|
Tournoi du 07-12-15
1 58,33 10 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
2 56,67 7 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
3 52,78 4 DEGUELLE Jacques -JASSOGNE Jacqueline
4 52,59 5 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David
5 51,48 1 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier
6 49,63 8 MATELART Marc -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
7 47,96 11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
8 46,85 6 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse
9 45,56 3 ARICKX Roger -DESSY Lina
10 45,37 9 POULAERT Gilbert -COLLET Claudine
11 42,78 2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 62,96 22 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre
2 58,15 16 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
3 56,67 18 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
4 55,56 20 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René
5 54,44 21 BRIOT Fernand -HUBLET Carlo
6 50,19 14 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
7 46,30 15 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude
8 45,37 12 POWIS Vinciane -MASSAUX Joel
9 43,52 13 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
10 43,33 19 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard
11 33,52 17 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
PAIRE Nr : 1 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier
12 POWIS Vinciane -MASSAUX Joel : 45,37 % 1 NS 1S S-1 -50 7 38.89
2 NS 2P E = -110 13 72.22
3 NS 1S S = 90 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
22 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 62,96 % 4 NS 4P E-1 100 17 94.44
5 NS 4T N+3 190 6 33.33
6 NS 2C E+1 -140 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
21 BRIOT Fernand -HUBLET Carlo : 54,44 % 7 NS 4P E = -620 8 44.44
8 NS 3S N-1 -50 4 22.22
9 NS 3S W-1 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
20 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 55,56 %10 NS 3S W+1 -630 6 33.33
11 NS 4P S-1 -50 5 27.78
12 NS 2S E+1 -150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
19 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,33 %13 NS 6P N = 1430 16 88.89
14 NS 3S E+3 -490 6 33.33
15 NS 4C N+1 650 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
18 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 56,67 %16 NS 3S E+1 -630 13 72.22
17 NS 3S S+2 460 16 88.89
18 NS 2C S-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
17 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 33,52 %19 NS 1S S+2 150 18 100.00
20 NS 3S S+1 630 10 55.56
21 NS 2K W = -90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
16 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 58,15 %22 NS 2P E+1 -140 6 33.33
23 NS 4P W-1 100 10 55.56
24 NS 3S N = 400 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
15 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 46,30 %25 NS 5K E = -600 6 33.33
26 NS 3S W = -600 6 33.33
27 NS 3C N-1 -50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
14 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 50,19 %28 NS 3S N+1 630 11 61.11
29 NS 2T S+1 110 13 72.22
30 NS 5T W = -400 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 278,0 / 540 = 51,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga
13 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 43,52 % 4 NS 3P E+1 -170 1 5.56
5 NS 3P S = 140 0 0.00
6 NS 2C E = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
12 POWIS Vinciane -MASSAUX Joel : 45,37 % 7 NS 4P E-1 100 16 88.89
8 NS 4C S-1 -50 4 22.22
9 NS 2C W+2 -170 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
22 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 62,96 %10 NS 3S E+2 -660 2 11.11
11 NS 4P N = 420 14 77.78
12 NS 3S E-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
21 BRIOT Fernand -HUBLET Carlo : 54,44 %13 NS 4P N+2 680 8 44.44
14 NS 3S E+3 -490 6 33.33
15 NS 4C N-2 -200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
20 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 55,56 %16 NS 3S W+2 -660 8 44.44
17 NS 3S S+1 430 14 77.78
18 NS 4CcS-4 -1100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
19 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,33 %19 NS 3S W-1 100 16 88.89
20 NS 4C S-1 -100 1 5.56
21 NS 2C W+1 -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
18 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 56,67 %22 NS 3K N-3 -150 4 22.22
23 NS 4P W-1 100 10 55.56
24 NS 3S S+1 430 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
17 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 33,52 %25 NS 3K E+2 -150 18 100.00
26 NS 2P W = -110 16 88.89
27 NS 3C N-2 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
16 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 58,15 %28 NS 3S N-1 -100 1 5.56
29 NS 2T S+1 110 13 72.22
30 NS 4P E+3 -510 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
15 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 46,30 %31 NS 1S W-1 50 2 11.11
32 NS 2T N+2 130 11 61.11
33 NS 2P W = -110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 231,0 / 540 = 42,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 ARICKX Roger -DESSY Lina
16 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 58,15 % 1 NS 2K N-1 -50 7 38.89
2 NS 3P E = -140 5 27.78
3 NS 1S S+1 120 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
14 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 50,19 % 7 NS 3S E+1 -630 2 11.11
8 NS 3S N-1 -50 4 22.22
9 NS 2T E-2 200 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
13 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 43,52 %10 NS 3S W = -600 10 55.56
11 NS 4P S+1 450 17 94.44
12 NS 3S W-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
12 POWIS Vinciane -MASSAUX Joel : 45,37 %13 NS 4P N+2 680 8 44.44
14 NS 4P W+2 -480 12 66.67
15 NS 4C N+2 680 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
22 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 62,96 %16 NS 6K E+1 -1390 2 11.11
17 NS 2P N-1 -50 1 5.56
18 NS 2C S-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
21 BRIOT Fernand -HUBLET Carlo : 54,44 %19 NS 2K E+2 -130 1 5.56
20 NS 3S S = 600 4 22.22
21 NS 3K W-1 50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
20 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 55,56 %22 NS 3T W+1 -130 8 44.44
23 NS 4P E-1 100 10 55.56
24 NS 3S N+1 430 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
19 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,33 %25 NS 3K W+3 -170 13 72.22
26 NS 3S W = -600 6 33.33
27 NS 3C N-3 -150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
18 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 56,67 %28 NS 3T S-1 -100 1 5.56
29 NS 2C E = -110 2 11.11
30 NS 6T W = -920 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 5,56 %
17 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 33,52 %31 NS 2P N+1 140 14 77.78
32 NS 2T N+2 130 11 61.11
33 NS 3PcW-2 300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
Total : 246,0 / 540 = 45,56 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 DEGUELLE Jacques -JASSOGNE Jacqueline
18 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 56,67 % 1 NS 1S S = 90 15 83.33
2 NS 2P E+1 -140 5 27.78
3 NS 1S S+2 150 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
17 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 33,52 % 4 NS 3P E = -140 7 38.89
5 NS 6T N+1 1390 17 94.44
6 NS 1C E+1 -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
15 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 46,30 %10 NS 3S W+2 -660 2 11.11
11 NS 5P S = 450 17 94.44
12 NS 3K W = -110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
14 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 50,19 %13 NS 6P N-1 -100 0 0.00
14 NS 5T E+1 -420 18 100.00
15 NS 4C N+1 650 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
13 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 43,52 %16 NS 3S E+2 -660 8 44.44
17 NS 5TcE-2 300 8 44.44
18 NS 2CcS-2 -500 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
12 POWIS Vinciane -MASSAUX Joel : 45,37 %19 NS 2K E+1 -110 4 22.22
20 NS 3S N+1 630 10 55.56
21 NS 2K W = -90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
22 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 62,96 %22 NS 3P E-1 100 14 77.78
23 NS 4P E-1 100 10 55.56
24 NS 4P N-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
21 BRIOT Fernand -HUBLET Carlo : 54,44 %25 NS 5K W+1 -620 2 11.11
26 NS 3S W = -600 6 33.33
27 NS 3K W = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
20 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 55,56 %28 NS 3S N+1 630 11 61.11
29 NS 2C E = -110 2 11.11
30 NS 6P W-1 50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
19 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,33 %31 NS 2P N+1 140 14 77.78
32 NS 2T N+3 150 15 83.33
33 NS 3P W-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
Total : 285,0 / 540 = 52,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David
20 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 55,56 % 1 NS 1S S = 90 15 83.33
2 NS 3P E = -140 5 27.78
3 NS 1S S+2 150 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
19 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,33 % 4 NS 2P E = -110 13 72.22
5 NS 6T N+1 1390 17 94.44
6 NS 2C E+1 -140 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
18 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 56,67 % 7 NS 4P E-1 100 16 88.89
8 NS 3S N-1 -50 4 22.22
9 NS 2C W+2 -170 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
16 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 58,15 %13 NS 4P N+2 680 8 44.44
14 NS 3S E+3 -490 6 33.33
15 NS 5T E-3 150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
15 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 46,30 %16 NS 6S E = -1440 0 0.00
17 NS 5K S = 400 11 61.11
18 NS 3S E-3 150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
14 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 50,19 %19 NS 2K E = -90 7 38.89
20 NS 3S N+1 630 10 55.56
21 NS 2K W+1 -110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
13 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 43,52 %22 NS 2P E+2 -170 2 11.11
23 NS 4P W-2 200 17 94.44
24 NS 3S N+1 430 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
12 POWIS Vinciane -MASSAUX Joel : 45,37 %25 NS 4T W+2 -170 13 72.22
26 NS 3S W-1 100 18 100.00
27 NS 3T W-3 150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
22 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 62,96 %28 NS 3S N+1 630 11 61.11
29 NS 2C E = -110 2 11.11
30 NS 4P E+2 -480 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
21 BRIOT Fernand -HUBLET Carlo : 54,44 %31 NS 2P N+1 140 14 77.78
32 NS 1S N = 90 5 27.78
33 NS 2P E = -110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
Total : 284,0 / 540 = 52,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse
22 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 62,96 % 1 NS 1S S-1 -50 7 38.89
2 NS 2K W+1 -110 13 72.22
3 NS 1S S+1 120 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
21 BRIOT Fernand -HUBLET Carlo : 54,44 % 4 NS 4P E-1 100 17 94.44
5 NS 3P N+1 170 3 16.67
6 NS 2C E = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
20 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 55,56 % 7 NS 4P E = -620 8 44.44
8 NS 4C N-1 -50 4 22.22
9 NS 4C W-1 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
19 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,33 %10 NS 3S W = -600 10 55.56
11 NS 3S N-1 -50 5 27.78
12 NS 1S E+3 -180 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
17 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 33,52 %16 NS 3S E+1 -630 13 72.22
17 NS 3S S = 400 11 61.11
18 NS 2C S-2 -200 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
16 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 58,15 %19 NS 2K E+2 -130 1 5.56
20 NS 3S N+1 630 10 55.56
21 NS 3K W = -110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
15 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 46,30 %22 NS 4CcN-2 -300 0 0.00
23 NS 3S E-1 100 10 55.56
24 NS 3S N+1 430 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
14 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 50,19 %25 NS 5T W+1 -620 2 11.11
26 NS 3S W = -600 6 33.33
27 NS 3P E = -140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
13 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 43,52 %28 NS 3S N+1 630 11 61.11
29 NS 2P N = 110 13 72.22
30 NS 6P E-2 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
12 POWIS Vinciane -MASSAUX Joel : 45,37 %31 NS 2P N = 110 7 38.89
32 NS 2T N+3 150 15 83.33
33 NS 2P W-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
Total : 253,0 / 540 = 46,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
13 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 43,52 % 1 NS 2C S = 110 18 100.00
2 NS 3P E = -140 5 27.78
3 NS 1S S+2 150 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
12 POWIS Vinciane -MASSAUX Joel : 45,37 % 4 NS 3P E+1 -170 1 5.56
5 NS 4P S = 620 10 55.56
6 NS 2C E-1 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
22 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 62,96 % 7 NS 3S E+1 -630 2 11.11
8 NS 3C S = 140 10 55.56
9 NS 4C W-1 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
21 BRIOT Fernand -HUBLET Carlo : 54,44 %10 NS 5T E-1 100 17 94.44
11 NS 2C S+2 170 10 55.56
12 NS 2C W-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
20 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 55,56 %13 NS 4P N+1 650 2 11.11
14 NS 3S E+2 -460 14 77.78
15 NS 3S S-2 -200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
18 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 56,67 %19 NS 2K E = -90 7 38.89
20 NS 3S S+3 690 18 100.00
21 NS 3K W = -110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
17 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 33,52 %22 NS 1P E+1 -110 10 55.56
23 NS 3K W = -110 3 16.67
24 NS 3S S+2 460 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
16 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 58,15 %25 NS 4K W+2 -170 13 72.22
26 NS 3S W = -600 6 33.33
27 NS 2P W+2 -170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
15 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 46,30 %28 NS 3S S+1 630 11 61.11
29 NS 1S S+3 180 18 100.00
30 NS 5PcW = -650 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
14 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 50,19 %31 NS 1S W-3 150 18 100.00
32 NS 3S S+1 430 18 100.00
33 NS 3P W-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
Total : 306,0 / 540 = 56,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
15 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 46,30 % 1 NS 1S S-1 -50 7 38.89
2 NS 3ScE-1 100 18 100.00
3 NS 1S S+2 150 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
14 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 50,19 % 4 NS 2P E = -110 13 72.22
5 NS 3P S+1 170 3 16.67
6 NS 3C E = -140 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
13 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 43,52 % 7 NS 3S E = -600 12 66.67
8 NS 3S N = 400 16 88.89
9 NS 2C W+2 -170 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
12 POWIS Vinciane -MASSAUX Joel : 45,37 %10 NS 1P E+1 -110 14 77.78
11 NS 4P S-1 -50 5 27.78
12 NS 3T W = -110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
22 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 62,96 %13 NS 5P N+1 680 8 44.44
14 NS 6T W = -920 0 0.00
15 NS 5K N = 600 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
21 BRIOT Fernand -HUBLET Carlo : 54,44 %16 NS 4S W+2 -690 4 22.22
17 NS 4TcE-1 100 4 22.22
18 NS 2S W-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
19 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,33 %22 NS 2P E-1 100 14 77.78
23 NS 4P W-2 200 17 94.44
24 NS 3S N+1 430 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
18 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 56,67 %25 NS 3K W+3 -170 13 72.22
26 NS 3S W = -600 6 33.33
27 NS 3K W+1 -130 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
17 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 33,52 %28 NS 3S N+1 630 11 61.11
29 NS 2P N = 110 13 72.22
30 NS 3P W+2 -200 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
16 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 58,15 %31 NS 3K N+1 130 10 55.56
32 NS 3S N-2 -100 1 5.56
33 NS 2P W+1 -140 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
Total : 268,0 / 540 = 49,63 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 POULAERT Gilbert -COLLET Claudine
17 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 33,52 % 1 NS 1S S-1 -50 7 38.89
2 NS 3P E = -140 5 27.78
3 NS 2S N = 120 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
16 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 58,15 % 4 NS 3P E = -140 7 38.89
5 NS 4PcS = 790 14 77.78
6 NS 2C E = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
15 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 46,30 % 7 NS 3S E+1 -630 2 11.11
8 NS 4C S = 420 18 100.00
9 NS 3S W-3 300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
14 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 50,19 %10 NS 3S W+2 -660 2 11.11
11 NS 4P S-1 -50 5 27.78
12 NS 3S W-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
13 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 43,52 %13 NS 4P N+2 680 8 44.44
14 NS 3S E+3 -490 6 33.33
15 NS 4C N+1 650 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
12 POWIS Vinciane -MASSAUX Joel : 45,37 %16 NS 3S E+2 -660 8 44.44
17 NS 3S S+3 490 18 100.00
18 NS 2C S-2 -200 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
22 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 62,96 %19 NS 1S N-1 -50 11 61.11
20 NS 3S N-1 -100 1 5.56
21 NS 2K E+1 -110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
20 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 55,56 %25 NS 5K W+1 -620 2 11.11
26 NS 2S W+1 -150 14 77.78
27 NS 3K W+1 -130 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
19 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,33 %28 NS 3S N+1 630 11 61.11
29 NS 3K W-1 100 8 44.44
30 NS 5T E+2 -440 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
18 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 56,67 %31 NS 2P N-1 -100 0 0.00
32 NS 1S N+1 120 8 44.44
33 NS 2CcS-3 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
Total : 245,0 / 540 = 45,37 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
19 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,33 % 1 NS 1S S-1 -50 7 38.89
2 NS 3P E-1 50 16 88.89
3 NS 1S S+2 150 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
18 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 56,67 % 4 NS 3P E = -140 7 38.89
5 NS 5T S+2 640 12 66.67
6 NS 2C E+1 -140 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
17 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 33,52 % 7 NS 4P W-1 100 16 88.89
8 NS 2S S+2 180 14 77.78
9 NS 2C W-1 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
16 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 58,15 %10 NS 6T E-1 100 17 94.44
11 NS 4P S-3 -150 0 0.00
12 NS 3S W-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
15 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 46,30 %13 NS 6P N = 1430 16 88.89
14 NS 3S E+3 -490 6 33.33
15 NS 4C N+1 650 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
14 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 50,19 %16 NS 5K E = -600 16 88.89
17 NS 5K S-1 -50 1 5.56
18 NS 3S E-2 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
13 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 43,52 %19 NS 1S S = 90 14 77.78
20 NS 3S N+2 660 16 88.89
21 NS 3S E-3 150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
12 POWIS Vinciane -MASSAUX Joel : 45,37 %22 NS 2P E-1 100 14 77.78
23 NS 2S E = -120 0 0.00
24 NS 3S N = 400 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
21 BRIOT Fernand -HUBLET Carlo : 54,44 %28 NS 3S N+1 630 11 61.11
29 NS 3T S-1 -100 6 33.33
30 NS 6P W-1 50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
20 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 55,56 %31 NS 1S W-2 100 4 22.22
32 NS 1S N = 90 5 27.78
33 NS 3P W-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 315,0 / 540 = 58,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
21 BRIOT Fernand -HUBLET Carlo : 54,44 % 1 NS 2S S-2 -100 0 0.00
2 NS 2P E+1 -140 5 27.78
3 NS 1S S+2 150 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
20 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 55,56 % 4 NS 2P E+1 -140 7 38.89
5 NS 3P S+2 200 8 44.44
6 NS 2C E = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
19 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,33 % 7 NS 4P E = -620 8 44.44
8 NS 3C S+1 170 12 66.67
9 NS 3S E-2 200 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
18 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 56,67 %10 NS 3S W = -600 10 55.56
11 NS 3S N = 400 12 66.67
12 NS 1S E+5 -240 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
17 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 33,52 %13 NS 6P N = 1430 16 88.89
14 NS 4P W+1 -450 16 88.89
15 NS 4C N = 620 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
16 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 58,15 %16 NS 6K E-1 100 18 100.00
17 NS 4K S = 130 6 33.33
18 NS 3S E-2 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
15 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 46,30 %19 NS 3S S-1 -50 11 61.11
20 NS 3S N+1 630 10 55.56
21 NS 2K W+2 -130 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
14 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 50,19 %22 NS 3P E-2 200 18 100.00
23 NS 2P W = -110 3 16.67
24 NS 3S N = 400 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
13 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 43,52 %25 NS 4P N-4 -200 8 44.44
26 NS 3S E = -600 6 33.33
27 NS 2P E+1 -140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
22 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 62,96 %31 NS 2P N = 110 7 38.89
32 NS 3S N-2 -100 1 5.56
33 NS 2P W+1 -140 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
Total : 259,0 / 540 = 47,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 POWIS Vinciane -MASSAUX Joel
1 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 51,48 % 1 EO 1S S-1 -50 11 61.11
2 EO 2P E = -110 5 27.78
3 EO 1S S = 90 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
7 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,67 % 4 EO 3P E+1 -170 17 94.44
5 EO 4P S = 620 8 44.44
6 EO 2C E-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 42,78 % 7 EO 4P E-1 100 2 11.11
8 EO 4C S-1 -50 14 77.78
9 EO 2C W+2 -170 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
8 MATELART Marc -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 49,63 %10 EO 1P E+1 -110 4 22.22
11 EO 4P S-1 -50 13 72.22
12 EO 3T W = -110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
3 ARICKX Roger -DESSY Lina : 45,56 %13 EO 4P N+2 680 10 55.56
14 EO 4P W+2 -480 6 33.33
15 EO 4C N+2 680 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
9 POULAERT Gilbert -COLLET Claudine : 45,37 %16 EO 3S E+2 -660 10 55.56
17 EO 3S S+3 490 0 0.00
18 EO 2C S-2 -200 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
4 DEGUELLE Jacques -JASSOGNE Jacqueline : 52,78 %19 EO 2K E+1 -110 14 77.78
20 EO 3S N+1 630 8 44.44
21 EO 2K W = -90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
10 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 58,33 %22 EO 2P E-1 100 4 22.22
23 EO 2S E = -120 18 100.00
24 EO 3S N = 400 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
5 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 52,59 %25 EO 4T W+2 -170 5 27.78
26 EO 3S W-1 100 0 0.00
27 EO 3T W-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
6 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,85 %31 EO 2P N = 110 11 61.11
32 EO 2T N+3 150 3 16.67
33 EO 2P W-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
Total : 245,0 / 540 = 45,37 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
7 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,67 % 1 EO 2C S = 110 0 0.00
2 EO 3P E = -140 13 72.22
3 EO 1S S+2 150 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 42,78 % 4 EO 3P E+1 -170 17 94.44
5 EO 3P S = 140 18 100.00
6 EO 2C E = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
8 MATELART Marc -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 49,63 % 7 EO 3S E = -600 6 33.33
8 EO 3S N = 400 2 11.11
9 EO 2C W+2 -170 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
3 ARICKX Roger -DESSY Lina : 45,56 %10 EO 3S W = -600 8 44.44
11 EO 4P S+1 450 1 5.56
12 EO 3S W-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
9 POULAERT Gilbert -COLLET Claudine : 45,37 %13 EO 4P N+2 680 10 55.56
14 EO 3S E+3 -490 12 66.67
15 EO 4C N+1 650 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
4 DEGUELLE Jacques -JASSOGNE Jacqueline : 52,78 %16 EO 3S E+2 -660 10 55.56
17 EO 5TcE-2 300 10 55.56
18 EO 2CcS-2 -500 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
10 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 58,33 %19 EO 1S S = 90 4 22.22
20 EO 3S N+2 660 2 11.11
21 EO 3S E-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
5 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 52,59 %22 EO 2P E+2 -170 16 88.89
23 EO 4P W-2 200 1 5.56
24 EO 3S N+1 430 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 47,96 %25 EO 4P N-4 -200 10 55.56
26 EO 3S E = -600 12 66.67
27 EO 2P E+1 -140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
6 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,85 %28 EO 3S N+1 630 7 38.89
29 EO 2P N = 110 5 27.78
30 EO 6P E-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
Total : 235,0 / 540 = 43,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
8 MATELART Marc -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 49,63 % 4 EO 2P E = -110 5 27.78
5 EO 3P S+1 170 15 83.33
6 EO 3C E = -140 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
3 ARICKX Roger -DESSY Lina : 45,56 % 7 EO 3S E+1 -630 16 88.89
8 EO 3S N-1 -50 14 77.78
9 EO 2T E-2 200 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
9 POULAERT Gilbert -COLLET Claudine : 45,37 %10 EO 3S W+2 -660 16 88.89
11 EO 4P S-1 -50 13 72.22
12 EO 3S W-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
4 DEGUELLE Jacques -JASSOGNE Jacqueline : 52,78 %13 EO 6P N-1 -100 18 100.00
14 EO 5T E+1 -420 0 0.00
15 EO 4C N+1 650 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
10 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 58,33 %16 EO 5K E = -600 2 11.11
17 EO 5K S-1 -50 17 94.44
18 EO 3S E-2 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
5 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 52,59 %19 EO 2K E = -90 11 61.11
20 EO 3S N+1 630 8 44.44
21 EO 2K W+1 -110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 47,96 %22 EO 3P E-2 200 0 0.00
23 EO 2P W = -110 15 83.33
24 EO 3S N = 400 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
6 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,85 %25 EO 5T W+1 -620 16 88.89
26 EO 3S W = -600 12 66.67
27 EO 3P E = -140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
1 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 51,48 %28 EO 3S N+1 630 7 38.89
29 EO 2T S+1 110 5 27.78
30 EO 5T W = -400 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
7 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,67 %31 EO 1S W-3 150 0 0.00
32 EO 3S S+1 430 0 0.00
33 EO 3P W-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
Total : 271,0 / 540 = 50,19 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude
8 MATELART Marc -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 49,63 % 1 EO 1S S-1 -50 11 61.11
2 EO 3ScE-1 100 0 0.00
3 EO 1S S+2 150 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
9 POULAERT Gilbert -COLLET Claudine : 45,37 % 7 EO 3S E+1 -630 16 88.89
8 EO 4C S = 420 0 0.00
9 EO 3S W-3 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
4 DEGUELLE Jacques -JASSOGNE Jacqueline : 52,78 %10 EO 3S W+2 -660 16 88.89
11 EO 5P S = 450 1 5.56
12 EO 3K W = -110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
10 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 58,33 %13 EO 6P N = 1430 2 11.11
14 EO 3S E+3 -490 12 66.67
15 EO 4C N+1 650 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
5 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 52,59 %16 EO 6S E = -1440 18 100.00
17 EO 5K S = 400 7 38.89
18 EO 3S E-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 47,96 %19 EO 3S S-1 -50 7 38.89
20 EO 3S N+1 630 8 44.44
21 EO 2K W+2 -130 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
6 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,85 %22 EO 4CcN-2 -300 18 100.00
23 EO 3S E-1 100 8 44.44
24 EO 3S N+1 430 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
1 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 51,48 %25 EO 5K E = -600 12 66.67
26 EO 3S W = -600 12 66.67
27 EO 3C N-1 -50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
7 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,67 %28 EO 3S S+1 630 7 38.89
29 EO 1S S+3 180 0 0.00
30 EO 5PcW = -650 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 42,78 %31 EO 1S W-1 50 16 88.89
32 EO 2T N+2 130 7 38.89
33 EO 2P W = -110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 250,0 / 540 = 46,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
3 ARICKX Roger -DESSY Lina : 45,56 % 1 EO 2K N-1 -50 11 61.11
2 EO 3P E = -140 13 72.22
3 EO 1S S+1 120 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
9 POULAERT Gilbert -COLLET Claudine : 45,37 % 4 EO 3P E = -140 11 61.11
5 EO 4PcS = 790 4 22.22
6 EO 2C E = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
10 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 58,33 %10 EO 6T E-1 100 1 5.56
11 EO 4P S-3 -150 18 100.00
12 EO 3S W-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
5 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 52,59 %13 EO 4P N+2 680 10 55.56
14 EO 3S E+3 -490 12 66.67
15 EO 5T E-3 150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 47,96 %16 EO 6K E-1 100 0 0.00
17 EO 4K S = 130 12 66.67
18 EO 3S E-2 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
6 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,85 %19 EO 2K E+2 -130 17 94.44
20 EO 3S N+1 630 8 44.44
21 EO 3K W = -110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
1 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 51,48 %22 EO 2P E+1 -140 12 66.67
23 EO 4P W-1 100 8 44.44
24 EO 3S N = 400 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
7 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,67 %25 EO 4K W+2 -170 5 27.78
26 EO 3S W = -600 12 66.67
27 EO 2P W+2 -170 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 42,78 %28 EO 3S N-1 -100 17 94.44
29 EO 2T S+1 110 5 27.78
30 EO 4P E+3 -510 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
8 MATELART Marc -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 49,63 %31 EO 3K N+1 130 8 44.44
32 EO 3S N-2 -100 17 94.44
33 EO 2P W+1 -140 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
Total : 314,0 / 540 = 58,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
9 POULAERT Gilbert -COLLET Claudine : 45,37 % 1 EO 1S S-1 -50 11 61.11
2 EO 3P E = -140 13 72.22
3 EO 2S N = 120 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
4 DEGUELLE Jacques -JASSOGNE Jacqueline : 52,78 % 4 EO 3P E = -140 11 61.11
5 EO 6T N+1 1390 1 5.56
6 EO 1C E+1 -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
10 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 58,33 % 7 EO 4P W-1 100 2 11.11
8 EO 2S S+2 180 4 22.22
9 EO 2C W-1 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 47,96 %13 EO 6P N = 1430 2 11.11
14 EO 4P W+1 -450 2 11.11
15 EO 4C N = 620 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
6 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,85 %16 EO 3S E+1 -630 5 27.78
17 EO 3S S = 400 7 38.89
18 EO 2C S-2 -200 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
1 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 51,48 %19 EO 1S S+2 150 0 0.00
20 EO 3S S+1 630 8 44.44
21 EO 2K W = -90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
7 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,67 %22 EO 1P E+1 -110 8 44.44
23 EO 3K W = -110 15 83.33
24 EO 3S S+2 460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 42,78 %25 EO 3K E+2 -150 0 0.00
26 EO 2P W = -110 2 11.11
27 EO 3C N-2 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
8 MATELART Marc -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 49,63 %28 EO 3S N+1 630 7 38.89
29 EO 2P N = 110 5 27.78
30 EO 3P W+2 -200 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
3 ARICKX Roger -DESSY Lina : 45,56 %31 EO 2P N+1 140 4 22.22
32 EO 2T N+2 130 7 38.89
33 EO 3PcW-2 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
Total : 181,0 / 540 = 33,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
4 DEGUELLE Jacques -JASSOGNE Jacqueline : 52,78 % 1 EO 1S S = 90 3 16.67
2 EO 2P E+1 -140 13 72.22
3 EO 1S S+2 150 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
10 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 58,33 % 4 EO 3P E = -140 11 61.11
5 EO 5T S+2 640 6 33.33
6 EO 2C E+1 -140 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
5 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 52,59 % 7 EO 4P E-1 100 2 11.11
8 EO 3S N-1 -50 14 77.78
9 EO 2C W+2 -170 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 47,96 %10 EO 3S W = -600 8 44.44
11 EO 3S N = 400 6 33.33
12 EO 1S E+5 -240 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
1 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 51,48 %16 EO 3S E+1 -630 5 27.78
17 EO 3S S+2 460 2 11.11
18 EO 2C S-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
7 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,67 %19 EO 2K E = -90 11 61.11
20 EO 3S S+3 690 0 0.00
21 EO 3K W = -110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 42,78 %22 EO 3K N-3 -150 14 77.78
23 EO 4P W-1 100 8 44.44
24 EO 3S S+1 430 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
8 MATELART Marc -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 49,63 %25 EO 3K W+3 -170 5 27.78
26 EO 3S W = -600 12 66.67
27 EO 3K W+1 -130 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
3 ARICKX Roger -DESSY Lina : 45,56 %28 EO 3T S-1 -100 17 94.44
29 EO 2C E = -110 16 88.89
30 EO 6T W = -920 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 94,44 %
9 POULAERT Gilbert -COLLET Claudine : 45,37 %31 EO 2P N-1 -100 18 100.00
32 EO 1S N+1 120 10 55.56
33 EO 2CcS-3 -500 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
Total : 306,0 / 540 = 56,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard
10 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 58,33 % 1 EO 1S S-1 -50 11 61.11
2 EO 3P E-1 50 2 11.11
3 EO 1S S+2 150 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
5 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 52,59 % 4 EO 2P E = -110 5 27.78
5 EO 6T N+1 1390 1 5.56
6 EO 2C E+1 -140 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 47,96 % 7 EO 4P E = -620 10 55.56
8 EO 3C S+1 170 6 33.33
9 EO 3S E-2 200 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
6 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,85 %10 EO 3S W = -600 8 44.44
11 EO 3S N-1 -50 13 72.22
12 EO 1S E+3 -180 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
1 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 51,48 %13 EO 6P N = 1430 2 11.11
14 EO 3S E+3 -490 12 66.67
15 EO 4C N+1 650 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 42,78 %19 EO 3S W-1 100 2 11.11
20 EO 4C S-1 -100 17 94.44
21 EO 2C W+1 -140 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
8 MATELART Marc -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 49,63 %22 EO 2P E-1 100 4 22.22
23 EO 4P W-2 200 1 5.56
24 EO 3S N+1 430 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
3 ARICKX Roger -DESSY Lina : 45,56 %25 EO 3K W+3 -170 5 27.78
26 EO 3S W = -600 12 66.67
27 EO 3C N-3 -150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
9 POULAERT Gilbert -COLLET Claudine : 45,37 %28 EO 3S N+1 630 7 38.89
29 EO 3K W-1 100 10 55.56
30 EO 5T E+2 -440 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
4 DEGUELLE Jacques -JASSOGNE Jacqueline : 52,78 %31 EO 2P N+1 140 4 22.22
32 EO 2T N+3 150 3 16.67
33 EO 3P W-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
Total : 234,0 / 540 = 43,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René
5 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 52,59 % 1 EO 1S S = 90 3 16.67
2 EO 3P E = -140 13 72.22
3 EO 1S S+2 150 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 47,96 % 4 EO 2P E+1 -140 11 61.11
5 EO 3P S+2 200 10 55.56
6 EO 2C E = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
6 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,85 % 7 EO 4P E = -620 10 55.56
8 EO 4C N-1 -50 14 77.78
9 EO 4C W-1 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
1 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 51,48 %10 EO 3S W+1 -630 12 66.67
11 EO 4P S-1 -50 13 72.22
12 EO 2S E+1 -150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
7 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,67 %13 EO 4P N+1 650 16 88.89
14 EO 3S E+2 -460 4 22.22
15 EO 3S S-2 -200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 42,78 %16 EO 3S W+2 -660 10 55.56
17 EO 3S S+1 430 4 22.22
18 EO 4CcS-4 -1100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
3 ARICKX Roger -DESSY Lina : 45,56 %22 EO 3T W+1 -130 10 55.56
23 EO 4P E-1 100 8 44.44
24 EO 3S N+1 430 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
9 POULAERT Gilbert -COLLET Claudine : 45,37 %25 EO 5K W+1 -620 16 88.89
26 EO 2S W+1 -150 4 22.22
27 EO 3K W+1 -130 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
4 DEGUELLE Jacques -JASSOGNE Jacqueline : 52,78 %28 EO 3S N+1 630 7 38.89
29 EO 2C E = -110 16 88.89
30 EO 6P W-1 50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
10 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 58,33 %31 EO 1S W-2 100 14 77.78
32 EO 1S N = 90 13 72.22
33 EO 3P W-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 300,0 / 540 = 55,56 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 BRIOT Fernand -HUBLET Carlo
11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 47,96 % 1 EO 2S S-2 -100 18 100.00
2 EO 2P E+1 -140 13 72.22
3 EO 1S S+2 150 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
6 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,85 % 4 EO 4P E-1 100 1 5.56
5 EO 3P N+1 170 15 83.33
6 EO 2C E = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
1 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 51,48 % 7 EO 4P E = -620 10 55.56
8 EO 3S N-1 -50 14 77.78
9 EO 3S W-1 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
7 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,67 %10 EO 5T E-1 100 1 5.56
11 EO 2C S+2 170 8 44.44
12 EO 2C W-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 42,78 %13 EO 4P N+2 680 10 55.56
14 EO 3S E+3 -490 12 66.67
15 EO 4C N-2 -200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
8 MATELART Marc -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 49,63 %16 EO 4S W+2 -690 14 77.78
17 EO 4TcE-1 100 14 77.78
18 EO 2S W-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
3 ARICKX Roger -DESSY Lina : 45,56 %19 EO 2K E+2 -130 17 94.44
20 EO 3S S = 600 14 77.78
21 EO 3K W-1 50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
4 DEGUELLE Jacques -JASSOGNE Jacqueline : 52,78 %25 EO 5K W+1 -620 16 88.89
26 EO 3S W = -600 12 66.67
27 EO 3K W = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
10 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 58,33 %28 EO 3S N+1 630 7 38.89
29 EO 3T S-1 -100 12 66.67
30 EO 6P W-1 50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
5 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 52,59 %31 EO 2P N+1 140 4 22.22
32 EO 1S N = 90 13 72.22
33 EO 2P E = -110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
Total : 294,0 / 540 = 54,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre
6 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,85 % 1 EO 1S S-1 -50 11 61.11
2 EO 2K W+1 -110 5 27.78
3 EO 1S S+1 120 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
1 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 51,48 % 4 EO 4P E-1 100 1 5.56
5 EO 4T N+3 190 12 66.67
6 EO 2C E+1 -140 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
7 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,67 % 7 EO 3S E+1 -630 16 88.89
8 EO 3C S = 140 8 44.44
9 EO 4C W-1 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 42,78 %10 EO 3S E+2 -660 16 88.89
11 EO 4P N = 420 4 22.22
12 EO 3S E-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
8 MATELART Marc -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 49,63 %13 EO 5P N+1 680 10 55.56
14 EO 6T W = -920 18 100.00
15 EO 5K N = 600 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
3 ARICKX Roger -DESSY Lina : 45,56 %16 EO 6K E+1 -1390 16 88.89
17 EO 2P N-1 -50 17 94.44
18 EO 2C S-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
9 POULAERT Gilbert -COLLET Claudine : 45,37 %19 EO 1S N-1 -50 7 38.89
20 EO 3S N-1 -100 17 94.44
21 EO 2K E+1 -110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
4 DEGUELLE Jacques -JASSOGNE Jacqueline : 52,78 %22 EO 3P E-1 100 4 22.22
23 EO 4P E-1 100 8 44.44
24 EO 4P N-1 -50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
5 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 52,59 %28 EO 3S N+1 630 7 38.89
29 EO 2C E = -110 16 88.89
30 EO 4P E+2 -480 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 47,96 %31 EO 2P N = 110 11 61.11
32 EO 3S N-2 -100 17 94.44
33 EO 2P W+1 -140 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
Total : 340,0 / 540 = 62,96 %
|
|