|
Tournoi du 08-08-16
Lundi
1 60,67 12 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie
2 60,35 2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
3 57,73 4 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
4 51,59 8 MATELART Marc -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
5 51,38 11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
6 49,98 6 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette
7 49,68 10 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane
8 49,61 9 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard
9 47,94 13 VAN DOOREN Michele -SALFI Huguette
10 46,82 7 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte
11 45,62 1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
12 43,80 3 MASSAUX Joel -BIOURGE Gabrielle
13 34,82 5 VAGMAN David -BERGER Jean Marie
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 62,27 14 PIROTTE Claude -CASSART Guy
2 59,41 21 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
3 58,48 16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
4 56,30 22 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
5 50,79 23 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette
6 50,29 26 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
7 49,21 17 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal
8 47,39 24 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
9 46,59 15 LEBRUN Robert -LENAERTS Pol
10 46,44 20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
11 45,15 25 BEYNE Anne -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
12 43,33 18 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
13 34,68 19 ROMAIN Roberte -QUENON
PAIRE Nr : 1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
14 PIROTTE Claude -CASSART Guy : 62,27 % 1 NS 3K N+1 130 15 68.18
2 NS 4C E-1 50 11 50.00
3 NS 4C W+1 -650 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
24 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,39 % 4 NS 3S N = 600 10 45.45
5 NS 4P S = 620 7 31.82
6 NS 4P W-1 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
23 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 50,79 % 7 NS 2C W-2 200 12 54.55
8 NS 1S S+1 120 6 27.27
9 NS 4C N-1 -50 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 29,09 %
22 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 56,30 %10 NS 4P E-1 100 8.8 40.00
11 NS 1S E+2 -150 0 0.00
12 NS 2C W+1 -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 13,33 %
21 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,41 %13 NS 4C N = 620 21 95.45
14 NS 3T N-1 -50 5 22.73
15 NS 6P N = 1430 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
26 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 50,29 %16 NS 3S S = 400 13 59.09
17 NS 4C S+1 450 12 54.55
18 NS 3S N = 600 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
19 ROMAIN Roberte -QUENON : 34,68 %19 NS 3S W+2 -660 7 31.82
20 NS 3S E-1 100 22 100.00
21 NS 2S W = -120 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
18 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,33 %22 NS 2P N = 110 21 95.45
23 NS 4P W = -620 2 9.09
24 NS 4C E = -420 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
17 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 49,21 %25 NS 3C N+1 170 9.9 45.00
26 NS 4P E-1 100 6.6 30.00
27 NS 4T N-1 -50 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 58,48 %28 NS 2P N-2 -200 4.5 20.45
29 NS 1P S+1 110 14.3 65.00
30 NS 3S E+2 -460 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
Total : 301,1 / 660 = 45,62 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
15 LEBRUN Robert -LENAERTS Pol : 46,59 % 4 NS 3S N+1 630 19 86.36
5 NS 4P S = 620 7 31.82
6 NS 2P W-2 200 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -CASSART Guy : 62,27 % 7 NS 4C E-2 200 12 54.55
8 NS 3P S = 140 12 54.55
9 NS 4C N = 420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 54,70 %
24 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,39 %10 NS 3S E-2 200 18.6 84.55
11 NS 1S E = -90 14 63.64
12 NS 2P N+1 140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,06 %
23 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 50,79 %13 NS 3C N+1 170 11 50.00
14 NS 3T N = 110 19 86.36
15 NS 4P N+2 680 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
22 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 56,30 %16 NS 3S N = 400 13 59.09
17 NS 4C S = 420 3 13.64
18 NS 3S N = 600 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
21 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,41 %19 NS 3S W+2 -660 7 31.82
20 NS 6S W+1 -1470 0 0.00
21 NS 2S W+1 -150 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
25 BEYNE Anne -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 45,15 %22 NS 1S W-1 100 15 68.18
23 NS 3P S = 140 16 72.73
24 NS 4C E = -420 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
19 ROMAIN Roberte -QUENON : 34,68 %25 NS 3C N+1 170 9.9 45.00
26 NS 3C N+2 200 17.5 79.55
27 NS 1S S+1 120 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 64,85 %
18 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,33 %28 NS 2P N-1 -100 14.3 65.00
29 NS 2S W-2 200 19.7 89.55
30 NS 3S E = -400 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 83,03 %
17 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 49,21 %31 NS 3S N = 600 16 72.73
32 NS 2P S+1 140 17 77.27
33 NS 2P W-3 150 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 78,79 %
Total : 398,3 / 660 = 60,35 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 MASSAUX Joel -BIOURGE Gabrielle
18 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,33 % 1 NS 4K S+1 150 21 95.45
2 NS 3C E-1 50 11 50.00
3 NS 4C W+1 -650 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 58,48 % 7 NS 1S W = -90 0 0.00
8 NS 2P N+1 140 12 54.55
9 NS 4C N+1 450 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 48,03 %
25 BEYNE Anne -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 45,15 %10 NS 40%60% Ajust 8.8 40.00
11 NS 1S E+1 -120 4 18.18
12 NS 3P N+1 170 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 51,21 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -CASSART Guy : 62,27 %13 NS 4C S-1 -100 0 0.00
14 NS 2K S-2 -100 0 0.00
15 NS 4P N+1 650 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 15,15 %
24 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,39 %16 NS 2S S = 120 6 27.27
17 NS 4C S = 420 3 13.64
18 NS 3S S = 600 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
23 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 50,79 %19 NS 3S W+2 -660 7 31.82
20 NS 3S E+3 -690 9 40.91
21 NS 1S W+1 -120 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
22 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 56,30 %22 NS 1S W+2 -150 1 4.55
23 NS Pass Passe 7 31.82
24 NS 4C W = -420 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
26 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 50,29 %25 NS 2C N+2 170 9.9 45.00
26 NS 3C N = 140 11 50.00
27 NS 3T N+1 130 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 59,85 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,44 %28 NS 2P N-2 -200 4.5 20.45
29 NS 1S W = -90 5.5 25.00
30 NS 3S E+4 -520 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 15,30 %
19 ROMAIN Roberte -QUENON : 34,68 %31 NS 3S N+1 630 22 100.00
32 NS 3ScW-1 200 21 95.45
33 NS 1S N+2 150 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 93,94 %
Total : 289,1 / 660 = 43,80 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,44 % 1 NS 5K S-1 -50 5 22.73
2 NS 3S E-2 100 17 77.27
3 NS 4PcN-3 -500 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
19 ROMAIN Roberte -QUENON : 34,68 % 4 NS 3S N-2 -200 2 9.09
5 NS 3S S+1 630 12 54.55
6 NS 3T S+1 130 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
17 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 49,21 %10 NS 4S E-2 200 18.6 84.55
11 NS 2C W = -110 8 36.36
12 NS 3P S = 140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 56,97 %
26 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 50,29 %13 NS 2P E-2 200 18 81.82
14 NS 1S S = 90 12 54.55
15 NS 4P S+1 650 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
15 LEBRUN Robert -LENAERTS Pol : 46,59 %16 NS 3S S = 400 13 59.09
17 NS 4C S+1 450 12 54.55
18 NS 3S S+2 660 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -CASSART Guy : 62,27 %19 NS 3S W+2 -660 7 31.82
20 NS 3S E+3 -690 9 40.91
21 NS 2S E = -120 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
24 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,39 %22 NS 2C S-1 -50 10 45.45
23 NS 3P S = 140 16 72.73
24 NS 3C E+1 -170 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
23 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 50,79 %25 NS 3C S+1 170 9.9 45.00
26 NS 4C S = 620 20.8 94.55
27 NS 2K E = -90 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
22 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 56,30 %28 NS 2T W-1 50 17.5 79.55
29 NS 1C E+1 -110 0.1 0.45
30 NS 3S E = -400 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 58,18 %
25 BEYNE Anne -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 45,15 %31 NS 3S S-1 -100 8 36.36
32 NS 3T E-2 200 21 95.45
33 NS 1S S+1 120 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
Total : 381,0 / 660 = 57,73 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 VAGMAN David -BERGER Jean Marie
26 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 50,29 % 1 NS 4K S-1 -50 5 22.73
2 NS 3S W = -400 0 0.00
3 NS 5C E = -650 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 21,21 %
21 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,41 % 4 NS 4P N-2 -200 2 9.09
5 NS 6S N-2 -200 0 0.00
6 NS 2P W = -110 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 10,61 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,44 % 7 NS 2C E-1 100 3 13.64
8 NS 2P N+2 170 21 95.45
9 NS 4C N = 420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 54,70 %
18 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,33 %13 NS 1S S+1 120 2 9.09
14 NS 2S N-1 -50 5 22.73
15 NS 4P N+1 650 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
17 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 49,21 %16 NS 3S S-2 -100 0 0.00
17 NS 4C S = 420 3 13.64
18 NS 3S S = 600 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
25 BEYNE Anne -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 45,15 %19 NS 3S W = -600 19 86.36
20 NS 3S E+3 -690 9 40.91
21 NS 3S W = -400 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
15 LEBRUN Robert -LENAERTS Pol : 46,59 %22 NS 1S W = -90 7 31.82
23 NS Pass Passe 7 31.82
24 NS 3C E+3 -230 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -CASSART Guy : 62,27 %25 NS 3C S+1 170 9.9 45.00
26 NS 4C S-1 -100 3.4 15.45
27 NS 3K E-1 50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 36,82 %
24 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,39 %28 NS 2P N-2 -200 4.5 20.45
29 NS 3C E-2 200 19.7 89.55
30 NS 3S E+2 -460 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
23 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 50,79 %31 NS 3S N-2 -200 3 13.64
32 NS 2P S = 110 9 40.91
33 NS 1S S+1 120 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
Total : 229,8 / 660 = 34,82 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette
24 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,39 % 1 NS 4K S = 130 15 68.18
2 NS 5T W-2 100 17 77.27
3 NS 4C W+1 -650 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
23 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 50,79 % 4 NS 3S N = 600 10 45.45
5 NS 4P S+2 680 21 95.45
6 NS 2P W+1 -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
25 BEYNE Anne -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 45,15 % 7 NS 2C E-1 100 3 13.64
8 NS 3P N = 140 12 54.55
9 NS 4C N = 420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 41,06 %
21 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,41 %10 NS 3S E+1 -630 2.3 10.45
11 NS 2P S = 110 22 100.00
12 NS 3P N = 140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,48 %
19 ROMAIN Roberte -QUENON : 34,68 %16 NS 3S S+1 430 21 95.45
17 NS 4C S+1 450 12 54.55
18 NS 3S N+1 630 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
18 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,33 %19 NS 3S W+2 -660 7 31.82
20 NS 3S E = -600 19 86.36
21 NS 2K W+1 -110 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
26 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 50,29 %22 NS 4T E-1 100 15 68.18
23 NS 2S E-2 200 21 95.45
24 NS 4C E+1 -450 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 58,48 %25 NS 2C N+2 170 9.9 45.00
26 NS 4C S-1 -100 3.4 15.45
27 NS 1S S = 90 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 40,15 %
15 LEBRUN Robert -LENAERTS Pol : 46,59 %28 NS 2P N-2 -200 4.5 20.45
29 NS 2P S = 110 14.3 65.00
30 NS 3S E+2 -460 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -CASSART Guy : 62,27 %31 NS 3S N-3 -300 0 0.00
32 NS 2T S-2 -100 0 0.00
33 NS 1S S = 90 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
Total : 329,9 / 660 = 49,98 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte
15 LEBRUN Robert -LENAERTS Pol : 46,59 % 1 NS 4C E-1 50 10 45.45
2 NS 2S W = -120 6 27.27
3 NS 4C W+1 -650 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -CASSART Guy : 62,27 % 4 NS 3S N-1 -100 6 27.27
5 NS 4P S+1 650 16 72.73
6 NS 4T N-1 -50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
24 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,39 % 7 NS 4C E-3 300 18 81.82
8 NS 2P N+1 140 12 54.55
9 NS 4C N-1 -50 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 47,27 %
26 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 50,29 %10 NS 2KcN-3 -800 0.1 0.45
11 NS 2C N-2 -100 10 45.45
12 NS 2P N+1 140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,97 %
22 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 56,30 %13 NS 3C N+1 170 11 50.00
14 NS 2C N-1 -50 5 22.73
15 NS 5P N = 650 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,44 %19 NS 3S W+2 -660 7 31.82
20 NS 3S E = -600 19 86.36
21 NS 3C E-1 50 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
19 ROMAIN Roberte -QUENON : 34,68 %22 NS 3T W-1 100 15 68.18
23 NS 2P S+1 140 16 72.73
24 NS 1C E+2 -140 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 80,30 %
18 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,33 %25 NS 2C N+2 170 9.9 45.00
26 NS 4C S-2 -200 0.1 0.45
27 NS 2T N+2 130 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
25 BEYNE Anne -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 45,15 %28 NS 2P N-1 -100 14.3 65.00
29 NS 2P S-1 -100 2.3 10.45
30 NS 3S E+3 -490 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 31,97 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 58,48 %31 NS 3S N = 600 16 72.73
32 NS 2P S = 110 9 40.91
33 NS 4P S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
Total : 309,0 / 660 = 46,82 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
17 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 49,21 % 1 NS 4K S+1 150 21 95.45
2 NS 3T W+1 -130 3 13.64
3 NS 5C W-1 100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 58,48 % 4 NS 4P N-2 -200 2 9.09
5 NS 4P S+1 650 16 72.73
6 NS 2P W = -110 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
15 LEBRUN Robert -LENAERTS Pol : 46,59 % 7 NS 2P N = 110 6 27.27
8 NS 2P N = 110 2 9.09
9 NS 4C N = 420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 30,45 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -CASSART Guy : 62,27 %10 NS 3S E-2 200 18.6 84.55
11 NS 1S E = -90 14 63.64
12 NS 3P N = 140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,06 %
24 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,39 %13 NS 3C N+1 170 11 50.00
14 NS 2K E-4 200 22 100.00
15 NS 6S N-5 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
25 BEYNE Anne -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 45,15 %16 NS 3S S-1 -50 3 13.64
17 NS 5C S+1 480 20 90.91
18 NS 3S N = 600 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
21 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,41 %22 NS 2P S = 110 21 95.45
23 NS Pass Passe 7 31.82
24 NS 4C E = -420 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,44 %25 NS 4C S = 420 21.9 99.55
26 NS 3C S = 140 11 50.00
27 NS 3S S-1 -50 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 59,85 %
19 ROMAIN Roberte -QUENON : 34,68 %28 NS 2P N = 110 21.9 99.55
29 NS 1S W-1 100 9.9 45.00
30 NS 3S E+3 -490 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
26 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 50,29 %31 NS 3S N = 600 16 72.73
32 NS 2P S = 110 9 40.91
33 NS 1S S = 90 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
Total : 340,5 / 660 = 51,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard
19 ROMAIN Roberte -QUENON : 34,68 % 1 NS 5K S-1 -50 5 22.73
2 NS 2K E-3 150 22 100.00
3 NS 4C W+1 -650 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
25 BEYNE Anne -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 45,15 % 4 NS 3S N+1 630 19 86.36
5 NS 4P S+1 650 16 72.73
6 NS 2P W-2 200 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 84,85 %
17 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 49,21 % 7 NS 2C E-2 200 12 54.55
8 NS 3P N = 140 12 54.55
9 NS 3C N+1 170 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 46,36 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 58,48 %10 NS 4P E-1 100 8.8 40.00
11 NS 1S W+1 -120 4 18.18
12 NS 2P N+1 140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 36,06 %
15 LEBRUN Robert -LENAERTS Pol : 46,59 %13 NS 2P S+2 170 11 50.00
14 NS 2K S = 90 12 54.55
15 NS 5P N = 650 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -CASSART Guy : 62,27 %16 NS 3S S-1 -50 3 13.64
17 NS 4C S+2 480 20 90.91
18 NS 3S S = 600 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
26 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 50,29 %19 NS 3S E+1 -630 16 72.73
20 NS 3S E+4 -720 3 13.64
21 NS 3S W-1 50 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
22 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 56,30 %25 NS 2C N+2 170 9.9 45.00
26 NS 3C S = 140 11 50.00
27 NS 4T N-1 -50 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
21 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,41 %28 NS 2P N-2 -200 4.5 20.45
29 NS 1S W = -90 5.5 25.00
30 NS 3S E+3 -490 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 21,97 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,44 %31 NS 3S N-1 -100 8 36.36
32 NS 2P S = 110 9 40.91
33 NS 1S S+2 150 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
Total : 327,4 / 660 = 49,61 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane
21 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,41 % 1 NS 3C E+1 -170 0 0.00
2 NS 2S E-2 100 17 77.27
3 NS 4C W+1 -650 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,44 % 4 NS 3S N+2 660 22 100.00
5 NS 4P S = 620 7 31.82
6 NS 2P W = -110 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
26 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 50,29 % 7 NS 4C E-4 400 21 95.45
8 NS 2C S = 110 2 9.09
9 NS 2P S = 110 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
18 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,33 %10 NS 3S E-2 200 18.6 84.55
11 NS 2S W-2 100 20 90.91
12 NS 2P N+2 170 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 90,30 %
17 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 49,21 %13 NS 4C N = 620 21 95.45
14 NS 2K S = 90 12 54.55
15 NS 6S N-3 -300 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 58,48 %16 NS 3S S = 400 13 59.09
17 NS 4C S+1 450 12 54.55
18 NS 3S N = 600 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
15 LEBRUN Robert -LENAERTS Pol : 46,59 %19 NS 3S W+2 -660 7 31.82
20 NS 4P W+2 -680 15 68.18
21 NS 2S W = -120 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -CASSART Guy : 62,27 %22 NS 1S W+1 -120 4 18.18
23 NS 2CcE+1 -870 0 0.00
24 NS 4CcE = -590 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 6,06 %
23 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 50,79 %28 NS 1S N = 90 19.7 89.55
29 NS 2K E-1 100 9.9 45.00
30 NS 3S E+2 -460 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 64,85 %
22 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 56,30 %31 NS 3S N-2 -200 3 13.64
32 NS 2P S = 110 9 40.91
33 NS 2S N+1 150 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
Total : 327,9 / 660 = 49,68 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
23 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 50,79 % 1 NS 5K S-1 -50 5 22.73
2 NS 3T W+1 -130 3 13.64
3 NS 3P S-3 -150 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
22 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 56,30 % 4 NS 4P N = 620 15 68.18
5 NS 5P S-1 -100 2 9.09
6 NS 2P W = -110 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
21 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,41 % 7 NS 4C E-2 200 12 54.55
8 NS 2C S = 110 2 9.09
9 NS 4C N+1 450 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 51,06 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,44 %10 NS 4P E-1 100 8.8 40.00
11 NS 1S W-1 50 18 81.82
12 NS 4P N-1 -100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 43,64 %
25 BEYNE Anne -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 45,15 %13 NS 3C N+1 170 11 50.00
14 NS 2C N = 110 19 86.36
15 NS 6P S = 1430 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
18 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,33 %16 NS 3S S = 400 13 59.09
17 NS 4C N+1 450 12 54.55
18 NS 3S N = 600 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
17 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 49,21 %19 NS 6S W-2 200 22 100.00
20 NS 3S E+3 -690 9 40.91
21 NS 3S W = -400 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 58,48 %22 NS 1S W-1 100 15 68.18
23 NS Pass Passe 7 31.82
24 NS 4C W = -420 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
15 LEBRUN Robert -LENAERTS Pol : 46,59 %25 NS 2C N+2 170 9.9 45.00
26 NS 4C S = 620 20.8 94.55
27 NS 1S S+2 150 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 79,70 %
24 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,39 %31 NS 3S N-1 -100 8 36.36
32 NS 2P S+1 140 17 77.27
33 NS 1S E = -90 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
Total : 339,1 / 660 = 51,38 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie
25 BEYNE Anne -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 45,15 % 1 NS 4K S = 130 15 68.18
2 NS 2C E = -110 8 36.36
3 NS 5C E = -650 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
18 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,33 % 4 NS 4P N = 620 15 68.18
5 NS 4P S = 620 7 31.82
6 NS 2P W-1 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
22 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 56,30 % 7 NS 4C E-4 400 21 95.45
8 NS 2P N+2 170 21 95.45
9 NS 4C N+1 450 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 93,48 %
15 LEBRUN Robert -LENAERTS Pol : 46,59 %10 NS 3S E-1 100 8.8 40.00
11 NS 1S E = -90 14 63.64
12 NS 3P N = 140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,21 %
19 ROMAIN Roberte -QUENON : 34,68 %13 NS 2C S+1 140 4 18.18
14 NS 2P E-2 100 16 72.73
15 NS 4P N+2 680 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
23 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 50,79 %16 NS 3S S+1 430 21 95.45
17 NS 4C N+2 480 20 90.91
18 NS 3S N = 600 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 58,48 %19 NS 3S W+2 -660 7 31.82
20 NS 3S E+4 -720 3 13.64
21 NS 3S W-1 50 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,44 %22 NS 1S W = -90 7 31.82
23 NS 4CcE-1 200 21 95.45
24 NS 2C E+3 -200 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
17 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 49,21 %28 NS 3T W = -110 11 50.00
29 NS 3T W-2 200 19.7 89.55
30 NS 3S W+2 -460 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 66,52 %
21 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,41 %31 NS 3S N = 600 16 72.73
32 NS 2P S = 110 9 40.91
33 NS 1S S = 90 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
Total : 400,4 / 660 = 60,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 VAN DOOREN Michele -SALFI Huguette
22 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 56,30 % 1 NS 4K S = 130 15 68.18
2 NS 3S E-2 100 17 77.27
3 NS 5C W+1 -680 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
26 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 50,29 % 4 NS 3S N = 600 10 45.45
5 NS 4P S+2 680 21 95.45
6 NS 2P W-1 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
19 ROMAIN Roberte -QUENON : 34,68 % 7 NS 3C E-2 200 12 54.55
8 NS 2S S+1 150 18 81.82
9 NS 60%50% Ajust 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 65,45 %
23 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 50,79 %10 NS 4P E-1 100 8.8 40.00
11 NS 1S E+1 -120 4 18.18
12 NS 3P N = 140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 36,06 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 58,48 %13 NS 2C S+2 170 11 50.00
14 NS 3T N-1 -50 5 22.73
15 NS 4C S-4 -400 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,44 %16 NS 3S S = 400 13 59.09
17 NS 4C S = 420 3 13.64
18 NS 3S N+2 660 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
24 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,39 %19 NS 3S E = -600 19 86.36
20 NS 4P W+2 -680 15 68.18
21 NS 3C E = -140 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
17 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 49,21 %22 NS 1S W+2 -150 1 4.55
23 NS 3C E-1 100 12 54.55
24 NS 4C E = -420 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
21 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,41 %25 NS 2C N+2 170 9.9 45.00
26 NS 3C S+1 170 15.4 70.00
27 NS 2CcE = -470 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 38,48 %
18 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,33 %31 NS 3S N = 600 16 72.73
32 NS 3P S-1 -50 2 9.09
33 NS 1S S+1 120 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
Total : 316,4 / 660 = 47,94 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 PIROTTE Claude -CASSART Guy
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 45,62 % 1 EO 3K N+1 130 7 31.82
2 EO 4C E-1 50 11 50.00
3 EO 4C W+1 -650 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
7 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 46,82 % 4 EO 3S N-1 -100 16 72.73
5 EO 4P S+1 650 6 27.27
6 EO 4T N-1 -50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,35 % 7 EO 4C E-2 200 10 45.45
8 EO 3P S = 140 10 45.45
9 EO 4C N = 420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 45,30 %
8 MATELART Marc -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 51,59 %10 EO 3S E-2 200 3.4 15.45
11 EO 1S E = -90 8 36.36
12 EO 3P N = 140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,94 %
3 MASSAUX Joel -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 43,80 %13 EO 4C S-1 -100 22 100.00
14 EO 2K S-2 -100 22 100.00
15 EO 4P N+1 650 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 84,85 %
9 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,61 %16 EO 3S S-1 -50 19 86.36
17 EO 4C S+2 480 2 9.09
18 EO 3S S = 600 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
4 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 57,73 %19 EO 3S W+2 -660 15 68.18
20 EO 3S E+3 -690 13 59.09
21 EO 2S E = -120 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
10 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 49,68 %22 EO 1S W+1 -120 18 81.82
23 EO 2CcE+1 -870 22 100.00
24 EO 4CcE = -590 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 93,94 %
5 VAGMAN David -BERGER Jean Marie : 34,82 %25 EO 3C S+1 170 12.1 55.00
26 EO 4C S-1 -100 18.6 84.55
27 EO 3K E-1 50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 63,18 %
6 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 49,98 %31 EO 3S N-3 -300 22 100.00
32 EO 2T S-2 -100 22 100.00
33 EO 1S S = 90 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
Total : 411,0 / 660 = 62,27 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 LEBRUN Robert -LENAERTS Pol
7 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 46,82 % 1 EO 4C E-1 50 12 54.55
2 EO 2S W = -120 16 72.73
3 EO 4C W+1 -650 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,35 % 4 EO 3S N+1 630 3 13.64
5 EO 4P S = 620 15 68.18
6 EO 2P W-2 200 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
8 MATELART Marc -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 51,59 % 7 EO 2P N = 110 16 72.73
8 EO 2P N = 110 20 90.91
9 EO 4C N = 420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 69,55 %
12 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie : 60,67 %10 EO 3S E-1 100 13.2 60.00
11 EO 1S E = -90 8 36.36
12 EO 3P N = 140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,79 %
9 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,61 %13 EO 2P S+2 170 11 50.00
14 EO 2K S = 90 10 45.45
15 EO 5P N = 650 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
4 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 57,73 %16 EO 3S S = 400 9 40.91
17 EO 4C S+1 450 10 45.45
18 EO 3S S+2 660 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
10 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 49,68 %19 EO 3S W+2 -660 15 68.18
20 EO 4P W+2 -680 7 31.82
21 EO 2S W = -120 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
5 VAGMAN David -BERGER Jean Marie : 34,82 %22 EO 1S W = -90 15 68.18
23 EO Pass Passe 15 68.18
24 EO 3C E+3 -230 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 51,38 %25 EO 2C N+2 170 12.1 55.00
26 EO 4C S = 620 1.2 5.45
27 EO 1S S+2 150 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 20,30 %
6 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 49,98 %28 EO 2P N-2 -200 17.5 79.55
29 EO 2P S = 110 7.7 35.00
30 EO 3S E+2 -460 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
Total : 307,5 / 660 = 46,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
8 MATELART Marc -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 51,59 % 4 EO 4P N-2 -200 20 90.91
5 EO 4P S+1 650 6 27.27
6 EO 2P W = -110 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
3 MASSAUX Joel -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 43,80 % 7 EO 1S W = -90 22 100.00
8 EO 2P N+1 140 10 45.45
9 EO 4C N+1 450 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 51,97 %
9 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,61 %10 EO 4P E-1 100 13.2 60.00
11 EO 1S W+1 -120 18 81.82
12 EO 2P N+1 140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 63,94 %
13 VAN DOOREN Michele -SALFI Huguette : 47,94 %13 EO 2C S+2 170 11 50.00
14 EO 3T N-1 -50 17 77.27
15 EO 4C S-4 -400 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
10 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 49,68 %16 EO 3S S = 400 9 40.91
17 EO 4C S+1 450 10 45.45
18 EO 3S N = 600 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
12 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie : 60,67 %19 EO 3S W+2 -660 15 68.18
20 EO 3S E+4 -720 19 86.36
21 EO 3S W-1 50 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 51,38 %22 EO 1S W-1 100 7 31.82
23 EO Pass Passe 15 68.18
24 EO 4C W = -420 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
6 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 49,98 %25 EO 2C N+2 170 12.1 55.00
26 EO 4C S-1 -100 18.6 84.55
27 EO 1S S = 90 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 59,85 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 45,62 %28 EO 2P N-2 -200 17.5 79.55
29 EO 1P S+1 110 7.7 35.00
30 EO 3S E+2 -460 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
7 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 46,82 %31 EO 3S N = 600 6 27.27
32 EO 2P S = 110 13 59.09
33 EO 4P S-2 -100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
Total : 386,0 / 660 = 58,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal
8 MATELART Marc -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 51,59 % 1 EO 4K S+1 150 1 4.55
2 EO 3T W+1 -130 19 86.36
3 EO 5C W-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
9 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,61 % 7 EO 2C E-2 200 10 45.45
8 EO 3P N = 140 10 45.45
9 EO 3C N+1 170 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 53,64 %
4 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 57,73 %10 EO 4S E-2 200 3.4 15.45
11 EO 2C W = -110 14 63.64
12 EO 3P S = 140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 43,03 %
10 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 49,68 %13 EO 4C N = 620 1 4.55
14 EO 2K S = 90 10 45.45
15 EO 6S N-3 -300 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
5 VAGMAN David -BERGER Jean Marie : 34,82 %16 EO 3S S-2 -100 22 100.00
17 EO 4C S = 420 19 86.36
18 EO 3S S = 600 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 51,38 %19 EO 6S W-2 200 0 0.00
20 EO 3S E+3 -690 13 59.09
21 EO 3S W = -400 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
13 VAN DOOREN Michele -SALFI Huguette : 47,94 %22 EO 1S W+2 -150 21 95.45
23 EO 3C E-1 100 10 45.45
24 EO 4C E = -420 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 45,62 %25 EO 3C N+1 170 12.1 55.00
26 EO 4P E-1 100 15.4 70.00
27 EO 4T N-1 -50 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
12 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie : 60,67 %28 EO 3T W = -110 11 50.00
29 EO 3T W-2 200 2.3 10.45
30 EO 3S W+2 -460 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 33,48 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,35 %31 EO 3S N = 600 6 27.27
32 EO 2P S+1 140 5 22.73
33 EO 2P W-3 150 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 21,21 %
Total : 324,8 / 660 = 49,21 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
3 MASSAUX Joel -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 43,80 % 1 EO 4K S+1 150 1 4.55
2 EO 3C E-1 50 11 50.00
3 EO 4C W+1 -650 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
12 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie : 60,67 % 4 EO 4P N = 620 7 31.82
5 EO 4P S = 620 15 68.18
6 EO 2P W-1 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
10 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 49,68 %10 EO 3S E-2 200 3.4 15.45
11 EO 2S W-2 100 2 9.09
12 EO 2P N+2 170 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 9,70 %
5 VAGMAN David -BERGER Jean Marie : 34,82 %13 EO 1S S+1 120 20 90.91
14 EO 2S N-1 -50 17 77.27
15 EO 4P N+1 650 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 51,38 %16 EO 3S S = 400 9 40.91
17 EO 4C N+1 450 10 45.45
18 EO 3S N = 600 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
6 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 49,98 %19 EO 3S W+2 -660 15 68.18
20 EO 3S E = -600 3 13.64
21 EO 2K W+1 -110 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 45,62 %22 EO 2P N = 110 1 4.55
23 EO 4P W = -620 20 90.91
24 EO 4C E = -420 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
7 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 46,82 %25 EO 2C N+2 170 12.1 55.00
26 EO 4C S-2 -200 21.9 99.55
27 EO 2T N+2 130 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,35 %28 EO 2P N-1 -100 7.7 35.00
29 EO 2S W-2 200 2.3 10.45
30 EO 3S E = -400 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 16,97 %
13 VAN DOOREN Michele -SALFI Huguette : 47,94 %31 EO 3S N = 600 6 27.27
32 EO 3P S-1 -50 20 90.91
33 EO 1S S+1 120 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
Total : 286,0 / 660 = 43,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 ROMAIN Roberte -QUENON
9 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,61 % 1 EO 5K S-1 -50 17 77.27
2 EO 2K E-3 150 0 0.00
3 EO 4C W+1 -650 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
4 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 57,73 % 4 EO 3S N-2 -200 20 90.91
5 EO 3S S+1 630 10 45.45
6 EO 3T S+1 130 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
13 VAN DOOREN Michele -SALFI Huguette : 47,94 % 7 EO 3C E-2 200 10 45.45
8 EO 2S S+1 150 4 18.18
9 EO 60%50% Ajust 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
12 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie : 60,67 %13 EO 2C S+1 140 18 81.82
14 EO 2P E-2 100 6 27.27
15 EO 4P N+2 680 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
6 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 49,98 %16 EO 3S S+1 430 1 4.55
17 EO 4C S+1 450 10 45.45
18 EO 3S N+1 630 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 45,62 %19 EO 3S W+2 -660 15 68.18
20 EO 3S E-1 100 0 0.00
21 EO 2S W = -120 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
7 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 46,82 %22 EO 3T W-1 100 7 31.82
23 EO 2P S+1 140 6 27.27
24 EO 1C E+2 -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 19,70 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,35 %25 EO 3C N+1 170 12.1 55.00
26 EO 3C N+2 200 4.5 20.45
27 EO 1S S+1 120 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 35,15 %
8 MATELART Marc -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 51,59 %28 EO 2P N = 110 0.1 0.45
29 EO 1S W-1 100 12.1 55.00
30 EO 3S E+3 -490 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
3 MASSAUX Joel -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 43,80 %31 EO 3S N+1 630 0 0.00
32 EO 3ScW-1 200 1 4.55
33 EO 1S N+2 150 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 6,06 %
Total : 228,9 / 660 = 34,68 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
4 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 57,73 % 1 EO 5K S-1 -50 17 77.27
2 EO 3S E-2 100 5 22.73
3 EO 4PcN-3 -500 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
10 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 49,68 % 4 EO 3S N+2 660 0 0.00
5 EO 4P S = 620 15 68.18
6 EO 2P W = -110 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
5 VAGMAN David -BERGER Jean Marie : 34,82 % 7 EO 2C E-1 100 19 86.36
8 EO 2P N+2 170 1 4.55
9 EO 4C N = 420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 45,30 %
11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 51,38 %10 EO 4P E-1 100 13.2 60.00
11 EO 1S W-1 50 4 18.18
12 EO 4P N-1 -100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 56,36 %
13 VAN DOOREN Michele -SALFI Huguette : 47,94 %16 EO 3S S = 400 9 40.91
17 EO 4C S = 420 19 86.36
18 EO 3S N+2 660 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
7 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 46,82 %19 EO 3S W+2 -660 15 68.18
20 EO 3S E = -600 3 13.64
21 EO 3C E-1 50 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
12 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie : 60,67 %22 EO 1S W = -90 15 68.18
23 EO 4CcE-1 200 1 4.55
24 EO 2C E+3 -200 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
8 MATELART Marc -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 51,59 %25 EO 4C S = 420 0.1 0.45
26 EO 3C S = 140 11 50.00
27 EO 3S S-1 -50 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 40,15 %
3 MASSAUX Joel -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 43,80 %28 EO 2P N-2 -200 17.5 79.55
29 EO 1S W = -90 16.5 75.00
30 EO 3S E+4 -520 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 84,70 %
9 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,61 %31 EO 3S N-1 -100 14 63.64
32 EO 2P S = 110 13 59.09
33 EO 1S S+2 150 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
Total : 306,5 / 660 = 46,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
10 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 49,68 % 1 EO 3C E+1 -170 22 100.00
2 EO 2S E-2 100 5 22.73
3 EO 4C W+1 -650 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
5 VAGMAN David -BERGER Jean Marie : 34,82 % 4 EO 4P N-2 -200 20 90.91
5 EO 6S N-2 -200 22 100.00
6 EO 2P W = -110 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 89,39 %
11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 51,38 % 7 EO 4C E-2 200 10 45.45
8 EO 2C S = 110 20 90.91
9 EO 4C N+1 450 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 48,94 %
6 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 49,98 %10 EO 3S E+1 -630 19.7 89.55
11 EO 2P S = 110 0 0.00
12 EO 3P N = 140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,52 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 45,62 %13 EO 4C N = 620 1 4.55
14 EO 3T N-1 -50 17 77.27
15 EO 6P N = 1430 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,35 %19 EO 3S W+2 -660 15 68.18
20 EO 6S W+1 -1470 22 100.00
21 EO 2S W+1 -150 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
8 MATELART Marc -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 51,59 %22 EO 2P S = 110 1 4.55
23 EO Pass Passe 15 68.18
24 EO 4C E = -420 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
13 VAN DOOREN Michele -SALFI Huguette : 47,94 %25 EO 2C N+2 170 12.1 55.00
26 EO 3C S+1 170 6.6 30.00
27 EO 2CcE = -470 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 61,52 %
9 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,61 %28 EO 2P N-2 -200 17.5 79.55
29 EO 1S W = -90 16.5 75.00
30 EO 3S E+3 -490 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 78,03 %
12 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie : 60,67 %31 EO 3S N = 600 6 27.27
32 EO 2P S = 110 13 59.09
33 EO 1S S = 90 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
Total : 392,1 / 660 = 59,41 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
13 VAN DOOREN Michele -SALFI Huguette : 47,94 % 1 EO 4K S = 130 7 31.82
2 EO 3S E-2 100 5 22.73
3 EO 5C W+1 -680 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 51,38 % 4 EO 4P N = 620 7 31.82
5 EO 5P S-1 -100 20 90.91
6 EO 2P W = -110 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
12 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie : 60,67 % 7 EO 4C E-4 400 1 4.55
8 EO 2P N+2 170 1 4.55
9 EO 4C N+1 450 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 6,52 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 45,62 %10 EO 4P E-1 100 13.2 60.00
11 EO 1S E+2 -150 22 100.00
12 EO 2C W+1 -140 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 86,67 %
7 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 46,82 %13 EO 3C N+1 170 11 50.00
14 EO 2C N-1 -50 17 77.27
15 EO 5P N = 650 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,35 %16 EO 3S N = 400 9 40.91
17 EO 4C S = 420 19 86.36
18 EO 3S N = 600 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
3 MASSAUX Joel -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 43,80 %22 EO 1S W+2 -150 21 95.45
23 EO Pass Passe 15 68.18
24 EO 4C W = -420 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
9 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,61 %25 EO 2C N+2 170 12.1 55.00
26 EO 3C S = 140 11 50.00
27 EO 4T N-1 -50 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
4 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 57,73 %28 EO 2T W-1 50 4.5 20.45
29 EO 1C E+1 -110 21.9 99.55
30 EO 3S E = -400 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 41,82 %
10 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 49,68 %31 EO 3S N-2 -200 19 86.36
32 EO 2P S = 110 13 59.09
33 EO 2S N+1 150 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
Total : 371,6 / 660 = 56,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 23 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette
11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 51,38 % 1 EO 5K S-1 -50 17 77.27
2 EO 3T W+1 -130 19 86.36
3 EO 3P S-3 -150 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
6 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 49,98 % 4 EO 3S N = 600 12 54.55
5 EO 4P S+2 680 1 4.55
6 EO 2P W+1 -140 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 45,62 % 7 EO 2C W-2 200 10 45.45
8 EO 1S S+1 120 16 72.73
9 EO 4C N-1 -50 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 70,91 %
13 VAN DOOREN Michele -SALFI Huguette : 47,94 %10 EO 4P E-1 100 13.2 60.00
11 EO 1S E+1 -120 18 81.82
12 EO 3P N = 140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 63,94 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,35 %13 EO 3C N+1 170 11 50.00
14 EO 3T N = 110 3 13.64
15 EO 4P N+2 680 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
12 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie : 60,67 %16 EO 3S S+1 430 1 4.55
17 EO 4C N+2 480 2 9.09
18 EO 3S N = 600 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
3 MASSAUX Joel -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 43,80 %19 EO 3S W+2 -660 15 68.18
20 EO 3S E+3 -690 13 59.09
21 EO 1S W+1 -120 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
4 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 57,73 %25 EO 3C S+1 170 12.1 55.00
26 EO 4C S = 620 1.2 5.45
27 EO 2K E = -90 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
10 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 49,68 %28 EO 1S N = 90 2.3 10.45
29 EO 2K E-1 100 12.1 55.00
30 EO 3S E+2 -460 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 35,15 %
5 VAGMAN David -BERGER Jean Marie : 34,82 %31 EO 3S N-2 -200 19 86.36
32 EO 2P S = 110 13 59.09
33 EO 1S S+1 120 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
Total : 335,2 / 660 = 50,79 %
PAIRE Nr : 24 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
6 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 49,98 % 1 EO 4K S = 130 7 31.82
2 EO 5T W-2 100 5 22.73
3 EO 4C W+1 -650 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 45,62 % 4 EO 3S N = 600 12 54.55
5 EO 4P S = 620 15 68.18
6 EO 4P W-1 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
7 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 46,82 % 7 EO 4C E-3 300 4 18.18
8 EO 2P N+1 140 10 45.45
9 EO 4C N-1 -50 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 52,73 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,35 %10 EO 3S E-2 200 3.4 15.45
11 EO 1S E = -90 8 36.36
12 EO 2P N+1 140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,94 %
8 MATELART Marc -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 51,59 %13 EO 3C N+1 170 11 50.00
14 EO 2K E-4 200 0 0.00
15 EO 6S N-5 -500 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
3 MASSAUX Joel -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 43,80 %16 EO 2S S = 120 16 72.73
17 EO 4C S = 420 19 86.36
18 EO 3S S = 600 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
13 VAN DOOREN Michele -SALFI Huguette : 47,94 %19 EO 3S E = -600 3 13.64
20 EO 4P W+2 -680 7 31.82
21 EO 3C E = -140 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
4 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 57,73 %22 EO 2C S-1 -50 12 54.55
23 EO 3P S = 140 6 27.27
24 EO 3C E+1 -170 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
5 VAGMAN David -BERGER Jean Marie : 34,82 %28 EO 2P N-2 -200 17.5 79.55
29 EO 3C E-2 200 2.3 10.45
30 EO 3S E+2 -460 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 51,38 %31 EO 3S N-1 -100 14 63.64
32 EO 2P S+1 140 5 22.73
33 EO 1S E = -90 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
Total : 312,8 / 660 = 47,39 %
PAIRE Nr : 25 BEYNE Anne -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
12 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie : 60,67 % 1 EO 4K S = 130 7 31.82
2 EO 2C E = -110 14 63.64
3 EO 5C E = -650 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
9 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,61 % 4 EO 3S N+1 630 3 13.64
5 EO 4P S+1 650 6 27.27
6 EO 2P W-2 200 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 15,15 %
6 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 49,98 % 7 EO 2C E-1 100 19 86.36
8 EO 3P N = 140 10 45.45
9 EO 4C N = 420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 58,94 %
3 MASSAUX Joel -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 43,80 %10 EO 40%60% Ajust 13.2 60.00
11 EO 1S E+1 -120 18 81.82
12 EO 3P N+1 170 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 48,79 %
11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 51,38 %13 EO 3C N+1 170 11 50.00
14 EO 2C N = 110 3 13.64
15 EO 6P S = 1430 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
8 MATELART Marc -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 51,59 %16 EO 3S S-1 -50 19 86.36
17 EO 5C S+1 480 2 9.09
18 EO 3S N = 600 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
5 VAGMAN David -BERGER Jean Marie : 34,82 %19 EO 3S W = -600 3 13.64
20 EO 3S E+3 -690 13 59.09
21 EO 3S W = -400 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,35 %22 EO 1S W-1 100 7 31.82
23 EO 3P S = 140 6 27.27
24 EO 4C E = -420 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
7 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 46,82 %28 EO 2P N-1 -100 7.7 35.00
29 EO 2P S-1 -100 19.7 89.55
30 EO 3S E+3 -490 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 68,03 %
4 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 57,73 %31 EO 3S S-1 -100 14 63.64
32 EO 3T E-2 200 1 4.55
33 EO 1S S+1 120 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
Total : 298,0 / 660 = 45,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 26 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
5 VAGMAN David -BERGER Jean Marie : 34,82 % 1 EO 4K S-1 -50 17 77.27
2 EO 3S W = -400 22 100.00
3 EO 5C E = -650 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 78,79 %
13 VAN DOOREN Michele -SALFI Huguette : 47,94 % 4 EO 3S N = 600 12 54.55
5 EO 4P S+2 680 1 4.55
6 EO 2P W-1 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
10 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 49,68 % 7 EO 4C E-4 400 1 4.55
8 EO 2C S = 110 20 90.91
9 EO 2P S = 110 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
7 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 46,82 %10 EO 2KcN-3 -800 21.9 99.55
11 EO 2C N-2 -100 12 54.55
12 EO 2P N+1 140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,03 %
4 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 57,73 %13 EO 2P E-2 200 4 18.18
14 EO 1S S = 90 10 45.45
15 EO 4P S+1 650 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 45,62 %16 EO 3S S = 400 9 40.91
17 EO 4C S+1 450 10 45.45
18 EO 3S N = 600 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,61 %19 EO 3S E+1 -630 6 27.27
20 EO 3S E+4 -720 19 86.36
21 EO 3S W-1 50 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
6 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 49,98 %22 EO 4T E-1 100 7 31.82
23 EO 2S E-2 200 1 4.55
24 EO 4C E+1 -450 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
3 MASSAUX Joel -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 43,80 %25 EO 2C N+2 170 12.1 55.00
26 EO 3C N = 140 11 50.00
27 EO 3T N+1 130 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 40,15 %
8 MATELART Marc -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 51,59 %31 EO 3S N = 600 6 27.27
32 EO 2P S = 110 13 59.09
33 EO 1S S = 90 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
Total : 331,9 / 660 = 50,29 %
|
|