 46,93 %19 NS 3C S-1 -50 5 20.83
20 NS Pass Passe 20 83.33
21 NS 3K E-1 50 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 48,61 %
19 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 49,82 %22 NS 3S N+1 430 21 87.50
23 NS 2K W = -90 13 54.17
24 NS 3P W = -140 4 16.67 µ Tbl = 52,78 %
18 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 46,78 %25 NS 4C N-3 -150 0.1 0.42
26 NS 2P N-1 -100 3.3 13.75
27 NS 3P S+1 170 23.9 99.58 µ Tbl = 37,92 %
17 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 46,49 %28 NS 3P N+1 170 6.6 27.50
29 NS 3S W-1 100 14.2 59.17
30 NS 4TcN-1 -100 2.3 9.58 µ Tbl = 32,08 %
Total : 403,2 / 720 = 56,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 MEYER Jean -VANDERVORST Mike
16 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 44,29 % 4 NS 2P N+1 140 21 87.50
5 NS 3S S+1 630 20 83.33
6 NS 3P W+2 -200 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 44,97 % 7 NS 2C S+1 140 15 62.50
8 NS 3P W-1 50 11 45.83
9 NS 2S E+2 -180 13 54.17 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
25 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 42,90 %10 NS 3K S = 110 18 75.00
11 NS 3P E+1 -170 4 16.67
12 NS 3P S = 140 20 83.33 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
24 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -DEGUELLE Jacques : 53,25 %13 NS 3S W+2 -660 1 4.17
14 NS 2T S+1 110 12 50.00
15 NS 3P E = -140 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
23 BERGER Jean Marie -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 47,82 %16 NS 2C S-1 -50 6 25.00
17 NS 3C E+1 -170 12 50.00
18 NS 4P N-4 -400 18 75.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
28 VAN DOOREN Michele -THIRIFAY Marie-Paule : 53,53 %19 NS 2C S+1 140 19 79.17
20 NS 1S S-2 -200 6 25.00
21 NS 4C N-1 -100 7 29.17 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
26 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 50,31 %22 NS 3S N-2 -100 3 12.50
23 NS 2K W-2 200 23 95.83
24 NS 2C N+1 140 23 95.83 µ Tbl = 68,06 %
20 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 46,93 %25 NS 3S S+2 460 21.8 90.83
26 NS 1S S = 90 7.7 32.08
27 NS 2CcE-1 100 13.1 54.58 µ Tbl = 59,17 %
19 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 49,82 %28 NS 3S S = 600 13.1 54.58
29 NS 4T E-1 100 14.2 59.17
30 NS 4T N = 130 17.4 72.50 µ Tbl = 62,08 %
18 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 46,78 %31 NS 3S S = 600 4.4 18.33
32 NS 3C W-1 100 14.2 59.17
33 NS 2P S-1 -50 9.8 40.83 µ Tbl = 39,44 %
Total : 385,7 / 720 = 53,57 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques
19 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 49,82 % 1 NS 4P W = -420 4 16.67
2 NS 3K E+1 -130 2 8.33
3 NS 4P N = 420 18.5 77.08 µ Tbl = 34,03 %
17 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 46,49 % 7 NS 4CcS-1 -200 2 8.33
8 NS 2C N = 110 19 79.17
9 NS 2C W+2 -170 17 70.83 µ Tbl = 52,78 %
26 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 50,31 %10 NS Pass Passe 7 29.17
11 NS 3P E = -140 15 62.50
12 NS 3C E-1 50 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 44,97 %13 NS 3S W = -600 6 25.00
14 NS 1S S+1 120 19 79.17
15 NS 2P E = -110 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 47,22 %
25 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 42,90 %16 NS 2C S = 110 17 70.83
17 NS 2C E+2 -170 12 50.00
18 NS 4C E+2 -480 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
24 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -DEGUELLE Jacques : 53,25 %19 NS 2C S = 110 14 58.33
20 NS 3T S-3 -300 2 8.33
21 NS 3P S = 140 19 79.17 µ Tbl = 48,61 %
23 BERGER Jean Marie -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 47,82 %22 NS 4T S = 130 10 41.67
23 NS 2K W-1 100 19 79.17
24 NS 2C N-1 -50 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 52,78 %
27 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Chantal : 54,99 %25 NS 3S N+1 430 15.3 63.75
26 NS 1S S = 90 7.7 32.08
27 NS 2C E-1 50 7.7 32.08 µ Tbl = 42,64 %
21 PIETQUIN Joseph -VUYTS Michèle : 55,71 %28 NS 2P S = 110 4.4 18.33
29 NS 3S E = -600 0.1 0.42
30 NS 4T N-1 -50 7.7 32.08 µ Tbl = 16,94 %
20 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 46,93 %31 NS 3S N+1 630 10.9 45.42
32 NS 3P W-1 100 14.2 59.17
33 NS Pass Passe 18.5 77.08 µ Tbl = 60,56 %
Total : 320,0 / 720 = 44,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
21 PIETQUIN Joseph -VUYTS Michèle : 55,71 % 1 NS 4P W-1 50 20 83.33
2 NS 2P E+1 -140 0 0.00
3 NS 50%50% Ajust 12 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
20 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 46,93 % 4 NS 1S W-1 100 12 50.00
5 NS 3S S+1 630 20 83.33
6 NS 4P W+1 -650 5 20.83 µ Tbl = 51,39 %
18 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 46,78 %10 NS 2P E-1 100 14 58.33
11 NS 3P E = -140 15 62.50
12 NS 2K N = 90 13 54.17 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
27 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Chantal : 54,99 %13 NS 4P W-4 400 24 100.00
14 NS 2P S = 110 12 50.00
15 NS 2P E-1 50 18 75.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
16 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 44,29 %16 NS 3C S = 140 23 95.83
17 NS 2C W+2 -170 12 50.00
18 NS 4C E+2 -480 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 52,78 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 44,97 %19 NS 3C S-1 -50 5 20.83
20 NS 2K E = -90 16 66.67
21 NS 2C N+1 140 19 79.17 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
25 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 42,90 %22 NS 3S N-1 -50 7 29.17
23 NS 1S E+1 -120 1 4.17
24 NS 3P W-1 50 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 31,94 %
24 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -DEGUELLE Jacques : 53,25 %25 NS 4C N = 420 12 50.00
26 NS 3C W-1 100 12 50.00
27 NS 2P N+1 140 20.7 86.25 µ Tbl = 62,08 %
28 VAN DOOREN Michele -THIRIFAY Marie-Paule : 53,53 %28 NS 4P S = 620 19.6 81.67
29 NS 3K W = -110 4.4 18.33
30 NS 3C E = -140 0.1 0.42 µ Tbl = 33,47 %
26 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 50,31 %31 NS 3S S+1 630 10.9 45.42
32 NS 3P W-1 100 14.2 59.17
33 NS 2S S+1 150 23.9 99.58 µ Tbl = 68,06 %
Total : 383,8 / 720 = 53,31 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
27 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Chantal : 54,99 % 1 NS 4P W-1 50 20 83.33
2 NS 3K E-1 50 14 58.33
3 NS 3S S-2 -100 0.1 0.42 µ Tbl = 47,36 %
22 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 62,01 % 4 NS Pass Passe 8 33.33
5 NS 2P S-1 -100 1 4.17
6 NS 4P E+1 -650 5 20.83 µ Tbl = 19,44 %
21 PIETQUIN Joseph -VUYTS Michèle : 55,71 % 7 NS 2C S+1 140 15 62.50
8 NS 4T S = 130 23 95.83
9 NS 4PcS-3 -500 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
19 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 49,82 %13 NS 2P E = -110 12 50.00
14 NS 2C S+1 140 23 95.83
15 NS 2P E = -110 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
28 VAN DOOREN Michele -THIRIFAY Marie-Paule : 53,53 %16 NS Pass Passe 11 45.83
17 NS 3C W+1 -170 12 50.00
18 NS 4C E+2 -480 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 36,11 %
26 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 50,31 %19 NS 2C S = 110 14 58.33
20 NS 1P S-3 -300 2 8.33
21 NS 4P S-1 -100 7 29.17 µ Tbl = 31,94 %
16 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 44,29 %22 NS 5T S = 400 17 70.83
23 NS 1S S-1 -100 7 29.17
24 NS 2P E-1 50 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 44,97 %25 NS 2C N+3 200 8.8 36.67
26 NS 1S S+1 120 17.4 72.50
27 NS 2CcE = -470 0.1 0.42 µ Tbl = 36,53 %
25 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 42,90 %28 NS 3S S+1 630 23.9 99.58
29 NS 5T E-3 300 23.9 99.58
30 NS 4CcE-2 300 21.8 90.83 µ Tbl = 96,67 %
24 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -DEGUELLE Jacques : 53,25 %31 NS 3S S+2 660 19.6 81.67
32 NS 4K S-1 -50 3.3 13.75
33 NS 3P S-2 -100 1.2 5.00 µ Tbl = 33,47 %
Total : 348,1 / 720 = 48,35 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 WILLEMS Jacques -GROSFILS Colette
25 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 42,90 % 1 NS 4P W = -420 4 16.67
2 NS 2C S = 110 24 100.00
3 NS 3P N+1 170 12 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
28 VAN DOOREN Michele -THIRIFAY Marie-Paule : 53,53 % 4 NS 2C S-2 -200 0 0.00
5 NS 4P S-1 -100 1 4.17
6 NS 3P W+2 -200 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 23,61 %
26 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 50,31 % 7 NS 2C S+1 140 15 62.50
8 NS 4P W-2 100 15 62.50
9 NS 3S E = -600 7 29.17 µ Tbl = 51,39 %
22 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 62,01 %10 NS Pass Passe 7 29.17
11 NS 1S W+2 -150 8 33.33
12 NS 3C W+1 -170 4 16.67 µ Tbl = 26,39 %
20 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 46,93 %16 NS 2C S = 110 17 70.83
17 NS 2C W+2 -170 12 50.00
18 NS 4C E+1 -450 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
19 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 49,82 %19 NS 2C S = 110 14 58.33
20 NS 2K E+2 -130 10 41.67
21 NS 2C N+1 140 19 79.17 µ Tbl = 59,72 %
27 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Chantal : 54,99 %22 NS 3S N = 400 17 70.83
23 NS 2S E-1 100 19 79.17
24 NS 3C N-3 -150 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 52,78 %
17 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 46,49 %25 NS 3C N-2 -100 2.3 9.58
26 NS 2P W-1 100 12 50.00
27 NS 2C E = -110 2.3 9.58 µ Tbl = 23,06 %
16 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 44,29 %28 NS 2P S+3 200 8.8 36.67
29 NS 3S E-1 100 14.2 59.17
30 NS 3C E-1 50 13.1 54.58 µ Tbl = 50,14 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 44,97 %31 NS 3S S-1 -100 0.1 0.42
32 NS 3P W-1 100 14.2 59.17
33 NS 1S E-2 100 21.8 90.83 µ Tbl = 50,14 %
Total : 321,8 / 720 = 44,69 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
16 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 44,29 % 1 NS 3K E+2 -150 11 45.83
2 NS 2S E-2 100 21 87.50
3 NS 3P N = 140 8.8 36.67 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 44,97 % 4 NS 2P N+1 140 21 87.50
5 NS 3K S = 110 4 16.67
6 NS 3P W+1 -170 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 65,28 %
25 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 42,90 % 7 NS 2C S+2 170 22 91.67
8 NS 4PcW-1 100 15 62.50
9 NS 3S E+1 -630 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
27 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Chantal : 54,99 %10 NS 3S N-3 -300 0 0.00
11 NS 2P E+1 -140 15 62.50
12 NS 3K N = 110 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 43,06 %
23 BERGER Jean Marie -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 47,82 %13 NS 4P E-1 100 19 79.17
14 NS 3T S-1 -50 2 8.33
15 NS 3P E-2 100 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
21 PIETQUIN Joseph -VUYTS Michèle : 55,71 %19 NS 3C S = 140 19 79.17
20 NS 2C N-1 -100 13 54.17
21 NS 4TcW = -510 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 47,22 %
20 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 46,93 %22 NS 3S N-5 -250 0 0.00
23 NS 2K W-2 200 23 95.83
24 NS 2P W = -110 6 25.00 µ Tbl = 40,28 %
28 VAN DOOREN Michele -THIRIFAY Marie-Paule : 53,53 %25 NS 4C N+1 450 18.5 77.08
26 NS 2S S-1 -100 3.3 13.75
27 NS 2P S+1 140 20.7 86.25 µ Tbl = 59,03 %
26 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 50,31 %28 NS 3S S = 600 13.1 54.58
29 NS 2S W+1 -150 2.3 9.58
30 NS 5CcE-2 300 21.8 90.83 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
17 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 46,49 %31 NS 3S S+1 630 10.9 45.42
32 NS 3K S = 110 23.9 99.58
33 NS 2C N-1 -50 9.8 40.83 µ Tbl = 61,94 %
Total : 391,1 / 720 = 54,32 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie
18 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 46,78 % 1 NS 4P W-2 100 24 100.00
2 NS 3K E-1 50 14 58.33
3 NS 4P N+1 450 22.8 95.00 µ Tbl = 84,44 %
17 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 46,49 % 4 NS 2C S = 110 16 66.67
5 NS 3K S+2 150 10 41.67
6 NS 3P W+1 -170 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
16 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 44,29 % 7 NS 3C S-1 -100 5 20.83
8 NS 3P W-1 50 11 45.83
9 NS 1C W+3 -170 17 70.83 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 44,97 %10 NS 3C N-2 -200 2 8.33
11 NS 4P E-1 50 23 95.83
12 NS 2P S+2 170 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,06 %
28 VAN DOOREN Michele -THIRIFAY Marie-Paule : 53,53 %13 NS 4P E-1 100 19 79.17
14 NS 2P S-1 -50 2 8.33
15 NS 2P E-1 50 18 75.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
26 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 50,31 %16 NS 3C S-1 -50 6 25.00
17 NS 2C W+2 -170 12 50.00
18 NS 2C E+4 -230 20 83.33 µ Tbl = 52,78 %
22 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 62,01 %22 NS 2PcW-1 200 13 54.17
23 NS 1P S = 80 16 66.67
24 NS 4P W = -420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,28 %
21 PIETQUIN Joseph -VUYTS Michèle : 55,71 %25 NS 3C N+1 170 5.5 22.92
26 NS 2PcW-2 500 21.8 90.83
27 NS 2CcE-1 100 13.1 54.58 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
20 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 46,93 %28 NS 4P S = 620 19.6 81.67
29 NS 3S W-1 100 14.2 59.17
30 NS 4CcE-2 300 21.8 90.83 µ Tbl = 77,22 %
27 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Chantal : 54,99 %31 NS 3S S+1 630 10.9 45.42
32 NS 4P W-1 100 14.2 59.17
33 NS 2K N-2 -100 1.2 5.00 µ Tbl = 36,53 %
Total : 419,1 / 720 = 58,21 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
28 VAN DOOREN Michele -THIRIFAY Marie-Paule : 53,53 % 1 NS 4K E+1 -150 11 45.83
2 NS 1P E = -80 8 33.33
3 NS 2P N+2 170 12 50.00 µ Tbl = 43,06 %
26 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 50,31 % 4 NS Pass Passe 8 33.33
5 NS 2P N+1 140 8 33.33
6 NS 4P E+1 -650 5 20.83 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
18 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 46,78 % 7 NS 2C N+1 140 15 62.50
8 NS 5K N-2 -100 5 20.83
9 NS 2S E+2 -180 13 54.17 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
17 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 46,49 %10 NS 2S N = 120 22 91.67
11 NS 3P E-1 50 23 95.83
12 NS 3P N = 140 20 83.33 µ Tbl = 90,28 %
16 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 44,29 %13 NS 2K N-4 -400 8 33.33
14 NS 2C N+1 140 23 95.83
15 NS 2P E = -110 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 44,97 %16 NS 3C N-1 -50 6 25.00
17 NS 3C E+1 -170 12 50.00
18 NS 4C E+2 -480 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
27 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Chantal : 54,99 %19 NS 4C N-2 -100 0 0.00
20 NS 2KcE = -180 8 33.33
21 NS 3P N-2 -200 4 16.67 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
23 BERGER Jean Marie -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 47,82 %25 NS 4C N = 420 12 50.00
26 NS 3C E-3 300 19.6 81.67
27 NS 3C E-2 100 13.1 54.58 µ Tbl = 62,08 %
22 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 62,01 %28 NS 3S N = 600 13.1 54.58
29 NS 3S E-1 100 14.2 59.17
30 NS 4T N-1 -50 7.7 32.08 µ Tbl = 48,61 %
21 PIETQUIN Joseph -VUYTS Michèle : 55,71 %31 NS 3C N+2 200 2.3 9.58
32 NS 3P E-1 100 14.2 59.17
33 NS 2C N-1 -50 9.8 40.83 µ Tbl = 36,53 %
Total : 329,0 / 720 = 45,69 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 de NICOLAS Bernard -GERARD Francis
22 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 62,01 % 1 NS 4P W = -420 4 16.67
2 NS 2K E+1 -110 5 20.83
3 NS 4P N = 420 18.5 77.08 µ Tbl = 38,19 %
21 PIETQUIN Joseph -VUYTS Michèle : 55,71 % 4 NS Pass Passe 8 33.33
5 NS 3S N = 600 14 58.33
6 NS 3P W+2 -200 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 52,78 %
27 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Chantal : 54,99 % 7 NS 2S N-1 -100 5 20.83
8 NS 3C N-2 -100 5 20.83
9 NS 2K W+3 -150 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 43,06 %
19 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 49,82 %10 NS Pass Passe 7 29.17
11 NS 4P E = -420 0 0.00
12 NS 1S N-3 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,72 %
18 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 46,78 %13 NS 2P E-1 100 19 79.17
14 NS 2P S-1 -50 2 8.33
15 NS 2P E = -110 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
17 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 46,49 %16 NS Pass Passe 11 45.83
17 NS 3C W+2 -200 0 0.00
18 NS 4C E+1 -450 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
16 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 44,29 %19 NS 3C S-1 -50 5 20.83
20 NS Pass Passe 20 83.33
21 NS 2C N = 110 12 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,39 %
28 VAN DOOREN Michele -THIRIFAY Marie-Paule : 53,53 %22 NS 3P W-2 200 13 54.17
23 NS 2C N-1 -100 7 29.17
24 NS 3P W-1 50 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 48,61 %
24 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -DEGUELLE Jacques : 53,25 %28 NS 4P S = 620 19.6 81.67
29 NS 3S W-1 100 14.2 59.17
30 NS 4T N-1 -50 7.7 32.08 µ Tbl = 57,64 %
23 BERGER Jean Marie -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 47,82 %31 NS 3S S+1 630 10.9 45.42
32 NS 3P W-1 100 14.2 59.17
33 NS Pass Passe 18.5 77.08 µ Tbl = 60,56 %
Total : 311,6 / 720 = 43,28 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse
24 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -DEGUELLE Jacques : 53,25 % 1 NS 4P W = -420 4 16.67
2 NS 3K E = -110 5 20.83
3 NS 2P N+3 200 15.3 63.75 µ Tbl = 33,75 %
23 BERGER Jean Marie -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 47,82 % 4 NS 2P N-1 -100 3 12.50
5 NS 3S N+1 630 20 83.33
6 NS 4P W+1 -650 5 20.83 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
22 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 62,01 % 7 NS 3S N-3 -300 0 0.00
8 NS 4KcN-1 -100 5 20.83
9 NS 3S E+1 -630 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
28 VAN DOOREN Michele -THIRIFAY Marie-Paule : 53,53 %10 NS 2K S = 90 12 50.00
11 NS 2P E+2 -170 4 16.67
12 NS 1S N = 90 13 54.17 µ Tbl = 40,28 %
26 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 50,31 %13 NS 3S W-1 100 19 79.17
14 NS 1S N+1 120 19 79.17
15 NS 2C W = -110 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 65,28 %
19 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 49,82 %16 NS 2C S+1 140 23 95.83
17 NS 2C W+2 -170 12 50.00
18 NS 4C E = -420 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
18 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 46,78 %19 NS 2P E-1 100 10 41.67
20 NS 3K E-1 100 24 100.00
21 NS 3C N = 140 19 79.17 µ Tbl = 73,61 %
17 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 46,49 %22 NS 3S N-1 -50 7 29.17
23 NS 1S N-1 -100 7 29.17
24 NS 2C N+1 140 23 95.83 µ Tbl = 51,39 %
16 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 44,29 %25 NS 4C N+1 450 18.5 77.08
26 NS 2P N = 110 15.3 63.75
27 NS 2P N = 110 17.4 72.50 µ Tbl = 71,11 %
25 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 42,90 %31 NS 3S N+2 660 19.6 81.67
32 NS 2P W+1 -140 0.1 0.42
33 NS 2C N-1 -50 9.8 40.83 µ Tbl = 40,97 %
Total : 358,0 / 720 = 49,72 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
26 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 50,31 % 1 NS 4P W = -420 4 16.67
2 NS 3K E-1 50 14 58.33
3 NS 3K W-1 100 6.6 27.50 µ Tbl = 34,17 %
19 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 49,82 % 4 NS 2P N = 110 16 66.67
5 NS 3S S+1 630 20 83.33
6 NS 4P W = -620 12 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
23 BERGER Jean Marie -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 47,82 % 7 NS 2P W-2 200 24 100.00
8 NS 3P W = -140 0 0.00
9 NS 3S E = -600 7 29.17 µ Tbl = 43,06 %
16 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 44,29 %10 NS Pass Passe 7 29.17
11 NS 2P E+1 -140 15 62.50
12 NS 3C W = -140 7 29.17 µ Tbl = 40,28 %
20 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 46,93 %13 NS 3S W+1 -630 4 16.67
14 NS 3K E-2 100 6 25.00
15 NS 2P E = -110 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 26,39 %
24 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -DEGUELLE Jacques : 53,25 %16 NS 2C S = 110 17 70.83
17 NS 3C E+1 -170 12 50.00
18 NS 3S W+1 -430 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 59,72 %
17 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 46,49 %19 NS 3T E-2 200 23 95.83
20 NS 2C N-3 -300 2 8.33
21 NS 3C N = 140 19 79.17 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
21 PIETQUIN Joseph -VUYTS Michèle : 55,71 %22 NS 3S N-2 -100 3 12.50
23 NS 2K W = -90 13 54.17
24 NS 3C S-1 -50 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 34,72 %
18 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 46,78 %28 NS 4P S-1 -100 1.2 5.00
29 NS 3K E-1 100 14.2 59.17
30 NS 3T N = 110 15.3 63.75 µ Tbl = 42,64 %
22 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 62,01 %31 NS 3S N+3 690 23.9 99.58
32 NS 3P W-1 100 14.2 59.17
33 NS 2C N-1 -50 9.8 40.83 µ Tbl = 66,53 %
Total : 342,2 / 720 = 47,53 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
23 BERGER Jean Marie -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 47,82 % 1 NS 4C N-2 -100 16 66.67
2 NS 3K E-1 50 14 58.33
3 NS 4C S-1 -50 3.3 13.75 µ Tbl = 46,25 %
27 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Chantal : 54,99 % 4 NS 1S S-1 -100 3 12.50
5 NS 3K S+1 130 6 25.00
6 NS 4P W+1 -650 5 20.83 µ Tbl = 19,44 %
20 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 46,93 % 7 NS 2C S+1 140 15 62.50
8 NS 3C N-2 -100 5 20.83
9 NS 5K W-1 100 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
24 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -DEGUELLE Jacques : 53,25 %10 NS 2P E-2 200 24 100.00
11 NS 3P E = -140 15 62.50
12 NS 4P S-2 -200 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 56,94 %
17 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 46,49 %13 NS 2C S-1 -100 14 58.33
14 NS 2P S = 110 12 50.00
15 NS 2K S = 90 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
21 PIETQUIN Joseph -VUYTS Michèle : 55,71 %16 NS 2P W = -110 0 0.00
17 NS 2C E+1 -140 24 100.00
18 NS 4C E+1 -450 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 47,22 %
25 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 42,90 %19 NS 2TcE-1 200 23 95.83
20 NS 2C N-1 -100 13 54.17
21 NS 3P S = 140 19 79.17 µ Tbl = 76,39 %
18 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 46,78 %22 NS 3S N+1 430 21 87.50
23 NS 1S E+1 -120 1 4.17
24 NS 2C N = 110 20 83.33 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
22 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 62,01 %25 NS 3C N+1 170 5.5 22.92
26 NS 3TcS = 670 23.9 99.58
27 NS 2C E-1 50 7.7 32.08 µ Tbl = 51,53 %
19 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 49,82 %31 NS 3S N+2 660 19.6 81.67
32 NS 4K S-1 -50 3.3 13.75
33 NS 1S N-1 -50 9.8 40.83 µ Tbl = 45,42 %
Total : 381,1 / 720 = 52,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
20 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 46,93 % 1 NS 4P W-1 50 20 83.33
2 NS 3K E-1 50 14 58.33
3 NS 4P N-1 -50 3.3 13.75 µ Tbl = 51,81 %
24 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -DEGUELLE Jacques : 53,25 % 4 NS 2C S = 110 16 66.67
5 NS 3S S+1 630 20 83.33
6 NS 4P W+1 -650 5 20.83 µ Tbl = 56,94 %
28 VAN DOOREN Michele -THIRIFAY Marie-Paule : 53,53 % 7 NS 3C S = 140 15 62.50
8 NS 3K S+1 130 23 95.83
9 NS 3K W+2 -150 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 81,94 %
21 PIETQUIN Joseph -VUYTS Michèle : 55,71 %10 NS 2K S+1 110 18 75.00
11 NS 3P E+1 -170 4 16.67
12 NS 3C W = -140 7 29.17 µ Tbl = 40,28 %
25 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 42,90 %13 NS 2S E+1 -150 10 41.67
14 NS 2P S = 110 12 50.00
15 NS 3S E = -400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 30,56 %
18 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 46,78 %16 NS 3C S-2 -100 2 8.33
17 NS 3C W+1 -170 12 50.00
18 NS 2C E+3 -200 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
22 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 62,01 %19 NS 2C S-1 -50 5 20.83
20 NS Pass Passe 20 83.33
21 NS 4PcS-3 -800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 34,72 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 44,97 %22 NS 3S N+2 460 24 100.00
23 NS 1P S-1 -100 7 29.17
24 NS 3P W-1 50 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 63,89 %
19 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 49,82 %25 NS 3S S+3 490 23.9 99.58
26 NS 2C W+1 -140 0.1 0.42
27 NS 3P S-2 -100 4.4 18.33 µ Tbl = 39,44 %
23 BERGER Jean Marie -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 47,82 %28 NS 4P S-1 -100 1.2 5.00
29 NS 3S W-1 100 14.2 59.17
30 NS 3K S-1 -50 7.7 32.08 µ Tbl = 32,08 %
Total : 346,8 / 720 = 48,17 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
1 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 56,00 % 1 EO 3K E+1 -130 10 41.67
2 EO 1S E-2 100 3 12.50
3 EO 4P N+1 450 1.2 5.00 µ Tbl = 19,72 %
7 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 54,32 % 4 EO 2P N+1 140 3 12.50
5 EO 3K S = 110 20 83.33
6 EO 3P W+1 -170 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 34,72 %
2 MEYER Jean -VANDERVORST Mike : 53,57 % 7 EO 2C S+1 140 9 37.50
8 EO 3P W-1 50 13 54.17
9 EO 2S E+2 -180 11 45.83 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 58,21 %10 EO 3C N-2 -200 22 91.67
11 EO 4P E-1 50 1 4.17
12 EO 2P S+2 170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,94 %
3 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 44,44 %13 EO 3S W = -600 18 75.00
14 EO 1S S+1 120 5 20.83
15 EO 2P E = -110 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 52,78 %
9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 45,69 %16 EO 3C N-1 -50 18 75.00
17 EO 3C E+1 -170 12 50.00
18 EO 4C E+2 -480 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,31 %19 EO 3C S-1 -50 19 79.17
20 EO 2K E = -90 8 33.33
21 EO 2C N+1 140 5 20.83 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
14 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 48,17 %22 EO 3S N+2 460 0 0.00
23 EO 1P S-1 -100 17 70.83
24 EO 3P W-1 50 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 36,11 %
5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 48,35 %25 EO 2C N+3 200 15.2 63.33
26 EO 1S S+1 120 6.6 27.50
27 EO 2CcE = -470 23.9 99.58 µ Tbl = 63,47 %
6 WILLEMS Jacques -GROSFILS Colette : 44,69 %31 EO 3S S-1 -100 23.9 99.58
32 EO 3P W-1 100 9.8 40.83
33 EO 1S E-2 100 2.2 9.17 µ Tbl = 49,86 %
Total : 323,8 / 720 = 44,97 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel
7 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 54,32 % 1 EO 3K E+2 -150 13 54.17
2 EO 2S E-2 100 3 12.50
3 EO 3P N = 140 15.2 63.33 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
2 MEYER Jean -VANDERVORST Mike : 53,57 % 4 EO 2P N+1 140 3 12.50
5 EO 3S S+1 630 4 16.67
6 EO 3P W+2 -200 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 58,21 % 7 EO 3C S-1 -100 19 79.17
8 EO 3P W-1 50 13 54.17
9 EO 1C W+3 -170 7 29.17 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
12 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 47,53 %10 EO Pass Passe 17 70.83
11 EO 2P E+1 -140 9 37.50
12 EO 3C W = -140 17 70.83 µ Tbl = 59,72 %
9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 45,69 %13 EO 2K N-4 -400 16 66.67
14 EO 2C N+1 140 1 4.17
15 EO 2P E = -110 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,31 %16 EO 3C S = 140 1 4.17
17 EO 2C W+2 -170 12 50.00
18 EO 4C E+2 -480 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 47,22 %
10 de NICOLAS Bernard -GERARD Francis : 43,28 %19 EO 3C S-1 -50 19 79.17
20 EO Pass Passe 4 16.67
21 EO 2C N = 110 12 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,61 %
5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 48,35 %22 EO 5T S = 400 7 29.17
23 EO 1S S-1 -100 17 70.83
24 EO 2P E-1 50 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
11 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,72 %25 EO 4C N+1 450 5.5 22.92
26 EO 2P N = 110 8.7 36.25
27 EO 2P N = 110 6.6 27.50 µ Tbl = 28,89 %
6 WILLEMS Jacques -GROSFILS Colette : 44,69 %28 EO 2P S+3 200 15.2 63.33
29 EO 3S E-1 100 9.8 40.83
30 EO 3C E-1 50 10.9 45.42 µ Tbl = 49,86 %
Total : 318,9 / 720 = 44,29 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 58,21 % 4 EO 2C S = 110 8 33.33
5 EO 3K S+2 150 14 58.33
6 EO 3P W+1 -170 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
3 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 44,44 % 7 EO 4CcS-1 -200 22 91.67
8 EO 2C N = 110 5 20.83
9 EO 2C W+2 -170 7 29.17 µ Tbl = 47,22 %
9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 45,69 %10 EO 2S N = 120 2 8.33
11 EO 3P E-1 50 1 4.17
12 EO 3P N = 140 4 16.67 µ Tbl = 9,72 %
13 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,93 %13 EO 2C S-1 -100 10 41.67
14 EO 2P S = 110 12 50.00
15 EO 2K S = 90 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
10 de NICOLAS Bernard -GERARD Francis : 43,28 %16 EO Pass Passe 13 54.17
17 EO 3C W+2 -200 24 100.00
18 EO 4C E+1 -450 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
12 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 47,53 %19 EO 3T E-2 200 1 4.17
20 EO 2C N-3 -300 22 91.67
21 EO 3C N = 140 5 20.83 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
11 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,72 %22 EO 3S N-1 -50 17 70.83
23 EO 1S N-1 -100 17 70.83
24 EO 2C N+1 140 1 4.17 µ Tbl = 48,61 %
6 WILLEMS Jacques -GROSFILS Colette : 44,69 %25 EO 3C N-2 -100 21.7 90.42
26 EO 2P W-1 100 12 50.00
27 EO 2C E = -110 21.7 90.42 µ Tbl = 76,94 %
1 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 56,00 %28 EO 3P N+1 170 17.4 72.50
29 EO 3S W-1 100 9.8 40.83
30 EO 4TcN-1 -100 21.7 90.42 µ Tbl = 67,92 %
7 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 54,32 %31 EO 3S S+1 630 13.1 54.58
32 EO 3K S = 110 0.1 0.42
33 EO 2C N-1 -50 14.2 59.17 µ Tbl = 38,06 %
Total : 334,7 / 720 = 46,49 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 58,21 % 1 EO 4P W-2 100 0 0.00
2 EO 3K E-1 50 10 41.67
3 EO 4P N+1 450 1.2 5.00 µ Tbl = 15,56 %
9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 45,69 % 7 EO 2C N+1 140 9 37.50
8 EO 5K N-2 -100 19 79.17
9 EO 2S E+2 -180 11 45.83 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,31 %10 EO 2P E-1 100 10 41.67
11 EO 3P E = -140 9 37.50
12 EO 2K N = 90 11 45.83 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
10 de NICOLAS Bernard -GERARD Francis : 43,28 %13 EO 2P E-1 100 5 20.83
14 EO 2P S-1 -50 22 91.67
15 EO 2P E = -110 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
14 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 48,17 %16 EO 3C S-2 -100 22 91.67
17 EO 3C W+1 -170 12 50.00
18 EO 2C E+3 -200 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,72 %19 EO 2P E-1 100 14 58.33
20 EO 3K E-1 100 0 0.00
21 EO 3C N = 140 5 20.83 µ Tbl = 26,39 %
13 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,93 %22 EO 3S N+1 430 3 12.50
23 EO 1S E+1 -120 23 95.83
24 EO 2C N = 110 4 16.67 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
1 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 56,00 %25 EO 4C N-3 -150 23.9 99.58
26 EO 2P N-1 -100 20.7 86.25
27 EO 3P S+1 170 0.1 0.42 µ Tbl = 62,08 %
12 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 47,53 %28 EO 4P S-1 -100 22.8 95.00
29 EO 3K E-1 100 9.8 40.83
30 EO 3T N = 110 8.7 36.25 µ Tbl = 57,36 %
2 MEYER Jean -VANDERVORST Mike : 53,57 %31 EO 3S S = 600 19.6 81.67
32 EO 3C W-1 100 9.8 40.83
33 EO 2P S-1 -50 14.2 59.17 µ Tbl = 60,56 %
Total : 336,8 / 720 = 46,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
3 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 44,44 % 1 EO 4P W = -420 20 83.33
2 EO 3K E+1 -130 22 91.67
3 EO 4P N = 420 5.5 22.92 µ Tbl = 65,97 %
12 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 47,53 % 4 EO 2P N = 110 8 33.33
5 EO 3S S+1 630 4 16.67
6 EO 4P W = -620 12 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
10 de NICOLAS Bernard -GERARD Francis : 43,28 %10 EO Pass Passe 17 70.83
11 EO 4P E = -420 24 100.00
12 EO 1S N-3 -300 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,28 %
5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 48,35 %13 EO 2P E = -110 12 50.00
14 EO 2C S+1 140 1 4.17
15 EO 2P E = -110 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
11 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,72 %16 EO 2C S+1 140 1 4.17
17 EO 2C W+2 -170 12 50.00
18 EO 4C E = -420 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
6 WILLEMS Jacques -GROSFILS Colette : 44,69 %19 EO 2C S = 110 10 41.67
20 EO 2K E+2 -130 14 58.33
21 EO 2C N+1 140 5 20.83 µ Tbl = 40,28 %
1 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 56,00 %22 EO 3S N+1 430 3 12.50
23 EO 2K W = -90 11 45.83
24 EO 3P W = -140 20 83.33 µ Tbl = 47,22 %
14 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 48,17 %25 EO 3S S+3 490 0.1 0.42
26 EO 2C W+1 -140 23.9 99.58
27 EO 3P S-2 -100 19.6 81.67 µ Tbl = 60,56 %
2 MEYER Jean -VANDERVORST Mike : 53,57 %28 EO 3S S = 600 10.9 45.42
29 EO 4T E-1 100 9.8 40.83
30 EO 4T N = 130 6.6 27.50 µ Tbl = 37,92 %
13 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,93 %31 EO 3S N+2 660 4.4 18.33
32 EO 4K S-1 -50 20.7 86.25
33 EO 1S N-1 -50 14.2 59.17 µ Tbl = 54,58 %
Total : 358,7 / 720 = 49,82 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
14 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 48,17 % 1 EO 4P W-1 50 4 16.67
2 EO 3K E-1 50 10 41.67
3 EO 4P N-1 -50 20.7 86.25 µ Tbl = 48,19 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,31 % 4 EO 1S W-1 100 12 50.00
5 EO 3S S+1 630 4 16.67
6 EO 4P W+1 -650 19 79.17 µ Tbl = 48,61 %
13 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,93 % 7 EO 2C S+1 140 9 37.50
8 EO 3C N-2 -100 19 79.17
9 EO 5K W-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
12 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 47,53 %13 EO 3S W+1 -630 20 83.33
14 EO 3K E-2 100 18 75.00
15 EO 2P E = -110 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 73,61 %
6 WILLEMS Jacques -GROSFILS Colette : 44,69 %16 EO 2C S = 110 7 29.17
17 EO 2C W+2 -170 12 50.00
18 EO 4C E+1 -450 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
1 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 56,00 %19 EO 3C S-1 -50 19 79.17
20 EO Pass Passe 4 16.67
21 EO 3K E-1 50 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 51,39 %
7 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 54,32 %22 EO 3S N-5 -250 24 100.00
23 EO 2K W-2 200 1 4.17
24 EO 2P W = -110 18 75.00 µ Tbl = 59,72 %
2 MEYER Jean -VANDERVORST Mike : 53,57 %25 EO 3S S+2 460 2.2 9.17
26 EO 1S S = 90 16.3 67.92
27 EO 2CcE-1 100 10.9 45.42 µ Tbl = 40,83 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 58,21 %28 EO 4P S = 620 4.4 18.33
29 EO 3S W-1 100 9.8 40.83
30 EO 4CcE-2 300 2.2 9.17 µ Tbl = 22,78 %
3 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 44,44 %31 EO 3S N+1 630 13.1 54.58
32 EO 3P W-1 100 9.8 40.83
33 EO Pass Passe 5.5 22.92 µ Tbl = 39,44 %
Total : 337,9 / 720 = 46,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 PIETQUIN Joseph -VUYTS Michèle
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,31 % 1 EO 4P W-1 50 4 16.67
2 EO 2P E+1 -140 24 100.00
3 EO 50%50% Ajust 12 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
10 de NICOLAS Bernard -GERARD Francis : 43,28 % 4 EO Pass Passe 16 66.67
5 EO 3S N = 600 10 41.67
6 EO 3P W+2 -200 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 47,22 %
5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 48,35 % 7 EO 2C S+1 140 9 37.50
8 EO 4T S = 130 1 4.17
9 EO 4PcS-3 -500 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
14 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 48,17 %10 EO 2K S+1 110 6 25.00
11 EO 3P E+1 -170 20 83.33
12 EO 3C W = -140 17 70.83 µ Tbl = 59,72 %
13 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,93 %16 EO 2P W = -110 24 100.00
17 EO 2C E+1 -140 0 0.00
18 EO 4C E+1 -450 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 52,78 %
7 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 54,32 %19 EO 3C S = 140 5 20.83
20 EO 2C N-1 -100 11 45.83
21 EO 4TcW = -510 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 52,78 %
12 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 47,53 %22 EO 3S N-2 -100 21 87.50
23 EO 2K W = -90 11 45.83
24 EO 3C S-1 -50 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 65,28 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 58,21 %25 EO 3C N+1 170 18.5 77.08
26 EO 2PcW-2 500 2.2 9.17
27 EO 2CcE-1 100 10.9 45.42 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
3 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 44,44 %28 EO 2P S = 110 19.6 81.67
29 EO 3S E = -600 23.9 99.58
30 EO 4T N-1 -50 16.3 67.92 µ Tbl = 83,06 %
9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 45,69 %31 EO 3C N+2 200 21.7 90.42
32 EO 3P E-1 100 9.8 40.83
33 EO 2C N-1 -50 14.2 59.17 µ Tbl = 63,47 %
Total : 401,1 / 720 = 55,71 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand
10 de NICOLAS Bernard -GERARD Francis : 43,28 % 1 EO 4P W = -420 20 83.33
2 EO 2K E+1 -110 19 79.17
3 EO 4P N = 420 5.5 22.92 µ Tbl = 61,81 %
5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 48,35 % 4 EO Pass Passe 16 66.67
5 EO 2P S-1 -100 23 95.83
6 EO 4P E+1 -650 19 79.17 µ Tbl = 80,56 %
11 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,72 % 7 EO 3S N-3 -300 24 100.00
8 EO 4KcN-1 -100 19 79.17
9 EO 3S E+1 -630 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
6 WILLEMS Jacques -GROSFILS Colette : 44,69 %10 EO Pass Passe 17 70.83
11 EO 1S W+2 -150 16 66.67
12 EO 3C W+1 -170 20 83.33 µ Tbl = 73,61 %
1 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 56,00 %13 EO 3S W+2 -660 23 95.83
14 EO 2P S = 110 12 50.00
15 EO 2P E-1 50 6 25.00 µ Tbl = 56,94 %
14 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 48,17 %19 EO 2C S-1 -50 19 79.17
20 EO Pass Passe 4 16.67
21 EO 4PcS-3 -800 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 65,28 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 58,21 %22 EO 2PcW-1 200 11 45.83
23 EO 1P S = 80 8 33.33
24 EO 4P W = -420 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,72 %
13 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,93 %25 EO 3C N+1 170 18.5 77.08
26 EO 3TcS = 670 0.1 0.42
27 EO 2C E-1 50 16.3 67.92 µ Tbl = 48,47 %
9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 45,69 %28 EO 3S N = 600 10.9 45.42
29 EO 3S E-1 100 9.8 40.83
30 EO 4T N-1 -50 16.3 67.92 µ Tbl = 51,39 %
12 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 47,53 %31 EO 3S N+3 690 0.1 0.42
32 EO 3P W-1 100 9.8 40.83
33 EO 2C N-1 -50 14.2 59.17 µ Tbl = 33,47 %
Total : 446,5 / 720 = 62,01 %
PAIRE Nr : 23 BERGER Jean Marie -COLLIN Jean-Marie
13 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,93 % 1 EO 4C N-2 -100 8 33.33
2 EO 3K E-1 50 10 41.67
3 EO 4C S-1 -50 20.7 86.25 µ Tbl = 53,75 %
11 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,72 % 4 EO 2P N-1 -100 21 87.50
5 EO 3S N+1 630 4 16.67
6 EO 4P W+1 -650 19 79.17 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
12 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 47,53 % 7 EO 2P W-2 200 0 0.00
8 EO 3P W = -140 24 100.00
9 EO 3S E = -600 17 70.83 µ Tbl = 56,94 %
1 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 56,00 %10 EO 3K S = 110 6 25.00
11 EO 2P E+1 -140 9 37.50
12 EO 3P S = 140 4 16.67 µ Tbl = 26,39 %
7 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 54,32 %13 EO 4P E-1 100 5 20.83
14 EO 3T S-1 -50 22 91.67
15 EO 3P E-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
2 MEYER Jean -VANDERVORST Mike : 53,57 %16 EO 2C S-1 -50 18 75.00
17 EO 3C E+1 -170 12 50.00
18 EO 4P N-4 -400 6 25.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
3 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 44,44 %22 EO 4T S = 130 14 58.33
23 EO 2K W-1 100 5 20.83
24 EO 2C N-1 -50 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 47,22 %
9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 45,69 %25 EO 4C N = 420 12 50.00
26 EO 3C E-3 300 4.4 18.33
27 EO 3C E-2 100 10.9 45.42 µ Tbl = 37,92 %
14 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 48,17 %28 EO 4P S-1 -100 22.8 95.00
29 EO 3S W-1 100 9.8 40.83
30 EO 3K S-1 -50 16.3 67.92 µ Tbl = 67,92 %
10 de NICOLAS Bernard -GERARD Francis : 43,28 %31 EO 3S S+1 630 13.1 54.58
32 EO 3P W-1 100 9.8 40.83
33 EO Pass Passe 5.5 22.92 µ Tbl = 39,44 %
Total : 344,3 / 720 = 47,82 %
PAIRE Nr : 24 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -DEGUELLE Jacques
11 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,72 % 1 EO 4P W = -420 20 83.33
2 EO 3K E = -110 19 79.17
3 EO 2P N+3 200 8.7 36.25 µ Tbl = 66,25 %
14 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 48,17 % 4 EO 2C S = 110 8 33.33
5 EO 3S S+1 630 4 16.67
6 EO 4P W+1 -650 19 79.17 µ Tbl = 43,06 %
1 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 56,00 % 7 EO 3T N = 110 16 66.67
8 EO 3K S = 110 5 20.83
9 EO 3S W+2 -660 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
13 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,93 %10 EO 2P E-2 200 0 0.00
11 EO 3P E = -140 9 37.50
12 EO 4P S-2 -200 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 43,06 %
2 MEYER Jean -VANDERVORST Mike : 53,57 %13 EO 3S W+2 -660 23 95.83
14 EO 2T S+1 110 12 50.00
15 EO 3P E = -140 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
12 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 47,53 %16 EO 2C S = 110 7 29.17
17 EO 3C E+1 -170 12 50.00
18 EO 3S W+1 -430 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 40,28 %
3 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 44,44 %19 EO 2C S = 110 10 41.67
20 EO 3T S-3 -300 22 91.67
21 EO 3P S = 140 5 20.83 µ Tbl = 51,39 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,31 %25 EO 4C N = 420 12 50.00
26 EO 3C W-1 100 12 50.00
27 EO 2P N+1 140 3.3 13.75 µ Tbl = 37,92 %
10 de NICOLAS Bernard -GERARD Francis : 43,28 %28 EO 4P S = 620 4.4 18.33
29 EO 3S W-1 100 9.8 40.83
30 EO 4T N-1 -50 16.3 67.92 µ Tbl = 42,36 %
5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 48,35 %31 EO 3S S+2 660 4.4 18.33
32 EO 4K S-1 -50 20.7 86.25
33 EO 3P S-2 -100 22.8 95.00 µ Tbl = 66,53 %
Total : 383,4 / 720 = 53,25 %
PAIRE Nr : 25 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette
6 WILLEMS Jacques -GROSFILS Colette : 44,69 % 1 EO 4P W = -420 20 83.33
2 EO 2C S = 110 0 0.00
3 EO 3P N+1 170 12 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
1 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 56,00 % 4 EO 2P N+2 170 0 0.00
5 EO 3K S+3 170 12 50.00
6 EO 2P E+2 -170 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 19,44 %
7 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 54,32 % 7 EO 2C S+2 170 2 8.33
8 EO 4PcW-1 100 9 37.50
9 EO 3S E+1 -630 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
2 MEYER Jean -VANDERVORST Mike : 53,57 %10 EO 3K S = 110 6 25.00
11 EO 3P E+1 -170 20 83.33
12 EO 3P S = 140 4 16.67 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
14 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 48,17 %13 EO 2S E+1 -150 14 58.33
14 EO 2P S = 110 12 50.00
15 EO 3S E = -400 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 69,44 %
3 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 44,44 %16 EO 2C S = 110 7 29.17
17 EO 2C E+2 -170 12 50.00
18 EO 4C E+2 -480 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
13 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,93 %19 EO 2TcE-1 200 1 4.17
20 EO 2C N-1 -100 11 45.83
21 EO 3P S = 140 5 20.83 µ Tbl = 23,61 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,31 %22 EO 3S N-1 -50 17 70.83
23 EO 1S E+1 -120 23 95.83
24 EO 3P W-1 50 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 68,06 %
5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 48,35 %28 EO 3S S+1 630 0.1 0.42
29 EO 5T E-3 300 0.1 0.42
30 EO 4CcE-2 300 2.2 9.17 µ Tbl = 3,33 %
11 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,72 %31 EO 3S N+2 660 4.4 18.33
32 EO 2P W+1 -140 23.9 99.58
33 EO 2C N-1 -50 14.2 59.17 µ Tbl = 59,03 %
Total : 308,9 / 720 = 42,90 %
PAIRE Nr : 26 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René
12 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 47,53 % 1 EO 4P W = -420 20 83.33
2 EO 3K E-1 50 10 41.67
3 EO 3K W-1 100 17.4 72.50 µ Tbl = 65,83 %
9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 45,69 % 4 EO Pass Passe 16 66.67
5 EO 2P N+1 140 16 66.67
6 EO 4P E+1 -650 19 79.17 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
6 WILLEMS Jacques -GROSFILS Colette : 44,69 % 7 EO 2C S+1 140 9 37.50
8 EO 4P W-2 100 9 37.50
9 EO 3S E = -600 17 70.83 µ Tbl = 48,61 %
3 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 44,44 %10 EO Pass Passe 17 70.83
11 EO 3P E = -140 9 37.50
12 EO 3C E-1 50 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
11 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,72 %13 EO 3S W-1 100 5 20.83
14 EO 1S N+1 120 5 20.83
15 EO 2C W = -110 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 34,72 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 58,21 %16 EO 3C S-1 -50 18 75.00
17 EO 2C W+2 -170 12 50.00
18 EO 2C E+4 -230 4 16.67 µ Tbl = 47,22 %
5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 48,35 %19 EO 2C S = 110 10 41.67
20 EO 1P S-3 -300 22 91.67
21 EO 4P S-1 -100 17 70.83 µ Tbl = 68,06 %
2 MEYER Jean -VANDERVORST Mike : 53,57 %22 EO 3S N-2 -100 21 87.50
23 EO 2K W-2 200 1 4.17
24 EO 2C N+1 140 1 4.17 µ Tbl = 31,94 %
7 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 54,32 %28 EO 3S S = 600 10.9 45.42
29 EO 2S W+1 -150 21.7 90.42
30 EO 5CcE-2 300 2.2 9.17 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,31 %31 EO 3S S+1 630 13.1 54.58
32 EO 3P W-1 100 9.8 40.83
33 EO 2S S+1 150 0.1 0.42 µ Tbl = 31,94 %
Total : 362,2 / 720 = 50,31 %
PAIRE Nr : 27 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Chantal
5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 48,35 % 1 EO 4P W-1 50 4 16.67
2 EO 3K E-1 50 10 41.67
3 EO 3S S-2 -100 23.9 99.58 µ Tbl = 52,64 %
13 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,93 % 4 EO 1S S-1 -100 21 87.50
5 EO 3K S+1 130 18 75.00
6 EO 4P W+1 -650 19 79.17 µ Tbl = 80,56 %
10 de NICOLAS Bernard -GERARD Francis : 43,28 % 7 EO 2S N-1 -100 19 79.17
8 EO 3C N-2 -100 19 79.17
9 EO 2K W+3 -150 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 56,94 %
7 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 54,32 %10 EO 3S N-3 -300 24 100.00
11 EO 2P E+1 -140 9 37.50
12 EO 3K N = 110 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 56,94 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,31 %13 EO 4P W-4 400 0 0.00
14 EO 2P S = 110 12 50.00
15 EO 2P E-1 50 6 25.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
1 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 56,00 %16 EO 2C S = 110 7 29.17
17 EO 2C W+2 -170 12 50.00
18 EO 2C E+2 -170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 26,39 %
9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 45,69 %19 EO 4C N-2 -100 24 100.00
20 EO 2KcE = -180 16 66.67
21 EO 3P N-2 -200 20 83.33 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
6 WILLEMS Jacques -GROSFILS Colette : 44,69 %22 EO 3S N = 400 7 29.17
23 EO 2S E-1 100 5 20.83
24 EO 3C N-3 -150 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 47,22 %
3 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 44,44 %25 EO 3S N+1 430 8.7 36.25
26 EO 1S S = 90 16.3 67.92
27 EO 2C E-1 50 16.3 67.92 µ Tbl = 57,36 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 58,21 %31 EO 3S S+1 630 13.1 54.58
32 EO 4P W-1 100 9.8 40.83
33 EO 2K N-2 -100 22.8 95.00 µ Tbl = 63,47 %
Total : 395,9 / 720 = 54,99 %
PAIRE Nr : 28 VAN DOOREN Michele -THIRIFAY Marie-Paule
9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 45,69 % 1 EO 4K E+1 -150 13 54.17
2 EO 1P E = -80 16 66.67
3 EO 2P N+2 170 12 50.00 µ Tbl = 56,94 %
6 WILLEMS Jacques -GROSFILS Colette : 44,69 % 4 EO 2C S-2 -200 24 100.00
5 EO 4P S-1 -100 23 95.83
6 EO 3P W+2 -200 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 76,39 %
14 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 48,17 % 7 EO 3C S = 140 9 37.50
8 EO 3K S+1 130 1 4.17
9 EO 3K W+2 -150 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 18,06 %
11 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,72 %10 EO 2K S = 90 12 50.00
11 EO 2P E+2 -170 20 83.33
12 EO 1S N = 90 11 45.83 µ Tbl = 59,72 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 58,21 %13 EO 4P E-1 100 5 20.83
14 EO 2P S-1 -50 22 91.67
15 EO 2P E-1 50 6 25.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 48,35 %16 EO Pass Passe 13 54.17
17 EO 3C W+1 -170 12 50.00
18 EO 4C E+2 -480 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 63,89 %
2 MEYER Jean -VANDERVORST Mike : 53,57 %19 EO 2C S+1 140 5 20.83
20 EO 1S S-2 -200 18 75.00
21 EO 4C N-1 -100 17 70.83 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
10 de NICOLAS Bernard -GERARD Francis : 43,28 %22 EO 3P W-2 200 11 45.83
23 EO 2C N-1 -100 17 70.83
24 EO 3P W-1 50 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 51,39 %
7 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 54,32 %25 EO 4C N+1 450 5.5 22.92
26 EO 2S S-1 -100 20.7 86.25
27 EO 2P S+1 140 3.3 13.75 µ Tbl = 40,97 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,31 %28 EO 4P S = 620 4.4 18.33
29 EO 3K W = -110 19.6 81.67
30 EO 3C E = -140 23.9 99.58 µ Tbl = 66,53 %
Total : 385,4 / 720 = 53,53 %
|
|