|
Tournoi du 13-02-17
Lundi
1 62,33 3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
2 54,15 2 BRIOT Fernand -DESSY Lina
3 52,91 9 SMEYERS Marc -KOSCIELNIAK Jean
4 52,87 8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
5 50,30 4 NELIS Claude -LEBRUN Robert
6 49,85 10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
7 49,67 7 CASSART Guy -POWIS Vinciane
8 45,26 1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
9 42,43 6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
10 40,13 5 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse
11 0,00 11 -
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 60,10 18 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal
2 59,59 14 GOBBE Amélie -SCHELLEKENS.Caroline
3 58,23 20 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
4 57,49 22 MOLS Bruno -CLERIN François-Xavier
5 54,53 13 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
6 53,85 15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
7 46,50 17 BIOURGE Gabrielle -VUYTS Michèle
8 42,86 19 VAN DOOREN Michele -MEHAGNOUL Michel
9 42,37 12 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette
10 41,23 21 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
11 34,22 16 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
PAIRE Nr : 1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
12 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 42,37 % 1 NS 3P E-2 100 15.7 87.22
2 NS 3C N = 140 12.3 68.33
3 NS 3S W+2 -660 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 74,63 %
22 MOLS Bruno -CLERIN François-Xavier : 57,49 % 4 NS 2K E = -90 6.8 37.78
5 NS 4P W = -420 1.2 6.67
6 NS 7K S-1 -50 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 21,11 %
21 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 41,23 % 7 NS 3C N-2 -200 2.3 12.78
8 NS 3S S+3 490 10.1 56.11
9 NS 1S W+2 -150 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 45,74 %
20 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 58,23 %10 NS 3S S+1 630 5.7 31.67
11 NS 6K S-2 -100 0.1 0.56
12 NS 2CcS-4 -1100 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 10,93 %
19 VAN DOOREN Michele -MEHAGNOUL Michel : 42,86 %13 NS 2C W+1 -140 4.6 25.56
14 NS 2P S-2 -100 3.4 18.89
15 NS 2P S+1 140 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
18 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 60,10 %16 NS 3T S = 110 0.1 0.56
17 NS 4C E+1 -450 2.3 12.78
18 NS 3K E-1 50 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
17 BIOURGE Gabrielle -VUYTS Michèle : 46,50 %19 NS 1S N-1 -50 1.2 6.67
20 NS 4C W = -620 6.8 37.78
21 NS 5TcN = 750 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 41,85 %
16 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 34,22 %22 NS 3S E-1 100 16.8 93.33
23 NS 4K E+1 -150 15.7 87.22
24 NS 2C N+2 170 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 53,85 %25 NS 6T N = 920 17.9 99.44
26 NS 2T N+1 110 2.3 12.78
27 NS 1S E = -90 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 62,22 %
14 GOBBE Amélie -SCHELLEKENS.Caroline : 59,59 %28 NS 4S S-1 -100 1 5.56
29 NS 4C E-4 400 16 88.89
30 NS 3S W = -400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
Total : 244,4 / 540 = 45,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 BRIOT Fernand -DESSY Lina
13 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 54,53 % 4 NS 2C E-3 300 16.8 93.33
5 NS 2P W+2 -170 13.4 74.44
6 NS 6T N = 920 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 80,74 %
12 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 42,37 % 7 NS 2P N = 110 13.4 74.44
8 NS 3S N+3 490 10.1 56.11
9 NS 1ScW+2 -580 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
22 MOLS Bruno -CLERIN François-Xavier : 57,49 %10 NS 3S S+2 660 15.7 87.22
11 NS 3P N+4 260 4.6 25.56
12 NS 3S W-2 100 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
21 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 41,23 %13 NS 2C E-1 100 15.7 87.22
14 NS 2C N = 110 17.9 99.44
15 NS 1P S = 80 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 72,78 %
20 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 58,23 %16 NS 3S N+2 460 11.2 62.22
17 NS 4C E = -420 10.1 56.11
18 NS 2P W = -110 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
19 VAN DOOREN Michele -MEHAGNOUL Michel : 42,86 %19 NS 1S N = 90 7.9 43.89
20 NS 2C W+2 -170 16.8 93.33
21 NS 6T N = 1370 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 78,89 %
18 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 60,10 %22 NS 3S W+1 -630 6.8 37.78
23 NS 3S E = -600 7.9 43.89
24 NS 4C N = 420 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
17 BIOURGE Gabrielle -VUYTS Michèle : 46,50 %25 NS 5T N = 400 3.4 18.89
26 NS 3P N+1 170 10.1 56.11
27 NS 2T W+1 -110 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
16 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 34,22 %28 NS 4P S-1 -100 1 5.56
29 NS 4K E = -130 6 33.33
30 NS 2K W+1 -110 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 53,85 %31 NS 3S S-1 -100 2.3 12.78
32 NS 2S E+1 -150 1.2 6.67
33 NS 3P E+1 -170 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 10,74 %
Total : 292,4 / 540 = 54,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
16 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 34,22 % 1 NS 3S S-1 -50 13.4 74.44
2 NS 4K E-4 200 17.9 99.44
3 NS 4C W+1 -650 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 91,11 %
14 GOBBE Amélie -SCHELLEKENS.Caroline : 59,59 % 7 NS 2S E-1 100 11.2 62.22
8 NS 3S N+3 490 10.1 56.11
9 NS 1S W+2 -150 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 62,22 %
13 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 54,53 %10 NS 3S S+1 630 5.7 31.67
11 NS 6P N+1 1010 15.7 87.22
12 NS 2C W-2 100 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
12 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 42,37 %13 NS 2C E+1 -140 4.6 25.56
14 NS 2T W-2 100 14.6 81.11
15 NS 2P S = 110 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
22 MOLS Bruno -CLERIN François-Xavier : 57,49 %16 NS 3S N+2 460 11.2 62.22
17 NS 4C E+1 -450 2.3 12.78
18 NS 2P W = -110 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
21 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 41,23 %19 NS 1S N+1 120 17.9 99.44
20 NS 2C W+2 -170 16.8 93.33
21 NS 5TcN = 750 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 91,30 %
20 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 58,23 %22 NS 2S W = -120 13.4 74.44
23 NS 4P W = -620 0.1 0.56
24 NS 4C N = 420 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 43,70 %
19 VAN DOOREN Michele -MEHAGNOUL Michel : 42,86 %25 NS 3S N+1 430 6.8 37.78
26 NS 3P N = 140 4.6 25.56
27 NS 1T W+2 -110 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 35,74 %
18 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 60,10 %28 NS 4P N+1 650 16 88.89
29 NS 4K E+1 -150 3 16.67
30 NS 3S W = -400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
17 BIOURGE Gabrielle -VUYTS Michèle : 46,50 %31 NS 3S S = 600 12.3 68.33
32 NS 3K E-2 200 16.8 93.33
33 NS 3T N = 110 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
Total : 336,6 / 540 = 62,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 NELIS Claude -LEBRUN Robert
18 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 60,10 % 1 NS 3S S-3 -150 4.6 25.56
2 NS 2C N+1 140 12.3 68.33
3 NS 3S W+3 -690 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 41,85 %
17 BIOURGE Gabrielle -VUYTS Michèle : 46,50 % 4 NS 2C S = 110 13.4 74.44
5 NS 2P W+3 -200 5.7 31.67
6 NS 6S N = 990 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 53,85 %10 NS 3S S+1 630 5.7 31.67
11 NS 3S N+4 520 13.4 74.44
12 NS 3S S-1 -100 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
14 GOBBE Amélie -SCHELLEKENS.Caroline : 59,59 %13 NS 2C W+1 -140 4.6 25.56
14 NS 2C N-2 -100 3.4 18.89
15 NS 1P S = 80 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 25,37 %
13 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 54,53 %16 NS 3S N+3 490 16.8 93.33
17 NS 2C E+3 -200 15.7 87.22
18 NS 3K E-1 50 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 91,30 %
12 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 42,37 %19 NS 1S N = 90 7.9 43.89
20 NS 4C W = -620 6.8 37.78
21 NS 6TcN-1 -200 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 41,85 %
22 MOLS Bruno -CLERIN François-Xavier : 57,49 %22 NS 3S W+1 -630 6.8 37.78
23 NS 3S E = -600 7.9 43.89
24 NS 3S N = 400 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 37,78 %
21 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 41,23 %25 NS 5T N = 400 3.4 18.89
26 NS 3C W-2 200 17.9 99.44
27 NS 1T W+2 -110 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
20 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 58,23 %28 NS 3K N = 110 4 22.22
29 NS 3S W-3 300 11 61.11
30 NS 3S E+1 -430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
19 VAN DOOREN Michele -MEHAGNOUL Michel : 42,86 %31 NS 3S S = 600 12.3 68.33
32 NS 1S N-2 -100 9 50.00
33 NS 3T N-1 -50 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
Total : 271,6 / 540 = 50,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse
20 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 58,23 % 1 NS 3S N-3 -150 4.6 25.56
2 NS 3C N = 140 12.3 68.33
3 NS 6S W = -1440 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
19 VAN DOOREN Michele -MEHAGNOUL Michel : 42,86 % 4 NS 2K E-1 100 10.1 56.11
5 NS 3P W+1 -170 13.4 74.44
6 NS 6S N-1 -50 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 49,81 %
18 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 60,10 % 7 NS 2S N-1 -100 4.6 25.56
8 NS 3S N+3 490 10.1 56.11
9 NS 3S W+1 -630 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 29,44 %
16 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 34,22 %13 NS 1C E = -80 13.4 74.44
14 NS 2T W = -90 7.9 43.89
15 NS 2P S = 110 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 62,22 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 53,85 %16 NS 2S N = 120 2.3 12.78
17 NS 4C W+1 -450 2.3 12.78
18 NS 2P W = -110 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 21,11 %
14 GOBBE Amélie -SCHELLEKENS.Caroline : 59,59 %19 NS 1S N = 90 7.9 43.89
20 NS 3S W+1 -630 0.1 0.56
21 NS 5TcN-1 -200 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 29,44 %
13 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 54,53 %22 NS 3S E+2 -660 0.1 0.56
23 NS 3S E = -600 7.9 43.89
24 NS 3S N = 400 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 25,37 %
12 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 42,37 %25 NS 3S N+3 490 15.7 87.22
26 NS 3P N+1 170 10.1 56.11
27 NS 2CcS = 470 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 80,93 %
22 MOLS Bruno -CLERIN François-Xavier : 57,49 %28 NS 2P N+3 200 8 44.44
29 NS 4C W-2 200 8 44.44
30 NS 3S E = -400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
21 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 41,23 %31 NS 3S S-1 -100 2.3 12.78
32 NS 3PcN-1 -100 9 50.00
33 NS 2P E+2 -170 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 25,19 %
Total : 216,7 / 540 = 40,13 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
22 MOLS Bruno -CLERIN François-Xavier : 57,49 % 1 NS 3S S-3 -150 4.6 25.56
2 NS 3P W-1 50 6.8 37.78
3 NS 3S W+2 -660 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
21 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 41,23 % 4 NS 2K E-1 100 10.1 56.11
5 NS 3P W+1 -170 13.4 74.44
6 NS 5T N+1 420 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
20 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 58,23 % 7 NS 1S E = -90 7.9 43.89
8 NS 3S N+3 490 10.1 56.11
9 NS 1S E+2 -150 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
19 VAN DOOREN Michele -MEHAGNOUL Michel : 42,86 %10 NS 3S S+1 630 5.7 31.67
11 NS 3T N+3 170 2.3 12.78
12 NS 2C S-1 -100 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 29,44 %
17 BIOURGE Gabrielle -VUYTS Michèle : 46,50 %16 NS 2K N+2 130 4.6 25.56
17 NS 4C W = -420 10.1 56.11
18 NS 2K E+1 -110 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 39,81 %
16 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 34,22 %19 NS 2C N = 110 15.7 87.22
20 NS 3S W = -600 13.4 74.44
21 NS 5T N = 600 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 74,63 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 53,85 %22 NS 3S W+1 -630 6.8 37.78
23 NS 3S E = -600 7.9 43.89
24 NS 2P E-3 150 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 27,41 %
14 GOBBE Amélie -SCHELLEKENS.Caroline : 59,59 %25 NS 5T N-1 -50 0.1 0.56
26 NS 3P N-2 -200 0.1 0.56
27 NS 3C S-1 -50 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 29,44 %
13 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 54,53 %28 NS 3P N+1 170 6 33.33
29 NS 5K E = -600 0 0.00
30 NS 3S E = -400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
12 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 42,37 %31 NS 3S S-1 -100 2.3 12.78
32 NS 2P W-2 200 16.8 93.33
33 NS 2P E+2 -170 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
Total : 229,1 / 540 = 42,43 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 CASSART Guy -POWIS Vinciane
13 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 54,53 % 1 NS 3S N-2 -100 10.1 56.11
2 NS 4CcN-1 -200 0.1 0.56
3 NS 3S E+3 -690 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 29,44 %
12 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 42,37 % 4 NS 2P S-1 -100 3.4 18.89
5 NS 2P W+3 -200 5.7 31.67
6 NS 7K S = 1440 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
22 MOLS Bruno -CLERIN François-Xavier : 57,49 % 7 NS 2C N+1 140 15.7 87.22
8 NS 3S N+3 490 10.1 56.11
9 NS 1S W+3 -180 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
21 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 41,23 %10 NS 3S S+1 630 5.7 31.67
11 NS 6S N+1 1020 17.9 99.44
12 NS 2C S-3 -300 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
20 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 58,23 %13 NS 3TcS-1 -200 0.1 0.56
14 NS 1S W-1 50 11.2 62.22
15 NS 2P S = 110 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 43,70 %
18 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 60,10 %19 NS 1S N = 90 7.9 43.89
20 NS 4C W = -620 6.8 37.78
21 NS 5C W = -450 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
17 BIOURGE Gabrielle -VUYTS Michèle : 46,50 %22 NS 3S W+1 -630 6.8 37.78
23 NS 3S E = -600 7.9 43.89
24 NS 3S N+1 430 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 56,30 %
16 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 34,22 %25 NS 3S N+2 460 11.2 62.22
26 NS 2T N+5 190 15.7 87.22
27 NS 2S E = -120 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 53,85 %28 NS 5P N+1 680 18 100.00
29 NS 4C W-4 400 16 88.89
30 NS 3S W = -400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
14 GOBBE Amélie -SCHELLEKENS.Caroline : 59,59 %31 NS 3S S = 600 12.3 68.33
32 NS 1S S-3 -150 1.2 6.67
33 NS 2P E+1 -140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
Total : 268,2 / 540 = 49,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 53,85 % 1 NS 5S N-5 -250 0.1 0.56
2 NS 3C N = 140 12.3 68.33
3 NS 3S W+4 -720 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 27,22 %
14 GOBBE Amélie -SCHELLEKENS.Caroline : 59,59 % 4 NS 3S N-2 -200 0.1 0.56
5 NS 3P W+1 -170 13.4 74.44
6 NS 6S N-2 -100 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 25,19 %
13 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 54,53 % 7 NS 3T E-2 200 17.9 99.44
8 NS 3S N+2 460 0.1 0.56
9 NS 3S E+1 -630 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
12 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 42,37 %10 NS 3S S+2 660 15.7 87.22
11 NS 3S N+3 490 9 50.00
12 NS 3P E-2 100 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 70,56 %
22 MOLS Bruno -CLERIN François-Xavier : 57,49 %13 NS 2C E = -110 11.2 62.22
14 NS 3T W-2 100 14.6 81.11
15 NS 3P S-1 -100 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
21 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 41,23 %16 NS 3S N+3 490 16.8 93.33
17 NS 4C E = -420 10.1 56.11
18 NS 2K E = -90 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 74,63 %
19 VAN DOOREN Michele -MEHAGNOUL Michel : 42,86 %22 NS 4P E-1 100 16.8 93.33
23 NS 4P W-2 200 17.9 99.44
24 NS 3S N+1 430 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 93,33 %
18 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 60,10 %25 NS 3S N+2 460 11.2 62.22
26 NS 3T N+3 170 10.1 56.11
27 NS 2T W+2 -130 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
17 BIOURGE Gabrielle -VUYTS Michèle : 46,50 %28 NS 4P N = 620 13 72.22
29 NS 4K E+1 -150 3 16.67
30 NS 3S W = -400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
16 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 34,22 %31 NS 3S S = 600 12.3 68.33
32 NS 1S N-1 -50 13.4 74.44
33 NS 2P E+1 -140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,26 %
Total : 285,5 / 540 = 52,87 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 SMEYERS Marc -KOSCIELNIAK Jean
17 BIOURGE Gabrielle -VUYTS Michèle : 46,50 % 1 NS 4T N = 130 17.9 99.44
2 NS 3C N-1 -100 4.6 25.56
3 NS 3S E+2 -660 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
16 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 34,22 % 4 NS 3S E-3 300 16.8 93.33
5 NS 3P W+1 -170 13.4 74.44
6 NS 5S S+2 520 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 76,67 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 53,85 % 7 NS 1S E = -90 7.9 43.89
8 NS 3S N+3 490 10.1 56.11
9 NS 2S W-1 100 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
14 GOBBE Amélie -SCHELLEKENS.Caroline : 59,59 %10 NS 3S S+1 630 5.7 31.67
11 NS 4P N = 420 6.8 37.78
12 NS 3S E-3 150 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 56,30 %
13 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 54,53 %13 NS 1S E+1 -120 9 50.00
14 NS 1S E+1 -120 0.1 0.56
15 NS 2C N-2 -200 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 17,04 %
12 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 42,37 %16 NS 3S N+2 460 11.2 62.22
17 NS 4C W = -420 10.1 56.11
18 NS 2P W = -110 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
22 MOLS Bruno -CLERIN François-Xavier : 57,49 %19 NS 1S N-1 -50 1.2 6.67
20 NS 4C W = -620 6.8 37.78
21 NS 4P W+1 -450 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 21,11 %
20 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 58,23 %25 NS 3S N+2 460 11.2 62.22
26 NS 3T N+3 170 10.1 56.11
27 NS 3T W = -110 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
19 VAN DOOREN Michele -MEHAGNOUL Michel : 42,86 %28 NS 3S N = 600 10 55.56
29 NS 4C W-4 400 16 88.89
30 NS 3S W = -400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
18 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 60,10 %31 NS 3S S = 600 12.3 68.33
32 NS 1S S-2 -100 9 50.00
33 NS 3P E = -140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
Total : 285,7 / 540 = 52,91 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
19 VAN DOOREN Michele -MEHAGNOUL Michel : 42,86 % 1 NS 3S N-2 -100 10.1 56.11
2 NS 1S E+1 -120 2.3 12.78
3 NS 3S W+2 -660 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 45,74 %
18 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 60,10 % 4 NS 2C S-1 -100 3.4 18.89
5 NS 4P W = -420 1.2 6.67
6 NS 3S S+3 490 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,19 %
17 BIOURGE Gabrielle -VUYTS Michèle : 46,50 % 7 NS 5T S-3 -300 0.1 0.56
8 NS 3S N+3 490 10.1 56.11
9 NS 1S W+2 -150 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
16 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 34,22 %10 NS 3S S+2 660 15.7 87.22
11 NS 3CcW-3 500 11.2 62.22
12 NS 2P E+1 -140 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 53,85 %13 NS 3C E-2 200 17.9 99.44
14 NS 1S E = -90 7.9 43.89
15 NS 2P S = 110 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 70,56 %
14 GOBBE Amélie -SCHELLEKENS.Caroline : 59,59 %16 NS 3S N = 400 6.8 37.78
17 NS 4C W-1 50 17.9 99.44
18 NS 1PcW+1 -260 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
13 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 54,53 %19 NS 2C E-1 100 13.4 74.44
20 NS 4C W = -620 6.8 37.78
21 NS 5PcE = -650 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
12 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 42,37 %22 NS 3S E+1 -630 6.8 37.78
23 NS 3S E = -600 7.9 43.89
24 NS 3S N+1 430 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 56,30 %
21 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 41,23 %28 NS 4P S = 620 13 72.22
29 NS 4C W-3 300 11 61.11
30 NS 3S W = -400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
20 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 58,23 %31 NS 3S S = 600 12.3 68.33
32 NS 1C E+2 -140 4.6 25.56
33 NS 3S S-2 -100 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
Total : 269,2 / 540 = 49,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 -
21 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 41,23 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
20 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 58,23 % 4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
19 VAN DOOREN Michele -MEHAGNOUL Michel : 42,86 % 7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
18 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 60,10 %10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
17 BIOURGE Gabrielle -VUYTS Michèle : 46,50 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
16 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 34,22 %16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 53,85 %19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
14 GOBBE Amélie -SCHELLEKENS.Caroline : 59,59 %22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
13 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 54,53 %25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00
27 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
22 MOLS Bruno -CLERIN François-Xavier : 57,49 %31 NS BYE 0 0.00
32 NS BYE 0 0.00
33 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 594 = 0,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 45,26 % 1 EO 3P E-2 100 2.3 12.78
2 EO 3C N = 140 5.7 31.67
3 EO 3S W+2 -660 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 25,37 %
7 CASSART Guy -POWIS Vinciane : 49,67 % 4 EO 2P S-1 -100 14.6 81.11
5 EO 2P W+3 -200 12.3 68.33
6 EO 7K S = 1440 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
2 BRIOT Fernand -DESSY Lina : 54,15 % 7 EO 2P N = 110 4.6 25.56
8 EO 3S N+3 490 7.9 43.89
9 EO 1ScW+2 -580 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 52,87 %10 EO 3S S+2 660 2.3 12.78
11 EO 3S N+3 490 9 50.00
12 EO 3P E-2 100 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 29,44 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 62,33 %13 EO 2C E+1 -140 13.4 74.44
14 EO 2T W-2 100 3.4 18.89
15 EO 2P S = 110 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
9 SMEYERS Marc -KOSCIELNIAK Jean : 52,91 %16 EO 3S N+2 460 6.8 37.78
17 EO 4C W = -420 7.9 43.89
18 EO 2P W = -110 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
4 NELIS Claude -LEBRUN Robert : 50,30 %19 EO 1S N = 90 10.1 56.11
20 EO 4C W = -620 11.2 62.22
21 EO 6TcN-1 -200 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 58,15 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 49,85 %22 EO 3S E+1 -630 11.2 62.22
23 EO 3S E = -600 10.1 56.11
24 EO 3S N+1 430 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 43,70 %
5 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,13 %25 EO 3S N+3 490 2.3 12.78
26 EO 3P N+1 170 7.9 43.89
27 EO 2CcS = 470 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 19,07 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,43 %31 EO 3S S-1 -100 15.7 87.22
32 EO 2P W-2 200 1.2 6.67
33 EO 2P E+2 -170 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
Total : 228,8 / 540 = 42,37 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
7 CASSART Guy -POWIS Vinciane : 49,67 % 1 EO 3S N-2 -100 7.9 43.89
2 EO 4CcN-1 -200 17.9 99.44
3 EO 3S E+3 -690 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 70,56 %
2 BRIOT Fernand -DESSY Lina : 54,15 % 4 EO 2C E-3 300 1.2 6.67
5 EO 2P W+2 -170 4.6 25.56
6 EO 6T N = 920 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 19,26 %
8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 52,87 % 7 EO 3T E-2 200 0.1 0.56
8 EO 3S N+2 460 17.9 99.44
9 EO 3S E+1 -630 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 62,33 %10 EO 3S S+1 630 12.3 68.33
11 EO 6P N+1 1010 2.3 12.78
12 EO 2C W-2 100 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
9 SMEYERS Marc -KOSCIELNIAK Jean : 52,91 %13 EO 1S E+1 -120 9 50.00
14 EO 1S E+1 -120 17.9 99.44
15 EO 2C N-2 -200 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 82,96 %
4 NELIS Claude -LEBRUN Robert : 50,30 %16 EO 3S N+3 490 1.2 6.67
17 EO 2C E+3 -200 2.3 12.78
18 EO 3K E-1 50 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 8,70 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 49,85 %19 EO 2C E-1 100 4.6 25.56
20 EO 4C W = -620 11.2 62.22
21 EO 5PcE = -650 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
5 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,13 %22 EO 3S E+2 -660 17.9 99.44
23 EO 3S E = -600 10.1 56.11
24 EO 3S N = 400 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 74,63 %
11 - : 0,00 %25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00
27 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,43 %28 EO 3P N+1 170 12 66.67
29 EO 5K E = -600 18 100.00
30 EO 3S E = -400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
Total : 265,0 / 486 = 54,53 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 GOBBE Amélie -SCHELLEKENS.Caroline
8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 52,87 % 4 EO 3S N-2 -200 17.9 99.44
5 EO 3P W+1 -170 4.6 25.56
6 EO 6S N-2 -100 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 74,81 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 62,33 % 7 EO 2S E-1 100 6.8 37.78
8 EO 3S N+3 490 7.9 43.89
9 EO 1S W+2 -150 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 37,78 %
9 SMEYERS Marc -KOSCIELNIAK Jean : 52,91 %10 EO 3S S+1 630 12.3 68.33
11 EO 4P N = 420 11.2 62.22
12 EO 3S E-3 150 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 43,70 %
4 NELIS Claude -LEBRUN Robert : 50,30 %13 EO 2C W+1 -140 13.4 74.44
14 EO 2C N-2 -100 14.6 81.11
15 EO 1P S = 80 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 74,63 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 49,85 %16 EO 3S N = 400 11.2 62.22
17 EO 4C W-1 50 0.1 0.56
18 EO 1PcW+1 -260 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
5 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,13 %19 EO 1S N = 90 10.1 56.11
20 EO 3S W+1 -630 17.9 99.44
21 EO 5TcN-1 -200 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 70,56 %
11 - : 0,00 %22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,43 %25 EO 5T N-1 -50 17.9 99.44
26 EO 3P N-2 -200 17.9 99.44
27 EO 3C S-1 -50 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 70,56 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 45,26 %28 EO 4S S-1 -100 17 94.44
29 EO 4C E-4 400 2 11.11
30 EO 3S W = -400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
7 CASSART Guy -POWIS Vinciane : 49,67 %31 EO 3S S = 600 5.7 31.67
32 EO 1S S-3 -150 16.8 93.33
33 EO 2P E+1 -140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
Total : 289,6 / 486 = 59,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 52,87 % 1 EO 5S N-5 -250 17.9 99.44
2 EO 3C N = 140 5.7 31.67
3 EO 3S W+4 -720 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 72,78 %
9 SMEYERS Marc -KOSCIELNIAK Jean : 52,91 % 7 EO 1S E = -90 10.1 56.11
8 EO 3S N+3 490 7.9 43.89
9 EO 2S W-1 100 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
4 NELIS Claude -LEBRUN Robert : 50,30 %10 EO 3S S+1 630 12.3 68.33
11 EO 3S N+4 520 4.6 25.56
12 EO 3S S-1 -100 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 49,85 %13 EO 3C E-2 200 0.1 0.56
14 EO 1S E = -90 10.1 56.11
15 EO 2P S = 110 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 29,44 %
5 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,13 %16 EO 2S N = 120 15.7 87.22
17 EO 4C W+1 -450 15.7 87.22
18 EO 2P W = -110 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 78,89 %
11 - : 0,00 %19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,43 %22 EO 3S W+1 -630 11.2 62.22
23 EO 3S E = -600 10.1 56.11
24 EO 2P E-3 150 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 72,59 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 45,26 %25 EO 6T N = 920 0.1 0.56
26 EO 2T N+1 110 15.7 87.22
27 EO 1S E = -90 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 37,78 %
7 CASSART Guy -POWIS Vinciane : 49,67 %28 EO 5P N+1 680 0 0.00
29 EO 4C W-4 400 2 11.11
30 EO 3S W = -400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
2 BRIOT Fernand -DESSY Lina : 54,15 %31 EO 3S S-1 -100 15.7 87.22
32 EO 2S E+1 -150 16.8 93.33
33 EO 3P E+1 -170 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 89,26 %
Total : 261,7 / 486 = 53,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 62,33 % 1 EO 3S S-1 -50 4.6 25.56
2 EO 4K E-4 200 0.1 0.56
3 EO 4C W+1 -650 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 8,89 %
9 SMEYERS Marc -KOSCIELNIAK Jean : 52,91 % 4 EO 3S E-3 300 1.2 6.67
5 EO 3P W+1 -170 4.6 25.56
6 EO 5S S+2 520 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 23,33 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 49,85 %10 EO 3S S+2 660 2.3 12.78
11 EO 3CcW-3 500 6.8 37.78
12 EO 2P E+1 -140 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
5 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,13 %13 EO 1C E = -80 4.6 25.56
14 EO 2T W = -90 10.1 56.11
15 EO 2P S = 110 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 37,78 %
11 - : 0,00 %16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,43 %19 EO 2C N = 110 2.3 12.78
20 EO 3S W = -600 4.6 25.56
21 EO 5T N = 600 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 25,37 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 45,26 %22 EO 3S E-1 100 1.2 6.67
23 EO 4K E+1 -150 2.3 12.78
24 EO 2C N+2 170 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
7 CASSART Guy -POWIS Vinciane : 49,67 %25 EO 3S N+2 460 6.8 37.78
26 EO 2T N+5 190 2.3 12.78
27 EO 2S E = -120 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
2 BRIOT Fernand -DESSY Lina : 54,15 %28 EO 4P S-1 -100 17 94.44
29 EO 4K E = -130 12 66.67
30 EO 2K W+1 -110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 52,87 %31 EO 3S S = 600 5.7 31.67
32 EO 1S N-1 -50 4.6 25.56
33 EO 2P E+1 -140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,74 %
Total : 166,3 / 486 = 34,22 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 BIOURGE Gabrielle -VUYTS Michèle
9 SMEYERS Marc -KOSCIELNIAK Jean : 52,91 % 1 EO 4T N = 130 0.1 0.56
2 EO 3C N-1 -100 13.4 74.44
3 EO 3S E+2 -660 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
4 NELIS Claude -LEBRUN Robert : 50,30 % 4 EO 2C S = 110 4.6 25.56
5 EO 2P W+3 -200 12.3 68.33
6 EO 6S N = 990 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 49,85 % 7 EO 5T S-3 -300 17.9 99.44
8 EO 3S N+3 490 7.9 43.89
9 EO 1S W+2 -150 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
11 - : 0,00 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,43 %16 EO 2K N+2 130 13.4 74.44
17 EO 4C W = -420 7.9 43.89
18 EO 2K E+1 -110 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 60,19 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 45,26 %19 EO 1S N-1 -50 16.8 93.33
20 EO 4C W = -620 11.2 62.22
21 EO 5TcN = 750 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 58,15 %
7 CASSART Guy -POWIS Vinciane : 49,67 %22 EO 3S W+1 -630 11.2 62.22
23 EO 3S E = -600 10.1 56.11
24 EO 3S N+1 430 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 43,70 %
2 BRIOT Fernand -DESSY Lina : 54,15 %25 EO 5T N = 400 14.6 81.11
26 EO 3P N+1 170 7.9 43.89
27 EO 2T W+1 -110 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 52,87 %28 EO 4P N = 620 5 27.78
29 EO 4K E+1 -150 15 83.33
30 EO 3S W = -400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 62,33 %31 EO 3S S = 600 5.7 31.67
32 EO 3K E-2 200 1.2 6.67
33 EO 3T N = 110 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
Total : 226,0 / 486 = 46,50 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal
4 NELIS Claude -LEBRUN Robert : 50,30 % 1 EO 3S S-3 -150 13.4 74.44
2 EO 2C N+1 140 5.7 31.67
3 EO 3S W+3 -690 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 58,15 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 49,85 % 4 EO 2C S-1 -100 14.6 81.11
5 EO 4P W = -420 16.8 93.33
6 EO 3S S+3 490 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,81 %
5 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,13 % 7 EO 2S N-1 -100 13.4 74.44
8 EO 3S N+3 490 7.9 43.89
9 EO 3S W+1 -630 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 70,56 %
11 - : 0,00 %10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 45,26 %16 EO 3T S = 110 17.9 99.44
17 EO 4C E+1 -450 15.7 87.22
18 EO 3K E-1 50 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
7 CASSART Guy -POWIS Vinciane : 49,67 %19 EO 1S N = 90 10.1 56.11
20 EO 4C W = -620 11.2 62.22
21 EO 5C W = -450 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
2 BRIOT Fernand -DESSY Lina : 54,15 %22 EO 3S W+1 -630 11.2 62.22
23 EO 3S E = -600 10.1 56.11
24 EO 4C N = 420 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 52,87 %25 EO 3S N+2 460 6.8 37.78
26 EO 3T N+3 170 7.9 43.89
27 EO 2T W+2 -130 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 62,33 %28 EO 4P N+1 650 2 11.11
29 EO 4K E+1 -150 15 83.33
30 EO 3S W = -400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
9 SMEYERS Marc -KOSCIELNIAK Jean : 52,91 %31 EO 3S S = 600 5.7 31.67
32 EO 1S S-2 -100 9 50.00
33 EO 3P E = -140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
Total : 292,1 / 486 = 60,10 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 VAN DOOREN Michele -MEHAGNOUL Michel
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 49,85 % 1 EO 3S N-2 -100 7.9 43.89
2 EO 1S E+1 -120 15.7 87.22
3 EO 3S W+2 -660 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 54,26 %
5 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,13 % 4 EO 2K E-1 100 7.9 43.89
5 EO 3P W+1 -170 4.6 25.56
6 EO 6S N-1 -50 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 50,19 %
11 - : 0,00 % 7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,43 %10 EO 3S S+1 630 12.3 68.33
11 EO 3T N+3 170 15.7 87.22
12 EO 2C S-1 -100 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 70,56 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 45,26 %13 EO 2C W+1 -140 13.4 74.44
14 EO 2P S-2 -100 14.6 81.11
15 EO 2P S+1 140 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
2 BRIOT Fernand -DESSY Lina : 54,15 %19 EO 1S N = 90 10.1 56.11
20 EO 2C W+2 -170 1.2 6.67
21 EO 6T N = 1370 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 21,11 %
8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 52,87 %22 EO 4P E-1 100 1.2 6.67
23 EO 4P W-2 200 0.1 0.56
24 EO 3S N+1 430 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 6,67 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 62,33 %25 EO 3S N+1 430 11.2 62.22
26 EO 3P N = 140 13.4 74.44
27 EO 1T W+2 -110 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 64,26 %
9 SMEYERS Marc -KOSCIELNIAK Jean : 52,91 %28 EO 3S N = 600 8 44.44
29 EO 4C W-4 400 2 11.11
30 EO 3S W = -400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
4 NELIS Claude -LEBRUN Robert : 50,30 %31 EO 3S S = 600 5.7 31.67
32 EO 1S N-2 -100 9 50.00
33 EO 3T N-1 -50 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
Total : 208,3 / 486 = 42,86 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
5 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,13 % 1 EO 3S N-3 -150 13.4 74.44
2 EO 3C N = 140 5.7 31.67
3 EO 6S W = -1440 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
11 - : 0,00 % 4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,43 % 7 EO 1S E = -90 10.1 56.11
8 EO 3S N+3 490 7.9 43.89
9 EO 1S E+2 -150 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 45,26 %10 EO 3S S+1 630 12.3 68.33
11 EO 6K S-2 -100 17.9 99.44
12 EO 2CcS-4 -1100 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 89,07 %
7 CASSART Guy -POWIS Vinciane : 49,67 %13 EO 3TcS-1 -200 17.9 99.44
14 EO 1S W-1 50 6.8 37.78
15 EO 2P S = 110 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 56,30 %
2 BRIOT Fernand -DESSY Lina : 54,15 %16 EO 3S N+2 460 6.8 37.78
17 EO 4C E = -420 7.9 43.89
18 EO 2P W = -110 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 62,33 %22 EO 2S W = -120 4.6 25.56
23 EO 4P W = -620 17.9 99.44
24 EO 4C N = 420 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 56,30 %
9 SMEYERS Marc -KOSCIELNIAK Jean : 52,91 %25 EO 3S N+2 460 6.8 37.78
26 EO 3T N+3 170 7.9 43.89
27 EO 3T W = -110 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
4 NELIS Claude -LEBRUN Robert : 50,30 %28 EO 3K N = 110 14 77.78
29 EO 3S W-3 300 7 38.89
30 EO 3S E+1 -430 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 49,85 %31 EO 3S S = 600 5.7 31.67
32 EO 1C E+2 -140 13.4 74.44
33 EO 3S S-2 -100 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
Total : 283,0 / 486 = 58,23 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
11 - : 0,00 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,43 % 4 EO 2K E-1 100 7.9 43.89
5 EO 3P W+1 -170 4.6 25.56
6 EO 5T N+1 420 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 45,26 % 7 EO 3C N-2 -200 15.7 87.22
8 EO 3S S+3 490 7.9 43.89
9 EO 1S W+2 -150 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 54,26 %
7 CASSART Guy -POWIS Vinciane : 49,67 %10 EO 3S S+1 630 12.3 68.33
11 EO 6S N+1 1020 0.1 0.56
12 EO 2C S-3 -300 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
2 BRIOT Fernand -DESSY Lina : 54,15 %13 EO 2C E-1 100 2.3 12.78
14 EO 2C N = 110 0.1 0.56
15 EO 1P S = 80 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 27,22 %
8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 52,87 %16 EO 3S N+3 490 1.2 6.67
17 EO 4C E = -420 7.9 43.89
18 EO 2K E = -90 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 25,37 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 62,33 %19 EO 1S N+1 120 0.1 0.56
20 EO 2C W+2 -170 1.2 6.67
21 EO 5TcN = 750 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 8,70 %
4 NELIS Claude -LEBRUN Robert : 50,30 %25 EO 5T N = 400 14.6 81.11
26 EO 3C W-2 200 0.1 0.56
27 EO 1T W+2 -110 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 49,85 %28 EO 4P S = 620 5 27.78
29 EO 4C W-3 300 7 38.89
30 EO 3S W = -400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
5 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,13 %31 EO 3S S-1 -100 15.7 87.22
32 EO 3PcN-1 -100 9 50.00
33 EO 2P E+2 -170 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 74,81 %
Total : 200,4 / 486 = 41,23 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 MOLS Bruno -CLERIN François-Xavier
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,43 % 1 EO 3S S-3 -150 13.4 74.44
2 EO 3P W-1 50 11.2 62.22
3 EO 3S W+2 -660 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 45,26 % 4 EO 2K E = -90 11.2 62.22
5 EO 4P W = -420 16.8 93.33
6 EO 7K S-1 -50 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 78,89 %
7 CASSART Guy -POWIS Vinciane : 49,67 % 7 EO 2C N+1 140 2.3 12.78
8 EO 3S N+3 490 7.9 43.89
9 EO 1S W+3 -180 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
2 BRIOT Fernand -DESSY Lina : 54,15 %10 EO 3S S+2 660 2.3 12.78
11 EO 3P N+4 260 13.4 74.44
12 EO 3S W-2 100 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 52,87 %13 EO 2C E = -110 6.8 37.78
14 EO 3T W-2 100 3.4 18.89
15 EO 3P S-1 -100 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 62,33 %16 EO 3S N+2 460 6.8 37.78
17 EO 4C E+1 -450 15.7 87.22
18 EO 2P W = -110 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
9 SMEYERS Marc -KOSCIELNIAK Jean : 52,91 %19 EO 1S N-1 -50 16.8 93.33
20 EO 4C W = -620 11.2 62.22
21 EO 4P W+1 -450 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 78,89 %
4 NELIS Claude -LEBRUN Robert : 50,30 %22 EO 3S W+1 -630 11.2 62.22
23 EO 3S E = -600 10.1 56.11
24 EO 3S N = 400 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 62,22 %
5 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,13 %28 EO 2P N+3 200 10 55.56
29 EO 4C W-2 200 10 55.56
30 EO 3S E = -400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
11 - : 0,00 %31 EO BYE 0 0.00
32 EO BYE 0 0.00
33 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 279,4 / 486 = 57,49 %
|
|