|
Tournoi du 11-01-16
1 69,26 A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
2 62,59 A.3 BRIOT Fernand -CASSART Guy
3 60,93 A.8 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno
4 50,74 A.4 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
5 50,56 A.5 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
6 50,19 A.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
7 47,22 A.6 COLLET Edgard -VUYTS Michèle
8 42,41 A.7 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN Robert
9 38,15 A10 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine
10 27,96 A.1 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 60,19 a.9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
2 60,00 a.7 BABIKOW Georges -MATELART Marc
3 55,56 a.6 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
4 53,89 a.3 GERARD Francis -de NICOLAS Bernard
5 50,56 a.1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine
6 50,00 a.4 GROSFILS Colette -MASSAUX Joel
7 49,81 a.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
8 48,52 a10 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
9 42,96 a.8 DANTINNE Pierre -DELHEZ Jacques
10 28,52 a.5 COLLET Claudine -ARICKX Roger
PAIRE Nr : A.1 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga
a.1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 50,56 % 1 NS 1ScN-3 -500 4 22.22
2 NS 1S S+2 150 4 22.22
3 NS 2C W = -110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
a.3 GERARD Francis -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,89 % 4 NS 3T W-2 200 8 44.44
5 NS 2S N = 120 0 0.00
6 NS 3S E+2 -660 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
a.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 49,81 % 7 NS 2CcS-2 -500 4 22.22
8 NS 3T S = 110 10 55.56
9 NS 5TcS-3 -500 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.6 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 55,56 %10 NS 4P E = -620 6 33.33
11 NS 2T E-2 100 11 61.11
12 NS 1S E+2 -150 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.7 BABIKOW Georges -MATELART Marc : 60,00 %13 NS 2C W+1 -140 2 11.11
14 NS 3S N = 400 2 11.11
15 NS 2C E+2 -170 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
a.8 DANTINNE Pierre -DELHEZ Jacques : 42,96 %16 NS 4P S-2 -100 0 0.00
17 NS 4C N+3 510 4 22.22
18 NS 1S S = 90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
a.9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 60,19 %19 NS 4C W = -620 3 16.67
20 NS 2P W = -110 2 11.11
21 NS 4P W = -420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
a10 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 48,52 %22 NS 3T N+1 130 0 0.00
23 NS 3S N+1 630 1 5.56
24 NS 3C E = -140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 5,56 %
a.4 GROSFILS Colette -MASSAUX Joel : 50,00 %25 NS 3K N-1 -50 1 5.56
26 NS 3P E = -140 1 5.56
27 NS 2S N+1 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 3,70 %
a.5 COLLET Claudine -ARICKX Roger : 28,52 %28 NS 4P E+1 -450 11 61.11
29 NS 2K N+1 110 10 55.56
30 NS 4K W-1 50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 151,0 / 540 = 27,96 %
PAIRE Nr : A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
a.3 GERARD Francis -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,89 % 1 NS 3P E-1 50 16 88.89
2 NS 3S S = 600 9 50.00
3 NS 3C W-1 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
a.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 49,81 % 4 NS 4P N-1 -100 3 16.67
5 NS 3S S+2 660 17 94.44
6 NS 3K E+1 -130 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 50,56 % 7 NS 4P E-1 100 10 55.56
8 NS 2P N+1 140 17 94.44
9 NS 5C E-1 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
a10 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 48,52 %10 NS 4P E-1 100 15 83.33
11 NS 2S S-1 -50 5 27.78
12 NS 1S E = -90 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
a.4 GROSFILS Colette -MASSAUX Joel : 50,00 %13 NS 2C E-1 100 14 77.78
14 NS 3S S+2 460 15 83.33
15 NS 2S E-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
a.5 COLLET Claudine -ARICKX Roger : 28,52 %16 NS 4C S+1 450 18 100.00
17 NS 6C N = 980 12 66.67
18 NS 1S S+2 150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
a.6 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 55,56 %19 NS 2T E-1 100 15 83.33
20 NS 2S N = 120 14 77.78
21 NS 4P E = -420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
a.7 BABIKOW Georges -MATELART Marc : 60,00 %22 NS 3S S+2 460 9 50.00
23 NS 4P S+2 680 15 83.33
24 NS 4T S = 130 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.8 DANTINNE Pierre -DELHEZ Jacques : 42,96 %25 NS 3T E-3 300 16 88.89
26 NS 4C S = 620 15 83.33
27 NS 3S N+1 430 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 60,19 %28 NS 5C W+1 -480 2 11.11
29 NS 3S N-1 -100 4 22.22
30 NS 5K E-1 50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 374,0 / 540 = 69,26 %
PAIRE Nr : A.3 BRIOT Fernand -CASSART Guy
a.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 49,81 % 1 NS 3P E+1 -170 8 44.44
2 NS 3S S = 600 9 50.00
3 NS 5K S-3 -150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 50,56 % 4 NS 4P S = 620 17 94.44
5 NS 2K N+3 150 7 38.89
6 NS 5K E-1 100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
a.3 GERARD Francis -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,89 % 7 NS 5KcN = 750 18 100.00
8 NS 4P N-2 -100 1 5.56
9 NS 5TcS-2 -300 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.8 DANTINNE Pierre -DELHEZ Jacques : 42,96 %10 NS 4P E-1 100 15 83.33
11 NS 2S S+2 180 18 100.00
12 NS 1S E = -90 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
a.9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 60,19 %13 NS 2C E+1 -140 2 11.11
14 NS 3S N+2 460 15 83.33
15 NS 2P E+1 -140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a10 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 48,52 %16 NS 2P S+1 140 16 88.89
17 NS 6C N = 980 12 66.67
18 NS 1S S = 90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
a.4 GROSFILS Colette -MASSAUX Joel : 50,00 %19 NS 4C W = -620 3 16.67
20 NS 2S N+1 150 16 88.89
21 NS 4P E = -420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.5 COLLET Claudine -ARICKX Roger : 28,52 %22 NS 6T N = 920 18 100.00
23 NS 4P S+2 680 15 83.33
24 NS 3T S+1 130 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
a.6 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 55,56 %25 NS 2K N+3 150 13 72.22
26 NS 4C S = 620 15 83.33
27 NS 3S S+2 460 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
a.7 BABIKOW Georges -MATELART Marc : 60,00 %28 NS 4P W+2 -480 2 11.11
29 NS 3S S-1 -100 4 22.22
30 NS 5KcW-1 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 338,0 / 540 = 62,59 %
PAIRE Nr : A.4 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
a.7 BABIKOW Georges -MATELART Marc : 60,00 % 1 NS 3P E+1 -170 8 44.44
2 NS 2S N = 120 2 11.11
3 NS 5K S-3 -150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
a.6 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 55,56 % 4 NS 3P N+1 170 6 33.33
5 NS 3S N = 600 13 72.22
6 NS 3S W+2 -660 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.5 COLLET Claudine -ARICKX Roger : 28,52 % 7 NS 4PcE-2 500 16 88.89
8 NS 3K S = 110 10 55.56
9 NS 5TcS-1 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
a.4 GROSFILS Colette -MASSAUX Joel : 50,00 %10 NS 5CcS-4 -1100 0 0.00
11 NS 2C N = 110 15 83.33
12 NS 1S E+1 -120 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a10 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 48,52 %13 NS 3S W-3 300 18 100.00
14 NS 3S S = 400 2 11.11
15 NS 3K N-2 -200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 60,19 %16 NS 2C N = 110 14 77.78
17 NS 6C N = 980 12 66.67
18 NS 1S S-1 -100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.8 DANTINNE Pierre -DELHEZ Jacques : 42,96 %19 NS 3S W-3 300 18 100.00
20 NS 4C S-1 -100 6 33.33
21 NS 4P E = -420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.3 GERARD Francis -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,89 %22 NS 3S S+3 490 15 83.33
23 NS 4P S+2 680 15 83.33
24 NS 3PcW = -530 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 49,81 %25 NS 3C S = 140 10 55.56
26 NS 3PcW-1 200 11 61.11
27 NS 4C S+2 480 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a.1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 50,56 %28 NS 5P W = -450 11 61.11
29 NS 3S N-1 -100 4 22.22
30 NS 4P S-2 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
Total : 274,0 / 540 = 50,74 %
PAIRE Nr : A.5 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
a.8 DANTINNE Pierre -DELHEZ Jacques : 42,96 % 1 NS 3PcE = -530 2 11.11
2 NS 3S N = 600 9 50.00
3 NS 2C W = -110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.7 BABIKOW Georges -MATELART Marc : 60,00 % 4 NS 3S N = 600 14 77.78
5 NS 2K S+3 150 7 38.89
6 NS 3S W+2 -660 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.6 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 55,56 % 7 NS 4PcE = -790 0 0.00
8 NS 5K S-2 -100 1 5.56
9 NS 5C E-3 300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 50,56 %10 NS 4PcE-1 200 18 100.00
11 NS 2K S-1 -50 5 27.78
12 NS 1S E+2 -150 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.5 COLLET Claudine -ARICKX Roger : 28,52 %13 NS 2C W-2 200 16 88.89
14 NS 3S N+2 460 15 83.33
15 NS 3C W-2 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
a.4 GROSFILS Colette -MASSAUX Joel : 50,00 %16 NS 4P S-1 -50 7 38.89
17 NS 4C N+1 450 1 5.56
18 NS 1S S = 90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a10 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 48,52 %19 NS 3S E-1 100 15 83.33
20 NS 3P E-2 200 18 100.00
21 NS 4P E = -420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
a.9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 60,19 %22 NS 3T N+2 150 3 16.67
23 NS 3S N+1 630 1 5.56
24 NS 3T S+1 130 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
a.3 GERARD Francis -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,89 %25 NS 3K N+1 130 7 38.89
26 NS 4T S = 130 8 44.44
27 NS 3S N+1 430 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 49,81 %28 NS 3P W+3 -230 18 100.00
29 NS 2K N+2 130 12 66.67
30 NS 5P S-3 -150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 273,0 / 540 = 50,56 %
PAIRE Nr : A.6 COLLET Edgard -VUYTS Michèle
a.9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 60,19 % 1 NS 3P E = -140 13 72.22
2 NS 3S S = 600 9 50.00
3 NS 3TcN-2 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.8 DANTINNE Pierre -DELHEZ Jacques : 42,96 % 4 NS 4P N = 620 17 94.44
5 NS 2K S+3 150 7 38.89
6 NS 5K E-1 100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
a.7 BABIKOW Georges -MATELART Marc : 60,00 % 7 NS 3T S-7 -700 2 11.11
8 NS 2C N+1 140 17 94.44
9 NS 5TcS-1 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 49,81 %10 NS 4P E = -620 6 33.33
11 NS 1S E = -90 1 5.56
12 NS 2C N-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
a.1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 50,56 %13 NS 2C E+1 -140 2 11.11
14 NS 3S S+2 460 15 83.33
15 NS 4P W-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.6 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 55,56 %16 NS 4P S-1 -50 7 38.89
17 NS 6C N = 980 12 66.67
18 NS 2K E = -90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.5 COLLET Claudine -ARICKX Roger : 28,52 %19 NS 4C E = -620 3 16.67
20 NS 2S N-1 -100 6 33.33
21 NS 4P E = -420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.4 GROSFILS Colette -MASSAUX Joel : 50,00 %22 NS 3S S+2 460 9 50.00
23 NS 4P S+1 650 7 38.89
24 NS 4T S = 130 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a10 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 48,52 %25 NS 4K N = 130 7 38.89
26 NS 3P W-1 100 5 27.78
27 NS 3S N+2 460 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.3 GERARD Francis -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,89 %28 NS 4P W+1 -450 11 61.11
29 NS 3S N-1 -100 4 22.22
30 NS 3P S-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
Total : 255,0 / 540 = 47,22 %
PAIRE Nr : A.7 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN Robert
a10 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 48,52 % 1 NS 3PcE+1 -630 0 0.00
2 NS 3S S+1 630 15 83.33
3 NS 2C W-1 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 60,19 % 4 NS 3P N-1 -100 3 16.67
5 NS 3K S+1 130 2 11.11
6 NS 5K E = -600 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
a.8 DANTINNE Pierre -DELHEZ Jacques : 42,96 % 7 NS 4P E-1 100 10 55.56
8 NS 3K S = 110 10 55.56
9 NS 5C E = -650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.3 GERARD Francis -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,89 %10 NS 4P E = -620 6 33.33
11 NS 2K S+1 110 15 83.33
12 NS 1S E+2 -150 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 49,81 %13 NS 2C W = -110 9 50.00
14 NS 3S N+1 430 8 44.44
15 NS 3K N-1 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 50,56 %16 NS 4P S-1 -50 7 38.89
17 NS 4C N+1 450 1 5.56
18 NS 1S S-1 -100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
a.7 BABIKOW Georges -MATELART Marc : 60,00 %19 NS 4C E = -620 3 16.67
20 NS 2C N-3 -300 0 0.00
21 NS 4P E = -420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
a.6 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 55,56 %22 NS 3T N+2 150 3 16.67
23 NS 4P S+1 650 7 38.89
24 NS 5T N-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
a.5 COLLET Claudine -ARICKX Roger : 28,52 %25 NS 4PcE-4 1100 18 100.00
26 NS 4P W-2 200 11 61.11
27 NS 3S N+2 460 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
a.4 GROSFILS Colette -MASSAUX Joel : 50,00 %28 NS 5P W = -450 11 61.11
29 NS 3S N+1 630 18 100.00
30 NS 4K W = -130 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 229,0 / 540 = 42,41 %
PAIRE Nr : A.8 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno
a.4 GROSFILS Colette -MASSAUX Joel : 50,00 % 1 NS 2P E+1 -140 13 72.22
2 NS 3S N+2 660 18 100.00
3 NS 2C W-1 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
a10 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 48,52 % 4 NS 3TcE-2 500 11 61.11
5 NS 5K S = 600 13 72.22
6 NS 2K E+2 -130 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 60,19 % 7 NS 4P E-1 100 10 55.56
8 NS 2P N = 110 10 55.56
9 NS 4C E = -620 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.5 COLLET Claudine -ARICKX Roger : 28,52 %10 NS 2P E+1 -140 12 66.67
11 NS 2T E-1 50 8 44.44
12 NS 3T E-1 50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
a.3 GERARD Francis -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,89 %13 NS 2C W = -110 9 50.00
14 NS 3S N+1 430 8 44.44
15 NS 3C W-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 49,81 %16 NS 4P N-1 -50 7 38.89
17 NS 6C N = 980 12 66.67
18 NS 1S N = 90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 50,56 %19 NS 2T E+1 -110 12 66.67
20 NS 2T N+1 110 11 61.11
21 NS 4P E = -420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.8 DANTINNE Pierre -DELHEZ Jacques : 42,96 %22 NS 3S N+2 460 9 50.00
23 NS 4P N+2 680 15 83.33
24 NS 3T N+1 130 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.7 BABIKOW Georges -MATELART Marc : 60,00 %25 NS 3K N+2 150 13 72.22
26 NS 3P W = -140 1 5.56
27 NS 3S N+3 490 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.6 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 55,56 %28 NS 4P W+2 -480 2 11.11
29 NS 1S N+2 150 14 77.78
30 NS 3K E = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 329,0 / 540 = 60,93 %
PAIRE Nr : A.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
a.5 COLLET Claudine -ARICKX Roger : 28,52 % 1 NS 3P E-2 100 18 100.00
2 NS 3S S+1 630 15 83.33
3 NS 2C W = -110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
a.4 GROSFILS Colette -MASSAUX Joel : 50,00 % 4 NS 4P N-2 -200 0 0.00
5 NS 3K S+2 150 7 38.89
6 NS 4K E = -130 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a10 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 48,52 % 7 NS 2K S+3 150 14 77.78
8 NS 3S N-1 -50 4 22.22
9 NS 5TcS-1 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.7 BABIKOW Georges -MATELART Marc : 60,00 %10 NS 4P E = -620 6 33.33
11 NS 2T E = -90 1 5.56
12 NS 1S E+2 -150 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
a.6 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 55,56 %13 NS 2C W = -110 9 50.00
14 NS 3S N+1 430 8 44.44
15 NS 3K N-2 -200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.3 GERARD Francis -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,89 %16 NS 4P S-1 -50 7 38.89
17 NS 6C N = 980 12 66.67
18 NS 1S S-1 -100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 49,81 %19 NS 1S E+1 -120 10 55.56
20 NS 2T N+1 110 11 61.11
21 NS 4P E = -420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 50,56 %22 NS 3S S+2 460 9 50.00
23 NS 4P S+1 650 7 38.89
24 NS 4T S = 130 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 60,19 %25 NS 3K N-1 -50 1 5.56
26 NS 4C S+1 650 18 100.00
27 NS 3S N+2 460 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.8 DANTINNE Pierre -DELHEZ Jacques : 42,96 %28 NS 4P W+1 -450 11 61.11
29 NS 1S N+3 180 16 88.89
30 NS 4P S-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
Total : 271,0 / 540 = 50,19 %
PAIRE Nr : A10 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine
a.6 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 55,56 % 1 NS 2P E+2 -170 8 44.44
2 NS 4P S-1 -100 0 0.00
3 NS 2C E = -110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
a.5 COLLET Claudine -ARICKX Roger : 28,52 % 4 NS 4TcE-2 500 11 61.11
5 NS 3S N+2 660 17 94.44
6 NS 3S W+2 -660 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.4 GROSFILS Colette -MASSAUX Joel : 50,00 % 7 NS 2P E+1 -140 6 33.33
8 NS 2P N = 110 10 55.56
9 NS 5TcS-3 -500 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 60,19 %10 NS 4P E = -620 6 33.33
11 NS 3T E-2 100 11 61.11
12 NS 1S E+2 -150 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.8 DANTINNE Pierre -DELHEZ Jacques : 42,96 %13 NS 2C W = -110 9 50.00
14 NS 3S S = 400 2 11.11
15 NS 3P W = -140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.7 BABIKOW Georges -MATELART Marc : 60,00 %16 NS 4P S-1 -50 7 38.89
17 NS 6C N = 980 12 66.67
18 NS 1S S-1 -100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.3 GERARD Francis -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,89 %19 NS 2C W+2 -170 8 44.44
20 NS 2S S-1 -100 6 33.33
21 NS 4PcE+1 -690 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
a.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 49,81 %22 NS 3S S+3 490 15 83.33
23 NS 4P S+1 650 7 38.89
24 NS 3T S+1 130 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 50,56 %25 NS 3K N = 110 4 22.22
26 NS 4P W-1 100 5 27.78
27 NS 3S N = 400 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
a10 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 48,52 %28 NS 4P W+1 -450 11 61.11
29 NS 3S N-1 -100 4 22.22
30 NS 5PcS-3 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
Total : 206,0 / 540 = 38,15 %
PAIRE Nr : a.1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine
A.1 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 27,96 % 1 EO 1ScN-3 -500 14 77.78
2 EO 1S S+2 150 14 77.78
3 EO 2C W = -110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
A.3 BRIOT Fernand -CASSART Guy : 62,59 % 4 EO 4P S = 620 1 5.56
5 EO 2K N+3 150 11 61.11
6 EO 5K E-1 100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 69,26 % 7 EO 4P E-1 100 8 44.44
8 EO 2P N+1 140 1 5.56
9 EO 5C E-1 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
A.5 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,56 %10 EO 4PcE-1 200 0 0.00
11 EO 2K S-1 -50 13 72.22
12 EO 1S E+2 -150 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.6 COLLET Edgard -VUYTS Michèle : 47,22 %13 EO 2C E+1 -140 16 88.89
14 EO 3S S+2 460 3 16.67
15 EO 4P W-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A.7 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN Robert : 42,41 %16 EO 4P S-1 -50 11 61.11
17 EO 4C N+1 450 17 94.44
18 EO 1S S-1 -100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
A.8 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno : 60,93 %19 EO 2T E+1 -110 6 33.33
20 EO 2T N+1 110 7 38.89
21 EO 4P E = -420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 50,19 %22 EO 3S S+2 460 9 50.00
23 EO 4P S+1 650 11 61.11
24 EO 4T S = 130 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A10 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 38,15 %25 EO 3K N = 110 14 77.78
26 EO 4P W-1 100 13 72.22
27 EO 3S N = 400 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
A.4 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,74 %28 EO 5P W = -450 7 38.89
29 EO 3S N-1 -100 14 77.78
30 EO 4P S-2 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
Total : 273,0 / 540 = 50,56 %
PAIRE Nr : a.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
A.3 BRIOT Fernand -CASSART Guy : 62,59 % 1 EO 3P E+1 -170 10 55.56
2 EO 3S S = 600 9 50.00
3 EO 5K S-3 -150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 69,26 % 4 EO 4P N-1 -100 15 83.33
5 EO 3S S+2 660 1 5.56
6 EO 3K E+1 -130 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.1 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 27,96 % 7 EO 2CcS-2 -500 14 77.78
8 EO 3T S = 110 8 44.44
9 EO 5TcS-3 -500 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.6 COLLET Edgard -VUYTS Michèle : 47,22 %10 EO 4P E = -620 12 66.67
11 EO 1S E = -90 17 94.44
12 EO 2C N-2 -200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
A.7 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN Robert : 42,41 %13 EO 2C W = -110 9 50.00
14 EO 3S N+1 430 10 55.56
15 EO 3K N-1 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.8 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno : 60,93 %16 EO 4P N-1 -50 11 61.11
17 EO 6C N = 980 6 33.33
18 EO 1S N = 90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 50,19 %19 EO 1S E+1 -120 8 44.44
20 EO 2T N+1 110 7 38.89
21 EO 4P E = -420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A10 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 38,15 %22 EO 3S S+3 490 3 16.67
23 EO 4P S+1 650 11 61.11
24 EO 3T S+1 130 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.4 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,74 %25 EO 3C S = 140 8 44.44
26 EO 3PcW-1 200 7 38.89
27 EO 4C S+2 480 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A.5 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,56 %28 EO 3P W+3 -230 0 0.00
29 EO 2K N+2 130 6 33.33
30 EO 5P S-3 -150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 269,0 / 540 = 49,81 %
PAIRE Nr : a.3 GERARD Francis -de NICOLAS Bernard
A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 69,26 % 1 EO 3P E-1 50 2 11.11
2 EO 3S S = 600 9 50.00
3 EO 3C W-1 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
A.1 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 27,96 % 4 EO 3T W-2 200 10 55.56
5 EO 2S N = 120 18 100.00
6 EO 3S E+2 -660 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
A.3 BRIOT Fernand -CASSART Guy : 62,59 % 7 EO 5KcN = 750 0 0.00
8 EO 4P N-2 -100 17 94.44
9 EO 5TcS-2 -300 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.7 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN Robert : 42,41 %10 EO 4P E = -620 12 66.67
11 EO 2K S+1 110 3 16.67
12 EO 1S E+2 -150 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.8 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno : 60,93 %13 EO 2C W = -110 9 50.00
14 EO 3S N+1 430 10 55.56
15 EO 3C W-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 50,19 %16 EO 4P S-1 -50 11 61.11
17 EO 6C N = 980 6 33.33
18 EO 1S S-1 -100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A10 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 38,15 %19 EO 2C W+2 -170 10 55.56
20 EO 2S S-1 -100 12 66.67
21 EO 4PcE+1 -690 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
A.4 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,74 %22 EO 3S S+3 490 3 16.67
23 EO 4P S+2 680 3 16.67
24 EO 3PcW = -530 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.5 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,56 %25 EO 3K N+1 130 11 61.11
26 EO 4T S = 130 10 55.56
27 EO 3S N+1 430 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A.6 COLLET Edgard -VUYTS Michèle : 47,22 %28 EO 4P W+1 -450 7 38.89
29 EO 3S N-1 -100 14 77.78
30 EO 3P S-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
Total : 291,0 / 540 = 53,89 %
PAIRE Nr : a.4 GROSFILS Colette -MASSAUX Joel
A.8 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno : 60,93 % 1 EO 2P E+1 -140 5 27.78
2 EO 3S N+2 660 0 0.00
3 EO 2C W-1 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
A.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 50,19 % 4 EO 4P N-2 -200 18 100.00
5 EO 3K S+2 150 11 61.11
6 EO 4K E = -130 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A10 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 38,15 % 7 EO 2P E+1 -140 12 66.67
8 EO 2P N = 110 8 44.44
9 EO 5TcS-3 -500 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.4 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,74 %10 EO 5CcS-4 -1100 18 100.00
11 EO 2C N = 110 3 16.67
12 EO 1S E+1 -120 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 69,26 %13 EO 2C E-1 100 4 22.22
14 EO 3S S+2 460 3 16.67
15 EO 2S E-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
A.5 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,56 %16 EO 4P S-1 -50 11 61.11
17 EO 4C N+1 450 17 94.44
18 EO 1S S = 90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.3 BRIOT Fernand -CASSART Guy : 62,59 %19 EO 4C W = -620 15 83.33
20 EO 2S N+1 150 2 11.11
21 EO 4P E = -420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.6 COLLET Edgard -VUYTS Michèle : 47,22 %22 EO 3S S+2 460 9 50.00
23 EO 4P S+1 650 11 61.11
24 EO 4T S = 130 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.1 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 27,96 %25 EO 3K N-1 -50 17 94.44
26 EO 3P E = -140 17 94.44
27 EO 2S N+1 150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 96,30 %
A.7 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN Robert : 42,41 %28 EO 5P W = -450 7 38.89
29 EO 3S N+1 630 0 0.00
30 EO 4K W = -130 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 270,0 / 540 = 50,00 %
PAIRE Nr : a.5 COLLET Claudine -ARICKX Roger
A.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 50,19 % 1 EO 3P E-2 100 0 0.00
2 EO 3S S+1 630 3 16.67
3 EO 2C W = -110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
A10 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 38,15 % 4 EO 4TcE-2 500 7 38.89
5 EO 3S N+2 660 1 5.56
6 EO 3S W+2 -660 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A.4 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,74 % 7 EO 4PcE-2 500 2 11.11
8 EO 3K S = 110 8 44.44
9 EO 5TcS-1 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
A.8 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno : 60,93 %10 EO 2P E+1 -140 6 33.33
11 EO 2T E-1 50 10 55.56
12 EO 3T E-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
A.5 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,56 %13 EO 2C W-2 200 2 11.11
14 EO 3S N+2 460 3 16.67
15 EO 3C W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 69,26 %16 EO 4C S+1 450 0 0.00
17 EO 6C N = 980 6 33.33
18 EO 1S S+2 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
A.6 COLLET Edgard -VUYTS Michèle : 47,22 %19 EO 4C E = -620 15 83.33
20 EO 2S N-1 -100 12 66.67
21 EO 4P E = -420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.3 BRIOT Fernand -CASSART Guy : 62,59 %22 EO 6T N = 920 0 0.00
23 EO 4P S+2 680 3 16.67
24 EO 3T S+1 130 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
A.7 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN Robert : 42,41 %25 EO 4PcE-4 1100 0 0.00
26 EO 4P W-2 200 7 38.89
27 EO 3S N+2 460 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
A.1 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 27,96 %28 EO 4P E+1 -450 7 38.89
29 EO 2K N+1 110 8 44.44
30 EO 4K W-1 50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 154,0 / 540 = 28,52 %
PAIRE Nr : a.6 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
A10 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 38,15 % 1 EO 2P E+2 -170 10 55.56
2 EO 4P S-1 -100 18 100.00
3 EO 2C E = -110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
A.4 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,74 % 4 EO 3P N+1 170 12 66.67
5 EO 3S N = 600 5 27.78
6 EO 3S W+2 -660 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.5 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,56 % 7 EO 4PcE = -790 18 100.00
8 EO 5K S-2 -100 17 94.44
9 EO 5C E-3 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.1 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 27,96 %10 EO 4P E = -620 12 66.67
11 EO 2T E-2 100 7 38.89
12 EO 1S E+2 -150 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 50,19 %13 EO 2C W = -110 9 50.00
14 EO 3S N+1 430 10 55.56
15 EO 3K N-2 -200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.6 COLLET Edgard -VUYTS Michèle : 47,22 %16 EO 4P S-1 -50 11 61.11
17 EO 6C N = 980 6 33.33
18 EO 2K E = -90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 69,26 %19 EO 2T E-1 100 3 16.67
20 EO 2S N = 120 4 22.22
21 EO 4P E = -420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
A.7 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN Robert : 42,41 %22 EO 3T N+2 150 15 83.33
23 EO 4P S+1 650 11 61.11
24 EO 5T N-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
A.3 BRIOT Fernand -CASSART Guy : 62,59 %25 EO 2K N+3 150 5 27.78
26 EO 4C S = 620 3 16.67
27 EO 3S S+2 460 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
A.8 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno : 60,93 %28 EO 4P W+2 -480 16 88.89
29 EO 1S N+2 150 4 22.22
30 EO 3K E = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 300,0 / 540 = 55,56 %
PAIRE Nr : a.7 BABIKOW Georges -MATELART Marc
A.4 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,74 % 1 EO 3P E+1 -170 10 55.56
2 EO 2S N = 120 16 88.89
3 EO 5K S-3 -150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
A.5 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,56 % 4 EO 3S N = 600 4 22.22
5 EO 2K S+3 150 11 61.11
6 EO 3S W+2 -660 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.6 COLLET Edgard -VUYTS Michèle : 47,22 % 7 EO 3T S-7 -700 16 88.89
8 EO 2C N+1 140 1 5.56
9 EO 5TcS-1 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 50,19 %10 EO 4P E = -620 12 66.67
11 EO 2T E = -90 17 94.44
12 EO 1S E+2 -150 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
A.1 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 27,96 %13 EO 2C W+1 -140 16 88.89
14 EO 3S N = 400 16 88.89
15 EO 2C E+2 -170 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
A10 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 38,15 %16 EO 4P S-1 -50 11 61.11
17 EO 6C N = 980 6 33.33
18 EO 1S S-1 -100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.7 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN Robert : 42,41 %19 EO 4C E = -620 15 83.33
20 EO 2C N-3 -300 18 100.00
21 EO 4P E = -420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 69,26 %22 EO 3S S+2 460 9 50.00
23 EO 4P S+2 680 3 16.67
24 EO 4T S = 130 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.8 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno : 60,93 %25 EO 3K N+2 150 5 27.78
26 EO 3P W = -140 17 94.44
27 EO 3S N+3 490 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.3 BRIOT Fernand -CASSART Guy : 62,59 %28 EO 4P W+2 -480 16 88.89
29 EO 3S S-1 -100 14 77.78
30 EO 5KcW-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 324,0 / 540 = 60,00 %
PAIRE Nr : a.8 DANTINNE Pierre -DELHEZ Jacques
A.5 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,56 % 1 EO 3PcE = -530 16 88.89
2 EO 3S N = 600 9 50.00
3 EO 2C W = -110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A.6 COLLET Edgard -VUYTS Michèle : 47,22 % 4 EO 4P N = 620 1 5.56
5 EO 2K S+3 150 11 61.11
6 EO 5K E-1 100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
A.7 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN Robert : 42,41 % 7 EO 4P E-1 100 8 44.44
8 EO 3K S = 110 8 44.44
9 EO 5C E = -650 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A.3 BRIOT Fernand -CASSART Guy : 62,59 %10 EO 4P E-1 100 3 16.67
11 EO 2S S+2 180 0 0.00
12 EO 1S E = -90 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
A10 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 38,15 %13 EO 2C W = -110 9 50.00
14 EO 3S S = 400 16 88.89
15 EO 3P W = -140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.1 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 27,96 %16 EO 4P S-2 -100 18 100.00
17 EO 4C N+3 510 14 77.78
18 EO 1S S = 90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
A.4 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,74 %19 EO 3S W-3 300 0 0.00
20 EO 4C S-1 -100 12 66.67
21 EO 4P E = -420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.8 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno : 60,93 %22 EO 3S N+2 460 9 50.00
23 EO 4P N+2 680 3 16.67
24 EO 3T N+1 130 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 69,26 %25 EO 3T E-3 300 2 11.11
26 EO 4C S = 620 3 16.67
27 EO 3S N+1 430 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 50,19 %28 EO 4P W+1 -450 7 38.89
29 EO 1S N+3 180 2 11.11
30 EO 4P S-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
Total : 232,0 / 540 = 42,96 %
PAIRE Nr : a.9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
A.6 COLLET Edgard -VUYTS Michèle : 47,22 % 1 EO 3P E = -140 5 27.78
2 EO 3S S = 600 9 50.00
3 EO 3TcN-2 -300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.7 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN Robert : 42,41 % 4 EO 3P N-1 -100 15 83.33
5 EO 3K S+1 130 16 88.89
6 EO 5K E = -600 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
A.8 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno : 60,93 % 7 EO 4P E-1 100 8 44.44
8 EO 2P N = 110 8 44.44
9 EO 4C E = -620 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A10 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 38,15 %10 EO 4P E = -620 12 66.67
11 EO 3T E-2 100 7 38.89
12 EO 1S E+2 -150 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.3 BRIOT Fernand -CASSART Guy : 62,59 %13 EO 2C E+1 -140 16 88.89
14 EO 3S N+2 460 3 16.67
15 EO 2P E+1 -140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.4 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,74 %16 EO 2C N = 110 4 22.22
17 EO 6C N = 980 6 33.33
18 EO 1S S-1 -100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.1 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 27,96 %19 EO 4C W = -620 15 83.33
20 EO 2P W = -110 16 88.89
21 EO 4P W = -420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
A.5 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,56 %22 EO 3T N+2 150 15 83.33
23 EO 3S N+1 630 17 94.44
24 EO 3T S+1 130 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
A.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 50,19 %25 EO 3K N-1 -50 17 94.44
26 EO 4C S+1 650 0 0.00
27 EO 3S N+2 460 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 69,26 %28 EO 5C W+1 -480 16 88.89
29 EO 3S N-1 -100 14 77.78
30 EO 5K E-1 50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 325,0 / 540 = 60,19 %
PAIRE Nr : a10 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
A.7 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN Robert : 42,41 % 1 EO 3PcE+1 -630 18 100.00
2 EO 3S S+1 630 3 16.67
3 EO 2C W-1 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A.8 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno : 60,93 % 4 EO 3TcE-2 500 7 38.89
5 EO 5K S = 600 5 27.78
6 EO 2K E+2 -130 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 50,19 % 7 EO 2K S+3 150 4 22.22
8 EO 3S N-1 -50 14 77.78
9 EO 5TcS-1 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 69,26 %10 EO 4P E-1 100 3 16.67
11 EO 2S S-1 -50 13 72.22
12 EO 1S E = -90 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
A.4 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,74 %13 EO 3S W-3 300 0 0.00
14 EO 3S S = 400 16 88.89
15 EO 3K N-2 -200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.3 BRIOT Fernand -CASSART Guy : 62,59 %16 EO 2P S+1 140 2 11.11
17 EO 6C N = 980 6 33.33
18 EO 1S S = 90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
A.5 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,56 %19 EO 3S E-1 100 3 16.67
20 EO 3P E-2 200 0 0.00
21 EO 4P E = -420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
A.1 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 27,96 %22 EO 3T N+1 130 18 100.00
23 EO 3S N+1 630 17 94.44
24 EO 3C E = -140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 94,44 %
A.6 COLLET Edgard -VUYTS Michèle : 47,22 %25 EO 4K N = 130 11 61.11
26 EO 3P W-1 100 13 72.22
27 EO 3S N+2 460 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A10 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 38,15 %28 EO 4P W+1 -450 7 38.89
29 EO 3S N-1 -100 14 77.78
30 EO 5PcS-3 -500 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
Total : 262,0 / 540 = 48,52 %
|
|