|
Tournoi du 12-09-16
Lundi
1 64,44 8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie
2 55,74 2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
3 54,26 11 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
4 53,89 10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
5 52,59 9 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte
~ 52,59 7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
~ 52,59 4 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
8 50,19 5 WANDERPEPEN Janine -BEYNE Anne
9 48,33 1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
10 33,70 6 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette
11 31,67 3 ARICKX Roger -ROEGIERS Marga
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 57,41 15 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
2 56,85 12 COLLIGNON Francis -COLLIGNON Véro
3 56,30 19 CASSART Guy -BRIOT Fernand
4 52,04 13 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel
5 51,11 20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
6 49,81 17 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle
7 48,52 16 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
8 48,33 18 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
9 46,48 14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
10 42,22 22 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele
11 40,93 21 DELHEZ Jacques -COURTOIS Patrick
PAIRE Nr : 1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
12 COLLIGNON Francis -COLLIGNON Véro : 56,85 % 1 NS 3P S-1 -50 4 22.22
2 NS 4C W-1 50 17 94.44
3 NS 4P W+1 -650 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
22 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 42,22 % 4 NS 3C E+1 -170 13 72.22
5 NS 3S S+2 660 15 83.33
6 NS 3S N = 400 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
21 DELHEZ Jacques -COURTOIS Patrick : 40,93 % 7 NS 3S N = 600 10 55.56
8 NS 3S W+1 -430 11 61.11
9 NS 2P S+1 140 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,11 %10 NS 4P W = -620 1 5.56
11 NS 2S W = -120 10 55.56
12 NS 4C S = 620 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
19 CASSART Guy -BRIOT Fernand : 56,30 %13 NS 2P S+1 140 13 72.22
14 NS 3S W-2 100 16 88.89
15 NS 4PcN = 790 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
18 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 48,33 %16 NS 4C N = 420 16 88.89
17 NS 3K E-2 100 10 55.56
18 NS 4C S = 620 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
17 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 49,81 %19 NS 3S N+1 430 7 38.89
20 NS 4C N-1 -100 3 16.67
21 NS 2C N+1 140 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
16 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 48,52 %22 NS 3C E = -140 8 44.44
23 NS 2P S-1 -100 3 16.67
24 NS 2C E = -110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
15 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 57,41 %25 NS 3S E+1 -630 2 11.11
26 NS 3S E+3 -690 0 0.00
27 NS 5C N-1 -50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 7,41 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 46,48 %28 NS 4TcN = 710 18 100.00
29 NS 1S W+1 -120 5 27.78
30 NS 5K E-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 261,0 / 540 = 48,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
13 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 52,04 % 4 NS 4C E = -620 5 27.78
5 NS 3S S+1 630 8 44.44
6 NS 3S S-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
12 COLLIGNON Francis -COLLIGNON Véro : 56,85 % 7 NS 3S N = 600 10 55.56
8 NS 3S W+2 -460 5 27.78
9 NS 2P S = 110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
22 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 42,22 %10 NS 4P W-1 100 13 72.22
11 NS 3T W = -110 14 77.78
12 NS 4C S+1 650 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
21 DELHEZ Jacques -COURTOIS Patrick : 40,93 %13 NS 2P E-3 300 18 100.00
14 NS 3S W-2 100 16 88.89
15 NS 3P N+2 200 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,11 %16 NS 4C N = 420 16 88.89
17 NS 4C S-1 -50 5 27.78
18 NS 4C N+1 650 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
19 CASSART Guy -BRIOT Fernand : 56,30 %19 NS 3S S+1 430 7 38.89
20 NS 3C N = 140 11 61.11
21 NS 3C N+1 170 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
18 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 48,33 %22 NS 4C W = -620 2 11.11
23 NS 3P E-2 200 17 94.44
24 NS 1S E+4 -210 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
17 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 49,81 %25 NS 3S E = -600 11 61.11
26 NS 3S E+1 -630 8 44.44
27 NS 3P W-2 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
16 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 48,52 %28 NS 2P W-1 50 14 77.78
29 NS 3T W-1 100 13 72.22
30 NS 5K E-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
15 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 57,41 %31 NS 1S S = 90 10 55.56
32 NS 4P E+1 -650 6 33.33
33 NS 2S N+2 180 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 301,0 / 540 = 55,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 ARICKX Roger -ROEGIERS Marga
16 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 48,52 % 1 NS 3T W = -110 2 11.11
2 NS 4PcN-3 -800 0 0.00
3 NS 3P W+3 -230 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 46,48 % 7 NS 3S N-1 -100 0 0.00
8 NS 3S W+1 -430 11 61.11
9 NS 4P S-3 -150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
13 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 52,04 %10 NS 2P W+1 -140 7 38.89
11 NS 2T E+2 -130 8 44.44
12 NS 2C S+2 170 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
12 COLLIGNON Francis -COLLIGNON Véro : 56,85 %13 NS 2C E+2 -170 0 0.00
14 NS 5T W = -400 1 5.56
15 NS 2P N+2 170 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
22 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 42,22 %16 NS 3C N = 140 10 55.56
17 NS 4C S-1 -50 5 27.78
18 NS 3S S+2 660 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
21 DELHEZ Jacques -COURTOIS Patrick : 40,93 %19 NS 3T S+1 130 0 0.00
20 NS 4C N-1 -100 3 16.67
21 NS 4P W-3 150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,11 %22 NS 4C E-1 100 13 72.22
23 NS 2K S+1 110 10 55.56
24 NS 1S E+3 -180 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
19 CASSART Guy -BRIOT Fernand : 56,30 %25 NS 3S E+2 -660 0 0.00
26 NS 3S E+1 -630 8 44.44
27 NS 4P W-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
18 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 48,33 %28 NS 5TcN-2 -500 2 11.11
29 NS 3C N-2 -200 1 5.56
30 NS 5KcE-1 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
17 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 49,81 %31 NS 3K N-2 -200 1 5.56
32 NS 5T S-2 -100 15 83.33
33 NS 2S N = 120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 171,0 / 540 = 31,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
18 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 48,33 % 1 NS 3S W-2 100 7 38.89
2 NS 4C W-1 50 17 94.44
3 NS 4P W+1 -650 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
17 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 49,81 % 4 NS 2C E+2 -170 13 72.22
5 NS 2S S+3 210 1 5.56
6 NS 3S S = 400 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
15 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 57,41 %10 NS 4P W-1 100 13 72.22
11 NS 3S W = -400 2 11.11
12 NS 3S S-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 46,48 %13 NS 2P S+2 170 16 88.89
14 NS 4T W+1 -150 9 50.00
15 NS 3P N = 140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
13 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 52,04 %16 NS 2T S = 90 8 44.44
17 NS 3C N = 140 13 72.22
18 NS 3S S+1 630 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
12 COLLIGNON Francis -COLLIGNON Véro : 56,85 %19 NS 3S S+2 460 16 88.89
20 NS 2C N+1 140 11 61.11
21 NS 3S S = 600 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
22 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 42,22 %22 NS 4C E-1 100 13 72.22
23 NS 4K S-1 -100 3 16.67
24 NS 2P S-1 -50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
21 DELHEZ Jacques -COURTOIS Patrick : 40,93 %25 NS 3S E = -600 11 61.11
26 NS 3S E = -600 14 77.78
27 NS 4C S+1 450 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,11 %28 NS 3S S = 600 16 88.89
29 NS 3K E-2 200 18 100.00
30 NS 5KcE-1 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
19 CASSART Guy -BRIOT Fernand : 56,30 %31 NS 2S S-2 -200 1 5.56
32 NS 5PcE = -850 1 5.56
33 NS 2P E = -110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 3,70 %
Total : 284,0 / 540 = 52,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 WANDERPEPEN Janine -BEYNE Anne
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,11 % 1 NS 3P N = 140 13 72.22
2 NS 3P N-2 -200 3 16.67
3 NS 4P W+2 -680 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
19 CASSART Guy -BRIOT Fernand : 56,30 % 4 NS 4C E+1 -650 0 0.00
5 NS 3S S+1 630 8 44.44
6 NS 3S N = 400 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
18 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 48,33 % 7 NS 3S N = 600 10 55.56
8 NS 3S W = -400 16 88.89
9 NS 4C E+1 -650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
16 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 48,52 %13 NS 1S S+1 120 10 55.56
14 NS 3T W+2 -150 9 50.00
15 NS 4P N = 620 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
15 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 57,41 %16 NS 4C N-1 -50 5 27.78
17 NS 3C S = 140 13 72.22
18 NS 4C N+1 650 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 46,48 %19 NS 3S N+1 430 7 38.89
20 NS 3C N = 140 11 61.11
21 NS 4C N = 620 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
13 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 52,04 %22 NS 4C W-1 100 13 72.22
23 NS 3K S = 110 10 55.56
24 NS 1S E = -90 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
12 COLLIGNON Francis -COLLIGNON Véro : 56,85 %25 NS 3S E = -600 11 61.11
26 NS 3S E+1 -630 8 44.44
27 NS 4P W-2 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
22 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 42,22 %28 NS 2P W+2 -170 6 33.33
29 NS 3T W = -110 8 44.44
30 NS 4P S-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
21 DELHEZ Jacques -COURTOIS Patrick : 40,93 %31 NS 2C E-2 100 14 77.78
32 NS 4P E+1 -650 6 33.33
33 NS 2S N = 120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 271,0 / 540 = 50,19 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette
22 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 42,22 % 1 NS 3C E = -140 0 0.00
2 NS 2PcN-1 -200 3 16.67
3 NS 2P W+2 -170 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
21 DELHEZ Jacques -COURTOIS Patrick : 40,93 % 4 NS 2C E+2 -170 13 72.22
5 NS 3S S = 600 4 22.22
6 NS 3S N+2 460 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,11 % 7 NS 3S S = 600 10 55.56
8 NS 3S W+4 -520 0 0.00
9 NS 3P S-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
19 CASSART Guy -BRIOT Fernand : 56,30 %10 NS 2P E+2 -170 4 22.22
11 NS 3S W = -400 2 11.11
12 NS 4C S = 620 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
17 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 49,81 %16 NS 3T S-2 -100 1 5.56
17 NS 4C N-1 -50 5 27.78
18 NS 4C S+1 650 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
16 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 48,52 %19 NS 3S S+1 430 7 38.89
20 NS 2C N+1 140 11 61.11
21 NS 2C N+2 170 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
15 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 57,41 %22 NS 4C W = -620 2 11.11
23 NS 2K S+1 110 10 55.56
24 NS 1S E+1 -120 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 46,48 %25 NS 3S E = -600 11 61.11
26 NS 3S E+2 -660 2 11.11
27 NS 3P W = -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
13 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 52,04 %28 NS 2P W = -110 9 50.00
29 NS 2PcS-1 -200 1 5.56
30 NS 4K W = -130 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
12 COLLIGNON Francis -COLLIGNON Véro : 56,85 %31 NS 2C E-1 50 5 27.78
32 NS 5P E = -650 6 33.33
33 NS 3S N-1 -50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
Total : 182,0 / 540 = 33,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
13 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 52,04 % 1 NS 2P N+1 140 13 72.22
2 NS 3C W = -140 10 55.56
3 NS 3P W+2 -200 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
12 COLLIGNON Francis -COLLIGNON Véro : 56,85 % 4 NS 2C E+2 -170 13 72.22
5 NS 1S N+4 210 1 5.56
6 NS 3S N = 400 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
22 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 42,22 % 7 NS 3S S = 600 10 55.56
8 NS 3S W+3 -490 2 11.11
9 NS 3P S = 140 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
21 DELHEZ Jacques -COURTOIS Patrick : 40,93 %10 NS 4P E-2 200 18 100.00
11 NS 3S W = -400 2 11.11
12 NS 4C S+1 650 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,11 %13 NS 2C W = -110 3 16.67
14 NS 4T W+1 -150 9 50.00
15 NS 4P N = 620 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
18 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 48,33 %19 NS 3S N+1 430 7 38.89
20 NS 4PcW-1 200 16 88.89
21 NS 3C N+1 170 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
17 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 49,81 %22 NS 4C W = -620 2 11.11
23 NS 3K S = 110 10 55.56
24 NS 2P W-1 50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
16 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 48,52 %25 NS 3S E = -600 11 61.11
26 NS 3S E+1 -630 8 44.44
27 NS 4P W-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
15 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 57,41 %28 NS 5TcN-1 -200 4 22.22
29 NS 2K E = -90 10 55.56
30 NS 3K E+1 -130 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 46,48 %31 NS 3T S = 110 16 88.89
32 NS 5T N-4 -200 12 66.67
33 NS 2S N = 120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
Total : 284,0 / 540 = 52,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie
15 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 57,41 % 1 NS 2P N+1 140 13 72.22
2 NS 3C W = -140 10 55.56
3 NS 5T N-3 -150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 46,48 % 4 NS 3C E+1 -170 13 72.22
5 NS 3S S+1 630 8 44.44
6 NS 3S S = 400 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
13 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 52,04 % 7 NS 3S N = 600 10 55.56
8 NS 3S W+1 -430 11 61.11
9 NS 3C E-1 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
12 COLLIGNON Francis -COLLIGNON Véro : 56,85 %10 NS 4P W-1 100 13 72.22
11 NS 1T W+2 -110 14 77.78
12 NS 4C S+1 650 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
22 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 42,22 %13 NS 2P N = 110 7 38.89
14 NS 3S W-2 100 16 88.89
15 NS 4P N = 620 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
21 DELHEZ Jacques -COURTOIS Patrick : 40,93 %16 NS 4C N = 420 16 88.89
17 NS 3PcE-4 800 18 100.00
18 NS 6C N-1 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
19 CASSART Guy -BRIOT Fernand : 56,30 %22 NS 4PcS-2 -300 6 33.33
23 NS 3P W-2 200 17 94.44
24 NS 2P W = -110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
18 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 48,33 %25 NS 3S E = -600 11 61.11
26 NS 3S E-1 100 17 94.44
27 NS 3P W-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
17 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 49,81 %28 NS 3T N-1 -100 12 66.67
29 NS 2C S = 110 16 88.89
30 NS 5KcE-1 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
16 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 48,52 %31 NS 1S S = 90 10 55.56
32 NS 5PcE = -850 1 5.56
33 NS 2S N+1 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
Total : 348,0 / 540 = 64,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte
17 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 49,81 % 1 NS 2P N+1 140 13 72.22
2 NS 3C W = -140 10 55.56
3 NS 4P W+1 -650 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
16 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 48,52 % 4 NS 3C E+1 -170 13 72.22
5 NS 3S S+2 660 15 83.33
6 NS 3S S+1 430 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
15 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 57,41 % 7 NS 3S N = 600 10 55.56
8 NS 3S W+2 -460 5 27.78
9 NS 3P S-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 46,48 %10 NS 4P W = -620 1 5.56
11 NS 3C S-2 -100 18 100.00
12 NS 4C S+1 650 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
13 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 52,04 %13 NS 2C W = -110 3 16.67
14 NS 5T W = -400 1 5.56
15 NS 4P N = 620 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
12 COLLIGNON Francis -COLLIGNON Véro : 56,85 %16 NS 4C N-1 -50 5 27.78
17 NS 3S N-2 -100 0 0.00
18 NS 6C N-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
22 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 42,22 %19 NS 3S N+1 430 7 38.89
20 NS 4C N-1 -100 3 16.67
21 NS 4C S = 620 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,11 %25 NS 3S E = -600 11 61.11
26 NS 3S E-1 100 17 94.44
27 NS 3P W-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
19 CASSART Guy -BRIOT Fernand : 56,30 %28 NS 2P W = -110 9 50.00
29 NS 1S W+1 -120 5 27.78
30 NS 5KxW-1 200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
18 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 48,33 %31 NS 2P W-3 150 18 100.00
32 NS 5TcS-1 -100 15 83.33
33 NS 2S N = 120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
Total : 284,0 / 540 = 52,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
19 CASSART Guy -BRIOT Fernand : 56,30 % 1 NS 3C E-3 150 18 100.00
2 NS 3C W = -140 10 55.56
3 NS 4P W+2 -680 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
18 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 48,33 % 4 NS 3S W+1 -630 2 11.11
5 NS 3S S+2 660 15 83.33
6 NS 3S N = 400 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
17 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 49,81 % 7 NS 3S S = 600 10 55.56
8 NS 3S W-1 50 18 100.00
9 NS 2P S = 110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
16 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 48,52 %10 NS 2P E+1 -140 7 38.89
11 NS 3T W = -110 14 77.78
12 NS 4CcS = 790 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
15 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 57,41 %13 NS 2P S = 110 7 38.89
14 NS 3CcN-2 -300 4 22.22
15 NS 2P N+2 170 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 46,48 %16 NS 2C N+2 170 12 66.67
17 NS 4C S = 420 16 88.89
18 NS 4C N+1 650 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
13 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 52,04 %19 NS 3S S+2 460 16 88.89
20 NS 4C N = 620 18 100.00
21 NS 3C N = 140 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
12 COLLIGNON Francis -COLLIGNON Véro : 56,85 %22 NS 3S E-2 200 18 100.00
23 NS 3P W = -140 0 0.00
24 NS 1S E+3 -180 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
21 DELHEZ Jacques -COURTOIS Patrick : 40,93 %28 NS 5TcN-3 -800 0 0.00
29 NS 1S W-1 100 13 72.22
30 NS 5KcE-1 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,11 %31 NS 2C E-1 50 5 27.78
32 NS 4TcS-3 -500 10 55.56
33 NS 3T N = 110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
Total : 291,0 / 540 = 53,89 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
21 DELHEZ Jacques -COURTOIS Patrick : 40,93 % 1 NS 3K E-2 100 7 38.89
2 NS 3C E = -140 10 55.56
3 NS 3P E+2 -200 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,11 % 4 NS 4C E = -620 5 27.78
5 NS 3S N+2 660 15 83.33
6 NS 3S N = 400 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
19 CASSART Guy -BRIOT Fernand : 56,30 % 7 NS 3S N = 600 10 55.56
8 NS 3S E+1 -430 11 61.11
9 NS 3K E+2 -150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
18 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 48,33 %10 NS 4P E-1 100 13 72.22
11 NS 2S E+1 -150 6 33.33
12 NS 4C N = 620 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
17 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 49,81 %13 NS 2P N+1 140 13 72.22
14 NS 4T E+1 -150 9 50.00
15 NS 4P N-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
16 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 48,52 %16 NS 4C N-2 -100 1 5.56
17 NS 4C N-1 -50 5 27.78
18 NS 4C N+1 650 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
15 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 57,41 %19 NS 3S N+2 460 16 88.89
20 NS 4C N-1 -100 3 16.67
21 NS 4C N = 620 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 46,48 %22 NS 3S E-1 100 13 72.22
23 NS 3K N = 110 10 55.56
24 NS 2C E = -110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
13 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 52,04 %25 NS 3S E = -600 11 61.11
26 NS 3S E+1 -630 8 44.44
27 NS 4PcE-2 300 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
22 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 42,22 %31 NS 1S N = 90 10 55.56
32 NS 4T N-1 -50 18 100.00
33 NS 2S N+1 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
Total : 293,0 / 540 = 54,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 COLLIGNON Francis -COLLIGNON Véro
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,33 % 1 EO 3P S-1 -50 14 77.78
2 EO 4C W-1 50 1 5.56
3 EO 4P W+1 -650 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,59 % 4 EO 2C E+2 -170 5 27.78
5 EO 1S N+4 210 17 94.44
6 EO 3S N = 400 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,74 % 7 EO 3S N = 600 8 44.44
8 EO 3S W+2 -460 13 72.22
9 EO 2P S = 110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 64,44 %10 EO 4P W-1 100 5 27.78
11 EO 1T W+2 -110 4 22.22
12 EO 4C S+1 650 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
3 ARICKX Roger -ROEGIERS Marga : 31,67 %13 EO 2C E+2 -170 18 100.00
14 EO 5T W = -400 17 94.44
15 EO 2P N+2 170 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
9 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 52,59 %16 EO 4C N-1 -50 13 72.22
17 EO 3S N-2 -100 18 100.00
18 EO 6C N-2 -200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
4 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 52,59 %19 EO 3S S+2 460 2 11.11
20 EO 2C N+1 140 7 38.89
21 EO 3S S = 600 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,89 %22 EO 3S E-2 200 0 0.00
23 EO 3P W = -140 18 100.00
24 EO 1S E+3 -180 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
5 WANDERPEPEN Janine -BEYNE Anne : 50,19 %25 EO 3S E = -600 7 38.89
26 EO 3S E+1 -630 10 55.56
27 EO 4P W-2 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
6 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 33,70 %31 EO 2C E-1 50 13 72.22
32 EO 5P E = -650 12 66.67
33 EO 3S N-1 -50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
Total : 307,0 / 540 = 56,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel
7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,59 % 1 EO 2P N+1 140 5 27.78
2 EO 3C W = -140 8 44.44
3 EO 3P W+2 -200 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,74 % 4 EO 4C E = -620 13 72.22
5 EO 3S S+1 630 10 55.56
6 EO 3S S-1 -50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 64,44 % 7 EO 3S N = 600 8 44.44
8 EO 3S W+1 -430 7 38.89
9 EO 3C E-1 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
3 ARICKX Roger -ROEGIERS Marga : 31,67 %10 EO 2P W+1 -140 11 61.11
11 EO 2T E+2 -130 10 55.56
12 EO 2C S+2 170 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
9 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 52,59 %13 EO 2C W = -110 15 83.33
14 EO 5T W = -400 17 94.44
15 EO 4P N = 620 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
4 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 52,59 %16 EO 2T S = 90 10 55.56
17 EO 3C N = 140 5 27.78
18 EO 3S S+1 630 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,89 %19 EO 3S S+2 460 2 11.11
20 EO 4C N = 620 0 0.00
21 EO 3C N = 140 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
5 WANDERPEPEN Janine -BEYNE Anne : 50,19 %22 EO 4C W-1 100 5 27.78
23 EO 3K S = 110 8 44.44
24 EO 1S E = -90 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
11 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 54,26 %25 EO 3S E = -600 7 38.89
26 EO 3S E+1 -630 10 55.56
27 EO 4PcE-2 300 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
6 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 33,70 %28 EO 2P W = -110 9 50.00
29 EO 2PcS-1 -200 17 94.44
30 EO 4K W = -130 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
Total : 281,0 / 540 = 52,04 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 64,44 % 4 EO 3C E+1 -170 5 27.78
5 EO 3S S+1 630 10 55.56
6 EO 3S S = 400 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
3 ARICKX Roger -ROEGIERS Marga : 31,67 % 7 EO 3S N-1 -100 18 100.00
8 EO 3S W+1 -430 7 38.89
9 EO 4P S-3 -150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
9 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 52,59 %10 EO 4P W = -620 17 94.44
11 EO 3C S-2 -100 0 0.00
12 EO 4C S+1 650 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
4 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 52,59 %13 EO 2P S+2 170 2 11.11
14 EO 4T W+1 -150 9 50.00
15 EO 3P N = 140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,89 %16 EO 2C N+2 170 6 33.33
17 EO 4C S = 420 2 11.11
18 EO 4C N+1 650 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
5 WANDERPEPEN Janine -BEYNE Anne : 50,19 %19 EO 3S N+1 430 11 61.11
20 EO 3C N = 140 7 38.89
21 EO 4C N = 620 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
11 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 54,26 %22 EO 3S E-1 100 5 27.78
23 EO 3K N = 110 8 44.44
24 EO 2C E = -110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
6 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 33,70 %25 EO 3S E = -600 7 38.89
26 EO 3S E+2 -660 16 88.89
27 EO 3P W = -140 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,33 %28 EO 4TcN = 710 0 0.00
29 EO 1S W+1 -120 13 72.22
30 EO 5K E-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,59 %31 EO 3T S = 110 2 11.11
32 EO 5T N-4 -200 6 33.33
33 EO 2S N = 120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
Total : 251,0 / 540 = 46,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 64,44 % 1 EO 2P N+1 140 5 27.78
2 EO 3C W = -140 8 44.44
3 EO 5T N-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
9 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 52,59 % 7 EO 3S N = 600 8 44.44
8 EO 3S W+2 -460 13 72.22
9 EO 3P S-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
4 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 52,59 %10 EO 4P W-1 100 5 27.78
11 EO 3S W = -400 16 88.89
12 EO 3S S-1 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,89 %13 EO 2P S = 110 11 61.11
14 EO 3CcN-2 -300 14 77.78
15 EO 2P N+2 170 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
5 WANDERPEPEN Janine -BEYNE Anne : 50,19 %16 EO 4C N-1 -50 13 72.22
17 EO 3C S = 140 5 27.78
18 EO 4C N+1 650 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
11 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 54,26 %19 EO 3S N+2 460 2 11.11
20 EO 4C N-1 -100 15 83.33
21 EO 4C N = 620 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
6 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 33,70 %22 EO 4C W = -620 16 88.89
23 EO 2K S+1 110 8 44.44
24 EO 1S E+1 -120 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,33 %25 EO 3S E+1 -630 16 88.89
26 EO 3S E+3 -690 18 100.00
27 EO 5C N-1 -50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 92,59 %
7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,59 %28 EO 5TcN-1 -200 14 77.78
29 EO 2K E = -90 8 44.44
30 EO 3K E+1 -130 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,74 %31 EO 1S S = 90 8 44.44
32 EO 4P E+1 -650 12 66.67
33 EO 2S N+2 180 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 310,0 / 540 = 57,41 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
3 ARICKX Roger -ROEGIERS Marga : 31,67 % 1 EO 3T W = -110 16 88.89
2 EO 4PcN-3 -800 18 100.00
3 EO 3P W+3 -230 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
9 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 52,59 % 4 EO 3C E+1 -170 5 27.78
5 EO 3S S+2 660 3 16.67
6 EO 3S S+1 430 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,89 %10 EO 2P E+1 -140 11 61.11
11 EO 3T W = -110 4 22.22
12 EO 4CcS = 790 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
5 WANDERPEPEN Janine -BEYNE Anne : 50,19 %13 EO 1S S+1 120 8 44.44
14 EO 3T W+2 -150 9 50.00
15 EO 4P N = 620 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
11 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 54,26 %16 EO 4C N-2 -100 17 94.44
17 EO 4C N-1 -50 13 72.22
18 EO 4C N+1 650 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
6 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 33,70 %19 EO 3S S+1 430 11 61.11
20 EO 2C N+1 140 7 38.89
21 EO 2C N+2 170 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,33 %22 EO 3C E = -140 10 55.56
23 EO 2P S-1 -100 15 83.33
24 EO 2C E = -110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,59 %25 EO 3S E = -600 7 38.89
26 EO 3S E+1 -630 10 55.56
27 EO 4P W-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,74 %28 EO 2P W-1 50 4 22.22
29 EO 3T W-1 100 5 27.78
30 EO 5K E-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 64,44 %31 EO 1S S = 90 8 44.44
32 EO 5PcE = -850 17 94.44
33 EO 2S N+1 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
Total : 262,0 / 540 = 48,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle
9 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 52,59 % 1 EO 2P N+1 140 5 27.78
2 EO 3C W = -140 8 44.44
3 EO 4P W+1 -650 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
4 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 52,59 % 4 EO 2C E+2 -170 5 27.78
5 EO 2S S+3 210 17 94.44
6 EO 3S S = 400 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,89 % 7 EO 3S S = 600 8 44.44
8 EO 3S W-1 50 0 0.00
9 EO 2P S = 110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
11 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 54,26 %13 EO 2P N+1 140 5 27.78
14 EO 4T E+1 -150 9 50.00
15 EO 4P N-1 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
6 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 33,70 %16 EO 3T S-2 -100 17 94.44
17 EO 4C N-1 -50 13 72.22
18 EO 4C S+1 650 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,33 %19 EO 3S N+1 430 11 61.11
20 EO 4C N-1 -100 15 83.33
21 EO 2C N+1 140 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,59 %22 EO 4C W = -620 16 88.89
23 EO 3K S = 110 8 44.44
24 EO 2P W-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,74 %25 EO 3S E = -600 7 38.89
26 EO 3S E+1 -630 10 55.56
27 EO 3P W-2 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 64,44 %28 EO 3T N-1 -100 6 33.33
29 EO 2C S = 110 2 11.11
30 EO 5KcE-1 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
3 ARICKX Roger -ROEGIERS Marga : 31,67 %31 EO 3K N-2 -200 17 94.44
32 EO 5T S-2 -100 3 16.67
33 EO 2S N = 120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 269,0 / 540 = 49,81 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
4 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 52,59 % 1 EO 3S W-2 100 11 61.11
2 EO 4C W-1 50 1 5.56
3 EO 4P W+1 -650 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,89 % 4 EO 3S W+1 -630 16 88.89
5 EO 3S S+2 660 3 16.67
6 EO 3S N = 400 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
5 WANDERPEPEN Janine -BEYNE Anne : 50,19 % 7 EO 3S N = 600 8 44.44
8 EO 3S W = -400 2 11.11
9 EO 4C E+1 -650 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
11 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 54,26 %10 EO 4P E-1 100 5 27.78
11 EO 2S E+1 -150 12 66.67
12 EO 4C N = 620 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,33 %16 EO 4C N = 420 2 11.11
17 EO 3K E-2 100 8 44.44
18 EO 4C S = 620 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,59 %19 EO 3S N+1 430 11 61.11
20 EO 4PcW-1 200 2 11.11
21 EO 3C N+1 170 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,74 %22 EO 4C W = -620 16 88.89
23 EO 3P E-2 200 1 5.56
24 EO 1S E+4 -210 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 64,44 %25 EO 3S E = -600 7 38.89
26 EO 3S E-1 100 1 5.56
27 EO 3P W-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
3 ARICKX Roger -ROEGIERS Marga : 31,67 %28 EO 5TcN-2 -500 16 88.89
29 EO 3C N-2 -200 17 94.44
30 EO 5KcE-1 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
9 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 52,59 %31 EO 2P W-3 150 0 0.00
32 EO 5TcS-1 -100 3 16.67
33 EO 2S N = 120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
Total : 261,0 / 540 = 48,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 CASSART Guy -BRIOT Fernand
10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,89 % 1 EO 3C E-3 150 0 0.00
2 EO 3C W = -140 8 44.44
3 EO 4P W+2 -680 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
5 WANDERPEPEN Janine -BEYNE Anne : 50,19 % 4 EO 4C E+1 -650 18 100.00
5 EO 3S S+1 630 10 55.56
6 EO 3S N = 400 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
11 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 54,26 % 7 EO 3S N = 600 8 44.44
8 EO 3S E+1 -430 7 38.89
9 EO 3K E+2 -150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
6 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 33,70 %10 EO 2P E+2 -170 14 77.78
11 EO 3S W = -400 16 88.89
12 EO 4C S = 620 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,33 %13 EO 2P S+1 140 5 27.78
14 EO 3S W-2 100 2 11.11
15 EO 4PcN = 790 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,74 %19 EO 3S S+1 430 11 61.11
20 EO 3C N = 140 7 38.89
21 EO 3C N+1 170 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 64,44 %22 EO 4PcS-2 -300 12 66.67
23 EO 3P W-2 200 1 5.56
24 EO 2P W = -110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
3 ARICKX Roger -ROEGIERS Marga : 31,67 %25 EO 3S E+2 -660 18 100.00
26 EO 3S E+1 -630 10 55.56
27 EO 4P W-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
9 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 52,59 %28 EO 2P W = -110 9 50.00
29 EO 1S W+1 -120 13 72.22
30 EO 5KxW-1 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
4 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 52,59 %31 EO 2S S-2 -200 17 94.44
32 EO 5PcE = -850 17 94.44
33 EO 2P E = -110 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 96,30 %
Total : 304,0 / 540 = 56,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
5 WANDERPEPEN Janine -BEYNE Anne : 50,19 % 1 EO 3P N = 140 5 27.78
2 EO 3P N-2 -200 15 83.33
3 EO 4P W+2 -680 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
11 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 54,26 % 4 EO 4C E = -620 13 72.22
5 EO 3S N+2 660 3 16.67
6 EO 3S N = 400 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
6 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 33,70 % 7 EO 3S S = 600 8 44.44
8 EO 3S W+4 -520 18 100.00
9 EO 3P S-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,33 %10 EO 4P W = -620 17 94.44
11 EO 2S W = -120 8 44.44
12 EO 4C S = 620 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,59 %13 EO 2C W = -110 15 83.33
14 EO 4T W+1 -150 9 50.00
15 EO 4P N = 620 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,74 %16 EO 4C N = 420 2 11.11
17 EO 4C S-1 -50 13 72.22
18 EO 4C N+1 650 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
3 ARICKX Roger -ROEGIERS Marga : 31,67 %22 EO 4C E-1 100 5 27.78
23 EO 2K S+1 110 8 44.44
24 EO 1S E+3 -180 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
9 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 52,59 %25 EO 3S E = -600 7 38.89
26 EO 3S E-1 100 1 5.56
27 EO 3P W-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
4 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 52,59 %28 EO 3S S = 600 2 11.11
29 EO 3K E-2 200 0 0.00
30 EO 5KcE-1 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,89 %31 EO 2C E-1 50 13 72.22
32 EO 4TcS-3 -500 8 44.44
33 EO 3T N = 110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
Total : 276,0 / 540 = 51,11 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 DELHEZ Jacques -COURTOIS Patrick
11 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 54,26 % 1 EO 3K E-2 100 11 61.11
2 EO 3C E = -140 8 44.44
3 EO 3P E+2 -200 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
6 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 33,70 % 4 EO 2C E+2 -170 5 27.78
5 EO 3S S = 600 14 77.78
6 EO 3S N+2 460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,33 % 7 EO 3S N = 600 8 44.44
8 EO 3S W+1 -430 7 38.89
9 EO 2P S+1 140 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,59 %10 EO 4P E-2 200 0 0.00
11 EO 3S W = -400 16 88.89
12 EO 4C S+1 650 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,74 %13 EO 2P E-3 300 0 0.00
14 EO 3S W-2 100 2 11.11
15 EO 3P N+2 200 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 64,44 %16 EO 4C N = 420 2 11.11
17 EO 3PcE-4 800 0 0.00
18 EO 6C N-1 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
3 ARICKX Roger -ROEGIERS Marga : 31,67 %19 EO 3T S+1 130 18 100.00
20 EO 4C N-1 -100 15 83.33
21 EO 4P W-3 150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
4 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 52,59 %25 EO 3S E = -600 7 38.89
26 EO 3S E = -600 4 22.22
27 EO 4C S+1 450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,89 %28 EO 5TcN-3 -800 18 100.00
29 EO 1S W-1 100 5 27.78
30 EO 5KcE-1 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
5 WANDERPEPEN Janine -BEYNE Anne : 50,19 %31 EO 2C E-2 100 4 22.22
32 EO 4P E+1 -650 12 66.67
33 EO 2S N = 120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 221,0 / 540 = 40,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele
6 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 33,70 % 1 EO 3C E = -140 18 100.00
2 EO 2PcN-1 -200 15 83.33
3 EO 2P W+2 -170 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,33 % 4 EO 3C E+1 -170 5 27.78
5 EO 3S S+2 660 3 16.67
6 EO 3S N = 400 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,59 % 7 EO 3S S = 600 8 44.44
8 EO 3S W+3 -490 16 88.89
9 EO 3P S = 140 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,74 %10 EO 4P W-1 100 5 27.78
11 EO 3T W = -110 4 22.22
12 EO 4C S+1 650 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 64,44 %13 EO 2P N = 110 11 61.11
14 EO 3S W-2 100 2 11.11
15 EO 4P N = 620 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
3 ARICKX Roger -ROEGIERS Marga : 31,67 %16 EO 3C N = 140 8 44.44
17 EO 4C S-1 -50 13 72.22
18 EO 3S S+2 660 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
9 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 52,59 %19 EO 3S N+1 430 11 61.11
20 EO 4C N-1 -100 15 83.33
21 EO 4C S = 620 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
4 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 52,59 %22 EO 4C E-1 100 5 27.78
23 EO 4K S-1 -100 15 83.33
24 EO 2P S-1 -50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
5 WANDERPEPEN Janine -BEYNE Anne : 50,19 %28 EO 2P W+2 -170 12 66.67
29 EO 3T W = -110 10 55.56
30 EO 4P S-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
11 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 54,26 %31 EO 1S N = 90 8 44.44
32 EO 4T N-1 -50 0 0.00
33 EO 2S N+1 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
Total : 228,0 / 540 = 42,22 %
|
|