|
Tournoi du 12-12-16
Lundi
1 59,20 A.3 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
2 56,77 A.4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -CASSART Guy
3 54,94 A13 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
4 54,52 A10 VUYTS Michèle -BIOURGE Gabrielle
5 52,48 A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
6 52,30 A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
7 52,17 A12 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
8 50,11 A.6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
9 48,97 A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
10 47,02 A.7 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse
11 45,67 A11 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte
12 38,05 A.5 NELIS Claude -LEBRUN Robert
13 37,83 A.9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 65,50 a13 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre
2 61,08 a11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
3 56,32 a.3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
4 56,21 a.2 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier
5 52,09 a12 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
6 50,71 a.5 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent
7 49,21 a.1 BEYNE Anne -WANDERPEPEN Janine
8 48,32 a.8 DEBIE Sylvie -MATELART Marc
9 47,65 a.9 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
10 44,95 a.4 LECERF Marcel -DEBUISSON Colette
11 43,45 a10 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean
12 38,45 a.7 ROMAIN Roberte -DEMARTHE DINA
13 36,03 a.6 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert
PAIRE Nr : A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
a.1 BEYNE Anne -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 49,21 % 1 NS 4C S-1 -50 4 18.18
2 NS 2S W+2 -180 9 40.91
3 NS 3C N-2 -100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
a11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 61,08 % 4 NS 6S W+1 -1470 11 50.00
5 NS 2T S-1 -100 4 18.18
6 NS 2P E+1 -140 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
a10 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 43,45 % 7 NS 2P E-1 100 11 50.00
8 NS 3S N+1 430 13 59.09
9 NS 3P N+1 170 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.9 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 47,65 %10 NS 2P S-1 -100 3 13.64
11 NS 1S W-2 100 22 100.00
12 NS 4P N-2 -200 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
a.8 DEBIE Sylvie -MATELART Marc : 48,32 %13 NS 4C N-1 -100 10 45.45
14 NS 6P E-1 50 22 100.00
15 NS 2C N+2 170 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
a13 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 65,50 %16 NS 5T N = 400 15 68.18
17 NS 1S W+1 -120 16 72.73
18 NS 3T E-1 50 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.6 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 36,03 %19 NS 4C W-1 100 21 95.45
20 NS 6C S = 1430 22 100.00
21 NS 4C E-2 100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 93,94 %
a.5 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 50,71 %22 NS 4C S = 420 4 18.18
23 NS 2C N+2 170 14 63.64
24 NS 3S E+1 -430 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
a.4 LECERF Marcel -DEBUISSON Colette : 44,95 %25 NS 4P S+1 450 13.2 60.00
26 NS 1S E = -90 14.3 65.00
27 NS 3K N = 110 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,32 %28 NS 1S N-2 -200 2.3 10.45
29 NS 4C N-1 -100 3.4 15.45
30 NS 3K N = 110 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 15,45 %
Total : 345,2 / 660 = 52,30 %
PAIRE Nr : A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
a.2 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 56,21 % 4 NS 6S W+1 -1470 11 50.00
5 NS 2K W = -90 9 40.91
6 NS 2P E+2 -170 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.1 BEYNE Anne -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 49,21 % 7 NS 2P E = -110 3 13.64
8 NS 3S N+2 460 20 90.91
9 NS 1S S+2 150 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 61,08 %10 NS 3K N-1 -100 3 13.64
11 NS 2T W-1 50 20 90.91
12 NS 4P N-1 -100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
a10 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 43,45 %13 NS 2P E-2 200 20 90.91
14 NS 4P E+1 -450 6 27.27
15 NS 4P W-4 200 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.9 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 47,65 %16 NS 3S N-1 -50 3 13.64
17 NS 3K E+1 -130 14 63.64
18 NS 3C N+1 170 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
a.8 DEBIE Sylvie -MATELART Marc : 48,32 %19 NS 2P W+1 -140 13 59.09
20 NS 4C N+2 680 15 68.18
21 NS 2S E+3 -210 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
a12 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,09 %22 NS 4C S+1 450 11 50.00
23 NS 3C N = 140 8 36.36
24 NS 3S W+2 -460 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.6 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 36,03 %25 NS 5P S = 450 13.2 60.00
26 NS 2S E-1 100 19.7 89.55
27 NS 4K N-1 -50 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
a.5 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 50,71 %28 NS 3S N-1 -100 9.9 45.00
29 NS 2PcE-1 200 18.6 84.55
30 NS 3S N = 400 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 73,03 %
a.4 LECERF Marcel -DEBUISSON Colette : 44,95 %31 NS 4P N+1 650 16 72.73
32 NS 4C N-1 -50 3 13.64
33 NS 3S E = -400 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
Total : 346,4 / 660 = 52,48 %
PAIRE Nr : A.3 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
a.5 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 50,71 % 1 NS 4C S+1 450 20 90.91
2 NS 3S W-2 100 18 81.82
3 NS 3CcN-3 -500 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,32 % 7 NS 3P E-2 200 21 95.45
8 NS 3S N+2 460 20 90.91
9 NS 4P N = 420 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 93,94 %
a12 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,09 %10 NS 2P S = 110 14 63.64
11 NS 2K N-2 -100 6 27.27
12 NS 4P N-1 -100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
a.1 BEYNE Anne -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 49,21 %13 NS 3PcE-3 800 22 100.00
14 NS 4P E+1 -450 6 27.27
15 NS 3C S = 140 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
a11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 61,08 %16 NS 3S N = 400 15 68.18
17 NS 3S W+1 -430 2 9.09
18 NS 3C S = 140 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
a10 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 43,45 %19 NS 2C W+1 -140 13 59.09
20 NS 4C N+2 680 15 68.18
21 NS 3S E = -400 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
a.9 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 47,65 %22 NS 4C S+1 450 11 50.00
23 NS 3C N+2 200 20 90.91
24 NS 1S W+2 -150 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
a13 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 65,50 %25 NS 5P N = 450 13.2 60.00
26 NS 2C S = 110 21.9 99.55
27 NS 2P W-1 50 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 63,18 %
a.7 ROMAIN Roberte -DEMARTHE DINA : 38,45 %28 NS 4C N-2 -200 2.3 10.45
29 NS 3C N+1 170 15.4 70.00
30 NS 2CcE-2 300 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
a.6 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 36,03 %31 NS 4P N+2 680 22 100.00
32 NS 2PcE = -670 0 0.00
33 NS 3S E = -400 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
Total : 390,7 / 660 = 59,20 %
PAIRE Nr : A.4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -CASSART Guy
a.7 ROMAIN Roberte -DEMARTHE DINA : 38,45 % 1 NS 4C S-1 -50 4 18.18
2 NS 5K E-3 150 21 95.45
3 NS 2P E+2 -170 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.6 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 36,03 % 4 NS 6S W+1 -1470 11 50.00
5 NS 2K E-1 50 16 72.73
6 NS 2P E = -110 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.4 LECERF Marcel -DEBUISSON Colette : 44,95 %10 NS 3S N = 600 22 100.00
11 NS 1S W = -90 11 50.00
12 NS 4P N-2 -200 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a13 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 65,50 %13 NS 2C N = 110 16 72.73
14 NS 4P E+1 -450 6 27.27
15 NS 2PcE-2 300 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.2 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 56,21 %16 NS 3S N = 400 15 68.18
17 NS 3S W+1 -430 2 9.09
18 NS 2C N+2 170 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
a.1 BEYNE Anne -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 49,21 %19 NS 2C W+1 -140 13 59.09
20 NS 4C N+2 680 15 68.18
21 NS 4C E-2 100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
a11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 61,08 %22 NS 4C S+2 480 19 86.36
23 NS 3C N = 140 8 36.36
24 NS 3S E+1 -430 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
a10 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 43,45 %25 NS 4P S+1 450 13.2 60.00
26 NS 1S E = -90 14.3 65.00
27 NS 2S S+3 210 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 74,85 %
a.9 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 47,65 %28 NS 2PcE-1 100 15.4 70.00
29 NS 2P E-1 100 6.6 30.00
30 NS 2CcE-2 300 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a12 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,09 %31 NS 3S S-1 -100 3 13.64
32 NS 4C S-1 -50 3 13.64
33 NS 3S E+2 -460 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 12,12 %
Total : 374,7 / 660 = 56,77 %
PAIRE Nr : A.5 NELIS Claude -LEBRUN Robert
a13 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 65,50 % 1 NS 4C S-1 -50 4 18.18
2 NS 3S E+1 -430 2 9.09
3 NS 3CcN-3 -500 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 15,15 %
a.8 DEBIE Sylvie -MATELART Marc : 48,32 % 4 NS 7S W = -2220 2 9.09
5 NS 3K W-1 50 16 72.73
6 NS 2C E+2 -170 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
a.7 ROMAIN Roberte -DEMARTHE DINA : 38,45 % 7 NS 2P E-1 100 11 50.00
8 NS 4T S+1 150 6 27.27
9 NS 4P N = 420 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
a.5 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 50,71 %13 NS 6KcS-8 -2300 0 0.00
14 NS 5CcN-2 -300 16 72.73
15 NS 2P W-3 150 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.4 LECERF Marcel -DEBUISSON Colette : 44,95 %16 NS 3S N = 400 15 68.18
17 NS 2S W+1 -150 12 54.55
18 NS 2C N+1 140 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a12 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,09 %19 NS 4C E-1 100 21 95.45
20 NS 4C N = 620 4 18.18
21 NS 4C E = -420 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.2 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 56,21 %22 NS 4C S+1 450 11 50.00
23 NS 2P E = -110 0 0.00
24 NS 3S W+1 -430 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.1 BEYNE Anne -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 49,21 %25 NS 3S N+1 430 3.4 15.45
26 NS 3S N-2 -200 2.3 10.45
27 NS 3K N = 110 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 35,15 %
a11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 61,08 %28 NS 2P N-2 -200 2.3 10.45
29 NS 3C N = 140 11 50.00
30 NS 3K N+2 150 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 30,15 %
a10 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 43,45 %31 NS 3S S-1 -100 3 13.64
32 NS 2C N+1 140 14 63.64
33 NS 3S E = -400 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 251,1 / 660 = 38,05 %
PAIRE Nr : A.6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
a11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 61,08 % 1 NS 4C S-1 -50 4 18.18
2 NS 3S W+1 -430 2 9.09
3 NS 4T W-2 200 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a10 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 43,45 % 4 NS 6S W+1 -1470 11 50.00
5 NS 1S S = 90 20 90.91
6 NS 2P E = -110 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a12 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,09 % 7 NS 3P E-2 200 21 95.45
8 NS 3S N+2 460 20 90.91
9 NS 2P N+1 140 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.8 DEBIE Sylvie -MATELART Marc : 48,32 %10 NS 2K W-1 100 10 45.45
11 NS 1S E = -90 11 50.00
12 NS 4P N-2 -200 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.6 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 36,03 %16 NS 6T N-1 -50 3 13.64
17 NS 2C N-1 -50 21 95.45
18 NS 4CcN = 790 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.5 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 50,71 %19 NS 2P W+2 -170 6 27.27
20 NS 4C N+1 650 7 31.82
21 NS 4C E+1 -450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 19,70 %
a13 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 65,50 %22 NS 4C S = 420 4 18.18
23 NS 3C N = 140 8 36.36
24 NS 3S E+2 -460 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 21,21 %
a.3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,32 %25 NS 4P S+1 450 13.2 60.00
26 NS 2K N-1 -100 8.8 40.00
27 NS 2P W-2 100 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
a.2 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 56,21 %28 NS 4C N-1 -100 9.9 45.00
29 NS 2C N+1 140 11 50.00
30 NS 3S S = 400 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 61,52 %
a.1 BEYNE Anne -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 49,21 %31 NS 3S S+1 630 11 50.00
32 NS 4T S = 130 8 36.36
33 NS 3S E = -400 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
Total : 330,7 / 660 = 50,11 %
PAIRE Nr : A.7 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse
a.2 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 56,21 % 1 NS 4C S+1 450 20 90.91
2 NS 3S W-1 50 14 63.64
3 NS 4CcN-4 -800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
a.1 BEYNE Anne -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 49,21 % 4 NS 6S W+1 -1470 11 50.00
5 NS 2K W = -90 9 40.91
6 NS 2P E+1 -140 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
a11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 61,08 % 7 NS 2P E = -110 3 13.64
8 NS 3S N = 400 8 36.36
9 NS 4P N-1 -50 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a13 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 65,50 %10 NS 2S N-1 -100 3 13.64
11 NS 2C S-2 -100 6 27.27
12 NS 3S S-3 -300 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
a.9 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 47,65 %13 NS 3C N = 140 18 81.82
14 NS 5P E = -450 6 27.27
15 NS 2C N+2 170 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
a.7 ROMAIN Roberte -DEMARTHE DINA : 38,45 %19 NS 3S W = -600 2 9.09
20 NS 4C N+2 680 15 68.18
21 NS 2C E-1 50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.6 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 36,03 %22 NS 4C S+2 480 19 86.36
23 NS 3C N+2 200 20 90.91
24 NS 3S E-1 50 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
a.5 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 50,71 %25 NS 3S N+2 460 21.9 99.55
26 NS 1S E+1 -120 6.6 30.00
27 NS 2P W-1 50 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 53,18 %
a12 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,09 %28 NS 3C S = 140 20.8 94.55
29 NS 2P E+1 -140 0.1 0.45
30 NS 2C E-2 100 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 35,15 %
a.3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,32 %31 NS 3S S+2 660 20 90.91
32 NS 3C N = 140 14 63.64
33 NS 3S E+2 -460 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
Total : 310,3 / 660 = 47,02 %
PAIRE Nr : A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
a.4 LECERF Marcel -DEBUISSON Colette : 44,95 % 1 NS 4C S-1 -50 4 18.18
2 NS 3S W+1 -430 2 9.09
3 NS 6ScE-3 800 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
a.3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,32 % 4 NS 4S W+3 -720 20 90.91
5 NS 2K E = -90 9 40.91
6 NS 2P E = -110 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
a.2 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 56,21 % 7 NS 3T N+1 130 16 72.73
8 NS 3S N+1 430 13 59.09
9 NS 3S S-1 -50 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.1 BEYNE Anne -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 49,21 %10 NS 2C E-2 200 18 81.82
11 NS 3C S-3 -150 0 0.00
12 NS 4P N-1 -100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
a11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 61,08 %13 NS 4CcN-1 -200 6 27.27
14 NS 5P E = -450 6 27.27
15 NS 2P W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a12 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,09 %16 NS 2P N+1 140 8 36.36
17 NS 1S W = -90 18 81.82
18 NS 3CcN+1 930 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.8 DEBIE Sylvie -MATELART Marc : 48,32 %22 NS 4C S-1 -50 0 0.00
23 NS 3C N+1 170 14 63.64
24 NS 3S E+1 -430 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.7 ROMAIN Roberte -DEMARTHE DINA : 38,45 %25 NS 3S N+1 430 3.4 15.45
26 NS 1S W = -90 14.3 65.00
27 NS 2K N+1 110 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
a.6 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 36,03 %28 NS 4C S-1 -100 9.9 45.00
29 NS 3S S-1 -100 3.4 15.45
30 NS 3S N = 400 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a13 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 65,50 %31 NS 3S S-1 -100 3 13.64
32 NS 2K W-2 200 21 95.45
33 NS 3S E+1 -430 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
Total : 323,2 / 660 = 48,97 %
PAIRE Nr : A.9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
a.6 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 36,03 % 1 NS 3C S+2 200 14 63.64
2 NS 3S W = -400 6 27.27
3 NS 3S E-3 300 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
a12 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,09 % 4 NS 7S W = -2220 2 9.09
5 NS 3S E-1 50 16 72.73
6 NS 2P E+1 -140 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
a.4 LECERF Marcel -DEBUISSON Colette : 44,95 % 7 NS 2P E = -110 3 13.64
8 NS 3T S+1 130 3 13.64
9 NS 2P N+1 140 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 19,70 %
a.3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,32 %10 NS 2P S-1 -100 3 13.64
11 NS 1S E+1 -120 2 9.09
12 NS 3S S-3 -300 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 10,61 %
a.2 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 56,21 %13 NS 3C N-1 -100 10 45.45
14 NS 5P E = -450 6 27.27
15 NS 3C N = 140 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
a.1 BEYNE Anne -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 49,21 %16 NS 5T N = 400 15 68.18
17 NS 2C N-1 -50 21 95.45
18 NS 2C N+1 140 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a13 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 65,50 %19 NS 4P E = -620 0 0.00
20 NS 3S N = 600 2 9.09
21 NS 2C W+3 -200 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 15,15 %
a.9 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 47,65 %25 NS 4P N = 420 0.1 0.45
26 NS 1S E+2 -150 4.5 20.45
27 NS 2P W-1 50 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 16,97 %
a.8 DEBIE Sylvie -MATELART Marc : 48,32 %28 NS 3C S = 140 20.8 94.55
29 NS 2P E-2 200 18.6 84.55
30 NS 2S S-1 -50 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 59,85 %
a.7 ROMAIN Roberte -DEMARTHE DINA : 38,45 %31 NS 3S S+1 630 11 50.00
32 NS 3T S = 110 6 27.27
33 NS 2S E+2 -180 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
Total : 249,7 / 660 = 37,83 %
PAIRE Nr : A10 VUYTS Michèle -BIOURGE Gabrielle
a.8 DEBIE Sylvie -MATELART Marc : 48,32 % 1 NS 4C S+1 450 20 90.91
2 NS 3S W-1 50 14 63.64
3 NS 3K W-1 100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
a.7 ROMAIN Roberte -DEMARTHE DINA : 38,45 % 4 NS 5S W+2 -720 20 90.91
5 NS 5K E-3 150 22 100.00
6 NS 2S E-2 200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 96,97 %
a13 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 65,50 % 7 NS 2P E = -110 3 13.64
8 NS 2T S+2 130 3 13.64
9 NS 2P N+2 170 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.5 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 50,71 %10 NS 2T E-1 100 10 45.45
11 NS 3CcS-1 -100 6 27.27
12 NS 4P N-2 -200 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
a.4 LECERF Marcel -DEBUISSON Colette : 44,95 %13 NS 3K S-5 -500 3 13.64
14 NS 4P E+1 -450 6 27.27
15 NS 2C N+3 200 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
a.3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,32 %16 NS 3S N = 400 15 68.18
17 NS 2S W+2 -180 10 45.45
18 NS 2C S+1 140 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
a.2 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 56,21 %19 NS 2C W+1 -140 13 59.09
20 NS 4C N+1 650 7 31.82
21 NS 2C E = -110 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.1 BEYNE Anne -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 49,21 %22 NS 4C S+2 480 19 86.36
23 NS 3P E-1 100 4 18.18
24 NS 3S W+1 -430 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a10 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 43,45 %28 NS 4C N-1 -100 9.9 45.00
29 NS 2P E-3 300 21.9 99.55
30 NS 2S N+3 210 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,85 %
a.9 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 47,65 %31 NS 4P N = 620 8 36.36
32 NS 3C N = 140 14 63.64
33 NS 3S E+1 -430 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
Total : 359,8 / 660 = 54,52 %
PAIRE Nr : A11 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte
a10 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 43,45 % 1 NS 3C S = 140 11 50.00
2 NS 2S W+2 -180 9 40.91
3 NS 3C N-3 -150 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.9 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 47,65 % 4 NS 6S W+1 -1470 11 50.00
5 NS 3K E = -110 1 4.55
6 NS 2P E = -110 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
a.8 DEBIE Sylvie -MATELART Marc : 48,32 % 7 NS 3P E-1 100 11 50.00
8 NS 3S N+1 430 13 59.09
9 NS 2P N = 110 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
a.7 ROMAIN Roberte -DEMARTHE DINA : 38,45 %10 NS 2C E-2 200 18 81.82
11 NS 2K N-1 -50 16 72.73
12 NS 4P N = 620 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 84,85 %
a12 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,09 %13 NS 2P E-1 100 14 63.64
14 NS 5CcN-1 -100 20 90.91
15 NS 2P W-3 150 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.5 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 50,71 %16 NS 3S N-1 -50 3 13.64
17 NS 2S W+3 -210 8 36.36
18 NS 3C N = 140 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
a.4 LECERF Marcel -DEBUISSON Colette : 44,95 %19 NS 2C W+1 -140 13 59.09
20 NS 4C N+2 680 15 68.18
21 NS 4C E-3 150 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,76 %
a.3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,32 %22 NS 4C S = 420 4 18.18
23 NS 4C N-1 -100 2 9.09
24 NS 3S E+2 -460 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 12,12 %
a.2 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 56,21 %25 NS 4P S+1 450 13.2 60.00
26 NS 2P N-3 -300 0.1 0.45
27 NS 4K N-2 -100 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 20,30 %
a11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 61,08 %31 NS 3S S-1 -100 3 13.64
32 NS 3C N = 140 14 63.64
33 NS 3S E+1 -430 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
Total : 301,4 / 660 = 45,67 %
PAIRE Nr : A12 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
a12 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,09 % 1 NS 3C S = 140 11 50.00
2 NS 4P E-3 150 21 95.45
3 NS 3CcN-3 -500 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.5 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 50,71 % 4 NS 4S W+3 -720 20 90.91
5 NS 2K E = -90 9 40.91
6 NS 2P E+1 -140 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
a.9 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 47,65 % 7 NS 2P E-1 100 11 50.00
8 NS 3S N+1 430 13 59.09
9 NS 2P N+2 170 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.2 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 56,21 %10 NS 2C W-1 100 10 45.45
11 NS 2C S-1 -50 16 72.73
12 NS 4P N-1 -100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
a.6 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 36,03 %13 NS 4CcN-2 -500 3 13.64
14 NS 5CcN-2 -300 16 72.73
15 NS 2C N+2 170 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a10 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 43,45 %16 NS 3S S-1 -50 3 13.64
17 NS 3S W = -400 6 27.27
18 NS 3C N = 140 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,32 %19 NS 2P W+3 -200 4 18.18
20 NS 6C N-1 -100 0 0.00
21 NS 2C E = -110 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
a.7 ROMAIN Roberte -DEMARTHE DINA : 38,45 %22 NS 4C S+1 450 11 50.00
23 NS 3C N+2 200 20 90.91
24 NS 3S E-1 50 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 78,79 %
a.4 LECERF Marcel -DEBUISSON Colette : 44,95 %28 NS 2C N = 110 17.5 79.55
29 NS 2C N+1 140 11 50.00
30 NS 2S N+2 180 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 56,52 %
a.8 DEBIE Sylvie -MATELART Marc : 48,32 %31 NS 4P N+1 650 16 72.73
32 NS 3C N = 140 14 63.64
33 NS 3S E+2 -460 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
Total : 344,3 / 660 = 52,17 %
PAIRE Nr : A13 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
a.9 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 47,65 % 1 NS 4C S = 420 16 72.73
2 NS 3S W-1 50 14 63.64
3 NS 3K W-1 100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a13 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 65,50 % 4 NS 7S W = -2220 2 9.09
5 NS 2P E = -110 1 4.55
6 NS 3P W = -140 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
a.6 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 36,03 % 7 NS 3C S = 140 18 81.82
8 NS 4P S-1 -50 0 0.00
9 NS 2P N+2 170 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a10 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 43,45 %10 NS 2C E-2 200 18 81.82
11 NS 2K N-1 -50 16 72.73
12 NS 4P N-3 -300 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,32 %13 NS 3C N-1 -100 10 45.45
14 NS 5CcN-2 -300 16 72.73
15 NS 5T W-3 150 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
a.7 ROMAIN Roberte -DEMARTHE DINA : 38,45 %16 NS 3S N+3 490 22 100.00
17 NS 3S E+1 -430 2 9.09
18 NS 3C N-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 61,08 %19 NS 2C W+1 -140 13 59.09
20 NS 4C N+2 680 15 68.18
21 NS 3C E = -140 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
a.4 LECERF Marcel -DEBUISSON Colette : 44,95 %22 NS 4C S+2 480 19 86.36
23 NS 3C N+1 170 14 63.64
24 NS 3S W = -400 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
a.8 DEBIE Sylvie -MATELART Marc : 48,32 %25 NS 4P S+1 450 13.2 60.00
26 NS 1S E = -90 14.3 65.00
27 NS 4P W-2 100 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.5 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 50,71 %31 NS 4P N+1 650 16 72.73
32 NS 3P E-2 200 21 95.45
33 NS 3S E = -400 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 80,30 %
Total : 362,6 / 660 = 54,94 %
PAIRE Nr : a.1 BEYNE Anne -WANDERPEPEN Janine
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 52,30 % 1 EO 4C S-1 -50 18 81.82
2 EO 2S W+2 -180 13 59.09
3 EO 3C N-2 -100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
A.7 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,02 % 4 EO 6S W+1 -1470 11 50.00
5 EO 2K W = -90 13 59.09
6 EO 2P E+1 -140 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 52,48 % 7 EO 2P E = -110 19 86.36
8 EO 3S N+2 460 2 9.09
9 EO 1S S+2 150 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 48,97 %10 EO 2C E-2 200 4 18.18
11 EO 3C S-3 -150 22 100.00
12 EO 4P N-1 -100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
A.3 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 59,20 %13 EO 3PcE-3 800 0 0.00
14 EO 4P E+1 -450 16 72.73
15 EO 3C S = 140 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
A.9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 37,83 %16 EO 5T N = 400 7 31.82
17 EO 2C N-1 -50 1 4.55
18 EO 2C N+1 140 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -CASSART Guy : 56,77 %19 EO 2C W+1 -140 9 40.91
20 EO 4C N+2 680 7 31.82
21 EO 4C E-2 100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
A10 VUYTS Michèle -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 54,52 %22 EO 4C S+2 480 3 13.64
23 EO 3P E-1 100 18 81.82
24 EO 3S W+1 -430 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.5 NELIS Claude -LEBRUN Robert : 38,05 %25 EO 3S N+1 430 18.6 84.55
26 EO 3S N-2 -200 19.7 89.55
27 EO 3K N = 110 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 64,85 %
A.6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 50,11 %31 EO 3S S+1 630 11 50.00
32 EO 4T S = 130 14 63.64
33 EO 3S E = -400 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
Total : 324,8 / 660 = 49,21 %
PAIRE Nr : a.2 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier
A.7 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,02 % 1 EO 4C S+1 450 2 9.09
2 EO 3S W-1 50 8 36.36
3 EO 4CcN-4 -800 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 52,48 % 4 EO 6S W+1 -1470 11 50.00
5 EO 2K W = -90 13 59.09
6 EO 2P E+2 -170 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 48,97 % 7 EO 3T N+1 130 6 27.27
8 EO 3S N+1 430 9 40.91
9 EO 3S S-1 -50 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A12 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,17 %10 EO 2C W-1 100 12 54.55
11 EO 2C S-1 -50 6 27.27
12 EO 4P N-1 -100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
A.9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 37,83 %13 EO 3C N-1 -100 12 54.55
14 EO 5P E = -450 16 72.73
15 EO 3C N = 140 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
A.4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -CASSART Guy : 56,77 %16 EO 3S N = 400 7 31.82
17 EO 3S W+1 -430 20 90.91
18 EO 2C N+2 170 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
A10 VUYTS Michèle -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 54,52 %19 EO 2C W+1 -140 9 40.91
20 EO 4C N+1 650 15 68.18
21 EO 2C E = -110 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.5 NELIS Claude -LEBRUN Robert : 38,05 %22 EO 4C S+1 450 11 50.00
23 EO 2P E = -110 22 100.00
24 EO 3S W+1 -430 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A11 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 45,67 %25 EO 4P S+1 450 8.8 40.00
26 EO 2P N-3 -300 21.9 99.55
27 EO 4K N-2 -100 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 79,70 %
A.6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 50,11 %28 EO 4C N-1 -100 12.1 55.00
29 EO 2C N+1 140 11 50.00
30 EO 3S S = 400 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 38,48 %
Total : 371,0 / 660 = 56,21 %
PAIRE Nr : a.3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 48,97 % 4 EO 4S W+3 -720 2 9.09
5 EO 2K E = -90 13 59.09
6 EO 2P E = -110 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
A.3 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 59,20 % 7 EO 3P E-2 200 1 4.55
8 EO 3S N+2 460 2 9.09
9 EO 4P N = 420 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 6,06 %
A.9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 37,83 %10 EO 2P S-1 -100 19 86.36
11 EO 1S E+1 -120 20 90.91
12 EO 3S S-3 -300 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 89,39 %
A13 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 54,94 %13 EO 3C N-1 -100 12 54.55
14 EO 5CcN-2 -300 6 27.27
15 EO 5T W-3 150 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
A10 VUYTS Michèle -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 54,52 %16 EO 3S N = 400 7 31.82
17 EO 2S W+2 -180 12 54.55
18 EO 2C S+1 140 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
A12 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,17 %19 EO 2P W+3 -200 18 81.82
20 EO 6C N-1 -100 22 100.00
21 EO 2C E = -110 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
A11 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 45,67 %22 EO 4C S = 420 18 81.82
23 EO 4C N-1 -100 20 90.91
24 EO 3S E+2 -460 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 87,88 %
A.6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 50,11 %25 EO 4P S+1 450 8.8 40.00
26 EO 2K N-1 -100 13.2 60.00
27 EO 2P W-2 100 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 52,30 %28 EO 1S N-2 -200 19.7 89.55
29 EO 4C N-1 -100 18.6 84.55
30 EO 3K N = 110 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 84,55 %
A.7 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,02 %31 EO 3S S+2 660 2 9.09
32 EO 3C N = 140 8 36.36
33 EO 3S E+2 -460 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
Total : 371,7 / 660 = 56,32 %
PAIRE Nr : a.4 LECERF Marcel -DEBUISSON Colette
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 48,97 % 1 EO 4C S-1 -50 18 81.82
2 EO 3S W+1 -430 20 90.91
3 EO 6ScE-3 800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
A.9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 37,83 % 7 EO 2P E = -110 19 86.36
8 EO 3T S+1 130 19 86.36
9 EO 2P N+1 140 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 80,30 %
A.4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -CASSART Guy : 56,77 %10 EO 3S N = 600 0 0.00
11 EO 1S W = -90 11 50.00
12 EO 4P N-2 -200 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A10 VUYTS Michèle -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 54,52 %13 EO 3K S-5 -500 19 86.36
14 EO 4P E+1 -450 16 72.73
15 EO 2C N+3 200 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
A.5 NELIS Claude -LEBRUN Robert : 38,05 %16 EO 3S N = 400 7 31.82
17 EO 2S W+1 -150 10 45.45
18 EO 2C N+1 140 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A11 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 45,67 %19 EO 2C W+1 -140 9 40.91
20 EO 4C N+2 680 7 31.82
21 EO 4C E-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,24 %
A13 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 54,94 %22 EO 4C S+2 480 3 13.64
23 EO 3C N+1 170 8 36.36
24 EO 3S W = -400 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 52,30 %25 EO 4P S+1 450 8.8 40.00
26 EO 1S E = -90 7.7 35.00
27 EO 3K N = 110 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A12 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,17 %28 EO 2C N = 110 4.5 20.45
29 EO 2C N+1 140 11 50.00
30 EO 2S N+2 180 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 43,48 %
A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 52,48 %31 EO 4P N+1 650 6 27.27
32 EO 4C N-1 -50 19 86.36
33 EO 3S E = -400 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
Total : 296,7 / 660 = 44,95 %
PAIRE Nr : a.5 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent
A.3 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 59,20 % 1 EO 4C S+1 450 2 9.09
2 EO 3S W-2 100 4 18.18
3 EO 3CcN-3 -500 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A12 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,17 % 4 EO 4S W+3 -720 2 9.09
5 EO 2K E = -90 13 59.09
6 EO 2P E+1 -140 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
A10 VUYTS Michèle -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 54,52 %10 EO 2T E-1 100 12 54.55
11 EO 3CcS-1 -100 16 72.73
12 EO 4P N-2 -200 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
A.5 NELIS Claude -LEBRUN Robert : 38,05 %13 EO 6KcS-8 -2300 22 100.00
14 EO 5CcN-2 -300 6 27.27
15 EO 2P W-3 150 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A11 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 45,67 %16 EO 3S N-1 -50 19 86.36
17 EO 2S W+3 -210 14 63.64
18 EO 3C N = 140 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
A.6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 50,11 %19 EO 2P W+2 -170 16 72.73
20 EO 4C N+1 650 15 68.18
21 EO 4C E+1 -450 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 80,30 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 52,30 %22 EO 4C S = 420 18 81.82
23 EO 2C N+2 170 8 36.36
24 EO 3S E+1 -430 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
A.7 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,02 %25 EO 3S N+2 460 0.1 0.45
26 EO 1S E+1 -120 15.4 70.00
27 EO 2P W-1 50 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 46,82 %
A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 52,48 %28 EO 3S N-1 -100 12.1 55.00
29 EO 2PcE-1 200 3.4 15.45
30 EO 3S N = 400 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 26,97 %
A13 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 54,94 %31 EO 4P N+1 650 6 27.27
32 EO 3P E-2 200 1 4.55
33 EO 3S E = -400 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 19,70 %
Total : 334,7 / 660 = 50,71 %
PAIRE Nr : a.6 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert
A.9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 37,83 % 1 EO 3C S+2 200 8 36.36
2 EO 3S W = -400 16 72.73
3 EO 3S E-3 300 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
A.4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -CASSART Guy : 56,77 % 4 EO 6S W+1 -1470 11 50.00
5 EO 2K E-1 50 6 27.27
6 EO 2P E = -110 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A13 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 54,94 % 7 EO 3C S = 140 4 18.18
8 EO 4P S-1 -50 22 100.00
9 EO 2P N+2 170 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A12 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,17 %13 EO 4CcN-2 -500 19 86.36
14 EO 5CcN-2 -300 6 27.27
15 EO 2C N+2 170 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 50,11 %16 EO 6T N-1 -50 19 86.36
17 EO 2C N-1 -50 1 4.55
18 EO 4CcN = 790 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 52,30 %19 EO 4C W-1 100 1 4.55
20 EO 6C S = 1430 0 0.00
21 EO 4C E-2 100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 6,06 %
A.7 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,02 %22 EO 4C S+2 480 3 13.64
23 EO 3C N+2 200 2 9.09
24 EO 3S E-1 50 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 52,48 %25 EO 5P S = 450 8.8 40.00
26 EO 2S E-1 100 2.3 10.45
27 EO 4K N-1 -50 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 48,97 %28 EO 4C S-1 -100 12.1 55.00
29 EO 3S S-1 -100 18.6 84.55
30 EO 3S N = 400 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 59,20 %31 EO 4P N+2 680 0 0.00
32 EO 2PcE = -670 22 100.00
33 EO 3S E = -400 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
Total : 237,8 / 660 = 36,03 %
PAIRE Nr : a.7 ROMAIN Roberte -DEMARTHE DINA
A.4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -CASSART Guy : 56,77 % 1 EO 4C S-1 -50 18 81.82
2 EO 5K E-3 150 1 4.55
3 EO 2P E+2 -170 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A10 VUYTS Michèle -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 54,52 % 4 EO 5S W+2 -720 2 9.09
5 EO 5K E-3 150 0 0.00
6 EO 2S E-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 3,03 %
A.5 NELIS Claude -LEBRUN Robert : 38,05 % 7 EO 2P E-1 100 11 50.00
8 EO 4T S+1 150 16 72.73
9 EO 4P N = 420 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
A11 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 45,67 %10 EO 2C E-2 200 4 18.18
11 EO 2K N-1 -50 6 27.27
12 EO 4P N = 620 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 15,15 %
A13 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 54,94 %16 EO 3S N+3 490 0 0.00
17 EO 3S E+1 -430 20 90.91
18 EO 3C N-1 -100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.7 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,02 %19 EO 3S W = -600 20 90.91
20 EO 4C N+2 680 7 31.82
21 EO 2C E-1 50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A12 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,17 %22 EO 4C S+1 450 11 50.00
23 EO 3C N+2 200 2 9.09
24 EO 3S E-1 50 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 21,21 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 48,97 %25 EO 3S N+1 430 18.6 84.55
26 EO 1S W = -90 7.7 35.00
27 EO 2K N+1 110 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
A.3 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 59,20 %28 EO 4C N-2 -200 19.7 89.55
29 EO 3C N+1 170 6.6 30.00
30 EO 2CcE-2 300 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
A.9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 37,83 %31 EO 3S S+1 630 11 50.00
32 EO 3T S = 110 16 72.73
33 EO 2S E+2 -180 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
Total : 253,8 / 660 = 38,45 %
PAIRE Nr : a.8 DEBIE Sylvie -MATELART Marc
A10 VUYTS Michèle -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 54,52 % 1 EO 4C S+1 450 2 9.09
2 EO 3S W-1 50 8 36.36
3 EO 3K W-1 100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
A.5 NELIS Claude -LEBRUN Robert : 38,05 % 4 EO 7S W = -2220 20 90.91
5 EO 3K W-1 50 6 27.27
6 EO 2C E+2 -170 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
A11 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 45,67 % 7 EO 3P E-1 100 11 50.00
8 EO 3S N+1 430 9 40.91
9 EO 2P N = 110 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
A.6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 50,11 %10 EO 2K W-1 100 12 54.55
11 EO 1S E = -90 11 50.00
12 EO 4P N-2 -200 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 52,30 %13 EO 4C N-1 -100 12 54.55
14 EO 6P E-1 50 0 0.00
15 EO 2C N+2 170 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 52,48 %19 EO 2P W+1 -140 9 40.91
20 EO 4C N+2 680 7 31.82
21 EO 2S E+3 -210 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 48,97 %22 EO 4C S-1 -50 22 100.00
23 EO 3C N+1 170 8 36.36
24 EO 3S E+1 -430 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A13 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 54,94 %25 EO 4P S+1 450 8.8 40.00
26 EO 1S E = -90 7.7 35.00
27 EO 4P W-2 100 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 37,83 %28 EO 3C S = 140 1.2 5.45
29 EO 2P E-2 200 3.4 15.45
30 EO 2S S-1 -50 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 40,15 %
A12 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,17 %31 EO 4P N+1 650 6 27.27
32 EO 3C N = 140 8 36.36
33 EO 3S E+2 -460 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
Total : 318,9 / 660 = 48,32 %
PAIRE Nr : a.9 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
A13 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 54,94 % 1 EO 4C S = 420 6 27.27
2 EO 3S W-1 50 8 36.36
3 EO 3K W-1 100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A11 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 45,67 % 4 EO 6S W+1 -1470 11 50.00
5 EO 3K E = -110 21 95.45
6 EO 2P E = -110 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
A12 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,17 % 7 EO 2P E-1 100 11 50.00
8 EO 3S N+1 430 9 40.91
9 EO 2P N+2 170 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 52,30 %10 EO 2P S-1 -100 19 86.36
11 EO 1S W-2 100 0 0.00
12 EO 4P N-2 -200 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
A.7 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,02 %13 EO 3C N = 140 4 18.18
14 EO 5P E = -450 16 72.73
15 EO 2C N+2 170 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 52,48 %16 EO 3S N-1 -50 19 86.36
17 EO 3K E+1 -130 8 36.36
18 EO 3C N+1 170 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
A.3 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 59,20 %22 EO 4C S+1 450 11 50.00
23 EO 3C N+2 200 2 9.09
24 EO 1S W+2 -150 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
A.9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 37,83 %25 EO 4P N = 420 21.9 99.55
26 EO 1S E+2 -150 17.5 79.55
27 EO 2P W-1 50 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 83,03 %
A.4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -CASSART Guy : 56,77 %28 EO 2PcE-1 100 6.6 30.00
29 EO 2P E-1 100 15.4 70.00
30 EO 2CcE-2 300 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A10 VUYTS Michèle -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 54,52 %31 EO 4P N = 620 14 63.64
32 EO 3C N = 140 8 36.36
33 EO 3S E+1 -430 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
Total : 314,5 / 660 = 47,65 %
PAIRE Nr : a10 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean
A11 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 45,67 % 1 EO 3C S = 140 11 50.00
2 EO 2S W+2 -180 13 59.09
3 EO 3C N-3 -150 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 50,11 % 4 EO 6S W+1 -1470 11 50.00
5 EO 1S S = 90 2 9.09
6 EO 2P E = -110 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 52,30 % 7 EO 2P E-1 100 11 50.00
8 EO 3S N+1 430 9 40.91
9 EO 3P N+1 170 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A13 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 54,94 %10 EO 2C E-2 200 4 18.18
11 EO 2K N-1 -50 6 27.27
12 EO 4P N-3 -300 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 52,48 %13 EO 2P E-2 200 2 9.09
14 EO 4P E+1 -450 16 72.73
15 EO 4P W-4 200 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A12 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,17 %16 EO 3S S-1 -50 19 86.36
17 EO 3S W = -400 16 72.73
18 EO 3C N = 140 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.3 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 59,20 %19 EO 2C W+1 -140 9 40.91
20 EO 4C N+2 680 7 31.82
21 EO 3S E = -400 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
A.4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -CASSART Guy : 56,77 %25 EO 4P S+1 450 8.8 40.00
26 EO 1S E = -90 7.7 35.00
27 EO 2S S+3 210 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 25,15 %
A10 VUYTS Michèle -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 54,52 %28 EO 4C N-1 -100 12.1 55.00
29 EO 2P E-3 300 0.1 0.45
30 EO 2S N+3 210 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,15 %
A.5 NELIS Claude -LEBRUN Robert : 38,05 %31 EO 3S S-1 -100 19 86.36
32 EO 2C N+1 140 8 36.36
33 EO 3S E = -400 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 286,8 / 660 = 43,45 %
PAIRE Nr : a11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
A.6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 50,11 % 1 EO 4C S-1 -50 18 81.82
2 EO 3S W+1 -430 20 90.91
3 EO 4T W-2 200 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 52,30 % 4 EO 6S W+1 -1470 11 50.00
5 EO 2T S-1 -100 18 81.82
6 EO 2P E+1 -140 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
A.7 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,02 % 7 EO 2P E = -110 19 86.36
8 EO 3S N = 400 14 63.64
9 EO 4P N-1 -50 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 52,48 %10 EO 3K N-1 -100 19 86.36
11 EO 2T W-1 50 2 9.09
12 EO 4P N-1 -100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 48,97 %13 EO 4CcN-1 -200 16 72.73
14 EO 5P E = -450 16 72.73
15 EO 2P W-2 100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A.3 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 59,20 %16 EO 3S N = 400 7 31.82
17 EO 3S W+1 -430 20 90.91
18 EO 3C S = 140 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
A13 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 54,94 %19 EO 2C W+1 -140 9 40.91
20 EO 4C N+2 680 7 31.82
21 EO 3C E = -140 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
A.4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -CASSART Guy : 56,77 %22 EO 4C S+2 480 3 13.64
23 EO 3C N = 140 14 63.64
24 EO 3S E+1 -430 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
A.5 NELIS Claude -LEBRUN Robert : 38,05 %28 EO 2P N-2 -200 19.7 89.55
29 EO 3C N = 140 11 50.00
30 EO 3K N+2 150 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 69,85 %
A11 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 45,67 %31 EO 3S S-1 -100 19 86.36
32 EO 3C N = 140 8 36.36
33 EO 3S E+1 -430 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
Total : 403,1 / 660 = 61,08 %
PAIRE Nr : a12 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
A12 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,17 % 1 EO 3C S = 140 11 50.00
2 EO 4P E-3 150 1 4.55
3 EO 3CcN-3 -500 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 37,83 % 4 EO 7S W = -2220 20 90.91
5 EO 3S E-1 50 6 27.27
6 EO 2P E+1 -140 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
A.6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 50,11 % 7 EO 3P E-2 200 1 4.55
8 EO 3S N+2 460 2 9.09
9 EO 2P N+1 140 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.3 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 59,20 %10 EO 2P S = 110 8 36.36
11 EO 2K N-2 -100 16 72.73
12 EO 4P N-1 -100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
A11 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 45,67 %13 EO 2P E-1 100 8 36.36
14 EO 5CcN-1 -100 2 9.09
15 EO 2P W-3 150 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 48,97 %16 EO 2P N+1 140 14 63.64
17 EO 1S W = -90 4 18.18
18 EO 3CcN+1 930 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.5 NELIS Claude -LEBRUN Robert : 38,05 %19 EO 4C E-1 100 1 4.55
20 EO 4C N = 620 18 81.82
21 EO 4C E = -420 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 52,48 %22 EO 4C S+1 450 11 50.00
23 EO 3C N = 140 14 63.64
24 EO 3S W+2 -460 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.7 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,02 %28 EO 3C S = 140 1.2 5.45
29 EO 2P E+1 -140 21.9 99.55
30 EO 2C E-2 100 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 64,85 %
A.4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -CASSART Guy : 56,77 %31 EO 3S S-1 -100 19 86.36
32 EO 4C S-1 -50 19 86.36
33 EO 3S E+2 -460 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 87,88 %
Total : 343,8 / 660 = 52,09 %
PAIRE Nr : a13 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre
A.5 NELIS Claude -LEBRUN Robert : 38,05 % 1 EO 4C S-1 -50 18 81.82
2 EO 3S E+1 -430 20 90.91
3 EO 3CcN-3 -500 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 84,85 %
A13 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 54,94 % 4 EO 7S W = -2220 20 90.91
5 EO 2P E = -110 21 95.45
6 EO 3P W = -140 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
A10 VUYTS Michèle -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 54,52 % 7 EO 2P E = -110 19 86.36
8 EO 2T S+2 130 19 86.36
9 EO 2P N+2 170 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.7 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,02 %10 EO 2S N-1 -100 19 86.36
11 EO 2C S-2 -100 16 72.73
12 EO 3S S-3 -300 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
A.4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -CASSART Guy : 56,77 %13 EO 2C N = 110 6 27.27
14 EO 4P E+1 -450 16 72.73
15 EO 2PcE-2 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 52,30 %16 EO 5T N = 400 7 31.82
17 EO 1S W+1 -120 6 27.27
18 EO 3T E-1 50 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 37,83 %19 EO 4P E = -620 22 100.00
20 EO 3S N = 600 20 90.91
21 EO 2C W+3 -200 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 84,85 %
A.6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 50,11 %22 EO 4C S = 420 18 81.82
23 EO 3C N = 140 14 63.64
24 EO 3S E+2 -460 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 78,79 %
A.3 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 59,20 %25 EO 5P N = 450 8.8 40.00
26 EO 2C S = 110 0.1 0.45
27 EO 2P W-1 50 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 36,82 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 48,97 %31 EO 3S S-1 -100 19 86.36
32 EO 2K W-2 200 1 4.55
33 EO 3S E+1 -430 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
Total : 432,3 / 660 = 65,50 %
|
|