|
Tournoi du 14-11-16
Lundi
1 64,92 2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
2 57,94 4 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
3 56,53 8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie
4 54,61 7 NELIS Claude -LEBRUN Robert
5 52,77 6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
6 52,38 11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
7 52,32 3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
8 50,97 5 CAMUS Colette -GROSFILS Colette
9 47,50 12 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
10 44,02 9 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Chantal
11 42,68 13 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
12 42,33 1 CLERIN François-Xavier -CASSART Guy
13 30,97 10 ARICKX Roger -ROMAIN R
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 58,70 23 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal
2 58,03 17 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle
3 56,33 16 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
4 56,12 14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
5 55,68 19 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand
6 53,52 24 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
7 50,33 18 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -THIRION Michel
8 48,82 22 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
~ 48,82 26 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre
10 43,12 20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
11 41,39 25 HOGGE Colette -VAN DOOREN Michele
12 39,91 21 AUBRY -ERPICUM Patrice
13 39,29 15 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert
PAIRE Nr : 1 CLERIN François-Xavier -CASSART Guy
14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 56,12 % 1 NS 3S E+1 -430 7 31.82
2 NS 4K W = -130 13 59.09
3 NS 3P N-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
24 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,52 % 4 NS 1S E-3 300 19 86.36
5 NS 4CcN-1 -200 0 0.00
6 NS 3K E = -110 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
23 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 58,70 % 7 NS 3KcN-1 -200 7 31.82
8 NS 1S E = -90 4 18.18
9 NS 1S W+1 -120 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
22 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 48,82 %10 NS 3S S-1 -100 4 18.18
11 NS 4C W = -420 13 59.09
12 NS 4P N-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
21 AUBRY -ERPICUM Patrice : 39,91 %13 NS 5T S+1 . 11 50.00
14 NS 2C S+1 140 20 90.91
15 NS 3S N+1 630 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
26 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 48,82 %16 NS 2P E+2 -170 5 22.73
17 NS 5P E = -450 8 36.36
18 NS 1S S = 90 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
19 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 55,68 %19 NS 2P W-1 100 22 100.00
20 NS 3S W = -600 2 9.09
21 NS 1S S = 90 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
18 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -THIRION Michel : 50,33 %22 NS 2P N+2 170 13 59.09
23 NS 4P W+1 -650 17 77.27
24 NS 3C E = -140 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
17 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 58,03 %25 NS 4P E+3 -710 6.6 30.00
26 NS 2P E = -110 7.7 35.00
27 NS 2C S+1 140 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
16 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 56,33 %28 NS 2P W+1 -140 5.5 25.00
29 NS 1P W+2 -140 17.5 79.55
30 NS 4C E = -420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 49,85 %
Total : 279,4 / 660 = 42,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
15 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 39,29 % 4 NS 2KcW-2 500 22 100.00
5 NS 4C N = 620 13 59.09
6 NS 3S E-1 100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 56,12 % 7 NS 3K N-1 -100 13 59.09
8 NS 3S E-3 150 19 86.36
9 NS 1S N-1 -50 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 75,76 %
24 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,52 %10 NS 3S S = 600 21 95.45
11 NS 4C W = -420 13 59.09
12 NS 4P N+1 650 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
23 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 58,70 %13 NS 3S S+3 . 11 50.00
14 NS 1S E-2 100 16 72.73
15 NS 3S N+1 630 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
22 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 48,82 %16 NS 2P E = -110 16 72.73
17 NS 4P E+1 -450 8 36.36
18 NS 2K E-3 150 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
21 AUBRY -ERPICUM Patrice : 39,91 %19 NS 2K S-3 -150 6 27.27
20 NS 3S W-1 100 19 86.36
21 NS 1S S = 90 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
25 HOGGE Colette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 41,39 %22 NS 2P N+3 200 20 90.91
23 NS 4P W+2 -680 6 27.27
24 NS 1S N+1 120 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
19 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 55,68 %25 NS 6P E = -1430 3.4 15.45
26 NS 2P E = -110 7.7 35.00
27 NS 2C S+1 140 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 36,82 %
18 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -THIRION Michel : 50,33 %28 NS 5PcW-2 300 19.7 89.55
29 NS 2P W+2 -170 6.6 30.00
30 NS 4C E = -420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 54,85 %
17 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 58,03 %31 NS 2S S+1 150 20 90.91
32 NS 1S S = 90 12 54.55
33 NS 4P N+2 480 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 75,76 %
Total : 428,5 / 660 = 64,92 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
18 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -THIRION Michel : 50,33 % 1 NS 3S E+1 -430 7 31.82
2 NS 3S E-1 50 17 77.27
3 NS 2P N+1 140 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
16 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 56,33 % 7 NS 2K N = 90 16 72.73
8 NS 2S E-1 50 8 36.36
9 NS 1S W = -90 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
25 HOGGE Colette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 41,39 %10 NS 4C S-1 -100 4 18.18
11 NS 2S E+3 -210 18 81.82
12 NS 5T N = 600 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 56,12 %13 NS 3S S+3 . 11 50.00
14 NS 4C S-1 -50 13 59.09
15 NS 3S N = 600 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
24 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,52 %16 NS 2P E+2 -170 5 22.73
17 NS 5P E = -450 8 36.36
18 NS 2T S = 90 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
23 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 58,70 %19 NS 1S E+2 -150 6 27.27
20 NS 2S E-1 100 19 86.36
21 NS 2C S+1 140 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
22 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 48,82 %22 NS 2P N = 110 5 22.73
23 NS 4P W+2 -680 6 27.27
24 NS 1S N = 90 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
26 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 48,82 %25 NS 7P E-1 100 21.9 99.55
26 NS 2P W = -110 7.7 35.00
27 NS 2C S+1 140 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 64,85 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 43,12 %28 NS 6C N-2 -200 2.3 10.45
29 NS 2P W+2 -170 6.6 30.00
30 NS 6C E-1 50 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
19 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 55,68 %31 NS 2S S = 120 11 50.00
32 NS 2P E-2 200 22 100.00
33 NS 4P N = 420 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
Total : 345,3 / 660 = 52,32 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 43,12 % 1 NS 3S E = -400 18 81.82
2 NS 4P S = 620 22 100.00
3 NS 2P N+1 140 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
19 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 55,68 % 4 NS 3C S-1 -100 6 27.27
5 NS 2C N+1 140 8 36.36
6 NS 3S E+2 -660 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
17 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 58,03 %10 NS 2C S+1 140 18 81.82
11 NS 3C W+1 -170 22 100.00
12 NS 3T N = 110 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
26 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 48,82 %13 NS 3S S+3 . 11 50.00
14 NS 3T S-3 -150 0 0.00
15 NS 3S S+1 630 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
15 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 39,29 %16 NS 3K N-2 -100 20 90.91
17 NS 3K S-4 -200 19 86.36
18 NS 1S S = 90 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 56,12 %19 NS 1S E+1 -120 12 54.55
20 NS 3ScW = -750 0 0.00
21 NS 1S S+1 120 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
24 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,52 %22 NS 2P N = 110 5 22.73
23 NS 4P W+2 -680 6 27.27
24 NS 2P S+1 140 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
23 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 58,70 %25 NS 7P E = -2210 0.1 0.45
26 NS 3C S = 140 20.8 94.55
27 NS 2P W = -110 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 35,15 %
22 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 48,82 %28 NS 5PcW-2 300 19.7 89.55
29 NS 3P W-1 100 21.9 99.55
30 NS 4C E-1 50 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 91,21 %
25 HOGGE Colette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 41,39 %31 NS 1P N+2 140 16 72.73
32 NS 1S S+3 180 20 90.91
33 NS 4P N+1 450 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
Total : 382,4 / 660 = 57,94 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 CAMUS Colette -GROSFILS Colette
26 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 48,82 % 1 NS 3S E = -400 18 81.82
2 NS 4PcS-2 -500 1 4.55
3 NS 4P N-2 -100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
21 AUBRY -ERPICUM Patrice : 39,91 % 4 NS 2C N+1 140 13 59.09
5 NS 4CcN = 790 22 100.00
6 NS 3S E-1 100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 43,12 % 7 NS 3S N-3 -300 4 18.18
8 NS 2K E-2 100 14 63.64
9 NS 2K S-1 -50 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
18 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -THIRION Michel : 50,33 %13 NS 2K N = . 11 50.00
14 NS 2C S+1 140 20 90.91
15 NS 3S N = 600 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
17 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 58,03 %16 NS 2P E+1 -140 13 59.09
17 NS 4P E+1 -450 8 36.36
18 NS 1S S-1 -100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
25 HOGGE Colette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 41,39 %19 NS 1S E = -90 17 77.27
20 NS 2P W = -110 14 63.64
21 NS 2S N+1 150 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 78,79 %
15 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 39,29 %22 NS 2P N+2 170 13 59.09
23 NS 4P W+1 -650 17 77.27
24 NS 2C W = -110 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 56,12 %25 NS 4P E+2 -680 13.2 60.00
26 NS 3C S-1 -100 14.3 65.00
27 NS 2P E+1 -140 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 41,82 %
24 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,52 %28 NS 4P W-1 50 9.9 45.00
29 NS 2P W+2 -170 6.6 30.00
30 NS 4C E+1 -450 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 28,48 %
23 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 58,70 %31 NS 1T S = 70 6 27.27
32 NS 2S S-2 -100 3 13.64
33 NS 4P N+2 480 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
Total : 336,4 / 660 = 50,97 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
24 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,52 % 1 NS 3S E+1 -430 7 31.82
2 NS 4CcE-1 100 20 90.91
3 NS 2P N = 110 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
23 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 58,70 % 4 NS 3K W-1 100 10 45.45
5 NS 4C N-1 -100 4 18.18
6 NS 3S E+2 -660 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
25 HOGGE Colette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 41,39 % 7 NS 2C E = -110 10 45.45
8 NS 3K E-2 100 14 63.64
9 NS 2C E-1 100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
21 AUBRY -ERPICUM Patrice : 39,91 %10 NS 3S S = 600 21 95.45
11 NS 4P W+1 -450 3 13.64
12 NS 4C S-1 -100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
19 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 55,68 %16 NS 3P E+1 -170 5 22.73
17 NS 4C N-4 -200 19 86.36
18 NS 1S S+1 120 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
18 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -THIRION Michel : 50,33 %19 NS 2K S-4 -200 0 0.00
20 NS 2P W+1 -140 12 54.55
21 NS 1S S+2 150 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
26 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 48,82 %22 NS 2P N+3 200 20 90.91
23 NS 4P E+1 -650 17 77.27
24 NS 4K S-2 -100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
16 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 56,33 %25 NS 6P E = -1430 3.4 15.45
26 NS 2P W = -110 7.7 35.00
27 NS 3C S = 140 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 36,82 %
15 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 39,29 %28 NS 4P E-1 50 9.9 45.00
29 NS 2P E+1 -140 17.5 79.55
30 NS 5C E-1 50 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 56,12 %31 NS 4P N-1 -100 1 4.55
32 NS 3S S-1 -50 9 40.91
33 NS 4P N+2 480 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
Total : 348,3 / 660 = 52,77 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 NELIS Claude -LEBRUN Robert
15 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 39,29 % 1 NS 3S E+1 -430 7 31.82
2 NS 3S E = -400 9 40.91
3 NS 2P N+1 140 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 56,12 % 4 NS 3C S-1 -100 6 27.27
5 NS 3S N+1 630 18 81.82
6 NS 3S E = -600 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
24 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,52 % 7 NS 1ScN-2 -500 2 9.09
8 NS 2PcN = 470 22 100.00
9 NS 1S W+1 -120 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
26 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 48,82 %10 NS 2S S = 120 15 68.18
11 NS 4C W = -420 13 59.09
12 NS 3S N+1 630 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
22 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 48,82 %13 NS 3S E+2 . 11 50.00
14 NS 2C N+1 140 20 90.91
15 NS 3S N = 600 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 43,12 %19 NS 1S N = 90 20 90.91
20 NS 3S W-2 200 22 100.00
21 NS 2S N = 120 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 84,85 %
19 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 55,68 %22 NS 3P N+1 170 13 59.09
23 NS 4P W+2 -680 6 27.27
24 NS 4CcW-2 300 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
18 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -THIRION Michel : 50,33 %25 NS 4P E+2 -680 13.2 60.00
26 NS 2P W+1 -140 1.2 5.45
27 NS 3C S = 140 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 41,82 %
25 HOGGE Colette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 41,39 %28 NS 4PcE-1 100 14.3 65.00
29 NS 2P W+2 -170 6.6 30.00
30 NS 4C E = -420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
16 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 56,33 %31 NS 3P S = 140 16 72.73
32 NS 2P S-2 -100 3 13.64
33 NS 4P N+1 450 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
Total : 360,4 / 660 = 54,61 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie
17 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 58,03 % 1 NS 4K W-3 150 22 100.00
2 NS 4PcS-2 -500 1 4.55
3 NS 3P N-1 -50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
16 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 56,33 % 4 NS 3C N+1 170 16 72.73
5 NS 4C N = 620 13 59.09
6 NS 2K E+3 -150 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
15 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 39,29 % 7 NS 2P N = 110 20 90.91
8 NS 2K E-1 50 8 36.36
9 NS 2C E = -110 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 56,12 %10 NS 3S S-1 -100 4 18.18
11 NS 3S E+1 -430 8 36.36
12 NS 4C S-1 -100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
24 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,52 %13 NS 4C W = . 11 50.00
14 NS 4CcN-1 -100 8 36.36
15 NS 3S N+1 630 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
25 HOGGE Colette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 41,39 %16 NS 2P E+2 -170 5 22.73
17 NS 5P E-1 50 22 100.00
18 NS 1S S = 90 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
21 AUBRY -ERPICUM Patrice : 39,91 %22 NS 2P N+3 200 20 90.91
23 NS 4P W-1 100 22 100.00
24 NS 1S N+2 150 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 93,94 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 43,12 %25 NS 4P E+2 -680 13.2 60.00
26 NS 3P E-1 100 17.5 79.55
27 NS 2C S+1 140 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 66,52 %
19 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 55,68 %28 NS 5PcW-2 300 19.7 89.55
29 NS 2P W+2 -170 6.6 30.00
30 NS 4C E = -420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 54,85 %
26 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 48,82 %31 NS 2P N+2 170 22 100.00
32 NS 3S S-2 -100 3 13.64
33 NS 4P N+1 450 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
Total : 373,1 / 660 = 56,53 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Chantal
19 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 55,68 % 1 NS 3S E+1 -430 7 31.82
2 NS 4C E = -420 6 27.27
3 NS 3P N-1 -50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
25 HOGGE Colette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 41,39 % 4 NS 3C S = 140 13 59.09
5 NS 4C N = 620 13 59.09
6 NS 3S E-1 100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
17 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 58,03 % 7 NS 2P N-1 -100 13 59.09
8 NS 1S E+2 -150 1 4.55
9 NS 1S W+1 -120 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
16 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 56,33 %10 NS 2C S = 110 11 50.00
11 NS 4C E+1 -450 3 13.64
12 NS 3S N+2 660 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
15 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 39,29 %13 NS 3S W+3 . 11 50.00
14 NS 2C S-1 -50 13 59.09
15 NS 3S N-1 -100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 56,12 %16 NS 1S N-2 -100 20 90.91
17 NS 4P W+1 -450 8 36.36
18 NS 1S S-1 -100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
26 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 48,82 %19 NS 1S E+1 -120 12 54.55
20 NS 2S W+1 -150 9 40.91
21 NS 1S S = 90 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
22 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 48,82 %25 NS 4P E+2 -680 13.2 60.00
26 NS 2P W+1 -140 1.2 5.45
27 NS 3C S = 140 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 41,82 %
21 AUBRY -ERPICUM Patrice : 39,91 %28 NS 4P W = -420 0.1 0.45
29 NS 2P W+1 -140 17.5 79.55
30 NS 4C E+1 -450 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 30,15 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 43,12 %31 NS 3P N = 140 16 72.73
32 NS 2S S = 120 15 68.18
33 NS 4P N+1 450 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
Total : 290,5 / 660 = 44,02 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 ARICKX Roger -ROMAIN R
21 AUBRY -ERPICUM Patrice : 39,91 % 1 NS 3S E+1 -430 7 31.82
2 NS 4C W+1 -450 4 18.18
3 NS 2P N = 110 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 43,12 % 4 NS 4C S-2 -200 0 0.00
5 NS 4C N-1 -100 4 18.18
6 NS 3S E = -600 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
26 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 48,82 % 7 NS 2KcN-1 -200 7 31.82
8 NS 3K E-2 100 14 63.64
9 NS 2C E = -110 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
18 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -THIRION Michel : 50,33 %10 NS 2C S = 110 11 50.00
11 NS 4P E+1 -450 3 13.64
12 NS 2P N+1 140 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
17 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 58,03 %13 NS 3S W+2 . 11 50.00
14 NS 1S E+1 -120 4 18.18
15 NS 3S S-4 -400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
16 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 56,33 %16 NS 2P E+2 -170 5 22.73
17 NS 4P W+1 -450 8 36.36
18 NS 1S S-1 -100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
15 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 39,29 %19 NS 1S E = -90 17 77.27
20 NS 2S W+1 -150 9 40.91
21 NS 1S S = 90 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 56,12 %22 NS 2S E+1 -150 0 0.00
23 NS 4P W+1 -650 17 77.27
24 NS 1S W = -90 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
23 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 58,70 %28 NS 2P W+1 -140 5.5 25.00
29 NS 2P W+2 -170 6.6 30.00
30 NS 5C E = -450 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 21,82 %
22 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 48,82 %31 NS 2P S = 110 8 36.36
32 NS 3S S-2 -100 3 13.64
33 NS 2P N+2 170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
Total : 204,4 / 660 = 30,97 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
23 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 58,70 % 1 NS 3S W+1 -430 7 31.82
2 NS 5C E-1 50 17 77.27
3 NS 3P N-1 -50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
22 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 48,82 % 4 NS 2K W+1 -110 2 9.09
5 NS 4C N+1 650 20 90.91
6 NS 3S E = -600 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
21 AUBRY -ERPICUM Patrice : 39,91 % 7 NS 2K N+2 130 22 100.00
8 NS 3P S-3 -150 1 4.55
9 NS 2K S-1 -50 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 43,12 %10 NS 1S S+1 120 15 68.18
11 NS 3P E+2 -200 20 90.91
12 NS 4P N+1 650 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 78,79 %
25 HOGGE Colette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 41,39 %13 NS 3S S+2 . 11 50.00
14 NS 2S E = -120 4 18.18
15 NS 3S N+1 630 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
18 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -THIRION Michel : 50,33 %16 NS 1S N-2 -100 20 90.91
17 NS 4P E+1 -450 8 36.36
18 NS 1S S+1 120 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
17 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 58,03 %19 NS 1S E+3 -180 2 9.09
20 NS 2S W+3 -210 4 18.18
21 NS 1S S = 90 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
16 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 56,33 %22 NS 2P N+2 170 13 59.09
23 NS 4P E+2 -680 6 27.27
24 NS 2C E+1 -140 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
15 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 39,29 %25 NS 4C E+1 -650 19.7 89.55
26 NS 2C S+1 140 20.8 94.55
27 NS 3C S = 140 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 81,36 %
24 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,52 %31 NS 3K N-1 -100 1 4.55
32 NS 2S S-1 -50 9 40.91
33 NS 4P N+2 480 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
Total : 345,7 / 660 = 52,38 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
25 HOGGE Colette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 41,39 % 1 NS 3S E+1 -430 7 31.82
2 NS 3S E = -400 9 40.91
3 NS 2P N-1 -50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
18 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -THIRION Michel : 50,33 % 4 NS 3C S-1 -100 6 27.27
5 NS 4C N = 620 13 59.09
6 NS 3S E = -600 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
22 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 48,82 % 7 NS 3C E-1 100 18 81.82
8 NS 2K E-1 50 8 36.36
9 NS 2K S-2 -100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
15 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 39,29 %10 NS 2C S-1 -100 4 18.18
11 NS 4P W+1 -450 3 13.64
12 NS 3S N+2 660 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
19 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 55,68 %13 NS 3S W+3 . 11 50.00
14 NS 1S E = -90 10 45.45
15 NS 3S N = 600 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
23 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 58,70 %16 NS 2P E+1 -140 13 59.09
17 NS 4P E+1 -450 8 36.36
18 NS 1S S = 90 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
16 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 56,33 %19 NS 1S E+2 -150 6 27.27
20 NS 2K W = -90 16 72.73
21 NS 1S S+1 120 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 43,12 %22 NS 3P N-1 -50 2 9.09
23 NS 4P E+2 -680 6 27.27
24 NS 2C W = -110 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
17 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 58,03 %28 NS 4PcE-1 100 14.3 65.00
29 NS 2P W+2 -170 6.6 30.00
30 NS 6C E-1 50 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 59,85 %
21 AUBRY -ERPICUM Patrice : 39,91 %31 NS 1S N+1 120 11 50.00
32 NS 2S S+1 150 18 81.82
33 NS 4P N+2 480 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
Total : 313,5 / 660 = 47,50 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
22 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 48,82 % 1 NS 3S E = -400 18 81.82
2 NS 4K W = -130 13 59.09
3 NS 2P N = 110 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
26 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 48,82 % 4 NS 3T W-3 300 19 86.36
5 NS 4C N-1 -100 4 18.18
6 NS 4C E-1 100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
19 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 55,68 % 7 NS 4PcS-3 -800 0 0.00
8 NS 3S W-3 150 19 86.36
9 NS 1S W+3 -180 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
23 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 58,70 %10 NS 4C S-1 -100 4 18.18
11 NS 4C W = -420 13 59.09
12 NS 3S N = 600 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
16 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 56,33 %13 NS 5T S+1 . 11 50.00
14 NS 1S E+1 -120 4 18.18
15 NS 3S S-2 -200 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 43,12 %16 NS 2P E+2 -170 5 22.73
17 NS 4P W+1 -450 8 36.36
18 NS 1S S+2 150 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
24 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,52 %19 NS 1S E+1 -120 12 54.55
20 NS 2S W+2 -180 6 27.27
21 NS 3S N-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
17 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 58,03 %22 NS 2P N+1 140 8 36.36
23 NS 4P W+2 -680 6 27.27
24 NS 2C E+1 -140 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 24,24 %
21 AUBRY -ERPICUM Patrice : 39,91 %25 NS 4P E+2 -680 13.2 60.00
26 NS 3C S-1 -100 14.3 65.00
27 NS 3C S = 140 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 61,67 %
18 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -THIRION Michel : 50,33 %31 NS 1C E-1 50 4 18.18
32 NS 2S S = 120 15 68.18
33 NS 4P N = 420 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 281,7 / 660 = 42,68 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -CASSART Guy : 42,33 % 1 EO 3S E+1 -430 15 68.18
2 EO 4K W = -130 9 40.91
3 EO 3P N-3 -150 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
7 NELIS Claude -LEBRUN Robert : 54,61 % 4 EO 3C S-1 -100 16 72.73
5 EO 3S N+1 630 4 18.18
6 EO 3S E = -600 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 64,92 % 7 EO 3K N-1 -100 9 40.91
8 EO 3S E-3 150 3 13.64
9 EO 1S N-1 -50 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 24,24 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 56,53 %10 EO 3S S-1 -100 18 81.82
11 EO 3S E+1 -430 14 63.64
12 EO 4C S-1 -100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 52,32 %13 EO 3S S+3 . 11 50.00
14 EO 4C S-1 -50 9 40.91
15 EO 3S N = 600 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Chantal : 44,02 %16 EO 1S N-2 -100 2 9.09
17 EO 4P W+1 -450 14 63.64
18 EO 1S S-1 -100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
4 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 57,94 %19 EO 1S E+1 -120 10 45.45
20 EO 3ScW = -750 22 100.00
21 EO 1S S+1 120 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
10 ARICKX Roger -ROMAIN R : 30,97 %22 EO 2S E+1 -150 22 100.00
23 EO 4P W+1 -650 5 22.73
24 EO 1S W = -90 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
5 CAMUS Colette -GROSFILS Colette : 50,97 %25 EO 4P E+2 -680 8.8 40.00
26 EO 3C S-1 -100 7.7 35.00
27 EO 2P E+1 -140 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 58,18 %
6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 52,77 %31 EO 4P N-1 -100 21 95.45
32 EO 3S S-1 -50 13 59.09
33 EO 4P N+2 480 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
Total : 370,4 / 660 = 56,12 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert
7 NELIS Claude -LEBRUN Robert : 54,61 % 1 EO 3S E+1 -430 15 68.18
2 EO 3S E = -400 13 59.09
3 EO 2P N+1 140 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 64,92 % 4 EO 2KcW-2 500 0 0.00
5 EO 4C N = 620 9 40.91
6 EO 3S E-1 100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 56,53 % 7 EO 2P N = 110 2 9.09
8 EO 2K E-1 50 14 63.64
9 EO 2C E = -110 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
12 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,50 %10 EO 2C S-1 -100 18 81.82
11 EO 4P W+1 -450 19 86.36
12 EO 3S N+2 660 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
9 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Chantal : 44,02 %13 EO 3S W+3 . 11 50.00
14 EO 2C S-1 -50 9 40.91
15 EO 3S N-1 -100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
4 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 57,94 %16 EO 3K N-2 -100 2 9.09
17 EO 3K S-4 -200 3 13.64
18 EO 1S S = 90 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
10 ARICKX Roger -ROMAIN R : 30,97 %19 EO 1S E = -90 5 22.73
20 EO 2S W+1 -150 13 59.09
21 EO 1S S = 90 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
5 CAMUS Colette -GROSFILS Colette : 50,97 %22 EO 2P N+2 170 9 40.91
23 EO 4P W+1 -650 5 22.73
24 EO 2C W = -110 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,38 %25 EO 4C E+1 -650 2.3 10.45
26 EO 2C S+1 140 1.2 5.45
27 EO 3C S = 140 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 18,64 %
6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 52,77 %28 EO 4P E-1 50 12.1 55.00
29 EO 2P E+1 -140 4.5 20.45
30 EO 5C E-1 50 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
Total : 259,3 / 660 = 39,29 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 56,53 % 4 EO 3C N+1 170 6 27.27
5 EO 4C N = 620 9 40.91
6 EO 2K E+3 -150 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 52,32 % 7 EO 2K N = 90 6 27.27
8 EO 2S E-1 50 14 63.64
9 EO 1S W = -90 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
9 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Chantal : 44,02 %10 EO 2C S = 110 11 50.00
11 EO 4C E+1 -450 19 86.36
12 EO 3S N+2 660 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
13 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 42,68 %13 EO 5T S+1 . 11 50.00
14 EO 1S E+1 -120 18 81.82
15 EO 3S S-2 -200 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
10 ARICKX Roger -ROMAIN R : 30,97 %16 EO 2P E+2 -170 17 77.27
17 EO 4P W+1 -450 14 63.64
18 EO 1S S-1 -100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
12 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,50 %19 EO 1S E+2 -150 16 72.73
20 EO 2K W = -90 6 27.27
21 EO 1S S+1 120 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,38 %22 EO 2P N+2 170 9 40.91
23 EO 4P E+2 -680 16 72.73
24 EO 2C E+1 -140 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 52,77 %25 EO 6P E = -1430 18.6 84.55
26 EO 2P W = -110 14.3 65.00
27 EO 3C S = 140 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 63,18 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -CASSART Guy : 42,33 %28 EO 2P W+1 -140 16.5 75.00
29 EO 1P W+2 -140 4.5 20.45
30 EO 4C E = -420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 50,15 %
7 NELIS Claude -LEBRUN Robert : 54,61 %31 EO 3P S = 140 6 27.27
32 EO 2P S-2 -100 19 86.36
33 EO 4P N+1 450 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
Total : 371,8 / 660 = 56,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 56,53 % 1 EO 4K W-3 150 0 0.00
2 EO 4PcS-2 -500 21 95.45
3 EO 3P N-1 -50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
9 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Chantal : 44,02 % 7 EO 2P N-1 -100 9 40.91
8 EO 1S E+2 -150 21 95.45
9 EO 1S W+1 -120 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
4 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 57,94 %10 EO 2C S+1 140 4 18.18
11 EO 3C W+1 -170 0 0.00
12 EO 3T N = 110 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
10 ARICKX Roger -ROMAIN R : 30,97 %13 EO 3S W+2 . 11 50.00
14 EO 1S E+1 -120 18 81.82
15 EO 3S S-4 -400 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
5 CAMUS Colette -GROSFILS Colette : 50,97 %16 EO 2P E+1 -140 9 40.91
17 EO 4P E+1 -450 14 63.64
18 EO 1S S-1 -100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,38 %19 EO 1S E+3 -180 20 90.91
20 EO 2S W+3 -210 18 81.82
21 EO 1S S = 90 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
13 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 42,68 %22 EO 2P N+1 140 14 63.64
23 EO 4P W+2 -680 16 72.73
24 EO 2C E+1 -140 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 75,76 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -CASSART Guy : 42,33 %25 EO 4P E+3 -710 15.4 70.00
26 EO 2P E = -110 14.3 65.00
27 EO 2C S+1 140 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
12 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,50 %28 EO 4PcE-1 100 7.7 35.00
29 EO 2P W+2 -170 15.4 70.00
30 EO 6C E-1 50 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 40,15 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 64,92 %31 EO 2S S+1 150 2 9.09
32 EO 1S S = 90 10 45.45
33 EO 4P N+2 480 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 24,24 %
Total : 383,0 / 660 = 58,03 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -THIRION Michel
3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 52,32 % 1 EO 3S E+1 -430 15 68.18
2 EO 3S E-1 50 5 22.73
3 EO 2P N+1 140 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
12 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,50 % 4 EO 3C S-1 -100 16 72.73
5 EO 4C N = 620 9 40.91
6 EO 3S E = -600 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
10 ARICKX Roger -ROMAIN R : 30,97 %10 EO 2C S = 110 11 50.00
11 EO 4P E+1 -450 19 86.36
12 EO 2P N+1 140 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
5 CAMUS Colette -GROSFILS Colette : 50,97 %13 EO 2K N = . 11 50.00
14 EO 2C S+1 140 2 9.09
15 EO 3S N = 600 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,38 %16 EO 1S N-2 -100 2 9.09
17 EO 4P E+1 -450 14 63.64
18 EO 1S S+1 120 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 52,77 %19 EO 2K S-4 -200 22 100.00
20 EO 2P W+1 -140 10 45.45
21 EO 1S S+2 150 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -CASSART Guy : 42,33 %22 EO 2P N+2 170 9 40.91
23 EO 4P W+1 -650 5 22.73
24 EO 3C E = -140 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
7 NELIS Claude -LEBRUN Robert : 54,61 %25 EO 4P E+2 -680 8.8 40.00
26 EO 2P W+1 -140 20.8 94.55
27 EO 3C S = 140 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 58,18 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 64,92 %28 EO 5PcW-2 300 2.3 10.45
29 EO 2P W+2 -170 15.4 70.00
30 EO 4C E = -420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 45,15 %
13 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 42,68 %31 EO 1C E-1 50 18 81.82
32 EO 2S S = 120 7 31.82
33 EO 4P N = 420 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 332,2 / 660 = 50,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand
9 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Chantal : 44,02 % 1 EO 3S E+1 -430 15 68.18
2 EO 4C E = -420 16 72.73
3 EO 3P N-1 -50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
4 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 57,94 % 4 EO 3C S-1 -100 16 72.73
5 EO 2C N+1 140 14 63.64
6 EO 3S E+2 -660 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
13 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 42,68 % 7 EO 4PcS-3 -800 22 100.00
8 EO 3S W-3 150 3 13.64
9 EO 1S W+3 -180 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
12 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,50 %13 EO 3S W+3 . 11 50.00
14 EO 1S E = -90 12 54.55
15 EO 3S N = 600 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 52,77 %16 EO 3P E+1 -170 17 77.27
17 EO 4C N-4 -200 3 13.64
18 EO 1S S+1 120 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -CASSART Guy : 42,33 %19 EO 2P W-1 100 0 0.00
20 EO 3S W = -600 20 90.91
21 EO 1S S = 90 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
7 NELIS Claude -LEBRUN Robert : 54,61 %22 EO 3P N+1 170 9 40.91
23 EO 4P W+2 -680 16 72.73
24 EO 4CcW-2 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 64,92 %25 EO 6P E = -1430 18.6 84.55
26 EO 2P E = -110 14.3 65.00
27 EO 2C S+1 140 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 63,18 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 56,53 %28 EO 5PcW-2 300 2.3 10.45
29 EO 2P W+2 -170 15.4 70.00
30 EO 4C E = -420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 45,15 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 52,32 %31 EO 2S S = 120 11 50.00
32 EO 2P E-2 200 0 0.00
33 EO 4P N = 420 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
Total : 367,5 / 660 = 55,68 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
4 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 57,94 % 1 EO 3S E = -400 4 18.18
2 EO 4P S = 620 0 0.00
3 EO 2P N+1 140 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
10 ARICKX Roger -ROMAIN R : 30,97 % 4 EO 4C S-2 -200 22 100.00
5 EO 4C N-1 -100 18 81.82
6 EO 3S E = -600 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
5 CAMUS Colette -GROSFILS Colette : 50,97 % 7 EO 3S N-3 -300 18 81.82
8 EO 2K E-2 100 8 36.36
9 EO 2K S-1 -50 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,38 %10 EO 1S S+1 120 7 31.82
11 EO 3P E+2 -200 2 9.09
12 EO 4P N+1 650 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 21,21 %
13 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 42,68 %16 EO 2P E+2 -170 17 77.27
17 EO 4P W+1 -450 14 63.64
18 EO 1S S+2 150 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
7 NELIS Claude -LEBRUN Robert : 54,61 %19 EO 1S N = 90 2 9.09
20 EO 3S W-2 200 0 0.00
21 EO 2S N = 120 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 15,15 %
12 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,50 %22 EO 3P N-1 -50 20 90.91
23 EO 4P E+2 -680 16 72.73
24 EO 2C W = -110 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 56,53 %25 EO 4P E+2 -680 8.8 40.00
26 EO 3P E-1 100 4.5 20.45
27 EO 2C S+1 140 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 33,48 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 52,32 %28 EO 6C N-2 -200 19.7 89.55
29 EO 2P W+2 -170 15.4 70.00
30 EO 6C E-1 50 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
9 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Chantal : 44,02 %31 EO 3P N = 140 6 27.27
32 EO 2S S = 120 7 31.82
33 EO 4P N+1 450 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
Total : 284,6 / 660 = 43,12 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 AUBRY -ERPICUM Patrice
10 ARICKX Roger -ROMAIN R : 30,97 % 1 EO 3S E+1 -430 15 68.18
2 EO 4C W+1 -450 18 81.82
3 EO 2P N = 110 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
5 CAMUS Colette -GROSFILS Colette : 50,97 % 4 EO 2C N+1 140 9 40.91
5 EO 4CcN = 790 0 0.00
6 EO 3S E-1 100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,38 % 7 EO 2K N+2 130 0 0.00
8 EO 3P S-3 -150 21 95.45
9 EO 2K S-1 -50 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 52,77 %10 EO 3S S = 600 1 4.55
11 EO 4P W+1 -450 19 86.36
12 EO 4C S-1 -100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -CASSART Guy : 42,33 %13 EO 5T S+1 . 11 50.00
14 EO 2C S+1 140 2 9.09
15 EO 3S N+1 630 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 64,92 %19 EO 2K S-3 -150 16 72.73
20 EO 3S W-1 100 3 13.64
21 EO 1S S = 90 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 56,53 %22 EO 2P N+3 200 2 9.09
23 EO 4P W-1 100 0 0.00
24 EO 1S N+2 150 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 6,06 %
13 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 42,68 %25 EO 4P E+2 -680 8.8 40.00
26 EO 3C S-1 -100 7.7 35.00
27 EO 3C S = 140 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 38,33 %
9 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Chantal : 44,02 %28 EO 4P W = -420 21.9 99.55
29 EO 2P W+1 -140 4.5 20.45
30 EO 4C E+1 -450 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 69,85 %
12 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,50 %31 EO 1S N+1 120 11 50.00
32 EO 2S S+1 150 4 18.18
33 EO 4P N+2 480 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
Total : 263,4 / 660 = 39,91 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
13 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 42,68 % 1 EO 3S E = -400 4 18.18
2 EO 4K W = -130 9 40.91
3 EO 2P N = 110 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,38 % 4 EO 2K W+1 -110 20 90.91
5 EO 4C N+1 650 2 9.09
6 EO 3S E = -600 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
12 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,50 % 7 EO 3C E-1 100 4 18.18
8 EO 2K E-1 50 14 63.64
9 EO 2K S-2 -100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -CASSART Guy : 42,33 %10 EO 3S S-1 -100 18 81.82
11 EO 4C W = -420 9 40.91
12 EO 4P N-2 -200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
7 NELIS Claude -LEBRUN Robert : 54,61 %13 EO 3S E+2 . 11 50.00
14 EO 2C N+1 140 2 9.09
15 EO 3S N = 600 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 64,92 %16 EO 2P E = -110 6 27.27
17 EO 4P E+1 -450 14 63.64
18 EO 2K E-3 150 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 52,32 %22 EO 2P N = 110 17 77.27
23 EO 4P W+2 -680 16 72.73
24 EO 1S N = 90 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
9 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Chantal : 44,02 %25 EO 4P E+2 -680 8.8 40.00
26 EO 2P W+1 -140 20.8 94.55
27 EO 3C S = 140 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 58,18 %
4 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 57,94 %28 EO 5PcW-2 300 2.3 10.45
29 EO 3P W-1 100 0.1 0.45
30 EO 4C E-1 50 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 8,79 %
10 ARICKX Roger -ROMAIN R : 30,97 %31 EO 2P S = 110 14 63.64
32 EO 3S S-2 -100 19 86.36
33 EO 2P N+2 170 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
Total : 322,2 / 660 = 48,82 %
PAIRE Nr : 23 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal
11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,38 % 1 EO 3S W+1 -430 15 68.18
2 EO 5C E-1 50 5 22.73
3 EO 3P N-1 -50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 52,77 % 4 EO 3K W-1 100 12 54.55
5 EO 4C N-1 -100 18 81.82
6 EO 3S E+2 -660 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -CASSART Guy : 42,33 % 7 EO 3KcN-1 -200 15 68.18
8 EO 1S E = -90 18 81.82
9 EO 1S W+1 -120 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
13 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 42,68 %10 EO 4C S-1 -100 18 81.82
11 EO 4C W = -420 9 40.91
12 EO 3S N = 600 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 64,92 %13 EO 3S S+3 . 11 50.00
14 EO 1S E-2 100 6 27.27
15 EO 3S N+1 630 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
12 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,50 %16 EO 2P E+1 -140 9 40.91
17 EO 4P E+1 -450 14 63.64
18 EO 1S S = 90 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 52,32 %19 EO 1S E+2 -150 16 72.73
20 EO 2S E-1 100 3 13.64
21 EO 2C S+1 140 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
4 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 57,94 %25 EO 7P E = -2210 21.9 99.55
26 EO 3C S = 140 1.2 5.45
27 EO 2P W = -110 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 64,85 %
10 ARICKX Roger -ROMAIN R : 30,97 %28 EO 2P W+1 -140 16.5 75.00
29 EO 2P W+2 -170 15.4 70.00
30 EO 5C E = -450 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 78,18 %
5 CAMUS Colette -GROSFILS Colette : 50,97 %31 EO 1T S = 70 16 72.73
32 EO 2S S-2 -100 19 86.36
33 EO 4P N+2 480 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
Total : 387,4 / 660 = 58,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 24 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 52,77 % 1 EO 3S E+1 -430 15 68.18
2 EO 4CcE-1 100 2 9.09
3 EO 2P N = 110 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -CASSART Guy : 42,33 % 4 EO 1S E-3 300 3 13.64
5 EO 4CcN-1 -200 22 100.00
6 EO 3K E = -110 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
7 NELIS Claude -LEBRUN Robert : 54,61 % 7 EO 1ScN-2 -500 20 90.91
8 EO 2PcN = 470 0 0.00
9 EO 1S W+1 -120 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 64,92 %10 EO 3S S = 600 1 4.55
11 EO 4C W = -420 9 40.91
12 EO 4P N+1 650 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 56,53 %13 EO 4C W = . 11 50.00
14 EO 4CcN-1 -100 14 63.64
15 EO 3S N+1 630 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 52,32 %16 EO 2P E+2 -170 17 77.27
17 EO 5P E = -450 14 63.64
18 EO 2T S = 90 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
13 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 42,68 %19 EO 1S E+1 -120 10 45.45
20 EO 2S W+2 -180 16 72.73
21 EO 3S N-2 -200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
4 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 57,94 %22 EO 2P N = 110 17 77.27
23 EO 4P W+2 -680 16 72.73
24 EO 2P S+1 140 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
5 CAMUS Colette -GROSFILS Colette : 50,97 %28 EO 4P W-1 50 12.1 55.00
29 EO 2P W+2 -170 15.4 70.00
30 EO 4C E+1 -450 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 71,52 %
11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,38 %31 EO 3K N-1 -100 21 95.45
32 EO 2S S-1 -50 13 59.09
33 EO 4P N+2 480 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
Total : 353,2 / 660 = 53,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 25 HOGGE Colette -VAN DOOREN Michele
12 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,50 % 1 EO 3S E+1 -430 15 68.18
2 EO 3S E = -400 13 59.09
3 EO 2P N-1 -50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
9 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Chantal : 44,02 % 4 EO 3C S = 140 9 40.91
5 EO 4C N = 620 9 40.91
6 EO 3S E-1 100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 52,77 % 7 EO 2C E = -110 12 54.55
8 EO 3K E-2 100 8 36.36
9 EO 2C E-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 52,32 %10 EO 4C S-1 -100 18 81.82
11 EO 2S E+3 -210 4 18.18
12 EO 5T N = 600 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,38 %13 EO 3S S+2 . 11 50.00
14 EO 2S E = -120 18 81.82
15 EO 3S N+1 630 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 56,53 %16 EO 2P E+2 -170 17 77.27
17 EO 5P E-1 50 0 0.00
18 EO 1S S = 90 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
5 CAMUS Colette -GROSFILS Colette : 50,97 %19 EO 1S E = -90 5 22.73
20 EO 2P W = -110 8 36.36
21 EO 2S N+1 150 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 21,21 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 64,92 %22 EO 2P N+3 200 2 9.09
23 EO 4P W+2 -680 16 72.73
24 EO 1S N+1 120 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
7 NELIS Claude -LEBRUN Robert : 54,61 %28 EO 4PcE-1 100 7.7 35.00
29 EO 2P W+2 -170 15.4 70.00
30 EO 4C E = -420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
4 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 57,94 %31 EO 1P N+2 140 6 27.27
32 EO 1S S+3 180 2 9.09
33 EO 4P N+1 450 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
Total : 273,2 / 660 = 41,39 %
PAIRE Nr : 26 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre
5 CAMUS Colette -GROSFILS Colette : 50,97 % 1 EO 3S E = -400 4 18.18
2 EO 4PcS-2 -500 21 95.45
3 EO 4P N-2 -100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
13 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 42,68 % 4 EO 3T W-3 300 3 13.64
5 EO 4C N-1 -100 18 81.82
6 EO 4C E-1 100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
10 ARICKX Roger -ROMAIN R : 30,97 % 7 EO 2KcN-1 -200 15 68.18
8 EO 3K E-2 100 8 36.36
9 EO 2C E = -110 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
7 NELIS Claude -LEBRUN Robert : 54,61 %10 EO 2S S = 120 7 31.82
11 EO 4C W = -420 9 40.91
12 EO 3S N+1 630 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
4 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 57,94 %13 EO 3S S+3 . 11 50.00
14 EO 3T S-3 -150 22 100.00
15 EO 3S S+1 630 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -CASSART Guy : 42,33 %16 EO 2P E+2 -170 17 77.27
17 EO 5P E = -450 14 63.64
18 EO 1S S = 90 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
9 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Chantal : 44,02 %19 EO 1S E+1 -120 10 45.45
20 EO 2S W+1 -150 13 59.09
21 EO 1S S = 90 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 52,77 %22 EO 2P N+3 200 2 9.09
23 EO 4P E+1 -650 5 22.73
24 EO 4K S-2 -100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 52,32 %25 EO 7P E-1 100 0.1 0.45
26 EO 2P W = -110 14.3 65.00
27 EO 2C S+1 140 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 35,15 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 56,53 %31 EO 2P N+2 170 0 0.00
32 EO 3S S-2 -100 19 86.36
33 EO 4P N+1 450 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
Total : 322,2 / 660 = 48,82 %
|
|