|
Tournoi du 10-04-17
Lundi
1 61,11 A.3 NELIS Claude -CASSART Guy
2 59,63 A.8 LIBERT Laurent -HUBLET Carlo
3 54,44 A.7 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette
4 51,48 A11 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
5 51,11 A.2 VAGMAN David -BERGER Jean Marie
6 50,74 A.5 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
7 48,15 A.6 COLLET Edgard -BEYNE Anne
8 47,96 A.1 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse
9 45,56 A.4 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette
10 41,11 A10 VEUGELERS Jean-Pierre -ARICKX Roger
11 38,70 A.9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
12 0,00 A12 -
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 63,58 a.2 JANSSENS Pierre -MATELART Marc
2 62,76 a.6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
3 56,58 a.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
4 53,09 a.4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
5 51,23 a.9 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard
6 51,03 a12 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François
7 50,19 a11 VAN DOOREN Michele -MOSSERAY Etienne
8 47,33 a.8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
9 44,03 a10 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
10 43,21 a.5 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
11 39,51 a.7 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert
12 38,70 a.1 ALLARD Jean-Marie -JAUMOTTE Jean-Marie
PAIRE Nr : A.1 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse
a.1 ALLARD Jean-Marie -JAUMOTTE Jean-Marie : 38,70 % 1 NS 4P E = -420 7 38.89
2 NS 3P E-2 100 15 83.33
3 NS 3S W-1 100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a11 VAN DOOREN Michele -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,19 % 4 NS 2P E+2 -170 8 44.44
5 NS 6P E = -980 10 55.56
6 NS 2T N+1 110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a10 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,03 % 7 NS 4K N-1 -100 0 0.00
8 NS 3P W-2 100 13 72.22
9 NS 1S E-1 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.9 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,23 %10 NS 3S S+1 630 14 77.78
11 NS 2P S+2 170 14 77.78
12 NS 3S W-2 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
a.8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,33 %13 NS 2C E+2 -170 13 72.22
14 NS 4C W-2 100 7 38.89
15 NS 4P S+2 680 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
a.7 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 39,51 %16 NS 1S S+1 120 18 100.00
17 NS 3S W+3 -490 0 0.00
18 NS 2S W = -120 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 62,76 %19 NS 4K W-1 100 9 50.00
20 NS 3S E+3 -690 3 16.67
21 NS 3S S-3 -300 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
a.5 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 43,21 %22 NS 3C W = -140 7 38.89
23 NS 3S E+1 -630 3 16.67
24 NS 2S W = -120 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,09 %25 NS 5K E = -600 4 22.22
26 NS 3S E = -600 3 16.67
27 NS 3S E = -400 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
a.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 56,58 %28 NS 2S E = -120 1 5.56
29 NS 3P W = -140 0 0.00
30 NS 2T W+1 -110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
Total : 259,0 / 540 = 47,96 %
PAIRE Nr : A.2 VAGMAN David -BERGER Jean Marie
a.2 JANSSENS Pierre -MATELART Marc : 63,58 % 4 NS 4PcE = -790 1 5.56
5 NS 6P E = -980 10 55.56
6 NS 1S E+1 -120 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
a.1 ALLARD Jean-Marie -JAUMOTTE Jean-Marie : 38,70 % 7 NS 1K S+3 130 7 38.89
8 NS 2K N+1 110 18 100.00
9 NS 1K N+1 90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
a11 VAN DOOREN Michele -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,19 %10 NS 3S S+1 630 14 77.78
11 NS 3C W-3 150 8 44.44
12 NS 3S W+1 -430 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a10 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,03 %13 NS 2C E+2 -170 13 72.22
14 NS 4CcW-3 500 16 88.89
15 NS 4P S+2 680 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
a.9 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,23 %16 NS 4CcW = -790 0 0.00
17 NS 4C E+1 -450 4 22.22
18 NS 3S E+1 -430 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
a.8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,33 %19 NS 4T S = 130 14 77.78
20 NS 3S W+2 -660 8 44.44
21 NS 5C S-2 -200 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a12 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 51,03 %22 NS 3C W = -140 7 38.89
23 NS 3S W+1 -630 3 16.67
24 NS 2C W = -110 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 62,76 %25 NS 3S E+1 -630 0 0.00
26 NS 3S E = -600 3 16.67
27 NS 2S W+3 -210 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
a.5 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 43,21 %28 NS 2S W = -120 1 5.56
29 NS 4PxW-3 1600 18 100.00
30 NS 4T W-1 50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
a.4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,09 %31 NS 3P N = 140 14 77.78
32 NS 2T W-1 100 15 83.33
33 NS 2P S = 110 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
Total : 276,0 / 540 = 51,11 %
PAIRE Nr : A.3 NELIS Claude -CASSART Guy
a.5 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 43,21 % 1 NS 4P E+1 -450 1 5.56
2 NS 4P W-3 150 18 100.00
3 NS 3S E-2 200 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 56,58 % 7 NS 3KcN = 670 18 100.00
8 NS 2K N-1 -50 6 33.33
9 NS 2P W = -110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a12 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 51,03 %10 NS 3K E = -110 6 33.33
11 NS 2P N+2 170 14 77.78
12 NS 2PcN-3 -800 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.1 ALLARD Jean-Marie -JAUMOTTE Jean-Marie : 38,70 %13 NS 2C E+1 -140 18 100.00
14 NS 4P S-1 -50 4 22.22
15 NS 4P S+2 680 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a11 VAN DOOREN Michele -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,19 %16 NS 2C W = -110 13 72.22
17 NS 4C E = -420 12 66.67
18 NS 2T W+2 -130 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
a10 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,03 %19 NS 3K W = -110 2 11.11
20 NS 2C E+1 -140 16 88.89
21 NS 3S N = 600 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.9 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,23 %22 NS 3C W = -140 7 38.89
23 NS 3S W = -600 17 94.44
24 NS 2S W = -120 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,33 %25 NS 3K E+2 -150 12 66.67
26 NS 1P E+2 -140 10 55.56
27 NS 2S W = -120 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
a.7 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 39,51 %28 NS 3S E-1 50 8 44.44
29 NS 4PcW-3 800 14 77.78
30 NS 2C S+2 170 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
a.6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 62,76 %31 NS 5KcE-3 500 16 88.89
32 NS 1S N-2 -100 8 44.44
33 NS 2P S-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 330,0 / 540 = 61,11 %
PAIRE Nr : A.4 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette
a.7 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 39,51 % 1 NS 2P E+1 -140 18 100.00
2 NS 4P E-2 100 15 83.33
3 NS 2P N-3 -150 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
a.6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 62,76 % 4 NS 4P E = -620 4 22.22
5 NS 6P E = -980 10 55.56
6 NS 1S E+1 -120 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
a.4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,09 %10 NS 3S S = 600 10 55.56
11 NS 2P S+2 170 14 77.78
12 NS 3PcN-3 -800 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 56,58 %13 NS 2C E+2 -170 13 72.22
14 NS 3C W = -140 0 0.00
15 NS 4P S+1 650 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.2 JANSSENS Pierre -MATELART Marc : 63,58 %16 NS 4C W = -620 4 22.22
17 NS 4C E+1 -450 4 22.22
18 NS 3S E+1 -430 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
a.1 ALLARD Jean-Marie -JAUMOTTE Jean-Marie : 38,70 %19 NS 3K W = -110 2 11.11
20 NS 2T W+3 -150 12 66.67
21 NS 2S N = 120 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a11 VAN DOOREN Michele -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,19 %22 NS 1S N-2 -100 16 88.89
23 NS 4C E+1 -650 0 0.00
24 NS 2T E+3 -150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a10 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,03 %25 NS 3S E-1 100 17 94.44
26 NS 3S E-1 100 17 94.44
27 NS 3S W = -400 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
a.9 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,23 %28 NS 2S E-1 50 8 44.44
29 NS 4PcW-2 500 10 55.56
30 NS 3C S-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a12 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 51,03 %31 NS 4CcS-1 -200 5 27.78
32 NS 2P W-1 100 15 83.33
33 NS 2P S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 246,0 / 540 = 45,56 %
PAIRE Nr : A.5 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
a.9 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,23 % 1 NS 2P E+3 -200 13 72.22
2 NS 1S W = -90 9 50.00
3 NS 6ScW-4 1100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
a.8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,33 % 4 NS 2P E+2 -170 8 44.44
5 NS 6P E = -980 10 55.56
6 NS 1S E = -90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.7 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 39,51 % 7 NS 4T W-1 100 3 16.67
8 NS 2S E-2 100 13 72.22
9 NS 1S E-2 200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.5 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 43,21 %13 NS 3S W = -600 7 38.89
14 NS 5KcS = 550 18 100.00
15 NS 6P S-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,09 %16 NS 2C W+2 -170 7 38.89
17 NS 4C E = -420 12 66.67
18 NS 3S E-1 50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a12 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 51,03 %19 NS 4K W-1 100 9 50.00
20 NS 3S W+3 -690 3 16.67
21 NS 2CcN+1 870 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.2 JANSSENS Pierre -MATELART Marc : 63,58 %22 NS 3C W = -140 7 38.89
23 NS 4C W = -620 10 55.56
24 NS 2S W+1 -150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.1 ALLARD Jean-Marie -JAUMOTTE Jean-Marie : 38,70 %25 NS 5K E = -600 4 22.22
26 NS 2S E = -120 12 66.67
27 NS 2C E+1 -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a11 VAN DOOREN Michele -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,19 %28 NS 3S E-2 100 15 83.33
29 NS 4P W-4 400 6 33.33
30 NS 4T W+1 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a10 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,03 %31 NS 5CcS-3 -800 0 0.00
32 NS 1S E+1 -120 2 11.11
33 NS 2C S = 110 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
Total : 274,0 / 540 = 50,74 %
PAIRE Nr : A.6 COLLET Edgard -BEYNE Anne
a11 VAN DOOREN Michele -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,19 % 1 NS 2P E+3 -200 13 72.22
2 NS 1S W+2 -150 1 5.56
3 NS 3S E+2 -660 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
a10 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,03 % 4 NS 2P E-1 100 15 83.33
5 NS 6S E+1 -1020 1 5.56
6 NS 1S E-2 200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a12 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 51,03 % 7 NS 3C E-3 300 15 83.33
8 NS 3K N-3 -150 0 0.00
9 NS 1K N+1 90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,33 %10 NS 5T N-2 -200 2 11.11
11 NS 2P S+2 170 14 77.78
12 NS 3S W+1 -430 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 62,76 %16 NS 2C W+1 -140 10 55.56
17 NS 4C E+1 -450 4 22.22
18 NS 3S E+1 -430 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.5 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 43,21 %19 NS 5K W-2 200 17 94.44
20 NS 3S E+3 -690 3 16.67
21 NS 2S S+2 180 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,09 %22 NS 3C W = -140 7 38.89
23 NS 4C W = -620 10 55.56
24 NS 2S W = -120 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 56,58 %25 NS 3K E+2 -150 12 66.67
26 NS 2C N-2 -200 8 44.44
27 NS 3K W+1 -130 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.2 JANSSENS Pierre -MATELART Marc : 63,58 %28 NS 3S E-2 100 15 83.33
29 NS 4P W-2 200 3 16.67
30 NS 2T W+2 -130 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.1 ALLARD Jean-Marie -JAUMOTTE Jean-Marie : 38,70 %31 NS 4C S-1 -100 9 50.00
32 NS 2T W = -90 10 55.56
33 NS 2P S-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 260,0 / 540 = 48,15 %
PAIRE Nr : A.7 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette
a.2 JANSSENS Pierre -MATELART Marc : 63,58 % 1 NS 4P E = -420 7 38.89
2 NS 1S W = -90 9 50.00
3 NS 3S E+2 -660 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.1 ALLARD Jean-Marie -JAUMOTTE Jean-Marie : 38,70 % 4 NS 3S E-1 100 15 83.33
5 NS 4P E+1 -450 16 88.89
6 NS 1S E-1 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
a11 VAN DOOREN Michele -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,19 % 7 NS 4T W-2 200 11 61.11
8 NS 2S W-2 100 13 72.22
9 NS 2C N-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a10 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,03 %10 NS 3S S+1 630 14 77.78
11 NS 1S E-2 100 4 22.22
12 NS 3S W-2 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.9 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,23 %13 NS 2C E+2 -170 13 72.22
14 NS 4C W-2 100 7 38.89
15 NS 4C S+1 650 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.7 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 39,51 %19 NS 5K W-2 200 17 94.44
20 NS 3S E+1 -630 10 55.56
21 NS 2S S+2 180 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
a.6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 62,76 %22 NS 3C W = -140 7 38.89
23 NS 4C W = -620 10 55.56
24 NS 1S W+1 -120 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.5 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 43,21 %25 NS 2S E+2 -180 8 44.44
26 NS 3S E-1 100 17 94.44
27 NS 2S W+1 -150 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
a12 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 51,03 %28 NS 3S E-2 100 15 83.33
29 NS 4P W-2 200 3 16.67
30 NS 2T W+2 -130 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 56,58 %31 NS 4P N-1 -100 9 50.00
32 NS 2T W+1 -110 5 27.78
33 NS 2P S-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
Total : 294,0 / 540 = 54,44 %
PAIRE Nr : A.8 LIBERT Laurent -HUBLET Carlo
a.4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,09 % 1 NS 4P E = -420 7 38.89
2 NS 2P W+1 -140 4 22.22
3 NS 3S E-1 100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 56,58 % 4 NS 2P E+2 -170 8 44.44
5 NS 6P E-1 50 18 100.00
6 NS 1S E-2 200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
a.2 JANSSENS Pierre -MATELART Marc : 63,58 % 7 NS 4T W-2 200 11 61.11
8 NS 1S E-2 100 13 72.22
9 NS 2C S-2 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.1 ALLARD Jean-Marie -JAUMOTTE Jean-Marie : 38,70 %10 NS 3PcW-4 1100 18 100.00
11 NS 2P S+2 170 14 77.78
12 NS 3S W-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
a11 VAN DOOREN Michele -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,19 %13 NS 4C W = -620 2 11.11
14 NS 4CcE-2 300 12 66.67
15 NS 4P S+1 650 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a12 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 51,03 %16 NS 3S S-2 -100 16 88.89
17 NS 6C E-1 50 17 94.44
18 NS 3S E = -400 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
a.8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,33 %22 NS 3C W = -140 7 38.89
23 NS 4C W = -620 10 55.56
24 NS 2S W = -120 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.7 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 39,51 %25 NS 2C W-1 100 17 94.44
26 NS 1K E = -70 14 77.78
27 NS 3S W+1 -430 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 62,76 %28 NS 2T W-2 100 15 83.33
29 NS 4PcW-2 500 10 55.56
30 NS 2T W+2 -130 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.5 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 43,21 %31 NS 4KcE-1 100 12 66.67
32 NS 2T W+1 -110 5 27.78
33 NS 2C S = 110 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 322,0 / 540 = 59,63 %
PAIRE Nr : A.9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
a.6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 62,76 % 1 NS 2P E+2 -170 16 88.89
2 NS 1S W+2 -150 1 5.56
3 NS 3S E+2 -660 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a12 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 51,03 % 4 NS 4PcE = -790 1 5.56
5 NS 6P E = -980 10 55.56
6 NS 1S E = -90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
a.4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,09 % 7 NS 3C E-3 300 15 83.33
8 NS 1C E+1 -110 3 16.67
9 NS 3S N-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 56,58 %10 NS 4T S-2 -200 2 11.11
11 NS 1S E-2 100 4 22.22
12 NS 2PcN-2 -500 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
a.2 JANSSENS Pierre -MATELART Marc : 63,58 %13 NS 3S W = -600 7 38.89
14 NS 4K S = 130 10 55.56
15 NS 4P S = 620 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.1 ALLARD Jean-Marie -JAUMOTTE Jean-Marie : 38,70 %16 NS 3CcW = -730 2 11.11
17 NS 3S W+1 -430 8 44.44
18 NS 2T E+2 -130 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a11 VAN DOOREN Michele -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,19 %19 NS 3K W = -110 2 11.11
20 NS 3C E = -140 16 88.89
21 NS 2C S = 110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.9 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,23 %25 NS 5K E = -600 4 22.22
26 NS 3S E = -600 3 16.67
27 NS 3S W+2 -460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
a.8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,33 %28 NS 3S E-1 50 8 44.44
29 NS 3KcN+2 1070 16 88.89
30 NS 3K N-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a.7 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 39,51 %31 NS 5KcW-4 800 18 100.00
32 NS 1P S = 80 12 66.67
33 NS 2P S-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
Total : 209,0 / 540 = 38,70 %
PAIRE Nr : A10 VEUGELERS Jean-Pierre -ARICKX Roger
a.8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,33 % 1 NS 4P E = -420 7 38.89
2 NS 1S W+1 -120 6 33.33
3 NS 4C W-4 400 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.7 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 39,51 % 4 NS 1P E+2 -140 12 66.67
5 NS 6S E = -990 4 22.22
6 NS 2P S = 110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 62,76 % 7 NS 3K N+1 130 7 38.89
8 NS 2C E = -110 3 16.67
9 NS 1P N-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.5 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 43,21 %10 NS 3S S-1 -100 8 44.44
11 NS 2C W-2 100 4 22.22
12 NS 3S W-2 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,09 %13 NS 4C E = -620 2 11.11
14 NS 5K S-2 -100 2 11.11
15 NS 4P S+1 650 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
a.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 56,58 %16 NS 2C W+2 -170 7 38.89
17 NS 4C W = -420 12 66.67
18 NS 2CcS-3 -800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.2 JANSSENS Pierre -MATELART Marc : 63,58 %19 NS 3S W-1 100 9 50.00
20 NS 3S W+3 -690 3 16.67
21 NS 3S S-3 -300 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
a.1 ALLARD Jean-Marie -JAUMOTTE Jean-Marie : 38,70 %22 NS 3C W = -140 7 38.89
23 NS 3S E = -600 17 94.44
24 NS 2P E = -110 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
a10 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,03 %28 NS 1S W = -90 4 22.22
29 NS 4PcW-2 500 10 55.56
30 NS 3T W = -110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.9 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,23 %31 NS 4C S-3 -300 2 11.11
32 NS 1S E+2 -150 0 0.00
33 NS 1S S = 90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
Total : 222,0 / 540 = 41,11 %
PAIRE Nr : A11 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
a10 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,03 % 1 NS 4P E+1 -450 1 5.56
2 NS 3P W-1 50 12 66.67
3 NS 3S W = -600 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.9 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,23 % 4 NS 3P E-2 200 18 100.00
5 NS 6S E+1 -1020 1 5.56
6 NS 2P S+1 140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,33 % 7 NS 3T W-1 100 3 16.67
8 NS 1S N = 90 8 44.44
9 NS 1S E = -90 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
a.7 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 39,51 %10 NS 6T N-2 -200 2 11.11
11 NS 1S E = -90 0 0.00
12 NS 3S W+1 -430 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
a12 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 51,03 %13 NS 4C E = -620 2 11.11
14 NS 3S N+1 430 14 77.78
15 NS 4P S+2 680 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.5 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 43,21 %16 NS 2C W = -110 13 72.22
17 NS 5C E-1 50 17 94.44
18 NS 3S E+1 -430 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
a.4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,09 %19 NS 3S E-1 100 9 50.00
20 NS 3C E = -140 16 88.89
21 NS 2C S = 110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 56,58 %22 NS 3P S = 140 18 100.00
23 NS 4C E = -620 10 55.56
24 NS 2S W+1 -150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.2 JANSSENS Pierre -MATELART Marc : 63,58 %25 NS 2K E+3 -150 12 66.67
26 NS 3S E = -600 3 16.67
27 NS 4C W-2 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a11 VAN DOOREN Michele -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,19 %31 NS 4CcS-1 -200 5 27.78
32 NS 3T W-2 200 18 100.00
33 NS 2P S = 110 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
Total : 278,0 / 540 = 51,48 %
PAIRE Nr : A12 -
a12 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 51,03 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.5 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 43,21 % 4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.9 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,23 % 7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.2 JANSSENS Pierre -MATELART Marc : 63,58 %10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 62,76 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a10 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,03 %16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 56,58 %19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.7 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 39,51 %22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,09 %28 NS BYE 0 0.00
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,33 %31 NS BYE 0 0.00
32 NS BYE 0 0.00
33 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 594 = 0,00 %
PAIRE Nr : a.1 ALLARD Jean-Marie -JAUMOTTE Jean-Marie
A.1 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,96 % 1 EO 4P E = -420 11 61.11
2 EO 3P E-2 100 3 16.67
3 EO 3S W-1 100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.7 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 54,44 % 4 EO 3S E-1 100 3 16.67
5 EO 4P E+1 -450 2 11.11
6 EO 1S E-1 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
A.2 VAGMAN David -BERGER Jean Marie : 51,11 % 7 EO 1K S+3 130 11 61.11
8 EO 2K N+1 110 0 0.00
9 EO 1K N+1 90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
A.8 LIBERT Laurent -HUBLET Carlo : 59,63 %10 EO 3PcW-4 1100 0 0.00
11 EO 2P S+2 170 4 22.22
12 EO 3S W-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
A.3 NELIS Claude -CASSART Guy : 61,11 %13 EO 2C E+1 -140 0 0.00
14 EO 4P S-1 -50 14 77.78
15 EO 4P S+2 680 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A.9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 38,70 %16 EO 3CcW = -730 16 88.89
17 EO 3S W+1 -430 10 55.56
18 EO 2T E+2 -130 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.4 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 45,56 %19 EO 3K W = -110 16 88.89
20 EO 2T W+3 -150 6 33.33
21 EO 2S N = 120 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A10 VEUGELERS Jean-Pierre -ARICKX Roger : 41,11 %22 EO 3C W = -140 11 61.11
23 EO 3S E = -600 1 5.56
24 EO 2P E = -110 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
A.5 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,74 %25 EO 5K E = -600 14 77.78
26 EO 2S E = -120 6 33.33
27 EO 2C E+1 -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.6 COLLET Edgard -BEYNE Anne : 48,15 %31 EO 4C S-1 -100 9 50.00
32 EO 2T W = -90 8 44.44
33 EO 2P S-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 209,0 / 540 = 38,70 %
PAIRE Nr : a.2 JANSSENS Pierre -MATELART Marc
A.7 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 54,44 % 1 EO 4P E = -420 11 61.11
2 EO 1S W = -90 9 50.00
3 EO 3S E+2 -660 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.2 VAGMAN David -BERGER Jean Marie : 51,11 % 4 EO 4PcE = -790 17 94.44
5 EO 6P E = -980 8 44.44
6 EO 1S E+1 -120 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
A.8 LIBERT Laurent -HUBLET Carlo : 59,63 % 7 EO 4T W-2 200 7 38.89
8 EO 1S E-2 100 5 27.78
9 EO 2C S-2 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A12 - : 0,00 %10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 38,70 %13 EO 3S W = -600 11 61.11
14 EO 4K S = 130 8 44.44
15 EO 4P S = 620 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.4 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 45,56 %16 EO 4C W = -620 14 77.78
17 EO 4C E+1 -450 14 77.78
18 EO 3S E+1 -430 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
A10 VEUGELERS Jean-Pierre -ARICKX Roger : 41,11 %19 EO 3S W-1 100 9 50.00
20 EO 3S W+3 -690 15 83.33
21 EO 3S S-3 -300 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
A.5 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,74 %22 EO 3C W = -140 11 61.11
23 EO 4C W = -620 8 44.44
24 EO 2S W+1 -150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A11 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 51,48 %25 EO 2K E+3 -150 6 33.33
26 EO 3S E = -600 15 83.33
27 EO 4C W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.6 COLLET Edgard -BEYNE Anne : 48,15 %28 EO 3S E-2 100 3 16.67
29 EO 4P W-2 200 15 83.33
30 EO 2T W+2 -130 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 309,0 / 486 = 63,58 %
PAIRE Nr : a.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
A.8 LIBERT Laurent -HUBLET Carlo : 59,63 % 4 EO 2P E+2 -170 10 55.56
5 EO 6P E-1 50 0 0.00
6 EO 1S E-2 200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
A.3 NELIS Claude -CASSART Guy : 61,11 % 7 EO 3KcN = 670 0 0.00
8 EO 2K N-1 -50 12 66.67
9 EO 2P W = -110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 38,70 %10 EO 4T S-2 -200 16 88.89
11 EO 1S E-2 100 14 77.78
12 EO 2PcN-2 -500 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
A.4 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 45,56 %13 EO 2C E+2 -170 5 27.78
14 EO 3C W = -140 18 100.00
15 EO 4P S+1 650 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A10 VEUGELERS Jean-Pierre -ARICKX Roger : 41,11 %16 EO 2C W+2 -170 11 61.11
17 EO 4C W = -420 6 33.33
18 EO 2CcS-3 -800 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A12 - : 0,00 %19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A11 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 51,48 %22 EO 3P S = 140 0 0.00
23 EO 4C E = -620 8 44.44
24 EO 2S W+1 -150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.6 COLLET Edgard -BEYNE Anne : 48,15 %25 EO 3K E+2 -150 6 33.33
26 EO 2C N-2 -200 10 55.56
27 EO 3K W+1 -130 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.1 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,96 %28 EO 2S E = -120 17 94.44
29 EO 3P W = -140 18 100.00
30 EO 2T W+1 -110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
A.7 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 54,44 %31 EO 4P N-1 -100 9 50.00
32 EO 2T W+1 -110 13 72.22
33 EO 2P S-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
Total : 275,0 / 486 = 56,58 %
PAIRE Nr : a.4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
A.8 LIBERT Laurent -HUBLET Carlo : 59,63 % 1 EO 4P E = -420 11 61.11
2 EO 2P W+1 -140 14 77.78
3 EO 3S E-1 100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 38,70 % 7 EO 3C E-3 300 3 16.67
8 EO 1C E+1 -110 15 83.33
9 EO 3S N-3 -150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.4 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 45,56 %10 EO 3S S = 600 8 44.44
11 EO 2P S+2 170 4 22.22
12 EO 3PcN-3 -800 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A10 VEUGELERS Jean-Pierre -ARICKX Roger : 41,11 %13 EO 4C E = -620 16 88.89
14 EO 5K S-2 -100 16 88.89
15 EO 4P S+1 650 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
A.5 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,74 %16 EO 2C W+2 -170 11 61.11
17 EO 4C E = -420 6 33.33
18 EO 3S E-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A11 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 51,48 %19 EO 3S E-1 100 9 50.00
20 EO 3C E = -140 2 11.11
21 EO 2C S = 110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.6 COLLET Edgard -BEYNE Anne : 48,15 %22 EO 3C W = -140 11 61.11
23 EO 4C W = -620 8 44.44
24 EO 2S W = -120 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.1 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,96 %25 EO 5K E = -600 14 77.78
26 EO 3S E = -600 15 83.33
27 EO 3S E = -400 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
A12 - : 0,00 %28 EO BYE 0 0.00
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.2 VAGMAN David -BERGER Jean Marie : 51,11 %31 EO 3P N = 140 4 22.22
32 EO 2T W-1 100 3 16.67
33 EO 2P S = 110 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
Total : 258,0 / 486 = 53,09 %
PAIRE Nr : a.5 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
A.3 NELIS Claude -CASSART Guy : 61,11 % 1 EO 4P E+1 -450 17 94.44
2 EO 4P W-3 150 0 0.00
3 EO 3S E-2 200 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A12 - : 0,00 % 4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A10 VEUGELERS Jean-Pierre -ARICKX Roger : 41,11 %10 EO 3S S-1 -100 10 55.56
11 EO 2C W-2 100 14 77.78
12 EO 3S W-2 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.5 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,74 %13 EO 3S W = -600 11 61.11
14 EO 5KcS = 550 0 0.00
15 EO 6P S-1 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A11 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 51,48 %16 EO 2C W = -110 5 27.78
17 EO 5C E-1 50 1 5.56
18 EO 3S E+1 -430 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
A.6 COLLET Edgard -BEYNE Anne : 48,15 %19 EO 5K W-2 200 1 5.56
20 EO 3S E+3 -690 15 83.33
21 EO 2S S+2 180 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.1 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,96 %22 EO 3C W = -140 11 61.11
23 EO 3S E+1 -630 15 83.33
24 EO 2S W = -120 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A.7 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 54,44 %25 EO 2S E+2 -180 10 55.56
26 EO 3S E-1 100 1 5.56
27 EO 2S W+1 -150 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
A.2 VAGMAN David -BERGER Jean Marie : 51,11 %28 EO 2S W = -120 17 94.44
29 EO 4PxW-3 1600 0 0.00
30 EO 4T W-1 50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
A.8 LIBERT Laurent -HUBLET Carlo : 59,63 %31 EO 4KcE-1 100 6 33.33
32 EO 2T W+1 -110 13 72.22
33 EO 2C S = 110 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 210,0 / 486 = 43,21 %
PAIRE Nr : a.6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
A.9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 38,70 % 1 EO 2P E+2 -170 2 11.11
2 EO 1S W+2 -150 17 94.44
3 EO 3S E+2 -660 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.4 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 45,56 % 4 EO 4P E = -620 14 77.78
5 EO 6P E = -980 8 44.44
6 EO 1S E+1 -120 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
A10 VEUGELERS Jean-Pierre -ARICKX Roger : 41,11 % 7 EO 3K N+1 130 11 61.11
8 EO 2C E = -110 15 83.33
9 EO 1P N-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A12 - : 0,00 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.6 COLLET Edgard -BEYNE Anne : 48,15 %16 EO 2C W+1 -140 8 44.44
17 EO 4C E+1 -450 14 77.78
18 EO 3S E+1 -430 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.1 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,96 %19 EO 4K W-1 100 9 50.00
20 EO 3S E+3 -690 15 83.33
21 EO 3S S-3 -300 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
A.7 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 54,44 %22 EO 3C W = -140 11 61.11
23 EO 4C W = -620 8 44.44
24 EO 1S W+1 -120 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.2 VAGMAN David -BERGER Jean Marie : 51,11 %25 EO 3S E+1 -630 18 100.00
26 EO 3S E = -600 15 83.33
27 EO 2S W+3 -210 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
A.8 LIBERT Laurent -HUBLET Carlo : 59,63 %28 EO 2T W-2 100 3 16.67
29 EO 4PcW-2 500 8 44.44
30 EO 2T W+2 -130 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.3 NELIS Claude -CASSART Guy : 61,11 %31 EO 5KcE-3 500 2 11.11
32 EO 1S N-2 -100 10 55.56
33 EO 2P S-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 305,0 / 486 = 62,76 %
PAIRE Nr : a.7 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert
A.4 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 45,56 % 1 EO 2P E+1 -140 0 0.00
2 EO 4P E-2 100 3 16.67
3 EO 2P N-3 -150 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
A10 VEUGELERS Jean-Pierre -ARICKX Roger : 41,11 % 4 EO 1P E+2 -140 6 33.33
5 EO 6S E = -990 14 77.78
6 EO 2P S = 110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.5 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,74 % 7 EO 4T W-1 100 15 83.33
8 EO 2S E-2 100 5 27.78
9 EO 1S E-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A11 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 51,48 %10 EO 6T N-2 -200 16 88.89
11 EO 1S E = -90 18 100.00
12 EO 3S W+1 -430 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
A.1 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,96 %16 EO 1S S+1 120 0 0.00
17 EO 3S W+3 -490 18 100.00
18 EO 2S W = -120 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.7 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 54,44 %19 EO 5K W-2 200 1 5.56
20 EO 3S E+1 -630 8 44.44
21 EO 2S S+2 180 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
A12 - : 0,00 %22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.8 LIBERT Laurent -HUBLET Carlo : 59,63 %25 EO 2C W-1 100 1 5.56
26 EO 1K E = -70 4 22.22
27 EO 3S W+1 -430 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.3 NELIS Claude -CASSART Guy : 61,11 %28 EO 3S E-1 50 10 55.56
29 EO 4PcW-3 800 4 22.22
30 EO 2C S+2 170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
A.9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 38,70 %31 EO 5KcW-4 800 0 0.00
32 EO 1P S = 80 6 33.33
33 EO 2P S-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
Total : 192,0 / 486 = 39,51 %
PAIRE Nr : a.8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
A10 VEUGELERS Jean-Pierre -ARICKX Roger : 41,11 % 1 EO 4P E = -420 11 61.11
2 EO 1S W+1 -120 12 66.67
3 EO 4C W-4 400 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.5 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,74 % 4 EO 2P E+2 -170 10 55.56
5 EO 6P E = -980 8 44.44
6 EO 1S E = -90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A11 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 51,48 % 7 EO 3T W-1 100 15 83.33
8 EO 1S N = 90 10 55.56
9 EO 1S E = -90 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
A.6 COLLET Edgard -BEYNE Anne : 48,15 %10 EO 5T N-2 -200 16 88.89
11 EO 2P S+2 170 4 22.22
12 EO 3S W+1 -430 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.1 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,96 %13 EO 2C E+2 -170 5 27.78
14 EO 4C W-2 100 11 61.11
15 EO 4P S+2 680 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
A.2 VAGMAN David -BERGER Jean Marie : 51,11 %19 EO 4T S = 130 4 22.22
20 EO 3S W+2 -660 10 55.56
21 EO 5C S-2 -200 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.8 LIBERT Laurent -HUBLET Carlo : 59,63 %22 EO 3C W = -140 11 61.11
23 EO 4C W = -620 8 44.44
24 EO 2S W = -120 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 NELIS Claude -CASSART Guy : 61,11 %25 EO 3K E+2 -150 6 33.33
26 EO 1P E+2 -140 8 44.44
27 EO 2S W = -120 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
A.9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 38,70 %28 EO 3S E-1 50 10 55.56
29 EO 3KcN+2 1070 2 11.11
30 EO 3K N-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A12 - : 0,00 %31 EO BYE 0 0.00
32 EO BYE 0 0.00
33 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 230,0 / 486 = 47,33 %
PAIRE Nr : a.9 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard
A.5 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,74 % 1 EO 2P E+3 -200 5 27.78
2 EO 1S W = -90 9 50.00
3 EO 6ScW-4 1100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
A11 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 51,48 % 4 EO 3P E-2 200 0 0.00
5 EO 6S E+1 -1020 17 94.44
6 EO 2P S+1 140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A12 - : 0,00 % 7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.1 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,96 %10 EO 3S S+1 630 4 22.22
11 EO 2P S+2 170 4 22.22
12 EO 3S W-2 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
A.7 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 54,44 %13 EO 2C E+2 -170 5 27.78
14 EO 4C W-2 100 11 61.11
15 EO 4C S+1 650 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.2 VAGMAN David -BERGER Jean Marie : 51,11 %16 EO 4CcW = -790 18 100.00
17 EO 4C E+1 -450 14 77.78
18 EO 3S E+1 -430 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
A.3 NELIS Claude -CASSART Guy : 61,11 %22 EO 3C W = -140 11 61.11
23 EO 3S W = -600 1 5.56
24 EO 2S W = -120 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 38,70 %25 EO 5K E = -600 14 77.78
26 EO 3S E = -600 15 83.33
27 EO 3S W+2 -460 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
A.4 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 45,56 %28 EO 2S E-1 50 10 55.56
29 EO 4PcW-2 500 8 44.44
30 EO 3C S-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A10 VEUGELERS Jean-Pierre -ARICKX Roger : 41,11 %31 EO 4C S-3 -300 16 88.89
32 EO 1S E+2 -150 18 100.00
33 EO 1S S = 90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
Total : 249,0 / 486 = 51,23 %
PAIRE Nr : a10 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
A11 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 51,48 % 1 EO 4P E+1 -450 17 94.44
2 EO 3P W-1 50 6 33.33
3 EO 3S W = -600 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.6 COLLET Edgard -BEYNE Anne : 48,15 % 4 EO 2P E-1 100 3 16.67
5 EO 6S E+1 -1020 17 94.44
6 EO 1S E-2 200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.1 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,96 % 7 EO 4K N-1 -100 18 100.00
8 EO 3P W-2 100 5 27.78
9 EO 1S E-1 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.7 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 54,44 %10 EO 3S S+1 630 4 22.22
11 EO 1S E-2 100 14 77.78
12 EO 3S W-2 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.2 VAGMAN David -BERGER Jean Marie : 51,11 %13 EO 2C E+2 -170 5 27.78
14 EO 4CcW-3 500 2 11.11
15 EO 4P S+2 680 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
A12 - : 0,00 %16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.3 NELIS Claude -CASSART Guy : 61,11 %19 EO 3K W = -110 16 88.89
20 EO 2C E+1 -140 2 11.11
21 EO 3S N = 600 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.4 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 45,56 %25 EO 3S E-1 100 1 5.56
26 EO 3S E-1 100 1 5.56
27 EO 3S W = -400 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
A10 VEUGELERS Jean-Pierre -ARICKX Roger : 41,11 %28 EO 1S W = -90 14 77.78
29 EO 4PcW-2 500 8 44.44
30 EO 3T W = -110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.5 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,74 %31 EO 5CcS-3 -800 18 100.00
32 EO 1S E+1 -120 16 88.89
33 EO 2C S = 110 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
Total : 214,0 / 486 = 44,03 %
PAIRE Nr : a11 VAN DOOREN Michele -MOSSERAY Etienne
A.6 COLLET Edgard -BEYNE Anne : 48,15 % 1 EO 2P E+3 -200 5 27.78
2 EO 1S W+2 -150 17 94.44
3 EO 3S E+2 -660 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
A.1 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,96 % 4 EO 2P E+2 -170 10 55.56
5 EO 6P E = -980 8 44.44
6 EO 2T N+1 110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.7 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 54,44 % 7 EO 4T W-2 200 7 38.89
8 EO 2S W-2 100 5 27.78
9 EO 2C N-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.2 VAGMAN David -BERGER Jean Marie : 51,11 %10 EO 3S S+1 630 4 22.22
11 EO 3C W-3 150 10 55.56
12 EO 3S W+1 -430 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.8 LIBERT Laurent -HUBLET Carlo : 59,63 %13 EO 4C W = -620 16 88.89
14 EO 4CcE-2 300 6 33.33
15 EO 4P S+1 650 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.3 NELIS Claude -CASSART Guy : 61,11 %16 EO 2C W = -110 5 27.78
17 EO 4C E = -420 6 33.33
18 EO 2T W+2 -130 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
A.9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 38,70 %19 EO 3K W = -110 16 88.89
20 EO 3C E = -140 2 11.11
21 EO 2C S = 110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.4 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 45,56 %22 EO 1S N-2 -100 2 11.11
23 EO 4C E+1 -650 18 100.00
24 EO 2T E+3 -150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.5 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,74 %28 EO 3S E-2 100 3 16.67
29 EO 4P W-4 400 12 66.67
30 EO 4T W+1 -150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A11 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 51,48 %31 EO 4CcS-1 -200 13 72.22
32 EO 3T W-2 200 0 0.00
33 EO 2P S = 110 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
Total : 271,0 / 540 = 50,19 %
PAIRE Nr : a12 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François
A12 - : 0,00 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 38,70 % 4 EO 4PcE = -790 17 94.44
5 EO 6P E = -980 8 44.44
6 EO 1S E = -90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
A.6 COLLET Edgard -BEYNE Anne : 48,15 % 7 EO 3C E-3 300 3 16.67
8 EO 3K N-3 -150 18 100.00
9 EO 1K N+1 90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.3 NELIS Claude -CASSART Guy : 61,11 %10 EO 3K E = -110 12 66.67
11 EO 2P N+2 170 4 22.22
12 EO 2PcN-3 -800 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A11 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 51,48 %13 EO 4C E = -620 16 88.89
14 EO 3S N+1 430 4 22.22
15 EO 4P S+2 680 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A.8 LIBERT Laurent -HUBLET Carlo : 59,63 %16 EO 3S S-2 -100 2 11.11
17 EO 6C E-1 50 1 5.56
18 EO 3S E = -400 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
A.5 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,74 %19 EO 4K W-1 100 9 50.00
20 EO 3S W+3 -690 15 83.33
21 EO 2CcN+1 870 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.2 VAGMAN David -BERGER Jean Marie : 51,11 %22 EO 3C W = -140 11 61.11
23 EO 3S W+1 -630 15 83.33
24 EO 2C W = -110 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.7 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 54,44 %28 EO 3S E-2 100 3 16.67
29 EO 4P W-2 200 15 83.33
30 EO 2T W+2 -130 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.4 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 45,56 %31 EO 4CcS-1 -200 13 72.22
32 EO 2P W-1 100 3 16.67
33 EO 2P S-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 248,0 / 486 = 51,03 %
|
|