|
Tournoi du 12-06-17
Lundi
1 60,46 A.8 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent
2 58,81 A.2 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
3 58,39 A.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
4 56,44 A.4 DELHEZ Jacques -BERGER Jean Marie
5 52,94 A.1 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
6 51,26 A.5 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard
7 49,22 A.7 NELIS Claude -VAN DOOREN Michele
8 44,63 A.6 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
9 36,15 A10 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
10 31,74 A.3 ERPICUM Patrice -ROMAIN Roberte
11 0,00 A11 -
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 63,60 a.9 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre
2 58,29 a.2 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
3 54,94 a.5 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
4 54,14 a.6 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
5 51,98 a.3 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy
6 50,21 a10 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane
7 50,10 a.8 PIETQUIN Joseph -WILLEMS Jacques
8 48,80 a.1 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard
9 41,93 a11 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette
10 38,42 a.7 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette
11 37,67 a.4 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
PAIRE Nr : A.1 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
a.1 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 48,80 % 1 NS 3S N-1 -50 3.4 18.89
2 NS 3S S+1 630 13.4 74.44
3 NS 5P W+2 -710 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 35,37 %
a11 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 41,93 % 4 NS 2P E = -110 6.8 37.78
5 NS 4C E-2 100 17.9 99.44
6 NS 4P S+2 480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
a10 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 50,21 % 7 NS 1S W-3 300 17.9 99.44
8 NS 6P E = -980 0.1 0.56
9 NS 2P S = 110 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
a.9 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre : 63,60 %10 NS 2P S = 110 4.6 25.56
11 NS 2P E+1 -140 3.4 18.89
12 NS 4CcE-2 300 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
a.8 PIETQUIN Joseph -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,10 %13 NS 4P S = 620 9 50.00
14 NS 3P N+1 170 9 50.00
15 NS 4C W-2 100 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
a.7 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 38,42 %16 NS 1C E+1 -110 5.7 31.67
17 NS 4C S+1 450 14.6 81.11
18 NS 3S E-2 100 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
a.6 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,14 %19 NS 3S W-2 200 14.6 81.11
20 NS 3S W+1 -630 3.4 18.89
21 NS 3S W = -400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.5 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 54,94 %22 NS 4P E = -620 3.4 18.89
23 NS 1S S+1 120 13.4 74.44
24 NS 4K W+1 -150 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 37,41 %
a.4 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 37,67 %25 NS 2S E = -120 10.1 56.11
26 NS 2P W+1 -140 7.9 43.89
27 NS 5K E = -400 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
a.3 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy : 51,98 %28 NS 2P E-2 100 13 72.22
29 NS 3S S+1 630 14 77.78
30 NS 4CcN-1 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 285,9 / 540 = 52,94 %
PAIRE Nr : A.2 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
a.2 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 58,29 % 4 NS 2K W = -90 11.2 62.22
5 NS 3S W-1 50 14.6 81.11
6 NS 4P S+2 480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
a.1 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 48,80 % 7 NS 1S W-1 100 5.7 31.67
8 NS 5T E = -400 13.4 74.44
9 NS 2P S = 110 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
a11 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 41,93 %10 NS 2P S+1 140 12.3 68.33
11 NS 3S W-2 100 13.4 74.44
12 NS 4P S-1 -100 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
a10 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 50,21 %13 NS 4P S = 620 9 50.00
14 NS 3P N+2 200 15.7 87.22
15 NS 3C W = -140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
a.9 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre : 63,60 %16 NS 3S S-3 -150 0.1 0.56
17 NS 3P N+2 200 4.6 25.56
18 NS 2PcN = 670 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 41,85 %
a.8 PIETQUIN Joseph -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,10 %19 NS 3S W-2 200 14.6 81.11
20 NS 2P E = -110 11.2 62.22
21 NS 4C W-1 50 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 74,81 %
a.7 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 38,42 %22 NS 5P E-1 100 14.6 81.11
23 NS 2K W+2 -130 0.1 0.56
24 NS 4KcW-2 300 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
a.6 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,14 %25 NS 3S E+1 -630 0.1 0.56
26 NS 2P W+1 -140 7.9 43.89
27 NS 4C E = -420 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 25,37 %
a.5 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 54,94 %28 NS 2P W-3 150 18 100.00
29 NS 4P N = 620 8 44.44
30 NS 3C N = 140 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
a.4 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 37,67 %31 NS 4C N+1 650 16.8 93.33
32 NS 3K E+1 -130 14.6 81.11
33 NS 4C E = -420 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
Total : 317,6 / 540 = 58,81 %
PAIRE Nr : A.3 ERPICUM Patrice -ROMAIN Roberte
a.5 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 54,94 % 1 NS 4P S-1 -50 3.4 18.89
2 NS 2C S+1 140 3.4 18.89
3 NS 3P W+4 -260 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.3 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy : 51,98 % 7 NS 1S W = -90 0.1 0.56
8 NS 6P E-2 100 17.9 99.44
9 NS 2C E-1 100 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
a.2 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 58,29 %10 NS 2P S = 110 4.6 25.56
11 NS 3S W = -400 0.1 0.56
12 NS 2C E+1 -140 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 8,89 %
a.1 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 48,80 %13 NS 3S S-2 -200 1.2 6.67
14 NS 4T W-1 50 2.3 12.78
15 NS 4C W = -420 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 8,70 %
a11 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 41,93 %16 NS 3T N-1 -50 10.1 56.11
17 NS 6C S-4 -200 0.1 0.56
18 NS 3P N-1 -100 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
a10 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 50,21 %19 NS 3S W-1 100 7.9 43.89
20 NS 3S W+1 -630 3.4 18.89
21 NS 4C W = -420 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
a.9 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre : 63,60 %22 NS 6C W-1 100 14.6 81.11
23 NS 2S S-1 -100 6.8 37.78
24 NS 1S E+3 -180 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 39,81 %
a.8 PIETQUIN Joseph -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,10 %25 NS 2S E+2 -180 4.6 25.56
26 NS 2C N-1 -100 16.8 93.33
27 NS 3S E+1 -430 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
a.7 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 38,42 %28 NS 2P E-2 100 13 72.22
29 NS 4P N = 620 8 44.44
30 NS 2C N = 110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.6 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,14 %31 NS 2C S+3 200 2.3 12.78
32 NS 4CcN-4 -800 1.2 6.67
33 NS 3CcE+1 -630 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 6,67 %
Total : 171,4 / 540 = 31,74 %
PAIRE Nr : A.4 DELHEZ Jacques -BERGER Jean Marie
a.7 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 38,42 % 1 NS 4P S = 420 16.8 93.33
2 NS 3C S = 140 3.4 18.89
3 NS 3C S = 140 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 70,56 %
a.6 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,14 % 4 NS 3C E-1 100 13.4 74.44
5 NS 3S W = -400 11.2 62.22
6 NS 4P S+2 480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,22 %
a.4 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 37,67 %10 NS 2P S+1 140 12.3 68.33
11 NS 3S W-2 100 13.4 74.44
12 NS 4P S = 620 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 80,74 %
a.3 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy : 51,98 %13 NS 4P S = 620 9 50.00
14 NS 2P N+2 170 9 50.00
15 NS 4C W = -420 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
a.2 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 58,29 %16 NS 2P N = 110 13.4 74.44
17 NS 4P N+1 450 14.6 81.11
18 NS 2K E+1 -110 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 58,15 %
a.1 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 48,80 %19 NS 5T W-1 100 7.9 43.89
20 NS 3S W-1 100 14.6 81.11
21 NS 3S W-1 50 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 68,70 %
a11 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 41,93 %22 NS 4P E = -620 3.4 18.89
23 NS 2T S = 90 9 50.00
24 NS 3K W = -110 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 43,70 %
a10 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 50,21 %25 NS 3S E-2 200 17.9 99.44
26 NS 3CcN-2 -500 0.1 0.56
27 NS 4C E-1 50 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
a.9 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre : 63,60 %28 NS 3T N-2 -200 0 0.00
29 NS 4P N = 620 8 44.44
30 NS 3T E = -110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
a.8 PIETQUIN Joseph -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,10 %31 NS 4C S = 620 9 50.00
32 NS 3S W-1 100 17.9 99.44
33 NS 4C E = -420 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
Total : 304,8 / 540 = 56,44 %
PAIRE Nr : A.5 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard
a.9 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre : 63,60 % 1 NS 3P S+1 170 9 50.00
2 NS 3S N+1 630 13.4 74.44
3 NS 4P W+3 -710 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 45,74 %
a.8 PIETQUIN Joseph -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,10 % 4 NS 2P E = -110 6.8 37.78
5 NS 3S W-1 50 14.6 81.11
6 NS 4P S+2 480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 56,30 %
a.7 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 38,42 % 7 NS 1S W-2 200 15.7 87.22
8 NS 4P E+1 -450 6.8 37.78
9 NS 3C E-2 200 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 74,81 %
a.5 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 54,94 %13 NS 4P S = 620 9 50.00
14 NS 1S W = -90 0.1 0.56
15 NS 2C W = -110 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
a.4 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 37,67 %16 NS 3C E = -140 2.3 12.78
17 NS 4P N+1 450 14.6 81.11
18 NS 3K E = -110 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
a.3 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy : 51,98 %19 NS 3S W-2 200 14.6 81.11
20 NS 3S W+1 -630 3.4 18.89
21 NS 4C W = -420 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
a.2 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 58,29 %22 NS 4P E = -620 3.4 18.89
23 NS 2P W = -110 3.4 18.89
24 NS 4K W = -130 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 27,22 %
a.1 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 48,80 %25 NS 2S E = -120 10.1 56.11
26 NS 2P W+1 -140 7.9 43.89
27 NS 2C E+2 -170 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
a11 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 41,93 %28 NS 2P E-2 100 13 72.22
29 NS 4P S = 620 8 44.44
30 NS 3C N = 140 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a10 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 50,21 %31 NS 4C S+1 650 16.8 93.33
32 NS 3CcN-3 -500 9 50.00
33 NS 3C E+1 -170 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
Total : 276,8 / 540 = 51,26 %
PAIRE Nr : A.6 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
a11 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 41,93 % 1 NS 3P S+1 170 9 50.00
2 NS 4C S+1 650 17.9 99.44
3 NS 4C S-1 -50 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 76,85 %
a10 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 50,21 % 4 NS 2P E = -110 6.8 37.78
5 NS 4C E = -420 6.8 37.78
6 NS 4P S+2 480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,85 %
a.9 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre : 63,60 % 7 NS 1S E-1 100 5.7 31.67
8 NS 4P E+1 -450 6.8 37.78
9 NS 2P S-1 -50 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 25,37 %
a.8 PIETQUIN Joseph -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,10 %10 NS 2P S+1 140 12.3 68.33
11 NS 2P E+1 -140 3.4 18.89
12 NS 4P N-1 -100 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
a.6 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,14 %16 NS 3CcE-1 200 16.8 93.33
17 NS 4C N = 420 6.8 37.78
18 NS 3C W-2 100 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
a.5 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 54,94 %19 NS 3S W+1 -630 0.1 0.56
20 NS 3S W = -600 9 50.00
21 NS 3S W+1 -430 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 21,11 %
a.4 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 37,67 %22 NS 5P E-1 100 14.6 81.11
23 NS 2P W-1 100 11.2 62.22
24 NS 3K W+2 -150 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
a.3 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy : 51,98 %25 NS 3S E = -600 2.3 12.78
26 NS 2P W+1 -140 7.9 43.89
27 NS 5K W = -400 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
a.2 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 58,29 %28 NS 1S N = 90 8 44.44
29 NS 4P N-1 -100 0 0.00
30 NS 3TcE-1 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.1 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 48,80 %31 NS 4C N = 620 9 50.00
32 NS 3S W = -600 6.8 37.78
33 NS 3C W = -140 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
Total : 241,0 / 540 = 44,63 %
PAIRE Nr : A.7 NELIS Claude -VAN DOOREN Michele
a.2 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 58,29 % 1 NS 2S S+2 180 13.4 74.44
2 NS 1S N+2 150 6.8 37.78
3 NS 4P W+3 -710 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
a.1 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 48,80 % 4 NS 2S W = -120 2.3 12.78
5 NS 3S W+1 -430 1.2 6.67
6 NS 4P S+2 480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 23,15 %
a11 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 41,93 % 7 NS 1S W-1 100 5.7 31.67
8 NS 4P E+1 -450 6.8 37.78
9 NS 1S N-1 -50 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 25,37 %
a10 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 50,21 %10 NS 2P S = 110 4.6 25.56
11 NS 3S W-3 150 17.9 99.44
12 NS 4P S-1 -100 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 50,19 %
a.9 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre : 63,60 %13 NS 3S S-2 -200 1.2 6.67
14 NS 3P N+1 170 9 50.00
15 NS 1S W+3 -180 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
a.7 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 38,42 %19 NS 3K E+1 -130 4.6 25.56
20 NS 3S W-1 100 14.6 81.11
21 NS 4C W-1 50 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 62,59 %
a.6 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,14 %22 NS 5C E-1 100 14.6 81.11
23 NS 2P E-2 200 16.8 93.33
24 NS 3C S = 140 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
a.5 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 54,94 %25 NS 3S E-1 100 15.7 87.22
26 NS 3P W = -140 7.9 43.89
27 NS 4C E = -420 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 54,26 %
a.4 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 37,67 %28 NS 2S N-1 -100 3 16.67
29 NS 4P N+1 650 17 94.44
30 NS 4C N = 420 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
a.3 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy : 51,98 %31 NS 4C S = 620 9 50.00
32 NS 3S W+2 -660 4.6 25.56
33 NS 3C E = -140 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
Total : 265,8 / 540 = 49,22 %
PAIRE Nr : A.8 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent
a.4 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 37,67 % 1 NS 4P S = 420 16.8 93.33
2 NS 3S S+1 630 13.4 74.44
3 NS 4C S-1 -50 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 82,96 %
a.3 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy : 51,98 % 4 NS 2P E-2 200 16.8 93.33
5 NS 3S E+1 -430 1.2 6.67
6 NS 4P S+2 480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.2 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 58,29 % 7 NS 2P N = 110 12.3 68.33
8 NS 4P E = -420 11.2 62.22
9 NS 1S N = 90 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
a.1 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 48,80 %10 NS 2P S+1 140 12.3 68.33
11 NS 2S W-2 100 13.4 74.44
12 NS 3P S+1 170 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 72,41 %
a11 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 41,93 %13 NS 4P S+1 650 15.7 87.22
14 NS 2P N+2 170 9 50.00
15 NS 4C W-1 50 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 72,78 %
a10 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 50,21 %16 NS 3CcE-1 200 16.8 93.33
17 NS 4C N+1 450 14.6 81.11
18 NS 3S E = -400 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
a.8 PIETQUIN Joseph -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,10 %22 NS 4P E = -620 3.4 18.89
23 NS 2P W = -110 3.4 18.89
24 NS 3P S = 140 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
a.7 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 38,42 %25 NS 2S E = -120 10.1 56.11
26 NS 3C N-1 -100 16.8 93.33
27 NS 3S E = -400 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 70,56 %
a.6 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,14 %28 NS 3T N-1 -100 3 16.67
29 NS 4P N+1 650 17 94.44
30 NS 4C N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.5 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 54,94 %31 NS 4C S = 620 9 50.00
32 NS 5CcN-4 -800 1.2 6.67
33 NS 4T S-2 -100 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
Total : 326,5 / 540 = 60,46 %
PAIRE Nr : A.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
a.6 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,14 % 1 NS 3S N-3 -150 0.1 0.56
2 NS 3C S+1 170 9 50.00
3 NS 5K E = -600 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 29,44 %
a.5 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 54,94 % 4 NS 3P E-2 200 16.8 93.33
5 NS 4C W = -420 6.8 37.78
6 NS 4P S+2 480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
a.4 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 37,67 % 7 NS 1S W-1 100 5.7 31.67
8 NS 3S E-1 50 15.7 87.22
9 NS 2C E-1 100 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
a.3 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy : 51,98 %10 NS 3C W-4 400 17.9 99.44
11 NS 1S W+1 -120 7.9 43.89
12 NS 2P S+1 140 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
a.2 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 58,29 %13 NS 4P S = 620 9 50.00
14 NS 4P N = 420 17.9 99.44
15 NS 4C W-1 50 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 76,85 %
a.1 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 48,80 %16 NS 2S S-1 -50 10.1 56.11
17 NS 3S S+1 430 9 50.00
18 NS 3S W-3 150 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
a11 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 41,93 %19 NS 3S W-2 200 14.6 81.11
20 NS 3S W-2 200 17.9 99.44
21 NS 5C E-1 50 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 87,22 %
a.9 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre : 63,60 %25 NS 1S W+1 -120 10.1 56.11
26 NS 2P W+1 -140 7.9 43.89
27 NS 3S E+3 -490 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
a.8 PIETQUIN Joseph -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,10 %28 NS 2P E-2 100 13 72.22
29 NS 4P N = 620 8 44.44
30 NS 4C N-3 -150 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.7 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 38,42 %31 NS 4C N = 620 9 50.00
32 NS 3K E+1 -130 14.6 81.11
33 NS 3C E = -140 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
Total : 315,3 / 540 = 58,39 %
PAIRE Nr : A10 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
a.8 PIETQUIN Joseph -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,10 % 1 NS 3P S+1 170 9 50.00
2 NS 4C S-2 -200 0.1 0.56
3 NS 5CcS-2 -300 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
a.7 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 38,42 % 4 NS 2P E+1 -140 0.1 0.56
5 NS 4C E = -420 6.8 37.78
6 NS 4P S+2 480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,44 %
a.6 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,14 % 7 NS 2P N = 110 12.3 68.33
8 NS 3S E+2 -460 2.3 12.78
9 NS 1S N = 90 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
a.5 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 54,94 %10 NS 2P S-1 -100 0.1 0.56
11 NS 1S W+1 -120 7.9 43.89
12 NS 3P S = 140 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
a.4 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 37,67 %13 NS 3S S+2 660 17.9 99.44
14 NS 2P N+2 170 9 50.00
15 NS 3C W+2 -200 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
a.3 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy : 51,98 %16 NS 1C E+1 -110 5.7 31.67
17 NS 4C N-1 -50 2.3 12.78
18 NS 2S W-2 100 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
a.2 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 58,29 %19 NS 3S W = -600 2.3 12.78
20 NS 3S W+1 -630 3.4 18.89
21 NS 4C W+1 -450 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 10,74 %
a.1 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 48,80 %22 NS 2P E = -110 9 50.00
23 NS 5K W-2 200 16.8 93.33
24 NS 4K W = -130 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
a10 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 50,21 %28 NS 2P E-1 50 6 33.33
29 NS 2P S+2 170 2 11.11
30 NS 4C N-3 -150 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
a.9 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre : 63,60 %31 NS 2K E-2 100 0.1 0.56
32 NS 3K E+2 -150 11.2 62.22
33 NS 3C E = -140 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 43,70 %
Total : 195,2 / 540 = 36,15 %
PAIRE Nr : A11 -
a10 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 50,21 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.9 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre : 63,60 % 4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.8 PIETQUIN Joseph -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,10 % 7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.7 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 38,42 %10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.6 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,14 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.5 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 54,94 %16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.4 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 37,67 %19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.3 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy : 51,98 %22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.2 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 58,29 %25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00
27 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a11 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 41,93 %31 NS BYE 0 0.00
32 NS BYE 0 0.00
33 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 594 = 0,00 %
PAIRE Nr : a.1 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard
A.1 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 52,94 % 1 EO 3S N-1 -50 14.6 81.11
2 EO 3S S+1 630 4.6 25.56
3 EO 5P W+2 -710 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 64,63 %
A.7 NELIS Claude -VAN DOOREN Michele : 49,22 % 4 EO 2S W = -120 15.7 87.22
5 EO 3S W+1 -430 16.8 93.33
6 EO 4P S+2 480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 76,85 %
A.2 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 58,81 % 7 EO 1S W-1 100 12.3 68.33
8 EO 5T E = -400 4.6 25.56
9 EO 2P S = 110 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
A.8 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 60,46 %10 EO 2P S+1 140 5.7 31.67
11 EO 2S W-2 100 4.6 25.56
12 EO 3P S+1 170 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 27,59 %
A.3 ERPICUM Patrice -ROMAIN Roberte : 31,74 %13 EO 3S S-2 -200 16.8 93.33
14 EO 4T W-1 50 15.7 87.22
15 EO 4C W = -420 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 91,30 %
A.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 58,39 %16 EO 2S S-1 -50 7.9 43.89
17 EO 3S S+1 430 9 50.00
18 EO 3S W-3 150 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
A.4 DELHEZ Jacques -BERGER Jean Marie : 56,44 %19 EO 5T W-1 100 10.1 56.11
20 EO 3S W-1 100 3.4 18.89
21 EO 3S W-1 50 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 31,30 %
A10 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 36,15 %22 EO 2P E = -110 9 50.00
23 EO 5K W-2 200 1.2 6.67
24 EO 4K W = -130 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
A.5 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,26 %25 EO 2S E = -120 7.9 43.89
26 EO 2P W+1 -140 10.1 56.11
27 EO 2C E+2 -170 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
A.6 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 44,63 %31 EO 4C N = 620 9 50.00
32 EO 3S W = -600 11.2 62.22
33 EO 3C W = -140 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
Total : 263,5 / 540 = 48,80 %
PAIRE Nr : a.2 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
A.7 NELIS Claude -VAN DOOREN Michele : 49,22 % 1 EO 2S S+2 180 4.6 25.56
2 EO 1S N+2 150 11.2 62.22
3 EO 4P W+3 -710 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
A.2 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 58,81 % 4 EO 2K W = -90 6.8 37.78
5 EO 3S W-1 50 3.4 18.89
6 EO 4P S+2 480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
A.8 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 60,46 % 7 EO 2P N = 110 5.7 31.67
8 EO 4P E = -420 6.8 37.78
9 EO 1S N = 90 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
A.3 ERPICUM Patrice -ROMAIN Roberte : 31,74 %10 EO 2P S = 110 13.4 74.44
11 EO 3S W = -400 17.9 99.44
12 EO 2C E+1 -140 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 91,11 %
A.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 58,39 %13 EO 4P S = 620 9 50.00
14 EO 4P N = 420 0.1 0.56
15 EO 4C W-1 50 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 23,15 %
A.4 DELHEZ Jacques -BERGER Jean Marie : 56,44 %16 EO 2P N = 110 4.6 25.56
17 EO 4P N+1 450 3.4 18.89
18 EO 2K E+1 -110 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 41,85 %
A10 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 36,15 %19 EO 3S W = -600 15.7 87.22
20 EO 3S W+1 -630 14.6 81.11
21 EO 4C W+1 -450 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 89,26 %
A.5 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,26 %22 EO 4P E = -620 14.6 81.11
23 EO 2P W = -110 14.6 81.11
24 EO 4K W = -130 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 72,78 %
A11 - : 0,00 %25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00
27 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.6 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 44,63 %28 EO 1S N = 90 10 55.56
29 EO 4P N-1 -100 18 100.00
30 EO 3TcE-1 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 283,3 / 486 = 58,29 %
PAIRE Nr : a.3 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy
A.8 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 60,46 % 4 EO 2P E-2 200 1.2 6.67
5 EO 3S E+1 -430 16.8 93.33
6 EO 4P S+2 480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 ERPICUM Patrice -ROMAIN Roberte : 31,74 % 7 EO 1S W = -90 17.9 99.44
8 EO 6P E-2 100 0.1 0.56
9 EO 2C E-1 100 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
A.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 58,39 %10 EO 3C W-4 400 0.1 0.56
11 EO 1S W+1 -120 10.1 56.11
12 EO 2P S+1 140 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
A.4 DELHEZ Jacques -BERGER Jean Marie : 56,44 %13 EO 4P S = 620 9 50.00
14 EO 2P N+2 170 9 50.00
15 EO 4C W = -420 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
A10 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 36,15 %16 EO 1C E+1 -110 12.3 68.33
17 EO 4C N-1 -50 15.7 87.22
18 EO 2S W-2 100 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
A.5 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,26 %19 EO 3S W-2 200 3.4 18.89
20 EO 3S W+1 -630 14.6 81.11
21 EO 4C W = -420 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
A11 - : 0,00 %22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.6 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 44,63 %25 EO 3S E = -600 15.7 87.22
26 EO 2P W+1 -140 10.1 56.11
27 EO 5K W = -400 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
A.1 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 52,94 %28 EO 2P E-2 100 5 27.78
29 EO 3S S+1 630 4 22.22
30 EO 4CcN-1 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.7 NELIS Claude -VAN DOOREN Michele : 49,22 %31 EO 4C S = 620 9 50.00
32 EO 3S W+2 -660 13.4 74.44
33 EO 3C E = -140 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
Total : 252,6 / 486 = 51,98 %
PAIRE Nr : a.4 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
A.8 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 60,46 % 1 EO 4P S = 420 1.2 6.67
2 EO 3S S+1 630 4.6 25.56
3 EO 4C S-1 -50 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 17,04 %
A.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 58,39 % 7 EO 1S W-1 100 12.3 68.33
8 EO 3S E-1 50 2.3 12.78
9 EO 2C E-1 100 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
A.4 DELHEZ Jacques -BERGER Jean Marie : 56,44 %10 EO 2P S+1 140 5.7 31.67
11 EO 3S W-2 100 4.6 25.56
12 EO 4P S = 620 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 19,26 %
A10 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 36,15 %13 EO 3S S+2 660 0.1 0.56
14 EO 2P N+2 170 9 50.00
15 EO 3C W+2 -200 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
A.5 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,26 %16 EO 3C E = -140 15.7 87.22
17 EO 4P N+1 450 3.4 18.89
18 EO 3K E = -110 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
A11 - : 0,00 %19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.6 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 44,63 %22 EO 5P E-1 100 3.4 18.89
23 EO 2P W-1 100 6.8 37.78
24 EO 3K W+2 -150 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
A.1 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 52,94 %25 EO 2S E = -120 7.9 43.89
26 EO 2P W+1 -140 10.1 56.11
27 EO 5K E = -400 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
A.7 NELIS Claude -VAN DOOREN Michele : 49,22 %28 EO 2S N-1 -100 15 83.33
29 EO 4P N+1 650 1 5.56
30 EO 4C N = 420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
A.2 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 58,81 %31 EO 4C N+1 650 1.2 6.67
32 EO 3K E+1 -130 3.4 18.89
33 EO 4C E = -420 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
Total : 183,1 / 486 = 37,67 %
PAIRE Nr : a.5 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
A.3 ERPICUM Patrice -ROMAIN Roberte : 31,74 % 1 EO 4P S-1 -50 14.6 81.11
2 EO 2C S+1 140 14.6 81.11
3 EO 3P W+4 -260 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 58,39 % 4 EO 3P E-2 200 1.2 6.67
5 EO 4C W = -420 11.2 62.22
6 EO 4P S+2 480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
A10 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 36,15 %10 EO 2P S-1 -100 17.9 99.44
11 EO 1S W+1 -120 10.1 56.11
12 EO 3P S = 140 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
A.5 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,26 %13 EO 4P S = 620 9 50.00
14 EO 1S W = -90 17.9 99.44
15 EO 2C W = -110 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
A11 - : 0,00 %16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.6 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 44,63 %19 EO 3S W+1 -630 17.9 99.44
20 EO 3S W = -600 9 50.00
21 EO 3S W+1 -430 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 78,89 %
A.1 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 52,94 %22 EO 4P E = -620 14.6 81.11
23 EO 1S S+1 120 4.6 25.56
24 EO 4K W+1 -150 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 62,59 %
A.7 NELIS Claude -VAN DOOREN Michele : 49,22 %25 EO 3S E-1 100 2.3 12.78
26 EO 3P W = -140 10.1 56.11
27 EO 4C E = -420 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 45,74 %
A.2 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 58,81 %28 EO 2P W-3 150 0 0.00
29 EO 4P N = 620 10 55.56
30 EO 3C N = 140 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
A.8 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 60,46 %31 EO 4C S = 620 9 50.00
32 EO 5CcN-4 -800 16.8 93.33
33 EO 4T S-2 -100 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
Total : 267,0 / 486 = 54,94 %
PAIRE Nr : a.6 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
A.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 58,39 % 1 EO 3S N-3 -150 17.9 99.44
2 EO 3C S+1 170 9 50.00
3 EO 5K E = -600 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 70,56 %
A.4 DELHEZ Jacques -BERGER Jean Marie : 56,44 % 4 EO 3C E-1 100 4.6 25.56
5 EO 3S W = -400 6.8 37.78
6 EO 4P S+2 480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,78 %
A10 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 36,15 % 7 EO 2P N = 110 5.7 31.67
8 EO 3S E+2 -460 15.7 87.22
9 EO 1S N = 90 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
A11 - : 0,00 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.6 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 44,63 %16 EO 3CcE-1 200 1.2 6.67
17 EO 4C N = 420 11.2 62.22
18 EO 3C W-2 100 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
A.1 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 52,94 %19 EO 3S W-2 200 3.4 18.89
20 EO 3S W+1 -630 14.6 81.11
21 EO 3S W = -400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.7 NELIS Claude -VAN DOOREN Michele : 49,22 %22 EO 5C E-1 100 3.4 18.89
23 EO 2P E-2 200 1.2 6.67
24 EO 3C S = 140 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
A.2 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 58,81 %25 EO 3S E+1 -630 17.9 99.44
26 EO 2P W+1 -140 10.1 56.11
27 EO 4C E = -420 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 74,63 %
A.8 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 60,46 %28 EO 3T N-1 -100 15 83.33
29 EO 4P N+1 650 1 5.56
30 EO 4C N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.3 ERPICUM Patrice -ROMAIN Roberte : 31,74 %31 EO 2C S+3 200 15.7 87.22
32 EO 4CcN-4 -800 16.8 93.33
33 EO 3CcE+1 -630 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 93,33 %
Total : 263,1 / 486 = 54,14 %
PAIRE Nr : a.7 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette
A.4 DELHEZ Jacques -BERGER Jean Marie : 56,44 % 1 EO 4P S = 420 1.2 6.67
2 EO 3C S = 140 14.6 81.11
3 EO 3C S = 140 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 29,44 %
A10 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 36,15 % 4 EO 2P E+1 -140 17.9 99.44
5 EO 4C E = -420 11.2 62.22
6 EO 4P S+2 480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,56 %
A.5 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,26 % 7 EO 1S W-2 200 2.3 12.78
8 EO 4P E+1 -450 11.2 62.22
9 EO 3C E-2 200 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 25,19 %
A11 - : 0,00 %10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.1 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 52,94 %16 EO 1C E+1 -110 12.3 68.33
17 EO 4C S+1 450 3.4 18.89
18 EO 3S E-2 100 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
A.7 NELIS Claude -VAN DOOREN Michele : 49,22 %19 EO 3K E+1 -130 13.4 74.44
20 EO 3S W-1 100 3.4 18.89
21 EO 4C W-1 50 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 37,41 %
A.2 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 58,81 %22 EO 5P E-1 100 3.4 18.89
23 EO 2K W+2 -130 17.9 99.44
24 EO 4KcW-2 300 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
A.8 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 60,46 %25 EO 2S E = -120 7.9 43.89
26 EO 3C N-1 -100 1.2 6.67
27 EO 3S E = -400 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 29,44 %
A.3 ERPICUM Patrice -ROMAIN Roberte : 31,74 %28 EO 2P E-2 100 5 27.78
29 EO 4P N = 620 10 55.56
30 EO 2C N = 110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 58,39 %31 EO 4C N = 620 9 50.00
32 EO 3K E+1 -130 3.4 18.89
33 EO 3C E = -140 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
Total : 186,7 / 486 = 38,42 %
PAIRE Nr : a.8 PIETQUIN Joseph -WILLEMS Jacques
A10 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 36,15 % 1 EO 3P S+1 170 9 50.00
2 EO 4C S-2 -200 17.9 99.44
3 EO 5CcS-2 -300 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
A.5 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,26 % 4 EO 2P E = -110 11.2 62.22
5 EO 3S W-1 50 3.4 18.89
6 EO 4P S+2 480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 43,70 %
A11 - : 0,00 % 7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.6 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 44,63 %10 EO 2P S+1 140 5.7 31.67
11 EO 2P E+1 -140 14.6 81.11
12 EO 4P N-1 -100 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
A.1 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 52,94 %13 EO 4P S = 620 9 50.00
14 EO 3P N+1 170 9 50.00
15 EO 4C W-2 100 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
A.2 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 58,81 %19 EO 3S W-2 200 3.4 18.89
20 EO 2P E = -110 6.8 37.78
21 EO 4C W-1 50 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 25,19 %
A.8 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 60,46 %22 EO 4P E = -620 14.6 81.11
23 EO 2P W = -110 14.6 81.11
24 EO 3P S = 140 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
A.3 ERPICUM Patrice -ROMAIN Roberte : 31,74 %25 EO 2S E+2 -180 13.4 74.44
26 EO 2C N-1 -100 1.2 6.67
27 EO 3S E+1 -430 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
A.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 58,39 %28 EO 2P E-2 100 5 27.78
29 EO 4P N = 620 10 55.56
30 EO 4C N-3 -150 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.4 DELHEZ Jacques -BERGER Jean Marie : 56,44 %31 EO 4C S = 620 9 50.00
32 EO 3S W-1 100 0.1 0.56
33 EO 4C E = -420 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
Total : 243,5 / 486 = 50,10 %
PAIRE Nr : a.9 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre
A.5 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,26 % 1 EO 3P S+1 170 9 50.00
2 EO 3S N+1 630 4.6 25.56
3 EO 4P W+3 -710 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 54,26 %
A11 - : 0,00 % 4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.6 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 44,63 % 7 EO 1S E-1 100 12.3 68.33
8 EO 4P E+1 -450 11.2 62.22
9 EO 2P S-1 -50 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 74,63 %
A.1 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 52,94 %10 EO 2P S = 110 13.4 74.44
11 EO 2P E+1 -140 14.6 81.11
12 EO 4CcE-2 300 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
A.7 NELIS Claude -VAN DOOREN Michele : 49,22 %13 EO 3S S-2 -200 16.8 93.33
14 EO 3P N+1 170 9 50.00
15 EO 1S W+3 -180 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
A.2 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 58,81 %16 EO 3S S-3 -150 17.9 99.44
17 EO 3P N+2 200 13.4 74.44
18 EO 2PcN = 670 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 58,15 %
A.3 ERPICUM Patrice -ROMAIN Roberte : 31,74 %22 EO 6C W-1 100 3.4 18.89
23 EO 2S S-1 -100 11.2 62.22
24 EO 1S E+3 -180 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 60,19 %
A.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 58,39 %25 EO 1S W+1 -120 7.9 43.89
26 EO 2P W+1 -140 10.1 56.11
27 EO 3S E+3 -490 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
A.4 DELHEZ Jacques -BERGER Jean Marie : 56,44 %28 EO 3T N-2 -200 18 100.00
29 EO 4P N = 620 10 55.56
30 EO 3T E = -110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
A10 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 36,15 %31 EO 2K E-2 100 17.9 99.44
32 EO 3K E+2 -150 6.8 37.78
33 EO 3C E = -140 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 56,30 %
Total : 309,1 / 486 = 63,60 %
PAIRE Nr : a10 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane
A11 - : 0,00 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.6 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 44,63 % 4 EO 2P E = -110 11.2 62.22
5 EO 4C E = -420 11.2 62.22
6 EO 4P S+2 480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,15 %
A.1 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 52,94 % 7 EO 1S W-3 300 0.1 0.56
8 EO 6P E = -980 17.9 99.44
9 EO 2P S = 110 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
A.7 NELIS Claude -VAN DOOREN Michele : 49,22 %10 EO 2P S = 110 13.4 74.44
11 EO 3S W-3 150 0.1 0.56
12 EO 4P S-1 -100 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 49,81 %
A.2 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 58,81 %13 EO 4P S = 620 9 50.00
14 EO 3P N+2 200 2.3 12.78
15 EO 3C W = -140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
A.8 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 60,46 %16 EO 3CcE-1 200 1.2 6.67
17 EO 4C N+1 450 3.4 18.89
18 EO 3S E = -400 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
A.3 ERPICUM Patrice -ROMAIN Roberte : 31,74 %19 EO 3S W-1 100 10.1 56.11
20 EO 3S W+1 -630 14.6 81.11
21 EO 4C W = -420 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
A.4 DELHEZ Jacques -BERGER Jean Marie : 56,44 %25 EO 3S E-2 200 0.1 0.56
26 EO 3CcN-2 -500 17.9 99.44
27 EO 4C E-1 50 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
A10 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 36,15 %28 EO 2P E-1 50 12 66.67
29 EO 2P S+2 170 16 88.89
30 EO 4C N-3 -150 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
A.5 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,26 %31 EO 4C S+1 650 1.2 6.67
32 EO 3CcN-3 -500 9 50.00
33 EO 3C E+1 -170 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
Total : 244,0 / 486 = 50,21 %
PAIRE Nr : a11 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette
A.6 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 44,63 % 1 EO 3P S+1 170 9 50.00
2 EO 4C S+1 650 0.1 0.56
3 EO 4C S-1 -50 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 23,15 %
A.1 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 52,94 % 4 EO 2P E = -110 11.2 62.22
5 EO 4C E-2 100 0.1 0.56
6 EO 4P S+2 480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
A.7 NELIS Claude -VAN DOOREN Michele : 49,22 % 7 EO 1S W-1 100 12.3 68.33
8 EO 4P E+1 -450 11.2 62.22
9 EO 1S N-1 -50 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 74,63 %
A.2 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 58,81 %10 EO 2P S+1 140 5.7 31.67
11 EO 3S W-2 100 4.6 25.56
12 EO 4P S-1 -100 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
A.8 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 60,46 %13 EO 4P S+1 650 2.3 12.78
14 EO 2P N+2 170 9 50.00
15 EO 4C W-1 50 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 27,22 %
A.3 ERPICUM Patrice -ROMAIN Roberte : 31,74 %16 EO 3T N-1 -50 7.9 43.89
17 EO 6C S-4 -200 17.9 99.44
18 EO 3P N-1 -100 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
A.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 58,39 %19 EO 3S W-2 200 3.4 18.89
20 EO 3S W-2 200 0.1 0.56
21 EO 5C E-1 50 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 12,78 %
A.4 DELHEZ Jacques -BERGER Jean Marie : 56,44 %22 EO 4P E = -620 14.6 81.11
23 EO 2T S = 90 9 50.00
24 EO 3K W = -110 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 56,30 %
A.5 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,26 %28 EO 2P E-2 100 5 27.78
29 EO 4P S = 620 10 55.56
30 EO 3C N = 140 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A11 - : 0,00 %31 EO BYE 0 0.00
32 EO BYE 0 0.00
33 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 203,8 / 486 = 41,93 %
|
|